WO2001071778A2 - Nanometric scale coherently controlled deposition - Google Patents

Nanometric scale coherently controlled deposition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001071778A2
WO2001071778A2 PCT/IL2001/000269 IL0100269W WO0171778A2 WO 2001071778 A2 WO2001071778 A2 WO 2001071778A2 IL 0100269 W IL0100269 W IL 0100269W WO 0171778 A2 WO0171778 A2 WO 0171778A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
molecules
atoms
predetermined pattern
electromagnetic field
deposition
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IL2001/000269
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2001071778A3 (en
Inventor
Paul Brumer
Dey Bijoy
Moshe Shapiro
Original Assignee
Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/531,036 external-priority patent/US6548124B1/en
Application filed by Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. filed Critical Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd.
Priority to AU2001244499A priority Critical patent/AU2001244499A1/en
Publication of WO2001071778A2 publication Critical patent/WO2001071778A2/en
Publication of WO2001071778A3 publication Critical patent/WO2001071778A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y30/00Nanotechnology for materials or surface science, e.g. nanocomposites
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82BNANOSTRUCTURES FORMED BY MANIPULATION OF INDIVIDUAL ATOMS, MOLECULES, OR LIMITED COLLECTIONS OF ATOMS OR MOLECULES AS DISCRETE UNITS; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT THEREOF
    • B82B3/00Manufacture or treatment of nanostructures by manipulation of individual atoms or molecules, or limited collections of atoms or molecules as discrete units
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y40/00Manufacture or treatment of nanostructures
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/04Coating on selected surface areas, e.g. using masks
    • C23C14/048Coating on selected surface areas, e.g. using masks using irradiation by energy or particles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F1/00Originals for photomechanical production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g., masks, photo-masks, reticles; Mask blanks or pellicles therefor; Containers specially adapted therefor; Preparation thereof
    • G03F1/68Preparation processes not covered by groups G03F1/20 - G03F1/50
    • G03F1/76Patterning of masks by imaging
    • G03F1/78Patterning of masks by imaging by charged particle beam [CPB], e.g. electron beam patterning of masks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/0005Production of optical devices or components in so far as characterised by the lithographic processes or materials used therefor
    • G03F7/001Phase modulating patterns, e.g. refractive index patterns
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70375Multiphoton lithography or multiphoton photopolymerization; Imaging systems comprising means for converting one type of radiation into another type of radiation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of the controlled deposition of molecules and atoms on surfaces on a nanometric scale.
  • a method of depositing molecules is also described in the above mentioned Celotta et al. patent, whereby more than one atomic species are concurrently evaporated onto the desired substrate surface.
  • One of the atomic species is focused into the desired pattern on the substrate by selecting the conditions to ensure that it is in resonance with the applied laser field, and the other, or others, are applied uniformly.
  • the two atomic species react chemically to form the desired molecular deposit.
  • a method for the formation of an array of spots of Cr0 2 is described therein. It is evident that this method for the deposition of molecules is complicated to perform, is limited to only specific molecules, and may prove difficult to achieve good stoichiometry.
  • the present invention seeks to provide a new method and apparatus for the optical focusing of atomic or molecular beams, such that the atoms or molecules can be deposited in aperiodic structures, with resolutions of down to 10-15 nanometers.
  • the ability to deposit atoms or molecules on surfaces at a nanometric scale has important applications in the semiconductor industry for the purposes of direct deposition etching and for other lithographic processes.
  • the nature of the pattern formed, including the position and width of the component parts of the pattern, are altered by varying a number of parameters associated with the beam preparation and with the electromagnetic fields to which the beam is subjected.
  • a beam of atoms or molecules, aimed at the surface on which the deposition is required, is preferably sent through a skimmer to minimize velocity components perpendicular to the direction of the beam.
  • the beam is then preferably further collimated by means of laser cooling or by sympathetic cooling or supersonic expansion, in order to reduce the transverse velocity to minimal levels.
  • the laser cooling can be performed by any of the methods known in the art. One such method is described in the article co-authored by one of the present applicants, entitled “Complete population transfer to and from a continuum and the radiative association of cold Na atoms to produce translationally cold Na 2 molecules in specific vib-rotational states" published in Optics Express, Vol.
  • laser cooling may be achieved by passing the atoms through counterpropagating laser fields, though this method is not fully developed at the time of this application for use with molecular beams. It may also be possible to use only mechanical cooling techniques, as described by Drodofsky et al. in an article in Microelectronic Eng. Vol. 30, p. 383ff, (1996), though the beam intensities in this method are very small, and the deposition rates are thus very much slower.
  • the transverse- velocity cooled atomic or molecular beam is then subjected to an electromagnetic field such as may be provided by one or more laser beams, either pulsed or CW, which prepares a linear superposition of states.
  • an electromagnetic field such as may be provided by one or more laser beams, either pulsed or CW, which prepares a linear superposition of states.
  • this superposition could preferably be of bound states primarily through a two photon absorption process.
  • the superposition could preferably be formed of Rydberg states.
  • This operation is another application of the process of coherent control, which has been developed recently to affect atomic and molecular processes by means of quantum interference. Up to now, coherent control has been used to control the outcome of unimolecular processes such as photodissociation, and more recently, collisional and scattering processes.
  • the prepared atomic or molecular beam then preferably passes through two or more standing electromagnetic fields directed parallel to the surface, which too may be produced by means of interacting laser beams.
  • the nature of the pattern deposited on the surface can be controlled, including the position, intensity and resolution of the component parts of the pattern.
  • the pattern displays a large background with several relatively low intense peaks when there is no atomic or molecular coherence, whereas the peaks become intense and the background weak when the atomic or molecular coherence is introduced.
  • a method of depositing atoms or molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of the atoms or molecules.
  • the first laser is either a CW or a pulsed laser.
  • the predetermined pattern is aperiodic and may be determined at least by the parameters of the first electromagnetic field and by the parameters of the second electromagnetic field.
  • a system for the deposition of atoms or molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of the atoms or molecules.
  • a system for the deposition of atoms or molecules as described above consisting of a source emitting a beam of the atoms or molecules, a laser cooling stage for minimizing the transverse velocity components of the molecules of the beam, a first electromagnetic field through which the beam is directed, operative to produce a superposition of states of the atoms or molecules, and a second electromagnetic field, through which the beam is thereafter directed, such that the atoms or molecules are focused onto the surface in the predetermined pattern.
  • Fig.l is a schematic representation of a system for performing coherently controlled atomic or molecular beam optical focusing, such as is suitable for executing nanolithography, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • Figs. 2(a) to 2(d) show how the density distribution of deposition of molecules and the optical potential vary along the z-direction, both in the presence of and in the absence of molecular coherence;
  • Figs. 3(a) to 3(d) are plotted under the same conditions as Figs. 2(a) to 2(d), but show an enlarged section in the z-direction;
  • Figs. 4(a) to 4(d) show the separate contributions to the molecular density as a function of z, due to the first and second SW fields, taking into account only the non-interference term of the optical potential;
  • Figs. 5(a) to 5(f) show the dependence of the deposition density on different superpositions of states, using the superposition (
  • Figs. 6(a) to 6(f) show the dependence of the deposition density on different superpositions of states, using the superposition (
  • Figs. 7(a) to 7(f) show the dependence of the deposition density on
  • Figs. 8(a) to 8(d) show plots of the optical potential for the superposition between
  • Figs. 9(a) to 9(c) displays the density distribution for three different values of phase between the two standing waves, for the superposition
  • Figs. 11(a) to 11(f) show the variation in the form and intensity of the strongest peak shown in Fig. 9(b), as a function of the intensity of the two S W fields, for six different values of the field of SW2;
  • Figs. 12(a) to 12(c) show plots of the density distribution for three different values of the interaction time, T ⁇ , for the superposition
  • Figs. 13(a) to 13(d) show the density distribution of deposition as a function of free flight distance, L ff for four different values of L f
  • Figs. 14(a) to 14(d) show the width of a typical deposited peak as a function of the rotational temperature of the molecules, for four different values of T r ;
  • Figs. 15(a) to 15(d) are graphs which show the density distribution for the deposition of atomic rubidium for different interaction times, both in the presence of and in the absence of coherent control.
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates a preferred embodiment of an apparatus for the execution of coherently controlled atomic or molecular beam optical focusing, such as is suitable for the performance of nanolithography.
  • the source 2 produces a beam of atoms or molecules, which is preferably cooled by thermal expansion through a supersonic nozzle 3, such as is well known in the art.
  • the beam may then preferably be further collimated mechanically by an exit aperture 8.
  • the transverse velocity spread is preferably reduced to minimal levels by means of laser cooling, such as by an optical pumping and trapping process.
  • laser cooling such as by an optical pumping and trapping process.
  • not all of these cooling processes may be used in performing the molecular deposition, but the outcome may be poorer spatial resolution, and, if at least the laser cooling process is not used, very much slower deposition rates.
  • the laser cooling may be preferably performed for an atomic beam by passing the beam through two counter-propagating laser beams 5 and 6, produced by reflecting one laser beam back along itself by means of an end mirror 7.
  • the laser is tuned to the appropriate frequency to effect the cooling as is known in the art. If lower transverse velocities are required then additional laser cooling methods known in the art, such as Sisyphus, can be used. Molecules are preferably cooled to a single rotational state.
  • the beam should preferably be collimated to have a residual transverse velocity of less than 10 nm/t d , where t d is the flight time in seconds from the beam source to the surface.
  • the highly collimated beam 10 propagates along the x direction and then passes through a preparatory electromagnetic field 12, which produces a linear superposition of states of the atoms or molecules.
  • the electromagnetic field is preferably produced by means of a laser 13.
  • the beam then preferably passes through two standing waves (SW) 14, 16 of a radiation field, preferably formed by retro-reflecting off a mirror 18, two near resonant, CW laser beams 20, 22, positioned above the substrate 24 onto which the molecules are to be deposited.
  • SW standing waves
  • the atoms or molecules experience a dipole force, due to the SW-induced optical potential (OP), which acts as an array of lenses, causing those atoms or molecules in the beam with kinetic energy less than the depth of the OP to focus into predefined patterns 26 as they deposit onto the substrate 24.
  • OP SW-induced optical potential
  • the kinetic energy of the beam in the x-direction v is approximately fixed and is much larger than the magnitude of the OP, such that a majority of the atoms or molecules are indeed focused as desired.
  • the focusing region is essentially uniform.
  • the focusing effect is then described by an effective one dimensional OP along the z-direction.
  • V op is the optical potential and the subscript i symbolizes the i-th atom or molecule in the beam, treated as a point-like particle.
  • the result of focusing by means of a one-dimensional OP along the z-direction is a pattern of lines of deposited atoms or molecules, of essentially uniform intensity in the y-direction, the lines being spaced in the z-direction and of width and intensity in accordance with the deposition parameters used.
  • an array of spots rather than an array of lines, by adding another electromagnetic field, preferably produced by another pair of laser beam standing waves, preferably directed orthogonally to the first pair of SW's and in the same plane thereto.
  • the second electromagnetic wave then produces an additional OP directed along the y-direction, thus focusing the atomic or molecular beam in this direction also.
  • the result of this preferred embodiment is therefore an array of deposited spots, in positions and of intensity according to the parameters chosen.
  • One preferred application is the direct deposition of hydrogen chloride or chlorine molecules on the surface of a microelectronic substrate for purposes of direct write etching.
  • Another application is in the direct writing of nanometer scale information for high density information storage.
  • Other preferred applications in the semiconductor industry include the production of nanometric scale photolithographic masks for subsequent conventional etching, the production of such masks for plasma etching, the doping of selected areas of a wafer on a nanometric scale for the production of high resolution structures, the deposition of high profile tip structures such as are used in field emission devices, and the generation of high resolution shaped optical grating structures. It should be emphasized that unlike the methods available in the prior art, since the present invention enables the deposition of complete molecules, the stoichiometry of the deposited layers or structures can be more readily maintained.
  • the optical coherence of the ordering and focusing laser beams, the atomic or molecular coherence, and the atomic or molecular beam itself must be arranged such that the optical potential interacts with the beam to direct the atoms or molecules to their correct positions.
  • Methods of calculation are now presented, according to preferred embodiments of the present invention, to illustrate how these necessary parameters are derived to ensure the desired nature and extent of the focusing effect and the deposition pattern. The calculations are now performed for the preferred embodiment of the focusing of a beam of nitrogen molecules, N 2 , though it is to be understood that similar methods of calculating the deposition pattern may be derived for other molecular or atomic species.
  • the molecular coherence is calculated. It is assumed that the molecular beam passes through a preparatory laser field to produce a superposition state composed of two Hamiltonian eigenstates. An extension to a superposition state involving more than two eigenstates is also possible.
  • the superposition state is given by:
  • Table I shows the value of the pump field E L required as a function of ⁇ , for
  • 2 0.2.
  • ⁇ 2 >
  • Table 2 lists the values of E L needed to achieve different values of
  • Table 3 shows the value of the pump field E L and the intensity I L and ⁇ L required for different supe ⁇ ositions of the ground electronic state between
  • 0.2, and negligible detuning are assumed.
  • Table 3 i v 2 E L (V/m) I L (W/cm 2 ) ⁇ L (Hz)
  • the beam downstream of the cooler is assumed to have a
  • Gaussian transverse speed distribution f(v ⁇ ) , where n is the number of particles used for simulation.
  • the center of the distribution v x is zero or very close to zero, and the spread of the distribution is ⁇ vl .
  • Calculations show that the deposition associated with a particular width ⁇ v may be approximately calculated by computing the deposition using a zero transverse velocity width and then broadening the computed peaks by 2 t d ⁇ v ⁇ , where t d is the time it takes for an atom or molecule to get from the collimated source to the deposition surface.
  • the value for the longitudinal speed ⁇ n of the beam is taken to be 600 m/s.
  • the combined SW field is of the form
  • E(z, t) [2E ⁇ 0) cos(k lZ )e i ⁇ it + c.c] + [2E 2 ] cos(k 2 z + ⁇ F )e i ⁇ 2t + c.c]
  • ⁇ ( ⁇ x ) + ⁇ (- ⁇ x ) + ⁇ ( ⁇ 2 ) -f ⁇ (- ⁇ 2 ) + ⁇ ( ⁇ 21 + ⁇ x ) + ⁇ (- ⁇ 2 ⁇ - ⁇ x ) + ⁇ ( ⁇ 2x - ⁇ 2 ) + ⁇ (- ⁇ 2i + ⁇ 2 )
  • the susceptibilities x above are given by
  • ⁇ mn > n being the unit vector along the direction of polarization of the external field. Since both the SW are linearly polarized along the z axis (Eq.(6)) only the zz component of the polarizability, denoted ⁇ zz , need be considered.
  • the superscripts "in” and “ni” refer to the interference and non-interference terras respectively of ⁇ , where the interference terms are the direct consequence of the coherent superposition of the ⁇ > and
  • Control over ⁇ ( ⁇ ) is obtained by changing various parameters, e.g., I -f o il) l c ⁇
  • the nonlinear dipole optical potential experienced by molecules in the N 2 molecular beam motion is
  • V ⁇ j i m ⁇ ⁇ (l ⁇ )E(m ⁇ j ) the components of dipole moment(Eq.(6)) other than those at frequencies ⁇ x and ⁇ 2 are ignored.
  • V% -[8Si 0)2 cos(k z) cos(k 2 z + ⁇ p) ⁇ 7 n ( ⁇ x ) + 8E? cos(k ⁇ z) cos(k 2 z + ⁇ F ) ⁇ i ( ⁇ 2 )]
  • optical potential in the absence of molecular coherence consists of two terms each representing the dipole interaction of the field and the induced molecular dipole of the same frequency.
  • Step 4 Calculate the force at every point and solve the set of equations given by Eqs. (1) and (2) where Pi is given by m N2 ⁇ .. For any i, the same equation with the same v_x_. will be solved m-i times.
  • Step 5 The final distribution p(z s , T) of the molecule along z s onto a substrate(s) is obtained by counting the number of particles hitting a particular region along z s upon their deposition onto a substrate.
  • the length of z s has been fixed at 4 ⁇ 2 for the computational example shown.
  • the deposition density distribution patterns obtained are functions of the parameters used in performing the coherently controlled optical focusing of the molecular beam. Ideally, every minimum of the Optical Potential OP acts as a focusing center, giving rise after a sufficient time of interaction, to a delta function molecular density distribution, and producing a corresponding pattern on the substrate.
  • the deposition pattern formed, p (z s , T) can be approximated by the expression:
  • the focusing quality of the deposition is dependent on a number of parameters, namely, c ⁇ 5 c 2 , ⁇ F , ⁇ v j_, I ⁇ 2 > , L ff , Ti nt , E ⁇ (0) and E 2 (0) .
  • c ⁇ 5 c 2 a number of parameters
  • ⁇ F a parameter that influences the rate of the deposition
  • ⁇ v j_ a number of parameters
  • Figs. 2(a) to 2(d) show how the density distribution of deposition p(z s ,Ti n ) and the optical potential vary along the z s direction, both in the presence of and in the absence of molecular coherence.
  • the scale for the optical potential is graduated in meV, while the distance along the z s direction is measured in ⁇ m. The results shown in Figs.
  • the superposition is created between the
  • Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) show the effects of the absence of molecular coherence.
  • Fig 2(a) shows the molecular density distribution and
  • Fig. 2(b) shows the corresponding optical potential.
  • the dipole force due to the non-interference term is exerted primarily along the gradient of the light intensity of the field with frequency ⁇ 2 since E 2 » Ei. This results in a force acting on the molecules in the direction of the minima of the intensity of the light field with frequency ⁇ 2 , i.e., toward the nodes of the standing wave.
  • This is the standard result realized in the atomic beam manipulation techniques known in the prior art, where deposition forms at the nodes of the SW.
  • FIGs. 2(c) and 2(d) show the density distribution and optical potential for the same conditions as in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), but including the effects of molecular coherence.
  • a rather irregular deposition is obtained, with peaks of different intensities, some significantly stronger than others.
  • the weaker spots appear at intervals of approximately 0.5 ⁇ 2 , with the brighter spots appearing at larger intervals.
  • Figs. 3(a) to 3(d) are plotted under the same conditions as Figs. 2(a) to 2(d), but show an enlarged section in the z s direction, to better illustrate the differences between the bright and weak deposition spots.
  • Figs. 4(a) to 4(d) show the separate contributions to the molecular density as a function of z s , due to the first and second SW fields, E ⁇ (0) and E 2 (0) , taking into account only the non-interference term V op (m) of the optical potential.
  • the parameters used for this example are identical to those used for calculating the distributions shown in the various plots of Figs. 2 and 3.
  • Fig. 4(a) shows a plot of p for the first field
  • Fig. 4(b) shows the values of V op (m) for the first field
  • Fig. 4(c) shows a plot of p for the second field
  • Figs. 5(a) to 5(f) and Figs. 6(a) to 6(f) show the dependence of p(z s ,Ti nt ) on different superpositions of states.
  • Figs. 5(a) to 5(f) show the results using the superposition (
  • the values ⁇ lxlO 9 Hz and
  • Figs. 7(a) to 7(f) show the dependence of p(z s ,Ti nt ) on
  • 2 0.01, for (b) 0.1, for (c) 0.15, for (d) 0.2, for (e) 0.4 and for (f) 0.5.
  • the superposition used is between the
  • the structure of the deposition distribution changes with changing
  • 2 0.2, and for the superposition between
  • Figs. 9(a) to 9(c) displays the density distribution p(z s ,Ti nt ) obtained for three different values of ⁇ F , for the supe ⁇ osition
  • ⁇ F -2.65 rad
  • the other parameters are those as used in the calculations for the previous relevant figures, such as Figs. 6(a), 7(a), 8(b), etc.
  • the parameter ⁇ F is seen to directly alter the position of the peaks, as well as their width and intensity.
  • Figs. 11(a) to 11(f) using similar calculations, show the variation in the form and intensity of the strongest peak shown in Fig. 9(a), as a function of the intensity of the two SW fields.
  • the beam parameters, T ⁇ t , L ff and ⁇ v also have an effect on the deposition density distribution. This effect is illustrated in the density plots shown in Figs. 12(a) to 12(c) and Figs. 13(a) to 13(d). Since the SW-induced optical potential is comprised of a series of harmonic-type potential wells of varying depth, the time of interaction Ti nt plays a crucial role in determining the nature of the deposition. In general, if T int is longer than the quarter period of oscillation of the molecule in any of the potential wells, sha ⁇ peaks will not be formed in the molecular density distribution. Instead the distribution will have large number of smaller peaks.
  • Figs. 12(a) to 12(c) show plots of the spatial values of p(z s ,Tj nt ) obtained for three different values of T kt , for the supe ⁇ osition
  • 020>, where ⁇ lxlO 9 Hz and
  • 2 0.2.
  • the values of T ⁇ t are (a) 0.5 ⁇ sec (b) 0.625 ⁇ sec, and (c) 0.8 ⁇ sec.
  • ⁇ vl 0 m/sec
  • E 2 (0) 1.0 10 6 V/cm
  • E 2 (0) /E ⁇ (0) l.OxlO 4
  • ⁇ F -2.65 rad
  • ⁇ i 0.628 ⁇ m
  • ⁇ 2 0.736 ⁇ m
  • L ff 0.
  • Tj nt 0.5 ⁇ sec (Fig. 12a) because Ti nt ⁇ T/4.
  • Figs. 14(a) to 14(d) show the width of a typical deposited peak as a function of the rotational temperature of the molecules.
  • Fig. 14(a) is shown at a temperature T r of 298°K, 14(b) at 150°K, 14(c) at 50°K, and 14(d) at 10°K.
  • T r temperature of 298°K
  • 14(b) at 150°K
  • 14(c) at 50°K
  • 14(d) at 10°K.
  • the graphs show that the deposited peaks becomes wider and more erratic with decrease in the rotational temperature.
  • the effect of rotational cooling is thus opposite to that of the translational cooling.
  • Figs. 15(a) to 15(d) are graphs of density distributions obtained, for the deposition of atomic rubidium for different interaction times, both in the presence of and in the absence of coherent control, according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the coherent control is achieved using a supersposition of Rydberg states of the atoms, in this case the 8s and 8d states.
  • This preparation can be performed by laser exciting the species from the ground atomic state, preferably where the atoms already have, as a result of preliminary laser cooling, a small transverse velocity distribution.
  • the atoms are passed through two laser fields with wavelengths of 3430.8 nm and 13291.9 nm, respectively, and with intensities of only 1.91 x 10 "3 Watt per square cm, and 0.19 Watt per square cm., respectively.
  • Such weak fields are effective because of the high polarizability obtained from Rydberg excited atoms.
  • 2 0.2.
  • the deposited atoms or molecules can be implanted into the surface of a semiconductor substrate, in order to produce selectively doped regions of nanometric resolution according to the predetermined pattern desired. This feature is useful in the production of high resolution semiconductor devices.
  • the atoms or molecules used are chosen according to the semiconductor material to be doped, and the type of doping required.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Nanotechnology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Composite Materials (AREA)
  • Chemical Vapour Deposition (AREA)

Abstract

A method for the controlled nanometer-scale deposition of atomic or molecular species on a surface (24), by means of coherently controlled optical focusing. The coherent control is conveniently performed by inducing a linear superposition of excited atomic states or molecular bound states respectively, by means of electromagnetic fields supplied by an applied laser beam (13). The optical focusing is conveniently performed by passing a beam (10) of such suitably prepared species through another electromagnetic field supplied by a standing wave (14, 18) induced by two interacting laser beams (20, 22). Altering the characteristics of the laser beams alters the forces operating on the species, thus directing them to the desired position on the surface (24). Selection of the frequencies, intensities, and relative phases of the electromagnetic fields, as well as the geometry of the interaction between the beam and the electromagnetic fields, enables deposition of aperiodic patterns (26) on the surface with a resolution of 10 to 15 nanometers. Such nanoscale focusing of atoms or molecules by coherent light can be used for executing nanometric lithographic processes.

Description

NANOMETRIC SCALE COEERENTLY CONTROLLED
DEPOSITION
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of the controlled deposition of molecules and atoms on surfaces on a nanometric scale.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The optical manipulation of atoms in their ground state constituting an atomic beam has been widely studied over the past few years. It has been shown, for instance in the article "Calculation of Atomic Positions in Nanometer-scale Direct-write Optical Lithography with an Optical Standing Wave", by K.K. Berggren et al., published in Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Vol.l 1, pp. 1166-1176 (1994), and in the references thereto, that an atomic beam can be focused to sub-micron scale dimensions by using the dipole forces exerted on the atoms by an electromagnetic field, such as that present in a standing light wave. One possible application of this phenomenon is in direct-write atomic nanolithography, which offers the possibility of microfabrication applications in the microelectronic industry, at resolutions well below the wavelength of ultra-violet light, as commonly used.
In U.S. Patent 5,360,764 to R. J. Celotta and J. J. McClelland, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, there is described the use of a combination of laser cooling techniques and periodic standing wave electromagnetic fields to enable the focusing of atoms and their subsequent deposition on a substrate, on a nanometric scale. However, the technique described therein has a number of disadvantages; firstly, it is limited to the controlled deposition of atoms, and there are many practical chemical processes, where the presence of molecules rather than atoms is preferable; and secondly, it is limited to the formation of periodic structures on the surface. The technique is thus both limited to atomic species as the type of materials that can be deposited, and also in the range of positions capable of deposition.
A method of depositing molecules is also described in the above mentioned Celotta et al. patent, whereby more than one atomic species are concurrently evaporated onto the desired substrate surface. One of the atomic species is focused into the desired pattern on the substrate by selecting the conditions to ensure that it is in resonance with the applied laser field, and the other, or others, are applied uniformly. At the positions of focus, the two atomic species react chemically to form the desired molecular deposit. Using this scheme, a method for the formation of an array of spots of Cr02 is described therein. It is evident that this method for the deposition of molecules is complicated to perform, is limited to only specific molecules, and may prove difficult to achieve good stoichiometry.
Methods of direct manipulation of the molecules of a molecular beam by means of optical focusing, analogous to the methods described above of atomic beam manipulation, have not yet proved particularly successful. The concepts associated with molecular manipulation have indeed been considered for several years, such as is described, for instance, in the article entitled "Deflection of Neutral Molecules Using a Nonresonant Dipole Force" by H. Stapelfeldt et al., published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 79, pp.2787-2788, 1997, and in the earlier references cited therein. However, in the work of Stapelfeldt et al., high intensity pulsed lasers were used to affect the motion of molecules in a beam, without showing how this could be applied for general deposition work, and certainly not for nanoscale sized structures. Furthermore, both the high fields required and the short laser pulses required are disadvantages of this approach.
There therefore exists an important need for a method for the controlled deposition of molecules on surfaces on a nanometric scale. In addition, the ability to perform controlled deposition of atoms in non-periodic patterns on a nanometric scale is also a needed technique which is hitherto unavailable.
The disclosures of each of the publications mentioned in this section, and of those in the other sections of this specification, are hereby incorporated by reference, each in its entirety.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention seeks to provide a new method and apparatus for the optical focusing of atomic or molecular beams, such that the atoms or molecules can be deposited in aperiodic structures, with resolutions of down to 10-15 nanometers. The ability to deposit atoms or molecules on surfaces at a nanometric scale has important applications in the semiconductor industry for the purposes of direct deposition etching and for other lithographic processes. The nature of the pattern formed, including the position and width of the component parts of the pattern, are altered by varying a number of parameters associated with the beam preparation and with the electromagnetic fields to which the beam is subjected.
A beam of atoms or molecules, aimed at the surface on which the deposition is required, is preferably sent through a skimmer to minimize velocity components perpendicular to the direction of the beam. The beam is then preferably further collimated by means of laser cooling or by sympathetic cooling or supersonic expansion, in order to reduce the transverse velocity to minimal levels. The better the collimation, the finer the resolution of the focusing effect achieved. The laser cooling can be performed by any of the methods known in the art. One such method is described in the article co-authored by one of the present applicants, entitled "Complete population transfer to and from a continuum and the radiative association of cold Na atoms to produce translationally cold Na2 molecules in specific vib-rotational states" published in Optics Express, Vol. 4, pp.91-106 (Jan., 1999), hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. Other methods are also given in the many references cited therein. Alternatively, for an atomic beam, laser cooling may be achieved by passing the atoms through counterpropagating laser fields, though this method is not fully developed at the time of this application for use with molecular beams. It may also be possible to use only mechanical cooling techniques, as described by Drodofsky et al. in an article in Microelectronic Eng. Vol. 30, p. 383ff, (1996), though the beam intensities in this method are very small, and the deposition rates are thus very much slower.
The transverse- velocity cooled atomic or molecular beam is then subjected to an electromagnetic field such as may be provided by one or more laser beams, either pulsed or CW, which prepares a linear superposition of states. For the molecular case, this superposition could preferably be of bound states primarily through a two photon absorption process. For the atomic case, the superposition could preferably be formed of Rydberg states. This operation is another application of the process of coherent control, which has been developed recently to affect atomic and molecular processes by means of quantum interference. Up to now, coherent control has been used to control the outcome of unimolecular processes such as photodissociation, and more recently, collisional and scattering processes. Details of the theory and some applications of the technique of coherent control are contained in the articles "Polarization Control of Branching Ratios in Photodissociation" by C. Asaro, P. Brumer and M. Shapiro, published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 60, pp. 1634-1637 (1988) and in "Coherent Control of Reactive Scattering" by A. Abrashkevich, M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 81, pp. 3789-3792 (1998), and in the many references cited therein.
In U.S. Patent No. 5,256,849, to M. O. Scully, there is described a method of increasing the refractive index of a material by means of the creation of superpositions of states therein, by means of coherent control of the atomic levels of the material. Alteration of the refractive index of a material is operative to affect the motion of light through the material. The use of coherent control in the present invention, unlike any of the methods described in the prior art, is operative to affect the motion of the atoms or molecules themselves, by means of optical focusing.
The prepared atomic or molecular beam then preferably passes through two or more standing electromagnetic fields directed parallel to the surface, which too may be produced by means of interacting laser beams. By varying the characteristics of the laser beams, the atomic or molecular properties, the distance of the stationary fields from the surface, and the properties of the stationary electromagnetic fields, the nature of the pattern deposited on the surface can be controlled, including the position, intensity and resolution of the component parts of the pattern. In general, the pattern displays a large background with several relatively low intense peaks when there is no atomic or molecular coherence, whereas the peaks become intense and the background weak when the atomic or molecular coherence is introduced.
In the case of atomic beam deposition, since the superposition may be formed from Rydberg excited states of the atoms, this affords the possibility of much higher polarizabilities, and hence requires much lower laser powers than for molecular beam deposition.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method of depositing atoms or molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of the atoms or molecules.
There is further provided in accordance with yet other preferred embodiments of the present invention, a method as described above and consisting of the steps of providing a collimated beam of atoms or molecules to be deposited, directing the beam through a first electromagnetic field, typically produced by a laser beam, operative to produce a superposition of states of the atoms or molecules, and thereafter directing the beam through a second electromagnetic field, typically produced by two or more standing waves, such that the atoms or molecules are focused onto the surface in the predetermined pattern.
In accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method as described above and also consisting of the step of cooling the beam before production of the superposition of bound states, the cooling being effected by means of a laser cooling process.
There is further provided in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method as described above and wherein the superposition of bound states of the molecules is formed by means of a two-photon absorption process.
In accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a method as described above and wherein the beam is cooled by a mechanical cooling process such as by expansion through a supersonic nozzle, either exclusively, or before it is subjected to the laser cooling process.
There is provided in accordance with yet a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method as described above and wherein the first laser is either a CW or a pulsed laser.
There is even further provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method as described above and wherein the standing waves are formed by one or more laser beams.
Furthermore, in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method as described above and wherein the predetermined pattern is aperiodic and may be determined at least by the parameters of the first electromagnetic field and by the parameters of the second electromagnetic field.
There is also provided in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method as described above and also consisting of the step of directing the beam through a third electromagnetic field, arranged approximately orthogonally to the second electromagnetic field, and in effectively the same common plane, such that the atoms or molecules are focused onto the surface in a predetermined array pattern, which could have a resolution of less than 50 nanometers. In accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of depositing atoms or molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface as described above, and wherein the atoms or molecules are operative to perform applications such as nanolithography, micro-etching, the writing of information on a storage medium, the formation of photolithographic masks, the production of doped regions within the surface, the production of high profile tip structures on the surface, or the production of optical grating structures on the surface.
There is further provided in accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a system for the deposition of atoms or molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of the atoms or molecules.
In accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a system for the deposition of atoms or molecules as described above, and consisting of a source emitting a beam of the atoms or molecules, a laser cooling stage for minimizing the transverse velocity components of the molecules of the beam, a first electromagnetic field through which the beam is directed, operative to produce a superposition of states of the atoms or molecules, and a second electromagnetic field, through which the beam is thereafter directed, such that the atoms or molecules are focused onto the surface in the predetermined pattern.
There is provided in accordance with yet a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, a system for the deposition of atoms or molecules as described above and wherein the first electromagnetic field is formed by at least one first laser beam.
There is even further provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a system for the deposition of atoms or molecules as described above and wherein the second electromagnetic field consists of at least two standing waves formed by laser beams. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Fig.l is a schematic representation of a system for performing coherently controlled atomic or molecular beam optical focusing, such as is suitable for executing nanolithography, according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
Figs. 2(a) to 2(d) show how the density distribution of deposition of molecules and the optical potential vary along the z-direction, both in the presence of and in the absence of molecular coherence;
Figs. 3(a) to 3(d) are plotted under the same conditions as Figs. 2(a) to 2(d), but show an enlarged section in the z-direction;
Figs. 4(a) to 4(d) show the separate contributions to the molecular density as a function of z, due to the first and second SW fields, taking into account only the non-interference term of the optical potential;
Figs. 5(a) to 5(f) show the dependence of the deposition density on different superpositions of states, using the superposition ( |000> + |v00>), where v takes the values 1 to 6;
Figs. 6(a) to 6(f) show the dependence of the deposition density on different superpositions of states, using the superposition ( |000> + |v20>), where v takes values of 0 to 5;
Figs. 7(a) to 7(f) show the dependence of the deposition density on |c2|2 for six different values of |c2|2, for the superposition between the |000> and |020> states;
Figs. 8(a) to 8(d), show plots of the optical potential for the superposition between |000> and |020> states, with and without molecular coherence, and for different values
Figure imgf000010_0001
;
Figs. 9(a) to 9(c) displays the density distribution for three different values of phase between the two standing waves, for the superposition |000> + |020>;
Figs. 10(a) to 10(f) illustrate the variation in the form and intensity of the strongest peak shown in Fig. 9(b) at zs = 0.49, as a function of six different values of the relative phase between the two standing waves;
Figs. 11(a) to 11(f) show the variation in the form and intensity of the strongest peak shown in Fig. 9(b), as a function of the intensity of the two S W fields, for six different values of the field of SW2;
Figs. 12(a) to 12(c) show plots of the density distribution for three different values of the interaction time, T^, for the superposition |000> + |020>;
Figs. 13(a) to 13(d) show the density distribution of deposition as a function of free flight distance, Lff for four different values of Lf
Figs. 14(a) to 14(d) show the width of a typical deposited peak as a function of the rotational temperature of the molecules, for four different values of Tr ; and
Figs. 15(a) to 15(d) are graphs which show the density distribution for the deposition of atomic rubidium for different interaction times, both in the presence of and in the absence of coherent control.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Reference is now made to Fig. 1, which schematically illustrates a preferred embodiment of an apparatus for the execution of coherently controlled atomic or molecular beam optical focusing, such as is suitable for the performance of nanolithography. The source 2 produces a beam of atoms or molecules, which is preferably cooled by thermal expansion through a supersonic nozzle 3, such as is well known in the art. The beam may then preferably be further collimated mechanically by an exit aperture 8. After this initial cooling, the transverse velocity spread is preferably reduced to minimal levels by means of laser cooling, such as by an optical pumping and trapping process. Alternatively and preferably, not all of these cooling processes may be used in performing the molecular deposition, but the outcome may be poorer spatial resolution, and, if at least the laser cooling process is not used, very much slower deposition rates.
The laser cooling may be preferably performed for an atomic beam by passing the beam through two counter-propagating laser beams 5 and 6, produced by reflecting one laser beam back along itself by means of an end mirror 7. The laser is tuned to the appropriate frequency to effect the cooling as is known in the art. If lower transverse velocities are required then additional laser cooling methods known in the art, such as Sisyphus, can be used. Molecules are preferably cooled to a single rotational state. In order to provide good focusing of the beam, necessary to achieve a resolution of approximately lOnm, the beam should preferably be collimated to have a residual transverse velocity of less than 10 nm/td, where td is the flight time in seconds from the beam source to the surface. The highly collimated beam 10 propagates along the x direction and then passes through a preparatory electromagnetic field 12, which produces a linear superposition of states of the atoms or molecules. The electromagnetic field is preferably produced by means of a laser 13.
The beam then preferably passes through two standing waves (SW) 14, 16 of a radiation field, preferably formed by retro-reflecting off a mirror 18, two near resonant, CW laser beams 20, 22, positioned above the substrate 24 onto which the molecules are to be deposited. While passing through the SW radiation field, the atoms or molecules experience a dipole force, due to the SW-induced optical potential (OP), which acts as an array of lenses, causing those atoms or molecules in the beam with kinetic energy less than the depth of the OP to focus into predefined patterns 26 as they deposit onto the substrate 24. Those atoms or molecules with kinetic energy greater than the depth of the OP skip over the potential well and are lost to the ordered deposition process.
According to a preferred method of embodiment of the present invention, the kinetic energy of the beam in the x-direction v is approximately fixed and is much larger than the magnitude of the OP, such that a majority of the atoms or molecules are indeed focused as desired. In the y-direction, perpendicular to the direction of the two SW's, the focusing region is essentially uniform. The focusing effect is then described by an effective one dimensional OP along the z-direction. The atoms or molecules in the beam execute motion according to the Hamilton's equation: mN ii = pi (1) d_ and P, = - dz Vc op tzi.pi (2)
where Vop is the optical potential and the subscript i symbolizes the i-th atom or molecule in the beam, treated as a point-like particle. The result of focusing by means of a one-dimensional OP along the z-direction is a pattern of lines of deposited atoms or molecules, of essentially uniform intensity in the y-direction, the lines being spaced in the z-direction and of width and intensity in accordance with the deposition parameters used.
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to deposit an array of spots rather than an array of lines, by adding another electromagnetic field, preferably produced by another pair of laser beam standing waves, preferably directed orthogonally to the first pair of SW's and in the same plane thereto. The second electromagnetic wave then produces an additional OP directed along the y-direction, thus focusing the atomic or molecular beam in this direction also. The result of this preferred embodiment is therefore an array of deposited spots, in positions and of intensity according to the parameters chosen.
One preferred application is the direct deposition of hydrogen chloride or chlorine molecules on the surface of a microelectronic substrate for purposes of direct write etching. Another application is in the direct writing of nanometer scale information for high density information storage. Other preferred applications in the semiconductor industry include the production of nanometric scale photolithographic masks for subsequent conventional etching, the production of such masks for plasma etching, the doping of selected areas of a wafer on a nanometric scale for the production of high resolution structures, the deposition of high profile tip structures such as are used in field emission devices, and the generation of high resolution shaped optical grating structures. It should be emphasized that unlike the methods available in the prior art, since the present invention enables the deposition of complete molecules, the stoichiometry of the deposited layers or structures can be more readily maintained.
In order to produce the desired deposition distribution on the substrate, the optical coherence of the ordering and focusing laser beams, the atomic or molecular coherence, and the atomic or molecular beam itself must be arranged such that the optical potential interacts with the beam to direct the atoms or molecules to their correct positions. Methods of calculation are now presented, according to preferred embodiments of the present invention, to illustrate how these necessary parameters are derived to ensure the desired nature and extent of the focusing effect and the deposition pattern. The calculations are now performed for the preferred embodiment of the focusing of a beam of nitrogen molecules, N2, though it is to be understood that similar methods of calculating the deposition pattern may be derived for other molecular or atomic species.
As a first step, the molecular coherence is calculated. It is assumed that the molecular beam passes through a preparatory laser field to produce a superposition state composed of two Hamiltonian eigenstates. An extension to a superposition state involving more than two eigenstates is also possible. The superposition state is given by:
|ψ(t)> = Cl|φι> e-ffiιt/h + c22> e^7* (3)
where |cpi> represents the Hamiltonian eigenstates of energy Ej. This coherent state is prepared by two-photon absorption using a laser of frequency ωL and amplitude E L. Application of perturbation theory methods, such as is known in the art, leads to the evaluation of the population of the upper level as:
Figure imgf000015_0001
where ^ - (Em-En)/h and Δ2ωL = Ω21 - 2ωL≡ (E2-Ei)/h - 2ω is the detuning of the two-photon absorption from resonance, and γ is the linewidth of the transition between two superposition states where m and n represent the quantum numbers corresponding to the rotational, vibrational and electronic states. Note that within the perturbation regime |c2|2 < 0.2, which restricts the power of the pump laser. Assuming a negligible value of Δ , a restriction on two parameters results, viz., |c2|2 and γ. Table I shows the value of the pump field EL required as a function of γ, for |c2|2 = 0.2. The pump laser is set at the frequency CD required for a resonant two-photon absorption process between the levels of the ground electronic state ]φχ> = |v=0,J=0,M=0> and |φ2> = |v=0,J=2,M=0>.
Table 1 γ (Hz) EL (V/m)
8.3 xlO6 1.0 xlO7
1.0 xlO9 1.1 xlO8 In this calculation of the optical potential are included the ground electronic state X∑ and six electronic excited states viz., b ∑* , c ,'ι1l ∑ v +
e ∑+ u , b1TTtl , clTTu and o1TTu whose transition dipole matrix elements between the ground and excited states are non-zero. Eigenstates involved in the superposition are taken to be in the X∑+ g state. Defining |vi5 Jj, Mj > as the i-th
eigenstate, the constraints of the selection rules mandate taking a superposition involving states where J2=Jι or J2=Jι+2. Here vj and J,- are the vibrational and rotational quantum numbers respectively and Mj is the component of Ji along the direction of polarization of the external field. A linearly polarized pump laser is used to achieve the allowed coefficient |c2|2 < 0.2.
As an example, Table 2 below lists the values of EL needed to achieve different values of |c2|2 for superpositions of the ground electronic state between
|v=0, J=0, M=0 > and |v=0, J=2, M=0 >, where a realistic value of γ=1.0xl09 Hz is assumed for N2 molecules, and negligible detuning is assumed, i.e. Δ2ωL « γ.
Table 2
|c2|2 EL (V/m) IL (W/cm2)
0.20 1.1 xlO8 6.42 xlO9
0.10 9.3 xlO7 4.59 xlO9
0.01 6.3 xlO7 2.11 xlO9
0.001 2.9 xlO7 1.54 xlO9
As a further example, Table 3, shows the value of the pump field EL and the intensity IL and ωL required for different supeφositions of the ground electronic state between |vls J=0, M=0 > and |v2, J=2, M=0 >, where as before, γ = 1.0 x 10 Hz, and |c2| = 0.2, and negligible detuning are assumed. Table 3 i v2 EL (V/m) IL (W/cm2) ωL (Hz)
0 1 4.6 xlO8 9.18 xlO10 2.1988 x 1014
0 2 4.72 xlO8 1.18 xlOπ 4.3673 x 1014
0 3 4.74 xlO8 1.19 xlO11 6.5077 x 1014
0 4 7.5 xlO8 2.98 xlO11 8.6241 x 1014
In the next step the beam downstream of the cooler is assumed to have a
Gaussian transverse speed distribution, f(vλ) , where n is the
Figure imgf000017_0001
number of particles used for simulation. The center of the distribution vx is zero or very close to zero, and the spread of the distribution is σvl . Calculations show that the deposition associated with a particular width σv may be approximately calculated by computing the deposition using a zero transverse velocity width and then broadening the computed peaks by 2 td σvι , where td is the time it takes for an atom or molecule to get from the collimated source to the deposition surface. The value for the longitudinal speed υn of the beam is taken to be 600 m/s. This value can be obtained from the expression:
Figure imgf000017_0002
where K is the Boltzmann constant, Mbuff is the mass of the buffer gas atom used, γ is the specific heat ratio of the buffer gas and T0 is the initial temperature. This expression is derived in the book "Atomic and Molecular Beam Methods" edited by G. Scoles, published by Oxford University Press, (1988). The effect of as described above aberrations due to the longitudinal speed distribution has been omitted here. The effect of the optical coherence of the standing waves, and the resulting optical potential, are now considered. The prepared N2 beam is subjected to two standing CW fields, whose intensity is uniform over a distance of Lint, the length of interaction along x , but is zero elsewhere. A free flight distance L j can also be introduced between the field and the surface to observe its effect on the deposition.
The wave vectors of the two standing waves (SW) are \k \z — ψ-z and \k2\z = ψ-z, where λi and λ2 are the optical wave length of the two standing waves and z is the unit vector along the propagation direction. The combined SW field is of the form
E(z, t) = [2E{0) cos(klZ)eiωit + c.c] + [2E2 ] cos(k2z + θF)eiω2t + c.c]
≡ [E(ω1) + c.c.] + [E(ω2) + c.c] (5)
where c.c. denotes the complex conjugate of the terms preceeding it, θp is the relative phase of the two SW, E10) and E2 {0) are given by E[0) = (2 ώa)i 2 and E (°) = (2l α)i/2 reSpectively with c, μ0 and I being the speed of the light, permeability of the vacuum and the intensity of the i-th SW field. The phase ΘF changes the position of the nodes and antinodes of E(z, t) along z and affects the position of the minima in the SW-induced OP. Choosing ω2 — ωx = Ω2ι = &jJL} s0 that excitation of > by )ι and of
Figure imgf000018_0001
> by ω2 lead to the same energy E = Eι + ωι = E2 + hω2. The interaction between the molecule and incident field is given by (—μ • E), where, within first order perturbation theory and neglecting state line widths, the dipole moment can be obtained as:
μ = μ(ωx) + μ(-ωx) + μ(ω2) -f μ(-ω2) + μ(ω21 + ωx) + μ(-ω - ωx) +μ(ω2x - ω2) + μ(-ω2i + ω2)
= χinl)E(ωl) + χnil)E(ωl) + χin2)E(ω2) + χni2)E(ω2) +Xin2ι + ω )E'(ω2l + ωx) + χin2l - ω2)E'(ω2l - ω2) + c.c. (6) O 01/71778
17
where E(ωi) are defined above, E'(ω2l + ωx) = E[0) cos(kχz) exp[(ω2ι + ωχ)t], and E'(ω2ι - ω2) = E^ cos(k2z + ΘF) exp[(ω21 - ω2)t], and μ(-ω) = μ(ω)*. The susceptibilities x above are given by
Figure imgf000019_0001
(ω2j - r ft 2cι
Figure imgf000019_0002
Figure imgf000019_0003
1 1 1
ft ω i -f- U> ϋJji — Lϋ2
Figure imgf000019_0004
ft *— ' ω5-ι -I- α>ι u)j2 — ωx
Figure imgf000019_0005
where ωmn
Figure imgf000019_0006
>, n being the unit vector along the direction of polarization of the external field. Since both the SW are linearly polarized along the z axis (Eq.(6)) only the zz component of the polarizability, denoted χzz, need be considered. Here the superscripts "in" and "ni" refer to the interference and non-interference terras respectively of χ, where the interference terms are the direct consequence of the coherent superposition of the \φχ > and | 2 > state. Control over χ(ω{) is obtained by changing various parameters, e.g., I -foil) lcι|ι ic2|) θjyi and θ , where ΘM is the relative phase of ci and c . The nonlinear dipole optical potential experienced by molecules in the N2 molecular beam motion is
Vop = -μ.E = - ∑ Vijlm (7) i=l,2 j=l,2;l=+,—,m=+,- where V{jim ~ μ(lωϊ)E(mωj). Here the components of dipole moment(Eq.(6)) other than those at frequencies ωx and ω2 are ignored. Note that there are three types of terms in Eq.(7) : (1) i=j ,1 ≠ m where Eq.(7) has only time independent parts, (2) l=m where Eq.(7) has terms which oscillate faster than ωx or ω2 and (3) i -ψ j, l φ m where Eq.(7) has terms which oscillate slower than either ω or ω2. Adopting the rotating wave approximation(RWA) results in the exclusion of terms corresponding to case (2). The final expression for the optical potential is then
Vop = -2[R Vχχ+-) + (V22+-) + M Vχ2+_) + &(V2χ+-)] = V£ + V£ (8)
where 5 denotes the real part and
-V0
Figure imgf000020_0001
+ 4E2<0)2 cos2(k2z + θp)χ™(ω2) +4Eχ{ )E2 { ) cos(kχz) cos(k2z + θFnix) 003( ! - ω2)t +4Eχ{ )E2 { ) cos(kχz) cos(k2z + θFni2) cos(ω2 - ωx)t] (9)
-V™ = 2[4Ef? cos(kχz) cos(k2z + 6F)χ (ωχ) + 4E2 {0? cos(kχz) cos(k2z + θF)χln2) +4Ef)E ) cos2(k2z + θF)[χin(ωχ) 003(0 ! - ω2)t - χf(ωx) sm(ωx - ω2)t] +4E[0)Ei0) cos2(kxz){χ™(ω2) cos(α;2 - ωx)t - χf(ω2) sin(ω2 - ωx)t]} (10)
Here χr denotes the real part, and χι denotes the imaginary part of the susceptibility. Numerical experiments show that the time-dependent parts in Eqs.(9) and (10) can be neglected; they are found not to cause any significant change in the trajectory. Therefore,
y™ = -{SE?2 cos2(kχz)χnix) + 8^0)2 cos2(k2z + θFni2)} (11) V% = -[8Si0)2 cos(k z) cos(k2z + θp)χ7 nx) + 8E? cos(kχz) cos(k2z + θF)χ^i2)]
(12)
Thus, the optical potential in the absence of molecular coherence consists of two terms each representing the dipole interaction of the field and the induced molecular dipole of the same frequency.
Thus, the molecules experience the above optical potential, which is an oscillating function along the z direction and which acts as an array of lenses. Each minimum of the potential behaves as a focusing center and each maximum behaves as a defocusing center. The results is an inhomogeneous aperiodic distribution of potential minima whose depths vary, depending on z, Ex , E2 , |cχ|, |c2|, ΘM and ΘF. Reference is now made to Figs. 2 and 3 (to be discussed in detail hereinbelow), which show typical results of the molecular density distribution obtained along the ^-direction, together with the corresponding optical potential. It is seen that V™ represents a periodic array of lenses, whereas Vop = V™ + V^ does not. Thus, unlike traditional atomic lithography where the optical potential is purely periodic, different optical potentials can be obtained by altering terms in the potential which enter via quantum interference. This feature of the present invention enables pattern formation not realized in prior art conventional atomic lithographic techniques.
The classical density distribution of molecules on the substrate is now calculated. For an initial uniform spatial distribution of molecules in the beam after the cooling process, p(z, 0) = constant, the classical trajectories can be calculated for every molecule interacting with the optical potential given by Eq.(8) to obtain the spatial distribution of molecule p(z, T) at time T — Tint + ^1L, where Tint is the actual interaction interaction time between the molecules and the optical potential, and is equal to
Figure imgf000021_0001
The numerical steps in the computation for this molecular density distribution after interacting with the SW-induced OP are as follows : Step 1: At t=0, consider a fixed number of molecules (n=20,000 in the example shown) uniformly distributed over a small portion of the profile of the cooled molecular source —αλ2 < z^ < α\2, where α = 2 in the example shown
Step 2: Divide this range of
Figure imgf000022_0001
where i=l, 2, , Nχ S0 that every ΔzW = J^ length of the profile of the cooled molecular source contains nx = n/Nx number of molecules.
Step 3: Fit these nx molecules into a transverse speed distribution function given by f(v±). This leads to say, m* molecules having transverse speed υ±. such that j rrij = J f(v±)dυ± = nx. Every N discrete length of size z^ has the same distribution.
Step 4: Calculate the force at every point
Figure imgf000022_0002
and solve the set of equations given by Eqs. (1) and (2) where Pi is given by mN2υ±.. For any i, the same equation with the same v_x_. will be solved m-i times.
Step 5: The final distribution p(zs, T) of the molecule along zs onto a substrate(s) is obtained by counting the number of particles hitting a particular region along zs upon their deposition onto a substrate. The length of zs has been fixed at 4λ2 for the computational example shown.
This method was used to compute results for various transverse velocity distributions. Below we report results for the case where συχ = 0. This can be corrected for nonzero σV by the method described above. The deposition density distribution patterns obtained are functions of the parameters used in performing the coherently controlled optical focusing of the molecular beam. Ideally, every minimum of the Optical Potential OP acts as a focusing center, giving rise after a sufficient time of interaction, to a delta function molecular density distribution, and producing a corresponding pattern on the substrate. The deposition pattern formed, p (zs, T) can be approximated by the expression:
p (zs, T) = ∑ |a(zs,T)| 2 f(z,T) δ(zs-zm) (13) m where |a(zs,T)| 2 is the intensity of focusing at a given point zs onto the substrate at time T, and f(z,T) may be chosen as a Lorentzian function. The point Zm is the position of a minimum in the optical potential. The width of f(z,T) together with |a(zs,T)| measures the quality of focusing of the molecules, in terms of the intensity and width of the focused beam particle deposits. The focusing quality of the deposition is dependent on a number of parameters, namely, cχ5 c2, ΘF, σvj_, IΦ2 >, Lff, Tint, Eι(0) and E2 (0) . As illustrative of the method of the present invention, the effect of these parameters on the nature of the resulting molecular deposit is now described.
(a) The Effect of Molecular Coherence:
The parameters C], c2, ΘM, |φι> and |φ2> introduced into the OP are the direct consequence of molecular coherence. As can be seen from the expressions for Vop (equations 11 and 12), these parameters do not affect the location of the OP minima. Hence they have no direct effect on changing the position of the deposition onto a substrate. However, they do have a direct effect on the intensity of the deposition resulting from the change in the magnitude of the OP. If there were no molecular coherence, deposition would be due only to Vop , i.e., the usual dipolar interaction between the molecule and the coherent electric field.
The effect of molecular coherence on the deposition distribution is shown in Figs. 2(a) to 2(d), which show how the density distribution of deposition p(zs,Tin) and the optical potential vary along the zs direction, both in the presence of and in the absence of molecular coherence. The scale for the optical potential is graduated in meV, while the distance along the zs direction is measured in μm. The results shown in Figs. 2(a) to 2(d) are calculated using 20,000 molecular trajectories, and under the conditions: σ = 0 m/s, E2 (0) = 1.0 x 106V/cm,
Figure imgf000024_0001
= 1.0 x 104 , ΘF - -2.65 rad,
TM = 0.625μsec, λi = 0.628 μm, λ2 = 0.736 μm and Lff = 0. The superposition is created between the |000> and |020> states.
In Fig. 2, and in all of the succeeding figures, the computations were done assuming a transverse velocity of zero. However, the results in the figures may be readily corrected to include a non-zero transverse velocity distribution by assuming that the transverse velocity distribution is Gaussian with a width σv±. The result of such a transverse velocity distribution is to broaden the features in the figures by approximately V2tdaVi, where t is the distance from the cooled, collimated source to the deposition surface.
Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) show the effects of the absence of molecular coherence. Fig 2(a) shows the molecular density distribution and Fig. 2(b) shows the corresponding optical potential. The dipole force due to the non-interference term is exerted primarily along the gradient of the light intensity of the field with frequency ω2 since E2 » Ei. This results in a force acting on the molecules in the direction of the minima of the intensity of the light field with frequency ω2, i.e., toward the nodes of the standing wave. This is the standard result realized in the atomic beam manipulation techniques known in the prior art, where deposition forms at the nodes of the SW.
If, however, the full optical potential Vop is applied, as given by the sum Vop (m) + Vop ( the distribution of the focusing centers changes significantly. Figs. 2(c) and 2(d) show the density distribution and optical potential for the same conditions as in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), but including the effects of molecular coherence. A rather irregular deposition is obtained, with peaks of different intensities, some significantly stronger than others. For the value
Figure imgf000024_0002
= 0.625 μsec used in the example shown in plotting Figs. 2(a) to (d), the weaker spots appear at intervals of approximately 0.5λ2 , with the brighter spots appearing at larger intervals. By contrast, without molecular coherence, as is seen from Fig. 2(a), there is a uniform array of deposition peaks of lower intensity than the maximum peaks obtained with molecular coherence, appearing at a regular interval of 0.5λ2.
Figs. 3(a) to 3(d) are plotted under the same conditions as Figs. 2(a) to 2(d), but show an enlarged section in the zs direction, to better illustrate the differences between the bright and weak deposition spots.
Reference is now made to Figs. 4(a) to 4(d) which show the separate contributions to the molecular density as a function of zs, due to the first and second SW fields, Eχ(0) and E2 (0), taking into account only the non-interference term Vop (m) of the optical potential. The parameters used for this example are identical to those used for calculating the distributions shown in the various plots of Figs. 2 and 3. Fig. 4(a) shows a plot of p for the first field, Fig. 4(b) shows the values of Vop (m) for the first field, Fig. 4(c) shows a plot of p for the second field, and Fig. 4(d) shows the values of Vop (m) for the second field. It is observed that since E » Eι; the contribution of the SW field of frequency ωx is small compared with that of ω2 . It should also be noted that Fig. 4(c) and Fig. 3(a) are essentially equivalent.
Figs. 5(a) to 5(f) and Figs. 6(a) to 6(f) show the dependence of p(zs,Tint) on different superpositions of states. Figs. 5(a) to 5(f) show the results using the superposition ( |000> + |v00>), where v takes the values 1 to 6 for Figs. 5(a) to 5(f) respectively, while Figs. 6(a) to 6(f) show the results using the superposition ( |000> + |v20>), where v takes values of 0 to 5 for Figs. 6(a) to 6(f) respectively. In the calculations used for plotting all parts of Figs. 5 and 6, the values γ = lxlO9 Hz and |c2|2 = 0.2 are assumed, and the other parameters used are identical to those used in Figs. 2 to 4, except that in fig. 5, ΘF = 2.65 rad.
Figs. 7(a) to 7(f) show the dependence of p(zs,Tint) on |c2|2 for six different values of |c2|2 . For Fig. 7(a), |c2|2 = 0.01, for (b) 0.1, for (c) 0.15, for (d) 0.2, for (e) 0.4 and for (f) 0.5. The superposition used is between the |000> and |020> states, and all of the parameters used, with the exception of the variable |c2|2, are those used in Figs. 6. Clearly, the structure of the deposition distribution changes with changing |c2| .
Reference is now made to Figs. 8(a) to 8(d), which show calculated plots of the optical potential corresponding to the parameters E2 (0) = l.OxlO6 V/cm, ΘF = -2.65 rad, λi = 0.628μm, λ2 = 0.736μm, γ = lxlO9 Hz and |c2|2 = 0.2, and for the superposition between |000> and |020> states. The different plots show the results corresponding to four different cases, namely: (a) without molecular coherence and with E2 (0VEi(0) = 1.0 x 104 , (b) with molecular coherence and E2 (0)/Eι(0) = 1.0 x 104, (c) with molecular coherence and E2 (0)/Eι(0) = 10, and (d) with molecular coherence and E2 (0VEI (0) = 1.0 . Plots corresponding to cases (b), (c) and (d) show Vop for 50 different values of ΘM. It is observed that change in the phase difference between C! and c2, i.e. change in the parameter ΘM, does not significantly alter the shape of the optical potential, except for minor changes in the depth of the well. As such, the deposition pattern on the surface cannot be altered significantly by means of changing ΘM.
(b) The Effect of Optical Coherence.
Figs. 9(a) to 9(c) displays the density distribution p(zs,Tint) obtained for three different values of ΘF , for the supeφosition |000> + |020>. In Fig. 9(a), ΘF = -2.65 rad, in Fig 9(b), ΘF = -2.0 rad., and in Fig. 9(c), ΘF = -1.0. The other parameters are those as used in the calculations for the previous relevant figures, such as Figs. 6(a), 7(a), 8(b), etc. The parameter ΘF is seen to directly alter the position of the peaks, as well as their width and intensity.
Figs. 10(a) to 10(f) illustrate the variation in the form and intensity of the strongest peak shown in Fig. 9(a), at zs = -0.49, as a function of the relative phase of the two standing waves. In Figs. 10(a) to 10(f), the absolute value of ΘF is set at -2.65, -2.55, -2.45, -2.35, -2.25 and -2.15 radians respectively. It is seen that the shaφest peak in the deposition density is obtained for ΘF = -2.65 rad., and that the peaks become weaker and broader as ΘF changes from -2.65 to -2.15 radian. In other words, there is an optimum value for ΘF that results in the most intense and highest resolution peak.
Figs. 11(a) to 11(f), using similar calculations, show the variation in the form and intensity of the strongest peak shown in Fig. 9(a), as a function of the intensity of the two SW fields. In Figs. 11, the value of E2 (0VEI(0) is set at l.OxlO4 and E2 (0) = (a) l.OxlO6, (b) 0.97xl06, (c) 0.94xl06, (d) 0.91xl06, (e) 0.88xl06, and (f) 0.85xl06 V/cm. Approximately optimum values of E2 (0) = 1.0xl06V/cm and E2 (0VEι(0) = l.OxlO4 result in a deposition density distribution peak with maximum intensity and minimum width. As is seen from Figs. 11(b) to 11(f), deviation from these values results in the peak becoming fainter and broader.
(c) Effect of Beam Parameters
The beam parameters, T^t , Lff and σv also have an effect on the deposition density distribution. This effect is illustrated in the density plots shown in Figs. 12(a) to 12(c) and Figs. 13(a) to 13(d). Since the SW-induced optical potential is comprised of a series of harmonic-type potential wells of varying depth, the time of interaction Tint plays a crucial role in determining the nature of the deposition. In general, if Tint is longer than the quarter period of oscillation of the molecule in any of the potential wells, shaφ peaks will not be formed in the molecular density distribution. Instead the distribution will have large number of smaller peaks. Expressed mathematically, a single shaφ peak in the region of the potential minima will be formed only when Tm- t ~ (2n+l)T/4, where T is the period of harmonic oscillation for a particular potential well. When Tjnt ≠ (2n+l)T/4, every peak formed at every potential minima after a time T/4, or (2n+l) multiples of T/4, splits into many weaker peaks.
This result can be demonstrated by reference to Figs. 12(a) to 12(c), which show plots of the spatial values of p(zs,Tjnt) obtained for three different values of Tkt, for the supeφosition |000> + |020>, where γ = lxlO9 Hz and |c2|2 = 0.2. The values of T^t are (a) 0.5μsec (b) 0.625μsec, and (c) 0.8μsec. The other parameters used in calculating the data are: σvl = 0 m/sec, E2 (0) = 1.0 106V/cm, E2 (0)/Eι(0) = l.OxlO4, ΘF = -2.65 rad, λi = 0.628μm, λ2 = 0.736μm and Lff = 0.
In accordance with the explanation given above, it is seen that the shaφ peak formed for Tint = 0.625μsec in Fig. 12(b) at zs ~ -0.5μm, splits into two relatively weak peaks at Tint = O.δμsec, as seen in Fig. 12(c). Similarly, for Tint = 0.5μsec (Fig. 12a), an intense single peak is obtained at zs ~ -1.2μm, because the time period T, corresponding to the potential in the region zs ~ -1.2μm is such that T/4 ≡ 0.5μsec. Similarly, the most intense peak formed at T^t = 0.625μsec (Fig. 12b) appears much less intense for Tjnt = 0.5μsec (Fig. 12a) because Tint <T/4. The shaφ single peak formed for Tjnt = 0.5μsec at zs ~ -1.2μm implies that the optical potential well at zs ~ -1.2μm corresponds to the period of oscillation ~ (0.5 / 4) μsec for N2.
It is thus observed that the molecular density distribution for different interaction times is a function of the optical potential, and conversely, knowledge of the spatial structure of the deposition density enables information to be obtained about the optical potential.
All of the above results of the application of the present invention are obtained with zero free flight distance, Lf = 0, between the applied field and the surface onto which the molecules are deposited. The addition of any finite free flight distance leads, for the parameters studied, to a deterioration of the quality of the deposition in terms of its intensity and line width. The density distribution of deposition as a function of free flight distance is shown in Figs. 13(a) to 13(d). The other deposition parameters for Figs. 13(a) to 13(d) are the same as those used for the previous examples, such as shown in Fig. 12(b). The values of Lff used in these figures are: Fig. 13(a), Lff = 0.0; 13(b), Lff =25μm; 13(c), Lff=50μm; and 13(d), Lff =75 μm. It is observed that the intensity of the deposition peak decreases rapidly with increase of Lff , and the peak itself broadens and splits into lower peaks.
The effect of the rotational cooling on the quality of the deposition is illustrated in Figs. 14(a) to 14(d), which show the width of a typical deposited peak as a function of the rotational temperature of the molecules. Fig. 14(a) is shown at a temperature Tr of 298°K, 14(b) at 150°K, 14(c) at 50°K, and 14(d) at 10°K. The graphs show that the deposited peaks becomes wider and more erratic with decrease in the rotational temperature. The effect of rotational cooling is thus opposite to that of the translational cooling.
Finally, Figs. 15(a) to 15(d) are graphs of density distributions obtained, for the deposition of atomic rubidium for different interaction times, both in the presence of and in the absence of coherent control, according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention. The coherent control is achieved using a supersposition of Rydberg states of the atoms, in this case the 8s and 8d states. This preparation can be performed by laser exciting the species from the ground atomic state, preferably where the atoms already have, as a result of preliminary laser cooling, a small transverse velocity distribution. The atoms are passed through two laser fields with wavelengths of 3430.8 nm and 13291.9 nm, respectively, and with intensities of only 1.91 x 10"3 Watt per square cm, and 0.19 Watt per square cm., respectively. Such weak fields are effective because of the high polarizability obtained from Rydberg excited atoms. The results shown in Figs. 15(a) to 15(d) are obtained with the values ΘM = 1.5 rad and ΘF = 1.26 rad, where ΘM and θFare defined above and with lc^2 =0.8 and |c2|2 = 0.2.
In Figs. 15(a) and 15(b) the deposition results atoms pass through the field for 0.26 μsec. In the absence of any interference terms, i.e. where the atoms are only subject to V then the resultant deposition is shown in Fig. 15(b). By contrast, when both Vm and V , are present i.e. where the interference term is included, then the deposition is much improved, as observed in Fig. 15(a). Similar results are shown in Figs. 15(c) and 15(d) for interaction times of 0.36 μsec. It is apparent from the examples shown, that, as in the molecular deposition case, for a specified interaction times, the application of coherent control gives much improved, i.e. narrower, peaks. Furthermore, the peaks may have aperiodic symmetry, unlike the previously mentioned prior art methods of atomic beam deposition.
This invention has been described heretowith in terms of the deposition of the atoms or molecules as a layer on the surface of a substrate to produce a predetermined pattern of material. According to further preferred embodiments of the present invention, the deposited atoms or molecules can be implanted into the surface of a semiconductor substrate, in order to produce selectively doped regions of nanometric resolution according to the predetermined pattern desired. This feature is useful in the production of high resolution semiconductor devices. The atoms or molecules used are chosen according to the semiconductor material to be doped, and the type of doping required.
The embodiments enumerated above have been described in terms of coherence arising out of two supeφosition states, and of focusing arising from the passage of the beam through two standing wave fields. According to further preferred embodiments of the present invention, use can be made of supeφosition of more than two states, and alternatively or additionally, of focusing by means of more than two standing wave fields. Use of these preferred embodiments provides more degrees of freedom in the choice of the parameters used to control the focusing of the atomic or molecular beam, thus allowing more flexibility in the achievement of the specific deposition pattern desired.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of various features described hereinabove as well as variations and modifications thereto which would occur to a person of skill in the art upon reading the above description and which are not in the prior art.

Claims

CLAIMSWe claim:
1. A method of depositing molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of said molecules.
2. The method according to claim 1 and comprising the steps of: providing a collimated beam of molecules; directing said beam through a first electromagnetic field operative to produce a supeφosition of bound states of said molecules; and thereafter directing said beam through a second electromagnetic field, such that said molecules are focused onto said surface in said predetermined pattern.
3. The method according to claim 2 and wherein said second electromagnetic field comprises at least two standing waves.
4. The method according to claim 2 and wherein said supeφosition of bound states of said molecules is formed by means of a two-photon absoφtion process.
5. The method according to claim 2 and also comprising the step of cooling said beam of molecules before production of said supeφosition of bound states.
6. The method according to claim 5 and wherein said step of cooling said beam is effected by means of a mechanical cooling process.
7. The method according to claim 6 and wherein said mechanical cooling process is effected by expansion of said beam through a supersonic nozzle.
8. The method according to claim 5 and wherein said step of cooling said beam is effected by means of a laser cooling process.
9. The method according to claim 8 and wherein said step of cooling said beam also comprises a mechanical cooling step.
10. The method according to claim 9 and wherein said mechanical cooling process is effected by expansion of said beam through a supersonic nozzle.
11. The method according to claim 2 and wherein said first electromagnetic field is formed by at least one first laser beam.
12. The method according to claim 11 and wherein said first laser is a CW laser.
13. The method according to claim 11 and wherein said first laser is a pulsed laser.
14. The method according to claim 3 and wherein said standing waves are formed by beams from at least one second laser.
15. The method according to claim 1 and wherein said predetermined pattern is aperiodic.
16. The method according to claim 2 and wherein said predetermined pattern is determined at least by the parameters of said first electromagnetic field and by the parameters of said second electromagnetic field.
17. The method according to claim 2 and also comprising the step of directing said beam through a third electromagnetic field, arranged approximately orthogonally to said second electromagnetic field, and in effectively the same common plane, such that said molecules are focused onto said surface in a predetermined array pattern.
18. The method according to claim 1 and wherein said predetermined pattern has a resolution of less than 50 nanometers.
19. The method according to claim 1 and wherein said predetermined pattern has a resolution of less than 20 nanometers.
20. A method of depositing molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of said molecules, wherein said molecules are operative to perform nanolithography.
21. A method of depositing molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 1, wherein said surface is a storage medium, and said molecules are operative to write information on said storage medium.
22. A method of depositing molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 1, wherein said molecules in said predetermined pattern constitute a photolithographic mask.
23. A method of depositing molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 1, wherein said molecules produce doped regions within said surface.
24. A method of depositing molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 1, wherein said molecules produce a high profile tip structure on said surface.
25. A method of depositing molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 1, wherein said molecules produce an optical grating structure on said surface.
26. A method of depositing molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 1, wherein said molecules are operative to perform micro-etching.
27. A system for the deposition of molecules in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of said molecules.
28. A system for the deposition of molecules according to claim 27, and comprising: a source emitting a beam of said molecules; a cooler for minimizing the transverse velocity components of said molecules of said beam; a first electromagnetic field through which said beam is directed, operative to produce a supeφosition of bound states of said molecules; and a second electromagnetic field, through which said beam is thereafter directed, such that said molecules are focused onto said surface in said predetermined pattern.
29. A system for the deposition of molecules according to claim 28, and wherein said cooler is a laser cooler.
30. A system for the deposition of molecules according to claim 29, and also comprising a mechanical cooler.
31. A system for the deposition of molecules according to claim 30, and wherein said mechanical cooler comprises a device for the expansion of said beam through a supersonic nozzle.
32. A system for the deposition of molecules according to claim 28 and wherein said first electromagnetic field is formed by at least one first laser beam.
33. A system for the deposition of molecules according to claim 28 and wherein said second electromagnetic field comprises at least two standing waves formed by laser beams.
34. A method of depositing atoms in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of said atoms.
35. The method according to claim 34 and comprising the steps of: providing a collimated beam of atoms; directing said beam through a first electromagnetic field operative to produce a supeφosition of excited states of said atoms; and thereafter directing said beam through a second electromagnetic field, such that said atoms are focused onto said surface in said predetermined pattern.
36. The method according to claim 35 and wherein said excited states are Rydberg states.
37. The method according to claim 35 and wherein said second electromagnetic field comprises at least two standing waves.
38. The method according to claim 35 and also comprising the step of cooling said beam of molecules before production of said supeφosition of excited states.
39. The method according to claim 38 and wherein said step of cooling said beam is effected by means of a laser cooling process.
40. The method according to claim 39 and wherein said step of cooling said beam also includes a mechanical cooling step.
41. The method according to claim 40 and wherein said mechanical cooling process is effected by expansion of said beam through a supersonic nozzle.
42. The method according to claim 35 and wherein said first electromagnetic field is formed by at least one first laser beam.
43. The method according to claim 42 and wherein said first laser is a CW laser.
44. The method according to claim 42 and wherein said first laser is a pulsed laser.
45. The method according to claim 37 and wherein said standing waves are formed by beams from at least one second laser.
46. The method according to claim 34 and wherein said predetermined pattern is aperiodic.
47. The method according to claim 35 and wherein said predetermined pattern is determined at least by the parameters of said first electromagnetic field and by the parameters of said second electromagnetic field.
48. The method according to claim 35 and also comprising the step of directing said beam through a third electromagnetic field, arranged approximately orthogonally to said second electromagnetic field, and in effectively the same common plane, such that said atoms are focused onto said surface in a predetermined array pattern.
49. The method according to claim 34 and wherein said predetermined pattern has a resolution of less than 50 nanometers.
50. The method according to claim 34 and wherein said predetermined pattern has a resolution of less than 20 nanometers.
51. A method of depositing atoms in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of said atoms, wherein said atoms are operative to perform nanolithography.
52. A method of depositing atoms in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 34, wherein said surface is a storage medium, and said atoms are operative to write information on said storage medium.
53. A method of depositing atoms in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 34, wherein said atoms in said predetermined pattern constitute a photolithographic mask.
54. A method of depositing atoms in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 34, wherein said atoms produce doped regions within said surface.
55. A method of depositing atoms in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 34, wherein said atoms produce a high profile tip structure on said surface.
56. A method of depositing atoms in a predetermined pattern onto a surface according to claim 34, wherein said atoms produce an optical grating structure on said surface.
57. A system for the deposition of atoms in a predetermined pattern onto a surface by means of coherently controlled optical focusing of a beam of said atoms.
58. A system for the deposition of atoms according to claim 57, and comprising: a source emitting a beam of said atoms; a cooler for minimizing the transverse velocity components of said atoms of said beam; a first electromagnetic field through which said beam is directed, operative to produce a supeφosition of excited states of said atoms; and a second electromagnetic field, through which said beam is thereafter directed, such that said atoms are focused onto said surface in said predetermined pattern.
59. The method according to claim 58 and wherein said excited states are Rydberg states.
60. A system for the deposition of atoms according to claim 58, and wherein said cooler comprises a laser cooler.
61. A system for the deposition of atoms according to claim 60, and also comprising a mechanical cooler.
62. A system for the deposition of atoms according to claim 61, and wherein said mechanical cooler comprises a device for the expansion of said beam through a supersonic nozzle.
63. A system for the deposition of atoms according to claim 58 and wherein said first electromagnetic field is formed by at least one first laser beam.
64. A system for the deposition of atoms according to claim 58 and wherein said second electromagnetic field comprises at least two standing waves formed by laser beams.
PCT/IL2001/000269 2000-03-20 2001-03-20 Nanometric scale coherently controlled deposition WO2001071778A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2001244499A AU2001244499A1 (en) 2000-03-20 2001-03-20 Nanometric scale coherently controlled deposition

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/531,036 US6548124B1 (en) 2000-03-20 2000-03-20 Nanometric scale coherently controlled molecular deposition
US09/531,036 2000-03-20
US68420300A 2000-10-06 2000-10-06
US09/684,203 2000-10-06

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001071778A2 true WO2001071778A2 (en) 2001-09-27
WO2001071778A3 WO2001071778A3 (en) 2002-03-14

Family

ID=27063445

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IL2001/000269 WO2001071778A2 (en) 2000-03-20 2001-03-20 Nanometric scale coherently controlled deposition

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2001244499A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001071778A2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007051274A1 (en) 2005-11-02 2007-05-10 Alexander Mikhailovich Ilyanok Scanning jet nanolithograph and the operation method thereof
EP1953763A1 (en) * 2005-11-02 2008-08-06 Ilyanok, Alexander Mikhailovich Scanning nanojet microscope and the operation method thereof
CN100491234C (en) * 2004-04-26 2009-05-27 中国科学院光电技术研究所 Method for making nanometer structure by optical operated atom and apparatus thereof
US9993982B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2018-06-12 Nuvotronics, Inc. Methods of fabricating electronic and mechanical structures

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5360764A (en) * 1993-02-16 1994-11-01 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce Method of fabricating laser controlled nanolithography

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5360764A (en) * 1993-02-16 1994-11-01 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce Method of fabricating laser controlled nanolithography

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BELL A S ET AL: "Atomic Lithography" MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, ELSEVIER PUBLISHERS BV., AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 41-42, 1 March 1998 (1998-03-01), pages 587-590, XP004111788 ISSN: 0167-9317 *
DEY B K ET AL: "Coherently controlled nanoscale molecular deposition" PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 9 OCT. 2000, APS, USA, vol. 85, no. 15, pages 3125-3128, XP002180011 ISSN: 0031-9007 *
LISON F ET AL: "NANOSCALE ATOMIC LITHOGRAPHY WITH A CESIUM ATOM BEAM" APPLIED PHYSICS B: LASERS AND OPTICS, SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL, BERLIN, DE, vol. B65, no. 3, 1 September 1997 (1997-09-01), pages 419-421, XP000699348 ISSN: 0946-2171 *
SAKAI H ET AL: "Optical deflection of molecules" PHYSICAL REVIEW A (ATOMIC, MOLECULAR, AND OPTICAL PHYSICS), APRIL 1998, APS THROUGH AIP, USA, vol. 57, no. 4, pages 2794-2801, XP002180010 ISSN: 1050-2947 *

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100491234C (en) * 2004-04-26 2009-05-27 中国科学院光电技术研究所 Method for making nanometer structure by optical operated atom and apparatus thereof
WO2007051274A1 (en) 2005-11-02 2007-05-10 Alexander Mikhailovich Ilyanok Scanning jet nanolithograph and the operation method thereof
EP1953117A1 (en) * 2005-11-02 2008-08-06 Ilyanok, Alexander Mikhailovich Scanning jet nanolithograph and the operation method thereof
EP1953763A1 (en) * 2005-11-02 2008-08-06 Ilyanok, Alexander Mikhailovich Scanning nanojet microscope and the operation method thereof
EP1953763A4 (en) * 2005-11-02 2008-12-17 Ilyanok Alexander Mikhailovich Scanning nanojet microscope and the operation method thereof
EP1953117A4 (en) * 2005-11-02 2008-12-31 Ilyanok Alexander Mikhailovich Scanning jet nanolithograph and the operation method thereof
US9993982B2 (en) 2011-07-13 2018-06-12 Nuvotronics, Inc. Methods of fabricating electronic and mechanical structures

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2001244499A1 (en) 2001-10-03
WO2001071778A3 (en) 2002-03-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Seideman Manipulating external degrees of freedom with intense light: Laser focusing and trapping of molecules
Drodofsky et al. Hexagonal nanostructures generated by light masks for neutral atoms.
Johnson et al. Localization of metastable atom beams with optical standing waves: nanolithography at the Heisenberg limit
US6048671A (en) Ultra-fine microfabrication method using an energy beam
Bloch et al. Optics with an atom laser beam
US5360764A (en) Method of fabricating laser controlled nanolithography
Oberthaler et al. One-, two-and three-dimensional nanostructures with atom lithography
Ohmukai et al. Atom lithography with ytterbium beam
US6891152B2 (en) Nano-lithography using squeezed atomic and molecular states
US6548124B1 (en) Nanometric scale coherently controlled molecular deposition
Chae Entanglement via rotational blockade of MgF molecules in a magic potential
Ohtsu et al. Nanofabrication and atom manipulation by optical near-field and relevant quantum optical theory
WO2001071778A2 (en) Nanometric scale coherently controlled deposition
US7002141B2 (en) Atomic lithography apparatus using electro-optic effect and method of manufacturing atomic structure
McClelland Nanofabrication via atom optics
Bell et al. Nano-lithography with atoms
US6686290B2 (en) Method of forming a fine pattern
Bongs et al. Coherent manipulation and guiding of Bose–Einstein condensates by optical dipole potentials
Thywissen et al. Demonstration of frequency encoding in neutral atom lithography
Camposeo et al. A laser-cooled atom beam for nanolithography applications
Nguyen et al. Coherent control in nanolithography: Rydberg atoms
Olsen et al. Bichromatic atomic lens
US8574824B2 (en) Sub-wavelength lithography via rabi oscillations
US20030213922A1 (en) Nanolithography molecular beam machine
Sun et al. Laser-diode-tuned sequential laser atom cooling and trapping for nanofabrications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: JP