WO1995026806A1 - Traitement de gaz de combustion par permeance et biodegradation - Google Patents

Traitement de gaz de combustion par permeance et biodegradation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1995026806A1
WO1995026806A1 PCT/GB1995/000744 GB9500744W WO9526806A1 WO 1995026806 A1 WO1995026806 A1 WO 1995026806A1 GB 9500744 W GB9500744 W GB 9500744W WO 9526806 A1 WO9526806 A1 WO 9526806A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
membrane
dce
gas
gaseous stream
concentration
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1995/000744
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Andrew Livingston
Luisa Maria Freitas Dos Santos
Original Assignee
Imperial College Of Science, Technology & Medicine
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Imperial College Of Science, Technology & Medicine filed Critical Imperial College Of Science, Technology & Medicine
Priority to AU20807/95A priority Critical patent/AU2080795A/en
Priority to JP7525510A priority patent/JPH09510917A/ja
Priority to EP95913276A priority patent/EP0752909A1/fr
Publication of WO1995026806A1 publication Critical patent/WO1995026806A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • B01D53/229Integrated processes (Diffusion and at least one other process, e.g. adsorption, absorption)
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/84Biological processes
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A50/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
    • Y02A50/20Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/30Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel

Definitions

  • VOC's volatile organic compounds
  • DCE- dichloroethane chlorinated solvents
  • aromatics benzene, toluene
  • Biodegradation renders the toxic VOC harmless by converting it into harmless components such as carbon dioxide, water and mineral constituents such as chloride ion.
  • a membrane bioreactor can be used to extract toxic VOC's from a waste gas stream, and then biodegrade them.
  • the membrane acts as a barrier between the biomedium and the contaminated gas stream (see figure 1) thus avoiding the entry into the biomedium of compounds (such as HC1) , which would hinder biological degradationT
  • the solutes may be transferred at a higher rate than in a conventional system since mass transfer through silicone rubber may be faster than mass transfer through a water film.
  • microorganisms can be maintained in a favourable growth environment, as they only receive the specific compound they need as carbon source from the gas stream.
  • a method of reducing the concentration of at least one gaseous or vapour phase organic compound present in a gaseous stream wherein said gaseous stream is caused to flow in contact with an interior surface of a substantially water-insoluble selectively permeable sheet, tubular or envelope-type polymeric membrane whose permeability to the said at least one organic compound exceeds its permeability to chloride ion, whilst simultaneously maintaining in contact with an external surface of said membrane an aqueous reaction medium containing biologically active reaction means such as biomass bacteria or algae or other microorganisms or immobilised cells capable of reacting with said at least one compound after it permeates from the gaseous stream through said membrane from said interior surface thereof to said external surface.
  • biologically active reaction means such as biomass bacteria or algae or other microorganisms or immobilised cells capable of reacting with said at least one compound after it permeates from the gaseous stream through said membrane from said interior surface thereof to said external surface.
  • Membrane modules may be constructed in any suitable configuration, e.g. spiral wound flat sheets, layered flat sheets, shell and tube.
  • Diagrams showing the operating principle are given in Figure 1, a system configuration including a remote bioreactor and membrane module is given in Figure 3, and operating data from determinations using the system including the remote bioreactor and the membrane module to biodegrade DCE containing waste gas are given in Figure 8.
  • a preferred feature of the present invention resides in use of a dense phase, hollow membrane such as a plurality of tubular synthetic elastomers like silicone rubber to create an interface between the gas and aqueous biological phases.
  • the present method is particularly useful in gas and vapour permeation, where problems of membrane-fouling or -scaling can be minimised, and parallel reactions may be avoided.
  • the selective mass transport allows the recovery of single compounds without an additional process step.
  • a membrane process can be described as a special type of extraction process which is more suitable for applications where the organic vapour content is too high to make carbon adsorption feasible, but too low to permit incineration.
  • membranes One step further in the use of membranes is the combination of membrane extraction and a subsequent bioconversion.
  • Microporous membranes have limited selectivities, which under certain conditions prevent complete VOC extraction. Additionally, the transmembrane pressure difference that destroys the membrane is much lower for microporous membranes, and the pores of the membrane can be blocked by biomass. Therefore, the use of dense membranes to treat VOCs is preferable.
  • a strain of microorganisms for example Xanthobacter. autotrophicus GJ10 described by Janssen et al in 1985 is capable of utilising DCE and other haloalkanes that are structurally related to DCE (e.g. 1-chlorobutane, 1-chloropropane, 1, 3-dichloropropane, bromoethane) as sole sources of carbon and energy.
  • DCE haloalkanes that are structurally related to DCE (e.g. 1-chlorobutane, 1-chloropropane, 1, 3-dichloropropane, bromoethane) as sole sources of carbon and energy.
  • the first step is the conversion of DCE to 2- chloroethanol by a constitutively produced haloalkane dehalogena ⁇ e.
  • chloroethanol is converted, via chloroacetaldehyde to 2-chloroacetic acid by a quinoprotein (PQQ) alcohol dehydrogena ⁇ e and a coenzyme (NAD) dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase.
  • PQQ quinoprotein
  • NAD coenzyme
  • the second dehalogenase dechlorinates the 2-chloroacetic acid to glycolic acid which is finally degraded to biomass, water, carbon dioxide and hydrochloric acid.
  • the overall stoichiometric equation can be expressed by
  • FIG 1 shows the principle of operation of the present membrane bioreactor system
  • Figure 2 illustrates mass transfer and biodegradation in a bioscrubber
  • FIG. 3 shows a membrane module and remote bioreactor configuration
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the metabolic pathway for dichloroethane (DCE) degradation by Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10
  • Figure 5 shows apparatus for investigating transmembrane transfer of DCE from a waste gas stream into a receiving solution
  • Figure 6 shows an apparatus for determination of mass transfer coefficients
  • FIG. 7 shows a more detailed arrangement of membrane module and remote bioreactor apparatus for quantitative measurements of DCE extraction and biodegradation
  • Figure 8 demonstrates removal efficiency of DCE in the membrane bioreactor
  • Figure 9 show the results of transfer test using silicone rubber membrane. DCE concentration curves in the gas vessel are identified thus -A in the receiving solution - ⁇ and in the gas -O
  • Figure 10 shows mass transfer results with membrane module (gas flow rate: 750 mL min -1 , receiving solution flow rate: 1050 mL min -1 ) :
  • Figure 11 shows mass transfer results with membrane module (gas flow rate: 1500 mL min , receiving solution flow rate: 1050 mL min -1 ) : DCE concentration curves in the gas production vessel (A) , gas inlet (o) , gas outlet (•) and the receiving solution ( ⁇ ),
  • Figure 12 shows " mass transfer results with membrane module (gas flow rate: 750 mL min , receiving solution flow rate: 2300 mL min -1 ) : DCE concentration curves in the gas production vessel (A) , gas inlet (o) , gas outlet (•) and the receiving solution ( ⁇ ) ,
  • Figure 13 shows mass transfer results with membrane module (gas flow rate: 1500 L min , receiving solution flow rate: 2300 mL min -1 ) : DCE concentration curves in the gas production vessel (A) , gas inlet (o) , gas outlet (•) and the receiving solution ( ⁇ ) ,
  • Figure 14 shows the gas flow rate of DCE waste gas
  • Figure 15 shows the pressure drop on the shell-side of the membrane
  • Figure 16 shows removal efficiency of DCE in the membrane bioreactor
  • FIG. 17 shows the flux of DCE through the membrane
  • Figure 18 shows carbon evolution: expected values assuming complete mineralisation of DCE to carbon dioxide (A) ; values from the analysis of the gas exhaust of the reactor ( ⁇ ) ; carbon leaving the bioreactor as biomass (o) ,
  • Figure 19 shows chloride evolution in the biological medium: expected values assuming complete mineralisation of DCE (A) and measured concentrations ( ⁇ ) .
  • the sealed flasks were subsequently analysed for DCE and Cl- concentrations and turbidity. Bacterial growth was observed with increasing turbidity which is proportional to the number of cells in the liquid, and decreasing DCE concentration showing that the microorganisms were able to utilise the provided DCE as a sole carbon source .
  • Samples of Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJI O cells were stored in f lasks containing glycerol and placed in a freezer compartment .
  • Ta b le 1 Nutrient salts and vitamins medium for Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10
  • initial column oven temperature 40°C initial time (period in which temperature stays constant): 2 min rate of column over temperature rise: 20C° per min final oven temperature: 100°C final time (period in which temperature is held before the oven is cooled down) 0.5 min
  • the concentration of DCE in the sample was calculated as follows:
  • the peak area generated by the GC is proportional to the mass of the detected compound.
  • the ratio between the amount of DCE and TCE in sample and in the standard can be expressed by
  • A is the value for the peak area in %.
  • DCE concentration in the waste gas and the exhaust gas was measured in the same GC and using the same temperature program. A 1 mL gas sample was injected into the column and the concentration was calculated against an external liquid standard.
  • A is the absolute peak value.
  • the factors C-, and C 2 take into account different attenuations and the presence of other compounds in the standard. For the gas measurements, liquid DCE solution was injected and analysed at the same attenuation as the samples, so that these factors became 1.
  • Chloride was assayed colorimetrically according to a known technique.
  • aqueous sample solution 3.0 L of mercuric thiocyanate solution (1.5 g mercuric thiocyanate in 500 mL of 98% ethanol) and 1.0 mL of iron alumn solution (8g ferric ammonium sulphate in 100 mL 6M nitric acid) were added.
  • the mixture was shaken and the colour allowed to develop for 10 min after which the absorption was measured at 460 nm.
  • the obtained value was compared with a standard calibration curve and the chloride concentration was calculated by linear interpolation.
  • the uncertainty of this assay (quoted as the standard deviation of 5 separate determinations) was 5% at the 10 mg L level.
  • Carbon dioxide was measured in an infra-red gas analyser (Servo ex PA 404).
  • the principle is based on the fact that many gases and liquids absorb energy in the infra ⁇ red region of the spectrum because of resonant molecular vibrations. These resonances produce highly characterised spectra which can be used to identify substances.
  • the gas stream was diverted through a cooler to condense the remaining moisture which might damage the infra-red analyser.
  • the analyser read the carbon dioxide concentration in volume percent (volume carbon dioxide per volume air) which was converted in mg L -1 .
  • the concentration in the air entering the bioreactor (0.03% - 0.04%) was subtracted.
  • an apparatus was constructed corresponding to Figure 5 using a tubular silicone rubber membrane (1 m length, 2 mm inner diameter, 0.5 mm wall thickness), being a commercially available poly(di ethylsiloxane) and inert filler for strength.
  • the gaseous waste stream was created by bubbling air into a vessel containing 10L of DCE solution with an initial concentration of 1000 mg L . Due to air stripping, DCE was transferred from the solution to the gaseous phase. This synthetic gas was pumped through the membrane at a flow rate of 0.5 L min . Due to this method used for gas generation, the gas produced also contained water vapour and therefore a humidity trap with silica gel was used to prevent humidity in the gas pump or on the gas side of the membrane. In order to keep constant atmospheric pressure in the gas production vessel, an outlet with an activated carbon trap was installed (see Fig. 5)
  • the synthetic DCE gas stream passed through the silicone tubing which was placed in a shakeflask containing the receiving solution.
  • This solution was 530 L distilled water at pH 7.0.-
  • the shakeflask was kept at a constant temperature of 30°C using a.waterbath.
  • All the tubing in the system other than the silicone rubber membrane was of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) which had been chosen to minimise adsorption of DCE from the waste gas and the receiving solution.
  • PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
  • the membrane module employed was a spiral wound silicone rubber tubing module with a transfer surface area of 2.5 m .
  • the specific surface area a M A H /V M was 1667 m -1 .
  • the DCE containing gas was circulated on the tube side at flow rates of 750 and 1500 mL min -1 .
  • the gas generation unit used in the previous examples was modified, as the transfer rates were expected to be higher and the concentration in the gas production vessel would consequently decrease rapidly preventing a constant gas flow.
  • a high concentration DCE solution (2800-2950 mg L -1 ) was added to the gas production vessel at flow rates that varied between 0.18 and 0.24 mL min -1 , and the same amount of solution was removed from the system via a multichannel peristaltic pump.
  • the DCE concentrations in the gas production vessel and in the receiving solution as well as the gas concentrations in the inlet and outlet of the membrane module were measured. Furthermore, the change in concentration of the highly concentrated DCE solution due to volatilisation was monitored.
  • the membrane bioreactor system used was similar to the previously described configuration for the determination of mass transfer coefficients.
  • the receiving solution vessel was replaced by a continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) used as a fermenter.
  • CSTR continuously stirred tank reactor
  • the CSTR was inoculated with Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10 cells grown on DCE under non-sterile conditions.
  • the membrane module employed was the same as described above.
  • the total biomedium volume was approximately 2 L including volume of the CSTR and membrane hold-up. Gas flow was set at a rate of 100 mL min- entering at the base of the CSTR through a stainless steel sparger. In order to achieve complete mixing and homogeneous aeration, the stirrer speed was set at 500 rpm.
  • the temperature of the biomedium was held constantly at 30°C by a temperature controller with a heating element.
  • a pH controller held the pH at 7.0 in the biomedium via the adding of acid (IM sulphuric acid solution) or base (IM sodium hydroxide solution) as necessary. Nutrient salt solution was added to the CSTR at a flow rate of 0.95 L min -1 through a multichannel peristaltic pump.
  • a water cooled condenser was fitted to the gas outlet to minimise the loss of DCE due to air stripping caused by the aeration of the bioreactor. Gas exiting the reactor was piped either to a fume cupboard or into the sample loop of the C0 2 analyser as required for C0 2 analysis.
  • the biomedium was recirculated at an initial flow rate of 2000 L min- on the shell side of the membrane. As the gas flow rate on the tube side, which was initially set at 1500 L min -1 , started to decrease due to membrane expansion, the biomedium flow rate was reduced to 1000 L min . The pressure drop on the biomedium side was measured regularly using a mercury manometer.
  • the DCE concentration in the gas entering and exiting the membrane was measured.
  • the concentration in the gas production vessel was monitored and the flow rate of the peristaltic pump adding the highly concentrated DCE solution was adjusted to between 0.176 and 0.32 mL min -1 .
  • the graphs in Figures 10 to 13 show the results of the mass transfer tests carried out with the membrane module at different flow rates on tube and shell side. The final DCE concentrations at steady state were determined.
  • the gas flow rate which was initially set at 1500 mL min -1 , decreased during the operating period due to swelling of the silicone rubber and growth of biomass on the shell- side which caused expansion of the membrane.
  • the change of these gas flow rates is shown in Fig. 14.
  • the average DCE gas concentration entering the membrane was 0.65 mg L -1 and decreased to a concentration of 0.06 mg L- at the membrane outlet.
  • the average removal efficiency shown in Fig. 16 was calculated as the ratio between outlet and inlet concentration and was approximately 91%.
  • the flux of DCE across the membrane calculated as the product of the gas flow rate and difference in DCE concentration between membrane inlet and outlet increased within the first two days of running the bioreactor apparatus.
  • the concentration in the biomedium increased and subsequently decreased within this time span, as the microorganisms acclimatised to the new growth conditions. After 48 hours, no DCE was detected in the biomedium, and therefore the driving force between gas and liquid phases increased leading to a maximum DCE flux of approximately 55 mg h .
  • the amount of carbon exiting the system was measured as C0 2 exiting through the gas outlet of the bioreactor, and as biomass leaving via the biomedium overflow.
  • the carbon evolved as C0 2 was calculated as the product of the air flow and the C0 2 concentration measured in the C0 2 analyser.
  • the amount of carbon leaving as biomass was obtained from the product of the biomedium flow rate of the overflow and the amount of suspended biomass which stayed constant at a value of 20 mg L -1 .
  • the amount of DCE lost due to air stripping was found to be less than 0.8% of the total amount of DCE entering the membrane bioreactor system and could therefore be neglected.
  • Fig. 19 shows the measured evolution of chloride ions calculated from the biomedium overflow flow rate and the chloride concentration in the biomedium, and the theoretical evolution of chloride assuming 100% conversion of DCE to chloride.
  • a membrane bioreactor system has been used to remove an organic pollutant 1, 2-dichloroethane (DCE) from a gaseous waste stream.
  • DCE 2-dichloroethane
  • this process allows the treatment of contaminated air streams at low flow rates and with low pollutant concentrations.
  • a plurality of elongate, tubular hollow silicone rubber membranes separate the contaminated gas stream from the biomedium. This allows selective transfer of the organic compound through the membrane to the biomedium where biodegradation occurs.
  • the conditions in the biomedium can be controlled independently from the waste gas side.
  • a gas flow rate of 770 mL min -1 and an average DCE concentration of 0.65 mg L -1 91% of the DCE present in the synthetically produced gaseous stream was biodegraded.
  • extensive growth of biofilm attached to the membrane surface on the biomedium side was observed, which caused a pressure drop on the biomedium side of the membrane of approximately 600 bar when steady state conditions were achieved.
  • the release of chloride ions due to the mineralisation of DCE was found to be 99%, while conversion of DCE to C0 2 was found to be 60% of the amount of carbon crossing the membrane. This discrepancy is thought to be due to the extensive biofilm formation.
  • the mass transfer of DCE across the membrane in absence of microbial activity was also determined. With a gas flow rate of 770 mL min -1 and a water flow rate of 1050 mL min , the overall mass transfer coefficient was determined to be 0.83.10 -3 m s -1 .
  • the comparison of the DCE fluxes across the membrane in the presence and absence of microbial activity revealed that the biofilm lowers significantly the amount of DCE crossing the membrane.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)

Abstract

Procédé de réduction de la concentration d'au moins un composé organique gazeux ou en phase vapeur, présent dans un flux de gaz, consistant à faire circuler ce flux en contact avec une surface intérieure d'une membrane polymère tubulaire ou du type enveloppe, sous forme d'une feuille perméable de façon sélective et pratiquement insoluble dans l'eau, la perméabilité de ladite membrane vis-à-vis d'au moins un composé organique excédant sa perméabilité à l'ion chlorure, tout en maintenant simultanément en contact avec une surface extérieure de ladite membrane un milieu de réaction aqueux contenant des moyens de réaction biologiquement actifs, tels que des bactéries ou algues d'une biomasse, capables de réagir avec au moins un composé après que celui-ci ait filtré du flux gazeux à travers ladite membrane, de la surface intérieure vers la surface extérieure de celle-ci.
PCT/GB1995/000744 1994-03-30 1995-03-30 Traitement de gaz de combustion par permeance et biodegradation WO1995026806A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU20807/95A AU2080795A (en) 1994-03-30 1995-03-30 Permeation and biological treatment of waste gas
JP7525510A JPH09510917A (ja) 1994-03-30 1995-03-30 廃ガスの透過及び生物学処理
EP95913276A EP0752909A1 (fr) 1994-03-30 1995-03-30 Traitement de gaz de combustion par permeance et biodegradation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9406323.7 1994-03-30
GB9406323A GB9406323D0 (en) 1994-03-30 1994-03-30 Treating waste gas

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1995026806A1 true WO1995026806A1 (fr) 1995-10-12

Family

ID=10752765

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1995/000744 WO1995026806A1 (fr) 1994-03-30 1995-03-30 Traitement de gaz de combustion par permeance et biodegradation

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0752909A1 (fr)
JP (1) JPH09510917A (fr)
AU (1) AU2080795A (fr)
GB (1) GB9406323D0 (fr)
WO (1) WO1995026806A1 (fr)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997019196A1 (fr) * 1995-11-22 1997-05-29 North Carolina State University Traitement par bioreacteur destine a l'elimination continue de composes organiques d'un flux de traitement en phase vapeur
EP0878214A2 (fr) * 1997-05-15 1998-11-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Procédé et dispositif pour décontaminer des milieux pollués
WO2000000275A1 (fr) * 1998-06-29 2000-01-06 Membrane Extraction Technology Ltd. Separation par membrane comprenant un fluide diphasique d'un cote de la membrane
US8679230B2 (en) 2008-12-19 2014-03-25 Michael L. Strickland Reducing emissions of VOCs from low-pressure storage tanks
EP3026105A1 (fr) * 2014-11-27 2016-06-01 Linde Aktiengesellschaft Tuyau de silicone de dissolution de CO2 dans de l'eau pour production d'algues
CN114558564A (zh) * 2022-01-20 2022-05-31 北京科技大学 基于活性藻的生物炭@金属型脱硝催化剂及其制备方法

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110339703A (zh) * 2019-07-16 2019-10-18 成都霸中霸科技发展有限责任公司 一种工厂有机废气生物净化处理装置

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2079460A5 (en) * 1970-02-02 1971-11-12 Rhone Poulenc Sa Polyorganosiloxane elastomer membranes - contng zeolite for gaseous separation procedures in conventional appts
DE3542599A1 (de) * 1985-12-03 1987-06-04 Ulrich Dipl Ing Baeuerle Verfahren und vorrichtung zur eliminierung schwer wasserloeslicher und leicht fluechtiger verunreinigungen aus einem abluft- bzw. abgasstrom durch biologische oxidation
DE4027126C1 (fr) * 1990-08-28 1991-12-12 Eberhard Prof. Dr. 2000 Hamburg De Bock
US5116506A (en) * 1989-06-30 1992-05-26 Oregon State University Support aerated biofilm reactor

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2079460A5 (en) * 1970-02-02 1971-11-12 Rhone Poulenc Sa Polyorganosiloxane elastomer membranes - contng zeolite for gaseous separation procedures in conventional appts
DE3542599A1 (de) * 1985-12-03 1987-06-04 Ulrich Dipl Ing Baeuerle Verfahren und vorrichtung zur eliminierung schwer wasserloeslicher und leicht fluechtiger verunreinigungen aus einem abluft- bzw. abgasstrom durch biologische oxidation
US5116506A (en) * 1989-06-30 1992-05-26 Oregon State University Support aerated biofilm reactor
DE4027126C1 (fr) * 1990-08-28 1991-12-12 Eberhard Prof. Dr. 2000 Hamburg De Bock

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997019196A1 (fr) * 1995-11-22 1997-05-29 North Carolina State University Traitement par bioreacteur destine a l'elimination continue de composes organiques d'un flux de traitement en phase vapeur
US5954858A (en) * 1995-11-22 1999-09-21 North Carolina State University Bioreactor process for the continuous removal of organic compounds from a vapor phase process stream
EP0878214A2 (fr) * 1997-05-15 1998-11-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Procédé et dispositif pour décontaminer des milieux pollués
EP0878214A3 (fr) * 1997-05-15 2000-04-05 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Procédé et dispositif pour décontaminer des milieux pollués
US6319706B1 (en) 1997-05-15 2001-11-20 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Process and apparatus for remedying polluted media
WO2000000275A1 (fr) * 1998-06-29 2000-01-06 Membrane Extraction Technology Ltd. Separation par membrane comprenant un fluide diphasique d'un cote de la membrane
US8679230B2 (en) 2008-12-19 2014-03-25 Michael L. Strickland Reducing emissions of VOCs from low-pressure storage tanks
EP3026105A1 (fr) * 2014-11-27 2016-06-01 Linde Aktiengesellschaft Tuyau de silicone de dissolution de CO2 dans de l'eau pour production d'algues
CN114558564A (zh) * 2022-01-20 2022-05-31 北京科技大学 基于活性藻的生物炭@金属型脱硝催化剂及其制备方法
CN114558564B (zh) * 2022-01-20 2022-12-30 北京科技大学 基于活性藻的生物炭@金属型脱硝催化剂及其制备方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH09510917A (ja) 1997-11-04
AU2080795A (en) 1995-10-23
GB9406323D0 (en) 1994-05-25
EP0752909A1 (fr) 1997-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Dos Santos et al. Novel membrane bioreactor for detoxification of VOC wastewaters: biodegradation of 1, 2-dichloroethane
Ergas et al. Characterization of compost biofiltration system degrading dichloromethane
Padhi et al. Biological oxidation of gaseous VOCs–rotating biological contactor a promising and eco-friendly technique
Kennes et al. Bioprocesses for air pollution control
Mudliar et al. Bioreactors for treatment of VOCs and odours–a review
Livingston A novel membrane bioreactor for detoxifying industrial wastewater: I. Biodegradation of phenol in a synthetically concocted wastewater
Livingston et al. Extractive membrane bioreactors for detoxification of chemical industry wastes: process development
EP2328671A1 (fr) Réacteur modulaire et procédé d extraction de dioxyde de carbone
Sempere et al. Performance evaluation of a biotrickling filter treating a mixture of oxygenated VOCs during intermittent loading
Zilli et al. Macro‐kinetic investigation on phenol uptake from air by biofiltration: influence of superficial gas flow rate and inlet pollutant concentration
Kim et al. Degradation of toluene vapor in a hydrophobic polyethylene hollow fiber membrane bioreactor with Pseudomonas putida
Freitas Santos et al. Dichloroethane removal from gas streams by an extractive membrane bioreactor
Xu et al. Formaldehyde removal from air by a biodegradation system
Brookes et al. Biological detoxification of a 3-chloronitrobenzene manufacture wastewater in an extractive membrane bioreactor
EP0752909A1 (fr) Traitement de gaz de combustion par permeance et biodegradation
Andres et al. Wood bark as packing material in a biofilter used for air treatment
Quinlan et al. VOC elimination in a compost biofilter using a previously acclimated bacterial inoculum
Freitas dos Santos et al. Extraction and biodegradation of a toxic volatile organic compound (1, 2-dichloroethane) from waste-water in a membrane bioreactor
Kumar et al. Continuous operation of membrane bioreactor treating toluene vapors by Burkholderia vietnamiensis G4
Brookes et al. Biotreatment of a point‐source industrial wastewater arising in 3, 4‐dichloroaniline manufacture using an extractive membrane bioreactor
Zhu et al. Biofiltration of benzene contaminated air streams using compost‐activated carbon filter media
US6030533A (en) Apparatus and method for the treatment of water containing organic pollutants
Luvsanjamba et al. Removal of dimethyl sulfide in a thermophilic membrane bioreactor
Kumar et al. Gaseous dimethyl sulphide removal in a membrane biofilm reactor: effect of methanol on reactor performance
Wei et al. Performance and mechanism of nitric oxide removal using a thermophilic membrane biofilm reactor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA GB JP US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1995913276

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: US

Ref document number: 1996 716353

Date of ref document: 19961029

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1995913276

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1995913276

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA