WO1997013327A1 - Viterbi co-processor and method of operation therefor - Google Patents

Viterbi co-processor and method of operation therefor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997013327A1
WO1997013327A1 PCT/EP1996/004160 EP9604160W WO9713327A1 WO 1997013327 A1 WO1997013327 A1 WO 1997013327A1 EP 9604160 W EP9604160 W EP 9604160W WO 9713327 A1 WO9713327 A1 WO 9713327A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
path
metric
viterbi
state
survivor path
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP1996/004160
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Paul Golding
Irwin Bennett
Original Assignee
Motorola Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Motorola Limited filed Critical Motorola Limited
Priority to EP96933367A priority Critical patent/EP0855107A1/en
Priority to JP9513937A priority patent/JPH11513544A/en
Publication of WO1997013327A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997013327A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0045Arrangements at the receiver end
    • H04L1/0054Maximum-likelihood or sequential decoding, e.g. Viterbi, Fano, ZJ algorithms
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H03M13/39Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes
    • H03M13/41Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H03M13/39Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes
    • H03M13/41Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors
    • H03M13/4115Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors list output Viterbi decoding
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H03M13/39Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes
    • H03M13/41Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors
    • H03M13/4138Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors soft-output Viterbi algorithm based decoding, i.e. Viterbi decoding with weighted decisions
    • H03M13/4146Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors soft-output Viterbi algorithm based decoding, i.e. Viterbi decoding with weighted decisions soft-output Viterbi decoding according to Battail and Hagenauer in which the soft-output is determined using path metric differences along the maximum-likelihood path, i.e. "SOVA" decoding
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H03M13/39Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes
    • H03M13/41Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors
    • H03M13/4138Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors soft-output Viterbi algorithm based decoding, i.e. Viterbi decoding with weighted decisions
    • H03M13/4146Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors soft-output Viterbi algorithm based decoding, i.e. Viterbi decoding with weighted decisions soft-output Viterbi decoding according to Battail and Hagenauer in which the soft-output is determined using path metric differences along the maximum-likelihood path, i.e. "SOVA" decoding
    • H03M13/4153Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors soft-output Viterbi algorithm based decoding, i.e. Viterbi decoding with weighted decisions soft-output Viterbi decoding according to Battail and Hagenauer in which the soft-output is determined using path metric differences along the maximum-likelihood path, i.e. "SOVA" decoding two-step SOVA decoding, i.e. the soft-output is determined by a second traceback operation after the determination of the hard decision like in the Berrou decoder
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H03M13/39Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes
    • H03M13/41Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors
    • H03M13/4161Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors implementing path management
    • H03M13/4169Sequence estimation, i.e. using statistical methods for the reconstruction of the original codes using the Viterbi algorithm or Viterbi processors implementing path management using traceback
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/65Purpose and implementation aspects
    • H03M13/6502Reduction of hardware complexity or efficient processing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/65Purpose and implementation aspects
    • H03M13/6502Reduction of hardware complexity or efficient processing
    • H03M13/6505Memory efficient implementations
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0045Arrangements at the receiver end
    • H04L1/0052Realisations of complexity reduction techniques, e.g. pipelining or use of look-up tables
    • H04L1/0053Realisations of complexity reduction techniques, e.g. pipelining or use of look-up tables specially adapted for power saving

Definitions

  • This invention relates, in general, to a Viterbi co-processor, and is particularly, but not exclusively, applicable to Viterbi co-processor operation, such as the implementation of calculations for minimum metric-distance likelihood searches required for Window Error Detection (WED).
  • WED Window Error Detection
  • FEC forward error correction
  • Viterbi co-processors already exist that can calculate required L-values for the purposes of soft-decision decoding, although some are limited in this respect to a "soft-output" mode (usually associated with Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MSLE)) and are therefore not enabled for convolutional decoding, as required in multi-mode machines.
  • MSLE Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation
  • an output sequence is determined based upon the most likely path through a logical trellis of states consisting of logical "0"s and logical "l"s that are distributed over time.
  • a measurement ofthe most likely bit sequence for the signal is made by making distance measurements ("branch metric calculations") between received data bits and hypothesised data bits.
  • the L-values provide a measurement of an absolute distance between two alternative branch metrics that converge to a decision point in the Viterbi state trellis along the survivor path.
  • these convergence points present an opportunity to discard, at these junctures, all paths except the most likely.
  • the path offering the smallest distance i.e. the largest branch metric
  • the lowest L-value (LMIN) for the survivor path is used as an index to an array of threshold values, with a received speech (or data) frame marked bad and rejected if LMIN is lower than a corresponding threshold.
  • the likelihood values can be used to provide "soft" output decisions for each bit input into the Viterbi algorithm.
  • an apphcation for the Likelihood values is the so-called Soft Output Viterbi Algorithm
  • SOVA that uses the L-values to iterate the survivor path decisions until convergence occurs on a final optimum path.
  • the L-values may be used to facilitate a reduced complexity (non-iterative) SOVA to provide a confidence measure of a whole (or portion) of the speech frame.
  • An example of this form of reduced complexity SOVA arises in the Window Error Detection algorithm used in GSM half-rate coding.
  • the WED algorithm associated with the Viterbi decoding algorithm used in decoding convolutional code applied to half-rate speech channels
  • the quality assessment is used to determine subsequent acceptance or rejection (erasure) of the decoded speech (or data) frame.
  • bits 73 to 97 are bits 73 to 97 (in combination, the so-called class la bits and the three (3) parity bits). These bits are important in the sense that they convey the most essential information about the speech samples contained in the transmitted information frame.
  • the WED function need only be apphed to the most important bits to determine the reliability ofthe transmission of these bits. Indeed, the WED algorithm utilises L-values (produced as a by ⁇ product of the Viterbi branch metric calculation).
  • Viterbi decoders are unable to provide LMIN values directly, and instead provide L-values that require further processing intervention (and hence greater data processing power and electrical power consumption) to calculate LMIN- Additionally, the WED algorithm actually requires a moving average of LMIN values to be stored in order to generate quality threshold information.
  • present (Viterbi) co-processor design is unable to cope with this additional requirement, so yet more post- Viterbi- stage processing (which clearly effects efficiency in implementing the WED function) must be performed off-line by a central processor.
  • the present methodology not only results in the performance of many unnecessary L-value calculations (for all bits output from the trellis) and increases the complexity ofthe Viterbi decoding (and WED function) process, but also requires significant control circuitry and substantial memory storage facilities in the Viterbi decoder (typically implemented as a DSP on a semiconductor chip).
  • prior art methods are less efficient in terms of throughput (i.e. operations performed per second) and power consumption, and incur greater cost as a result of requiring the use ofhigh frequency devices.
  • a method of calculating a metric-difference value of a survivor path for an encoded frame provided to a Viterbi decoder arranged to perform a decoding process on the encoded frame comprising: processor means for controlling the decoding process; a Viterbi state trellis responsive to the encoded frame and having a plurality of branches each having a plurahty of logic states; and a memory, responsive to the processor means, for storing data generated during the decoding process and for storing an indication of a particular branch in the Viterbi trellis from which the metric-difference value is to be calculated; the method comprising the steps of: a) during a first pass ofthe decoding process, calculating path metrics for the encoded frame for a plurality of paths through the Viterbi state trellis, such that each of the plurality of paths comprises a logic state in each of said pluraht
  • the minimum metric-difference value is stored in the memory and subsequently compared against newly calculated minimum metric-difference values for the survivor path in subsequent branches, such that only a numerically smallest value is retained in memory.
  • this reduces the number of memory locations required to store calculated metric-difference values.
  • the step of determining is achieved by performing a trace-back of the survivor path using at least some of the associations stored in memory during the first pass, wherein a comparison of relative sizes between possible alternative associations for the survivor path in a branch determines the survivor path.
  • the association indicates a relative directional displacement from a preceding logic state ofthe survivor path in a preceding branch of the Viterbi state trellis, and the step of dete ⁇ nining is achieved by performing a trace-back of the survivor path using the relative directional displacement between logic states in at least some adjacent branches along the survivor path.
  • a Viterbi co-processor arranged to perform a decoding process on an encoded frame
  • the Viterbi co-processor comprising: processor means for controlling the decoding process; a Viterbi state trellis responsive to the encoded frame and having a plurality of branches each having a plurality of logic states; and a memory, responsive to the processor means, for storing data generated during the decoding process and for storing an indication of a particular branch in the Viterbi trellis from which the metric-difference value is to be calculated; the processor means further comprising: means for calculating path metrics for the encoded frame for a plurality of paths through the Viterbi state trellis during a first pass ofthe decoding process, wherein each of the plurality of paths comprises a logic state in each of said plurality of branches; means for generating and storing in the memory an association between the logic state and a corresponding path metric; means, response to the indication, for associating each
  • FIG. 1 is a representation of a prior art convolutional coder.
  • FIG. 2 shows a prior art Viterbi state trellis containing a multitude of possible paths.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an association of likelihood (L-) values with logic states on the Viterbi state trellis of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 4 is a prior art memory block used in association with the trellis of FIG. 2 and the mechanism of FIG. 3.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a Viterbi decoder according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a memory block used by the Viterbi decoder of FIG. 5 for storing L-values in accordance with a first preferred operating mechanism of present invention.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates tapping and storage of state values from a Viterbi state trellis in accordance with an alternate operating mechanism ofthe present invention.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a memory block utilised by the Viterbi decoder of FIG. 5.
  • FIG. 9 shows a memory location for storage of an absolute LMIN value for a Viterbi algorithm in accordance with the alternate operating mechanism of FIG. 7.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a representation of a prior art convolutional coder 10 that is used to encode (prior to transmission) information bits of an input signal 12. More particularly, input bits are shifted on a bit-by-bit basis into register (memory) elements 14 and 16, at which point the register elements 14 and 16 are selectively tapped and logically combined (usually with and input bit). In the case of convolutional coding, logical combination typically takes the form of an exclusive-OR (XOR) function. With particular regard to FIG. 1, register element 16 is tapped and XORed in logic gate 18 with input bit 20. Also, register elements 16 is tapped and XORed in logic gate 22 with input bit 20 and the contents of register element 14.
  • XOR exclusive-OR
  • Logic gates 18 and 22 provide (at outputs 24 and 26, respectively) convolutionally encoded output data bits 28 and 30.
  • the convolutional coder 10 of FIG. 1 is therefore said to have a constraint length of three (3), indicating the total number of bits ofthe input signal 12 used in the encoding operation, and a rate of 1/2, i.e. that every input bit produces two (2) output bits.
  • FIG. 2 shows a prior art Viterbi state trellis 50 (containing a multitude of possible paths 52-56) that is arranged to decode a received convolutionally encoded signal 58.
  • Each path 52-56 represents a possible logic transition between states with respect to time. Therefore, most trellis points 59-66 in the Viterbi trellis 50 potentially provide a point of convergence.
  • the thickened line 57 represents a survivor path having an output ultimately selected at trellis point 64.
  • the illustrated Viterbi state trellis 50 shows a four-state code by way of example, although the numbers of states may be varied according to requirements, e.g.
  • Points 64 and 66 represent possible survivor paths through the trellis and can therefore be loosely considered as outputs. Again, as will be understood, only a relatively few states and paths have been specifically identified for the sake of clarity, although many states and paths exist within the Viterbi trellis 50.
  • FIG. 3 A mechanism for calculating hkeUhood (L-) values on the Viterbi state trellis of FIG. 2, is shown in FIG. 3. More particularly, logic states M and M+2 V 1 (hereinafter referred to by reference numerals 70 and 72, respectively) have calculated path (or survivor) metrics PA and P ⁇ associated respectively therewith and stored, respectively, in memory elements 76 and 78. In the particular instance of FIG. 3, logic states 70 and 72 converge to logic state 2M (hereinafter referred to by reference numeral 74) via branch (B) metrics 80 and 82 (or BA and B ⁇ ), respectively. Therefore, logic state 74 also has a calculated path metric PN associated therewith that is stored in memory element 84.
  • logic state 74 also has a calculated path metric PN associated therewith that is stored in memory element 84.
  • logic state 74 has a L-value (LN) associated therewith and stored in memory element 86.
  • LN L-value
  • the memory elements used to store the path metrics will be located in a memory block of the Viterbi decoder.
  • the values of the path (survivor) metric and the L-value are calculated by the following equations:
  • FIG. 4 is a prior art memory block 90 used in association with the Viterbi state trellis of FIG. 2, and the mechanism for calculating path metrics and likelihood values of FIG. 3. Specifically, movement through the Viterbi trellis of FIG. 2 can also be considered as a transition between columns (or
  • branches containing a plurality of logic states, with each logic state in each branch being located on a possible path through the Viterbi trellis.
  • each L-value for each state in the trellis must also be stored (in addition to the retention in memory ofthe path metrics associated with each path).
  • the memory block 90 contains a vast array of storage elements 91-93 (typically indexed in some identifying manner, such as by way of state 95 and column/branch position 97).
  • the Viterbi decoder 100 has signal processing capabilities and comprises a Viterbi trelhs/microcontroller portion 101 and a memory portion 102 that is responsive to the Viterbi trellis/microcontroller portion 101 and which is used for data storage.
  • the Viterbi trelhs/microcontroller portion 101 (as typified by FIG. 2) is responsible for the operational control of the decoding process and data manipulation.
  • an encoded input signal 104 received by the Viterbi decoder is decoded by the Viterbi trelhs/microcontroller portion 101 to produce a decoded output 106 indicative of survivor paths through the trellis.
  • the memory portion 102 contains registers for storing information generated by the microcontroller portion 101 during the decoding process. More particularly, the memory portion 102 contains a data register 110 for storing and indexing data, e.g. recording path metrics, L-values and related information generated upon traversing the trellis.
  • the memory portion 102 additionally includes a window register 108 used to define a window of N branches identified by a start-column (and optionally a finish-column).
  • the window register 108 identifies a branch in the trellis at which to start metric- difference (L-) value calculations (e.g. start at "column x") and potentially a branch in the trellis at which to suspend/terminate such calculations (e.g. stop at "column x+5"). Furthermore, the N branches of the window represent the portion of the speech/data frame ofthe Viterbi state trellis that is subject to the WED function. In the absence of a finish-column, the metric-difference value calculations will commence at the start-column and continue throughout the subsequent branches (or columns) ofthe trellis.
  • the data register 110 may also comprise a path memory 111 for storing mapping bits (the function of which is specific to an alternate embodiment of the present invention to be described subsequently).
  • the data register 110 stores only a minimum L-value (e.g. LMIN ) f° r eacn indexed path route 112 (e.g. path "A"). More particularly, the minimum L-value is the numerically smallest L-value for each of the survivor paths at the current branch in the trellis.
  • LMIN minimum L-value
  • L-values are stored in the LMIN register 110 by the Viterbi trellis microcontroller portion 101 through a "minimum wave method".
  • Metric-difference (L-value) calculations commence (as defined by the start-column) at the start of the window, which start point may be at the beginning ofthe frame or at some later point. Then, for every branch in the window, the L-values are calculated for each decision point (and hence each possible path), and then compared against a L-value stored previously for each path. Only the lowest numeric L-value for each particular path (e.g.
  • LMIN ⁇ is stored in the LMIN register 110, which process may therefore involve the over- writing (substitution) of older but higher numeric L-values.
  • a convergence point such as logic state 74
  • two path metrics and hence two L-values
  • a programmable register arrangement of the first preferred operating mechanism provides greater flexibility in decoding and allows adaptation of Viterbi decoders for future changes in coding algorithm, e.g. the so-called enhanced full-rate coding algorithms. Furthermore, as will be appreciated, by defining a window of interest in the Viterbi trellis, fewer calculation are required and a resultant power saving in a DSP therefore achieved.
  • the survivor path through a Viterbi trellis can be identified independently of calculated L-values for the survivor path.
  • WED in a Viterbi decoder is operated through a "two-pass method".
  • the Viterbi algorithm is first executed (pass #1) with the calculation and storage of L-values suppressed/suspended.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates tapping and storage of state values from a Viterbi state trellis in accordance with the alternate operating mechanism of the present invention.
  • a portion 120 ofthe Viterbi state trellis has been illustrated, which portion 120 comprises a plurality of logic states 122-134 distributed amongst a plurality of branches (col x, col x+1, col x+2,...col x+5).
  • a particular branch (in this case col x+2) has been identified as the start-column, with the particular logic states 128-134 contained therein tapped to provide respective trellis data words 138-144, comprising the path metrics for each state in branch x+2, directly associated with the start ofthe window.
  • tapping of the logic states 128-134 in the Viterbi state trellis in general, may be implemented by hard- wire taps or through a "state download" of logic state values from the branches, for example.
  • a state download offers greater flexibility with respect to window definition and is the preferred method.
  • the data trelhs words 138-144 (and their respective associations with the logic states in the branch of the start of the window) are stored in the data register 110.
  • the path metrics calculated during pass #1 of a frame through the Viterbi state trelhs need not be stored, since some will be discarded or over-written and others may prove superfluous to the decoding algorithm.
  • the data register need only store a most recently calculated path metric for each path through the trellis together with an indication (stored in path memory 111) of which particular one of the two possible logic states in the preceding branch provided the route of the path.
  • the nature of the path memory 111 will now be described in relation to FIG. 8.
  • Paths 112 through the Viterbi state trellis are indexed against branches 150 (such as those identified as col x, col x+1, col x+2 and survivor path) o the trellis.
  • Logical values 152-156 i.e. logical "0"s or logical "l”s (referred to as "pointers"), are associated with each path and branch in the path memory 111.
  • a logical "0" or a logical "1” is attributed against a particular path and branch dependent upon a perceived direction from which the path emanates.
  • attribution of a logical "0” could indicate the movement from logic state "00" ofthe Viterbi state trellis 50 to logic state "01”, rather than from logic state "10” to "01”, whereas attribution of a logical "1" in the path memory would indicate the opposite.
  • attribution of pointers in the path memory 111 can also be considered as indicating the relative movement (directional displacement) of the path based on absolute values of the preceding logic states as compared against a present logic state for a state in a branch.
  • any appropriate form of logical attribution (pointer) indicating the relative nature ofthe higher or lower logic state in the preceding branch can be utilised in the path memory 111.
  • the path that terminates at a given logical state e.g. the logical "0" state in the Viterbi state trellis (as is the case for GSM channel decoding).
  • the desired survivor path is "traced - back" to its corresponding state in the start-column (i.e. the first branch) of the identified window.
  • Trace-back to the corresponding state in the first branch may be achieved through the realisation that the state having the smallest distance (largest path metric) of the two possible path metrics in an immediately preceding branch of the trellis represents the actual route of the desired survivor path (although this requires storage, during pass #1, of all path metrics for the trellis).
  • trace-back may be achieved using the pointers stored in path memory 111 and the path metric of the survivor path (bearing in mind that the path metric ofthe survivor path is mathematically derived from previously calculated path metrics), i.e. trace- back is achieved by simply moving to (selecting) the appropriate logic state (of the two possible logical states) in the preceding branch in response to the direction indicated by the logical value ofthe pointer.
  • the trellis data words 138-144 recorded and associated with the first branch ofthe window during pass #1 are nominally re-loaded into the first branch ofthe window, and a portion ofthe Viterbi algorithm is executed a second time (pass #2) for the same frame (concentrating on the desired survivor path).
  • pass #2 metric-difference (L-value) calculations are performed for the desired survivor path only, and only a single absolute lowest LMINABS va l ue f° r the subsequent branches of the trellis is recorded and stored (which potentially results in a previous LMINABS va e being discarded and therefore over-written).
  • L-value metric-difference
  • path metrics for the desired survivor path because these have already been calculated during pass #1 and have been previously stored in memory, although a numeric comparison between the two possible path metric values would need to be made to determine the actual path. As such, the values of the path metrics subsequently encountered on the desired survivor path are retrieved directly. However, if the path memory 111 is utilised to store pointers and only the survivor path metric recorded, then path metric calculations will be required, which path metric calculations will necessarily commence at the first branch ofthe window identified by window register 108.
  • FIG. 9 shows a memory location (or element) 170 for storage of an absolute LMINABS v£u ⁇ ue f° r a Viterbi algorithm in accordance with the alternate operating mechanism of FIG. 7, which memory location 170 may be located in the data register 110.
  • Implementation of the alternate embodiment provides substantial benefits and advantages with respect to window error detection and Viterbi decoding. Particularly, substantial memory storage space is saved in terms of both storage of path metric values and particularly L-values, since only one relatively small register is required to store the single LME ⁇ ABS- Additionally, the alternate operating method substantially reduces the number of calculations performed by the DSP (Viterbi decoder), and hence a substantial reduction in power consumption ofthe DSP results. Indeed, when employing the two-pass method for the WED function, there is an order of magnitude reduction in the number of calculation required, and an estimated power saving of ⁇ 70% for a GSM-type Viterbi half-rate code.
  • the rate (and efficiency) ofthe Viterbi decoding process is increased substantially which therefore allows Viterbi decoders to be implemented on substantially lower frequency sihcon devices (or the like). Furthermore, having alleviated the requirement for high frequency devices, a substantial cost saving and higher manufacturing productivity results.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Error Detection And Correction (AREA)

Abstract

A reduction in the number of metric-difference calculations (used in Window Error Detection) in a Viterbi state trellis (120) is achieved by performing two passes of a frame through the trellis (120). During a first pass, metric-difference calculations are suspended, but path metric calculations are indexed. At an identified branch, trellis data words (138-144) are recorded and associated with the branch (see the figure). Upon completion of the first pass, a desired survivor path is determined and 'traced-back' to its corresponding state in the identified branch using indexed path metrics, for example. The path metric corresponding to this state is nominally reloaded and, starting from that state, decoding of the frame occurs for a second pass while metric-difference (L-value) calculations are performed on the desired survivor path only, and only a single lowest L-value for the desired survivor path is recorded.

Description

VITERBI CO-PROCESSOR AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREFOR
Field of he Invention
This invention relates, in general, to a Viterbi co-processor, and is particularly, but not exclusively, applicable to Viterbi co-processor operation, such as the implementation of calculations for minimum metric-distance likelihood searches required for Window Error Detection (WED).
Summary ofthe Prior Art
In modern communication systems, such as the pan-European Groupe Speciale Mobile (GSM) cellular communication system, forward error correction (FEC) ofthe physical radio channel is provided by means of signal encryption. More specifically, in the case of the GSM communication system, this encryption takes the form of convolutional coding.
The complex nature of these codes requires extensive computational (processor) power, with the optimum decoding process provided by a Viterbi decoding algorithm. In the Viterbi algorithm, decoded bits of information are output in a ratio of one output bit per input bit. However, the decoding process also provides additional information which can be utilised to allow multiple output bits (say N) to be generated per input bit, where each N-bits represents a confidence measure of the actual output bit. The use of this confidence measure is often referred to as "soft-decision" decoding. One particular method used to provide additional confidence information requires the output of metric-difference values (or "Likelihood" values, L) associated with each decision point along a "survivor path" of a Viterbi (state) trellis.
Viterbi co-processors already exist that can calculate required L-values for the purposes of soft-decision decoding, although some are limited in this respect to a "soft-output" mode (usually associated with Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MSLE)) and are therefore not enabled for convolutional decoding, as required in multi-mode machines. With respect to the Viterbi trellis (and algorithm), an output sequence is determined based upon the most likely path through a logical trellis of states consisting of logical "0"s and logical "l"s that are distributed over time. More particularly, at reception of a signal, a measurement ofthe most likely bit sequence for the signal is made by making distance measurements ("branch metric calculations") between received data bits and hypothesised data bits. In fact, the L-values provide a measurement of an absolute distance between two alternative branch metrics that converge to a decision point in the Viterbi state trellis along the survivor path. Furthermore, since paths through the trellis converge (with time) to convergence points, these convergence points present an opportunity to discard, at these junctures, all paths except the most likely. Specifically, the path offering the smallest distance (i.e. the largest branch metric) is the path retained, while the others are discarded. Subsequently, the lowest L-value (LMIN) for the survivor path is used as an index to an array of threshold values, with a received speech (or data) frame marked bad and rejected if LMIN is lower than a corresponding threshold.
As indicated above, the likelihood values can be used to provide "soft" output decisions for each bit input into the Viterbi algorithm. Indeed, an apphcation for the Likelihood values is the so-called Soft Output Viterbi Algorithm
(SOVA) that uses the L-values to iterate the survivor path decisions until convergence occurs on a final optimum path. Also, the L-values may be used to facilitate a reduced complexity (non-iterative) SOVA to provide a confidence measure of a whole (or portion) of the speech frame. An example of this form of reduced complexity SOVA arises in the Window Error Detection algorithm used in GSM half-rate coding.
In the GSM half-rate speech specification, there is a requirement to include the WED algorithm (associated with the Viterbi decoding algorithm used in decoding convolutional code applied to half-rate speech channels) which provides a mechanism for assessing quality of a decoded frame of speech. Particularly, the quality assessment (measurement) is used to determine subsequent acceptance or rejection (erasure) of the decoded speech (or data) frame.
As will be appreciated, the most important bits in the half-rate speech frame are bits 73 to 97 (in combination, the so-called class la bits and the three (3) parity bits). These bits are important in the sense that they convey the most essential information about the speech samples contained in the transmitted information frame.
Furthermore, as will be appreciated, the WED function need only be apphed to the most important bits to determine the reliability ofthe transmission of these bits. Indeed, the WED algorithm utilises L-values (produced as a by¬ product of the Viterbi branch metric calculation).
The problem with present Viterbi decoders is that they are unable to provide LMIN values directly, and instead provide L-values that require further processing intervention (and hence greater data processing power and electrical power consumption) to calculate LMIN- Additionally, the WED algorithm actually requires a moving average of LMIN values to be stored in order to generate quality threshold information. Unfortunately, present (Viterbi) co-processor design is unable to cope with this additional requirement, so yet more post- Viterbi- stage processing (which clearly effects efficiency in implementing the WED function) must be performed off-line by a central processor. Also, existing co-processors perform L-value calculations for all elements of the Viterbi trellis, even though the GSM WED function, for example, only requires the function to be implemented on a certain part (bits 73 to 97 in the specific instance ofthe GSM WED function) of the input data frame. However, present-day techniques require the necessary storage of all L-values since prior to completing the decode of a complete frame, the survivor path through the trellis is unknown. Consequently, there is no way of knowing in advance which decision (convergence) points require the storage of L-values.
Clearly, the present methodology not only results in the performance of many unnecessary L-value calculations (for all bits output from the trellis) and increases the complexity ofthe Viterbi decoding (and WED function) process, but also requires significant control circuitry and substantial memory storage facilities in the Viterbi decoder (typically implemented as a DSP on a semiconductor chip). As such, prior art methods are less efficient in terms of throughput (i.e. operations performed per second) and power consumption, and incur greater cost as a result of requiring the use ofhigh frequency devices. As such, a need exists for an improved method of Viterbi decoding that requires a lower volume of data processing.
Summary of the Invention
According to a first aspect ofthe present invention there is provided a method of calculating a metric-difference value of a survivor path for an encoded frame provided to a Viterbi decoder arranged to perform a decoding process on the encoded frame, the Viterbi decoder comprising: processor means for controlling the decoding process; a Viterbi state trellis responsive to the encoded frame and having a plurality of branches each having a plurahty of logic states; and a memory, responsive to the processor means, for storing data generated during the decoding process and for storing an indication of a particular branch in the Viterbi trellis from which the metric-difference value is to be calculated; the method comprising the steps of: a) during a first pass ofthe decoding process, calculating path metrics for the encoded frame for a plurality of paths through the Viterbi state trellis, such that each of the plurality of paths comprises a logic state in each of said plurahty of branches and such that an association between the logic state and a corresponding path metric is realised by the processor means and stored in the memory; b) in response to the indication and while calculating the path metrics, associating each logic state ofthe plurality of logic states in the particular branch with a path metric to produce a plurality of trellis data words, and storing these trellis data words in memory; c) at termination ofthe first pass, identifying the survivor path; d) determining a particular logic state in the particular branch through which the survivor path passed by using the association of at least some of the logic states of the survivor path; and e) executing a second pass of the decoding process for the encoded frame from the particular state in the particular branch by initially selecting and using a path metric from a trellis data word ofthe plurality of trellis data words that corresponds to that particular state in order to calculate a minimum metric- difference value for the survivor path only.
In a preferred embodiment the minimum metric-difference value is stored in the memory and subsequently compared against newly calculated minimum metric-difference values for the survivor path in subsequent branches, such that only a numerically smallest value is retained in memory. Advantageously, this reduces the number of memory locations required to store calculated metric-difference values.
In a further embodiment, the step of determining is achieved by performing a trace-back of the survivor path using at least some of the associations stored in memory during the first pass, wherein a comparison of relative sizes between possible alternative associations for the survivor path in a branch determines the survivor path. Alternatively, the association indicates a relative directional displacement from a preceding logic state ofthe survivor path in a preceding branch of the Viterbi state trellis, and the step of deteπnining is achieved by performing a trace-back of the survivor path using the relative directional displacement between logic states in at least some adjacent branches along the survivor path.
In another aspect of the present invention there is provided a Viterbi co-processor arranged to perform a decoding process on an encoded frame, the Viterbi co-processor comprising: processor means for controlling the decoding process; a Viterbi state trellis responsive to the encoded frame and having a plurality of branches each having a plurality of logic states; and a memory, responsive to the processor means, for storing data generated during the decoding process and for storing an indication of a particular branch in the Viterbi trellis from which the metric-difference value is to be calculated; the processor means further comprising: means for calculating path metrics for the encoded frame for a plurality of paths through the Viterbi state trellis during a first pass ofthe decoding process, wherein each of the plurality of paths comprises a logic state in each of said plurality of branches; means for generating and storing in the memory an association between the logic state and a corresponding path metric; means, response to the indication, for associating each logic state of the plurality of logic states in the particular branch with a path metric to produce a plurality of trellis data words, and for storing these trellis data words in memory; means for identifying the survivor path at termination of the first pass; means, responsive to the association of at least some ofthe logic states of the survivor path, for determining a particular logic state in the particular branch through which the survivor path passed; means for executing a second pass of the decoding process for the encoded frame from the particular state in the particular branch; means for initially selecting and using a path metric from a trellis data word of the plurahty of trellis data words that corresponds to that particular state; and means, responsive to the path metric selected from the trellis data word that corresponds to that particular state, for only calculating a minimum metric- difference value for the survivor path.
Exemplary embodiments ofthe present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a representation of a prior art convolutional coder.
FIG. 2 shows a prior art Viterbi state trellis containing a multitude of possible paths.
FIG. 3 illustrates an association of likelihood (L-) values with logic states on the Viterbi state trellis of FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 is a prior art memory block used in association with the trellis of FIG. 2 and the mechanism of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a Viterbi decoder according to the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a memory block used by the Viterbi decoder of FIG. 5 for storing L-values in accordance with a first preferred operating mechanism of present invention.
FIG. 7 illustrates tapping and storage of state values from a Viterbi state trellis in accordance with an alternate operating mechanism ofthe present invention.
FIG. 8 illustrates a memory block utilised by the Viterbi decoder of FIG. 5. FIG. 9 shows a memory location for storage of an absolute LMIN value for a Viterbi algorithm in accordance with the alternate operating mechanism of FIG. 7.
Detailed Description of a Preferred Embodiment
Referring to FIG. 1 there is shown a representation of a prior art convolutional coder 10 that is used to encode (prior to transmission) information bits of an input signal 12. More particularly, input bits are shifted on a bit-by-bit basis into register (memory) elements 14 and 16, at which point the register elements 14 and 16 are selectively tapped and logically combined (usually with and input bit). In the case of convolutional coding, logical combination typically takes the form of an exclusive-OR (XOR) function. With particular regard to FIG. 1, register element 16 is tapped and XORed in logic gate 18 with input bit 20. Also, register elements 16 is tapped and XORed in logic gate 22 with input bit 20 and the contents of register element 14. Logic gates 18 and 22 provide (at outputs 24 and 26, respectively) convolutionally encoded output data bits 28 and 30. The convolutional coder 10 of FIG. 1 is therefore said to have a constraint length of three (3), indicating the total number of bits ofthe input signal 12 used in the encoding operation, and a rate of 1/2, i.e. that every input bit produces two (2) output bits.
Although, for the sake of brevity and simplicity, only two register elements are illustrated, it will be appreciated that a convolutional coder will typically comprise several such register elements.
Now, FIG. 2 shows a prior art Viterbi state trellis 50 (containing a multitude of possible paths 52-56) that is arranged to decode a received convolutionally encoded signal 58. Each path 52-56 represents a possible logic transition between states with respect to time. Therefore, most trellis points 59-66 in the Viterbi trellis 50 potentially provide a point of convergence. In the specific case of FIG. 2, the thickened line 57 represents a survivor path having an output ultimately selected at trellis point 64. Additionally, the illustrated Viterbi state trellis 50 shows a four-state code by way of example, although the numbers of states may be varied according to requirements, e.g. eight- state or sixteen-state codes may be utilised in some channel coding protocols. Points 64 and 66 represent possible survivor paths through the trellis and can therefore be loosely considered as outputs. Again, as will be understood, only a relatively few states and paths have been specifically identified for the sake of clarity, although many states and paths exist within the Viterbi trellis 50.
A mechanism for calculating hkeUhood (L-) values on the Viterbi state trellis of FIG. 2, is shown in FIG. 3. More particularly, logic states M and M+2V 1 (hereinafter referred to by reference numerals 70 and 72, respectively) have calculated path (or survivor) metrics PA and Pβ associated respectively therewith and stored, respectively, in memory elements 76 and 78. In the particular instance of FIG. 3, logic states 70 and 72 converge to logic state 2M (hereinafter referred to by reference numeral 74) via branch (B) metrics 80 and 82 (or BA and Bβ), respectively. Therefore, logic state 74 also has a calculated path metric PN associated therewith that is stored in memory element 84. Additionally, logic state 74 has a L-value (LN) associated therewith and stored in memory element 86. Typically, the memory elements used to store the path metrics will be located in a memory block of the Viterbi decoder. As will be understood, the values of the path (survivor) metric and the L-value are calculated by the following equations:
P = Maximum value of {(PA + BA), (Pβ + Bβ)} (eqn. 1); and LN = I (PA + BA) - (Pβ + BB) I (eqn. 2).
FIG. 4 is a prior art memory block 90 used in association with the Viterbi state trellis of FIG. 2, and the mechanism for calculating path metrics and likelihood values of FIG. 3. Specifically, movement through the Viterbi trellis of FIG. 2 can also be considered as a transition between columns (or
"branches") containing a plurality of logic states, with each logic state in each branch being located on a possible path through the Viterbi trellis. As has been explained, since the final survivor path through the trellis is unknown until the completion of the decode of the complete frame, each L-value for each state in the trellis must also be stored (in addition to the retention in memory ofthe path metrics associated with each path). As such, the memory block 90 contains a vast array of storage elements 91-93 (typically indexed in some identifying manner, such as by way of state 95 and column/branch position 97).
Referring now to FIG. 5, there is shown a block diagram of a Viterbi decoder 100 according to the present invention. As will be appreciated, the Viterbi decoder 100 has signal processing capabilities and comprises a Viterbi trelhs/microcontroller portion 101 and a memory portion 102 that is responsive to the Viterbi trellis/microcontroller portion 101 and which is used for data storage. The Viterbi trelhs/microcontroller portion 101 (as typified by FIG. 2) is responsible for the operational control of the decoding process and data manipulation. More particularly, an encoded input signal 104 received by the Viterbi decoder is decoded by the Viterbi trelhs/microcontroller portion 101 to produce a decoded output 106 indicative of survivor paths through the trellis. The memory portion 102 contains registers for storing information generated by the microcontroller portion 101 during the decoding process. More particularly, the memory portion 102 contains a data register 110 for storing and indexing data, e.g. recording path metrics, L-values and related information generated upon traversing the trellis. The memory portion 102 additionally includes a window register 108 used to define a window of N branches identified by a start-column (and optionally a finish-column). The window register 108 identifies a branch in the trellis at which to start metric- difference (L-) value calculations (e.g. start at "column x") and potentially a branch in the trellis at which to suspend/terminate such calculations (e.g. stop at "column x+5"). Furthermore, the N branches of the window represent the portion of the speech/data frame ofthe Viterbi state trellis that is subject to the WED function. In the absence of a finish-column, the metric-difference value calculations will commence at the start-column and continue throughout the subsequent branches (or columns) ofthe trellis. Optionally, the data register 110 may also comprise a path memory 111 for storing mapping bits (the function of which is specific to an alternate embodiment of the present invention to be described subsequently).
In FIG. 6 there is shown, in greater detail, a portion ofthe data register 110 used (by the Viterbi decoder of FIG. 5) according to a first preferred operating mechanism of present invention. As well as containing an indexed array of calculated path metrics, the data register 110 stores only a minimum L-value (e.g. LMIN ) f°r eacn indexed path route 112 (e.g. path "A"). More particularly, the minimum L-value is the numerically smallest L-value for each of the survivor paths at the current branch in the trellis.
According to a first preferred operating mechanism of the present invention, L-values are stored in the LMIN register 110 by the Viterbi trellis microcontroller portion 101 through a "minimum wave method". Metric-difference (L-value) calculations commence (as defined by the start-column) at the start of the window, which start point may be at the beginning ofthe frame or at some later point. Then, for every branch in the window, the L-values are calculated for each decision point (and hence each possible path), and then compared against a L-value stored previously for each path. Only the lowest numeric L-value for each particular path (e.g. (LMi β) is stored in the LMIN register 110, which process may therefore involve the over- writing (substitution) of older but higher numeric L-values. As will be understood, it is possible for paths to converge at a convergence point (such as logic state 74) when traversing between branches. In this case, it is necessary to calculate two L-values for the two alternate converging paths, and then to compare the newly calculated L-values against previously stored L-values for the different paths previously taken to this convergence point. In this respect, it will be appreciated that in the present case only two path metrics (and hence two L-values) can potentially converge to a convergence point for the exemplary trellis arrangement illustrated.
In summary, when traversing between adjacent branches of a Viterbi state trelhs, newly calculated L-values are compared with previously calculated L-values, with only the lowest numeric value retained as the LMIN value for each path. Then, once the frame has been decoded and the survivor path(s) identified, the LMIN value stored for a desired survivor path can be immediately determined and read-out by the microcontroller portion 101. As a result of this method, a better quality numeric value for the metric- difference calculation is obtained through the selection of the absolute lowest LMIN value over an entire path (or portion thereof). Indeed, use of a programmable register arrangement of the first preferred operating mechanism provides greater flexibility in decoding and allows adaptation of Viterbi decoders for future changes in coding algorithm, e.g. the so-called enhanced full-rate coding algorithms. Furthermore, as will be appreciated, by defining a window of interest in the Viterbi trellis, fewer calculation are required and a resultant power saving in a DSP therefore achieved.
In an alternate embodiment ofthe present invention, it has been reahsed that the survivor path through a Viterbi trellis can be identified independently of calculated L-values for the survivor path. Thus, WED in a Viterbi decoder is operated through a "two-pass method". The Viterbi algorithm is first executed (pass #1) with the calculation and storage of L-values suppressed/suspended.
FIG. 7 illustrates tapping and storage of state values from a Viterbi state trellis in accordance with the alternate operating mechanism of the present invention. Particularly, a portion 120 ofthe Viterbi state trellis has been illustrated, which portion 120 comprises a plurality of logic states 122-134 distributed amongst a plurality of branches (col x, col x+1, col x+2,...col x+5). A particular branch (in this case col x+2) has been identified as the start-column, with the particular logic states 128-134 contained therein tapped to provide respective trellis data words 138-144, comprising the path metrics for each state in branch x+2, directly associated with the start ofthe window. As will be appreciated, tapping of the logic states 128-134 in the Viterbi state trellis, in general, may be implemented by hard- wire taps or through a "state download" of logic state values from the branches, for example. Clearly, a state download offers greater flexibility with respect to window definition and is the preferred method. The data trelhs words 138-144 (and their respective associations with the logic states in the branch of the start of the window) are stored in the data register 110.
As will be appreciated, all of the path metrics calculated during pass #1 of a frame through the Viterbi state trelhs need not be stored, since some will be discarded or over-written and others may prove superfluous to the decoding algorithm. However, in a first implementation of the alternate embodiment of the present invention, it is necessary to record all path metrics from at least the start of the window to the point where a desired survivor path is determined. Alternatively, in a second implementation of the alternate embodiment of the present invention, the data register need only store a most recently calculated path metric for each path through the trellis together with an indication (stored in path memory 111) of which particular one of the two possible logic states in the preceding branch provided the route of the path. The nature of the path memory 111 will now be described in relation to FIG. 8.
Referring to FIG. 8, an exemplary structure of the path memory is illustrated. Paths 112 through the Viterbi state trellis are indexed against branches 150 (such as those identified as col x, col x+1, col x+2 and survivor path) o the trellis. Logical values 152-156, i.e. logical "0"s or logical "l"s (referred to as "pointers"), are associated with each path and branch in the path memory 111. More particularly, since (in the present case) a path passes through a state in a branch only derivable from one of two earlier logic states in a preceding branch, then a logical "0" or a logical "1" is attributed against a particular path and branch dependent upon a perceived direction from which the path emanates. For example, attribution of a logical "0" could indicate the movement from logic state "00" ofthe Viterbi state trellis 50 to logic state "01", rather than from logic state "10" to "01", whereas attribution of a logical "1" in the path memory would indicate the opposite. As such, attribution of pointers in the path memory 111 can also be considered as indicating the relative movement (directional displacement) of the path based on absolute values of the preceding logic states as compared against a present logic state for a state in a branch. Clearly, any appropriate form of logical attribution (pointer) indicating the relative nature ofthe higher or lower logic state in the preceding branch can be utilised in the path memory 111.
Storage of pointers as an indication of each survivor path is advantageous since only one bit of information need by stored to indicate the path direction, and only the most recent path metric for the path need be recorded in the data register. Consequently, there is a reduction in the amount of memory required to store the data generated by the decoding process.
On completion of pass #1, a desired survivor path is identified in accordance with usual, known practices that will be readily appreciated by the skilled addressee, e.g. the identification ofthe path having the smallest distance
(largest branch metric) or, alternatively, the path that terminates at a given logical state, e.g. the logical "0" state in the Viterbi state trellis (as is the case for GSM channel decoding). At this point, the desired survivor path is "traced - back" to its corresponding state in the start-column (i.e. the first branch) of the identified window. Trace-back to the corresponding state in the first branch may be achieved through the realisation that the state having the smallest distance (largest path metric) of the two possible path metrics in an immediately preceding branch of the trellis represents the actual route of the desired survivor path (although this requires storage, during pass #1, of all path metrics for the trellis). Alternatively, trace-back may be achieved using the pointers stored in path memory 111 and the path metric of the survivor path (bearing in mind that the path metric ofthe survivor path is mathematically derived from previously calculated path metrics), i.e. trace- back is achieved by simply moving to (selecting) the appropriate logic state (of the two possible logical states) in the preceding branch in response to the direction indicated by the logical value ofthe pointer.
After trace-back, the trellis data words 138-144 recorded and associated with the first branch ofthe window during pass #1 are nominally re-loaded into the first branch ofthe window, and a portion ofthe Viterbi algorithm is executed a second time (pass #2) for the same frame (concentrating on the desired survivor path). During pass #2, metric-difference (L-value) calculations are performed for the desired survivor path only, and only a single absolute lowest LMINABS valuer the subsequent branches of the trellis is recorded and stored (which potentially results in a previous LMINABS va e being discarded and therefore over-written). In fact, only the path metric associated with the desired survivor path and the corresponding state in the first branch ofthe identified window need be re-loaded.
As will be appreciated, during pass #2 and provided that all path metrics have been stored, there is no need to re-calculate path metrics for the desired survivor path because these have already been calculated during pass #1 and have been previously stored in memory, although a numeric comparison between the two possible path metric values would need to be made to determine the actual path. As such, the values of the path metrics subsequently encountered on the desired survivor path are retrieved directly. However, if the path memory 111 is utilised to store pointers and only the survivor path metric recorded, then path metric calculations will be required, which path metric calculations will necessarily commence at the first branch ofthe window identified by window register 108.
Selection between the first trace-back implementation (i.e. the storage of all path metrics) and the second implementation (i.e. the storage of pointers and only the most recent path metric) depends upon the operating characteristics and structure of the Viterbi decoder because there is a memory/power trade-off between these two alternative implementations (with the first requiring a larger memory capacity but potentially simpler processing). FIG. 9 shows a memory location (or element) 170 for storage of an absolute LMINABS v£u<uer a Viterbi algorithm in accordance with the alternate operating mechanism of FIG. 7, which memory location 170 may be located in the data register 110.
Implementation of the alternate embodiment provides substantial benefits and advantages with respect to window error detection and Viterbi decoding. Particularly, substantial memory storage space is saved in terms of both storage of path metric values and particularly L-values, since only one relatively small register is required to store the single LMEΝABS- Additionally, the alternate operating method substantially reduces the number of calculations performed by the DSP (Viterbi decoder), and hence a substantial reduction in power consumption ofthe DSP results. Indeed, when employing the two-pass method for the WED function, there is an order of magnitude reduction in the number of calculation required, and an estimated power saving of ~70% for a GSM-type Viterbi half-rate code. As a direct consequence ofthe reduction in the number of calculation, the rate (and efficiency) ofthe Viterbi decoding process is increased substantially which therefore allows Viterbi decoders to be implemented on substantially lower frequency sihcon devices (or the like). Furthermore, having alleviated the requirement for high frequency devices, a substantial cost saving and higher manufacturing productivity results.

Claims

Claims
1. A method of calculating a metric-difference value of a survivor path for an encoded frame (104) provided to a Viterbi decoder (100) arranged to perform a decoding process on the encoded frame, the Viterbi decoder (100) comprising: processor means (101) for controlling the decoding process; a Viterbi state trellis (120) responsive to the encoded frame and having a plurality of branches (x-(x+5)) each having a plurality of logic states (128-134); and a memory (102), responsive to the processor means (101), for storing data (110-112) generated during the decoding process and for storing an indication (108) of a particular branch in the Viterbi trelhs from which the metric-difference value is to be calculated; the method comprising the steps of: a) during a first pass of the decoding process, calculating path metrics (112) for the encoded frame for a plurality of paths through the Viterbi state trellis (120), such that each of the plurahty of paths comprises a logic state in each of said plurality of branches and such that an association between the logic state and a corresponding path metric is reahsed by the processor means and stored in the memory; b) in response to the indication and while calculating the path metrics, associating each logic state ofthe plurality of logic states in the particular branch with a path metric to produce a plurahty of trellis data words (138- 144), and storing these trelhs data words in memory (110-112); c) at termination of the first pass, identifying the survivor path; d) determining a particular logic state in the particular branch through which the survivor path passed by using the association of at least some of the logic states ofthe survivor path; and e) executing a second pass of the decoding process for the encoded frame from the particular state in the particular branch by initially selecting and using a path metric from a trelhs data word ofthe plurahty of trellis data words that corresponds to that particular state in order to calculate a minimum metric-difference value for the survivor path only.
2. The method of calculating a metric-difference value according to claim 1, wherein the minimum melric-difference value is stored in the memory (110- 112) and subsequently compared against newly calculated minimum metric-difference values for the survivor path in subsequent branches, and wherein only a numerically smallest value is retained in memory.
3. The method of calculating a metric-difference value according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the step of determining is achieved by performing a trace-back of the survivor path using at least some of the associations stored in memory during the first pass, wherein a comparison of relative sizes between possible alternative associations for the survivor path in a branch determines the survivor path.
4. The method of calculating a metric-difference value according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the association indicates a relative directional displacement from a preceding logic state of the survivor path in a preceding branch of the Viterbi state trellis, and the step of determining is achieved by performing a trace-back of the survivor path using the relative directional displacement between logic states in at least some adjacent branches along the survivor path.
5. The method of calculating a metric-difference value according to any preceding claim, wherein the survivor path is identified as the path metric having the smallest distance.
6. The method of calculating a metric-difference value according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the survivor path is identified as the path that terminates at a predeterrnined logical state in a predetermined branch of the Viterbi state trelhs.
7. A Viterbi co-processor (100) arranged to perform a decoding process on an encoded frame (104), the Viterbi co-processor (100) comprising: processor means (101) for controlhng the decoding process; a Viterbi state trelhs (120) responsive to the encoded frame and having a plurahty of branches (x-(x+5)) each having a plurahty of logic states; and a memory (102), responsive to the processor means (101), for storing data generated during the decoding process and for storing an indication (128- 144) of a particular branch (x+2) in the Viterbi trellis (120) from which the metric-difference value is to be calculated; the processor means (101) further comprising: means for calculating path metrics for the encoded frame for a plurahty of paths through the Viterbi state trelhs during a first pass ofthe decoding process, wherein each of the plurality of paths comprises a logic state in each of said plurality of branches; means for generating and storing in the memory an association between the logic state and a corresponding path metric; means, response to the indication, for associating each logic state of the plurahty of logic states in the particular branch with a path metric to produce a plurality of trelhs data words, and for storing these trellis data words in memory; means for identifying the survivor path at termination of the first pass; means, responsive to the association of at least some of the logic states of the survivor path, for determining a particular logic state in the particular branch through which the survivor path passed; means for executing a second pass ofthe decoding process for the encoded frame from the particular state in the particular branch; means for initially selecting and using a path metric from a trellis data word ofthe plurahty of trellis data words that corresponds to that particular state; and means, responsive to the path metric selected from the trellis data word that corresponds to that particular state, for only calculating a minimum metric-difference value for the survivor path.
8. The Viterbi co-processor of claim 7, wherein the means for determining further comprises: means for performing a trace-back ofthe survivor path using at least some ofthe associations stored in memory during the first pass; and means for comparing relative sizes between possible alternative associations for the survivor path in a branch; wherein the means for determining determines the survivor path in response to the relative sizes.
9. The Viterbi co-processor of claim 7, wherein the memory (102), in response to the processor means (101), stores a path comprising associations indicative of a relative directional displacement from a preceding logic state of the survivor path in a preceding branch of the Viterbi state trellis; and wherein the means for determining the particular logic state in the particular branch through which the survivor path passed identifies the particular logic state by performing a trace-back of the survivor path in response to the relative directional displacement between logic states in at least some adjacent branches along the survivor path.
PCT/EP1996/004160 1995-09-30 1996-09-24 Viterbi co-processor and method of operation therefor WO1997013327A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP96933367A EP0855107A1 (en) 1995-09-30 1996-09-24 Viterbi co-processor and method of operation therefor
JP9513937A JPH11513544A (en) 1995-09-30 1996-09-24 Viterbi coprocessor and method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9519995A GB2305827B (en) 1995-09-30 1995-09-30 Viterbi co-processor and method of operation therefor
GB9519995.6 1995-09-30

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997013327A1 true WO1997013327A1 (en) 1997-04-10

Family

ID=10781562

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP1996/004160 WO1997013327A1 (en) 1995-09-30 1996-09-24 Viterbi co-processor and method of operation therefor

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0855107A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH11513544A (en)
CN (1) CN1200849A (en)
GB (1) GB2305827B (en)
WO (1) WO1997013327A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999049634A2 (en) * 1998-03-23 1999-09-30 Nokia Networks Oy Modulation detection method and apparatus
US6507927B1 (en) 1999-02-09 2003-01-14 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Method and device for estimating the reliability of a decoded symbol sequence

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100190291B1 (en) * 1996-07-30 1999-06-01 윤종용 Trellis back control device of viterbi decoder
JP2002504289A (en) * 1997-06-13 2002-02-05 シーメンス アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト Source Controlled Channel Decoding Using Intraframe Correlation
JP3374908B2 (en) 1999-05-06 2003-02-10 日本電気株式会社 Method of updating reference value in high-speed closed-loop transmission power control
CN1529945A (en) 2000-10-24 2004-09-15 因芬尼昂技术股份公司 Method and device for decoding sequence of physical signals, reliability detection unit and viterbl decoding unit
US20100278287A1 (en) * 2003-03-27 2010-11-04 Nokia Corporation List Output Viterbi Deconder with Blockwise ACS and Traceback

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0229246A2 (en) * 1986-01-15 1987-07-22 ANT Nachrichtentechnik GmbH Method for decoding digital signals, as well as a Viterbi decoder and applications
EP0302330A2 (en) * 1987-08-03 1989-02-08 ANT Nachrichtentechnik GmbH Method and arrangement for evaluating branch and path metrics
EP0512641A1 (en) * 1991-05-08 1992-11-11 ALCATEL BELL Naamloze Vennootschap Decoder device
US5408502A (en) * 1992-07-13 1995-04-18 General Instrument Corporation Apparatus and method for communicating digital data using trellis coded QAM with punctured convolutional codes
US5430768A (en) * 1994-09-21 1995-07-04 Seagate Technology, Inc. Maximum likelihood detector for a disc drive PRML read channel

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0229246A2 (en) * 1986-01-15 1987-07-22 ANT Nachrichtentechnik GmbH Method for decoding digital signals, as well as a Viterbi decoder and applications
EP0302330A2 (en) * 1987-08-03 1989-02-08 ANT Nachrichtentechnik GmbH Method and arrangement for evaluating branch and path metrics
EP0512641A1 (en) * 1991-05-08 1992-11-11 ALCATEL BELL Naamloze Vennootschap Decoder device
US5408502A (en) * 1992-07-13 1995-04-18 General Instrument Corporation Apparatus and method for communicating digital data using trellis coded QAM with punctured convolutional codes
US5430768A (en) * 1994-09-21 1995-07-04 Seagate Technology, Inc. Maximum likelihood detector for a disc drive PRML read channel

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999049634A2 (en) * 1998-03-23 1999-09-30 Nokia Networks Oy Modulation detection method and apparatus
WO1999049634A3 (en) * 1998-03-23 1999-11-11 Nokia Networks Oy Modulation detection method and apparatus
US6353913B2 (en) 1998-03-23 2002-03-05 Nokia Networks Oy Modulation detection method and apparatus
US6507927B1 (en) 1999-02-09 2003-01-14 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Method and device for estimating the reliability of a decoded symbol sequence

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0855107A1 (en) 1998-07-29
GB2305827B (en) 2000-01-19
GB2305827A (en) 1997-04-16
CN1200849A (en) 1998-12-02
JPH11513544A (en) 1999-11-16
GB9519995D0 (en) 1995-12-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5432803A (en) Maximum likelihood convolutional decoder
US8122327B2 (en) Symbol-level soft output viterbi algorithm (SOVA) and a simplification on SOVA
US5802116A (en) Soft decision Viterbi decoding with large constraint lengths
KR19990028216A (en) Optimal Soft-Output Decoder for Tail-Biting Trellis Codes
US6452985B1 (en) Viterbi decoding apparatus and Viterbi decoding method
JPH11355152A (en) Addition/comparison/selection circuit, liklihood sequence detector, and addition/comarison/selection function execution method
KR20090071455A (en) Decoding apparatus and decoding method
KR100675389B1 (en) Viterbi decoder for executing trace-back work in parallel, and, method thereof
JPH0316046B2 (en)
WO1997013327A1 (en) Viterbi co-processor and method of operation therefor
CN100499379C (en) A coding method of convolution code
KR20070073648A (en) Transport format detecting apparatus and method
US7404139B2 (en) Decoder with M-AT-A-Time Traceback
JPH09232971A (en) Viterbi decoding method and viterbi decoding circuit
JP3512176B2 (en) Turbo decoding device and method of controlling number of decoding repetitions in turbo decoding
US20070201586A1 (en) Multi-rate viterbi decoder
CN105356893A (en) Tail code configurable Viterbi decoding method and decoder
JPH06284018A (en) Viterbi decoding method and error correcting and decoding device
US7263653B2 (en) Algorithm for a memory-based Viterbi decoder
US6904105B1 (en) Method and implemention of a traceback-free parallel viterbi decoder
Chandel et al. Viterbi decoder plain sailing design for TCM decoders
JPH05335973A (en) Viterbi decoder and decoder for convolution code
KR100491016B1 (en) Trace-Back Viterbi Decoder with Consecutive Control of Backward State Transition and Method thereof
JP2000324047A (en) Method for updating reference value in high-speed closed loop transmission power control
KR20050055556A (en) Low power viterbi decoder and trace-back method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 96197832.5

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CN JP US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1996933367

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 1997 513937

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1996933367

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1996933367

Country of ref document: EP