WO1998040606A1 - Well treatment with particles - Google Patents

Well treatment with particles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1998040606A1
WO1998040606A1 PCT/GB1998/000552 GB9800552W WO9840606A1 WO 1998040606 A1 WO1998040606 A1 WO 1998040606A1 GB 9800552 W GB9800552 W GB 9800552W WO 9840606 A1 WO9840606 A1 WO 9840606A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
particles
well
solution
coating
deposition
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1998/000552
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Philip John Charles Webb
Original Assignee
Aea Technology Plc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Aea Technology Plc filed Critical Aea Technology Plc
Priority to AU63008/98A priority Critical patent/AU6300898A/en
Publication of WO1998040606A1 publication Critical patent/WO1998040606A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/92Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation characterised by their form or by the form of their components, e.g. encapsulated material

Definitions

  • This invention relates to particles which incorporate chemicals for treating wells, such as oil wells, to a method of treating a well using such particles, and to a method of making such particles.
  • the composition of the fluid or fluids in or adjacent to the well is such that it is beneficial to add to the fluid a material to inhibit deleterious processes (such as corrosion, or scale deposition) wnich woul ⁇ otnerwise occur.
  • the provisior or sucn inhibitor material in an oil well is theretore well known, It may be injected as a liquid, or incorporated into a bead or particle, for example (EP 0 193 369 (Exxon)) in a polymer bead from which it leaches out into the well fluid, or (US 3 782 469 (Fulford) ) adsorbed onto proppant particles such as sand grains, or (GB 2 284 223 B (AEA Technology) ) precipitated in a porous ceramic bead.
  • Such beads or particles may be introduced into the well m a variety of ways, for example m a prepacked screen, or in a gravel pack, or as a fracture proppant.
  • a method of treating a well comprising of depositing a well treatment agent onto insoluble, inorganic particles, by wetting the particles with a solution in a solvent, the solution comprising the well treatment agent, polyvalent cations if the solvent is aqueous, and a deposition-enhancing agent, and drying the wetted particles gradually so as to deposit a hard, adherent coating comprising the well treatment agent on the external surface of the particles, and introducing the coated particles into the well.
  • the solution used to wet the particles desirably has a viscosity higher than that of water, for example up to 20 times that of water, as this ensures that a thicker coating of the solution remains on the particles. Good results have been obtained with a solution of viscosity 5 times that of water, i.e. of viscosity 5 x 10 Pa s.
  • the well treatment agent might be a scale inhibitor, corrosion inhibitor, ⁇ sphaltene deposition inhibitor, wax deposition mhiDitor, ⁇ emuisifier, gel breaker, biocide, or a hydrogen sulphide scavenger, for example.
  • the deposition-enhancing agent may be a polymeric and/or an organic material.
  • a liquid coating for example being a surface wetting agent, and/or a viscosifier, or it may influence the form of the deposited solid, for example being an anti-foam agent.
  • it might comprise a silicone oil acting as an antifoam agent; this is preferably provided m sufficient quantity to give a concentration of between 100 and 1000 ppm m the solution, for example 200 ppm.
  • the particles may be porous or non-porous, but are preferably not more than 30% porosity, as particles of higher porosity tend to be insufficiently strong.
  • the particles may be of any shape, but the preferred particles are generally spheroidal beads, or spherical beads, preferably of an inorganic oxide or a ceramic material for example alumina, silica, silicon carbide or aluminium silicate based material.
  • the coating on the surface is typically of thickness in the range 1 urn up to 20 ⁇ m, for example 2 ⁇ m or 5 ⁇ m.
  • the drying step desirably takes place at a temperature above the boiling point of the solvent at the applied pressure, but is desirably sufficiently gradual that the drying takes more than 1 hour, preferably more than VA hours to complete.
  • the pressure is atmospheric, for an aqueous solvent the temperature is desirably m the range 100°C to 120°C; for example the particles might be exposed to a gas stream at 120°C. If the particles are dried at a temperature below the solvent's boiling point, the drying process will be slower.
  • the invention also provides particles coated with well treatment agent by the said deposition method, tor use m the treatment method.
  • the particles may oe introduced into the well m a prepacked screen, or in a gravel pack, or as proppant particles injected into the formation around the well, or m other ways, and may be used on their own or m conjunction with other types of particle.
  • the particles are preferably of size m the range 0.3 mm to 5 mm, more preferably between 0.5 mm and 2.0 mm, for example about 0.5 mm or about 1.0 mm. It is often desirable to have all the particles of the same size.
  • the coated particles act as a reservoir of the well treatment agent, which gradually leaches out into the well fluids over a period which is preferably several months and for some well treatment agents is preferably more than a year, for example between 3 and 5 years.
  • the resulting concentration of the chemical in the well bore is m the range 0.1 to 100 ppm, preferably 1 to 50 ppm, for example 10 ppm.
  • the term "insoluble” means that the particles are not soluble in the well fluids (e.g. water, brine, or oil) under the conditions found m the well, which typically means at temperatures no higher than 250°C and pressures no higher than about 120 MPa . Because they are insoluble they continue to act as proppant, gravel-pack or filter-pack particles even after all the well treatment agent has leached away.
  • the coated particles prefferably comply with the API specification for the use to which they are to be put. This recommends testing criteria for particle shape, for acid resistance (in 12% HC1 and 3% HF solution), and for crush resistance.
  • the particles are therefore desirably strong enough to withstand crushing at pressures above 1000 psi (6.9 MPa), for example above 3000 psi (21 MPa) , for example up to 6000 psi (41 MPa) or higher.
  • the API criterion for crushing strength depends on the particle size, and on use; for example sand particles of size 20 - 40 mesh (0.42 - 0.84 mm) for use in gravel packs must not lose more than 2% by mass at a closure pressure of 2000 psi, sand particles of that size for use as fracture proppants must not lose more than 14% at 4000 psi, while particles of that size for use as high strength fracture proppants must not lose more than 10% at a closure pressure in the range 7500 to 15000 psi.
  • the chemical composition of the solution from which the coating is derived has a significant effect on the nature of the coating, and on the subsequent rate of dissolution when the coated particles are exposed to well fluids.
  • polyvalent cations promote the formation of a solid coating of scale inhibitor on particles, the coating dissolving at a rate which results in scale inhibitor concentrations in the range 0.1 to 100 ppm (as discussed earlier) .
  • the preferred cations are calcium and magnesium.
  • the cation concentration is preferably in the range 5000 to 150 000 ppm.
  • the concentration of scale inhibitor in water subsequently flowing past the coated particles decreases.
  • the pH of the solution affects the composition of the deposited coating, and so affects the subsequent rate of dissolution of the inhibitor (e.g. scale inhibitor) into water flowing past the coated particles.
  • the inhibitor e.g. scale inhibitor
  • Increasing the pH of the solution reduces the rate of release of the inhibitor
  • the pH is generally adjusted to be m the range 6 to 11, for example pHlO.
  • the drying step is also important in determining whether or not a hard, adherent coating is produced. If the drym ⁇ takes olace too tne deposition will tend to De powdery or flaky ano non-adherent On tne other hand slow drying reduces the throughput and so may not be economic. Drying m a fluidised bed using an air stream supplied at between 110°C and 140°C, more preferably about 120°C, has been found to be satisfactory. Other types of drier, such as rotary driers, cone driers or paddle driers may be used, as long as rapid drying is avoided. The drying may be performed at ambient pressure, or at reduced pressure.
  • the concentration of the well treatment agent which is required in the well fluids will differ from well to well.
  • the present invention allows a coating of well treatment agent to be deposited on the particles with the requisite solubility and dissolution rate for use m a particular well.
  • the invention will now be further and more particularly described by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawing which shows graphically the variation of inhibitor concentration with volume of water flowing through a packed bed.
  • a fluid into the well such that the pressure at the depth of those strata is sufficient to cause cracking or fracturing of the rocks of the strata.
  • the fluid may contain a dissolved polymer cross-linked to form a gel (so it is of high viscosity), and may include particles of solid material which are carried into the fractures as the fluid is injected. The gel subsequently breaks down, and the particles prevent the fractures closing when the pressure is reduced.
  • Such particles may be referred to as proppant particle-:.
  • One type of proppant particle comprises 0.5 mm diameter spheres of an alumino silicate ceramic. Such particles may be coated with a layer of scale inhibitor as follows. A 25 wt% solution of commercially available part neutralised diethylene-triamme penta (methylene- phosphonic acid) has its solution pH set to 8.0 by the addition of concentrated sodium hydroxide. A silicone oil type anti-foam is added to give a solution concentration of 200 ppm. Calcium and magnesium chlorides are added to the scale inhibitor solution to give calcium and magnesium solution concentrations of 500 ppm and 15 000 ppm respectively.
  • the resulting mixture is more viscous than water. It is used to wet the spherical proppant particles, and the excess liquid drained off. The particles are then dried m a fluidised bed with an air stream at 120°C over a period of between IV-. and 2 hours, so forming a hard, adherent coating of solid scale inhibitor on their surfaces of thickness about 5 urn.
  • Experimental measurements were then taken, using a column packed with the coated particles, and causing sea water (obtained from near Chesil Beach) to flow through the column. Referring to the drawing, this shows how the concentration of inhibitor m the sea water emerging from the column varied with the number of column pore volumes which have flowed through the column. The inhibitor dissolves m the water, at first rapidly, and then at a steady rate.
  • a 40 wt% solution of commercially available phosphmo-carboxylic acid has its solution pH set to 10.0 by the addition of concentrated sodium hydroxide.
  • a silicone oil type anti-foam is added to give a solution concentration of 200 ppm.
  • Calcium and magnesium chlorides are added to the scale inhibitor solution to give calcium and magnesium solution concentrations of 20 000 ppm and 10 000 ppm, respectively. This solution has a viscosity about five times that of water (at room temperature) .
  • a 40 wt% solution of commercially available a polyvmylsulphonate has its solution pH set to 10.0 by the addition of concentrated sodium hydroxide.
  • a silicone oil type anti-foam is added to give a solution concentration of 200 ppm.
  • Calcium chloride is added to the scale inhibitor solution to give a calcium solution concentration of 40 000 ppm. This solution has a viscosity about three times that of water.
  • suitable scale inhibitors are: polyacrylate, a copolymer of vmylsulphonate and acrylic acid, a copolymer of maleic acid and acrylic acid, or other phosphonate-type inhibitors such as aminotrimethylene phosphonic acid.
  • a solution of such a chemical at a concentration m tne range 25 to 50 wt% would have its pH set m the range 6-11 by adding for example sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid, and polyvalent cations such as calcium or magnesium added as chlorides or carbonates. After addition of a deposition enhancing agent the mixture would be used to coat particles, and the particles then gradually dried.
  • the particles might be dried in a rotary drier with an air stream at 120°C, or in a cone drier under reduced pressure, for example 0.75 atmosphere, and at a temperature corresponding to a vapour pressure of for example 0.75 to 0.9 atm.
  • the deposition enhancing agent might be silicone oil (as m the examples given earlier) , or might be a surfactant such as sodium dodecylbenzene sulphonic acid or nonylethoxylated phenols, which are typically provided at a concentration (by weight) m the range 10 ppm up to 1000 ppm.

Abstract

Well treatment chemicals are deposited as a hard adherent coating onto insoluble inorganic particles such as ceramic beads. The solution from which deposition occurs includes a deposition-enhancing agent, for example an antifoam agent, and has a pH and a polyvalent cation concentration which ensure the coating is of low solubility. The coated particles are used as proppants or in filter beds within a well, gradually releasing the chemicals into the well fluids.

Description

Well Treatment with Particles
This invention relates to particles which incorporate chemicals for treating wells, such as oil wells, to a method of treating a well using such particles, and to a method of making such particles.
For many oil wells the composition of the fluid or fluids in or adjacent to the well is such that it is beneficial to add to the fluid a material to inhibit deleterious processes (such as corrosion, or scale deposition) wnich woulα otnerwise occur. The provisior or sucn inhibitor material in an oil well is theretore well known, It may be injected as a liquid, or incorporated into a bead or particle, for example (EP 0 193 369 (Exxon)) in a polymer bead from which it leaches out into the well fluid, or (US 3 782 469 (Fulford) ) adsorbed onto proppant particles such as sand grains, or (GB 2 284 223 B (AEA Technology) ) precipitated in a porous ceramic bead. In the case of water wells and water injection wells too there may be a need to supply water treatment chemicals to the well. Such beads or particles may be introduced into the well m a variety of ways, for example m a prepacked screen, or in a gravel pack, or as a fracture proppant.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of treating a well, the method comprising of depositing a well treatment agent onto insoluble, inorganic particles, by wetting the particles with a solution in a solvent, the solution comprising the well treatment agent, polyvalent cations if the solvent is aqueous, and a deposition-enhancing agent, and drying the wetted particles gradually so as to deposit a hard, adherent coating comprising the well treatment agent on the external surface of the particles, and introducing the coated particles into the well.
The solution used to wet the particles desirably has a viscosity higher than that of water, for example up to 20 times that of water, as this ensures that a thicker coating of the solution remains on the particles. Good results have been obtained with a solution of viscosity 5 times that of water, i.e. of viscosity 5 x 10 Pa s. The well treatment agent might be a scale inhibitor, corrosion inhibitor, αsphaltene deposition inhibitor, wax deposition mhiDitor, σemuisifier, gel breaker, biocide, or a hydrogen sulphide scavenger, for example. The deposition-enhancing agent may be a polymeric and/or an organic material. It may aid the formation of a liquid coating, for example being a surface wetting agent, and/or a viscosifier, or it may influence the form of the deposited solid, for example being an anti-foam agent. For example it might comprise a silicone oil acting as an antifoam agent; this is preferably provided m sufficient quantity to give a concentration of between 100 and 1000 ppm m the solution, for example 200 ppm.
In this specification the term 'solution' is to be taken as encompassing both solutions and dispersions. The particles may be porous or non-porous, but are preferably not more than 30% porosity, as particles of higher porosity tend to be insufficiently strong. The particles may be of any shape, but the preferred particles are generally spheroidal beads, or spherical beads, preferably of an inorganic oxide or a ceramic material for example alumina, silica, silicon carbide or aluminium silicate based material. The coating on the surface is typically of thickness in the range 1 urn up to 20 μm, for example 2 μm or 5 μm. The drying step desirably takes place at a temperature above the boiling point of the solvent at the applied pressure, but is desirably sufficiently gradual that the drying takes more than 1 hour, preferably more than VA hours to complete. If the pressure is atmospheric, for an aqueous solvent the temperature is desirably m the range 100°C to 120°C; for example the particles might be exposed to a gas stream at 120°C. If the particles are dried at a temperature below the solvent's boiling point, the drying process will be slower.
The invention also provides particles coated with well treatment agent by the said deposition method, tor use m the treatment method. The particles may oe introduced into the well m a prepacked screen, or in a gravel pack, or as proppant particles injected into the formation around the well, or m other ways, and may be used on their own or m conjunction with other types of particle. For any of these uses the particles are preferably of size m the range 0.3 mm to 5 mm, more preferably between 0.5 mm and 2.0 mm, for example about 0.5 mm or about 1.0 mm. It is often desirable to have all the particles of the same size.
Once introduced into the well, the coated particles act as a reservoir of the well treatment agent, which gradually leaches out into the well fluids over a period which is preferably several months and for some well treatment agents is preferably more than a year, for example between 3 and 5 years. Typically the resulting concentration of the chemical in the well bore is m the range 0.1 to 100 ppm, preferably 1 to 50 ppm, for example 10 ppm. The term "insoluble" means that the particles are not soluble in the well fluids (e.g. water, brine, or oil) under the conditions found m the well, which typically means at temperatures no higher than 250°C and pressures no higher than about 120 MPa . Because they are insoluble they continue to act as proppant, gravel-pack or filter-pack particles even after all the well treatment agent has leached away.
It is desirable for the coated particles to comply with the API specification for the use to which they are to be put. This recommends testing criteria for particle shape, for acid resistance (in 12% HC1 and 3% HF solution), and for crush resistance. The particles are therefore desirably strong enough to withstand crushing at pressures above 1000 psi (6.9 MPa), for example above 3000 psi (21 MPa) , for example up to 6000 psi (41 MPa) or higher. The API criterion for crushing strength depends on the particle size, and on use; for example sand particles of size 20 - 40 mesh (0.42 - 0.84 mm) for use in gravel packs must not lose more than 2% by mass at a closure pressure of 2000 psi, sand particles of that size for use as fracture proppants must not lose more than 14% at 4000 psi, while particles of that size for use as high strength fracture proppants must not lose more than 10% at a closure pressure in the range 7500 to 15000 psi.
The chemical composition of the solution from which the coating is derived has a significant effect on the nature of the coating, and on the subsequent rate of dissolution when the coated particles are exposed to well fluids. For example polyvalent cations promote the formation of a solid coating of scale inhibitor on particles, the coating dissolving at a rate which results in scale inhibitor concentrations in the range 0.1 to 100 ppm (as discussed earlier) . The preferred cations are calcium and magnesium. The cation concentration is preferably in the range 5000 to 150 000 ppm. As the mole ratio of polyvalent cation to scale inhibitor is increased in the solution from which the coating is deposited, the concentration of scale inhibitor in water subsequently flowing past the coated particles decreases. Also the pH of the solution affects the composition of the deposited coating, and so affects the subsequent rate of dissolution of the inhibitor (e.g. scale inhibitor) into water flowing past the coated particles. Increasing the pH of the solution reduces the rate of release of the inhibitor The pH is generally adjusted to be m the range 6 to 11, for example pHlO.
The drying step is also important in determining whether or not a hard, adherent coating is produced. If the drymσ takes olace too
Figure imgf000007_0001
tne deposition will tend to De powdery or flaky ano non-adherent On tne other hand slow drying reduces the throughput and so may not be economic. Drying m a fluidised bed using an air stream supplied at between 110°C and 140°C, more preferably about 120°C, has been found to be satisfactory. Other types of drier, such as rotary driers, cone driers or paddle driers may be used, as long as rapid drying is avoided. The drying may be performed at ambient pressure, or at reduced pressure.
It will be appreciated that the concentration of the well treatment agent which is required in the well fluids will differ from well to well. The present invention allows a coating of well treatment agent to be deposited on the particles with the requisite solubility and dissolution rate for use m a particular well.
The invention will now be further and more particularly described by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawing which shows graphically the variation of inhibitor concentration with volume of water flowing through a packed bed. To increase the permeability of oil-bearing strata m the vicinity of an oil well, it is known to inject a fluid into the well such that the pressure at the depth of those strata is sufficient to cause cracking or fracturing of the rocks of the strata. The fluid may contain a dissolved polymer cross-linked to form a gel (so it is of high viscosity), and may include particles of solid material which are carried into the fractures as the fluid is injected. The gel subsequently breaks down, and the particles prevent the fractures closing when the pressure is reduced. Such particles may be referred to as proppant particle-:.
Example 1
One type of proppant particle comprises 0.5 mm diameter spheres of an alumino silicate ceramic. Such particles may be coated with a layer of scale inhibitor as follows. A 25 wt% solution of commercially available part neutralised diethylene-triamme penta (methylene- phosphonic acid) has its solution pH set to 8.0 by the addition of concentrated sodium hydroxide. A silicone oil type anti-foam is added to give a solution concentration of 200 ppm. Calcium and magnesium chlorides are added to the scale inhibitor solution to give calcium and magnesium solution concentrations of 500 ppm and 15 000 ppm respectively.
The resulting mixture is more viscous than water. It is used to wet the spherical proppant particles, and the excess liquid drained off. The particles are then dried m a fluidised bed with an air stream at 120°C over a period of between IV-. and 2 hours, so forming a hard, adherent coating of solid scale inhibitor on their surfaces of thickness about 5 urn. Experimental measurements were then taken, using a column packed with the coated particles, and causing sea water (obtained from near Chesil Beach) to flow through the column. Referring to the drawing, this shows how the concentration of inhibitor m the sea water emerging from the column varied with the number of column pore volumes which have flowed through the column. The inhibitor dissolves m the water, at first rapidly, and then at a steady rate.
The following two examples are of different solutions, each containing a different scale inhibitor, which are suitaole for use m torming a coating on proppant particles.
Example 2
A 40 wt% solution of commercially available phosphmo-carboxylic acid has its solution pH set to 10.0 by the addition of concentrated sodium hydroxide. A silicone oil type anti-foam is added to give a solution concentration of 200 ppm. Calcium and magnesium chlorides are added to the scale inhibitor solution to give calcium and magnesium solution concentrations of 20 000 ppm and 10 000 ppm, respectively. This solution has a viscosity about five times that of water (at room temperature) .
Example 3
A 40 wt% solution of commercially available a polyvmylsulphonate has its solution pH set to 10.0 by the addition of concentrated sodium hydroxide. A silicone oil type anti-foam is added to give a solution concentration of 200 ppm. Calcium chloride is added to the scale inhibitor solution to give a calcium solution concentration of 40 000 ppm. This solution has a viscosity about three times that of water.
It will be appreciated that the invention is applicable with a wide range of different oilfield chemicals. Other suitable scale inhibitors are: polyacrylate, a copolymer of vmylsulphonate and acrylic acid, a copolymer of maleic acid and acrylic acid, or other phosphonate-type inhibitors such as aminotrimethylene phosphonic acid. A solution of such a chemical at a concentration m tne range 25 to 50 wt% would have its pH set m the range 6-11 by adding for example sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid, and polyvalent cations such as calcium or magnesium added as chlorides or carbonates. After addition of a deposition enhancing agent the mixture would be used to coat particles, and the particles then gradually dried. The particles might be dried in a rotary drier with an air stream at 120°C, or in a cone drier under reduced pressure, for example 0.75 atmosphere, and at a temperature corresponding to a vapour pressure of for example 0.75 to 0.9 atm. The deposition enhancing agent might be silicone oil (as m the examples given earlier) , or might be a surfactant such as sodium dodecylbenzene sulphonic acid or nonylethoxylated phenols, which are typically provided at a concentration (by weight) m the range 10 ppm up to 1000 ppm.

Claims

C laims
1. A method of treating a well, the method comprising depositing a well treatment agent onto insoluble, inorganic particles by wetting the particles w th a solution in a solvent, the solution comprising the well treatment agent, and polyvalent cations if the solvent is aqueous, drying the wetted particles, and introducing the coated particles into the well, and characterised in that the solution also contains a deposition-enhancing agent, that the drying is performed gradually, and the deposition method is such that a hard, adherent coating comprising the well treatment agent is deposited on the external surface of the particles.
2. A method as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the deposition enhancing agent comprises a surface-wetting agent and/or a viscosifier and/or an antifoam agent.
3. A method as claimed m Claim 1 or Claim 2 wherein the solvent is aqueous, and the solution contains polyvalent cations in the range 5000 to 150 000 ppm and has a pH m the range 6 to 11, selected to acnieve a coating of desired solubility.
4. Particles coated with a hard, adherent coating on their external surface for use in the treatment method as claimed m any one of the preceding Claims.
5. Particles as claimed in Claim 4 wherein the coating is of thickness m the range 2 ╬╝m to 10 ╬╝m.
PCT/GB1998/000552 1997-03-13 1998-02-20 Well treatment with particles WO1998040606A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU63008/98A AU6300898A (en) 1997-03-13 1998-02-20 Well treatment with particles

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9705200.5 1997-03-13
GBGB9705200.5A GB9705200D0 (en) 1997-03-13 1997-03-13 Well treatment with particles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1998040606A1 true WO1998040606A1 (en) 1998-09-17

Family

ID=10809168

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1998/000552 WO1998040606A1 (en) 1997-03-13 1998-02-20 Well treatment with particles

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU6300898A (en)
GB (1) GB9705200D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1998040606A1 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999036668A1 (en) * 1998-01-17 1999-07-22 Aea Technology Plc Well treatment
US6209646B1 (en) 1999-04-21 2001-04-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Controlling the release of chemical additives in well treating fluids
WO2002008562A2 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-01-31 Sinvent As Combined liner and matrix system, use of the system and method for control and monitoring of processes in a well
US6357527B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2002-03-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated breakers and method for use in treating subterranean formations
US6444316B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2002-09-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated chemicals for use in controlled time release applications and methods
WO2007063325A1 (en) * 2005-12-01 2007-06-07 Visible Technology Oil & Gas Limited Particles
US9879173B2 (en) 2011-03-30 2018-01-30 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Well treatment composites for use in well treatment fluids
CN108611086A (en) * 2018-05-07 2018-10-02 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of overlay film proppant and preparation method thereof

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3072192A (en) * 1959-02-19 1963-01-08 Marathon Oil Co Method of inhibiting corrosion in oil production
US3782469A (en) * 1972-05-25 1974-01-01 Cities Service Oil Co Formation and wellbore scale prevention
US4231428A (en) * 1978-12-04 1980-11-04 Phillips Petroleum Company Well treatment method
EP0193369A2 (en) * 1985-02-27 1986-09-03 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. Polymer article and its use for controlled introduction of reagent into a fluid
WO1992012328A1 (en) * 1991-01-04 1992-07-23 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Encapsulated breaker chemical with a multi-coat layer urea
GB2298440A (en) * 1995-02-28 1996-09-04 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Well treatment

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3072192A (en) * 1959-02-19 1963-01-08 Marathon Oil Co Method of inhibiting corrosion in oil production
US3782469A (en) * 1972-05-25 1974-01-01 Cities Service Oil Co Formation and wellbore scale prevention
US4231428A (en) * 1978-12-04 1980-11-04 Phillips Petroleum Company Well treatment method
EP0193369A2 (en) * 1985-02-27 1986-09-03 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. Polymer article and its use for controlled introduction of reagent into a fluid
WO1992012328A1 (en) * 1991-01-04 1992-07-23 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Encapsulated breaker chemical with a multi-coat layer urea
GB2298440A (en) * 1995-02-28 1996-09-04 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Well treatment

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999036668A1 (en) * 1998-01-17 1999-07-22 Aea Technology Plc Well treatment
US6209646B1 (en) 1999-04-21 2001-04-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Controlling the release of chemical additives in well treating fluids
US6527051B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2003-03-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated chemicals for use in controlled time release applications and methods
US6357527B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2002-03-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated breakers and method for use in treating subterranean formations
US6444316B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2002-09-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated chemicals for use in controlled time release applications and methods
US6554071B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2003-04-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Encapsulated chemicals for use in controlled time release applications and methods
WO2002008562A3 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-04-04 Sinvent As Combined liner and matrix system, use of the system and method for control and monitoring of processes in a well
WO2002008562A2 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-01-31 Sinvent As Combined liner and matrix system, use of the system and method for control and monitoring of processes in a well
US6672385B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2004-01-06 Sinvent As Combined liner and matrix system
WO2007063325A1 (en) * 2005-12-01 2007-06-07 Visible Technology Oil & Gas Limited Particles
EA013192B1 (en) * 2005-12-01 2010-02-26 Визибл Текнолоджи Ойл Энд Гэс Лимитед Manufactured particle for use in well or in reservoir
US8735333B2 (en) 2005-12-01 2014-05-27 Ewen Robertson Particles
US9879173B2 (en) 2011-03-30 2018-01-30 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Well treatment composites for use in well treatment fluids
CN108611086A (en) * 2018-05-07 2018-10-02 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of overlay film proppant and preparation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU6300898A (en) 1998-09-29
GB9705200D0 (en) 1997-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5964291A (en) Well treatment
EP0193369B1 (en) Polymer article and its use for controlled introduction of reagent into a fluid
US20090038799A1 (en) System, Method, and Apparatus for Combined Fracturing Treatment and Scale Inhibition
CA2502694C (en) Acid-coated sand for gravel pack and filter cake clean-up
AU2006248771B2 (en) Methods to increase recovery of treatment fluid following stimulation of a subterranean formation
US8857515B2 (en) Silica control agents for use in subterranean treatment fluids
EP0616660A1 (en) Method of propagating a hydraulic fracture using fluid loss control particulates
US20130255951A1 (en) Compositions, Systems and Methods for Releasing Additive Components
US10865339B2 (en) Slow-release scale inhibiting compositions
BRPI1007996B1 (en) METHOD FOR TREATING UNDERGROUND FORMATIONS
EA026696B1 (en) Method of removing filter cake at low temperature (embodiments)
CN1984769A (en) Coating and/or treating hydraulic fracturing proppants to improve wettability, proppant lubrication, and/or to reduce damage by fracturing fluids and reservoir fluids
CA2851207A1 (en) Compositions, systems and methods of making coated additive components
NO316293B1 (en) Fluid loss control system for hydrocarbon recovery and method of protecting a borehole during single hydrocarbon recovery operation
US4787455A (en) Method for scale and corrosion inhibition in a well penetrating a subterranean formation
US4779679A (en) Method for scale and corrosion inhibition in a well penetrating a subterranean formation
WO1999036668A1 (en) Well treatment
SA517390200B1 (en) Shaped compressed pellets for slow release of well treatment agents into a well and methods of using the same
WO1998040606A1 (en) Well treatment with particles
NO20130019A1 (en) Water-sensitive porous medium for controlling water production in the wellbore and methods for this
CN110168012A (en) Multiphase polymer suspension and application thereof
CN112177578B (en) Profile control and flooding agent and profile control and flooding method in oil and gas field layer
US20180282609A1 (en) Titanium Chloride Encapsulation for Acid Generation
AU2020287847B2 (en) Low temperature diversion in well completion operations using a langbeinite compound
WO2024015658A1 (en) Environmentally acceptable wellbore stability additive

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH HU IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1998539325

Format of ref document f/p: F

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase