WO2002025948A1 - Increased bandwidth in aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems - Google Patents

Increased bandwidth in aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2002025948A1
WO2002025948A1 PCT/US2001/027471 US0127471W WO0225948A1 WO 2002025948 A1 WO2002025948 A1 WO 2002025948A1 US 0127471 W US0127471 W US 0127471W WO 0225948 A1 WO0225948 A1 WO 0225948A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
top boxes
transmission
slot
receiver
headend receiver
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/027471
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Theodore Calderone
Mark J. Foster
Original Assignee
Agile Tv Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Agile Tv Corporation filed Critical Agile Tv Corporation
Priority to AU2001287072A priority Critical patent/AU2001287072A1/en
Publication of WO2002025948A1 publication Critical patent/WO2002025948A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
    • H04N21/20Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
    • H04N21/23Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware
    • H04N21/238Interfacing the downstream path of the transmission network, e.g. adapting the transmission rate of a video stream to network bandwidth; Processing of multiplex streams
    • H04N21/2385Channel allocation; Bandwidth allocation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
    • H04N21/60Network structure or processes for video distribution between server and client or between remote clients; Control signalling between clients, server and network components; Transmission of management data between server and client, e.g. sending from server to client commands for recording incoming content stream; Communication details between server and client 
    • H04N21/61Network physical structure; Signal processing
    • H04N21/6106Network physical structure; Signal processing specially adapted to the downstream path of the transmission network
    • H04N21/6118Network physical structure; Signal processing specially adapted to the downstream path of the transmission network involving cable transmission, e.g. using a cable modem
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
    • H04N21/60Network structure or processes for video distribution between server and client or between remote clients; Control signalling between clients, server and network components; Transmission of management data between server and client, e.g. sending from server to client commands for recording incoming content stream; Communication details between server and client 
    • H04N21/61Network physical structure; Signal processing
    • H04N21/6156Network physical structure; Signal processing specially adapted to the upstream path of the transmission network
    • H04N21/6168Network physical structure; Signal processing specially adapted to the upstream path of the transmission network involving cable transmission, e.g. using a cable modem
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/16Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
    • H04N7/173Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems with two-way working, e.g. subscriber sending a programme selection signal
    • H04N7/17309Transmission or handling of upstream communications

Definitions

  • the invention relates to transmission systems. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus that provides increased bandwidth in Aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems.
  • the installed base of cable television set-top boxes was designed for efficient downstream, i.e. cable plant to subscriber, information delivery.
  • Upstream data transmission i.e. from subscriber to cable plant, is much more restrictive, supporting only limited bandwidth.
  • the transmit hardware is capable of selecting twenty different 256K bps channels, each of which uses QPSK transmission coding. While the hardware is capable of frequency-hopping to avoid channels which are subject to interference, the scheme used is fairly static, with typical deployments only using two active upstream communications channels, for an aggregate bandwidth of only 512K bps per cluster of set-top boxes. This cluster is called a node in cable television terms, and typically represents between 500 and 2000 subscribers.
  • the transmission control protocol used is one where an individual set-top box immediately transmits any pending request to the headend, without regard to whether or not the channel is already in use. This transmission is repeated at regular intervals until the box receives an acknowledgement command, indicating successful receipt of the transmission.
  • Downstream data transmission occurs in a separate frequency band from the upstream channels.
  • this transmission control protocol is quite inefficient due to the number of collisions which ensue, e.g. simultaneous transmissions from different set-top boxes which interfere with one another, forcing all of the transmitters to repeat their transmissions again.
  • the preferred embodiment of the invention provides a method and apparatus that increases bandwidth in Aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems, for example, thereby allowing voice transmission in such systems.
  • a first step in improving efficiency of known systems is to increase the number of parallel upstream transmissions by changing known systems from frequency hopping to a parallel transmission model.
  • the invention replaces the existing headend receiver with one that is capable of simultaneously receiving data from all of the possible upstream channels simultaneously.
  • the head-end receiver examines the RF spectrum to determine which frequencies are available, and which are not available due to interference from other sources. After determining which frequencies are free of interference, the headend receiver then polls the node to determine how many set-top boxes are active in this node. Once this is complete, the headend receiver partitions the total number of set-top boxes into an approximately equal number of set-top boxes for each of the available upstream data channels. That is, the boxes are assigned a transmission channel. The head-end receiver then commands each set-top box to tune to the channel it has been assigned by sending the channel selection information to each set-top box, i.e. using the separate downstream transmission channel mentioned above.
  • a second major change to known systems revises the transmission control protocol from an Aloha system to a slotted assignment system.
  • the head-end receiver is used not just to assign each set-top box a specific transmission channel, but also a specific transmission time slot.
  • assigning a specific set-top box to a particular slot it becomes possible for multiple set- top boxes to transmit in sequential slots, while assuring that the transmission packets do not collide.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system architecture according to the invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow diagram showing a channel assignment scheme according to the invention.
  • Fig. 3 shows channel and status information and corresponding allocation table entries according to the invention
  • Fig. 4 is a timing diagram showing slot assignments according to the invention.
  • Fig. 5 shows is a flow diagram that the provision of high resolution slot interrupts in a low resolution device.
  • the preferred embodiment of the invention provides a method and apparatus that increases bandwidth in Aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems thereby allowing, for example, voice transmission in such systems.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system architecture according to the invention.
  • Such systems with which the invention may be used can include, but are not limited to, a headend receiver 10 and one or more set-top boxes 11 , 12 between which communication proceeds over a plurality of communications channels, e.g. Channel.,-Channel N .
  • a first step in improving efficiency of known systems is to increase the number of parallel upstream transmissions. To do this, the nature of the transmission system must be revised. However, replacing existing set-top boxes is a very expensive proposition, so it is extremely desirable to devise a method of accomplishing this task using existing set-top boxes.
  • the invention achieves this goal by changing such systems from frequency hopping to a parallel transmission model.
  • the first step is to replace the existing headend receiver with one that is capable of simultaneously receiving data from all of the possible upstream channels simultaneously, i.e. twenty in the case of the DTC-2000 discussed above.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing a channel assignment scheme according to the invention
  • the head-end receiver is made responsible for active frequency management of the upstream transmission spectrum.
  • the head-end receiver examines the RF spectrum to determine which frequencies are available (101), and which are not available due to interference from other sources. After determining which frequencies are free of interference, the headend receiver then polls the node to determine how many set-top boxes are active in this node (102). Once this is determined, the headend receiver partitions the set-top boxes into an approximately equal number of set-top boxes for each of the available upstream data channels (103). That is, the boxes are assigned a transmission channel. The head-end receiver then commands each set-top box to tune to the channel it has been assigned by sending the channel selection information to each set-top box (104), i.e. using the separate downstream transmission channel mentioned above.
  • the headend receiver uses an allocation table 14 (Figs. 1 and 3) to keep track of the assignments of channels by storing a mapping between each channel and the set-top box to which the channel is assigned.
  • An important element of the allocation table is that it keeps track of areas which are deemed to be busy. Thus, a key function of a headend receiver is in finding those frequencies which are not available, and eliminating them from the allocation table.
  • frequency hopping is relatively insensitive to interference by virtue of the fact that if there is an interfering carrier, such carrier only interferes with one step of the frequency hopping sequence. Therefore, only a minimal amount of information is lost and an error correction scheme can usually correct for this loss.
  • the channel is removed from the allocation table and is not allocated to any set-top box until it is no longer busy.
  • the invention actively avoids interference instead of passively correcting for or responding to such interference because busy channels are actually removed from the allocation table.
  • the headend receiver When there is a need to assign a channel to a set-top box, the headend receiver only sees the available channels, as listed in the allocation table. When a busy channel becomes free, it is put back into the allocation table and can subsequently be assigned by the headend receiver.
  • a second major change to known systems requires no hardware whatsoever, but revises the transmission control protocol from an Aloha system to a slotted assignment system. To do this, the head-end receiver is used not just to assign each set-top box a specific transmission channel, but also a specific transmission time slot (105; see Fig. 2).
  • a "slot" is a specific slice of time used to transmit information, typically a fraction of a second in length.
  • each second on each channel is divided up into one thousand slots, for a slot length of one millisecond.
  • time division multiple access systems which of many transmitters is allowed to transmit in a given time slot.
  • One such method is referred to as a reservation protocol in which a talker who wants to talk requests, and is then assigned, one of the available time slots. When that time slot arrives, the talker talks, and then is quiet while others talk.
  • the management and assignment of time slots comes from some central authority, which in the case of a cable modem system is the headend controller.
  • a reserved time slot allows a modem to transmit a known amount of information in a known period. However, if the modem does not wish to use the time slot, the time slot is not available for use by anyone else until the controller decides that the time slot is available and then assigns it to someone else, (see W. Ciciora, J. Farmer, D. Large, Modern Cable Television Technology. Ch. 4, pp. 199, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, (1999).
  • guard band such that a worst case clock skew between different transmitters does not result in overlap from slot to slot.
  • This guard band itself often requires a substantial protion of the bandwidth that is available.
  • factors that go into computing the optimal guard band such as local oscillator inaccuracy multiplied by the duration of time between time synchronization, and uncertainty involved in the hardware transmission path, i.e. variation in latency between the various set top boxes for which it is difficult, if not impossible, to account.
  • the presently preferred method of assigning slots in the system herein is for the downstream data transmitter to broadcast a timestamp at a regular interval 106), e.g. every one second.
  • This heartbeat is received by all set-top boxes in the network, forming a rigid timing standard for the boxes.
  • the inherent timing inaccuracy of the individual set-top boxes is not given the opportunity to become significant because each box resets its slot timers when it receives the broadcast time-stamp (114). In this manner, a consistent time is maintained throughout the network.
  • each of the set-top boxes may be at very different distances from the headend, and because each may have a different internal processing speed, the response time from the different set-top boxes is individually skewed, thereby preventing perfect alignment of the different transmission slots.
  • the headend receiver requests that each individual set-top box echo a specific command (108) as rapidly as possible during system initialization (107), while polling the node for attached set-top boxes.
  • the head-end receiver sends out the command, it begins running an internal timer (17; see Fig. 1). This timer is incremented (110) until a response is received from the set-top box (109). This response may be an echo of the timestamp.
  • the value of the timer once the response has been received is an accurate measure of the propagation delay in the network, plus the processing delay in the particular set-top box.
  • a timestamp is used to account for varying delays in downstream transmission.
  • the timestamp which is transmitted contains a value indicating the actual moment in time when the transmitted packet hits the wire.
  • the head-end receiver transmits the time correction factor it computed while polling the set-top box back to the set-top box (112). Inside the set-top box, this timing correction factor is subtracted from the nominal slot time to find a corrected slot time (113). By doing so, the set-top box's processing time effectively becomes zero. As a consequence, by the time the set-top box actually begins transmission, its packet is aligned properly to the desired slot transmission point so that sequential transmissions do not interfere with one another.
  • FIG. 5 shows is a flow diagram that shows the provision of high resolution slot interrupts in a low resolution device.
  • a hardware timer interrupt 17 (Fig. 1) is programmed to awaken the CPU at the set-top box at the nearest hardware interrupt point preceding the desired slot interval (150, 151), then software counters 18 are used to count down the remaining time (152) until this set-top box's transmission slot (153, 154).

Abstract

A method and apparatus that increases bandwidth in Aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems is disclosed.

Description

Increased Bandwidth in Aloha-based
Frequency Hopping Transmission Systems
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates to transmission systems. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus that provides increased bandwidth in Aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
The installed base of cable television set-top boxes was designed for efficient downstream, i.e. cable plant to subscriber, information delivery. Upstream data transmission, i.e. from subscriber to cable plant, is much more restrictive, supporting only limited bandwidth. As new classes of interactive services become available, it becomes ever more important to increase the upstream transmission bandwidth. For example, if it is necessary to pass voice information from the subscriber to the cable headend (also known as the "headend"), sufficient upstream bandwidth must be made available.
One of the most popular digital set-top boxes, the General Instruments (now Motorola) DCT-2000, is a useful example. When the box was first deployed, upstream transmissions were restricted to user pay-per-view requests, and other infrequent transmissions. As a consequence, the transmission format used for upstream transmissions was not required to be very efficient, and in fact, it is not very efficient.
In this set-top box, the transmit hardware is capable of selecting twenty different 256K bps channels, each of which uses QPSK transmission coding. While the hardware is capable of frequency-hopping to avoid channels which are subject to interference, the scheme used is fairly static, with typical deployments only using two active upstream communications channels, for an aggregate bandwidth of only 512K bps per cluster of set-top boxes. This cluster is called a node in cable television terms, and typically represents between 500 and 2000 subscribers.
Furthermore, the transmission control protocol used, referred to as Aloha, is one where an individual set-top box immediately transmits any pending request to the headend, without regard to whether or not the channel is already in use. This transmission is repeated at regular intervals until the box receives an acknowledgement command, indicating successful receipt of the transmission.
Downstream data transmission occurs in a separate frequency band from the upstream channels. As is well-understood, this transmission control protocol is quite inefficient due to the number of collisions which ensue, e.g. simultaneous transmissions from different set-top boxes which interfere with one another, forcing all of the transmitters to repeat their transmissions again. This leads to typical channel utilization on the order of just 30%. As a consequence, the total bandwidth available for upstream transmission per node is only about 30% * 512K bps = -137K bps, on average.
Transporting voice across this limited bandwidth is not practical because an individual voice stream requires a minimum of perhaps 4K bps, meaning that at most (137K / 4K =) 34 people could use the link simultaneously, which is as little as (34 / 2000 = ) 1.7% of the available households.
It would be advantageous to provide a method and apparatus that increases bandwidth in Aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems, for example, thereby allowing voice transmission in such systems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The preferred embodiment of the invention provides a method and apparatus that increases bandwidth in Aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems, for example, thereby allowing voice transmission in such systems.
A first step in improving efficiency of known systems is to increase the number of parallel upstream transmissions by changing known systems from frequency hopping to a parallel transmission model. To increase upstream bandwidth, the invention replaces the existing headend receiver with one that is capable of simultaneously receiving data from all of the possible upstream channels simultaneously.
Next, by treating the head-end receiver and the set-top boxes as an integrated system, it is possible to use the existing transmission spectrum much more efficiently. Instead of enabling each set-top box to perform frequency hopping, it is much more effective if the head-end receiver is made responsible for active frequency management of the upstream transmission spectrum. To do this, when the system is first powered-up, the head-end receiver examines the RF spectrum to determine which frequencies are available, and which are not available due to interference from other sources. After determining which frequencies are free of interference, the headend receiver then polls the node to determine how many set-top boxes are active in this node. Once this is complete, the headend receiver partitions the total number of set-top boxes into an approximately equal number of set-top boxes for each of the available upstream data channels. That is, the boxes are assigned a transmission channel. The head-end receiver then commands each set-top box to tune to the channel it has been assigned by sending the channel selection information to each set-top box, i.e. using the separate downstream transmission channel mentioned above.
A second major change to known systems revises the transmission control protocol from an Aloha system to a slotted assignment system. To do this, the head-end receiver is used not just to assign each set-top box a specific transmission channel, but also a specific transmission time slot. By assigning a specific set-top box to a particular slot, it becomes possible for multiple set- top boxes to transmit in sequential slots, while assuring that the transmission packets do not collide.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system architecture according to the invention;
Fig. 2 is a flow diagram showing a channel assignment scheme according to the invention;
Fig. 3 shows channel and status information and corresponding allocation table entries according to the invention;
Fig. 4 is a timing diagram showing slot assignments according to the invention; and
Fig. 5 shows is a flow diagram that the provision of high resolution slot interrupts in a low resolution device.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The preferred embodiment of the invention provides a method and apparatus that increases bandwidth in Aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems thereby allowing, for example, voice transmission in such systems.
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system architecture according to the invention. Such systems with which the invention may be used can include, but are not limited to, a headend receiver 10 and one or more set-top boxes 11 , 12 between which communication proceeds over a plurality of communications channels, e.g. Channel.,-ChannelN.
Hopping-Parallel Transmission
A first step in improving efficiency of known systems is to increase the number of parallel upstream transmissions. To do this, the nature of the transmission system must be revised. However, replacing existing set-top boxes is a very expensive proposition, so it is extremely desirable to devise a method of accomplishing this task using existing set-top boxes. The invention achieves this goal by changing such systems from frequency hopping to a parallel transmission model.
To increase upstream bandwidth, the first step is to replace the existing headend receiver with one that is capable of simultaneously receiving data from all of the possible upstream channels simultaneously, i.e. twenty in the case of the DTC-2000 discussed above.
Next, by treating the head-end receiver and the set-top boxes as an integrated system, it is possible to use the existing transmission spectrum much more efficiently. Fig. 2 is a flow diagram showing a channel assignment scheme according to the invention
Instead of enabling each set-top box to perform frequency hopping, it is much more effective if the head-end receiver is made responsible for active frequency management of the upstream transmission spectrum. To do this, when the system is first powered-up (100) and intermittently thereafter, the head-end receiver examines the RF spectrum to determine which frequencies are available (101), and which are not available due to interference from other sources. After determining which frequencies are free of interference, the headend receiver then polls the node to determine how many set-top boxes are active in this node (102). Once this is determined, the headend receiver partitions the set-top boxes into an approximately equal number of set-top boxes for each of the available upstream data channels (103). That is, the boxes are assigned a transmission channel. The head-end receiver then commands each set-top box to tune to the channel it has been assigned by sending the channel selection information to each set-top box (104), i.e. using the separate downstream transmission channel mentioned above.
The headend receiver uses an allocation table 14 (Figs. 1 and 3) to keep track of the assignments of channels by storing a mapping between each channel and the set-top box to which the channel is assigned. An important element of the allocation table is that it keeps track of areas which are deemed to be busy. Thus, a key function of a headend receiver is in finding those frequencies which are not available, and eliminating them from the allocation table.
One reason for using frequency hopping is that it is relatively insensitive to interference by virtue of the fact that if there is an interfering carrier, such carrier only interferes with one step of the frequency hopping sequence. Therefore, only a minimal amount of information is lost and an error correction scheme can usually correct for this loss.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, if there is interference on a channel, e.g. the channel is busy, then the channel is removed from the allocation table and is not allocated to any set-top box until it is no longer busy. Thus, the invention actively avoids interference instead of passively correcting for or responding to such interference because busy channels are actually removed from the allocation table. When there is a need to assign a channel to a set-top box, the headend receiver only sees the available channels, as listed in the allocation table. When a busy channel becomes free, it is put back into the allocation table and can subsequently be assigned by the headend receiver.
By making this simple change, the number of upstream channels increases dramatically, from typically two upstream channels, to perhaps sixteen channels depending on the amount of interference which is actually present in the upstream transmission spectrum. In the case mentioned above, this provides eight times more upstream transmission bandwidth, allowing up to (1.7% * 8) = 13.6% of households to transmit voice information simultaneously.
Improving Channel Utilization
A second major change to known systems requires no hardware whatsoever, but revises the transmission control protocol from an Aloha system to a slotted assignment system. To do this, the head-end receiver is used not just to assign each set-top box a specific transmission channel, but also a specific transmission time slot (105; see Fig. 2).
For the purposes of this document, a "slot" (see Fig. 4) is a specific slice of time used to transmit information, typically a fraction of a second in length. Here, assume that each second on each channel is divided up into one thousand slots, for a slot length of one millisecond. By assigning a specific set-top box to a particular slot, which is stored in a time slot table 16 (see Fig. 1), it becomes possible for multiple set-top boxes to transmit in sequential slots, while assuring that the transmission packets do not collide.
It is known in time division multiple access systems which of many transmitters is allowed to transmit in a given time slot. One such method is referred to as a reservation protocol in which a talker who wants to talk requests, and is then assigned, one of the available time slots. When that time slot arrives, the talker talks, and then is quiet while others talk. The management and assignment of time slots comes from some central authority, which in the case of a cable modem system is the headend controller. A reserved time slot allows a modem to transmit a known amount of information in a known period. However, if the modem does not wish to use the time slot, the time slot is not available for use by anyone else until the controller decides that the time slot is available and then assigns it to someone else, (see W. Ciciora, J. Farmer, D. Large, Modern Cable Television Technology. Ch. 4, pp. 199, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, (1999).
One general problem in known systems is that the assignment of slots normally requires very precise alignment of the timing of each device in the system, such that each transmitter knows precisely when its assigned slot time arrives.
One known technique is to define a guard band such that a worst case clock skew between different transmitters does not result in overlap from slot to slot. This guard band itself often requires a substantial protion of the bandwidth that is available. There are a number of factors that go into computing the optimal guard band, such as local oscillator inaccuracy multiplied by the duration of time between time synchronization, and uncertainty involved in the hardware transmission path, i.e. variation in latency between the various set top boxes for which it is difficult, if not impossible, to account.
The presently preferred method of assigning slots in the system herein is for the downstream data transmitter to broadcast a timestamp at a regular interval 106), e.g. every one second. This heartbeat is received by all set-top boxes in the network, forming a rigid timing standard for the boxes. By repeating the heartbeat at regular, e.g. one second, intervals the inherent timing inaccuracy of the individual set-top boxes is not given the opportunity to become significant because each box resets its slot timers when it receives the broadcast time-stamp (114). In this manner, a consistent time is maintained throughout the network.
However, an additional problem arises in known cable systems. Because each of the set-top boxes may be at very different distances from the headend, and because each may have a different internal processing speed, the response time from the different set-top boxes is individually skewed, thereby preventing perfect alignment of the different transmission slots. To correct for this, the headend receiver requests that each individual set-top box echo a specific command (108) as rapidly as possible during system initialization (107), while polling the node for attached set-top boxes. At the instant the head-end receiver sends out the command, it begins running an internal timer (17; see Fig. 1). This timer is incremented (110) until a response is received from the set-top box (109). This response may be an echo of the timestamp. The value of the timer once the response has been received is an accurate measure of the propagation delay in the network, plus the processing delay in the particular set-top box. By applying this new knowledge, it becomes possible to align the timing for all set-top boxes in the system (111), so that the slot times are aligned.
Note that a timestamp is used to account for varying delays in downstream transmission. The timestamp which is transmitted contains a value indicating the actual moment in time when the transmitted packet hits the wire. By having the set-top box echo the received timestamp, it becomes possible to measure the precise time overhead or loss inherent in the network and the particular set-top box, even in the presence of varying transmit delay in the downstream transmitter. Note that maximal accuracy may be obtained by repeating this process several times and averaging the time correction results.
To accomplish slot alignment, the head-end receiver transmits the time correction factor it computed while polling the set-top box back to the set-top box (112). Inside the set-top box, this timing correction factor is subtracted from the nominal slot time to find a corrected slot time (113). By doing so, the set-top box's processing time effectively becomes zero. As a consequence, by the time the set-top box actually begins transmission, its packet is aligned properly to the desired slot transmission point so that sequential transmissions do not interfere with one another.
As a final step, many set-top boxes do not have the hardware clock resolution to enable interrupts to occur at the desired slot frequency. To resolve this, a combination of interrupts and software counters are used to provide finer time granularity. Fig. 5 shows is a flow diagram that shows the provision of high resolution slot interrupts in a low resolution device. In essence, a hardware timer interrupt 17 (Fig. 1) is programmed to awaken the CPU at the set-top box at the nearest hardware interrupt point preceding the desired slot interval (150, 151), then software counters 18 are used to count down the remaining time (152) until this set-top box's transmission slot (153, 154). By combining these methods, it becomes possible to have more slots available than the hardware interrupt would otherwise make possible because the slots may be subdivided into sub-slots that are finer than the resolution of the set-top box. All told, this slotted approach to transmission can increase utilization of individual upstream channels from approximately 30%, to in excess of 80%. As a consequence, the number of simultaneous voice transmissions in the example system described here increases to (13.6% * 80% / 30%) = 36%, i.e. more than twenty times faster than the original installation. This substantial bandwidth increase is crucial because it enables entirely new classes of service to be delivered to subscriber's homes, without requiring expensive replacement of the installed base of set-top boxes.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to the preferred embodiment, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that other applications may be substituted for those set forth herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention should only be limited by the Claims included below.

Claims

1. An apparatus for increasing bandwidth in a frequency hopping transmission system, comprising: a headend receiver responsible for active frequency management of an upstream transmission RF spectrum, wherein said headend receiver is capable of simultaneously receiving data from all possible upstream channels; and one or more set-top boxes, each of said set top boxes being associated with a particular one of one or more nodes; wherein communication between said headend receiver and said one or more set-top boxes proceeds via a parallel transmission model over said RF spectrum which comprises a plurality of communications channels.
2. The apparatus of Claim 1 , wherein when said apparatus is first powered- up and optionally intermittently thereafter, said head-end receiver periodically examines said RF spectrum to determine which frequencies are available, and which are not available due to interference from other sources.
3. The apparatus of Claim 2, wherein said headend receiver polls said one or more nodes to determine how many of said one or more set-top boxes are active in each node after determining which frequencies are free of interference.
4. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said one or more set-top boxes are each assigned to a transmission channel by said headend receiver.
5. The apparatus of Claim 4, wherein said headend receiver partitions said one or more set-top boxes into an approximately equal number of set-top boxes for each of said available upstream data channels
6. The apparatus of Claim 4, wherein said head-end receiver commands each of said one or more set-top boxes to tune to a channel to which it has been assigned by sending channel selection information to each of said one or more set-top boxes.
7. The apparatus of Claim 6, wherein said headend receiver uses a separate downstream transmission channel to send channel selection information to each of said one or more set-top boxes.
8. The apparatus of Claim 4, wherein headend receiver further comprises: an allocation table for keeping track of assignments of channels by storing a mapping between each channel and a set-top box to which said channel is assigned.
9. The apparatus of Claim 8, wherein said allocation table keeps track of areas which are deemed to be busy.
10. The apparatus of Claim 8, wherein said headend receiver finds those frequencies which are not available and eliminates them temporarily from said allocation table.
11. The apparatus of Claim 1 , wherein said headend receiver further comprises: a slotted assignment system which assigns each of said one or more set-tops boxes a specific transmission slot, wherein each slot comprises a specific slice of time used to transmit information.
12. The apparatus of Claim 11 , said slotted assignment system further comprising: a guard band such that a worst case clock skew between different transmitters does not result in overlap from slot to slot.
13. The apparatus of Claim 11 , said slotted assignment system further comprising: a timestamp that is broadcast downstream to each of said one or more set-top boxes at a regular interval.
14. The apparatus of Claim 13, wherein said timestamp is repeated at regular intervals so that inherent timing inaccuracy of individual set-top boxes is not given an opportunity to become significant because each of said one or more set-top boxes resets a slot timer when it receives a broadcast time-stamp.
15. The apparatus of Claim 13, wherein said headend receiver requests that each of said one or more set-top boxes echos a specific command as rapidly as possible periodically, while polling each of said one or more nodes for attached set-top boxes.
16. The apparatus of Claim 15, wherein said headend receiver further comprises: a mechanism that begins running an internal timer at the instant said head-end receiver sends out said command to a particular one of said one or more set-top boxes; wherein said timer is incremented until a response is received from said particular one of said one or more set-top boxes; wherein said response is an echo of said timestamp; wherein a value of said timer is an accurate measure of propagation delay plus processing delay in said particular one of said one or more set-top boxes once a response has been received by said headend receiver; and wherein a value is generated for each of said one or more set-top boxes to align timing for said one or more set-top boxes.
17. The apparatus of Claim 16, wherein said headend receiver repeatedly operates said mechanism several times and averages time correction results obtained thereby.
18. The apparatus of Claim 16, wherein said head-end receiver transmits a particular time correction factor it computed while polling said one or more set-top boxes back to a corresponding one of said one or more set-top boxes; wherein said corresponding one or said one or more set-top boxes subtracts said timing correction factor from a nominal slot time to determine a corrected slot time; and wherein a transmission packet is aligned properly to a desired slot transmission point by the time said particular one or said one or more set-top boxes actually begins transmission.
19. The apparatus of Claim 12, said slotted assignment system further comprising: a mechanism that enables interrupts to occur at a desired slot frequency.
20. The apparatus of Claim 19, said mechanism comprising: a timer interrupt programmed to awaken a CPU at each set-top box at a nearest hardware interrupt point preceding a desired slot interval; and a counter for counting down a remaining time until said set-top box's transmission slot is reached; wherein said slots are subdivided into sub-slots that are finer than the timing resolution of said set-top box.
21. A method for increasing bandwidth in a frequency hopping transmission system, comprising the steps of: providing a headend receiver responsible for active frequency management of an upstream transmission RF spectrum, wherein said headend receiver is capable of simultaneously receiving data from all possible upstream channels; and providing one or more set-top boxes, each of said set top boxes associated with a particular one of one or more nodes; wherein communication between said headend receiver and said one or more set-top boxes proceeds via a parallel transmission model over said
RF spectrum which comprises a plurality of communications channels.
22. The method of Claim 21 , further comprising the step of: said head-end receiver examining said RF spectrum to determine which frequencies are available, and which are not available due to interference from other sources.
23. The method of Claim 22, further comprising the step of: said headend receiver polling said one or more nodes to determine how many of said one or more set-top boxes are active in each node after determining which frequencies are free of interference.
24. The method of Claim 23, further comprising the step of: said headend receiver assigning each of said one or more set-top boxes to a transmission channel.
25. The method of Claim 24, further comprising the step of: said headend receiver partitioning said one or more set-top boxes into an approximately equal number of set-top boxes for each of said available upstream data channels
26. The method of Claim 24, further comprising the step of: said head-end receiver commanding each of said one or more set-top boxes to tune to a channel to which it has been assigned by sending channel selection information to each of said one or more set-top boxes.
27. The method of Claim 26, further comprising the step of: said headend receiver using a separate downstream transmission channel to send channel selection information to each of said one or more set-top boxes.
28. The method of Claim 24, further comprising the step of: keeping track of assignments of channels by storing a mapping between each channel and a set-top box to which said channel is assigned in an allocation table associated with said headend receiver.
29. The method of Claim 28, further comprising the step of: said allocation table keeping track of areas which are deemed to be busy.
30. The method of Claim 28, further comprising the step of: said headend receiver finding those frequencies which are not available and eliminates them from said allocation table.
31. The method of Claim 21 , further comprising the step of: assigning each of said one or more set-tops boxes a specific transmission slot with a slotted assignment system associated with said headend receiver, wherein each slot comprises a specific slice of time used to transmit information.
32. The method of Claim 31 , further comprising the step of: said slotted assignment system providing a guard band such that a worst case clock skew between different transmitters does not result in overlap from slot to slot.
33. The method of Claim 31, further comprising the step of: said slotted assignment system providing a timestamp that is broadcast downstream to each of said one or more set-top boxes at a regular interval.
34. The method of Claim 32, further comprising the step of: repeating said timestamp at regular intervals so that inherent timing inaccuracy of individual set-top boxes is not given an opportunity to become significant because each of said one or more set-top boxes resets a slot timer when it receives a broadcast time-stamp.
35. The method of Claim 33, further comprising the step of: said headend receiver requesting that each of said one or more set-top boxes echo a specific command as rapidly as possible during system initialization, while polling each of said one or more nodes for attached set-top boxes.
36. The method of Claim 35, further comprising the steps of: providing a mechanism running an internal timer in said headend receiver at the instant said head-end receiver sends out said command to a particular one of said one or more set-top boxes; incrementing said timer is until a response is received from said particular one of said one or more set-top boxes; wherein said response is an echo of said timestamp; wherein a value of said timer is an accurate measure of propagation delay plus processing delay in said particular one of said one or more set-top boxes once a response has been received by said headend receiver; and wherein a value is generated for each of said one or more set-top boxes to align timing for said one or more set-top boxes.
37. The method of Claim 36, further comprising the step of: said headend receiver repeatedly operating said mechanism several times and averaging time correction results obtained thereby.
38. The method of Claim 36, further comprising the step of: said head-end receiver transmiting a particular time correction factor it computed while polling said one or more set-top boxes back to a corresponding one of said one or more set-top boxes; wherein said corresponding one or said one or more set-top boxes subtracts said timing correction factor from a nominal slot time to determine a corrected slot time; and wherein a transmission packet is aligned properly to a desired slot transmission point by the time said particular one or said one or more set-top boxes actually begins transmission.
39. The method of Claim 32, said slotted assignment system further comprising: a mechanism that enables interrupts to occur at a desired slot frequency.
40. The method of Claim 39, further comprising the steps of: providing a timer interrupt programmed to awaken a CPU at each set- top box at a nearest hardware interrupt point preceding a desired slot interval; and providing a counter for counting down a remaining time until said set- top box's transmission slot is reached; wherein said slots are subdivided into sub-slots that are finer that the resolution of said set-top box.
41. A method for increasing bandwidth in a frequency hopping transmission system comprising one or more set-top boxes, each of said set top boxes associated with a particular one of one or more nodes, said method comprising the steps of: providing a headend receiver responsible for active frequency management of an upstream transmission RF spectrum, wherein said headend receiver is capable of simultaneously receiving data from all possible upstream channels; wherein communication between said headend receiver and said one or more set-top boxes proceeds via a parallel transmission model over said RF spectrum which comprises a plurality of communications channels.
42. A method for increasing bandwidth in a frequency hopping transmission system comprising one or more set-top boxes, each of said set top boxes associated with a particular one of one or more nodes, said method comprising the steps of: assigning each of said one or more set-tops boxes a specific transmission slot with a slotted assignment system associated with a headend receiver, wherein each slot comprises a specific slice of time used to transmit information; providing a timer interrupt programmed to awaken a CPU at each set- top box at a nearest hardware interrupt point preceding a desired slot interval; and providing a counter for counting down a remaining time until said set- top box's transmission slot is reached; wherein said slots are subdivided into sub-slots that are finer that the resolution of said set-top box.
43. A method for increasing bandwidth in a frequency hopping transmission system comprising one or more set-top boxes, each of said set top boxes associated with a particular one of one or more nodes, said method comprising the steps of: assigning each of said one or more set-top boxes to a transmission channel with a headend receiver; and keeping track of assignments of channels by storing a mapping between each channel and a set-top box to which said channel is assigned in an allocation table associated with said headend receiver.
44. An apparatus for increasing bandwidth in a frequency hopping transmission system comprising one or more set-top boxes, each of said set top boxes associated with a particular one of one or more nodes, said apparatus comprising: a headend receiver responsible for active frequency management of an upstream transmission RF spectrum; wherein said headend receiver further comprises: a mechanism for simultaneously receiving data from all possible upstream channels; and a parallel transmission model, wherein communication between said headend receiver and said one or more set-top boxes proceeds over said RF spectrum which comprises a plurality of communications channels.
45. An apparatus for increasing bandwidth in a frequency hopping transmission system comprising one or more set-top boxes, each of said set top boxes associated with a particular one of one or more nodes, said apparatus comprising: means for assigning each of said one or more set-tops boxes a specific transmission slot with a slotted assignment system associated with a headend receiver, wherein each slot comprises a specific slice of time used to transmit information; a timer interrupt programmed to awaken a CPU at each set-top box at a nearest hardware interrupt point preceding a desired slot interval; and a counter for counting down a remaining time until said set-top box's transmission slot is reached; wherein said slots are subdivided into sub-slots that are finer that a resolution of said set-top box.
46. An apparatus for increasing bandwidth in a frequency hopping transmission system comprising one or more set-top boxes, each of said set top boxes associated with a particular one of one or more nodes, said apparatus comprising: means for assigning each of said one or more set-top boxes to a transmission channel with a headend receiver; and an allocation table associated with said headend receiver for keeping track of assignments of channels by storing a mapping between each channel and a set-top box to which said channel is assigned.
PCT/US2001/027471 2000-09-19 2001-09-04 Increased bandwidth in aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems WO2002025948A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2001287072A AU2001287072A1 (en) 2000-09-19 2001-09-04 Increased bandwidth in aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US66487400A 2000-09-19 2000-09-19
US09/664,874 2000-09-19

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002025948A1 true WO2002025948A1 (en) 2002-03-28

Family

ID=24667801

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/027471 WO2002025948A1 (en) 2000-09-19 2001-09-04 Increased bandwidth in aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2001287072A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2002025948A1 (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5225902A (en) * 1990-03-20 1993-07-06 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Automatic frequency selection in a bi-directional cable television system
US5546119A (en) * 1994-11-14 1996-08-13 Bestler; Caitlin B. Transmission modulator for cable television upstream data transmission
US5613191A (en) * 1995-05-01 1997-03-18 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Customer premise wireless distribution of audio-video, control signals and voice using CDMA
US5870134A (en) * 1997-03-04 1999-02-09 Com21, Inc. CATV network and cable modem system having a wireless return path
US5883901A (en) * 1995-09-22 1999-03-16 Hewlett-Packard Company Communications system including synchronization information for timing upstream transmission of data and ability to vary slot duration
WO2000003542A1 (en) * 1998-07-13 2000-01-20 Uni.Com S.P.A. Optimized system for distributing television and telecommunication services from a peripheral node to user terminals

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5225902A (en) * 1990-03-20 1993-07-06 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Automatic frequency selection in a bi-directional cable television system
US5546119A (en) * 1994-11-14 1996-08-13 Bestler; Caitlin B. Transmission modulator for cable television upstream data transmission
US5613191A (en) * 1995-05-01 1997-03-18 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Customer premise wireless distribution of audio-video, control signals and voice using CDMA
US5883901A (en) * 1995-09-22 1999-03-16 Hewlett-Packard Company Communications system including synchronization information for timing upstream transmission of data and ability to vary slot duration
US5870134A (en) * 1997-03-04 1999-02-09 Com21, Inc. CATV network and cable modem system having a wireless return path
WO2000003542A1 (en) * 1998-07-13 2000-01-20 Uni.Com S.P.A. Optimized system for distributing television and telecommunication services from a peripheral node to user terminals

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2001287072A1 (en) 2002-04-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8005072B2 (en) Synchronization of multiple base stations in a wireless communication system
US10057024B2 (en) Transmission scheme for communication systems
US6614799B1 (en) Method and apparatus for dynamic adjustment of cable modem back-off parameters in a cable modem network
US5960000A (en) System, device, and method for contention-based reservation in a shared medium network
US6980540B1 (en) Apparatus and method for acquiring an uplink traffic channel, in wireless communications systems
US8054856B2 (en) Method for synchronizing voice traffic with minimum latency in a communications network
US5841777A (en) System and method for accommodating ABR and CBR traffic on a shared communications channel
US5886993A (en) System, device, and method for sharing contention mini-slots among multiple priority classes
US8718091B2 (en) Cable modem system with sample and packet synchronization
US7440529B2 (en) Method for synchronization of wireless devices through accelerated advance of counters
US7065378B1 (en) Optimal use of request access TDMA slots for automatic level control
US6031846A (en) Method and apparatus for improved time division multiple access (TDMA) communication
Sala et al. Adaptive control mechanism for cable modem MAC protocols
EP1151582B1 (en) Communication method for a communication network having minimized round-trip contention delay
US8254394B1 (en) Technique for providing constant bit rate (CBR) service over a time-slotted access channel
WO2002025948A1 (en) Increased bandwidth in aloha-based frequency hopping transmission systems
US6807195B1 (en) Synchronization arrangement for packet cable telephony modem
EP1212865B1 (en) Method and apparatus for the synchronization of multiple cable modem termination system devices
US7009993B2 (en) Contention resolution protocol
US20210410167A1 (en) Systems and methods for latency reduction using map staggering
Sala et al. Adaptive MAC protocol for a cable modem
Chiu et al. The MXL MAC protocol for HFC networks
Cohen An efficient scheme for accommodating synchronous traffic in a cable-modem network while avoiding segmentation of asynchronous packets
Jian et al. Dynamic bandwidth allocation scheme for MCNS DOCSIS
Cohen An E cient Scheme for Accommodating Synchronous Tra c in a Cable-Modem Network While Avoiding Segmentation of Asynchronous Packets

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP