CLEANING COMPOSITIONS
The present invention relates to cleaning compositions and more particularly, to soft metal safe alkaline cleaning compositions.
Alkaline cleaning compositions are particularly useful in the removal from various surfaces of tenacious soils, particularly those containing biological material such as proteins and fats. Where the surfaces to be treated by the alkaline cleaning compositions are made of soft metals such as aluminium, the causticity of the alkaline cleaning compositions tends to cause corrosion of the soft metal surfaces. It has been common practice to use sodium silicate as a corrosion inhibitor in these alkaline cleaning compositions. However, the causticity of such "silicated" cleaning compositions must be kept low, otherwise the compositions become unstable and unsafe to apply to the soft metal surfaces. This has limited the use of such silicated compositions to light-duty cleaning only. Additionally, silicated compositions deposit a white silicate film on the metal surfaces thereby posing rinsing difficulties and, the hotter the surfaces, the more difficult the deposits are to remove.
In order to overcome the problems of such silicated cleaning compositions, copending US patent application serial number 08/266,175, filed on 27th June 1994 (the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference) provides an alkaline cleaner composition comprising calcium ions; a surfactant selected from alkylpolyglucosides, amphoterics, polycarboxyls and polyhydroxyls; and an ot-hydroxy carboxylic acid such as tartaric acid. Whilst such cleaner compositions are found to be stable, silicate-free and soft metal safe, their utility is limited to compositions free from oxidising agents, such as hypochlorite. It is frequently desirable in the general field of cleaning compositions to use oxidising agents such as sodium hypochlorite, particularly because of their disinfectant properties. A disadvantage with the non-silicated soft metal safe alkaline cleaners described in USSN 08/266,175 is that they are not stable in the presence of such oxidising agents.
US-A-4229409 describes a method for inhibiting the corrosion of aluminium in contact with aqueous alkaline solutions. 2- phosphonobutane-l,2,4-tricarboxylic acid or the sodium, potassium or ammonium salt thereof is added to the aqueous alkaline solution.
In order to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art, the present invention provides a concentrate for use in diluted form in an aqueous cleaning composition. The concentrate comprises the following components:
(a) a source of calcium ions;
(b) 2-phosphonobutane-l,2,4-tricarboxylic acid or a salt thereof (PBTC) ; and
(c) (i) a saturated polymer containing carboxylate groups; (ii) a sulphonate compound of general formula (I)
R - (Ar)n - S03- M* (I)
in which Ar is phenyl or naphthyl, n=0 or 1, M* is H* or a suitable counterion, and R is a Cβ to C18 straight chain alkyl group; and/or (iii) a sulphonate compound of general formula (II)
(Ar ' ) - 0 - (Ar" ) - R"
/ \
S03- M' * S03- M"* (ID
in which Ar' and Ar" are the same or different and are phenyl or naphthyl, M'* and M"* are the same or different and are H* or a suitable counterion, and R' and R" are the same or different and are C6 to C16 straight chain or branched chain alkyl.
The concentrate is found to be stable in the presence of both oxidising agents and alkali. This therefore provides a useful alternative to alkaline cleaners containing silicates for use on soft metals such as aluminium.
Component (c) tends to act as a weak sequestrant for the calcium ions. It is therefore important to avoid the presence in the concentrate of any strong chelating agents such as EDTA or its analogues. In an advantageous embodiment, component (c) (i) comprises a polyacrylate polymer. The polymer may be a homopolymer or a copolymer although it has been found that homopolyacrylates are particularly useful. Ho opolyacrylates of molecular weight 4,500 are commercially available, such as Norasol LMW45, which is a 50% solution of homopolyacrylate available from Norso Haas. The polyacrylate polymer is preferably present in the concentrate in the range 5% to 7.5% by weight, preferably around 6.5% by weight of the concentrate. Because these saturated polymers tend not to have strong surfactant or foaming properties, it is advantageous to include in the concentrate an additional foaming surfactant. This is discussed in further detail below.
In addition to, or instead of the saturated polymer component (c) (i ) , the sulphonate compound of general formula (I) or (II) may be incorporated in the concentrate. Preferably, component (c) (ii) comprises the sulphonate compound of general formula (I) in which Ar is phenyl, n=l and R is an n-dodecyl group. This compound is available as a commercial mixture of sulphonates, which sulphonates are substituted at various positions on the phenyl ring. This commercial mixture is sold by Albright and Wilson under the trade name Nansa SSA. Preferably, this sulphonate compound is present in the concentrate in the range 2% to 4% by weight of the concentrate.
Component (c) (iii) preferably comprises the sulphonate compound of general formula (II) in which R' and R" are both n-decyl groups and Ar' and Ar" are both phenyl. A sulphonate compound having the general formula (III) as shown below is commercially available from the Dow Chemical Company under the trade name Dowfax 3B2.
SO,H SO,H
n-decyl L-—<(g3/-- n
n-decyl (III)
This sulphonate compound is preferably present in the concentrate in the range 3% to 5% by weight of the concentrate.
Each of the sulphonate compounds is not only thought to act to sequester the calcium ions but also provides foaming surfactant properties.
The source of calcium ions can be any conventional source such as a water-soluble calcium salt. Examples of such salts include calcium chloride, calcium nitrate and calcium acetate.
Calcium acetate is a particularly useful source of calcium ions. Preferably, the source of calcium ions provides a calcium ion concentration in the range 0.25 to 0.5% by weight of the concentrate, more preferably around 0.375% by weight of the concentrate.
A suitable source of PBTC is a commercially-available solution of 50% in water available from Bayer under the trade name Bayhibit AM. Preferably, the PBTC is present in the range 0.5% to 3%, more preferably 0.75% to 2.1% by weight of the concentrate, especially around 1.25%.
Whilst the above concentrates can be supplied in the absence of alkali for subsequent mixture with an alkali source, it is preferable that the concentrate further comprises an alkali source, such as an alkali metal hydroxide. Useful alkali metal hydroxides are sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide, the potassium hydroxide being preferred. The alkali metal hydroxide is generally present in the range 3 to 5% by weight of the concentrate, preferably around 4.5% by weight of the concentrate.
A particular advantage of the concentrate according to the present invention is that it can be formulated so as to be stable in the presence of an oxidising agent. The use of oxidising agents in cleaning compositions is advantageous because the oxidising agent can act as a biocide and also as a bleach. Amongst the oxidising agents useable in the present invention are hydrogen peroxide, isocyanurates, persulphates, perborates and halophores which are capable of producing a halogen-containing oxidising species. The halophores include chlorophores, such as hypochlorite, chloramines, chlorine dioxide and perchlorates; bromophores, and iodophores, as well as mixed halides. The chlorophores, such as hypochlorite, are particularly useful as both biocides and bleaches. Thus, advantageously, the concentrate of the present invention further comprises an oxidising agent, preferably a chlorophore. The chlorophore, such as sodium hypochlorite, is typically present in the concentrate in the range 2.2 to 2.8% by weight of the concentrate.
In concentrates containing the oxidising agent, each of the components of the concentrate must be sufficiently stable to the oxidising agent during the typical storage lifetime of the concentrate. Preferably, none of the organic components of the concentrate should contain any regions, such as unsaturated regions, which are capable of being oxidised in the presence of the oxidising agent .
It is advantageous for the concentrate to be able to foam when applied in diluted form to the surface to be treated. As a general rule, the presence of foam in a cleaning operation increases the contact time of the cleaning composition with the surface to be treated and this can increase the effectiveness of the cleaning composition. The foam can also help to remove the soil physically from the surface. It is therefore advantageous for the concentrate to include a foaming surfactant. The sulphonate compounds of general formulae (I) and (II) can both act as foaming surfactants as well as calcium ion sequesterants. Thus, the addition to the sulphonate compounds of further foaming
surfactants or hydrotropes is optional. It is, however, advantageous to add one or more foaming surfactants to the concentrate when the saturated polymer is present because the saturated polymer is not usually a foaming surfactant. Either or both of the sulphonates components of general formulae (I) and (II) can therefore be included in the concentrate, as well as the saturated polymer. Alternatively, any conventional foaming surfactant can be added to the concentrate, provided that it too is stable in the presence of the oxidising agent. Preferably, the foaming surfactant comprises a C12 dimethyl amine oxide although other foaming surfactants such as C14 dimethyl amine oxide or lauryl sulphate can be used.
Hydrotropes which may also be added to the concentrate include aryl sulphonates such as sodium toluene sulphonate, sodium xylene sulphonate and phosphate esters e.g. Triton H66 (Union Carbide) .
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a cleaning composition comprising a concentrate as described above, diluted with water to form a solution in the range 1% to 10% by volume, preferably around 5% by volume. The water used to dilute the concentrate may be soft water or hard water such as typical town mains tap water, for example at 300 mg/1 calcium as calcium carbonate.
The present invention will now be described in further detail, by way of example only, with reference to the following Examples.
In each of the following Examples compositions were tested for their ability to prevent corrosion of aluminium, both in terms of corrosion rate and final appearance of the aluminium, and for their stability. Unless otherwise stated, the amounts of component present in each composition are by weight, the total composition being 100%.
Corrosion Rate
A test method was used based on the ASTM test method G31. Metal coupons of dimensions 50 x 25 x 0.8 mm of aluminium (SIC or 6082) . The dry weight of the metal coupons is determined before and after the test and the test usually carried out in quadruplicate. The coupons are suspended in 500 ml test solution made up in distilled water or a suitable water chemistry such as soft or hard water and the aluminium suspended in the solution for twenty-four hours in a semi-sealed bottle. The weight loss over the twenty-four hour test period is measured thereby to allow the corrosion rate to be calculated in mm/year.
The appearance of the aluminium coupons resulting from the tests is compared visually.
Stability
The compositions are tested for stability on storage at 40°, 4°C and room temperature. Each sample should remain in a single phase with minimal precipitation for at least three months at room temperature or for one month at 4°C or 40°C. A freeze-thaw test is also normally performed and the product should be unaffected for three to six freeze-thaw cycles.
Examples
A) Homopolyacrylate m. wt. 4500 with calcium acetate
Al A2
Water q.s. q.s.
Calcium Acetate 0.50 1.00
Homopolyacrylate m. wt. 4500 (50%) 13.00 13.00
Potassium hydroxide (45%) 7.50 7.50
Sodium hypochlorite (11-14%) 20.00 20.00
5% dilution in hard water 300mg/l as CaC03 pH 9.6 10.5
Corrosion rate mm/yr SIC 24 hrs test 0.07 0.07
Example A simply shows that the presence of homopolyacrylate in a calcium-containing alkaline composition gives a low corrosion rate. The composition was found to be highly stable and did not dull the appearance of the aluminium coupons under test . However, when used in the presence of a surfactant, the composition would be highly unstable and unusable.
B) Example with PBTC and calcium acetate
Bl B2 B3
Water q.s. q.s. q.s.
Calcium Acetate 0.80 0.80 0.80
PBTC (50%) 5.00 8.00 10.00
Potassium hydroxide 10.00 10.00 10.00 (45%)
Sodium hypochlorite (11-14%) 20.00 20.00 20.00
5% dilution in distilled water
Corrosion rate mm/yr 9.54 5.00 1.97 SIC 24 hrs test
Although the compositions of Example B were relatively stable, high corrosion rates were found except at the highest PBTC concentration.
C) Examples with homopolyacrylate m. wt. 4500 and PBTC
Cl C2 C3
Water q.s. q.s. q.s.
Calcium Acetate 1.00 1.00 1.00
Homopolyacrylate m. wt. 4500 (50%) 13.00 13.00 13.00
PBTC (50%) 1.50 2.70 4.20
Potassium hydroxide (45%) 10.00 12.50 15.00
Sodium hypochlorite (11-14%) 20.00 20.00 20.00
5% dilution in Hard water 300mg/l as CaC03 pH 10.9 12.0 12.1
Corrosion rate mm/yr 7.41 3.08 5.03 SIC 24 hrs test
Calcium, homopolyacrylate and PBTC are all present in Example C and give rise to a composition which is relatively stable and which gives some reduction in corrosion rates.
D) Examples with homopolyacrylate, PBTC and n-decyl diphenyl disulphonate (Dowfax 3B2)
Dl D2 D3
Water q.s. q.s. q.s.
Calcium Acetate 1.00 1.00 1.00
Homopolyacrylate m. wt . 13.00 13.00 13.00 4500 (50%)
PBTC (50%) 1.50 2.70 4.20 n-decyl diphenyl 4.00 4.00 4.00 disulphonate (30%)
Potassium hydroxide 10.00 12.50 15.00 (45%)
Sodium hypochlorite 20.00 20.00 20.00 (11-14%)
5% dilution in Hard water 300mg/l as CaC03
PH 10.9 12.0 12.3
Corrosion rate mm/yr
0.28 2.45 5.33 SIC 24 hrs test
In Example D, both homopolyacrylate and n-decyl diphenyl disulphonate are used and it is found that low corrosion rates can be achieved. The compositions of this Example were relatively stable although the appearance of the coupon on test was dull.
E) Examples of different levels of calcium acetate in formulation with homopolyacrylate, PBTC and n-decyl diphenyl disulphonate (Dowfax 3B2)
El E2 E3 E4
Water q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s.
Calcium Acetate 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
Homopolyacrylate m. wt. 4500 (50%) 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
PBTC (50%) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 n-decyl diphenyl disulphonate (30%) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Potassium hydroxide (45%) 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Sodium hypochlorite (11-14%) 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
5% dilution in Hard water 300mg/l as CaC03 pH 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.4
Corrosion rate mm/yr SIC 24 hrs test 0.16 2.21 0.08 0.01
The ingredients of Example D were used in this Example E with variation of the calcium concentration. Low corrosion rates were found but the compositions were less stable than those in Example D. The appearance of the coupon was improved, however.
F) Examples of different levels of alkali in formulation with calcium acetate, homopolyacrylate, PBTC and n-decyl diphenyl disulphonate (Dowfax 3B2)
FI F2 F3 F4
Water q.s . q.s. q.s. q.s.
Calcium Acetate 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Homopolyacrylate m. wt. 4500 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 (50%)
PBTC (50%) 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.00 n-decyl diphenyl 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 disulphonate (30%)
Potassium hydroxide (45%) 10.00 12.00 10.00 10.00
Sodium hypochlorite (11-14%) 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
5% dilution in Hard water 300mg/l as CaC03 pH 10.2 12.0 12.4 12.6
Corrosion rate mm/yr 0.06 1.64 4.03 4.21 SIC 24 hrs test
In this Example the quantities of alkali were varied and it was found that the corrosion rate increased concomittently. The composition was found to become unstable at the higher alkali concentrations.
G) Examples with different surfactant combinations in formulation with calcium
acetate, homopolyacrylate and PBTC
Gl G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8
Water q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s.
Calcium Acetate 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Homopolyacrylate m. w . 4500 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 (50%)
PBTC (50%) 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 n-decyl diphenyl 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 disulphonate (30%)
Sodium alkane sulphonate 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 (30%)
C12 dimethyl amine oxide 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 (30%)
Potassium hydroxide (45%) 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Sodium hypochlorite (11-14%) 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
5% dilution in Hard water 300mg/l as CaC03 pH 10.0 10.2 10.2 10.0 10.1 10.3 10.4 10.4
Corrosion rate mm/yr 0.03 0.13 0.02 0.08 0.05 0.09 SIC 24 hrs test 0.08 0.13
The corrosion rates were low in Example G although different surfactant combinations were found to give different stability results. The Examples using sodium alkane sulphonate were found to be the least stable whereas those using C12 dimethyl amine oxide were found to be the most stable, with the best coupon appearance.
H) Examples based on the example G4 to optimise the calcium level to maximise the stability
HI H2 H3 H4 H5
Water q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s. q.s.
Calcium Acetate 1.00 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50
Homopolyacrylate
13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 m. wt. 4500 (50%)
PBTC (50%) 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 n-decyl diphenyl disulphonate 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
(30%)
C12 dimethyl amine oxide (30%) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Potassium hydroxide (45%) 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Sodium hypochlorite 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
(11-14%)
5% dilution in Hard water 300mg/l as CaC03 pH 10.6 10.0 10.3 10.3 10.0
Corrosion rate mm/yr 0.36 0.02 0.06 0.05 0.09
SIC 24 hrs test
In Example H, the amounts of calcium were varied, based on Example G4. The corrosion rates were found to be very low and the coupon appearance generally acceptable. The stability of the samples was not quite as good as that of Example G4.
I) Examples based on example G7 to optimise the calcium level to maximise the stability
11 12 13 14 15
Water q.s. q.s . q.s . q.s . q.s.
Calcium Acetate 1.00 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50
Homopolyacrylate m. wt. 4500 (50%) 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
PBTC (50%) 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
C12 dimethyl amine oxide (30%) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Potassium hydroxide (45%) 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Sodium hypochlorite (11-14%) 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
5% dilution in Hard water 300mg/l as CaC03
PH 11.8 10.2 10.4 10.3 10.4
Corrosion rate mm/yr 1.94 0.06 0.11 0.08 0.08
SIC 24 hrs test
Varying the calcium level based on Example G7, it was found that both stability and coupon appearance were slightly worse than Example G7, with comparable corrosion rates.