WO1995026628A1 - Regeneration of green plants from protoplasts isolated from microspore cultures of barley - Google Patents

Regeneration of green plants from protoplasts isolated from microspore cultures of barley Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1995026628A1
WO1995026628A1 PCT/FI1995/000186 FI9500186W WO9526628A1 WO 1995026628 A1 WO1995026628 A1 WO 1995026628A1 FI 9500186 W FI9500186 W FI 9500186W WO 9526628 A1 WO9526628 A1 WO 9526628A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
protoplasts
barley
regeneration
plants
microspore
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/FI1995/000186
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Marjatta Salmenkallio-Marttila
Ulrika KURTÉN
Leena Mannonen
Anneli Ritala
Veli Kauppinen
Original Assignee
Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus filed Critical Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus
Priority to AU22168/95A priority Critical patent/AU2216895A/en
Publication of WO1995026628A1 publication Critical patent/WO1995026628A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8201Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
    • C12N15/8206Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation by physical or chemical, i.e. non-biological, means, e.g. electroporation, PEG mediated
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H4/00Plant reproduction by tissue culture techniques ; Tissue culture techniques therefor
    • A01H4/005Methods for micropropagation; Vegetative plant propagation using cell or tissue culture techniques

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to plant biotechnology and specifically to a method for regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts isolated from cultured microspores of barley.
  • the method has been developed for barley, it is applicable also for the other cereals for which microspore and anther culture methods have been developed, e.g. wheat, rye, oat, maize and rice.
  • Direct gene transfer methods can be used to transform the protoplasts with foreign gene(s), whereby regeneration of the transformed protoplasts provide transgenic green plants.
  • Friable embryogenic callus that is suitable for the initiation of suspension cultures is in the case of barley difficult to obtain; the establishment of suspension cultures usually takes at least six months and only a fraction of the suspension culture lines yield regenerable protoplasts. Moreover, the morphogenic capacity of suspension cultures decreases during long periods of culture (L ⁇ hrs and L ⁇ rz 1988, Datta et al. 1992, Jahne et al. 1991).
  • a successful transformation also implies the regeneration of the cell to a new plant and production of progeny with the transferred new trait. This means that one basic requirement for the use of any of these transformation methods is an efficient culture and regeneration system that guarantees regeneration of fertile plants from single transformed cells.
  • protoplasts For the genetic modification of plants protoplasts are of great value. Protoplasts can be transformed by direct gene transfer, uptake of DNA through the plasma membrane stimulated either chemically or electrically. When using multicellular explant systems in transformation, as is the case with e.g. particle bombardment, chimaeric calli and plants may be produced as a result, while using protoplast systems for transformation, true transgenic clones can be obtained.
  • the problem with the recovery of transgenic plants from protoplasts relates to plant regeneration, not to the transformation methods (Potrykus 1991).
  • Transient gene expression in protoplasts has been used to optimize gene transfer methods and to study the function of regulatory elements of plant genes.
  • Transgenic rice (Toriyama et al. 1988, Zhang & Wu 1988, Zhang et al. 1988) and maize (Rhodes et al. 1988b) plants have been obtained following direct DNA transfer to protoplasts.
  • regenerable protoplasts can be isolated with a high yield. From the isolated protoplasts green plants can be regenerated by cultivating in appropriate media. When the isolated protoplasts are transformed with foreign genes, transgenic barley plants are obtained after regeneration.
  • the present invention thus provides a method for generating fertile barley plants, comprising cold treatment of barley spikes, isolating microspores from the cold treated spikes, culturing the isolated microspores as a suspension in a medium containing maltose, nitrogen sources and growth regulators, isolating protoplasts from the microspore mass obtained using conventional methods, cultivating the said protoplasts in a medium containing maltose, a nurse culture and growth regulators, and regenerating the protoplasts to generate fertile barley plants.
  • the invention provides a method for generating transgenic barley plants, comprising culturing microspores isolated from cold treated barley spikes in a medium containing maltose, nitrogen sources and growth regulators, isolating protoplasts from the microspore mass obtained using conventional methods, transforming the isolated protoplasts with foreign gene(s), and cultivating the transformed protoplasts in a medium containing maltose, a nurse culture and growth regulators, and regenerating the protoplasts to generate transgenic barley plants.
  • the plant material used in the present invention is obtained by growing barley grains (Hordeum vulgare L.) e.g. in a growth room for a few weeks, preferably about 6 to 8 weeks, until the spikes of the tillers are developed to have microspores in the late uninucleate to early binucleate stage.
  • the harvested tillers are cold treated by keeping them at a temperature under 10 °C, preferably at 7 °C for 1 to 4 weeks, preferably about 2 to 4 weeks.
  • the optimal cold treatment time is 3 weeks.
  • the microspores are isolated from the cold treated spikes by methods known in the art.
  • the spikes are e.g. cut into pieces and macerated with a teflon rod or, alternatively, by machine in a blendor.
  • Different appropriate buffers and media can be used in the isolation.
  • the crude preparation obtained is subsequently filtered to separate the microspores from the debris and the microspores are collected in an appropriate medium for cultivation.
  • the isolated microspores are then cultured for 2 to 4 weeks to get an appropriate amount of microspore mass for further prosecution.
  • the culturing procedure of the microspores there are four factors which have importance in view of the subsequent protoplast isolation. These factors are the cultivating time, the maltose concentration of the culturing medium, the growth regulators used, and the amount and nature of the nitrogen source in the medium.
  • a preferable culturing time is from 3 to 4 weeks. According to the experiments in the present work protoplast yields obtained were on the average 12 x 10 6 per g fresh weight when cultivating the microspores for 3 weeks and on the average 3 x 10 6 per g fresh weight as the cultivation time was 4 weeks. As the microspore mass is further doubled within the fourth week, a most preferable cultivating time proved to be from 22 to 24 days.
  • Maltose is a preferable carbon source in the microspore cultivating medium.
  • the amount of maltose in the medium is a critical factor when protoplasts are to be isolated from the microspore mass.
  • An appropriate amount is from about 0.150 M to about 0.200 M. Concentrations higher than 0.200 M decrease the protoplast yield substantially.
  • a preferable concentration according to the present invention is about 0.175 M.
  • the growth regulators are also important in the microspore culture medium affecting e.g. the differentiation as well as the division (callus formation) of the cells.
  • 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) is often the only growth regulator used.
  • a preferable medium used in this invention comprises 2,4-D (2,4-dichloro- phenoxyacetic acid), which increases the division of the cells, and kinetin (KIN), which affects the differentiation of the cells.
  • Appropriate concentration of 2,4-D in the microspore culture medium is from about 4.5 ⁇ M to about 22.6 ⁇ M, a preferable concentration being about 7.9 ⁇ M.
  • an appropriate concentration is from about 0.5 ⁇ M to about 4.6 ⁇ M, a preferable concentration being about 1.2 ⁇ M.
  • inorganic nitrogen sources in the microspore culture medium e.g. NO 3 and NH 4 can be used.
  • NO 3 and NH 4 can be used in the N6 basal medium described by Chu et al. (1975) the ratio and concentration of NO 3 and NH 4 are optimal for the purposes of the present invention.
  • said medium supplemented with the growth regulators discussed above, and further with glutamine as an organic nitrogen source, is preferable in the method of this invention.
  • Protoplasts are isolated from the microspore mass by methods analogous to the prior known protoplast isolation procedures.
  • the isolation can be performed in a medium described e.g. by Lazzeri et al. (1991) with appropriate lytic enzymes, e.g. cellulase, macerozyme and pectolyase. After a few hours' incubation the suspension is filtrated and the protoplasts are washed with the same medium and centrifuged.
  • the protoplasts so obtained can be used for transformation with direct gene transfer methods, e.g. electroporation or PEG-transformation. These techniques are well known in the art. Subsequent regeneration of the transformed protoplasts produces plants carrying the foreign gene in all of their cells.
  • the protoplasts are suspended at a density of 1-3 x 10 6 per ml in an appropriate medium containing agarose as gelling agent.
  • the suspension is plated on culture plate inserts or on Petri dishes.
  • a nurse culture is added to the plates to support the division of the protoplasts.
  • the nurse cultures are obtained by suspending an aliquot of the microspore mass or an appropriate suspension culture to the protoplast medium used (without the gelling agent). The importance of nurse cultures for the regeneration of barley protoplasts was evident, as the protoplasts failed to divide without the support of nurse cells.
  • the maltose concentration of the culturing and regeneration media i.e. the maltose concentration of the culturing and regeneration media, the growth regulators used, the amount and nature of the nitrogen source(s), and the time of cultivation in the different media.
  • Maltose is the preferable carbon source for the culture and regeneration of protoplasts.
  • the appropriate amount in the protoplast medium is about 0.50 to about 0.65 M.
  • the optimal composition of growth regulators is 2.3 ⁇ M 2,4- D.
  • the addition of coconut water into the protoplast medium is also important for the division and growth of the protoplasts.
  • Appropriate regenerating media for the protoplast cultures are e.g. the regeneration media II and III, which are the modified regeneration media II and III, respectively, described by Olsen (1987).
  • preferable media according to this invention contain maltose instead of sucrose.
  • the essential factors are the sequential lowering of the sugar concentration of the medium and the addition of the plant growth regulator 6-benzyl-aminopurine, which promotes the differentiation of the proembryos.
  • the plantlets regenerated on medium II are transferred to medium III for rooting and further development.
  • the essential features of this medium are the low concentration of sucrose and the omission of plant growth regulators.
  • Fig. 1 The vector pHTT303 used in transformation of barley containing the marker gene nptll coding for neomycin phosphotransferase II under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S transcript promoter.
  • Fig. 2 The vector pKAH36 used in transformation of barley containing the gene egll of Trichoderma reesei coding for endo- ⁇ -glucanase under the control of barley ⁇ -amylase promoter.
  • Fig. 3 The vector pKAH21 used in Example 5 containing the gene egll of Trichoderma reesei coding for endo- ⁇ -glucanase under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S transcript promoter
  • Fig. 4 NPTII activity in leaf extracts of transgenic barley plants regenerated from protoplasts.
  • Lane NC represents a negative control from a non- transformed barley plant and lane PC a positive control from tobacco transgenic for 35S-nptII.
  • Samples 1, 2 and 3 represent leaf extracts of three transgenic barley plants regenerated from protoplasts.
  • Barley grains (Hordeum vulgar e L. cv. Kymppi, an elite cultivar of spring barley) were obtained from Kesko Agronomic Station, Hauho. Plants were grown in a growth room (22/13°C day/night, 16 h light 4000 ⁇ mol ⁇ rY 1 ). The duration of the growth period was 6-8 weeks. The tillers were harvested when the sheath of the flag leaf had emerged 5-10 cm, which correlates with the late uninucleate to early binucleate stage of microspore development. The tillers were wrapped in aluminium foil and placed in beakers in a cold room at 7°C for 3-4 weeks.
  • Microspore isolation and culture Microspores were isolated and cultured in 108- medium (Table 1), which is the N6 basal medium (Chu et al 1975) supplemented with 1.1 mM of glutamine, 2.8 mM of m-inositol, 0.175 M of maltose, 7.9 ⁇ M of 2,4-D and 1.2 ⁇ M of kinetin.
  • 108- medium a N6 basal medium (Chu et al 1975) supplemented with 1.1 mM of glutamine, 2.8 mM of m-inositol, 0.175 M of maltose, 7.9 ⁇ M of 2,4-D and 1.2 ⁇ M of kinetin.
  • 108- medium Table 1
  • 108- medium the N6 basal medium (Chu et al 1975) supplemented with 1.1 mM of glutamine, 2.8 mM of m-inositol, 0.175 M of maltose, 7.9 ⁇
  • microspores were resuspended in 9 ml of the same medium and the total number of microspores and the number of embryogenic microspores were counted in a Fuchs-Rosenthal haemo- cytometer.
  • the number of microspores isolated per spike varied between 0.7 and 1.6 x 10 s with a mean of 1.1 x 10 5 per spike.
  • the microspores were plated as crude preparations and their viability varied between 33 % and 53 % (mean 42 %).
  • the microspores were cultured in 108-medium at a density of 0.8-1.0 x 10 5 ml "1 in 5 cm Petri dishes in the dark. The cultures were incubated stationary for the first 1.5 weeks and in a rotary shaker for another 1.5 weeks (65 rpm, stroke radius 2.5 cm).
  • Protoplast isolation Protoplasts were isolated from three to four weeks old cultures of isolated microspores according to the protocol of Lazzeri et al. (1991) for barley suspension cultures. 2-3 g of microspore mass were incubated in 20 ml of enzyme solution containing 1.0% cellulase Onozuka RS, 0.5% Macerozyme RIO and 0.05% pectolyase Y23 in washing solution (LW, Table 2). After 2-3 h incubation the suspension was diluted with equal volume of LW solution and filtrated through 160 ⁇ m, 55 ⁇ m and 20 ⁇ m nylon sieves. The protoplasts were washed twice with LW (100 x g, 5 min).
  • the protoplasts were treated with heat shock by incubating the protoplast suspension in 45°C water bath for 5 min and then cooled on ice. After incubation in the cold room at 7 °C for approximately two hours the protoplasts were collected by centrifugation (100 g, 5 min) and either plated for regeneration or used for transformation experiments.
  • Protoplast culture The protoplasts were suspended in Ll-protoplast medium (Table 2) containing 2.3 ⁇ M of 2,4-D, 0.5 M of maltose and 1.2% agarose (Sea- Plaque ® , FMC Corporation) at a density of 2-3 x 10° ml -1 .
  • the suspension was plated on MillicellTM-CM culture plate inserts, which were placed in 9 cm Petri dishes containing 8 ml of nurse culture.
  • the nurse cultures were prepared by suspending approximately 0.5 g of the same microspore mass as was used for protoplast isolation in 8 ml of LI protoplast medium without agarose. Cultures were incubated on a rotary shaker (65 rpm, stroke radius 2.5 cm) at 23°C in the dark.
  • Vitamin A - 0.005 -
  • the regeneration media II and III were the modified MS-media II and III, respectively, used by Olsen (1987) for barley anther culture.
  • the medium II contained maltose instead of sucrose (Hunter 1987) and the media were solidified with 0.3% gellan gum.
  • Embryogenic structures developing from the dividing protoplasts were transferred to regeneration medium II for further development.
  • the plates were incubated at 23°C with illumination (50 ⁇ mol m ' V 1 ). Green plantlets were transferred to medium III for further growth and potted in soil when about 10 cm tall. Table 3. Composition of the plant regeneration media II and III.
  • Microspores were isolated and cultured as described in Example 1. 3.0 g of callus mass from microspore cultured for 23 days and 4.5 g of callus mass from microspores cultured for 30 days were used for protoplast isolation. Protoplasts were isolated and cultured as in Example 2. The results of the experiment are presented in Table 5.
  • Protoplasts were suspended in electroporation buffer (0.55 M mannitol, 130 mM KC1, 10 mM NaCl, 4 mM CaCl 2 and 10 mM HEPES ⁇ pH 7.0 or 35 mM aspartic acid monopotassium salt, 35 mM glutamic acid monopotassium salt, 5 mM calcium gluconate, 5 mM MES and 0.55 M mannitol, pH 7.0) at a density of 3-5 x 10 6 /ml. 300 ⁇ l samples were mixed with 30 ⁇ g of plasmid DNA (pKAH36 or pHTT303) in multi-well dishes (Sterilin 33F24L) and chilled on ice for 10 min before electropo ⁇ ration.
  • electroporation buffer (0.55 M mannitol, 130 mM KC1, 10 mM NaCl, 4 mM CaCl 2 and 10 mM HEPES ⁇ pH 7.0 or 35 mM aspartic acid monopot
  • the protoplasts were suspended in F medium (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KC1, 5 mM HEPES, 5 mM glucose, 125 mM CaCl 2 , pH 7.0) at a density of 5 x 10 6 per ml.
  • F medium 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KC1, 5 mM HEPES, 5 mM glucose, 125 mM CaCl 2 , pH 7.0
  • the suspension was divided in 0.5 ml aliquots in centrifuge tubes and 50 ⁇ g of pKAH36 DNA was added. After 5 min 1 ml of 40% w/v PEG 1500 or PEG 4000 in F solution was added slowly to the protoplast suspension. The mixture was incubated for 15 min with gentle shaking at intervals. 2 ml aliquots of F solution were added four times at 5 min intervals.
  • the protoplasts were then pelleted by centrifugation at 100 g for 5 min and cultured as described in Example 2.
  • Control protoplasts were treated with PEG without addition of plasmid DNA.
  • the transformed protoplasts were cultured without any selective agents in the medium and the green plantlets obtained were screened for the transferred trait as described in Example 6.
  • Table 7 Regeneration of protoplast cultures after treatment with PEG, 4.5 x 10 6 protoplasts treated per each sample
  • Neomycin phosphotransferase II activity in the plants was assayed with the NPTII gel assay (Reiss et al. 1984, modified by Van den Broeck et al. 1985) (Fig. 4).
  • PCR polymerase chain reaction
  • the complete PCR mixture contained 100-500 ng of genomic or 0.5 pg of pKAH21 DNA, 12.5 pmol of each oligonucleotide primer, 200 ⁇ M dNTPs, 0.5 U Dynazyme and buffer supplied by the enzyme manufacturer (Finnzymes Oy) in a total volume of 100 ⁇ l. Thirty cycles were performed under following conditions: 75 s at 95°C, 2 min at 55°C, and 3 min at 72°C. Primers were designed to amplify a 557 bp fragment of the cDNA for EGI.
  • the forward primer was 5 -AGGA- CACCTCGGTGGTCCTT-3' and the reverse primer 5'-AGAGTGAGGGGT- CAAGGCATT-3'.
  • the PCR performance was controlled by including a primer pair amplifying the promoter fragment of one of the ⁇ -amylase genes.
  • Total DNA isolated from a transgenic barley cell line (K96/3a) was used as a positive control.
  • the amplified samples were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to plant biotechnology and specifically to a method for regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts isolated from cultured microspores of barley. Direct gene transfer methods can be used to transform the protoplasts with foreign gene(s), whereby regeneration of the transformed protoplasts provide transgenic green plants.

Description

Regeneration of green plants from protoplasts isolated from microspore cultures of barley
Field of the invention
The present invention relates to plant biotechnology and specifically to a method for regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts isolated from cultured microspores of barley. Although the method has been developed for barley, it is applicable also for the other cereals for which microspore and anther culture methods have been developed, e.g. wheat, rye, oat, maize and rice. Direct gene transfer methods can be used to transform the protoplasts with foreign gene(s), whereby regeneration of the transformed protoplasts provide transgenic green plants.
Background of the invention
Eventhough representatives of most of the world's crop plants have been regenerated from protoplasts, the regeneration of a whole plant from single protoplasts still remains a problem (Lazzeri et al. 1990, Roest & Glissen 1993). Regeneration methods often apply only to particular varieties or even genotypes. Cells or tissues that in themselves are regenerable are most likely the ones that yield protoplast cultures capable of regenerating new plants. Therefore most of these methods are based on the production of embryogenic suspension cultures.
Methods for protoplast regeneration have been developed for the major cereals rice (Fujimura et al. 1985), maize (Rhodes et al, 1988a), wheat (Vasil et al. 1990), sorghum (Wei and Xu 1990) and barley (Yan et al. 1990, Jahne et al. 1991). Key steps in these methods are the production of suspension cultures that are a good source of protoplasts while they still retain their regeneration capacity. The establishment of regenerable cell suspension cultures of barley has proven difficult as is the case with other gramineous species. Friable embryogenic callus that is suitable for the initiation of suspension cultures is in the case of barley difficult to obtain; the establishment of suspension cultures usually takes at least six months and only a fraction of the suspension culture lines yield regenerable protoplasts. Moreover, the morphogenic capacity of suspension cultures decreases during long periods of culture (Lϋhrs and Lδrz 1988, Datta et al. 1992, Jahne et al. 1991).
Plant biotechnology provides new possibilities for the improvement of crop plants. However, cereals have proved to be very recalcitrant to genetic engineering. At present there is no satisfactory method available for routine transformation of barley or other cereals (Potrykus 1991, Karp & Lazzeri 1992). The failure to achieve Agrobacterium-ind ced transformation in cereals has led to increased interest in other methods for the production of transgenic plants, such as the use of particle bombardment (Mendel et al. 1989, Ritala et al. 1994) and direct DNA-uptake into cells or protoplasts stimulated either electrically or chemically (Lazzeri et al. 1991).
In addition to the delivery and integration of foreign DNA into the target cell, a successful transformation also implies the regeneration of the cell to a new plant and production of progeny with the transferred new trait. This means that one basic requirement for the use of any of these transformation methods is an efficient culture and regeneration system that guarantees regeneration of fertile plants from single transformed cells.
For the genetic modification of plants protoplasts are of great value. Protoplasts can be transformed by direct gene transfer, uptake of DNA through the plasma membrane stimulated either chemically or electrically. When using multicellular explant systems in transformation, as is the case with e.g. particle bombardment, chimaeric calli and plants may be produced as a result, while using protoplast systems for transformation, true transgenic clones can be obtained. The problem with the recovery of transgenic plants from protoplasts relates to plant regeneration, not to the transformation methods (Potrykus 1991).
Transient gene expression in protoplasts has been used to optimize gene transfer methods and to study the function of regulatory elements of plant genes. Transgenic rice (Toriyama et al. 1988, Zhang & Wu 1988, Zhang et al. 1988) and maize (Rhodes et al. 1988b) plants have been obtained following direct DNA transfer to protoplasts. Transgenic callus lines of barley but no plants have been obtained using PEG-induced direct DNA uptake into protoplasts (Lazzeri et al. 1991).
At the moment plant regeneration remains the major limitation to the application of genetic engineering of plant cells to crop improvement. The currently used gene transfer techniques require the use of embryogenic suspension cultures, which are rather difficult to establish and maintain. Barley plants have been regenerated from protoplasts derived from embryogenic suspension cultures (Yan et al. 1990, Jahne et al. 1991, Funatsuki et al. 1992). However, considering the use of the protoplast system for transformation, the relatively unstable plant regeneration reported in these studies remains a problem.
Summary of the invention
We have now developed a method for the production of microspore cultures, from which regenerable protoplasts can be isolated, thus avoiding the problems related to embryogenic suspension cultures. With our protocol good plant production from protoplasts was obtained repeatedly and plantlets regenerated from protoplasts were potted in soil within 4-5 months of collecting the spikes for microspore culture. The protoplasts obtained with this method have been successfully used for the production of transgenic barley plants.
Detailed description of the invention
The present inventors have now found that from a microspore mass cultured in an optimized medium regenerable protoplasts can be isolated with a high yield. From the isolated protoplasts green plants can be regenerated by cultivating in appropriate media. When the isolated protoplasts are transformed with foreign genes, transgenic barley plants are obtained after regeneration. The present invention thus provides a method for generating fertile barley plants, comprising cold treatment of barley spikes, isolating microspores from the cold treated spikes, culturing the isolated microspores as a suspension in a medium containing maltose, nitrogen sources and growth regulators, isolating protoplasts from the microspore mass obtained using conventional methods, cultivating the said protoplasts in a medium containing maltose, a nurse culture and growth regulators, and regenerating the protoplasts to generate fertile barley plants.
In another aspect the invention provides a method for generating transgenic barley plants, comprising culturing microspores isolated from cold treated barley spikes in a medium containing maltose, nitrogen sources and growth regulators, isolating protoplasts from the microspore mass obtained using conventional methods, transforming the isolated protoplasts with foreign gene(s), and cultivating the transformed protoplasts in a medium containing maltose, a nurse culture and growth regulators, and regenerating the protoplasts to generate transgenic barley plants.
The plant material used in the present invention is obtained by growing barley grains (Hordeum vulgare L.) e.g. in a growth room for a few weeks, preferably about 6 to 8 weeks, until the spikes of the tillers are developed to have microspores in the late uninucleate to early binucleate stage. The harvested tillers are cold treated by keeping them at a temperature under 10 °C, preferably at 7 °C for 1 to 4 weeks, preferably about 2 to 4 weeks. The optimal cold treatment time is 3 weeks.
The microspores are isolated from the cold treated spikes by methods known in the art. The spikes are e.g. cut into pieces and macerated with a teflon rod or, alternatively, by machine in a blendor. Different appropriate buffers and media can be used in the isolation. In this work the 108-medium, supplemented as described in the examples, was used. The crude preparation obtained is subsequently filtered to separate the microspores from the debris and the microspores are collected in an appropriate medium for cultivation. The isolated microspores are then cultured for 2 to 4 weeks to get an appropriate amount of microspore mass for further prosecution. In the culturing procedure of the microspores there are four factors which have importance in view of the subsequent protoplast isolation. These factors are the cultivating time, the maltose concentration of the culturing medium, the growth regulators used, and the amount and nature of the nitrogen source in the medium.
After 2 weeks of culture the amount of the microspore mass is still rather small, but it will increase tenfold within the third week. A preferable culturing time is from 3 to 4 weeks. According to the experiments in the present work protoplast yields obtained were on the average 12 x 106 per g fresh weight when cultivating the microspores for 3 weeks and on the average 3 x 106 per g fresh weight as the cultivation time was 4 weeks. As the microspore mass is further doubled within the fourth week, a most preferable cultivating time proved to be from 22 to 24 days.
Maltose is a preferable carbon source in the microspore cultivating medium. The amount of maltose in the medium is a critical factor when protoplasts are to be isolated from the microspore mass. An appropriate amount is from about 0.150 M to about 0.200 M. Concentrations higher than 0.200 M decrease the protoplast yield substantially. A preferable concentration according to the present invention is about 0.175 M.
The growth regulators are also important in the microspore culture medium affecting e.g. the differentiation as well as the division (callus formation) of the cells. In conventional methods 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) is often the only growth regulator used. A preferable medium used in this invention comprises 2,4-D (2,4-dichloro- phenoxyacetic acid), which increases the division of the cells, and kinetin (KIN), which affects the differentiation of the cells. Appropriate concentration of 2,4-D in the microspore culture medium is from about 4.5 μM to about 22.6 μM, a preferable concentration being about 7.9 μM. For kinetin an appropriate concentration is from about 0.5 μM to about 4.6 μM, a preferable concentration being about 1.2 μM. As inorganic nitrogen sources in the microspore culture medium e.g. NO3 and NH4 can be used. In the N6 basal medium described by Chu et al. (1975) the ratio and concentration of NO3 and NH4 are optimal for the purposes of the present invention. Thus said medium supplemented with the growth regulators discussed above, and further with glutamine as an organic nitrogen source, is preferable in the method of this invention.
Protoplasts are isolated from the microspore mass by methods analogous to the prior known protoplast isolation procedures. The isolation can be performed in a medium described e.g. by Lazzeri et al. (1991) with appropriate lytic enzymes, e.g. cellulase, macerozyme and pectolyase. After a few hours' incubation the suspension is filtrated and the protoplasts are washed with the same medium and centrifuged.
The protoplasts so obtained can be used for transformation with direct gene transfer methods, e.g. electroporation or PEG-transformation. These techniques are well known in the art. Subsequent regeneration of the transformed protoplasts produces plants carrying the foreign gene in all of their cells.
For culture the protoplasts are suspended at a density of 1-3 x 106 per ml in an appropriate medium containing agarose as gelling agent. The suspension is plated on culture plate inserts or on Petri dishes. After the agarose has solidified, a nurse culture is added to the plates to support the division of the protoplasts. The nurse cultures are obtained by suspending an aliquot of the microspore mass or an appropriate suspension culture to the protoplast medium used (without the gelling agent). The importance of nurse cultures for the regeneration of barley protoplasts was evident, as the protoplasts failed to divide without the support of nurse cells.
In the protoplast culture and regeneration procedure same factors have importance as in the microspore culturing method, i.e. the maltose concentration of the culturing and regeneration media, the growth regulators used, the amount and nature of the nitrogen source(s), and the time of cultivation in the different media. Maltose is the preferable carbon source for the culture and regeneration of protoplasts. The appropriate amount in the protoplast medium is about 0.50 to about 0.65 M. For the division of protoplasts the optimal composition of growth regulators is 2.3 μM 2,4- D. The addition of coconut water into the protoplast medium is also important for the division and growth of the protoplasts.
Appropriate regenerating media for the protoplast cultures are e.g. the regeneration media II and III, which are the modified regeneration media II and III, respectively, described by Olsen (1987). However, preferable media according to this invention contain maltose instead of sucrose. For the regeneration of plants the essential factors are the sequential lowering of the sugar concentration of the medium and the addition of the plant growth regulator 6-benzyl-aminopurine, which promotes the differentiation of the proembryos. The plantlets regenerated on medium II are transferred to medium III for rooting and further development. The essential features of this medium are the low concentration of sucrose and the omission of plant growth regulators.
High concentrations of sugar are used to adjust the osmotic pressure of the protoplast culture medium. The type of sugar used is important also for other than osmotic reasons. For the culture of protoplasts isolated from barley microspores maltose was superior to glucose at same osmolality. In media containing glucose the protoplasts divided poorly, the plating efficiencies were only a few percent of the ones obtained with maltose and no plants were regenerated.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 The vector pHTT303 used in transformation of barley containing the marker gene nptll coding for neomycin phosphotransferase II under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S transcript promoter.
Fig. 2 The vector pKAH36 used in transformation of barley containing the gene egll of Trichoderma reesei coding for endo-β-glucanase under the control of barley α-amylase promoter. Fig. 3 The vector pKAH21 used in Example 5 containing the gene egll of Trichoderma reesei coding for endo-β-glucanase under the control of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S transcript promoter
Fig. 4 NPTII activity in leaf extracts of transgenic barley plants regenerated from protoplasts. Lane NC represents a negative control from a non- transformed barley plant and lane PC a positive control from tobacco transgenic for 35S-nptII. Samples 1, 2 and 3 represent leaf extracts of three transgenic barley plants regenerated from protoplasts.
The following examples describe the procedures used in the present invention.
Experimental
Example 1. Isolation and culturing of microspores
Plant material. Barley grains (Hordeum vulgar e L. cv. Kymppi, an elite cultivar of spring barley) were obtained from Kesko Agronomic Station, Hauho. Plants were grown in a growth room (22/13°C day/night, 16 h light 4000 μmol πrY1). The duration of the growth period was 6-8 weeks. The tillers were harvested when the sheath of the flag leaf had emerged 5-10 cm, which correlates with the late uninucleate to early binucleate stage of microspore development. The tillers were wrapped in aluminium foil and placed in beakers in a cold room at 7°C for 3-4 weeks.
Microspore isolation and culture. Microspores were isolated and cultured in 108- medium (Table 1), which is the N6 basal medium (Chu et al 1975) supplemented with 1.1 mM of glutamine, 2.8 mM of m-inositol, 0.175 M of maltose, 7.9 μM of 2,4-D and 1.2 μM of kinetin. For microspore isolation ten spikes were cut into 3-4 pieces and macerated with a teflon rod in the 108-medium. The crude microspore preparation was then filtered through an 80 μm nylon sieve and the microspores were collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 300 x g. The microspores were resuspended in 9 ml of the same medium and the total number of microspores and the number of embryogenic microspores were counted in a Fuchs-Rosenthal haemo- cytometer. The number of microspores isolated per spike varied between 0.7 and 1.6 x 10s with a mean of 1.1 x 105 per spike. The microspores were plated as crude preparations and their viability varied between 33 % and 53 % (mean 42 %). The microspores were cultured in 108-medium at a density of 0.8-1.0 x 105 ml"1 in 5 cm Petri dishes in the dark. The cultures were incubated stationary for the first 1.5 weeks and in a rotary shaker for another 1.5 weeks (65 rpm, stroke radius 2.5 cm).
Table 1. Composition of the medium 108 for microspore isolation and culture
Macroelements mg/1 Iron mg/1
KN03 2830 FeS04.7H20 27,8
CaCl2.2H20 166 Na2EDTA.2H20 37,3
KH2P04 400
(NH4)2SO4 463
MgSO4.7H2O 185
Microelements mg/1 Vitamins mg/1
MnS04.4H20 4.4 Nicotinamide 0.5
H3BO3 1.6 Thiamine-HCl 1.0
ZnSO4.7H2O 1.5 Pyridoxine-HCl 0.5
KI 0.8
Amino acids mg/1 Growth regulators mg/1
Glutamine 160 2,4-D 1.75
Glycine 2 Kinetin 0.25
Carbohydrates mg/1
- pH 5.8
Maltose 63000 - sterilized by filtration thr ough 0.22
/n-Inositol 500 μm membrane
Example 2. Isolation and culturing of protoplasts, and regeneration of plants
Protoplast isolation. Protoplasts were isolated from three to four weeks old cultures of isolated microspores according to the protocol of Lazzeri et al. (1991) for barley suspension cultures. 2-3 g of microspore mass were incubated in 20 ml of enzyme solution containing 1.0% cellulase Onozuka RS, 0.5% Macerozyme RIO and 0.05% pectolyase Y23 in washing solution (LW, Table 2). After 2-3 h incubation the suspension was diluted with equal volume of LW solution and filtrated through 160 μm, 55 μm and 20 μm nylon sieves. The protoplasts were washed twice with LW (100 x g, 5 min). The protoplasts were treated with heat shock by incubating the protoplast suspension in 45°C water bath for 5 min and then cooled on ice. After incubation in the cold room at 7 °C for approximately two hours the protoplasts were collected by centrifugation (100 g, 5 min) and either plated for regeneration or used for transformation experiments.
Protoplast culture. The protoplasts were suspended in Ll-protoplast medium (Table 2) containing 2.3 μM of 2,4-D, 0.5 M of maltose and 1.2% agarose (Sea- Plaque®, FMC Corporation) at a density of 2-3 x 10° ml-1. The suspension was plated on Millicell™-CM culture plate inserts, which were placed in 9 cm Petri dishes containing 8 ml of nurse culture. The nurse cultures were prepared by suspending approximately 0.5 g of the same microspore mass as was used for protoplast isolation in 8 ml of LI protoplast medium without agarose. Cultures were incubated on a rotary shaker (65 rpm, stroke radius 2.5 cm) at 23°C in the dark. After one week of culture the feeder cells were removed and 2 ml of fresh 108 medium (0.175 M maltose, 7.9 μM 2,4-D, 1.2 μM KIN) was added in the plates. After another week of culture the old medium was replaced with fresh 108 medium. After one more week the agarose pieces were transferred on L2 medium (Table 2) solidified with 0.3% gellan gum (Gelrite™, Scott Laboratories). The plating efficiencies were determined as the number of protoplasts producing microcalli in four weeks.
Table 2. Composition of the media used for protoplast isolation and culture.
LW mg/1 LI mg/1 L2 mg/1
Macroelements
NH4N03 750 750 1500
KH2PO4 200 200 200
KN03 1750 1750 1750
CaCl2.2H2O 450 450 450
MgS04.7H20 350 350 350
Iron
FeS04.7H20 _ 27.8 27.8
Na2EDTA.2H20 - 37.3 37.3
Microelements
MnSO4.H2O 15 15 15
H3BO3 5 5 5
ZnSO4.7H2O 13.35 13,35 13.35
KI 0.75 0.75 0.75
NaMoO4.2H2O 0.27 0.27 0.27
CuS04.5H20 0.025 0.025 0.025
CoCl2.6H20 0.025 0.025 0.025
Vitamins
Nicotinic acid 1 1
Thiamine-HCl - 10 10
Pyridoxine-HCl - 1 1
Ascorbic acid - 1 1
Choline chloride - 0.5 -
Ca-pantothenate - 0.5 1
Folic acid - 0.2 - p -Aminobenzoic acid - 0.01 -
Biotin - 0.005 -
Vitamin A - 0.005 -
Vitamin D3 - 0.005 -
Amino acids
Glutamine 750 750 750
Proline 150 150 150
Asparagine 100 100 100 Table 2. cont.
LW mg/1 LI mg/1 L2 mg/1
Growth regulators
2,4-D - 0.5 2.5
Carbohydrates
Maltose — 180 000 30 000 -Inositol - 100 200
Mannitol 110 000 125 -
Sucrose - 125 -
Mannose - 125 -
, Fructose - 125 -
Ribose - 125 -
Xylose - 125 -
Rhamnose - 125 -
Cellobiose - 125 -
Sorbitol - 125 -
Organic supplements
- 10 -
Coconut water (ml/1) pH 5.7
- LW-medium sterilized by autoclaving, LI- and L2-media sterilized by filtration through 0.22 μm membrane
Plant regeneration. The regeneration media II and III (Table 3) were the modified MS-media II and III, respectively, used by Olsen (1987) for barley anther culture. The medium II contained maltose instead of sucrose (Hunter 1987) and the media were solidified with 0.3% gellan gum. Embryogenic structures developing from the dividing protoplasts were transferred to regeneration medium II for further development. The plates were incubated at 23°C with illumination (50 μmol m'V1). Green plantlets were transferred to medium III for further growth and potted in soil when about 10 cm tall. Table 3. Composition of the plant regeneration media II and III.
II mg/1 III mg/1
Macroelements
NH4N03 165 165
KH2P04 170 170
KN03 1900 1900
CaCl2.2H2O 440 440
MgSO4.7H2O 370 370
Iron
FeS04.7H2O 27.8 27.8 Na2EDTA.2H20 37.3 37.3
Microelements
MnS04.4H20 22.3 22.3
H3BO3 6.2 6.2
ZnSO4.7H2O 8.6 8.6
KI 0.83 0.83
NaMoO4.2H2O 0.25 0.25
CuS04.5H2O 0.025 0.025
CoCl2.6H2O 0.025 0.025
Vitamins
Thiamine-HCl 0.4 0.4
Amino acids
Glutamine 750 750
Growth regulators
6-benzyl-aminopurine 0.4
Carbohydrates -Inositol 100 100
Maltose 35000
Sucrose 20000
- pH 5.6 The microspores isolated from 20 spikes produced approximately one gram of mass in three weeks. Protoplast yield varied between 5 x 106 and 15 x 106 per g fresh weight. Therefore one spike corresponds to approximately 0.5 x 106 protoplasts.
Protoplasts failed to divide without the support of nurse cells. When cultured with nurse cells, the protoplasts started to divide after one week of culture and colonies were visible after 2-3 weeks. Protoplast derived calli resembled very much in appearance the embryogenic calli derived from microspore cultures.
The results from the protoplast regeneration experiments are presented in Table 4. Plating efficiencies obtained in our experiments, between 0.002 % and 0.015 %, are relatively low. However, we obtained good plant production repeatedly. The production of green plants varied from one to 20 per 1 x 106 protoplasts with a mean of 8.3. This is approximately one tenth of the regeneration capacity of the microspore cultures. The plants transferred to soil are morphologically similar to the plants regenerated from microspore cultures and they are fertile.
Table 4. Regeneration of barley protoplasts, summary of seven separate experi¬ ments.
Total number of spikes 100
Total number of protoplasts 55.5 x 106
Total number of microcalli (plating efficiency) 5116 (0.01%)
Number of green and albino plants 459 584
Green plants per 1x10° protoplasts 8.3
Green plants per spike 4.6 Example 3. Effect of the age of the microspore culture on the regeneration of protoplasts
Microspores were isolated and cultured as described in Example 1. 3.0 g of callus mass from microspore cultured for 23 days and 4.5 g of callus mass from microspores cultured for 30 days were used for protoplast isolation. Protoplasts were isolated and cultured as in Example 2. The results of the experiment are presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Effect of the age of the microspore culture on regeneration of protoplasts
Age of culture
23 d 30 d
Yield of protoplasts/g fw 8.0 x 106 2.7 x 106
Green plants/lxlO6 protoplasts 2.5 0.8
Isolation of protoplasts from microspores cultured for three weeks appears to be optimal. At three weeks the yield of protoplasts is high and the protoplasts are highly regenerable. At two weeks there is not yet enough cell mass for protoplast isolation and over five weeks old cultures yield only very low numbers of proto¬ plasts.
Example 4. Transformation of barley protoplasts by electroporation
Protoplasts were suspended in electroporation buffer (0.55 M mannitol, 130 mM KC1, 10 mM NaCl, 4 mM CaCl2 and 10 mM HEPES^ pH 7.0 or 35 mM aspartic acid monopotassium salt, 35 mM glutamic acid monopotassium salt, 5 mM calcium gluconate, 5 mM MES and 0.55 M mannitol, pH 7.0) at a density of 3-5 x 106/ml. 300 μl samples were mixed with 30 μg of plasmid DNA (pKAH36 or pHTT303) in multi-well dishes (Sterilin 33F24L) and chilled on ice for 10 min before electropo¬ ration. An electrical field of 400-900 v/cm was applied at 0°C by discharge of a 200 μF capacitor that had been charged with an electrophoresis power supply. The protoplasts were kept on ice for 10 min after which the protoplast suspension was mixed with the protoplast culture medium and cultured as described in Example 2. Control protoplasts were not treated with DNA and electroporation. The protoplasts were regenerated without any selective agents in the medium and the leaves of the green plantlets obtained were screened for the transferred trait as described in Example 6.
Table 6. Regeneration of control and transformed protoplast cultures after treatment by electroporation
Treatment No. of pro¬ No. of No. of Transgenic toplasts microcalli green green plants plants pKAH36 Control 5 x 106 56 113 Sample 1 5 x 106 36 18 Sample 2 5 x 106 238 40 6 Sample 3 5 x l06 143 17 pHTT303 Control 3.25 x 106 18 Sample 3.25 x 106 20 3 3
Example 5. Transformation of barley protoplasts by treatment with polyethylene glycol (PEG).
The protoplasts were suspended in F medium (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KC1, 5 mM HEPES, 5 mM glucose, 125 mM CaCl2, pH 7.0) at a density of 5 x 106 per ml. The suspension was divided in 0.5 ml aliquots in centrifuge tubes and 50 μg of pKAH36 DNA was added. After 5 min 1 ml of 40% w/v PEG 1500 or PEG 4000 in F solution was added slowly to the protoplast suspension. The mixture was incubated for 15 min with gentle shaking at intervals. 2 ml aliquots of F solution were added four times at 5 min intervals. The protoplasts were then pelleted by centrifugation at 100 g for 5 min and cultured as described in Example 2. Control protoplasts were treated with PEG without addition of plasmid DNA. The transformed protoplasts were cultured without any selective agents in the medium and the green plantlets obtained were screened for the transferred trait as described in Example 6. Table 7. Regeneration of protoplast cultures after treatment with PEG, 4.5 x 106 protoplasts treated per each sample
Treatment Number of Number of Green plants microcalli green plants per 1 x 106 protoplasts
PEG 1500 Control 75 32 7.1 Sample 1 63 63 14.0 Sample 2 22 62 13.8
PEG 4000 Control 34 3 0.7 Sample 1 88 6 1.3 Sample 2 89 1 0.2
Example 6. Screening for the transformed plants.
Assay for NPTII activity. Neomycin phosphotransferase II activity in the plants was assayed with the NPTII gel assay (Reiss et al. 1984, modified by Van den Broeck et al. 1985) (Fig. 4).
Screening of plants by PCR technique. The plant material was screened by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) carried out in a Perkin Elmer cetus 9600 thermocycler. The complete PCR mixture contained 100-500 ng of genomic or 0.5 pg of pKAH21 DNA, 12.5 pmol of each oligonucleotide primer, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.5 U Dynazyme and buffer supplied by the enzyme manufacturer (Finnzymes Oy) in a total volume of 100 μl. Thirty cycles were performed under following conditions: 75 s at 95°C, 2 min at 55°C, and 3 min at 72°C. Primers were designed to amplify a 557 bp fragment of the cDNA for EGI. The forward primer was 5 -AGGA- CACCTCGGTGGTCCTT-3' and the reverse primer 5'-AGAGTGAGGGGT- CAAGGCATT-3'. The PCR performance was controlled by including a primer pair amplifying the promoter fragment of one of the α-amylase genes. Total DNA isolated from a transgenic barley cell line (K96/3a) was used as a positive control. The amplified samples were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 2% agarose gel. References
Chu, C.C., Wang, C.C., Sun, C.S, Hsu, C, Yin, K.C., Chu, C.Y. & Bi, F.Y. (1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci. Sin. 18:659-668
Datta, K., Potrykus, I., Datta, S.K. (1992) Efficient fertile plant regeneration from protoplasts of the Indica rice breeding line IR72 (Oryza sativa L.) Plant cell reports 11:229-233
Fujimura, T., Sakurai, M., Agaki, H., Negishi, T. & Hirose, A. (1985) Regeneration of rice plants from protoplasts. Plant Tissue Culture Letters 2:74-75. Funatsuki, H., Lorz, H. & Lazzeri, P.A. (1992) Use of feeder cells to improve barley protoplast culture and regeneration. Plant Sci. 85:179-187
Hunter, C.P. (1987) Plant generation method. European patent application No. 245 898
Jahne, A., Lazzeri, P.A. & Lorz, H. (1991) Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts derived from embryogenic cell suspensions of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Cell Reports 10:1-6 Karp, A. & Lazzeri, P.A. (1992) Regeneration, stability and transformation of barley. In: Shewry, P.R. (Ed) Barley: genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology and biotechnology, (pp 549-571). C.A.B. International, Wallingford
Lazzeri, P.A., Brettschneider, R., Lϋhrs, R. & Lorz, H. (1991) Stable transformation of barley via PEG-induced direct DNA uptake into protoplasts. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:437-444
Lazzeri, P.A. & Lorz, H. (1990) Regenerable suspension and protoplast cultures of barley and stable transformation via DNA uptake into protoplasts. In: Lycett, G.W. & Grierson, D. (Eds.) Genetic engineering of crop plants. Butterworths, London, pp. 231-237.
Lϋhrs, R. & Lorz, H. (1988) Initiation of morphogenic cell suspension and protoplast cultures of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Planta 175:71-81
Mendel, R.R., Mϋller, B., Schulze, J., Kolesnikov, V. & Zelenin, A. (1989) Delivery of foreign genes to intact barley cells by high-velocity microprojectiles. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78:31-34 Olsen, F.L. (1987) Induction of microspore embryogenesis in cultured anthers of Hordeum vulgare. The effects of ammonium nitrate, glutamine and asparagine as nitrogen sources. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 52:393-404 Potrykus, I. 1991 Gene transfer to plants: Assessment of published approaches and results. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:205-225
Reiss, B., Sprengel, R., Will, H. & Schaller, H. (1984) A new sensitive method for qualitative and quantitative assay of neomycin phosphotransferase in crude cell extracts. Gene 30:211-218
Rhodes, C.A., Lowe, K.S. & Ruby, K.L. (1988a) Plant regeneration from protoplasts isolated from embryogenic maize cell cultures. Bio/Technology 6:56-60
Rhodes, C.A., Pierce, D.A., Mettler, I.J., Mascarenhas, D. & Detmer, J.J. (1988b) Genetically transformed maize plants from protoplasts. Science 240:204-207
Ritala, A., Aspegren, K., Kurten, U., Salmenkallio-Marttila, M., Mannonen, L., Hannus, R., Kauppinen, V., Teeri, T.H. & Enari, T.-M. (1994) Fertile transgenic barley by particle bombardment of immature embryos. Plant Mol. Biol. (In press)
Roest, S. & Glissen, L.I.W. (1993) Regeneration from protoplasts - a supplementary literature review. Acta Bot. Neerl 42:1-23
Toriyama, K., Arimoto, Y., Uchimiya, H. & Hinata, K. (1988) Transgenic rice plants after direct gene transfer into protoplasts. Bio/Technology 6:1072-1074.
Van den Broeck, G., Timko, M.P., Kausch, A.P., Cashmore, A.R., Van Montagu, M. & Herrera-Estrella, L. (1985) Targeting of a foreign protein to chloroplasts by fusion to the transit peptide from the small subunit of ribulose 1,5-phosphate carboxylase. nature 313:358-363
Vasil, V., Redway, F. & Vasil, I.K. (1990) Regeneration of plants from embryogenic suspension culture protoplasts of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Bio/Technology 8:429-434
Wei, Z. & Xu, Z. (1990) Regeneration of fertile plants from embryogenic suspension culture protoplasts of Sorghum vulgare. Plant Cell Reports 9:51-53
Yan, Q., Zhang, X., Shi, J. & Li, J. (1990) Green plant regeneration from protoplasts of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Kexue Tongbao 35:1581-1583.
Zhang, W. & Wu, R. (1988) Efficient regeneration of transgenic plants from rice protoplasts and correctrly regulated expression of the foreign gene in the plants. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76:835-840.
Zhang, H.M., Yang, H., Rech, E ., Golds, T.J., Davis, A.S., Mulligan, B.J., Cocking, E.C. & Davey, M.R. (1988) Transgenic rice plants produced by electropo- ration-mediated plasmid uptake into protoplasts. Plant Cell Reports 7:379-84.

Claims

We claim:
1. A method of generating fertile barley plants comprising (a) cold treatment of barley spikes at a temperature under 10 °C for 1 to 4 weeks,
(b) isolating microspores from the cold treated barley spikes,
(c) culturing the isolated microspores as a suspension for up to 4 weeks in a medium containing maltose, the concentration of maltose being from about 0.150 M to about 0.200 M, nitrogen sources and growth regulators, (d) isolating protoplasts from the microspore mass obtained using conventional methods, (e) cultivating said protoplasts in a medium containing maltose, the concentration of maltose being from about 0.500 M to about 0.650 M, a nurse culture and growth regulators, and (f) regenerating the protoplasts in protoplast regeneration medium to generate fertile barley plants.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the growth regulators used are 2,4-D and kinetin.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein as an organic nitrogen source used is glutamin.
4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the nurse culture comprises a suspension of the microspore mass obtained at stage (c).
5. Use of the protoplasts obtained at stage (d) of claim 1 for transformation with foreign gene(s).
6. A method of generating transgenic barley plants comprising
(a) cold treatment of barley spikes at a temperature under 10 °C for 1 to 4 weeks,
(b) isolating microspores from the cold treated spikes,
(c) culturing the isolated microspores for up to 4 weeks in a medium containing maltose, the concentration of maltose being from about 0.150 M to about 0.200
M, nitrogen sources and growth regulators,
(d) isolating protoplasts from the microspore mass obtained using conventional methods,
(e) transforming the isolated protoplasts with foreign gene(s), (f) cultivating the transformed protoplasts in a medium containing maltose, the concentration of maltose being from about 0.500 M to about 0.650 M, a nurse culture and growth regulators, and (g) regenerating the protoplasts in protoplast regeneration medium to generate trans genie barley plants.
7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the nurse culture comprises a suspension of the microspore mass obtained at stage (c).
8. The method according to claim 6, wherein the growth regulators used are 2,4-D and kinetin.
PCT/FI1995/000186 1994-04-05 1995-04-05 Regeneration of green plants from protoplasts isolated from microspore cultures of barley WO1995026628A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU22168/95A AU2216895A (en) 1994-04-05 1995-04-05 Regeneration of green plants from protoplasts isolated from microspore cultures of barley

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI941551A FI941551A (en) 1994-04-05 1994-04-05 Regeneration of green plants from protoplasts isolated from barley microspor cultures
FI941551 1994-04-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1995026628A1 true WO1995026628A1 (en) 1995-10-12

Family

ID=8540444

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI1995/000186 WO1995026628A1 (en) 1994-04-05 1995-04-05 Regeneration of green plants from protoplasts isolated from microspore cultures of barley

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2216895A (en)
FI (1) FI941551A (en)
WO (1) WO1995026628A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008136797A1 (en) * 2007-05-07 2008-11-13 University Of South Carolina Method for micropropagation of monocots based on sustained totipotent cell cultures
US7863046B2 (en) 2007-05-07 2011-01-04 The University Of South Carolina Method for micropropagation of monocots based on sustained totipotent cell cultures
WO2012122019A1 (en) * 2011-03-05 2012-09-13 Millercoors, Llc Barley cultivar moravian 115

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1994001999A1 (en) * 1992-07-23 1994-02-03 Carlsberg Forskningscenter Plant tissue culture method of regeneration and procedures for isolating protoplasts

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1994001999A1 (en) * 1992-07-23 1994-02-03 Carlsberg Forskningscenter Plant tissue culture method of regeneration and procedures for isolating protoplasts

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
THEOR. APPL. GENET, Volume 81, 1991, P.A. LAZZERI et al., "Stable Transformation of Barley Via PEG-Induced Direct DNA Uptake Into Protoplasts", pages 437-444. *
THEOR. APPL. GENET, Volume 82, 1991, A. JAEHNE et al., "Plant Regeneration From Embryogenic Cell Suspensions Derived From Anther Cultures of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)", pages 74-80. *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2008136797A1 (en) * 2007-05-07 2008-11-13 University Of South Carolina Method for micropropagation of monocots based on sustained totipotent cell cultures
US7863046B2 (en) 2007-05-07 2011-01-04 The University Of South Carolina Method for micropropagation of monocots based on sustained totipotent cell cultures
US8030073B2 (en) 2007-05-07 2011-10-04 The University Of South Carolina Method for micropropagation of monocots based on sustained totipotent cell cultures
US8105835B2 (en) 2007-05-07 2012-01-31 The University Of South Carolina Method for micropropagation of monocots based on sustained totipotent cell cultures
WO2012122019A1 (en) * 2011-03-05 2012-09-13 Millercoors, Llc Barley cultivar moravian 115

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2216895A (en) 1995-10-23
FI941551A (en) 1995-10-06
FI941551A0 (en) 1994-04-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6570067B1 (en) Stable transformation of plant cells
Hoekstra et al. Anther and microspore culture of Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Igri
AU656357B2 (en) Stable transformation of maize cells by electroporation
US5508184A (en) Process for transforming plant protoplast
AU774441B2 (en) Method for the regeneration of cotton
EP0442174A1 (en) Stable transformation of plant cells
EP1765057B1 (en) Method for agrobacterium transformation for dihaploid corn plants
US6153811A (en) Method for reduction of transgene copy number
IE81133B1 (en) Regeneration of fertile graminaceous plants of the subfamily pooideae from protoplasts
Salmenkallio-Marttila et al. Transgenic barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by electroporation of protoplasts
Pescitelli et al. Stable transformation via electroporation into maize type II callus and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants
Funatsuki et al. Use of feeder cells to improve barley protoplast culture and regeneration
US6140555A (en) Methods for maize transformation coupled with adventitious regeneration utilizing nodal section explants and mature zygotic embryos
WO1995026628A1 (en) Regeneration of green plants from protoplasts isolated from microspore cultures of barley
Fehér et al. Plant protoplasts for cell fusion and direct DNA uptake: culture and regeneration systems
WO2009067398A1 (en) Transformation of crambe abyssinica
US20040210959A1 (en) A Novel Method for Production of Transformed Dihaploid Corn Plants
US6570068B1 (en) Methods for maize transformation coupled with adventitious regeneration utilizing nodal section explants and mature zygotic embryos
JPH10510149A (en) Enhanced biotin biosynthesis in plant tissues
Golds et al. Protoplast preparation without centrifugation: plant regeneration of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
Hsu et al. Initiation of cell suspension cultures and plant regeneration from protoplast of asparagus
Latif et al. Plant regeneration from protoplasts isolated from cell suspension cultures of the wild tomato, Lycopersicon chilense Dun.
Majewska-Sawka et al. Isolation and culture of suspension-derived protoplasts of Beta vulgaris L.
US20140186924A1 (en) Methods for transforming tarwi and for producing molecular farming products in transgenic tarwi seed
Funatsuki et al. Regeneration of plants from protoplasts of Hordeum vulgare (barley)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU BR CA CN CZ EE FI JP LT LV NO NZ RU US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase