WO2002073887A2 - System and method to avoid overload in a node caused by reporting activities from other nodes - Google Patents

System and method to avoid overload in a node caused by reporting activities from other nodes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2002073887A2
WO2002073887A2 PCT/EP2002/001411 EP0201411W WO02073887A2 WO 2002073887 A2 WO2002073887 A2 WO 2002073887A2 EP 0201411 W EP0201411 W EP 0201411W WO 02073887 A2 WO02073887 A2 WO 02073887A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
reports
reporting
node
telecommunications system
rate
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2002/001411
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2002073887A3 (en
Inventor
Robert LUNDBÄCK
Kjell MARKSTRÖM
Ola SÖDERLUND
Anders Torneus
Lars Mansson
Peter Cigehn
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority to AU2002253006A priority Critical patent/AU2002253006A1/en
Publication of WO2002073887A2 publication Critical patent/WO2002073887A2/en
Publication of WO2002073887A3 publication Critical patent/WO2002073887A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/29Flow control; Congestion control using a combination of thresholds
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/04Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
    • G05B19/042Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
    • G05B19/0428Safety, monitoring
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/06Generation of reports
    • H04L43/065Generation of reports related to network devices
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0876Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
    • H04L43/0882Utilisation of link capacity
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/11Identifying congestion
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/26Flow control; Congestion control using explicit feedback to the source, e.g. choke packets
    • H04L47/263Rate modification at the source after receiving feedback
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/02Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
    • H04W28/0289Congestion control
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20Pc systems
    • G05B2219/24Pc safety
    • G05B2219/24207If processor overloaded, reduce messages sent by other systems to it

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a telecommunications system, and in particular, to avoiding overload in a telecommunications system, for example by reducing the amount of traffic relating to measurement reporting.
  • the invention can be used to avoid processor overload or interface overload.
  • the processor 3 can enter an overload condition.
  • fast response times are essential, and loading the processor 3 too high can cause timing problems.
  • the system can become slow with long response times. If the overload condition is prolonged, the system can crash, or cause a re-start of the system.
  • US 4,974,256 is an example of a telecommunications system having means for preventing the overload of a controlling processor.
  • This patent describes how the occupancy of a processor is measured, and, when its occupancy exceeds a predetermined threshold, the load is shed to other processors.
  • this system avoids processor overload, it does so by off-loading tasks to other processors when a CPU overload is detected. The other processors then process the tasks in parallel with the first processor.
  • Such a system has the disadvantage that it increases the cost of the telecommunications system, and requires complex processing to control the parallel operations performed by the plurality of processors.
  • a method of preventing an overload condition at a node in a telecommunications system in which the node receives reports from a plurality of reporting devices, the method comprising the steps of: monitoring the load of the node; and controlling the rate at which reports are sent from at least one of the reporting - devices to the node in accordance with the monitored load.
  • a method of reducing the number of measurement reports transmitted in a telecommunications system comprising the steps of: performing a measurement; comparing the measurement with a previously reported measurement; determining whether the difference is greater than a predetermined amount ,- and, if so, reporting the measurement.
  • Figure 1 shows an overview of a typical telecommunications system
  • Figure 3 shows the steps involved in avoiding overload according to one aspect of the present invention
  • the system will instruct at least one of the channel devices 5 to reduce the rate at which it sends measurement reports 7 to the processor 3, step 105.
  • processor 3 itself.
  • this task may be performed by some other part of the system.
  • the reduction in the number of measurement reports 7 may be achieved in a number of ways, as will be discussed in greater detail later in the application.
  • step 107 the load of the processor 3 is monitored, in step 107, and checked in step 109 to determine whether the load has fallen below a second threshold T 2 . If the load has not fallen below threshold T 2 , the system will continue to monitor the load, step 107.
  • the processor 3 When the load falls below threshold T 2 , the processor 3 will instruct one or more channel devices 5 to increase the rate at which they send measurement reports 7 to the processor 3, step 111.
  • the value of the threshold T x is set above the value of threshold T 2 , thereby providing a hysteresis, which avoids the channel devices having to change rates too often.
  • the processor 3 may instigate a further reduction in the number of measurement reports 7 being received from the channel devices 5.
  • further reduction of the reporting rate would be meaningless if the measurement reporting was not a significant contributor to the processor load.
  • Figure 4 shows the load of processor 3 during a typical operating cycle according to the present invention.
  • the threshold T x may be set to be, say, 90% of the maximum load of the processor. This will cause the processor 3 to instruct one or more of the channel devices 5 to reduce the rate at which it sends measurement reports 7 to the processor 3. This will result in the load of processor 3 falling over time.
  • the processor 3 will instruct one or more of the channel devices to increase the rate at which they send measurement reports 7 to the processor 3.
  • each of the channel devices 5 will send measurement reports 7 at its normal reporting rate.
  • T 2 is preferably lower than T 1# thereby providing an in-built hysteresis in the system. As mentioned earlier, this avoids the undesirable effect of causing the channel devices 5 to change reporting rates too often.
  • the system has the ability to learn the behaviour of the system, so that it can learn how the load of the processor 3 is affected by the rate at which it receives measurement reports 7 from the channel devices 5.
  • This information can be used to fine tune the performance of the system during use, so that it can accurately predict how many measurement reports must be eliminated in order to reduce the load of the processor 3 to an acceptable level .
  • an additional step may be performed between steps 103 and 105, or 109 and 111, in which historical data is used to determine how the reporting rates are to be reduced.
  • Fine tuning arrangements can include the use of timers which block the system from returning to normal reporting mode for a predetermined time. Also, the thresholds and time delays can be configurable or adjusted by the learning feature.
  • FIG. 5 shows the load of processor 3 during a typical operating cycle according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • there are additional threshold levels resulting in the reporting rates being changed more frequently.
  • T a threshold
  • the processor 3 will instruct one or more of the channel devices 5 to reduce the rate at which it sends measurement reports 7 to the processor 3. This should result in the load of the processor 3 falling.
  • the processor 3 will instruct the channel devices 5 to send fewer measurement reports 7.
  • the processor 3 will instruct one or more of the channel devices 5 to increase the rate at which measurement reports are sent.
  • the processor 3 will instruct more of the channel devices to increase the rate at which measurement reports are sent.
  • T d threshold
  • each of the channel devices 5 will be sending measurement reports 7 at its normal reporting rate.
  • the load of an interface shown in Figure 2 is monitored to determine the load at any point in time, step 101.
  • the load of the interface is checked to determine whether it has crossed a first threshold T 17 step 103. If the load is below threshold T lf no action is taken, and the system continues to monitor the load, while continuing to send measurement reports as normal . However, if the load of the interface is determined as being above threshold T 1/ the system will instruct at least one of the reporting devices, for example a channel card processor 25 or channel card sub-processor 27 to reduce the rate at which measurement reports are sent to the interface A or B respectively, step 105.
  • the reporting devices for example a channel card processor 25 or channel card sub-processor 27 to reduce the rate at which measurement reports are sent to the interface A or B respectively, step 105.
  • step 107 the load of interface B is monitored, in step 107, and checked in step 109 to determine whether the load has fallen below a second threshold T 2 . If the load has not fallen below threshold T 2 , the system will continue to monitor the load, step 107.
  • the card sub- processor CSP- L may be instructed to increase the rate at which it sends measurement reports to the card processor 25 x , step 111.
  • the value of the threshold T x is set above the value of threshold T 2 , thereby providing a hysteresis, which avoids the card sub-processors CSP ⁇ n having to change rates too often.
  • steps 107 and 109 determines in steps 107 and 109 that the load of the interface B is not falling to an acceptable level, or if the load is not falling quickly enough, then steps can be taken to instigate a further reduction in the number of measurement reports being received from the card sub-processors CSP ⁇ .
  • step 207 This procedure continues, with the measurement reported in step 207 becoming the "previously reported measurement" for future comparisons in step 203.
  • the actual measurements are carried out at the same frequency as normal, but are only reported if the new measurement deviates from the previously reported measurement by a value which is greater than the reporting deviation threshold. For example, assume that measurements have integer values, the measurement interval is 10ms, and the reporting deviation threshold is set to 5. If it is then assumed that the following sequence of measured values are made :
  • This may be accomplished, for example, by sending "dummy" measurement reports when there is no valid data available for transmission. For example, if a particular node is only receiving measurement reports in alternate cycles, the node can send dummy measurement reports to an external system during the alternate cycles when it is not receiving reports itself.
  • a dummy report may be a repeat of the previous measurement report, or a value which is extrapolated from previous measurement reports.
  • the receiver of the measurement data could remember the last reported value.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A base station (1) with a processor (3) receives measurement reports (7) form a plurality of channel devices 51? 5n?, each channel device (5) performing measurements on its respective channel. Overload of the processor (3) is avoided by reducing the rate at which measurement reports (7) are sent to the processor (3) when the load of processor (3) is determined as exceeding a given threshold. The channel devices (5) are allowed to increase their reporting rates after the load of the processor falls again to an acceptable level. The measurement deviates from a previously reported measurement by a predetermined amount.

Description

TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
FIELD OF INVENTION
The invention relates to a telecommunications system, and in particular, to avoiding overload in a telecommunications system, for example by reducing the amount of traffic relating to measurement reporting. The invention can be used to avoid processor overload or interface overload.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Figure 1 shows an over view of a typical telecommunications system. A radio base station (RBS) 1 comprises a processor 3 for controlling the operation of the base station 1. Among the various tasks performed by the processor 3, one aspect is to manage a number of channel devices 5X ...5n. Each channel device 5 performs measurements on its respective channel, which are reported by way of measurement reports 11. ..7n to the processor 3. Typically, the measurements relate to the channel quality, for example, signal to noise ratio, or downlink transmitted code power.
Each of the plurality of channel devices 5 will therefore send measurement reports 7 to the processor 3 at a particular rate. Different channel devices 5 may send measurement reports 7 at different rates depending, for example, on what is being reported by the particular channel device 5. Based on the information contained in the measurement reports 7, the processor 3 sends external measurement reports 9 to an external system 11, for example a radio network controller (RNC) . The transportation of measurement reports 7 to the processor 3 , coupled with the sending of external measurement reports 9 from the processor 3 to an external system 11, contribute significantly to the load of the processor 3. The sending of measurement reports 7 also contributes significantly to the processing load of each of the channel devices 5. For example, if several hundred channels are being controlled with each channel having periodic measurements, say once every second, then several hundred measurement reports-will be transported within the processor 3 per second.
There is therefore a risk that, if the processor 3 has to handle a large number of measurement reports 7 and 9, then the processor 3 can enter an overload condition. For real-time systems, fast response times are essential, and loading the processor 3 too high can cause timing problems. For example, the system can become slow with long response times. If the overload condition is prolonged, the system can crash, or cause a re-start of the system.
Therefore, it can be seen that the handling of measurement reports 7 and 9 forms a large part of the processing load of a base station controller.
US 4,974,256 is an example of a telecommunications system having means for preventing the overload of a controlling processor. This patent describes how the occupancy of a processor is measured, and, when its occupancy exceeds a predetermined threshold, the load is shed to other processors. Although this system avoids processor overload, it does so by off-loading tasks to other processors when a CPU overload is detected. The other processors then process the tasks in parallel with the first processor. Such a system has the disadvantage that it increases the cost of the telecommunications system, and requires complex processing to control the parallel operations performed by the plurality of processors.
In addition to overloading a processor, measurement reports can also cause interface load problems. For example, a situation can arise whereby a large number of measurement reports must-be transmitted over an interface with limited bandwidth.
Figure 2 shows a telecommunication system having several levels of processing, which are interconnected by several interfaces .
A controlling processor 21 can be connected to one or ' more channel cards 23α to 23m via an interface A. Each channel card 23 may have its own processor, 25x to 25m, respectively. A processor 25 may in turn interface with one or more card sub-processors CSPX to CSPn, shown as items 27-, via an interface B.
It can be seen that, if the number of measurement reports exceed the bandwidth of a given interface, A or B, then the telecommunications system can become overloaded.
The aim of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus which avoid or reduce the likelihood of overload occurring in a processor or interface, by controlling the handling of measurement reports in the telecommunications system. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of preventing an overload condition at a node in a telecommunications system, in which the node receives reports from a plurality of reporting devices, the method comprising the steps of: monitoring the load of the node; and controlling the rate at which reports are sent from at least one of the reporting - devices to the node in accordance with the monitored load.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of reducing the number of measurement reports transmitted in a telecommunications system, the method comprising the steps of: performing a measurement; comparing the measurement with a previously reported measurement; determining whether the difference is greater than a predetermined amount ,- and, if so, reporting the measurement.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a telecommunications -system having a node which receives reports from a plurality of reporting devices, the telecommunications system comprising: means for determining the load at the node; and controlling means for controlling the rate at which reports are sent from at least one reporting device to the node, in accordance with the determined load at the node.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a telecommunications system comprising one or more reporting devices for sending measurement reports to other parts of the telecommunications system, at least one of the reporting devices comprising: means for performing a measurement; means for comparing the measurement with a previously reported measurement ; and means for reporting the measurement only if the deviation from the previously reported measurement is more than a predetermined value.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a better understanding of the present invention, and to show more clearly how it may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which:-
Figure 1 shows an overview of a typical telecommunications system;
Figure 2 shows a more detailed view of a telecommunications system;
Figure 3 shows the steps involved in avoiding overload according to one aspect of the present invention;
Figure 4 illustrates how load varies over time in response to the method described in Figure 3 ;
Figure 5 illustrates how processor load varies over time in response to another aspect of the present invention.
Figure 6 shows how the number of measurement reports may be reduced according to another aspect of the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
Referring to Figure 3, the load of a processor, for example the processor 3 shown in Figure 1, is monitored to determine the load at any point in time, step 101.
The load of the processor is checked to determine whether it has crossed a first threshold Tl r step 103.
If the load is below threshold T1# no action is taken, and the system continues to monitor the load, while continuing to process measurement reports as normal.
However, if the load of the processor is determined as being above threshold Tlr the system will instruct at least one of the channel devices 5 to reduce the rate at which it sends measurement reports 7 to the processor 3, step 105.
It is noted that the tasks of monitoring the load of processor 3 and controlling the channel devices 5 may be performed by processor 3 itself. Alternatively, this task may be performed by some other part of the system.
The reduction in the number of measurement reports 7 may be achieved in a number of ways, as will be discussed in greater detail later in the application.
Over time, the reduction of measurement reports 7 being sent from the channel devices 5 to the processor 3 will result in the load of processor 3 falling.
During this time the load of the processor 3 is monitored, in step 107, and checked in step 109 to determine whether the load has fallen below a second threshold T2. If the load has not fallen below threshold T2, the system will continue to monitor the load, step 107.
When the load falls below threshold T2, the processor 3 will instruct one or more channel devices 5 to increase the rate at which they send measurement reports 7 to the processor 3, step 111.
Advantageously, the value of the threshold Tx is set above the value of threshold T2, thereby providing a hysteresis, which avoids the channel devices having to change rates too often.
It is noted that if the system determines in steps 107 and 109 that the load of the processor 3 is not falling to an acceptable level, or if the load is not falling quickly enough, then the processor 3 may instigate a further reduction in the number of measurement reports 7 being received from the channel devices 5. However, it is noted that further reduction of the reporting rate, would be meaningless if the measurement reporting was not a significant contributor to the processor load. Thus, there is preferably a lower limit to the amount the measurement reports are reduced.
Figure 4 shows the load of processor 3 during a typical operating cycle according to the present invention. As the load of processor 3 increases it crosses threshold Tx." The threshold Tx may be set to be, say, 90% of the maximum load of the processor. This will cause the processor 3 to instruct one or more of the channel devices 5 to reduce the rate at which it sends measurement reports 7 to the processor 3. This will result in the load of processor 3 falling over time. When the load crosses the second threshold T2, the processor 3 will instruct one or more of the channel devices to increase the rate at which they send measurement reports 7 to the processor 3. Ideally, each of the channel devices 5 will send measurement reports 7 at its normal reporting rate.
As can be seen, T2 is preferably lower than T1# thereby providing an in-built hysteresis in the system. As mentioned earlier, this avoids the undesirable effect of causing the channel devices 5 to change reporting rates too often. - -
Preferably, the system has the ability to learn the behaviour of the system, so that it can learn how the load of the processor 3 is affected by the rate at which it receives measurement reports 7 from the channel devices 5. This information can be used to fine tune the performance of the system during use, so that it can accurately predict how many measurement reports must be eliminated in order to reduce the load of the processor 3 to an acceptable level . With such a feature, an additional step may be performed between steps 103 and 105, or 109 and 111, in which historical data is used to determine how the reporting rates are to be reduced.
Fine tuning arrangements can include the use of timers which block the system from returning to normal reporting mode for a predetermined time. Also, the thresholds and time delays can be configurable or adjusted by the learning feature.
Figure 5 shows the load of processor 3 during a typical operating cycle according to another embodiment of the present invention. According to this embodiment, there are additional threshold levels, resulting in the reporting rates being changed more frequently. As the load of processor 3 increases it crosses threshold Ta. This will cause the processor 3 to instruct one or more of the channel devices 5 to reduce the rate at which it sends measurement reports 7 to the processor 3. This should result in the load of the processor 3 falling. However, if the load of the processor 3 continues to rise beyond a second threshold Tb, the processor 3 will instruct the channel devices 5 to send fewer measurement reports 7. As the load of the processor 3 falls below threshold Tc, the processor 3 will instruct one or more of the channel devices 5 to increase the rate at which measurement reports are sent. As the load continues to fall beyond threshold Td, the processor 3 will instruct more of the channel devices to increase the rate at which measurement reports are sent. Ideally, at this point, each of the channel devices 5 will be sending measurement reports 7 at its normal reporting rate.
It is noted that the number of" thresholds could be increased further. Indeed, it is also possible that the channel devices 5. could be continually controlled in relation to the load of the processor 3.
The method and system for avoiding overload described above have the advantage that a given processor can handle more channel devices, thereby having greater capacity. Alternatively, a system having a given number of channel devices can make use of a slower, and thereby cheaper, processor, thereby reducing the cost of the overall system.
According to another aspect of the invention, the same inventive concept as described above in relation to avoiding overload in a processor, can also be used to avoid overload in an interface, such as interface A or interface B shown in Figure 2.
As above, referring again to Figure 3, the load of an interface shown in Figure 2 is monitored to determine the load at any point in time, step 101. The load of the interface is checked to determine whether it has crossed a first threshold T17 step 103. If the load is below threshold Tlf no action is taken, and the system continues to monitor the load, while continuing to send measurement reports as normal . However, if the load of the interface is determined as being above threshold T1/ the system will instruct at least one of the reporting devices, for example a channel card processor 25 or channel card sub-processor 27 to reduce the rate at which measurement reports are sent to the interface A or B respectively, step 105.
Over time, the reduction of measurement reports being sent, for example from a card -sub-processor CSPX to a card processor 25x in Figure 2, will result in the load of interface B falling.
During this time the load of interface B is monitored, in step 107, and checked in step 109 to determine whether the load has fallen below a second threshold T2. If the load has not fallen below threshold T2, the system will continue to monitor the load, step 107.
When the load falls below threshold T2, the card sub- processor CSP-L may be instructed to increase the rate at which it sends measurement reports to the card processor 25x, step 111. Preferably, the value of the threshold Tx is set above the value of threshold T2, thereby providing a hysteresis, which avoids the card sub-processors CSP^n having to change rates too often.
It is noted that if the system determines in steps 107 and 109 that the load of the interface B is not falling to an acceptable level, or if the load is not falling quickly enough, then steps can be taken to instigate a further reduction in the number of measurement reports being received from the card sub-processors CSP^.
A more detailed explanation will now be given as to how the number of measurement reports may be reduced.
According to one aspect of the invention, the number of measurement reports may be reduced by instructing a particular channel device, card processor or card sub- processor to send measurement reports on every other cycle.
According to another aspect of" the invention, the number of measurement reports could be reduced by prioritizing between different types of measurements, measurements done on different channel types and measurements carried out for different purposes. In the latter case, measurements which are needed to maintain channels that have previously been set up can be given priority over less important measurements, such as performance management measurements. In this situation, performance management measurements would be reported at a reduced rate, before reducing the reporting rate of more important measurements.
According to another aspect of the invention, -admeasurement reports may be reduced by only reporting a new value when the new value deviates from the previously reported value by more than a predetermined amount, referred to hereinafter as the reporting deviation threshold.
For a given system behaviour, in general terms the smaller the reporting deviation threshold, the larger the number of measurement reports which are sent, and vice versa.
Referring to Figure 6, a new measurement is performed, step 201, and compared with the value of the previously reported measurement, step 203. Next, it is determined whether the value of the new measurement deviates from the value of the previously reported measurement by a predetermined amount, the reporting deviation threshold, as shown in step 205.
If the deviation is less than the threshold, then no report is made and the system returns to carry out the next scheduled measurement. If the deviation is more than the threshold, then the new measurement is reported, step 207.
This procedure continues, with the measurement reported in step 207 becoming the "previously reported measurement" for future comparisons in step 203.
Thus, the actual measurements are carried out at the same frequency as normal, but are only reported if the new measurement deviates from the previously reported measurement by a value which is greater than the reporting deviation threshold. For example, assume that measurements have integer values, the measurement interval is 10ms, and the reporting deviation threshold is set to 5. If it is then assumed that the following sequence of measured values are made :
4,6,9,11,15,13,17,20,26,22,25,30,28,29,35,33,29,27,23, 19,20,16,13,
then the following measurements will be reported:
4 (10ms), 9 (30ms), 15 (50ms), 20 (80ms) , 26 (90ms), 35 (150ms), 29 (170ms), 23 (190ms), 16 (220ms).
Thus, instead of reporting 23 values, only 9 values are reported .
The reporting deviation threshold may be varied, for example in response to load conditions, so that the deviation threshold is increased when traffic is heavy, and reduced when traffic is light .
Although this form of measurement reduction has been described in relation to reducing overload conditions at a processor or interface, this aspect of the invention may equally be applied to reducing the number of measurement reports in more general terms .
In the various aspects of the invention described above, it has been assumed that fewer measurement reports are reported during the overload condition. However, certain nodes in the telecommunications system may have constraints imposed upon them by external systems. For example, an external system may have a requirement that measurement reports are sent to it at a set frequency. Thus, if a node sending measurement reports to such an external system is itself receiving measurement reports at a reduced rate, then steps need to be taken to ensure that the node can nevertheless send external measurement reports at the desired frequency.
This may be accomplished, for example, by sending "dummy" measurement reports when there is no valid data available for transmission. For example, if a particular node is only receiving measurement reports in alternate cycles, the node can send dummy measurement reports to an external system during the alternate cycles when it is not receiving reports itself. A dummy report may be a repeat of the previous measurement report, or a value which is extrapolated from previous measurement reports.
In the embodiment of Figure 6, if an external system requires measurement reports to be reported at a particular frequency, then, during the periods when no reports would normally be sent' (e.g. at the time slots corresponding to 20ms, 40ms, 60ms, 70ms, 100ms, 110ms, 120ms, 130ms, 140ms, 160ms, 180ms, 200ms, 210ms in the example above) , a repeat of the previous report could be resent .
For example, in the example described above, the external interface could report :
4,4,9,9,15,15,15,20,26,26,26,26,26,26,35,35,29,29,23,23 ,23,16,16.
The deviation from the actual measured values will then be: 0,2,0,2,0,2,2,0,0,4,1,4,2,3,0,2,0,2,0,4,3,0,3. This equates to an average deviation of 36/23=1.57 from the true measurement value .
The arrangements described above have the advantage that the invention can be adopted in a particular environment without having to modify the interface to an external system, and without any of the external systems having to modify their own processing arrangements .
Furthermore, the invention has the advantage that no modifications are required to any external systems since the invention can continue to send measurement reports to external systems at the same rate.
Alternatively, rather than have the reporting device send the previous measurement value when a constant measurement rate is required, the receiver of the measurement data could remember the last reported value.
The invention also has the effect of increasing system stability since overload is prohibited and response times become faster as CPU load, or interface load is reduced. Timing problems are also avoided, together with possible crash problems, resulting in less disturbance to the telecommunications system.
Although the preferred embodiment is concerned with reducing the effect of measurement reports, it will be appreciated that the invention is equally applicable to other forms of data being received from a plurality of devices at different rates.

Claims

CLAIMS .
1. A method of preventing an overload condition at a node in a telecommunications system, in which the node receives reports from a plurality of reporting devices, the method comprising the steps of: monitoring the load of the node; and controlling the rate at which reports are sent from at least one of the reporting devices to the node in accordance with the monitored load.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the step of determining whether the load has crossed a first threshold, and, if so, decreasing the rate at which at least one of the reporting devices sends reports to the node .
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, further comprising the step of determining whether- the load has crossed a second threshold, and, if so, increasing the rate at which at least one of ' the reporting devices sends reports to the node.
4. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the rate at which reports are sent may be varied in accordance with at least one further threshold being crossed.
5. A method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the step of decreasing the rate at which messages are sent from a reporting device involves instructing the reporting device to omit certain reports which it would normally send to the processor.
6. A method as claimed in claim 5, comprising instructing the reporting device to omit alternate reports which it would normally send to the processor.
7. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the step of decreasing the rate at which reports are sent from a reporting device involves instructing the reporting device to only send reports when a new reporting value deviates from a previously sent reporting value by a predetermined amount.
8. A method as claimed in-claim 7, wherein the predetermined amount may be changed.
9. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the first threshold is higher than the second threshold.
10. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, further comprising a self learning function for learning how the load of the node changes in response to the rate at which reports are received, and using this information to control the rate at which reports are sent from reporting device-s.
11. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the reports are measurement reports.
12. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding clams, wherein the node is a processor.
13. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the node is an interface. •
14. A method of reducing the number of measurement reports transmitted in a telecommunications system, the method comprising the steps of: performing a measurement ; comparing the measurement with a previously reported measurement; determining whether the difference is greater than a predetermined amount; and, if so, reporting the measurement.
15. A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the predetermined amount may be changed.
16. A telecommunications- system having a node which receives reports from a plurality of reporting devices, the telecommunications system comprising: means for determining the load at the node; and controlling means for controlling the rate at which reports are sent from at least one reporting device to the node, in accordance with the determined load at the node .
17. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim 16, wherein the controlling means comprises: means for determining whether the load has crossed a first threshold; and means for decreasing the rate at which at least one of the reporting devices sends reports to the node in response to the first threshold being crossed.
18. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim 16 or 17, wherein the controlling means comprises: means for determining whether the load has crossed a second threshold; and means for increasing the rate at which at least one of the reporting devices sends reports to the node in response to the second threshold being crossed.
19. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim 17 or 18, wherein the means for increasing and/or decreasing the rate at which at least one of the reporting devices sends reports to the node acts in , accordance with at least one further threshold being crossed.
20. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim 17, wherein the means for decreasing the rate at which messages are sent from a reporting device comprises means for instructing the' reporting device to omit certain reports which it would normally send to the node.
21. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim 20, comprising means for instructing the reporting device to omit alternate reports which it would normally send to the node.
22. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim
17, wherein the means for decreasing the rate at which reports are sent from a reporting device includes means for instructing the reporting device to only send reports when a new reporting value deviates from a reporting value sent in a previous report by a predetermined amount .
23. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim 22, wherein the predetermined amount may be changed.
24. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim
18, wherein the first threshold is higher than the second threshold.
- 25. A telecommunications system as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 24, further comprising self learning means for learning how the load of the node changes in response to the rate at which reports are received, and using this information to control the rate at which reports are sent from reporting devices.
26. A telecommunications system as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 25, wherein the reporting devices are channel devices, channel card processors or channel card sub-processors.
27. A telecommunications system as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 26, wherein the node is a processor.
28. A telecommunications system as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 26, wherein the node is an interface.
29. A telecommunications system comprising one or more reporting devices for sending measurement reports to other parts of the telecommunications system, at least one of the reporting devices comprising: means for performing a measurement ; means for comparing the measurement with a previously reported measurement; and means for reporting the measurement only if the deviation from the previously reported measurement is more than a predetermined value .
30. A telecommunications system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the predetermined value may be changed.
31. A method of preventing overload in a telecommunications system, the method being substantially as hereinbefore described, with reference to, and as shown in Figures 3 to 6 of the accompanying drawings .
32. A telecommunications system substantially as hereinbefore described, with reference to, and as shown in Figures 3 to 6 of the accompanying drawings .
PCT/EP2002/001411 2001-02-21 2002-02-11 System and method to avoid overload in a node caused by reporting activities from other nodes WO2002073887A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2002253006A AU2002253006A1 (en) 2001-02-21 2002-02-11 System and method to avoid overload in a node caused by reporting activities from other nodes

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0104374.4 2001-02-21
GB0104374A GB2372676A (en) 2001-02-21 2001-02-21 Preventing overload in a telecommunications system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002073887A2 true WO2002073887A2 (en) 2002-09-19
WO2002073887A3 WO2002073887A3 (en) 2002-12-19

Family

ID=9909281

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2002/001411 WO2002073887A2 (en) 2001-02-21 2002-02-11 System and method to avoid overload in a node caused by reporting activities from other nodes

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2002253006A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2372676A (en)
WO (1) WO2002073887A2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004043101A1 (en) * 2002-11-07 2004-05-21 Motorola Inc A communication unit and method of communicating measurement reports therefor
WO2005032185A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-04-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) System and method for reporting measurements in a communication system
WO2009022966A1 (en) * 2007-08-16 2009-02-19 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) A method and apparatus for collecting performance management data in communication networks
WO2009035397A1 (en) * 2007-09-11 2009-03-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Measurement control based on rbs processing capability
CN101594625A (en) * 2009-06-15 2009-12-02 中兴通讯股份有限公司 The statistical method of paging channel load rate and device
CN102223622A (en) * 2010-04-13 2011-10-19 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Reporting method and system for multimode network element alarm
WO2015124213A1 (en) * 2014-02-24 2015-08-27 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Rate control for application performance monitoring

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4438493B2 (en) * 2004-04-21 2010-03-24 日本電気株式会社 Mobile communication system, radio base station, mobile station, and transmission power control method used therefor
EP1598715A1 (en) * 2004-05-18 2005-11-23 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for detecting the communication load of a control system
EP2553966A1 (en) * 2010-04-01 2013-02-06 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Measurement reporting in communications systems

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1994018771A1 (en) * 1993-02-03 1994-08-18 Novell, Inc. Flow control by evaluating network load
EP0825506A2 (en) * 1996-08-20 1998-02-25 Foxboro Corporation Methods and apparatus for remote process control

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0479448A (en) * 1990-07-18 1992-03-12 Nec Corp Monitoring system
EP0487235B1 (en) * 1990-11-21 1999-02-03 AT&T Corp. Bandwidth and congestion management in accessing broadband ISDN networks
US5548533A (en) * 1994-10-07 1996-08-20 Northern Telecom Limited Overload control for a central processor in the switching network of a mobile communications system
US5867787A (en) * 1995-07-31 1999-02-02 Northern Telecom Limited Overload control for an integrated MSC/HLR switch
DE19532929C2 (en) * 1995-09-06 1999-04-15 Siemens Ag Procedure for reducing alarm messages in load situations

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1994018771A1 (en) * 1993-02-03 1994-08-18 Novell, Inc. Flow control by evaluating network load
EP0825506A2 (en) * 1996-08-20 1998-02-25 Foxboro Corporation Methods and apparatus for remote process control

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ESTEVE M ET AL: "Flow control mechanism with hysteresial techniques" ELECTRONICS LETTERS, IEE STEVENAGE, GB, vol. 34, no. 4, 19 February 1998 (1998-02-19), pages 332-333, XP006009340 ISSN: 0013-5194 *
PRUE W., POSTEL J.: "RFC 1016: Something a host could do with source quench: The source quench introduced delay" [Online] July 1987 (1987-07) , IETF , INTERNET XP002203521 Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1016.html> [retrieved on 2002-06-26] page 1, line 15 - line 21 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004043101A1 (en) * 2002-11-07 2004-05-21 Motorola Inc A communication unit and method of communicating measurement reports therefor
GB2395398B (en) * 2002-11-07 2007-05-23 Motorola Inc A communication unit and method of communicating measurement reports therefor
WO2005032185A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-04-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) System and method for reporting measurements in a communication system
US7580362B2 (en) 2003-09-30 2009-08-25 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) System and method for reporting measurements in communication system
WO2009022966A1 (en) * 2007-08-16 2009-02-19 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) A method and apparatus for collecting performance management data in communication networks
WO2009035397A1 (en) * 2007-09-11 2009-03-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Measurement control based on rbs processing capability
US8086244B2 (en) 2007-09-11 2011-12-27 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Measurement control based on RBS processing capability
CN101594625A (en) * 2009-06-15 2009-12-02 中兴通讯股份有限公司 The statistical method of paging channel load rate and device
CN102223622A (en) * 2010-04-13 2011-10-19 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Reporting method and system for multimode network element alarm
WO2015124213A1 (en) * 2014-02-24 2015-08-27 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Rate control for application performance monitoring
US10153956B2 (en) 2014-02-24 2018-12-11 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Rate control for application performance monitoring

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2002253006A1 (en) 2002-09-24
GB2372676A (en) 2002-08-28
GB0104374D0 (en) 2001-04-11
WO2002073887A3 (en) 2002-12-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7301905B1 (en) Overload control system and method for a telecommunications system
US5319638A (en) Link-by-link congestion control for packet transmission systems
EP1588576B1 (en) Resource allocation management
JP4720295B2 (en) Abnormality detection system and maintenance system
US9479314B2 (en) Method and apparatus for adjusting channel quality indicator feedback period to increase uplink capacity
JP5073211B2 (en) Method and apparatus for iteratively determining an association between a mobile device and an access point to achieve load balancing
EP2725740A1 (en) Adaptive method and device for heartbeat period
US7636310B2 (en) Communication control system and communication control method
WO2002073887A2 (en) System and method to avoid overload in a node caused by reporting activities from other nodes
US8010672B2 (en) Methods and systems for controlling utilization of resources of contention
KR20040044413A (en) Method and apparatus for congestion control in a wireless communication system
WO2002052736A2 (en) Method and apparatus for providing adaptive fast radio channel congestion control
US10616083B2 (en) Data acquisition using remote platform gateways
US7193992B2 (en) Method of radio resource management for integrated voice and data CDMA networks
CN105338652A (en) Channel detection method based on contention window and device thereof
US7756522B2 (en) Dynamic traffic control method and device for the same
EP3148150A1 (en) Method and device for determining transmission buffer size
US20030157896A1 (en) Controlling performance measurements in a telecommunications network
KR100758779B1 (en) Regulation control system, radio communication terminal unit, regulation control method and radio communication terminal control method
US20030167353A1 (en) System and method for determining notification behavior of a system
EP2530980B1 (en) Transmission power controller and radio base station
EP4016966A1 (en) Dynamic adaptation of time-aware communications in time-sensitive systems
KR100786063B1 (en) The data rate control method on the reverse link
CN113747253B (en) Network bandwidth determining method, video RTP receiving end and storage medium
EP2247044A1 (en) Packet network processing node and method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP