WO1998005031A2 - A method and a device for the reduction impulse noise from a speech signal - Google Patents
A method and a device for the reduction impulse noise from a speech signal Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1998005031A2 WO1998005031A2 PCT/FI1997/000458 FI9700458W WO9805031A2 WO 1998005031 A2 WO1998005031 A2 WO 1998005031A2 FI 9700458 W FI9700458 W FI 9700458W WO 9805031 A2 WO9805031 A2 WO 9805031A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- residual
- signal
- numerical values
- calculated
- noise
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 54
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 title description 9
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000006854 communication Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000010295 mobile communication Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 7
- 210000001260 vocal cord Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000001755 vocal effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004704 glottis Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003455 independent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000867 larynx Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003928 nasal cavity Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035790 physiological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012805 post-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001702 transmitter Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Speech or voice signal processing techniques to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/02—Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
- G10L21/0208—Noise filtering
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00
- G10L25/03—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00 characterised by the type of extracted parameters
- G10L25/12—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00 characterised by the type of extracted parameters the extracted parameters being prediction coefficients
Definitions
- a method and a device fop the reduction impulse noise from a speech signal
- the invention relates in general to reduction of noise in an electrically reproduced speech signal.
- the invention relates to a method and an apparatus whereby impulse noise, or brief noise peaks, can be eliminated from a speech signal. More specifically the invention relates to a method and an apparatus which improve the quality of sound reproduced by digital mobile stations.
- the microphone of the transmitting party converts the acoustic speech signal into electric form whereafter it is conveyed using various coding and modulation methods to the receiving party whose equipment, including a loudspeaker, reconverts the signal into acoustic form.
- the transmission path may include radio transmission and reception as well as transmission across fixed wire and fibre-optic connections.
- Recording, transmission and playback conditions distort the transmitted speech signal and induce in it many kinds of spurious effects which the receiving party, or the listener, experiences as disturbing.
- the transmitting party with the microphone may be in a noisy place so that the microphone also records the ambient noise in the background. Electric switches, motors, lightnings and other electric systems operating in the same area also induce noise in an electric communication system.
- the noise may be relatively continuous in nature, in which case it is called white noise, or it may consist of single momentary disturbances, in which case it is called impulse noise.
- a differential microphone structure aims at the same effect using only one microphone element which the speech signal affects only in one direction but noise affects symmetrically in both directions.
- So-called active noise reduction employs special sound generating elements that produce acoustic oscillation having the same amplitude as the background noise measured, but the opposite phase.
- Prior-art methods have some known disadvantages. Filters having effect on certain frequency areas require prior knowledge of useful and unwanted frequencies or alternatively complex circuit arrangements that analyse the speech signal's frequency structure and control the filters' frequency response. Methods that aim at eliminating background noise in the transmitting end are ineffective against disturbances generated at a later stage of the transmission path and usually are unable to eliminate impulse noise. Active noise reduction in the receiving end requires expensive and complex electronics to produce a real-time response to measured background noise impulses, and noise reduction is then not directed to disturbances in the transmitted signal but to local background noise.
- An object of this invention is to provide a method and an apparatus with which the understandability of an electrically reproduced speech signal can be enhanced in an advantageous manner compared to the prior art. Another object of the invention is that the method according to it only calls for slight changes in prior-art apparatus reproducing sound electrically so that the manufacturing costs of the apparatus according to the invention are not substantially bigger than in the prior art. A further object of the invention is that the method according to it is applicable in small, portable communication devices such as mobile phones.
- the objects of the invention are achieved by eliminating from an electric waveform corresponding to an acoustic signal features that cannot have originated in the human sound production system.
- samples radically different from their surroundings are processed so as to better match samples produced by the human voice production mechanism by replacing them by estimates from linear predictive coding (LPC) analysis.
- LPC linear predictive coding
- the method according to the invention for reducing noise in a digitally transmitted speech signal consisting of numerical values representing successive samples of a certain waveform, wherein it is recognised those of said numerical values that represent waveform details (2) which produce noise in significant portions, is characterised in that to recognise a certain first numerical value it is calculated
- a first residual which equals the difference of a numerical value representing a sample of said waveform and an estimate calculated for that numerical value on the basis of other numerical values, calculated at sampling moments in a certain set of numerical values including said first numerical value
- a second residual which equals the difference of a numerical value representing a sample of said waveform and an estimate calculated for that numerical value on the basis of other numerical values, calculated at sampling moments in said set of numerical values when said first numerical value has been replaced by the estimate calculated for it, and said first numerical value is recognised on the basis of said first and second residuals.
- the invention is also directed to an apparatus for realising the method described above.
- the apparatus according to the invention for reducing noise in a digitally transmitted signal which consists of numerical values representing samples of a certain waveform, is characterised in that it comprises
- the invention is based on the knowledge that, as a rule, a speech signal produced by the human vocal organs conforms to certain laws. If an acoustic signal is given an electrical representation, these laws are manifest in a certain regularity in the waveform of the electric signal.
- an electric signal is represented by a train of samples, where the samples can be processed individually or in groups of desired sizes. If the value of a given sample substantially differs from an otherwise regular waveform, it can be assumed that it was not generated on the basis of the original acoustic signal but as a consequence of a sudden disturbance.
- the deviating sample value is replaced by a value that is closer to the estimate obtained on the basis of the regular waveform so that a near-original, noiseless signal can be reconstructed.
- a preferred embodiment of the invention is based on the known LPC method, in which at each sample of a digital signal a difference is calculated representing the difference of the current sample and the estimate calculated for it on the basis of the previous samples.
- a sudden disturbance in the original signal results in the degradation of the estimate, which shows as increasing amplitudes of the difference values at the location of the disturbance.
- the effect of the disturbance is removed when the deviating sample is replaced by another value which better conforms to the average behaviour of the speech signal.
- a preferred replacement value is the value calculated for the sample in question as an estimate determined on the basis of the previous speech samples.
- Noise reduction according to the invention is preferably realised at the receiving end so that it works for all disturbances originated at the transmitting end or on the transmission path and transmitted via a communications link to the receiving apparatus.
- This brings considerable advantage as a communications device applying the method according to the invention produces a higher-quality acoustic signal from a received radio signal than an apparatus without the noise reduction according to the invention.
- the invention is not limited to be used at the receiving end only, but it can also be used to enhance the signal quality prior to transmission.
- the invention is applicable in local digital sound reproduction systems that do not require signal transmission in a communications network.
- the noise reduction according to the invention can be applied to cellular networks and mobile stations.
- the inventional method can be realised in a receiving mobile station without any hardware changes as the implementation of the method can utilise information already computed in the mobile station.
- the inventional method is flexible in a mobile station environment in that it can be realised so as to process different quantities of candidate impulses so that computing capacity can be adapted to the environment.
- the simplicity of the method is an advantage as far as the production of mobile stations is concerned because it makes possible to perform the new calculations using the existing DSP circuit in the phone without any changes in the electronic circuitry of the apparatus.
- the proposed method does not call for changes in the LPC parameters, such as the order and frame size, of the most typical speech encoders.
- the invention can be realised in a mobile station mainly by modifying the software that controls the operation of the mobile station.
- the method according to the invention can be realised not only in a receiving mobile station but also in a transmitting mobile station or in cellular base stations where transmission and reception coding is identical to that of mobile stations. Realisation of the method in base stations has the special advantage that no changes are needed in the existing mobile stations.
- Fig. la shows a certain signal waveform and sampling applied to it
- Fig. lb shows an LPC residual formed from the waveform of Fig. la according to the prior art
- Fig. lc shows an LPC residual shaped according to a preferred embodiment of the invention
- FFiigg.. 22 shows in the form of block diagram a communications device which includes noise removal according to the invention
- Fig. 3 shows in the form of block diagram a noise removal arrangement according to the invention applied to a transmitter according to the GSM system and Fig. 4 shows in the form of block diagram noise removal according to the invention applied to a receiver according to the GSM system.
- the sound production process of a healthy person starts with air being pushed from the lungs through the vocal cords in the larynx so that the vocal cords start oscillating and generate a so-called glottis impulse.
- a speaker can produce various resonating frequencies (so-called formants).
- formants As the glottal excitation that has left the vocal cords passes through the vocal tract, the exitation is strongly filtered by the vocal tract.
- the sound produced e.g. vowel /a/, gets its characteristic shape mainly from the vocal tract's resonating frequencies used in the sound production.
- vocal cords do not oscillate in the speech production, but the speaker produces in the outcoming air flow interruptions and/or broadband noise oscillation using the mouth. So, the human sound production mechanism, particularly in the case of voiced sounds, produces speech in physiological processes based on the periodic motion of two baggy organs (vocal cords) containing plenty of water. The waveform thus produced, when received by a microphone and converted to electric form, is quite regular when observed across a short span of time.
- Fig. la schematically shows part of a waveform of an electric signal.
- it represent a human speech sound, recorded by a microphone and analogically converted into an electric signal the amplitude of which varies as a function of time as described by the waveform 1.
- the human sound production system can only produce certain relatively regular waveforms, so we can say about the waveform 1 that the sudden peak 2 in it is probably caused by a disturbance and not included in the original speech sound.
- the waveform 1 must be shaped such that the effect of the peak 2 is eliminated so that when an electric signal according to the shaped waveform is fed to a loudspeaker, the loudspeaker reproduces the sound without the disturbance.
- Signal distortion caused by sudden disturbances such as the peak 2 is called impulse noise.
- the waveform 1 is not processed as such, but it is sampled, i.e. samples are taken from the analog signal at regular intervals. Sampling can be realised using various methods.
- a preferred embodiment of the invention for removing impulse noise involves the LPC method, which is known per se, but the essential features of the method will nevertheless be described below to provide background information for the preferred embodiment of the invention.
- the LPC method an estimate is produced for each sample of a digital sample train, said estimate being a weighted linear combination of p previous samples, where p is a positive parameter. Then it is calculated the difference of the current signal and the estimate calculated for it in the manner described above, said difference being called a residual signal, or residual. The better the estimate, the smaller the energy of the residual signal.
- the LPC analysis has become the most significant technique facilitating speech coding.
- a speech signal of good quality can be transmitted using a considerably lower bit rate than that used e.g. by the pulse code modulation (PCM) technique traditionally used in the fixed telecommunications network.
- PCM pulse code modulation
- Efficient speech coding using the LPC analysis is based on the fact that a residual resembling noise can be quantised using a small amount of information without significantly degrading the quality of the signal synthesised from the residual back into a speech signal.
- the LPC method cannot predict sudden noise peaks, it produces for a sample corresponding to a time index k an estimate which is represented by the darkened circle 4 in the case depicted by Fig. la.
- the open circle 3 represents a sample of the original signal suffering from impulse noise at time index k so that the difference of the signal and the estimate is quite big.
- Fig. lb shows a prior-art LPC residual which shows that the prediction error grows considerably across the time span from index k to index k+p, where p is the order of the prediction, i.e. the number of the previous samples used for calculating a given estimate.
- an apparatus processing the original noisy speech signal examines whether it would be more logical to replace in a given time index the speech signal sample by the estimate produced by the LPC analysis so that the residual of the new signal thus obtained would be smaller than the residual computed from the original speech signal.
- Fig. lc shows a residual calculated by replacing a noisy sample of the original speech signal at time index k by an estimate produced by the LPC analysis.
- the invention be applied as an enhancement method for the speech quality of a sound-reproducing apparatus prior to the conversion of a digital signal into an analog one by a D/A converter.
- the method aims at reconstructing a speech signal spoiled by impulse noise so that it becomes nearer to the waveform that represented the signal before the introduction of the noise.
- By feeding the reconstructed wave- form to a loudspeaker we get an acoustic signal that sounds almost like the original noiseless speech signal.
- the apparatus calculates for each digital signal sample an estimate on the basis of previous samples.
- the preferred embodiment of the invention only requires that the apparatus knows a certain threshold value to which it compares the ratio of the energies of two residuals. A first residual has been calculated from the original signal which may include noise.
- a second residual is the residual obtained from the signal wherein the sample of the original speech signal at the current time index has been replaced by the LPC estimate of that sample.
- These two residuals differ from each other only in the index span from k to k+p, where k is the current time index and p is the order of the LPC prediction.
- Computing capacity can be saved in the energy calculation by taking into account the fact that differences occur only in that span.
- a residual and its energy are always computed within a certain time window that includes the current sample or samples. If the ratio of the energies of said two residuals exceeds said threshold value, the apparatus assumes that the speech signal sample at the current time index is a noise peak so that there is good reason to replace it by the LPC estimate.
- FIG. 2 shows a simple block diagram of an apparatus applying the preferred embodiment of the invention described above. It generally comprises a reception part 24, the detailed structure of which is not shown but which may include e.g. known means for receiving, demodulating and decoding a radio signal transmitted from a base station in a digital cellular radio system.
- the reception part 24 feeds to block 20 a bit string that corresponds to a speech signal.
- the digital-to-analog conversion is performed in block 21.
- Block 22 calculates the residuals and compares the ratio of the energies of two residuals to a predetermined threshold value. When block 22 detects that the threshold value is exceeded, it instructs block 21 to replace the sample in the current time index by the value produced by the LPC prediction.
- Average magnitude of residuals varies according to the regularity of the original signal.
- the resulting waveform is very regular and thus very predictable.
- the residual energies are very small and disturbances caused by impulse noise are clearly discernible. If the speaker utters an /s/ sound, the acoustic signal resembles random noise and its predictability is poor. Then, disturbances caused by impulse noise do not induce in the residual as great a change as in the case of voiced sounds.
- the method according to the invention is unable to improve the quality of voiceless sounds as effectively as that of voiced sounds. This, however, is not very significant since in the case of the /s/ sound impulse noise is mixed with the characteristic noise structure of the sound it- self and a listener will not experience it as disturbing as in the case of a voiced sound.
- the invention advantageously prepares for this divergence of sounds in such a manner that the threshold value at which a signal sample is interpreted as a noise peak, is adaptive, i.e. its magnitude is determined in a certain manner by the average ratio of the residual energies compared.
- the comparison block 22 comprises e.g. a FIFO-type (First-In- First-Out) register 22a that always stores the n latest residuals or residual energy ratios, where n is a positive parameter.
- the comparison block 22 must include calculating means 22b for computing an average or median or another suitable parameter from the contents of the register as well as means for determining the threshold value on the basis of said parameter. All said functional features are preferably realised as a program executed by a digital signal processor.
- Fig. 3 illustrates the operation of the method according to the invention in a trans- mitter encoder 10 of the GSM system. More specifically, it is a regular pulse excited-long term predictive (RPE-LTP) speech encoder, which is currently widely considered the technically most capable speech encoder, but the inventional ideas of the example discussed here can also be applied to the CELP (Code Excited Linear Prediction), SBC-APCM, SBC-ADPCM and MPE-LTP speech encoders.
- RPE-LTP regular pulse excited-long term predictive
- a pre-emphasised speech signal is divided into segments comprising 160 samples in a segmentation part 40 to which the signal is brought via connection 34. After that, the segments of the signal are windowed using so-called Hamming windows in block 50.
- the windowed and segmented signal goes to short term prediction (STP) analysis and filtering 300 where autocorrelation coefficients are first computed in block 60 in which the signal arrives via connection 56.
- the autocorrelation coefficients are taken via connection 67 to block 70 where reflection coefficients are calculated using the so-called Schur recursion.
- the reflection coefficients are sent 714 to the impulse removal 140 where they are used for recognising noise peaks.
- the reflection coefficients are also sent forward in the STP analysis (300) via connection 78 to block 80, where logarithmic area ratios (LAR) are computed from them.
- the logarithmic area ratios are quantised in blocks 90 and 100 and interpolated linearly in blocks 110 and 120.
- an STP residual is computed from the processed logarithmic area ratios using a so-called partial correlation (PARCOR) method.
- PARCOR partial correlation
- This STP residual is fed to the impulse removal 140, where according to the invention a corrected residual is formed using both the original speech signal (connection 14) and the reflection coefficients (connection 714), said corrected residual being characterised in that the effects of the most significant noise peaks have been removed from it.
- the corrected residual is fed via connection 141 to a long term prediction (LTP) analysis, where a peak structure reproduced at the fundamental frequency of the speech is removed from the residual signal using a so-called long term LPC estimate.
- LTP long term prediction
- the residual signal can be substantially improved by adding the impulse removal according to the invention, block 140, connections 14, 714, 1314, 141, to the known GSM speech encoder. It is obvious that a better quality of the residual signal can substantially reduce noise in the speech signal.
- an RPE decoder 170 detects a speech signal from a coded signal brought to a GSM receiver, said speech signal being then sent via connection 1718 to be LTP synthesised in block 180.
- the speech signal is then taken via connections 1813 and 1319 to signal postprocessing 500.
- the LTP and STP syntheses (180, 190) and filterings performed on the speech signal along this path are substantially inverse operations of the LTP and STP analyses and filterings already described in conjunction with Fig. 3.
- the RPE decoder 170 also receives LPC coefficients which are sent via connection 1710 to the STP synthesis filtering chain 400 where reflection coefficients are filtered from the LPC coefficients using parameters of logarithmic area ratios.
- the reflection coefficients are filtered in blocks 100, 110, 120 by quantising and linearly interpolating the logarithmic area ratio parameters.
- the method is substantially the inverse operation of the compilation of the uncorrected residual described in conjunction with Fig. 3.
- the reflection coefficients are sent via connection 1214 to the impulse removal 140 where the strongest noise peaks are removed from the speech signal according to the invention using the reflection coefficients received via connection 1214.
- the method discussed above substantially improves the quality of speech reproduced by a GSM receiver.
- the embodiment shown in Fig. 4 is particularly advantageous in a receiving GSM mobile station since in this case the corrected signal is no more sent to possibly corruptive transmission paths but will propagate direct to the listener's ear.
- the invention provides an apparatus and a method for improving the under- standability of an electrically reproduced speech signal in a manner which is easy to implement and which effectively attenuates all disturbances caused by the transmitting end, transmission path and preceding parts of the receiving apparatus in addition to disturbances acoustically coupled to the microphone.
- the method according to the invention does not require complex equipment or special components so that it is ideal for small, portable communications devices, such as mobile stations, but on the other hand, it can be easily applied to base stations of various cellular networks as well.
- the invention is also applicable to data com- munications systems of fixed networks. If the invention is applied in a communications device designed for the handling of both speech and other signals, it may be advantageous to include in the device a switch or an automatic function that activates the operation according to the invention only when the communications device is processing speech.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Compression, Expansion, Code Conversion, And Decoders (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU35445/97A AU3544597A (en) | 1996-07-25 | 1997-07-25 | A method and a device for the reduction impulse noise from speech signal |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FI962965A FI962965A (en) | 1996-07-25 | 1996-07-25 | Method and apparatus for eliminating impulse interference from the speech signal |
FI962965 | 1996-07-25 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1998005031A2 true WO1998005031A2 (en) | 1998-02-05 |
WO1998005031A3 WO1998005031A3 (en) | 1998-03-05 |
Family
ID=8546431
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI1997/000458 WO1998005031A2 (en) | 1996-07-25 | 1997-07-25 | A method and a device for the reduction impulse noise from a speech signal |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU3544597A (en) |
FI (1) | FI962965A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998005031A2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2000038180A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2000-06-29 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Noise suppression in a mobile communications system |
WO2006127968A1 (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2006-11-30 | Berkley Integrated Audio Software, Inc. | Restoring audio signals corrupted by impulsive noise |
EP2149879A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Noise detecting device and noise detecting method |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0336685A2 (en) * | 1988-04-08 | 1989-10-11 | Cedar Audio Limited | Impulse noise detection and supression |
JPH06177786A (en) * | 1992-12-08 | 1994-06-24 | Pioneer Electron Corp | Impulse noise elimination device |
JPH08195688A (en) * | 1995-01-17 | 1996-07-30 | Kokusai Electric Co Ltd | Receiving device having noise eliminating function |
JPH08275086A (en) * | 1995-04-03 | 1996-10-18 | Toshiba Corp | Pcm demodulation processing circuit |
-
1996
- 1996-07-25 FI FI962965A patent/FI962965A/en unknown
-
1997
- 1997-07-25 WO PCT/FI1997/000458 patent/WO1998005031A2/en active Application Filing
- 1997-07-25 AU AU35445/97A patent/AU3544597A/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0336685A2 (en) * | 1988-04-08 | 1989-10-11 | Cedar Audio Limited | Impulse noise detection and supression |
JPH06177786A (en) * | 1992-12-08 | 1994-06-24 | Pioneer Electron Corp | Impulse noise elimination device |
JPH08195688A (en) * | 1995-01-17 | 1996-07-30 | Kokusai Electric Co Ltd | Receiving device having noise eliminating function |
JPH08275086A (en) * | 1995-04-03 | 1996-10-18 | Toshiba Corp | Pcm demodulation processing circuit |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2000038180A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2000-06-29 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Noise suppression in a mobile communications system |
WO2006127968A1 (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2006-11-30 | Berkley Integrated Audio Software, Inc. | Restoring audio signals corrupted by impulsive noise |
US7787975B2 (en) | 2005-05-26 | 2010-08-31 | Berkley Integrated Audio Software, Inc. | Restoring audio signals |
EP2149879A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Noise detecting device and noise detecting method |
US8892430B2 (en) | 2008-07-31 | 2014-11-18 | Fujitsu Limited | Noise detecting device and noise detecting method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FI962965A (en) | 1998-01-26 |
AU3544597A (en) | 1998-02-20 |
WO1998005031A3 (en) | 1998-03-05 |
FI962965A0 (en) | 1996-07-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5933803A (en) | Speech encoding at variable bit rate | |
KR100575193B1 (en) | A decoding method and system comprising an adaptive postfilter | |
JP4927257B2 (en) | Variable rate speech coding | |
EP0673013B1 (en) | Signal encoding and decoding system | |
EP0993670B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for speech enhancement in a speech communication system | |
KR100421160B1 (en) | Adaptive Filter and Filtering Method for Low Bit Rate Coding | |
KR100216018B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for encoding and decoding of background sounds | |
US20030065507A1 (en) | Network unit and a method for modifying a digital signal in the coded domain | |
EP1020848A2 (en) | Method for transmitting auxiliary information in a vocoder stream | |
WO1994025959A1 (en) | Use of an auditory model to improve quality or lower the bit rate of speech synthesis systems | |
KR100498177B1 (en) | Signal quantizer | |
WO1998005031A2 (en) | A method and a device for the reduction impulse noise from a speech signal | |
KR20000028699A (en) | Device and method for filtering a speech signal, receiver and telephone communications system | |
GB2336978A (en) | Improving speech intelligibility in presence of noise | |
Stansfield et al. | Speech processing techniques for HF radio security | |
JP3896654B2 (en) | Audio signal section detection method and apparatus | |
Stansfield et al. | Adaptive filters in speech coding | |
WO1993021627A1 (en) | Digital signal coding | |
Kulakcherla | Non linear adaptive filters for echo cancellation of speech coded signals |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH HU IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL |
|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH HU IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): GH KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: CA |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 1998508288 Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |