WO1999053683A1 - Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with progressive row reset - Google Patents

Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with progressive row reset Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999053683A1
WO1999053683A1 PCT/US1999/003364 US9903364W WO9953683A1 WO 1999053683 A1 WO1999053683 A1 WO 1999053683A1 US 9903364 W US9903364 W US 9903364W WO 9953683 A1 WO9953683 A1 WO 9953683A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
active
pixel sensor
pixel
transistor
reset
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/003364
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Lester J. Kozlowski
David L. Standley
Original Assignee
Conexant Systems, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Conexant Systems, Inc. filed Critical Conexant Systems, Inc.
Priority to EP99908192A priority Critical patent/EP0988749A1/en
Priority to AU27685/99A priority patent/AU2768599A/en
Priority to JP55165299A priority patent/JP2002501718A/en
Publication of WO1999053683A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999053683A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/60Noise processing, e.g. detecting, correcting, reducing or removing noise
    • H04N25/65Noise processing, e.g. detecting, correcting, reducing or removing noise applied to reset noise, e.g. KTC noise related to CMOS structures by techniques other than CDS
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/70SSIS architectures; Circuits associated therewith
    • H04N25/76Addressed sensors, e.g. MOS or CMOS sensors
    • H04N25/77Pixel circuitry, e.g. memories, A/D converters, pixel amplifiers, shared circuits or shared components

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to electronic imaging devices and, in particular, to CMOS imagers having a minimum number of analog components in each pixel.
  • CCD sensors for generating video or still images.
  • the various schemes can be grouped into two basic classes, depending upon whether signal amplification is performed at each pixel site or in support circuits outside the pixel array.
  • Passive-pixel sensors perform amplification outside the array.
  • Passive pixel sensors exhibits pixel simplicity and maximized optical fill factor.
  • Active-pixel sensors include an amplifier at each pixel site. Active pixel sensors optimize signal transfer and sensitivity.
  • the simplest passive pixel comprises a photodiode and an access transistor.
  • the photo-generated charge is passively transferred from each pixel to downstream circuits.
  • the integrated charge must, however, be efficiently transferred with low noise and non-uniformity. Since each column of pixels often shares a common row or column bus for reading the signal, noise and non-uniformity suppression are typically facilitated in the "column" buffer servicing each bus.
  • Figure 1 One example of a passive pixel implementation is shown in Figure 1. It uses a buffer consisting of a transimpedance amplifier with capacitive feedback to yield reasonable sensitivity considering the large bus capacitance. Such charge-amplification was not generally practical for on-chip implementation in early MOS imaging sensors. Accordingly, alternative schemes compatible with NMOS technology were used.
  • BASIS Base-Stored Image Sensor
  • the '696 patent for example, augments the basic source-follower configuration of the '016 patent with a column buffer that cancels fixed pattern noise, but adds a fourth transistor that creates a floating node vulnerable to generation of random offsets for charge-pumping and concomitant charge redistribution.
  • the '016 patent offers a method for reducing offset errors, but not with adequate accuracy and resolution to be useful for competing with CCDs.
  • these and other similar approaches requires 3-4 transistors in the pixel (at least one of which is relatively large to minimize 1/f noise) in addition to the photodiode.
  • These implementations also require off-chip signal processing for best S/N performance because none addresses the dominant source of temporal noise.
  • a dedicated memory element is usually needed, either on-chip of off- chip, to store the reset voltage to apply correlated double sampling and coherently subtract the correlated reset noise while the photo-generated voltage is being read.
  • circuitry at each pixel consisting of a photodetector and three transistors.
  • the first transistor serves as the driver of a source follower during signal read and as the driver of a transimpedance amplifier during signal reset to suppress reset noise without having to implement correlated double sampling using either on-chip or off-chip memory.
  • the second transistor is an access MOSFET used to read the signal from each pixel and multiplex the signal outputs from an array of pixels.
  • the third transistor is a MOSFET that resets the detector after the integrated signal has been read and the detector sense node has effectively been "pinned" by the transimpedance amplifier. -5-
  • Figure 1 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the amplifier system for a passive-pixel MOS photodiode array of the prior art
  • Figure 2 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the amplifier system for a passive-pixel imaging sensor of the prior art
  • Figure 3 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the amplifier system for an active-pixel imaging sensor of the prior art
  • Figure 4 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating a preferred embodiment of the low-noise active-pixel of the present invention.
  • Figure 5 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the operation of the low-noise amplifier system of the present invention during signal reset;
  • Figure 6 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the operation of the present invention during readout
  • Figure 7 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the preferred embodiment of the column-based source supply circuit
  • Figure 8 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the preferred embodiment of the row-based access supply circuit
  • Figure 9 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the small-signal equivalent circuit for the active-pixel sensor of the present invention.
  • Figure 10 is a signal diagram showing representative clocking for the tapered-reset waveform
  • Figure 11 is a 2-dimensional graph showing performance of the present invention with respect to noise
  • Figure 12 is a 3 -dimensional graph showing performance of the present invention with respect to noise.
  • Visible imaging systems implemented in CMOS have the potential for significant reductions in cost and power requirements in components such as image sensors, drive electronics, and output signal conditioning electronics.
  • a video camera for example, can be configured as a single CMOS integrated circuit supported by only an oscillator and a battery.
  • Such a CMOS imaging system requires lower voltages and dissipates less power than a CCD-based system. These improvements translate into smaller camera size, longer battery life, and applicability to many new products.
  • active-pixel sensor (APS) devices Active-pixel sensors can provide low read noise comparable or superior to scientific grade CCD systems.
  • the active circuit in each pixel of an APS device utilizes cell "real estate" that could otherwise be used to enable imagers having optical format compatible with standard lenses and/or to maximize the sensor optical fill factor for high sensitivity.
  • Active-pixel circuits also may increase power dissipation relative to passive-pixel alternatives, increase fixed pattern noise (possibly requiring additional circuitry to suppress the noise), and limit scalability.
  • the low noise amplifier system of the present invention is formed by the aggregate circuitry in each pixel and the waveform generation circuits servicing that column or row of pixels.
  • the signals from the active pixels are read out by a low-noise signal amplification system consisting of the active-pixel, the waveform generators and a standard column buffer.
  • the column buffer in the downstream electronics often performs correlated double sampling, sample-and-hold, optional video pipelining, and column amplifier offset cancellation functions to suppress the temporal and spatial noise that would otherwise be generated by the column buffer.
  • the low-noise system of the present invention provides the following key functions: (1) suppression of reset noise without having to provide means for analog memory and signal subtraction for each pixel to facilitate correlated double sampling; (2) high sensitivity via source follower amplification; (3) adequate amplifier bandwidth to avoid generation of fixed pattern noise due to variations in amplifier time constant and stray capacitance; (4) adequate power supply rejection to enable development of cameras-on-a-chip that do not require elaborate support electronics; and (5) compatibility with application to imaging arrays having pixel pitch ⁇ 5 microns.
  • the invention has the advantage of full process compatibility with standard suicided submicron CMOS. This helps maximize yield and minimize die cost because the circuit complexity is distributed amongst the active-pixels and peripheral circuits, and exploits signal processing capability inherent to CMOS.
  • the invention's spectral response is broad from the near-ultraviolet (400 nm) to the near-IR (>800 nm).
  • the invention offers as-drawn optical fill factor >25% at 7 ⁇ m pixel pitch using 0.5 ⁇ m design rules in CMOS.
  • the actual optical fill factor is somewhat larger due to lateral collection and the large diffusion length of commercial CMOS processes.
  • a final advantage is the flexibility to collocate digital logic and signal-processing circuits giving rise to a high immunity to electromagnetic interference.
  • the low-noise APS can provide temporal read noise as low as 15 e- (at data rates compatible with either video imaging or still photography via electronic means), fixed pattern noise significantly below 0.1% of the maximum signal (on a par with competing CCD imagers), ⁇ 0.5% non-linearity, >1 V signal swing for 3.3 V power supply, large charge- handling capacity, and variable sensitivity using simple serial interface updated on a frame-by-frame basis via digital interface to a host microprocessor.
  • a prototype embodiment of the low-noise APS invention formed a visible imager comprising an array of 1032 (columns) by 776 (rows) of visible light detectors (photodetectors).
  • the rows and columns of pixels were spaced 7 microns center-to-center using standard 0.5 ⁇ m design rules. Subsequent layouts using 0.25 ⁇ m rules show that the invention provides similar fill factor at a highly desirable pitch of 5 ⁇ m.
  • Four columns and rows of detectors at the perimeter of the light-sensitive region were covered with metal and used to establish the dark level for off-chip signal processing.
  • the detectors in each row were covered with color filters to produce color imagers. For example, the odd rows may begin at the left with red, green, then blue filters, and the even rows may begin with blue, red, then green filters, with these patterns repeating to fill the respective rows.
  • a low-noise active-pixel sensor 10 is illustrated in Figure 4.
  • Each pixel 10 in a sensor array (not shown) comprises a photodetector 12, such as a photodiode, for example, connected to the gate of a dual- driver MOSFET 14, and one leg of a reset MOSFET 16.
  • a row select MOSFET 18 has one leg connected to MOSFET 14.
  • Column bus 20 connects all the pixels in a column of the photodetector array by way of the row select MOSFET 18 to a source supply 30.
  • Row bus 22 connects all the pixel resets in a row to an access supply 40.
  • Tapered reset supply 50 supplies an optimized active-pixel reset waveform ( Figure 10) to the gate of MOSFET 16.
  • Photodiode 12 may comprise a substrate diode, for example, with the suicide cleared. In this embodiment, it is necessary to clear the suicide because it is opaque to visible light. Pixel 10 is designed as simply as possible to obtain the largest available light detecting area while providing broad spectral response, control of blooming and signal integration time, and compatibility with CMOS production processes. -9-
  • photodiode 12 may be formed at the same time as the lightly doped drain (LDD) implant of n-type MOSFETs for the chosen process; this creates an n-on-p photodiode junction in the p-type substrate. Since no additional ion implantation is necessary, the process and wafer cost for active-pixel circuit 10 are the same as those of standard, high volume digital electronic products.
  • LDD lightly doped drain
  • Figure 5 illustrates operation of the circuit of Figure 4 during pixel reset.
  • Figure 6 illustrates the operation during readout.
  • the photodetectors 12 are first reset one row at a time within an array, from bottom to top. Within each row, photodetectors 12 are reset from left to right.
  • Reset is initiated by fully enabling the row select MOSFETs 18 of the pixels in the selected row, thereby connecting a low-impedance voltage source (located in source supply 30) to one leg of MOSFET 14 for all the pixels in the selected row.
  • a current source located in access supply 40 is connected to the drain leg of MOSFET 14.
  • the current source may be an n-type MOSFET 56 driven by bias voltage, Vhi as and powered from V dd .
  • the pixel amplifiers in the selected row are now configured as distributed transimpedance amplifiers with capacitive-feedback provided by MOSFET 14's Miller capacitance with the transimpedance amplifier's current source being located in the column buffer.
  • MOSFET 14 thus acts as a transconductance
  • reset MOSFET 16 acts as a resistance controlled by the tapered reset supply 50.
  • the series resistance of MOSFET 16 is gradually increased by applying a decreasing ramp waveform ( Figure 10) to the gate of MOSFET 16 to give the feedback transconductance of MOSFET 14 the opportunity to null the reset noise (kTC) via feedback.
  • This active-pixel implementation resets within an aperture of tens of microseconds using standard 0.5 micron CMOS technology. -10-
  • Figure 6 shows the same pixel circuit configured in readout mode.
  • the signals from photodetectors 12 are subsequently read out after the prescribed integration time, one row at a time, from bottom to the top of the array. Within each row, photodetectors 12 are read out from left to right. Readout is initiated by turning on the access MOSFETs 18 of all the photodetectors 12 in a selected row.
  • one leg of MOSFET 14 is now connected via row bus 22 to low- impedance voltage source Vdd by fully turning on V b i as for MOSFET 56.
  • the other leg of MOSFET 14 is also connected to a current source at the periphery via column bus 20.
  • MOSFET 14 is now a source follower driver so that the amplified signal from each row- selected photodiode 12 is efficiently transferred to column bus 20.
  • FIG. 7 shows a preferred embodiment for source supply 30.
  • Supply voltage V S R C is buffered by a unity gain amplifier 44.
  • the gate 42 of transistor 46 is pulsed by the supply voltage to fully turn on transistor 46 and connect V SRC to the output bus 20.
  • the gate 42 is pulsed low to open-circuit transistor 46.
  • Current source 48 now supplies the active-pixels with supply current I SRC which is established by a constant voltage V nb i as -
  • Figure 8 shows a preferred embodiment for access supply 40.
  • a supply voltage V dd is buffered by a unity gain amplifier 52.
  • the gate 50 of transistor 54 is pulsed by the supply voltage to fully turn off transistor 54 and let current source 56 supply the active-pixels with supply current I ⁇ which is established by constant voltage V b i as -
  • gate 50 is pulsed low to connect V dd to the output bus 22.
  • the application of the tapered reset waveform ( Figure 10) to the transimpedance amplifier enables the reset noise (kTC noise) envelope to decay before the reset switch 16 ( Figure 4) is completely opened.
  • the invention also reduces the fixed-pattern offsets from MOSFET 14 in each pixel because the photodiode node charges to a voltage that cancels MOSFET 14 variations from pixel-to-pixel.
  • a row is resettable to within several tens of microseconds for full noise suppression, or a shorter time for moderate noise reduction.
  • Figure 9 shows the generalized small-signal equivalent circuit model for the pixel 10 during reset. This circuit allows calculation of the steady-state noise envelope at the reset node depending on reset switch resistance, R sw . If the reset voltage is ramped down too slowly, too much time is needed to reset each row and operation at video frame rates becomes problematic. Application to digital still cameras, however, is still quite feasible. If the tapered-reset waveform is ramped down too quickly, then the kTC noise envelope will not decay sufficiently to suppress reset noise before the switch is completely opened.
  • Figure 9 shows the photodiode 12 node as having a voltage Vj and capacitance d to ground.
  • the amplifier 14 output node has voltage V 2 , output capacitance Co and output conductance G 0 to ground.
  • the capacitance C 0 is associated with the entire reset access bus, most of which comes from the MOSFET 14-MOSFET 16 function of all rows.
  • the transconductance of MOSFET 14, possibly degenerated by MOSFET 18, is shown as a controlled current source g m Vi.
  • the feedback capacitance, C fb is the parasitic Miller capacitance of MOSFET 14.
  • Noise from MOSFET 14 is represented by current source i n .
  • Noise from MOSFET 16 (which is operated in the ohmic region) is represented by voltage source V n . Not included in this simplified model is the noise from capacitive feedthrough of the tapered-reset waveform.
  • the tapered-clock waveform's time constant is thus appropriately selected so that the dimensionless quantity (ki + k 2 ) is significantly >1.
  • the reset noise is hence reduced to the much smaller quantity stemming from the transconductance amplifier's feedback capacitance.
  • this feedback capacitance is the parasitic Miller capacitance of MOSFET 14.
  • R sw must be tailored to support any changes in line rate. Increasing the line rate hence requires lower switch resistance.
  • the table numerically illustrates the impact on reset noise as the tapered clock time constant is appropriately shortened. At a time constant of 2.7 ⁇ sec, the reset noise degrades to 55 e-.
  • the column bus 20 is preferably monitored by a standard column buffer to read the video signal when it is available.
  • the key requirements on the column buffer are similar to conventional designs having to handle voltage-mode signals and are well known in the art.
  • the clock signal ( Figure 10), for reset circuit 10, and clocking of source supply 30 and access supply 40, to facilitate active-pixel reset and readout, is generated on-chip using standard CMOS digital logic. This digital logic scheme thus enables "windowing,” wherein a user can read out the imager in various formats simply by enabling the appropriate support logic to clock the appropriate subformat. With windowing, the 1032 x 776 format of the prototype embodiment can be read out as one or more arbitrarily sized and positioned M x N arrays without having to read out the entire array.
  • a user might desire to change a computer-compatible "VGA" format (i.e., approximately 640 x 480) to either Common Interface Format (CIF; nominally 352 x 240) or Quarter Common Interface Format (QCIF; nominally 176 x 120) without having to read out all the pixels in the entire array.
  • CIF Common Interface Format
  • QCIF Quarter Common Interface Format
  • This feature simplifies support electronics to reduce cost and match the needs of the particular communication medium.
  • a personal teleconference link to a remote user having only QCIF capability could be optimized to provide QCIF resolution and thus reduce bandwidth requirements throughout the teleconference link.
  • an imager configured on Common Interface Format (CIF) could provide full-CIF images while supplying windowed information for the portions of the image having the highest -14-
  • Figures 11 and 12 illustrate the noise performance possibilities of the present invention.
  • Figure 11 shows the relation of reset noise Q n in electrons (e-) to variation in the reset resistance (Rsw)-
  • Figure 12 shows the effect of the feedback capacitance C A , on the noise.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Transforming Light Signals Into Electric Signals (AREA)
  • Solid State Image Pick-Up Elements (AREA)

Abstract

An imaging array of active pixel sensors uses a compact three transistor CMOS implementation for each pixel. A current source at the top of each column creates a distributed feedback amplifier for each pixel in a selected row. The reset amplifier acts as a variable resistance in the source-follower amplifier feedback circuit. The variable resistance is controlled by a range reset voltage applied to the reset amplifier thereby nulling the photodiode reset noise.

Description

-1-
COMPACT LOW-NOISE ACTIVE PIXEL SENSOR WITH PROGRESSIVE ROW RESET
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to electronic imaging devices and, in particular, to CMOS imagers having a minimum number of analog components in each pixel.
2. Description of Related Art
There presently exists many alternatives to CCD sensors for generating video or still images. The various schemes can be grouped into two basic classes, depending upon whether signal amplification is performed at each pixel site or in support circuits outside the pixel array. Passive-pixel sensors perform amplification outside the array. Passive pixel sensors exhibits pixel simplicity and maximized optical fill factor. Active-pixel sensors include an amplifier at each pixel site. Active pixel sensors optimize signal transfer and sensitivity.
The simplest passive pixel comprises a photodiode and an access transistor. The photo-generated charge is passively transferred from each pixel to downstream circuits. The integrated charge must, however, be efficiently transferred with low noise and non-uniformity. Since each column of pixels often shares a common row or column bus for reading the signal, noise and non-uniformity suppression are typically facilitated in the "column" buffer servicing each bus. One example of a passive pixel implementation is shown in Figure 1. It uses a buffer consisting of a transimpedance amplifier with capacitive feedback to yield reasonable sensitivity considering the large bus capacitance. Such charge-amplification was not generally practical for on-chip implementation in early MOS imaging sensors. Accordingly, alternative schemes compatible with NMOS technology were used. The basic scheme shown in Figure 2 was mass-produced by Hitachi for camcorders. The key refinements over the Figure 1 scheme include anti-blooming control and circuitry for reducing fixed pattern noise. Though these imagers were inferior to the emerging charge coupled device (CCD) imagers available at the time, similar MOS imagers are still being offered commercially today.
Subsequent efforts at improving passive-pixel imager performance have also focused on column buffer enhancements. The column buffer was improved by using an enhancement/depletion inverter amplifier to provide reasonably large amplification in a small amount of real estate. Its 40 lux sensitivity was still nearly an order of magnitude below that of competing CCD-based sensors. Others worked to enhance sensitivity and facilitate automatic gain control via charge amplification in the column buffer. More recently, the capacitive-feedback transimpedance amplifier (CTIA) concept of Figure 1 has served as a basis for further development, as exemplified by U.S. Patent Nos. 5,043,820 and 5,345,266. The CTIA is nearly ideal for passive- pixel readout if the problems with temporal noise pickup and fixed-pattern noise are adequately addressed.
Though much progress has been made in developing passive-pixel imagers, their temporal S/N performance is still fundamentally inferior to competing CCD imagers. Their bus capacitance translates to read noise of « 100 e-. CCDs, on the other hand, typically have read noise of 20 to 40 e- at video frame rates. The allure of producing imagers with conventional MOS fabrication technologies rather than esoteric CCD processes (which usually require many implantation steps and complex interface circuitry) encouraged the development of active-pixel sensors. In order to mitigate the noise associated with the bus capacitance, amplification was added to the pixel via the phototransistor. One such approach called a Base-Stored Image Sensor (BASIS) used a bipolar transistor in emitter follower configuration with a downstream correlated double sample to suppress random and temporal noise. By storing the photogenerated-signal on the phototransistor's base to provide charge amplification, the minimum scene illumination was reduced to 10" lux in a linear sensor array. However, the minimum scene illumination was higher (10"2 lux) in a two-dimensional BASIS imager having -3-
310,000 pixels because the photoresponse non-uniformity was relatively high (<2%). These MOS imagers had adequate sensitivity, but their pixel pitch was too large at about 13 μm. This left the problem of shrinking the pixel pitch while also reducing photoresponse non-uniformity. Since the incorporation of bipolar phototransistors is not strictly compatible with mainstream CMOS processes, some approaches have segregated photodetection and signal amplification. United States Patent Nos. 5,296,696 and 5,083,016, for example, describe active-pixel sensors essentially comprising a three- transistor pixel with photodiode. These implementations still exhibit inadequate performance. The '696 patent, for example, augments the basic source-follower configuration of the '016 patent with a column buffer that cancels fixed pattern noise, but adds a fourth transistor that creates a floating node vulnerable to generation of random offsets for charge-pumping and concomitant charge redistribution. The '016 patent offers a method for reducing offset errors, but not with adequate accuracy and resolution to be useful for competing with CCDs. Furthermore, these and other similar approaches requires 3-4 transistors in the pixel (at least one of which is relatively large to minimize 1/f noise) in addition to the photodiode. These implementations also require off-chip signal processing for best S/N performance because none addresses the dominant source of temporal noise. In order to eliminate or greatly suppress the reset noise (kTC) generated by resetting the detector capacitance, a dedicated memory element is usually needed, either on-chip of off- chip, to store the reset voltage to apply correlated double sampling and coherently subtract the correlated reset noise while the photo-generated voltage is being read.
This basic deficiency was addressed in U.S. Patent No. 5,471,515 by developing an active pixel sensor (APS) that uses intra-pixel charge transfer to store the reset charge at each pixel at the start of each imaging frame. The floating gate APS facilitates correlated double sampling with high efficiency by adding several transistors and relying on a photogate for signal detection. The concomitant drawbacks, however, are intractable because they increase imager cost. The former adds several transistors to each pixel and several million transistors to each imager -4-
thereby reducing production yield. The latter is not compatible with standard CMOS gate fabrication so a non-standard process must be developed. These deficiencies were tackled in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,576,763 and 5,541,402 issued to Ackland et al. and U.S. Patent Nos. 5,587,596 and 5,608,243 issued to Chi et al. Ackland addressed the image lag issues associated with the intra-pixel charge transfer means. But his approach still requires a non-standard CMOS process. Chi reduced pixel complexity by using the simplest possible active pixel comprising only a phototransistor and reset MOSFET. Chi's implementation still suffers from reset noise and compromises spectral response at longer wavelengths because the photodiode is in an n-well.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide an active-pixel low- noise imaging system for implementation in CMOS or in other semiconductor fabrication technologies.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a low-noise amplifier for an imaging system that efficiently suppresses reset noise.
It is yet another object of this invention to provide an integrated low- noise amplifier for an imaging system that has low cost and low power consumption while exhibiting low temporal and fixed pattern noise.
These objects and the advantages of the present invention are accomplished by circuitry at each pixel consisting of a photodetector and three transistors. The first transistor serves as the driver of a source follower during signal read and as the driver of a transimpedance amplifier during signal reset to suppress reset noise without having to implement correlated double sampling using either on-chip or off-chip memory. The second transistor is an access MOSFET used to read the signal from each pixel and multiplex the signal outputs from an array of pixels. The third transistor is a MOSFET that resets the detector after the integrated signal has been read and the detector sense node has effectively been "pinned" by the transimpedance amplifier. -5-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRA WTNGS
Other objects and the many attendant advantages of this invention will be readily apparent upon reference to the following detailed descriptions when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the figures, and wherein:
Figure 1 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the amplifier system for a passive-pixel MOS photodiode array of the prior art;
Figure 2 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the amplifier system for a passive-pixel imaging sensor of the prior art; Figure 3 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the amplifier system for an active-pixel imaging sensor of the prior art;
Figure 4 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating a preferred embodiment of the low-noise active-pixel of the present invention;
Figure 5 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the operation of the low-noise amplifier system of the present invention during signal reset;
Figure 6 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the operation of the present invention during readout;
Figure 7 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the preferred embodiment of the column-based source supply circuit; Figure 8 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the preferred embodiment of the row-based access supply circuit;
Figure 9 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating the small-signal equivalent circuit for the active-pixel sensor of the present invention;
Figure 10 is a signal diagram showing representative clocking for the tapered-reset waveform;
Figure 11 is a 2-dimensional graph showing performance of the present invention with respect to noise;
Figure 12 is a 3 -dimensional graph showing performance of the present invention with respect to noise. -6-
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Visible imaging systems implemented in CMOS have the potential for significant reductions in cost and power requirements in components such as image sensors, drive electronics, and output signal conditioning electronics. A video camera, for example, can be configured as a single CMOS integrated circuit supported by only an oscillator and a battery. Such a CMOS imaging system requires lower voltages and dissipates less power than a CCD-based system. These improvements translate into smaller camera size, longer battery life, and applicability to many new products. Because of the advantages offered by CMOS visible imagers, there has been considerable effort to develop active-pixel sensor (APS) devices. Active-pixel sensors can provide low read noise comparable or superior to scientific grade CCD systems. The active circuit in each pixel of an APS device, however, utilizes cell "real estate" that could otherwise be used to enable imagers having optical format compatible with standard lenses and/or to maximize the sensor optical fill factor for high sensitivity. Active-pixel circuits also may increase power dissipation relative to passive-pixel alternatives, increase fixed pattern noise (possibly requiring additional circuitry to suppress the noise), and limit scalability.
The low noise amplifier system of the present invention is formed by the aggregate circuitry in each pixel and the waveform generation circuits servicing that column or row of pixels. The signals from the active pixels are read out by a low-noise signal amplification system consisting of the active-pixel, the waveform generators and a standard column buffer. In addition to means for suppressing the detector's reset noise, the column buffer in the downstream electronics often performs correlated double sampling, sample-and-hold, optional video pipelining, and column amplifier offset cancellation functions to suppress the temporal and spatial noise that would otherwise be generated by the column buffer. -7-
The low-noise system of the present invention provides the following key functions: (1) suppression of reset noise without having to provide means for analog memory and signal subtraction for each pixel to facilitate correlated double sampling; (2) high sensitivity via source follower amplification; (3) adequate amplifier bandwidth to avoid generation of fixed pattern noise due to variations in amplifier time constant and stray capacitance; (4) adequate power supply rejection to enable development of cameras-on-a-chip that do not require elaborate support electronics; and (5) compatibility with application to imaging arrays having pixel pitch <5 microns.
The invention has the advantage of full process compatibility with standard suicided submicron CMOS. This helps maximize yield and minimize die cost because the circuit complexity is distributed amongst the active-pixels and peripheral circuits, and exploits signal processing capability inherent to CMOS. The invention's spectral response is broad from the near-ultraviolet (400 nm) to the near-IR (>800 nm).
Because the low-noise system of the present invention has only four MOSFETs in each pixel, the invention offers as-drawn optical fill factor >25% at 7 μm pixel pitch using 0.5 μm design rules in CMOS. The actual optical fill factor is somewhat larger due to lateral collection and the large diffusion length of commercial CMOS processes. A final advantage is the flexibility to collocate digital logic and signal-processing circuits giving rise to a high immunity to electromagnetic interference. When fully implemented in a desired camera-on-a-chip architecture, the low-noise APS can provide temporal read noise as low as 15 e- (at data rates compatible with either video imaging or still photography via electronic means), fixed pattern noise significantly below 0.1% of the maximum signal (on a par with competing CCD imagers), <0.5% non-linearity, >1 V signal swing for 3.3 V power supply, large charge- handling capacity, and variable sensitivity using simple serial interface updated on a frame-by-frame basis via digital interface to a host microprocessor. A prototype embodiment of the low-noise APS invention formed a visible imager comprising an array of 1032 (columns) by 776 (rows) of visible light detectors (photodetectors). The rows and columns of pixels were spaced 7 microns center-to-center using standard 0.5 μm design rules. Subsequent layouts using 0.25 μm rules show that the invention provides similar fill factor at a highly desirable pitch of 5 μm. Four columns and rows of detectors at the perimeter of the light-sensitive region were covered with metal and used to establish the dark level for off-chip signal processing. In addition, the detectors in each row were covered with color filters to produce color imagers. For example, the odd rows may begin at the left with red, green, then blue filters, and the even rows may begin with blue, red, then green filters, with these patterns repeating to fill the respective rows.
A low-noise active-pixel sensor 10 according to the present invention is illustrated in Figure 4. Each pixel 10 in a sensor array (not shown) comprises a photodetector 12, such as a photodiode, for example, connected to the gate of a dual- driver MOSFET 14, and one leg of a reset MOSFET 16. A row select MOSFET 18 has one leg connected to MOSFET 14. Column bus 20 connects all the pixels in a column of the photodetector array by way of the row select MOSFET 18 to a source supply 30. Row bus 22 connects all the pixel resets in a row to an access supply 40. Tapered reset supply 50 supplies an optimized active-pixel reset waveform (Figure 10) to the gate of MOSFET 16. Photodiode 12 may comprise a substrate diode, for example, with the suicide cleared. In this embodiment, it is necessary to clear the suicide because it is opaque to visible light. Pixel 10 is designed as simply as possible to obtain the largest available light detecting area while providing broad spectral response, control of blooming and signal integration time, and compatibility with CMOS production processes. -9-
For maximum compatibility with standard submicron CMOS processes, photodiode 12 may be formed at the same time as the lightly doped drain (LDD) implant of n-type MOSFETs for the chosen process; this creates an n-on-p photodiode junction in the p-type substrate. Since no additional ion implantation is necessary, the process and wafer cost for active-pixel circuit 10 are the same as those of standard, high volume digital electronic products.
Figure 5 illustrates operation of the circuit of Figure 4 during pixel reset. Figure 6 illustrates the operation during readout. In the preferred embodiment, the photodetectors 12 are first reset one row at a time within an array, from bottom to top. Within each row, photodetectors 12 are reset from left to right.
Reset is initiated by fully enabling the row select MOSFETs 18 of the pixels in the selected row, thereby connecting a low-impedance voltage source (located in source supply 30) to one leg of MOSFET 14 for all the pixels in the selected row. As each column in the imaging array is subsequently enabled to multiplex the signal in a format similar to a raster line of video, a current source located in access supply 40 is connected to the drain leg of MOSFET 14. The current source may be an n-type MOSFET 56 driven by bias voltage, Vhias and powered from Vdd. Topologically, the pixel amplifiers in the selected row are now configured as distributed transimpedance amplifiers with capacitive-feedback provided by MOSFET 14's Miller capacitance with the transimpedance amplifier's current source being located in the column buffer. MOSFET 14 thus acts as a transconductance, and reset MOSFET 16 acts as a resistance controlled by the tapered reset supply 50. The series resistance of MOSFET 16 is gradually increased by applying a decreasing ramp waveform (Figure 10) to the gate of MOSFET 16 to give the feedback transconductance of MOSFET 14 the opportunity to null the reset noise (kTC) via feedback. This active-pixel implementation resets within an aperture of tens of microseconds using standard 0.5 micron CMOS technology. -10-
Figure 6 shows the same pixel circuit configured in readout mode. The signals from photodetectors 12 are subsequently read out after the prescribed integration time, one row at a time, from bottom to the top of the array. Within each row, photodetectors 12 are read out from left to right. Readout is initiated by turning on the access MOSFETs 18 of all the photodetectors 12 in a selected row. To enable high- sensitivity readout, one leg of MOSFET 14 is now connected via row bus 22 to low- impedance voltage source Vdd by fully turning on Vbias for MOSFET 56. The other leg of MOSFET 14 is also connected to a current source at the periphery via column bus 20. MOSFET 14 is now a source follower driver so that the amplified signal from each row- selected photodiode 12 is efficiently transferred to column bus 20.
Figure 7 shows a preferred embodiment for source supply 30. Supply voltage VSRC is buffered by a unity gain amplifier 44. To facilitate configuring the active-pixels as transimpedance amplifiers for low-noise reset, the gate 42 of transistor 46 is pulsed by the supply voltage to fully turn on transistor 46 and connect VSRC to the output bus 20. To facilitate active-pixel readout, the gate 42 is pulsed low to open-circuit transistor 46. Current source 48 now supplies the active-pixels with supply current ISRC which is established by a constant voltage Vnbias-
Figure 8 shows a preferred embodiment for access supply 40. A supply voltage Vdd is buffered by a unity gain amplifier 52. To facilitate configuring the active- pixels as transimpedance amplifiers for low-noise reset, the gate 50 of transistor 54 is pulsed by the supply voltage to fully turn off transistor 54 and let current source 56 supply the active-pixels with supply current I^ which is established by constant voltage Vbias- To facilitate active-pixel readout, gate 50 is pulsed low to connect Vdd to the output bus 22. The application of the tapered reset waveform (Figure 10) to the transimpedance amplifier enables the reset noise (kTC noise) envelope to decay before the reset switch 16 (Figure 4) is completely opened. The invention also reduces the fixed-pattern offsets from MOSFET 14 in each pixel because the photodiode node charges to a voltage that cancels MOSFET 14 variations from pixel-to-pixel. By using a -11-
tapered reset, a row is resettable to within several tens of microseconds for full noise suppression, or a shorter time for moderate noise reduction.
Figure 9 shows the generalized small-signal equivalent circuit model for the pixel 10 during reset. This circuit allows calculation of the steady-state noise envelope at the reset node depending on reset switch resistance, Rsw. If the reset voltage is ramped down too slowly, too much time is needed to reset each row and operation at video frame rates becomes problematic. Application to digital still cameras, however, is still quite feasible. If the tapered-reset waveform is ramped down too quickly, then the kTC noise envelope will not decay sufficiently to suppress reset noise before the switch is completely opened.
Figure 9 shows the photodiode 12 node as having a voltage Vj and capacitance d to ground. The amplifier 14 output node has voltage V2, output capacitance Co and output conductance G0 to ground. The capacitance C0 is associated with the entire reset access bus, most of which comes from the MOSFET 14-MOSFET 16 function of all rows. The transconductance of MOSFET 14, possibly degenerated by MOSFET 18, is shown as a controlled current source gmVi. The feedback capacitance, Cfb, is the parasitic Miller capacitance of MOSFET 14. Noise from MOSFET 14 is represented by current source in. Noise from MOSFET 16 (which is operated in the ohmic region) is represented by voltage source Vn. Not included in this simplified model is the noise from capacitive feedthrough of the tapered-reset waveform.
-12-
in 2= ^ 4kT gm
v^ = 4kTRsw
Using the small-signal equivalent circuit, a simplified noise formula can be derived since:
Assuming that the amplifier's dc gain, AdC, is much greater than 1, then the rms reset noise is:
Qn ≡ V™ amp """ ^sw "l + TC fb
where k, = RswG°Cl and k2 = RswgmCfb Co + Cj C0 + Cj
The tapered-clock waveform's time constant is thus appropriately selected so that the dimensionless quantity (ki + k2) is significantly >1. The reset noise is hence reduced to the much smaller quantity stemming from the transconductance amplifier's feedback capacitance. In the present invention, this feedback capacitance is the parasitic Miller capacitance of MOSFET 14.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention has the approximate design values: 1000x700 format, 7 μm x 7 μm pixel, gm=20 μmho; G0=0.08 μmho, Adc=300; ^=15 fF; C0=3.0 pF and Cfl>=0.3fF. The desired tapered-clock frequency of 25 kHz that is fully compatible with video rate operation hence requires Rsw=50 GΩ and an optimum tapered-clock time constant of 25 μs. This yields k1+k2 :=58 for the preferred embodiment, and an equivalent noise capacitance of 1.8 fF. Since the nominal detector capacitance is 15 fF and kTC noise is proportional to the square root of the relevant capacitance, the reset noise is suppressed from about 55 e- to only 14 e-. -13-
Rsw must be tailored to support any changes in line rate. Increasing the line rate hence requires lower switch resistance. The table numerically illustrates the impact on reset noise as the tapered clock time constant is appropriately shortened. At a time constant of 2.7 μsec, the reset noise degrades to 55 e-.
Impact on Reset Noise for Preferred Embodiment
1 Rsw(GΩ) 50 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.1
2 kl+k2 58 23.2 11.6 5.8 2.32 1.16 0.58 0.12
3 Reset Noise (e-) 14 17 21 26 35 41 47 55
Figure imgf000015_0001
4 τ(μsec) 25 25 24 22 18 14 9.5 2.7
The column bus 20 is preferably monitored by a standard column buffer to read the video signal when it is available. The key requirements on the column buffer are similar to conventional designs having to handle voltage-mode signals and are well known in the art. The clock signal (Figure 10), for reset circuit 10, and clocking of source supply 30 and access supply 40, to facilitate active-pixel reset and readout, is generated on-chip using standard CMOS digital logic. This digital logic scheme thus enables "windowing," wherein a user can read out the imager in various formats simply by enabling the appropriate support logic to clock the appropriate subformat. With windowing, the 1032 x 776 format of the prototype embodiment can be read out as one or more arbitrarily sized and positioned M x N arrays without having to read out the entire array. For example, a user might desire to change a computer-compatible "VGA" format (i.e., approximately 640 x 480) to either Common Interface Format (CIF; nominally 352 x 240) or Quarter Common Interface Format (QCIF; nominally 176 x 120) without having to read out all the pixels in the entire array. This feature simplifies support electronics to reduce cost and match the needs of the particular communication medium. As an example, a personal teleconference link to a remote user having only QCIF capability could be optimized to provide QCIF resolution and thus reduce bandwidth requirements throughout the teleconference link. As a further example, an imager configured on Common Interface Format (CIF) could provide full-CIF images while supplying windowed information for the portions of the image having the highest -14-
interest for signal processing and data compression. During teleconferencing, the window around a person's mouth (for example) could be supplied more frequently than the entire CIF image. This scheme would reduce bandwidth requirements throughout the conference link. Figures 11 and 12 illustrate the noise performance possibilities of the present invention. Figure 11 shows the relation of reset noise Qn in electrons (e-) to variation in the reset resistance (Rsw)- Figure 12 shows the effect of the feedback capacitance CA, on the noise.
Although the present invention has been described with respect to specific embodiments thereof, various changes and modifications can be carried out by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention encompass such changes and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

-15-CLAIMSWhat Is Claimed Is:
1. An active-pixel sensor including a radiation detector in a plurality of active pipe sensors organized into a sensor array, said active-pixel sensor comprising: a transistor amplifier having an input and output, its input connected to said radiation detector for generating an electrical signal output having a magnitude that is a function of the charge input generated by the radiation detector; a switch connected to said transistor amplifier for impressing the electrical signal from said transistor amplifier into an output line; and a variable resistance connected between said transistor amplifier and said radiation detector for resetting the charge input to said transistor amplifier to a predetermined signal level.
2. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 1 wherein said variable resistance comprises a transistor with a first and second leg and a gate connected between said transistor amplifier and said radiation detector by its first and second legs and a tapered reset supply voltage being supplied to its gate.
3. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 1 wherein said switch comprises a transistor with a first and second leg and a gate connected between said transistor amplifier output and the output line by its first and second legs, a row select signal on the gate turning the transistor on.
4. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 2 wherein the tapered reset supply voltage supplied to the gate of the transistor comprises a decreasing ramp waveform commensurately increasing the series resistance of the transistor, whereby reset noise in the sensor is nulled. -16-
5. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 1 where said transistor amplifier is a MOSFET.
6. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 5 wherein said switch is a MOSFET.
7. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 6 wherein said variable resistance is a MOSFET.
8. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 7 wherein said radiation detector is a photodiode.
9. An active-pixel sensor including a radiation detector in a two- dimensional array of active-pixel sensors organized into rows and columns of sensors; comprising: a transistor amplifier having an input and an output, its input connected to said radiation detector for generating an electrical signal output having a magnitude that is a format of the charge at its input generated by the radiation detector; a switch connected to said transistor amplifier for impressing the electrical signal of its output onto a column output line; and a variable resistance connected between said transistor amplifier and said radiation detector for resetting the charge the transistor at its input to a predetermined signal lead.
10. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 9 wherein said variable resistance comprises a transistor with a first leg, a second leg and a gate connected between said transistor amplifier and said radiation detector by the first and second leg, and a tapered reset supply voltage being supplied to the gate.
11. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 9 wherein said switch comprises a transistor with a first leg, a second leg and a gate, connected between the output of said transistor amplifier and the column output line by its first and second legs, a row select signal being supplied to the gate to turn the transistor on. Γûá17-
12. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 10 wherein the tapered reset supply voltage supplied to the gate of the transistor comprises a decreasing ramp waveform commensurately increasing the series resistance of the transistor, whereby reset noise in the sensor is nulled.
13. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 9 wherein said variable resistance is gradually increased during reset, whereby reset noise in the sensor is nulled.
14. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 13 further comprising a source supply connected to a column output line of a two-dimensional array of active-pixel sensor organized into rows and columns of sensors.
15. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 14 wherein said source supply comprises: a voltage source VSRC; a current source ISRC; and means for connecting the voltage source VSRC to said column output line during reset of the sensor, one connecting said current source ISRC to said column output line during readout of the sensor.
16. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 13 further comprising an access supply connected to a row output line of a two-dimensional array of active-pixel sensors organized into rows and columns of sensors.
17. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 17 wherein said access supply comprises: a supply voltage Vdd; a supply current Ibias; and means for connecting the supply current Ibias to said row output line during reset of the sensors, and connecting the supply voltage Vdd to said row output line during readout of the sensors.
18. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 14 further comprising an access supply connected to a row output line of a two-dimensional array of active-pixel sensors organized into rows and columns of sensors.
19. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 18 wherein said source supply comprises: a voltage source VSRC; a current source ISRC; and means for connecting the voltage source VSRC to said column output line during reset of the sensor, one connecting said current source ISRC to said column output line during readout of the sensor.
20. The active-pixel sensor of Claim 18 wherein said access supply comprises: a supply voltage Vdd; a supply current Ibias; and means for connecting the supply current Ibias to said row output line during reset of the sensors, and connecting the supply voltage Vdd to said row output line during readout of the sensors.
PCT/US1999/003364 1998-04-08 1999-02-17 Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with progressive row reset WO1999053683A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP99908192A EP0988749A1 (en) 1998-04-08 1999-02-17 Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with progressive row reset
AU27685/99A AU2768599A (en) 1998-04-08 1999-02-17 Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with progressive row reset
JP55165299A JP2002501718A (en) 1998-04-08 1999-02-17 Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with innovative row reset

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/057,423 1998-04-08
US09/057,423 US6697111B1 (en) 1998-04-08 1998-04-08 Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with progressive row reset

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999053683A1 true WO1999053683A1 (en) 1999-10-21

Family

ID=22010491

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/003364 WO1999053683A1 (en) 1998-04-08 1999-02-17 Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with progressive row reset

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US6697111B1 (en)
EP (1) EP0988749A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2002501718A (en)
AU (1) AU2768599A (en)
TW (1) TW420942B (en)
WO (1) WO1999053683A1 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1175085A2 (en) * 2000-07-17 2002-01-23 Symagery Microsystems Inc. Active pixel sensor array reset
EP1195987A2 (en) * 2000-10-03 2002-04-10 Agilent Technologies Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) Improved image sensor reset circuit for reducing image lag
EP1253781A2 (en) * 2001-04-26 2002-10-30 Fujitsu Limited X-Y address type solid-state image pickup device
EP1507406A1 (en) * 2003-08-11 2005-02-16 Agilent Technologies Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) Image sensor with active reset and randomly addressable pixels
DE10116827B4 (en) * 2000-10-05 2005-02-17 Honda Giken Kogyo K.K. image sensor
US6888572B1 (en) * 2000-10-26 2005-05-03 Rockwell Science Center, Llc Compact active pixel with low-noise image formation
EP1557887A1 (en) * 2004-01-22 2005-07-27 STMicroelectronics Limited Image sensor power supply
US11653117B2 (en) 2019-12-23 2023-05-16 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Imaging device

Families Citing this family (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU9456198A (en) * 1998-09-28 2000-04-17 3Dv Systems Ltd. Distance measurement with a camera
EP0999698B1 (en) * 1998-11-02 2013-06-19 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Solid-state image pickup device and method of resetting the same
US6809767B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2004-10-26 Kozlowski Lester J Low-noise CMOS active pixel sensor for imaging arrays with high speed global or row reset
US6310366B1 (en) * 1999-06-16 2001-10-30 Micron Technology, Inc. Retrograde well structure for a CMOS imager
US6333205B1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2001-12-25 Micron Technology, Inc. CMOS imager with selectively silicided gates
US6727946B1 (en) * 1999-12-14 2004-04-27 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. APS soft reset circuit for reducing image lag
JP2003234961A (en) * 2002-02-06 2003-08-22 Sharp Corp Solid-state imaging device
JP3973083B2 (en) * 2002-02-13 2007-09-05 シャープ株式会社 Solid-state imaging device, pixel defect conversion method thereof, and flaw correction method
US20050068438A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Innovative Technology Licensing, Llc Low noise CMOS amplifier for imaging sensors
US7046284B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2006-05-16 Innovative Technology Licensing Llc CMOS imaging system with low fixed pattern noise
US20060033826A1 (en) * 2004-08-12 2006-02-16 Xinqiao Liu Imaging array having variable pixel size
US7697050B1 (en) 2004-09-07 2010-04-13 Melexis Tessenderlo Nv Active pixel image sensor with low noise reset
US20060077273A1 (en) * 2004-10-12 2006-04-13 Hae-Seung Lee Low noise active pixel image sensor
US7609303B1 (en) 2004-10-12 2009-10-27 Melexis Tessenderlo Nv Low noise active pixel image sensor using a modified reset value
US8319307B1 (en) * 2004-11-19 2012-11-27 Voxtel, Inc. Active pixel sensors with variable threshold reset
US8508638B2 (en) * 2005-03-14 2013-08-13 Intellectual Ventures Ii Llc 3T pixel for CMOS image sensors with low reset noise and low dark current generation utilizing parametric reset
KR100718879B1 (en) * 2005-06-28 2007-05-17 (주)실리콘화일 Unit pixel of image sensor having 2-transistor structure
US7847846B1 (en) 2006-05-16 2010-12-07 University Of Rochester CMOS image sensor readout employing in-pixel transistor current sensing
JP4614286B2 (en) * 2006-06-12 2011-01-19 セイコーインスツル株式会社 Photoelectric conversion device, image sensor, optical reader
US7619671B2 (en) * 2006-07-18 2009-11-17 Aptina Imaging Corporation Method, apparatus and system for charge injection suppression in active pixel sensors
US7944020B1 (en) 2006-12-22 2011-05-17 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Reverse MIM capacitor
US7755679B2 (en) * 2007-03-07 2010-07-13 Altasens, Inc. Apparatus and method for reducing edge effect in an image sensor
US7755689B2 (en) * 2007-10-05 2010-07-13 Teledyne Licensing, Llc Imaging system with low noise pixel array column buffer
US8299513B2 (en) * 2008-04-30 2012-10-30 Omnivision Technologies, Inc. High conversion gain image sensor
US20100252717A1 (en) * 2008-09-29 2010-10-07 Benoit Dupont Active-pixel sensor
US7852124B2 (en) * 2008-11-03 2010-12-14 Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, Llc Low noise correlated double sampling amplifier for 4T technology
JP2013030820A (en) * 2009-11-12 2013-02-07 Panasonic Corp Solid-state image pickup device
JP5470181B2 (en) 2010-07-09 2014-04-16 パナソニック株式会社 Solid-state imaging device
JP5530277B2 (en) 2010-07-09 2014-06-25 パナソニック株式会社 Solid-state imaging device and driving method thereof
US20120049041A1 (en) * 2010-09-01 2012-03-01 International Business Machines Corporation Switched rail circuitry and modified cell structure and method of manufacture and use
US9191598B2 (en) 2011-08-09 2015-11-17 Altasens, Inc. Front-end pixel fixed pattern noise correction in imaging arrays having wide dynamic range
JP6832649B2 (en) 2016-08-17 2021-02-24 ブリルニクス インク Solid-state image sensor, solid-state image sensor drive method, and electronic equipment
US10574913B2 (en) 2017-09-07 2020-02-25 Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, Llc High dynamic range CTIA pixel
FR3089682B1 (en) * 2018-12-05 2020-12-25 Commissariat Energie Atomique PIXEL MATRIX EQUIPPED WITH AN INVERTED VOLTAGE TRACKER
KR20210131795A (en) 2020-04-24 2021-11-03 삼성전자주식회사 Pixel array, and image sensor comprising thereof
JP2024010357A (en) 2022-07-12 2024-01-24 ブリルニクス シンガポール プライベート リミテッド Solid-state imaging device, driving method for solid-state imaging device, and electronic equipment

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5296696A (en) * 1992-01-29 1994-03-22 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Solid state image pickup apparatus and driving method

Family Cites Families (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4249122A (en) 1978-07-27 1981-02-03 National Semiconductor Corporation Temperature compensated bandgap IC voltage references
JPS57184376A (en) 1981-05-09 1982-11-13 Sony Corp Signal output circuit of image pickup device
US4466018A (en) 1981-05-09 1984-08-14 Sony Corporation Image pickup apparatus with gain controlled output amplifier
FR2554622B1 (en) 1983-11-03 1988-01-15 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MATRIX OF ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS
US4794247A (en) 1987-09-18 1988-12-27 Santa Barbara Research Center Read-out amplifier for photovoltaic detector
US5043820A (en) 1989-03-27 1991-08-27 Hughes Aircraft Company Focal plane array readout employing one capacitive feedback transimpedance amplifier for each column
EP0493455B1 (en) 1989-09-23 1994-11-23 Vlsi Vision Limited I.c. sensor
US5083016A (en) 1990-03-27 1992-01-21 Hughes Aircraft Company 3-transistor source follower-per-detector unit cell for 2-dimensional focal plane arrays
US5452004A (en) * 1993-06-17 1995-09-19 Litton Systems, Inc. Focal plane array imaging device with random access architecture
US5471515A (en) 1994-01-28 1995-11-28 California Institute Of Technology Active pixel sensor with intra-pixel charge transfer
US5541402A (en) 1994-10-17 1996-07-30 At&T Corp. Imaging active pixel device having a non-destructive read-out gate
US5576763A (en) 1994-11-22 1996-11-19 Lucent Technologies Inc. Single-polysilicon CMOS active pixel
US5654537A (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-08-05 Symbios Logic Inc. Image sensor array with picture element sensor testability
US6155488A (en) * 1995-08-25 2000-12-05 Psc Inc. Optical reader with adaptive exposure control
US5587596A (en) 1995-09-20 1996-12-24 National Semiconductor Corporation Single MOS transistor active pixel sensor cell with automatic anti-blooming and wide dynamic range
US5608243A (en) 1995-10-19 1997-03-04 National Semiconductor Corporation Single split-gate MOS transistor active pixel sensor cell with automatic anti-blooming and wide dynamic range
US5892540A (en) * 1996-06-13 1999-04-06 Rockwell International Corporation Low noise amplifier for passive pixel CMOS imager
US6002432A (en) * 1996-09-10 1999-12-14 Foveon, Inc. Method for operating an active pixel sensor cell that reduces noise in the photo information extracted from the cell
US6175383B1 (en) * 1996-11-07 2001-01-16 California Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus of high dynamic range image sensor with individual pixel reset
JP3915161B2 (en) * 1997-03-04 2007-05-16 ソニー株式会社 Method for expanding dynamic range of solid-state image sensor with blooming prevention structure and solid-state image sensor
US6344877B1 (en) * 1997-06-12 2002-02-05 International Business Machines Corporation Image sensor with dummy pixel or dummy pixel array
US5917547A (en) * 1997-07-21 1999-06-29 Foveonics, Inc. Two-stage amplifier for active pixel sensor cell array for reducing fixed pattern noise in the array output
US5923369A (en) * 1997-07-23 1999-07-13 Foveonics, Inc. Active pixel sensor cell with differential amplifier and array including same
US5900623A (en) * 1997-08-11 1999-05-04 Chrontel, Inc. Active pixel sensor using CMOS technology with reverse biased photodiodes
US5965871A (en) * 1997-11-05 1999-10-12 Pixart Technology, Inc. Column readout multiplexer for CMOS image sensors with multiple readout and fixed pattern noise cancellation
US5952686A (en) * 1997-12-03 1999-09-14 Hewlett-Packard Company Salient integration mode active pixel sensor
US6493030B1 (en) * 1998-04-08 2002-12-10 Pictos Technologies, Inc. Low-noise active pixel sensor for imaging arrays with global reset

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5296696A (en) * 1992-01-29 1994-03-22 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Solid state image pickup apparatus and driving method

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1175085A2 (en) * 2000-07-17 2002-01-23 Symagery Microsystems Inc. Active pixel sensor array reset
EP1175085A3 (en) * 2000-07-17 2002-05-08 Symagery Microsystems Inc. Active pixel sensor array reset
US7929034B2 (en) 2000-07-17 2011-04-19 Harusaki Technologies, Llc Active pixel sensor array reset
US7142240B1 (en) 2000-07-17 2006-11-28 Psion Teklogix Systems, Inc. Active pixel sensor array reset
EP1195987A2 (en) * 2000-10-03 2002-04-10 Agilent Technologies Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) Improved image sensor reset circuit for reducing image lag
EP1195987A3 (en) * 2000-10-03 2002-05-15 Agilent Technologies Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) Improved image sensor reset circuit for reducing image lag
JP2002152596A (en) * 2000-10-03 2002-05-24 Agilent Technol Inc Image pickup device
DE10116827B4 (en) * 2000-10-05 2005-02-17 Honda Giken Kogyo K.K. image sensor
US6888572B1 (en) * 2000-10-26 2005-05-03 Rockwell Science Center, Llc Compact active pixel with low-noise image formation
USRE43314E1 (en) * 2000-10-26 2012-04-17 Altasens, Inc. Compact active pixel with low-noise image formation
EP1253781A3 (en) * 2001-04-26 2003-08-20 Fujitsu Limited X-Y address type solid-state image pickup device
CN100429926C (en) * 2001-04-26 2008-10-29 富士通株式会社 XY address type solid pick-up device
EP1253781A2 (en) * 2001-04-26 2002-10-30 Fujitsu Limited X-Y address type solid-state image pickup device
EP1507406A1 (en) * 2003-08-11 2005-02-16 Agilent Technologies Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) Image sensor with active reset and randomly addressable pixels
EP1557887A1 (en) * 2004-01-22 2005-07-27 STMicroelectronics Limited Image sensor power supply
US7659498B2 (en) 2004-01-22 2010-02-09 Stmicroelectronics Ltd. Image sensor power supply including at least one ripple rejection circuit for reducing variations in the supply voltage
US11653117B2 (en) 2019-12-23 2023-05-16 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Imaging device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2768599A (en) 1999-11-01
EP0988749A1 (en) 2000-03-29
US6697111B1 (en) 2004-02-24
TW420942B (en) 2001-02-01
JP2002501718A (en) 2002-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6697111B1 (en) Compact low-noise active pixel sensor with progressive row reset
EP1072151B1 (en) Low-noise active pixel sensor for imaging arrays with global reset
US6535247B1 (en) Active pixel sensor with capacitorless correlated double sampling
US6587142B1 (en) Low-noise active-pixel sensor for imaging arrays with high speed row reset
US6532040B1 (en) Low-noise active-pixel sensor for imaging arrays with high speed row reset
USRE43314E1 (en) Compact active pixel with low-noise image formation
US6809767B1 (en) Low-noise CMOS active pixel sensor for imaging arrays with high speed global or row reset
US5892540A (en) Low noise amplifier for passive pixel CMOS imager
JP3724188B2 (en) Solid-state imaging device
US6734907B1 (en) Solid-state image pickup device with integration and amplification
JP4156831B2 (en) Active pixel image sensor
US6965707B1 (en) Compact active pixel with low-noise snapshot image formation
US20050068438A1 (en) Low noise CMOS amplifier for imaging sensors
JP3740840B2 (en) Solid-state imaging device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1999 551652

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1999908192

Country of ref document: EP

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1999908192

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1999908192

Country of ref document: EP