WO1999003966A1 - Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer - Google Patents

Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999003966A1
WO1999003966A1 PCT/US1998/014100 US9814100W WO9903966A1 WO 1999003966 A1 WO1999003966 A1 WO 1999003966A1 US 9814100 W US9814100 W US 9814100W WO 9903966 A1 WO9903966 A1 WO 9903966A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
agglomerates
detergent
fluid bed
bed dryer
built
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/014100
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Allen Dale Beer
Original Assignee
The Procter & Gamble Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Procter & Gamble Company filed Critical The Procter & Gamble Company
Priority to EP98935559A priority Critical patent/EP1005522B1/en
Priority to AT98935559T priority patent/ATE278765T1/en
Priority to CA002295941A priority patent/CA2295941C/en
Priority to DE69826871T priority patent/DE69826871T2/en
Priority to BR9810716-0A priority patent/BR9810716A/en
Priority to JP2000503174A priority patent/JP2003521548A/en
Priority to US09/462,935 priority patent/US6440342B1/en
Publication of WO1999003966A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999003966A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D11/00Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents ; Methods for using cleaning compositions
    • C11D11/0082Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents ; Methods for using cleaning compositions one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads
    • C11D11/0088Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents ; Methods for using cleaning compositions one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads the liquefied ingredients being sprayed or adsorbed onto solid particles
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D11/00Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents ; Methods for using cleaning compositions
    • C11D11/0082Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents ; Methods for using cleaning compositions one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/06Powder; Flakes; Free-flowing mixtures; Sheets

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to a process for producing a low density detergent composition More particularly, the invention is directed to a process dunng which low density detergent agglomerates are produced by feeding a surfactant paste or liquid acid precursor of anionic surfactant and dry starting detergent matenal sequentially into two high speed mixers followed by a fluid bed dryer which has an optimally selected nozzle height for spraying on a binder
  • the process produces a free flowing, low density detergent composition which can be commercially sold as a conventional non-compact detergent composition or used as an admix in a low dosage, "compact" detergent product BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • the first type of process involves spray-drying an aqueous detergent slurry in a spray-drying tower to produce highly porous detergent granules.
  • the va ⁇ ous detergent components are dry mixed after which they are agglomerated with a binder such as a nonionic or anionic surfactant.
  • a binder such as a nonionic or anionic surfactant.
  • Marume ⁇ zer® This apparatus comprises a substantially horizontal, roughened, rotatable table positioned withm and at the base of a substantially vertical, smooth walled cylinder
  • This process is essentially a batch process and is therefore less suitable for the large scale production of detergent powders
  • other attempts have been made to provide continuous processes for increasing the density of "post-tower” or spray d ⁇ ed detergent granules
  • such processes require a first apparatus which pulve ⁇ zes or g ⁇ nds the granules and a second apparatus which increases the density of the pulve ⁇ zed granules by agglomeration While these processes achieve the desired increase in density by treating or densifying "post tower” or spray d ⁇ ed granules, they do not provide a process which has the flexibility of providing lower density granules.
  • Patent No. 4,900,466 (Lever); France et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,576,285 (Procter & Gamble); and Dhalewadika et al, PCT WO 96/04359 (Unilever).
  • the present invention meets the aforementioned needs in the art by providing a process which produces a low density (below about 600 g/1) detergent composition directly from a surfactant paste and dry starting detergent ingredients.
  • the process involves agglomerating the starting detergent ingredients in a high speed mixer followed by a second high speed mixer. Thereafter, the agglomerates formed in the high speed mixers are agglomerated and dried in a fluid bed dryer in which a liquid binder is sprayed onto the agglomerates from one or more nozzles at a selected height from the distribution plate of the fluid bed dryer.
  • the process does not use the conventional spray drying towers currently used and is therefore more efficient, economical and flexible with regard to the variety of detergent compositions which can be produced in the process. Moreover, the process is more amenable to environmental concerns in that it does not use spray drying towers which typically emit particulates and volatile organic compounds into the atmosphere.
  • agglomerates refers to particles formed by agglomerating detergent granules or particles which typically have a smaller median particle size than the formed agglomerates.
  • median particle size it is meant the particle size diameter value above which 50% of the particles have a larger particle size and below which 50% of particles have a smaller particle size. All percentages used herein are expressed as “percent-by-weight" on an anhydrous basis unless indicated otherwise.
  • a process for preparing low density detergent agglomerates comprises the steps of: (a) agglomerating a detergent surfactant paste or precursor thereof and dry starting detergent material in a first high speed mixer to obtain agglomerates; (b) mixing the agglomerates in a second high speed mixer to obtain built-up agglomerates; and (c) feeding the built-up agglomerates into a fluid bed dryer in which a binder is sprayed via a nozzle having a height of from about 25 cm to about 60 cm from the distributor plate of the fluid bed dryer such that the built-up agglomerates are dried and agglomerated to form the low detergent agglomerates having a density in a range from about 300 g/1 to about 550 g/1
  • another process for prepa ⁇ ng low density detergent agglomerates is provided The process comp ⁇ ses the steps of (a) agglomerating a detergent surfact
  • the present invention is directed to a process m which low density agglomerates are produced by a three step process, the last of which involves a fluid bed dryer containing one or more nozzles positioned at a selected height from the distnbution plate of the dryer.
  • the process forms free flowing, low density detergent agglomerates which can be used alone as the detergent product or as an admixture with conventional spray-dned detergent granules and/or high density detergent agglomerates in a final commercial detergent product.
  • the process desc ⁇ bed herein can be operated continuously or in a batch mode depending upon the particularly desired application.
  • One major advantage of the present process is that it utilizes equipment which can be operated differently from the present process parameters to obtain high density detergent compositions.
  • a single large-scale commercial detergent manufactunng facility can be built to produce high or low density detergent compositions depending upon the local consumer demand and its inevitable fluctuations between compact and non- compact detergent products.
  • a detergent surfactant paste or precursor thereof as set forth in more detail hereinafter and dry starting detergent matenal is inputted and agglomerated in a high speed mixer
  • the dry starting matenal can include only those relatively inexpensive detergent materials typically used in modern granular detergent products
  • Such ingredients include but are not limited to, builders, fillers, dry surfactants, and flow aides
  • the builder includes aluminosi cates, crystalline layered silicates, phosphates, carbonates and mixtures thereof which is the essential dry starting detergent ingredient within the scope of the current process Relatively expensive materials such as Burkeite (Na2S ⁇ 4 «Na2C ⁇ 3) and the various silicas are not necessary to achieve the desired low density agglomerates produced by the process Rather, by selecting the binder and nozzle height through which the binder is sprayed onto the agglomerates in the fluid bed dryer as descnbed in more detail hereinafter, the present process achieve
  • the first step of the process it is preferable to include from 1% to about 40% by weight of undersized detergent particles or "fines" in the first step of the process. This can be conveniently accomplished by screening the detergent particles formed subsequent to the fluid bed dryer to a median particle size range of from about 10 microns to about 150 microns and feeding these "fines" back into the first high speed mixer.
  • the high speed mixer can be any one of a vanety of commercially available mixers such as a Lodige CB 30 mixer or similar brand mixer.
  • These types of mixers essentially consist of a honzontal, hollow static cylinder having a centrally mounted rotating shaft around which several shovel and rod-shaped blades are attached which have a tip speed of from about 5 m/s to about 30 m/s, more preferably from about 6 m/s to about 26 m/s
  • the shaft rotates at a speed of from about 100 rpm to about 2500 rpm, more preferably from about 300 rpm to about 1600 rpm.
  • the mean residence time of the detergent ingredients in the high speed mixer is preferably m range from about 2 seconds to about 45 seconds, and most preferably from about 5 seconds to about 15 seconds.
  • This mean residence time is conveniently measured by dividing the weight of the mixer at steady state by throughput (kg/hr) flow.
  • Another suitable mixer is any one of the vanous Flexomix models available from Schugi (Netherlands) which are vertically positioned high speed mixers. This type of mixer is preferably operated at a Froude Index of from about 13 to about 32. See U.S. Patent 5,149,455 to Jacobs et al (issued September 22, 1992) for a detailed discussion of this well-known Froude Index which is a dimensionless number that can be optimally selected by those skilled in the art.
  • a liquid acid precursor of an anionic surfactant is inputted with the dry starting detergent matenal which at least includes a neutralizing agent such as sodium carbonate
  • the preferred liquid acid surfactant precursor is C ⁇ ⁇ _ ⁇ g linear alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant ("HLAS"), although any acid precursor ot an anionic surfactant may be used m the process
  • a more preferred embodiment involves feeding a liquid acid precursor of C i2-14 linear alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant with a Xo-18 a lkyl ethoxylated sulfate (“AS”) surfactant into the first high speed mixer, preferably in a weight ratio of from about 5 1 to about 1 5, and most preferably, in a range of from about 1 1 to about 3 1 (HLAS AS)
  • the result of such mixing is a "dry neutralization" reaction between the HLAS and the sodium carbonate embodied in the dry starting detergent material, all of which forms agglomer
  • the built-up agglomerates are inputted into a fluid bed dryer in which the agglomerates are dned and agglomerated to a median particle size of from about 300 microns to about 700 microns, more preferably from about 325 microns to about 450 microns
  • the density of the agglomerates formed is from about 300 g/1 to about 550 g/1, more preferably from about 350 g/1 to about 500 g/1, and even more preferably from about 400 g/1 to about 480 g/1 All of these densities are generally below that of typical detergent compositions formed of dense agglomerates or most typical spray-dned granules.
  • a binder as descnbed previously is preferably added dunng this step to enhance formation of the desired agglomerates
  • a particularly preferred binder is liquid sodium silicate in an amount of from about 0 1% to about 20% by weight of the final low density composition
  • the nozzle height through which the binder is added is preferably from about 25 cm to about 60 cm, more preferably from about 30 cm to about 60 cm, most preferably from about 40 cm to about 60 cm, and even more preferably at 40 cm, from the dist ⁇ bution plate of the fluid bed dryer
  • Preferably all of the nozzles used in the fluid bed drying apparatus have such a height arrangement
  • the benefits of the process in this regard can be enhanced by maintaining the spray-on flux of the binder in the fluid bed to be from about 0.02 kg. c ⁇ Xhr to about 0.06 kg/cm ⁇ /hr, more preferably from about 0.04 kg/cnXhr to about 0.05 kg/cm ⁇ /hr.
  • the air inlet temperature in the fluid bed dryer is from about 100°C to about 200°C, more preferably from about 110°C to about 130°C.
  • the unfluidized bed height in fluid bed dryer is preferably from about 5 cm to about 20 cm.
  • the process benefits can be enhanced by maintaining the fluidized air flux in the fluid bed dryer is from about 0.6 kg/m ⁇ /s to about 0.8 kg/m ⁇ /s. It has also been found beneficial to add the binder simultaneously at more than one location in one or more of the steps of the process.
  • the liquid silicate can be added at two locations in the fluid bed dryer, e.g., at or near the inlet port and at or near the exit port.
  • the median binder droplet diameter is from about 20 microns to about 150 microns, a parameter which enhances formation of the desired built-up agglomerates.
  • the ratio of the median binder droplet diameter to built-up agglomerate (exiting the second high speed mixer) particle diameter is preferably from about 0.1 to about 0.6.
  • the process may involve adding the binder to both the second high speed mixer as well as the fluid bed dryer. It has also been found beneficial to add the binder simultaneously at more than one location in one or more of the steps of the process.
  • the liquid silicate can be added at two locations in the fluid bed dryer, e.g., at or near the inlet port and at or near the exit port.
  • the agglomerates are built-up from smaller sizes to large sized particles having a high degree of intraparticle porosity.
  • the degree of intraparticle porosity is preferably from about 20% to about 40%, and most preferably from about 25% to about 35%.
  • the intraparticle porosity can be conveniently measured by standard mercury porosimetry testing.
  • optional steps contemplated by the present process include screening the oversized detergent agglomerates in a screening apparatus which can take a variety of forms including but not limited to conventional screens chosen for the desired particle size of the finished detergent product.
  • Other optional steps include conditioning of the detergent agglomerates by subjecting the agglomerates to additional drying and/or cooling by way of apparatus discussed previously.
  • Another optional step of the instant process entails finishing the resulting detergent agglomerates by a variety of processes including spraying and/or admixing other conventional detergent ingredients.
  • the finishing step encompasses spraying perfumes, brighteners and enzymes onto the finished agglomerates to provide a more complete detergent composition.
  • Such techniques and ingredients are well known in the art.
  • the liquid acid precursor of anionic surfactant is used in the first step of the process, and in optional embodiments, as a liquid binder in the second and/or third essential steps of the process
  • This liquid acid precursor will typically have a viscosity measured at 30°C of from about 500 cps to about 5,000 cps
  • the liquid acid is a precursor for the anionic surfactants desc ⁇ bed in more detail hereinafter
  • a detergent surfactant paste can also be used m the process and is preferably in the form of an aqueous viscous paste, although other forms are also contemplated by the invention
  • This so-called viscous surfactant paste has a viscosity of from about 5,000 cps to about 100,000 cps, more preferably from about 10,000 cps to about 80,000 cps, and contains at least about 10% water, more preferably at least about 20% water
  • the viscosity is measured at 70°C and at shear rates of about 10 to 100 sec "' Furthermore, the sur
  • the surfactant itself, in the viscous surfactant paste, is preferably selected from anionic, nonionic, zwitte ⁇ onic, ampholytic and cationic classes and compatible mixtures thereof
  • Detergent surfactants useful herein are descnbed m U S. Patent 3,664,961, Norns, issued May 23, 1972, and m U S. Patent 3,919,678, Laughlm et al., issued December 30, 1975, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Useful cationic surfactants also include those descnbed in U.S. Patent 4,222,905, Cockrell, issued September 16, 1980, and m U S. Patent 4,239,659, Murphy, issued December 16, 1980, both of which are also incorporated herein by reference.
  • amonics and nomonics are preferred and amonics are most preferred.
  • Nonhmitmg examples of the preferred anionic surfactants useful in the surfactant paste, or from which the liquid acid precursor descnbed herein denves include the conventional C ⁇ ⁇ -C ⁇ alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS"), p ⁇ mary, branched-chain and random CI Q-C20 alkyl sulfates ("AS"), the CJQ-CI g secondary (2,3) alkyl sulfates of the formula CH 3 (CH2) x (CHOS0 3 " M + ) CH 3 and CH 3 (CH 2 ) y (CHOS0 3 " M + ) CH 2 CH 3 where x and (y + 1) are integers of at least about 7, preferably at least about 9, and M is a 510 water-solubilizmg cation, especially sodium, unsaturated sulfates such as oleyl sulfate, and the Cio-Ci g alkyl alkoxy sulfates ("AE X S"; especially
  • exemplary surfactants useful m the paste of the invention include and C10-C18 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates (especially the EO 1-5 ethoxycarboxylates), the ClO-18 gly cer ol ethers, the CI Q-CI. g alkyl polyglycosides and their corresponding sulfated polyglycosides, and C12-C1 g alpha-sulfonated fatty acid esters.
  • the conventional nonionic and amphotenc surfactants such as the Ci 2-C1 g alkyl ethoxylates ("AE") including the so-called narrow peaked alkyl ethoxylates and alkyl phenol alkoxylates (especially ethoxylates and mixed ethoxy/propoxy), C12-C 1 g betaines and sulfobetaines ("sultames”), I Q-C I g amine oxides, and the like, can also be included in the overall compositions.
  • the Cj -C ⁇ N-alkyl polyhydroxy fatty acid amides can also be used. Typical examples include the C ⁇ -Cj N-methylglucamides. See WO 9,206,154.
  • sugar-derived surfactants include the N-alkoxy polyhydroxy fatty acid amides, such as X0-C1 8 N-(3-methoxypropyl) glucamide.
  • the N-propyl through N-hexyl C ⁇ -C j glucamides can be used for low sudsing.
  • C 10X20 conventional soaps may also be used. If high sudsing is desired, the branched-chain C J Q-C I g soaps may be used. Mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants are especially useful.
  • Other conventional useful surfactants are listed m standard texts.
  • the starting dry detergent material of the present process preferably compnses a builder and other standard detergent ingredients such as sodium carbonate, especially when a liquid acid precursor of a surfactant is used as it is needed as a neutralizing agent in the first step of the process.
  • preferable starting dry detergent matenal includes sodium carbonate and a phosphate or an alummosi cate builder which is referenced as an alummosilicate ion exchange material.
  • a preferred builder is selected from the group consisting of aluminosihcates, crystalline layered silicates, phosphates, carbonates and mixtures thereof.
  • Preferred phosphate builders include sodium t ⁇ polyphosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate and mixtures thereof.
  • inorganic phosphate builders are sodium and potassium tnpolyphosphate, pyrophosphate, polymenc metaphosphate having a degree of polymerization of from about 6 to 21, and orthophosphates.
  • polyphosphonate builders are the sodium and potassium salts of ethylene diphosphonic acid, the sodium and potassium salts of ethane 1-hydroxy-l, 1 -diphosphonic acid and the sodium and potassium salts of ethane, 1 , 1 ,2-t ⁇ phosphon ⁇ c acid.
  • Other phosphorus builder compounds are disclosed in U.S. Patents 3,159,581; 3,213,030; 3,422,021; 3,422,137; 3,400,176 and 3,400,148, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • the aluminosilicate ion exchange materials used herein as a detergent builder preferably have both a high calcium ion exchange capacity and a high exchange rate. Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that such high calcium ion exchange rate and capacity are a function of several interrelated factors which denve from the method by which the aluminosilicate ion exchange material is produced.
  • the aluminosilicate ion exchange materials used herein are preferably produced in accordance with Corkill et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,605,509 (Procter & Gamble), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the aluminosilicate ion exchange material is in "sodium" form since the potassium and hydrogen forms of the instant aluminosilicate do not exhibit the as high of an exchange rate and capacity as provided by the sodium form.
  • the aluminosilicate ion exchange material preferably is in over dned form so as to facilitate production of c ⁇ sp detergent agglomerates as described herein.
  • the aluminosilicate ion exchange materials used herein preferably have particle size diameters which optimize their effectiveness as detergent builders.
  • particle size diameter represents the average particle size diameter of a given aluminosilicate ion exchange material as determined by conventional analytical techniques, such as microscopic determination and scanning electron microscope (SEM).
  • the preferred particle size diameter of the aluminosilicate is from about 0.1 micron to about 10 microns, more preferably from about 0.5 microns to about 9 microns. Most preferably, the particle size diameter is from about 1 microns to about 8 microns.
  • the aluminosilicate ion exchange matenal has the formula Na z [(A10 2 ) z .(Si ⁇ 2) y ]xH 2 0 wherein z and y are integers of at least 6, the molar ratio of z to y is from about 1 to about 5 and x is from about 10 to about 264. More preferably, the aluminosilicate has the formula
  • aluminosilicates are available commercially, for example under designations Zeolite A, Zeolite B and Zeolite X.
  • Naturally-occurnng or synthetically derived aluminosilicate ion exchange materials suitable for use herein can be made as descnbed in Krummel et al, U.S. Patent No. 3,985,669, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the aluminosilicates used herein are further charactenzed by their ion exchange capacity which is at least about 200 mg equivalent of CaC0 3 hardness/gram, calculated on an anhydrous basis, and which is preferably in a range from about 300 to 352 mg equivalent of CaC0 3 hardness/gram.
  • the instant aluminosilicate ion exchange materials are still further charactenzed by their calcium ion exchange rate which is at least about 2 grains Ca "H" /gallon/m ⁇ nute/-gram gallon, and more preferably in a range from about 2 grains Ca "H 7gallon/minute/-gram/gallon to about 6 grains Ca ++ /gallon minute/-gram/gallon .
  • Adjunct Detergent Ingredients The starting dry detergent material in the present process can include additional detergent ingredients and/or, any number of additional ingredients can be incorporated in the detergent composition during subsequent steps of the present process.
  • adjunct ingredients include other detergency builders, bleaches, bleach activators, suds boosters or suds suppressors, anti-tarnish and anticorrosion agents, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, germicides, pH adjusting agents, non-builder alkalinity sources, chelatmg agents, smectite clays, enzymes, enzyme-stabilizing agents and perfumes See U S Patent 3,936,537, issued February 3, 1976 to Baskerville, Jr et al , incorporated herein by reference
  • Other builders can be generally selected from the va ⁇ ous borates, polyhydroxy sulfonates, polyacetates, carboxylates, citrates, tartrate mono- and di-succinates, and mixtures thereof Preferred are the alkali metal, especially sodium, salts of the above In companson with amorphous sodium silicates, crystalline layered sodium silicates exhibit a clearly increased calcium and magnesium ion exchange capacity In addition, the layered sodium silicates prefer magnesium ions over calcium ions, a feature necessary to insure that substantially all of the "hardness" is removed from the wash water These crystalline layered sodium silicates, however, are generally more expensive than amorphous silicates as well as other builders. Accordingly, in order to provide an economically feasible laundry detergent, the proportion of crystalline layered sodium silicates used must be determined judiciously
  • the crystalline layered sodium silicates suitable for use herein preferably have the formula NaMS ⁇ x 0 2x + ⁇ yH 2 0 wherein M is sodium or hydrogen, x is from about 1.9 to about 4 and y is from about 0 to about 20. More preferably, the crystalline layered sodium silicate has the formula
  • nonphosphorus, inorganic builders are tetraborate decahydrate and silicates having a weight ratio of S ⁇ Ofact to alkali metal oxide of from about 0.5 to about 4 0, preferably from about 1.0 to about 2.4.
  • Water-soluble, nonphosphorus organic builders useful herein include the vanous alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates and polyhydroxy sulfonates.
  • polyacetate and polycarboxylate builders are the sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylene diamme tetraacetic acid, nit ⁇ lot ⁇ acetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, mel tic acid, benzene polycarboxy c acids, and cit ⁇ c acid
  • Polymenc polycarboxylate builders are set forth in U.S. Patent 3,308,067, Diehl, issued March 7, 1967, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Such matenals include the water-soluble salts of homo- and copolymers of aliphatic carboxyhc acids such as maleic acid, ltacomc acid, mesaconic acid, fuma ⁇ c acid, acomtic acid, citraconic acid and methylene malomc acid Some of these materials are useful as the water-soluble anionic polymer as hereinafter described, but only if in intimate admixture with the non-soap anionic surfactant
  • Other suitable polycarboxylates for use herein are the polyacetal carboxylates desc ⁇ bed in U S Patent 4,144,226, issued March 13, 1979 to Crutchfield et al, and U S Patent 4,246,495, issued March 27, 1979 to Crutchfield et al, both of which are incorporated herein by reference
  • These polyacetal carboxylates can be prepared by b ⁇ nging together under polymenzation conditions an ester of glyoxy c acid and a polymerization initiator The resulting polyacetal carb
  • Bleaching agents and activators are desc ⁇ bed in U S. Patent 4,412,934, Chung et al., issued November 1, 1983, and in U.S. Patent 4,483,781, Hartman, issued November 20, 1984, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Chelatmg agents are also desc ⁇ bed in U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., from Column 17, line 54 through Column 18, line 68, incorporated herein by reference.
  • Suds modifiers are also optional ingredients and are descnbed in U.S. Patents 3,933,672, issued January 20, 1976 to Bartoletta et al., and 4,136,045, issued January 23, 1979 to Gault et al., both incorporated herein by reference.
  • Suitable smectite clays for use herein are descnbed m U.S. Patent 4,762,645,
  • EXAMPLE This Example illustrates the process invention in which a low density agglomerated detergent composition is prepared.
  • a Lodige CB 30 high speed mixer is charged with a mixture of powders, namely sodium carbonate (median particle size 15 microns) and sodium t ⁇ polyphosphate ("STPP") with a median particle size of 25 microns
  • the mixer is operated at 1600 rpm and the sodium carbonate, STPP, HLAS and AES are formed into agglomerates having a median particle size of about 110 microns after a mean residence time in the Lodig
  • a HLAS binder is inputted into the Schugi (Model # FX160) mixer dunng this step which results in built-up agglomerates having a median particle size of about 180 microns being formed Thereafter, the built-up agglomerates are passed through a four-zone fluid bed dryer which is operated at an air inlet temperature of about 125°C and a nozzle height of 40 cm from the distribution plate m the first and fourth zones of the fluid bed
  • the spray-on flux of the sodium silicate in 0.04 kg/cm ⁇ /hr, the unfluidized bed height is 10 cm, and the fluidized air flux is 0.6 kg/ ⁇ Xs.
  • fines are also added to the Lodige CB 30 mixer.
  • liquid sodium silicate is fed into the fluid bed dryer resulting in the finished detergent agglomerates having a density of about 485 g/1 and a median particle size of about 360 microns.
  • the finished agglomerates have excellent physical properties in that they are free flowing as exhibited by their supenor cake strength grades.
  • the composition of the agglomerates are given below in Table I.
  • the agglomerates embody about 14% of fines (less than 150 microns) which are recycled from the fluid bed back into the Lodige CB 30 which enhances production of the agglomerates produced by the process.

Abstract

A process for preparing low density detergent agglomerates having a density in a range from about 300 g/l to about 550 g/l is provided. The process involves the steps of: (a) agglomerating a detergent surfactant paste or precursor thereof and dry starting detergent material in a first high speed mixer to obtain agglomerates; (b) mixing the agglomerates in a second high speed mixer to obtain built-up agglomerates; and (c) feeding the built-up agglomerates into a fluid bed dryer in which a binder is sprayed via a nozzle having a height of from about 25 cm to about 60 cm from the distributor plate of the fluid bed dryer such that the built-up agglomerate are dried and agglomerated to form the desired low detergent agglomerates.

Description

PROCESS FOR MAKING A LOW DENSITY DETERGENT COMPOSITION BY CONTROLLING NOZZLE HEIGHT IN A FLUID BED DRYER
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention generally relates to a process for producing a low density detergent composition More particularly, the invention is directed to a process dunng which low density detergent agglomerates are produced by feeding a surfactant paste or liquid acid precursor of anionic surfactant and dry starting detergent matenal sequentially into two high speed mixers followed by a fluid bed dryer which has an optimally selected nozzle height for spraying on a binder The process produces a free flowing, low density detergent composition which can be commercially sold as a conventional non-compact detergent composition or used as an admix in a low dosage, "compact" detergent product BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Recently, there has been considerable interest within the detergent industry for laundry detergents which are "compact" and therefore, have low dosage volumes. To facilitate production of these so-called low dosage detergents, many attempts have been made to produce high bulk density detergents, for example with a density of 600 g/1 or higher The low dosage detergents are currently in high demand as they conserve resources and can be sold in small packages which are more convenient for consumers However, the extent to which modern detergent products need to be "compact" in nature remains unsettled. In fact, many consumers, especially in developing countries, continue to prefer a higher dosage levels in their respective laundering operations. Consequently, there is a need m the art of producing modern detergent compositions for flexibility in the ultimate density of the final composition.
Generally, there are two primary types of processes by which detergent granules or powders can be prepared. The first type of process involves spray-drying an aqueous detergent slurry in a spray-drying tower to produce highly porous detergent granules. In the second type of process, the vaπous detergent components are dry mixed after which they are agglomerated with a binder such as a nonionic or anionic surfactant. In both processes, the most important factors which govern the density of the resulting detergent granules are the density, porosity and surface area, shape of the vaπous starting matenals and their respective chemical composition These parameters, however, can only be vaned within a limited range. Thus, flexibility in the substantial bulk density can only be achieved by additional processing steps which lead to lower density of the detergent granules. There have been many attempts in the art for providing processes which increase the density of detergent granules or powders Particular attention has been given to densification of spray-dried granules by post tower treatment For example, one attempt involves a batch process in which spray-dπed or granulated detergent powders containing sodium tπpolyphosphate and sodium sulfate are densified and spheromzed in a
Marumeπzer® This apparatus comprises a substantially horizontal, roughened, rotatable table positioned withm and at the base of a substantially vertical, smooth walled cylinder This process, however, is essentially a batch process and is therefore less suitable for the large scale production of detergent powders More recently, other attempts have been made to provide continuous processes for increasing the density of "post-tower" or spray dπed detergent granules Typically, such processes require a first apparatus which pulveπzes or gπnds the granules and a second apparatus which increases the density of the pulveπzed granules by agglomeration While these processes achieve the desired increase in density by treating or densifying "post tower" or spray dπed granules, they do not provide a process which has the flexibility of providing lower density granules.
Moreover, all of the aforementioned processes are directed pπmaπly for densifying or otherwise processing spray dπed granules Currently, the relative amounts and types of matenals subjected to spray drying processes m the production of detergent granules has been limited For example, it has been difficult to attain high levels of surfactant m the resulting detergent composition, a feature which facilitates production of detergents m a more efficient manner. Thus, it would be desirable to have a process by which detergent compositions can be produced without having the limitations imposed by conventional spray drying techniques.
To that end, the art is also replete with disclosures of processes which entail agglomerating detergent compositions. For example, attempts have been made to agglomerate detergent builders by mixing zeolite and/or layered silicates m a mixer to form free flowing agglomerates While such attempts suggest that their process can be used to produce detergent agglomerates, they do not provide a mechanism by which conventional starting detergent matenals m the form of surfactant pastes or precursors thereof, liquids and dry matenals can be effectively agglomerated into cπsp, free flowing detergent agglomerates having low densities rather than high densities. In the past, attempts at producing such low density agglomerates involves a nonconventional detergent ingredient which is typically expensive, thereby adding to the cost of the detergent product. One such example of this involves a process of agglomerating with inorganic double salts such as Burkeite to produce the desired low density agglomerates.
Accordingly, there remains a need m the art to have a process for producing a low density detergent composition directly from starting detergent ingredients without the need for relatively expensive specialty ingredients. Also, there remains a need for such a process which is more efficient, flexible and economical to facilitate large-scale production of detergents of low as well as high dosage levels.
BACKGROUND ART The following references are directed to densifying spray-dried granules: Appel et al. U.S. Patent No. 5, 133,924 (Lever); Bortolotti et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,160,657 (Lever); Johnson et al, British patent No. 1,517,713 (Unilever); and Curtis, European Patent Application 451 ,894. The following references are directed to producing detergents by agglomeration: Beerse et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,108,646 (Procter & Gamble); Capeci et al, U.S. Patent No. 5.366,652 (Procter & Gamble); Hollingsworth et al, European Patent Application 351,937 (Unilever); and Swatling et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,205,958. The following references are directed to inorganic double salts: Evans et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,820,441 (Lever); Evans et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,818,424 (Lever); Atkinson et al, U.S.
Patent No. 4,900,466 (Lever); France et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,576,285 (Procter & Gamble); and Dhalewadika et al, PCT WO 96/04359 (Unilever).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention meets the aforementioned needs in the art by providing a process which produces a low density (below about 600 g/1) detergent composition directly from a surfactant paste and dry starting detergent ingredients. In essence, the process involves agglomerating the starting detergent ingredients in a high speed mixer followed by a second high speed mixer. Thereafter, the agglomerates formed in the high speed mixers are agglomerated and dried in a fluid bed dryer in which a liquid binder is sprayed onto the agglomerates from one or more nozzles at a selected height from the distribution plate of the fluid bed dryer. The process does not use the conventional spray drying towers currently used and is therefore more efficient, economical and flexible with regard to the variety of detergent compositions which can be produced in the process. Moreover, the process is more amenable to environmental concerns in that it does not use spray drying towers which typically emit particulates and volatile organic compounds into the atmosphere.
As used herein, the term "agglomerates" refers to particles formed by agglomerating detergent granules or particles which typically have a smaller median particle size than the formed agglomerates. By "median particle size", it is meant the particle size diameter value above which 50% of the particles have a larger particle size and below which 50% of particles have a smaller particle size. All percentages used herein are expressed as "percent-by-weight" on an anhydrous basis unless indicated otherwise.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a process for preparing low density detergent agglomerates is provided. The process comprises the steps of: (a) agglomerating a detergent surfactant paste or precursor thereof and dry starting detergent material in a first high speed mixer to obtain agglomerates; (b) mixing the agglomerates in a second high speed mixer to obtain built-up agglomerates; and (c) feeding the built-up agglomerates into a fluid bed dryer in which a binder is sprayed via a nozzle having a height of from about 25 cm to about 60 cm from the distributor plate of the fluid bed dryer such that the built-up agglomerates are dried and agglomerated to form the low detergent agglomerates having a density in a range from about 300 g/1 to about 550 g/1 In accordance with another aspect of the invention, another process for prepaπng low density detergent agglomerates is provided The process compπses the steps of (a) agglomerating a detergent surfactant paste or precursor thereof and dry starting detergent material m a first high speed mixer to obtain agglomerates, (b) mixing the agglomerates in a second high speed mixer to obtain built-up agglomerates, and (c) feeding the built-up agglomerates into a fluid bed dryer m which sodium silicate is sprayed via a nozzle having a height of from about 40 cm to about 60 cm from the distributor plate of the fluid bed dryer such that the built-up agglomerates are dried and agglomerated to form the low detergent agglomerates having a density in a range from about 300 g/1 to about 550 g/1 The detergent products made in accordance with any of the process embodiments descπbed herein are also provided.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a process for producing a low density detergent composition directly from starting detergent ingredients which does not include relatively expensive specialty ingredients. It is also an object of the invention to provide such a process which is more efficient, flexible and economical so as to facilitate large-scale production of detergents of low as well as high dosage levels. These and other objects, features and attendant advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the following detailed descπption of the preferred embodiment and the appended claims.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT The present invention is directed to a process m which low density agglomerates are produced by a three step process, the last of which involves a fluid bed dryer containing one or more nozzles positioned at a selected height from the distnbution plate of the dryer. In this way, the process forms free flowing, low density detergent agglomerates which can be used alone as the detergent product or as an admixture with conventional spray-dned detergent granules and/or high density detergent agglomerates in a final commercial detergent product. It should be understood that the process descπbed herein can be operated continuously or in a batch mode depending upon the particularly desired application. One major advantage of the present process is that it utilizes equipment which can be operated differently from the present process parameters to obtain high density detergent compositions. Thus, a single large-scale commercial detergent manufactunng facility can be built to produce high or low density detergent compositions depending upon the local consumer demand and its inevitable fluctuations between compact and non- compact detergent products.
Process In the first step of the process, a detergent surfactant paste or precursor thereof as set forth in more detail hereinafter and dry starting detergent matenal is inputted and agglomerated in a high speed mixer Unlike previous processes in this area, the dry starting matenal can include only those relatively inexpensive detergent materials typically used in modern granular detergent products Such ingredients, include but are not limited to, builders, fillers, dry surfactants, and flow aides Preferably, the builder includes aluminosi cates, crystalline layered silicates, phosphates, carbonates and mixtures thereof which is the essential dry starting detergent ingredient within the scope of the current process Relatively expensive materials such as Burkeite (Na2Sθ4«Na2Cθ3) and the various silicas are not necessary to achieve the desired low density agglomerates produced by the process Rather, by selecting the binder and nozzle height through which the binder is sprayed onto the agglomerates in the fluid bed dryer as descnbed in more detail hereinafter, the present process achieves the desired low density. Further, it is preferable to include from 1% to about 40% by weight of undersized detergent particles or "fines" in the first step of the process. This can be conveniently accomplished by screening the detergent particles formed subsequent to the fluid bed dryer to a median particle size range of from about 10 microns to about 150 microns and feeding these "fines" back into the first high speed mixer. The high speed mixer can be any one of a vanety of commercially available mixers such as a Lodige CB 30 mixer or similar brand mixer. These types of mixers essentially consist of a honzontal, hollow static cylinder having a centrally mounted rotating shaft around which several shovel and rod-shaped blades are attached which have a tip speed of from about 5 m/s to about 30 m/s, more preferably from about 6 m/s to about 26 m/s Preferably, the shaft rotates at a speed of from about 100 rpm to about 2500 rpm, more preferably from about 300 rpm to about 1600 rpm. Preferably, the mean residence time of the detergent ingredients in the high speed mixer is preferably m range from about 2 seconds to about 45 seconds, and most preferably from about 5 seconds to about 15 seconds. This mean residence time is conveniently measured by dividing the weight of the mixer at steady state by throughput (kg/hr) flow. Another suitable mixer is any one of the vanous Flexomix models available from Schugi (Netherlands) which are vertically positioned high speed mixers. This type of mixer is preferably operated at a Froude Index of from about 13 to about 32. See U.S. Patent 5,149,455 to Jacobs et al (issued September 22, 1992) for a detailed discussion of this well-known Froude Index which is a dimensionless number that can be optimally selected by those skilled in the art.
In a preferred embodiment of the process invention, a liquid acid precursor of an anionic surfactant is inputted with the dry starting detergent matenal which at least includes a neutralizing agent such as sodium carbonate The preferred liquid acid surfactant precursor is Cι ι_ι g linear alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant ("HLAS"), although any acid precursor ot an anionic surfactant may be used m the process A more preferred embodiment involves feeding a liquid acid precursor of C i2-14 linear alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant with a Xo-18 alkyl ethoxylated sulfate ("AS") surfactant into the first high speed mixer, preferably in a weight ratio of from about 5 1 to about 1 5, and most preferably, in a range of from about 1 1 to about 3 1 (HLAS AS) The result of such mixing is a "dry neutralization" reaction between the HLAS and the sodium carbonate embodied in the dry starting detergent material, all of which forms agglomerates It is preferable to add the HLAS before the addition of other surfactants such as AS or alkyl ethoxylate sulfate ("AES") surfactants so as to insure optimal mixing and neutralization of the HLAS in the first high speed mixer In the second step of the process, the detergent agglomerates formed m the first step are inputted into a second high speed mixer which can be the same piece of equipment as used in the first step or a different type of high speed mixer For example, a Lodige CB mixer can be used in the first step while a Schugi mixer is used in the second step In this second process step, the agglomerates are mixed and built-up further in a controlled fashion In this step, a sufficient amount of binder can be inputted to facilitate agglomeration build-up in the mixer Typical binders include liquid sodium silicate, a liquid acid precursor of an anionic surfactant such as HLAS, nonionic surfactant, polyethylene glycol or mixtures thereof
In the next step of the process, the built-up agglomerates are inputted into a fluid bed dryer in which the agglomerates are dned and agglomerated to a median particle size of from about 300 microns to about 700 microns, more preferably from about 325 microns to about 450 microns The density of the agglomerates formed is from about 300 g/1 to about 550 g/1, more preferably from about 350 g/1 to about 500 g/1, and even more preferably from about 400 g/1 to about 480 g/1 All of these densities are generally below that of typical detergent compositions formed of dense agglomerates or most typical spray-dned granules.
A binder as descnbed previously is preferably added dunng this step to enhance formation of the desired agglomerates In this regard, a particularly preferred binder is liquid sodium silicate in an amount of from about 0 1% to about 20% by weight of the final low density composition The nozzle height through which the binder is added is preferably from about 25 cm to about 60 cm, more preferably from about 30 cm to about 60 cm, most preferably from about 40 cm to about 60 cm, and even more preferably at 40 cm, from the distπbution plate of the fluid bed dryer Preferably all of the nozzles used in the fluid bed drying apparatus have such a height arrangement Unexpectedly, it has been found that by selecting the nozzle height to be within the aforementioned ranges, supeπor low density agglomerates are produced in the process from both a low density and free flowability standpoint.
Additionally, the benefits of the process in this regard can be enhanced by maintaining the spray-on flux of the binder in the fluid bed to be from about 0.02 kg. cπXhr to about 0.06 kg/cm^/hr, more preferably from about 0.04 kg/cnXhr to about 0.05 kg/cm^/hr. Preferably, the air inlet temperature in the fluid bed dryer is from about 100°C to about 200°C, more preferably from about 110°C to about 130°C. Also, the unfluidized bed height in fluid bed dryer is preferably from about 5 cm to about 20 cm. It has also been found that the process benefits can be enhanced by maintaining the fluidized air flux in the fluid bed dryer is from about 0.6 kg/m^/s to about 0.8 kg/m^/s. It has also been found beneficial to add the binder simultaneously at more than one location in one or more of the steps of the process. For example, the liquid silicate can be added at two locations in the fluid bed dryer, e.g., at or near the inlet port and at or near the exit port. Also, the median binder droplet diameter is from about 20 microns to about 150 microns, a parameter which enhances formation of the desired built-up agglomerates. Further in this regard, the ratio of the median binder droplet diameter to built-up agglomerate (exiting the second high speed mixer) particle diameter is preferably from about 0.1 to about 0.6.
Optionally, the process may involve adding the binder to both the second high speed mixer as well as the fluid bed dryer. It has also been found beneficial to add the binder simultaneously at more than one location in one or more of the steps of the process. For example, the liquid silicate can be added at two locations in the fluid bed dryer, e.g., at or near the inlet port and at or near the exit port. As with the first and second steps of the process, the agglomerates are built-up from smaller sizes to large sized particles having a high degree of intraparticle porosity. The degree of intraparticle porosity is preferably from about 20% to about 40%, and most preferably from about 25% to about 35%. The intraparticle porosity can be conveniently measured by standard mercury porosimetry testing.
Other optional steps contemplated by the present process include screening the oversized detergent agglomerates in a screening apparatus which can take a variety of forms including but not limited to conventional screens chosen for the desired particle size of the finished detergent product. Other optional steps include conditioning of the detergent agglomerates by subjecting the agglomerates to additional drying and/or cooling by way of apparatus discussed previously.
Another optional step of the instant process entails finishing the resulting detergent agglomerates by a variety of processes including spraying and/or admixing other conventional detergent ingredients. For example, the finishing step encompasses spraying perfumes, brighteners and enzymes onto the finished agglomerates to provide a more complete detergent composition. Such techniques and ingredients are well known in the art.
Detergent Surfactant Paste or Precursor The liquid acid precursor of anionic surfactant is used in the first step of the process, and in optional embodiments, as a liquid binder in the second and/or third essential steps of the process This liquid acid precursor will typically have a viscosity measured at 30°C of from about 500 cps to about 5,000 cps The liquid acid is a precursor for the anionic surfactants descπbed in more detail hereinafter A detergent surfactant paste can also be used m the process and is preferably in the form of an aqueous viscous paste, although other forms are also contemplated by the invention This so-called viscous surfactant paste has a viscosity of from about 5,000 cps to about 100,000 cps, more preferably from about 10,000 cps to about 80,000 cps, and contains at least about 10% water, more preferably at least about 20% water The viscosity is measured at 70°C and at shear rates of about 10 to 100 sec "' Furthermore, the surfactant paste, if used, preferably compnses a detersive surfactant in the amounts specified previously and the balance water and other conventional detergent ingredients. The surfactant itself, in the viscous surfactant paste, is preferably selected from anionic, nonionic, zwitteπonic, ampholytic and cationic classes and compatible mixtures thereof Detergent surfactants useful herein are descnbed m U S. Patent 3,664,961, Norns, issued May 23, 1972, and m U S. Patent 3,919,678, Laughlm et al., issued December 30, 1975, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Useful cationic surfactants also include those descnbed in U.S. Patent 4,222,905, Cockrell, issued September 16, 1980, and m U S. Patent 4,239,659, Murphy, issued December 16, 1980, both of which are also incorporated herein by reference. Of the surfactants, amonics and nomonics are preferred and amonics are most preferred.
Nonhmitmg examples of the preferred anionic surfactants useful in the surfactant paste, or from which the liquid acid precursor descnbed herein denves, include the conventional C\ \-C\ alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS"), pπmary, branched-chain and random CI Q-C20 alkyl sulfates ("AS"), the CJQ-CI g secondary (2,3) alkyl sulfates of the formula CH3(CH2)x(CHOS03 "M+) CH3 and CH3 (CH2)y(CHOS03 "M+) CH2CH3 where x and (y + 1) are integers of at least about 7, preferably at least about 9, and M is a 510 water-solubilizmg cation, especially sodium, unsaturated sulfates such as oleyl sulfate, and the Cio-Ci g alkyl alkoxy sulfates ("AEXS"; especially EO 1-7 ethoxy sulfates).
Optionally, other exemplary surfactants useful m the paste of the invention include and C10-C18 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates (especially the EO 1-5 ethoxycarboxylates), the ClO-18 glycerol ethers, the CI Q-CI. g alkyl polyglycosides and their corresponding sulfated polyglycosides, and C12-C1 g alpha-sulfonated fatty acid esters. If desired, the conventional nonionic and amphotenc surfactants such as the Ci 2-C1 g alkyl ethoxylates ("AE") including the so-called narrow peaked alkyl ethoxylates and
Figure imgf000013_0001
alkyl phenol alkoxylates (especially ethoxylates and mixed ethoxy/propoxy), C12-C 1 g betaines and sulfobetaines ("sultames"), I Q-C I g amine oxides, and the like, can also be included in the overall compositions. The Cj -C^ N-alkyl polyhydroxy fatty acid amides can also be used. Typical examples include the C^-Cj N-methylglucamides. See WO 9,206,154. Other sugar-derived surfactants include the N-alkoxy polyhydroxy fatty acid amides, such as X0-C1 8 N-(3-methoxypropyl) glucamide. The N-propyl through N-hexyl C^-Cj glucamides can be used for low sudsing. C 10X20 conventional soaps may also be used. If high sudsing is desired, the branched-chain C J Q-C I g soaps may be used. Mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants are especially useful. Other conventional useful surfactants are listed m standard texts.
Dry Detergent Matenal The starting dry detergent material of the present process preferably compnses a builder and other standard detergent ingredients such as sodium carbonate, especially when a liquid acid precursor of a surfactant is used as it is needed as a neutralizing agent in the first step of the process. Thus, preferable starting dry detergent matenal includes sodium carbonate and a phosphate or an alummosi cate builder which is referenced as an alummosilicate ion exchange material. A preferred builder is selected from the group consisting of aluminosihcates, crystalline layered silicates, phosphates, carbonates and mixtures thereof. Preferred phosphate builders include sodium tπpolyphosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate and mixtures thereof. Additional specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders are sodium and potassium tnpolyphosphate, pyrophosphate, polymenc metaphosphate having a degree of polymerization of from about 6 to 21, and orthophosphates. Examples of polyphosphonate builders are the sodium and potassium salts of ethylene diphosphonic acid, the sodium and potassium salts of ethane 1-hydroxy-l, 1 -diphosphonic acid and the sodium and potassium salts of ethane, 1 , 1 ,2-tπphosphonιc acid. Other phosphorus builder compounds are disclosed in U.S. Patents 3,159,581; 3,213,030; 3,422,021; 3,422,137; 3,400,176 and 3,400,148, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The aluminosilicate ion exchange materials used herein as a detergent builder preferably have both a high calcium ion exchange capacity and a high exchange rate. Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that such high calcium ion exchange rate and capacity are a function of several interrelated factors which denve from the method by which the aluminosilicate ion exchange material is produced. In that regard, the aluminosilicate ion exchange materials used herein are preferably produced in accordance with Corkill et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,605,509 (Procter & Gamble), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Preferably, the aluminosilicate ion exchange material is in "sodium" form since the potassium and hydrogen forms of the instant aluminosilicate do not exhibit the as high of an exchange rate and capacity as provided by the sodium form. Additionally, the aluminosilicate ion exchange material preferably is in over dned form so as to facilitate production of cπsp detergent agglomerates as described herein. The aluminosilicate ion exchange materials used herein preferably have particle size diameters which optimize their effectiveness as detergent builders. The term "particle size diameter" as used herein represents the average particle size diameter of a given aluminosilicate ion exchange material as determined by conventional analytical techniques, such as microscopic determination and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The preferred particle size diameter of the aluminosilicate is from about 0.1 micron to about 10 microns, more preferably from about 0.5 microns to about 9 microns. Most preferably, the particle size diameter is from about 1 microns to about 8 microns.
Preferably, the aluminosilicate ion exchange matenal has the formula Naz[(A102)z.(Siθ2)y]xH20 wherein z and y are integers of at least 6, the molar ratio of z to y is from about 1 to about 5 and x is from about 10 to about 264. More preferably, the aluminosilicate has the formula
Na12[(Alθ2)i2-(Siθ2)i2] H20 wherein x is from about 20 to about 30, preferably about 27. These preferred aluminosilicates are available commercially, for example under designations Zeolite A, Zeolite B and Zeolite X. Alternatively, naturally-occurnng or synthetically derived aluminosilicate ion exchange materials suitable for use herein can be made as descnbed in Krummel et al, U.S. Patent No. 3,985,669, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The aluminosilicates used herein are further charactenzed by their ion exchange capacity which is at least about 200 mg equivalent of CaC03 hardness/gram, calculated on an anhydrous basis, and which is preferably in a range from about 300 to 352 mg equivalent of CaC03 hardness/gram. Additionally, the instant aluminosilicate ion exchange materials are still further charactenzed by their calcium ion exchange rate which is at least about 2 grains Ca"H"/gallon/mιnute/-gram gallon, and more preferably in a range from about 2 grains Ca"H7gallon/minute/-gram/gallon to about 6 grains Ca++/gallon minute/-gram/gallon .
Adjunct Detergent Ingredients The starting dry detergent material in the present process can include additional detergent ingredients and/or, any number of additional ingredients can be incorporated in the detergent composition during subsequent steps of the present process. These adjunct ingredients include other detergency builders, bleaches, bleach activators, suds boosters or suds suppressors, anti-tarnish and anticorrosion agents, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, germicides, pH adjusting agents, non-builder alkalinity sources, chelatmg agents, smectite clays, enzymes, enzyme-stabilizing agents and perfumes See U S Patent 3,936,537, issued February 3, 1976 to Baskerville, Jr et al , incorporated herein by reference
Other builders can be generally selected from the vaπous borates, polyhydroxy sulfonates, polyacetates, carboxylates, citrates, tartrate mono- and di-succinates, and mixtures thereof Preferred are the alkali metal, especially sodium, salts of the above In companson with amorphous sodium silicates, crystalline layered sodium silicates exhibit a clearly increased calcium and magnesium ion exchange capacity In addition, the layered sodium silicates prefer magnesium ions over calcium ions, a feature necessary to insure that substantially all of the "hardness" is removed from the wash water These crystalline layered sodium silicates, however, are generally more expensive than amorphous silicates as well as other builders. Accordingly, in order to provide an economically feasible laundry detergent, the proportion of crystalline layered sodium silicates used must be determined judiciously
The crystalline layered sodium silicates suitable for use herein preferably have the formula NaMSιx02x+ι yH20 wherein M is sodium or hydrogen, x is from about 1.9 to about 4 and y is from about 0 to about 20. More preferably, the crystalline layered sodium silicate has the formula
NaMSi2θ5.yH20 wherein M is sodium or hydrogen, and y is from about 0 to about 20 These and other crystalline layered sodium silicates are discussed in Corkill et al, U.S Patent No. 4,605,509, previously incorporated herein by reference.
Examples of nonphosphorus, inorganic builders are tetraborate decahydrate and silicates having a weight ratio of SιO„ to alkali metal oxide of from about 0.5 to about 4 0, preferably from about 1.0 to about 2.4. Water-soluble, nonphosphorus organic builders useful herein include the vanous alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates and polyhydroxy sulfonates. Examples of polyacetate and polycarboxylate builders are the sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylene diamme tetraacetic acid, nitπlotπacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, mel tic acid, benzene polycarboxy c acids, and citπc acid Polymenc polycarboxylate builders are set forth in U.S. Patent 3,308,067, Diehl, issued March 7, 1967, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Such matenals include the water-soluble salts of homo- and copolymers of aliphatic carboxyhc acids such as maleic acid, ltacomc acid, mesaconic acid, fumaπc acid, acomtic acid, citraconic acid and methylene malomc acid Some of these materials are useful as the water-soluble anionic polymer as hereinafter described, but only if in intimate admixture with the non-soap anionic surfactant Other suitable polycarboxylates for use herein are the polyacetal carboxylates descπbed in U S Patent 4,144,226, issued March 13, 1979 to Crutchfield et al, and U S Patent 4,246,495, issued March 27, 1979 to Crutchfield et al, both of which are incorporated herein by reference These polyacetal carboxylates can be prepared by bπnging together under polymenzation conditions an ester of glyoxy c acid and a polymerization initiator The resulting polyacetal carboxylate ester is then attached to chemically stable end groups to stabilize the polyacetal carboxylate against rapid depolymeπzation m alkaline solution, converted to the corresponding salt, and added to a detergent composition Particularly preferred polycarboxylate builders are the ether carboxylate builder compositions compπsmg a combination of tartrate monosuccmate and tartrate disuccinate descnbed in U S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., issued May 5, 1987, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Bleaching agents and activators are descπbed in U S. Patent 4,412,934, Chung et al., issued November 1, 1983, and in U.S. Patent 4,483,781, Hartman, issued November 20, 1984, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Chelatmg agents are also descπbed in U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al., from Column 17, line 54 through Column 18, line 68, incorporated herein by reference. Suds modifiers are also optional ingredients and are descnbed in U.S. Patents 3,933,672, issued January 20, 1976 to Bartoletta et al., and 4,136,045, issued January 23, 1979 to Gault et al., both incorporated herein by reference. Suitable smectite clays for use herein are descnbed m U.S. Patent 4,762,645,
Tucker et al, issued August 9, 1988, Column 6, line 3 through Column 7, line 24, incorporated herein by reference. Suitable additional detergency builders for use herein are enumerated m the Baskerville patent, Column 13, line 54 through Column 16, line 16, and in U.S. Patent 4,663,071, Bush et al, issued May 5, 1987, both incorporated herein by reference.
In order to make the present invention more readily understood, reference is made to the following example, which is intended to be illustrative only and not intended to be limiting in scope.
EXAMPLE This Example illustrates the process invention in which a low density agglomerated detergent composition is prepared. A Lodige CB 30 high speed mixer is charged with a mixture of powders, namely sodium carbonate (median particle size 15 microns) and sodium tπpolyphosphate ("STPP") with a median particle size of 25 microns A liquid acid precursor of sodium alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant (C12H25-C6H4-SO3- H or "HLAS" as noted below) and a 70% active aqueous C J Q- 18 a^' ethoxylated sulfate surfactant (EO = 3, "AES") paste are also inputted into the Lodige CB 30 mixer, wherein the HLAS is added first The mixer is operated at 1600 rpm and the sodium carbonate, STPP, HLAS and AES are formed into agglomerates having a median particle size of about 110 microns after a mean residence time in the Lodige CB 30 mixer of about 5 seconds The agglomerates are then fed to a Schugi (Model # FX160) high speed mixer which is operated at 2800 rpms with a mean residence time of about 2 seconds. A HLAS binder is inputted into the Schugi (Model # FX160) mixer dunng this step which results in built-up agglomerates having a median particle size of about 180 microns being formed Thereafter, the built-up agglomerates are passed through a four-zone fluid bed dryer which is operated at an air inlet temperature of about 125°C and a nozzle height of 40 cm from the distribution plate m the first and fourth zones of the fluid bed The spray-on flux of the sodium silicate in 0.04 kg/cm^/hr, the unfluidized bed height is 10 cm, and the fluidized air flux is 0.6 kg/πXs. In the amounts and particle size specified below, fines are also added to the Lodige CB 30 mixer. In the first and fourth zones of the fluid bed dryer, liquid sodium silicate is fed into the fluid bed dryer resulting in the finished detergent agglomerates having a density of about 485 g/1 and a median particle size of about 360 microns. Unexpectedly, the finished agglomerates have excellent physical properties in that they are free flowing as exhibited by their supenor cake strength grades. The composition of the agglomerates are given below in Table I.
TABLE I (% weight) Component I
LAS (Na) 15.8
AES (EO = 3) 4.7
Sodium carbonate 48.0
STPP 22.7
Sodium Silicate 5.5
Water
100.0 The agglomerates embody about 14% of fines (less than 150 microns) which are recycled from the fluid bed back into the Lodige CB 30 which enhances production of the agglomerates produced by the process. Having thus described the invention m detail, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention and the invention is not to be considered limited to what is described in the specification.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A process for preparing a low density detergent composition characterized by the steps of:
(a) agglomerating a detergent surfactant paste or precursor thereof and dry starting detergent material in a first high speed mixer to obtain agglomerates;
(b) mixing said agglomerates in a second high speed mixer to obtain built-up agglomerates; and
(c) feeding said built-up agglomerates into a fluid bed dryer in which a binder is sprayed via a nozzle having a height of from 25 cm to 60 cm from the distributor plate of said fluid bed dryer such that said built-up agglomerates are dried and agglomerated to form said low detergent agglomerates having a density in a range from 300 g/1 to 550 g/1.
2. A process of claim 1 wherein said binder is sodium silicate.
3. A process of claim 1 wherein said binder has a spray-on flux of from 0.02 kg/cm2/hr to 0.06 kg/cm2/hr.
4. A process of claim 1 wherein the air inlet temperature of said fluid bed dryer is from l l0┬░C to l30oC.
5. A process of claim 1 wherein said binder has a median diameter droplet of from 20 microns to 100 microns.
6. A process of claim 1 wherein the fluidized air flux in said fluid bed dryer is from 0.6 kg/m2/s to 0.8 kg/m2/s.
7. A process of claim 1 wherein said step (a) includes agglomerating a liquid acid precursor of Cu_╬╣ g linear alkylbenzene sulfonate surfactant and a C ] o- 18 a^ ethoxylated sulfate surfactant.
8. A process of claim 1 wherein said binder is added at the inlet and exit ports of said fluid bed dryer.
9. A process of claim 1 wherein said nozzle height is from 35 cm to 45 cm.
10. A process for preparing a low density detergent composition characterized by the steps of:
(a) agglomerating a detergent surfactant paste or precursor thereof and dry starting detergent material in a first high speed mixer to obtain agglomerates;
(b) mixing said agglomerates in a second high speed mixer to obtain built-up agglomerates; and
(c) feeding said built-up agglomerates into a fluid bed dryer in which sodium silicate is sprayed via a nozzle having a height of from 40 cm to 60 cm from the distributor plate of said fluid bed dryer such that said built-up agglomerates are dried and agglomerated to form said low detergent agglomerates having a density in a range from 300 g/1 to 550 g/1.
PCT/US1998/014100 1997-07-14 1998-07-08 Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer WO1999003966A1 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP98935559A EP1005522B1 (en) 1997-07-14 1998-07-08 Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer
AT98935559T ATE278765T1 (en) 1997-07-14 1998-07-08 METHOD FOR PRODUCING DETERGENTS WITH LOW BULK DENSITY BY CONTROLLING THE NOZZLE HEIGHT IN THE FLUID BED
CA002295941A CA2295941C (en) 1997-07-14 1998-07-08 Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer
DE69826871T DE69826871T2 (en) 1997-07-14 1998-07-08 METHOD FOR PRODUCING DETERGENTS WITH A LOW BULK DENSITY BY CHECKING THE NOZZLE HEIGHT IN THE FLUID BED
BR9810716-0A BR9810716A (en) 1997-07-14 1998-07-08 Process for producing a low density detergent composition by controlling the nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer
JP2000503174A JP2003521548A (en) 1997-07-14 1998-07-08 Method for producing low-density detergent composition by adjusting nozzle height in fluidized bed dryer
US09/462,935 US6440342B1 (en) 1998-07-08 1998-07-08 Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US5247297P 1997-07-14 1997-07-14
US60/052,472 1997-07-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999003966A1 true WO1999003966A1 (en) 1999-01-28

Family

ID=21977821

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/014100 WO1999003966A1 (en) 1997-07-14 1998-07-08 Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer

Country Status (10)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1005522B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2003521548A (en)
CN (1) CN1170918C (en)
AR (1) AR016330A1 (en)
AT (1) ATE278765T1 (en)
BR (1) BR9810716A (en)
CA (1) CA2295941C (en)
DE (1) DE69826871T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2230707T3 (en)
WO (1) WO1999003966A1 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6056905A (en) * 1997-06-16 2000-05-02 Lever Brothers Company Division Of Conopco, Inc. Production of detergent granulates
US6077820A (en) * 1995-12-20 2000-06-20 Lever Brothers Company Division Of Conopco, Inc. Process for preparing a granular detergent
US6133223A (en) * 1997-06-27 2000-10-17 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Production of detergent granulates
US6274544B1 (en) 1997-06-16 2001-08-14 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Production of detergent granulates
US6455490B1 (en) 1999-06-10 2002-09-24 Unilever Home & Personal Care Usa Division Of Conopco, In.C Granular detergent component containing zeolite map and laundry detergent compositions
US6555514B1 (en) 1998-10-26 2003-04-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Processes for making granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
JP2006509855A (en) * 2002-12-12 2006-03-23 ヘンケル・コマンディットゲゼルシャフト・アウフ・アクチエン Dry neutralization method II
WO2009140071A1 (en) * 2008-05-14 2009-11-19 The Procter & Gamble Company A solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2443073A1 (en) * 1973-09-10 1975-03-20 Lion Fat Oil Co Ltd PROCESS FOR IMPROVING KOERNIGER DETERGENTS AND DETERGENTS
GB2209172A (en) * 1987-08-28 1989-05-04 Unilever Plc Preparation of solid particulate components for detergents
WO1997022685A1 (en) * 1995-12-20 1997-06-26 Unilever Plc A process for preparing a granular detergent

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2443073A1 (en) * 1973-09-10 1975-03-20 Lion Fat Oil Co Ltd PROCESS FOR IMPROVING KOERNIGER DETERGENTS AND DETERGENTS
GB2209172A (en) * 1987-08-28 1989-05-04 Unilever Plc Preparation of solid particulate components for detergents
WO1997022685A1 (en) * 1995-12-20 1997-06-26 Unilever Plc A process for preparing a granular detergent

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6077820A (en) * 1995-12-20 2000-06-20 Lever Brothers Company Division Of Conopco, Inc. Process for preparing a granular detergent
US6056905A (en) * 1997-06-16 2000-05-02 Lever Brothers Company Division Of Conopco, Inc. Production of detergent granulates
US6274544B1 (en) 1997-06-16 2001-08-14 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Production of detergent granulates
US6429184B1 (en) 1997-06-16 2002-08-06 Lever & Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Production of detergent granulates
US6133223A (en) * 1997-06-27 2000-10-17 Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Production of detergent granulates
US6555514B1 (en) 1998-10-26 2003-04-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Processes for making granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
US6455490B1 (en) 1999-06-10 2002-09-24 Unilever Home & Personal Care Usa Division Of Conopco, In.C Granular detergent component containing zeolite map and laundry detergent compositions
JP2006509855A (en) * 2002-12-12 2006-03-23 ヘンケル・コマンディットゲゼルシャフト・アウフ・アクチエン Dry neutralization method II
WO2009140071A1 (en) * 2008-05-14 2009-11-19 The Procter & Gamble Company A solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt
EP2123742A1 (en) 2008-05-14 2009-11-25 The Procter and Gamble Company A solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt
EP2123743A1 (en) 2008-05-14 2009-11-25 The Procter and Gamble Company A solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt
EP2128235A1 (en) 2008-05-14 2009-12-02 The Procter and Gamble Company A solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt
WO2009151799A2 (en) * 2008-05-14 2009-12-17 The Procter & Gamble Company A solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt
WO2009151799A3 (en) * 2008-05-14 2010-02-25 The Procter & Gamble Company A solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt
US7727947B2 (en) 2008-05-14 2010-06-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for the preparation of a solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt
US7732394B2 (en) 2008-05-14 2010-06-08 The Procter & Gamble Company Solid laundry detergent composition comprising light density silicate salt

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69826871T2 (en) 2006-03-09
ATE278765T1 (en) 2004-10-15
DE69826871D1 (en) 2004-11-11
EP1005522B1 (en) 2004-10-06
CA2295941C (en) 2003-04-22
JP2003521548A (en) 2003-07-15
CN1170918C (en) 2004-10-13
CA2295941A1 (en) 1999-01-28
EP1005522A1 (en) 2000-06-07
CN1269824A (en) 2000-10-11
ES2230707T3 (en) 2005-05-01
BR9810716A (en) 2000-08-08
AR016330A1 (en) 2001-07-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2234086C (en) Process for making a low density detergent compositon by agglomeration with an inorganic double salt
CA2199370C (en) Process for making a high density detergent composition which includes selected recycle streams
US5489392A (en) Process for making a high density detergent composition in a single mixer/densifier with selected recycle streams for improved agglomerate properties
EP0929653B1 (en) Process for making a detergent composition by non-tower process
EP0777724A1 (en) Agglomeration process for making a detergent composition utilizing spray drying towers
CA2245933C (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by agglomeration with an inorganic double salt
EP1005521B1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling agglomeration via particle size
US5565137A (en) Process for making a high density detergent composition from starting detergent ingredients
US6355606B1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlled agglomeration in a fluid bed dryer
EP0876468A1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by agglomeration with a hydrated salt
EP1005522B1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer
WO2000053714A1 (en) Process for producing coated detergent particles
US6440342B1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer
US6281188B1 (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition
WO2000037605A1 (en) Process for making a low bulk density detergent composition by agglomeration
MXPA00000523A (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer
MXPA00000593A (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlled agglomeration in a fluid bed dryer
CA2344535A1 (en) Granular detergent compositions having homogenous particles and process for producing same
MXPA00000591A (en) Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling agglomeration via particle size

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 98808951.3

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BR CA CN JP MX TR US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2295941

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2295941

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: PA/a/2000/000523

Country of ref document: MX

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09462935

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998935559

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998935559

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1998935559

Country of ref document: EP