WO2000000825A9 - Detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens - Google Patents

Detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens

Info

Publication number
WO2000000825A9
WO2000000825A9 PCT/US1999/014827 US9914827W WO0000825A9 WO 2000000825 A9 WO2000000825 A9 WO 2000000825A9 US 9914827 W US9914827 W US 9914827W WO 0000825 A9 WO0000825 A9 WO 0000825A9
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
antigen
immune
cells
privileged
lymphocytes
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/014827
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2000000825A3 (en
WO2000000825A2 (en
Inventor
Robert B Darnell
Matthew L Albert
Nina Bhardwaj
Original Assignee
Univ Rockefeller
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Univ Rockefeller filed Critical Univ Rockefeller
Priority to EP99932105A priority Critical patent/EP1092154A2/en
Priority to JP2000557146A priority patent/JP2004510950A/en
Priority to AU48488/99A priority patent/AU4848899A/en
Priority to CA002336382A priority patent/CA2336382A1/en
Publication of WO2000000825A2 publication Critical patent/WO2000000825A2/en
Publication of WO2000000825A3 publication Critical patent/WO2000000825A3/en
Publication of WO2000000825A9 publication Critical patent/WO2000000825A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/5005Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
    • G01N33/5091Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing the pathological state of an organism
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P25/00Drugs for disorders of the nervous system
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P35/00Antineoplastic agents
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P37/00Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
    • A61P37/02Immunomodulators
    • A61P37/04Immunostimulants
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/435Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
    • C07K14/46Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates
    • C07K14/47Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates from mammals
    • C07K14/4701Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans from vertebrates from mammals not used
    • C07K14/4748Tumour specific antigens; Tumour rejection antigen precursors [TRAP], e.g. MAGE
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/564Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for pre-existing immune complex or autoimmune disease, i.e. systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid factors or complement components C1-C9
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/569Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for microorganisms, e.g. protozoa, bacteria, viruses
    • G01N33/56966Animal cells
    • G01N33/56972White blood cells
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2333/00Assays involving biological materials from specific organisms or of a specific nature
    • G01N2333/435Assays involving biological materials from specific organisms or of a specific nature from animals; from humans
    • G01N2333/705Assays involving receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
    • G01N2333/715Assays involving receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants for cytokines; for lymphokines; for interferons

Definitions

  • This invention relates to diagnostic and therapeutic methods based upon the development of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens and its role in the etiology of paraneoplastic neuronal disorders and tumor immunity, among other conditions.
  • Constant surveillance of epitopes throughout those structures in the body accessible to the immune system provides a very effective means for recognizing and maintaining "self” and destroying epitopes and their carriers which invade the body or arise pathologically, such as
  • tumors even when these tumors express what are believed to be tumor-specific antigens such as
  • PNDs neuronal disorders
  • PCD paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration
  • the tumor expresses neuron-specific proteins (antigens).
  • CSF cerebrospinal fluid
  • tumor cell antigens which also cross-react with the same proteins expressed in neurons
  • onconeural antigens A high titer antibody recognizes the intracellular antigen cdr2
  • Certain regions of the body such as the brain, eye, and testis, are protected from immune
  • immune privileged the immune system is proposed to initiate PCD by recognizing the normally
  • immune-privileged antigen cdr2 10 when it is ectopically expressed in gynecologic tumors.
  • CSF cerebrospinal fluid
  • the brain is immune privileged, and furthermore the target antigen is cytoplasmic, the etiology
  • paraneoplastic neuronal disorders PND
  • PND paraneoplastic neuronal disorders
  • paraneoplastic disorder which is seen in patients with breast or ovarian cancer is paraneoplastic
  • Hu syndrome is associated with small cell lung cancer
  • opsoclonus or spontaneous, chaotic eye movements, and myoclonus, jerky body movements, may accompany breast cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or small cell lung cancer, and are associated with antibodies to the onconeural antigen Nova.
  • the target onconeural antigens have yet to be identified for some disorders believed to be paraneoplastic. Patients with Hodgkin's disease and other lymphomas may develop subacute
  • tumors such as lung cancer and is believed to be immune mediated (2).
  • spinal cord dysfunction e.g. , myelopathy
  • motor neuron diseases e.g., motor neuron diseases
  • blindness e.g., blindness
  • other neurologic symptoms are found to have specific sets of underlying tumors and are believed to have immunity to unknown or partially-characterized onconeural antigens (2,37). Less well
  • the dermatologic condition vitiligo, in which melanocytes producing skin
  • PND-associated tumors are typically occult (24,25); in several cases they have been identified only by microscopic analysis of suspect organs following exploratory surgery or at
  • Hu paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis
  • SCLCa small cell lung cancers
  • tumor specimens obtained from PND patients cells, as well as neurons from clinically obtained from PND patients cells, as well as neurons from clinically
  • antibodies are more than markers for neurologic disease or even the presence of tumor
  • LEMS Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome
  • PND antigens have
  • MG the acetylcholine receptor
  • LEMS the presynaptic calcium channel
  • CTLs antigen-specific T lymphocytes
  • lymphocytes are targeted, explains for the first time the etiology of the PNDs. Both activated
  • targets for the immune system If expressed in tumors, they provide targets for effective
  • autoimmune disease may result.
  • the cellular immune response to an immune-privileged antigen are provided, the cellular immune
  • dysproliferative diseases include but are not limited to dysproliferative diseases, paraneoplastic syndromes, and
  • the method comprises quantitating in a sample of bodily fluid from
  • the preferred method involves the detection of T lymphocytes which
  • paraneoplastic antigens and most preferably, onconeural antigens such as cdr2 and
  • Hu antigen One example of a means for detection comprises determining the extent of
  • Another method comprises detecting the extent of recognition by the cytotoxic T cells of target
  • immune-privileged antigen are also provided.
  • the methods are memory T cells.
  • presenting cells presenting the immune -privileged antigen.
  • the extent of recognition of target cells expressing the antigen is determined after exposure of
  • the present invention further provides a method for screening individuals for the presence of
  • This method comprises measuring the presence and extent of T
  • lymphocytes specific for immune privileged antigens Furthermore, a method is provided for
  • lymphocytes that are specific for the antigen or its fragment.
  • tumor has a sufficient population of antigen-specific T lymphocytes to control the tumor or is
  • This method comprises quantitating T lymphocytes
  • antigen-specific T lymphocytes in a patient is described wherein the numbers of antigen-
  • fragments thereof may be used in the present invention to provide reagents for carrying out the
  • the immune-privileged antigen may be cdr2.
  • cells expressing an immune -privileged antigen may be cells stably transfected to express an
  • the interferon- ⁇ release may be measured in an
  • Diagnostic kits are also provided with componentry capable of measuring the above-described
  • T lymphocytes and antigens comprising, for example, one or more of the following reagents:
  • a target cell expressing the immune-privileged antigen or its fragment; a fragment of
  • the immune-privileged antigen in a tetrameric complex with HLA in a tetrameric complex with HLA; and a reagent such as an
  • immune-privileged antigen is cdr2, useful isolated
  • kits may include target cells prepared from a cell line or, for example, Drosophila, which expressed the immune-privileged antigen, and further may express HLA molecules and co-stimulatory molecules.
  • a kit may further include components for detecting cytokine production, such as ⁇ -IFN, as a means for detecting immune cell activation.
  • HLA haplotypes may be employed in order to detect
  • the method is carried out by first isolating a quantity of APCs from a sample of the patient's blood, then exposing the APCs in vitro to the immune -privileged antigen or its fragment, followed by
  • the reintroducing the antigen-exposed APCs to the patient reintroducing the antigen-exposed APCs to the patient.
  • Methods for achieving presentation of the immune-privileged antigen or its fragment on the APCs in the aforementioned methods is achieved using any one of several methods.
  • APCs are provided with apoptotic cells expressing the immune-privileged antigen or
  • HeLa cells which express the cdr2 antigen (9), or transfected cells such as
  • Drosophila cells expressing the gene encoding the immune-privileged antigen. These cells may
  • Drosophila cells function as an antigen-presenting cell, thus forming a useful APC for
  • T lymphocytes as described above. These cells also have
  • the preferred antigen is a paraneoplastic antigen
  • an onconeural antigen such as cdr2 and Hu antigen.
  • an onconeural antigen such as cdr2 and Hu antigen.
  • the immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes are derived from a donor individual of
  • a mammal wherein the pathological state is caused by the presence in the mammal
  • T lymphocytes specific for an immune -privileged antigen The method consists of
  • T lymphocytes specific for cells expressing the immune-privileged antigen T lymphocytes specific for cells expressing the immune-privileged antigen.
  • agents include tacrolimus, cyclosporin, immunosuppressive cytokines,
  • corticosteroids corticosteroids, and combinations.
  • the preferred agent is tacrolimus.
  • antigen is preferably a paraneoplastic antigen, most preferably, and onconeural antigen such as cdr2 and Hu antigen and their fragments.
  • onconeural antigen such as cdr2 and Hu antigen and their fragments.
  • agents is to the central nervous system.
  • Other effective routes of administration are also possible.
  • lymphocytes as well as decreasing the expression of paraneoplastic antigens on non-tumor
  • methods and agents are provided for enhancing the killing of tumors
  • T lymphocytes expressing immune privileged antigens by T lymphocytes.
  • T lymphocytes tumor immunity by T lymphocytes as well as their suppression in the treatment of the
  • T lymphocytes susceptible to disease caused by the same T lymphocytes.
  • Figure 1 depicts a Western blot analysis of patient's serum and CSF against the cloned cdr2
  • T lymphocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood of acute (A) and chronic (B).
  • HLA-A2.1 + matched control individuals pulsed with peptides and co-cultured with T cells.
  • influenza matrix protein served as a positive control for the generation of a CTL recall
  • Figure 3 depicts cytofluorography of cells isolated from the CSF of a patient with acute PCD
  • CD56 is a marker for natural killer cells
  • CD 19 is specific for B cells
  • CD3 is
  • CD4 and CD8 indicate helper and cytotoxic T cell subsets, respectively;
  • CD25 is the IL2 receptor and is a marker for activated T cells.
  • Figure 4 shows a Western blot analysis of cdr2 expression in human ovarian tumors.
  • Protein extracts from 9 human ovarian tumors were run on Western blots and probed with
  • immunoreactive band of identical Mr and pi is present in extracts of mouse brain or a human
  • mouse cdr2 cDNA encodes a protein that is 87% identical with human cdr2 (10), and this
  • Figure 5 shows that apoptotic cells expressing cdr2 may be used to present antigen to T
  • MC 97-09 DCs were co-cultured with apoptotic uninfected HeLa cells and syngeneic T cells. After 7 days, responding T cells were tested using T2 cells pulsed with
  • M peptide (SEQ ID NO: 9) pulsed T2 cells (HeLa cells were uninfected).
  • Figure 6 A-C show that apoptotic PC7 cells are capable of cross-priming cdr2-specific CD8 +
  • mice were immunized with apoptotic tumor cells which expresses cdr2, and
  • Figure 7 shows the results of a simplified assay of cdr2-specific T cells present in the blood
  • Dendritic cells from a blood sample are matured, then exposed to
  • lymphocytes results in gamma-interferon production by T lymphocytes as an indicator of the
  • tumor neoplasm
  • neoplasia neoplasia
  • dysproliferative cells express
  • Cytotoxic T lymphocytes are effector T cells, usually CD8 + , that can mediate the lysis
  • cells include ⁇ / ⁇ and CD4+ NK 1.1 + cells.
  • Immune privilege and immune-privileged antigen refer to the isolation of certain sites and
  • antigens within the body from the immune system relate to antigens to which an
  • Immune-privileged antigens are expressed by some tumors resulting in
  • antigens are neuronal antigens, a subset of which are the onconeural or paraneoplastic antigens,
  • Antigen presenting cells are cells including dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells,
  • paraneoplastic syndromes wherein individuals with a tumor experience disease at remote
  • CTLs cytotoxic T lymphocytes
  • memory T lymphocytes targeted against CTLs
  • privileged antigens expressed by mmor cells induce a cellular immune response which in some
  • immune privileged sites in the body include the testis and parts of the eye.
  • T lymphocytes specific for immune-privileged antigens are usefully employed.
  • T lymphocytes specific for immune-privileged antigens provides an opportunity
  • T lymphocytes may eradicate the tumor at an early stage but leave behind
  • identification of the particular antigen to which it is directed may allow therapeutic intervention before the development of the neurological disease and may facilitate treatment of the persisting condition.
  • APCs are responsible for creating or expanding the population of specific CTLs or memory T lymphocytes.
  • paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD)
  • gynecological mmors such as those of the ovary and breast.
  • privileged antigen of neuronal cells is expressed in gynecological tumors, enabling the
  • T lymphocytes assayed directly from
  • the PCD antigen has been identified as cdr2, a protein expressed in neuronal cells and in
  • polypeptide fragments of cdr2 which are targets for naturally-occurring CTLs in PCD patients.
  • these syndromes may be subacute or acute, causing serious
  • Hu antigen is expressed by small cell lung mmors; Hu syndrome is another
  • tumors suggests that breast or ovarian mmor cells expressing cdr2 are responsible for initiating
  • DCs dendritic cells
  • tumors expressing cdr2 may be amenable to diagnosis and therapy by particular embodiments
  • the present invention includes immune
  • privileged antigens generally, not limited to those described herein in addition to Nova, ⁇ -
  • privileged antigens include, but are not limited to,
  • paraneoplastic neuronal degeneration paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, Hu syndrome,
  • neuroblastoma neuroblastoma, vitiligo, myasthenia gravis, subacute motor neuropathy, subacute necrotic
  • myelopathy myelopathy, polyneuropathy, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
  • cytotoxic and memory T lymphocytes is performed in order to identify the presence and extent
  • a paraneoplastic or other syndrome such as an
  • autoimmune disorder e.g. vitiligo.
  • This test is performed as a routine assay such as a
  • cerebrospinal fluid other appropriate bodily fluid containing lymphocytes is obtained, such as cerebrospinal fluid
  • an assay is
  • privileged antigen i.e. , peptide fragments of the antigen complexed in an HLA tetramer (51).
  • a specific antibody reagent is prepared that recognizes peptides of the immune-
  • this reagent is used to detect T lymphocytes
  • the reagent must be specific for the particular HLA
  • privileged antigens and HLA haplotypes is sought. Detection is achieved using any of a
  • FACS cell sorting
  • CTLs ability of such CTLs to lyse target cells expressing the immune-privileged antigen or a peptide thereof in the context of HLA is employed. Lysis of such cells by CTLs is detected by
  • HLA haplotype HLA-antigen peptide any one of several methods is used. For example, any one of several methods is used.
  • the target cell may be one that expresses HLA, such as the cell line T2 (TAP " ' " HLA-
  • the cells are pulsed with
  • immune-privileged antigen peptides such as the cdr2 peptides described herein, and
  • target cells by CTLs, lysis of the target cells is determined.
  • the target cells is
  • lysis is assayed by the release of other intracellular markers such as
  • the identification of CTLs specific for an immune- privileged antigen is readily determined by incubating T lymphocytes with the above-described
  • ⁇ -interferon and other cytokines including
  • TNF- ⁇ , RANTES, MlP-l ⁇ and other chemokines as well as to lyse target cells bearing the
  • immune privileged antigens such as cdr2 expressed by HeLa cells
  • calls may additionally be engineered to express molecules of a particular HLA haplotype
  • These cells may thus function as target cells
  • immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes A series of such cells may be prepared, each expressing a different HLA haplotype, for use in screening.
  • This value is then used to identify a patient in which a tumor is or had been present,
  • T lymphocytes receptors capable of detecting tetramers comprising HLA molecule
  • immune-privileged antigen peptides The selection of the immune-privileged antigen or
  • a test for example for cancer, a test comprises a
  • paraneoplastic antigen are present in individuals with paraneoplastic syndrome. In order to provide a paraneoplastic antigen.
  • memory T cells must be exposed to APCs presenting the immune-privileged antigen.
  • the assay is carried out by following steps:
  • T lymphocytes or the isolated T lymphocytes
  • Measuring the immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes is accomplished by any one
  • the HLA-peptide tetramer may be measured, or the extent of secretion of mediators from the
  • T lymphocytes may be determined; alternatively, the cytolytic activity of the T lymphocytes
  • the APCs may be dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells, microglial cells, fibrocytes, engineered cells containing MHC and secreting co-stimulatory
  • expressing the desired peptide for example, it may be achieved by delivering antigen through
  • mediators such as ⁇ -interferon production is used as the read ⁇
  • an assay is provided for the detection of cdr2-specific T
  • This assay is rapid and offers the ability to screen large numbers of patient samples for
  • the number of T cells stimulated by the immune privileged antigen-fed dendritic cells is an
  • the apoptotic debris to which the dendritic cells are exposed may be, by
  • a negative control may be used in the assay, for example, the same cell
  • peripheral blood is obtained from a
  • Such cells expressing cdr2 protein may be prepared for example, as described in Example 6
  • IFN- ⁇ interferon gamma
  • IFN- ⁇ release may be measured in any one of
  • the standard ELISPOT assay provides a rapid method. For example, 10 5
  • T cells are placed in a 96-well plate, previously coated with a monoclonal antibody specific for
  • IFN- ⁇ IFN- ⁇
  • 10 4 -irradiated stimulator cells such as EC2 or EL4.
  • IFN- ⁇ spot forming cells SFCs
  • HRP-AEC 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole
  • nitrocellulose-bottom wells are plated with antibody to IFN- ⁇ , release allowed
  • peripheral blood can be determined.
  • haplotype can be assayed by this method.
  • the assay is relatively simple, can be
  • this assay can ultimately be done without DCs as antigen presenting
  • APCs peripheral blood monocytes
  • immune-privileged antigen-expressing mmor has a sufficient population of antigen-specific T
  • lymphocytes to control the tumor or is a candidate for anti-cancer therapy by quantitating T lymphocytes specific for the particular antigen.
  • the method can be used for
  • T lymphocytes in a patient i.e. , increase the population for anti-cancer therapy
  • the assay readout can be compared to pre-
  • Cytokines are known to promote the expression
  • cytokines present in pathological states such as neoplasia or
  • a paraneoplastic syndrome can induce, accelerate or exacerbate the disease process by
  • Diagnostic kits are embodied by the present invention which provide particular immune-
  • sample of bodily fluid in accordance with the various methods described above. For instance,
  • immune-privileged antigen peptides such as by way of non-limiting example, the several amino acids listed above.
  • HLA molecule and peptides for direct detection of CTLs with receptors specific for the
  • Kit componentry will be specific to the type of assay to be performed and the type
  • therapeutic modalities are generally directed to either the enhancement or the diminution of the
  • immune-privileged antigens results in pathology, for example, autoimmune diseases.
  • pathology for example, autoimmune diseases.
  • the extent of application of either of these therapies may be any one of these therapies.
  • T cells are elevated, yet the animal is not neuro logically compromised. As will be shown in
  • the apoptotic mmor cell was a cell line (PC7) generated by stably transfecting EL4 cells (a T
  • CD8 + T cells were purified
  • CD8 antibody coupled to iron conjugated microbeads are incubated with splenocytes and CD8 +
  • T cells are positively selected by passing the cells through a magnetic column.
  • the positively selected CD8 + T cells were used directly in an ELISPOT assay.
  • lymphocytes to lyse MHC-matched target cells expressing cdr2, EC2 cells, but not MHC-
  • cdr2-expressing mmor cells is possible without inducing autoimmune neurologic disease.
  • enhanced anti-tumor therapy is provided to a patient with a neoplasm
  • lymphocytes to be stimulated may
  • APCs such as dendritic cells isolated from the patient ex vivo to one or more peptides of the particular antigen, or by other known means, whereby the antigen will be available for presentation to T lymphocytes.
  • the antigen-exposed APCs are then reintroduced into the patient to stimulate the activation of specific T lymphocytes in vivo, or, the APCs, for example, dendritic cells, may be further exposed in vitro to T lymphocytes isolated from the patient, whereby presentation to T lymphocytes will induce the activation of antigen-specific
  • T lymphocytes or dendritic cells are reintroduced into the patient, wherein the CTLs
  • ex- vivo therapies may be achieved by any one of several, non-limiting
  • memory T lymphocytes may be activated
  • immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes may be isolated using the HLA-peptide tetramer as described above, and then expanded with cytokines,
  • the activated, antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes may then be reintroduced to the patient.
  • Non-limiting examples include increasing cytokine levels, inhibiting the expression of Fas-ligand expression (44) on mmor cells to block apoptosis, inducing the expression of MHC I molecules on the mmor using, for example, Nef
  • Nef-like protein(41) radiation therapy, tumor chemotherapy, Bax induction in the mmor (52) and inducing apoptosis of mmor cells using FLIP inhibitors (49).
  • cells may be engineered to be sensitive to a drug such as gancyclovir by methods known to the
  • any induction or exacerbation of a PND may be controlled by suppressing the introduced immune cell population by administration of the drug to which the cells are sensitive.
  • the dendritic cells to the intact antigen or its peptides allow for processing and presentation.
  • the antigen is provided in a form which can be readily processed and
  • transfect dendritic cells 50
  • delivery is achieved using cells which already express the desired antigen; for example, HeLa cells, which
  • privileged antigen is provided wherein suppression of cellular immunity is desired to intervene
  • Agents useful for this method of treatment include, but are not
  • immunosuppressive agents such as tacrolimus, cyclosporin, corticosteroids, and
  • privileged antigen is directed to the body in general or to specific locations for increased
  • Such agents may be administered by parenteral injection, or for oral, pulmonary, nasal or other forms of administration. Appropriate dosage levels for treatment of the various conditions in various patients will be
  • non-tumor cells This is achieved by reducing the level of cytokines in contact with the non-mmor cells, as it is known that cytokines will promote the expression of endogenous antigen via MHC-I molecules (21,22). Treatment with inhibitors of cytokine production, such
  • corticosteroids or anti-cytokine agents such as anti-cytokine antibodies, are provided as corticosteroids, or anti-cytokine agents such as anti-cytokine antibodies, are provided as corticosteroids, or anti-cytokine agents such as anti-cytokine antibodies, are provided as corticosteroids, or anti-cytokine agents such as anti-cytokine antibodies, are provided as
  • anti-cytokine therapy delivered to the CNS is provided by means such
  • paraneoplastic antigen by lymphocytes include those which suppress the
  • means to decrease the sensitivity of non-mmor cells to CTLs are
  • perforin-mediated CTL killing may be inhibited (43);
  • apoptosis may be inhibited for example, by inhibitors of FLIP (39); reducing Bax expression
  • cytokines that promote the immune-privileged state may be administered,
  • IL-10 IL-10 and TGF- ⁇ (46); and MHC I expression may be decreased (41).
  • based anti-cancer therapy provides both the enhancement of the anti-cancer therapy and
  • immortalized, immune-privileged antigen-specific CTLs can be prepared
  • CTLs can be expanded in vitro and introduced into the patient. In order to control the
  • the cells can be engineered to be sensitive to a certain drug, such as
  • control may be unnecessary.
  • the patient in an example of an course of therapy using such cells for a patient with an existing PND, the patient can be first treated with an anti-cytokine agent and a blood brain sealing agent to reduce expression of the privileged antigen on non-
  • mmor cells and to restrict access of the CTLs to the brain, respectively.
  • Other means for protecting the brain include increasing FAS ligand expression in the brain (40), decreasing Bax expression in neurons (45), and decreasing cytokine levels in the brain (46).
  • paraneoplastic antigens such as the cdr2-l (SEQ ID NO: l) and cdr2-2 (SEQ ID NO: 2) fragments of cdr2, which are believed to be the natively processed cdr2 peptides to which
  • kits for stimulating the production of T lymphocytes specific for immune privileged antigens comprises cells which express an immune-privileged antigen as
  • the cells may further comprise
  • These cells may be derived from a cell line, such as a
  • Drosophila cell line The cells may be used for the in-vivo or ex-vivo stimulation of T
  • the kit may further comprise T lymphocytes from donors with the same HLA
  • haplotype as the patient, in order to participate in the further stimulation of a cellular immune
  • Peripheral blood was obtained from HLA A2.1 + PCD patients and normal donors in
  • PBMCs were isolated using Ficoll-Hypaque
  • T cell enriched (ER+) and T cell depleted (ER- ) populations were selected from the group consisting of T cell enriched (ER+) and T cell depleted (ER- ) populations.
  • T cells were further purified from ER+ cells for the CTL recall assays by removing
  • peripheral blood precursors by culturing ER- cells for 7 days in the presence of GM-CSF
  • Activated CTLs were detected using T-cells as effector cells in a conventional Na 51 CrO 4 release
  • T2 cells (a TAP-/-, HLA-A2.1 + , class II- cell line) were
  • T2 cells pulsed with peptide served as targets.
  • Specific lysis was determined by
  • PCD peptides designated
  • Monoclonal antibodies to the following antigens were used: CD19, CD56, CD3,
  • CD83 (Coulter Corp.). Cell populations from the peripheral blood and spinal fluid were
  • PBMCs were treated with BFA and cytokine production was stimulated using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate [PMA] and ionomycin [I] (23) .
  • T helper cells were delineated by a CD3 + CD4 -I- phenotype and levels of IFN ⁇ , TNF ⁇ , IL2 and IL-4 were determined.
  • PCD Three PCD patients were smdied to explore the namre of the immune response in the serum and spinal fluid. All patients had HLA-A2.1 + phenotypes. One (Patient 1) had acute disease and two (Patients 2 and 3) had chronic disease (seen 18 days, 9 months, and 6 months, respectively, after the onset of cerebellar dysfunction). The diagnosis of PCD was confirmed
  • CD8+ CTLs are involved in mmor immunity in PCD was investigated using peptide epitopes derived from cdr2 in a standard chromium release assay.
  • Target cells were T2 cells, a TAP " ' " HLA-A2.1 + cell line pulsed with cdr2 peptides (predicted
  • effector target ratios.
  • cdr2-specific CTLs were detected showing specificity for
  • PBMCs peripheral blood mononuclear cells
  • DCs were prepared by culturing a T cell depleted mononuclear fraction for 7 days in
  • GM-CSF granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
  • IL 4 interleukin 4
  • the DCs generated had a typical
  • HLA-A2.1 epitope derived from the influenza matrix protein were determined (data not).
  • CSF Cerebrospinal fluid
  • Example 3 Intracellular Cytokine Staining of CSF Cells of Patient 1 To further define the activated cell population present in the CSF of patient 1 , intracellular cytokine staining was performed and cells were assayed by four color cytofluorographic analysis. This revealed helper T cells present in the CSF which produced IL-2, IFN ⁇ and TNF ⁇ but not IL-4 — a cytokine profile characteristic of Thl cells ( Figure 3B). Furthermore, it was possible to demonstrate that the cells responsible for the production of these cytokines were activated T blasts (selected based on their increased forward scatter). In contrast, CD3 + CD4 + cells isolated from the peripheral blood of the same patient produced no cytokine unless
  • the Hu antigen has been found to be expressed ubiquitously in its associated tumor type (small cell lung cancer).
  • the cdr2 antigen is present in a larger set of gynecologic mmors than the rarity of PCD might suggest, ovarian and breast mmor
  • ovarian mmors express the cdr2 tumor antigen. Similar results were found in samples of non-PCD associated breast tumors, where at least 25 percent of mmors express the cdr2 antigen.
  • MC (97-09) DCs were co-cultured with apoptotic uninfected HeLa cells and syngeneic T cells.
  • Yol through Yo8 (corresponding to SEQ ID NO: l through SEQ ID NO: 8, and also referred to
  • cdr2-l through cdr2-8) were tested for Matrix peptide (M) (SEQ ID NO: 9) pulsed T2 cells (HeLa cells were uninfected). These results show that successful induction of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to certain cdr2 peptides may be achieved by the use of apopototic cells delivering the target antigen.
  • M Matrix peptide
  • Example 6 Generation of a mouse model that recapitulates aspects of the tumor immunity in the disorder in the absence of autoimmune neurologic disease
  • a mouse model of PCD was generated that recapimlates aspects of the mmor immunity in the disorder in the absence of autoimmune neurologic disease. Mice were immunized using an
  • apoptotic mmor cell PC7, which results in the generation of potent cdr2 -specific killer T cells.
  • the following cell lines were used in evaluating the model. For example, EC2 cells were
  • mice were immunized with 10 7 -irradiated PC7 cells, subcutaneously, at one week
  • Target cells included EC2 and EL4, demonstrating the generation of
  • mice were purified from the spleens of primed and naive mice using the MACS cell isolation
  • anti-CD8 antibody coupled to iron conjugated microbeads are incubated with
  • splenocytes and CD8 + T cells are positively selected by passing the cells through a magnetic
  • model system is analogous to the cross-priming of tumor cells evident in patients with PCD.
  • a control for this experiment included the use of TIB84 cells as targets in the CTL assay (Fig.
  • T cells that target the congenic line TIB84.
  • Congenic lines are useful as they contain allo-
  • cdr2-specific killer T cells have been identified in patients with effective tumor suppression and PCD.
  • significant numbers of breast and ovarian tumors present in neurologically normal patients express the cdr2 target antigen. Therefore, the present study demonstrates that stimulation of T cells able to kill cdr2- expressing mmor cells is possible without inducing autoimmune neurologic disease.
  • Example 7 ELISPOT assay for the detection of cdr2-specific T cells
  • EC2 cells were generated by stably transfecting EL4 cells with pcDNA-cdr2, and determination of protein expression made by Western blot analysis; please refer to Example 6 and Table 1 regarding these cells. These fed DCs were then incubated with patient's peripheral blood lymphocytes, and interferon gamma (IFN- ⁇ ) release measured as an index of stimulation.
  • IFN- ⁇ interferon gamma
  • assay for IFN- ⁇ release is a standard ELISPOT assay. In this instance, the assay was done
  • the number of cdr2-specific T cells in a patient's peripheral blood can be determined.
  • DCs were grown from an HLA A2.1 + patient with PCD
  • T cell activation was measured by counting spots
  • This patient had a significant number of cdr2 + T cells evident by the large numbers of spots
  • Negative controls included T cells incubated with apoptotic debris in the absence of
  • MHC class I gene expression in single neurons of the central nervous system differential regulation by interferon (IFN)-gamma and mmor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. J Exp Med 185: 305-316.
  • IFN interferon
  • TNF necrosis factor
  • HIV-1 Nef protein protects infected primary cells against killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Namre 391: 397-401.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Neurology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Rehabilitation Therapy (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)

Abstract

Diagnostic and therapeutic methods for the detection of paraneoplastic antigen-specific cells, enhancing tumor immunity by increasing the population of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), and suppressing cellular immunity to treat the paraneoplastic syndrome.

Description

DETECTION AND MODULATION OF CELLULAR IMMUNITY TO IMMUNE PRIVILEGED ANTIGENS
GOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT
The research leading to the present invention was supported, at least in part, by grants from
the Department of Defense, Breast Cancer Research Award No. DAMD017-94-J-4277, the National Institutes of Health Award No. M01 RR00102, and the National Multiple
Sclerosis Society. Accordingly, the Government may have certain rights in the invention.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to diagnostic and therapeutic methods based upon the development of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens and its role in the etiology of paraneoplastic neuronal disorders and tumor immunity, among other conditions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Constant surveillance of epitopes throughout those structures in the body accessible to the immune system provides a very effective means for recognizing and maintaining "self" and destroying epitopes and their carriers which invade the body or arise pathologically, such as
infectious microorganisms. One important role of immune surveillance is the recognition and
destruction of neoplastic cells that are believed to arise continuously in the body and for the most part are eliminated by the immune system before becoming detectable. However,
examples of naturally-occurring tumor immunity have been elusive. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes,
key participants in effective immune surveillance, are not expanded in patients with active
tumors, even when these tumors express what are believed to be tumor-specific antigens such
as the MAGE/MART antigens of melanoma.
Effective tumor immunity has been documented, however, in individuals with paraneoplastic
neuronal disorders (PNDs). These syndromes are poorly understood diseases in which serious
effects of cancer in the body occur in the nervous system without any direct involvement of the
tumor. PND patients typically present to physicians with neurologic dysfunction unaware that
they harbor a tumor. For example, patients with ovarian or breast cancer who develop
paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD) have an effective tumor immune response (3 ,4,5 ;
reviewed in 1,2,6), and moreover, the tumor expresses neuron-specific proteins (antigens).
These patients have in circulation and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antibodies against these
tumor cell antigens, which also cross-react with the same proteins expressed in neurons,
termed onconeural antigens. A high titer antibody recognizes the intracellular antigen cdr2
expressed in the ovarian or breast tumor present in PCD patients (10); and also recognizes the
antigen in Purkinje neurons of the cerebellum (10). However, as will be elaborated below, the
existence of this antibody does not account for the etiology of the PND nor for effective tumor
killing.
Certain regions of the body, such as the brain, eye, and testis, are protected from immune
surveillance, these sites are referred to as immune privileged. Based on the above observations, the immune system is proposed to initiate PCD by recognizing the normally
immune-privileged antigen cdr2 (10) when it is ectopically expressed in gynecologic tumors.
This immune response is associated clinically with effective tumor immunity, and is believed
to lead to the recognition and destruction of Purkinje neurons expressing cdr2. cDNAs
encoding several of the target antigens have been cloned, for example, cdr2 which has been
shown to be the correct tumor antigen (9,54). However, because the target neuronal antigen
is cytoplasmic, the role of circulating and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) antibodies against these
antigens in the pathogenesis of PCD is questionable. Moreover, attempts to reproduce the
disorder by passive or active transfer of antibodies have failed (11 ,12,13). As the target organ,
the brain, is immune privileged, and furthermore the target antigen is cytoplasmic, the etiology
of the paraneoplastic syndrome is difficult to reconcile. This is further confounded by the
apparent absence of a cellular immune response against tumor antigens in general and the
apparent absence of a cellular immune response in PCD. No cytotoxic T lymphocytes were
found against the cdr2 protein using autologous dendritic cells in a patient with PCD (47). The
etiology of tumor immunity in PND is enigmatic.
As described above, the paraneoplastic syndromes are serious conditions associated with
tumors and frequently affect the central nervous system; these disorders are collectively
referred to as paraneoplastic neuronal disorders (PND). For example, one common
paraneoplastic disorder which is seen in patients with breast or ovarian cancer is paraneoplastic
cerebellar degeneration, or PCD, in which a progressive and severe neurological dysfunction
occurs involving the cerebellum, leading to dyscoordination of the legs and arms, dizziness and
double vision. Frequently, these symptoms appear before the diagnosis of cancer. In another
- example of neurological degeneration, Hu syndrome is associated with small cell lung cancer
and antibodies to the onconeural antigen Hu. In other examples, opsoclonus, or spontaneous, chaotic eye movements, and myoclonus, jerky body movements, may accompany breast cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or small cell lung cancer, and are associated with antibodies to the onconeural antigen Nova.
The target onconeural antigens have yet to be identified for some disorders believed to be paraneoplastic. Patients with Hodgkin's disease and other lymphomas may develop subacute
cerebellar degeneration that is believed to be immune mediated (22,42). Eaton-Lambert
syndrome, a condition causing weakness in the limbs, may also accompany intrathoracic
tumors such as lung cancer and is believed to be immune mediated (2). Some patients who develop spinal cord dysfunction (e.g. , myelopathy), motor neuron diseases, blindness and other neurologic symptoms are found to have specific sets of underlying tumors and are believed to have immunity to unknown or partially-characterized onconeural antigens (2,37). Less well
understood, the incidence of the muscle diseases dermatomyositis and polymyositis is increased
in cancer patients. The dermatologic condition vitiligo, in which melanocytes producing skin
pigment are destroyed, appears associated with a decrease in incidence of melanoma. It is thus apparent that an association exists between tumors, and in some cases tumor immunity, and
the sites of the paraneoplastic disorder symptoms, perhaps through the existence of some
common antigens.
Several lines of evidence suggest the existence of naturally-occurring tumor immunity in PND
patients. PND-associated tumors are typically occult (24,25); in several cases they have been identified only by microscopic analysis of suspect organs following exploratory surgery or at
autopsy. Patients with PND-associated tumors have significantly-limited disease and an
improved tumor prognosis relative to patients with histologically-identical tumors unassociated
with PND (20,24,26-28). In some cases PND-associated tumors have been documented to
regress with the onset of autoimmune neurologic disease (7).
Specific clinical data regarding anti-tumor immunity is available for several of the PNDs.
Patients with paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis harbor high titers of an antibody termed Hu
and small cell lung cancers (SCLCa); their tumors are typically limited to single nodules
(53/55 [96%] patients in the most complete study published [3] ). This is a remarkable
finding given that most SCLCa patients from unselected series (over 60%) have widely
metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (and no detectable titers of Hu antibody) . In
addition, fifteen percent of SCLCa patients without PND nonetheless have detectable titers
of the Hu antibody (20). These patients have statistically significant increases in the frequency
of limited stage disease, complete response to chemotherapy and longer survival (3, 5). These
results suggest that anti-PND antibodies may be associated with suppression of tumor
growth independently from their association with neurologic disease.
There are also firm associations between the presence of the Nova (Ri) (28) and Yo (10)
antibodies in PND patients and clinically-limited malignancy. Both antibodies are found in
women with gynecologic cancer. Of 52 Yo-antibody -positive patients with breast or
ovarian cancer (4), two-thirds (34/52) presented with neurologic symptoms prior to the
diagnosis of cancer, and 87% (45/52) had limited oncologic disease when diagnosed; similarly, 4/7 Nova-positive patients presented with neurologic symptoms, 6/7 had limited
stage disease, and no tumor could be found in one patient (28). By comparison, only 50-60%
of unselected breast cancer patients, and 25% of ovarian cancer present with limited stage
disease (8).
Experimental observations support the clinical evidence that there is immunologic recognition
of tumor cells in PND. High titer anti-PND antibodies are found in the serum and
cerebrospinal fluid of PND patients. In vitro, these antibodies react specifically with
tumor specimens obtained from PND patients cells, as well as neurons from clinically
affected areas of the nervous system (24,25, 29). For example, 10/10 breast or ovarian
tumors from Yo-positive patients were immunoreactive with biotinylated Yo antisera (4), and
3/4 breast or fallopian tumors from Nova-positive patients were immunoreactive with
biotinylated Nova antisera (28). Taken together, these observations suggest that PND
antibodies are more than markers for neurologic disease or even the presence of tumor
cells, but are markers, and perhaps in part reflective of effective anti-tumor immune
responses.
The immunologic basis of the anti-tumor and antineuronal immune response in PND is
unknown. The finding of autoantibodies with neuronal binding specificity, and observations
on autoimmune neurologic disorders of the peripheral nervous system, have focused attention
on the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of PND. In myasthenia gravis (MG) and
Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), antineuronal antibodies have been found to
passively transfer autoimmune disease in animals (30, 31). In PND, there are relatively higher titers of antibody in the CSF than serum (IgG index > 1) (32) suggestive of an active B cell
inflammatory response within the CNS compartment. Furthermore, although the data is not
fully compelling, there have been numerous reports that PND antibodies may be neurotoxic
in vitro and that antibodies may be able to be taken up by neurons (33, 34). These
observations have led clinicians to focus therapy for the PNDs on the elimination of PND
antibodies. Unfortunately these attempts have been uniformly unsuccessful (24, 32. 35).
Several features of the PNDs distinguish them from MG and LEMS and suggest that B cells
might not be sufficient or even necessary for the development of PND. PND antigens have
been found to be cytoplasmic (Yo, β-NAP) or nuclear (Nova, Hu) proteins, unlike the target
antigens in MG (the acetylcholine receptor) or LEMS (the presynaptic calcium channel) (2).
It is difficult to reconcile these observations with the premise that PND antibodies play a
primary role in PND autoimmunity. Moreover, attempts to produce animal models of PND,
including infusion of antibody into the CSF and immunization with cloned fusion protein, have
failed (11, 12).
Thus, the etiology of the paraneoplastic syndromes appears to have an immunological basis,
heretofore undefined. It is towards a better understanding of the etiology of the paraneoplastic
neuronal disorders and the establishment of a link between effective tumor immunity and these
serious, remote complications of neoplasia in immune privileged sites that the present invention
is directed, with objectives of improving the detection of tumors and paraneoplastic disorders
in individuals in general and offering improved therapies for both tumors expressing immune
privileged antigens and the associated syndromes. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The inventors herein have made the surprising and remarkable finding of the presence of mmor
antigen-specific T lymphocytes (CTLs) in patients with paraneoplastic neuronal disorders.
This finding provides a basis for understanding the desirable and often effective cell-based
immunologic attack on the tumors, and the effective but undesirable attack on remote target
organ(s) of the paraneoplastic disorders by CTLs. Expression of the same immune -privileged
antigen by these remote tissues as that which is expressed in the tumor cells, and to which T
lymphocytes are targeted, explains for the first time the etiology of the PNDs. Both activated
CTLs and memory T lymphocytes specific for the tumor and for the remote antigen have been
detected. This finding provides an appreciation that immune privileged antigens offer a unique
set of targets for the immune system. If expressed in tumors, they provide targets for effective
anti-tumor immunity. If immune-privilege or tolerance to these antigens is broken, for
example in the setting of effective anti-tumor immunity, autoimmune disease may result. The
identification of a cellular immune response to immune-privileged antigens that can be readily
and specifically detected, amplified, or inhibited, provides the basis for diagnostic and
therapeutic utilities disclosed herein. Based upon this discovery, diagnostic utilities are
disclosed for the detection and monitoring of cellular immunity to privileged antigens, and
therapeutic methods are described for increasing the effectiveness of anti-tumor immunity and
also for protecting the immune privileged site from immune-mediated pathology. Known
diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and manipulations of the immune system are modified
based on the discoveries herein in order to detect and modulate the immune response to immune-privileged antigens.
As will be described in more detail below, only a fraction of patients with a specific T
lymphocyte response to immune privileged antigens, especially those with tumors, exhibit an
overt paraneoplastic disorder, yet such patients are at risk for the development of, or may have
as-yet undetected autoimmune disease or another subclinical disorders . In accordance with the
present invention, methods for determining in an individual the presence and extent of a
cellular immune response to an immune-privileged antigen are provided, the cellular immune
response associated directly or indirectly with a pathological state. Examples of pathological
states include but are not limited to dysproliferative diseases, paraneoplastic syndromes, and
autoimmune disorders. The method comprises quantitating in a sample of bodily fluid from
an individual the presence and extent of T lymphocytes specific for the immune-privileged
antigen or its fragments. The preferred method involves the detection of T lymphocytes which
recognize paraneoplastic antigens, and most preferably, onconeural antigens such as cdr2 and
Hu antigen. One example of a means for detection comprises determining the extent of
activation of T lymphocytes upon exposure to the antigen by measuring cytokine production;
another method comprises detecting the extent of recognition by the cytotoxic T cells of target
cells expressing the antigen. Methods for detecting T lymphocytes bearing receptors for
immune-privileged antigen are also provided.
In the instance where the T lymphocytes to be detected are memory T cells, the methods
comprises detecting the extent of activation of memory T cells after exposure to antigen-
presenting cells (APCs) presenting the immune -privileged antigen. In another embodiment, the extent of recognition of target cells expressing the antigen is determined after exposure of
the memory T lymphocytes to APCs presenting the immune-privileged antigen.
The present invention further provides a method for screening individuals for the presence of
tumors expressing immune-privileged antigens as well as detecting the early onset or
propensity to develop a pathological state caused by a cellular immune response to an immune-
privileged antigen. This method comprises measuring the presence and extent of T
lymphocytes specific for immune privileged antigens. Furthermore, a method is provided for
determining whether a neoplasm expresses an immune-privileged antigen by quantitating T
lymphocytes that are specific for the antigen or its fragment. In another embodiment, a method
is disclosed for determining whether a patient with a immune -privileged antigen-expressing
tumor has a sufficient population of antigen-specific T lymphocytes to control the tumor or is
a candidate for anti-cancer therapy. This method comprises quantitating T lymphocytes
specific for the antigen or a fragment. In a still further embodiment, a method for monitoring
the effectiveness of therapies directed to modulate the population of immune-privileged
antigen-specific T lymphocytes in a patient is described wherein the numbers of antigen-
specific T lymphocytes are quantitated.
The cDNAs encoding the target immune-privileged as well as their expressed proteins and
fragments thereof may be used in the present invention to provide reagents for carrying out the
diagnostic and therapeutic methods as described herein, as well as being part of a diagnostic
kit. As described above, the sequence and cDNA of cdr2 is known (9,54); its fragments that
complexes with HLA are described below. In a further example of a screening method for identifying the number of immune-privileged
antigen-specific T cells in a patient sample, the following steps may be carried out:
i) maturing dendritic cells in the blood sample;
ii) exposing the matured dendritic cells to apoptotic debris from unrelated
cells expressing an immune-privileged antigen;
iii) co-incubating the immune-privileged antigen-exposed dendritic cells
with the peripheral blood lymphocytes from the patient; and
iv) correlating the amount of interferon-γ released from the lymphocytes
with the number of immune privileged antigen-specific T cells in the
sample.
By way of non-limiting example, the immune-privileged antigen may be cdr2. The unrelated
cells expressing an immune -privileged antigen may be cells stably transfected to express an
immune-privileged antigen, such as cdr2. The interferon-γ release may be measured in an
ELISPOT assay.
Diagnostic kits are also provided with componentry capable of measuring the above-described
T lymphocytes and antigens comprising, for example, one or more of the following reagents:
an isolated, immune -privileged antigen or preferably a fragment of the immune-privileged
antigen; a target cell expressing the immune-privileged antigen or its fragment; a fragment of
the immune-privileged antigen in a tetrameric complex with HLA; and a reagent such as an
antibody or labeled antibody which recognizes a fragment of the immune-privileged antigen
in a complex with HLA. When the immune-privileged antigen is cdr2, useful isolated
polypeptide sequences identified include cdr2 pep tides referred to as Yol through Yo8, or cdr2-l through cdr2-8, and identified herein as SEQ ID NO:l , SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7 and SEQ ID NO:8. The kit may include target cells prepared from a cell line or, for example, Drosophila, which expressed the immune-privileged antigen, and further may express HLA molecules and co-stimulatory molecules. A kit may further include components for detecting cytokine production, such as γ-IFN, as a means for detecting immune cell activation. To broadly screen samples from a
variety of patients with different HLA haplotypes, a variety of target cells expressing the same
immune-privileged antigen, but different HLA haplotypes, may be employed in order to detect
immune-privileged antigen specific T lymphocytes regardless of the patient's HLA haplotype.
It is another object of the present invention to provide methods for treating a neoplasm in a
patient in which the neoplasm expresses an immune-privileged antigen. One preferred
embodiment is accomplished by increasing the number of immune-privileged, antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes present in the patient. In one, non-limiting example, the method is carried out by first isolating a quantity of APCs from a sample of the patient's blood, then exposing the APCs in vitro to the immune -privileged antigen or its fragment, followed by
reintroducing the antigen-exposed APCs to the patient. In another related embodiment, the
same method is followed with an additional step of exposing the antigen-exposed APCs in vitro to a quantity of T lymphocytes isolated from the patient, and reintroducing the T lymphocytes to the patient. These examples are illustrative of methods of providing the patient with immune
privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes and/or immune-privileged antigen-presenting APCs
in order to develop or enhance immunity to the tumor. Methods for achieving presentation of the immune-privileged antigen or its fragment on the APCs in the aforementioned methods is achieved using any one of several methods. For
example, APCs are provided with apoptotic cells expressing the immune-privileged antigen or
a fragment. These can be commonly available cell lines expressing the immune privileged
antigen, such as HeLa cells, which express the cdr2 antigen (9), or transfected cells such as
Drosophila cells expressing the gene encoding the immune-privileged antigen. These cells may
also be further engineered to additionally express the gene encoding the MHC molecule
haplotype of the patient, and even further engineered to express co-stimulatory molecules, such
that the Drosophila cells function as an antigen-presenting cell, thus forming a useful APC for
in-vivo or ex-vivo stimulation of T lymphocytes as described above. These cells also have
diagnostic utility, as described herein. The preferred antigen is a paraneoplastic antigen, and
most preferred, an onconeural antigen such as cdr2 and Hu antigen. In a further embodiment,
the immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes are derived from a donor individual of
the same HLA haplotype as the patient.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, a method for treating a pathological state in
a mammal is provided, wherein the pathological state is caused by the presence in the mammal
of T lymphocytes specific for an immune -privileged antigen. The method consists of
administration of an effective amount of an agent which decreases the population of activated
T lymphocytes specific for cells expressing the immune-privileged antigen. Non-limiting
examples of such agents include tacrolimus, cyclosporin, immunosuppressive cytokines,
corticosteroids, and combinations. The preferred agent is tacrolimus. The immune-privileged
antigen is preferably a paraneoplastic antigen, most preferably, and onconeural antigen such as cdr2 and Hu antigen and their fragments. The preferred route of administration of the
agents is to the central nervous system. Other effective routes of administration are also
disclosed.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for decreasing the
ability of non-tumor cells expressing privileged antigens to be killed by cytotoxic T
lymphocytes as well as decreasing the expression of paraneoplastic antigens on non-tumor
cells. These may be achieved by several methods, for example, by reducing the cytokine level
in contact with the affected cells; increasing the expression of Nef or Nef-like proteins,
inhibiting perforin-mediated CTL killing of neurons, and inhibiting apoptosis of the target
cells.
In another embodiment, methods and agents are provided for enhancing the killing of tumors
expressing immune privileged antigens by T lymphocytes. These methods include
administering cytokines, inhibiting Fas-ligand expression in the tumor, and inducing the
expression of MHC I molecules on the tumor. Other methods may be used in combination
with increasing the immune-privileged T lymphocyte activity in the patient.
In a preferred embodiment, an individual with a tumor expressing an immune-privileged
antigen and also suffering from a paraneoplastic disease or other syndrome in which the
immune system is recognizing and attacking the same antigen at a non-tumor site within the
body is treated by increasing the immune recognition of the immune-privileged antigen of the
tumor exemplified by the non-limiting examples of methods disclosed herein, while concurrently protecting the non- tumor site from immune attack by the corresponding methods disclosed herein.
It is thus a principal object of the present invention to take advantage of the presence of
immune -privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes to detect the existence of a pathological
state in a patient and to monitor the efficacy of treatments based upon the enhancement of
tumor immunity by T lymphocytes as well as their suppression in the treatment of the
associated syndrome in the non-tumor site. It is a further object of the present invention to
provide both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes for the detection of tumors and paraneoplastic
syndromes, to increase the immune destruction of such tumors as well as to protect the non-
tumor organs susceptible to disease caused by the same T lymphocytes.
These and other aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated by reference to the
following drawings and Detailed Description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 depicts a Western blot analysis of patient's serum and CSF against the cloned cdr2
fusion protein (9). Serum (1 : 10,000 dilution) and CSF (1 :500 dilution) from patient 1 (lanes
1, 4), patient 2 (lanes 2, 5), or serum from a patient with an irrelevant PND (Hu syndrome;
1:500 dilution; lane 3) was blotted. Serum and CSF from patient 3 gave similar results. Figure 2 demonstrates that Cdr2 -specific killer cells are present in the peripheral blood of
PCD patients. T lymphocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood of acute (A) and chronic
(B) HLA-A2.1 + PCD patients. (A) Isolated T lymphocytes were used directly in a chromium
release assay using peptide pulsed T2 cells (a TAP"'" HLA-A2.1 + cell line) as targets. Peptides
were predicted based on known anchor residues for the HLA-A2.1 binding groove, and
designated cdr2-l and cdr2-2. (B) Blood derived DCs were generated from PCD and
HLA-A2.1+ matched control individuals, pulsed with peptides and co-cultured with T cells.
After seven days, the responding T cells were tested for cytolytic activity specific for cdr2 as
determined by 51Cr release assay. The HLA-A2.1 immunodominant epitope derived from the
influenza matrix protein served as a positive control for the generation of a CTL recall
response (data not shown). Effector : target ratio = 20: 1. In (A) and (B), percent cytotoxicity
is measured as a function of spontaneous and total release. Background killing of target cells
was 0 - 3 % in all groups. Results are representative of 6 experiments and the values shown
represent the mean from triplicate wells.
Figure 3 depicts cytofluorography of cells isolated from the CSF of a patient with acute PCD
indicate a Thl-type cellular immune response. (A) Cells present in the CSF were assayed for
various phenotypic markers by FACScan® (Becton Dickinson) using the indicated monoclonal
antibodies; CD56 is a marker for natural killer cells; CD 19 is specific for B cells; CD3 is
present on all T cells; CD4 and CD8 indicate helper and cytotoxic T cell subsets, respectively;
CD25 is the IL2 receptor and is a marker for activated T cells. A second analysis was
performed after the patient received tacrolimus. * p < 0.005. (B) Cells from the CSF were
assayed for their intracellular cytokine profile using a dual laser fluorocytometer (Becton Dickinson). Cells were treated with brefeldin A (BFA), and stained for the presence of accumulated cytokines using the indicated monoclonal antibodies. T-blasts were selected based
on forward scatter and these cells consisted of approximately 10% of the CD3 + CD4+ T cell
population. (C) As a control, PBMCs were isolated at the same time and assayed as described
in (B). In addition, the PBMCs were stimulated using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and
ionomycin allowing cytokine production to be detected as a positive control (23).
Figure 4 shows a Western blot analysis of cdr2 expression in human ovarian tumors. (A)
Protein extracts from 9 human ovarian tumors were run on Western blots and probed with
biotinylated affinity purified PCD antibody. Strong cdr2 reactivity was evident in tumors 1 ,
2, 6, 7 and 9, as well as in extracts of human Purkinje neurons; there was no reactivity with
a protein extract of normal human ovary. Probing a duplicate blot with an anti-tubulin
antibody showed immunoreactive protein in each lane. A non-specific (NS) band was present
in Purkinje extracts and ovarian tumors that reacted with avidin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP)
secondary alone (data not shown). (B) IEF/SDS-PAGE analysis of cdr2 expression. An
immunoreactive band of identical Mr and pi is present in extracts of mouse brain or a human
ovarian tumor when probed with PCD antiserum and HRP conjugated secondary antibody.
The mouse cdr2 cDNA encodes a protein that is 87% identical with human cdr2 (10), and this
protein migrates identically with cdr2 detected in human Purkinje extracts (data not shown).
Extraneous cross reactive bands seen in standard 1-D SDS gels (A) do not resolve on IEF.
Figure 5 shows that apoptotic cells expressing cdr2 may be used to present antigen to T
lymphocytes. MC (97-09) DCs were co-cultured with apoptotic uninfected HeLa cells and syngeneic T cells. After 7 days, responding T cells were tested using T2 cells pulsed with
various Yo peptides, Yol through Yo8 (corresponding to SEQ ID NO: l through SEQ ID
NO: 8, and also referred to as cdr2-l through cdr2-8). Negative control included testing Matrix
peptide (M) (SEQ ID NO: 9) pulsed T2 cells (HeLa cells were uninfected).
Figure 6 A-C show that apoptotic PC7 cells are capable of cross-priming cdr2-specific CD8 +
T cells in vivo. Mice were immunized with apoptotic tumor cells which expresses cdr2, and
potent cdr2-specific killer T cells were demonstrated, in the absence of any neurologic
dysfunction.
Figure 7 shows the results of a simplified assay of cdr2-specific T cells present in the blood
of a patient with PCD. Dendritic cells from a blood sample are matured, then exposed to
apoptotic cells expressing cdr2. Subsequently, exposure of the cells to peripheral blood
lymphocytes results in gamma-interferon production by T lymphocytes as an indicator of the
number of cdr2-specific T cells in the individual.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The terms "tumor," "cancer, " "neoplasm," "neoplasia" and their etymological relatives are
used interchangeably herein to refer generally to dysproliferative diseases and the attendant
affected cells or cell masses. Preferably, the dysproliferative cells referred to herein express
an immune- privileged antigen. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are effector T cells, usually CD8 + , that can mediate the lysis
of target cells bearing antigenic peptides associated with a MHC molecule. Other cytotoxic
cells include γ/δ and CD4+ NK 1.1 + cells.
Immune privilege and immune-privileged antigen refer to the isolation of certain sites and
antigens within the body from the immune system and thus relate to antigens to which an
immune response is not normally developed. Immune-privileged antigens expressed
ectopically (i.e. , outside of their normally immune-privileged sites) may result in autoimmunity
or tumor immunity. Immune-privileged antigens are expressed by some tumors resulting in
an immune response to both the tumor and to non-tumor sites expressing the same immune -
privileged antigens. Subsequent access of the immune effector cells to the immune privileged
sites results in immune attack of non-tumor cells. One type of such immune-privileged
antigens are neuronal antigens, a subset of which are the onconeural or paraneoplastic antigens,
against which an immune response will cause neurologic disease. A more detailed description
of the onconeural antigens may be found in reference (2), herein incorporated by reference.
Antigen presenting cells (APCs) are cells including dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells,
that can process and present antigenic peptides in association with class I or class II MHC
molecules and deliver a co-stimulatory signal necessary for T cell activation.
It has been discovered by the inventors herein that the heretofore enigmatic etiology of the
paraneoplastic syndromes, wherein individuals with a tumor experience disease at remote
locations within the body leading to severe neurological impairment, is explained by the existence of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and memory T lymphocytes targeted against
mmor antigens which also recognize identical antigens expressed on neurons. Such immune-
privileged antigens expressed by mmor cells induce a cellular immune response which in some
cases provides effective and desirable mmor immunity, but as an undesirable side effect
mediates immune attack on normal tissues in immune privileged sites which also express the
same antigen. Less well understood is access of CTLs to the immune privileged sites as well
as the expression of the normally cytoplasmic immune-privileged antigens on non-tumor cells.
As mentioned above, patients often experience the remote, adverse effects before detection of
the mmor. Because the antigens recognized by specific CTLs are located in immune privileged
sites within the body, for example, in the brain in paraneoplastic neuronal degeneration, the
discovery herein provides an explanation for the poorly understood phenomenon of immune
system attack on immune privileged, non-tumor antigens. In addition to the brain, other
immune privileged sites in the body include the testis and parts of the eye.
In accordance with the present invention and as will be elucidated in the examples and
description below, both diagnostic and therapeutic utilities are provided in which the presence
or activity of T lymphocytes specific for immune-privileged antigens are usefully employed.
Detection of T lymphocytes specific for immune-privileged antigens provides an opportunity
for screening patients for the early detection of tumors which express such antigens, and
facilitates the monitoring of patients undergoing anti-cancer therapies. Effective mmor
immunity by such T lymphocytes may eradicate the tumor at an early stage but leave behind
a paraneoplastic syndrome or autoimmune disease; detection of the cellular immune response
and identification of the particular antigen to which it is directed may allow therapeutic intervention before the development of the neurological disease and may facilitate treatment of the persisting condition.
New methods of treatment of neoplasms as well as of paraneoplastic syndromes and
autoimmune diseases is also provided by the appreciation of the role of T lymphocytes in the
pathophysiology of the paraneoplastic syndromes and immunologic recognition of privileged
antigens in general. The effectiveness of mmor immunity mediated by specific CTLs which
recognize the immune-privileged antigen expressed by mmors is stimulated or enhanced by
creating or expanding the population of specific CTLs or memory T lymphocytes. APCs
exposed to the immune-privileged antigen are employed to enhance the immune response.
Methods for the protection of non-mmor cells from immune attack are also provided, in order
to protect the non-mmor target sites from pathology, especially when an immune response
against the mmor is enhanced.
Among the various paraneoplastic syndromes, paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD)
is associated with gynecological mmors such as those of the ovary and breast. As will be seen
in the examples below, CTLs present in PCD patients specifically lyse target cells presenting
peptides derived from the PCD antigen called cdr2. Thus, cdr2 antigen, normally an immune-
privileged antigen of neuronal cells, is expressed in gynecological tumors, enabling the
induction of a cellular immune response to the antigen. T lymphocytes assayed directly from
the serum of an acute PCD patient, as well as dendritic cell-stimulated memory T cells present
in patients with chronic PCD, demonstrated cdr2-specific cytotoxicity . The PCD antigen has been identified as cdr2, a protein expressed in neuronal cells and in
gynecological mmors (9, 54). An investigation by the present inventors into the processing
of the cdr2 antigen for presentation by APCs to T lymphocytes has led to the identification of
polypeptide fragments of cdr2 which are targets for naturally-occurring CTLs in PCD patients.
These peptides are believed to be those presented by dendritic cells in the development of
cellular immunity. Eight peptides, namely cdr2-l or Yol (SEQ ID NO: l), cdr2-2 or Yo2
(SEQ ID NO:2), cdr2-3 or Yo3 (SEQ ID NO:3), cdr2-4 or Yo4 (SEQ ID NO:4), cdr2-5 or
Yo5 (SEQ ID NO:5), and cdr2-6 or Yo6 (SEQ ID NO:6), cdr2-7 or Yo7 (SEQ ID NO:7)
and cdr2-8 or Yo8 (SEQ ID NO:8) have been synthetically prepared, and are used
diagnostically and therapeutically in the practice of the present invention. Furthermore, and
as will be described below in detail, engineering of cells to express these peptides has
additional diagnostic and therapeutic utilities in the detection and treatment of cancer and
paraneoplastic diseases.
In several other diseases, cellular immunity against antigens expressed by a mmor is
responsible or presumed responsible for the attack of non-mmor cells expressing the same
antigens. As described above, these syndromes may be subacute or acute, causing serious
complications. Hu antigen is expressed by small cell lung mmors; Hu syndrome is another
example of a neurological disease brought about by a cellular immune response to an immune-
privileged antigen. The identification by the inventors herein of the role of cellular immunity
in the etiology of these diseases provides the link between expression of non-tumor antigens
at the affected site of the paraneoplastic syndrome and the expression of the antigen in the
mmor. As described above, the presence of cdr2-specific CTLs on a wide range of gynecological
tumors suggests that breast or ovarian mmor cells expressing cdr2 are responsible for initiating
PCD. However, the detection of cdr2 in a high percentage of non-PCD-associated mmors
indicates that there are additional factors responsible for successful tumor immunity. Relevant
factors include mmor cell expression of MHC-I (demonstrated in PND-associated mmors; ref
18) and the proximity of dendritic cells (DCs) to apoptotic mmors that may be necessary for
cross-priming (19). It has been reported that 15 % of patients with non-PND associated small
cell lung cancer harbor low titers of the PND Hu antibody, and that this antibody response
predicts limited mmor spread and a complete response to chemotherapy (5,20). The invention
described herein is extended to the presence of Hu-specific CTLs in such patients. Similarly,
it is expected that a significant percentage of patients with non-PND-associated gynecological
tumors expressing cdr2 may be amenable to diagnosis and therapy by particular embodiments
of this invention whereby the presence of cdr2-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes are detected
and their activity modulated in these patients. The present invention includes immune
privileged antigens generally, not limited to those described herein in addition to Nova, β-
NAP, etc.) and are taught to be relevant by this invention.
Thus, it is towards the detection and the modulation of the T lymphocyte response to immune
privileged antigens that the present invention is directed. Enhancement of the immune
response increases the effectiveness of antitumor activity . Suppression of the immune response
alleviates the paraneoplastic or autoimmune disease. The diseases and syndromes that arise
as a result of a cellular immune response to privileged antigens include, but are not limited to,
paraneoplastic neuronal degeneration, paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, Hu syndrome,
-2: the Ri syndrome (opsoclonus-myoclonus ataxia associated with breast, fallopian tube and small
cell lung cancer, and the Ri or Nova antigen), opsoclonus and myoclonus associated with
neuroblastoma, vitiligo, myasthenia gravis, subacute motor neuropathy, subacute necrotic
myelopathy, polyneuropathy, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
These conditions appear to be directly or indirectly related to neoplasia in the patient, either
undetectable, overt, or as a result of a mmor which spontaneously regressed. In some cases,
the identity of the antigen is not yet elucidated, but the course of the disease and its relationship
with neoplasia and the other, better-studied diseases indicates a role for an as-yet identified
immune-privileged antigen in the etiology of the disease. Furthermore, it is suspected that the
above-mentioned diseases as well as various autoimmune disease may in fact arise from a
cellular immune response to a neoplasm which was effectively eradicated by the immune
response, but results in T lymphocytes attacking privileged antigen and evoking a syndrome
far after the neoplasm is eradicated. The diagnostic and therapeutic methods of the present
invention directed to the paraneoplastic diseases will also find utility in the diagnosis and
therapy of the other immune-privileged antigen-related diseases, including autoimmune
diseases.
In one embodiment of the present invention, quantitation of immune-privileged antigen-specific
cytotoxic and memory T lymphocytes is performed in order to identify the presence and extent
of a tumor or to confirm the diagnosis of a paraneoplastic or other syndrome, such as an
autoimmune disorder, e.g. vitiligo. This test is performed as a routine assay such as a
screening test or for individuals undergoing physical examination. It may also be performed
in individuals suspected of having a neoplasm or a disease related to a cellular immune response to an immune-privileged antigen. In order to carry out the test, a sample of blood or
other appropriate bodily fluid containing lymphocytes is obtained, such as cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF).
In order to determine the presence of cytotoxic T lymphocytes that are specific for a particular
immune-privileged antigen, any one of several types of assays is performed, all of which are
known to one or ordinary skill in the art. By way of non-limiting examples, an assay is
performed which identifies the presence of T lymphocyte receptors that recognize the immune-
privileged antigen, i.e. , peptide fragments of the antigen complexed in an HLA tetramer (51).
In this assay, a specific antibody reagent is prepared that recognizes peptides of the immune-
privileged antigen complexed with HLA; this reagent is used to detect T lymphocytes
expressing the particular receptor. The reagent must be specific for the particular HLA
haplotype of the patient. In a routine screening test, various combinations of immune-
privileged antigens and HLA haplotypes is sought. Detection is achieved using any of a
number of means, for example, with a fluorescent labeled reagent using fluorescence-activated
cell sorting (FACS) techniques, or by using a detectable label such as a radioactive or
enzymatic tag and quantitating the binding of the reagent to T lymphocytes in the sample by
standard techniques. These various methods are provided by way of non-limiting examples
to illustrate the practice of the invention, based upon the detection of CTLs that recognize
immune-privileged antigens.
In another example of the means for detecting immune-privileged antigen-specific CTLs, the
ability of such CTLs to lyse target cells expressing the immune-privileged antigen or a peptide thereof in the context of HLA is employed. Lysis of such cells by CTLs is detected by
methods known to the skilled artisan. For preparation of the target cells expressing the
appropriate HLA haplotype HLA-antigen peptide, any one of several methods is used. For
example, the target cell may be one that expresses HLA, such as the cell line T2 (TAP"'" HLA-
A2.1 +), and will incorporate peptides into the HLA complex. The cells are pulsed with
immune-privileged antigen peptides such as the cdr2 peptides described herein, and
subsequently used as targets to detect specific CTLs. To detect specific recognition of the
target cells by CTLs, lysis of the target cells is determined. For example, the target cells is
preloaded with a marker such as Na51CrO4; lysis of the target cells results in the release of the
label. Alternatively, lysis is assayed by the release of other intracellular markers such as
intracellular enzymes, e.g., lactate dehydrogenase. These various methods are known to one
of ordinary skill in the art. In a particular embodiment of the aforementioned method, the
following steps are performed:
i) obtaining a sample of a bodily fluid;
ii) isolating T lymphocytes from the sample;
iii) preparing a sample of target cells bearing on the cell surface the immune-
privileged antigen or a fragment thereof in the context of HLA;
iv) incubating the isolated T lymphocytes with the target cells;
v) quantitating the viability of the target cells; and
iv) correlating the viability of said target cells with the presence of immune-
privileged antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the sample.
In a further and preferred embodiment, the identification of CTLs specific for an immune- privileged antigen is readily determined by incubating T lymphocytes with the above-described
target cells, and subsequently detecting the release of specific mediators from the CTLs
indicative of the specific recognition and subsequent activation. CTLs encountering the antigen
to which they are targeted are known to release γ-interferon and other cytokines including
TNF-α, RANTES, MlP-lα and other chemokines, as well as to lyse target cells bearing the
antigen. As an example of the practice of this preferred method, the following steps are
carried out:
i) obtaining a sample of bodily fluid from an individual which contains T
lymphocytes;
ii) optionally isolating T lymphocytes from the sample;
iii) exposing the body fluid sample or the isolated T lymphocytes to the immune-
privileged antigen or fragment in the context of HLA;
iv) quantitating the level of a mediator produced by the T lymphocytes.
Cells expressing particular immune privileged antigens useful for the practice of these
embodiment of the present invention include but is not limited to cells which naturally express
immune privileged antigens, such as cdr2 expressed by HeLa cells; cells transfected with a
gene which results in expression of the desired antigen, such as Drosophila cells; other
examples are known to one of ordinary skill in the art. As described above, such transfected
calls may additionally be engineered to express molecules of a particular HLA haplotype, and
in addition may express co-stimulatory molecules. These cells may thus function as target cells
which express the antigen in the context of HLA molecules, useful for the identification of
immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes. A series of such cells may be prepared, each expressing a different HLA haplotype, for use in screening.
The level of γ-interferon or other mediators produced is directly related to the numbers of T
lymphocytes specific for the immune-privileged antigen or fragment thereof present in the
sample. This value is then used to identify a patient in which a tumor is or had been present,
and the possibility of the development of a paraneoplastic syndrome or other disorder
characterized by the presence of immune-privileged antigen-specific CTLs. Other methods
for detecting antigen-specific CTLs are applicable to the practice of the present invention as
adapted for measuring CTLs specific immune-privileged antigens. Examples provided to
illustrate the invention are not intended to be limiting. For example, methods as described
above to directly identify CTLs against immune-privileged antigens include detecting on the
surface of T lymphocytes receptors capable of detecting tetramers comprising HLA molecule
and immune-privileged antigen peptides. The selection of the immune-privileged antigen or
its fragments for the assays of the present invention may be general or specific to the particular
syndrome to be detected. For general screening, for example for cancer, a test comprises a
mixmre of the various known paraneoplastic antigens or fragments . After identifying a patient
as having specific CTLs against a mixmre of antigens, further screening is carried out to
pinpoint the particular antigen. Such screening and further identification may then be used to
direct the future course of therapy for the patient, for example, therapies to increase the CTLs
against the particular mmor, and to reduce the severity of the paraneoplastic syndrome by
suppressing the CTLs in non-tumor sites within the body; these therapeutic utilities are
described in further detail below. It has also been found by the inventors herein that memory T cells specific for the
paraneoplastic antigen are present in individuals with paraneoplastic syndrome. In order to
screen for or detect the presence and extent of memory T cells in a patient sample, suspected
memory T cells must be exposed to APCs presenting the immune-privileged antigen.
Detection of the resulting activated T lymphocytes is quantitated in a similar fashion to the
detection of CTLs directly in a patient sample as described above. As a general example of
the method, the assay is carried out by following steps:
I) obtaining a sample of bodily fluid containing T lymphocytes;
ii) optionally isolating T lymphocytes from the sample of bodily fluid;
iii) preparing differentiated APCs that have processed and are presenting the
immune-privileged antigen;
iv) co-incubating the immune-privileged antigen-presenting APCs with the sample
or the isolated T lymphocytes;
v) measuring immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes.
Measuring the immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes is accomplished by any one
of a number of methods known in the art. For example, expression of receptors recognizing
the HLA-peptide tetramer may be measured, or the extent of secretion of mediators from the
T lymphocytes may be determined; alternatively, the cytolytic activity of the T lymphocytes
towards target cells expressing the immune-privileged antigen in the context of HLA may be
detected.
By way of non-limiting examples, the APCs may be dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells, microglial cells, fibrocytes, engineered cells containing MHC and secreting co-stimulatory
molecules, among others. Various known methods are used to prepare the target cells
expressing the desired peptide; for example, it may be achieved by delivering antigen through
apoptotic cells which express the antigen or a peptide fragment, by use of heat shock proteins
which direct proteins to the MHC, and the direct pulsing of the cells with protein or peptides.
These examples are merely illustrative of examples of the practice of the present invention and
are not intended to be limiting.
In the specific example wherein mediators such as γ-interferon production is used as the read¬
out of the assay, its level will be directly related to the numbers of memory T lymphocytes in
the patient sample, and thus is correlated with the presence and extent of the neoplasm in said
individual or the prior presence of a neoplasm. Cytolysis and quantitation of specific receptors
also provides similar data.
In another aspect of the invention, an assay is provided for the detection of cdr2-specific T
cells. This assay is rapid and offers the ability to screen large numbers of patient samples for
the presence of cdr2-specific T cells in the form of a kit. The steps of this method are as
follows:
i) obtaining a sample of blood;
ii) maturing dendritic cells in the blood sample;
iii) exposing the matured dendritic cells to apoptotic debris from unrelated cells
expressing an immunerprivileged antigen;
iv) co-incubating the immune-privileged antigen-exposed dendritic cells with the
50- patient's peripheral blood lymphocytes; and
v) measuring interferon-γ released from the lymphocytes as a measure of
stimulation.
The number of T cells stimulated by the immune privileged antigen-fed dendritic cells is an
indication of the number of immune privileged antigen-specific T cells in the patient's
peripheral blood. The apoptotic debris to which the dendritic cells are exposed may be, by
way of non-limiting example, apoptotic, transfected cells expressing an immune privileged
antigen such as cdr2. A negative control may be used in the assay, for example, the same cell
line but not expressing the antigen.
As an example of the practice of the above procedure, peripheral blood is obtained from a
patient and dendritic cells were matured as described in Example 1. These cells were then fed
with apoptotic debris from unrelated (mouse) cells that do or do not express the cdr2 protein.
Such cells expressing cdr2 protein may be prepared for example, as described in Example 6
below, such as PC7 or EC2 cells, by stably transfecting EL4 cells with pcDNA-cdr2, and
determination of protein expression made by Western blot analysis. These fed DCs are then
incubated with patient's peripheral blood lymphocytes, and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release
measured as an index of stimulation. Although IFN-γ release may be measured in any one of
a number of ways, the standard ELISPOT assay provides a rapid method. For example, 105
T cells are placed in a 96-well plate, previously coated with a monoclonal antibody specific for
IFN-γ, and incubated with 104 -irradiated stimulator cells (such as EC2 or EL4). After 20
hours, the cells are washed out and IFN-γ spot forming cells (SFCs) are detected using a biotinylated anti-IFN-γ antibody, and an HRP-AEC (3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole) staining
procedure. SFCs reported per million cells.
In this example, nitrocellulose-bottom wells are plated with antibody to IFN-γ, release allowed
to occur for 20 hours, plates are washed, and a second anti-IFN-γ antibody is added which was
conjugated to biotin to allow colorimetric detection. The number of spots secreting IFN-γ
directly correspond to the number of T cells in the assay that are stimulated by the DCs. By
comparing the number of T cells stimulated by EL4-fed DCs (negative control) with the
number stimulated by EC2-fed DCs, the number of cdr2 -specific T cells in a patient's
peripheral blood can be determined.
There are several advantages of this assay. First, there is no HLA restriction required as there
is for CTL assays in which T2 (HLA A2.1) targets are killed, so that patients of any MHC
haplotype can be assayed by this method. Second, the assay is relatively simple, can be
performed from a peripheral blood draw, and can be performed by automated ELISPOT robots
and readers. Third, although current methods allow DCs to be grown from a single 50 ml
peripheral blood draw, this assay can ultimately be done without DCs as antigen presenting
cells (APCs), using peripheral blood monocytes, which as a mixed cell population, have
sufficient APCs to allow T cell stimulation.
Furthermore, the above-described assays are useful to determine whether a patient with a
immune-privileged antigen-expressing mmor has a sufficient population of antigen-specific T
lymphocytes to control the tumor or is a candidate for anti-cancer therapy, by quantitating T lymphocytes specific for the particular antigen. In addition, the method can be used for
monitoring the effectiveness of therapies intended to modulate the population of antigen-
specific T lymphocytes in a patient, i.e. , increase the population for anti-cancer therapy, and
decrease the population for protection of non-tumor sites and alleviation of for example the
paraneoplastic syndrome, by measuring the numbers of cytotoxic and memory T lymphocytes
in accordance with the methods described above. The assay readout can be compared to pre-
established standards and ranges to enable the health care professional to direct the appropriate
course of therapy based on assay results.
As a consequence of the discovery of the role of CTLs in paraneoplastic syndromes, the
inventors herein have identified a further diagnostic modality to monitor the progression or
predict the potential success of immune-privileged antigen CTL-based therapies as described
hereinabove, and to determine the propensity for the development of the syndrome as a
consequence of the participation of cytokines . Cytokines are known to promote the expression
of cytoplasmic antigen via MHC-I molecules (21,22), and thus increased levels of cytokines
may enhance the effectiveness of the killing of mmor cells by the therapeutic methods of the
present invention. Conversely, cytokines present in pathological states, such as neoplasia or
a paraneoplastic syndrome, can induce, accelerate or exacerbate the disease process by
promoting the expression of antigens on non-tumor cells. This may also help explain the still
poorly understood phenomenon of how immune-privileged antigen-specific CTLs which arise
from the expression of the antigen on mmor cells, are able to first gain access to normally
immune privileged body sites such as the central nervous system, perhaps through a cytokine-
mediated weakening of the endothelium barrier, and secondly, to recognize and attack neuronal and other cells in which the antigen is normally cytoplasmic and not expressed on the surface.
Measurement of cytokine levels in contact with the paraneoplastic syndrome-affected tissue is
thus useful in assessing the severity or potential severity of the disease.
Diagnostic kits are embodied by the present invention which provide particular immune-
privileged antigens or fragments for the use in detecting antigen-specific T lymphocytes in a
sample of bodily fluid, in accordance with the various methods described above. For instance,
immune-privileged antigen peptides, such as by way of non-limiting example, the several
previously-described peptides of cdr2 predicted to bind to the binding domain of HLA, may
be included in a kit for the preparation of target cells bearing antigenic peptides in the context
of HLA. Another component of a kit comprises a labeled or tetrameric complex containing
the HLA molecule and peptides, for direct detection of CTLs with receptors specific for the
complex. Kit componentry will be specific to the type of assay to be performed and the type
or types of immune privileged antigens to be detected.
As a result of the discovery by the inventors herein of the role of T lymphocytes in both the
progression of paraneoplastic syndromes and in mmor immunity , several therapeutic modalities
are provided that are directed to the enhancement of the immune response to the mmor, and
the suppression of the immune response at the site of the affected non-mmor tissues. These
therapeutic modalities are generally directed to either the enhancement or the diminution of the
cellular immune response to privileged antigens, and has utility in the treatment of cancer,
paraneoplastic syndromes and in other diseases in which an inappropriate immune response to
immune-privileged antigens results in pathology, for example, autoimmune diseases. Depending on the patient's condition, the extent of application of either of these therapies may
be appropriate; ideally, these may be applied simultaneously for optimizing the anti-cancer
benefits of cellular immunity while protecting non-tumor cells from immune destruction. The
effectiveness of these therapies disclosed as a consequence of the present invention is enhanced
by concurrently providing other known means to increase the effectiveness of cellular
immunity.
The therapeutic regimen of enhancing killing of mmor cells in a patient by increasing the
number or activation state of immune privileged antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells in a patient
is supported experimentally by the ability to develop an animal model wherein such cytotoxic
T cells are elevated, yet the animal is not neuro logically compromised. As will be shown in
more detail in Example 5 below, this has been achieved using mice that were immunized using
an apoptotic tumor cell, which results in the generation of potent cdr2-specific killer T cells.
The apoptotic mmor cell was a cell line (PC7) generated by stably transfecting EL4 cells (a T
cell lymphoma) with pcDNA-cdr2, and determination of protein expression made by Western
blot analysis. Mice were immunized with irradiated PC7 cells, followed by harvesting the
spleens of primed and naive littermates. Mixed lymphocyte / mmor cell cultures were
established using MHC-matched target cells, EC2 cells, or TIB84 cells for purposes of
restimulating primed T cells. After 5 days, responding T cells were collected and tested at
various ratios in a standard chromium release assay. Alternatively, CD8+ T cells were purified
from the spleens of primed and naive mice using the MACS cell isolation system. Briefly, anti-
CD8 antibody coupled to iron conjugated microbeads are incubated with splenocytes and CD8+
T cells are positively selected by passing the cells through a magnetic column. The positively selected CD8+ T cells were used directly in an ELISPOT assay.
The results of the experiment showed specificity as demonstrated by the ability of T
lymphocytes to lyse MHC-matched target cells expressing cdr2, EC2 cells, but not MHC-
matched cells that lack cdr2 expression. As the PC7 cells are MHC-mismatched with respect
to the C57/B6 mouse that was immunized, it is believed that this model system is analogous
to the cross-priming of mmor cells evident in patients with PCD.
In addition to the killing assay, IFN-γ release was also demonstrated from T cells purified
from PC7 immunized mice. This short term assay confirmed that high levels of CTL
precursors exist in the immunized mice. As no immunized mice exhibited signs of neurologic
dysfunction, these data indicate the ability to separate mmor immunity from the autoimmune
neurodegeneration. As described above, cdr2-specific killer T cells have been identified in
patients with effective mmor suppression and PCD. In addition, significant numbers of breast
and ovarian mmors present in neurologically normal patients express the cdr2 target antigen.
Therefore, the present study demonstrates in this model that stimulation of T cells able to kill
cdr2-expressing mmor cells is possible without inducing autoimmune neurologic disease.
In a first embodiment, enhanced anti-tumor therapy is provided to a patient with a neoplasm
expressing an immune-privileged antigen by increasing the number of immune-privileged
antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the patient. The lymphocytes to be stimulated may
either be the patient's own cells, stimulated in vivo or ex vivo, or they may be HLA-matched
cells from another source, as will be described below. This increase can be effected by
56- exposing APCs such as dendritic cells isolated from the patient ex vivo to one or more peptides of the particular antigen, or by other known means, whereby the antigen will be available for presentation to T lymphocytes. The antigen-exposed APCs are then reintroduced into the patient to stimulate the activation of specific T lymphocytes in vivo, or, the APCs, for example, dendritic cells, may be further exposed in vitro to T lymphocytes isolated from the patient, whereby presentation to T lymphocytes will induce the activation of antigen-specific
CTLs. T lymphocytes or dendritic cells are reintroduced into the patient, wherein the CTLs
will promote anti-tumor activity, and dendritic cells will stimulate additional CTLs in vivo. For example, to practice the first method, the following steps are followed:
i) isolating a quantity of dendritic cells from a sample of patient's blood;
ii) exposing the dendritic cells in vitro to the immune-privileged antigen fragment; iii) reintroducing the antigen-exposed dendritic cells to the patient.
The aforementioned ex- vivo therapies may be achieved by any one of several, non-limiting
methods, known to the skilled artisan. For example, memory T lymphocytes may be activated
ex vivo by exposure to dendritic cells presenting the desired immune privileged antigen. In
another non-limiting example, immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes may be isolated using the HLA-peptide tetramer as described above, and then expanded with cytokines,
e.g., IL-2, or in the presence of dendritic cells, before reintroduction to the patient. Bulk T
cells isolated from the patient may be exposed to dendritic cells presenting the antigen; then
the activated, antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes may then be reintroduced to the patient.
As mentioned above, these methods may be enhanced by concurrent therapies which increase the effectiveness of T lymphocyte killing. Non-limiting examples include increasing cytokine levels, inhibiting the expression of Fas-ligand expression (44) on mmor cells to block apoptosis, inducing the expression of MHC I molecules on the mmor using, for example, Nef
inhibitor or Nef-like protein(41), radiation therapy, tumor chemotherapy, Bax induction in the mmor (52) and inducing apoptosis of mmor cells using FLIP inhibitors (49).
In a further embodiment of the above example, to achieve an object of the present invention
in enhancing cellular immune-based therapy to cancer patients in those at risk for the
development of, or exhibiting, a PND, the above-described T lymphocytes and/or dendritic
cells may be engineered to be sensitive to a drug such as gancyclovir by methods known to the
skilled artisan (53). After introduction of the immune cells to the patient, any induction or exacerbation of a PND may be controlled by suppressing the introduced immune cell population by administration of the drug to which the cells are sensitive.
In the practice of the above method, certain immune-privileged antigens may not be adequately
taken up by dendritic cells for presentation on the cell surface, nor will exposure of the
dendritic cells to the intact antigen or its peptides allow for processing and presentation. In a further embodiment, the antigen is provided in a form which can be readily processed and
presented. Among various known means for increasing antigen presentation by poorly
immunogenic or poorly processed antigens, use of apoptotic cells expressing the desired
antigen to deliver antigen to dendritic cells (17), in addition to other known means such as the
use of viral vectors, naked and plasmid DNA, RNA, liposomes with nucleic acid to thereby
transfect dendritic cells (50) have been described. In a preferred embodiment, delivery is achieved using cells which already express the desired antigen; for example, HeLa cells, which
are useful in the above-described methods for the treatment of PND because they express the
cdr2 antigen. These immune -privileged antigen-expressing cells are induced to become
apoptotic before exposure to the APCs.
In another embodiment of the invention, a method of treatment of a patient with a
paraneoplastic syndrome or other inappropriate cellular immune response to an immune
privileged antigen is provided wherein suppression of cellular immunity is desired to intervene
in the attack of non-tumor cells by antigen-specific CTLs. Such methods of treatment are
targeted at decreasing or suppressing the cellular immune response against the specific
immune-privileged antigen. Agents useful for this method of treatment include, but are not
limited to, immunosuppressive agents such as tacrolimus, cyclosporin, corticosteroids, and
azathioprine, which have been shown to eliminate CTLs. These agents are useful for the
treatment of paraneoplastic syndromes as described herein, whereby CTLs targeted against
immune-privileged antigens are eliminated. In a further embodiment, suppression of the attack
of CTLs on immune privileged sites such as the brain is achieved by sealing the blood-brain
barrier. This may be accomplished by the use of various agents known in the art, for example,
corticosteroids. Protection of the brain to maintain immune privilege also may be achieved by
upregulating Fas ligand expression (40).
Administration of an agent to suppress the cellular immune response against an immune-
privileged antigen is directed to the body in general or to specific locations for increased
effectiveness, for example, in the case of paraneoplastic syndromes, to the central nervous system, by intracranial or intrathecal administration. Such agents may be administered by parenteral injection, or for oral, pulmonary, nasal or other forms of administration. Appropriate dosage levels for treatment of the various conditions in various patients will be
ascertainable by the ordinary skilled worker, considering the therapeutic context, age and general health of the recipient.
As a consequence of the discovery of the role of CTLs in paraneoplastic syndromes, the inventors herein have identified a further therapeutic modality to intervene in the development
or progression of the syndrome by limiting the expression of the immune-privileged antigen
by non-tumor cells. This is achieved by reducing the level of cytokines in contact with the non-mmor cells, as it is known that cytokines will promote the expression of endogenous antigen via MHC-I molecules (21,22). Treatment with inhibitors of cytokine production, such
as corticosteroids, or anti-cytokine agents such as anti-cytokine antibodies, are provided as
non-limiting examples. In the example of PND wherein CTLs attack neuronal cells in the central nervous system, anti-cytokine therapy delivered to the CNS is provided by means such
as intrathecal administration as described above.
In a further embodiment, a method is provided for decreasing the recognition of non-mmor
cells expressing paraneoplastic antigens by paraneoplastic antigen-specific T lymphocytes by contacting non-tumor cells with an agent which interferes with the recognition of
paraneoplastic antigen by lymphocytes. Such agents include those which suppress the
expression of MHC , and other agents which suppress antigen presentation, such as those which
may switch a Thl response to a Th2 response. In a still further embodiment, means to decrease the sensitivity of non-mmor cells to CTLs are
known and may be used in conjunction with the methods and agents of the present invention.
By way of non-limiting examples; perforin-mediated CTL killing may be inhibited (43);
apoptosis may be inhibited for example, by inhibitors of FLIP (39); reducing Bax expression
in neurons (45); cytokines that promote the immune-privileged state may be administered,
such as IL-10 and TGF-β (46); and MHC I expression may be decreased (41).
As mentioned above, an optimal treatment regimen for a patient in need of a cellular immune-
based anti-cancer therapy provides both the enhancement of the anti-cancer therapy and
protects the non-mmor tissues and cells from the therapy. Thus, treatment to stimulate or
expand the CTL population while protecting the non-mmor cells from attack by the CTLs is
desirable. Since CTLs normally pass very minimally into the CSF, no additional therapeutic
intervention may be needed; if additional measures are desirable, this can be achieved, for
example, by administering to the patient an anti-cytokine agent as described above prior to the
introduction of CTLs, or limiting the effective period of CTL therapy by providing a
population of CTLs which may be specifically inactivated as described above. By way of non-
limiting examples, immortalized, immune-privileged antigen-specific CTLs can be prepared
from an immortalized cell line of the same HLA type as the patient. The antigen-specific
CTLs can be expanded in vitro and introduced into the patient. In order to control the
population of these cells within the patient and to avert the potential attack by these cells of
non-mmor cells, the cells can be engineered to be sensitive to a certain drug, such as
gancyclovir (53). In patients with mmors who otherwise are neurologically normal, such
control may be unnecessary. Alternatively, in an example of an course of therapy using such cells for a patient with an existing PND, the patient can be first treated with an anti-cytokine agent and a blood brain sealing agent to reduce expression of the privileged antigen on non-
mmor cells and to restrict access of the CTLs to the brain, respectively. Other means for protecting the brain include increasing FAS ligand expression in the brain (40), decreasing Bax expression in neurons (45), and decreasing cytokine levels in the brain (46). A gancyclovir-
sensitive (53), immune-privileged antigen-specific, immortalized CTL line may then be
introduced, and allowed to attack the mmor. The patient is closely monitored for the
appearance of or the exacerbation of the paraneoplastic syndrome, which, if it begins to occur, the patient is administered gancyclovir to suppress the therapy partially or completely. This
cycle may be repeated as necessary the effect the destruction of the neoplasm. As it is expected that most immune-privileged mmor patients do not have PND, this method is preferred in
monitoring such patients.
As described above, the inventors herein have identified certain peptide fragments of
paraneoplastic antigens, such as the cdr2-l (SEQ ID NO: l) and cdr2-2 (SEQ ID NO: 2) fragments of cdr2, which are believed to be the natively processed cdr2 peptides to which
CTLs are targeted. As such, these peptides have utility in the diagnostic methods provided
herein for identifying antigen-specific T lymphocytes, as well as therapeutic utilities in producing dendritic cells and other APCs presenting specific peptides.
Based on the above-described therapeutic utilities of the present invention, additional
embodiments comprise kits for carrying out one or more of the therapeutic modalities described
herein. In one embodiment, a kit for stimulating the production of T lymphocytes specific for immune privileged antigens comprises cells which express an immune-privileged antigen as
well as MHC molecules which match that of the patient to be treated; the cells may further
express co-stimulatory molecules. These cells may be derived from a cell line, such as a
Drosophila cell line. The cells may be used for the in-vivo or ex-vivo stimulation of T
lymphocytes. The kit may further comprise T lymphocytes from donors with the same HLA
haplotype as the patient, in order to participate in the further stimulation of a cellular immune
response to a mmor.
The present invention may be better understood by reference to the following non-limiting
Examples, which are provided as exemplary of the invention. The following examples are
presented in order to more fully illustrate the preferred embodiments of the invention. They
should in no way be construed, however, as limiting the broad scope of the invention.
General Methods
Peripheral blood was obtained from HLA A2.1 + PCD patients and normal donors in
heparinized syringes or by leukapheresis. PBMCs were isolated using Ficoll-Hypaque
(Pharmacia Biotech). T cell enriched (ER+) and T cell depleted (ER- ) populations were
prepared by rosetting with neuraminidase-treated sheep red blood cells as previously described
(14). T cells were further purified from ER+ cells for the CTL recall assays by removing
monocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, and B cells as described (14). DCs were generated from
peripheral blood precursors by culturing ER- cells for 7 days in the presence of GM-CSF
(Immunex Corp.) and IL-4 (Schering-Plough Corp.), followed by 4 days in monocyte
-4 conditioned medium (15).
Activated CTLs were detected using T-cells as effector cells in a conventional Na51CrO4 release
assay directly after purification. T2 cells (a TAP-/-, HLA-A2.1 + , class II- cell line) were
pulsed for 1 hr with 1 mM of various peptides, loaded with Na51CrO4 and used as targets
(14). Alternatively, memory CTL responses were stimulated using DCs pulsed for 4 hours with
1 mM of various peptides. After 7 days, responding T cells were assayed for cytolytic activity.
Again, T2 cells pulsed with peptide served as targets. Specific lysis was determined by
subtracting the percent cytotoxicity of unpulsed T2 cells (0 - 3 %). PCD peptides, designated
cdr2-l (KLVPDSLYV) (SEQ ID NO:l) and cdr2-2 (SLLEEMFLT) (SEQ ID NO:2), were
predicted based on anchor residues for HLA A2.1 and synthesized (Biosysnthesis Inc). Six
other peptides derived from cdr2 were tested (data not shown). The control for these
experiments included the use of the immunodominant influenza matrix peptide, GILGFVFTL
(SEQ ID NO:9)
Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) to the following antigens were used: CD19, CD56, CD3,
CD4, CD8, αβTCR, CD25, IFNγ, TNFα, IL2, IL4, CD14, HLA-DR (Becton Dickinson);
CD83 (Coulter Corp.). Cell populations from the peripheral blood and spinal fluid were
phenotyped with a panel of MoAbs listed above and analyzed on a FACScan (Becton
Dickinson). Additionally, the DCs prepared from the patients were assayed for phenotypic
markers (CD14- CD83 + HLA-DR+). Dead cells and contaminating red blood cells were
excluded by forward and side scatter properties. Intracellular cytokine profiles were assessed
using a dual laser fluorocytometer (Becton Dickinson). Cells were treated with BFA, an inhibitor of secretion, followed by cell fixation and permeabilization, and then intracytoplasmic staining of accumulated cytokines (23). As a control, PBMCs were treated with BFA and cytokine production was stimulated using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate [PMA] and ionomycin [I] (23) . T helper cells were delineated by a CD3 + CD4 -I- phenotype and levels of IFNγ, TNFα, IL2 and IL-4 were determined.
Example 1 Identification of cdr2-specifϊc Cytotoxic and Memory T Lymphocytes in
Patients with Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration
Three PCD patients were smdied to explore the namre of the immune response in the serum and spinal fluid. All patients had HLA-A2.1 + phenotypes. One (Patient 1) had acute disease and two (Patients 2 and 3) had chronic disease (seen 18 days, 9 months, and 6 months, respectively, after the onset of cerebellar dysfunction). The diagnosis of PCD was confirmed
in each patient by demonstrating the presence of high titer cdr2 antibodies reactive with cloned
fusion protein (Figure 1), and peripheral blood lymphocytes were obtained for cellular immune
assays. The possibility of that CD8+ CTLs are involved in mmor immunity in PCD was investigated using peptide epitopes derived from cdr2 in a standard chromium release assay.
Target cells were T2 cells, a TAP"'" HLA-A2.1 + cell line pulsed with cdr2 peptides (predicted
for HLA-A2.1 based on determined anchor residues) and loaded with Na51CrO4. Effector T
cells were obtained from peripheral blood (14) and incubated directly with targets at various
effector : target ratios. In patient 1, cdr2-specific CTLs were detected showing specificity for
the cdr2-2 and, to a lesser extent, cdr2-l peptides (Figure 2A). This response was titratable and specific for acute PCD, as no response was detected in an HLA-A2.1+ normal control (Figure
2 A) or in either patient with chronic PCD (data not shown).
In order to examine whether memory T cells were present in the peripheral blood of PCD
patients, an in vitro recall assay was established. Patients were leukapheresed, providing a
source of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Terminally differentiated dendritic
cells (DCs) were prepared by culturing a T cell depleted mononuclear fraction for 7 days in
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin 4 (IL 4),
followed by 4 days in monocyte conditioned medium (15). The DCs generated had a typical
stellate morphology, were nonadherent, expressed characteristic maturation markers (i.e.
CD83), and had potent T cell-stimulating capacity in mixed leukocyte reactions at stimulator
to responder ratios of 300: 1 or less (data not shown). These blood derived DCs were pulsed
with eight different cdr2 peptides and co-cultured with purified syngeneic T cells (14). After
7 days, responding T cells were tested for cytolytic activity specific for cdr2 epitopes using
peptide pulsed T2 cells as targets. In patients 2 and 3 (with chronic PCD), cdr2-specific CTLs
were detected (Figure 2B) using the cdr2-l and cdr2-2 peptides. This CTL activity was not
detected in 4 control individuals or in patient 1 (with acute PCD; Figure 2B and data not
shown). As a control for these experiments, CTL responses specific for the immunodominant
HLA-A2.1 epitope derived from the influenza matrix protein were determined (data not
shown).
Example 2 Detection of Activated Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes in the Cerebrospinal Fluid
of a Patient with Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration; Treatment with Tacrolimus
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed that Patient 1 had a CSF pleiocytosis when first
seen (99 WBC/mm3). This enabled an evaluation of the autoimmune neurologic component
of the patient's disorder by directly analyzing the CSF cells with cytofluorography and
monoclonal antibodies specific for phenotypic cellular markers. Greater than 75 % of the cells
present were CD 3+ αβ T cells (Figure 3A); approximately 40% of these were activated T
blasts (CD25 +CD3 +). Less than 5 % of the cells were natural killer (NK) cells (CD56 + ),
"10% were B cells (CD 19+), and less than 2% of these cells were CD 4" / CD 8" T cells
(Figure 3A). As a result of the acute nature of this patient's disease, some clinically evident
residual cerebellar function, and the presence of activated T cells in her CSF (characterized by
a CD25+ CD3+ phenotype), patient 1 was treated with tacrolimus (FK506), a drug which
inhibits activation of T cells and partitions favorably into the CSF (16). The patient tolerated
treatment for 10 days without side effects; however, evidence of recovery of cerebellar
function was not observed. On day 11 , treatment was discontinued and CSF was obtained for
analysis, which revealed that the CD25+ T cells had been eradicated (Figure 3A). These
results show that tacrolimus can effectively suppress activated T cells in the CSF of a PCD
patient, and may be an effective alternative to treatments aimed at suppressing B cells or
removing antibodies. Early intervention may be necessary to arrest clinical disease before
there is excessive Purkinje cell death.
Example 3 Intracellular Cytokine Staining of CSF Cells of Patient 1 To further define the activated cell population present in the CSF of patient 1 , intracellular cytokine staining was performed and cells were assayed by four color cytofluorographic analysis. This revealed helper T cells present in the CSF which produced IL-2, IFNγ and TNFα but not IL-4 — a cytokine profile characteristic of Thl cells (Figure 3B). Furthermore, it was possible to demonstrate that the cells responsible for the production of these cytokines were activated T blasts (selected based on their increased forward scatter). In contrast, CD3 + CD4+ cells isolated from the peripheral blood of the same patient produced no cytokine unless
stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate (PMA) and ionomycin (I) prior to analysis (Figure 3B).
Example 4 Demonstration of cdr2 Antigen on Gynecological Tumors
Despite the rarity of the paraneoplastic neurologic disorders, the target PND antigen in one
such disorder (the Hu antigen) has been found to be expressed ubiquitously in its associated tumor type (small cell lung cancer). To evaluate whether the cdr2 antigen is present in a larger set of gynecologic mmors than the rarity of PCD might suggest, ovarian and breast mmor
tissues obtained from neurologically normal individuals were examined for expression of cdr2
by Western blot analysis. Twelve of 19 tumors of ovarian epithelial cell origin expressed
robust amounts of protein immunoreactive with PCD antisera (Fig. 4A and data not shown). To confirm that this antigen corresponded to the cdr2 antigen, the migration of immunoreactive
antigen from cerebellum were compared with that from the tumor samples by 2D
IEF/SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4B). These experiments confirm that the immunoreactive cdr2 band
co-migrates in brain and mmor tissues, and demonstrate that a high percentage of non-PCD
ovarian mmors express the cdr2 tumor antigen. Similar results were found in samples of non-PCD associated breast tumors, where at least 25 percent of mmors express the cdr2 antigen.
Example 5 Use of Apoptotic Cells to Deliver Immune-Privileged Antigen to Antigen- Presenting Cells
MC (97-09) DCs were co-cultured with apoptotic uninfected HeLa cells and syngeneic T cells.
After 7 days, responding T cells were tested using T2 cells pulsed with various Yo peptides,
Yol through Yo8 (corresponding to SEQ ID NO: l through SEQ ID NO: 8, and also referred
to as cdr2-l through cdr2-8). Negative control included testing Matrix peptide (M) (SEQ ID NO: 9) pulsed T2 cells (HeLa cells were uninfected). These results show that successful induction of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to certain cdr2 peptides may be achieved by the use of apopototic cells delivering the target antigen.
Example 6 Generation of a mouse model that recapitulates aspects of the tumor immunity in the disorder in the absence of autoimmune neurologic disease
A mouse model of PCD was generated that recapimlates aspects of the mmor immunity in the disorder in the absence of autoimmune neurologic disease. Mice were immunized using an
apoptotic mmor cell, PC7, which results in the generation of potent cdr2 -specific killer T cells. The following cell lines were used in evaluating the model. For example, EC2 cells were
generated by stably transfecting EL4 cells with pcDNA-cdr2, and determination of protein
expression made by Western blot analysis. TABLE 1
Cell Mouse of MHC allele Antigen Description
Line Origin expression
PC7 DBA/2 H-2d cdr2 cdr2-transfected P815 cells
P815 DBA/2 H-2d parental Mastocytoma tumor line
EC2 C57BL/6 H-2D cdr2 cdr2-transfected EL4 cells
TIB84 Balb/c H-2b Minor H of Fibroblast line from DBA/2 congenic strain
EL4 C57BL/6 H-2° parental T cell lymphoma
C57BL/6 mice were immunized with 107 -irradiated PC7 cells, subcutaneously, at one week
intervals for a total of two injections. One to three weeks after the second injection, the spleens
of primed and naive littermates were harvested. Mixed lymphocyte / mmor cell cultures were
established using EC2 cells or TIB84 cells for purposes of restimulating primed T cells. After
5 days, responding T cells were collected and tested at various ratios in a standard chromium
release assay. Target cells included EC2 and EL4, demonstrating the generation of
cdr2-specifιc killer T cells (A) and TIB84 and EL4, demonstrating the generation of
allo-reactive T cells capable of recognizing minor histocompatibility antigens in the context of
self-MHC I (B). Average values of triplicates from experimental wells (E) are compared to
average values of spontaneous (S) and total (T) release as follows: % cytotoxicity = ((E-S) / (T-S)) x 100. Naive littermates were used as negative controls. Alternatively, CD8+ T cells
were purified from the spleens of primed and naive mice using the MACS cell isolation
system. Briefly, anti-CD8 antibody coupled to iron conjugated microbeads are incubated with
splenocytes and CD8+ T cells are positively selected by passing the cells through a magnetic
column. The positively selected CD8+ T cells were used directly in an ELISPOT assay. 105 T
cells were placed in a 96-well plate, previously coated with a monoclonal antibody specific for IFN-, and incubated with 104 -irradiated stimulator cells (EC2 or EL4). After 20 hours, the
cells were washed out and IFN- spot forming cells (SFCs) were detected using a biotinylated
anti-IFN- antibody, and an HRP-AEC (3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole) staining procedure. SFCs reported per million cells. (C).
The results of the experiment are shown in Figure 6. The specificity was demonstrated as
measured by the ability to lyse MHC-matched target cells expressing cdr2, EC2 cells, but not
MHC-matched cells that lack cdr2 expression, EL4 (Fig. 6A). As the PC7 cells are MHC-
mismatched with respect to the C57/B6 mouse that was immunized, it is believed that this
model system is analogous to the cross-priming of tumor cells evident in patients with PCD.
A control for this experiment included the use of TIB84 cells as targets in the CTL assay (Fig.
6B), demonstrating the generation of allo-reactive T cells capable of recognizing minor
histocompatibility antigens in the context of self-MHC I. As the PC7 cell also harbor
allogeneic antigens with respect to the C57/B6 mouse, it was possible to stimulate allo-specific
T cells that target the congenic line, TIB84. Congenic lines are useful as they contain allo-
antigen presented in the context of self MHC molecules. Table 1 above provides the MHC
haplotypes and cdr2 expression.
In addition to the killing assay, IFN-γ release was also demonstrated from T cells purified
from PC7 immunized mice (Fig. IC). This short term assay confirmed that high levels of CTL
precursors exist in the immunized mice. No immunized mice exhibited signs of neurologic
dysfunction. These data indicate the ability to separate tumor immunity from the autoimmune
neurodegeneration. As described above, cdr2-specific killer T cells have been identified in patients with effective tumor suppression and PCD. In addition, significant numbers of breast and ovarian tumors present in neurologically normal patients express the cdr2 target antigen. Therefore, the present study demonstrates that stimulation of T cells able to kill cdr2- expressing mmor cells is possible without inducing autoimmune neurologic disease.
Example 7 ELISPOT assay for the detection of cdr2-specific T cells
A new assay for the detection of cdr2 -specific T cells was developed. This assay is faster and
offers the ability to screen large numbers of patient samples for the presence of cdr2-specific T cells in the form of a kit. Peripheral blood was obtained from patients and dendritic cells
were matured as described above. These cells were then fed with apoptotic debris from
unrelated (mouse) cells that did not (EL4) or that did (EC2) express the cdr2 protein. EC2 cells were generated by stably transfecting EL4 cells with pcDNA-cdr2, and determination of protein expression made by Western blot analysis; please refer to Example 6 and Table 1 regarding these cells. These fed DCs were then incubated with patient's peripheral blood lymphocytes, and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release measured as an index of stimulation. The
assay for IFN-γ release is a standard ELISPOT assay. In this instance, the assay was done
manually, by plating nitrocellulose-bottom wells with antibody to IFN-γ, allowing release to
occur for 20 hours, washing plates, and adding a second anti-IFN-γ antibody which was conjugated to biotin to allow colorimetric detection. The number of spots secreting IFN-γ
directly correspond to the number of T cells in the assay that were stimulated by the DCs. By
comparing the number of T cells stimulated by EL4-fed DCs (negative control) with the
number stimulated by EC2-fed DCs, the number of cdr2-specific T cells in a patient's peripheral blood can be determined.
In an example of the above method, DCs were grown from an HLA A2.1 + patient with PCD
and ovarian cancer that was in remission. These cells were pulsed with either nothing, the
HLA A2.1 immunodominant matrix peptide (MP) as a positive control, or apoptotic
(irradiated) EL4 or EC2 cells. These DCs were then cultured together with T cells in varying
ratios of T cell: apoptotic cell, as indicated. T cell activation was measured by counting spots
corresponding to IFN-γ release as described. The results of the assay are shown in Figure 7.
This patient had a significant number of cdr2 + T cells evident by the large numbers of spots
seen with EC2 stimulation, and the differences in spot number seen with EL4 versus EC2 fed
cells. Negative controls included T cells incubated with apoptotic debris in the absence of
DCs, and T cells incubated with neither DC nor apoptotic debris; neither control led to T cell
stimulation.
This invention may be embodied in other forms or carried out in other ways without departing
from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present disclosure is therefore to be
considered as in all respects illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being
indicated by the appended Claims, and all changes which come within the meaning and range
of equivalency are intended to be embraced therein.
Various publications are cited herein, the disclosures of which are incoφorated by reference
in their entireties. Literature Cited
1. T. Boon and L. J. Old, Curr Opin Immunol 9, 681 (1997).
2. Darnell, R.B. (1996). Onconeural antigens and the paraneoplastic neurologic disorders: at the intersection of cancer, immunity and the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 4529-4536.
3. Dalmau, J. , Graus, F., Rosenblum, M.K. & Posner, J.B. (1991). Anti-Hu associated paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis/sensory neuropathy: a clinical study of 71 patients. Medicine 71 : 59-72.
4. Peterson, K. , Rosenblum, M.K., Kotanides, H. & Posner, J.B. (1992). Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration. I. A clinical analysis of 55 anti-Yo antibody- positive patients. Neurology 42: 1931-1937.
5. Graus, F., Dalmau, J. , Rene, R., Tora, M. , Malats, N. , Verschuuren, J.J., Cardenal, F., Vinolas, N. , Garcia del Muro, J. , Vadell, C, Mason, W.P., Rosell, R. , Posner, J.B. & Real, F.X. (1997). Anti-Hu antibodies in patients with small-cell lung cancer: association with complete response to therapy and improved survival. J Clin Oncol 15: 2866-2872.
6. J. B. Posner and J. Dalmau, Curr Opin Immunol 9, 723 (1997).
7. Darnell, R.B. & DeAngelis, L.M. (1993). Regression of small-cell lung carcinoma in patients with paraneoplastic neuronal antibodies. Lancet 341 : 21-22.
8. Devita, V.T. , Hellman, S. & Rosenberg, S. (1989). Cancer, Principles and Practice of Oncology. In eds. (J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia), pp. 1930-1931.
9. H. Fathallah-Shaykh, S. Wolf, E. Wong, J. Posner, H. Furneaux, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 3451 (1991).
10. J. P. Corradi, C. W. Yang, J. C. Darnell, J. Dalmau, R. B. Darnell, J Neurosci 17, 1406 (1997).
11. Smitt, P.A.E.S. , Manley, G.T. & Posner, J.B. (1995). Immunization with the paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis antigen HuD does not cause neurologic disease in mice. Neurology 45: 1873-1878.
12. Sakai, K. , Gofuku, M., Kitagawa, Y., Ogasawara, T. & Hirose, G. (1995). Induction of anti-Purkinje cell antibodies in vivo by immunizing with a recombinant 52- kDa paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration-associated protein. J Neuroimmunol 60: 135- 141.
13. M. Tanaka, K. Tanaka, O. Onodera, S. Tsuji, Clin Neurol Neurosurg 97, 97 (1995).
14. N. Bhardwaj et al. , J Clin Invest 94, 797 (1994).
15. A. Bender, M. Sapp, G. Schuler, R. M. Steinman, N. Bhardwaj, J Immunol Methods 196, 121 (1996).
16. S. L. Schreiber and G. R. Crabtree, Immunol Today 13, 136 (1992).
17. M. L. Albert, B. Sauter, N. Bhardwaj, Namre 392, 86 (1998).
18. J. Dalmau et al. , Cancer 75, 99 (1995).
19. G. Schuler and R. M. Steinman, J Exp Med 186, 1183 (1997).
20. Dalmau, J., Furneaux, H.M., Gralla, R.J. , Kris, M.G. & Posner, J.B. (1990). Detection of the anti-Hu antibody in the serum of patients with small cell lung cancer-a quantitative Western blot analysis. Ann Neurol 27: 544-552.
21. Neumann, H., Cavalie, A. , Jenne, D.E. & Wekerle, H. (1995). Induction of MHC class I genes in neurons. Science 269: 549-552. 22. Neumann, H., Schmidt, H., Cavalie, A., Jenne, D. & Wekerle, H. (1997). Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I gene expression in single neurons of the central nervous system: differential regulation by interferon (IFN)-gamma and mmor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. J Exp Med 185: 305-316.
23. L. J. Picker et al., Blood 86, 1408 (1995).
24. Posner, J.B. & Furneaux, H.M. (1990). Paraneoplastic syndromes. In Immunologic mechanisms in neurologic and psychiatric disease, Waksman, B.H., eds. (Raven Press, Ltd., New York), pp. 187-219.
25. Darnell, R.B. (1994). Paraneoplastic syndromes. In Current diagnosis in neurology, Feldmann, E., eds. (Mosby-Year Book, Inc. , Philadelphia), pp. 137-141.
26. Anderson, N.E. , Rosenblum, M.K. & Posner, J.B. (1988). Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration: clinical-immunological correlations. Ann Neurol 24: 559-567.
27. Hetzel, D. , Stanhope, C, O'Neill, B. & Lennon, V. (1990). Gynecologic cancer in patients with subacute cerebellar degeneration predicted by anti-Purkinje cell antibodies and limited in metastatic volume. Mayo Clin Proc 65: 1558-1563.
28. Luque, F., Furneaux, H., Ferziger, R. , Rosenblum, M., Wray, S., Schold, S. , Glantz, M. , Jaeckle, K. , Biran, H. , Lesser, M. , Paulsen, W., River, M. & Posner, J. (1991). Anti-Ri: an antibody associated with paraneoplastic opsoclonus and breast cancer. Ann Neurol 29: 241-251.
29. Graus, F., Elkon, K.B. , Cordon-Cardo, C. & Posner, J.B. (1986). Sensory neuronopathy and small cell lung cancer; antineuronal antibody that also reacts with the mmor. Am J Med 80: 45-52.
30. Lang, B., Newsom-Davis, J., Wray, D. & Vincent, A. (1981). Autoimmune aetiology for myasthenic (Eaton-Lambert) syndrome. Lancet ii: 224-226.
31. Patrick, J. & Lindstrom, J. (1973). Autoimmune response to acetylcholine receptor. Science 180: 821-822.
32. Furneaux, H.L., Reich, L. & Posner, J.P. (1990). Autoantibody synthesis in the central nervous system of patients with paraneoplastic syndromes. Neurology 40: 1085- 1091.
33. Graus, F., Ilia, I., Agusti, M., Ribalta, T. , Cruz-Sanchez, F. & Juarez, C. (1991). Effect of intra ventricular injection of an anti-Purkinje cell antibody (anti-Yo) in a guinea pig model. J Neurol Sci 106: 82-87.
34. Greenlee, J.E. , Parks, T.N. & Jaeckle, K.A. (1993). Type Ila ('anti-Hu') antineuronal antibodies produce destruction of rat cerebellar granule neurons in vitro. Neurology 43: 2049-2054.
35. Graus, F., Vega, F. , Delattre, J.Y. , Bonaventura, I., Ren'e, R., Arbaiza, D. & Tolosa, E. (1992). Plasmapheresis and antineoplastic treatment in CNS paraneoplastic syndromes with antineuronal autoantibodies. Neurology 42: 536-40.
36. Lampson, L. (1987). Molecular bases of the immune response to neural antigens. Trends Neurosci 10: 211-216.
37. Medawar, P. (1948). Immunity to homologous grafted skin. III. The fate of skin homografts transplanted to the brain, to subcutaneous tissue, and to the anterior chamber of the eye. Br J Exp Pathol 29: 58-69.
38. Griffith, T.S. , Brunner, T.. Fletcher, S.M., Green, D.R. & Ferguson, T.A. (1995). Fas ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune privilege. Science 270: 1189-1192. 39. Rensing-Ehl, A. , Malipiero, U., Irmler, M., Tschopp, J. , Constam, D. & Fontana, A. (1996). Neurons induced to express major histocompatibility complex class I antigen are killed via the perforin and not the Fas (APO-1/CD95) pathway. Eur J Immunol 26: 2271-4.
40. Saas, P., Walker, P.R. , Hahne, M., Quiquerez, A.L. , Schnuriger, V., Perrin, G. , French, L., Van Meir, E.G. , de Tribolet, N., Tschopp, J. & Dietrich, P.Y. (1997). Fas ligand expression by astrocytoma in vivo: maintaining immune privilege in the brain? J Clin Invest 99: 1173-8.
41. Collins, K.L., Chen, B.K., Kalams, S.A. , Walker, B.D. & Baltimore, D. (1998). HIV-1 Nef protein protects infected primary cells against killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Namre 391: 397-401.
42. Hammack, J. , Kotanides, H., Rosenblum, M.K. & Posner, J.B. (1992). Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration. II. Clinical and immunologic findings in 21 patients with Hodgkin's disease. Neurology 42: 1938-1943.
43. Lowin, B. , Hahne, M. , Mattmann, C. & Tschopp, J. (1994). Cytolytic T-cell cytotoxicity is mediated through perforin and Fas lytic pathways. Namre 370: 650-2.
44. Hahne, M., Rimoldi, D., Schroter, M. , Romero, P. , Schreier, M. , French, L.E. , Schneider, P. , Bornand, T., Fontana, A., Lienard, D., Cerottini, J. & Tschopp, J. (1996). Melanoma cell expression of Fas(Apo-l/CD95) ligand: implications for mmor immune escape [see comments] . Science 274: 1363-6.
45. White, F.A., Keller-Peck, C.R., Knudson, CM., Korsmeyer, S.J. & Snider, W.D. (1998). Widespread elimination of naturally occurring neuronal death in Bax- deficient mice. J Neurosci 18: 1428-39.
46. D'Orazio, T.J. & Niederkorn, J.Y. (1998). A novel role for TGF-beta and IL-10 in the induction of immune privilege. J Immunol 160: 2089-98.
47. Tanaka, M. , Tanaka, K., Idezuka, J., Tsuji, S. Failure to detect cytotoxic T cell activity against recombinant Yo protein using autologous dendritic cells as the target in a patient with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration and anti-Yo antibody. Exp. Neurol. 150:337 (1998).
48. Tollefson, A.E. , Hermiston, T.W., Lichtenstein, D.L. , Colle, C.F. , Tripp, R.A., Dimitrov, T. , Toth, K., Wells, C.E., Doherty, P.C. & Wold, W.S. (1998). Forced degradation of Fas inhibits apoptosis in adenovirus-infected cells. Namre 392:726-730.
49. Irmler, M., Thome, M., Hahne, M. , Schneider, P. , Hofmann, K., Steiner, V. , Bodmer, J.L. , Shroter, M., Burns, K., Mattmann, C, Rimoldi, D., French, L.E., and Tschopp, J. (1997). Inhibition of death receptor signals by cellular FLIP. Namre 388: 190-5.
50. Banchereau, J. and Steinman, R.M. (1998). Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Namre 392:245-252.
51. Altman, J.D. , Moss, P.A.H., Goulder, P.J.R. , Barouch, D.H. , McHeyzer-Williams, M.G. , Bell, J.I., McMichael, A.J. and Davis, M.M. (1996). Phenotypic analysis of antigen- specific T lymphocytes. Scienct 274(5284): 94-96.
52. Sharma, K. and Srikant, C.B. (1998). Induction of wild-type p53, Bax, and acidic endonuclease during somatostatin-signaled apoptosis in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells . Int. J. Cancer 76:259-66.
53. Cohen, J.L. , Boyer, O., Saloman, B., Onclercq, R. , Charlotte, F., Bruel, S.. Boisserie, G. , & Klatzmann, D. (1997). Prevention of graft-versus-host disease in mice using a suicide gene expressed in T lymphocytes. Blood 89(12):4636-4645. 54. Sakai, K. , Mitchell, D. , Tsukamoto, T. , & Steinman, L. (1990). Ann Neurol. 28:692- 698.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method for determining the presence and extent of a cellular immune response in an
individual to an immune-privileged antigen said cellular immune response associated
directly or indirectly with a pathological state, comprising quantitating in a sample of
bodily fluid from said individual the presence and extent of T lymphocytes specific for
said immune-privileged antigen or fragments thereof.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said pathological state is a dysproliferative disease,
paraneoplastic syndrome, or an autoimmune disorder.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said immune-privileged antigen is selected from the
group consisting of paraneoplastic antigens, neuron-specific antigens, testis-specific
antigens, and eye-specific antigens.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein said paraneoplastic antigen is an onconeural antigens.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said onconeural antigen is selected from the group
consisting of cdr2, Hu antigen, and Nova antigen.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said T lymphocytes are cytotoxic T lymphocytes and
said immune-privileged antigen is an onconeural antigen.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein said onconeural antigen is cdr2.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said T lymphocytes specific for said immune-privileged
antigen are cytotoxic T cells and said method comprises detecting the extent of
expression of T lymphocyte receptors capable of recognizing said antigen.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein said T lymphocytes specific for said immune-privileged
antigen are cytotoxic T cells and said method comprises detecting the extent of
activation of T lymphocytes upon exposure to said antigen.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein said T lymphocytes specific for said immune-privileged
antigen are cytotoxic T cells and said method comprises detecting the extent of
recognition by said cytotoxic T cells of target cells or target molecules expressing said
antigen.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein said T lymphocytes specific for said immune-privileged
antigen are killer T cells and said method comprises detecting the extent of expression
of killer lymphocyte receptors expressing said antigen.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein said T lymphocytes specific for said immune-
privileged antigen are memory T cells and said method comprises detecting the extent
of activation of said memory T cells after exposure to antigen presenting cells
presenting said antigen.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein said T lymphocytes specific for said immune-privileged
antigen are memory T cells and said method comprises detecting the extent of
recognition of target cells expressing said antigen or a fragment thereof after exposure
of said memory T lymphocytes to antigen presenting cells presenting said antigen.
14. The method of claim 1 wherein said T lymphocytes specific for said immune-privileged
antigen are memory T cells and said method comprises detecting the extent of
recognition of target molecules bearing said antigen or a fragment thereof after
exposure of said memory T lymphocytes to antigen presenting cells presenting said
antigen.
15. A method for screening individuals for the early onset or propensity to develop a
pathological state caused by a cellular immune response to an immune-privileged
antigen in accordance with claim 1.
16. A method for determining whether a neoplasm in an individual expresses an immune -
privileged antigen by quantitating T lymphocytes from said individual that are specific
for said antigen or a fragment thereof in accordance with claim 1.
17. A method of determining whether a patient with a immune-privileged antigen-
expressing mmor has a sufficient population of antigen-specific T lymphocytes to
control the mmor or is a candidate for anti-cancer therapy by quantitating T lymphocytes specific for said antigen or fragment thereof in accordance with claim 1.
18. A method for monitoring the effectiveness of therapies directed to modulate the population of immune-privileged antigen-specific T lymphocytes in a patient by
measuring the numbers of antigen-specific T lymphocytes in accordance with claim 1.
19. A method for determining the susceptibility of a patient with an immune-privileged antigen-expressing mmor to a paraneoplastic syndrome by quantitating the cytokine
level in a bodily fluid of said patient.
20. A method for determining the quantity of immune privileged antigen-specific T cells in a sample of peripheral blood comprising the steps of i) maturing dendritic cells in said blood sample; ii) exposing said matured dendritic cells to apoptotic debris from unrelated
cells expressing an immune-privileged antigen; iii) co-incubating said immune-privileged antigen-exposed dendritic cells
with the peripheral blood lymphocytes from said patient; and iv) correlating the amount of interferon-γ released from said lymphocytes
with the number of immune privileged antigen-specific T cells in the
sample.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein said immune-privileged antigen is cdr2.
22. The method of claim 20 wherein said umelated cells expressing an immune-privileged
antigen are cells stably transfected to express an immune-privileged antigen.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein said immune-privileged antigen is cdr2.
24. The method of claim 20 wherein said interferon-γ release is measured in an ELISPOT
assay.
25. A diagnostic kit for the quantitation of T lymphocytes specific for an immune-
privileged antigen or fragments thereof comprising one or more reagents selected from
the group consisting of a fragment of the immune-privileged antigen, a target cell
expressing said immune-privileged antigen or fragment thereof, a fragment of the
immune-privileged antigen in a tetrameric complex with HLA, and combinations
thereof; said kit further comprising additional components if necessary , and instructions
for use of said kit.
26. A method for treating a neoplasm in a patient wherein said neoplasm expresses an
immune-privileged antigen by increasing the number or activation state of immune-
privileged antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes present in said patient.
27. The method of claim 26 according to the steps of:
i) isolating a quantity of antigen presenting cells from a sample of blood
from said patient; ii) exposing said antigen presenting cells in vitro to said immune-privileged antigen or fragment thereof;
iii) reintroducing said antigen-exposed antigen presenting cells to said
patient.
28. The method of claim 27 further comprising exposing said antigen-exposed antigen
presenting cells in vitro to a quantity of T lymphocytes isolated from the blood of said
patient, and reintroducing said T lymphocytes to said patient.
29. The method of claim 27 wherein said exposure of said immune-privileged antigen or
fragment thereof to said antigen presenting cells is achieved ex vivo using a cell
expressing said immune-privileged antigen or a fragment thereof.
30. The method of claim 29 wherein said cell expressing said immune-privileged antigen
is an apoptotic cell or artificial antigen-presenting cell expressing MHC class I
molecules, or a cell pulsed with immune-privileged antigen peptides.
31. The method of claim 26 wherein said immune-privileged antigen-specific T
lymphocytes are prepared from a HLA-matched source of cells selected from the group
consisting of T lymphocytes from a donor individual, an immortalized cell line of the
same HLA phenotype as the patient, and a drug-sensitive, immortalized cell line of the
same HLA phenotype as the patient.
32. The method of claim 27 wherein said antigen-presenting cells are prepared from a
HLA-matched source of cells selected from the group consisting of antigen-presenting
cells from a donor individual, an immortalized cell line of the same HLA phenotype
as the patient, and Drosophila cells transfected to express MHC I and immune-
privileged antigen peptides.
33. A method for treating a pathological state in a mammal said pathological state caused
by the presence in said mammal of T lymphocytes specific for an immune-privileged
antigen, comprising administration of an effective amount of an agent which decreases
the population or activity of activated T lymphocytes specific for cells expressing said
immune-privileged antigen.
34. The method of claim 33 wherein said agent is tacrolimus, cyclosporin,
immunosuppressive cytokines, corticosteroids, or azathioprine.
35. The method of claim 33 wherein said immune-privileged antigen cdr2 or fragments
thereof, or Hu antigen or fragments thereof.
36. The method of claim 33 wherein said pathological state is paraneoplastic neuronal
disorder and said agent is administered to the central nervous system.
37. A method for decreasing the expression of an immune privileged antigen on non-mmor
cells comprising administration of an effective amount of an agent which decreases expression of said antigen.
38. The method of claim 37 wherein said agent is a cytokine antagonist.
39. A method of decreasing the killing of cells expressing an immune-privileged antigen
by cytotoxic T lymphocytes by decreasing the sensitivity of said cells to cytotoxic T
lymphocytes specific for said immune-privileged antigen.
40. An isolated polypeptide sequence identified as SEQ ID NO: 1 , SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID
NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, SEQ ID NO:7 or SEQ ID NO:8.
41. A diagnostic kit for measuring the number of immune -privileged antigen-specific T
cells in a patient sample comprising:
i) cells expressing an immune-privileged antigen;
ii) reagents and materials for performing an ELISPOT assay for gamma-
interferon; and
iii) instructions for use of said kit.
PCT/US1999/014827 1998-06-30 1999-06-30 Detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens WO2000000825A2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP99932105A EP1092154A2 (en) 1998-06-30 1999-06-30 Detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens
JP2000557146A JP2004510950A (en) 1998-06-30 1999-06-30 Methods and Agents for Detection and Modulation of Cellular Immunity to Immunoimmune Antigens
AU48488/99A AU4848899A (en) 1998-06-30 1999-06-30 Methods and agents for the detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens
CA002336382A CA2336382A1 (en) 1998-06-30 1999-06-30 Methods and agents for the detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10797898A 1998-06-30 1998-06-30
US09/107,978 1998-06-30

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000000825A2 WO2000000825A2 (en) 2000-01-06
WO2000000825A3 WO2000000825A3 (en) 2000-02-10
WO2000000825A9 true WO2000000825A9 (en) 2000-05-25

Family

ID=22319532

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/014827 WO2000000825A2 (en) 1998-06-30 1999-06-30 Detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens

Country Status (4)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2004510950A (en)
AU (1) AU4848899A (en)
CA (1) CA2336382A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000000825A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1092154A2 (en) 1998-06-30 2001-04-18 The Rockefeller University Detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens
EP1178785B1 (en) * 1999-05-06 2008-12-24 Wake Forest University Compositions and methods for identifying antigens which elicit an immune response
WO2001057534A2 (en) * 2000-02-04 2001-08-09 Bioseek Compositions and methods for reducing autoimmunity
WO2002036748A2 (en) * 2000-11-03 2002-05-10 Nexell Therapeutics, Inc. Methods for depleting and isolating alloreactive and antigen-reactive t cells from hematopoietic donor cells
EP1734663B1 (en) 2005-06-17 2011-06-15 Fujitsu Limited Multi-hop communication system
US7928190B2 (en) * 2007-07-05 2011-04-19 Darnell Robert B Methods and compositions for tumor vaccination and therapy

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1992019635A1 (en) * 1991-04-25 1992-11-12 Sloan-Kettering Institute For Cancer Research Antigen recognized by antibodies associated with paraneoplastic opsoclonus and methods of use thereof
WO1993003375A1 (en) * 1991-08-09 1993-02-18 Washington University Autoantibodies and their targets in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathies
US5753522A (en) * 1991-12-06 1998-05-19 Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital And Medical Center Purified protein for identifying a cancer-associated retinopathy autoantibody
US5686068A (en) * 1994-03-24 1997-11-11 Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research Isolated peptides derived from MAGE-2, cytolytic T cells specific to complexes of peptide and HLA-A2 molecules, and uses thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2000000825A3 (en) 2000-02-10
CA2336382A1 (en) 2000-01-06
WO2000000825A2 (en) 2000-01-06
AU4848899A (en) 2000-01-17
JP2004510950A (en) 2004-04-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Allenbach et al. Role of regulatory T cells in a new mouse model of experimental autoimmune myositis
Jagessar et al. Induction of progressive demyelinating autoimmune encephalomyelitis in common marmoset monkeys using MOG34-56 peptide in incomplete freund adjuvant
Tzartos et al. Interleukin-17 production in central nervous system-infiltrating T cells and glial cells is associated with active disease in multiple sclerosis
US8598125B2 (en) CDCA1 peptide and pharmaceutical agent comprising the same
JP2005179371A (en) Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune disease
Perera et al. Active immunization with myelin-derived altered peptide ligand reduces mechanical pain hypersensitivity following peripheral nerve injury
JP2006512396A (en) Methods for inducing and maintaining immune tolerance
CN112512554A (en) Immunodominant proteins and fragments in multiple sclerosis
IL195115A (en) Personalized t-cell vaccine for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and methods of making same
US11567078B2 (en) Blood cell biomarker for late onset Alzheimer&#39;s disease
WO2011106645A1 (en) Direct analysis of antigen-specific immune response
WO2000000825A9 (en) Detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens
US6750029B1 (en) Methods and agents for the detection and modulation of cellular immunity to immune privileged antigens
Pang et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α blockade leads to decreased peripheral T cell reactivity and increased dendritic cell number in peripheral blood of patients with ankylosing spondylitis
JPWO2009034961A1 (en) Method for evaluating human dendritic cells and human cell immunotherapeutic agent
RU2828590C2 (en) Immunodominant proteins and fragments in multiple sclerosis
Cao et al. CTRP4 binds to the interleukin-6 Receptor and ameliorates autoimmune encephalomyelitis by suppressing Th17 cell differentiation
Gupta Inhibiting Auto-Antigen Presentation on MHC Class-II by Small Molecules in Sjogren’s Syndrome
Roed et al. Myelin specific T-cells CD4
Shaw et al. RIP2 signaling in Central Nervous System-Infiltrating Dendritic Cells Promotes Cellular Activation, Inflammation and Autoimmune Disease Progression
Shono et al. A small molecule c-Rel inhibitor reduces alloactivation of T-cells
Angelini et al. Immune-mediated disorders of the central nervous system in children
van Driel BSc et al. Induction of Progressive Demyelinating Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in Common Marmoset Monkeys Using MOG^ sub 34-56^ Peptide in Incomplete Freund Adjuvant
Elliott Cytokine alteration of Fas ligand on CD4 and γδ T cells of multiple sclerosis patients

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AU CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AU CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): AU CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGE 50, DESCRIPTION, REPLACED BY A NEW PAGE 50; PAGES 1/7-7/7, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/7-7/7; DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 2000 557146

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

ENP Entry into the national phase in:

Ref document number: 2336382

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 48488/99

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1999932105

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1999932105

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1999932105

Country of ref document: EP