WO1996010054A1

WO1996010054A1 - Improved carpet reclamation process

Info

Publication number: WO1996010054A1
Application number: PCT/US1995/012186
Authority: WO
Inventors: Jerauld Lee Dickerson; Roger Joseph Goulet; Peter Michael Ramsden; Susan Ramilo Williams
Original assignee: Monsanto Company
Priority date: 1994-09-29
Filing date: 1995-09-26
Publication date: 1996-04-04
Also published as: CA2133303A1; AU3724195A

Abstract

A process for the reclamation of base materials from carpet is disclosed. The process includes contacting the carpet with a composition which contains a chemical softening agent for the binder material in the carpet and separating the carpet pile from the carpet backing(s).

Description

IMPROVED CARPET RI -MOTIO PPC^?*-. BA^GRQT ND OF THE INVENTION

l. Field of the Invention

The present invention is directed to an improved process for carpet reclamation and more particularly, the process is directed to the use of an agent for chemically softening or dissolving binder material con¬ ventionally associated with carpet in order to expedite and simplify the reclamation process.

2. Description of the Prior Art

Carpet reclamation processes have been previously proposed in the art and are exemplified by the process disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,230,473, issued to Hagguist et al., July 27, 1993. In the Hagguist et al. method, apart from intro¬ ductory steps which involve screening the carpet, and preliminary loop cutting and other processing, the removal of the secondary backing involves a whole series of steps. This additionally is the situation when the binder material is to be removed from the primary backing.

In greater detail and with respect to the removal of the secondary backing from the carpet, the carpet must be initially exposed to fluids under pressure for loosening and debonding the latex binder from the sec¬ ondary backing. The next step includes passing the remaining materia^"' onto a further processing stage where the secondary backing is mechanically treated with rotating mechanical impingement devices on both sides of the carpet. It is the mechanical arrangement that results in the removal of the secondary backing. At this time, the binder system is still substantially intact.

In order to remove the binder material, the re- maining carpet structure must be passed to yet another stage where there is included a plurality of rotating brushes as well as rotating high pressure nozzle heads. This, as indicated by the patentees, results in the gradual loosening and removal of the binder system from the primary backing.

In view of the teachings of this reference, it is clear that the method is dependent on the use of mechanical means for the removal of not only the sec¬ ondary backing, but further the removal of the latex binder conventionally positioned between the secondary backing and the primary backing.

The Hagguist et al. process also suffers the draw¬ backs cc^*mmon to all multiple step processes, including increased production time and cost, the use of a great- er number of moving parts, the potential recruirement for a larger labor force and difficulty in efficiently operating at a commercial level wherein, for example, millions of square meters of carpet may be processed.

In view of what has been proposed in the prior art set forth above, there clearly exists a need for a high efficiency method of reclaiming base components of a carpet quickly and without the use of toxic contami¬ nants or multiple stage processes.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention satisfies the above needs and achieves the results and benefits set forth below by providing a process for reclaiming carpet compo¬ nents, the carpet including backing material, binder material and carpet pile, the process comprising the steps of: contacting the carpet with a composition including a chemical softening agent (as defined below) for the binder and separating the pile from the backing.

The amount of chemical softening agent in the composition and the conditions for the contacting step, for example temperature and time, may be selected to either substantially dissolve the binder or soften the binder.

The process and device of the present invention permits the reuse and recycle of the pile material into critical end uses requiring a high degree of product purity such as, for example, carpet fibers, plastic pellets and other materials. Once the contacting step is complete, the backings may be separated from each other by making use of mechanical means, fluid means including air and liquid flow, vacuum means or by manual means.

According to yet another aspect of one embodiment of the present invention there is provided a system for reclaiming carpet components, the carpet including backing material, binding material and carpet pile, the system including: advancing means for advancing the carpet to a solvent application means; solvent applica¬ tion means for applying solvent to the carpet to dis- solve the binder material; and collection means for collecting separated backing material and carpet pile.

It will be readily appreciated that the process as set forth herein is clearly applicable to all carpet types including, for example, standard carpet with styrene butadiene rubber latex binders and primary and secondary backings, and those with foam layers, includ¬ ing urethanes.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Having thus generally described the invention, reference will be made below to the accompanying draw¬ ings illustrating preferred embodiments and in which:

Figures 1 and 2 illustrate various types of carpeting in cross-section; and

Figure 3 is a schematic illustration of the process according to one embodiment of the present invention. PKTi^&τT*^TiT^> DESCRIPTION OF THE

Referring now to the drawings. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate cross-sectional views of typical carpet varieties which are processable according to the pres- ent invention. In Figure 1 , the carpet 10 includes a primary backing 12 within which is disposed carpet pile 14. The carpet pile 14 is fixedly secured to backing 12 with binder 16, typically a latex binder. Prefera¬ bly, a secondary backing 18 is additionally provided and is secured to primary backing 12 by binder 16.

Figure 2 illustrates a second carpet type wherein the binder material 16 comprises a foam material 20 and the carpet 10 does not include a secondary backing.

While these carpet types are shown as exemplary of carpets processable according to the present invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of carpeting may also be processed accord¬ ing to the present invention.

Prior to the performance of the process of the present invention, the carpet may be screened for pro¬ cessing suitability. The use of visual inspection, metal detectors, etc., may be employed to this end. Further, the carpet may be cleaned or preconditioned with, for example, a surface active agent or other compound(s) to enhance the processing thereof.

The process of the present invention includes contacting the carpet with a composition which includes a chemical softening agent for the binder. The term "chemical softening agent", as utilized herein, is defined as any agent capable under specified conditions of softening or dissolving a material, for example a binder material, via chemical reaction or interaction therewith. The specific chemical softening agent will therefore be selected based on the type and nature of the binder used in the carpet. The term "composition" is defined herein to include, without limitation, mix¬ tures, solutions, emulsions, dispersions and the like. The chemical softening agent preferably is non- toxic and environmentally friendly. A preferred chemi¬ cal softening agent includes at least one dimethyl ester. Dimethyl adipate, dimethyl glutamate, dimethyl succinate and mixtures thereof are especially pre¬ ferred. Particularly preferred chemical softening agents are dimethyl succinate and a mixture of dimethyl adipate and dimethyl glutarate. Suitable dimethyl es¬ ters are commercially available from Monsanto Company under the trade name SANTOSOL^®.

Suitable compositions include aqueous or non- aqueous compositions of the chemical softening agent. In order to further enhance the dissolution or soften¬ ing of the binder, additional chemicals may be added to the composition including, for example, surface active agents to enhance the wettability of the backing mate¬ rial of the carpet. In addition, thickeners may be added to control the flow and adhesive properties of the composition. A particularly useful thickener is commercially available from B. F. Goodrich under the trade name CARBOPOL^®.

A preferred composition includes at least one dimethyl ester and water, most preferably in a weight ratio of about 1:1. The concentration of chemical softening agent in the composition will vary greatly depending on the type of carpet and the conditions utilized in the contacting step such as, for example, time and temperature. Pre¬ ferred chemical softening agent amounts are from at least about 10% by weight based on the total weight of the composition.

The contacting step may be performed by any meth¬ od, including, for example, immersing the carpet in the composition, applying the composition to the pile or applying the composition to the backing. Preferably, the contacting step is performed in the presence of a surface active agent. The surface active agent may be added to the composition which contacts the carpet or it may be pre-applied to the carpet prior to the con¬ tacting step. Suitable surface active agents include, for example, anionic and nonionic surfactants. The condition for the contacting step will vary greatly depending on, for example, the carpet type, type and concentration of chemical softening agent, and the like. Contact time will generally extend at least 5 seconds while the contact temperature may range from ambient temperatures to just below the boiling point of the composition. In a preferred embodiment wherein at least one dimethyl ester is utilized as the chemical softening agent, the contacting step is performed at a temperature of at least 20°C, more preferably at least 35°C.

Preferably, the concentration of solvent is selected and the contacting step is performed under conditions sufficient to reduce the amount of force required to remove a tuft from the carpet by at least 50% according to the test set forth in the examples below.

In a first particularly preferred embodiment, the concentration of chemical softening agent is selected and the contacting step is performed under conditions sufficient to substantially dissolve the binder in the agent. Most preferably, the pile removed after the contacting step will therefore be substantially free from binder as the binder is dissolved in the agent. The process may further include removing the dissolved binder from the composition and recovery of the chemi¬ cal softening agent.

In a second preferred embodiment, the concentra¬ tion of chemical softening agent is selected and the contacting step is performed under conditions suffi- cient to soften the binder. In this embodiment, the process of the present invention optionally includes removing binder from the pile after pile is separated from the backing.

Any residual composition present on the individual base components (pile and/or backing[s] ) of the carpet may be removed by simply washing the components and this may additionally include pressurized washing mak¬ ing use of a suitable washing agent.

Turning to Figure 3, which illustrates a schematic illustration of a device suitable for practicing the process of the invention for processing the carpet of FIG 1, a first roller 30 advances the carpet material to a first pair of liquid nip rollers 32 and 34. First set of rollers 32 and 34 include the composition for application onto the secondary backing 18 of the carpet 10. The composition is preferably heated such that the contacting step is conducted at a temperature of at least 35°C. A second set of rollers 36 and 38 further apply additional amount of the composition through the secondary backing into the binder material of the carpet.

The carpet is then passed between two star wheels 40 and 42 which mechanically loosen the secondary back¬ ing from the carpet passing therethrough. At this point, the secondary backing is effectively removed from the carpet and to this end, an abrasive roll 44 is provided and further acts on a smooth roll 46 to remove the secondary backing from the carpet. The removed secondary backing may be passed on through rollers 48 and 50 to a high pressure wash, globally denoted by numeral 52, optionally dried by pressure rollers 54 and 56 and collected on a spool 58 for subsequent usage.

Once the secondary backing 18 has been completely removed, the primary backing 12, together with the pile 14 and binder 16, are further treated with the solvent using a nip roller arrangement 60 and 62 in a similar manner as set forth with respect to nips 32 and 34. After a suitable dwell time, the remaining material is subjected to a high pressure water wash at 64 in order to remove any residual binder from the primary backing along with any remaining solvent. After entering the washing cycle 64, the primary backing and carpet pile is then dried in a drying cycle at 66 using any suit¬ able means for effectively drying, e.g. forced hot air.

In order to remove the carpet pile 14 from the primary backing 12, once dried, the primary backing and carpet pile are passed into contact over a source of vacuum. In the embodiment shown, this is an inverted vacuum plate 68 which pulls the carpet pile 14 of the primary backing 12 for subsequent collection as gener¬ ally indicated by the arrow 70 in Figure 3. Any re- maining particles of binder 16 are then dropped into a collection unit (not shown) . The separated primary backing 12 is then optionally washed and passed on to a collection spool, the latter steps not being schemati¬ cally illustrated in Figure 3. As further steps, the solvent may be applied pressurably to the carpet. Further, the carpet may be passed through the system a second time, when required. In addition to the above, the spent solvent may be reused by recycling the same subsequent to filtering the spent solution. Further, the solvent may be puri¬ fied by distillation or other well known chemical puri¬ fication techniques.

Other solvents may be combined with the dissolving solvent to enhance dissolution or softening of the binder.

The following examples, while not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, serve to further illustrate and describe its benefits.

I. πnrrposition Preparation

Compositions for use in the process of the present invention were formulated according to the specifica¬ tions set forth in Table 1 below.

Table 1 Compositions

Item Chemical Softening Agent Water No. Wt % of Composition Wt % of Composition

1 dimethyl adipate, 100% 0%

2 dimethyl adipate, 50% 50%

3 dimethyl succinate, 100% 0%

4 dimethyl succinate, 50% 50%

5 dimethyl glutarate, 100% 0%

6 dimethyl glutarate, 50% 50% dimethyl adipate, 23-27%

7 dimethyl glutarate, 72-76% 0% dimethyl adipate, 12-14%

8 dimethyl glutamate, 36-38% 50%

- lO - II. Carpet Treatment Procedure

2-inch (5.08 cm) by 2-inch (5.08 cm) samples of a conventional carpet construction having tufts, a prima¬ ry backing, a styrene-butadiene rubber latex adhesive and a secondary backing were partially immersed in one of the composition items in Table 1 at ambient tempera¬ ture. For each composition item, the composition amounts tested were 5 ml, 7 ml and 10 ml. For each amount tested, the immersion times tested were 5 min- utes, 60 minutes and 18 hours. Control samples were left untreated.

III. Tuft Removal Test

The samples, including the controls, were then tested to determine the force required to remove a tuft from the sample. Each sample was immobilized and any excess composition removed. The tip of an individual tuft was then grasped with a clamp and pulled on until it was removed from the carpet sample without breaking. The clamp was connected to a conventional INSTRON^® testing device which measured the maximum pulling force exerted on the tuft by the clamp during its removal from the carpet sample. Three individual tufts from each sample were tested in this manner and an arithme¬ tic average force (F) for each sample was calculated. A force reduction percentage versus the control was also calculated as

%ΔF =

/ F_o-._to x 100% The results are set forth below in Table 2, with item numbers corresponding to those provided in Table 1.

Table 2

Force Reduction %

Item No. (% ΔF from Control)

1 67.8

2 75.0

3 57.1

4 78.6

5 57.1

6 78.6

7 71.4

8 78.6

Control (Untreated Samples) 0

As shown above, the process of the present inven¬ tion reduced the force required for tuft removal at least 50% and for some items as much as 75% or more.

Examples 1Q-14

For examples 10-14, compositional items 2, 4, 6, and 8 from Table 1 were utilized in test procedures identical to those set forth in Examples 1-9 except that the treatment of the carpet sample was conducted at a temperature of 50°C. The results are set forth below in Table 3.

Table 3

Test Item Composition % ΔF from No. Item No. Control

10 2 82.1

11 4 89.3

12 6 85.7

13 8 78.6

Control

14 (Untreated Samples) 0

As shown above, the presence of heat in the con¬ tacting step of the process of the present invention further reduces the force required for tuft removal.

Although embodiments of the invention have been described in detail herein, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that numerous modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the intended scope of the invention.

Claims

WE CLAIM:

1. A process for reclaiming carpet components, said carpet including a backing and carpet pile disposed within said backing material and secured to said backing with a binder material, said process comprising:

(a) contacting said carpet with a composition comprising a chemical softening agent for said binder material; and (b) separating said pile from said backing.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein said agent comprises at least one dimethyl ester.

3. The process of claim 2 wherein said composi¬ tion further comprises water.

4. The process of claim 3 wherein said water and said dimethyl ester are present in said composition at a weight ratio of about 1:1.

5. The process of claim 4 wherein said dimethyl ester is a combination of dimethyl adipate and dimethyl glutarate.

6. The process of claim 4 wherein said contacting step is conducted at a temperature of at least 35°C.

7. The process of claim 6 wherein said dimethyl ester is dimethyl succinate.

8. A process for reclaiming carpet components, said carpet including a backing and carpet pile disposed within said backing material and secured to said backing with a binder material, said procers comprising: (a) contacting said carpet with a composition comprising a chemical softening agent for said binder material; and

(b) separating said pile from said backing; wherein the concentration of said agent is selected and said contacting step is conducted under conditions sufficient to soften said binder material.

9. The process of claim 8 wherein said solvent comprises at least one dimethyl ester.

10. The process of claim 9 wherein said composi¬ tion further comprises water.

11. The process of claim 10 wherein said water and said dimethyl ester are present in said composition at a weight ratio of about 1:1.

12. The process of claim 11 wherein said dimethyl ester is a combination of dimethyl adipate and dimethyl glutarate.

13. The process of claim 11 wherein said contact¬ ing step is conducted at a temperature of at least 35°C.

14. The process of claim 13 wherein said dimethyl ester is dimethyl succinate.