COMPOSITE GOLF CLUB SHAFT
AND METHOD FOR ITS MANUFACTURE
Cross-Reference to Related Applications
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent
applications Serial No. 60/018,882, entitled "Composite Golf Club Shaft and
Method for Its Manufacture," filed on May 31 , 1996 and Serial No.
60/023,488, entitled "Composite Golf Club Shaft and Method for Its
Manufacture," filed on August 9, 1996, and U.S. non-provisional patent
application Serial No. 08/709,269, entitled "Composite Golf Club Shaft and
Method for Its Manufacture," filed on September 6. 1996. Each of these
applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Background and Summary of the Invention
This invention relates generally to golf club shafts. More particularly,
it concerns an improved composite shaft and a method for its manufacture,
and a club made with such a shaft.
Recent advances in golf shaft manufacture involve the use of carbon-
or boron-based resin-impregnated sheet material in a wrapped laminar
structure. The structure forms a thin-walled but very strong, slightly
frustoconical, but substantially cylindrical shaft. It has been found that such a
shaft delivers excellent torque transmission from the hands of a golfer holding
the shaft at one end to a golf club head mounted on the other end, when the
shaft is gripped and swung. Such golf shaft structure and method are
described and illustrated in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/366,965,
filed December 30, 1994, now U.S. Patent No. 5,569,099, entitled GOLF
CLUB SHAFT AND LAMINAR STRUCTURAL ELEMENT AND
METHOD FOR ITS MANUFACTURE, incorporated herein by reference.
Briefly, the invented golf club shaft includes a first elongate segment
for mounting to a golf club head, formed by wrapping sheet material around a
substantially cylindrical, very slightly tapered and thus slightly frustoconical
mandrel, and a second elongate approximately frustoconical segment for
gripping by a golfer. The second segment is formed around the first segment
and mandrel to produce a smoothly tapering exterior surface of the shaft. The
shaft thus has a bugle or horn shape with a curvilinear flare at its gripping
end, and an abrupt interior region of joinder between the segments. The
joinder between the segments preferably is approximately one-third of the
way from the gripping end of the shaft. The shaft tapers such that its head-
mounting end is less than approximately one-third the diameter of its gripping
end. Greatly improved torque transmission and drive distance are achievable
due to the structure of the shaft, even over that described in the above-
referenced US Patent No. 5,569,099.
The shaft also appears to exhibit shock-dampening properties, and
includes an ergonomically designed gripping end, both properties allowing
the shaft to be used without the conventional addition of a grip. The
elimination of the grip, which usually is made of an elastomer, significantly
lightens the gripping end, dramatically changing the balance of a club made
with the invented shaft. The balance point of a club made with the invented
shaft is very close to the club head, even when the club head is quite
lightweight. The elimination of the grip also improves the torque
characteristics by eliminating the elastomeric grip flexing between the shaft
and the golfer's hand. The shape and smooth, hard surface of the gripping
end allows for a great variety of performance enhancing techniques, by
applying padding, adhesives and lubricants to selected portions of a golfer's
hands.
These and additional objects and advantages of the present invention
will be understood more readily after a consideration of the drawings and the
detailed description of the preferred embodiment.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is an isometric view of a golf club, including a shaft made in
accordance with the preferred embodiment and a golf club head attached to
the shaft.
Fig. 2 is an enlarged, fragmentary, cross-sectional view of the shaft
taken generally along line 2-2 in Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a greatly enlarged cross-sectional view of the shaft taken
generally along line 3-3 in Fig. 1 , also shown without the head.
Fig. 4 is a front view of a partially completed golf club shaft made in
accordance with its preferred embodiment, shown before the application of an
exterior coating, enlarged relative to Fig. 1, and with slightly different
dimensional proportions from the shaft shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 5A is a front view similar to that shown in Fig. 4, illustrating the
preferred method of manufacturing the invented golf club shaft.
Fig. 5B is a front view similar to that shown in Fig. 5A, illustrating
alternative methods of manufacturing the invented golf club shaft.
Fig. 6 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of an end cap for use in the
shaft, viewed similarly to Fig. 4, and further enlarged.
Fig. 7 is a fragmentary front view of a golf club similar to the club
shown in Fig. 1 , greatly enlarged, with a portion of the shaft omitted as
indicated.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
Referring first to Figs. 1 , 2 and 4, the invented golf club shaft is
indicated generally at 10 in the form of an elongate, hollow, horn-shaped,
curvilinearly flared but generally cylindrical body. Shaft 10 is defined by a
first end 12 that serves as a head-mounting end 12, a second end 14 that
serves as a gripping end or end region 14, and an exterior surface 16. Exterior
surface 16 preferably is a hard glossy surface smoothly tapering from a
head-mounting end outer diameter 18 to a gripping end outer diameter 20.
An intermediate outer diameter 22 is indicated between head-mounting end
12 and gripping end 14. Shaft 10 is formed with a thin wall indicated in Fig.
2 at 24, having a wall thickness 26 (see Fig. 2) and an overall axial length 28
(see Fig. 4).
Turning to Figs. 3 through 5 A, shaft 10 preferably is made of a
composite material including a plurality of laminar sheet material-type plies
(identified below). The composite material preferably is formed of flexible
fibers based on a chemical element selected from a group including boron,
tungsten, iron, and carbon. When the chemical element includes carbon, the
carbon is typically hexagonally crystallized, and is known as graphite. For
example, the material may comprise graphite-based, binder-containing, heat-
settable fibers formed into a sheet with a predefined, uniform orientation of
the fibers in the sheet. Such a sheet optimally may be oriented relative to the
long axis of shaft 10 to orient the fibers contained in the sheet to provide the
desired structural characteristics for shaft 10.
The selective orientation of the fibers in the material in the preferred
embodiment is best understood with reference to Fig. 5 A, showing the
material in layered sheets or plies, before it is formed into the shaft shape of
shaft 10. It will be seen that the plies are grouped into two discrete segments.
The plies may be characterized by the orientation or bias of the fibers in the
plies, relative to the longitudinal axis of the plies. Those plies in which the
fibers are aligned with the longitudinal axis are referred to herein as
longitudinally oriented plies, and those plies in which the fibers extend at an
angle to the longitudinal axis are referred to as angularly oπented or biased
plies.
Preferably, the plies alternate between angularly biased plies and
longitudinally oriented (unbiased) plies. For example, in a first segment 30,
shown in the lower portion of Fig. 5 A, the plies include an angularly biased
ply 31 , an adjacent longitudinally oriented ply 32, another angularly biased
ply 33 adjacent ply 32, and finally another longitudinally oπented ply 34. It
will be seen that the fibers in angularly biased plies 31 and 33 are shown at
mirrored angles to each other. The preferred angle of the fibers in plies 31
and 33 is approximately 45-degrees to the longitudinal axes of the plies,
which also means that the fibers in ply 31 are perpendicular to the fibers in
ply 33.
A similar fiber arrangement is found in a second segment 35. Thus,
the plies include an angularly biased ply 36, a longitudinally oriented ply 37,
another angularly biased ply 38, and another longitudinally oriented ply 39.
Longitudinally oriented ply 37 is immediately intermediate angularly biased
plies 36 and 38. The fibers in angularly biased plies 36 and 38 are mirrored
similar to plies 31 and 33, but the angular bias is such that the fibers are
oriented at approximately a 60-degree angle to the longitudinal axes of the
plies. This means that the fibers in plies 31 and 33 are closer to alignment
with the longitudinal axes of the plies than are the fibers in plies 36 and 38.
When the plies are formed into a finished shaft, as described below, it will be
seen that the longitudinal axes of the plies are axially oriented relative to the
shaft.
By dividing all of the plies of the composite material into two discrete
segments of substantially continuous fibers, as opposed to continuous fibers
running substantially the entire length of shaft 10, it has been found that the
resulting club made with shaft 10 is much more responsive than a
conventional club. It is believed that shaft 10 better resists both flexure and
torsion.
The laminar structure of an alternative embodiment is demonstrated in
Fig. 5B. A single overlapping ply with substantially continuous fiber,
extending the entire length of shaft 10 is indicated at 134, replacing
longitudinally oriented plies 34 and 39 in segments 30 and 35, respectively.
Yet another alternative embodiment, not shown, would incorporate plies 34
and 39 of segments 30 and 35 in addition to overlapping ply 134.
Overlapping ply 134 adds substantially continuous fibers extending the entire
length of the alternative shaft, and thus changes the dynamics of shaft 10 so
that it is somewhat less responsive. However, this alternative shaft also is
more forgiving, and thus offers some desirable characteristics for some
players and situations.
In Figs. 1, 2, and 4, shaft 10 will be seen to have several segments or
portions that correspond to changes in the taper or contour of exterior sur "
16, and correspond to the segments of plies of the composite material, just
described. A first elongate segment, or portion 40, is shown in Fig. 1 as
having a first frustoconical contour defined by very small (less than 0.5-
degrees) first angle of taper indicated at 42 in Fig. 4. Given the small degree
of taper of first segment 40, it will be referred to herein occasionally as
substantially cylindrical, despite the fact that it is actually slightly
frustoconical. This provides a convenient way to describe first segment 40
relative to other more highly tapered segments of shaft 10, described below.
First segment 40 has an axial length 44 (see Fig. 4), at one end of which is a
smaller annular edge region 46, and at the other end of which is a larger
annular edge region 48. Edge region 46 corresponds to outer diameter 18,
shown in Fig. 1. For reference, a final inner diameter 50 is indicated in Fig. 2,
corresponding to edge region 48 of segment 40.
A second elongate segment or portion of shaft 10 is indicated at 52 in
Fig. 1. Second segment 52 includes a second frustoconical contour
substantially defined by a second angle of taper 54 of approximately 0.5
degrees, shown in Fig. 4. Second segment 52 has an overall axial length 56,
and further includes a subsegment or subportion 58 (see Fig. 1) that forms an
annular edge region of second segment 52. Similarly, subsegment 58 has a
third contour defined by a third angle of taper 60 of approximately 2 degrees,
and an axial length indicated at 62. The third contour renders shaft 10
somewhat bugle or horn shaped. For reference, an initial inner diameter 64 is
indicated in Fig. 2 for second segment 52, and an intermediate outer diameter
66 is indicated in Fig. 1. Intermediate outer diameter 66 corresponds to the
beginning of subsegment 58. The end of subsegment 58 corresponds to
gripping end outer diameter 20, discussed above.
Referring collectively to Figs. 1 and 5A, it will be seen that first
segment 40 corresponds to plies 31 through 35 , and second segment 52
corresponds to plies 36 through 39, with some overlap of first segment 40 by
second segment 52. The change in contour from segment 40 to segment 52 is
believed to complement the discrete segments of fibers, making shaft 10 even
more responsive, and to isolate a golfer holding end 14 from vibrations
generated at end 12. A transition region 68 is indicated in Fig. 1 by the
joinder of first segment 40 and second segment 52, and is in the form of a
smoothly tapering blended joint, when viewed from the exterior of shaft 10.
Thus, transition region 68 corresponds to the joint between the plies of first
segment 40 and second segment 52. Transition region 68 includes an interior
region of joinder with an abrupt step increase in inner diameter, indicated at
70 in Fig. 2. The axial length of transition region 68 is indicated in Fig. 4 at
72.
Annular edge region 58 of second segment 52 may be capped with an
end cap 74, formed from cork or other resilient material. As shown in Fig. 6,
end cap 74 preferably has an axial length indicated at 76 and a hollow core
78.
For reference, a golf club head 80 is shown in Figs. 1 and 7, and
includes a bottom surface indicated at 82. A center of mass for head 80 is
indicated at 80a in Fig. 7. Shaft 10 and head 80 together form a finished golf
club 84. A center of mass 84a for finished golf club 84 is indicated in Fig. 7.
The shock-isolating feature of shaft 10 eliminates the need for a
conventional grip. This improves the responsiveness of club 84 by
eliminating the flexure and torsion that is found in the elastomeric grips of
conventional clubs. It also eliminates the weight of a grip, which
conventionally is at the gripping end of club 84, making the club much lighter
than a conventional club and moving the balance point of club 84 much closer
to the head (and thus lower to the ground when club 84 is in use) than in a
conventional club. This is the case even when head 80 is much lighter than
normal. It has been found that lighter clubs with lower balance points,
measured relative to a ground plane in normal playing position, often perform
better than clubs with higher balance points.
Furthermore, the above-discussed aspects of second segment 52,
including the changes in contour and smooth-glossy surface 16 allow for the
use of numerous performance-enhancing compounds and articles other than a
shaft-mounted grip. For example, a golfer may find that wearing a glove on
one hand, while applying some lubricant to the other hand allows the gloved
hand to exert the majority of the control over the club. Similar results might
be achieved by using an adhesive on one hand, and not on the other. Further
fine-tuning might include the use of adhesive or lubricant just on one portion
of a hand.
A more detailed explanation of the dimensions of shaft 10 and the
relationship of shaft 10 to club head 80 in finished golf club 84 is aided by the
following identifications, as shown best in Fig. 7. A longitudinal axis 86 is
indicated for shaft 10, and a ground plane 88, based on the normal playing
orientation of club 84, is shown, with ground plane 88 being approximately
tangential to a portion of bottom surface 82. A ground-based balance point
distance 90 is defined from club center of mass 84a to bottom surface 82,
taken perpendicularly from ground plane 88, as shown by the dimension
callout lines in Fig. 7. An overall length of club 84 is indicated at 92,
measured from the top of shaft 10 to bottom surface 82, taken along
longitudinal axis 86 by projection, also shown by dimension callout lines in
Fig. 7. An alternative measurement of the balance point is indicated in Fig. 7,
showing an axial balance point distance 94 measured by projection of both
center of mass 84a and bottom surface 82 onto axis 86, and measuring the
axial distance between these projected points, as shown. Finally, a gripping
region is indicated at 96, corresponding generally to the region of shaft 10
having a frustoconical contour defined by second angle of taper 54. A
midpoint of gripping region 96 is indicated at 98.
Thus, club 84 could be described as follows. Club 84 includes a shaft
10 and a golf head 80. Shaft 10 has a longitudinal axis 86. Head 80 includes
a bottom surface 82 opposite from shaft 10, bottom surface 82 defining a
ground plane 88 approximately contacting bottom surface 82 and extending at
an angle 88a of approximately 50-degrees from longitudinal axis 86. A
ground-based balance point distance 90 is defined between club center of
mass 84a and bottom surface 82, measured along a line projecting
perpendicularly to ground plane 88, as indicated by dimensional line 90.
Alternatively, an axial balance point distance 94 is defined between center of
mass 84a and bottom surface 82, measured along longitudinal axis 86 by
perpendicular projection, as shown by dimensional line 94.
Preferably, club 84 has an overall weight of less than approximately
400-grams and an overall length of at least 42-inches. Shaft 10 has a shaft
weight and head 80 has a head weight and the ratio of the head weight to the
shaft weight is more than approximately 3-to-l . More specifics on the
weights of shaft 10, head 80, and club 84 are given in the tables below.
The above-defined axial length, inner and outer diameters, angles of
taper and choice of fibers may be varied to produce various shafts 10 for use
in different-purpose golf clubs. For example, a smaller diameter shaft might
be used by players with smaller hands. Conversely, a larger diameter shaft
might be used by players with large hands or with arthritis. In general, first
segment 40 is approximately two-thirds of overall shaft length 28 of shaft 10,
and second segment 52 is approximately one-third of overall shaft length 28.
Second segment 52 ranges from approximately 10.5-inches to 16-inches in
length. The following table lists more specific dimensions for selected clubs.
The following table lists results from robotic tests of two clubs made from
the invented shaft (New "Firm" and New "Strong"), as well as two clubs made
from other shafts (B.B. UL "Firm" and A.J. Tech(tm) 2590 XKD). Each club
was swung with the same force, hitting a ball with the center of the face of the
head, and the results show selected measurements from a series of 8 hits with
each club. The average value is listed, as indicated by "avg.," and standard
deviation is listed for distance and velocity, indicated by "s/d." Dispersion
measures the amount of variation from straight-line travel of the ball, whether
airborne or total. The airborne distance is the point-to-point distance from the tee
to the first landing of the ball. Swing weight is a standardized measurement for
golf clubs, reflecting the "feeling" of the club by measuring the static balance
leverage of the club.
^1
I m ~ m σ^
-I
3 c r m-
IS-t
O
H
VO
© o
Given the above identification of the various aspects of a golf club,
different embodiments of the invention may be described. For example, one
embodiment may be described as a shaft 10 having two distinct elongate
segments 40 and 52. First segment 40 is substantially cylindrical and extends
from a first end 12 for mounting of a golf club head 80, to a second end 48.
Second segment 52 is substantially frustoconical and extends coaxially with first
segment 40. A first end of second segment 52 is joined with second end 48 of
first segment 40. A second end 14 of second segment 52 is provided for manual
gripping by a user.
First segment 40 preferably is approximately twice as long as second
segment 52, although the ratio of the two segments 40 and 52 may vary
somewhat within the spirit and scope of the invention, as shown in the
differences between Figs. 1 and 4. First segment 40 and second segment 52 meet
in a region of joinder 68. Inner diameters 50 and 64 of segments 40 and 52 are
substantially different, as shown in Fig. 2. Segments 40 and 52 have
substantially identical outer diameters in region 68.
A different embodiment may be described as a shaft 10 for attachment at
a first end 12 to a golf club head 80, wherein shaft 10 is defined by an exterior
surface 16 having a first contour over a first portion 40 of shaft 10 adjacent first
end 12 and a second contour over a second portion 52 of shaft 10 distant from
first end 12, wherein the contour of second portion 52 flares relative to the
contour of first portion 40.
Preferred Method of Manufacturing the Preferred Embodiment
The preferred method for manufacturing shaft 10 includes steps to create
a laminated first segment 40 for shaft 10. These include the steps of selecting
graphite-based oriented fiber sheet material, cutting from the sheet material a first
elongate rectangular biased ply 31 (one in which the ply is cut from the sheet
material relative to the fiber orientation in the sheet material so that the fibers in
the resulting ply extend at an angle to the long axis of the rectangle defined by
the ply), cutting from the sheet material an elongate rectangular intermediate
longitudinally oriented ply 32 (one in which the fibers extend parallel to the long
axis of the rectangle defined by the ply), and cutting from the sheet material a
second elongate rectangular biased ply 33 . Intermediate ply 32 is sandwiched
between first biased ply 31 and second biased ply 33 and the fibers in first ply 31
are oriented to extend at an angle approximately perpendicular to the fibers in
second biased ply 33. The fibers in plies 31 and 33 are oriented to define an
angle of approximately 45-degrees to the long axis of the rectangular plies.
Preferably, an outer longitudinally oriented ply 34 similar to intermediate ply 32
is applied to second biased ply 33. The sandwiched plies preferably are tacked
together by applying heat at selected regions.
The preferred method further includes steps to create a laminated second
segment 52 attached to first segment 40. For example, the method includes the
steps of selecting boron-based oriented fiber sheet material, and cutting from the
sheet material plies similar to those defined for use in forming first segment 40.
A first elongate rectangular biased ply 36 is cut, an elongate rectangular
intermediate ply 37 is cut, and a second elongate rectangular biased ply 38 is cut.
Preferably, the fibers in biased plies 36 and 38 are oriented to be closer to
alignment with the short sides of the rectangular ply than to its long sides,
defining an angle of approximately 60-degrees to the long axis of the rectangular
ply, as shown in Fig. 5 A. The fibers in first ply 36 are oriented approximately
opposite (or mirrored) to the fibers in second ply 38. In Fig. 5B, the angles of
plies 36 and 38 are shown at an alternative angle of 30-degrees to the long axis of
shaft 10.
The long axes of rectangular plies 36, 37 and 38 will be aligned with
longitudinal axis 86 in the finished shaft 10. Intermediate ply 37 is sandwiched
between first ply 36 and second ply 38. Preferably, an outer longitudinally
oriented ply 39 similar to intermediate ply 37 is applied to second ply 38. The
sandwiched plies preferably are tacked together by applying heat at selected
regions.
The method further includes the step of interposing a portion of
boron-based first ply 36 between graphite-based intermediate ply 32 and second
ply 33. The boron-based plies are tacked to the graphite-based plies by applying
heat to selective regions of overlap between the plies. The regions of overlap
increase the structural integrity of the joint between first segment 40 and second
segment 52, while maintaining the discrete segments of plies, discussed above.
A mandrel 100 is formed having predefined regions of a first taper, a
second taper greater than the first taper, and a third taper greater than the second
taper, and the graphite-based sheet material is rolled onto mandrel 100 to form
substantially first segment 40. Further rolling of the sheet material onto mandrel
100 rolls the boron-based sheet material around mandrel 100, thus lapping first
segment 40 with additional sheet material to form substantially second segment
52. The preferred alignment of the fibers in plies 31, 33, 36, and 38 results in a
shaft 10 having angularly biased plies in first segment 40 and second segment 52,
with fibers in first segment 40 being closer to axial alignment than the fibers in
second segment 52. The rolled and overlapped sheet material, including plies 31,
32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, and 39 are set or cured in a vacuum autoclave as will be
understood by those having skill in the art. The resulting shaft preferably is
coated with any suitable coating 16a (see Fig. 3) to define smoothly tapering
exterior surface 16 and to produce an integral shaft 10.
The preferred method may be varied in numerous ways to produce an
alternative embodiment of shaft 10, each embodiment having the geometry
defined above and incorporating material properties as desired. For example, the
sheet material may be selected having fibers based on compounds other than
graphite or boron, such as glass or tungsten. The grouping of graphite- and
boron-based fibers described above may be altered so that segment 40 is boron-
based and segment 52 is graphite-based. Further, each ply in the sheet material
may be selected to include fibers based on compounds different from the fibers in
any other ply in shaft 10. Still further, the selection of oriented fiber ply may be
replaced or augmented by helical or longitudinal winding of fibers about or along
mandrel 100, as is understood by those having skill in the art. Yet further, an
alternative method may include the steps of cutting from the graphite-based sheet
material an elongate rectangular overlapping ply 134 in which the fibers are
longitudinally oriented, and rolling overlapping ply 134 around first segment 40,
second segment 52, and mandrel 100 to overlap first segment 40 and second
segment 52. In yet another alternative embodiment, the step involving
overlapping ply 134 may replace the steps involving plies 34 and 39.
Described differently, a method for manufacturing a golf club shaft
includes rolling laminar sheet material, such as plies 31 , 32, and 33, onto a
mandrel 100 to produce a first shaft segment 40 that is substantially cylindrical
and slightly tapered throughout its length. Shaft segment 40 terminates on either
end in an annular edge region, 12 and 48. Slightly smaller annular edge region
12 is adaptable to mount a golf club head 80.
First shaft segment 40 is lapped in slightly larger annular edge region 48
with additional laminar sheet material, such as plies 36, 37, and 38, to produce a
second shaft segment 52 that is substantially frustoconical. Second shaft
segment 52 extends axially with first shaft segment 40 and to a predetermined
length therebeyond. The lapping is performed in such manner that there is a
smoothly tapering transition region 68 along the exterior surfaces of first and
second shaft segments, 40 and 52.
The predetermined length is formed by rolling the additional sheet
material onto mandrel 100. The predetermined length terminates in an annular
edge region having a diameter that is substantially greater than annular edge
region 46 of first shaft segment 40. The sheet material of first and second shaft
segments 40 and 52 is set or cured to produce an integral shaft 10 of determined
length.
While the present invention has been shown and described with reference
to the preferred embodiment, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that
other changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the
spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.