WO1994014390A1 - Device for orbital implant - Google Patents

Device for orbital implant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1994014390A1
WO1994014390A1 PCT/US1992/011203 US9211203W WO9414390A1 WO 1994014390 A1 WO1994014390 A1 WO 1994014390A1 US 9211203 W US9211203 W US 9211203W WO 9414390 A1 WO9414390 A1 WO 9414390A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
implant
orbital implant
coating
integrated orbital
agent
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1992/011203
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Arthur C. Perry
Original Assignee
Orbital Implant Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Orbital Implant Technology filed Critical Orbital Implant Technology
Priority to AU34212/93A priority Critical patent/AU3421293A/en
Priority to DE69231578T priority patent/DE69231578T2/en
Priority to PCT/US1992/011203 priority patent/WO1994014390A1/en
Priority to CA002152617A priority patent/CA2152617C/en
Priority to AT93902750T priority patent/ATE197666T1/en
Priority to EP93902750A priority patent/EP0746270B1/en
Priority claimed from CA002152617A external-priority patent/CA2152617C/en
Publication of WO1994014390A1 publication Critical patent/WO1994014390A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/14Eye parts, e.g. lenses, corneal implants; Implanting instruments specially adapted therefor; Artificial eyes
    • A61F2/141Artificial eyes

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Transplantation (AREA)
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry (AREA)
  • Cardiology (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Vascular Medicine (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)

Abstract

An orbital implant with a synthetic coating is provided. The coating ensures that the outer surface of the orbital implant is smooth to prevent tissue trauma. The term coating not only denotes a liquid-type material which covers the orbital implant, but also includes a sheet-like bio-polymer that maybe wrapped around the outer surface of the orbital implant. Additionally, different elements maybe integrated with the coating for improved vascularization and biocompatibility.

Description

DESCRIPTION
Device for Orbital Implant
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to implants for the orbital socket of the eye. It also relates to materials and methods for use in conjunction with orbital or ocular implants.
Background
Enucleation or evisceration of the eye is performed because of disease or trauma that make the removal of the eye, or the intraocular contents of the eye, necessary. Following such a procedure, the patient normally desires use of an artificial eye to restore a more normal appear¬ ance. To satisfactorily fit an artificial eye into the orbital socket, an orbital (herein also called an "ocu¬ lar") implant must be placed within the orbit to replace the volume that was lost when the eye or its contents was removed. However, the use of an orbital implant and the subsequent fitting of the artificial eye confer more than a cosmetic benefit. They help maintain the normal struc¬ ture of the eyelids and eyebrows; they aid in normal tear drainage; and, when used in children, they help stimulate normal growth of the orbital bones.
Even though an artificial eye can be made today which has a very realistic appearance it fails to track in con¬ junction with the normal eye because there is no coupling between the artificial eye and the orbital implant. The artificial eye drifts within the socket and does not track with the normal eye. This lack of tracking is quite apparent and disconcerting to even a casual observer, creating a sense of self-consciousness on the part of the patient. Because of this shortcoming of traditional implants, efforts have been made to attach the eye muscles to the implant and then to attach the artificial eye to
SUBSTITUTESHEET the implant. This provided adequate tracking of the arti¬ ficial eye. However the success was short-lived because, in a brief period of time, the implant is extruded from the orbit. This extrusion of the implant occurred because the fixing of the artificial eye to the implant material exposes the implant to the outside environment. This permitted bacteria to enter, and the implant became chron¬ ically infected. This exposure was considered necessary, however, to produce the attachment between the implant and the artificial eye.
A porous integrated orbital implant overcomes these problems. One type of integrated orbital implant is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,976,731, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. In that pub- lication, the use and preparation of an orbital implant comprising hydroxyapatite is described. The use of porous hydroxyapatite allows integration of the implant with fibrovascular tissue. These porous hydroxyapatite implants, or "PHA" implants, are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,976,731, as providing advantages over other implant materials particularly because such integration of the patient's own tissue allows coupling of the implant to the artificial eye, as well as increased long-term stability of both the artificial eye and the implant. A wide variety of other materials have been used for orbital implants, such as ivory spheres, gold globes, silk, catgut, acrylic plastics or silicones, human bone (C.C. Sood et al. , International Surσerv. Vol. 54, No. l, p. 1 (1970)), and antigen-free cancellous calf bone, so called "Kiel Bone," (A.C.B. Molteno, et al. , Brit. J. Qphthal.. Vol. 57, p. 615 (1973) and A.C.B. Molteno, Trans: of the Oohthal. Soc. New Zealand. Vol. 32, p. 36 (1980) . These other materials, however, do not provide for significant integration of tissue and vascularization of the implant itself. As described above, and in U.S. Patent No. 4,976,731, these materials are thus disadvan¬ tageous in that, when the surrounding tissue heals, the
SUBSTITUTE SHEET patient risks chronic infection as a result of subsequent procedures necessary to connect the implant to the artifi¬ cial eye to provide tracking of the artificial eye. Also, the weight of the artificial eye is not supported by the implant. This lack of support puts pressure on the lower lid causing lower lid sagging.
In the past, however, unevenly textured surfaces of orbital implants have required coating so that the surface is smooth and slippery for facile insertion of the orbital implant into the eye socket. Uneven or roughly textured surfaces, such as the surface of a hydroxyapatite orbital implant, may cause trauma to or otherwise tear tissue surrounding the eye socket where the implant is to be inserted. An uneven or rough textured surface does not allow the implant to be placed deeply into the orbital socket. This problem has been addressed by using homolo¬ gous or autologous materials, such as human or animal sclera, fascia, or dura for a coating. See. U.S. Patent No. 4,976,731 which describes, for example, the use of the patient's own scleral sac in the case of an eviscerated eye (in which all the inner contents of the eye have been removed) . If the eyeball has been enucleated (removal of the entire eyeball after severing it from the eye muscles and the optic nerve) , other material must be used for coating the orbital implant. Materials such as scleral sacs obtained from cadavers or from eye banks, collagen tissue obtained from tissue banks or from animals, or autologous tissue, from another area of the patient's own body have been used. These materials may be difficult to obtain or use. For example, scleral sacs obtained from eye banks may be unavailable in locations not in proximity to an eye bank. Moreover, these materials may facilitate the transmission of human or animal disease. Human tissues, in particular, may be capable of transmission of such disease as hepati¬ tis or Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) . Moreover, some of these materials are perishable, and thus must be transported rapidly and used rapidly. If autolo¬ gous tissue is used, there is, of course, a certain amount of trauma to the patient himself because another invasive operation is required. Furthermore, typically with the use of human or animal tissue for coating orbital im¬ plants, the surgeon must perform such wrapping immediately prior to the implantation, thus, the time of surgery is lengthened and the time the patient must be under anes¬ thesia is prolonged. Also, large-scale production of pre- coated orbital implants is impracticable and unavailable.
As a result of the shortcomings of prior coating materials for orbital implants, there exists an unfilled and long felt need for an orbital implant coating material which is not capable of disease transmission, which causes no detriment or undue trauma to the recipient of the orbi¬ tal implant, which can be stored and used later without significant problems of perishability, which can be prac¬ ticably produced in conjunction with the orbital implant itself, which does not lengthen the operation or unduly prolong the time the patient is anesthetized, and which provides a smooth, even surface for the orbital implant.
Relatedly, there also exists a need for means to improve the vascularization of integrated orbital im¬ plants. As set forth above, integrated orbital implants, for example, those comprised of hydroxyapatite, allow vascularization of the implant itself. In a certain percentage of the patients (about three to five percent) , however, vascularization is impeded or inhibited for no known reason. In addition, an increased rate or degree of vascular integration into the orbital implant may benefit patients by allowing a faster fitting of the improved prosthetic.
The advantages to improved vascularization, either in terms of rate of penetration, or the density of blood vessels formed per unit volume, are clear means to attach the orbital implant to the artificial eye (and thereby provide means for smooth movement of the artificial eye) may occur sooner; and, the strength of the coupling of the orbital implant to the surrounding muscle and scar tissue may be enhanced. With increased vascularization, implant migration and extrusion is decreased. Integration of the tissue is extremely important to properly hold the implant in place.
Therefore, there also exists a need for improved means for vascularization of integrated orbital implants.
This improved means for vascularization may be associated with the orbital implant coating, or associated with the orbital implant itself or, as an ongoing therapy.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention provides for novel improvement of orbital implants by providing synthetic coating materi- als. Also, means for coating integrated orbital implants so that the surface is smooth is herein provided. Relat- edly, means for improved vascularization of integrated orbital implants are provided. Compositions and methods are described herein. As used herein, the orbital implants is synonymous with ocular implants. The term "integrated" is used herein to denote those implants into which the orbital tissue of the recipient penetrates. Also as used herein, the term "coat" or "coating" denotes material which is used to cover the implant. One type of "coating" is a non-liquid form of material, such as a sheet-like bio- polymer (described in further detail herein) , which is here also described as something which is "wrapped" or a "wrapping." Synthetic coating materials are provided which virtually eliminate the risk of disease transmission previously resulting from use of human or animal tissues. Also, synthetic coating material provides for a decrease in preparation time in that the orbital implant may be produced without the need for a surgeon to coat the orbi¬ tal implant immediately prior to insertion into a patient. This would also reduce operative time and time under anesthesia. In addition, the use of synthetic materials eliminates morbidity caused by use of the patient's own tissue, as well as the problems caused by the perishable nature of naturally occurring products. There is thus provided a means for a uniform surface which enables the orbital implant, whether integrated or non-integrated, to freely slide into the orbital socket with minimal damage to the surrounding tissue. As an additional benefit, the use of synthetic materials may improve the rate or robust¬ ness of vascularization of integrated orbital implants. One example provided herein is coating a hydroxyapatite integrated orbital implant with plaster of Paris. Other examples include biopolymers. Again, these materials may be suitable for dipping the implant, or may be in solid (or semi-solid) form and may be suitable for wrapping the implant. This also satisfies the need for an implant which may be deeply inserted into the orbital socket, yet permits fibrovascular integration. Relatedly, provided are means and compositions for improved vascularization of the orbital implant. This improved vascularization involves the addition of vascu¬ larizing agents to the orbital implant, or to the coating materials. These agents promote the vascularization of the orbital implant via enhancing the vascularization process from the surrounding tissue. Other advantages to using vascularizing agents may include improved wound healing or other secondary therapeutic benefits to the patient. There is thus provided the inclusion of vascular- izing agents either in association with the orbital implant, in association with the coating material, or via the addition of exogenous vascularizing agents at the time of the insertion of the orbital implant, or as an ongoing therapy until the orbital implant is sufficiently integrated.
It is thus one object of the present invention to provide synthetic coating materials for orbital implants
SUBSTITUTESHEET which the recipient finds immune-compatible and which may be absorbed by the recipient's tissue, yet present extremely low levels, or essentially no risk, of trans¬ mission of human disease, which cause no trauma to the patient, which are not unduly perishable, which may optionally be manufactured in conjunction with an orbital implant if desired, and which provide for a smooth surface covering for orbital implants.
It is another object of the present invention to provide said synthetic coating material via in vitro processes including but not limited to recombinant nucleic acid means or cell culture means.
It is another object of the present invention to provide orbital implants with said synthetic coating material.
It is another object of the present invention to provide prosthesis comprising an orbital implant with said synthetic coating material having affixed thereto an artificial eye. It is another object of the present invention to provide integrated orbital implants which are coated so that they may be fully inserted in the orbital socket and permit penetration of fibrovascular tissue.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an orbital implant containing an agent which promotes vascularization.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an orbital implant with synthetic coating material containing, either in association with said implant or in association with said synthetic coating material, an agent which promotes vascularization.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a prosthesis comprising an orbital implant with synthetic coating material with an artificial eye affixed thereto, containing, either in association with the orbital implant or in association with the synthetic coating material, an agent which promotes vascularization.
SUBSTITUTESHEET It is another object of the present invention to provide a surgical process including evisceration of an eye and replacing the volume in the scleral sac with an orbital implant which contains an agent which promotes vascularization.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a surgical process including enucleation of an eye and its replacement by an orbital implant with a synthetic coating. It is another object of the present invention to provide a surgical process including enucleation of an eye and its replacement by an orbital implant with a synthetic coating which contains, either associated with said orbital implant or associated with said synthetic coating, an agent which promotes vascularization.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a surgical process including replacing a first orbital implant with a second orbital implant with a synthetic coating. It is another object of the present invention to provide a surgical process including the insertion of an orbital implant with a synthetic coating into a recipient whose orbital socket lacks any implant, (as, for example, a recipient whose eyeball has been completely removed and no implant was placed in the socket) .
It is another object of the present invention to provide a means to promote fibrovascular formation in the orbital socket of an orbital implant recipient, said means including the use of an agent which promotes vasculariza- tion.
Set forth below are the preferred embodiments. These embodiments are illustrative, and are not intended to be limitations to the appended claims.
Orbital Implants The preferred implant is an integrated orbital implant. As set forth above, the term "integrated" herein
SUBSTITUTESHEET denotes those implants into which the recipient's own tis¬ sue will penetrate as the socket surrounding the implant heals. Other implants which are not "integrated" such as certain acrylic or silicone implants, may also be used, and one skilled in the art will recognize the extent to which the coating or vascularization compositions and methods described herein are applicable thereto.
Low density, porous hydroxyapatite of the kind obtained from coral or by synthetic means is the more preferred material for the integrated orbital implant. Implants made of this materials are available from Integrated Orbital Implants, Inc., San Diego, California. The less preferred material is granular high density hydroxyapatite, such as that used as bone grafting material. For low density hydroxyapatite, a sphere is machined to an appropriate size to be used as an implant from a larger block of porous hydroxyapatite. Hydroxyapa¬ tite implants are sterilized, preferably by autoclaving, prior to the use of the implant in the surgical procedure. As noted above, orbital implants may be used in eviscerations, where the contents of the eyeball is removed, and replaced with the orbital implant; the coating or wrapping is provided by the patient's own scleral sac which is sewn closed around the implant. For enucleation, where the entire eyeball is removed after severing it from the eye muscles and the optic nerve and replaced with an implant; the implant may be placed inside coating material which may be also be sutured closed if appropriate, or the implant may be dipped in coating material if that is appropriate. In addition, the present compositions and procedures are useful for replacing original orbital implants with a second orbital implant. This "secondary" replacement is particularly important as some patients may desire to replace their original non- integrated implant with an integrated orbital implant so as to create a more natural movement, and natural posi¬ tion. This replacement with an additional implant may also be required if the previous implant has migrated, has become exposed, or has been extruded. For secondary implant replacement, the implant, if desired, is placed inside coating material which may be closed via suturing (if appropriate) or the implant may be dipped in coating material prior to use. In the above surgical procedures, the implant or, if coated, the coated implant may then be sutured to the patient's extraocular muscles of the orbit. Generally, after implantation of an integrated orbital implant, the socket is allowed to heal for approximately six months. During the healing process, fibrovascular tissue penetrates the porous structure of the sphere as the coating material is gradually absorbed or penetrated. After sufficient in-growth, the implant can be drilled or otherwise modified to permit the artifi¬ cial eye to be coupled to it. U.S. Patent No. 4,976,731, sets forth two embodiments for connecting the orbital implants to the artificial eye. In one embodiment, the artificial eye is permanently fitted with a peg which then fits into a hole drilled into the implant, thus coupling the implant with the artificial eye. In another embodi¬ ment, a protruding peg is placed into a drilled hole of the implant and the artificial eye is recessed to receive the peg and thus be coupled with the implant via the peg. In either embodiment, the artificial eye and peg can be readily removed to permit cleaning. One skilled in the art will recognize other means to attach the artificial eye to the implant which has integrated.
One additional means of coupling the implant to the artificial eye is the use of magnets. For example, one pole of the magnet (for example, the "+" pole) is incor¬ porated within a hydroxyapatite orbital implant. The opposite pole of the magnet (in this example, the "-" pole) is incorporated within the artificial eye. The attraction between poles causes the artificial eye to be coupled to the implant. In this way, the resulting integrated implants are very satisfactory from the patient's point of view. The implant resists extrusion from the orbit. Instead, it becomes an integral part of the orbital structure because of the integration of the fibrovascular tissue into the porous material. Being fixed to the eye muscle, the implant is capable of tracking with the normal eye. When an artificial eye is fixed to the implant to complete the prosthesis, a very satisfactory, natural appearance results.
To date, over 1,000 patients have had this material implanted into the orbit. There have been no chronic infections or extrusions of the implant in patients whose implants have vascularized and have been followed up to 60 months. In those patients who have had the hole drilled into the implant so that it is coupled to the artificial eye, the tracking has been very satisfactory.
Coatinσ Materials
Preferred coating materials for use with integrated orbital implants satisfy two criteria: (1) they will be accepted by the patient, and not cause undue adverse immune response; and (2) ultimately, upon the integration of the orbital implant, the coating material will be absorbed by the patient's body. The term "synthetic" is used herein to denote that the source of material is manufactured in some way, rather than obtained directly from human or other animal sources (such as tissue from the patient himself or eye banks or tissue banks) . For example, plaster of Paris or similar calcium-containing materials are appropriate synthetic coating materials.
Materials produced in vitro, such as, for example, by recombinant nucleic acid technology or by cell culture techniques, are herein considered synthetic, as are other more traditional means for chemical synthesis. For example, a gene encoding a polymer, such as collagen, or a subunit thereof, may be expressed in cell culture.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Also, animal tissue, or substances obtained from animals are considered synthetic in that such materials must be obtained from animal sources and treated for use in humans. Preferably, the coating material will be a biodegradable, polymeric compound. The term "polymeric" or "polymer" is used here to denote any molecule which is comprised of repeated subunits, including proteinaceous molecules. The term "polymeric compound" refers to a compound which contains at least one polymer. The polymer may be cross-linked, and is preferably elastomeric, as opposed to rigid in structure.
Several biodegradable polymers are currently being investigated for medical applications, such as polygly- colic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydiox- anone, polycyanoacrylates, polyorthoesters, poly(gamma- ethyl glutamate) , as well as pseudo poly(amino acids) . For background on the suitability of these polymers for synthetic coating materials, see Kohn, Medical Designs and Material (March 1991):25-30, which is herein fully incorporated by reference.
In the case of integrated orbital implants, the coating material should be absorbed by the body because any artificial material left in the body may inhibit epithelialization and may become a site of chronic infections.
Preferably, the outer coating material should be thick enough to make the implant smooth, typically about l/16th of an inch thick. In addition, the coating material should otherwise allow for the free formation of fibrovascular tissue within the orbital implant. For example, synthetic extracellular matrix proteins, such as the collagens, or other polymers which provide for struc¬ tural integrity are also suitable as coating or wrapping materials.
One should recognize that the above materials are illustrative of the present synthetic coating materials, and are not intended as an exhaustive list. Other syn¬ thetic coating materials will be apparent to one skilled in the art.
The coating material itself should be sterilized, either in conjunction with the orbital implant, or sep¬ arately and then used to cover the separately-sterilized implant under sterile conditions. Antibiotics may be used as an additional precaution to prevent infection. The choice of sterilization means will depend, in part, on the coating material used. For example, autoclaving may be inappropriate for various polymers, including protein- aceous compounds, as the extreme temperature and pressure may cause a change in the characteristics of the material. One skilled in the art will be able to readily ascertain which sterilization processes are appropriate for which coating materials/orbital implant materials.
Preferably, the coating material is suitable for covering the implant as part of a single manufacturing process. This would benefit the surgeon who would save time by not having to prepare the implant immediately prior to placing the implant into the patient. This would also benefit the patient who would be assured of proper implant characteristics, such as lack of immunogenicity, and ready absorption by the body, for example. This would benefit both the surgeon and the patient because it would decrease the time in which the patient would be under anesthesia. This would also benefit the manufacturer who would be able to place the implant in the synthetic coat¬ ing as part of the manufacturing process and would be able to store and ship inventory as a single unit. The manu¬ facturer could also ship the coating and the implant as two separate units which could then be assembled by the surgeon.
For example, the synthetic coating material may be in solution or liquid form. The un-coated implant may be dipped directly into the coating material. Or, the synthetic coating material may be in a sheet-like form, and may be wrapped around the implant.
Most preferably, an integrated orbital implant is used with a synthetic coating material, wherein said synthetic coating material causes no undue immune reaction in the patient, is absorbed by the patient's own tissue, and is capable of being vascularized. Particularly, an integrated orbital implant comprised of sterile, low density, porous hydroxyapatite, with sterile coating material including at least one synthetic polymer is the most preferable embodiment. Also, as described below, Plaster of Paris also serves to smooth over orbital implants without the adverse effects described above.
As will be described in further detail below, the coating material may be comprised of synthetic material which is also useful to deliver therapeutic agents, such as vascularization agents. For example, the synthetic material may be a polymer cross-linked in such a way as to provide for time-released drug delivery. The cross- linkages may essentially "trap" aqueous solutions of therapeutic agents, and substantially mediate the release of such agents from the coating materials. Other means of incorporating therapeutic agents into coating materials will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therapeutic agents, in addition to agents which promote vascularization, may also include, for example, antibiotic agents, wound healing promoters, blood clotting/blood clot dissolving agents, or mixtures thereof.
Smooth-Coated Hydroxyapatite Implants
One reason for having a smooth surface on the hydroxyapatite orbital implant is primarily to allow it to be placed into the socket without the surface of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant grabbing onto the soft tissues. The surface of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant is covered with many small spicules, and it is very much like Velcro™ when placed in contact with soft tissue—it clings to the tissue very firmly. Therefore, without having a smooth surface, the hydroxyapatite orbi¬ tal implant cannot easily be placed deep within the orbit. Coating or wrapping the hydroxyapatite orbital implant in homologous sclera makes the outside surface smooth and allows the implant to go into the orbit in a way similar to a silicone or plastic ball. If it is not wrapped in sclera, the implant can be wrapped with two pieces of thin plastic and then, once the implant is in place, the plastic is withdrawn from the orbit, leaving the hydroxyapatite orbital implant in its proper position in the deep orbit. These materials, however, have drawbacks as described above. An hydroxyapatite orbital implant with a smooth coating on the outside that is absorbable would make it easy to place the implant deep within the orbital tissues without coating or wrapping it in any other material. For example, plaster of Paris, when used as a coating directly over the hydroxyapatite implant, smooths the surface of the implant and allows for deep orbital implantation. In addition, plaster of Paris is absorbed and allows for penetration of fibrovascular tissue, and avoids immuno- incompatability problems. Also, plaster of Paris is autoclavable, and inexpensive. Other coatings which are calcium-based or otherwise similar to plaster of Paris may also provide these advantages. The description of combining the coatings with other materials, such as therapeutics, may also be applicable herein. Other coatings which provide for a smooth surface which are capable of being penetrated with fibrovascular tissue and which provides no significant immunoincompat- ability problems will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Vascularization Agents
Relatedly, as indicated above, agents which promote vascularization may also be used in conjunction with orbi¬ tal implants, particularly integrated orbital implants. Generally, the term "promote" with reference to vascular¬ ization denotes increasing the rate of blood vessel forma¬ tion, or increasing the number of blood vessels per unit volume. Typically, the more vascularization is promoted, the sooner the orbital implant is integrated into the patient's orbital socket. Even if integrated orbital implants are not used, improved vascularization in the area surrounding the implant may promote wound healing.
One advantage of having the hydroxyapatite orbital implant impregnated with an agent that causes more rapid vascularization would mean that the patient could be fit with a motility prosthesis more rapidly if the implant is vascularized more rapidly. The motility peg should not be placed within the implant until there is good vasculariza¬ tion of the implant. This takes approximately six months in most patients and even longer in a small number of patients. Once the hydroxyapatite orbital implant is impregnated with fibrovascular tissue, the chances of it migrating are much decreased and the chance of it becoming infected are much decreased. Other porous implants, in addition to hydroxyapatite orbital implants, are also suitable, and may be vascular¬ ized. Preferably, the pores will be interconnected, i.e.. the pores will not "dead end." This leads to full vascularization. Increase in vascularization may be accomplished by vascularization agents, such as growth factors. These growth factors may be applied via the orbital implant itself, for example, by dipping the orbital implant into a solution containing the vascularization agent prior to insertion of the orbital implant. Alternatively, as described above, the vascularization agent may be incor¬ porated into the coating or wrapping material. For
SUBSTITUTE SHEET example, if a synthetic polymer is used, the polymer may be prepared such that the vascularization promoter is contained within the chains of the polymer molecules. Another alternative is for the implant to be impregnated with a vascularization agent as part of the manufacturing process.
As yet another alternative, exogenous vascularizing agents may be applied as a post-operative therapy to encourage the integration of an integrated orbital implant or promote wound healing. One skilled in the art will envision other means for applying vascularization agents in this context to improve the rate or character of vascularization of the orbital implant.
For example, in the practice of the therapeutic methods of the present invention, an effective amount of the active compound, including derivatives or salts thereof, or a pharmaceutical composition containing the same, is administered via any of the usual and acceptable methods known in the art, either singly or in combination with another compound or compounds of the present inven¬ tion or other pharmaceutical agents such as immunosup- pressants, antihistamines, corticosteroids, and the like. These compounds or compositions can thus be administered orally, sublingually, topically (e.g., on the skin or in the eyes) parenterally (e.g., intramuscularly, intravenously, subcutaneously or intradermally) , or by inhalation, and in the form of either solid, liquid, or gaseous dosage including tablets, suspensions, and aero¬ sols, or other forms. The administration can be conducted in single unit dosage form with continuous therapy or in single dose therapy ad libitum. As described above, the compounds also may be delivered via the implant coating or wrapping material, or via the implant itself.
In one preferred embodiment, the therapeutic methods of the present invention are practiced when the relief of symptoms is specifically required or perhaps imminent; in
SUBSTITUTESHEET another preferred embodiment, the method hereof is effect¬ ively practiced as continuous or prophylactic treatment.
In the practice of the therapeutic methods of the invention, the particular dosage of pharmaceutical compo- sition to be administered to the subject will depend on a variety of considerations including the nature of the affliction, the severity thereof, the schedule of adminis¬ tration, the age and physical characteristics of the subject and so forth. Proper dosages may be established using clinical approaches familiar to those skilled in the medicinal arts.
Examples of agents which promote vascularization include growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, neovascular growth factor, and epithelial growth factor. Also, serum or plasma, prefer¬ ably from the patient himself to avoid antigenicity or disease transmission problems promotes vascularization. One skilled in the art will be able to ascertain other useful vascularization agents. These agents which promote vascularization may also be used in conjunction with other agents which produce beneficial effects. For example, as indicated above, immunosuppressant or antibiotic agents may provide bene¬ ficial results and prevent undue immune response or insure against undue infection. Certain cell adhesion modulating molecules, such as arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGO) containing compounds, or heparin may provide beneficial cell adhesion to the implant and thereby promote integration of integrated implants. It should also be understood that vascularization agents may be contained in an impure medium or may be contained as a mixture of known ingredients. For example, it has been thought that dipping a hydroxyapatite inte¬ grated orbital implant into the patient's own normal human serum or plasma increases the rate and the degree of robustness of the vascularization. One skilled in the art will recognize that there are many vascularizing agents,
SUBSTITUTESHEET some of which may also function as wound healing agents, or have other beneficial functions. The above list, of vascularization agents is not intended to be complete, and it is not intended to provide limitation to the appended claims.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a photographic representation of a porous hydroxyapatite implant wrapped in sclera with windows cut into the sclera for attachment of muscles and for in- growth of vessels. Similar windows may be cut in suitable synthetic coating or wrapping materials.
FIG. 2 is a technetium99 bone scan showing good uptake and hence good vascularization of the implant in the right orbit. FiG. 3 is a photographic representation of an implant showing a peg for direct attachment of an artificial eye. FIG. 4 is a photographic representation of an implant showing a ball and socket coupling for direct attachment of an artificial eye.
Example
Surgical Technique — Enucleation
Enucleation is the complete removal of the eyeball after severing it from the eye muscles and the optic nerve. This example describes the surgical technique of enucleation and replacement of the contents in the orbital socket with a hydroxyapatite implant. Coatings and wrappings are discussed.
The enucleation procedure may be done under local or general anesthesia. In either case, 4-5 cc of 2% Lido- caine with epinephrine and Hyaluronidase are given in the retrobulbar space for hemostasis. When a local is being used for the anesthesia, the 2% Xylocaine with epinephrine may be mixed as a 50-50 mix with 0.75% Bupivacaine and Hyaluronidase for a longer duration of effect. A 4-0 silk double-armed suture is used through the upper fornix in a mattress fashion (D.E. Soil Archives of Ophthal., Vol. 87, p. 196 (1972)). This is done to isolate and protect the levator muscle and to identify the superior fornix to keep it from being shortened during closure of anterior Tenon's capsule. In cases of secondary implant, this suture may also be used inferiorly to delineate the desired inferior fornix. A 360-degree peritomy is done preserving as much conjunctiva and Tenon's as possible. The extraocular muscles, including the obliques, are tagged with a double- armed 5-0 Vicryl suture, and the muscles are released from the globe. The neurectomy is done using the surgeon's preference, and the eye is delivered. As in any enuclea¬ tion procedure, hemostasis should be well-controlled prior to putting an implant in the socket.
At this point, the hole in posterior Tenon's capsule is evaluated where the optic nerve penetrated the capsule. If this opening is small, it is widened by spreading the opening with a blunt hemostat. This will allow the orbi- tal implant to extend into the muscle cone, thus allowing a larger implant to be used. Anterior Tenon's layer can then be closed without tension. This is a variation on the technique first described by Soil (J_d.). In the technique described herein, however, posterior Tenon's capsule is not closed anterior to the implant.
The size of the porous hydroxyapatite (PHA) orbital implant to be used is then determined by placing a sili- cone or acrylic sphere into the orbit. Generally, a 20 mm or 22 mm easily fits into the orbit with anterior Tenon's capsule being pulled together without tension. By evalu¬ ating the fit of the silicone or acrylic sphere, the size of the PHA sphere to be used can be chosen. If one uses sclera to wrap the implant, this adds 1.5 mm in diameter to the implant. Therefore, if one determines with the acrylic sizing sphere that a 22 mm implant fits well, a 20-mm PHA sphere wrapped in sclera would be its equivalent. If sclera is to be used, it is soaked in a saline and antibiotic solution (i.e. 30 cc of saline with 80 mg of Gentamycin) . A selected PHA implant is soaked in the same solution. If the sclera has been preserved in alcohol or glycerin, these substances should be entirely removed and the sclera completely hydrated before soaking it in the antibiotic and saline solution. The PHA implant is placed in this scleral shell, and the sclera is sutured around the sphere with 5-0 Vicryl. The sclera is trimmed to fit snugly around the implant. When using sclera, it is pre¬ ferred to use a whole-eviscerated eyebank globe treated in alcohol and preserved by treating it in a solution of saline and Gentamycin (i.e. 100 cc of saline and 40 mg or Gentamycin) and freezing it. As for using sclera, it is preferred to use sclera to wrap the PHA implant as opposed to placing it in the socket unwrapped.
Experience has shown that the movement of the implant and thus the artificial eye is greater when the implant is coated or wrapped. The use of other wrapping or coating material is herein described. Procedures for using bio- polymers or other materials described herein may be performed prior to the initiation of surgery, if these materials are not rapidly degraded. For example, the entire step of wrapping the implant in sclera is eliminated if the implanted is coated with plaster of Paris. For using bio-polymers, for example, one may essentially coat or wrap the implant in a material comprised of the bio-polymer. This may be done in advance of the surgery, and obviate the need for prolonging the patient's exposure to anesthetics.
In addition, the implant itself may be impregnated with vascularizing agents at this point or previously. For example, the implant may be dipped in the patient's own serum, or other vascularizing agent, prior to surgery. As described above, the vascularizing agent may be in the coating or wrapping material, as well as the implant itself.
SUBSTITUTESHEET For example, an hydroxyapatite orbital implant may be coated in plaster of Paris, autoclaved, and ready for insertion into the recipient. Or, an hydroxyapatite orbi¬ tal implant may be dipped in a bio-polymer, or dipped in a "cocktail" of biopolymer, therapeutic agent (such as antibiotic) , and vascularization agent. Or, an hydroxy¬ apatite orbital implant may be dipped in a vascularization agent, then wrapped in a sheet-like form of a biopolymer, such as a suitable size sheet of collagen which has been prepared in vitro. These examples are illustrative, as a wide variety of combinations may be selected, which selection may depend on the recipient, the surgeon's own experience, and the materials involved, as well as other factors which will be apparent to one skilled in the art. Once the PHA implant has been coated or wrapped in sclera or other material, the anterior pole of the implant is determined and marked with a marking pen. I tend to make an area near the optic nerve the anterior pole. I cut out the cornea and placed it into the socket posteriorly. The area where the rectus muscles are to be attached to the sclera is then determined, and small windows (5 mm x 7 mm) of sclera are cut out (FIG. 1) . This area of attachment can be determined by placing the scleral wrapped implant into the orbit in its proper position and marking where the cut ends of the rectus muscles fall on the sclera with normal tension being placed on the muscles. The rectus muscles are then sewn to the sclera by passing the double-armed 5-0 Vicryl through the anterior lip of the scleral window. Tying the suture down snugly pulls the muscle into the window and into contact with the PHA sphere. The obliques are attached at their appropriate positions on the sclera, but windows are not generally cut out for their attachment.
Cutting out the windows in the sclera for the attachment of the muscles and cutting the cornea out and placing it posteriorly, allows more rapid vascularization of the PHA implant. Blood vessels can more rapidly go into the PHA material without having to first penetrate the sclera.
The double-armed sutures anchoring the rectus muscles to the sclera may then be passed through anterior Tenon's and conjunctiva into their respective fornices and tied externally on the conjunctiva. This tends to deepen the fornix. Care should be taken to place these sutures in such a fashion that they do not keep anterior Tenon's capsule and conjunctiva from closing without tension. The anterior Tenon's layer is then closed with interrupted 5-0 Vicryl suture, and the conjunctiva is closed with a run¬ ning 5-0 Vicryl suture. Antibiotic ointment is applied to the socket and an acrylic conformer is placed in the socket. Care is taken to be sure the conformer does not put undue pressure on the closure of conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule. One or two inter-marginal temporary tarsorrhaphy sutures of 5-0 Vicryl can be used if more than normal edema is anticipated. These intermarginal sutures are routinely used with eviscerations. At the end of the procedure, 4 cc of 0.75% Bupivacaine are injected into the muscle cone for postoperative pain control.
I have used a firm pressure dressing over the orbit and leave it in place for 4 - 5 days. I have the patient on an oral antibiotic for ten days. A four-day course of oral steroids may be used to decrease the swelling of the orbit and therefore decrease the patient's discomfort. After the dressing is removed, the socket is treated with topical antibiotics, and the socket is usually ready for a prosthetic fitting in six weeks. The PHA implant may be placed in the enucleated socket without being wrapped in sclera or other permanent wrapping. Smooth material may be used to drape the rough implant for insertion. Once inserted, the smooth material may be removed. Holes can be cored through the implant material with a 19-gauge hypodermic needle and a 4-0 Vicryl suture passed through these holes with a Keith needle. The extraocular muscles are then tied to the 4-0
SUBSTITUTESHEET Vicryl suture material that has been passed through the implant. When sclera is not used, I use two pieces of plastic draping material slightly overlapped on each other. The PHA sphere is placed in the center of this overlapped plastic, and the edges of the plastic are drawn up around the implant. The implant then being completely wrapped in this plastic material can be placed into the deep portion of the orbit. The index finger holds the orbital implant in place, and the two pieces of plastic are gently pulled from underneath the implant leaving the implant in its proper position. Tenon' s capsule and conjunctiva are then closed over the implant in a normal fashion.
Since the material has a rough surface and has many small spicule-type projections, when not wrapping the material in sclera or otherwise providing for a smooth surface, extra care should be taken in closing the Tenon's and conjunctiva because the sharp edges of the material may cause the anterior closure to open. If there is any question as to the integrity of the anterior closure, I recommend that a small cap of sclera or fascia be placed between the anterior surface of the implant and the Tenon's closure. This gives another barrier of protection and prevents early exposure. Until this implant becomes vascularized, it should be treated as any other implant, and early exposure should be avoided.
Surgical Technique - Evisceration
The porous hydroxyapatite implant is well-suited to be use with an evisceration. The implant is placed within the patient's own sclera. The implant to be placed within the patient's own sclera may be coated or wrapped prior to insertion in the scleral cavity.
Evisceration, the removal of the intraocular contents of the eye, can be done with the cornea left intact, or with the cornea removed. The procedure can be done under a local or general anesthesia. After the appropriate anesthesia has been given, a lid speculum is place between the lids and a 360 degree peritomy of the conjunctiva is done at the limbus. Dissection between the sclera and Tenon' s capsule is done in the quadrants between the rectus muscles. If the cornea is to be removed, it is removed at this time and a dissection carried out between the choroid and the sclera to remove the intraocular contents. The intraocular contents may be saved as a surgical specimen for examination by pathologists. If the cornea is left intact, an incision in the sclera approximately 5 to 6 mm. posterior to the limbus just in front of the insertion of the superior rectus muscle is carried out and extended for 180 degrees. The intraocular contents are removed with an evisceration spoon with the dissection being carried out between the sclera and choroid. This specimen is also sent to pathology.
The inside layer of the sclera is scrubbed well to remove any further residue pigment. Also, if the cornea is left intact, the epithelium and the endothelium are removed. The inside of the sclera is then treated with a cotton tip applicator soaked in absolute alcohol to denature any remaining pigmented cells. The inside of the sclera is well irrigated with normal saline solution. Hemostasis is maintained with a cautery unit.
Relaxing incisions in the sclera can be made in between the rectus muscles to allow a larger implant to be placed within the scleral cavity. Also, the sclera can be opened posteriorly to allow a larger implant to be placed within the scleral cavity and also, by opening the sclera in the posterior aspect, this allows more rapid vasculari¬ zation of the hydroxyapatite implant. The scleral cavity is sized with a silicone or plastic sphere to determine the size of the hydroxyapatite implant. Once the size is determined, the hydroxyapatite implant is placed on the sterile table and soaked in antibiotic solution and saline.
SUBSTITUTESHEET If the implant is not coated, the hydroxyapatite implant is then wrapped in two pieces of thin draping plastic. This is done by placing two 6x6 inch pieces of plastic so that the edges overlap by 1/4 inch. The hydroxyapatite implant which has been chosen is placed in the central portion of this overlapped area, and the plastic is drawn up around the hydroxyapatite implant. This produces a smooth coating for the outside of the implant. If the implant is already coated with another material, as described above, this would not be necessary. Also, as indicated above, the implant or coating may be treated with vascularization agents or other therapeutic agents. As described above, the implant may be coated or wrapped in synthetic material, such as plaster of Paris, or biopolymers, and vascularizing agents may be used, for example, in conjunction with antibiotics. This prepared implant is then inserted into the sclera.
The implant is then placed within the scleral cavity and if the plastic has been used, the plastic is pulled out from under the implant while the implant is being held in the scleral sac with the index finger. The sclera anteriorly is then closed with interrupted 5-0 Vicryl sutures. Tenon's capsule is then closed over the sclera and/or cornea with interrupted 5-0 Vicryl sutures and then the conjunctiva is closed with a running 5-0 Vicryl suture. A temporary conformer is placed within the lids after antibiotic ointment has been applied, and the lids are temporarily closed with two temporary tarsorrhaphy sutures of 5-0 Vicryl. A firm pressure dressing is applied.
Surgical Technique - Secondary Orbital Implant
The porous hydroxyapatite orbital implant can be used as a secondary implant in patients who have (1) no orbital implant, (2) a migrated orbital implant, (3) an implant with inadequate volume, (4) an extruding orbital implant, or (5) in patients who desire to have more motility of the artificial eye. This procedure can be done under local or general anesthesia.
Surgical Technique After adequate anesthesia has been given, a double- armed silk suture is placed in the upper and lower fornix to identify the fornices. A lid speculum is placed between the lids. An incision across the posterior aspect of the orbit is made in the horizontal dimension. A conjunctival flap is dissected into the fornix above and below. The orbital implant and its pseudocapsule are removed, if they are present, and a pocket for the new orbital implant is fashioned. The orbital implant can be placed into this pocket, wrapped in sclera or unwrapped and, if the implant surface is smooth (such as if it is pre-coated) , no wrapping is necessary. As with the surgical techniques above, the implant may be coated with a variety of materials, and may contain vascularization agents or other therapeutic agents. It should be noted that prior to implanting the hydroxyapatite implant, in this or other surgical procedures, it should be soaked in saline with antibiotic solution.
After placing the implant into the socket, the anterior soft tissues are closed with interrupted 5-0 Vicryl, and the conjunctiva is closed with a running 5-0 Vicryl. If the muscles are to be attached to the implant, after the patient's implant has been removed along with its pseudocapsule, exploration of the orbit is then done in an attempt to locate and isolate the extraocular muscles. Once these have been identified, the hydroxyapa¬ tite is placed into the orbit, which may be treated with coatings or vascularizing agents or other agents as described above.
The extraocular muscles are then sutured to the implant material or to the surrounding wrapping, such as if the implant is wrapped in sclera or wrapped in a
SUBSTITUTESHEET synthetic coating which is in sheet form. After suturing the muscles to the implant, the anterior soft tissues are closed with interrupted 5-0 Vicryl and the conjunctiva is run with 5-0 Vicryl. A temporary conformer is placed between the lids after antibiotic ointment has been applied, and temporary tarsorrhaphy sutures of 5-0 Vicryl are applied. A firm pressure dressing is then applied.
Drilling the Hole:
The patient that has received a porous hydroxyapatite (PHA) orbital implant is treated in the same way as any other an ophthalmic patient postoperatively. The socket is usually ready for a custom-fit prosthesis in six weeks. There may be slightly more swelling in the early post¬ operative period because of the movement of the implant in the socket.
The time it takes for the integrated orbital implant to be vascularized is variable. See, D.E. Soil, Advances in Ophthalmic. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Vol. 2, p. 1322, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Co., 1987. The integrated implant vascularizes more quickly if not wrapped. Having openings cut in the covering of sclera or other appro¬ priate coating or wrapping material, increases the rate of vascularization. If left completely wrapped in sclera, the implant is generally vascularized in about six months. It is likely that other coating or wrapping material, such as synthetic collagen, will require a similar time frame for vascularization in the absence of vascularization agents. And, as indicated above, vascularization agents can be used to improve the time frame for vascularization. At about six months postoperatively, a techne- tium" bone scan is done to assess the vascularity of the implant (FIG. 2) . If the implant is well vascularized, it is ready to be drilled and made into a direct motility implant. One skilled in the art will be able to ascertain the degree of vascularization. The drilling of the hole for the motility prosthesis is done under retrobulbar (actually retroimplant) local anesthesia. The area on the surface of the conjunctiva to be drilled is marked with a marking pen. This location is most easily determined by having the ocularist make a template of the patient's artificial eye. In the area of the pupil, the template has a through-and-through hole. By placing the template in the socket, the surface of the conjunctiva can be marked through this hole. This indicates the correct location for drilling.
Once the area for drilling has been determined, the eye is prepped and draped in the usual fashion. A lid speculum is placed between the lids, and the area to be drilled is cauterized with a hand-held cautery. The con- junctiva and subconjunctiva tissues are grasped with heavy-toothed forceps to stabilize the implant. A hole 3 mm in diameter and 10 - 13 mm in depth is drilled. It is best to use a drill bit with the cutting portion limited only to the end of the bit and not extending up the sides of the bit. This avoids the conjunctiva from being gathered up onto the drill bit. A flat-headed peg 2.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm long is placed in the drilled hole. If the fit is good and the peg seats well against the conjunctiva, the peg is removed, the hole is irrigated, the peg covered with antibiotic ointment and replaced in the hole. The patient's artificial eye is replaced over this peg, and the eye is patched for 24 hours. In three to four weeks, the patient is sent to an ocularist to have this peg fit to the posterior surface of the artificial eye (FIG. 3) . The most common way the implant is coupled to the artificial eye is to have the flat-headed peg replaced with a peg 13 mm long that has a ball on one end. The ball portion of the peg sits above the surface of the conjunctiva. The ocularist then drills a small hemi- spherical indentation out of the back of the patient's artificial eye, and the ball of the peg fits into this socket. By this ball-and-socket coupling, the movement of the implant is transferred to the artificial eye (FIG. 4) . Alternatively, the flat-headed peg can be attached directly to the posterior surface of the artificial eye. It cannot be emphasized too strongly that the closure of anterior Tenon's and conjunctiva is especially impor¬ tant if the PHA implant is not wrapped in sclera or some other material making a smooth surface. With the amount of movement that the implant will have by being attached to the extraocular muscles, without good closure the tissue may be broken down by the rough edges of the implant material.
Once the implant has been integrated with the fibro¬ vascular tissues of the orbit, exposure of the implant is not of a concern because it will support fibrovascular and epithelial growth on its surface.
Size of the Orbital Implant:
The purpose of an orbital implant is to prevent retraction of orbital tissues, to replace the volume lost by the removal of the eye, to help the prosthesis fit more comfortably and more accurately, and to produce movement of the prosthesis. Replacing the volume of the orbit will have a major effect on the final appearance of the artificial eye.
The volume of the artificial eye plus the volume of the orbital implant should be equal to the volume of the eye that was removed. If the eye is assumed to be a sphere with a diameter of 24 mm, the volume of that sphere is 7.2 cc (v=4 τrR/3) . The average artificial eye has a volume of 2.5 cc. Therefore, the volume of the orbital implant should be the difference between the volume of the eye removed (7.2 cc) and the volume of the artificial eye (2.5 cc) . This calculation results in an implant that should supply a volume of 4.7 cc (7.2 cc - 2.5 cc) . An implant that supplies this volume would have a diameter of 21 mm. Table 1 shows the volume of various implant sizes and the approximate implant sizes to use with eyes of different diameters.
In the past, ophthalmologists have been taught that the largest implant that should be used during an enuclea- tion is 18 mm. It was thought that an implant larger than 18 mm is more likely to be closed with tension on the Tenon's and conjunctival suture line, and therefore, the wound would more likely break down and the implant extrude. The recommended sizes of orbital implants there- fore were usually 16 mm or 18 mm. With the use of an 18 mm sphere, a volume deficit of 1.4 cc would occur. The use of a 16 mm sphere will produce a volume deficit of 2.3 cc. This volume deficit of 1.4 cc - 2.3 cc corresponds very well clinically to the volumes often needed to correct enophthalmos with subperiosteal orbital volume augmentation.
I believe the reason that clinicians found the rate of extrusion higher with implants larger than 18 mm was the fact that the implant was placed primarily within Tenon's capsule. With a small opening in posterior Tenon's and the implant placed within the confines of Tenon's capsule, an implant larger than an 18 mm did put undue tension on the anterior Tenon's closure.
Soil made a great contribution in surgical technique with his recommendation of placing the implant within the muscle cone posterior to the deep layer of Tenon's capsule (D.B. Soil, Archives of Qphthal.. Vol. 87, p. 196 (1972)). This allowed a larger implant to be placed in the orbit and still have Tenon's capsule closed without tension. Generally, in an adult a 20 mm or 22 mm sphere can easily be placed in the muscle cone and Tenon's be closed without tension.
A large implant (i.e. 22 mm) will be needed if prior to the enucleation a patient has had several surgical procedures or for any other reason may have retraction or fibrosis of the orbital soft tissue or fat atrophy. The wrapping of the implant in eyebank sclera adds about 1.5 mm to the diameter of the implant. Therefore, a 20 mm sphere wrapped in eyebank sclera gives a volume of , a sphere with a diameter of 21.5 mm. For sclera-wrapped implants, I prefer to use a 20 or 22 mm PHA implant wrapped in sclera in almost all adult cases with normal- sized globes. Similar techniques can be used for measuring the volume and diameter of implants coated or wrapped in other material.
There can be problems with placing an orbital implant that was too large into the orbit even if extrusion is not a consideration. The problem is that the ocularist may not be able to fit an artificial eye with enough anterior - posterior thickness to create a realistic anterior chamber depth. Also, there may not be enough thickness to allow the ocularist to later drill the posterior surface of the prosthesis to create the socket for the ball-and- socket motility peg. When the prosthesis must be made thin to prevent a proptotic appearance, the anterior chamber depth is shallow and the iris diaphragm appears to be bowed forward. This gives less than a satisfactory result. This is one of the primary problems with the appearance of a scleral shell.
If this were to occur with a PHA spherical implant, the problem would be solved by making an incision over the implant and exposing the implant material. A small drill can then be used to bur away the anterior portion of the implant material and its investing soft tissue. The soft tissue anterior to the implant can then be closed and the volume of the implant reduced. Also, vascularizing materials can be added at this point.
The examples set forth above are illustrative, and are not to be construed as limitations of the appended claims. One skilled in the art will recognize other embodiments of the present invention. Ta e 1 - Determination of Orbital Im lant Size
Figure imgf000035_0001
SUBSTITUTESHEET

Claims

Claims
1. An integrated orbital implant with a synthetic coating.
2. An integrated orbital implant of claim 1 which is made of hydroxyapatite.
3. An integrated orbital implant of claim 1 wherein said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient.
4. An integrated orbital implant of claim 3 wherein said synthetic coating contains a polymer.
5. An integrated orbital implant of claim 4 wherein said polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydioxanone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma-ethyl glutamate) and pseudo poly (amino acids) .
6. An integrated orbital implant of claim 4 wherein said polymer includes an extracellular matrix protein.
7. An integrated orbital implant of claim 6 wherein said extracellular matrix protein is selected from the group consisting of collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vitronectin.
8. An integrated orbital implant of claim 3 wherein said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique.
9. An integrated orbital implant of claim 8 wherein said in vitro technique is cell culture, recombinant nucleic acid technology, or a combination thereof.
10. An integrated orbital implant of claim 3 wherein said synthetic coating is a calcium-containing compound.
11. An integrated orbital implant of claim 10 wherein said calcium-containing compound is plaster of Paris.
12. An integrated orbital implant of claim 3 which contains an agent which promotes vascularization.
13. An integrated orbital implant of claim 12 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is contained either in said synthetic coating, or in said integrated orbital implant.
14. An integrated orbital implant of claim 12 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and epidermal growth factor.
15. An integrated orbital implant of claim 12 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is serum or plasma.
16. An integrated orbital implant of claim 15 wherein said serum or plasma is derived from the recipient of said integrated orbital implant.
17. An integrated orbital implant of claim 1 which contains a magnet.
18. An integrated orbital implant of claim 1 which contains at least one therapeutic agent.
19. An integrated orbital implant of claim 18 wherein said therapeutic agent is selected from the group
SUBSTITUTESHEET consisting of an immunosuppressant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
20. An integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating, wherein (a) said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient; (b) optionally, said synthetic coating contains a polymer; (c) optionally, said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique;
(d) optionally, said synthetic coating is a calcium- containing compound;
(e) optionally, said synthetic coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization;
(f) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and
(g) optionally, contains at least one therapeutic agent.
21. An integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating, wherein
(a) said synthetic coating is comprised of a material selected from the group consisting of polygly- colic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydiox- anone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma- ethyl glutamate) , pseudo poly (amino acids) , collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, vitronectin, plaster of Paris and any combination thereof;
(b) optionally, said implant with coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization, which agent is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and serum, plasma or any combination thereof; (c) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and
(d) optionally, said implant with coating contains an additional therapeutic agent, which agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppressant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
22. A prosthesis comprised of an integrated orbital implant with a synthetic coating to which is coupled an artificial eye.
23. A prosthesis of claim 22 which is made of hydroxyapatite.
24. A prosthesis of claim 22 wherein said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recip¬ ient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient.
25. A prosthesis of claim 24 wherein said synthetic coating contains a polymer.
26. A prosthesis of claim 25 wherein said polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydioxanone, poly¬ cyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma-ethyl glutamate) and pseudo poly (amino acids) .
27. A prosthesis of claim 25 wherein said polymer includes an extracellular matrix protein.
28. A prosthesis of claim 27 wherein said extracellular matrix protein is selected from the group consisting of collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vitronectin.
SUBSTITUTESHEET
29. A prosthesis of claim 24 wherein said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique.
30. A prosthesis of claim 29 wherein said in vitro technique is cell culture, recombinant nucleic acid technology, or a combination thereof.
31. A prosthesis of claim 24 wherein said synthetic coating is a calcium-containing compound.
- 32. A prosthesis of claim 31 wherein said calcium- containing compound is plaster of Paris.
33. A prosthesis of claim 24 which contains an agent which promotes vascularization.
34. A prosthesis of claim 33 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is contained either in said synthetic coating, or in said integrated orbital implant.
35. A prosthesis of claim 33 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and epidermal growth factor.
36. A prosthesis of claim 33 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is serum or plasma.
37. A prosthesis of claim 36 wherein said serum or plasma is derived from the recipient of said integrated orbital implant.
38. A prosthesis of claim 22 which contains a magnet.
SUBSTITUTESHEET
39. A prosthesis of claim 22 which contains at least one therapeutic agent.
40. A prosthesis of claim 39 wherein said thera¬ peutic agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppressant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
41. A prosthesis comprised of an integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating to which is coupled an artificial eye, wherein (a) said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient;
(b) optionally, said synthetic coating contains a polymer; (c) optionally, said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique;
(d) optionally, said synthetic coating is a calcium- containing compound;
(e) optionally, said synthetic coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization;
(f) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and
(g) optionally, contains at least one therapeutic agent.
42. A prosthesis comprised of an integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating to which is coupled an artificial eye, wherein
(a) said synthetic coating is comprised of a material selected from the group consisting of polygly- colic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydiox¬ anone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma- ethyl glutamate) , pseudo poly (amino acids) , collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, vitronectin, plaster of Paris and any combination thereof;
SUBSTIT (b) optionally, said implant with coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization, which agent is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and serum, plasma or any combination thereof;
(c) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and,
(d) optionally, said implant with coating contains an additional therapeutic agent, which agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppressant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
43. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant with a synthetic coating wherein said integrated orbital implant is dipped in said material which constitutes said synthetic coating.
44. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 43 which is made of hydroxyapatite.
45. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 43 wherein said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient.
46. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 45 wherein said synthetic coating contains a polymer.
47. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 46 wherein said polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydioxanone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma-ethyl glutamate) and pseudo poly (amino acids) .
SUBSTITUTESHEET
48. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 46 wherein said polymer includes an extracellular matrix protein.
49. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 48 wherein said extracellular matrix protein is selected from the group consisting of collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vitronectin.
50. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 45 wherein said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique.
51. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 50 wherein said in vitro technique is cell culture, recombinant nucleic acid technology, or a combination thereof.
52. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 45 wherein said synthetic coating is a calcium-containing compound.
53. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 52 wherein said calcium-containing compound is plaster of Paris.
54. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 45 which contains an agent which promotes vascularization.
55. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 54 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is contained either in said synthetic coating, or in said integrated orbital implant.
56. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 54 wherein said agent which promotes
SUBSTITUTESHEET vascularization is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and epidermal growth factor.
57. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 54 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is serum or plasma.
58. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 57 wherein said serum or plasma is derived from the recipient of said integrated orbital implant.
59. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 43 which contains a magnet.
60. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 43 which contains at least one therapeutic agent.
61. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 60 wherein said therapeutic agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppres¬ sant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
62. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating wherein said integrated orbital implant is dipped in said material which constitutes said synthetic coating, wherein
(a) said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient;
(b) optionally, said synthetic coating contains a polymer;
SUBSTITUTESHEET (c) optionally, said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique;
(d) optionally, said synthetic coating is a calcium- containing compound; (e) optionally, said synthetic coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization;
(f) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and
(g) optionally contains at least one therapeutic agent.
63. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating wherein said integrated orbital implant is dipped in said material which constitutes said synthetic coating, wherein
(a) said synthetic coating is comprised of a material selected from the group consisting of polygly- colic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydiox¬ anone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma- ethyl glutamate) , pseudo poly (amino acids) , collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, vitronectin, plaster of Paris and any combination thereof;
(b) optionally, said implant with coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization, which agent is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and serum, plasma or any combination thereof;
(c) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and
(d) optionally, said implant with coating contains an additional therapeutic agent, which agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppressant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
64. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant with a synthetic coating wherein said integrated orbital implant is wrapped in said material which constitutes said synthetic coating.
65. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 64 which is made of hydroxyapatite.
66. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 64 wherein said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient.
67. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 66 wherein said synthetic coating contains a polymer.
68. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 67 wherein said polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydioxanone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma-ethyl glutamate) and pseudo poly (amino acids) .
69. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 67 wherein said polymer includes an extracellular matrix protein.
70. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 69 wherein said extracellular matrix protein is selected from the group consisting of collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vitronectin.
71. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 66 wherein said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique.
72. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 71 wherein said in vitro technique is cell culture, recombinant nucleic acid technology, or a combination thereof.
73. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 66 wherein said synthetic coating is a calcium-containing compound.
74. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 73 wherein said calcium-containing compound is plaster of Paris.
75. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 66 which contains an agent which promotes vascularization.
76. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 75 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is contained either in said synthetic coating, or in said integrated orbital implant.
77. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 75 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and epidermal growth factor.
78. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 75 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is serum or plasma.
79. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 78 wherein said serum or plasma is derived from the recipient of said integrated orbital implant.
80. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 64 which contains a magnet.
81. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 64 which contains at least one therapeutic agent.
82. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant of claim 81 wherein said therapeutic agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppres¬ sant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
83. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coat¬ ing wherein said integrated orbital implant is wrapped in said material which constitutes said synthetic coating, wherein
(a) said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient;
(b) optionally, said synthetic coating contains a polymer;
(c) optionally, said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique;
(d) optionally, said synthetic coating is a calcium- containing compound; (e) optionally, said synthetic coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization;
(f) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and
(g) optionally, contains at least one therapeutic agent.
84. A method of preparing an integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating wherein said integrated orbital implant is wrapped
SUBSTITUTESHEET in said material which constitutes said synthetic coating, wherein
(a) said synthetic coating is comprised of a material selected from the group consisting of polygly- colic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydiox¬ anone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma- ethyl glutamate) , pseudo poly (amino acids) , collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, vitronectin, plaster of Paris and any combination thereof; (b) optionally, said implant with coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization, which agent is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and serum, plasma or any combination thereof;
(c) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and
(d) optionally, said implant with coating contains an additional therapeutic agent, which agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppressant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
85. A surgical process wherein an integrated orbital implant with a synthetic coating is implanted into a recipient.
86. A surgical process of claim 85 wherein said orbital implant is made of hydroxyapatite.
87. A surgical process of claim 85 wherein said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient.
88. A surgical process of claim 87 wherein said synthetic coating contains a polymer.
SUBSTITUTESHEET
89. A surgical process of claim 88 wherein said polymer is selected from the group consisting of polygly- colic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydiox¬ anone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma- ethyl glutamate) and pseudo poly (amino acids) .
90. A surgical process of claim 88 wherein said polymer includes an extracellular matrix protein.
91. A surgical process of claim 90 wherein said extracellular matrix protein is selected from the group consisting of collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vitronectin.
92. A surgical process of claim 87 wherein said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique.
93. A surgical process of claim 92 wherein said in vitro technique is cell culture, recombinant nucleic acid technology, or a combination thereof.
94. A surgical process of claim 87 wherein said synthetic coating is a calcium-containing compound.
95. A surgical process of claim 94 wherein said calcium-containing compound is plaster of Paris.
96. A surgical process of claim 87 wherein said implant with a coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization.
97. A surgical process of claim 96 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is contained either in said synthetic coating, or in said integrated orbital implant.
SUBSTITUTESHEET
98. A surgical process of claim 96 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and epidermal growth factor.
99. A surgical process of claim 96 wherein said agent which promotes vascularization is serum or plasma.
100. A surgical process of claim 99 wherein said serum or plasma is derived from the recipient of said integrated orbital implant.
101. A surgical process of claim 85 wherein said implant with a coating contains a magnet.
102. A surgical process of claim 85 wherein said implant with a coating contains at least one therapeutic agent.
103. A surgical process of claim 102 wherein said therapeutic agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppressant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
104. A surgical process wherein an integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating is implanted into a recipient, wherein
(a) said synthetic coating does not cause adverse immune reaction in a recipient of said orbital implant, and wherein said coating is absorbable by said recipient;
(b) optionally, said synthetic coating contains a polymer;
(c) optionally, said synthetic coating is prepared via an in vitro technique; (d) optionally, said synthetic coating is a calcium- containing compound; (e) optionally, said synthetic coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization;
(f) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and (g) optionally contains at least one therapeutic agent.
105. A surgical process wherein an integrated orbital implant comprised of hydroxyapatite with a synthetic coating is implanted into a recipient, wherein (a) said synthetic coating is comprised of a material selected from the group consisting of polygly- colic acid, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polydioxanone, polycyanoacrylate, polyorthoester, poly (gamma-ethyl glutamate) , pseudo poly (amino acids) , collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin, vitronectin, plaster of Paris and any combination thereof;
(b) optionally, said implant with coating contains an agent which promotes vascularization, which agent is selected from the group consisting of neovascular growth factor, epithelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and serum, plasma or any combination thereof;
(c) optionally, said implant with coating contains a magnet; and (d) optionally, said implant with coating contains an additional therapeutic agent, which agent is selected from the group consisting of an immunosuppressant, an antibiotic, and a cell-adhesion modulating molecule.
PCT/US1992/011203 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 Device for orbital implant WO1994014390A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU34212/93A AU3421293A (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 Device for orbital implant
DE69231578T DE69231578T2 (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 IMPLANT FOR THE EYE CAVE WITH RESORBABLE COATING
PCT/US1992/011203 WO1994014390A1 (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 Device for orbital implant
CA002152617A CA2152617C (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 Device for orbital implant
AT93902750T ATE197666T1 (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 EYE SOCKET IMPLANT WITH ABSORBABLE COATING
EP93902750A EP0746270B1 (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 Orbital implant having synthetic and absorbable coating

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US1992/011203 WO1994014390A1 (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 Device for orbital implant
CA002152617A CA2152617C (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 Device for orbital implant

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1994014390A1 true WO1994014390A1 (en) 1994-07-07

Family

ID=25678049

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1992/011203 WO1994014390A1 (en) 1992-12-24 1992-12-24 Device for orbital implant

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO1994014390A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998049973A1 (en) * 1997-05-09 1998-11-12 Orbital Implants Technology Orbital implant pegs
FR2778555A1 (en) * 1998-05-15 1999-11-19 Fci France Chirurgie Instrumen KERATOPROTHESIS
WO2000015270A1 (en) * 1998-09-10 2000-03-23 Schering Aktiengesellschaft Coated medical devices and implants
EP1049423A1 (en) * 1998-01-22 2000-11-08 Arthur C. Perry Biocompatible structure comprising means for enhanced fibrovascular ingrowth
FR2806630A1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2001-09-28 Iris Laboratoire Implantable prosthesis component e.g. for eye socket is made from biocompatible substrate covered with porous ceramic and nutrient layers
US6514286B1 (en) * 1996-12-03 2003-02-04 Osteobiologics, Inc. Biodegradable polymeric film
WO2005055872A3 (en) * 2003-12-03 2006-04-06 Arthur C Perry Orbital implant coating having differential degradation
DE102005030614A1 (en) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-11 Transtissue Technologies Gmbh Cell-free graft
US8118867B2 (en) * 2003-12-03 2012-02-21 Arthur C. Perry Orbital implant coating having bulbously raised suture zone
US8734828B2 (en) 2006-10-06 2014-05-27 Biotissue Ag Matrix-gel graft without cells

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU633525A1 (en) * 1974-12-02 1978-11-25 Рижский Медицинский Институт Ocular implant with prosthesis
US4619655A (en) * 1984-01-26 1986-10-28 University Of North Carolina Plaster of Paris as a bioresorbable scaffold in implants for bone repair
US4713076A (en) * 1984-04-19 1987-12-15 Klaus Draenert Coating composition and anchorage component for surgical implants
US4904259A (en) * 1988-04-29 1990-02-27 Samuel Itay Compositions and methods for repair of cartilage and bone
US4976731A (en) * 1987-10-19 1990-12-11 Perry Arthur C Device for orbital implant
US5002583A (en) * 1985-08-13 1991-03-26 Sandu Pitaru Collagen implants
US5007930A (en) * 1985-02-19 1991-04-16 The Dow Chemical Company Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics
US5041138A (en) * 1986-11-20 1991-08-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture
US5073114A (en) * 1988-02-23 1991-12-17 Detsch Steven G Bone growing method and composition

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU633525A1 (en) * 1974-12-02 1978-11-25 Рижский Медицинский Институт Ocular implant with prosthesis
US4619655A (en) * 1984-01-26 1986-10-28 University Of North Carolina Plaster of Paris as a bioresorbable scaffold in implants for bone repair
US4713076A (en) * 1984-04-19 1987-12-15 Klaus Draenert Coating composition and anchorage component for surgical implants
US5007930A (en) * 1985-02-19 1991-04-16 The Dow Chemical Company Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics
US5002583A (en) * 1985-08-13 1991-03-26 Sandu Pitaru Collagen implants
US5041138A (en) * 1986-11-20 1991-08-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture
US4976731A (en) * 1987-10-19 1990-12-11 Perry Arthur C Device for orbital implant
US5073114A (en) * 1988-02-23 1991-12-17 Detsch Steven G Bone growing method and composition
US4904259A (en) * 1988-04-29 1990-02-27 Samuel Itay Compositions and methods for repair of cartilage and bone

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP0746270A4 *

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6514286B1 (en) * 1996-12-03 2003-02-04 Osteobiologics, Inc. Biodegradable polymeric film
WO1998049973A1 (en) * 1997-05-09 1998-11-12 Orbital Implants Technology Orbital implant pegs
EP1049423A1 (en) * 1998-01-22 2000-11-08 Arthur C. Perry Biocompatible structure comprising means for enhanced fibrovascular ingrowth
EP1049423A4 (en) * 1998-01-22 2002-01-30 Arthur C Perry Biocompatible structure comprising means for enhanced fibrovascular ingrowth
FR2778555A1 (en) * 1998-05-15 1999-11-19 Fci France Chirurgie Instrumen KERATOPROTHESIS
EP0956834A3 (en) * 1998-05-15 1999-12-15 F.C.I. (France Chirurgie Instrumentation) Keratoprosthesis and tool to treat the haptic
WO2000015270A1 (en) * 1998-09-10 2000-03-23 Schering Aktiengesellschaft Coated medical devices and implants
FR2806630A1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2001-09-28 Iris Laboratoire Implantable prosthesis component e.g. for eye socket is made from biocompatible substrate covered with porous ceramic and nutrient layers
WO2005055872A3 (en) * 2003-12-03 2006-04-06 Arthur C Perry Orbital implant coating having differential degradation
US7407510B2 (en) * 2003-12-03 2008-08-05 Perry Arthur C Orbital implant coating having differential degradation
US8118867B2 (en) * 2003-12-03 2012-02-21 Arthur C. Perry Orbital implant coating having bulbously raised suture zone
US8226713B2 (en) * 2003-12-03 2012-07-24 Perry Arthur C Orbital implant coating having differential degradation
DE102005030614A1 (en) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-11 Transtissue Technologies Gmbh Cell-free graft
DE102005030614B4 (en) * 2005-06-30 2014-05-08 Biotissue Ag Cell-free graft, its use, process for its preparation, matrix thus produced with gel and process for the preparation of this matrix with gel
US9125871B2 (en) 2005-06-30 2015-09-08 Biotissue Ag Cell-free graft
US8734828B2 (en) 2006-10-06 2014-05-27 Biotissue Ag Matrix-gel graft without cells

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6033437A (en) Pegs for orbital implants
Maas et al. Implants in rhinoplasty
Sami et al. Perspective on orbital enucleation implants
Rubin et al. Enhancement of the cosmetic and functional outcome of enucleation with the conical orbital implant
WO1994014390A1 (en) Device for orbital implant
Stephenson Evisceration of the eye with expansion sclerotomies
Migliori et al. The domed dermis-fat graft orbital implant
Jordan et al. Evaluation and management of the anophthalmic socket and socket reconstruction
CN112494729B (en) Drug-containing tissue graft and preparation method and application thereof
Boretos Cellular polymers for medical use: the vital role of porosity and permeability
Colton et al. Use of Mersilene mesh in nasal augmentation
Soll Insertion of secondary intraorbital implants
EP0746270B1 (en) Orbital implant having synthetic and absorbable coating
Jordan et al. Enucleation, evisceration, secondary orbital implantation
RU2337652C1 (en) Method for support-motor stump formation for ocular prosthesis
Hita-Antón et al. Eye removal—Current indications and technical tips
Romkes et al. Followup of a dog with an intraocular silicone prosthesis combined with an extraocular glass prosthesis
Lisman et al. Current concepts in dermis-fat grafting
Jordan et al. Surgical techniques in enucleation: the role of various types of implants and the efficacy of pegged and nonpegged approaches
RU2295937C1 (en) Method for forming primary locomotor stump after eyeball evisceration
Meltzer Complications of enucleation and evisceration: prevention and treatment
AU2018203711A1 (en) Improved Phalloplasty Method
Davis et al. Enucleation
Reinheimer Techniques of enucleation and evisceration
Piest et al. Pediatric enucleation, evisceration, and exenteration techniques

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU BB BG BR CA CS FI HU JP KP KR KZ LK MG MN MW NO PL RO RU SD

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1993902750

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2152617

Country of ref document: CA

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1993902750

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1993902750

Country of ref document: EP