METHODS OF DELIVERING GLP-1
RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to United States Provisional Application 60/081,562, filed April 13, 1998.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the treatment of non-insulin dependent diabetes by delivery of glucagon-like peptide-l-(7-37) (hereinafter GLP-1") and muteins thereof (particularly the Gly8 mutein) at a time and dose sufficient cause therapeutic regulation of glucose levels within a mammal. Preferably, the GLP-1 is delivered using encapsulated GLP-1 secreting cells.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Loss of glucose-induced insulin secretion by pancreatic beta cells is a major characteristic of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus ("type II diabetes"). In the treatment of type II diabetes, when diet and exercise are no longer able to correct the diabetic syndrome, postprandial insulin secretion is stimulated by administration of insulin secretagogues such as, for example, sulfonylureas. These substances stimulate insulin secretion by directly inhibiting the activity of the potassium- ATP channel. After several years of treatment, however, the initial efficacy of sulfonylureas often begins to diminish. This has been attributed to beta cell exhaustion resulting from the action of the sulfonylureas solely on the stimulation of insulin secretion without a concomitant positive effect on insulin biosynthesis. At present, this limitation to
treatment with the sulfonylureas has not been overcome and new clinically useful insulin secretagogues are therefore required
One new insulin secretagogue currently being investigated is GLP-1. To date, GLP-1 is perhaps the most potent insulinotropic hormone to be characterized and is widely considered as a potential successful new agent for the treatment of type II diabetes, in part, because its activity is preserved in patients with this disease. One limitation to its therapeutic use, however, is its very short in vivo half life of approximately five minutes, which is due, in part, to rapid degradation by the endoprotease dipeptidylpeptidase IV. Several studies have been carried out to evaluate the therapeutic potential of
GLP-1 in the control of diabetic hyperglycemia in human patients. See, for example, Gutniak, M., Orskov, C, Hoist, J.J., Ahren, B., & Efendic, S. Antidiabetogenic effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36) amide in normal subjects and patients with diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 326, 1316-22 (1992). In initial clinical tests, GLP-1 was given intravenously either as a bolus at the beginning of a meal or as continuous infusion over the time of observation. The possible prolonged correction of glycemia after cessation of peptide administration has been recently evaluated.
It has been observed that GLP-1 infused overnight to diabetic patients may lead to correction of basal hyperglycemia, however, discontinuation of GLP-1 infusion just before breakfast was followed by immediate return of glycemia to the diabetic level, indicating no prolonged effect of GLP-1. GLP-1 was also administrated either as subcutaneous injections or as buccal tablets. This led to a good correction of the glycemic excursions but the therapeutic efficacy of the peptide was short-lived.
Habener, United States Patent 5,614,492, incorporated herein by reference, refers to treating type II diabetes with GLP-1. Additionally, several muteins of GLP-1 have been isolated for use in treating type II diabetes. See, e.g. U.S. Patent Νos. 5,118,666; 5,120,712; 5,545,618 (all by Habener) and PCT patent application WO 97/29180, each incorporated herein by reference.
Again, however, the route of administration suggested in those patents (i.e., via i.v. infusion), is done concurrently with the meal because of the short half-life of the peptide in vivo. Thus, a deficiency in the art remains.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention provides a method and devices for treating type II diabetes by administering over various time courses a specified continuous dose of a GLP-1 or mutein thereof, to a patient, preferably a GLP-1 mutein having a glycine substitute for alanine at position 8 ("GLP- 1 -Gly8") .
In one embodiment, GLP-1 , or preferably a GLP-1 mutein, most preferably GLP-1-Glyg (having a relatively long half-life) is delivered into the patient at a specified time before a meal. Preferably, the specified time is between 4.0 hours and 0.5 hours before the meal ("pre-prandially"). Most preferably, the GLP-1 mutein is delivered to the patient 0.5 hours pre-prandially. If injected, we contemplate a dosage of GLP-1 or GLP-1 mutein at a rate of about 10-70 μg/day, most preferably 20-50 μg/day (assuming an 80 kg person).
In another embodiment, the GLP-1 is administered by implanting cells or tissue that secrete the GLP-1 or GLP-1 mutein into the patient. In a further embodiment, the GLP-1 secreting cells are encapsulated in at least one device, which is implanted into the patient. While any suitable systemic implantation site is contemplated, we prefer implantion intraperitoneally into the patient.
When delivery is continuous (e.g., using implanted cells or continuous pump, preferably implanted cells, most preferably encapsulated implanted cells), we contemplate providing a continuous dosage of GLP- 1 at a rate of about 0.1 - 80 μg/day (assuming a 90 kg person), preferably 0.5- 2.5 μg/day (assuming an 90 kg person).
In another embodiment, when delivery is continuous (e.g., using implanted cells or continuous pump, preferably implanted cells, most preferably encapsulated implanted cells), we contemplate providing a continuous dosage of GLP-1 mutein (preferably the GLP-1-Gly8 mutein) at a rate of about 0.0125 - 2.5 μg/day (assuming a 90 kg person), preferably 0.05- 2.0 μg/day (assuming an 90 kg person).
In another embodiment, when GLP-1 or a GLP-1 mutein is administered continuously, weight gain associated with Type II diabetes is markedly reduced.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 shows a strategy for creating a multimeric IgSP-GLP-l-IP2 expression cassette.
Fig. 2 shows various plasmid maps for construction of a multimeric IgSP-GLP- 1-IP2 expression cassette.
Fig. 3 shows a list of multimeric GLP-1 expression cassettes.
Fig. 4 shows GLP-1 secretion from BHK cells transfected with a multimeric GLP-1 expression cassette.
Fig. 5 shows regulation of blood glucose in diabetic and non-diabetic control rats, as well as diabetic rats implanted with GLP-1 secreting encapsulated cell devices.
Fig. 6 shows weight gain over time in diabetic and non-diabetic control rats, as well as diabetic rats implanted with GLP-1 secreting encapsulated cell devices.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Glucagon is a 29 amino acid hormone produced in human A-cells of the pancreas. It acts principally to promote glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, which causes an increase in the level of blood sugar. Glucagon binds to specific cell-surface receptors found on insulin producing cells. Upon binding glucagon stimulates rapid synthesis of cyclic adenosine monophosphate cAMP, which in turn causes the level of insulin to rise. As the level of insulin rises, it down regulates the production of glucagon, thus completing the feedback loop. In this manner, the expression of glucagon is regulated by insulin which is ultimately regulated by glucose blood levels. Glucagon is translated from a 630 base pair gene to form the precursor preproglucagon, which is subsequently post-translationally truncated to proglucagon. Proglucagon is subsequently cleaved into three discrete highly homologous individual peptides called glucagon, glucagon-like protein 1, and glucagon-like protein 2. GLP-1 and GLP -2 are 37 and 34 amino acids respectively and are found in the pancreas. By GLP-1 we mean the amino acid sequence of human wild type GLP-1 as presented in United States patents 5,118,666; 5,120,712; 5,545618 and 5,614,492, each incorporated herein by reference. The GLP-1-Gly8 mutein preferred in the present invention has substitution of the alanine normally present at the second position of GLP-1 by a glycine (and otherwise has the amino acid sequence of wild type GLP-1). This substitution confers resistance to the peptide from hydrolysis by the purified dipeptidyalpeptidase IV ("DPPIV") enzyme and preserves biological activity of the mutant peptide incubated for up to 72 hours in the presence of FBS, which naturally contains the DPPIV enzyme compared to the decreased activity of the wild-type peptide
under identical conditions. Importantly, this Ala to Gly substitution did not change the binding affinity nor the capacity of the peptide to activate the production of cAMP. The effectiveness of the DPPIV-resistant form of the mutein peptide to control glycemic levels in glucose intolerant mice was demonstrated the following by several experiments.
First, when injected at 30 minutes after the initiation of an interperitoneal glucose tolerance test ("IPGTT"), GLP-1-Gly8 showed an approximately 10-fold more potent therapeutic effect with 0.1 nanomole of the mutant peptide giving the same glycemic correction as 1 nanomole of GLP-1. This effect was mediated by the insulinotropic effect of the peptide since insulin levels rose and glucagon levels decreased 30 minutes after injection of the mutant peptide.
Second, pre-injection of one nanomole of GLP-1-Gly8 up to 4 hours before initiation of the IPGTT completely corrected the glucose intolerance whereas the same amount of GLP-1 had no effect even when injected 30 minutes before the IPGTT. Third, when injected 2 hours before the IPGTT, 0.3 nanomole completely corrected the glucose intolerance and 0.1 nanomole had a significant effect.
This improved physiological action of GLP-1 -Gly8 was unexpected as previously published data reported that the half-life of GLP-1 -Gly8 incubated in vitro in pig serum was increased by approximately only 6-fold and that its half-life when injected intravenously in pigs was increased by approximately only 3-fold as compared to GLP-1. The basis for the improved biological efficacy of this peptide is so far not known. It may however be due to the fact that cleavage of GLP-1 by DPPIV leads to the formation of GLP-l(9-37). This 9-37 peptide is a low affinity antagonist of the GLP-1 receptor and can be found, in vitro, in a 10-fold excess over GLP-1. Because of its resistance to DPPIV, GLP-1-Gly8 is unlikely to give rise to significant concentrations of this antagonist. This may therefore explain, in part, the persistence of the in vitro efficacy of the mutated peptide.
In addition, a single injection of GLP-1 -Gly8 increased insulin and decreased glucagon plasma levels much more efficiently than GLP-1 and for a prolonged period of time. The improved insulin to glucagon ratio may have significant effects on hepatic gene expression which may lead to long-term control of hepatic glucose production thereby further reinforcing the antidiabetic effect of GLP-1 -Gly8.
As a result, GLP-1-Gly8, due to its resistance to inactivation by DPPIV and probable absence of antagonist production, increases insulin secretion and decreases glucagon plasma levels for a longer time than the natural peptide. These combined effects lead to prolonged improvement of glucose homeostasis, possibly through alteration of gene expression, in particular those coding for enzymes involved in hepatic glucose metabolism.
GLP-1-Gly8 therefore represents a significantly improved form of this incretin hormone since lower doses could be used for the correction of diabetic hyperglycemia and with a more flexible schedule of administration. Thus in one embodiment, a schedule of administration and dosages of GLP-1 -
Gly8 is provided. In this embodiment, the patient is administered preprandially a therapeutic amount of a GLP-1-Gly8 mutein, the mutein having the following formula:
His-Xaa'-Glu-Gly-Thr-Phe-Thr-Ser-Asp-Val-Ser-Ser-Tyr-Leu-Xaa'-Gly-Gln-Ala- Ala-Xaa3-Xaa4-Phe-Ile-Ala-Trp-Leu-Val-Lys-Gly-Arg-Xaa5 (SEQ ID NO 1) wherein
Xaa1 Gly, ;
Xaa2 is Glu, Gin, Ala, Thr, Ser, and Gly;
Xaa3 is Lys, and Arg; Xaa4 is Glu, Gin, Ala, Thr, Ser, and Gly; and
Xaa5 is Gly-OH or is absent;
In this embodiment, the GLP-1 or GLP-1 mutein is delivered preprandially preferably between 0.5 hours and 4.0 hours. More preferably, the GLP-1 or GLP-1 mutein is delivered preprandially at approximately 0.5 hours. We contemplate a number of modes of delivery, including via injection, orally in a pharmaceutically acceptable formulation (preferably in a buccal tablet), or via continuous delivery using slow release polymers or encapsulated cell-based delivery.
In one preferred cell-based delivery embodiment, a continuous dose of GLP-1 or GLP-1 mutein (most preferably GLP-1 -Gly 8) is provided by implanting cells or tissue secreting the GLP-1 or GLP-1 mutein (preferably the mutein of SEQ ID NO. 1, most preferably the GLP-1-Gly8 mutein having a Gly at position 8 and otherwise having the same amino acid sequence as wild type GLP-1) into the patient.
The cells can be implanted either unencapsulated or encapsulated in a semipermeable membrane. If unencapsulated cells are implanted, the patient may need to be treated concommittently with immunosupressive drugs. We prefer use of
encapsulated cells or tissue. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, GLP-1 secreting cells or GLP-1 mutein secreting cells (preferably GLP-1-Gly8 secreting cells) are encapsulated in a semipermeable membrane prior to implantation within the host. The cells continuously secrete the GLP-1 or GLP-1 mutein which passes through the semipermiable membrane into the patient where it exhibits its therapeutic effect.
Many different cell types may be encapsulated in the device disclosed by the present invention. These include well known, publicly available immortalized cell lines as well as dividing primary cell cultures. Examples of suitable cell lines include Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO); baby hamster kidney cells (BHK); mouse fibroblast-3T3 cells; African green monkey cell lines (including COS-1, COS-7, BSC-1, BSC-40, BMT-10 and Vero); rat adrenal pheochromocytoma (PC 12 and PC12A); AT3, rat glial tumor (C6); EGF-responsive neurospheres; bFGF-responsive neural progenitor stem cells derived from the CNS of mammals [Richards et al, PNAS 89: 8591-8595 (1992); Ray et al, PNAS 90: 3602-3606 (1993)]; primary fibroblasts; Schwann cells; astrocytes; β-TC cells,;Hep-G2 cells; oligodendrocytes and their precursors; mouse myoblast cells-C2C12; human glial-derived cells-Hs683; human glial-derived cells-A172; porcine glioblasts; chondroblasts isolated from human long bone; rabbit corneal-derived cells (SIRC), and CAC cells.
In a preferred embodiment, the encapsulated cells are transfected with DNA molecules comprising DNA sequences coding for GLP-1 or a GLP-1 mutein. The
DNA encoding GLP-1 and various GLP-1 muteins, including the GLP-1-Gly8 mutein, are known.
Methods of using encapsulated cells for the delivery of biologically active molecules is disclosed in US patent 5,653,975, herein incorporated by reference. Methods for the use of encapsulated cells to deliver biologically active moieties and to provide metabolic functions (such as removal of harmful substances) are known. See, e.g., US patent 5,800,828, herein incorporated by reference.
Methods for controlling cell distribution within an encapsulation device have also been discussed. See, e.g., US patent 5,795,790, herein incorporated by reference. his invention contemplates encapsulating several different cell types. For example, a patient may be implanted with a capsule device containing a first cell type (e.g., BHK cells). If after time the patient develops an immune response to that cell type, the capsule can be retrieved, or explanted, and a second capsule can be implanted
containing a second cell type (e.g., C2C,2 cells). In this manner, continuous provision of the therapeutic molecules is possible, even if the patient develops an immune response to one of the encapsulated cell types.
In one preferred embodiment myoblasts, most preferably human myoblasts, are transformed with a DNA encoding GLP-1 or a GLP-1 mutein. Schematic representations of GLP-1 -Gly8 expression vectors are provided herein.
Encapsulation hinders elements of the immune system from entering the capsule, thereby protecting the encapsulated cells from immune destruction. The semipermeable nature of the capsule membrane also permits the molecule of interest to easily diffuse from the capsule into the surrounding host tissue. This technique limits the risk of tumor formation inherent in cell-based therapies and allows the use of unmatched human or even animal tissue, without immunosuppression of the recipient. Moreover, the implant may be retrieved if necessary or desired.
As used herein "a biocompatible capsule" means that the capsule, upon implantation in a host mammal, does not elicit a detrimental host response sufficient to result in the rejection of the capsule or to render it inoperable, for example, through degradation.
A variety of biocompatible capsules are suitable or delivery of molecules according to this invention. Such capsules will allow or the passage of metabolites, nutrients and therapeutic substances while minimizing the detrimental effects on the host immune system. Numerous encapsulation devices are known, having various outer surface morphologies and other mechanical and structural characteristics.
Useful biocompatible polymer capsules are comprised of (a) a core which contains a cell or cells, either suspended in a liquid medium or immobilized within an immobilizing matrix; and (b) surrounded or peripheral region of permselective matrix or membrane (jacket) which does not contain isolated cells, which is biocompatible, and which is sufficient to protect isolated cells if present in the core from detrimental immunological attack.
Some transformed cells or cell lines are most advantageously isolated within a capsule having a liquid core. For example, cells can be isolated within a capsule whose core comprises a nutrient medium, optionally containing a liquid source of additional factors to sustain cell viability and function, such as fetal bovine or equine serum.
Alternatively, the core may be composed of an immobilizing matrix which stabilizes the position of the cells. The matrix may be formed from a hydrogels or extracellular matrix molecule (or components thereof), or other suitable material (e.g., non-woven polyester fabrics, foams, or other biocompatible immobilizing material), preferably a biocompatible hydrogel. See, e.g., WO92/19195 and WO95/05452. The term "hydrogel" herein refers to a three dimensional network of cross- linked hydrophilic polymers. The network is in the form of a gel, substantially composed of water, preferably but not limited to gels being greater than 90% water. Compositions which form hydrogels fall into three classes. The first class carrier a net negative charge (e.g., alginate). The second class carrier a net positive charge(e.g., collagen and laminin). Examples of commercially available extracellular matrix components include Matrigel™ and Vitrogen™. The third class is net neutral in charge (e.g., highly crosslinked polyethylene oxide, or polyvinylalcohol). Any suitable matrix or spacer may be employed within the core, including precipitated chitosan, synthetic polymers and polymer blends, microcarriers and the like, depending upon the growth characteristics of the cells to be encapsulated.
Various polymers and polymer blends can be used to manufacture the capsule jacket, including, but not limited to, polyacrylates (including acrylic copolymers), polyvinylidenes, polyvinyl chloride copolymers, polyurethanes, polystyrenes, polyamides, cellulose acetates, cellulose nitrates, polysulfones (including polyether sulfones), polyphosphazenes, polyacrylonitriles, poly(acrylonitrile/covinyl chloride), as well as derivatives, copolymers and mixtures thereof.
In a preferred configuration, the capsule jacket comprises a biocompatible semipermeable hollow fiber membrane. Such membranes, and methods for making them are disclosed in United States patents 5,284,761 and 5,158,881, herein incorporated by reference. In a preferred embodiment, the capsule jacket is formed from a polyether sulfone hollow fiber, such as those described in United States Patent Nos. 4,976,859 and 4,968,733, herein incorporated by reference. An alternate preferred jacket material is poly(acrylonitrile/covinyl chloride). Preferably, the capsules are immunoisolatory. To be immunoisolatory, the surrounding or peripheral region of the capsule should confer protection of the cells from the immune system of the host in whom the capsule is implanted, by preventing
harmful substances of the host's body from entering the core of the vehicle, and by providing a physical barrier sufficient to prevent detrimental immunological contact between the isolated cells and the host's immune system. The thickness of this physical barrier can vary, but it will always be sufficiently thick to prevent direct contact between the cells and/or substances on either side of the barrier. The thickness of this region generally ranges between 5 and 200 microns; thicknesses of 10 to 100 microns are preferred, and thickness of 20 to 75 microns are particularly preferred. Types of immunological attach which can be prevented or minimized by the use of the instant vehicle include attack by macrophages, neutrophils, cellular immune responses (e.g. natural killer cells adn antibody-dependent T cell-mediated cyto lysis (ADCC), and humoral response (e.g., antibody-dependent, complement-mediated cytolysis).
An immunoisolatory capsule can be used for the delivery, even from xenogeneic cells, of products having a wide range of molecular sizes. Accordingly, nominal molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) values from 50 kD up to 1000 - 2000 kD are contemplated. Preferably, the MWCO is between 70-300 kD.
The capsule can be any configuration appropriate for maintaining biological activity and providing access for delivery of the product or function, including for example, cylindrical, rectangular, disk-shaped, patch-shaped, ovoid, stellate, or spherical. Moreover, the capsule can be coiled or wrapped into a mesh-like or nested structure. If the capsule is to be retrieved after it is implanted, configurations which tend to lead to migration of the capsules from the site of implantation, such as spherical capsules small enough to travel in the recipient's blood vessels, are not preferred. Certain shapes, such as rectangles, patches, disks, cylinders, and flat sheets offer greater structural integrity and are preferable where retrieval is desired. In one preferred embodiment, the implantable capsule is of a sufficient size and durability for complete retrieval after implantation, and preferably the device has a tether that aides in retrieval. Such tethers are well known in the art. Such macrocapsules have a core of a preferable minimum volume of about 1 to 10 μl and depending upon use are easily fabricated to have a volume in excess of 100 μl. In a hollow fiber configuration, the fiber will have an inside diameter of less than 1500 microns, preferably between 300-900 microns. In either geometry, the hydraulic permeability will be in the rate of 25 to 70 mls/min m2/mmHg. The glucose
mass transfer coefficient of the capsule, defined, measured and calculated as described by Dionne et al., ASAIO Abstracts, p. 99 (1993), and Colton et al., The Kidney, eds., Brenner BM and Rector FC, pp. 2425-89 (1981) will be greater than 10"6 cm sec, preferably greater than 10"4 cm/sec. Cell loading density may be varied over a wide range. We contemplate encapsulation of between 104 to 109, preferably 105 to 108 cells, in each device. Cells, either in aqueous solution or in a supporting matrix (e.g., a hydrogel, extracellular matrix components or supporting or immobilizing matrix), are then injected into the membrane and the ends of the device are sealed. Any suitable method of sealing the capsules may be used, including the employment of polymer adhesives and/or crimping, knotting and heat sealing. These sealing techniques are known in the art. In addition, any suitable "dry" sealing method can also be used, as described in United States patent 5,738,673, incorporated herein by reference. In such methods, a substantially non-porous fitting is provided through which the cell-containing solution is introduced. Subsequent to filling, the capsule is sealed.
The methods and devices of this invention are intended for use in a mammalian host, recipient, patient, subject or individual, preferably a primate, most preferably a human. A number of different implantation sites are contemplated for the devices and methods of this invention. These implantation sites include systemic implantation, including subcutaneous (preferable), intraperitoneal (also preferable), intravenous, or intramuscular implantation, and implantation into the central nervous system, including the brain, spinal cord, and aqueous and vitreous humors of the eye, intrathecally, and into the lateral ventricles. When delivery is continuous (e.g., using implanted cells or continuous pump, preferably implanted cells, most preferably encapsulated implanted cells), we contemplate providing a continuous dosage of GLP-1 at a rate of about 0.1 - 80 μg/day (assuming a 90 kg person), preferably 0.5- 2.5 μg/day (assuming an 90 kg person).
In another embodiment, when delivery is continuous (e.g., using implanted cells or continuous pump, preferably implanted cells, most preferably encapsulated implanted cells), we contemplate providing a continuous dosage of GLP-1 mutein
(preferably the GLP-1-Gly8 mutein) at a rate of about 0.0125 - 2.5 μg/day (assuming a 90 kg person), preferably 0.05- 2.0 μg/day (assuming an 90 kg person).
The actual dosage can be varied by any suitable method known in the art, including, e.g., by implanting a fewer or greater number of capsules. For macrocapsular delivery, we prefer between one and ten capsules.
The following examples are presented in order to more fully illustrate the preferred embodiments of the invention. These examples should in no way be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
EXAMPLES Example 1: Resistance of GLP-1-Gly8 to Dipeptidylpeptidase IV
GLP-1, GLP-1 -Gly8 and diprotin A were purchased from Bachem, Switzerland, and were HPLC purified to 97%. Peptides were incubated in the presence of 20μM of purified DPPIV in a total volume of 50μl of 25 mM triethanolamine pH 7.8 for 15 min at 37°C. The incubation reaction was then acidified and peptides analyzed by HPLC using a Nucleosil phenyl reverse-phase column (125 x 3.0 mm, Macherey-Nagel, Oensingen, Switzerland) using isocratic elution conditions. The sensitivity of the method allowed the detection of 0.1% of degradation product GLP-1 (9-37). Intact GLP-1 and GLP-1-Gly8 eluted at a retention time of approximately 7.5 minutes. The GLP-l-(9-37) eluted at a retention time of approximately 10.5 minutes. In conditions where as much as 10 % of GLP- 1 was converted to GLP- 1 -(9-39), less than 0.1 %
GLP-1-Gly8 was converted to the truncated from, thus indicating marked resistance of GLP-1-Gly8 to DPPIV.
Alternatively, peptides were incubated, at an initial concentration of lOnM, in DMEM containing 10% FBS, which naturally contains DPPIV, at 37°C for different periods of time and in the presence or absence of 0.2 mM diprotin A, which is an inhibitor of DPPIV. The stability of GLP-1-Gly8 was analyzed by assaying the bioactivity of the remaining peptide by measuring its ability to activate cAMP production in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts that stably express the rat GLP-1 receptor (clone 5 cells). Production of intracellular cAMP in clone 5 cells was induced by adding an aliquot of the incubation medium diluted 1:10 to the cell culture. The activity of the sample was compared to a standard dose-response curve for cAMP
production generated using the corresponding peptide diluted in the same incubation medium.
The half-life of GLP-1 was about 35 hours when incubated in the presence of FBS and was extended to 65 hours when diprotin A was present. In contrast, under the same conditions, GLP-1-Gly8 remained stable for more than 72 hours and was not affected by the presence of diprotin A.
Example 2: Binding of GLP-1-Gly8 to the GLP-1 Receptor
Binding of GLP-1 -Gly8 to the GLP-1 receptor was evaluated in displacement experiments. Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts expressing GLP-1 receptor (Clone 5) cells were incubated in the presence of tracer amounts of radioiodinated GLP-1. Increasing concentrations of wild-type or mutant peptides were added to displace the radiolabeled material. The amount of radioactivity in the cell supernatant was then quantified and plotted vs. peptide concentration. The IC 50s for displacement of bound radioiodinated GLP-1 by GLP-1 or GLP-1-Gly8 were not statistically different (0.41 ±- 0.14 nM vs. 1.39 ±- 0.61 nM, respectively). The data are the mean ± SE of 4 different experiments. Dose dependent induction of cAMP accumulation in clone 5 cells by both peptides also displayed the same EC50s. Again, the data are the mean ± SE of 4 different experiments. The EC50 (nM, mean ± SE) is indicated for both peptides.
Example 3: In vivo studies of GLP-1 and GLP-1 -Gly8 in mice
Six week old male C57Bl/6JIco mice weighing 18 to 20 g were obtained from IFFA Credo, L'Arbresle, France. The mice were fed ad libitum either with normal chow pellets ("NC") or a high fat diet ("HF"). The NC chow had an energy content of 12 % from fat, 28 % from protein, and 60 % from carbohydrates. The HF chow had an energy content of 72 % from fat, 28 % from protein and less that 1 % from carbohydrate. After eight weeks of diet the HF fed mice had a body weight of 30.2 ±- 0.6 grams and the NC fed mice had a body 28.1 ±- 0.3 grams. Over the course of the study, the HF fed mice weighed approximately 30 % more than the NC fed mice, with average body weights of 38.5 ±- 0.8 g to 30.3 ±- 3 g for the HF and NC mice, respectively.
The presence of a diabetic phenotype was determined by measuring blood glucose, glucagon, and insulin for fed mice and fasted mice at various time intervals. Table 1, below, shows that after feeding, blood glucose levels were lower in HF mice than in the NC mice as a result of the absence of carbohydrates from the HF diet. Fasting, however, induced a rapid decrease in blood glucose concentrations in the NC mice whereas in the HF group glycemia remained relatively constant (5.7 ±- 0.2 mM and 7.2 ±- 0.1 mM after six hours fast in NC and HF mice, respectively).
Table 1 shows the results after 24 hours. Insulin levels in the fed state were lower in the HF mice as compared to the NC mice as shown in Table 1. Twenty four hours of fasting decreased insulin concentrations in both groups and insulin levels were significantly lower in the HF group compared to the NC group. Table 1 also shows that glucagon levels in the fed state were higher in the HF group than in the NC mice, but were no different after fasting. Taken together, these data indicate that the high fat feeding induced a diabetic phenotype on the HF mice.
Table 1 : Glucose, insulin, and glucagon levels in fed and 24 hours Fasted C57B1/6J mice after 16-18 weeks of NC or HF diet
* significantly different from the corresponding HF group. PO.05, n≤5.
GLP-1 and GLP-1-Gly8 were also evaluated for their ability to correct the glycemic excursions of HF mice during intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (IPGTT) performed after a five hour period of fasting. To determine blood glucose levels, 2 μl of blood was removed from the tail vein of the mice and glucose level was determined using a glucose meter (Bayer, Zurich, Switzerland). The results were plotted for various time points and the area under the curve was determined ("AUC"). Insulin and
glucagon were analyzed by radioimmunoassays (Linco, St Louis, MO) from blood collected from the orbital sinus of separate sets of animals.
Figure 1 shows the IPGTT curves performed with NC and HF mice. The HF mice show a higher glycemia at the time of glucose injection and a much higher and prolonged increase in blood glucose. This is reflected by the 1.7-fold higher area under the curve for the first two hours. (AUC(0-120) for HF compared to NC mice. Table 2, shown below, presents the blood glucose, plasma insulin and glucagon levels 30 minutes after the initiation of the IPGTT. Glycemia was two-fold higher and plasma insulin was 50% lower in HF compared to control mice and glucagon levels were the same (Table 2). There was thus impaired insulin to glucose and insulin and insulin to glucagon ratios characteristic of type II diabetes. When injected at 30 minutes, one nanomole of GLP-1 led to a correction of the AUC calculated between 60 and 120 minutes. This correction was however not as good as with one nanomole of GLP-1 - Gly8. But similar to that obtained with 0.1 nanomole, of GLP-1 -Gly8. Furthermore, with the mutant, but not with the wild-type peptide, the correction of glycemia was associated with a rise in circulating insulin and a decrease in plasma glucagon measured at 60 minutes after initiation of the IPGTT as shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Plasma hormones and glucose levels in HF fed mice during an
IPGTT.
An IPGTT (1 g/kg body weight) was performed with 5 hours fasted NC or HF mice. 30 minutes after initiation of the test, the HF mice received an i.p. injection of saline, or of saline containing 1 nanomole of GLP-1 or GLP-1 -Gly 8. Glucose, insulin, and glucagon levels were measured at 60 minutes.
Mice HF mice
at 30 min of IPGTT at 60 min of IPGTT after injection at 30 min. of:
NC HF Saline GLP-1 GLP-1-Gly8
Glucose 10.4+0.7* 20.2±1.5 13.5±0.2 l l.l±0.7a 7.2±1.7a (Mm)
Insulin 55.2+6.1* 24.6+4.9 8.010.9 6.8±1.0 25.7±1.2a (μU/ml)
Glucagon 59.1+2.0 53.2±4.0 53.0±3.7 Sl.l±l l.l 38.2±2.9a (pg/ml)
Insulin 5.5 1.2 0.51 0.75 2.44a Glucose ratio
Insulin Glucagon ratio 0.93 0.49 0.15 0.12 0.67a
* : significantly different from the corresponding HF group, p<0.05, n≤5. a : Significantly different from the corresponding HF saline group, p<0.05, n≤ 5.
GLP-1 or GLP-1-Gly8 were then injected into the peritoneal cavity of HF mice at several time points before the initiation of an IPGTT. When preinjected at -30 minutes one nanomole of GLP-1 did not normalize the glucose tolerance whereas one nanomole of GLP-1 -Gly8 completely normalized it. This was quantified by calculating the AUC(0-120) of the glucose tolerance test. The glucose AUC(0-120) was also corrected when one nanomole GLP-1-Gly8 was injected intraperitoneally up to 4 hours, but not 24 hours, before the start of the IPGTT. When administered intraperitoneally 2
hours before initiation of the IPGTT, complete correction of the glucose intolerance could be achieved with 0.3 nanomole of GLP-1 -Gly8 and that a significant effect was still observed with 0.1 nanomole.
The ability of GLP-1 -Gly8 to control glycemia in 5 hours fasted mice was then established. A single injection of one nanomole of GLP-1 -Gly8 could maintain normoglycemia for at least 4 hours whereas the effect of one nanomole of GLP-1 had already vanished after 3 minutes. Alternatively, when GLP-1-Gly8 was injected 2 hours before blood was sampled, normoglycemia was maintained with as low as 0.1 nanomole as shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Effect of GLP1 on fasting blood glucose levels.
C57B1/6J mice fed a NC or a HF diet were fasted for 5 hours before the blood glucose measurements were performed. The mice had previously received 1 nanomole of GLP- 1 or GLP1-Gly8 as i.p. injection at the indicated times before blood sampling or the indicated amount of GLP-1 -Gly8 2 hours before the measurement of glycemia.
* = significantly different from the corresponding not injected HF group, p<0.05, n≤5. a = significantly different from the corresponding saline injected HF group, p<0.05, n≤5.
Example 4 GLP-1 -GIy8 expression plasmid Materials
All restriction, modifying, and Taq polymerase enzymes were purchased from Life-Technologies (Basel, Switzerland). The TOPO-TA Cloning kits were obtained from Invitrogen Corporation (Carlsbad, CA., U.S.A.).
Oligonucleotides
Oligonucleotides were custom synthesized by Life-Technologies (Basel, Switzerland) and/or Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland). Oligonucleotides synthesized for the cloning of the multimeric IgSP-GLP 1 -IP2 expression cassettes included: oMODEX- 1025: 5'-CCCGCTAGCGCGTCACCCCTAGAGTCGAGCTGTG-3'; oMODEX-1026: 5'- TCCCTTCACCATGCGAATTCACCCCTGTAG-3'; oMODEX- 1027: 5'- ACAGGGGTGAATTCGCATGGTGAAGGGACC-3'; oMODEX-1028: 5'- TTTGCGGCCGCTCATCGCCTCCCTCGGCCTTTCACCAGC-3'; oMODEX- 1029: 5'- TCCCTTCAGCATGCGAATTCACCCCTGTAG-3'; oMODEX- 1030: 5'- ACAGGGGTGAATTCGCATGCTGAAGGGACC-3'; oMODEX-1031 h:5'- AGGCCTCCCACGTTCCTCGACTATGGCGAC-3'; θMODEΞX-1032: 5'- TCGCGACATGCTGAAGGGACCTTTACCAGTG-3,; oMODEX-1033: 5'- TCGCGACATGGTGAAGGGACCTTTACCAGTG-3';
Generation of PCR#1 Cassette Containing IgSP-GLPl-IP2:
The IgSP-GLP 1-IP2 chimeric cassette was generated by recombinant PCR. Briefly, oligonucleotides oMODEX- 1025 and -1029 were used to generate the first PCR product A containing the IgSP coding region whereas oligonucleotides oMODEX-1030 and -103 lh were used to generate the first PCR product B containing the GLP1-IP2 coding region. PCR Products A and B were combined for a second PCR reaction using flanking oligonucleotides oMODEX- 1025 and -1031h to generate the recombinant IgSP-GLP 1-IP2 product which was directly cloned into pCR21.-TOPO vector by using the TOPO Cloning Kit (Invitrogen). The resulting clone was named as pl035 (refer to Figure 2) and the nucleotide sequence of the cloned IgSP- GLP 1-IP2 recombinant PCR product was verified to be correct.
The IgSP-GLP 1(G8)-IP2 chimeric cassette was also generated with the same protocol as described above for IgSP-GLP 1-IP2. The oligonucleotides used for the first PCR products A and B were oMODEX- 1025/ 1026 and -1027/1031h while the oligonucleotides used for the recombinant PCR reaction were oMODEX- 1025 and - 1031h. The resulting clone was named as pi 041 (refer to Figure 2) and the nucleotide sequence of the cloned IgSP-GLP 1(G8)-IP2 recombinant PCR product was verified to be correct.
Generation of PCR#2 Cassette Containing GLP1-IP2:
The GLP1-IP2 and GLP1(G8)-IP2 cassettes were generated by PCR using oligonucleotides oMODEX- 1032/103 lh and -1033/-1031h, respectively. The PCR products of GLP 1 -IP2 and GLP 1 (G8)-IP2 were directly cloned into pCR21.-TOPO vector by using the TOPO Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) generating pi 037 and pi 043, respectively (refer to Figure 2). The nucleotide sequences of the cloned GLP1-IP2 and GLP1(G8)-_P2 PCR products were verified to be correct.
Generation of PCR#3 Cassette Containing IP2 :
The IP2 and IP2(G8) cassettes were generated by PCR using oligonucleotides oMODEX-1032/1028 and -1033/-1028, respectively. The PCR products of _P2 and IP2(G8) were directly cloned into pCR21.-TOPO vector by using the TOPO Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) generating pl039 and pl045, respectively (refer to Figure 2). The nucleotide sequences of the cloned IP2 and IP2(G8) PCR products were verified to be correct.
Construction of the Multimeric IgSP-GLPl-IP2 Expression cassette:
The general strategy for generating multimeric GLP1-IP2 coding regions is depicted in Figure 1. For the IgSP-GLP 1-IP2, the basic building blocks are the
PCR#1, PCR#2, and PCR#3 in plasmids pl035, pl037, and pl039, respectively (refer to Figure 2). For the IgSP-GLP 1(G8)-IP2, the basic building blocks are the PCR#1, PCR#2, and PCR#3 in plasmids pl041, pl043, and pl045 (refer to Figure 3). These basic building blocks can be pieced together to generate an unlimited number of multimeric GLP1-IP2 expression cassettes as shown in Figure 1. Table 1 lists the intermediary multimeric GLP1 constructs for both wild type and G8 versions in pCR2.1-TOPO.
Construction of pPI-DN-Based Expression Vectors: The final multimeric GLP1 expression cassettes, designated Final 2, Final 3,
Final 4, and Final 5 were subcloned into the expression vector pPI-DN (refer to Figure 3) generating pi 062, pi 068, pi 079, and pi 085, respectively. Similarly, the final
multimeric GLP1(G8) expression cassettes of Final 2, Final 3, Final 4, and Final 5 were also subcloned into the expression vector pPI-DN generating pi 064, pi 070, pl081, and pl087, respectively (refer to Figure 3). Briefly, the multimeric GLPl expression cassettes were excised out of the pCR2.1-TOPO-based clones by Nhel and Notl digestions and subsequently subcloned into pPI-DN that was also digested with Nhel and Notl. All the resulting clones are in the sense orientation.
Generation of Stable BHK Cell Lines:
All the pPI-DN-based multimeric GLPl expression vectors were stably transfected into BHK cells by using the Lipofectamine Plus (Gibco Life-Technology, MD). Briefly, the selection drug G418 was added to the transfected BHK cells 24 hours after transfection. Stably transfected pi 091 /BHK ells were grown in DMEM plus 10% FBS and 1 mg/ml of G418 for 2 weeks. One hundred thousand cells of each stable BHK cell lines were seeded and pulsed with 1 ml of DMEM plus 10% for 24 hours. The amount of secreted GLPl and GLP1(G8) peptides was analyzed by RIA.
Results
As shown in Figure 4, all versions of multimeric GLPl expression cassettes can direct high levels of GLPl secretion in stable BHK cells. The 2-mer, 3-mer, and 4-mer wild type GLPl expression cassettes were shown to secret GLPl at 40+8, 115+1, and 116+21 ng/million cells/24 hrs, respectively. The 2-mer, 3-mer, and 4- mer GLP1(G8) expression cassettes were shown to secrete GLP1(G8) at 82+7, 250+17, and 441+130 ng/million cells/24 hrs, respectively.
Example 5 Encapsulation of GLP-1 secreting cells
One suitable encapsulation procedure is as follows: The hollow fibers were fabricated from a polyether sulfone (PES) with an outside diameter of 720 μm and a wall thickness of a 100 μm (AKZO-Nobel Wuppertal, Germany). These fibers are described in United States patents 4,976,859 and 4,968,733, herein incorporated by reference. In some studies we use a PES#5 membrane which has a MWCO of about 280 kd. In other studies we use a PES#8 membrane which has a MWCO of about 90 kd.
The devices typically comprise:
1) a semipermeable poly (ether sulfone) hollow fiber membrane fabricated by AKZO Nobel Faser AG;
2) a hub membrane segment; 3) a light cured methacrylate (LCM) resin leading end; and
4) a silicone tether. The semipermeable PES membrane used typically have the following characteristics:
Internal Diameter 500 + 30 μm
Wall Thickness 100 ± 15 μm Force at Break 100 + 15 cN
Elongation at Break 44 + 10%
Hydraulic Permeability 63 + 8 (ml/min m2 mmHg) nMWCO (dextrans) 280 ± 20 kd
The components of the device are commercially available. The LCM glue is available from Ablestik Laboratories (Newark, DE); Luxtrak Adhesives LCM23 and LCM24). The tether material is available from Specialty Silicone Fabricators (Robles, CA). The tether dimensions are 0.79 mm OD x 0.43 mm ID x length 202 mm. The morphology of the device is as follows: The inner surface has a permselective skin. The wall has an open cell foam structure. The outer surface has an open structure, with pores up to 1.5 μm occupying 30 + 5% of the outer surface.
Fiber material is first cut into 5 cm long segments and the distal extremity of each segment sealed with a photopolymerized acrylic glue (LCM-25, ICI). Following sterilization with ethylene oxide and outgassing, the fiber segments are loaded with a suspension of transfected cells in an alginate or collagen solution (Zyderm® soluble bovine collagen) via a Hamilton syringe and a 25 gauge needle through an attached injection port. The proximal end of the capsule was sealed with the same acrylic glue. In some studies the collagen matrix was Zyplast™. The volume of the device contemplated in the human studies is approximately 15-18 μl. A silicone tether (Specialty Silicone Fabrication, Taunton, MA) (ED: 690 μm; OD: 1.25 mm) is placed over the proximal end of the fiber allowing easy manipulation and retrieval of the device.
Example 6 Delivery of GLP-1
As shown in Figure 5, diabetic rats, 33 days post implantion with GLP-1 secreting encapsulated cell devices are able to properly glucose regulate virtually indistinguishable from non-diabetic control, compared with untreated diabetic controls.
In addition, as shown in Figure 6, diabetic rats with GLP-1 secreting device implants showed markedly reduce weight gain compared to diabetic control counterparts.