WO1996037237A1 - An in vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging - Google Patents

An in vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1996037237A1
WO1996037237A1 PCT/US1996/007337 US9607337W WO9637237A1 WO 1996037237 A1 WO1996037237 A1 WO 1996037237A1 US 9607337 W US9607337 W US 9607337W WO 9637237 A1 WO9637237 A1 WO 9637237A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
mice
uva
uvb
transgenic mouse
skin
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1996/007337
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Eric Bernstein
Jouni Uitto
Original Assignee
Thomas Jefferson University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/449,826 external-priority patent/US5648061A/en
Application filed by Thomas Jefferson University filed Critical Thomas Jefferson University
Priority to JP8535812A priority Critical patent/JPH11507807A/en
Priority to EP96920342A priority patent/EP0831931A4/en
Priority to US08/973,449 priority patent/US6018098A/en
Publication of WO1996037237A1 publication Critical patent/WO1996037237A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/85—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for animal cells
    • C12N15/8509—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for animal cells for producing genetically modified animals, e.g. transgenic
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K67/00—Rearing or breeding animals, not otherwise provided for; New or modified breeds of animals
    • A01K67/027—New or modified breeds of vertebrates
    • A01K67/0275—Genetically modified vertebrates, e.g. transgenic
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K49/00—Preparations for testing in vivo
    • A61K49/0004—Screening or testing of compounds for diagnosis of disorders, assessment of conditions, e.g. renal clearance, gastric emptying, testing for diabetes, allergy, rheuma, pancreas functions
    • A61K49/0008—Screening agents using (non-human) animal models or transgenic animal models or chimeric hosts, e.g. Alzheimer disease animal model, transgenic model for heart failure
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K2217/00—Genetically modified animals
    • A01K2217/05—Animals comprising random inserted nucleic acids (transgenic)
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K2227/00—Animals characterised by species
    • A01K2227/10—Mammal
    • A01K2227/105—Murine
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K2267/00—Animals characterised by purpose
    • A01K2267/03—Animal model, e.g. for test or diseases
    • A01K2267/0393—Animal model comprising a reporter system for screening tests

Definitions

  • Cutaneous aging results from both intrinsic chronological aging and extrinsic sun-exposure. Montagna et al., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol . 1989, 21:907-918; Kligman, L.H., Aging and the Skin. Raven Press, New York, 1989, pp. 331-346; Taylor et al., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol . 1990, 221:1-15. The majority of changes associated with an aged appearance result from chronic sun- damage. Warren et al., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol . 1991, 25:751- 760; Frances, C. and Robert, L., Int. J. Dermatol . 1984, 23:166-179.
  • Elevated elastin RNA levels in sun-damaged skin result from enhanced elastin promoter activity, as shown by transient transfections of fibroblasts with a DNA construct composed of the human elastin promoter linked to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene. Bernstein et al., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1994, 103:182-186.
  • CAT chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
  • a transgenic mouse line which expresses the human elastin promoter/CAT construct has now been developed to further study the role of elastin promoter activation in cutaneous photoaging.
  • These mice express human elastin promoter activity in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated manner. Promoter activity can be studied in this model as a function of small increases in ultraviolet radiation, demonstrating the sensitivity of the assay. In addition quantitative data can be obtained after only a single exposure to ultraviolet radiation.
  • This transgenic mouse and fibroblasts derived from this mouse are useful as In vivo and in vitro models to study cutaneous photoaging and in the identification of agents which may protect against photodamage.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide mouse fibroblast cultures derived from a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter.
  • a transgenic mouse model has been developed which permits the investigation of human elastin promoter activity in response to ultraviolet irradiation both in vivo by direct irradiation of mouse skin, and in vitro by irradiation of dermal fibroblasts grown from skin explants.
  • Previous studies investigating the effect of ultraviolet radiation on photoaging in animal models have measured elastic fiber damage, solar elastosis, skin wrinkling, and skin sagging.
  • the similarity between the mouse and human action spectra for development of edema and erythema in response to ultraviolet radiation suggests that mouse models may accurately mimic human responses to ultraviolet radiation. For example, wrinkling of mouse skin mimics human wrinkling which occurs in chronically photodamaged skin.
  • mice do not develop erythema in a manner similar to humans and the elastic fiber alterations in mice in response to ultraviolet radiation are qualitatively different from those occurring in chronically sun-damaged human skin.
  • the numerous dermal cysts present in hairless mice proliferate in response to ultraviolet radiation, a response which has no clinical correlate in human skin. Skin sagging, a response in certain mice to high dose UVA, does not appear to have a histopathologic correlate in mice and may not have a clinical correlation to a human response.
  • mouse skin is relatively thin in comparison to human skin, thus, permitting better penetration of ultraviolet radiation. This may, in part, account for the accentuated response of mouse skin to ultraviolet radiation.
  • the decreased thickness of mouse skin may also exaggerate the potential effects of UVB as compared to UVA, relative to humans. UVB penetrates only the most superficial dermis in humans, whereas in mice, the relative proportion of the dermis exposed to UVB is much greater. Utilizing the human elastin promoter in the transgenic mouse model of the present, is believed to more accurately reflect the human response to ultraviolet radiation. The approximate time of maximal promoter activation and the duration of promoter elevation after a single exposure of UVA or UVB radiation was determined.
  • mice were treated with a single dose of 245.7 mJ/cm 2 of UVB or 38.2 J/cm 2 of UVA.
  • Elastin promoter activity was maximal 24 hours after UVB exposure with a 4.6-fold increase over controls.
  • CAT activity remained elevated 72 hours after irradiation at nearly 2 times control levels. By 96 hours, the activity fell to below one-third that of controls.
  • UVA irradiation CAT activity was maximal 12-24 hours after light exposure, demonstrating a more modest increase of less than twice that of controls. This increase persisted until 48 hours after UVA exposure. By 72 hours after UVA exposure, CAT activity fell to one-third that of controls.
  • mice were harvested 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours following UVB exposure. A 20% increase in CAT activity was measured 1 hour following exposure while a 70% elevation was measured 2 hours after exposure.
  • mice The dose-response relationship for elastin promoter activity in UVB-treated mice was observed after only a single dose of UVB. Other in vivo models of photoaging require numerous treatments over a much longer period of time to demonstrate a measurable effect.
  • Experimentally produced elastosis in mice was first produced by Sams et al. using very large amounts of ultraviolet radiation. J. Invest . Dermatol . 1964, 43:467-471. In these studies, one group of mice received 1,040 human minimal erythema doses ( EDs) over 3 months from a bank of fluorescent tubes, while another group received 13,000 MEDs given over 52 weeks in 260 treatments.
  • EDs human minimal erythema doses
  • Elastosis was demonstrated by histochemical staining for elastin and, in irradiated mice, demonstrated an increased elastin staining. Since this initial report, a number of researchers have used murine models of cutaneous photoaging evaluating the production of dermal elastosis. Sams et al., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1964, 43:467-471; Nakamura, K. and Johnson, W.C., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1968, 51:253-258; Berger et al., Arch. Dermatol . Res. 1980, 269:39-49; Kligman, L.H., Arch. Dermatol . Res .
  • the elevation of the elastin promoter in response to UVB and UVA was also determined to be dose dependent. Increasing doses of ultraviolet radiation were administered and skin harvested 24 hours after light exposure. In response to UVB irradiation at 30.7, 122.8 and 491.4 mJ/cm 2 , CAT activity increased to 1.7-, 4.1- and 8.5-fold greater than controls, respectively. In response to UVA irradiation, a more modest increase in CAT activity was seen. Doses of 9.5 and 38.2 J/cm 2 resulted in increases of 1.6- and 1.7-fold over controls, respectively.
  • the transgenic mouse model of the present invention yields quantitative data.
  • Kligman and Sayre Photochem. Photobiol . 1991, 53:237-242
  • the parameters used to assess degree of elastosis in the prior art were evaluated subjectively.
  • the effect of ultraviolet radiation on CAT activity in vitro was also determined.
  • Early passage fibroblasts derived from skin explants of the transgenic mice were irradiated and harvested for determination of CAT activity 24 hours later.
  • Doses of UVB ranged from 0.7 to 10.9 mJ/cm 2 , with the highest doses resulting in over a 30-fold increase in CAT activity.
  • Promoter activity as measured by CAT assay, peaked at a dose of 5.5 mJ/cm 2 , which corresponded with a treatment time of 40 seconds.
  • CAT activity remained elevated at about 30-fold with increasing UVB doses, eventually resulting in a decrease in CAT activity which corresponds with cell death.
  • UVA doses of up to 2.2 J/cm 2 which corresponds with a light treatment time of over 18 minutes, did not increase CAT activity in vitro. Longer treatment times resulted in cell death.
  • PUVA-treated cell cultures demonstrated 2.6-, 13.2- and 2.0- fold increases in CAT activity in response to 1 J/cm 2 of UVA with 8-MOP doses of 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 ⁇ g/ml of 8-MOP, respectively.
  • 8-MOP doses 3 ⁇ g/ml
  • the induction of elastin promoter activity decreased signif cantly at this dose presumably due to decreased cell viability.
  • Protein assays demonstrated a dose- dependent reduction in total protein harvested indicative of cell death at the highest 8-MOP doses.
  • mice treated with 8-MOP or UVA alone did not exhibit a significant change in CAT activity, as compared to untreated controls.
  • PUVA- treated mice demonstrated a 3.1-fold increase in CAT activity demonstrating in vivo activation of the elastin promoter in response to PUVA as well.
  • the transgenic mouse model of the present invention provides a rapid, quantitative means of measuring human elastin promoter activity in response to single doses of ultraviolet radiation. Enhanced CAT activity was demonstrated in response to both UVA and UVB. Further, the ability to study the effects of ultraviolet radiation both in vivo and in vitro enables further investigation of the mechanisms responsible for elastin promoter activation by ultraviolet radiation.
  • This model also provides a tool for the rapid evaluation of sunscreens and other compounds thought to alter the effects of solar radiation. In addition, this model can be used to study the effects of treatments such as psoralen on a specific gene as in the studies performed with PUVA treatment.
  • a test compound is applied to the skin of a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter.
  • the transgenic mouse is then exposed to ultraviolet radiation, either UVB or UVA and human elastin promoter activity in the mouse is determined.
  • the transgenic mouse is exposed to 8-MOP followed by UVA.
  • the human elastin promoter activity is then compared to that in transgenic mice also exposed to an equivalent dose of ultraviolet radiation which were not treated with the test compound to determine whether or not the test compound provided protection against the ultraviolet radiation.
  • fibroblast cells derived from a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter are treated with a test compound.
  • the treated fibroblast cells are then exposed to UVB radiation or 8-MOP followed by UVA radiation and human elastin promoter activity in the fibroblast cells is determined.
  • This activity is compared to fibroblast cells from the transgenic mice exposed to the same dose of UVB radiation or 8-MOP followed by UVA radiation but which were not treated with the test compound to determine if the test compound provided protection against the exposure.
  • Example 1 Transgenic mice expressing the human elastin promoter
  • mice expressing the 5.2- kb human elastin promoter linked to a CAT reporter gene were used. Hsu-Wong et al., J. Biol . Chem. 1994, 269:18072-18075. These mice express the human elastin promoter in a tissue- specific and developmentally regulated manner. Mice four or five days old were used since at this age, visible hair growth is not yet present.
  • Fibroblast cultures were established from the skin of transgenic mice by explanting tissue specimens onto the tissue culture plastic dishes and allowing cells to migrate to the surrounding area.
  • the primary cultures were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's (DME) medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1 mM L-glutamine and antibiotics at 37°C.
  • DME Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
  • the primary cell cultures were passaged by trypsinization and the subcultures in passages 2 or 3 were utilized for radiation experiments. After exposure to ultraviolet radiation, the cells were incubated in DME medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum for 24 hours, then harvested for determination of CAT activity as described in Example 3.
  • CAT activity was determined.
  • the specimens were homogenized in 0.25 Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, using a tissue homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Inc. Westbury, NY). The homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 X g for 15 minutes at 4°C and the protein concentration in the supernatant determined by a commercial protein assay kit (Bio- Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA).
  • UVB radiation For administration of UVB radiation, a closely spaced array of seven Westinghouse FS-40 sunlamps was used which delivered uniform irradiation at a distance of 35 cm. Irradiating with UVA was performed using seven Sylvania FR40T12 PUVA lamps in the above mentioned array, filtered through window glass of 2 mm thickness to remove wavelengths below 320 nm. The energy output at 35 cm was measured with a Solar Light model 3D UVA and UVB detector (Solar Light Company, Philadelphia, PA). The output of FX-40 sunlamps was 23.4 units/hour of UVB at 38 cm, where each unit is equivalent to 21 mJ/cm 2 of erythema effective energy. The output for FR40T12 PUVA lamps filtered through window glass was 2.02 mW/cm 2 , with no detectable UVB radiation.
  • mice were placed under the center of the light array and restrained with adhesive tape, exposing their dorsal surfaces to the ultraviolet radiation at a distance of 35 cm from the fluorescent tubes. Untreated control mice were restrained in a similar manner. To determine the time of maximal promoter activation and the duration of elevated promoter activity following UVA and UVB irradiation, time course experiments were carried out. Doses were selected in accordance with amounts showing moderate promoter activation. Mice were irradiated for one-half hour with UVB (dose of 245.7 mJ/cm 2 ) or with UVA for 5.2 hours (dose of 38.2 J/cm 2 ). Irradiated skin was then harvested over the next 72 to 96 hours for determination of CAT activity.
  • UVB dose of 245.7 mJ/cm 2
  • UVA for 5.2 hours
  • mice were sacrificed at the first time point (12 hours after irradiation). To determine the earliest response of CAT activity to UVB irradiation, mice were harvested 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours after UVB exposure. Unirradiated mice were harvested 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after control mice to determine the fall in endogenous CAT activity over time.
  • mice were used for each dose or time point in each experiment.
  • Fibroblast cultures as described above were exposed for 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 seconds of UVB corresponding to doses of 0.7, 1.4, 2.7, 5.5 and 10.9 mJ/cm 2 , respectively.
  • Cultures were exposed to UVA for 2.3, 4.6, 9.2 and 18.4 minutes corresponding to doses of 0.3, 0.6, 1.1 and 2.2 J/cm 2 .
  • tissue culture medium was removed from cells and replaced with a thin layer of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) sufficient to cover the cells. Control unirradiated cells were also placed in PBS. Medium was replaced in all dishes immediately after the last light dose was administered. Only fibroblasts from mice in the same litters were used for any given experiment and utilized in the first few passages. Two dishes of cells were used for each time point.
  • PBS phosphate buffered saline
  • Control cells received no UVA or 8-MOP.
  • UVA controls received 1 J/cm 2 of UVA without prior incubation with 8-MOP.
  • 8-MOP controls received the highest dose of 8-MOP (3 ⁇ g/ml) but no UVA.
  • PUVA-treated cells were preincubated with either 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 ⁇ g/ml of 8-MOP in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and then exposed to 1 J/cm 2 of UVA.
  • 8-MOP was administered by diluting 8-MOP in PBS to the desired concentration. Before application to cultures, tissue culture medium was removed and the cells were rinsed twice with PBS.
  • mice were placed under the center of the light array and restrained with adhesive tape, exposing their dorsal surfaces to UVA at a distance of 38 cm from the fluorescent tubes. Unirradiated control mice were restrained in a similar manner. For each experiment, only mice from the same litter were used. 8-MOP-treated mice received 25 ⁇ l of an ethanolic solution containing 2 mg/ml of 8-MOP, applied twice to their backs 15 and 7.5 minutes before UVA (10 J/cm 2 ) exposure. 8-MOP control mice received identical topical applications of 8-MOP. PUVA-treated mice received both 8-MOP and UVA. Following phototreatment, the backs of the mice were rinsed twice with 70% isopropyl alcohol pads to remove excess 8-MOP. Mice were sacrificed and skin harvested for determination of CAT activity 24 hours after phototreatment.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Endocrinology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Diabetes (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
  • Cosmetics (AREA)
  • Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)

Abstract

A transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter ois provided. Mouse fibroblast cultures derived from this transgenic mouse are also provided. In addition methods of identifiying compounds capable of inhibiting cutaneous photodamaged with this transgenic mouse or fibroblast cultures derived from these mice are provided.

Description

AN IN VIVO AND IN VITRO MODEL OF CUTANEOUS PHOTOAGING
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Cutaneous aging results from both intrinsic chronological aging and extrinsic sun-exposure. Montagna et al., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol . 1989, 21:907-918; Kligman, L.H., Aging and the Skin. Raven Press, New York, 1989, pp. 331-346; Taylor et al., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol . 1990, 221:1-15. The majority of changes associated with an aged appearance result from chronic sun- damage. Warren et al., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol . 1991, 25:751- 760; Frances, C. and Robert, L., Int. J. Dermatol . 1984, 23:166-179. Dramatic alterations of the superficial dermis accompany the deep wrinkles and laxity common in photoaged skin. The major histopathologic alteration of photoaged skin is the accumulation of material which, on routine histopathologic examination, has the staining characteristics of elastin and is, thus, termed solar elastosis. Immunohistochemical staining has shown the poorly-formed fibers comprising solar elastosis to be composed of elastin (Chen et al., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1986, 87:334-337; Mera et al., Br. J. Dermatol . 1987, 117:21-27) fibrillin (Chen et al., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1986, 87:334-337; Dahlback et al., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1990, 94:284-291; Bernstein et al., J. Invest. Dermatol . 1994, 103:182-186) and versican, the normal components of elastic fibers (Zimmerman et al., J. Cell . Blol . 1994, 124:817-825). A coordinate increase in elastin, fibrillin and versican mRNAs has been demonstrated in fibroblasts derived from photodamaged skin, as compared to fibroblasts derived from normal skin from the same individuals. Bernstein et al., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1994, 103:182-186. Elevated elastin RNA levels in sun-damaged skin result from enhanced elastin promoter activity, as shown by transient transfections of fibroblasts with a DNA construct composed of the human elastin promoter linked to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene. Bernstein et al., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1994, 103:182-186.
A transgenic mouse line which expresses the human elastin promoter/CAT construct has now been developed to further study the role of elastin promoter activation in cutaneous photoaging. These mice express human elastin promoter activity in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated manner. Promoter activity can be studied in this model as a function of small increases in ultraviolet radiation, demonstrating the sensitivity of the assay. In addition quantitative data can be obtained after only a single exposure to ultraviolet radiation. This transgenic mouse and fibroblasts derived from this mouse are useful as In vivo and in vitro models to study cutaneous photoaging and in the identification of agents which may protect against photodamage.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter.
Another object of the present invention is to provide mouse fibroblast cultures derived from a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter.
Method of identifying compounds capable of inhibiting cutaneous photodamage using either the transgenic mouse or fibroblasts derived from these mice are also provided.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Profound changes take place in the superficial dermis as a result of chronic sun-exposure. The major alteration is the deposition of massive amounts of abnormal elastic material, termed solar elastosis. It has been shown that solar elastosis is accompanied by elevations in elastin and fibrillin mRNAs and elastin promoter activity. A transgenic mouse model useful as both an in vivo and in vitro model for studying cutaneous photoaging, and for testing compounds that may inhibit cutaneous photodamage has now been developed. Using this transgenic mouse line, which expresses the human elastin promoter linked to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated manner, it is now possible to investigate the effects of ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) on human elastin promoter activity in vivo and in vitro.
In mice a single dose of UVB (491.4 mJ/cm2) resulted in up to an 8.5-fold increase in promoter activity, while a more modest 1.8-fold increase was measured with UVA (38.2 J/cm2). In addition, in vitro studies revealed over a 30-fold increase in elastin promoter activity in response to UVB (5.5 mJ/cm2), while no change was measured in response to UVA (2.2 J/cm2). These results confirm the role of UVB in elastin promoter activation in photoaging and UVA as a contributing factor. In vitro results suggest a direct stimulatory effect of UV on the dermal fibroblasts, in addition to any contribution by pro- inflammatory cytokines from other inflammatory and resident cells of the dermis.
In the present invention, a transgenic mouse model has been developed which permits the investigation of human elastin promoter activity in response to ultraviolet irradiation both in vivo by direct irradiation of mouse skin, and in vitro by irradiation of dermal fibroblasts grown from skin explants. Previous studies investigating the effect of ultraviolet radiation on photoaging in animal models have measured elastic fiber damage, solar elastosis, skin wrinkling, and skin sagging. The similarity between the mouse and human action spectra for development of edema and erythema in response to ultraviolet radiation suggests that mouse models may accurately mimic human responses to ultraviolet radiation. For example, wrinkling of mouse skin mimics human wrinkling which occurs in chronically photodamaged skin. These changes take place more rapidly in mouse skin, permitting more rapid evaluation of - 4 - ultraviolet radiation effects than may be possible in humans. However, differences in several parameters measured in previous studies as also apparent. For example, mice do not develop erythema in a manner similar to humans and the elastic fiber alterations in mice in response to ultraviolet radiation are qualitatively different from those occurring in chronically sun-damaged human skin. In addition, the numerous dermal cysts present in hairless mice proliferate in response to ultraviolet radiation, a response which has no clinical correlate in human skin. Skin sagging, a response in certain mice to high dose UVA, does not appear to have a histopathologic correlate in mice and may not have a clinical correlation to a human response. Finally, mouse skin is relatively thin in comparison to human skin, thus, permitting better penetration of ultraviolet radiation. This may, in part, account for the accentuated response of mouse skin to ultraviolet radiation. However, the decreased thickness of mouse skin may also exaggerate the potential effects of UVB as compared to UVA, relative to humans. UVB penetrates only the most superficial dermis in humans, whereas in mice, the relative proportion of the dermis exposed to UVB is much greater. Utilizing the human elastin promoter in the transgenic mouse model of the present, is believed to more accurately reflect the human response to ultraviolet radiation. The approximate time of maximal promoter activation and the duration of promoter elevation after a single exposure of UVA or UVB radiation was determined. Mice were treated with a single dose of 245.7 mJ/cm2 of UVB or 38.2 J/cm2 of UVA. Elastin promoter activity, as measured by CAT assay, was maximal 24 hours after UVB exposure with a 4.6-fold increase over controls. CAT activity remained elevated 72 hours after irradiation at nearly 2 times control levels. By 96 hours, the activity fell to below one-third that of controls. After UVA irradiation, CAT activity was maximal 12-24 hours after light exposure, demonstrating a more modest increase of less than twice that of controls. This increase persisted until 48 hours after UVA exposure. By 72 hours after UVA exposure, CAT activity fell to one-third that of controls. To determine the earliest increase in CAT activity following UVB irradiation, mice were harvested 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours following UVB exposure. A 20% increase in CAT activity was measured 1 hour following exposure while a 70% elevation was measured 2 hours after exposure.
Since CAT activity decreases as a function of age, time course experiments underestimated relative CAT activity for time points after the initial 12 hour time point. Controls for time course experiments were harvested at the 12 hour time point. If the decrease in endogenous CAT activity is considered, CAT activity remained at, or near, maximal levels until 72 hours after light exposure for UVB-treated mice, and until 48 hours in UVA-treated mice. By 72 hours after UVA exposure and 96 hours after UVB exposure, CAT activity fell to one-third that of controls sacrificed 12 hours after light exposure. Untreated mice sacrificed 72 and 96 hours after 4-5 day old controls also demonstrated baseline CAT activity which was one-third that of the younger control mice. Thus, baseline endogenous CAT activity in mice 8-9 days old decreases to one- third that of 5 day old mice from the same litter.
The dose-response relationship for elastin promoter activity in UVB-treated mice was observed after only a single dose of UVB. Other in vivo models of photoaging require numerous treatments over a much longer period of time to demonstrate a measurable effect. Experimentally produced elastosis in mice was first produced by Sams et al. using very large amounts of ultraviolet radiation. J. Invest . Dermatol . 1964, 43:467-471. In these studies, one group of mice received 1,040 human minimal erythema doses ( EDs) over 3 months from a bank of fluorescent tubes, while another group received 13,000 MEDs given over 52 weeks in 260 treatments. Elastosis was demonstrated by histochemical staining for elastin and, in irradiated mice, demonstrated an increased elastin staining. Since this initial report, a number of researchers have used murine models of cutaneous photoaging evaluating the production of dermal elastosis. Sams et al., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1964, 43:467-471; Nakamura, K. and Johnson, W.C., J. Invest . Dermatol . 1968, 51:253-258; Berger et al., Arch. Dermatol . Res. 1980, 269:39-49; Kligman, L.H., Arch. Dermatol . Res . 1982, 272:229-238; Kligman et al., J. Invest. Dermatol . 1982, 78:181- 189; Poulsen et al., Br. J. Dermatol . 1984, 110:531-538; Kligman et al., J. Invest. Dermatol . 1985, 84:272-276; Bissett et al., Photochem. Photobiol . 1987, 46:367-376; Bissett et al., Photochem. Photobiol . 1989, 50:763-769; Wulf et al., Photodermatology 1989, 6:44-51; Kligman, L.H. and Sayre, R.M., Photochem. Photobiol . 1991, 53:237-242; and Moran, M. and Granstein, R.D., J. Invest. Dermatol . 1994, 103:797-800. The number of treatments with ultraviolet radiation in these studies ranges from 36 to 260 given over 13 to 62 weeks. This is in contrast to the single doses used in the current study. Thus, the total dose of UVB used to produce measurable solar elastosis using the same UVB lamps in the present study, ranged from 6- (Bissett et al., Photochem. Photobiol . 1987, 46:367- 376) to almost 40-fold (Poulsen et al., Br. J. Dermatol . 1984, 110:531-538) larger than the largest dose used with the model of the present invention.
The elevation of the elastin promoter in response to UVB and UVA was also determined to be dose dependent. Increasing doses of ultraviolet radiation were administered and skin harvested 24 hours after light exposure. In response to UVB irradiation at 30.7, 122.8 and 491.4 mJ/cm2, CAT activity increased to 1.7-, 4.1- and 8.5-fold greater than controls, respectively. In response to UVA irradiation, a more modest increase in CAT activity was seen. Doses of 9.5 and 38.2 J/cm2 resulted in increases of 1.6- and 1.7-fold over controls, respectively.
In addition to requiring substantially shorter treatment times and doses of ultraviolet radiation, the transgenic mouse model of the present invention yields quantitative data. With the exception of Kligman and Sayre, Photochem. Photobiol . 1991, 53:237-242, who used an image analysis system to quantify elastosis, the parameters used to assess degree of elastosis in the prior art were evaluated subjectively. The effect of ultraviolet radiation on CAT activity in vitro was also determined. Early passage fibroblasts derived from skin explants of the transgenic mice were irradiated and harvested for determination of CAT activity 24 hours later. Doses of UVB ranged from 0.7 to 10.9 mJ/cm2, with the highest doses resulting in over a 30-fold increase in CAT activity. Promoter activity, as measured by CAT assay, peaked at a dose of 5.5 mJ/cm2, which corresponded with a treatment time of 40 seconds. CAT activity remained elevated at about 30-fold with increasing UVB doses, eventually resulting in a decrease in CAT activity which corresponds with cell death. In contrast, UVA doses of up to 2.2 J/cm2, which corresponds with a light treatment time of over 18 minutes, did not increase CAT activity in vitro. Longer treatment times resulted in cell death.
The ability of treatment with a combination of 8- methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and UVA, referred to as PUVA, was also found to upregulate elastin promoter activity in this model. Treatment of skin diseases with PUVA results in clinical alterations in treated skin similar to those observed in chronically photodamaged skin. PUVA-treated patients develop non-melanoma skin cancers, pigmentary alterations and wrinkling characteristics of sun-induced changes. Fibroblast cultures treated with 8-MOP or UVA alone exhibited no significant change in CAT activity as compared to untreated controls. However, PUVA-treated cell cultures demonstrated 2.6-, 13.2- and 2.0- fold increases in CAT activity in response to 1 J/cm2 of UVA with 8-MOP doses of 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 μg/ml of 8-MOP, respectively. Although the highest dose of 8-MOP (3 μg/ml) were expected to generate a greater number of photoadducts than lower doses, the induction of elastin promoter activity decreased signif cantly at this dose presumably due to decreased cell viability. Protein assays demonstrated a dose- dependent reduction in total protein harvested indicative of cell death at the highest 8-MOP doses. Mice treated with 8-MOP or UVA alone did not exhibit a significant change in CAT activity, as compared to untreated controls. However, PUVA- treated mice demonstrated a 3.1-fold increase in CAT activity demonstrating in vivo activation of the elastin promoter in response to PUVA as well.
The transgenic mouse model of the present invention provides a rapid, quantitative means of measuring human elastin promoter activity in response to single doses of ultraviolet radiation. Enhanced CAT activity was demonstrated in response to both UVA and UVB. Further, the ability to study the effects of ultraviolet radiation both in vivo and in vitro enables further investigation of the mechanisms responsible for elastin promoter activation by ultraviolet radiation. This model also provides a tool for the rapid evaluation of sunscreens and other compounds thought to alter the effects of solar radiation. In addition, this model can be used to study the effects of treatments such as psoralen on a specific gene as in the studies performed with PUVA treatment.
Methods of identifying compounds capable of inhibiting cutaneous photodamage using the models of the present invention are also provided. In one embodiment a test compound is applied to the skin of a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter. The transgenic mouse is then exposed to ultraviolet radiation, either UVB or UVA and human elastin promoter activity in the mouse is determined. Alternatively, the transgenic mouse is exposed to 8-MOP followed by UVA. The human elastin promoter activity is then compared to that in transgenic mice also exposed to an equivalent dose of ultraviolet radiation which were not treated with the test compound to determine whether or not the test compound provided protection against the ultraviolet radiation. In another embodiment, fibroblast cells derived from a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter are treated with a test compound. The treated fibroblast cells are then exposed to UVB radiation or 8-MOP followed by UVA radiation and human elastin promoter activity in the fibroblast cells is determined. This activity is compared to fibroblast cells from the transgenic mice exposed to the same dose of UVB radiation or 8-MOP followed by UVA radiation but which were not treated with the test compound to determine if the test compound provided protection against the exposure.
The following nonlimiting examples are provided to further illustrate the present invention.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Transgenic mice expressing the human elastin promoter
A homozygous line of transgenic mice expressing the 5.2- kb human elastin promoter linked to a CAT reporter gene was used. Hsu-Wong et al., J. Biol . Chem. 1994, 269:18072-18075. These mice express the human elastin promoter in a tissue- specific and developmentally regulated manner. Mice four or five days old were used since at this age, visible hair growth is not yet present.
Example 2: Fibroblast Cultures
Fibroblast cultures were established from the skin of transgenic mice by explanting tissue specimens onto the tissue culture plastic dishes and allowing cells to migrate to the surrounding area. The primary cultures were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's (DME) medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1 mM L-glutamine and antibiotics at 37°C. The primary cell cultures were passaged by trypsinization and the subcultures in passages 2 or 3 were utilized for radiation experiments. After exposure to ultraviolet radiation, the cells were incubated in DME medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum for 24 hours, then harvested for determination of CAT activity as described in Example 3.
Example 3: CAT Assay
To measure the expression of the human elastin promoter/CAT reporter gene construct in the skin of transgenic mice and in fibroblast cultures established from these animals, CAT activity was determined. For extraction of the CAT from skin, the specimens were homogenized in 0.25 Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, using a tissue homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Inc. Westbury, NY). The homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 X g for 15 minutes at 4°C and the protein concentration in the supernatant determined by a commercial protein assay kit (Bio- Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). Aliquots of the supernatant containing 100 μg of protein were used for assay of CAT activity by incubation with [14C] chloramphenicol in accordance with well-known procedures. The acetylated and non-acetylated forms of radioactive chloramphenicol were separated by thin- layer chromatography and CAT activity was determined by the radioactivity in the acetylated forms as a percent of the total radioactivity in each sample.
Example 4: UV Sources
For administration of UVB radiation, a closely spaced array of seven Westinghouse FS-40 sunlamps was used which delivered uniform irradiation at a distance of 35 cm. Irradiating with UVA was performed using seven Sylvania FR40T12 PUVA lamps in the above mentioned array, filtered through window glass of 2 mm thickness to remove wavelengths below 320 nm. The energy output at 35 cm was measured with a Solar Light model 3D UVA and UVB detector (Solar Light Company, Philadelphia, PA). The output of FX-40 sunlamps was 23.4 units/hour of UVB at 38 cm, where each unit is equivalent to 21 mJ/cm2 of erythema effective energy. The output for FR40T12 PUVA lamps filtered through window glass was 2.02 mW/cm2, with no detectable UVB radiation.
Example 5: Irradiation
Mice were placed under the center of the light array and restrained with adhesive tape, exposing their dorsal surfaces to the ultraviolet radiation at a distance of 35 cm from the fluorescent tubes. Untreated control mice were restrained in a similar manner. To determine the time of maximal promoter activation and the duration of elevated promoter activity following UVA and UVB irradiation, time course experiments were carried out. Doses were selected in accordance with amounts showing moderate promoter activation. Mice were irradiated for one-half hour with UVB (dose of 245.7 mJ/cm2) or with UVA for 5.2 hours (dose of 38.2 J/cm2). Irradiated skin was then harvested over the next 72 to 96 hours for determination of CAT activity. Control mice were sacrificed at the first time point (12 hours after irradiation). To determine the earliest response of CAT activity to UVB irradiation, mice were harvested 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours after UVB exposure. Unirradiated mice were harvested 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after control mice to determine the fall in endogenous CAT activity over time.
To determine the dose/response relationship for UVB, doses of 30.7, 122.8 and 491.4 mJ/cm2 were administered over 0.06, 0.25 and 1 hours, respectively. The dose/response relationship for UVA was determined utilizing doses of 9.5 and 38.2 J/cm2, administered over 1.3 and 5.2 hours, respectively. For each experiment, only mice from the same litter were used. Following light exposure, mice were returned to the mother for 24 hours and then sacrificed and skin harvested for determination of CAT activity. At least 2 mice were used for each dose or time point in each experiment.
Fibroblast cultures as described above were exposed for 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 seconds of UVB corresponding to doses of 0.7, 1.4, 2.7, 5.5 and 10.9 mJ/cm2, respectively. Cultures were exposed to UVA for 2.3, 4.6, 9.2 and 18.4 minutes corresponding to doses of 0.3, 0.6, 1.1 and 2.2 J/cm2. To prevent light absorption by tissue culture medium, just prior to irradiation, tissue culture medium was removed from cells and replaced with a thin layer of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) sufficient to cover the cells. Control unirradiated cells were also placed in PBS. Medium was replaced in all dishes immediately after the last light dose was administered. Only fibroblasts from mice in the same litters were used for any given experiment and utilized in the first few passages. Two dishes of cells were used for each time point.
Example 6: PUVA Treatment
In vitro: Fibroblast cultures obtained as described in Example 2 were divided into 6 groups and treated as follows.
Control cells received no UVA or 8-MOP. UVA controls received 1 J/cm2 of UVA without prior incubation with 8-MOP. 8-MOP controls received the highest dose of 8-MOP (3 μg/ml) but no UVA. PUVA-treated cells were preincubated with either 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 μg/ml of 8-MOP in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and then exposed to 1 J/cm2 of UVA. 8-MOP was administered by diluting 8-MOP in PBS to the desired concentration. Before application to cultures, tissue culture medium was removed and the cells were rinsed twice with PBS. Cells were incubated in 10 cm diameter dishes with 3 ml of 8-MOP for 12.5 minutes. UVA controls were placed in equal amounts of PBS for 12.5 minutes prior to irradiation with UVA. After treatment, cells were cleansed twice with PBS and tissue culture medium was replaced in all dishes. Only fibroblasts from mice representing the same litter were used for any given experiment, and utilized in passages 2-3. Two dishes of cells were used for each time point. Cells were harvested for determination of CAT activity 24 hours after phototreatment, because maximal promoter activation occurs 24 hours after irradiation.
In vivo: Mice were placed under the center of the light array and restrained with adhesive tape, exposing their dorsal surfaces to UVA at a distance of 38 cm from the fluorescent tubes. Unirradiated control mice were restrained in a similar manner. For each experiment, only mice from the same litter were used. 8-MOP-treated mice received 25 μl of an ethanolic solution containing 2 mg/ml of 8-MOP, applied twice to their backs 15 and 7.5 minutes before UVA (10 J/cm2) exposure. 8-MOP control mice received identical topical applications of 8-MOP. PUVA-treated mice received both 8-MOP and UVA. Following phototreatment, the backs of the mice were rinsed twice with 70% isopropyl alcohol pads to remove excess 8-MOP. Mice were sacrificed and skin harvested for determination of CAT activity 24 hours after phototreatment.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter.
2. A mouse fibroblast culture derived from a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter.
3. A method of identifying compounds capable of inhibiting cutaneous photodamage comprising:
(a) applying a test compound to skin of a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter; (b) exposing the transgenic mouse to UVB radiation,
UVA radiation, or 8-methoxypsoralen followed by UVA radiation; and
(c) measuring human elastin promoter activity in the transgenic mouse.
4. A method of identifying compounds capable of inhibiting cutaneous photodamage comprising:
(a) contacting fibroblast cells derived from a transgenic mouse capable of expressing human elastin promoter with a test compound; (b) exposing the fibroblast cells to UVB radiation, or 8-methoxypsoralen followed by UVA radiation; and
(c) measuring human elastin promoter activity in the fibroblast cells.
PCT/US1996/007337 1995-05-24 1996-05-21 An in vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging WO1996037237A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP8535812A JPH11507807A (en) 1995-05-24 1996-05-21 In vivo and in vitro models of skin photoaging
EP96920342A EP0831931A4 (en) 1995-05-24 1996-05-21 An in vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging
US08/973,449 US6018098A (en) 1995-06-16 1996-05-21 In vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/449,826 1995-05-24
US08/449,826 US5648061A (en) 1995-05-24 1995-05-24 In vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging
US28095P 1995-06-16 1995-06-16
US60/000,280 1995-06-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1996037237A1 true WO1996037237A1 (en) 1996-11-28

Family

ID=26667437

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1996/007337 WO1996037237A1 (en) 1995-05-24 1996-05-21 An in vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0831931A4 (en)
JP (1) JPH11507807A (en)
CA (1) CA2219976A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1996037237A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000050892A1 (en) * 1999-02-24 2000-08-31 Bernstein Eric F An in vivo and in vitro model for cutaneous photoaging and oxidative damage
EP1067968A1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2001-01-17 The General Hospital Corporation Methods for evaluating a compound for its effect on skin
AU760969B2 (en) * 1999-02-23 2003-05-22 Charles River Laboratories, Inc. System and method for evaluating agents which prevent oxidative damage
US6689936B1 (en) 1997-12-17 2004-02-10 The General Hospital Corp. Method for evaluating a compound for its effect on skin
US6753146B1 (en) * 1999-02-23 2004-06-22 Eric F. Bernstein System and method for evaluating agents which prevent oxidative damage
US7163679B1 (en) 1999-05-06 2007-01-16 The General Hospital Corporation Versican and epithelial-mesenchymal interaction
EP1875927A1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2008-01-09 The General Hospital Corporation Methods for evaluating a compound for its effect on skin

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BERNSTEIN E F, ET AL.: "ENHANCED ELASTIN GENE EXPRESSION IN CHRONICALLY PHOTODAMAGED SKIN: LOCALIZATION OF MRNAS BY IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION AND EVIDENCE FOR TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION OF THE GENE BY TRANSIENT TRANSFECTIONS WITH PROMOTER/RECPORTER GENE CONSTRUCTS", JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, US, vol. 101, no. 03, 1 September 1993 (1993-09-01), US, pages 01/02, XP002947475, ISSN: 0022-202X, DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12358246 *
BISSETT D L, HANNON D P, ORR T V: "WAVELENGTH DEPENDENCE OF HISTOLOGICAL, PHYSICAL, AND VISIBLE CHANGES IN CHRONICALLY UV-IRRDIATED HAIRLESS MOUSE SKIN", PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC., US, vol. 50, no. 06, 1 January 1989 (1989-01-01), US, pages 763 - 769, XP002947469, ISSN: 0031-8655, DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb02907.x *
HSU-WONG S, ET AL.: "EXPRESSION OF A HUMAN ELASTIN PROMOTER-REPORTER GENE CONSTRUCT IN TRANSGENIC MICE", CLINICAL RESEARCH, THOROFARE, NJ, US, vol. 40, no. 02, 1 January 1992 (1992-01-01), US, pages 01/02, XP002947476, ISSN: 0009-9279 *
HSU-WONG S, ET AL.: "TISSUE-SPECIFIC AND DEVELOPMENTALLY REGULATED EXPRESSION OF HUMAN ELASTIN PROMOTER ACTIVITY IN TRANSGENIC MICE", JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, US, vol. 269, no. 27, 8 July 1994 (1994-07-08), US, pages 18072 - 18075, XP002947432, ISSN: 0021-9258 *
KAEHAERI V-M, ET AL.: "DELETION ANALYSES OF 5'- FLANKING REGION OF THE HUMAN ELASTIN GENE", JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, US, vol. 265, no. 16, 5 June 1990 (1990-06-05), US, pages 9485 - 9490, XP002947433, ISSN: 0021-9258 *
KLIGMAN L H, AKIN F J, KLIGMAN A M: "PREVENTION OF ULTRAVIOLET DAMAGE TO THE DERMIS OF HAIRLESS MICE BY SUNSCREENS", JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, US, vol. 78, no. 02, 1 January 1982 (1982-01-01), US, pages 181 - 189, XP002947474, ISSN: 0022-202X, DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12506359 *
See also references of EP0831931A4 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1067968A1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2001-01-17 The General Hospital Corporation Methods for evaluating a compound for its effect on skin
EP1067968A4 (en) * 1997-12-17 2001-06-13 Gen Hospital Corp Methods for evaluating a compound for its effect on skin
US6689936B1 (en) 1997-12-17 2004-02-10 The General Hospital Corp. Method for evaluating a compound for its effect on skin
EP1875927A1 (en) * 1997-12-17 2008-01-09 The General Hospital Corporation Methods for evaluating a compound for its effect on skin
AU760969B2 (en) * 1999-02-23 2003-05-22 Charles River Laboratories, Inc. System and method for evaluating agents which prevent oxidative damage
US6753146B1 (en) * 1999-02-23 2004-06-22 Eric F. Bernstein System and method for evaluating agents which prevent oxidative damage
WO2000050892A1 (en) * 1999-02-24 2000-08-31 Bernstein Eric F An in vivo and in vitro model for cutaneous photoaging and oxidative damage
AU761728B2 (en) * 1999-02-24 2003-06-05 Charles River Laboratories, Inc. An (in vivo) and (in vitro) model for cutaneous photoaging and oxidative damage
US7163679B1 (en) 1999-05-06 2007-01-16 The General Hospital Corporation Versican and epithelial-mesenchymal interaction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0831931A4 (en) 2001-09-26
EP0831931A1 (en) 1998-04-01
JPH11507807A (en) 1999-07-13
CA2219976A1 (en) 1996-11-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bernerd et al. UVA exposure of human skin reconstructed in vitro induces apoptosis of dermal fibroblasts: subsequent connective tissue repair and implications in photoaging
US5648061A (en) In vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging
Bernstein et al. Ultraviolet radiation activates the human elastin promoter in transgenic mice: a novel in vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging
Clydesdale et al. Ultraviolet light induced injury: immunological and inflammatory effects
US20050208000A1 (en) Compositions and methods for prevention of photoaging
Kawase et al. Exacerbated and prolonged allergic and non-allergic inflammatory cutaneous reaction in mice with targeted interleukin-18 expression in the skin
EP0831931A1 (en) An in vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging
US6018098A (en) In vivo and in vitro model of cutaneous photoaging
Bernstein et al. Evaluation of sunscreens with various sun protection factors in a new transgenic mouse model of cutaneous photoaging that measures elastin promoter activation
Takeuchi et al. A novel in vivo model for evaluating agents that protect against ultraviolet A-induced photoaging
CN108653736A (en) Application of the M2 types pyruvate kinase as drug target in the drug for preparing prevention psoriasis
Zhang Animal Models of Skin Disorders
Petersen et al. Regulation and inhibition of collagenase expression by long‐wavelength ultraviolet radiation in cultured human skin fibroblasts
Yamazaki et al. XPA gene-deficient, SCF-transgenic mice with epidermal melanin are resistant to UV-induced carcinogenesis
Miyauchi-Hashimoto et al. Ultraviolet radiation-induced suppression of natural killer cell activity is enhanced in xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) model mice
US20060029555A1 (en) Compositions and methods for prevention of photoaging
Schwartz et al. Changes in contractile properties of skeletal muscle during developmentally programmed atrophy and death
US6753146B1 (en) System and method for evaluating agents which prevent oxidative damage
AU761728B2 (en) An (in vivo) and (in vitro) model for cutaneous photoaging and oxidative damage
AU760969B2 (en) System and method for evaluating agents which prevent oxidative damage
EP0906078A1 (en) Use of tempol in the prevention of photoaging
KR101403570B1 (en) SKH-1 Hr mouse model for atopic dermatitis with epicutaneous allergen sensitization and method for preparing the same
GANGE et al. Topical spermine and putrescine stimulated DNA synthesis in the hairless mouse epidermis
Pastila et al. In vivo UVA irradiation of mouse is more efficient in promoting pulmonary melanoma metastasis than in vitro
SAKURA SAMP1 mice as a new animal model for photoaging of the skin associated with spontaneous higher oxidative stress status

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA JP US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2219976

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2219976

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1996 535812

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1996920342

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 08973449

Country of ref document: US

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1996920342

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1996920342

Country of ref document: EP