WO2001099431A2 - Method and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging system by offsetting pixels - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging system by offsetting pixels Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001099431A2
WO2001099431A2 PCT/US2001/018954 US0118954W WO0199431A2 WO 2001099431 A2 WO2001099431 A2 WO 2001099431A2 US 0118954 W US0118954 W US 0118954W WO 0199431 A2 WO0199431 A2 WO 0199431A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
image
images
pixel
green
color
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/018954
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2001099431A3 (en
Inventor
Wade Thomas Cathey, Jr.
Hans Brandon Wach
Original Assignee
University Technology Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University Technology Corporation filed Critical University Technology Corporation
Priority to AU2001266878A priority Critical patent/AU2001266878A1/en
Publication of WO2001099431A2 publication Critical patent/WO2001099431A2/en
Publication of WO2001099431A3 publication Critical patent/WO2001099431A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/48Increasing resolution by shifting the sensor relative to the scene
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N23/00Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof
    • H04N23/10Cameras or camera modules comprising electronic image sensors; Control thereof for generating image signals from different wavelengths
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N2209/00Details of colour television systems
    • H04N2209/04Picture signal generators
    • H04N2209/041Picture signal generators using solid-state devices
    • H04N2209/042Picture signal generators using solid-state devices having a single pick-up sensor
    • H04N2209/045Picture signal generators using solid-state devices having a single pick-up sensor using mosaic colour filter
    • H04N2209/046Colour interpolation to calculate the missing colour values

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging systems by permanently offsetting pixels in overlapped red, green and blue images and reconstructing the full color image.
  • the first method is to put a color filter array (CFA) over the detector array, such that certain pixels detect certain colors. For example, one third of the pixels would detect red light, one third of the pixels would detect green light, and one third of the pixels would detect blue light.
  • CFA color filter array
  • the result of using such a color filter is that each pixel in the array only sees one color, so that to obtain a full color image, interpolation must be used to estimate the other two colors at each pixel.
  • Figures 1A and 1 B show how this method is used.
  • the image obtained by the detector array through the color filter array has an arrangement of red pixels, blue pixels, and green pixels, for example in the Bayer CFA pattern, as shown in Figure 1A.
  • the intensity of each pixel indicates how much of the selected color of light was detected.
  • all of the pixels have all three colors of light, because the green light is interpolated in some manner, for example between pixels G1 , G4, G5, and G7 to determine the intensity of green light in the upper left hand pixel , and so on.
  • each three color pixel is really accurate only with respect to one of the three colors.
  • the second method is more expensive, and more accurate with respect to color.
  • Three separate detector arrays are used, one for each color. Thus three images, one for each color, are formed. Then the three images are overlapped to give a composite full color image.
  • the grey scale resolution is no better than the first method, but the accuracy of the colors is greater.
  • Figure 2 indicates how the three images are overlapped to generate an accurate three color image.
  • each array has a 100% fill factor (ratio of pixel size to pixel spacing), meaning there is little or no dead space between pixels. This reduces aliasing.
  • Figure 3 shows how this occurs.
  • the main lobe of the image spectrum curve is as narrow as possible (the first zero is at the sampling frequency) when the fill factor is 100%.
  • Aliasing is an important factor in generating color images. Aliasing occurs when the lens presents more spatial detail to the detector array than it can record. The spatial detail that is left over appears as incorrect, less detailed information. That is, the image has errors caused by the detailed information that is masquerading, or aliasing, as less detailed information.
  • the resolution of a detector array can be increased by making multiple exposures of the image and moving the image with respect to the detector array between exposures. For example, if the detector array is shifted by 1/2 pixel, the image resolution recorded by the combination of the two images is doubled in the direction of the shift. This gives erroneous images if the object moves between exposures. For example, a black on white edge would appear as a colored edge.
  • the green CCD image is shifted horizontally and vertically 1/3 of a pixel with respect to the red CCD image
  • the blue CCD image is further shifted horizontally and vertically 1/3 of a pixel with respect to the green CCD image.
  • the detectors themselves need not be moved, but instead the three images can be shifted by the appropriate subpixel amount.
  • the color representation of the resulting image can be as good as the image acquired with the detector arrays aligned, and the resolution can be nearly tripled (the fill factor must be decreased to triple the resolution).
  • n arrays are used.
  • Each array has pixels of height p and width ⁇ , and each one is shifted by p/n vertically and/ or ⁇ /n horizontally.
  • Another embodiment uses three detector arrays, each with a color filter array on it, and displaces the images by subpixel amounts as described above.
  • One advantage of this approach is that some color filter arrays allot proportionally more pixels to green, because it is more important to human viewers.
  • An example of a color filter array is the Bayer pattern color filter array, shown in Figure 1 (prior art).
  • the color recovery process also called reconstruction, is aided by use of one of several interpolation methods.
  • the simplest method entails replicating the color value of each pixel nine times (in a 3 by 3 array) and using the raw red, green, and blue values at each effective pixel location.
  • a second reconstruction method entails using simple linear interpolation of each color plane.
  • a third reconstruction method interpolates the green color plane by means of linear interpolation, and then interpolates the red and blue color planes with help from the knowledge of the green color plane.
  • Figure 1 A shows an image obtained by a detector array through the color filter array.
  • Figure 1 B shows the reconstructed three color image with one method for interpolating the pixels of the image of Figure 1A.
  • Figure 2 indicates how the three one color images are overlapped to reconstruct a three color image.
  • Figure 3 shows the image spatial frequency spectrum curve obtained using the method of Figure 2.
  • Figure 4 is a diagram showing red, green, and blue CCD images with offset pixels according to the present invention.
  • Figure 5 shows the image spectrum curve obtained using the offset pixel method of Figure 4.
  • Figure 6A is a diagram showing three images obtained by detectors through Bayer color filter arrays with offset pixels.
  • Figure 6B is a diagram showing a similar two detector embodiment.
  • Figure 7 shows a three by three array of reconstituted pixels obtained by a first reconstruction method according to the present invention.
  • Figure 8A is a diagram showing a blue array with zero padding and Figure 8B shows a low pass filter for filtering this array illustrating a second reconstruction method according to the present invention.
  • Figure 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a third reconstruction method according to the present invention.
  • FIG 4 is a diagram showing red, green, and blue CCD images with offset pixels according to the present invention. These CCD images are shown as arrays having three by three pixels, for simplicity. In practical use, the CCD images would be on the order of 500 by 500 pixels, or larger.
  • red CCD image 402 is overlaid by blue CCD image 404, which in turn is overlaid by green CCD image 406.
  • blue CCD image 404 is offset by 1/3 of a pixel, both vertically and horizontally, from red CCD image 402.
  • Green CCD image 406 is further offset by 1/3 of a pixel both vertically and horizontally, in the same direction. This orientation results in an effective sample rate that is three times the normal sampling rate, vertically and horizontally, of the individual CCD arrays.
  • the effective sample rate around the perimeter of the overlaid image is not as high, but in most imaging systems, there are surplus pixels around the perimeter of the array detector.
  • Each sensor, or CCD has its own inherent resolution cutoff, which is affected by both the pixel spacing and the pixel size.
  • the digital signal processing combines the three images from the CCDs and forms the effective pixels, reconstructing the image.
  • Figure 7 shows the simplest method of reconstruction in the embodiment of Figure 4.
  • n arrays could be used.
  • Each array has pixels of height p and width ⁇ , and each one is shifted by p/n vertically and/or ⁇ /n horizontally.
  • Figure 5 shows the image spectrum curve obtained using the offset pixel method of Figure 4.
  • Curve 506 is the closest replicated spectrum (caused by the sampling) that remains after sampling with a 1/2 pixel shift. For example, the blue image may be moved down 1/2 pixel and the green image may be moved to the side 1/2 pixel.
  • Curve 508 is the closest replicated spectrum that remains after sampling with a 1/3 pixel shift, and shows that again there is no aliasing.
  • the blue image might be moved down 1/3 pixel and to the right 1/3 pixel
  • the green image might be moved down 2/3 pixel and to the right 2/3 pixel.
  • Curve 510 is a sine function related to the width of the pixel, and provides low pass filtering of the image. To increase the resolution in the case of a 1/3 pixel shift, the pixel size (and hence the fill factor) must be reduced. This broadens the sine function and thereby passes higher frequencies. Any replicated spectrum that overlapped the image spectrum would result in aliasing of the image. Comparison with the image spectrum of Figure 3 (prior art) shows how the resolution has increased, and aliasing has been greatly reduced or eliminated.
  • FIG. 6A is a diagram showing three images obtained by detectors through Bayer color filter arrays with offset pixels.
  • Bayer color filter arrays CFAs
  • CFAs use twice as many green pixels as red or blue pixels, because green is the most important color to human viewers.
  • the three images are overlaid in an offset manner as described above.
  • CCD CFAs take on many different forms and are usually designed to facilitate reconstruction through knowledge of the human visual system.
  • the idea of using shifted CCD arrays to increase resolution, antialiasing and color performance can be extended to use any combination of CFAs. Another such example might be the use of one green CCD and two Bayer CFAs.
  • Figure 6B shows an alternative embodiment, wherein one detector array could be used to detect the green portion of images, and a second array with red and blue filters could be displaced 1/2 pixel both in the x and y directions. This doubles the resolution of the system, reduces aliasing, provides more green information for the color interpolation (or image reconstruction), and reduces the number of CCD arrays needed.
  • Figure 7 shows a three by three array of reconstituted effective pixels obtained by the simplest reconstruction method (for example section 408 of Figure 4, coterminous with blue pixel 22). This method of reconstruction entails replicating the value of each color pixel nine times (in a three by three array), and applying the raw red, green, and blue values at each location.
  • FIGs 8a and 8b illustrate linear interpolation of each channel, or color plane.
  • Figure 8A is a diagram showing a blue array with zero padding.
  • Each channel or color plane is increased to nine times its original size (e.g. A 100 by 100 pixel array would be transformed into a 300 by 300 value array) by inserting eight zeroes around each pixel value.
  • a simple low pass filter is then applied to each channel in order to replace the inserted zeroes with their estimated values as shown in Figure 8B.
  • Figure 8B shows a five by five low pass filter for filtering the array of Figure 8A (the filter can also be larger).
  • the coefficients used in the filter are denoted u, w, x, y, z and can be optimized for best performance by those skilled in the art of filter design.
  • This reconstruction method produces a better image than the method shown in Figure 7, but it ignores the fact that the human eye responds better to green light than to red or blue. Also, it blindly interpolates each channel separately.
  • Figure 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a third reconstruction method, which interpolates the green channel first, and then uses the results to better interpolate the red and blue channels. This method avoids the blind interpolation of the previous method and also utilizes a major aspect of the human visual system.
  • the above objective is achieved as illustrated in Figure 9. Again, eight zeros are placed around the known blue values to create a zero-padded version of the blue channel as shown in Figure 8A.
  • the zero-padded blue channel and the interpolated green channel are divided on a pixel by pixel basis. This yields a new channel that has ratios of blue and green at pixel locations where blue was known and zeros elsewhere.

Abstract

Methods and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging systems reposition the fixed detector arrays (or the red, green, and blue images on the detector arrays) so that the resolution of the composite three color image is increased. For example, the green CCD image is shifted horizontally and vertically 1/3 of a pixel with respect to the red CCD image, and the blue CCD image is further shifted horizontally and vertically 1/3 of a pixel with respect to the green CCD image. Image alignment may be accomplished with some combination of CCD movement and/or image movement. The color recovery process, also called reconstruction, may be aided by use of one of several interpolation methods. Color filter arrays may be used over the CCDs.

Description

METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR INCREASING RESOLUTION IN DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEMS BY OFFSETTING PIXELS
This invention was made with Government support awarded by the national science foundation under Grant Number NSF MIP-9613754 and the Army Research Office under Grant Number DOD DAAG 55-97-1 -
0348. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging systems by permanently offsetting pixels in overlapped red, green and blue images and reconstructing the full color image.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
In digital cameras, there are two generally accepted methods for acquiring color images using a light detector array. The first method is to put a color filter array (CFA) over the detector array, such that certain pixels detect certain colors. For example, one third of the pixels would detect red light, one third of the pixels would detect green light, and one third of the pixels would detect blue light. The result of using such a color filter is that each pixel in the array only sees one color, so that to obtain a full color image, interpolation must be used to estimate the other two colors at each pixel. Figures 1A and 1 B (prior art) show how this method is used. The image obtained by the detector array through the color filter array has an arrangement of red pixels, blue pixels, and green pixels, for example in the Bayer CFA pattern, as shown in Figure 1A. The intensity of each pixel indicates how much of the selected color of light was detected. In Figure 1 B all of the pixels have all three colors of light, because the green light is interpolated in some manner, for example between pixels G1 , G4, G5, and G7 to determine the intensity of green light in the upper left hand pixel , and so on. Thus, each three color pixel is really accurate only with respect to one of the three colors.
The second method is more expensive, and more accurate with respect to color. Three separate detector arrays are used, one for each color. Thus three images, one for each color, are formed. Then the three images are overlapped to give a composite full color image. The grey scale resolution is no better than the first method, but the accuracy of the colors is greater. Figure 2 (prior art) indicates how the three images are overlapped to generate an accurate three color image. In addition, each array has a 100% fill factor (ratio of pixel size to pixel spacing), meaning there is little or no dead space between pixels. This reduces aliasing. Figure 3 (prior art) shows how this occurs. The main lobe of the image spectrum curve is as narrow as possible (the first zero is at the sampling frequency) when the fill factor is 100%.
Aliasing is an important factor in generating color images. Aliasing occurs when the lens presents more spatial detail to the detector array than it can record. The spatial detail that is left over appears as incorrect, less detailed information. That is, the image has errors caused by the detailed information that is masquerading, or aliasing, as less detailed information.
It is known in the art that the resolution of a detector array can be increased by making multiple exposures of the image and moving the image with respect to the detector array between exposures. For example, if the detector array is shifted by 1/2 pixel, the image resolution recorded by the combination of the two images is doubled in the direction of the shift. This gives erroneous images if the object moves between exposures. For example, a black on white edge would appear as a colored edge.
A need remains in the art for methods and apparatus for increasing resolution and reducing aliasing in digital imaging systems by permanently offsetting pixels in overlapped red, green and blue images and properly reconstructing the full color image.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide methods and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging systems by permanently offsetting pixels in overlapped red, green and blue images and properly reconstructing the full color image.
This is accomplished by repositioning the fixed detector arrays (or the red, green, and blue images on the detector arrays) so that the resolution of the composite three color image is increased. For example, the green CCD image is shifted horizontally and vertically 1/3 of a pixel with respect to the red CCD image, and the blue CCD image is further shifted horizontally and vertically 1/3 of a pixel with respect to the green CCD image. The detectors themselves need not be moved, but instead the three images can be shifted by the appropriate subpixel amount. The color representation of the resulting image can be as good as the image acquired with the detector arrays aligned, and the resolution can be nearly tripled (the fill factor must be decreased to triple the resolution).
In the general case, n arrays are used. Each array has pixels of height p and width σ, and each one is shifted by p/n vertically and/ or σ/n horizontally.
Another embodiment uses three detector arrays, each with a color filter array on it, and displaces the images by subpixel amounts as described above. One advantage of this approach is that some color filter arrays allot proportionally more pixels to green, because it is more important to human viewers. An example of a color filter array is the Bayer pattern color filter array, shown in Figure 1 (prior art).
The color recovery process, also called reconstruction, is aided by use of one of several interpolation methods. The simplest method entails replicating the color value of each pixel nine times (in a 3 by 3 array) and using the raw red, green, and blue values at each effective pixel location.
A second reconstruction method entails using simple linear interpolation of each color plane. A third reconstruction method interpolates the green color plane by means of linear interpolation, and then interpolates the red and blue color planes with help from the knowledge of the green color plane.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 A (prior art) shows an image obtained by a detector array through the color filter array.
Figure 1 B (prior art) shows the reconstructed three color image with one method for interpolating the pixels of the image of Figure 1A.
Figure 2 (prior art) indicates how the three one color images are overlapped to reconstruct a three color image.
Figure 3 (prior art) shows the image spatial frequency spectrum curve obtained using the method of Figure 2.
Figure 4 is a diagram showing red, green, and blue CCD images with offset pixels according to the present invention.
Figure 5 shows the image spectrum curve obtained using the offset pixel method of Figure 4.
Figure 6A is a diagram showing three images obtained by detectors through Bayer color filter arrays with offset pixels. Figure 6B is a diagram showing a similar two detector embodiment.
Figure 7 shows a three by three array of reconstituted pixels obtained by a first reconstruction method according to the present invention.
Figure 8A is a diagram showing a blue array with zero padding and Figure 8B shows a low pass filter for filtering this array illustrating a second reconstruction method according to the present invention. Figure 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a third reconstruction method according to the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Figure 4 is a diagram showing red, green, and blue CCD images with offset pixels according to the present invention. These CCD images are shown as arrays having three by three pixels, for simplicity. In practical use, the CCD images would be on the order of 500 by 500 pixels, or larger.
In the example of Figure 4, red CCD image 402 is overlaid by blue CCD image 404, which in turn is overlaid by green CCD image 406. In one preferred embodiment, blue CCD image 404 is offset by 1/3 of a pixel, both vertically and horizontally, from red CCD image 402. Green CCD image 406 is further offset by 1/3 of a pixel both vertically and horizontally, in the same direction. This orientation results in an effective sample rate that is three times the normal sampling rate, vertically and horizontally, of the individual CCD arrays. The effective sample rate around the perimeter of the overlaid image is not as high, but in most imaging systems, there are surplus pixels around the perimeter of the array detector.
Each sensor, or CCD, has its own inherent resolution cutoff, which is affected by both the pixel spacing and the pixel size. The digital signal processing combines the three images from the CCDs and forms the effective pixels, reconstructing the image. Figure 7 shows the simplest method of reconstruction in the embodiment of Figure 4. In the general case, n arrays could be used. Each array has pixels of height p and width σ, and each one is shifted by p/n vertically and/or σ/n horizontally. The detected image in the horizontal dimension, yh, can then be written as: n-l yh = [g(x) *rect ] 3 comb(^) (1) i=0
Where g(x) is the intensity distribution at the detector, * indicates the convolution operator,
#1/2 rect(x) = <0, otherwise and comb (x) = 3 δ(x-k) =-4
Taking the Fourier transform of (1) the spectrum of the detected image is n-1 yh = σ2G(u)sinc(σu) *comb(σu) 3 exp(-j 2πui -J) (2) i=0
The summation in (2) can be rewritten as,
|^xp(-jπu ) 3 exp(jπu — (2i+ 1)), neven
"J σ — i=-n/2
3 exp(-i2πui — ) = έ (3) ι=o n I (n-l)σ (n~1)/2 σ
I exp(-jπu ) 3 exp(jπu — 2i), nodd
< n i=-(n-l)/2
Using the Euler relation the summations in (3) can be written as cosines as:
(4)
Figure imgf000010_0001
Two cases of particular interest are when n=2 and n=3. Ignoring the phase term, which is not detected by a CCD, the image spectra of these two cases are:
yh |n=2 = σ2G(u)sinc(σu) * 2cos(2πu— )comb(σu) (5a)
|n=3 = σ2G(u)sinc(σu) * (l +2cos(2πuγ ))comb(σu) (5b)
Figure 5 shows the image spectrum curve obtained using the offset pixel method of Figure 4.
Curve 506 is the closest replicated spectrum (caused by the sampling) that remains after sampling with a 1/2 pixel shift. For example, the blue image may be moved down 1/2 pixel and the green image may be moved to the side 1/2 pixel.
Curve 508 is the closest replicated spectrum that remains after sampling with a 1/3 pixel shift, and shows that again there is no aliasing. In this case the blue image might be moved down 1/3 pixel and to the right 1/3 pixel, and the green image might be moved down 2/3 pixel and to the right 2/3 pixel. Curve 510 is a sine function related to the width of the pixel, and provides low pass filtering of the image. To increase the resolution in the case of a 1/3 pixel shift, the pixel size (and hence the fill factor) must be reduced. This broadens the sine function and thereby passes higher frequencies. Any replicated spectrum that overlapped the image spectrum would result in aliasing of the image. Comparison with the image spectrum of Figure 3 (prior art) shows how the resolution has increased, and aliasing has been greatly reduced or eliminated.
Figure 6A is a diagram showing three images obtained by detectors through Bayer color filter arrays with offset pixels. Bayer color filter arrays (CFAs) use twice as many green pixels as red or blue pixels, because green is the most important color to human viewers. The three images (for example) are overlaid in an offset manner as described above. There are a multitude of variations on this idea not only in reconstruction methods but also in the CCD CFAs used. These CFAs take on many different forms and are usually designed to facilitate reconstruction through knowledge of the human visual system. The idea of using shifted CCD arrays to increase resolution, antialiasing and color performance can be extended to use any combination of CFAs. Another such example might be the use of one green CCD and two Bayer CFAs.
Figure 6B shows an alternative embodiment, wherein one detector array could be used to detect the green portion of images, and a second array with red and blue filters could be displaced 1/2 pixel both in the x and y directions. This doubles the resolution of the system, reduces aliasing, provides more green information for the color interpolation (or image reconstruction), and reduces the number of CCD arrays needed.
Given the 1/3 pixel shifting described with regard to Figure 6A, a generalized pixel results in nine effective pixels, as shown in Figure 4. Figure 7 shows a three by three array of reconstituted effective pixels obtained by the simplest reconstruction method (for example section 408 of Figure 4, coterminous with blue pixel 22). This method of reconstruction entails replicating the value of each color pixel nine times (in a three by three array), and applying the raw red, green, and blue values at each location.
The present method does not attempt to increase the resolution of each channel, but rather that of the final three-color image. In order to prevent unwanted color effects in the final image, some form of reconstruction is desirable. Figures 8a and 8b illustrate linear interpolation of each channel, or color plane.
Figure 8A is a diagram showing a blue array with zero padding. Each channel or color plane is increased to nine times its original size (e.g. A 100 by 100 pixel array would be transformed into a 300 by 300 value array) by inserting eight zeroes around each pixel value. A simple low pass filter is then applied to each channel in order to replace the inserted zeroes with their estimated values as shown in Figure 8B.
Figure 8B shows a five by five low pass filter for filtering the array of Figure 8A (the filter can also be larger). The coefficients used in the filter are denoted u, w, x, y, z and can be optimized for best performance by those skilled in the art of filter design. The only restriction on the coefficients of the filter shown in Figure 8B are that x+z=1 and 2w+y+u=1. This reconstruction method produces a better image than the method shown in Figure 7, but it ignores the fact that the human eye responds better to green light than to red or blue. Also, it blindly interpolates each channel separately.
Figure 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a third reconstruction method, which interpolates the green channel first, and then uses the results to better interpolate the red and blue channels. This method avoids the blind interpolation of the previous method and also utilizes a major aspect of the human visual system. In the case of the blue channel, the above objective is achieved as illustrated in Figure 9. Again, eight zeros are placed around the known blue values to create a zero-padded version of the blue channel as shown in Figure 8A. The zero-padded blue channel and the interpolated green channel are divided on a pixel by pixel basis. This yields a new channel that has ratios of blue and green at pixel locations where blue was known and zeros elsewhere. It is this new channel that is then lowpass filtered, recalling the same nuances described in the method above, to replace the zero values. Finally, a pixel by pixel multiplication with the resulting channel and the interpolated green channel produces the final interpolated blue channel. An identical process is used to interpolate the red channel. The three interpolated channels now compose a reconstructed image with increased resolution, antialiasing and color performance.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that many other configurations fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
What is claimed is:

Claims

1 . Improved apparatus for increasing resolution in a digital imaging system of the type having at least two fixed detector arrays for imaging an object and reconstruction means for composing a composite image from the images captured by the detector arrays, wherein the improvement comprises:
each detector array is located such that its captured image is shifted by a subpixel amount with respect to the images captured by the other detector arrays; and
the reconstruction means provides color for each portion of the shifted images.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 , having two fixed detector arrays, one configured for capturing a red and blue image, and the other for capturing a green image, wherein the images captured by the detector arrays are shifted 1/2 of a pixel with respect to each other captured image.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 having three fixed detector arrays.
4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the three detector arrays are configured for capturing a red, a green, and a blue image, and wherein the images captured by the detector arrays are shifted 1/3 of a pixel with respect to each other captured image.
5. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the three detector arrays are configured for capturing Bayer pattern images, and wherein the images captured by the detector arrays are shifted 1/3 of a pixel with respect to each other captured image.
6. A method of imaging an object comprising the steps of:
(a) capturing three images of the object;
(b) shifting each captured image a subpixel amount with respect to the other captured images; and
(c) interpolating between the shifted images to form a composite image.
7. A method of imaging an object comprising the steps of:
(a) capturing two images of the object;
(b) shifting each captured image a subpixel amount with respect to the other captured image; and
(c) interpolating between the shifted images to form a composite image.
PCT/US2001/018954 2000-06-16 2001-06-13 Method and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging system by offsetting pixels WO2001099431A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2001266878A AU2001266878A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2001-06-13 Methods and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging systems by offsetting pixels

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US59615300A 2000-06-16 2000-06-16
US09/596,153 2000-06-16

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001099431A2 true WO2001099431A2 (en) 2001-12-27
WO2001099431A3 WO2001099431A3 (en) 2002-03-28

Family

ID=24386172

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/018954 WO2001099431A2 (en) 2000-06-16 2001-06-13 Method and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging system by offsetting pixels

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2001266878A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001099431A2 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1528814A2 (en) 2003-10-31 2005-05-04 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Imaging apparatus
US7031054B2 (en) 2002-10-09 2006-04-18 The Regent Of The University Of Colorado Methods and systems for reducing depth of field of hybrid imaging systems
US7180673B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2007-02-20 Cdm Optics, Inc. Mechanically-adjustable optical phase filters for modifying depth of field, aberration-tolerance, anti-aliasing in optical systems
WO2007093241A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2007-08-23 OCé PRINTING SYSTEMS GMBH Method and device for scanning images
US7417601B2 (en) 2003-05-20 2008-08-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Projector systems
US7469202B2 (en) 2003-12-01 2008-12-23 Omnivision Cdm Optics, Inc. System and method for optimizing optical and digital system designs
US7732750B2 (en) 1995-02-03 2010-06-08 The Regents Of The University Of Colorado Wavefront coding interference contrast imaging systems
US7773143B2 (en) 2004-04-08 2010-08-10 Tessera North America, Inc. Thin color camera having sub-pixel resolution
US7944467B2 (en) 2003-12-01 2011-05-17 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. Task-based imaging systems
US8049806B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2011-11-01 Digitaloptics Corporation East Thin camera and associated methods
US8144208B2 (en) 2003-12-01 2012-03-27 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. Task-based imaging systems
US8724006B2 (en) 2004-01-26 2014-05-13 Flir Systems, Inc. Focal plane coding for digital imaging
US8953087B2 (en) 2004-04-08 2015-02-10 Flir Systems Trading Belgium Bvba Camera system and associated methods

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4725881A (en) * 1984-05-19 1988-02-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for increasing the resolution of a color television camera with three mutually-shifted solid-state image sensors
US5442394A (en) * 1991-02-26 1995-08-15 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for improving the resolution of three CCD camera and apparatus thereof
US5532742A (en) * 1992-07-22 1996-07-02 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Image pickup apparatus with horizontal line interpolation function having three image pickup units shifted in vertical phase from one another
US5640206A (en) * 1994-05-31 1997-06-17 Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. Imaging apparatus including offset pixels for generating vertical high frequency component
EP0888001A2 (en) * 1997-06-27 1998-12-30 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image pickup apparatus

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3024370B2 (en) * 1992-07-22 2000-03-21 松下電器産業株式会社 Imaging device with horizontal line interpolation function

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4725881A (en) * 1984-05-19 1988-02-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for increasing the resolution of a color television camera with three mutually-shifted solid-state image sensors
US5442394A (en) * 1991-02-26 1995-08-15 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for improving the resolution of three CCD camera and apparatus thereof
US5532742A (en) * 1992-07-22 1996-07-02 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Image pickup apparatus with horizontal line interpolation function having three image pickup units shifted in vertical phase from one another
US5640206A (en) * 1994-05-31 1997-06-17 Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. Imaging apparatus including offset pixels for generating vertical high frequency component
EP0888001A2 (en) * 1997-06-27 1998-12-30 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image pickup apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 018, no. 275 (E-1553), 25 May 1994 (1994-05-25) & JP 06 046433 A (MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC IND CO LTD), 18 February 1994 (1994-02-18) *

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7732750B2 (en) 1995-02-03 2010-06-08 The Regents Of The University Of Colorado Wavefront coding interference contrast imaging systems
US7031054B2 (en) 2002-10-09 2006-04-18 The Regent Of The University Of Colorado Methods and systems for reducing depth of field of hybrid imaging systems
US7180673B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2007-02-20 Cdm Optics, Inc. Mechanically-adjustable optical phase filters for modifying depth of field, aberration-tolerance, anti-aliasing in optical systems
US7679830B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2010-03-16 The Regents Of The University Of Colorado Optical systems utilizing multiple phase filters to increase misfocus tolerance
US7417601B2 (en) 2003-05-20 2008-08-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Projector systems
EP1528814A3 (en) * 2003-10-31 2007-01-03 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Imaging apparatus
US7961235B2 (en) 2003-10-31 2011-06-14 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Imaging apparatuses, image data processing methods, and articles of manufacture
EP1528814A2 (en) 2003-10-31 2005-05-04 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Imaging apparatus
US7944467B2 (en) 2003-12-01 2011-05-17 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. Task-based imaging systems
US7860699B2 (en) 2003-12-01 2010-12-28 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. System and method for optimizing optical and digital system designs
US7469202B2 (en) 2003-12-01 2008-12-23 Omnivision Cdm Optics, Inc. System and method for optimizing optical and digital system designs
US8144208B2 (en) 2003-12-01 2012-03-27 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. Task-based imaging systems
US8760516B2 (en) 2003-12-01 2014-06-24 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. Task-based imaging systems
US8724006B2 (en) 2004-01-26 2014-05-13 Flir Systems, Inc. Focal plane coding for digital imaging
US7773143B2 (en) 2004-04-08 2010-08-10 Tessera North America, Inc. Thin color camera having sub-pixel resolution
US8953087B2 (en) 2004-04-08 2015-02-10 Flir Systems Trading Belgium Bvba Camera system and associated methods
US8049806B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2011-11-01 Digitaloptics Corporation East Thin camera and associated methods
US7746519B2 (en) 2006-02-14 2010-06-29 Oce Printing Systems Gmbh Method and device for scanning images
WO2007093241A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2007-08-23 OCé PRINTING SYSTEMS GMBH Method and device for scanning images

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2001099431A3 (en) 2002-03-28
AU2001266878A1 (en) 2002-01-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5778106A (en) Electronic camera with reduced color artifacts
Chang et al. Effective use of spatial and spectral correlations for color filter array demosaicking
CA1287163C (en) Method and apparatus for reconstructing missing color samples
Hubel et al. Spatial frequency response of color image sensors: Bayer color filters and Foveon X3
US7701496B2 (en) Color filter pattern for color filter arrays including a demosaicking algorithm
US6181376B1 (en) Method of determining missing color values for pixels in a color filter array
EP1227661A2 (en) Method and apparatus for generating and storing extended dynamic range digital images
US20070159542A1 (en) Color filter array with neutral elements and color image formation
WO2001099431A2 (en) Method and apparatus for increasing resolution in digital imaging system by offsetting pixels
JP2000134634A (en) Image converting method
EP1209900B1 (en) Method and apparatus for performing tone scale modifications
JP3908169B2 (en) Method and system for sensing and interpolating color image data
US6842191B1 (en) Color image restoration with anti-alias
Hirakawa et al. Spatio-spectral sampling and color filter array design
KR20020039633A (en) Image processing apparatus and method
DE60114520T2 (en) Color imaging device
JP2004519156A (en) Contour filter for output signal of image detector
Guttosch Investigation of Color Aliasing of High Spatial Frequencies and Edges for Bayer-Pattern Sensors and Foveon X3® Direct Image Sensors
Alleysson et al. Frequency selection demosaicking: A review and a look ahead
JP2004023384A (en) Method for interpolating pixel signal such as tesselated green signal in interleave relation of single-plate color camera
US20080199105A1 (en) Method and Apparatus for Spatial Interpolation of Colour Images
Lee et al. High quality image interpolation for color filter arrays
Kriss Tradeoff between aliasing artifacts and sharpness in assessing image quality
JP3965457B2 (en) Interpolation method for interleaved pixel signals such as checkered array green signal for single-panel color camera
Muresan et al. Reconstruction of color images from CCD arrays

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP