WO2001067644A1 - Compensation for polarization-mode dispersion in multiple wavelength-division multiplexed channels - Google Patents

Compensation for polarization-mode dispersion in multiple wavelength-division multiplexed channels Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001067644A1
WO2001067644A1 PCT/US2001/007257 US0107257W WO0167644A1 WO 2001067644 A1 WO2001067644 A1 WO 2001067644A1 US 0107257 W US0107257 W US 0107257W WO 0167644 A1 WO0167644 A1 WO 0167644A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
power
polarization
pmd
dgd
channels
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/007257
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2001067644A8 (en
Inventor
Reza Khosravani
Steven A. Havstad
Yong-Won Song
Paniz Ebrahimi
Alan E. Willner
Original Assignee
University Of Southern California
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University Of Southern California filed Critical University Of Southern California
Priority to AU2001245488A priority Critical patent/AU2001245488A1/en
Publication of WO2001067644A1 publication Critical patent/WO2001067644A1/en
Publication of WO2001067644A8 publication Critical patent/WO2001067644A8/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/26Optical coupling means
    • G02B6/27Optical coupling means with polarisation selective and adjusting means
    • G02B6/2753Optical coupling means with polarisation selective and adjusting means characterised by their function or use, i.e. of the complete device
    • G02B6/278Controlling polarisation mode dispersion [PMD], e.g. PMD compensation or emulation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/25Arrangements specific to fibre transmission
    • H04B10/2507Arrangements specific to fibre transmission for the reduction or elimination of distortion or dispersion
    • H04B10/2569Arrangements specific to fibre transmission for the reduction or elimination of distortion or dispersion due to polarisation mode dispersion [PMD]

Definitions

  • This application relates to compensation for optical dispersion, and more specifically, to techniques
  • optical transmission media such as optical fibers are birefringent and hence exhibit different
  • an optical signal that comprises two components along the two orthogonal principal directions for each frequency, can be distorted after propagation through the
  • PMD polarization-mode dispersion
  • DGD differential group delay
  • Typical causes for such birefringence in fibers include, among others, imperfect circular core and unbalanced stress in a fiber along different transverse directions.
  • the axis of birefringence of the optical fiber can change randomly on a time scale that varies between milliseconds and hours, depending on the external conditions.
  • the DGD in an actual PMD fiber is not a fixed value but a random variable that has a Maxwellian probability density function.
  • PMD is one of key limitations to the performance of some high-speed optical fiber communication systems at or above 10 Gbits/s per channel due to the fiber birefringence. Fibers with significant PMD (e.g., about 1 to 10 ps/k 1 2 ) are used in various fiber networks, particularly in those that were deployed in 1980' s and early 1990' s. Summary
  • the present disclosure includes PMD compensation in WDM systems without wavelength demultiplexing. All WDM channels are guided through the same optical path in a PMD compensation module. The overall system performance can be improved by reducing the fading probability for one or more worst-performing channels at any given time.
  • One embodiment of a PMD compensation system includes a PMD compensator and a feedback control that produces a control signal for controlling the PMD compensator.
  • the PMD compensator guides a plurality of WDM optical channels through a common optical path to modify a differential group delay (DGD) in each channel.
  • the PMD compensator is operable to adjust the DGD in response to the control signal.
  • the feedback control is coupled to measure a property of the channels as a whole and operable to generate the control signal according to the measured property.
  • FIG. 1 shows a PMD compensation system based on one embodiment .
  • FIG. 2A shows simulation results of the power penalty through the system in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 2B shows the Maxwellian probability distribution for the differential group delay (DGD) in the input signal.
  • FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 4 show measured power penalty and eye diagram for four WDM channels with and without using a PMD compensation system based on the design in
  • FIG. 5 compares the simulated probability density function for the channel with the worst DGD with and without the PMD compensation.
  • FIG. 6 shows another PMD compensation system with two or more adjustable PMD compensators.
  • DGD Maxwellian probability density function may have significant and adverse impact on the signal degradation even though the probabilities for such high DGD values to occur are low. Hence, it is desirable to design a PMD compensation scheme capable of reducing the impact of such high DGD values with low probabilities. In addition, as an alternative to compensation for the PMD in each individual WDM channel, the overall effects of
  • PMD on multiple WDM channels may be reduced by processing the multiple WDM channels as a whole.
  • This compensation scheme may be used to reduce the device complexity and cost for the PMD compensation.
  • an ideal multiple-channel first- order PMD compensator would generate PMD vectors opposite to the PMD vectors of the transmission fiber at each channel wavelength.
  • the correlation bandwidth of PMD vectors for different WDM channels is approximately inversely proportional to the amplitude of the PMD vector and is greater than the channel spacing.
  • the PMD vectors on the Poincare sphere for different WDM channels are correlated.
  • different WDM channels may be treated equally in an appropriate PMD compensation scheme to effectively compensate for the PMD in different WDM channels at the same time.
  • PMD vectors of different WDM channels are independent from one another. Therefore, under the conventional wisdom, this appears to suggest that different WDM channels should be separately compensated.
  • Some PMD compensation schemes follow this rational by using a WDM demultiplexer to first separate the different WDM channels and then using separate PMD compensators to respectively compensate for the PMD in different WDM channels. The PMD-compensated channels are then combined by a WDM multiplexer at the output.
  • a feedback control mechanism is used to monitor the degree of PMD degradation on the overall performance of the combined WDM channels by measuring a property of the combined WDM channels . Based this monitoring, the feedback control mechanism dynamically adjusts the one or more PMD compensators to reduce the PMD effect on the overall performance of the combined WDM channels .
  • FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a PMD compensation system 100.
  • a fiber 101 is used to transport an input optical signal 102 with multiple WDM channels from an optical link with PMD.
  • a PMD compensator 110 is coupled in the fiber 101 to receive and process the input optical signal 102 to produce a PMD-compensated signal 116.
  • the PMD compensator 110 is designed to process the input signal 102 as a whole without distinguishing individual WDM channels .
  • different WDM channels are not demultiplexed and separated within the PMD compensator 110 but are guided through the same optical path within the PMD compensator 110.
  • the PMD compensator 110 includes a polarization controller 112 and a polarization-maintaining (PM) fiber 114.
  • the polarization controller 112 controls and adjusts the polarization of light so that its output signal has a particular polarization.
  • the polarization controller 112 is operable to set its output polarization in any desired polarization state and may operate in response to an external control signal.
  • the PM fiber 114 is birefringent and has fixed orthogonal principal polarization axes.
  • the system 100 implements an optical coupler 120 in the fiber 101 to tap a small PMD monitor signal 122 from the signal 116. The remaining portion of the signal 116 is then sent out in the fiber 101 as the output signal 124.
  • a PMD feedback control loop 130 is used to receive and process the PMD monitor signal 122 and to produce a control signal 136A for controlling the PMD compensator 110.
  • the control signal 136A is used to control the operation of the polarization controller 112.
  • This PMD feedback control loop 130 measures the degree of the total degradation of the combined WDM channels in the signal 116 at any given moment, and adjusts the amount of DGD it produces in the signal 116 to optimally decrease the DGD for the worst WDM channel.
  • each channel may have some residual PMD degradation, the probability of any of the channels being severely degraded by PMD can be significantly reduced. This technique may be used to significantly reduce the power-penalty distribution tail for each WDM channel and the probability of link outage .
  • One realization of the PMD feedback control loop 130 includes a single optical detector 132, a RF power detector 134, and a feedback control circuit 136.
  • the optical detector 132 may be a high-speed detector capable of responding at the highest bit rate in the WDM channels to convert the optical monitor signal 122 into an electrical detector signal 132A.
  • the detector signal 132A essentially replicates the optical modulations in the total optical power of the combined WDM channels in form of a modulated current or voltage .
  • the RF power detector 134 receives the detector signal 132A and measures the electrical power associated with the signal 132A which is proportional to the square of the modulated current or voltage in the signal 132A.
  • the RF power detector 134 then produces a signal 134A that is proportional to the measured AC electrical power of the detector signal 132A either in the entire frequency range or a selected frequency range. Note that the DC portion of the measured electrical power could be removed by filtering 134.
  • This signal 134A is then processed by the feedback control circuit 136 to produce the control signal 136A.
  • This signal 136A is fed back to the polarization controller 112 to increase the detected RF power by adjusting the polarization of the PMD compensator 110.
  • This feedback operation can improve or optimize the overall system performance and produce increased eye-openings for the WDM data streams in the output 124.
  • the RF power detector 134 may include one or more RF bandpass filters to filter the power signal in one or more frequency bands to generate one or more signals like the signal 134A.
  • FIG. 2A shows simulation results of the power penalty corresponding to different DGD values.
  • FIG. 2B shows the corresponding Maxwellian distribution in the input signal 102.
  • the power penalty for small DGD values is small and may be negligible.
  • the high DGD values generate significant power penalties.
  • the probability of a large DGD value is very small.
  • the channels will be severely degraded only if the state-of- polarization of each channel is somewhat orthogonal to its own PMD vector. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that more than one channel will be severely degraded at any given time. [0025]
  • the compensation performance of the system 100 was demonstrated by operating on four equal-power WDM channels with a channel spacing of about 4 ran.
  • FIGS. 3A and 3B show the power penalty measurements for the combined four WDM channels by a total of 1000 independent measurements with 250 measurements per channel.
  • FIG. 4 shows one measurement of the eye diagram of the four channels before and after compensation. Channel 4, the most-degraded channel, is shown to improve significantly after compensation without impacting the other channels .
  • FIG. 5 shows the simulated DGD distribution of the worst channel in a four-channel WDM system with 25 ps average DGD with and without compensation.
  • FIG. 6 shows one PMD compensation system 600 with a PMD compensator 610 that has three adjustable pairs of polarization controller and PM fibers, 110A, HOB, and HOC.
  • the feedback control 136 produces three control signals 136A, 136B, and 136 to control the three different polarization controllers, respectively.
  • the number of the polarization controllers and the PM fiber sections increases, it is more likely to produce a resultant frequency-dependent PMD vector that could better compensate in the PMD in each WDM channel .

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Optical Communication System (AREA)

Abstract

Techniques for compensating for polarization-mode dispension (PMD) in multiple wavelength-division multiplexed (WDM) channels (102) by processing all WDM channels in the same manner without demultiplexing the channels. A feedback control (136) is provided to decrease the worst-case power penalty and the channel fading probability by optimizing over the entire group of WDM channels.

Description

COMPENSATIONFORPOLARIZAΗON-MODEDISPERSIONINMULTIPLEWAVELENGTH- DIVISION MULTIPLEXED CHANNELS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. 5 Provisional Application No.60/187, 126, filed on March 6, 2000.
Background
[0002] This application relates to compensation for optical dispersion, and more specifically, to techniques
10 for reducing polarization-mode dispersion in optical media such as optical fiber links in optical wavelength- division multiplexing (WDM) systems.
[0003] Some optical transmission media such as optical fibers are birefringent and hence exhibit different
15 refractive indices for light with different polarizations along two orthogonal principal directions. Therefore, an optical signal, that comprises two components along the two orthogonal principal directions for each frequency, can be distorted after propagation through the
20 transmission medium since the two components propagate in different group velocities. This optical dispersion is generally referred to as polarization-mode dispersion ("PMD") . [0004] The degree of PMD may be approximately characterized by the average differential group delay ("DGD") between two principal states of polarization. Typical causes for such birefringence in fibers include, among others, imperfect circular core and unbalanced stress in a fiber along different transverse directions. The axis of birefringence of the optical fiber can change randomly on a time scale that varies between milliseconds and hours, depending on the external conditions. Thus, the DGD in an actual PMD fiber is not a fixed value but a random variable that has a Maxwellian probability density function.
[0005] Such polarization-mode dispersion is undesirable in part because the pulse broadening can limit the transmission bit rate, the transmission bandwidth, and other performance factors of an optical communication system. In fact, PMD is one of key limitations to the performance of some high-speed optical fiber communication systems at or above 10 Gbits/s per channel due to the fiber birefringence. Fibers with significant PMD (e.g., about 1 to 10 ps/k 1 2) are used in various fiber networks, particularly in those that were deployed in 1980' s and early 1990' s. Summary
[0006] The present disclosure includes PMD compensation in WDM systems without wavelength demultiplexing. All WDM channels are guided through the same optical path in a PMD compensation module. The overall system performance can be improved by reducing the fading probability for one or more worst-performing channels at any given time. [0007] One embodiment of a PMD compensation system includes a PMD compensator and a feedback control that produces a control signal for controlling the PMD compensator. The PMD compensator guides a plurality of WDM optical channels through a common optical path to modify a differential group delay (DGD) in each channel. The PMD compensator is operable to adjust the DGD in response to the control signal. The feedback control is coupled to measure a property of the channels as a whole and operable to generate the control signal according to the measured property.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0008] FIG. 1 shows a PMD compensation system based on one embodiment .
[0009] FIG. 2A shows simulation results of the power penalty through the system in FIG. 1.
[0010] FIG. 2B shows the Maxwellian probability distribution for the differential group delay (DGD) in the input signal.
[0011] FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 4 show measured power penalty and eye diagram for four WDM channels with and without using a PMD compensation system based on the design in
FIG. 1.
[0012] FIG. 5 compares the simulated probability density function for the channel with the worst DGD with and without the PMD compensation.
[0013] FIG. 6 shows another PMD compensation system with two or more adjustable PMD compensators.
Detailed Description
[0014] The techniques for PMD compensation described in this disclosure are in part based on the recognition that, the high DGD values in the distribution tail of the
DGD Maxwellian probability density function may have significant and adverse impact on the signal degradation even though the probabilities for such high DGD values to occur are low. Hence, it is desirable to design a PMD compensation scheme capable of reducing the impact of such high DGD values with low probabilities. In addition, as an alternative to compensation for the PMD in each individual WDM channel, the overall effects of
PMD on multiple WDM channels may be reduced by processing the multiple WDM channels as a whole. This compensation scheme may be used to reduce the device complexity and cost for the PMD compensation. [0015] In principle, an ideal multiple-channel first- order PMD compensator would generate PMD vectors opposite to the PMD vectors of the transmission fiber at each channel wavelength. In the low-PMD regime where the average DGD in the transmission link is low, the correlation bandwidth of PMD vectors for different WDM channels is approximately inversely proportional to the amplitude of the PMD vector and is greater than the channel spacing. Hence, the PMD vectors on the Poincare sphere for different WDM channels are correlated. Under this condition, different WDM channels may be treated equally in an appropriate PMD compensation scheme to effectively compensate for the PMD in different WDM channels at the same time. [0016] In the high-PMD regime where the correlation bandwidth of the PMD vectors is less than the WDM channel spacing, however, the PMD vectors of different WDM channels are independent from one another. Therefore, under the conventional wisdom, this appears to suggest that different WDM channels should be separately compensated. Some PMD compensation schemes follow this rational by using a WDM demultiplexer to first separate the different WDM channels and then using separate PMD compensators to respectively compensate for the PMD in different WDM channels. The PMD-compensated channels are then combined by a WDM multiplexer at the output. Such schemes may increase both structural complexity and the cost of the PMD compensation system. [0017] The present disclosure goes beyond the conventional wisdom to teach that, different WDM channels may still be treated equally as a whole even in the high- PMD regime where the correlation bandwidth of the PMD vectors is less than the WDM channel spacing. This is in part based on the recognition that two or more WDM channels are not likely to be severely degraded by the PMD at any given time. Instead, statistically, the majority of the WDM channels at any given time are likely to be in the low-DGD regime. Techniques of this disclosure use one or more PMD compensators to equally process different WDM channels without channel discrimination by guiding each and every WDM channels through the same optical path. This approach can significantly decrease the worst-case power penalty and the channel fading probability by optimizing over the entire group of WDM channels although each WDM channel may still have some residue PMD. [0018] In particular, a feedback control mechanism is used to monitor the degree of PMD degradation on the overall performance of the combined WDM channels by measuring a property of the combined WDM channels . Based this monitoring, the feedback control mechanism dynamically adjusts the one or more PMD compensators to reduce the PMD effect on the overall performance of the combined WDM channels .
[0019] FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a PMD compensation system 100. A fiber 101 is used to transport an input optical signal 102 with multiple WDM channels from an optical link with PMD. A PMD compensator 110 is coupled in the fiber 101 to receive and process the input optical signal 102 to produce a PMD-compensated signal 116. Notably, the PMD compensator 110 is designed to process the input signal 102 as a whole without distinguishing individual WDM channels . Hence, different WDM channels are not demultiplexed and separated within the PMD compensator 110 but are guided through the same optical path within the PMD compensator 110.
[0020] In the illustrated implementation, the PMD compensator 110 includes a polarization controller 112 and a polarization-maintaining (PM) fiber 114. The polarization controller 112 controls and adjusts the polarization of light so that its output signal has a particular polarization. In particular, the polarization controller 112 is operable to set its output polarization in any desired polarization state and may operate in response to an external control signal. Several implementations of such a polarization controller are well known. The PM fiber 114 is birefringent and has fixed orthogonal principal polarization axes. Hence, as the polarization controller 112 rotates the polarization of the input signal 102 relative to the principal polarization axes of the PM fiber 114, a delay between the two orthogonal polarizations can be introduced through propagation through the PM fiber 114 in each WDM channel . [0021] The system 100 implements an optical coupler 120 in the fiber 101 to tap a small PMD monitor signal 122 from the signal 116. The remaining portion of the signal 116 is then sent out in the fiber 101 as the output signal 124. A PMD feedback control loop 130 is used to receive and process the PMD monitor signal 122 and to produce a control signal 136A for controlling the PMD compensator 110. In the example shown, the control signal 136A is used to control the operation of the polarization controller 112. This PMD feedback control loop 130 measures the degree of the total degradation of the combined WDM channels in the signal 116 at any given moment, and adjusts the amount of DGD it produces in the signal 116 to optimally decrease the DGD for the worst WDM channel. Hence, although each channel may have some residual PMD degradation, the probability of any of the channels being severely degraded by PMD can be significantly reduced. This technique may be used to significantly reduce the power-penalty distribution tail for each WDM channel and the probability of link outage . [0022] One realization of the PMD feedback control loop 130 includes a single optical detector 132, a RF power detector 134, and a feedback control circuit 136. The optical detector 132 may be a high-speed detector capable of responding at the highest bit rate in the WDM channels to convert the optical monitor signal 122 into an electrical detector signal 132A. The detector signal 132A essentially replicates the optical modulations in the total optical power of the combined WDM channels in form of a modulated current or voltage . The RF power detector 134 receives the detector signal 132A and measures the electrical power associated with the signal 132A which is proportional to the square of the modulated current or voltage in the signal 132A. The RF power detector 134 then produces a signal 134A that is proportional to the measured AC electrical power of the detector signal 132A either in the entire frequency range or a selected frequency range. Note that the DC portion of the measured electrical power could be removed by filtering 134. This signal 134A is then processed by the feedback control circuit 136 to produce the control signal 136A. This signal 136A is fed back to the polarization controller 112 to increase the detected RF power by adjusting the polarization of the PMD compensator 110. This feedback operation can improve or optimize the overall system performance and produce increased eye-openings for the WDM data streams in the output 124. [0023] The RF power detector 134 may include one or more RF bandpass filters to filter the power signal in one or more frequency bands to generate one or more signals like the signal 134A. This technique could be used to increase the sensitivity of the feedback control to the PMD-induced signal variations in the input WDM channels because the power variation in the signal 134A in a particular frequency band may be more sensitive than power variations in other frequency bands . Alternatively, a tunable RF bandpass filter may be used in the power detector 134 to adjust the frequency band of the signal 134A to optimize the detection sensitivity. The feedback control circuit 136 selects one signal 134A or a combination of these signals that is most sensitive to the PMD variation to produce the control signal 136A. [0024] FIG. 2A shows simulation results of the power penalty corresponding to different DGD values. FIG. 2B shows the corresponding Maxwellian distribution in the input signal 102. The power penalty for small DGD values is small and may be negligible. The high DGD values generate significant power penalties. Additionally, the probability of a large DGD value is very small. Moreover, even if two channels both have a large DGD, the channels will be severely degraded only if the state-of- polarization of each channel is somewhat orthogonal to its own PMD vector. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that more than one channel will be severely degraded at any given time. [0025] The compensation performance of the system 100 was demonstrated by operating on four equal-power WDM channels with a channel spacing of about 4 ran. A multi- section PMD emulator with rotatable connectors was used to produce a Maxwellian-distributed DGD with a PMD-vector autocorrelation function that closely resembles that of real fiber. The average DGD produced by the PMD emulator is about 42 ps . The PMD compensator 110 was implemented with an electrically-controlled single-section compensator which includes a polarization controller and a short length of PM fiber to produce 30 ps of DGD. The RF bandpass filter in the RF detector used for the measurements had a bandwidth of about 4 GHz from 4GHz to 8GHz. [0026] FIGS. 3A and 3B show the power penalty measurements for the combined four WDM channels by a total of 1000 independent measurements with 250 measurements per channel. Each independent measurement corresponds to a different emulator state. Simultaneous compensation of all WDM channels can reduce the probability of the highly-degraded tail events . For the combined WDM channels, the 2% worst case of the power penalty distribution tail for the channels is reduced from 9.6 dB to 5.3 dB. [0027] FIG. 4 shows one measurement of the eye diagram of the four channels before and after compensation. Channel 4, the most-degraded channel, is shown to improve significantly after compensation without impacting the other channels . [0028] FIG. 5 shows the simulated DGD distribution of the worst channel in a four-channel WDM system with 25 ps average DGD with and without compensation. Four independent PMD vectors are simulated 200,000 times, and the distribution of the maximum length (DGD) of the four vectors is plotted as the DGD distribution for the worst channel in the uncompensated system. For the compensated system, a fixed 23-ps compensating PMD vector is used in an optimum position on the Poincare sphere for each simulation to decrease the maximum length (DGD) PMD vector. The simulation indicates that, the DGD distribution of the worst channel has been improved on average. In addition, the tail of the distribution has been considerably reduced. The 0.01% tail of DGD distribution is reduced from 77 ps to 57 ps, which reduces the power penalty from 9.5 dB to 4.3 dB. [0029] The PMD compensation system 100 in FIG. 1 may be modified by having more than one pair of a polarization controller 112 and a PM fiber 114. This modification can be used to achieve additional freedom and flexibility in adjusting or optimizing the direction of the compensating PMD vector of the PMD compensator 110 on the Poincare sphere and the length (DGD) of this compensating vector and hence further improve the compensation. FIG. 6 shows one PMD compensation system 600 with a PMD compensator 610 that has three adjustable pairs of polarization controller and PM fibers, 110A, HOB, and HOC. The feedback control 136 produces three control signals 136A, 136B, and 136 to control the three different polarization controllers, respectively. In general, as the number of the polarization controllers and the PM fiber sections increases, it is more likely to produce a resultant frequency-dependent PMD vector that could better compensate in the PMD in each WDM channel .
[0030] Although the present disclosure only includes a few embodiments, other modifications and enhancements may be made without departing from the following claims .

Claims

What Is Claimed Is:
1. A system, comprising: a polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) compensator operable to guide a plurality of wavelength- division multiplexed (WDM) optical channels through a common optical path to modify a differential group delay (DGD) in each channel, said PMD compensator operable to adjust said DGD in response to a control signal; and a feedback control coupled to measure a property of said channels as a whole and operable to generate said control signal according to said property.
2. The system as in claim 1, wherein said property includes an AC electrical power proportional to a current or voltage that represents a total optical power of said channels .
3. The system as in claim 2, wherein said feedback control adjusts said PMD compensator to increase said AC electrical power.
4. The system as in claim 1, wherein said PMD compensator includes a polarization controller operable to adjust an output polarization in response to said control signal, and a polarization-maintaining fiber.
5. The system as in claim 1, wherein said PMD compensator includes a plurality of units connected in series, each unit including a polarization controller operable to adjust an output polarization in response to said control signal and a polarization-maintaining fiber.
6. The system as in claim 1, wherein said feedback control includes: an optical coupler disposed to couple a portion of an output signal from said PMD compensator that combines said channels; an optical detector to convert said portion into an electrical signal; an electrical power detector to detect an AC power of said electrical signal; and a control circuit to generate said control signal to increase said AC power.
7. The system as in claim 6, wherein said electrical power detector includes an electrical bandpass filter to select said AC power in a frequency band to increase response sensibility of said feedback control.
8. The system as in claim 6, wherein said electrical power detector includes at least two electrical bandpass filters with different frequency bands to select said AC power in one of said frequency bands to increase response sensibility of said feedback control.
9. A method, comprising: directing each of a plurality of wavelength- division multiplexed (WDM) optical channels through a common optical path to modify a differential group delay (DGD) in each channel so as to produce an output with modified WDM channels; measuring power of an AC portion of said output; and modifying the DGD to increase said power.
10. The method as in claim 9, wherein said modification includes adjusting a polarization of each channel relative to a principal axis of a polarization- maintaining fiber in said common optical path.
11. The method as in claim 9, further comprising: filtering said power in frequency to select a portion of said power in a selected frequency band; and wherein the DGD is modified to increase said portion in said selected frequency band.
12. The method as in claim 9, further comprising: filtering said power in frequency to select a first portion of said power in a first selected frequency band; filtering said power in frequency to select a second portion of said power in a second selected frequency band; and selecting one of said first and said portions to be increased by modifying the DGD.
13. The method as in claim 9, wherein said measuring power of said AC portion of said output includes: tapping an output of said common optical path to produce an optical monitor signal; converting said optical monitor signal into an electrical signal; measuring an AC electrical power of said electrical signal; and filtering said AC electrical power in frequency to produce said AC portion.
14. The method as in claim 9, wherein said common optical path includes a first optical polarization controller and a first polarization-maintaining fiber, and wherein said first optical polarization controller is adjusted to modify the DGD.
15. The method as in Claim 9, wherein said common optical path includes a plurality of pairs of a polarization controller and a polarization-maintaining fiber connected in series, wherein each optical polarization controller is adjusted to modify the DGD.
16. A system, comprising: a polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) compensator operable to guide a plurality of wavelength- division multiplexed (WDM) optical channels through a common optical path to modify a differential group delay (DGD) in each channel, said common optical path comprising a plurality of adjustable units connected in series respectively operable to adjust the DGD in response to a plurality of control signals, respectively; and a feedback control coupled to measure a property of said channels as a whole after transmitting through said common optical path and operable to generate said control signals according to said property.
17. The system as in claim 16, wherein each adjustable unit includes a polarization controller operable to adjust an output polarization in response to a respective control signal and a polarization- maintaining fiber.
18. The system as in claim 16, wherein said feedback control includes: an optical coupler disposed to couple a portion of an output signal from said PMD compensator that combines said channels; an optical detector to convert said portion into an electrical signal; an electrical power detector to detect an AC power of said electrical signal; and a control circuit to generate said control signals to increase said AC power.
19. A method, comprising: directing each of a plurality of wavelength- division multiplexed (WDM) optical channels through a common optical path to modify a differential group delay (DGD) in each channel so as to produce an output with modified WDM channels; and controlling said DGD to reduce an overall signal fading in said output caused by polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) on all of said channels without separately compensating PMD in each channel.
20. The method as in claim 19, further comprising: measuring power of an AC portion of said output; and modifying the DGD to increase said power.
PCT/US2001/007257 2000-03-06 2001-03-06 Compensation for polarization-mode dispersion in multiple wavelength-division multiplexed channels WO2001067644A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2001245488A AU2001245488A1 (en) 2000-03-06 2001-03-06 Compensation for polarization-mode dispersion in multiple wavelength-division multiplexed channels

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18712600P 2000-03-06 2000-03-06
US60/187,126 2000-03-06

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001067644A1 true WO2001067644A1 (en) 2001-09-13
WO2001067644A8 WO2001067644A8 (en) 2001-11-01

Family

ID=22687706

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/007257 WO2001067644A1 (en) 2000-03-06 2001-03-06 Compensation for polarization-mode dispersion in multiple wavelength-division multiplexed channels

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US6603890B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2001245488A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001067644A1 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1294115A2 (en) * 2001-09-18 2003-03-19 Fujitsu Limited Transmission characteristic compensation scheme
WO2003028254A2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-04-03 Terapulse, Inc. Method and apparatus for higher-order compensation of transmission distortion in optical transmission media
WO2003050983A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2003-06-19 Marconi Uk Intellectual Property Ltd Signal transmission apparatus and a method of signal transmission
WO2003077449A1 (en) * 2002-03-14 2003-09-18 Aelis Photonics (Israel) Ltd. Dynamic broadband optical equalizer
US6856710B2 (en) 2001-03-19 2005-02-15 Terapulse, Inc. Polarization mode dispersion compensation in optical transmission media
EP1570595A1 (en) * 2002-11-08 2005-09-07 Pirelli & C. S.p.A. Optical communication line and system with reduced polarization mode dispersion
US7106443B2 (en) 2002-04-10 2006-09-12 Lighthouse Capital Partners, Inc. Optical signal-to-noise monitor having increased coherence
WO2017166327A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Automatic endless polarization controller for a silicon-on-insulator platform

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3655826B2 (en) * 1998-07-10 2005-06-02 シーメンス アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト Polarization mode dispersion detector
JP2001203637A (en) * 2000-01-19 2001-07-27 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Wavelength multiplex optical transmission system
ITMI20010442A1 (en) * 2001-03-02 2002-09-02 Marconi Comm Spa OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR COMPENSATION OR EMULATION OF PMD EFFECTS
US20030067641A1 (en) * 2001-08-14 2003-04-10 Terapulse, Inc. Apparatus and methods for polarization measurements across a spectral range
DE10147227B4 (en) * 2001-09-14 2013-09-05 Finisar Corp. Optical filter and method for optical filtering
US7068896B1 (en) 2002-02-07 2006-06-27 Northwestern University Method and system for the controlled production of polarization mode dispersion
US6724469B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2004-04-20 Exfo Electro-Optical Engineering Inc. Polarization-OTDR for measuring characteristics of optical fibers
US20030231390A1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2003-12-18 Wein Steven J. Athermal delay line
EP1347589A1 (en) * 2002-03-21 2003-09-24 Alcatel A wavelength division multiplex transmission system or a polarisation division multiplex system which means for measuring dispersion characteristics, an optical transmitter, an optical receiver and a method therefore
US7330663B2 (en) * 2002-06-03 2008-02-12 Lucent Technologies Inc. PMD-reduction processing for a multi-channel receiver
US7352971B2 (en) * 2002-08-02 2008-04-01 Nortel Networks Limited Broadband control of polarization mode dispersion
US7362977B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2008-04-22 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for reduction of non-linear intra-channel distortions
JP4468656B2 (en) * 2003-05-27 2010-05-26 株式会社日立製作所 Signal waveform deterioration compensator
US20060198640A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-09-07 Jopson Robert M Method and apparatus for PMD mitigation in optical communication systems
WO2006096391A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-09-14 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for pmd mitigation in optical communication systems
US7256876B1 (en) 2005-07-14 2007-08-14 At&T Corp. Estimating optical transmission system penalties induced by polarization mode dispersion (PMD)
US7869716B1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2011-01-11 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Method and apparatus for broadband mitigation of polarization mode dispersion
US8140934B2 (en) * 2008-03-13 2012-03-20 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. LDPC-coded multilevel modulation scheme

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5473457A (en) * 1993-12-20 1995-12-05 Nec Corporation Method and apparatus for compensating dispersion of polarization
US5930414A (en) * 1997-09-16 1999-07-27 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic compensation of first-order polarization mode dispersion (PMD)
US5949560A (en) * 1997-02-05 1999-09-07 Northern Telecom Limited Optical transmission system

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2758029B1 (en) * 1996-12-30 1999-01-29 Alsthom Cge Alcatel POLARIZATION DISPERSION COMPENSATION DEVICE IN AN OPTICAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
US5859939A (en) * 1997-02-25 1999-01-12 Mci Communications Corporation Method and system for equalizing PMD using incremental delay switching
FR2791835B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2001-06-29 Cit Alcatel DEVICE AND METHOD FOR COMPENSATING FOR POLARIZATION DISPERSION IN AN OPTICAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
US6330375B1 (en) * 1999-12-16 2001-12-11 Lucent Technologies Inc. Distortion analyzer for compensation apparatus of first order polarization mode dispersion (PMD)
US6459830B1 (en) 2000-02-08 2002-10-01 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Method and apparatus to compensate for polarization mode dispersion

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5473457A (en) * 1993-12-20 1995-12-05 Nec Corporation Method and apparatus for compensating dispersion of polarization
US5949560A (en) * 1997-02-05 1999-09-07 Northern Telecom Limited Optical transmission system
US5930414A (en) * 1997-09-16 1999-07-27 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic compensation of first-order polarization mode dispersion (PMD)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6856710B2 (en) 2001-03-19 2005-02-15 Terapulse, Inc. Polarization mode dispersion compensation in optical transmission media
EP1294115A3 (en) * 2001-09-18 2004-08-11 Fujitsu Limited Transmission characteristic compensation scheme
US6904548B2 (en) 2001-09-18 2005-06-07 Fujitsu Limited Transmission characteristic compensation scheme
EP1294115A2 (en) * 2001-09-18 2003-03-19 Fujitsu Limited Transmission characteristic compensation scheme
WO2003028254A3 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-07-31 Terapulse Inc Method and apparatus for higher-order compensation of transmission distortion in optical transmission media
WO2003028254A2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-04-03 Terapulse, Inc. Method and apparatus for higher-order compensation of transmission distortion in optical transmission media
WO2003050983A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2003-06-19 Marconi Uk Intellectual Property Ltd Signal transmission apparatus and a method of signal transmission
CN100409598C (en) * 2001-12-12 2008-08-06 爱立信股份有限公司 Signal transmission apparatus and a method of signal transmission
US7447441B2 (en) 2001-12-12 2008-11-04 Ericsson Ab Signal transmission apparatus and a method of signal transmission
WO2003077449A1 (en) * 2002-03-14 2003-09-18 Aelis Photonics (Israel) Ltd. Dynamic broadband optical equalizer
US7106443B2 (en) 2002-04-10 2006-09-12 Lighthouse Capital Partners, Inc. Optical signal-to-noise monitor having increased coherence
EP1570595A1 (en) * 2002-11-08 2005-09-07 Pirelli & C. S.p.A. Optical communication line and system with reduced polarization mode dispersion
WO2017166327A1 (en) 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Automatic endless polarization controller for a silicon-on-insulator platform
EP3408694A4 (en) * 2016-03-31 2019-02-20 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Automatic endless polarization controller for a silicon-on-insulator platform
EP3796056A1 (en) * 2016-03-31 2021-03-24 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Automatic endless polarization controller for a silicon-on-insulator platform

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2001245488A1 (en) 2001-09-17
US6603890B2 (en) 2003-08-05
WO2001067644A8 (en) 2001-11-01
US20010055437A1 (en) 2001-12-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6603890B2 (en) Compensation for polarization-mode dispersion in multiple wavelength-division multiplexed channels without separate composition for each individual channel
US20100239245A1 (en) Polarization Mode Emulators and Polarization Mode Dispersion Compensators Based on Optical Polarization Rotators with Discrete Polarization States
US5930414A (en) Method and apparatus for automatic compensation of first-order polarization mode dispersion (PMD)
US20080038000A1 (en) Monitoring and in-line compensation of polarization dependent loss for lightwave systems
EP1223694A2 (en) Dispersion compensating method, dispersion compensating apparatus and optical transmission system
WO2002019001A2 (en) Compensation and control of both first-order and higher-order polarization-mode dispersion
US6459830B1 (en) Method and apparatus to compensate for polarization mode dispersion
EP1495560B1 (en) Polarisation mode dispersion compensator
Khosravani et al. Polarization-mode dispersion compensation in WDM systems
US20010046348A1 (en) Multi-wavelength/multi-channel system
JP4278913B2 (en) System and method for compensating for both chromatic dispersion and polarization mode dispersion
US20040197100A1 (en) Optical transmission system and optical coupler/branching filter
JP2001203637A (en) Wavelength multiplex optical transmission system
JP4044115B2 (en) Polarization mode dispersion compensation apparatus, polarization mode dispersion compensation method, and application thereof to an optical communication system
US6889011B1 (en) Integrated adaptive chromatic dispersion/polarization mode dispersion compensation system
US5537238A (en) Method and apparatus for making wavelength adjustments in a wavelength division multiplex system
US20060263094A1 (en) Apparatus for mitigating the effects of polarization mode dispersion of a plurality of optical signals
US20060013592A1 (en) Polarization mode dispersion compensation apparatus and method thereof in light wavelength division multiplexing transmission system
Yan et al. Demonstration of in-line monitoring and compensation of polarization-dependent loss for multiple channels
Kieckbusch et al. Adaptive PMD compensator in 160Gb/s DPSK transmission over installed fiber
US6961483B1 (en) Technique for mitigation of polarization mode dispersion in fiber optic transmission links
JP4056846B2 (en) Dispersion monitoring device, dispersion monitoring method, and automatic dispersion compensation system
EP1148667A1 (en) A multi-wavelength/multi-channel optical system
Yan et al. Simple bit-rate-independent PMD monitoring for WDM systems
Yu et al. Optical compensation of PMD-induced power fading for single sideband subcarrier-multiplexed systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: C1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: C1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

CFP Corrected version of a pamphlet front page
CR1 Correction of entry in section i

Free format text: PAT. BUL. 37/2001 UNDER (81) ADD "CO"

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP