WO1996038820A1 - Security control system - Google Patents
Security control system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1996038820A1 WO1996038820A1 PCT/GB1996/001249 GB9601249W WO9638820A1 WO 1996038820 A1 WO1996038820 A1 WO 1996038820A1 GB 9601249 W GB9601249 W GB 9601249W WO 9638820 A1 WO9638820 A1 WO 9638820A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- door
- image
- parameter
- image data
- control system
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003708 edge detection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001429 visible spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05G—SAFES OR STRONG-ROOMS FOR VALUABLES; BANK PROTECTION DEVICES; SAFETY TRANSACTION PARTITIONS
- E05G5/00—Bank protection devices
- E05G5/003—Entrance control
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05Y—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
- E05Y2900/00—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
- E05Y2900/10—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof
- E05Y2900/13—Type of wing
- E05Y2900/132—Doors
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a control system for use with a security door, with interlocking or synchronised doors, or with other means, such as turnstiles, flaps or other obstacles, for controlling access to a secured area.
- a typical security door may comprise a revolving door divided into, say, four compartments by radially extending wings.
- the wings are coupled centrally at their upper or lower end to an interlock operated by a control system and are typically motor driven, but may alternatively be pushed manually. Turnstile systems are generally free to be pushed manually.
- the control system may operate, for example, in response to a card reader.
- An authorised person wishing to pass through the door will then insert their pass card in the reader and, provided that their card is recognised, the control system then operates the interlock to free the revolving door so the user can pass through it. If the card is not recognised, or if an unauthorised person attempts to gain access without use of the pass card reader, then the interlock holds the wings of the revolving door against movement and so prevents passage through the door.
- the present inventors have adopted an entirely new approach to the detection of tail-gating and piggy-backing, based on the use of video data. While the use of video data has previously been proposed for the recognition of authorised persons, as an alternative, e.g., to the use of card readers, the use of video data for piggy-backing detection (APB) has not previously been thought desirable or possible. On the face of it the complexity of the visual data which would be gathered from e.g., a revolving transparent door, and the processing overheads involved in determining from such data the number of persons present provide a major disincentive to the adoption of such techniques.
- APB piggy-backing detection
- APB detection generally has to be carried out in the short interval of time during which the user is passing through the door and so techniques involving large processing overheads tend to be avoided.
- the present inventors have realised that with appropriate processing, the raw video data can be used to yield a simple parameter for comparison with a predetermined threshold, and that the use of video data in this manner allows effective APB detection in real time using a relatively low-powered processor.
- the threshold may be for a statistic derived from a number of parameters in combination.
- the image processor and discriminator comprise a cascaded series of modules, each module being arranged to process image data to determine a respective parameter, and to compare the parameter with a corresponding threshold.
- the modules are arranged so that when one module is able to make a decision at a predetermined confidence level, then that module produces the said discriminatory output signal, otherwise the said module passing image data on to a subsequent module for further processing.
- the modules are arranged generally in order of their discriminatory power, with the most powerful module receiving the image data first.
- the discriminatory power of a module is a measure of its ability to make a discriminatory decision with a minimum processing overhead, and so at maximum speed.
- the efficiency of the whole system is maximised by using the fastest tests firsts, and only passing on to tests with a greater processing overhead when the preceding tests fail to meet a predetermined confidence level.
- the image processor is arranged to capture a background image of the door with no person present, and to capture a subsequent image of the door with a person present and to discard from the second said image video data which is unchanged from the background image.
- a method of controlling a security access device including capturing video image data from a secured area of the access device, processing said image data and thereby deriving at least one parameter for discriminating the number of persons present in the secured area, and
- the present invention also encompasses a security access device when fitted with a control system in accordance with the first aspect of the present invention.
- a security access device including a secured region bounded by one or more wholly or partially transparent walls, characterised by a control system including a video input device arranged to view the secured region, and in that the transparent walls include filter means arranged to block or reduce the transmission of light in part of the visible/near-visible optical spectrum, and in that the video input device has a sensitivity/wavelength characteristic generally complementary to the transmission characteristic of the said filter means associated with the transparent walls, the visibility to the video input device of objects outside the transparent walls thereby being reduced or eliminated.
- Revolving security doors for example, are commonly built with glass doors. Objects outside the secured area are therefore potentially visible to any video security control system and may "confuse" any judgement made by the control system.
- This aspect of the present invention overcomes this problem by using walls which are transparent in one part of the visible/near-visible spectrum and a video input device which is sensitive in another part of the spectrum.
- the walls may, for example, be covered by a film which blocks transmission in the infra-red.
- the video device may either be selected to be inherently sensitive in the infra-red range, and insensitive outside that range, or, may be provided with an input filter giving this desired sensitivity/wavelength characteristic.
- Figure l is a block diagram of a system embodying the present invention.
- Figures 2a and 2b are schematic representations of captured video data at different stages of processing
- Figure 3 shows a set of pixel masks used in processing the image data to detect the head edges shown in Figure 2b;
- Figure 4 is a schematic illustrating the processing of the image data to derive the image height and width
- Figure 5 is a flow diagram for the image processing in the APB control circuit
- Figure 6 is a schematic of hardware for implementing the system of Figure 1;
- Figures 7a - 7d are graphs showing experimental data obtained using the system of Figure 1.
- An entry control system comprises a revolving door 1 which, in this example, has four compartments defined by radially extending wings 2a-2d.
- the movement of the wings is controlled by an interlock 3 mounted centrally above the wings.
- This interlock operates in a fashion conventional in revolving security doors to lock the door against movement until an appropriate control signal is received from a control unit.
- a card reader 5 is connected to the door controller 4 and stands outside the door 1. In use, when someone wishes to pass through the door, that person inserts their card in the reader 5. Provided that the card is recognised, the reader 5 outputs an authorization signal to the door controller 4 which then operates the interlock 3 to free the door which is then driven by a motor through an angle sufficient for the authorised user to pass from the entrance to the exit of the door.
- control system for the door further comprises a video camera 6 which is mounted above the door looking down into an underlying compartment.
- the video data from the camera is processed in an APB control circuit 7 to produce a discriminatory output which goes to the controller 4 for the door to operate the interlock 3 to lock the door when piggy-backing or tail-gating is detected.
- the APB control circuit has a cascaded hierarchical structure. This comprises a plurality of stages arranged generally in order of the discriminatory power of the particular parameter which is derived and used.
- the image data is first subject to processing by the first of this hierarchy of stages. If that results in the production of a parameter having a value such that a decision on the presence or absence of a second person can be made with adequate confidence, then the processing is terminated at that stage and an appropriate output signal produced and fed to the external control unit. If, however, a decision cannot be made based on the first parameter, then the image data is passed on to the next stage in the hierarchy, for further processing and the derivation of a further parameter and so on.
- the system is structured to maximise the processing speed and to minimise the average processing overhead for the image data.
- a single parameter may be used for the discrimination in the majority of cases, with further parameters being derived and tested only in those marginal cases where a single parameter does not enable a decision to be made with sufficient confidence.
- the first stage of the video control circuit is a background-subtraction stage. This firstly captures a background image of the compartment of the door prior to the entry of the user into the field of view of the camera. This background image is stored in order to provide a means of identifying changes occurring when entry into the door compartment is effected. Subsequently, as the user passes into the field of view, the system captures a second image, the "present" image. This is compared with the stored background image and those pixels which are unchanged are discarded, thereby eliminating them from the subsequent processing stages.
- the comparison is carried out by taking the grey scale values in the range 1-255 of each pixel, subtracting one from the other and writing a value of 0 for each pixel where the result of the subtraction is 0 or is less than a predetermined small value, say 10. Where, the difference is greater than this predetermined threshold, then the value written is simply the grey scale value of the present image for that pixel. In the course of this process a count is maintained of the number of non-zero pixels produced and this is used as the first test parameter for APB detection. It is found that when two or more persons are present the difference count is characteristically higher than when a single person is present in the door. In some cases however the result of the difference count will be too close to the relevant predetermined threshold for a reliable determination to be made. In this case the video data is passed on for subsequent stages of processing and discrimination.
- the next stage carries out edge detection using the known Sobel edge detection algorithm.
- This algorithm is applied only to the non-zero pixels of the image output from the first stage and sets those pixels to one of two binary values producing a binary image with, for example, edges shown in black on a white ground as in Figure 2a.
- a determination is then made of the area inside the edges. This is done by stepping a window of dimensions, e.g., 10 x 10 through the image and recording a count for each pixel which is inside the edges and for which none of the pixels of the window cross an edge. This count then is a measure of the area inside the edges and is related to the area in the view of the camera of the shoulders and head of the person passing through the door.
- This measure of the area provides a second discriminatory parameter which as in the first stage is compared with a respective discriminatory threshold. As before, if this comparison produces a result with a sufficient degree of certainty, then the processing can be terminated at that stage and the discriminatory output passed on to the control system 7. If this is not the case, then the system passes on to the next stage of processing. As illustrated in Figure 4, this calculates the height and width of the image defined by the edges, calculates the ratio of the two, and compares this with a respective predetermined threshold.
- the final processing module carries out what has been termed "head edge detection” .
- This uses the aliasing characteristic of the "corners" of the detected edges.
- the image data is compared with a set of pixel masks of the form shown in Figure 3. A count is incremented, and a mark displayed ( Figure 2b) , for each pixel where a match is found with one of the masks. The count of the number of matches is then compared with a predetermined threshold for the count to provide a further discriminatory test.
- control system 7 may activate the -interlock to lock the door against movement, thereby trapping the users, or may drive the door in the reverse direction to expel the users.
- the inventors have found that the discrimination of the system can be improved by calculating an additional parameter to compensate for the position of an object in the door.
- the parameters discussed above are based on what is assumed to be a plan view from above of the person in the door. However, if the person is not directly under the camera, then the camera captures part of the side of the body too. This extra information would tend to distort the measurement and could lead to the mis-classification of a tall off-centre person as two people. To avoid this, a measurement is taken first of the position of the centre of the object. This is then compared with the actual centre of the camera and an adjustment parameter is set. The adjustment parameter takes the form of a ratio by which subsequently determined parameters are multiplied.
- Figure 7a and Column 1 of Table l show the measurements of the position of the object used for determining the adjustment ratio for a sample of 72 test images. The higher the number the further the object is from the centre of the camera.
- the images are a selection from the following categories: a single person; two people; people carrying large and small objects; a person carrying a large object over their head.
- Figure 7b and Column 2 of the table show the difference count parameter, after correction by the adjustment ratio or "normalising factor" of Figure 7a.
- images 68-70 are large objects carried over the top of the head and so result in a large difference count.
- Figure 7c and Column 3 show the (corrected) head area parameter. This measurement is a guide to the total area available to be a head space. Images 68-70 would cause concern as the values are extremely high. These images would fall above the alarm threshold, as 2 people could fit under such a large object.
- Figure 7d shows the height/width ratio parameter measuring the compactness of the image. The lower the value, the more likely that the imaged object is two people.
- Table 1 below lists the data illustrated in these graphs. Columns 1 to 3 are identified above. The data contained in the other columns are as follows:
- the Normalising Factor is used to adjust the . ratio depending on the position of the object in respect to the centre of the camera.
- This measurement is the number of pixel patterns that match with a head indicator mask. The greater the number the larger the number of head mask matches.
- This measurement is the number of straight lines found in the image.
- the comparators may be arranged to make an "intelligent" decision based on a number of parameters, rather than simply applying a single threshold.
- the system may also include a knowledge base so that it can judge each situation on the measurements of the current image and knowledge gained about the environment the system is working with..
- Table 2 lists the subjects used for the different images listed in Table 1.
- the following thresholds may be used by the comparators for discrimination:
- the system described above may be modified through the use of moving images, that is to say the capturing of a series of video frames as the person moves through the door. This then produces distinctive "constants" which may be used as the basis for discriminatory parameters in an analogous fashion to the process discussed above.
- some of the processing modules may use appropriately trained neural networks. These may be trained on the parameters produced by other modules.
- Appropriate thresholds for the different parameters used by different modules may be obtained by inspection from real sample data such as that illustrated in Figures 7a-7d, and or from computer modelling of the environment in which the system is to be used.
- Figure 6 illustrates one example of hardware embodying the system.
- a camera 61 views the target scene and passes the acquired image to a frame grabber 62.
- the camera views the target scene through an IR bandpass filter.
- An IR bandstop filter which may be in the form of a film applied to the walls of the revolving door and which is transparent in the rest of the visual spectrum is then used to screen the extraneous visual field from the field of view of the camera.
- a light source may be provided inside the door to provide illumination at levels appropriate to the sensitiviry of the video camera 61.
- the image from the frame grabber is passed to a single board PC 63 which runs image processing software implementing the hierarchical modular structure discussed above. Once a decision has been made by the control program, an output is passed to the door controller 64.
- the camera 61 is a 1/3 inch black and white El camera (RS845-184) having a 1/3 inch CS mount DD lens, 2.6mm (RS846-266) .
- the frame grabber is that available commercially as VIDEOBLASTER SE.
- the single board PC uses an Intel 486DX2/66 microprocessor and an ISA bus.
- the interface to the door controller 64 is a standard PC ISA bus serial card.
- the user interface which enables the user to set adjustable parameters for the control program may comprise a keyboard or keypad and a VDU or LCD display.
- appendix A the source code for the image processing/discrimination program run on the single board PC 63
- appendix B the different elements of the program are listed in pseudocode.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU58264/96A AU5826496A (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1996-05-24 | Security control system |
EP96919896A EP0832472A1 (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1996-05-24 | Security control system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB9511140.7 | 1995-06-02 | ||
GBGB9511140.7A GB9511140D0 (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1995-06-02 | Security control system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1996038820A1 true WO1996038820A1 (en) | 1996-12-05 |
Family
ID=10775379
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB1996/001249 WO1996038820A1 (en) | 1995-06-02 | 1996-05-24 | Security control system |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0832472A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU5826496A (en) |
GB (1) | GB9511140D0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1996038820A1 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1999055995A1 (en) * | 1998-04-29 | 1999-11-04 | Malcolm William Thomas | An access control system |
WO2003088157A1 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2003-10-23 | Newton Security Inc. | Tailgating and reverse entry detection, alarm, recording and prevention using machine vision |
EP1686544A3 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2006-12-06 | Optex Co., Ltd. | Traffic monitoring apparatus |
US7397929B2 (en) | 2002-09-05 | 2008-07-08 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Method and apparatus for monitoring a passageway using 3D images |
US7400744B2 (en) | 2002-09-05 | 2008-07-15 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Stereo door sensor |
US7623674B2 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2009-11-24 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Method and system for enhanced portal security through stereoscopy |
US8326084B1 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2012-12-04 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | System and method of auto-exposure control for image acquisition hardware using three dimensional information |
ITMI20120686A1 (en) * | 2012-04-24 | 2013-10-25 | Cometa S P A | PASSAGE DETECTION EQUIPMENT |
EP3203447A1 (en) * | 2016-02-04 | 2017-08-09 | Holding Assessoria I Lideratge, S.L. (HAL SL) | Detection of fraudulent access at control gates |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3564132A (en) * | 1966-01-17 | 1971-02-16 | Mardix | Apparatus for controlling the passage of persons and objects between two areas utilizing closed circuit television |
WO1981001213A1 (en) * | 1979-10-16 | 1981-04-30 | Otis Elevator Co | Object and people counting system |
DE3740115A1 (en) * | 1986-11-26 | 1988-06-09 | Matsushita Electric Works Ltd | PERSONNEL DETECTION ARRANGEMENT |
EP0431363A1 (en) * | 1989-12-05 | 1991-06-12 | GALLENSCHÜTZ METALLBAU GmbH | Security entrance chamber for personnel |
WO1994027408A1 (en) * | 1993-05-14 | 1994-11-24 | Rct Systems, Inc. | Video traffic monitor for retail establishments and the like |
-
1995
- 1995-06-02 GB GBGB9511140.7A patent/GB9511140D0/en active Pending
-
1996
- 1996-05-24 WO PCT/GB1996/001249 patent/WO1996038820A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1996-05-24 AU AU58264/96A patent/AU5826496A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1996-05-24 EP EP96919896A patent/EP0832472A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3564132A (en) * | 1966-01-17 | 1971-02-16 | Mardix | Apparatus for controlling the passage of persons and objects between two areas utilizing closed circuit television |
WO1981001213A1 (en) * | 1979-10-16 | 1981-04-30 | Otis Elevator Co | Object and people counting system |
DE3740115A1 (en) * | 1986-11-26 | 1988-06-09 | Matsushita Electric Works Ltd | PERSONNEL DETECTION ARRANGEMENT |
EP0431363A1 (en) * | 1989-12-05 | 1991-06-12 | GALLENSCHÜTZ METALLBAU GmbH | Security entrance chamber for personnel |
WO1994027408A1 (en) * | 1993-05-14 | 1994-11-24 | Rct Systems, Inc. | Video traffic monitor for retail establishments and the like |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1999055995A1 (en) * | 1998-04-29 | 1999-11-04 | Malcolm William Thomas | An access control system |
WO2003088157A1 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2003-10-23 | Newton Security Inc. | Tailgating and reverse entry detection, alarm, recording and prevention using machine vision |
US7382895B2 (en) | 2002-04-08 | 2008-06-03 | Newton Security, Inc. | Tailgating and reverse entry detection, alarm, recording and prevention using machine vision |
US7397929B2 (en) | 2002-09-05 | 2008-07-08 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Method and apparatus for monitoring a passageway using 3D images |
US7400744B2 (en) | 2002-09-05 | 2008-07-15 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Stereo door sensor |
US7623674B2 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2009-11-24 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Method and system for enhanced portal security through stereoscopy |
US8326084B1 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2012-12-04 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | System and method of auto-exposure control for image acquisition hardware using three dimensional information |
US7536253B2 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2009-05-19 | Optex Co., Ltd. | Traffic monitoring apparatus |
EP1686544A3 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2006-12-06 | Optex Co., Ltd. | Traffic monitoring apparatus |
ITMI20120686A1 (en) * | 2012-04-24 | 2013-10-25 | Cometa S P A | PASSAGE DETECTION EQUIPMENT |
EP2657885A1 (en) * | 2012-04-24 | 2013-10-30 | Cometa S.p.A. | Detection of passage in a revolving door |
EP3203447A1 (en) * | 2016-02-04 | 2017-08-09 | Holding Assessoria I Lideratge, S.L. (HAL SL) | Detection of fraudulent access at control gates |
WO2017133902A1 (en) * | 2016-02-04 | 2017-08-10 | Holding Assessoria I Lideratge, S.L. (Hal Sl) | Detection of fraudulent access at control gates |
US11315374B2 (en) | 2016-02-04 | 2022-04-26 | Holding Assessoria I Lideratge, S.L. | Detection of fraudulent access at control gates |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0832472A1 (en) | 1998-04-01 |
GB9511140D0 (en) | 1995-07-26 |
AU5826496A (en) | 1996-12-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7536037B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for human distinction using infrared light | |
EP1346327B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for resolution of entry/exit conflicts for security monitoring systems | |
US7215798B2 (en) | Method for forgery recognition in fingerprint recognition by using a texture classification of gray scale differential images | |
CN109409315B (en) | Method and system for detecting remnants in panel area of ATM (automatic Teller machine) | |
CN107679471A (en) | Indoor occupant sky hilllock detection method based on video monitoring platform | |
Ziliani et al. | Image analysis for video surveillance based on spatial regularization of a statistical model-based change detection | |
KR20090086898A (en) | Detection of smoke with a video camera | |
CN111259718B (en) | Staircase retention detection method and system based on Gaussian mixture model | |
EP1010130A1 (en) | Low false alarm rate video security system using object classification | |
EP2546807B1 (en) | Traffic monitoring device | |
CN111127810A (en) | Automatic alarming method and system for open fire of machine room | |
EP0832472A1 (en) | Security control system | |
CN112396011A (en) | Face recognition system based on video image heart rate detection and living body detection | |
JPH07181012A (en) | Feature amount detector for image data | |
JP2003051076A (en) | Device for monitoring intrusion | |
JP2599701B2 (en) | Elevator Standby Passenger Number Detection Method | |
JP2002304651A (en) | Device and method for managing entering/leaving room, program for executing the same method and recording medium with the same execution program recorded thereon | |
CN107221056A (en) | The method stopped based on human bioequivalence | |
KR102211903B1 (en) | Method And Apparatus for Photographing for Detecting Vehicle Occupancy | |
KR20190072323A (en) | Image Monitoring System and Method for Monitoring Image | |
JP3813023B2 (en) | Iris recognition device | |
CN107221058A (en) | Intelligent channel barrier system | |
JPH0869523A (en) | Human body recognizing device | |
KR100338473B1 (en) | Face detection method using multi-dimensional neural network and device for the same | |
JPH05300516A (en) | Animation processor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1996919896 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1996919896 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: CA |
|
WWR | Wipo information: refused in national office |
Ref document number: 1996919896 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 1996919896 Country of ref document: EP |