WO1996003534A1

WO1996003534A1 - Process for treating the surface of aluminum sheet for cap manufacturing

Info

Publication number: WO1996003534A1
Application number: PCT/US1995/009135
Authority: WO
Inventors: Mitsuru Nakamura; Kazuya Nakada; Hiroyuki Wada
Original assignee: Henkel Corporation
Priority date: 1994-07-26
Filing date: 1995-07-25
Publication date: 1996-02-08
Also published as: DE69512779T2; EP0771368B1; EP0771368A1; DE69512779D1; AU3270895A; EP0771368A4; JPH0833867A

Abstract

Aluminum and aluminum alloy sheets bearing a polymer coating formed by coating the sheets with a waterborne liquid composition comprising a water-soluble zirconium compound and an acrylate polymer or copolymer with a glass transition temperature that is not more than 0 °C and drying at least part of the liquid coating into place on the sheets have good corrosion resistance and paint adhesion, even after cold forming such as is used in making container caps. The waterborne liquid composition also has a long pot life, so that consistent results over a period of time can readily be obtained with it.

Description

PROCESS FORTREATINGTHESURFACEOFALUMINUM SHEET FORCAP

MANUFACTURING

Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a process for treating the surface of aluminum and aluminum alloy sheet, particularly sheet intended for the manufacture of caps (hereinafter referred to in some cases as aluminum cap stock sheet). More particularly, this invention relates to a process for treating the surface of aluminum cap stock sheet that forms thereon a polymer coating that is highly paint adherent even after the forming operation. Description of Related Art

In addition to having sufficient strength, aluminum cap stock sheet must generally have an excellent processability and workability, because of the deep- drawing operation used to form caps. Phosphate-chromate treatments have been executed on aluminum cap stock sheet with the objective of imparting thereto corrosion resistance and paint adherence. However, paint film adher¬ ence during the forming operation is inadequate when phosphate-chromate treat- ments are used by themselves, with the result that paint exfoliation can still oc¬ cur.

As one example of art directed to solving this problem, Japanese Patent Publication Number Sho 54-18664 [18,664/1979] discloses a "waterbome com¬ position for the treatment of metal surfaces". This invention is characterized by the use of a waterbome composition containing a water-soluble zirconium com¬ pound plus a water-soluble or water-dispersible resin (e.g., polyacrylic acid, etc.) as a paint undercoating treatment. Unfortunately, in the case of cap stock, which is subjected to a severe forming operation, the undercoating film provided by the described composition is unable to follow deformation of the material during the forming operation, with the result that the art in this invention again does not al¬ ways prevent such phenomena as paint exfoliation.

Japanese Patent Application Laid Open [Kokai or Unexamined] Number Sho 62-253574 [253,574/1987] discloses a "waterbome composition for applica- tion as a paint undercoating treatment for aluminum and its alloys". This inven¬ tion seeks to improve paint adherence through the addition of another essential component to the known composition of water-soluble zirconium compound + polyacrylic acid. This additional component consists of a water-soluble sub- stance that contains the amino, amide, or imino group. However, the presence of said water-soluble substance containing, the amino, amide, or imino group as an essential component of the undercoating treatment bath causes the treatment bath to have a short pot life and therefore greatly complicates the maintenance of stable film characteristics. Problems to Be Solved bv the Invention

Thus, there has yet to appear a surface treatment process that provides the surface of aluminum cap stock with a treatment film that, after the forming op¬ eration, is strongly adherent to paint films applied on the aluminum or aluminum alloy stock and is also highly corrosion resistant. Moreover, such a process in which the treatment bath has a long pot life is also unknown.

Therefore, the present invention takes as its object the introduction of a process, for treating the surface of aluminum and aluminum alloys, which uses a waterbome composition in which the undercoating treatment bath is relatively stable during prolonged use and which provides corrosion resistance and paint adherence even after a forming operation such as is used for cap manufacturing. Summary of the Invention

The present inventors discovered that the aforementioned object could be accomplished by the formation of a polymer coating on the surface of aluminum sheet or aluminum alloy sheet by coating thereof with a liquid waterbome compo- sition in which a water-soluble zirconium compound is combined with at least one selection from acrylic polymers and copolymers that have a glass-transition tem¬ perature no greater than 0 °C, and by thereafter drying, preferably without any intermediate rinsing. Detailed Description of the Invention. Including Preferred Embodiments Aluminum sheet, aluminum alloy sheet, and the like comprise the alumin¬ um and aluminum alloy cap stock to which the present invention is directed. The aluminum alloy is specifically exemplified by aluminum-manganese-iron alloys, aluminum-iron-silicon alloys, aluminum-iron-magnesium alloys, and the like. Such aluminum and aluminum alloy stock may be subjected to the present inven¬ tion after the preliminary execution thereon of a conventional phosphate-chro¬ mate treatment, zirconium conversion treatment, or the like, as described in the article entitled "Aruminiumu no kasei shori no genjou to kongo" [Title in English: "Current and Future Status of the Conversion Treatment of Aluminum"] in Nihon Paakaraijingυ Gihou [Journal name in English: Nihon Parkehzing Technical Re¬ ports], 1988, No. 1 , published on 3 July 1988.

An essential aspect of the present invention consists of the use as a paint undercoating of a polymer coating, preferably crosslinked, that is composed of a water-soluble zirconium compound and at least 1 selection from acrylic poly¬ mers and copolymers that have a glass-transition temperature no greater than 0 ^βC.

The acrylic polymer with a glass-transition temperature of 0 °C or less that is an essential component of the paint undercoating film according to the present invention can be a homopolymer of such polymerizable monomers as, for ex¬ ample, ethyl acrylate, isopropyl acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, n-butyl acrylate, n-hexyl methacrylate, lauryl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxypropyl acrylate, and the like. Acrylic copolymers with a glass-transition temperature of 0 °C or less may also be used as all or part of one essential component of the paint undercoating film according to the present invention. When a copolymer of two or more acrylic monomers is used in this invention, the degree(s) of polymerization of each acryl¬ ic monomer must be controlled in such a manner that the glass-transition tem- perature of the copolymer is 0 °C or less.

The homopolymers and copolymers to be used in the invention preferably have molecular weights in the range from 2,000 to 100,000 and more preferably in the range from 10,000 to 50,000.

Preferred examples of copolymers suitable for use according to the inven- tion are copolymers of:

(A.1 ) at least one acrylic monomer having in each molecule at least one moiety selected from the group consisting of carboxyl, hydroxyl, amide, and gly- cidyl; and (A.2) at least one acrylate ester monomer.

A preferred paint undercoating film is a crosslinked polymer film that com¬ prises, preferably consists essentially of, or more preferably consists of, (A) an acrylic copolymer including residues from components (A.1 ) and (A.2) as de¬ scribed above and (B) a water-soluble zirconium compound.

Component (A.1 ) as described above is exemplified by such polymerizab- le monomers as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, itaconic acid, 2-hy- droxyethyl methacrylate, hydroxypropyl methacrylate, acrylamide, N-methylol- acrylamide, diacetone acrylamide, and glycidyl methacrylate.

Acrylate ester monomer component (A.2) is exemplified by such polymer- izable monomers as ethyl acrylate, isopropyl acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, n- butyl acrylate, n-hexyl methacrylate, lauryl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxypropyl acrylate, and the like, The discussion will now turn to the water-soluble zirconium compound(s) that are also an essential component of the treatment agent according to the present invention. Typical examples of subject water-soluble zirconium com¬ pounds are the alkali metal and ammonium zirconium carbonates, ammonium fluozirconate, zirconium acetate, zirconium nitrate, and zirconium sulfate. Also useable are any other water-soluble zirconium compounds that are able to de¬ posit a zirconium compound on the surface of aluminum or aluminum alloy upon drying.

The acrylic polymer and/or copolymer is preferably used in the present in¬ vention at 0.5 to 2.0 weight parts per 1 weight part of the water-soluble zirconium compound. At less than 0.5 weight part of acrylic (co)polymer per 1 weight part of water-soluble zirconium compound, the polymer film is often unable to follow deformation of the material during the forming operation on the polymer film- coated aluminum or aluminum alloy; this can result in a reduced adherence in the worked region. At an amount in excess of 2.0 weight parts, the acrylic (co)poly- mer often does not exhibit an adequate water resistance, so that paint adherence will be reduced in some cases.

Water is the main component of the solvent/continuous phase for the paint undercoating treatment agent in the instant invention. However, a water-soluble organic solvent, such as an alcohol, ketone, monoether of a glycol, etc., may also be used at no more than 5 weight parts per 100 weight parts water for the pur¬ pose of adjusting the drying rate or improving the coatability. The viscosity and solids concentration of the paint undercoating treatment agent of the instant invention preferably should be adjusted so as to provide, af¬ ter application of the treatment agent to the surface of the aluminum or aluminum alloy and drying, a zirconium compound add-on of from 1 to 50 milligrams per square meter (hereinafter usually abbreviated as "mg/m²"), measured as its stoi- chiometric equivalent as Zr0₂. The viscosity and solids concentration are prefer¬ ably also selected so as to yield a uniform undercoating film. The particularly preferred range for the zirconium compound add-on is from 5 to 30 mg/m² as Zr0₂. Good adherence at the worked regions is not usually obtained with less than 1 mg/m² as Zr0₂ or with more than 50 mg/m² as Zr0₂. The paint undercoating treatment agent used by the present invention can be applied to the surface of the aluminum cap stock sheet by any suitable coat¬ ing technique(s) such as dipping, spraying, roll coating, flow coating, and the like. The drying process is also not critical, but the use of a hot air current of at least 110 °C for formation of the polymer film is preferred. The various paints appropriate to the particular objective of protection or decoration can be applied on aluminum or aluminum alloy that has been subject¬ ed to a paint undercoating treatment according to the instant invention.

In order to obtain a relatively long pot life for a liquid treatment composi¬ tion used according to this invention, the composition preferably does not contain any substantial amount of any water-soluble substance containing amino, am¬ ide, or imino moieties, except possibly for the acrylic copolymer itself.

The present invention will be explained in greater detail through the work¬ ing and comparative examples provided below. General Procedures for the Examples and Comparison Examples The sample material, process for forming the paint undercoating films and protective paint coatings, treatment process, and test process used were as described below, unless a specific exception is noted. (1 ) Sample material

The cap stock consisted of JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard) type A- 3105 aluminum sheets with a thickness of 0.25 millimeters (hereinafter usually abbreviated as "mm"), a width of 200 mm, and a length of 250 mm.

(2) Formation of the undercoating films

Table 1 reports the compositions of the treatment agents used in the working and comparative examples to form the undercoating films. The under¬ coating films were produced by using a roll coater to apply the undercoating treatment agent described in Table 1 onto the aforementioned aluminum sheet and then baking for 10 seconds in a 245 °C oven to form a film with the specified add-on mass.

Table 1

COMPOSITIONS OF THE TREATMENT AGENTS USED TO FORM THE PAINT

UNDERCOATING FILMS

No. Characteristics of Acrylic Component Water-Soluble Ratio by (A) Zirconium Weight of Compound (B) Solids,

Monomer(s) Used to Make τ_g, °c (A)/(B)

According to the Invention

1 Hydroxypropylacrylate only -7 AZC 1/1

2 2-Hydroxyethylacrylate only -15 Zirconium acetate 1/1

3 95 Mole % of 2-HEA + 5 mole -9 Zirconium acetate 1/1 % of acrylic acid

4 70 Mole % of 2-HEA + 30 mole -20 AZC 1/1 % of methacrylic acid

Comparisons

5 Acrylic acid only 100 AZC 1/1

6 Hydroxypropylacrylate only -7 None N.a.

7 None N.a. AZC N.a.

Abbreviations for Table 1

T_g = Glass transition temperature; AZC = ammonium zirconium carbonate; 2-HEA = 2- hydroxyethylacrylate; N.a. = Not applicable. (3) Formation of the protective paint coating

An epoxy-phenol resin paint was used to produce the protective paint coatings. The protective paint coating was produced by using a roll coater to ap¬ ply the epoxy-phenol resin paint over the paint undercoating film already formed on the aluminum sheet. This was followed by baking for 10 minutes at 180 ^CC to form a coating with a dry weight of 50 milligrams per square decimeter (herein¬ after usually abbreviated as "mg/dm²").

(4) Treatment conditions and process

Variations in the treatment conditions and process used in the working and comparative examples are reported in Table 2. In addition to the variations shown in Table 2, all substrates in all the working and comparative examples were subjected to the following non-varying treatments before the conversion treatment shown in Table 2: Decreasing by spraying for 5 seconds at 60 °C with FINECLEANER® 4377K, an alkaline degreaser commercially available from Ni- hon Parkerizing Company, Limited, and then water rinsing by spraying tap water for 20 seconds. Also, all substrates in all the examples and comparison examp¬ les were subjected to drying in a hot air current at 80 °C for 2 minutes after the pretreatment water rinse and before the application of the treatment agent shown in Table 2. Finally, all substrates in all the examples and comparison examples received the following treatments after the paint undercoating treatment shown in Table 2: Roll coating with epoxy-phenol paint and drying in a current of air at 180 °C for 10 minutes. The reference superscripts in Table 2 refer to the follow¬ ing: (^*1 ) ALCHROM® K702, a chromium phosphate-based conversion treat¬ ment agent, commercially available from Nihon Parkerizing Company, Ltd., which was sprayed on the samples for 5 seconds at 50 °C and (*2) ALODINE® 404, a zirconium-based conversion treatment agent, commercially available from Nihon Parkerizing Company, Ltd., which was sprayed on the samples for 20 seconds at 40 °C.

(5) Evaluation test process (5-1 ) Hot water resistance

For this test, the test sheet lacked the protective paint coating but had been processed up to and including the paint undercoating treatment. The test Table 2 TREATMENT VARIATIONS FOR EXAMPLES 1 - 6 AND COMPARISON

EXAMPLES 1 - 5

No. Pretreatment Paint Undercoating Treatment

Conv. Water Treatment Hot Air Zr Add-on, mg/M² Treat. Rinse? Agent Used Drying?

Ex l None No 1 Yes 10

Ex 2 None No 2 Yes 10

Ex 3 (* 1) Yes 1 Yes 10

Ex 4 ( ) Yes 3 Yes 10

Ex 5 (* 1) Yes 4 Yes 10

Ex 6 (*2) Yes 1 Yes 10

CE 1 None No None No 0

CE 2 (* 1) Yes None No 0

CE 3 (*1) Yes 5 Yes 10

CE 4 (*D Yes 6 Yes 10

CE 5 (* 1) Yes 7 Yes 0

Abbreviations for Table 2

No = Number; Conv. Treat. = Conversion Treatment; mg/M² = milligrams per square meter; Ex = Working Example; CE = Comparison Example.

Other Notes for Table 2 The explanations of the meanings of the symbols in the column headed "Conv. Treat." are given in the main text. When a pretreatment water rinse was used, it was with tap water for 20 seconds. The numbers in the column headed "Treatment Agent Used" refer to the treatment agents identified by number in Table 1. When hot air drying was used as part of the paint undercoating treatment, it was with air at 245 °C for 10 seconds.

sheet was immersed in water at 95 °C for 20 minutes, and any changes in ap¬ pearance were then noted and reported according to the following scale:

+ + = no change in appearance

+ = slight whitening x = distinct whitening (5-2) Corrosion resistance

The test sheet for this test lacked the protective paint coating but had been processed up to and including the paint undercoating treatment. The test sheet was subjected to salt spray testing according to JIS Z-2731 for 300 hours, and the extent of white rust development was then scored according to the fol¬ lowing scale:

+ + = area of rust development is less than 3 % + = area of rust development is from at least 3 % up to but not including 30 % x = area of rust development is at least 30 %

(5-3) Formability

The treated sheet was cut to give a disk with a diameter of 135 mm. This was subjected to a high-speed cylindrical deep-drawing test using a punch diam¬ eter of 60 mm, a blank holding pad pressure of 1.2 tons, and a deep-draw veloc- ity of 30 meters/minute. Press oil (#640 from Nippon Kousakuyu) was applied at 2 grams per square meter for this operation. Then, to evaluate the formability, the thus-formed test specimen was placed in a laboratory high-pressure steam autoclave sterilizer (from Sanyo Denki) loaded with distilled water. The autoclave was run for 30 minutes after a temperature of 120 °C had been established. A peeling test was then carried out on a Crosshatch pattern using cellophane tape (from Nichiban), and the results were reported on the following evaluation scale: + + = no peeling

+ = peeling over less than 5 % of the area x = peeling over an area of at least 5 %. The results of these tests are shown in Table 3. These results make it clear that, by comparison with the undrawn state the undercoated cap stock of Comparative Example 3 had a better hot water resistance and corrosion resist¬ ance than the untreated sheet of Comparative Example 1 and the phosphate- chromate film bearing sheet of Comparative Example 2. However, Comparative Example 3 evidenced an unsatisfactory formability. In Comparative Example 4, in which the water-soluble zirconium compound was omitted from the undercoat¬ ing film, both the hot water resistance and the formability were unsatisfactory. Table 3 PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS FOR EXAMPLES 1 - 6 AND COMPARISON

EXAMPLES 1 - 5

Number Result of Evaluation for:

Hot Water Resistance Corrosion Resistance Formability

Ex 1 + + + + + +

Ex 2 + + + + + +

Ex 3 + + + + + +

Ex 4 + + + + + +

Ex 5 + + + + + +

Ex 6 + + + + + +

CE 1 x x X

CE 2 + + + +

CE 3 + + + +

CE 4 + + +

CE 5 + + +

Abbreviations for Table 3 Ex = Working Example; CE = Comparison Example.

The performance was also inadequate in Comparative Example 5, which con¬ cerned the application of only the water-soluble zirconium compound.

In contrast to the preceding results, the undercoated stock prepared in Ex¬ amples 1 to 6 according to the present invention had an excellent hot water re¬ sistance and corrosion resistance and also an excellent post-forming adherence.

The pot lives of some treatment bath compositions was measured by com¬ paring the formability results achieved with the bath compositions immediately after mixing and then later after aging the same bath compositions at 40 ^CC for many days after mixing. The coated metal samples for testing the formability were prepared by the same procedures, before and after the treatment with the baths as shown in Table 4, as were used for Example 3 above, and the formabil¬ ity was measured as described above. Table 4 reports the treatment bath com¬ positions used in these pot life tests and the results of these tests.

Table 4 COMPOSITIONS AND RESULTS FOR POT LIFE TESTING

No. Active Ingredients in Treatment Bath Formability Test Results

Acrylate Pol¬ Zirconium Third Immediately After Aging at 40 °C ymer or Source Com¬ After Mix¬ for: Copolymer ponent ing

10 Days 30 Days

Ex 7 HPA-Hom ZA None + + + + + +

Ex 8 2-HEA-Hom ZA None + + + + + +

Ex 9 1 MA 9 2-HEA AZC None + + + + + +

CE 6 A-Hom AZC γ-APES + + + +

CE 7 A-Hom AZC Urea resin + + + +

Abbreviations for Table 4

No. = Number; HPA-Hom = hydroxypropyl acrylate homopolymer; ZA = zirconium acetate; 2-HEA- Hom = Homopolymer of 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate; 1 MA/9 2-HEA = copolymer of methacrvlic acid and 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate in a weight ratio of 1:9; AZC = ammonium zirconium carbonate; A-Hom = acrylic acid homopolymer; γ-APES = gamma-aminopropylethoxysilane ; Ex = Working Example; CE = Comparison Example.

Other Notes for Table 4

The amount of acrylate polymer was 5 g/L, and the amount of zirconium source was such as to give a stoichiometric equivalent of 5 g/L of Zr0₂, in every instance in Table 4. The amount of urea resin was 5 g/L and the amount of γ-APES was 0.8 g/L .

A third component was added in Comparative Examples 6 and 7 for the 5 purpose of improving the adherence. However, the formability was observed to have deteriorated after even 10 days of aging at 40 °C in the case of Compara¬ tive Examples 6 and 7. In contrast to this, an excellent formability was obtained in Examples 7 to 9 according to the present invention even after aging for 30 days at 40 °C; this indicated an excellent pot life for compositions according to o the invention. Thus a process according to the present invention for treating aluminum and aluminum alloy cap stock sheet can impart thereto a paint adher¬ ence that is excellent even after the forming operation. The invention composi¬ tion is also stable and provides an excellent pot life.

Claims

1. A process for treating a surface of aluminum or aluminum alloy sheet, said process comprising steps of:

(I) covering the surface of the aluminum or aluminum alloy sheet with a liquid waterbome composition comprising:

(A) a component selected from the group consisting of acrylic poly¬ mers and copolymers that have a glass-transition temperature no greater than 0° C; and

(B) a component selected from the group consisting of water-soluble zirconium compounds; and

(II) drying onto the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at least part of the liquid waterbome composition coated thereon in step (I), so as to form an adherent polymer film on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface. 2. A process according to claim 1 , wherein component (A) is selected from the group consisting of copolymers of:

(A.1 ) at least one acrylic monomer having in each molecule at least one moiety selected from the group consisting of carboxyl, hydroxyl, amide, and glycidyl moieties; and (A.

2) at least one acrylate ester monomer.

3. A process according to claim 2, wherein the ratio by weight of component (A) to component (B) in the liquid waterbome composition is from 0.5:1.0 to 2.0:1.0.

4. A process according to claim 3, wherein component (A) is selected from polymers and copolymers with a molecular weight in the range from 2,000 to

100,000.

5. A process according to claim 4, wherein component (A) is selected from polymers and copolymers with a molecular weight in the range from 10,000 to 50,000.

6. A process according to claim 5, wherein an amount of zirconium corre¬ sponding stoichiometrically to from 1 to 50 mg/m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad- herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the end of step (II).

7. A process according to claim 6, wherein an amount of zirconium corre¬ sponding stoichiometrically to from 5 to 30 mg/m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad-

5 herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the end of step (II).

8. A process according to claim 4, wherein an amount of zirconium corre¬ sponding stoichiometrically to from 1 to 50 mg/m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad¬ herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the o end of step (II).

9. A process according to claim 8, wherein an amount of zirconium corre¬ sponding stoichiometrically to from 5 to 30 mg/m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad¬ herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the end of step (II). s

10. A process according to claim 3, wherein an amount of zirconium corre¬ sponding stoichiometrically to from 1 to 50 mg m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad¬ herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the end of step (II).

11. A process according to claim 10, wherein an amount of zirconium corre- o sponding stoichiometrically to from 5 to 30 mg/m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad¬ herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the end of step (II).

12. A process according to claim 2, wherein an amount of zirconium corre¬ sponding stoichiometrically to from 1 to 50 mg/m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad- 5 herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the end of step (II).

13. A process according to claim 12, wherein an amount of zirconium corre¬ sponding stoichiometrically to from 5 to 30 mg/m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad¬ herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the 0 end of step (II).

14. A process according to claim 1 , wherein an amount of zirconium corre- sponding stoichiometrically to from 1 to 50 mg/m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad¬ herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the end of step (II).

15. A process according to claim 14, wherein an amount of zirconium corre- sponding stoichiometrically to from 5 to 30 mg m² of Zr0₂ is contained in the ad¬ herent polymer film present on the aluminum or aluminum alloy surface at the end of step (II).

16. A process according to claim 2, wherein component (A) is selected from polymers and copolymers with a molecular weight in the range from 2,000 to 100,000.

17. A process according to claim 16, wherein component (A) is selected from polymers and copolymers with a molecular weight in the range from 10,000 to 50,000.

18. A process according to claim 1 , wherein component (A) is selected from polymers and copolymers with a molecular weight in the range from 2,000 to

100,000.

19. A process according to claim 18, wherein component (A) is selected from polymers and copolymers with a molecular weight in the range from 10,000 to 50,000.

20. A process according to claim 1 , wherein the ratio by weight of component (A) to component (B) in the liquid waterbome composition is from 0.5:1.0 to 2.0:1.0.