WO2000057606A1 - Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals - Google Patents

Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000057606A1
WO2000057606A1 PCT/SE2000/000456 SE0000456W WO0057606A1 WO 2000057606 A1 WO2000057606 A1 WO 2000057606A1 SE 0000456 W SE0000456 W SE 0000456W WO 0057606 A1 WO0057606 A1 WO 0057606A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
communications link
network communications
discarding
parameters
data
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/SE2000/000456
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Lars Westberg
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority to AU41546/00A priority Critical patent/AU4154600A/en
Priority to EP00921205A priority patent/EP1163768A1/en
Priority to CA002367553A priority patent/CA2367553A1/en
Priority to KR1020017012011A priority patent/KR20020001792A/en
Publication of WO2000057606A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000057606A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/64Hybrid switching systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/11Identifying congestion
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/24Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS
    • H04L47/2416Real-time traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/32Flow control; Congestion control by discarding or delaying data units, e.g. packets or frames
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/04Protocols for data compression, e.g. ROHC
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/16Implementation or adaptation of Internet protocol [IP], of transmission control protocol [TCP] or of user datagram protocol [UDP]
    • H04L69/161Implementation details of TCP/IP or UDP/IP stack architecture; Specification of modified or new header fields
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/16Implementation or adaptation of Internet protocol [IP], of transmission control protocol [TCP] or of user datagram protocol [UDP]
    • H04L69/163In-band adaptation of TCP data exchange; In-band control procedures
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/16Implementation or adaptation of Internet protocol [IP], of transmission control protocol [TCP] or of user datagram protocol [UDP]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to overload situations within IP-network communications links, and more particularly, to a method for relieving an overload situation within an IP-network communications link in a manner that optimizes the quality of speech signals within the communications link.
  • a cellular access network signals are transmitted through an air interface portion 15 and an IP transmission network 20 as shown in FIGURE 1.
  • the IP transmission network 20 utilizes IP -network communications links to move data through the network 20.
  • the speech quality considerations are essentially due to the quality of signal (QOS) degradation occurring over the air interface 15.
  • QOS degradation in the IP transmission network 20 must be negligible when compared to degradation on the air interface 15 or speech signal quality becomes unacceptable.
  • the main signal degradation problem arising in IP-network communications links of the IP transmission network 20 occurs during certain overload situations which require the IP transmission network to discard traffic. This involves the discarding of data packets from the IP-network communications links.
  • the overload situation may be triggered by a link failure or other re-rerouting actions in the IP transmission network 20. In many cases, the overload situation may be only temporary such as in the case of statistical multiplexing. However, in all of these situations, the overflow traffic must be discarded in such a way as to avoid the lowering of speech signal quality.
  • the problem with existing IP based networks arises from the fact that they are optimized for a best-effort application that provides the best overall signal quality. The quality of signal mechanism is optimized in a similar manner.
  • the current method is optimized in the flow control mechanisms of the TCP-protocol such that routers will discard packet traffic in a random manner enabling the system to control traffic in a fair way that randomly discards packets without giving particular preference to any type of packet or the associated connection. While this may be acceptable to overall traffic performance, this can have a detrimental effect on the speech signal quality.
  • the present invention overcomes the foregoing and other problems with a method for discarding data within an IP -network communications link in a manner that optimizes the quality of speech data on the communications link.
  • An IP -network communications link is monitored for the occurrence of an overload condition on the link.
  • specific groups of data are selected within the IP-network communications link.
  • the packet payloads of data packets within the communications link are separated into important parameters and less important parameters. The less important parameters are selected and discarded from a plurality of data packets within the IP -network communications link.
  • select groups of data packets referred to as real-time flow sessions containing data packets having the same source and destination IP addresses and source and destination ports, and consisting of encapsulated video, audio, etc. signals, are selected and deleted from the IP-network communications link. In this manner, only a single or a few real-time flow session need be eliminated from the link, and the remaining links remain unaffected.
  • FIGURE 1 is a block diagram illustrating a cellular access network
  • FIGURE 2 is a block diagram illustrating the transmission of data packets over a IP -network communications link
  • FIGURE 3 is an illustration of a first embodiment of the present invention wherein a portion of a plurality of packet payloads are deleted from data packets within the IP -network communications link;
  • FIGURE 4 is a block diagram illustrating the method of FIGURE 3;
  • FIGURE 5 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein data packets from a single real-time flow are deleted from the IP -network communications link; and
  • FIGURE 6 is a flow diagram illustrating the method of FIGURE 5.
  • FIGURE 2 there is illustrated a single IP-network communications link 25 on an IP transmission network 20 (FIGURE 1).
  • the communications link 25 Upon the communications link 25 are multiple data packets 30 including a packet header 35 and a payload 40.
  • the packet header 35 includes information enabling the data packet 30 to be transmitted over the IP -network communications link 25.
  • the payload 40 comprises the information being transmitted over the IP-network communications link 25 between source and destination locations.
  • the packet header 35 includes fixed value parameters 45 and non-fixed value parameters 50.
  • the fixed value parameters do not often change during a call and only need to be sent a few times during a call.
  • the non-fixed value parameters 50 change frequently during a call and are coded and always transmitted in a compressed header. This manner of only transmitting the fixed values a few times during a call is referred to as header compression. This is accomplished by including a record 55 at each end of the IP -network communications link 25 that includes the fixed parameters 45 which are not being transmitted. There is one record made for each real-time flow proceeding from a source location to a destination location.
  • an overload condition detected on the IP-network communications link 25 may be alleviated without degrading the quality of speech signals (i.e., the manner in which the audio signals are perceived at a receiving end is not severely degraded) on the communications link 25.
  • An overload condition occurs when more traffic (i.e., data packets) are present on the communications link than can be handled.
  • multiple data packets 30 on the IP -network communications link 25 have their packet payloads 40 sorted to determine the important parameters 70 and less important parameters 75 contained in each data packet 30. The designation of important and less-important parameters is normally performed before or during packetization of the data.
  • the less important parameter 75 from each packet payload 40 are selected and discarded from each data packet 30 by local routers within the IP network such that the full data packet 30 becomes a truncated data packet 30a including only the important parameters 70 of the data payload 40 and the packet leader 35. In this way, each data packet 30 is transmitted as a truncated or partial packet 30a rather than the full packet originally provided.
  • the quality of the speech signals within the IP-network communications link 25 is maintained at a high level despite the fact that the less important parameters are deleted.
  • the divisions into important and less important parameters are carried out normally by the signal processing protocol, but other methods for prioritizing the parameters may be used. Referring now to FIGURE 4, there is illustrated a flow diagram describing the method of FIGURE 3.
  • the IP -network communications link 25 is monitored at step 80 for the occurrence of an overload condition.
  • the important and less important parameters of the packet payload 40 within the data packet 30 are noted at step 85 as discussed above.
  • the less important parameters are selected at step 90 from a plurality of the data packets 30, and the selected parameters are discarded at step 95.
  • the packet headers may also have header compression applied at step 100, and the truncated packets 30a are transmitted at step 105 over the IP -network communications link 25.
  • a number of data packets 30 may be entirely deleted from the IP-network communications link 25.
  • a determination is made by the local routers of the IP networks of the real-time process flows to which each packet 30 within the IP-network communications link 25 is associated by reading the information contained within packet headers 35.
  • a real-time process flow comprises a plurality of data packets having the same source and destination IP addresses and the same source and destination ports.
  • a real-time process flow may also comprise portions of a multiplexed data flow which come from a single data flow source before multiplexing. Each data packet 30 having this same information is considered to be from the same real-time process flow.
  • a single IP -network communications link 25 can have a plurality of real-time flows associated therewith as illustrated in FIGURE 3 by reference number 30a, 30b and 30c. From a speech signal quality point of view, it is better to drop a single one of the real-time flows, for example 30b, rather than to drop packets from each of the real-time flows. Thus, by dropping the real-time flow represented by 30b, the IP- network communications link 25 would be converted to include only the real-time flows 30a and 30c as shown. While the signal for the real-time flow 30b would be entirely lost, the quality of signal for real-time flows 30a and 30c would remain unaffected. A determination of which real time flow to drop may be made at random or based upon any number of methods.
  • the methods include but are not limited to dropping flows based upon prioritizations within the packet header; assigning certain addresses to have a higher priority; having control signals dynamically select parameters to be deleted; providing priority to particular bearer protocols; or discarding from a last connected real time flow.
  • the IP -network communications link 25 is monitored for the occurrence of an overload condition at step 120. Upon detection of the overload condition, the determination of real-time flows presently supported by a IP -network communications link 25 are determined at step 125. After determination of at least one real-time flow, a single real-time flow is selected at step 130 by routers of the IP network, and the selected real-time flow is discarded from the IP -network communications link 25 at step 135. The optional step of packet header compression may be performed on the remaining data packets 30 at step 140, and the remaining packets are transmitted over the IP-network communications link at step 145.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

A method for discarding data within an IP-network communications link (10) in a manner that optimizes the quality of speech data contained in the IP-network communications link (10). Initially, the IP-network communications link (10) is monitored to determine the occurrence of an overload condition. At least a portion of a plurality of data packets (30) within the IP-network communications link (10) are selected in response to detection of the overload condition. The selected portions are discarded from the IP-network communications link (10), and the remainder of the packets (30) transmitted on the link (10).

Description

DISCARDING TRAFFIC IN IP NETWORKS TO OPTIMIZE THE QUALITY OF
SPEECH SIGNALS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to overload situations within IP-network communications links, and more particularly, to a method for relieving an overload situation within an IP-network communications link in a manner that optimizes the quality of speech signals within the communications link.
Description of Related Art
In a cellular access network 10, signals are transmitted through an air interface portion 15 and an IP transmission network 20 as shown in FIGURE 1. The IP transmission network 20 utilizes IP -network communications links to move data through the network 20. In the cellular access network 10, the speech quality considerations are essentially due to the quality of signal (QOS) degradation occurring over the air interface 15. QOS degradation in the IP transmission network 20 must be negligible when compared to degradation on the air interface 15 or speech signal quality becomes unacceptable.
The main signal degradation problem arising in IP-network communications links of the IP transmission network 20 occurs during certain overload situations which require the IP transmission network to discard traffic. This involves the discarding of data packets from the IP-network communications links. The overload situation may be triggered by a link failure or other re-rerouting actions in the IP transmission network 20. In many cases, the overload situation may be only temporary such as in the case of statistical multiplexing. However, in all of these situations, the overflow traffic must be discarded in such a way as to avoid the lowering of speech signal quality. The problem with existing IP based networks arises from the fact that they are optimized for a best-effort application that provides the best overall signal quality. The quality of signal mechanism is optimized in a similar manner. While this type of quality of signal mechanism might be appropriate for the overall signal, this system is not necessarily appropriate from the speech quality point of view. The current method is optimized in the flow control mechanisms of the TCP-protocol such that routers will discard packet traffic in a random manner enabling the system to control traffic in a fair way that randomly discards packets without giving particular preference to any type of packet or the associated connection. While this may be acceptable to overall traffic performance, this can have a detrimental effect on the speech signal quality.
By discarding packets in a random manner, poor behavior may be imported on the quality of speech signals as a whole. Thus, if one or several speech signals causes an overflow condition and initiates the discard of traffic from 100 other real-time flows consisting of a number of speech packets, the overall quality for all users on the 100 real-time flows can be degraded below an acceptable threshold for high quality speech signals. Some manner of limiting the effects of overload conditions on overall speech signal quality is needed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention overcomes the foregoing and other problems with a method for discarding data within an IP -network communications link in a manner that optimizes the quality of speech data on the communications link. An IP -network communications link is monitored for the occurrence of an overload condition on the link. In response to detection of an overload condition, specific groups of data are selected within the IP-network communications link. In a first embodiment, the packet payloads of data packets within the communications link are separated into important parameters and less important parameters. The less important parameters are selected and discarded from a plurality of data packets within the IP -network communications link. In a second embodiment, select groups of data packets referred to as real-time flow sessions containing data packets having the same source and destination IP addresses and source and destination ports, and consisting of encapsulated video, audio, etc. signals, are selected and deleted from the IP-network communications link. In this manner, only a single or a few real-time flow session need be eliminated from the link, and the remaining links remain unaffected.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following Detailed Description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein: FIGURE 1 is a block diagram illustrating a cellular access network;
FIGURE 2 is a block diagram illustrating the transmission of data packets over a IP -network communications link;
FIGURE 3 is an illustration of a first embodiment of the present invention wherein a portion of a plurality of packet payloads are deleted from data packets within the IP -network communications link;
FIGURE 4 is a block diagram illustrating the method of FIGURE 3;
FIGURE 5 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein data packets from a single real-time flow are deleted from the IP -network communications link; and FIGURE 6 is a flow diagram illustrating the method of FIGURE 5.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to FIGURE 2, there is illustrated a single IP-network communications link 25 on an IP transmission network 20 (FIGURE 1). Upon the communications link 25 are multiple data packets 30 including a packet header 35 and a payload 40. The packet header 35 includes information enabling the data packet 30 to be transmitted over the IP -network communications link 25. The payload 40 comprises the information being transmitted over the IP-network communications link 25 between source and destination locations.
The packet header 35 includes fixed value parameters 45 and non-fixed value parameters 50. The fixed value parameters do not often change during a call and only need to be sent a few times during a call. The non-fixed value parameters 50 change frequently during a call and are coded and always transmitted in a compressed header. This manner of only transmitting the fixed values a few times during a call is referred to as header compression. This is accomplished by including a record 55 at each end of the IP -network communications link 25 that includes the fixed parameters 45 which are not being transmitted. There is one record made for each real-time flow proceeding from a source location to a destination location.
Referring now to FIGURE 3, there is illustrated a first embodiment of the invention wherein an overload condition detected on the IP-network communications link 25 may be alleviated without degrading the quality of speech signals (i.e., the manner in which the audio signals are perceived at a receiving end is not severely degraded) on the communications link 25. An overload condition occurs when more traffic (i.e., data packets) are present on the communications link than can be handled. During an overload condition, multiple data packets 30 on the IP -network communications link 25 have their packet payloads 40 sorted to determine the important parameters 70 and less important parameters 75 contained in each data packet 30. The designation of important and less-important parameters is normally performed before or during packetization of the data. The less important parameter 75 from each packet payload 40 are selected and discarded from each data packet 30 by local routers within the IP network such that the full data packet 30 becomes a truncated data packet 30a including only the important parameters 70 of the data payload 40 and the packet leader 35. In this way, each data packet 30 is transmitted as a truncated or partial packet 30a rather than the full packet originally provided. The quality of the speech signals within the IP-network communications link 25 is maintained at a high level despite the fact that the less important parameters are deleted. The divisions into important and less important parameters are carried out normally by the signal processing protocol, but other methods for prioritizing the parameters may be used. Referring now to FIGURE 4, there is illustrated a flow diagram describing the method of FIGURE 3. The IP -network communications link 25 is monitored at step 80 for the occurrence of an overload condition. Upon detection of an overload condition, the important and less important parameters of the packet payload 40 within the data packet 30 are noted at step 85 as discussed above. The less important parameters are selected at step 90 from a plurality of the data packets 30, and the selected parameters are discarded at step 95. In an optional step, the packet headers may also have header compression applied at step 100, and the truncated packets 30a are transmitted at step 105 over the IP -network communications link 25.
In an alternative embodiment, rather than deleting a portion of the packet payloads 40 within a number of data packets 30, a number of data packets 30 may be entirely deleted from the IP-network communications link 25. In this embodiment, a determination is made by the local routers of the IP networks of the real-time process flows to which each packet 30 within the IP-network communications link 25 is associated by reading the information contained within packet headers 35. A real-time process flow comprises a plurality of data packets having the same source and destination IP addresses and the same source and destination ports. A real-time process flow may also comprise portions of a multiplexed data flow which come from a single data flow source before multiplexing. Each data packet 30 having this same information is considered to be from the same real-time process flow.
A single IP -network communications link 25 can have a plurality of real-time flows associated therewith as illustrated in FIGURE 3 by reference number 30a, 30b and 30c. From a speech signal quality point of view, it is better to drop a single one of the real-time flows, for example 30b, rather than to drop packets from each of the real-time flows. Thus, by dropping the real-time flow represented by 30b, the IP- network communications link 25 would be converted to include only the real-time flows 30a and 30c as shown. While the signal for the real-time flow 30b would be entirely lost, the quality of signal for real-time flows 30a and 30c would remain unaffected. A determination of which real time flow to drop may be made at random or based upon any number of methods. The methods include but are not limited to dropping flows based upon prioritizations within the packet header; assigning certain addresses to have a higher priority; having control signals dynamically select parameters to be deleted; providing priority to particular bearer protocols; or discarding from a last connected real time flow.
Referring now to FIGURE 6, there is illustrated a flow diagram describing the method of FIGURE 5. The IP -network communications link 25 is monitored for the occurrence of an overload condition at step 120. Upon detection of the overload condition, the determination of real-time flows presently supported by a IP -network communications link 25 are determined at step 125. After determination of at least one real-time flow, a single real-time flow is selected at step 130 by routers of the IP network, and the selected real-time flow is discarded from the IP -network communications link 25 at step 135. The optional step of packet header compression may be performed on the remaining data packets 30 at step 140, and the remaining packets are transmitted over the IP-network communications link at step 145.
Although preferred embodiments of the method and apparatus of the present invention have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it is understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth and defined by the following claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method for discarding data within an IP -network communications link in a manner that optimizes a quality of speech data on the IP -network communications link, comprising the steps of: monitoring the IP-network communications link for occurrence of an overload condition; selecting at least a portion of a plurality of data packets within the IP- network communications link in response to the overload condition, wherein deletion of said selected at least one of a plurality of data packets would not substantially degrade a quality of speech signals on the link; and discarding the selected portions of the plurality of data packets from the IP-network communications link.
2. The method of Claim 1 , wherein the step of selecting further comprises the steps of: dividing a packet payload into a first group of parameters and a second group of parameters; and selecting the second group of parameters in response to the overload condition.
3. The method of Claim 2, wherein the step of discarding comprises discarding the selected second group of parameters from the packet payloads of the IP- network communications link.
4. The method of Claim 2, wherein the discarding of the selected parameters does not substantially degrade an audio signal perceived by a listener at a receiving end of the IP network communications link.
5. The method of Claim 2, further comprising the step of storing at each end of the IP -network communications link records containing the second group of parameters.
6. The method of Claim 1 , wherein the step of selecting further comprises the steps of: determining at least one real-time flow session upon the IP -network communications link; selecting the determined at least one real-time flow session in response to the overload condition.
7. The method of Claim 6, wherein the step of discarding further comprises the step of discarding the selected real-time flow session from the IP- network communications link.
8. The method of Claim 6, wherein the real-time flow session comprises a group of data packets having a same source and destination IP-addresses and source and destination ports.
9. The method of Claim 1, further including the step of compressing packet headers on the IP-network communications link.
10. A method for discarding data within an IP-network communications link in a manner that optimizes a quality of speech data on the IP network communication link, comprising the steps of: monitoring the IP -network communications link for occurrence of an overload condition; dividing a packet payload into an important group of parameters and a less important group of parameters; selecting the less important group of parameters in response to the overload condition; and discarding the less important group of parameters from a plurality of data packet payload of the IP-network communications link.
11. The method of Claim 10 further including the step of compressing packet headers on the IP -network communications link.
12. The method of Claim 10, wherein the discarding of the less important group of parameters does not substantially degrade an audio signal perceived by a listener at a receiving end of the IP network communications link.
13. A method for discarding data within an IP-network communications link to optimize a quality of speech data on the IP -network communications link, comprising the steps of: monitoring the IP -network communications link for occurrence of an overload condition; determining a plurality of data packets having a same source and destination IP addresses and a same source and destination ports; and discarding the determined plurality of data packets from the IP -network communications link in response to the overload condition.
14. The method of Claim 13 further including the step of compressing packet headers on the IP -network communications link.
15. The method of Claim 13, wherein the discarding of the determined plurality of data packets does not substantially degrade an audio signal perceived by a listener at a receiving end of the IP network communications link.
PCT/SE2000/000456 1999-03-23 2000-03-08 Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals WO2000057606A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU41546/00A AU4154600A (en) 1999-03-23 2000-03-08 Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals
EP00921205A EP1163768A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2000-03-08 Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals
CA002367553A CA2367553A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2000-03-08 Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals
KR1020017012011A KR20020001792A (en) 1999-03-23 2000-03-08 Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US27506999A 1999-03-23 1999-03-23
US09/275,069 1999-03-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000057606A1 true WO2000057606A1 (en) 2000-09-28

Family

ID=23050766

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE2000/000456 WO2000057606A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2000-03-08 Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1163768A1 (en)
KR (1) KR20020001792A (en)
CN (1) CN1345499A (en)
AU (1) AU4154600A (en)
CA (1) CA2367553A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000057606A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1802050A1 (en) 2005-12-21 2007-06-27 Alcatel Lucent Discarded packet indicator
US7489631B2 (en) 2004-03-18 2009-02-10 Veraz Networks Ltd. Method and device for quality management in communication networks
US7693151B2 (en) 2004-11-03 2010-04-06 Veraz Networks Ltd. Method and devices for providing protection in packet switched communications networks
US7848309B2 (en) 2006-08-10 2010-12-07 Fujitsu Limited Relay apparatus, relay method, and relay program
US8537694B2 (en) 2004-07-19 2013-09-17 Dialogic Networks (Israel) Ltd. Processing of packets including processing instructions and forwarded in communication networks
GB2520972A (en) * 2013-12-05 2015-06-10 Ibm Workload management
WO2020210780A1 (en) * 2019-04-12 2020-10-15 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. Chunk based network qualitative services

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100358306C (en) * 2004-03-19 2007-12-26 华为技术有限公司 A method for planning wireless communication network
US8332375B2 (en) * 2007-08-29 2012-12-11 Nirvanix, Inc. Method and system for moving requested files from one storage location to another
GB2481971B (en) * 2010-07-07 2016-12-21 Cray Uk Ltd Apparatus & method
WO2013066301A1 (en) * 2011-10-31 2013-05-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Reducing tcp timeouts due to incast collapse at a network switch

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0275679A1 (en) * 1986-12-31 1988-07-27 AT&T Corp. Packet switching system arranged for congestion control
EP0739140A2 (en) * 1995-04-18 1996-10-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Encoder for an end-to-end scalable video delivery system

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0275679A1 (en) * 1986-12-31 1988-07-27 AT&T Corp. Packet switching system arranged for congestion control
EP0739140A2 (en) * 1995-04-18 1996-10-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Encoder for an end-to-end scalable video delivery system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
SRIRAM K ET AL: "TRAFFIC SMOOTHING EFFECTS OF BIT DROPPING IN A PACKET VOICE MULTIPLEXER", PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL JOINT CONFERENCE OF THE COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SOCIETIES. (INFOCOM),US,NEW YORK, IEEE, vol. CONF. 7, 27 March 1988 (1988-03-27), pages 759-770, XP000014677, ISBN: 0-8186-0833-1 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7489631B2 (en) 2004-03-18 2009-02-10 Veraz Networks Ltd. Method and device for quality management in communication networks
US8537694B2 (en) 2004-07-19 2013-09-17 Dialogic Networks (Israel) Ltd. Processing of packets including processing instructions and forwarded in communication networks
US7693151B2 (en) 2004-11-03 2010-04-06 Veraz Networks Ltd. Method and devices for providing protection in packet switched communications networks
EP1802050A1 (en) 2005-12-21 2007-06-27 Alcatel Lucent Discarded packet indicator
US7848309B2 (en) 2006-08-10 2010-12-07 Fujitsu Limited Relay apparatus, relay method, and relay program
GB2520972A (en) * 2013-12-05 2015-06-10 Ibm Workload management
US9674069B2 (en) 2013-12-05 2017-06-06 International Business Machines Corporation Workload management
US10044651B2 (en) 2013-12-05 2018-08-07 International Business Machines Corporation Workload management
US10250533B2 (en) 2013-12-05 2019-04-02 International Business Machines Corporation Workload management
US10348660B2 (en) 2013-12-05 2019-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Workload management
US10659407B2 (en) 2013-12-05 2020-05-19 International Business Machines Corporation Workload management
WO2020210780A1 (en) * 2019-04-12 2020-10-15 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. Chunk based network qualitative services

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1345499A (en) 2002-04-17
CA2367553A1 (en) 2000-09-28
EP1163768A1 (en) 2001-12-19
KR20020001792A (en) 2002-01-09
AU4154600A (en) 2000-10-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7630393B1 (en) Optimizing queuing of voice packet flows in a network
US7483378B2 (en) Edge switch
EP1516501B1 (en) Method and apparatus for enhancing the quality of service of a wireless communication
AU602379B2 (en) Packet switching system arranged for congestion control through bandwidth management
US20030152096A1 (en) Intelligent no packet loss networking
US5889762A (en) Control of overload situations in frame relay network which discards the contents of a virtual-channel-specific buffer when said buffer is full
CA2363591C (en) Update of header compression state in packet communications
US6205149B1 (en) Quality of service control mechanism and apparatus
EP1495591B1 (en) Reducing transmission time for data packets controlled by a link layer protocol comprising a fragmenting/defragmenting capability
WO2004092927B1 (en) Call admission control/session management based on n source to destination severity levels for ip networks
EP1550271A1 (en) Routing data packets in a compressed-header domain
JP2008086048A (en) Apparatus and method of packet processing
US7321557B1 (en) Dynamic latency assignment methodology for bandwidth optimization of packet flows
KR20050086537A (en) Method for selecting a logical link for a packet in a router
EP1163768A1 (en) Discarding traffic in ip networks to optimize the quality of speech signals
US20040090917A1 (en) Selecting data packets
EP0673573B1 (en) A method for congestion management in a frame relay network and a node in a frame relay network
US20120213133A1 (en) Method and system for identifying media type transmitted over an atm network
US20040068577A1 (en) Method for controlling a stream of data packets in a packet data communication network
EP2134058B1 (en) Method for protecting a packet based network and border node protection system
US7088738B1 (en) Dynamic fragmentation of information
EP1017207B1 (en) Radio link with dynamic adaptation
JP2004289794A (en) Device for accessing communication network for selective degradation of data flows
JP3508697B2 (en) Packet switching device and packet switching method
US7978834B2 (en) Call control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 00805325.1

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2367553

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2367553

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020017012011

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2000921205

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2000921205

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020017012011

Country of ref document: KR

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2000921205

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1020017012011

Country of ref document: KR