WO1997017667A9 - Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions - Google Patents

Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions

Info

Publication number
WO1997017667A9
WO1997017667A9 PCT/GB1996/002742 GB9602742W WO9717667A9 WO 1997017667 A9 WO1997017667 A9 WO 1997017667A9 GB 9602742 W GB9602742 W GB 9602742W WO 9717667 A9 WO9717667 A9 WO 9717667A9
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
pseudo
transmitter
intervals
local timing
random
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1996/002742
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1997017667A1 (en
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to AU75023/96A priority Critical patent/AU7502396A/en
Priority to KR1019980703381A priority patent/KR19990067371A/en
Priority to JP9517995A priority patent/JP2000500932A/en
Priority to EP96937429A priority patent/EP0859989A1/en
Priority to CA 2235585 priority patent/CA2235585A1/en
Priority to BR9611705A priority patent/BR9611705A/en
Publication of WO1997017667A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997017667A1/en
Publication of WO1997017667A9 publication Critical patent/WO1997017667A9/en

Links

Definitions

  • THIS invention relates to a method of identifying a plurality of transmitters, each of which transmits data at intervals to a receiver.
  • the invention also relates to an identification system comprising a plurality of transmitters and a receiver, and to the transmitters themselves.
  • the invention further relates to method and apparatus for improving the identification systems disclosed in EP 494,114 A and, in particular, EP 585,132 A.
  • Identification systems are known in which a plurality of transmitters, typically transponders, are activated by an interrogation signal and then transmit reply signals, usually containing identification data, to a receiver, which typically forms part of the interrogator.
  • the signals may be transmitted in many ways, including electromagnetic energy, e.g. radio frequency (RF), infra red (IR), and coherent light, and sound, e.g. ultrasound.
  • RF radio frequency
  • IR infra red
  • coherent light e.g. ultrasound
  • the transmission may be achieved by actual emission of RF energy by the transmitters, or by the modulation of the reflectivity of an antenna of the transmitter, resulting in varying amounts of RF energy in the interrogation signal being reflected or back-scattered from the transmitter antenna.
  • GB 2,116,808 A discloses an identification system in which the individual transponders are programmed to retransmit data in a pseudo-random manner. Timing signals for the transponders in this identification system are derived from a crystal oscillator, thereby making the transponders more expensive to manufacture.
  • EP 467.036 A describes another identification system which uses a pseudo-random delay between transponder data transmissions.
  • a linear recursive sequence generator is seeded by the transponder identification address to make the pseudo-random delay as random as possible.
  • EP 494,1 14 A and EP 585,132 A disclose identifications systems in which the transponders may be programmed with the same data. It is an object of this invention to provide an improved system for generating the pseudo-random delays between transponder transmissions.
  • a method of identifying a plurality of transmitters, each transmitting at intervals to a receiver comprising varying the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions from each transmitter by enabling each transmitter at intervals which are calculated randomly or pseudo-randomly and are related to an operating frequency of local timing means associated with that transmitter.
  • the intervals are preferably varied between a maximum duration which is related to a predetermined number of cycles of the local timing means, and a minimum interval.
  • the duration of the intervals between transmissions may be calculated by periodically generating pseudo-random numbers, comparing the pseudo-random number with an output of counter means clocked by the local timing means, and enabling the transmitter when the pseudo-random number and the output of the counter means correspond.
  • an identification system comprising a plurality of transmitters each adapted to transmit at intervals and at least one receiver for receiving transmissions from the transmitters, each transmitter including means for generating transmissions, means for calculating the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions and means for enabling the transmitter at random or pseudorandom intervals related to an operating frequency of local timing means.
  • a transmitter adapted to transmit at intervals comprising means for generating transmissions, means for calculating the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions and means for enabling the transmitter at random or pseudo-random intervals related to an operating frequency of local timing means.
  • the local timing means is preferably an oscillator of the transmitter, with an unspecified clock frequency which is subject to a relatively large tolerance, so that the oscillators of different transmitters tend to run at different frequencies.
  • the enabling means may include a pseudo-random number generator arranged to generate pseudo-random numbers, counter means arranged to count at a rate related to the oscillator frequency, and comparator means arranged to compare the outputs of the pseudo-random number generator and the counter means and to enable the transmitter only when the outputs correspond.
  • the transmitters may be radio frequency identification (RF/ID) transponders.
  • RFID radio frequency identification
  • transponders which embody the "anti-clash protocol" described in EP 494,1 14 A and EP 585, 132 A, it is not necessary for the identification code of each transponder to be different; the transponders can be identical, allowing them to be manufactured in large quantities, very cheaply. It is an advantage of this invention that when such an anti-clash protocol is used there is better immunity against clashes. However, reading a plurality of transponders may be completed more rapidly if unique seeds are used in the pseudo-random number ⁇ enerator.
  • the invention extends to a method of operating a transmitter and the integrated circuits from which the transmitters of the invention are customarily constructed.
  • FIG. 1 is a block schematic diagram of a radio frequency transponder according to the invention.
  • Figure 2 is a block schematic diagram of the transmit controller block in Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 3 is a schematic diagram showing the timing of the transmissions of two transponders or tags.
  • the purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and a system which enhances the probability of identification of a number of transmitters, typically transponders, which are all transmitting data to a receiver.
  • a number of transmitters typically transponders
  • the invention is also applicable to other systems.
  • the invention may be employed in systems in which a number of self-powered transmitters must be identified by a receiver, or systems in which a number of transmitters broadcast using a randomly delayed "back-off and retry" algorithm.
  • the invention addresses this requirement by having the transmitters, or transponders, transmit at different times, at random or pseudo-random intervals, rather than at regular intervals.
  • the degree of randomness of successive transmissions from each transponder is enhanced by deriving the random or pseudo-random timing from local timing means, typically an oscillator, of each transponder.
  • the transponders may be of the type described in EP 494,1 14 A and EP 585,132 A, the entire contents of these documents being incorporated herein by reference.
  • the relatively large tolerance in the operating frequency of the oscillators of nominally identical transponders increases the randomness of their transmissions.
  • the transponder has an antenna 10 which receives energy from an RF interrogation signal transmitted by an interrogator, and a portion of this energy is diverted to charge a capacitor C which acts as a power supply for the transponder.
  • the transponder has an on-board oscillator 12 which operates at the same nominal frequency as other nominally identical transponders. However, due to manufacturing tolerances in the preferred low cost integrated circuit transponders, the output frequency of the oscillator 12 typically has a manufacturing tolerance of ⁇ 25%. The output frequency is also affected by the supply voltage VDD from the capacitor C, which is in turn affected by the strength of the received energy from the interrogation signal due to proximity to the interrogator, antenna orientation and other factors.
  • each tag has an oscillator whose frequency is subject to significant uncertainty, being dependent on both manufacturing tolerances and supply voltage, which is itself dependent on received RF field strength. The frequency of each oscillator is therefore indeterminate, being unspecified until the tag is in operation.
  • the heavy black line 1 indicates the components of the transponder which may be integrated into a monolithic integrated circuit.
  • the transponder includes a non- volatile memory element 14, typically an EEPROM. which stores the transponder's identification code and configuration information which programs the transponder for different code data transmission frequencies (bit rates), maximum delay time (Nmax.T), and seeds for a pseudo-random time delay circuit.
  • the transponder further includes an output driver 16 which in the described embodiment modulates the load applied to the antenna 10. thus modulating its reflectivity, but which could also be an active transmitter.
  • a control logic circuit 18 controls the operation of the output driver 16 and reads data from the memory element 14 in response to signals from a transmit controller circuit 20 which is shown in greater detail in Figure 2.
  • a power on reset circuit 22 initialises the control logic circuit 18 into a predetermined start-up state when a voltage is applied to the circuit.
  • the transmit controller circuit 20 is shown in greater detail.
  • This circuit includes a sequencer 24 which receives the clock signal from the oscillator 12 and derives from it a frequency, which may be lower, to generate a "memory read” signal which is applied to the control logic circuit 18, together with the clock signal.
  • the "memory read” signal is a continuous sequence of pulses at a constant frequency and with a period T. Each of these pulses causes the control logic block 18 to instruct the memory element 14, via a "read out command” signal, to output the identification code stored therein sequentially into the control logic circuit.
  • the code is not passed to the output driver 16 by the control logic circuit for transmission unless the transmit controller 20 also outputs a "transmit enable" signal to the control logic circuit 18 simultaneously with the respective "memory read” pulse. This occurs only occasionally, at pseudo-random time intervals, as described below.
  • the output of the sequencer circuit 24 is also fed to a code cycle counter 26 which is therefore incremented each time the identification code output sequence from the memory element 14 is started.
  • the code cycle counter is never reset, but counts up to its maximum count, after which it returns to zero and counts up again.
  • a pseudo-random number generator circuit 28 generates a pseudo-random number from time to time, and both the output of the pseudo-random number generator 28 and the current output of the code cycle counter 26 are fed to a comparator 30.
  • the comparator 30 gives an output whenever the two numbers being compared are equal, which output is the "transmit enable" signal referred to above.
  • the transmit enable signal also triggers the pseudo-random number G enerator to generate a new pseudo-random number.
  • Tag 1 When the "transmit enable" signal goes high at the same time as the "memory read” signal, the code which has been read from the memory element 14 by the control logic circuit 18 is output to the output driver 16 and transmitted.
  • the transmissions of two transponders or tags, Tag 1 and Tag 2 are compared.
  • T for Tag 1 is not the same as for T for Tag 2, but subject to the same variations as the frequency referred to above.
  • TI, T2, T3 TN for any tag are not exactly equal owing to variations with time in the supply voltage for the particular tag. There are therefore frequency variations between tags, and between different times with the same tag.
  • the anti-clash system used in this invention achieves a considerably better immunity against clashes than if the tag clock signals were derived from the RF carrier frequency (by frequency division, for example), as is the case in some other RF identification systems, and is relatively inexpensive to implement.
  • Nmax is configured at the time of programming or manufacture of the transponders. It has been experimentally determined that for a particular figure of Nmax there is a practical limit to the number of transponders or tags which can be read simultaneously, in the same RF interrogation field. If the number of transponders in the same interrogation field is compared with the time taken for all transponders to be identified successfully, that time is roughly proportional to the number of transponders, due to clashes between transponder transmissions, until the number of transponders approaches Nmax/2. If the number of transponders is increased beyond this point, the time taken to identify the tags increases rapidly towards a condition where no transponders are identified at all, as all transmissions result in clashes.
  • transponder identification code the only value which may need to be adjusted from one transponder to the next is the transponder identification code. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention may be put into effect in a number of different systems. In systems in which the variation of local timing means is not an inherent feature, such a variation may be included into the system design. For example, a number of different crystal oscillator circuits which run at a various speeds may be used.
  • Each transmitter may be provided with a different oscillator circuit although the provision of unique frequencies for a set transmitters is not essential.
  • transmitters may be able to dynamically alter the frequency of the local timing means, by e.g. switching between oscillator circuits.
  • local timing means in which the frequency is dependent on external factors e.g. temperature, incident light, may provide the necessary variation in frequency.

Abstract

The present invention provides method and apparatus which enhance the probability of identification of a number of transmitters (1), typically transponders, which are all transmitting data to a receiver. The invention is applicable to a number of systems including passive radio-frequency transponders systems, systems in which a number of self-powered transmitters must be identified by a receiver, or systems in which a number of transmitters broadcast using a randomly delayed 'back-end and retry' algorithm. Each transmitter (1) is adapted to transmit at intervals and comprises means for generating transmissions, means for calculating the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions and means (20) for enabling the transmitter at random or pseudo-random intervals related to an operating frequency of local timing means (21). In passive RFID systems, the frequency of the local timing means is indeterminate, being unspecified until the transmitter is in operation.

Description

ENHANCED DETECTION OF MULTIPLE DATA TRANSMISSIONS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
THIS invention relates to a method of identifying a plurality of transmitters, each of which transmits data at intervals to a receiver. The invention also relates to an identification system comprising a plurality of transmitters and a receiver, and to the transmitters themselves. The invention further relates to method and apparatus for improving the identification systems disclosed in EP 494,114 A and, in particular, EP 585,132 A.
Identification systems are known in which a plurality of transmitters, typically transponders, are activated by an interrogation signal and then transmit reply signals, usually containing identification data, to a receiver, which typically forms part of the interrogator. The signals may be transmitted in many ways, including electromagnetic energy, e.g. radio frequency (RF), infra red (IR), and coherent light, and sound, e.g. ultrasound. For example, the transmission may be achieved by actual emission of RF energy by the transmitters, or by the modulation of the reflectivity of an antenna of the transmitter, resulting in varying amounts of RF energy in the interrogation signal being reflected or back-scattered from the transmitter antenna.
In general, if the transmissions of two transmitters overlap or clash, the transmissions are lost, since the receiver cannot distinguish the separate transmissions. Thus, the system must provide for each transmitter to transmit repeatedly until its transmission takes place in a "quiet" time and is successfully received by the interrogator. GB 2,116,808 A discloses an identification system in which the individual transponders are programmed to retransmit data in a pseudo-random manner. Timing signals for the transponders in this identification system are derived from a crystal oscillator, thereby making the transponders more expensive to manufacture.
EP 467.036 A describes another identification system which uses a pseudo-random delay between transponder data transmissions. In this example, a linear recursive sequence generator is seeded by the transponder identification address to make the pseudo-random delay as random as possible.
It is an object of the invention to provide an alternative system for enhancing the detection of multiple transmissions in a system of this kind.
EP 494,1 14 A and EP 585,132 A disclose identifications systems in which the transponders may be programmed with the same data. It is an object of this invention to provide an improved system for generating the pseudo-random delays between transponder transmissions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method of identifying a plurality of transmitters, each transmitting at intervals to a receiver, comprising varying the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions from each transmitter by enabling each transmitter at intervals which are calculated randomly or pseudo-randomly and are related to an operating frequency of local timing means associated with that transmitter.
The intervals are preferably varied between a maximum duration which is related to a predetermined number of cycles of the local timing means, and a minimum interval.
In the above method, the duration of the intervals between transmissions may be calculated by periodically generating pseudo-random numbers, comparing the pseudo-random number with an output of counter means clocked by the local timing means, and enabling the transmitter when the pseudo-random number and the output of the counter means correspond.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided an identification system comprising a plurality of transmitters each adapted to transmit at intervals and at least one receiver for receiving transmissions from the transmitters, each transmitter including means for generating transmissions, means for calculating the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions and means for enabling the transmitter at random or pseudorandom intervals related to an operating frequency of local timing means.
According to third aspect of the invention there is provided a transmitter adapted to transmit at intervals comprising means for generating transmissions, means for calculating the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions and means for enabling the transmitter at random or pseudo-random intervals related to an operating frequency of local timing means.
The local timing means is preferably an oscillator of the transmitter, with an unspecified clock frequency which is subject to a relatively large tolerance, so that the oscillators of different transmitters tend to run at different frequencies.
The enabling means may include a pseudo-random number generator arranged to generate pseudo-random numbers, counter means arranged to count at a rate related to the oscillator frequency, and comparator means arranged to compare the outputs of the pseudo-random number generator and the counter means and to enable the transmitter only when the outputs correspond.
The transmitters may be radio frequency identification (RF/ID) transponders. In transponders which embody the "anti-clash protocol" described in EP 494,1 14 A and EP 585, 132 A, it is not necessary for the identification code of each transponder to be different; the transponders can be identical, allowing them to be manufactured in large quantities, very cheaply. It is an advantage of this invention that when such an anti-clash protocol is used there is better immunity against clashes. However, reading a plurality of transponders may be completed more rapidly if unique seeds are used in the pseudo-random number <ιenerator.
- The invention extends to a method of operating a transmitter and the integrated circuits from which the transmitters of the invention are customarily constructed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a block schematic diagram of a radio frequency transponder according to the invention;
Figure 2 is a block schematic diagram of the transmit controller block in Figure 1 ; and
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram showing the timing of the transmissions of two transponders or tags.
DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT
The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and a system which enhances the probability of identification of a number of transmitters, typically transponders, which are all transmitting data to a receiver. Although the embodiment described below refers to passive radio-frequency transponders which are activated and powered by an interrogation signal received from an interrogator, the invention is also applicable to other systems. For example, the invention may be employed in systems in which a number of self-powered transmitters must be identified by a receiver, or systems in which a number of transmitters broadcast using a randomly delayed "back-off and retry" algorithm.
The invention addresses this requirement by having the transmitters, or transponders, transmit at different times, at random or pseudo-random intervals, rather than at regular intervals. In addition, the degree of randomness of successive transmissions from each transponder is enhanced by deriving the random or pseudo-random timing from local timing means, typically an oscillator, of each transponder. The transponders may be of the type described in EP 494,1 14 A and EP 585,132 A, the entire contents of these documents being incorporated herein by reference. The relatively large tolerance in the operating frequency of the oscillators of nominally identical transponders increases the randomness of their transmissions.
Referring now to Figure 1, a passive RF transponder is shown schematically. The transponder has an antenna 10 which receives energy from an RF interrogation signal transmitted by an interrogator, and a portion of this energy is diverted to charge a capacitor C which acts as a power supply for the transponder. The transponder has an on-board oscillator 12 which operates at the same nominal frequency as other nominally identical transponders. However, due to manufacturing tolerances in the preferred low cost integrated circuit transponders, the output frequency of the oscillator 12 typically has a manufacturing tolerance of ± 25%. The output frequency is also affected by the supply voltage VDD from the capacitor C, which is in turn affected by the strength of the received energy from the interrogation signal due to proximity to the interrogator, antenna orientation and other factors. Thus each tag has an oscillator whose frequency is subject to significant uncertainty, being dependent on both manufacturing tolerances and supply voltage, which is itself dependent on received RF field strength. The frequency of each oscillator is therefore indeterminate, being unspecified until the tag is in operation.
The heavy black line 1 indicates the components of the transponder which may be integrated into a monolithic integrated circuit.
The transponder includes a non- volatile memory element 14, typically an EEPROM. which stores the transponder's identification code and configuration information which programs the transponder for different code data transmission frequencies (bit rates), maximum delay time (Nmax.T), and seeds for a pseudo-random time delay circuit. The transponder further includes an output driver 16 which in the described embodiment modulates the load applied to the antenna 10. thus modulating its reflectivity, but which could also be an active transmitter. A control logic circuit 18 controls the operation of the output driver 16 and reads data from the memory element 14 in response to signals from a transmit controller circuit 20 which is shown in greater detail in Figure 2. A power on reset circuit 22 initialises the control logic circuit 18 into a predetermined start-up state when a voltage is applied to the circuit.
In Figure 2, the transmit controller circuit 20 is shown in greater detail. This circuit includes a sequencer 24 which receives the clock signal from the oscillator 12 and derives from it a frequency, which may be lower, to generate a "memory read" signal which is applied to the control logic circuit 18, together with the clock signal. The "memory read" signal is a continuous sequence of pulses at a constant frequency and with a period T. Each of these pulses causes the control logic block 18 to instruct the memory element 14, via a "read out command" signal, to output the identification code stored therein sequentially into the control logic circuit. However, the code is not passed to the output driver 16 by the control logic circuit for transmission unless the transmit controller 20 also outputs a "transmit enable" signal to the control logic circuit 18 simultaneously with the respective "memory read" pulse. This occurs only occasionally, at pseudo-random time intervals, as described below.
The output of the sequencer circuit 24 is also fed to a code cycle counter 26 which is therefore incremented each time the identification code output sequence from the memory element 14 is started. The code cycle counter is never reset, but counts up to its maximum count, after which it returns to zero and counts up again. A pseudo-random number generator circuit 28 generates a pseudo-random number from time to time, and both the output of the pseudo-random number generator 28 and the current output of the code cycle counter 26 are fed to a comparator 30. The comparator 30 gives an output whenever the two numbers being compared are equal, which output is the "transmit enable" signal referred to above. The transmit enable signal also triggers the pseudo-random number Generator to generate a new pseudo-random number. When the "transmit enable" signal goes high at the same time as the "memory read" signal, the code which has been read from the memory element 14 by the control logic circuit 18 is output to the output driver 16 and transmitted. Referring to Figure 3, the transmissions of two transponders or tags, Tag 1 and Tag 2 are compared. Tag 1 has an oscillator running somewhat faster than Tag 2. Both have the same Nmax programmed into them, but at the particular time shown in the diagram, Tag 1 will remain in a passive (non-transmitting) mode for a period of Nl .T, where Nl varies with each transmission/quiet cycle, (0<=N<=Nmax), while Tag 2 remains passive for N2.T. Note that T for Tag 1 is not the same as for T for Tag 2, but subject to the same variations as the frequency referred to above. Furthermore, TI, T2, T3 TN for any tag are not exactly equal owing to variations with time in the supply voltage for the particular tag. There are therefore frequency variations between tags, and between different times with the same tag. The anti-clash system used in this invention achieves a considerably better immunity against clashes than if the tag clock signals were derived from the RF carrier frequency (by frequency division, for example), as is the case in some other RF identification systems, and is relatively inexpensive to implement.
The value of Nmax is determined by the number of bits being compared by the comparator 30. In the case of an 8 bit comparison, Nmax=255. Nmax is configured at the time of programming or manufacture of the transponders. It has been experimentally determined that for a particular figure of Nmax there is a practical limit to the number of transponders or tags which can be read simultaneously, in the same RF interrogation field. If the number of transponders in the same interrogation field is compared with the time taken for all transponders to be identified successfully, that time is roughly proportional to the number of transponders, due to clashes between transponder transmissions, until the number of transponders approaches Nmax/2. If the number of transponders is increased beyond this point, the time taken to identify the tags increases rapidly towards a condition where no transponders are identified at all, as all transmissions result in clashes.
Because of the various advantageous aspects of the design of the above described transponders, a large degree of randomness is obtained in the transmission of data from each transponder, notwithstanding that the transponders are programmed with the same value of Nmax and are essentially identical. This means that the only value which may need to be adjusted from one transponder to the next is the transponder identification code. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention may be put into effect in a number of different systems. In systems in which the variation of local timing means is not an inherent feature, such a variation may be included into the system design. For example, a number of different crystal oscillator circuits which run at a various speeds may be used. Each transmitter may be provided with a different oscillator circuit although the provision of unique frequencies for a set transmitters is not essential. Alternatively, transmitters may be able to dynamically alter the frequency of the local timing means, by e.g. switching between oscillator circuits. In the same spirit, local timing means in which the frequency is dependent on external factors e.g. temperature, incident light, may provide the necessary variation in frequency.

Claims

Claims
1. A method of identifying a plurality of transmitters, each transmitting at intervals to a receiver, comprising varying the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions from each transmitter by enabling each transmitter at intervals which are calculated randomly or pseudo-randomly and are related to an operating frequency of local timing means associated with that transmitter.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 in which the intervals are varied between a maximum duration which is related to a predetermined number of cycles of the local timing means, and a minimum interval.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 in which the operating frequency of the local timing means is indeterminate.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1 in which the duration of the intervals between transmissions may be calculated by generating pseudo-random numbers, comparing the pseudo-random number with an output of counter means clocked by the local timing means, and enabling the transmitter only when the pseudo-random number and the output of the counter means correspond.
5. A method as claimed in claim 4 in which the pseudo-random numbers are generated periodically.
6. An identification system comprising a plurality of transmitters each adapted to transmit at intervals and at least one receiver for receiving transmissions from the transmitters, each transmitter including means for generating transmissions, means for calculating the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions and means for enabling the transmitter at random or pseudo-random intervals related to an operating frequency of local timing means.
7. An identification system as claimed in claim 6 in which the calculating means varies the intervals between a maximum duration which is related to a predetermined number of cycles of the local timing means, and a minimum interval.
8. An identification system as claimed in claim 6 in which the local timing means is an oscillator.
9. An identification system as claimed in claim 8 in which the clock frequency of each oscillator is subject to a relatively large tolerance.
10. An identification system as claimed in claim 8 in which the oscillators of different transmitters tend to run at different frequencies.
1 1. An identification system as claimed in claim 8 in which the operating frequency of the transmitter is indeterminate.
12. An identification system as claimed in claim 6 in which the calculating means includes a pseudo-random number generator arranged to generate pseudo-random numbers and counter means arranged to count at a rate related to the frequency of the local timing means
13. An identification system as claimed in claim 12 in which the enabling means compares the output of the pseudo-random number generator with the output of the counter and enables the transmitter only when the pseudo-random number and the output of the counter means correspond.
14 An identification system as claimed in claim 13 in which the pseudo-random numbers are generated periodically.
15. A transmitter adapted to transmit at intervals comprising means for generating transmissions, means for calculating the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions and means for enabling the transmitter at random or pseudo-random intervals related to an operating frequency of local timing means.
16. A transmitter as claimed in claim 15 in which the calculating means varies the intervals between a maximum duration which is related to a predetermined number of cycles of the local timing means, and a minimum interval.
17. A transmitter as claimed in claim 15 in which the local timing means is an oscillator.
18. A transmitter as claimed in claim 17 in which the clock frequency of the oscillator is subject to a relatively large tolerance.
19. A transmitter as claimed in claim 15 in which the calculating means includes a pseudo-random number generator arranged to generate pseudo-random numbers and counter means arranged to count at a rate related to the frequency of the local timing means
20. A transmitter as claimed in claim 19 in which the enabling means compares the output of the pseudo-random number generator with the output of the counter and enables the transmitter only when the pseudo-random number and the output of the counter means correspond.
21 A transmitter as claimed in claim 20 in which the pseudo-random numbers are generated periodically.
22. A method of generating transmissions from a transmitter at random intervals comprising, varying the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions from each transmitter by enabling the transmitter at intervals which are calculated randomly or pseudo-randomly and are related to an operating frequency of local timing means associated with the transmitter
23. A method as claimed in claim 22 in which the intervals are varied between a maximum duration which is related to a predetermined number of cycles of the local timing means, and a minimum interval.
24. A method as claimed in claim 22 in which the duration of the intervals between transmissions may be calculated by generating pseudo-random numbers, comparing the pseudo-random number with an output of counter means clocked by the local timing means, and enabling the transmitter only when the pseudo-random number and the output of the counter means correspond.
25. A method as claimed in claim 24 in which the pseudo-random numbers are generated periodically.
26. An integrated circuit for use in a transmitter comprising local timing means, means for calculating the duration of the intervals between successive transmissions and means for enabling the transmitter at random or pseudo-random intervals related to an operating frequency of the local timing means.
27 . An integrated circuit as claimed in claim 25 in which the local timing means is an oscillator.
28. An integrated circuit as claimed in claim 27 in which the clock frequency of the oscillator is subject to a relatively large tolerance.
29. An integrated circuit as claimed in claim 25 in which the calculating means includes a pseudo-random number generator arranged to generate pseudo-random numbers and counter means arranged to count at a rate related to the frequency of the local timing means
30. An integrated circuit as claimed in claim 29 in which the enabling means compares the output of the pseudo-random number generator with the output of the counter and enables the transmitter only when the pseudo-random number and the output of the counter means correspond.
PCT/GB1996/002742 1995-11-09 1996-11-08 Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions WO1997017667A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU75023/96A AU7502396A (en) 1995-11-09 1996-11-08 Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions
KR1019980703381A KR19990067371A (en) 1995-11-09 1996-11-08 Transmitter Identification System and Method for Improved Multiple Data Transmission Detection
JP9517995A JP2000500932A (en) 1995-11-09 1996-11-08 Improved detection of multiple data transmission
EP96937429A EP0859989A1 (en) 1995-11-09 1996-11-08 Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions
CA 2235585 CA2235585A1 (en) 1995-11-09 1996-11-08 Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions
BR9611705A BR9611705A (en) 1995-11-09 1996-11-08 Increased detection of multiple data transmissions

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ZA95/9519 1995-11-09
ZA959519 1995-11-09

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997017667A1 WO1997017667A1 (en) 1997-05-15
WO1997017667A9 true WO1997017667A9 (en) 1998-07-16

Family

ID=25585411

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1996/002742 WO1997017667A1 (en) 1995-11-09 1996-11-08 Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions

Country Status (11)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0859989A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2000500932A (en)
KR (1) KR19990067371A (en)
CN (1) CN1201540A (en)
AR (1) AR002220A1 (en)
AU (1) AU7502396A (en)
BR (1) BR9611705A (en)
CA (1) CA2235585A1 (en)
MX (1) MX9803671A (en)
TW (1) TW383527B (en)
WO (1) WO1997017667A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2333623B (en) * 1998-01-24 2000-04-26 Plessey Telecomm Transaction system
GB2335573B (en) 1998-03-18 2000-03-15 Univ Singapore An RF transponder identification system and protocol
GB2344257A (en) 1998-11-26 2000-05-31 Innovision Research And Techno Data communication apparatus and board game
JP3001570B1 (en) 1999-02-22 2000-01-24 埼玉日本電気株式会社 Adaptive antenna directivity control method and system
MXPA01011736A (en) * 1999-05-21 2003-09-04 Koerner Ralph J Identification system for monitoring the presence/absence of members of a defined set.
AU2001264504A1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2001-12-24 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Random identity management in scatternets
KR100486754B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2005-05-03 매그나칩 반도체 유한회사 Radio Frequency Identification Tag System for preventing collision and collision preventing method thereof
FR2833724A1 (en) * 2001-12-13 2003-06-20 Canal Plus Technologies DIGITAL ELECTRONIC COMPONENT PROTECTED AGAINST ELECTRICAL AND / OR ELECTROMAGNETIC ANALYZES, ESPECIALLY IN THE FIELD OF CHIP CARDS
GB0213724D0 (en) * 2002-06-14 2002-07-24 Turner Christopher G G Electronic identification system
US20100045434A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2010-02-25 Nxp B.V. Communication between a communication station and data carriers
KR100749818B1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2007-08-17 한국전자통신연구원 Apparatus and Method for Reading Multi Tag in RFID System
US20070126556A1 (en) * 2005-12-07 2007-06-07 Kovio, Inc. Printed radio frequency identification (RFID) tag using tags-talk-first (TTF) protocol
EP1956513B1 (en) 2007-02-07 2010-06-02 Albis Technologies AG Transmission protocol opening a dynamic window for receiving data
CN101604021B (en) * 2009-07-09 2012-05-09 复旦大学 Location method and device of wireless radio frequency identification system
KR20120011602A (en) * 2010-07-29 2012-02-08 삼성테크윈 주식회사 Communication control method of RFID reader

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4471345A (en) * 1982-03-05 1984-09-11 Sensormatic Electronics Corporation Randomized tag to portal communication system
FR2667715A1 (en) * 1990-10-09 1992-04-10 Gemplus Card Int METHOD AND DEVICE FOR INCREASING THE PROTECTION OF A MEMORY CARD.
US5530702A (en) * 1994-05-31 1996-06-25 Ludwig Kipp System for storage and communication of information

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6480143B1 (en) Electronic identification system
EP1017005B1 (en) A system and method for communicating with multiple transponders
US6784787B1 (en) Identification system
JP3138564B2 (en) Method for interrogating multiple battery restaurant spawners and transponder for use in a remote identification system
US6909366B1 (en) Multi-dimensional electronic identification of articles
US5302954A (en) Identification apparatus and methods
WO1997017667A9 (en) Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions
US5793324A (en) Transponder signal collision avoidance system
US6104279A (en) Method of communication between a plurality of remote units and a control unit
EP0859989A1 (en) Enhanced detection of multiple data transmissions
EP0390822B1 (en) Identification apparatus and method
EP0405695A1 (en) An electromagnetic identification system for identifying a plurality of coded responders simultaneously present in an interrogation field
US20020175806A1 (en) Electronic tag binary selection method
WO1998032238A2 (en) Transponder communication device
US6150934A (en) Electronic communication system between a base station and transponders
EP0910899B1 (en) Transponder communication device
US20060097848A1 (en) Electronic identification system
JPH09251076A (en) Code generator for transponder
EP1372103A1 (en) Electronic identification system
EP0919943B1 (en) A transponder system
RU2231129C2 (en) Process of identification of articles and mark for identification system