WO2001006056A1 - Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process - Google Patents

Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001006056A1
WO2001006056A1 PCT/FI2000/000648 FI0000648W WO0106056A1 WO 2001006056 A1 WO2001006056 A1 WO 2001006056A1 FI 0000648 W FI0000648 W FI 0000648W WO 0106056 A1 WO0106056 A1 WO 0106056A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
variable
measured
headbox
unknown
reference variable
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/FI2000/000648
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
John Shakespeare
Jari HÄMÄLÄINEN
Petri Nyberg
Original Assignee
Metso Paper Automation Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Metso Paper Automation Oy filed Critical Metso Paper Automation Oy
Priority to CA002379228A priority Critical patent/CA2379228A1/en
Priority to DE10084794T priority patent/DE10084794T1/en
Priority to AU62840/00A priority patent/AU6284000A/en
Priority to AT0912300A priority patent/AT410846B/en
Publication of WO2001006056A1 publication Critical patent/WO2001006056A1/en
Priority to FI20020068A priority patent/FI20020068A/en

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21GCALENDERS; ACCESSORIES FOR PAPER-MAKING MACHINES
    • D21G9/00Other accessories for paper-making machines
    • D21G9/0009Paper-making control systems

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process.
  • US patent 5812404 discloses a method for the continuous overall regulation of a headbox of a paper machine.
  • a physical fluid flow model of a pulp suspension flow discharged from the headbox to be regulated is formed and solved to obtain a simulated flow state based, e.g., on data on the geometry of the headbox and initial and boundary conditions related to the headbox.
  • a target flow state based on the quality requirements of the paper produced from the pulp suspension flow, the costs of operation and runnability of the machine is obtained and a difference between the simulated flow state obtained as the solution of the flow model and the target flow state is determined. This difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized to determine optimal regulation values and set values for instrumentation devices and actuators of the headbox which affect the pulp suspension flow.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a method for obtaining a more accurate estimate of unknown or imprecisely known variables of a paper making process.
  • the method of the invention is characterized by comprising the steps of forming a mathematical model of a process, the model including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known, measuring a plurality of process variables and at least one property of a manufactured paper web, utilizing the measurements as initial and boundary values of the model, choosing at least one of said measured process variables or measured web properties as a reference variable, choosing an initial value for the target variable, solving the mathematical model, simulating a value of the reference variable utilizing the model, determining a difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable, the difference constituting a cost function, and optimizing the cost function to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable.
  • the essential idea of the invention is that a mathematical model of a process is formed, the model including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known.
  • Plural process variables are measured and at least one property of the manufactured paper web is measured.
  • At least one of said measured process variables or measured web properties is chosen as a reference variable.
  • Boundary conditions for the mathematical model are obtained from the remaining measured process variables and measured web properties.
  • An initial value is chosen for the target variable for solving the mathematical model, the reference variable is thereby simulated, and a difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable is determined. This difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable.
  • the idea of a preferred embodiment is that the process is a flow process in a headbox and the target variable is a variable of the headbox.
  • An advantage of the invention is that variables of the paper making process can be estimated in a more accurate and diverse manner than earlier, which allows to improve control of the paper making process.
  • the method applies particularly to estimation of unknown or imprecisely known variables which are multivariate or vector quantities, such as the cross machine profile of a process variable or web property, or the statistical distribution of a variable whose value changes with position or time.
  • paper also refers to paper board and tissue.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic side view of a paper making process
  • Figure 2 is a simplified block diagram of a method of the invention
  • Figure 3 is a simplified flowchart for an optimizing controller in which the method of the invention can be utilized.
  • Figure 1 schematically shows a paper machine.
  • the paper machine comprises a headbox 1 , from which pulp is fed into a former 2, where a fiber web 3 is formed of the pulp.
  • the web 3 is conveyed to a press 4 and further to a dryer unit 5. From the dryer unit 5 the web 3 is conveyed to a reel 6.
  • a paper machine may also comprise, for example, a size press, coaters or a calender, which are not illustrated in the Figure 1 for the sake of clarity.
  • the function of the paper machine is known per se for those skilled in the art, and will therefore not be further explained in this context.
  • the paper machine also comprises at least one measuring device 7 for measuring properties of the paper web 3.
  • the measuring device 7 is used for measuring e.g. the basis weight BW, dry weight profile DWP and the fiber orientation angle profile FO of the paper web 3.
  • the paper machine also comprises other measuring devices for measuring values and properties at different parts of the paper machine. Headbox pressure P, headbox consistency Cs, a profile of dilution valve positions DVP and headbox upper lip profile ULP are given as examples of such measurements in Figure 1. Additional properties of the paper web or of process streams can be measured from samples taken from the manufactured paper or process streams using instruments located elsewhere.
  • the invention relates to a method for estimating unobserved variables or imprecisely measured process variables in a paper machine during operation, and especially for estimating an unknown or imprecisely measured process variable in the headbox 1 of a paper machine or in the sheet formed of the headbox discharge.
  • a mathematical model of the process is formed based for example on the geometry of the headbox 1 and physical models of the flow phenomena occurring therein, and including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known.
  • Plural process variables are measured, for example using instruments in or around the headbox 1 and the various process streams leading to or from the headbox, and at least one property of the manufactured paper web 3 is measured using instruments elsewhere on the machine or in a laboratory.
  • At least one of said measured process variables or measured web properties is chosen as a reference variable.
  • Boundary conditions for the mathematical model are obtained from the remaining measured process variables and measured web properties.
  • An initial value is chosen for the target variable for solving the mathematical model, the reference variable is thereby simulated, and a difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable is determined. This difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable.
  • the initial value chosen can be, for example, an imprecise measurement of the target variable, so that the optimization produces an estimate which is of superior accuracy to the measurement.
  • FIG. 2 A simplified flow chart for the estimation process is depicted in Figure 2.
  • the physical and geometric parameters are known a priori.
  • the measurements of known states are provided by measuring instruments or operator input.
  • the initial estimate of the unknown variable or state may be supplied from an approximate measurement, or may be provided by other means of estimation, or by an operator.
  • the slice opening profile is approximately known.
  • the profile of the upper lip ULP is measured at a number of locations across the slice, but the shape of the lower lip is generally unknown.
  • various profiles which depend on the slice opening profile are measured, such as the basis weight profile BW or dry weight profile DWP and the fiber orientation angle profile FO.
  • the optimization uses the measured slice lip shape as an initial estimate of the slice opening profile.
  • One or more suitable measurements such as the fiber orientation angle profile FO or dry weight profile DWP or basis weight profile BW are used as reference variables.
  • Other measurements such as headbox pressure P, consistency Cs, temperatures, flows, a profile of dilution valve positions DVP etc. are used as inputs to a mathematical model of the flow process in the headbox 1 and jet.
  • headbox pressure P consistency Cs, temperatures, flows, a profile of dilution valve positions DVP etc.
  • a penalty to be optimized is calculated from the difference between the measured fiber orientation angle profile and simulated fiber orientation angle profile. This penalty is optimized by adjusting the estimate of the slice opening profile, the optimum being reached when the simulated fiber orientation angle profile most closely matches the measured fiber orientation angle profile.
  • This invention solves a mathematical model of the headbox to estimate unknown or imprecisely known current operating parameters consistent with measured properties of the current product.
  • the present invention is particularly well suited for estimation of the initial conditions for a method of optimizing control such as that disclosed in US 5812404 which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the present invention uses inverse modeling to provide such a controller with improved estimates of its initial and boundary conditions.
  • the present invention can utilize similar mathematical and physical models to those used by such a controller, or can use different ones.
  • FIG. 3 A simplified flow chart for an optimizing controller is depicted in Figure 3.
  • One or more of the "measurements of known variables/states" in that figure can be supplied by the estimation process of this invention.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)

Abstract

Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process wherein a mathematical model of a process is formed, the model including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known. A plurality of process variables and at least one property of a manufactured paper are measured. At least one of said measured variables or properties is chosen as a reference variable. An initial value is chosen for the target variable for solving the mathematical model and a difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable is determined. The difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable.

Description

METHOD OF ESTIMATING UNKNOWN OR IMPRECISELY KNOWN VARIABLES IN A PAPER MAKING PROCESS
The invention relates to a method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process.
US patent 5812404 discloses a method for the continuous overall regulation of a headbox of a paper machine. A physical fluid flow model of a pulp suspension flow discharged from the headbox to be regulated is formed and solved to obtain a simulated flow state based, e.g., on data on the geometry of the headbox and initial and boundary conditions related to the headbox. A target flow state based on the quality requirements of the paper produced from the pulp suspension flow, the costs of operation and runnability of the machine is obtained and a difference between the simulated flow state obtained as the solution of the flow model and the target flow state is determined. This difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized to determine optimal regulation values and set values for instrumentation devices and actuators of the headbox which affect the pulp suspension flow.
Provision of accurate initial and boundary conditions is advantageous in a method disclosed in US 5812404 but the solution of US 5821 404 relies on measurements alone to provide said conditions. Measurements alone cannot provide all required initial values with adequate accuracy. The values of variables are also too imprecise or unknown at several other points of the paper making process, and thus it would be necessary to obtain a more accurate estimate of the variable values. An object of the present invention is to provide a method for obtaining a more accurate estimate of unknown or imprecisely known variables of a paper making process.
The method of the invention is characterized by comprising the steps of forming a mathematical model of a process, the model including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known, measuring a plurality of process variables and at least one property of a manufactured paper web, utilizing the measurements as initial and boundary values of the model, choosing at least one of said measured process variables or measured web properties as a reference variable, choosing an initial value for the target variable, solving the mathematical model, simulating a value of the reference variable utilizing the model, determining a difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable, the difference constituting a cost function, and optimizing the cost function to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable.
The essential idea of the invention is that a mathematical model of a process is formed, the model including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known. Plural process variables are measured and at least one property of the manufactured paper web is measured. At least one of said measured process variables or measured web properties is chosen as a reference variable. Boundary conditions for the mathematical model are obtained from the remaining measured process variables and measured web properties. An initial value is chosen for the target variable for solving the mathematical model, the reference variable is thereby simulated, and a difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable is determined. This difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable. The idea of a preferred embodiment is that the process is a flow process in a headbox and the target variable is a variable of the headbox. An advantage of the invention is that variables of the paper making process can be estimated in a more accurate and diverse manner than earlier, which allows to improve control of the paper making process. The method applies particularly to estimation of unknown or imprecisely known variables which are multivariate or vector quantities, such as the cross machine profile of a process variable or web property, or the statistical distribution of a variable whose value changes with position or time.
In this disclosure the term "paper" also refers to paper board and tissue.
The invention will be described in greater detail in the accompanying drawings, in which
Figure 1 is a schematic side view of a paper making process, Figure 2 is a simplified block diagram of a method of the invention, and
Figure 3 is a simplified flowchart for an optimizing controller in which the method of the invention can be utilized. Figure 1 schematically shows a paper machine. The paper machine comprises a headbox 1 , from which pulp is fed into a former 2, where a fiber web 3 is formed of the pulp. The web 3 is conveyed to a press 4 and further to a dryer unit 5. From the dryer unit 5 the web 3 is conveyed to a reel 6. A paper machine may also comprise, for example, a size press, coaters or a calender, which are not illustrated in the Figure 1 for the sake of clarity. Furthermore, the function of the paper machine is known per se for those skilled in the art, and will therefore not be further explained in this context.
The paper machine also comprises at least one measuring device 7 for measuring properties of the paper web 3. The measuring device 7 is used for measuring e.g. the basis weight BW, dry weight profile DWP and the fiber orientation angle profile FO of the paper web 3. The paper machine also comprises other measuring devices for measuring values and properties at different parts of the paper machine. Headbox pressure P, headbox consistency Cs, a profile of dilution valve positions DVP and headbox upper lip profile ULP are given as examples of such measurements in Figure 1. Additional properties of the paper web or of process streams can be measured from samples taken from the manufactured paper or process streams using instruments located elsewhere.
The invention relates to a method for estimating unobserved variables or imprecisely measured process variables in a paper machine during operation, and especially for estimating an unknown or imprecisely measured process variable in the headbox 1 of a paper machine or in the sheet formed of the headbox discharge. A mathematical model of the process is formed based for example on the geometry of the headbox 1 and physical models of the flow phenomena occurring therein, and including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known. Plural process variables are measured, for example using instruments in or around the headbox 1 and the various process streams leading to or from the headbox, and at least one property of the manufactured paper web 3 is measured using instruments elsewhere on the machine or in a laboratory. At least one of said measured process variables or measured web properties is chosen as a reference variable. Boundary conditions for the mathematical model are obtained from the remaining measured process variables and measured web properties. An initial value is chosen for the target variable for solving the mathematical model, the reference variable is thereby simulated, and a difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable is determined. This difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable. The initial value chosen can be, for example, an imprecise measurement of the target variable, so that the optimization produces an estimate which is of superior accuracy to the measurement.
A simplified flow chart for the estimation process is depicted in Figure 2. The physical and geometric parameters are known a priori. The measurements of known states are provided by measuring instruments or operator input. The initial estimate of the unknown variable or state may be supplied from an approximate measurement, or may be provided by other means of estimation, or by an operator.
For example, in the headbox 1 the slice opening profile is approximately known. The profile of the upper lip ULP is measured at a number of locations across the slice, but the shape of the lower lip is generally unknown. However, various profiles which depend on the slice opening profile are measured, such as the basis weight profile BW or dry weight profile DWP and the fiber orientation angle profile FO.
The optimization uses the measured slice lip shape as an initial estimate of the slice opening profile. One or more suitable measurements, such as the fiber orientation angle profile FO or dry weight profile DWP or basis weight profile BW are used as reference variables. Other measurements, such as headbox pressure P, consistency Cs, temperatures, flows, a profile of dilution valve positions DVP etc. are used as inputs to a mathematical model of the flow process in the headbox 1 and jet. By solving the mathematical model of the headbox 1 , a simulation of the fiber orientation angle profile is obtained. A penalty to be optimized is calculated from the difference between the measured fiber orientation angle profile and simulated fiber orientation angle profile. This penalty is optimized by adjusting the estimate of the slice opening profile, the optimum being reached when the simulated fiber orientation angle profile most closely matches the measured fiber orientation angle profile. This invention solves a mathematical model of the headbox to estimate unknown or imprecisely known current operating parameters consistent with measured properties of the current product.
The present invention is particularly well suited for estimation of the initial conditions for a method of optimizing control such as that disclosed in US 5812404 which is incorporated herein by reference. The present invention uses inverse modeling to provide such a controller with improved estimates of its initial and boundary conditions. The present invention can utilize similar mathematical and physical models to those used by such a controller, or can use different ones.
A simplified flow chart for an optimizing controller is depicted in Figure 3. One or more of the "measurements of known variables/states" in that figure can be supplied by the estimation process of this invention.
The drawings and the description thereof are merely intended to illustrate the inventive idea. The details of the invention may vary within the scope of the claims. Thus the method of the invention can in principle be applied at any point of the paper making process.

Claims

1. A method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process, the method comprising the steps of forming a mathematical model of a process, the model including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known, measuring a plurality of process variables and at least one property of a manufactured paper web, utilizing the measurements as initial and boundary values of the model, choosing at least one of said measured process variables or measured web properties as a reference variable, choosing an initial value for the target variable, solving the mathematical model, simulating a value of the reference variable utilizing the model, determining a difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable, the difference constituting a cost function, and optimizing the cost function to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable.
2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the process is a flow process in a headbox and the target variable is a variable of the headbox.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the target variable is a slice opening profile of the headbox.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the reference variable is a fiber orientation angle profile.
5. A method according to claim 3, wherein the reference variable is a basis weight profile.
6. A method according to claim 3, wherein the reference variable is a dry weight profile.
7. A method according to claim 2, wherein the measured process variables comprise headbox pressure and headbox consistency.
8. A method according to claim 2, wherein the measured process variables comprise a profile of dilution valve positions.
PCT/FI2000/000648 1999-07-15 2000-07-14 Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process WO2001006056A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002379228A CA2379228A1 (en) 1999-07-15 2000-07-14 Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process
DE10084794T DE10084794T1 (en) 1999-07-15 2000-07-14 Method for estimating unknown or inaccurately known variables in a paper making process
AU62840/00A AU6284000A (en) 1999-07-15 2000-07-14 Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process
AT0912300A AT410846B (en) 1999-07-15 2000-07-14 METHOD FOR ESTIMATING UNKNOWN OR INACCURATE VARIABLES IN A PAPER PRODUCTION PROCESS
FI20020068A FI20020068A (en) 1999-07-15 2002-01-14 Method for estimating unknown or inaccurately known variables in the papermaking process

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US35388499A 1999-07-15 1999-07-15
US09/353,884 1999-07-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001006056A1 true WO2001006056A1 (en) 2001-01-25

Family

ID=23391006

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI2000/000648 WO2001006056A1 (en) 1999-07-15 2000-07-14 Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process

Country Status (5)

Country Link
AT (1) AT410846B (en)
AU (1) AU6284000A (en)
CA (1) CA2379228A1 (en)
DE (1) DE10084794T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001006056A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2063020A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2009-05-27 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Simulation method, fiber orientation control method, and fiber orientation control device

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5812404A (en) * 1996-04-18 1998-09-22 Valmet Corporation Method for overall regulation of the headbox of a paper machine or equivalent

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5812404A (en) * 1996-04-18 1998-09-22 Valmet Corporation Method for overall regulation of the headbox of a paper machine or equivalent

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2063020A1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2009-05-27 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Simulation method, fiber orientation control method, and fiber orientation control device
EP2063020A4 (en) * 2006-09-05 2012-04-25 Yokogawa Electric Corp Simulation method, fiber orientation control method, and fiber orientation control device
US8214071B2 (en) 2006-09-05 2012-07-03 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Simulation method, fiber orientation control method and fiber orientation control apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATA91232000A (en) 2002-12-15
AU6284000A (en) 2001-02-05
CA2379228A1 (en) 2001-01-25
DE10084794T1 (en) 2002-09-05
AT410846B (en) 2003-08-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2334660C (en) Paper stock shear and formation control
US5825653A (en) Method for overall regulation of a former of a paper machine or equivalent
US6473670B1 (en) Method and apparatus for executing grade change in paper machine grade
US5812404A (en) Method for overall regulation of the headbox of a paper machine or equivalent
EP1922447B1 (en) Method and system for cross-directional alignment of a sheetmaking system
US7437208B2 (en) System for computer-aided measurement of quality and/or process data in a paper machine
US6863919B1 (en) Method for controlling the moisture of a web in machine direction on a coating machine
US6584703B1 (en) Method for controlling the moisture of a web in machine direction on a coating machine and calender
US20130327126A1 (en) Porosity measurement
Braatz et al. Identification, estimation, and control of sheet and film processes
KR101100660B1 (en) Simulation method, fiber orientation control method, and fiber orientation control device
WO2003040465A1 (en) Method and apparatus for adjusting operation of wire section
KR100423178B1 (en) General adjustment of the head box and / or forming device of a paper machine or the like
WO2001006056A1 (en) Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making process
JP4162864B2 (en) Paper machine control method and apparatus
WO1999038101A1 (en) Paper stock shear and formation control
US8732103B2 (en) Process controller having a laboratory data validation model and methods for using the same
WO2008040845A1 (en) Method and apparatus for analysing and controlling the manufacturing process of a web-like material
FI130085B (en) Monitoring method and apparatus
FI119113B (en) An adjustment method and system for adjusting the machine direction thickness of a fibrous web
Karlsson et al. Controllability of paper making
EP1155191A1 (en) Method for executing grade change on a paper machine

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ CZ DE DE DK DK DM DZ EE EE ES FI FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2000 9123

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 20010125

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20009123

Country of ref document: AT

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20020068

Country of ref document: FI

Ref document number: 2379228

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: A9123/2000

Country of ref document: AT

RET De translation (de og part 6b)

Ref document number: 10084794

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020905

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10084794

Country of ref document: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP