WO1995019545A1 - Method and system for managing aircraft threat data - Google Patents

Method and system for managing aircraft threat data Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1995019545A1
WO1995019545A1 PCT/US1995/000708 US9500708W WO9519545A1 WO 1995019545 A1 WO1995019545 A1 WO 1995019545A1 US 9500708 W US9500708 W US 9500708W WO 9519545 A1 WO9519545 A1 WO 9519545A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
threat
data
region
concern
adjacent
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1995/000708
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
David L. Deis
Robert M. Gjullin
Original Assignee
Honeywell Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honeywell Inc. filed Critical Honeywell Inc.
Priority to JP7519207A priority Critical patent/JPH09507713A/en
Priority to EP95909265A priority patent/EP0740773A1/en
Publication of WO1995019545A1 publication Critical patent/WO1995019545A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G9/00Systems for controlling missiles or projectiles, not provided for elsewhere
    • F41G9/02Systems for controlling missiles or projectiles, not provided for elsewhere for bombing control
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G9/00Systems for controlling missiles or projectiles, not provided for elsewhere
    • F41G9/002Systems for controlling missiles or projectiles, not provided for elsewhere for guiding a craft to a correct firing position
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C21/00Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
    • G01C21/005Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 with correlation of navigation data from several sources, e.g. map or contour matching

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to computer-based systems for navigating aircraft and, more particularly, to a system and method for detecting and responding to unanticipated threats to aircraft.
  • the planned route which is stored in the aircraft's computer system, includes a starting point, a number of intermediate waypoints, and an ending point. The distance between each waypoint is measured in nautical miles and is referred to as a leg.
  • a planned routed consists of a number of connected legs that angle around known threats to provide the shortest and safest route between the aircraft's starting point and its ultimate mission destination
  • the route is planned such that there is no "mtervisibility,” i.e., the aircraft being detectable by the threat.
  • the route planning must also take into account the problem of threats, unknown at the time, which might "pop up" during the mission. When an unknown threat appears, steps must be taken to avoid detection by the new threat without compromising the mission's objectives.
  • mtervisibility data for all known threats is precalculated and stored on disk memory. This data is then embedded into terrain data segments for display as part of a map on a display device within the aircraft. This data is also used for threat avoidance, but must be read into the threat avoidance procedure as the procedure is executed. Overall, this approach is slow and inflexible. It requires new disks to be generated for each mission and threat mtervisibility levels to be predetermined. The mtervisibility data for any unknown threats that pop up must be calculated and stored for the entire mission, limiting the number that can be processed during a given mission.
  • An object of the invention therefore, is to provide the capability to process a large number of threats for functions such as display and threat avoidance. Another object of the invention is to allow updating of the display in real time by calculating and storing threat mtervisibility data beforehand. Still another object of the invention is to improve the threat avoidance function by calculating and storing mtervisibility data for previous threats beforehand so that route changes can be determined as soon as mtervisibility data for any new, unknown threat is calculated. This allows for a faster response to close range unknown threats.
  • the invention comprises a method and system for managing aircraft threat data for threat avoidance to an airborne aircraft. More particularly, the method of the invention includes storing in computer memory a number of data segments representing adjacent regions of an area, the area location changing as the aircraft moves from one location to another. What known and unknown threats within the adjacent regions comprising the area are then determined from the segments. Intervisibility data for the threats determined to be within the area is calculated and stored. The method may further include determining a local region of concern centered within the adjacent regions. If a threat moves from an adjacent region into this region of concern, the threat intervisibility data is then provided for a number of functions. These other functions may include displaying the local region of concern, including the intervisibility data for threats therein.
  • FIG. 1 is a pictorial view of an area for which data is calculated in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is structure chart of a system for managing aircraft threat data in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a threat management process in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a pictorial view of an area 8 through which an aircraft 10 on a mission must fly along its flight plan 12.
  • a number of threats Tl through T3 such as antiaircraft batteries, radar sites, and the like.
  • Each threat has an intervisibility region that covers a region wherein the threat would detect the aircraft 10 if the aircraft were to enter that region.
  • the intervisibility region which is generally circular, is limited by obstacles such as mountains, fixed placement, etc., as in the case of the threat T3.
  • the area 8 is represented in the aircraft's computer memory as a number of data segments (nine in the preferred embodiment) representing adjacent regions 14 of the area 8.
  • Each data segment represents a region of 100 square nautical miles in the preferred embodiment, although other-sized regions could be used if desired.
  • the data within a data segment includes data on the terrain of the region, threats known to be in the region, and previously unknown threats recently detected.
  • At the center of the area 10 is a region 16 of concern.
  • Region 16 is a region whose data is then furnished for other functions such as display on a display device in the aircraft, or use for avoiding threats that fall or otherwise move within region 16.
  • One such threat avoidance process is described in co-pending U.S. patent application entitled THREAT AVOIDANCE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AIRCRAFT, Serial No. 08/182,892, filed January 18, 1994, is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • FIG. 2 is a structure chart of a system 20 for managing aircraft threat data in accordance with the invention.
  • the system 20 includes at its core a threat management process 22, to be described, which communicates with a number of modules.
  • a known threats module 24 provides threat parametric data on known threats to the process 22 in each region 14.
  • An unknown threats module 26 identifies and locates previously unknown threats for the process 22.
  • Process 22 communicates the known and unknown threat data to an intervisibility engine 28.
  • the intervisibility engine calculates the intervisibility data for the new threat and transfers it into cache memory 30 via process 22.
  • a terrain data module 29 communicates other data about regions 16 to the process 22, such as the nature of the terrain. What data is communicated to the process 22 depends on what regions are adjacent to the aircraft on the flight plan.
  • the process 22 packages the appropriate data into data segments representing adjacent regions 14 and communicates the data segments to cache memory 30.
  • the cache memory 30 makes the data available for the threat avoidance process 32, the display process 34 and possibly other functions 36.
  • known data processing steps for taking the data from cache memory 30 and providing it to functions 32, 34 or 36 have been omitted from the figure.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the steps of a preferred embodiment of the process 22 for managing aircraft threat data for threat avoidance.
  • the terrain data is fetched for each adjacent region within the area around the point of interest (40).
  • the fetched data is stored as data segments in computer cache memory 30 (42).
  • the spacial extent of each data segment is then checked to determine if the space represented by the segment contains a threat (44). If the data segment does not contain a threat, then a check is made to see if the area around the point of interest has changed because the aircraft has moved from one location to another (46). If the area is changing, additional data segments are fetched. If not, the process waits for a change.
  • a data segment does contain a threat, the threat is checked to see if it is a known threat (50). Data on known threats is fetched (52). If the threat is unknown, its nature is first determined and then stored for further reference as a now-known threat (54). In either case, the intervisibility for the threat is then calculated and stored in cache memory 30 (56). The threat is then checked to see if it has entered the region of concern 16 (58).
  • the process checks again for a change in location and waits for a change (46). Once it is determined that a threat has entered the region of concern 16, the threat intervisibility data is passed to the other functions (60). These other functions include threat avoidance 32 and displaying 34 the local region of concern including intervisibility data, and possibly other functions 36.
  • the invention offers a number of advantages of prior approaches. It allows the aircraft's intervisibility display to be updated in real time since the intervisibility data has previously been calculated (when the threat first entered an adjacent region) before the data is displayed in the region of concern.
  • the invention also improves the threat avoidance function. If an unknown threat pops up in the region of concern, that threat's intervisibility data has previously been calculated and can be used to replan the mission immediately.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
  • Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)

Abstract

A method for calculating intervisibility data in advance of its use for permitting a real time update of threat information. Threat intervisibility data corresponding to an area comprised of adjacent regions is calculated and stored. A region of concern is centered in the adjacent regions. As the location of an aircraft changes, threats move from an adjacent region to the region of concern. However, since the intervisibility data was calculated when the threat first appeared in the adjacent region, it is now available for other functions without further processing. Such other functions include providing it to a threat avoidance algorithms or for display within the aircraft.

Description

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING AIRCRAFT THREAT DATA
GOVERNMENT RIGHTS
The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. F33600-88-G-5107, awarded by the Department of the Air Force. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to computer-based systems for navigating aircraft and, more particularly, to a system and method for detecting and responding to unanticipated threats to aircraft.
In planning the route of an aircraft's mission, known threats such as hostile ground fire, military bases, etc., are taken into account. The planned route, which is stored in the aircraft's computer system, includes a starting point, a number of intermediate waypoints, and an ending point. The distance between each waypoint is measured in nautical miles and is referred to as a leg. Thus a planned routed consists of a number of connected legs that angle around known threats to provide the shortest and safest route between the aircraft's starting point and its ultimate mission destination
(endpoint). The route is planned such that there is no "mtervisibility," i.e., the aircraft being detectable by the threat.
However, the route planning must also take into account the problem of threats, unknown at the time, which might "pop up" during the mission. When an unknown threat appears, steps must be taken to avoid detection by the new threat without compromising the mission's objectives.
In a prior approach, mtervisibility data for all known threats is precalculated and stored on disk memory. This data is then embedded into terrain data segments for display as part of a map on a display device within the aircraft. This data is also used for threat avoidance, but must be read into the threat avoidance procedure as the procedure is executed. Overall, this approach is slow and inflexible. It requires new disks to be generated for each mission and threat mtervisibility levels to be predetermined. The mtervisibility data for any unknown threats that pop up must be calculated and stored for the entire mission, limiting the number that can be processed during a given mission.
An object of the invention, therefore, is to provide the capability to process a large number of threats for functions such as display and threat avoidance. Another object of the invention is to allow updating of the display in real time by calculating and storing threat mtervisibility data beforehand. Still another object of the invention is to improve the threat avoidance function by calculating and storing mtervisibility data for previous threats beforehand so that route changes can be determined as soon as mtervisibility data for any new, unknown threat is calculated. This allows for a faster response to close range unknown threats.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The invention comprises a method and system for managing aircraft threat data for threat avoidance to an airborne aircraft. More particularly, the method of the invention includes storing in computer memory a number of data segments representing adjacent regions of an area, the area location changing as the aircraft moves from one location to another. What known and unknown threats within the adjacent regions comprising the area are then determined from the segments. Intervisibility data for the threats determined to be within the area is calculated and stored. The method may further include determining a local region of concern centered within the adjacent regions. If a threat moves from an adjacent region into this region of concern, the threat intervisibility data is then provided for a number of functions. These other functions may include displaying the local region of concern, including the intervisibility data for threats therein. Along with the method is a system for managing aircraft threat data. The system includes means for storing the data segment in computer memory, means for determining from the segments what known and unknown threats are within the regions, and means for calculating and storing threat intervisibility data for the threats within the regions. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings. BRTEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a pictorial view of an area for which data is calculated in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 2 is structure chart of a system for managing aircraft threat data in accordance with the invention. FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a threat management process in accordance with the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1 is a pictorial view of an area 8 through which an aircraft 10 on a mission must fly along its flight plan 12. Within the view are shown a number of threats Tl through T3, such as antiaircraft batteries, radar sites, and the like. Each threat has an intervisibility region that covers a region wherein the threat would detect the aircraft 10 if the aircraft were to enter that region. In some cases, the intervisibility region, which is generally circular, is limited by obstacles such as mountains, fixed placement, etc., as in the case of the threat T3.
In the present invention, the area 8 is represented in the aircraft's computer memory as a number of data segments (nine in the preferred embodiment) representing adjacent regions 14 of the area 8. Each data segment represents a region of 100 square nautical miles in the preferred embodiment, although other-sized regions could be used if desired. The data within a data segment includes data on the terrain of the region, threats known to be in the region, and previously unknown threats recently detected. At the center of the area 10 is a region 16 of concern. Region 16 is a region whose data is then furnished for other functions such as display on a display device in the aircraft, or use for avoiding threats that fall or otherwise move within region 16. One such threat avoidance process is described in co-pending U.S. patent application entitled THREAT AVOIDANCE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AIRCRAFT, Serial No. 08/182,892, filed January 18, 1994, is hereby incorporated by reference.
. FIG. 2 is a structure chart of a system 20 for managing aircraft threat data in accordance with the invention. The system 20 includes at its core a threat management process 22, to be described, which communicates with a number of modules. A known threats module 24 provides threat parametric data on known threats to the process 22 in each region 14. An unknown threats module 26 identifies and locates previously unknown threats for the process 22. Process 22 communicates the known and unknown threat data to an intervisibility engine 28. The intervisibility engine, in turn, calculates the intervisibility data for the new threat and transfers it into cache memory 30 via process 22. A terrain data module 29 communicates other data about regions 16 to the process 22, such as the nature of the terrain. What data is communicated to the process 22 depends on what regions are adjacent to the aircraft on the flight plan. These regions are determined by navigational instruments on board the aircraft. Other modules, of course, may be included. The modular data may also be rearranged in equivalent ways using other modules. The process 22 packages the appropriate data into data segments representing adjacent regions 14 and communicates the data segments to cache memory 30. The cache memory 30, in turn, makes the data available for the threat avoidance process 32, the display process 34 and possibly other functions 36. For clarity, known data processing steps for taking the data from cache memory 30 and providing it to functions 32, 34 or 36 have been omitted from the figure.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the steps of a preferred embodiment of the process 22 for managing aircraft threat data for threat avoidance. Initially the terrain data is fetched for each adjacent region within the area around the point of interest (40). The fetched data is stored as data segments in computer cache memory 30 (42). The spacial extent of each data segment is then checked to determine if the space represented by the segment contains a threat (44). If the data segment does not contain a threat, then a check is made to see if the area around the point of interest has changed because the aircraft has moved from one location to another (46). If the area is changing, additional data segments are fetched. If not, the process waits for a change. If a data segment does contain a threat, the threat is checked to see if it is a known threat (50). Data on known threats is fetched (52). If the threat is unknown, its nature is first determined and then stored for further reference as a now-known threat (54). In either case, the intervisibility for the threat is then calculated and stored in cache memory 30 (56). The threat is then checked to see if it has entered the region of concern 16 (58).
If not, the process checks again for a change in location and waits for a change (46). Once it is determined that a threat has entered the region of concern 16, the threat intervisibility data is passed to the other functions (60). These other functions include threat avoidance 32 and displaying 34 the local region of concern including intervisibility data, and possibly other functions 36.
The invention offers a number of advantages of prior approaches. It allows the aircraft's intervisibility display to be updated in real time since the intervisibility data has previously been calculated (when the threat first entered an adjacent region) before the data is displayed in the region of concern.
The invention also improves the threat avoidance function. If an unknown threat pops up in the region of concern, that threat's intervisibility data has previously been calculated and can be used to replan the mission immediately.
This invention has been described herein in considerable detail in order to comply with the Patent Statutes and to provide those skilled in the art with the information needed to apply the novel principles and to construct and use such specialized components as are required. However, it is to be understood that the invention is not restricted to the particular embodiment that has been described and illustrated, but can be carried out by specifically different equipment and devices, and that various modifications, both as to the equipment details and operating procedures, can be accomplished without departing from the scope of the invention itself. Having illustrated and described the principles of the invention in a preferred embodiment, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. For example, features of the invention may be implemented in hardware or software.
Therefore, the illustrated embodiment should be considered only as a preferred example of the invention and not as a limitation on the scope of the claims. We therefore claim as our invention all modifications and equivalents to the illustrated embodiment coming within the scope and spirit of following claims.

Claims

1. A computerized method of managing aircraft threat data for threat avoidance to an airborne aircraft, comprising: storing in computer memory a number of data segments representing adjacent regions of an area, the area location changing as the aircraft moves from one location to another; determining from the segments what known and unknown threats are within the adjacent regions comprising the area; and calculating and storing threat intervisibility data for the threats within the adj acent regions.
2. The method of claim 1 including: determining a local region of concern centered within the adjacent regions; and providing the threat intervisibility data previously calculated for an adjacent region for other functions whenever a threat moves from the adjacent region into the region of concern.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the other function comprises: displaying the local region of concern on a display in the aircraft, including intervisibility data; and updating the display of the intervisibility data as a threat moves into the region of concern.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein the other function comprises invoking a threat avoidance process when a threat moves from the adjacent region into the region of concern.
5. The method of claim 1 including: reading new data segments into memory representing new regions as the area location changes, each data segment representing a spacial extent; determining from the spacial extent of new segments what new known and unknown threats have entered the adjacent regions; and calculating and storing threat intervisibility data for the new threats within the adjacent regions.
6. A computerized system for managing aircraft threat data for threat avoidance to an airborne aircraft, comprising: means for storing in computer memory a number of data segments representing adjacent regions of an area, the area location changing as the aircraft moves from one location to another; means for determining from the segments what known and unknown threats are within the adjacent regions; and means for calculating and storing threat intervisibility data for the threats within the adjacent regions.
7. The system of claim 6 including: means for determining a local region of concern centered within the adjacent regions; and means for providing the stored threat intervisibility data previously calculated for an adjacent region for other functions whenever the threat moves from the adjacent region into the region of concern.
8. The system of claim 7 including: means for displaying the local region of concern on a display in the aircraft, including intervisibility data; and means for updating the display of the intervisibility data as a threat moves from the adjacent region into the region of concern.
9. The system of claim 7 including means for invoking a threat avoidance process when a threat moves from the adjacent region into the region of concern.
10. The system of claim 6 including: means for storing into memory new data segments representing adjacent regions as the area location changes; means for determining from the new segments what new known and unknown threats have entered the adjacent regions; and means for calculating and storing threat intervisibility data for the new threats within the adjacent regions.
11. A computerized method of managing aircraft threat data for threat avoidance to an airborne aircraft, comprising: storing data segments representing adjacent regions of an area, the area location changing as the aircraft moves from one location to another; determining a local region of concern centered within the adjacent regions; determining from the segments what known and unknown threats are within the adjacent regions; calculating and storing threat intervisibility data for the threats within the regions; and providing the stored threat intervisibility data previously calculated for an adjacent region for other functions whenever a threat moves from an adjacent region into the region of concern.
PCT/US1995/000708 1994-01-18 1995-01-17 Method and system for managing aircraft threat data WO1995019545A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7519207A JPH09507713A (en) 1994-01-18 1995-01-17 Method and system for managing aircraft threat data
EP95909265A EP0740773A1 (en) 1994-01-18 1995-01-17 Method and system for managing aircraft threat data

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18289394A 1994-01-18 1994-01-18
US08/182,893 1994-01-18

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1995019545A1 true WO1995019545A1 (en) 1995-07-20

Family

ID=22670513

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1995/000708 WO1995019545A1 (en) 1994-01-18 1995-01-17 Method and system for managing aircraft threat data

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0740773A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH09507713A (en)
CA (1) CA2181458A1 (en)
IL (1) IL112239A0 (en)
WO (1) WO1995019545A1 (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2749650A1 (en) * 1996-06-07 1997-12-12 Sextant Avionique STEERING METHOD OF A VEHICLE WITH A VIEW TO MAKING A CHANGE IN COURSE AND APPLICATION OF THE METHOD FOR SIDE BYPASSING OF A ZONE
FR2749686A1 (en) * 1996-06-07 1997-12-12 Sextant Avionique METHOD FOR THE VEHICLE LATERAL AVOIDANCE OF A MOBILE AREA
NL1003873C2 (en) * 1996-08-26 1998-03-03 Hollandse Signaalapparaten Bv Method for operating a fire control system.
WO1999023443A1 (en) * 1997-11-03 1999-05-14 Raytheon Company Knowledge based automatic threat evaluation and weapon assignment
WO2001033506A1 (en) * 1999-11-02 2001-05-10 Roberto Roldan Prado Method to present the threat situation on a display
WO2001039127A1 (en) * 1999-11-25 2001-05-31 Roberto Roldan Prado Method to present the threat situation on a display
WO2003094082A2 (en) * 2002-02-21 2003-11-13 Lockheed Martin Corporation Architecture for real-time maintenance of distributed mission plans
US7194353B1 (en) 2004-12-03 2007-03-20 Gestalt, Llc Method and system for route planning of aircraft using rule-based expert system and threat assessment
US7242407B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2007-07-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Reprojecting map images using graphical techniques
US7280897B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2007-10-09 Lockheed Martin Corporation Intervisibility determination
US7486840B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2009-02-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Map image object connectivity
US7492965B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2009-02-17 Lockheed Martin Corporation Multiple map image projecting and fusing
US7769502B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2010-08-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Survivability/attack planning system
EP2815202A4 (en) * 2012-02-16 2015-10-28 Saab Ab A method for determining threat status for combat aircrafts
WO2017204721A1 (en) * 2016-05-23 2017-11-30 Saab Ab Method for controlling a display mode in a combat aircraft
CN110260871A (en) * 2019-04-17 2019-09-20 太原理工大学 A kind of manoeuvre of forces environmental modeling method that facing area threatens

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111968413B (en) * 2020-08-26 2021-09-24 成都民航空管科技发展有限公司 Flight plan synchronization method for regional control center and terminal area ATC system
JP2021047205A (en) * 2020-12-10 2021-03-25 Kddi株式会社 Determination device, determination method, and program

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE INSPEC INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS, STEVENAGE, GB; DISSANAYAKE T B ET AL: "Real-time management of strategic penetrator missions" *
DATABASE INSPEC INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS, STEVENAGE, GB; KUPFERER R A ET AL: "Tactical flight management-survivable penetration" *
DATABASE INSPEC INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS, STEVENAGE, GB; LIBBY V ET AL: "Real-time inter visibility calculations for ground-based radar systems" *
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE 1984 NATIONAL AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE. NAECON 1984 (IEEE CAT. NO. 84CH2029-7), DAYTON, OH, USA, 21-25 MAY 1984, 1984, NEW YORK, NY, USA, IEEE, USA, pages 1308 - 1312 vol *
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE 1984 NATIONAL AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE. NAECON 1984 (IEEE CAT. NO. 84CH2029-7), DAYTON, OH, USA, 21-25 MAY 1984, 1984, NEW YORK, NY, USA, IEEE, USA, pages 503 - 509 vol. *
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SPIE - THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, USA, vol. 1955, ISSN 0277-786X, pages 318 - 323 *

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2749650A1 (en) * 1996-06-07 1997-12-12 Sextant Avionique STEERING METHOD OF A VEHICLE WITH A VIEW TO MAKING A CHANGE IN COURSE AND APPLICATION OF THE METHOD FOR SIDE BYPASSING OF A ZONE
FR2749686A1 (en) * 1996-06-07 1997-12-12 Sextant Avionique METHOD FOR THE VEHICLE LATERAL AVOIDANCE OF A MOBILE AREA
WO1997047946A1 (en) * 1996-06-07 1997-12-18 Sextant Avionique Method for controlling a vehicle in order to change course and application of method for the lateral avoidance of a zone
WO1997047945A1 (en) * 1996-06-07 1997-12-18 Sextant Avionique Method for the lateral avoidance of a mobile zone by a vehicle
NL1003873C2 (en) * 1996-08-26 1998-03-03 Hollandse Signaalapparaten Bv Method for operating a fire control system.
WO1998009131A1 (en) * 1996-08-26 1998-03-05 Hollandse Signaalapparaten B.V. Method for operating a fire-control system
AU724187B2 (en) * 1996-08-26 2000-09-14 Thales Nederland B.V. Method for operating a fire-control system
WO1999023443A1 (en) * 1997-11-03 1999-05-14 Raytheon Company Knowledge based automatic threat evaluation and weapon assignment
US5992288A (en) * 1997-11-03 1999-11-30 Raytheon Company Knowledge based automatic threat evaluation and weapon assignment
WO2001033506A1 (en) * 1999-11-02 2001-05-10 Roberto Roldan Prado Method to present the threat situation on a display
WO2001039127A1 (en) * 1999-11-25 2001-05-31 Roberto Roldan Prado Method to present the threat situation on a display
AU780498B2 (en) * 1999-11-25 2005-03-24 Roberto Roldan Prado Method to present the threat situation on a display
WO2003094082A3 (en) * 2002-02-21 2003-12-11 Lockheed Corp Architecture for real-time maintenance of distributed mission plans
WO2003094082A2 (en) * 2002-02-21 2003-11-13 Lockheed Martin Corporation Architecture for real-time maintenance of distributed mission plans
US7242407B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2007-07-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Reprojecting map images using graphical techniques
US7280897B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2007-10-09 Lockheed Martin Corporation Intervisibility determination
US7486840B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2009-02-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Map image object connectivity
US7492965B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2009-02-17 Lockheed Martin Corporation Multiple map image projecting and fusing
US8010244B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2011-08-30 Lockheed Martin Corporation Intervisibility determination
US7194353B1 (en) 2004-12-03 2007-03-20 Gestalt, Llc Method and system for route planning of aircraft using rule-based expert system and threat assessment
US7769502B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2010-08-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Survivability/attack planning system
EP2815202A4 (en) * 2012-02-16 2015-10-28 Saab Ab A method for determining threat status for combat aircrafts
WO2017204721A1 (en) * 2016-05-23 2017-11-30 Saab Ab Method for controlling a display mode in a combat aircraft
CN110260871A (en) * 2019-04-17 2019-09-20 太原理工大学 A kind of manoeuvre of forces environmental modeling method that facing area threatens

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2181458A1 (en) 1995-07-20
IL112239A0 (en) 1995-03-30
EP0740773A1 (en) 1996-11-06
JPH09507713A (en) 1997-08-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0740773A1 (en) Method and system for managing aircraft threat data
EP2498055B1 (en) Management System for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
CN109435955B (en) Performance evaluation method, device and equipment for automatic driving system and storage medium
Kayton et al. Avionics navigation systems
US5086396A (en) Apparatus and method for an aircraft navigation system having improved mission management and survivability capabilities
US7072746B1 (en) Methods, devices, and systems for automatic flight logs
US6240341B1 (en) Flight management system (FMS) with integrated bit mapped data charts
JP2812639B2 (en) Route search system and route search method
WO2010117396A2 (en) Airspace deconfliction system
US20080147320A1 (en) Aircraft airspace display
JPH039211A (en) Navigation system for aircraft and method of assisting navigation of aircraft during sortie
Zhu et al. A novel intelligent strategy for improving measurement precision of FOG
US8121783B2 (en) Method for selective filtering of an aircraft flight plan according to the operational needs
US20210025716A1 (en) Navigation based on multi-agent interest diffusion
Leavitt Real-time in-flight planning
EP2037380A1 (en) Method and system for sharing information between disparate data sources in a network
US20020140810A1 (en) System and method for locating a waypoint
JP3719845B2 (en) POSITION DISPLAY DEVICE, POSITION DISPLAY METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
Waanders et al. Sensor supported pilot assistance for helicopter flight in DVE
JP2000155900A (en) Ground collision prediction method and device for air traffic control, and computer-readable recording medium
EP0655714A1 (en) Transformation of digital terrain elevation data to reveal areas of low observability
JPH04298000A (en) Device and method for making flight plan
USH1878H (en) Electronic chart assisted navigation system
Frankovich et al. Expert System Applications to the Cockpit of the'90s
JP7432783B1 (en) Information processing device, information processing method, and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2181458

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1995909265

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1995909265

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1995909265

Country of ref document: EP