WO1993025225A1 - Liposomal formulations for administering to cancer patients - Google Patents

Liposomal formulations for administering to cancer patients Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1993025225A1
WO1993025225A1 PCT/US1993/005654 US9305654W WO9325225A1 WO 1993025225 A1 WO1993025225 A1 WO 1993025225A1 US 9305654 W US9305654 W US 9305654W WO 9325225 A1 WO9325225 A1 WO 9325225A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
monensin
recited
immunotoxin
liposome
cancer
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1993/005654
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1993025225A9 (en
Inventor
Mandip Singh Sachdeva
Thomas W. Griffin
Harninder S. Atwal
Ali R. Salimi
Original Assignee
University Of Massachusetts Medical Center
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University Of Massachusetts Medical Center filed Critical University Of Massachusetts Medical Center
Priority to AU46338/93A priority Critical patent/AU4633893A/en
Publication of WO1993025225A1 publication Critical patent/WO1993025225A1/en
Publication of WO1993025225A9 publication Critical patent/WO1993025225A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33—Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/335—Heterocyclic compounds having oxygen as the only ring hetero atom, e.g. fungichromin
    • A61K31/365—Lactones
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33—Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/335—Heterocyclic compounds having oxygen as the only ring hetero atom, e.g. fungichromin
    • A61K31/35—Heterocyclic compounds having oxygen as the only ring hetero atom, e.g. fungichromin having six-membered rings with one oxygen as the only ring hetero atom
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K45/00—Medicinal preparations containing active ingredients not provided for in groups A61K31/00 - A61K41/00
    • A61K45/06—Mixtures of active ingredients without chemical characterisation, e.g. antiphlogistics and cardiaca
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/51—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
    • A61K47/68—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an antibody, an immunoglobulin or a fragment thereof, e.g. an Fc-fragment
    • A61K47/6801—Drug-antibody or immunoglobulin conjugates defined by the pharmacologically or therapeutically active agent
    • A61K47/6803—Drugs conjugated to an antibody or immunoglobulin, e.g. cisplatin-antibody conjugates
    • A61K47/6811—Drugs conjugated to an antibody or immunoglobulin, e.g. cisplatin-antibody conjugates the drug being a protein or peptide, e.g. transferrin or bleomycin
    • A61K47/6817—Toxins
    • A61K47/6819—Plant toxins
    • A61K47/6825—Ribosomal inhibitory proteins, i.e. RIP-I or RIP-II, e.g. Pap, gelonin or dianthin
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/51—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
    • A61K47/68—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an antibody, an immunoglobulin or a fragment thereof, e.g. an Fc-fragment
    • A61K47/6801—Drug-antibody or immunoglobulin conjugates defined by the pharmacologically or therapeutically active agent
    • A61K47/6803—Drugs conjugated to an antibody or immunoglobulin, e.g. cisplatin-antibody conjugates
    • A61K47/6811—Drugs conjugated to an antibody or immunoglobulin, e.g. cisplatin-antibody conjugates the drug being a protein or peptide, e.g. transferrin or bleomycin
    • A61K47/6817—Toxins
    • A61K47/6819—Plant toxins
    • A61K47/6825—Ribosomal inhibitory proteins, i.e. RIP-I or RIP-II, e.g. Pap, gelonin or dianthin
    • A61K47/6827—Ricin A
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/69—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the conjugate being characterised by physical or galenical forms, e.g. emulsion, particle, inclusion complex, stent or kit
    • A61K47/6905—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the conjugate being characterised by physical or galenical forms, e.g. emulsion, particle, inclusion complex, stent or kit the form being a colloid or an emulsion
    • A61K47/6911—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the conjugate being characterised by physical or galenical forms, e.g. emulsion, particle, inclusion complex, stent or kit the form being a colloid or an emulsion the form being a liposome
    • A61K47/6913—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the conjugate being characterised by physical or galenical forms, e.g. emulsion, particle, inclusion complex, stent or kit the form being a colloid or an emulsion the form being a liposome the liposome being modified on its surface by an antibody
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/10—Dispersions; Emulsions
    • A61K9/127—Liposomes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/10—Dispersions; Emulsions
    • A61K9/127—Liposomes
    • A61K9/1271—Non-conventional liposomes, e.g. PEGylated liposomes, liposomes coated with polymers

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to methods of treating patients suffering from cancer, to pharmaceutical compositions and kits for use in such methods, and to methods of making such pharmaceutical formulations.
  • the invention more particularly relates to methods of potentiating the cytotoxic effects of immunotoxins, compensating for and/or overcoming resistance against anti-cancer drugs, potentiating the cytotoxic effects of radiolabelled antibodies and/or increasing association of radiolabelled antibodies with cancer cells.
  • Ricin A chain immunotoxins directed against selected tumor-associated antigens are potent and selective in vitro cytotoxins for human malignant cells (Trowbridge IS, Domingo D: Anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal and toxin-antibody conjugates affect growth of human tumor cells. Nature 294:171-173, 1981; Griffin T , Pagnini P, McGrath J, McCann, J, Houston LL: Activity of anti-transferrin receptor immunotoxins against human adenocarcinomas of the colon and pancreas.
  • tumor-associated antigens e.g., human transferrin receptor and carcinoembryonic antigen
  • the holotoxin ricin through its B chain possesses an efficient mechanism to assist A chain traversal into the cytoplasm.
  • B chain may greatly enhance the nonspecific toxicity of the conjugate due to binding of the cell surface glycoproteins and glycolipids of normal tissue.
  • several groups of investigators have developed antibody conjugates with blocked galactose binding sites on the B chain. Wawrzynczak EJ, Watson GJ, Cumber AJ, et. al. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 32:289-295 (1991).
  • the present invention is directed to methods for increasing the cytoplasmic access of ricin A chain in vivo.
  • the present invention is also directed to methods for increasing the effectiveness of other cancer treatments.
  • the present inventors noted that it has been theorized that the ricin A chain ⁇ ubunits of ricin A immunotoxins kill target cells by inhibiting cellular protein synthesis by the enzymatic removal of adenine from the 28S ribosomal RNA (Endo Y, Tsurugi K: RNA N-glycosidase activity of ricin A chain. Mechanism of action of the toxic lectin ricin on eukaryotic ribosomes. J Biol Chem 262:8128-8130, 1987). However, the mechanism by which the A chain of an immunotoxin bound to a cell surface antigen reaches the ribosomes in the cytosol is not well understood.
  • the present inventors identified a discrepancy, in that one molecule of toxic A chain is sufficient to kill a cell if it gains access to the cytosol (Olsnes S, Fernandez-Puentes C, Caarrasco L and Vasguez D: Ribosome inactivation by the toxic lectins abrin and ricin.
  • the present inventors observed that the efficacy of a ricin A immunotoxin is increased by lysomotropic amines, carboxylic ionophores and lysosomal enzyme inhibitors.
  • Carboxylic ionophores function at extremely low doses and reliably produce a dramatic increase in ricin A immunotoxin specific cytotoxicity.
  • Monensin is a carboxylic ionophore which catalyses exchange between monovalent cations and hydrogen ions within intracellular vesicle compartments, facilitating cation exchange across cellular membranes (Pressman B: Biological applications of ionophores, Ann Rev Biochem 45:501-530, 1976) . At low concentrations, monensin sensitizes cells to the cytotoxic action of cell-specific immunotoxins.
  • monensin increased the in vitro cytotoxicity and kinetics of cell killing of ricin A chain immunotoxins directed against colorectal cancer cell lines (Griffin TW, Pagnini P, McGrath J, McCann, J, Houston LL: Activity of anti-transferrin receptor immunotoxins against human adenocarcino as of the colon and pancreas. J Biol Re ⁇ p Modif 7:559-562, 1988; Griffin TW, Childs RL, Levin LV, Fitzgerald DJP: Enhancement of the specific cytotoxicity of anticarcinoembryonic antigen immunotoxin by adenovirus and ionophore.
  • glioma (Recht L, Griffin T, Raso V, and Salimi A: Immunotoxins directed against transferrin receptor are potent in vitro cytotoxins for human glioma cells. Cancer Res 50:6696-6700, 1990) , leukemia (Casselas P, Bourie BJ, Gros P, and Jansen FK: Kinetics of cytotoxicity induced by immunotoxins: Enhancement by lysomotrophic amines and carboxylic ionophores. J Biol Che 259:9359-9364, 1984) and others (see Casellas P, Jansen FK: Immunotoxin enhancers. Frankel AE (ed) , Immunotoxins.
  • the present invention provides more effective cancer treatments, by providing materials which, when coadministered with cancer-treating agents, improve the effectiveness of the treatment.
  • the present inventors have found that monensin can be reliably and reproducibly incorporated into liposomes, and that liposomal monensin, optionally linked to tumor-associated monoclonal antibody (MAb) or other ligand is a more potent and more effective potentiator than free monensin in buffer for in vitro and in vivo immunotoxin cytotoxicity toward target cancer cells.
  • the present inventors have also found that monensin in liposomes increases the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs against which cancer tends to develop resistance.
  • monensin in liposomes increases the effectiveness of radiolabelled antibodies.
  • the present inventors have also found that other ionophores such as nigericin, brefeldin and lasalocid in liposomes can improve cancer therapies.
  • the present invention relates to methods for treating living beings, particularly mammals (e.g., humans), afflicted with cancer.
  • the phrase "afflicted with cancer", as used herein, refers to living beings which have at least one cancer cell.
  • the present invention also relates to pharmaceutical formulations for use in such methods, and to methods for making such pharmaceutical formulations and components thereof.
  • liposomes are used as a delivery system.
  • ionophore-containing liposomes are administered to a patient to whom (a) immunotoxin, (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance or (c) radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies are being administered simultaneously or concurrently.
  • the term "concurrently” means that although materials are not necessarily administered at the same instant, they are both present in the patient during at least part of the time that the patient is undergoing treatment, e.g., the materials are administered sequentially.
  • ionophore-containing liposomes having linked thereto a tumor- associated monoclonal antibody or a ligand (other than a monoclonal antibody) like transferrin, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor B, alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone, interleukin- 2, interleukin-6, etc., which are administered to a patient to whom (a) immunotoxin, (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance or (c) radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies are being administered.
  • a tumor- associated monoclonal antibody or a ligand other than a monoclonal antibody
  • transferrin epidermal growth factor
  • transforming growth factor B transforming growth factor B
  • alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone interleukin- 2, interleukin-6, etc.
  • the above-described therapies can be used to modulate any compound which requires intracellular processing for anti-cancer activity.
  • Fig 1A is a plot of percentage of protein synthesis inhibition (based on control) vs. monensin concentration for a test conducted in Example 1. Liposomal monensin was more potent than free monensin for sensitization of cells to specific immunotoxin. Comparison of the molar concentration of free monensin and liposomal monensin required for the potentiation of the cytotoxicity of specific (anti-TfR) immunotoxin for H-MESO-i human mesothelioma cells.
  • H-MESO-l cells 100,000 cells/well were incubated for 16h (16 hours) with the designated concentrations of free monensin or liposomal monensin with or without 10 pM specific immunotoxin before measuring [ 3 H] leucine incorporation. Values, mean of triplicate determinations expressed as the % control mean ⁇ S.D.
  • A-A immunotoxin + monensin;
  • o-o) liposomal monensin % control mean ⁇ S.D.
  • Fig. IB is a plot of percentage of protein synthesis inhibition (based on control) vs. monensin concentration for a test conducted in Example 1. Specificity of liposomal monensin effect is shown. H-MESO-l cells (100,000 cells/well) were incubated for 16h with the designated concentrations of free monensin or liposomal monensin with or without 10 pM control anti-CEA specific immunotoxin before measuring [ 3 H] leucine incorporation. Values, mean of triplicate determinations expressed as the % control mean ⁇ S.D. (A-A) immunotoxin + monensin; (•-•) immunotoxin + liposomal monensin; ( ⁇ - ⁇ ) monensin; (o-o) liposomal monensin.
  • Fig. 2A is a plot of percentage of protein synthesis inhibition (based on control) vs. immunotoxin concentration for a test conducted in Example 1.
  • the enhancement of immunotoxin effect on specific target cells is greater for liposomal monensin than free monensin.
  • Fig. 2B is a plot of percentage of protein synthesis inhibition (based on control) vs. immunotoxin concentration for a test conducted in Example 1. Differential cytotoxicity of anti-TfR immunotoxin with liposomal monensin (0.1 ⁇ M) for antigen positive U87 cells ( — ) vs antigen negative C 6 cells (O-O) . Conditions as in 2A.
  • Fig. 3A is a plot of percentage of survival vs. days after implant for a test conducted in Example 1. Effect of liposomal monensin on • the therapeutic effect of specific (anti-TfR) immunotoxin given in multiple doses to nude mice bearing H-MESO-l as an advanced intraperitoneal xenograft is shown. Groups of 8 mice received vehicle control, (°-°) ; anti-TfR IT (10 ⁇ g/dose) alone ( • - • ); ( ⁇ - ⁇ ) anti-TfR IT + 100 ⁇ Lip Mon; (A-A) anti-TfR IT + 300 ⁇ Lip Mon. Injections were i.p. and repeated every other day for a total of seven injections.
  • Fig. 3B is a plot of percentage of survival vs. days after implant for a test conducted in Example 1.
  • Fig. 3 depicts survival of nude mice treated with single dose of specific (anti-TfR) IT and liposomal monensin (O-O) PBS control;
  • A-A 100 ⁇ g IT ⁇ 300 ⁇ Lip Mon;
  • O-O liposomal monensin
  • Figs. 4A-4F are photographs of test groups of mice from the experiment reported in Figure 3A.
  • Fig. 4A depicts PBS treated mice 21 days after treatment. All mice in this group died by day 28.
  • Fig. 4B depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin on day 21. All mice in this group died by day 39.
  • Fig. 4C depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin and 100 ⁇ L monensin liposomes on day 21.
  • Fig. 4D depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin and 300 ⁇ L of monensin liposomes (day 21) .
  • Fig. 4E depicts the same group as Figure 4D on day 50.
  • Fig. 4F depicts the same group as Figure 4D on day 90.
  • Figs. 5A and 5B are electron micrographs of CEM human leukemia cells.
  • Fig. 5A shows cells treated with 0.01 ⁇ M liposomal monensin for 3 hours. Conspicuous dilation of the Golgi apparatus is seen.
  • Fig. 5B shows cells treated with 0.01 ⁇ M monensin for three hours. Normal Golgi morphology is demonstrated.
  • ionophore-containing unilamellar liposomes are administered to a patient to whom (a) immunotoxin, (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer develops resistance or (c) radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies are being administered simultaneously or concurrently.
  • the ionophore- containing liposomes can be made by any suitable technique.
  • suitable techniques include pressure-assisted liposome formation (e.g., a French Press method, homogenizing, extruding, or using a icrofluidizer) , vibration-assisted liposome formation (e.g., sonication) and pH gradient methods.
  • pressure-assisted liposome formation e.g., a French Press method, homogenizing, extruding, or using a icrofluidizer
  • vibration-assisted liposome formation e.g., sonication
  • pH gradient methods e.g., a French Press method, homogenizing, extruding, or using a icrofluidizer
  • the French Press method and the extruding method are most preferred according to the present invention.
  • French Press methods generally include the steps of suspending phospholipid material in solvent (e.g., hexane, ether or any other suitable solvent) which contains the ionophore (e.g., monensin), sonicating, evaporating to remove excess solvent, centrifuging and pressing with a French pressure cell.
  • solvent e.g., hexane, ether or any other suitable solvent
  • ionophore e.g., monensin
  • the drug associated with liposomes is then separated from unbound drug, e.g., by centrifugation and washing with buffer.
  • Extruding methods generally include the steps of forming a lipid composition containing phospholipid and the drug, extruding the lipid composition through a suitable membrane with gradually decreasing pore size, e.g., double stacked polycarbonate membranes, using a high pressure extruder device, e.g., an extruder made by Lipex Biomembranes, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Extruding methods can generally provide a relatively narrow size range of liposomal drug.
  • Suitable phospholipid ⁇ for use in making liposomes according to any of the various methods are well known in the art, and include, e.g., phosphatidylcholine, soy phosphatidyl choline, phosphatidic acid, phosphtidyl ethanolamine, phosphatidyl serine, sphingomyelin, hydrogenated phosphatidyl inosotol, ganglioside GM, and polyethylene glycol.
  • the lipid composition for use in making liposomes according to any technique, including those mentioned above, preferably contains cholesterol, which assists in preventing leakage of the ionophore from the liposome, and which provides stability to the membrane.
  • the lipid composition may also contain a material of positive or negative charge (e.g., stearyl amine) when the phospholipid is substantially neutral, to reduce the tendency of the lipid composition to agglomerate.
  • the average size of the liposomes according to the present invention is very important.
  • the liposomes used in accordance with the present invention have an average diameter in the range of from 50 to 200 nanometers, preferably 100 to 150 nanometers. It is believed that a small size is particularly important for efficient internalization of liposomal monensin in order to elucidate a biological response in vitro or in vivo.
  • the liposomal drugs for use in accordance with the present invention include the ionophores, such as monensin, nigericin, brefeldin and lasalocid.
  • the preferred ionophore in accordance with the present invention is monensin. Monensin is commercially available, e.g., from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) .
  • liposomal ionophore is administered simultaneously or concurrently with an immunotoxin.
  • the liposomal ionophore and immunotoxin are preferably administered via the same mode of administration.
  • Any suitable immunotoxin may be employed, and preferred immunotoxins according to the present invention include ricin A immunotoxin, blocked ricin immunotoxin, pokeweed antiviral protein immunotoxin and gelonin immunotoxin, particularly in connection with coad inistration of liposomal monensin.
  • the immunotoxins are made in any suitable way, as well known by those skilled in the art, by linking the monoclonal antibody into the immunotoxin, e.g., using any suitable disulfide linker, such as aminothiolone, SMPT, etc.
  • suitable monoclonal antibodies for use in connection with this aspect of the invention include any tumor-associated antibody, e.g., anti-transferrin receptor MAb, anti-carcinoe bryonic antigen MAb, B72.3 antibody again ⁇ t the TAG antigen and CD33 antibody for leukemia.
  • liposomal ionophore as described above is administered simultaneously or concurrently with anti-cancer drugs to which cancer tends to develop resistance (i.e., the same dose, over time, becomes less effective) .
  • the liposomal ionophore and anti-cancer drug are preferably administered via the same mode of administration.
  • anti-cancer drugs include Vincristine, etoposide, Taxol and the anthracyclines, e.g., adriamycin (or doxorubicin) , daunomycin and vinblastine.
  • liposomal ionophore as described above is administered simultaneously or concurrently with radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies.
  • the liposomal ionophore and the radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies are preferably administered via the same mode of administration.
  • Any suitable tumor-associated monoclonal antibody such as those described above, can be employed.
  • Any suitable radioactive label may be used, such as rhenium 186, rhenium 188, iodine 125, iodine 131, etc.
  • liposomal monensin can retard the metabolic degradation of radioimmunoconjugates by tumor cells and also enhance cellular retention of radiolabelled antibodies.
  • liposomal ionophore (as discussed above) having linked thereto tumor-associated monoclonal antibody is administered simultaneously or concurrently with (a) immunotoxin (as described above) , (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance - ⁇ as described above) , or (c) radiolabelled antibodies (as described above) .
  • the liposomal ionophore linked to monoclonal antibody and the immunotoxin, anti-cancer drug or radiolabelled antibodies are preferably administered via the same mode of administration.
  • the ionophore-containing liposomes can be prepared in any suitable manner, as described above. Any suitable monoclonal antibody may be employed, such as those mentioned above.
  • the monoclonal antibody can be linked to the liposome by any suitable method, and such methods are well known to those skilled in the art.
  • the method of Singh, et al (Singh M, Ghose T, Faulkner G, Knalovec J and Mezei M: Targeting of methotrexate-containing liposomes with a monoclonal antibody against human renal cancer. Cancer Res 49:3976-34, 1989) can be used, in which SPDP is employed.
  • SATA N-succinimidyl-S-acetyl thioacetate to form a thioether linkage with liposomes in which the phospholipid is functionalized by various lipophilic maleimide compounds
  • EDCI water soluble carbodiimide
  • liposomal ionophore (as discussed above) having linked thereto ligands (other than monoclonal antibodies) , such as tumor- directed proteins, e.g.,ligands like transferrin, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor B, alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone, interleukin-2, interleukin-6, etc., is administered simultaneously or concurrently with (a) immunotoxin (as described above) , (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance (as described above) , or (c) radiolabelled antibodies (as described above) .
  • ligands other than monoclonal antibodies
  • the liposomal ionophore linked to ligand and the immunotoxin, anti-cancer drug or radiolabelled antibodies are preferably administered via the same mode of administration.
  • the ionophore-containing liposomes can be prepared in any suitable manner, as described above.
  • the ligand can be linked to the liposome by any suitable method, and such methods are well known to those skilled in the art.
  • the liposomal ionophore can be introduced into a patient by any suitable means.
  • Preferred modes of administration include intravenous-, intraperitoneal, intrathecal, intravesicular and intrapleural.
  • Any suitable formulations for administering the liposomal ionophore according to each specific mode may be employed, and the materials to be included with the liposomal drug to make such formulations for the various modes (e.g., carriers, etc.) are well known by those skilled in this art.
  • suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carrier materials include saline buffer, e.g., phosphate buffer saline, etc.
  • Suitable dosages to be administered depend on the route of administration, factors regarding the patient (e.g., the type of patient and the weight of the patient), the type(s) of materials being administered, etc. , and can readily be determined by those skilled in the art.
  • Representative suitable dosages for human adults are 10 to 1000 ml of liposomal drug containing 0.01 to 1 ⁇ M drug, e.g., monensin.
  • Representative suitable dosages for mice are in the range of about 2400 times lower than those for human adults.
  • Representative in vitro dosages are set forth in the Examples.
  • the lipid composition preferably contains diacyl lipids with bulky polyoxyethylene glycol (PEG) head groups (see Klibinov AL, Moriya a K, Torchillin VP and Huang L, FEBS Lett. 268: 238-237 (1990)) , hydrogenated phosphatidyl inositol containing liposomes (see Gabizon A, Shiota R, Papahadjopoulous D. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
  • PEG polyoxyethylene glycol
  • the final formulation can be lyophilized and reconstituted in accordance with techniques well known by those skilled in this art.
  • liposomal monensin is more potent in producing immunotoxin potentiation than monensin in buffer, and produces greater enhancement of specific cytotoxicity than monensin in buffer.
  • Liposomal monensin plus immunotoxin has produced long- term disease free survival in animals with macroscopic tumors. These preparations do not lose activity in the presence of serum or whole blood.
  • liposomal monensin While not intending to be bound by any particular theory as to why liposomal monensin according to the present invention achieves potentiation and provides other benefits, it is believed by the present inventors that monensin liposomes are probably endocytosed by tumor cells. It has been observed that liposomal monensin achieves potentiation of many different immunotoxins, radiolabelled antibodies and overcomes resistance to adriamycin to an extent which surpasses free monensin.
  • the ionophores are similar in that they are all lipophilic. Part of the present invention is the recognition that due to the lipophilicity of monensin, as well as the other ionophores, administering them in liposomal form achieves the favorable results described herein. The similarity of the ionophores in this context makes it clear to those of skill in this art that the other ionophores will behave in a manner which is like that of monensin.
  • Example 1 The invention may be more fully understood with reference to the following Examples.
  • Example 1 The invention may be more fully understood with reference to the following Examples.
  • Monensin was purchased from the Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) .
  • the ionophore was prepared as a 10" 2 M stock solution in ethanol and diluted prior to use to an appropriate final concentration in PBS (0.14 M NaCl, 0.01 M NaHP0 4 , pH 7.4).
  • Liposomal monensin was prepared by drying phosphatidylcholme (100 mg/ml) in hexane to a thin film in vacuo for 24 hrs and then resuspending this mixture in ether containing 0.5 ml monensin (2.7 x 10" 3 M) .
  • the final lipid composition consisted of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholme : cholesterol : stearyl amine (5:3:1). This mixture was sonicated for 2 minutes in a bath sonicator in doubly distilled H : 0 containing 0.01% Triton, after which the ether was removed by rotary evaporation under reduced pressure to form a lipid gel.
  • the gel was then sonicated for 1 minute in 1 ml PBS.
  • the resultant suspension was centrifuged x 2 at 14,000 g x 10 min at 4' C. After centrifugation, the liposomes were pressed with a French pressure cell at 1000 psi.
  • the drug associated with liposomes was separated from unbound drug by low speed centrifugation and washing, with two changes of buffer.
  • the particle size of the liposomes was measured with a laser sub icron particle sizer. The average liposome diameter was 200 nm with a range from 50-1000 nm.
  • the colorimetric a ⁇ say for monensin utilized a previously described TLC spray reagent composed of 3% vanillin in absolute ethanol containing 1.5% concentrated sulfuric acid.
  • 300 ⁇ L of the stock reagent was added to a 10 x 75 cm borosilicate glass tube.
  • the mixture was then warmed on a heating block at 80 °C for 30 minutes.
  • a icrocentrifuge tube containing water was placed on top of the vial to promote reflux.
  • the color reaction was monitored at 555 nm on the spectrophotometer, and a linear standard curve of monensin concentration (0.5 to 10 ⁇ g) was generated.
  • a standard curve was generated for liposomal monensin in a similar manner, except that blank liposomes lacking monensin were added to the test samples and standard ⁇ to co pen ⁇ ate for the altered absorbance.
  • the 7D3 murine monoclonal antibody directed against the human transferrin receptor is an IgG, which was produced in BALB/c mica by immunization with cultured human leukemia CEM cells.
  • the C110 murine monoclonal antibody is an IgG, directed against the human carcinoembryonic antigen. Immunotoxins against the human transferrj-n receptor and carcinoembryonic antigen were produced with these antibodies by conjugating the native ricin A chain to each antibody via the SPDP reagent.
  • H-MESO-l is a human malignant mesothelioma cell line which grows both in tissue culture and as an i.p.
  • mice develop prodigious ascites with suspended tumor cell clusters and macroscopic tumor modules.
  • a cytocrit of the malignant ascites obtained by centrifugation was approximately 30%. Fine structural electron microscopy
  • CEM cells were incubated in RPMI 1640 media with either free monensin or liposomal monensin for 3 hours at 37° C.
  • the cells were washed with PBS, then pelleted and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS. Following fixation, the samples were post- fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated and embedded in Epon. Sections were cut and double strained with 2% uranyl acetate (7 in) and 1% lead citrate (3 min) .
  • H-MESO-l cells were added to microtiter wells (100,000 cells/well) in the presence of 200 ⁇ L (50000 cpm) of 0.1 ⁇ M liposomal monensin or 0.1 ⁇ M free monensin in medium. Assays were run in triplicate. At the designated time points, the cells were harvested, washed with PBS, and 3 H-incorporation determined by scintillation counting.
  • mice BALB/c nu/nu mice were inoculated i.p. with 1 x 10 7 H- MESO-1 cells/mouse on day 0. On day 20 after cell inoculation, when the mice had gained 6-8 g due to tumor ascites, they were randomized to treatment with vehicle control, immunotoxin, or immunotoxin plus liposomal monensin (6-8 mice/group) .
  • vehicle control immunotoxin
  • immunotoxin plus liposomal monensin 6-8 mice/group
  • the specific anti-TfR-immunotoxin or control (anti-CEA) immunotoxin were drawn up in sterile vehicle (0.14 M NaCl, 0.01 NaHPO.., pH 7.4) with or without monensin.
  • the immunotoxins were administered i.p.
  • Fig. 1A shows a 16 hour protein synthesis inhibition assay for H-MESO-l mesothelioma cells treated with a fixed subtoxic concentration of specific anti-TfR immunotoxin (10 pM) and log dilutions of monensin or liposomal monensin.
  • Co-incubation of liposomal monensin with specific immunotoxin produced 50% protein synthesis inhibition at a concentration of monensin (0.3 nM) 200 fold lower than that required for monensin in buffer (0.05 ⁇ M) .
  • Liposomal monensin and free monensin had similar nonspecific toxicity for H-MESO-l cells ( Figure 1A) .
  • Tartakoff (Tartakoff AM. Perturbation of vesicular traffic with the carboxylic ionophore monensin. Cell 32 : 1026-1028 , 1983) has described the conspicuous dilation of Golgi-derived vacuoles in mouse plasma cells after one hour of treatment with 1 ⁇ M monensin, and monensin inhibition of Golgi apparatus function is now well established. Similar swelling of the Golgi apparatus cisternae observed by electron microscopy were seen in CEM human leukemia cells within three hours incubation with 0.1 ⁇ M monensin (V.R., unpublished) . The effect of liposomal monensin on this Golgi apparatus morphology was examined.
  • FIG. 4A depicts mice treated with PBS beginning 21 days after injection of the mesothelia cells. All mice in this group died by day 28.
  • Fig. 4B depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin beginning on day 21. All mice in this group died by day 39.
  • Fig. 4C depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin and 100 ⁇ L monensin liposomes beginning on day 21.
  • Fig. 4D depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin and 300 ⁇ L of monensin liposomes beginning on day 21.
  • Fig. 4E depicts the same group as Figure 4D on day 50.
  • Fig. 4f depicts the same group as Figure 4D on day 90.
  • Liposomes (containing monensin) of various sizes were prepared by extrusion (rather than by the French press method) , by extruding multi-lamellar vesicles consisting of Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholme (40 g) : Cholesterol (13 mg) : Stearyl amine (2.9 mg) with 5 mg monensin through double stacked polycarbonate membranes with gradually decreasing pore size (0.4-0.05 ⁇ m) using a high pressure extruder device (Lipex Biomembranes, Vancouver, B.C., Canada) .
  • Liposomal monensin (Lip Mon) formulations of diameter 106, 135, 165, 260 and 500nm were prepared and further used in combination with specific immunotoxin in various in vitro cytotoxicity assays as described in Example 1.
  • Lip Mon formulations of 106-I65nm in combination with specific ricin A immunotoxin (as described in Example 1) increased its cytotoxicity 100 fold in comparison to monensin in buffer in an in vitro cytotoxicity assay with LS174T cells (IC 50 10" 9 vs 10' 7 M) .
  • Lip Mon produced a 50% inhibition of protein ⁇ ynthesis at an immunotoxin concentration of 10 "11 M and a monensin concentration of l ⁇ ' 9 M, as compared to 10' 7 M free monensin.
  • Lip Mon formulations of diameter 260 - 500 nm had minimal or no potentiation effect. There was no nonspecific toxicity of Lip Mon at the concentrations used and the specificity of Lip Mon formulations was further demonstrated with control cell lines. Liposomal formulations were stable at 4 * C for several months and their size did not change by more than 5% over a period of 4 months.
  • Liposomes containing 3 H- monensin were mixed with thiolated reduced antibody overnight.
  • the unbound antibody was separated from liposome bound antibody by column chromatography on Sepharose 4B followed by Ficoll-flotation.
  • Retained immunoreactivity of the MAb after conjugation to liposome was determined by flow cytometry and by the comparison of indirect im unofluorescence of target cells stained with roughly equimolar amounts of unconjugated MAb and MAb conjugated to liposomal monensin.
  • Two antibodies (anti-TfR and anti-CEA) were used to conjugate to the liposomes.
  • anti-TfR IT immunodevoid H-Meso-1 and C6 cell lines.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Preparation (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)

Abstract

There are provided methods of treating patients suffering from cancer, pharmaceutical compositions and kits for use in such methods, and methods of making such pharmaceutical compositions. The compositions comprise a liposome having an ionophore entrapped therein, and they are administered to a patient to whom an immunotoxin, an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance, or a radiolabelled monoclonal antibody is also being administered. The liposome may be free of any ligand, may have a ligand bound thereto, or may have a monoclonal antibody bound thereto.

Description

LIPOSOMAL FORMULATIONS FOR ADMINISTERING TO CANCER PATIENTS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to methods of treating patients suffering from cancer, to pharmaceutical compositions and kits for use in such methods, and to methods of making such pharmaceutical formulations. The invention more particularly relates to methods of potentiating the cytotoxic effects of immunotoxins, compensating for and/or overcoming resistance against anti-cancer drugs, potentiating the cytotoxic effects of radiolabelled antibodies and/or increasing association of radiolabelled antibodies with cancer cells.
Ricin A chain immunotoxins directed against selected tumor-associated antigens (e.g., human transferrin receptor and carcinoembryonic antigen) are potent and selective in vitro cytotoxins for human malignant cells (Trowbridge IS, Domingo D: Anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal and toxin-antibody conjugates affect growth of human tumor cells. Nature 294:171-173, 1981; Griffin T , Pagnini P, McGrath J, McCann, J, Houston LL: Activity of anti-transferrin receptor immunotoxins against human adenocarcinomas of the colon and pancreas. J Biol Resp Modif 7:559-562, 1988; and Levin LV, Griffin TW, Childs LR, Davis S, Haagenson DE: Multiple anti-CEA immunotoxins active against human adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Immunol I munotherapy 24:202-206, 1987) . Despite the marked in vitro potency of ricin A immunotoxins, a major factor limiting their efficacy is their lack of potency in vivo (Griffin TW, Richardson C, LePage D, Bogden AE, Raso V: Antitumor activity of intraperitoneal immunotoxins in a nude mouse model of human malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Research 47:4266-4282, 1987; Griffin TW, Morgan AC, Blythman HE: Immunotoxin therapy: assessment by animal models. Frankel AE (ed) , Immunotoxins. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 433-456, 1988).
The holotoxin ricin through its B chain possesses an efficient mechanism to assist A chain traversal into the cytoplasm. However, the inclusion of B chain may greatly enhance the nonspecific toxicity of the conjugate due to binding of the cell surface glycoproteins and glycolipids of normal tissue. In attempts to decrease the nonspecific toxicity of B chain while retaining increased potency, several groups of investigators have developed antibody conjugates with blocked galactose binding sites on the B chain. Wawrzynczak EJ, Watson GJ, Cumber AJ, et. al. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 32:289-295 (1991).
The present invention is directed to methods for increasing the cytoplasmic access of ricin A chain in vivo. The present invention is also directed to methods for increasing the effectiveness of other cancer treatments.
The present inventors noted that it has been theorized that the ricin A chain εubunits of ricin A immunotoxins kill target cells by inhibiting cellular protein synthesis by the enzymatic removal of adenine from the 28S ribosomal RNA (Endo Y, Tsurugi K: RNA N-glycosidase activity of ricin A chain. Mechanism of action of the toxic lectin ricin on eukaryotic ribosomes. J Biol Chem 262:8128-8130, 1987). However, the mechanism by which the A chain of an immunotoxin bound to a cell surface antigen reaches the ribosomes in the cytosol is not well understood. The present inventors identified a discrepancy, in that one molecule of toxic A chain is sufficient to kill a cell if it gains access to the cytosol (Olsnes S, Fernandez-Puentes C, Caarrasco L and Vasguez D: Ribosome inactivation by the toxic lectins abrin and ricin. Kinetics of the enzy ic activity of the toxin A-chains. Eur J Bioche 60:281-288, 1975; Olsnes S, Pihl H: The molecular action of toxins and viruses. Toxic Lectins and Related Proteins P. Cohen and S. Van Heynigen (eds) Elseiver Biomedical Press, New York, 52- 105, 1982), whereas saturating concentrations of antibody A chain conjugates typically deliver at least 100,000 ricin A chain molecules to determinant sites on the exterior of the cell membrane. In view of this discrepancy, the present inventors ascertained that there was a possibility that the cytotoxic efficiency of ricin A-chain immunotoxins and other cancer treatments could be significantly improved.
The present inventors observed that the efficacy of a ricin A immunotoxin is increased by lysomotropic amines, carboxylic ionophores and lysosomal enzyme inhibitors. Carboxylic ionophores function at extremely low doses and reliably produce a dramatic increase in ricin A immunotoxin specific cytotoxicity.
Monensin is a carboxylic ionophore which catalyses exchange between monovalent cations and hydrogen ions within intracellular vesicle compartments, facilitating cation exchange across cellular membranes (Pressman B: Biological applications of ionophores, Ann Rev Biochem 45:501-530, 1976) . At low concentrations, monensin sensitizes cells to the cytotoxic action of cell-specific immunotoxins. Specifically, monensin increased the in vitro cytotoxicity and kinetics of cell killing of ricin A chain immunotoxins directed against colorectal cancer cell lines (Griffin TW, Pagnini P, McGrath J, McCann, J, Houston LL: Activity of anti-transferrin receptor immunotoxins against human adenocarcino as of the colon and pancreas. J Biol Reεp Modif 7:559-562, 1988; Griffin TW, Childs RL, Levin LV, Fitzgerald DJP: Enhancement of the specific cytotoxicity of anticarcinoembryonic antigen immunotoxin by adenovirus and ionophore. J Natl Cancer Inst 79:679-685, 1987), mesothelioma (Griffin TW, Richardson C, LePage D, Bogden AE, Raso V: Antitumor activity of intraperitoneal immunotoxins in a nude mouse model of human malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Research 47:4266-4282, 1987), breast cancer (Griffin TW, Pagnini PG, Houston LL: Enhancement of the specific cytotoxicity of a breast cancer-associated antigen immunotoxin by the carboxylic ionophore monensin. J Biol Resp Modit. 6:537-545, 1987) , glioma (Recht L, Griffin T, Raso V, and Salimi A: Immunotoxins directed against transferrin receptor are potent in vitro cytotoxins for human glioma cells. Cancer Res 50:6696-6700, 1990) , leukemia (Casselas P, Bourie BJ, Gros P, and Jansen FK: Kinetics of cytotoxicity induced by immunotoxins: Enhancement by lysomotrophic amines and carboxylic ionophores. J Biol Che 259:9359-9364, 1984) and others (see Casellas P, Jansen FK: Immunotoxin enhancers. Frankel AE (ed) , Immunotoxins. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 351- 374, 1988; Fitzgerald DJP, Trowbridge IS, Pastan I, and Willingham: Enhancement of toxicity of anti-transferrin receptor antibody- Pseudomonas exotoxin conjugates by adenovirus; Ramakrishnan S and Houston LL: Inhibition of human acute ly phoblastic leukemia cells by immunotoxin: potentiation by chloroquine. Science 223:58-61, 1983; Raso V, and Lawrence J: Carboxylic ionophores enhance the cytotoxic potency of ligand and antibody-delivered ricin A chain. J Exp Med 160:1234-1240, 1984; Casselas P, Bourie BJ, Gros P, and Jansen FK: Kinetics of cytotoxicity induced by immunotoxins: Enhancement by lysoso otrophic amineε and carboxylic ionophores. J Biol Che 259:9359-9364, 1984; Vitetta E: Synergy between immunotoxins prepared with native ricin A chains and chemically modified ricin B chain. J Immunol; 136:1880-1887, 1986; Griffin TW, Childs RL, Levin LV, Fitzgerald DJP: Enhancement of the specific cytotoxicity of anticarcinoembryonic antigen immunotoxin by adenovirus and ionophore. J Natl Cancer Inst 79:679-685, 1987) . This effect was pronounced (2-4 logs increased cell kill) and specific (no potentiating effect with control immunotoxins or control cell lines) . Despite this in vitro effect, the combination of free monensin and immunotoxin has shown no or minor therapeutic advantage in in vivo trials, compared to treatment with immunotoxin alone (Griffin TW, Richardson C, LePage. D, Bogden AE, Raso V: Antitumor activity of intraperitoneal immunotoxins in a nude mouse model of human malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Research 47:4266- 4282, 1987; Roth JA, Ames RS, Fry IC, Lee HM, Scannon PJ: Mediation of reduction of spontaneous and experimental pulmonary etastases by ricin A chain immunotoxins 45-2D9-RTA with potentiation by systemic monensin in mice. Cancer Res 48:3496- 3501, 1988; and Marks, MA, Ettenson D, Bjorn MJ, Lei M, Baumal R: Inhibition of human tumor growth by intraperitoneal immunotoxins in nude mice. Cancer Res 50:288-292, 1990).
Although monensin is commonly considered a lysosomotrophic agent, the potentiation of ricin A chain immunotoxins occurs at concentrations of monensin at which no change in vesicle pH is detectable (Olsnes S, Sandvig I: How protein toxins enter and kill cells. Immunotoxins. Frankel AE (ed) , Kluwer Academic Publishers, 39-74, 1988; Raso V, Watkins SC, Slayter H, Fehrmann C: Intracellular pathway of ricin A chain cytotoxins. In Biological Approaches to the Controlled Delivery of Drugs. C.C. Juliano (ed) , Annals of the New York Acad Sci 507:172- 186, 1987) . Considerable evidence now exists that monensin affects intracellular events after cell surface binding of immunotoxin, and that intracellular trafficking is the rate-limiting step in tumor cell killing (Raso, V., Watkins, S., Slayter, H-. , Fehrmann, C. , Nerbonne, S. Subcellular compartmentalization and the potency of ricin A chain cytotoxins. in: Bonavida, B. and Collier, R. J. Eds. Membrane-mediated cytotoxicity. New York, UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology, New Series. 45: 1985) .
There is an ongoing need for more effective cancer treatments. The present invention provides more effective cancer treatments, by providing materials which, when coadministered with cancer-treating agents, improve the effectiveness of the treatment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present inventors have found that monensin can be reliably and reproducibly incorporated into liposomes, and that liposomal monensin, optionally linked to tumor-associated monoclonal antibody (MAb) or other ligand is a more potent and more effective potentiator than free monensin in buffer for in vitro and in vivo immunotoxin cytotoxicity toward target cancer cells. The present inventors have also found that monensin in liposomes increases the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs against which cancer tends to develop resistance. The present inventors have also found that monensin in liposomes increases the effectiveness of radiolabelled antibodies. The present inventors have also found that other ionophores such as nigericin, brefeldin and lasalocid in liposomes can improve cancer therapies.
The present invention relates to methods for treating living beings, particularly mammals (e.g., humans), afflicted with cancer. The phrase "afflicted with cancer", as used herein, refers to living beings which have at least one cancer cell. The present invention also relates to pharmaceutical formulations for use in such methods, and to methods for making such pharmaceutical formulations and components thereof.
According to the present invention, liposomes are used as a delivery system. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, ionophore-containing liposomes are administered to a patient to whom (a) immunotoxin, (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance or (c) radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies are being administered simultaneously or concurrently. As used herein, the term "concurrently" means that although materials are not necessarily administered at the same instant, they are both present in the patient during at least part of the time that the patient is undergoing treatment, e.g., the materials are administered sequentially. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there are provided ionophore-containing liposomes having linked thereto a tumor- associated monoclonal antibody or a ligand (other than a monoclonal antibody) like transferrin, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor B, alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone, interleukin- 2, interleukin-6, etc., which are administered to a patient to whom (a) immunotoxin, (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance or (c) radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies are being administered. The above-described therapies can be used to modulate any compound which requires intracellular processing for anti-cancer activity.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES
Fig 1A is a plot of percentage of protein synthesis inhibition (based on control) vs. monensin concentration for a test conducted in Example 1. Liposomal monensin was more potent than free monensin for sensitization of cells to specific immunotoxin. Comparison of the molar concentration of free monensin and liposomal monensin required for the potentiation of the cytotoxicity of specific (anti-TfR) immunotoxin for H-MESO-i human mesothelioma cells. H-MESO-l cells (100,000 cells/well) were incubated for 16h (16 hours) with the designated concentrations of free monensin or liposomal monensin with or without 10 pM specific immunotoxin before measuring [3H] leucine incorporation. Values, mean of triplicate determinations expressed as the % control mean ± S.D. (A-A) immunotoxin + monensin; (•-•) immunotoxin + liposomal monensin; (Δ-Δ) monensin; (o-o) liposomal monensin.
Fig. IB is a plot of percentage of protein synthesis inhibition (based on control) vs. monensin concentration for a test conducted in Example 1. Specificity of liposomal monensin effect is shown. H-MESO-l cells (100,000 cells/well) were incubated for 16h with the designated concentrations of free monensin or liposomal monensin with or without 10 pM control anti-CEA specific immunotoxin before measuring [3H] leucine incorporation. Values, mean of triplicate determinations expressed as the % control mean ± S.D. (A-A) immunotoxin + monensin; (•-•) immunotoxin + liposomal monensin; (Δ-Δ) monensin; (o-o) liposomal monensin.
Fig. 2A is a plot of percentage of protein synthesis inhibition (based on control) vs. immunotoxin concentration for a test conducted in Example 1. The enhancement of immunotoxin effect on specific target cells is greater for liposomal monensin than free monensin. Cytotoxicity of specific (anti-human TfR) immunotoxin with free monensin or liposomal monensin for U87 human and C6 rodent, glioblastoma cells. U87 or C6 cells (100,000 cells/well) were incubated with specific immunotoxin at the designated concentrations either alone or with free monensin (0.1 μM) or liposomal monensin (o.l μM) for 18 h before measuring [3H] leucine incorporation. Values, mean of triplicate determinations expressed as the % control mean ± S.D. (A-A) IT (immunotoxin) vs control C6 cells; (O-O) IT vs specific U87 cells; (Δ-Δ) IT -f MON vs U87 cells; (■-■) IT + LIP MON vs U87 cells.
Fig. 2B is a plot of percentage of protein synthesis inhibition (based on control) vs. immunotoxin concentration for a test conducted in Example 1. Differential cytotoxicity of anti-TfR immunotoxin with liposomal monensin (0.1 μM) for antigen positive U87 cells ( — ) vs antigen negative C6 cells (O-O) . Conditions as in 2A.
Fig. 3A is a plot of percentage of survival vs. days after implant for a test conducted in Example 1. Effect of liposomal monensin on • the therapeutic effect of specific (anti-TfR) immunotoxin given in multiple doses to nude mice bearing H-MESO-l as an advanced intraperitoneal xenograft is shown. Groups of 8 mice received vehicle control, (°-°) ; anti-TfR IT (10 μg/dose) alone (•-•); (Δ-Δ) anti-TfR IT + 100 λ Lip Mon; (A-A) anti-TfR IT + 300 λ Lip Mon. Injections were i.p. and repeated every other day for a total of seven injections.
Fig. 3B is a plot of percentage of survival vs. days after implant for a test conducted in Example 1. Fig. 3 depicts survival of nude mice treated with single dose of specific (anti-TfR) IT and liposomal monensin (O-O) PBS control; (A-A) : 100 μg IT ÷ 300 λ Lip Mon; ( ) 100 μg IT + 100 λ Lip Mon.
Figs. 4A-4F are photographs of test groups of mice from the experiment reported in Figure 3A. Fig. 4A depicts PBS treated mice 21 days after treatment. All mice in this group died by day 28. Fig. 4B depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin on day 21. All mice in this group died by day 39. Fig. 4C depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin and 100 μL monensin liposomes on day 21. Fig. 4D depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin and 300 μL of monensin liposomes (day 21) . Fig. 4E depicts the same group as Figure 4D on day 50. Fig. 4F depicts the same group as Figure 4D on day 90.
Figs. 5A and 5B are electron micrographs of CEM human leukemia cells. Fig. 5A shows cells treated with 0.01 μM liposomal monensin for 3 hours. Conspicuous dilation of the Golgi apparatus is seen. Fig. 5B shows cells treated with 0.01 μM monensin for three hours. Normal Golgi morphology is demonstrated.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, ionophore-containing unilamellar liposomes are administered to a patient to whom (a) immunotoxin, (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer develops resistance or (c) radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies are being administered simultaneously or concurrently.
According to the present invention, the ionophore- containing liposomes (liposomal .ionophore) can be made by any suitable technique. Several examples of suitable techniques include pressure-assisted liposome formation (e.g., a French Press method, homogenizing, extruding, or using a icrofluidizer) , vibration-assisted liposome formation (e.g., sonication) and pH gradient methods. Of these, the French Press method and the extruding method are most preferred according to the present invention.
French Press methods, well known in the art, generally include the steps of suspending phospholipid material in solvent (e.g., hexane, ether or any other suitable solvent) which contains the ionophore (e.g., monensin), sonicating, evaporating to remove excess solvent, centrifuging and pressing with a French pressure cell. The drug associated with liposomes is then separated from unbound drug, e.g., by centrifugation and washing with buffer.
Extruding methods generally include the steps of forming a lipid composition containing phospholipid and the drug, extruding the lipid composition through a suitable membrane with gradually decreasing pore size, e.g., double stacked polycarbonate membranes, using a high pressure extruder device, e.g., an extruder made by Lipex Biomembranes, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Extruding methods can generally provide a relatively narrow size range of liposomal drug.
Suitable phospholipidε for use in making liposomes according to any of the various methods are well known in the art, and include, e.g., phosphatidylcholine, soy phosphatidyl choline, phosphatidic acid, phosphtidyl ethanolamine, phosphatidyl serine, sphingomyelin, hydrogenated phosphatidyl inosotol, ganglioside GM, and polyethylene glycol.
The lipid composition for use in making liposomes according to any technique, including those mentioned above, preferably contains cholesterol, which assists in preventing leakage of the ionophore from the liposome, and which provides stability to the membrane. The lipid composition may also contain a material of positive or negative charge (e.g., stearyl amine) when the phospholipid is substantially neutral, to reduce the tendency of the lipid composition to agglomerate.
The average size of the liposomes according to the present invention is very important. The liposomes used in accordance with the present invention have an average diameter in the range of from 50 to 200 nanometers, preferably 100 to 150 nanometers. It is believed that a small size is particularly important for efficient internalization of liposomal monensin in order to elucidate a biological response in vitro or in vivo.
The liposomal drugs for use in accordance with the present invention include the ionophores, such as monensin, nigericin, brefeldin and lasalocid. The preferred ionophore in accordance with the present invention is monensin. Monensin is commercially available, e.g., from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) .
According to one aspect of the present invention, liposomal ionophore is administered simultaneously or concurrently with an immunotoxin. The liposomal ionophore and immunotoxin are preferably administered via the same mode of administration. Any suitable immunotoxin may be employed, and preferred immunotoxins according to the present invention include ricin A immunotoxin, blocked ricin immunotoxin, pokeweed antiviral protein immunotoxin and gelonin immunotoxin, particularly in connection with coad inistration of liposomal monensin. The immunotoxins are made in any suitable way, as well known by those skilled in the art, by linking the monoclonal antibody into the immunotoxin, e.g., using any suitable disulfide linker, such as aminothiolone, SMPT, etc. Suitable monoclonal antibodies for use in connection with this aspect of the invention include any tumor-associated antibody, e.g., anti-transferrin receptor MAb, anti-carcinoe bryonic antigen MAb, B72.3 antibody againεt the TAG antigen and CD33 antibody for leukemia.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, liposomal ionophore as described above is administered simultaneously or concurrently with anti-cancer drugs to which cancer tends to develop resistance (i.e., the same dose, over time, becomes less effective) . The liposomal ionophore and anti-cancer drug are preferably administered via the same mode of administration. Such anti-cancer drugs include Vincristine, etoposide, Taxol and the anthracyclines, e.g., adriamycin (or doxorubicin) , daunomycin and vinblastine. Experiments have shown that liposomal monensin can overcome adriamycin resistance in adriamycin resistant tumor cell lines by at least 10 - 100 times.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, liposomal ionophore as described above is administered simultaneously or concurrently with radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies. The liposomal ionophore and the radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies are preferably administered via the same mode of administration. Any suitable tumor-associated monoclonal antibody, such as those described above, can be employed. Any suitable radioactive label may be used, such as rhenium 186, rhenium 188, iodine 125, iodine 131, etc. Experiments have shown that liposomal monensin can retard the metabolic degradation of radioimmunoconjugates by tumor cells and also enhance cellular retention of radiolabelled antibodies. As an example, upon using 5 x 10"8 M liposomal monensin, 85 % of initially bound CPM (radioactivity) was still associated with cell, whereas with aqueous monensin, only 57 % of initially bound CPM was still cell associated.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, liposomal ionophore (as discussed above) having linked thereto tumor-associated monoclonal antibody is administered simultaneously or concurrently with (a) immunotoxin (as described above) , (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance -{as described above) , or (c) radiolabelled antibodies (as described above) . The liposomal ionophore linked to monoclonal antibody and the immunotoxin, anti-cancer drug or radiolabelled antibodies are preferably administered via the same mode of administration. The ionophore-containing liposomes can be prepared in any suitable manner, as described above. Any suitable monoclonal antibody may be employed, such as those mentioned above. The monoclonal antibody can be linked to the liposome by any suitable method, and such methods are well known to those skilled in the art. For instance, the method of Singh, et al (Singh M, Ghose T, Faulkner G, Knalovec J and Mezei M: Targeting of methotrexate-containing liposomes with a monoclonal antibody against human renal cancer. Cancer Res 49:3976-34, 1989) can be used, in which SPDP is employed. Other suitable methods include (but are not limited to) (1) using SATA (N-succinimidyl-S-acetyl thioacetate to form a thioether linkage with liposomes in which the phospholipid is functionalized by various lipophilic maleimide compounds; (2) derivatizing the antibody using palmitic acid and linking the antibody to liposomes or liposomal drug by a detergent dialysis method; or (3) activating the carboxyl groups on IgG using water soluble carbodiimide (EDCI) to react the carboxyl groups with nucleophilic groups such as NH2 on phosphatidyl ethanolamine present in liposomes (or liposomes containing drug) by an amide band.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, liposomal ionophore (as discussed above) having linked thereto ligands (other than monoclonal antibodies) , such as tumor- directed proteins, e.g.,ligands like transferrin, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor B, alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone, interleukin-2, interleukin-6, etc., is administered simultaneously or concurrently with (a) immunotoxin (as described above) , (b) an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance (as described above) , or (c) radiolabelled antibodies (as described above) . The liposomal ionophore linked to ligand and the immunotoxin, anti-cancer drug or radiolabelled antibodies are preferably administered via the same mode of administration. The ionophore-containing liposomes can be prepared in any suitable manner, as described above. The ligand can be linked to the liposome by any suitable method, and such methods are well known to those skilled in the art.
For practicing any aspect of the present invention, the liposomal ionophore, optionally linked to monoclonal antibody or ligand as discussed above, can be introduced into a patient by any suitable means. Preferred modes of administration include intravenous-, intraperitoneal, intrathecal, intravesicular and intrapleural. Any suitable formulations for administering the liposomal ionophore according to each specific mode may be employed, and the materials to be included with the liposomal drug to make such formulations for the various modes (e.g., carriers, etc.) are well known by those skilled in this art. For instance, suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carrier materials include saline buffer, e.g., phosphate buffer saline, etc.
Suitable dosages to be administered depend on the route of administration, factors regarding the patient (e.g., the type of patient and the weight of the patient), the type(s) of materials being administered, etc. , and can readily be determined by those skilled in the art. Representative suitable dosages for human adults are 10 to 1000 ml of liposomal drug containing 0.01 to 1 μM drug, e.g., monensin. Representative suitable dosages for mice are in the range of about 2400 times lower than those for human adults. Representative in vitro dosages are set forth in the Examples.
For intravenous injection of liposomal monensin in accordance with any aspect of the present invention, in order to avoid uptake by the reticuloendothelial system and to prolong circulation time, the lipid composition preferably contains diacyl lipids with bulky polyoxyethylene glycol (PEG) head groups (see Klibinov AL, Moriya a K, Torchillin VP and Huang L, FEBS Lett. 268: 238-237 (1990)) , hydrogenated phosphatidyl inositol containing liposomes (see Gabizon A, Shiota R, Papahadjopoulous D. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 81: 1484-1488, (1989)) , and/or amphiphiles like ganglioside GMj (see Liu D, Mori A, Huang L, Biochi ica et Biophvsica Acta . 1066:159-165 (1991)) .
To improve shelf life stability of the liposomes according to the present invention, the final formulation can be lyophilized and reconstituted in accordance with techniques well known by those skilled in this art.
It has been found that liposomal monensin is more potent in producing immunotoxin potentiation than monensin in buffer, and produces greater enhancement of specific cytotoxicity than monensin in buffer. Liposomal monensin plus immunotoxin has produced long- term disease free survival in animals with macroscopic tumors. These preparations do not lose activity in the presence of serum or whole blood.
While not intending to be bound by any particular theory as to why liposomal monensin according to the present invention achieves potentiation and provides other benefits, it is believed by the present inventors that monensin liposomes are probably endocytosed by tumor cells. It has been observed that liposomal monensin achieves potentiation of many different immunotoxins, radiolabelled antibodies and overcomes resistance to adriamycin to an extent which surpasses free monensin. The ionophores are similar in that they are all lipophilic. Part of the present invention is the recognition that due to the lipophilicity of monensin, as well as the other ionophores, administering them in liposomal form achieves the favorable results described herein. The similarity of the ionophores in this context makes it clear to those of skill in this art that the other ionophores will behave in a manner which is like that of monensin.
The mechanism of the improved potency of liposomal monensin for the in vitro potentiation of immunotoxins is not precisely clear. One hypothesis is that the liposomal monensin may be taken up by the tumor cells to a greater degree than free monensin. Metabolism of the lipids may then release the monensin and produce increased potentiation. However, incubation of H-MESO- 1 with 3H-monenεin in 0.1 μM liposomal monensin at 37 degrees C for 18 hours produced no increased cellular uptake of radioactivity (Table 2) . Similarly, Rahman et al have reported MCF-7 breast cancer cells are eight-fold more sensitive to liposomal doxorubicin than free drug, despite slightly lower cellular accumulation of the liposomal drug (Rahman, A., Dusre, L. , Forst, D. , Thierry, A., Roh, J.K., Greenspan, A., Treat, J. Membrane alterations by liposomes to enhance clinical efficacy of cytotoxic drugs, in: Horizons in Membrane Biotechnology, Wiley-Liss, Inc.: 1990) . A more provocative explanation of the effect of liposomal entrapment is that it improves intracellular access of the ionophore to the site of immunotoxin potentiation. Current evidence suggests that this site may be the post-Golgi region of the cell (Olsnes S, Sandvig I: How protein toxins enter and kill cells. Immunotoxins. Frankel AE
(ed) , Kluwer Academic Publishers, 39-74, 1988) . This explanation is consistent with the observation that liposomal monensin induced characteristic dilation of the Golgi in CEM cells (Figure 5) at a concentration of monensin (0.01 μM) associated with immunotoxin potentiation, whereas free monensin at this concentration neither altered the Golgi nor potentiated immunotoxin. Straubinger et al
(Straubinger, R.M. Papahadjopoulos, D., and Hong, K. Endocytosis and intracellular fate of liposomes using pyranine as a probe. Biochemistry, 29:4929-4939: 1990) have recently reported that most cell-associated liposomes (100 n in diameter) were internalized rapidly, and passed through acidic intracellular organelles. Thiε pathway is comparable to that of the anti-TfR immunotoxin (Raso, V., Watkinε, S., Slayter, H. , Fehrmann, C. , Nerbonne, S. Subcellular compartmentalization and the potency of ricin A chain cytotoxins. in: Bonavida, B. and Collier, R. J. Eds. Membrane- mediated cytotoxicity. New York, UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology, New Series. 45: 1985) . Therefore, co- internalization of immunotoxin and liposomal monensin in the same vesicle may produce marked potentiation. Further understanding of the mechanism of the improved potency and efficiency of liposomal monensin may yield information regarding the site and mechanism of ricin A chain passage to the cytoplasm phenomenon. Examples
The invention may be more fully understood with reference to the following Examples. Example 1
Monensin was purchased from the Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) . The ionophore was prepared as a 10"2M stock solution in ethanol and diluted prior to use to an appropriate final concentration in PBS (0.14 M NaCl, 0.01 M NaHP04, pH 7.4).
Preparation of liposomes containing monensin
Liposomal monensin was prepared by drying phosphatidylcholme (100 mg/ml) in hexane to a thin film in vacuo for 24 hrs and then resuspending this mixture in ether containing 0.5 ml monensin (2.7 x 10"3M) . The final lipid composition consisted of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholme : cholesterol : stearyl amine (5:3:1). This mixture was sonicated for 2 minutes in a bath sonicator in doubly distilled H:0 containing 0.01% Triton, after which the ether was removed by rotary evaporation under reduced pressure to form a lipid gel. The gel was then sonicated for 1 minute in 1 ml PBS. The resultant suspension was centrifuged x 2 at 14,000 g x 10 min at 4' C. After centrifugation, the liposomes were pressed with a French pressure cell at 1000 psi. The drug associated with liposomes was separated from unbound drug by low speed centrifugation and washing, with two changes of buffer. The particle size of the liposomes was measured with a laser sub icron particle sizer. The average liposome diameter was 200 nm with a range from 50-1000 nm.
For comparison experiments with free monensin, an accurate determination of the per cent incorporation of added monensin and final drug concentration in the liposomes was essential. Therefore, these data were determined by two separate methods: per cent recovery of 3H-monensin in the final liposome preparations and a spectrophotometric assay of monensin by the use of the vanillin reagent.
To produce 3H-monensin, approximately 100,000 mCi of carrier-free tritium gas was exchanged with monensin in ethanol in the presence of catalyst to produce 31.5 mCi of 5H-monensin (Dupont NEN, North Billerica, MA) . The homogeneity of the radiolabelled product was confirmed by silica thin layer chromatography with autoradiography and high pressure liquid chromatography. The recovery from analytic HPLC was 97%, indicating the absence of colloids. The radiochemical purity of the completed product was 98.5% and the specific activity was 31.5 mCi/ml.
The colorimetric aεsay for monensin utilized a previously described TLC spray reagent composed of 3% vanillin in absolute ethanol containing 1.5% concentrated sulfuric acid. To perform an assay, 300 μL of the stock reagent was added to a 10 x 75 cm borosilicate glass tube. The monensin control or unknown, in 50 μL of PBS, was added to the tube. The mixture was then warmed on a heating block at 80 °C for 30 minutes. A icrocentrifuge tube containing water was placed on top of the vial to promote reflux. The color reaction was monitored at 555 nm on the spectrophotometer, and a linear standard curve of monensin concentration (0.5 to 10 μg) was generated. A standard curve was generated for liposomal monensin in a similar manner, except that blank liposomes lacking monensin were added to the test samples and standardε to co penεate for the altered absorbance.
Monoclonal antibodies and immunotoxins
The 7D3 murine monoclonal antibody directed against the human transferrin receptor is an IgG, which was produced in BALB/c mica by immunization with cultured human leukemia CEM cells. The C110 murine monoclonal antibody is an IgG, directed against the human carcinoembryonic antigen. Immunotoxins against the human transferrj-n receptor and carcinoembryonic antigen were produced with these antibodies by conjugating the native ricin A chain to each antibody via the SPDP reagent. Both anti-TfR and anti-CEA immunotoxins have been described in previous publications (Griffin TW, Richardson C, LePage D, Bogden AE, Raso V: Antitumor activity of intraperitoneal immunotoxins in a nude mouse model of human malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Research 47:4266-4282, 1987; Griffin TW, Childs RL, Levin LV, Fitzgerald DJP: Enhancement of the specific cytotoxicity of anticarcinoe bryonic antigen immunotoxin by adenovirus and ionophore. J Natl Cancer Inst 79:679-685, 1987) .
Cell lines and Animal Model
The human colorectal cell line LS174T, the human glioblastoma cell lines U375, U87, and MG-1 (Griffin TW, Pagnini PG, Houston LL: Enhancement of the specific cytotoxicity of a breast cancer-associated antigen immunotoxin by the carboxylic ionophore monensin. J Biol Resp Modit. 6:537-545, 1987) , and the human leukemia cell line CEM were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. H-MESO-l is a human malignant mesothelioma cell line which grows both in tissue culture and as an i.p. (intraperitoneal) xenograft in genetically athymic mice (Griffin TW, Richardson C, LePage D, Bogden AE, Raso V: Antitumor activity of intraperitoneal immunotoxins in a nude mouse model of human malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Research 47:4266-4282, 1987; Griffin T and Raso V: Monensin in lipid emulsion for the in. vivo potentiation of ricin A chain immunotoxins. Cancer Res 51:4316- 4322, 1991; Reale FR, Griffin TW, Compton JM, Graham S, Townes PL, Bogden AE: H-MESO-l: Characterization of a human malignant mesothelioma cell line. A biphasic solid and ascitic tumor model. Cancer Res 47:3328-3336, 1987; Raso V, McGrath J: Cure of experimental human malignant mesothelioma in athymic mice by diphtheria toxin. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:622-627, 1989) . The intraperitoneal xenograft is highly virulent, killing mice within 30 days of tumor cell inoculation. At days 15-20 following the infection of 107 H-MESO-l cells, the mice develop prodigious ascites with suspended tumor cell clusters and macroscopic tumor modules. A cytocrit of the malignant ascites obtained by centrifugation was approximately 30%. Fine structural electron microscopy
CEM cells were incubated in RPMI 1640 media with either free monensin or liposomal monensin for 3 hours at 37° C. The cells were washed with PBS, then pelleted and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS. Following fixation, the samples were post- fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated and embedded in Epon. Sections were cut and double strained with 2% uranyl acetate (7 in) and 1% lead citrate (3 min) .
Cytotoxicity assays
Inhibition of 3H-leucine incorporation was used to evaluate the cytotoxic action of immunotoxins in vitro (Griffin TW, Richards-on C, LePage D, Bogden AE, Raso V: Antitumor activity of intraperitoneal immunotoxins in a nude mouεe model of human malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Research 47:4266-4282, 1987; Raso V, and Lawrence J: Carboxylic ionophores enhance the cytotoxic potency of ligand and antibody-delivered ricin A chain. J Exp Med 160:1234-1240, 1984; Griffin TW, Childs RL, Levin LV, Fitzgerald DJP: Enhancement of the specific cytotoxicity of anticarcinoembryonic antigen immunotoxin by adenovirus and ionophore. J Natl Cancer Inst 79:679-685, 1987). Where indicated, cells were treated with monensin or liposomal monensin at concentrations of 0.1-0.01 mM together with serial dilutions of immunotoxin. In addition, cells were incubated with specific or control immunotoxin at a constant concentration of 10 pM with serial dilutions of monensin or liposomal monensin. Aliquots of CEM cells prepared for electron microscopy were also evaluated for cytotoxicity by the following method: CEM cells (100,000 cells/well) were incubated for 3 hours at 37° C with either 0.01 μM monensin in buffer or 0.01 μM liposomal monensin. The cells were then diluted 1/40 into leucine-free media (effective remaining dose of monensin = 0.25 nM) and exposed to 10 nM anti-TfR immunotoxin for 2 hours before pulsing with 3H-leucine for 30 minutes.
Association of 3H-monensin with H-MESO-l Cells
H-MESO-l cells were added to microtiter wells (100,000 cells/well) in the presence of 200 μL (50000 cpm) of 0.1 μM liposomal monensin or 0.1 μM free monensin in medium. Assays were run in triplicate. At the designated time points, the cells were harvested, washed with PBS, and 3H-incorporation determined by scintillation counting.
In Vivo Trials of Immunotoxins and Liposomal Monensin
BALB/c nu/nu mice were inoculated i.p. with 1 x 107 H- MESO-1 cells/mouse on day 0. On day 20 after cell inoculation, when the mice had gained 6-8 g due to tumor ascites, they were randomized to treatment with vehicle control, immunotoxin, or immunotoxin plus liposomal monensin (6-8 mice/group) . The specific anti-TfR-immunotoxin or control (anti-CEA) immunotoxin were drawn up in sterile vehicle (0.14 M NaCl, 0.01 NaHPO.., pH 7.4) with or without monensin. The immunotoxins were administered i.p. at 10 μg/mouse repeated every other day for a total of 7 injections. The specific or control immunotoxin was combined with liposomal monensin at a dose of 100 μL or 300 μL of 10 μM monensin per injection. Mice were also treated with either 200 μg IT (immunotoxin) alone or together with 200 or 300 μL of liposomal monensin (concentration 2.8 x 10*5M monensin) as a single i.p. injection.
Results
Incorporation of Monensin Within Liposomes
The amount of 3H-monensin which remained with the liposomes following preparation and purification was used to determine the per cent incorporation of monensin. In multiple liposomal preparations, ten to twenty per cent of the total cpm added were incorporated into the washed liposomes, yielding a concentration of monensin in the low speed washed liposome pellet of about 2-3 x 10"5M. The concentration of monensin was also verified by the colorimetric vanillin asεay. Results were within ±5% of those measured by the incorporation of 3H-monensin in multiple preparations. In vitro potentiation of immunotoxins
Fig. 1A shows a 16 hour protein synthesis inhibition assay for H-MESO-l mesothelioma cells treated with a fixed subtoxic concentration of specific anti-TfR immunotoxin (10 pM) and log dilutions of monensin or liposomal monensin. Co-incubation of liposomal monensin with specific immunotoxin produced 50% protein synthesis inhibition at a concentration of monensin (0.3 nM) 200 fold lower than that required for monensin in buffer (0.05 μM) . Liposomal monensin and free monensin had similar nonspecific toxicity for H-MESO-l cells (Figure 1A) . The specificity of this potentiation was shown by the lack of effect of a control (anti- CEA) immunotoxin combined with monensin or liposomal monensin for H-MESO-l cells which do not express CEA (Reale FR, Griffin TW, Compton JM, Graham S, Townes PL, Bogden AE: H-MESO-l: Characterization of a human malignant mesothelioma cell line. A biphasic solid and ascitic tumor model. Cancer Res 47:3328-3336, 1987) . (Fig. IB)
Similar but less pronounced effects were seen with the U87 cell line (IC50 1.1 nM Lip Mon, 10 nM Mon), and the U373 cell line (IC50 1.0 nM Lip Mon, 10 nM Mon), as discussed below. To evaluate the magnitude of potentiation, both liposomal and free monensin were included at a maximally effective level of 0.1 μM, and the extent of cytotoxicity was measured as a function of immunotoxin (anti-TfR) concentration necessary to inhibit protein synthesis by 50%. The IC50 values for the human glioblastoma cell line U87 were 91 pM, 4 pM, and 1.8 x 10'3 pM (Fig. 2A) with immunotoxin alone, immunotoxin with free monensin, and immunotoxin with liposomal monensin, respectively. A rat glioma cell line which does not express the human target antigen (Recht L, Griffin T, Raso V, and Salimi A: Immunotoxins directed against transferrin receptor are potent in vitro cytotoxins for human glioma cells. Cancer Res 50:6696-6700, 1990) was used to demonstrate the specificity of the anti-TfR immunotoxin with liposomal monensin. This combination had minimal cytotoxicity for this control cell line (ICJO of the specific immunotoxin with liposomal monensin greater than 0.1 μM) . Therefore, the concentrations of specific immunotoxin required to produce 50% inhibition of protein synthesis in antigen-positive and antigen-negative target cells differed by 8 orders of magnitude (Fig. 2B) .
The extent of immunotoxin potentiation by monensin vs liposomal monensin was also determined in other human tumor cell lines (Table 1) . The increased potentiation obtained by the use of liposomal monensin (as reflected by the ratio of the IC50 of the anti-TfR immunotoxin with monensin/IC50 of immunotoxin with liposomal monensin) varied from 5 to 2000 fold.
Free and liposomal monensin were tested with an anti-CEA immunotoxin on CEA-bearing LS174T colorectal cancer cells (Table 1). Monensin at a concentration of 0.01 μM had no effect on the IC50 of this immunotoxin, while liposomal monensin at the same concentration reduced the IC50100-fold. In contrast, co-incubation of the anti-CEA immunotoxin with 0.01 μM liposomal monensin had minimal effect on the IC50 for the CEA-devoid glioma cell line MG-1. (Table 1) These results establiεh the increased potentiating effect on cytotoxicity using a very different cellular target antigen system.
Association of 3H-Monensin with H-MESO-l Cells
The association of 3H-monensin either in buffer or in liposomes with H-MESO-l cells over time is shown in Table 2. Recovery of 3H-monensin added to media without cells under identical circumstances was 94 ±6%. Uptake of 3H-monensin was not increased by the use of lipoεomes, at a monensin concentration of 0.1 μM. Similar experiments performed at InM monensin produced too few cell-associated counts for evaluation.
Effect of Monensin/Liposomal Monensin on the Subcellular Morphology of CEM Leukemic Cells
Tartakoff (Tartakoff AM. Perturbation of vesicular traffic with the carboxylic ionophore monensin. Cell 32 : 1026-1028 , 1983) has described the conspicuous dilation of Golgi-derived vacuoles in mouse plasma cells after one hour of treatment with 1 μM monensin, and monensin inhibition of Golgi apparatus function is now well established. Similar swelling of the Golgi apparatus cisternae observed by electron microscopy were seen in CEM human leukemia cells within three hours incubation with 0.1 μM monensin (V.R., unpublished) . The effect of liposomal monensin on this Golgi apparatus morphology was examined. The effect of similar treatment of CEM cells with monensin in buffer or liposomal monensin was asεeεεed by E.M. (Figure 5) . Thiε concentration of free monenεin (0.01 μM) had minimal effect on vesicular morphology of CEM cells (Figure 5B) , while the same concentration of liposomal monensin produced the characteristic dilation of Golgi-derived vacuoles (Figure 5A) . As can be seen in Table 3, treatment of CEM cells for three hours with 10 nM anti-TfR immunotoxin with or without 0.01 μM monensin in buffer had minimal cytotoxicity; in contrast, immunotoxin plus 0.01 μM liposomal monensin inhibited protein synthesis by 98%.
Effect of Specific Immunotoxin and Liposomal Monensin In Vivo
Single and multiple treatments with liposomal monensin and specific immunotoxin in the H-Meso-1 model were evaluated. Results are shown in Figures 3 and 4. The dose of anti-TfR immunotoxin used in the multiple dose studieε was 10 μg qod x 7. Immunotoxin treatment at this low dose produced no improvement in survival over the vehicle control (Figure 3A) . In contrast, liposomal monensin in combination with specific immunotoxin significantly prolonged survival, with 21% of mice (3/14) treatment with the higher dose of liposomes (300 μL) with no evidence of tumor at day 150. (Combination of two experiments.) Mice treated with 10 μg of control anti-CEA immunotoxin plus liposomal monensin on the same schedule had a median survival similar to the vehicle controls.
The results of the single dose trial are shown in Figure 3B. Mice treated with a single dose of liposomal monensin had no improvement in survival, while mice treated with immunotoxin alone (200 μg) had a modest increase in survival (ILS 110%, longest survivor 60 days) . In contrast, 32% of mice treated with a single dose of immunotoxin and 300 μL of liposomal monensin survived tumor-free to 160 days. (5 μg total dose of monensin, Λ0.4% of the acute dose LD5ϋ of monensin in mice) . Figs. 4A-4F are photographs of test groups of mice from the experiment reported in Figure 3A. Fig. 4A depicts mice treated with PBS beginning 21 days after injection of the mesothelia cells. All mice in this group died by day 28. Fig. 4B depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin beginning on day 21. All mice in this group died by day 39. Fig. 4C depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin and 100 μL monensin liposomes beginning on day 21. Fig. 4D depicts mice treated with specific immunotoxin and 300 μL of monensin liposomes beginning on day 21. Fig. 4E depicts the same group as Figure 4D on day 50. Fig. 4f depicts the same group as Figure 4D on day 90.
In an 'animal model of advanced intraperitoneal malignancy, i.p. administration of liposomal monensin together with specific immunotoxin significantly prolonged survival of mice bearing advanced macroscopic tumor while immunotoxin treatment alone was without effect. Moreover, 20% of the mice were rendered tumor-free by the combination of immunotoxin and liposomal monensin.
TABLE 1 CYTOTOXICITY OF IMMUNOTOXINS WITH MONENSIN OR LIPOSOMAL MONENSIN ON HUMAN TUMOR CELL LINES
IC5ϋ OF ANTI-TfR IMMUNOTOXIN
Figure imgf000035_0001
ICjo OF ANTI-CEA IMMUNOTOXIN
100
Figure imgf000035_0002
MG-1 GLIOMA 300 not 200
(Antigen negative control) done
*0.1 μM **0.03 μM
TABLE 2
ASSOCIATION OF 3H-MONENSIN WITH H-MESO-l CELLS: COMPARISON OF LIPOSOMAL MONENSIN WITH MONENSIN IN BUFFER
Liposomal Monensin Monensin (0.1 μM) in
Time (0.1 μM) Buffer After cpm/10 5 cells cpm/10 5 cells Addition (Mean +/- S.D.1 fMean +/- S.D. )
10" 693 ± 78 994 ± 20
1 Hour 1012 ± 15 1168 ± 83
2 Hours 843 ± 51 1200 ± 60
3 Hours 776 ± 31 1135 ± 77 18 Hours 802 ± 47 1260 ± 255
TABLE 3
EFFECT OF TREATMENT WITH ANTI-TFR IMMUNOTOXIN AND MONENSIN/
LIPOSOMAL MONENSIN ON CEM LEUKEMIA CELLS
ADDITION 3H-LEUCINE INCORPORATION % INHIB, cpm
Cells Alone 19,545
10 nM Immunotoxin 17,350 11
Pretreated with 0.01 μM Monensin then Immunotoxin 16,920 13
Pretreated with 0.01 μM Liposomal
Monensin then Immunotoxin 410 98
Example 2
Liposomes (containing monensin) of various sizes were prepared by extrusion (rather than by the French press method) , by extruding multi-lamellar vesicles consisting of Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholme (40 g) : Cholesterol (13 mg) : Stearyl amine (2.9 mg) with 5 mg monensin through double stacked polycarbonate membranes with gradually decreasing pore size (0.4-0.05μm) using a high pressure extruder device (Lipex Biomembranes, Vancouver, B.C., Canada) . Liposomal monensin (Lip Mon) formulations of diameter 106, 135, 165, 260 and 500nm were prepared and further used in combination with specific immunotoxin in various in vitro cytotoxicity assays as described in Example 1. Lip Mon formulations of 106-I65nm in combination with specific ricin A immunotoxin (as described in Example 1) increased its cytotoxicity 100 fold in comparison to monensin in buffer in an in vitro cytotoxicity assay with LS174T cells (IC5010"9 vs 10'7M) . Similarly, with H-MESO-l eεothelioma cell line, Lip Mon produced a 50% inhibition of protein εynthesis at an immunotoxin concentration of 10"11 M and a monensin concentration of lθ'9 M, as compared to 10'7 M free monensin. Lip Mon formulations of diameter 260 - 500 nm had minimal or no potentiation effect. There was no nonspecific toxicity of Lip Mon at the concentrations used and the specificity of Lip Mon formulations was further demonstrated with control cell lines. Liposomal formulations were stable at 4* C for several months and their size did not change by more than 5% over a period of 4 months. The amount of monensin leakage from liposomes over a period of 12 weeks was less than 10%. These results indicate that liposomal monensin is probably endocytosed by tumor cells and a small size is important for its efficient internalization and hence for elucidating a biological response in vitro or in vivo.
Example 3
To produce MAb-conjugated liposomes using the liposomes prepared in Example 2, the procedure of Singh, et al (Singh M, Ghose T, Faulkner G, Knalovec J and Mezei M: Targeting of methotrexate-containing liposomes with a monoclonal antibody against human renal cancer. Cancer Res 49:3976-34, 1989) was followed. Stearylamine 260 mg (965 μmol) and the heterobifunctional reagent SPDP 200 mg (640 μmol) were dissolved separately in 12 ml portions of absolute methanol. The solution of SPDP was added dropwise to the stearylamine solution and the reaction carried out at room temperature and monitored by thin layer chromatography. After 30 min, methanol was removed by vacuum evaporation. The product was then purified by column chromatography on 12 g silica gel (100-200 mesh) . The column was eluted with ethyl acetate-petroleum ether (40:60) using a maximum flow rate of 85-100 l/hr, collecting 10 ml fractions which were monitored by TLC. Fractions containing PDP-stearylamine were pooled and uεed for the production of monenεin liposomes. SPDP was also used to introduce pyridyl disulfide groups into the MAb. 10 moles of SPDP were reacted with one mole of MAb in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.5 for 24 hours. The reaction mixture was dialyzed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer at 4' C to remove low molecular weight substances. It was then further reduced with DTT in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl, pH 4.5 for one hour and eluted through a Sephadex G- 25M column to remove excess DTT and pyridine-2-thione. The reduced thiolated IgG was immediately used for coupling to liposomes. Thiolated IgG (10-12 mg) and liposomes (21 μmol) were stirred overnight at room temperature (pH 8) . Liposomes containing 3H- monensin were mixed with thiolated reduced antibody overnight. The unbound antibody was separated from liposome bound antibody by column chromatography on Sepharose 4B followed by Ficoll-flotation. Retained immunoreactivity of the MAb after conjugation to liposome was determined by flow cytometry and by the comparison of indirect im unofluorescence of target cells stained with roughly equimolar amounts of unconjugated MAb and MAb conjugated to liposomal monensin. Two antibodies (anti-TfR and anti-CEA) were used to conjugate to the liposomes. Specific (anti-TfR) IT (immunotoxin) as discussed in Example 1 in the presence of 1 nM of anti-CEA monensin liposome (the cytotoxicity asεay was conducted as discussed in Example 1) produced 50% inhibition of protein synthesis in LS174T colorectal cancer target cells at a concentration of 0.1 pM, a 100-fold increase in potency as compared to IT plus untargeted 1 nm monensin liposome. In contrast., anti- ' CEA monensin liposome did not potentiate the α-TfR IT cytotoxicity of the CEA-devoid H-Meso-1 and C6 cell lines.
Based on the information contained in the present application and the results of the foregoing tests, one of skill in this art would conclude that the present invention would be effective in treating all types of cancer, and can suitably employ any type of liposome.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, modifications, substitutions and deletions not specifically described may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention defined in the appended claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A pharmaceutical composition comprising at least one liposome having a diameter in the range of from about 50 nm to about 200 nm, said liposome having at least one ionophore entrapped therein.
2. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim l, wherein said at least one liposome has a diameter in the range of from about 100 nm to about 150 nm.
3. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim 1, wherein said at least one ionophore is selected from the group consisting of monensin, nigericin, brefeldin and lasalocid.
4. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim 1, wherein said at least one ionophore comprises monensin.
5. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim 1, further comprising an immunotoxin, an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance, or a radiolabelled monoclonal antibody.
6. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim 5, wherein said immunotoxin is selected from the group consisting of ricin A, blocked ricin, pokeweed antiviral protein and gelonin.
7. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim 5, wherein said anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance is selected from the group consisting of adriamycin, vincristine, etoposide, dauno ycin, taxol and vinblaεtine.
8. A pharmaceutical compoεition as recited in claim 1, wherein said at least one liposome is free of any bound ligand.
9. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim 1, wherein said at least one liposome has a monoclonal antibody bound thereto.
10. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim 1, wherein said at least one liposome has a ligand bound thereto.
11. A pharmaceutical composition as recited in claim 10, wherein said ligand is selected from the group consisting of trans errin, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor B, alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone, interleukin-2 and interleukin-6.
12. A method of treating a mammal afflicted with cancer, the method comprising administering to said patient a pharmaceutical composition comprising at least one liposome having at least one ionophore entrapped therein.
13. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein said at least one liposome has a diameter in the range of from about 50 nm to about 200 nm.
14. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein said at least one liposome has a diameter in the range of from about 100 nm to about 150 nm.
15. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein said at least one ionophore is selected from the group consisting of monensin, nigericin, brefeldin and lasalocid.
16. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein said at least one ionophore comprises monensin.
17. A method as recited in claim 12, further comprising administering to said mammal an immunotoxin, an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance, or a radiolabelled monoclonal antibody.
18. A method as recited in claim 17, wherein said immunotoxin is selected from the group consisting of ricin A, blocked ricin, pokeweed antiviral protein and gelonin.
19. A method as recited in claim 17, wherein said anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resiεtance is selected from the group consisting of adriamycin, vincristine, etoposide, daunomycin, taxol and vinblastine.
20. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein said at least one liposome is free of any bound ligand.
21. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein said at least one liposome has a monoclonal antibody bound thereto.
22. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein εaid at least one liposome has a ligand bound thereto.
23. A method as recited in claim 22, wherein said ligand iε εelected from the group conεisting of transferrin, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor B, alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone, interleukin-2 and interleukin-6.
24. A kit comprising at least one liposome having at least one ionophore entrapped therein and an immunotoxin, an anti-cancer drug against which cancer tends to develop resistance, or a radiolabelled monoclonal antibody.
25. A kit as recited in claim 24, wherein said at least one liposome has a diameter in the range of from about 100 nm to about 150 nm.
26. A. kit aε recited in claim 24, wherein said at least one ionophore is monensin.
27. A method for manufacturing a pharmaceutical composition, the method comprising entrapping at leaεt one ionophore in at least one liposome having a diameter in the range of from about 50 n to about 200 nm.
PCT/US1993/005654 1992-06-17 1993-06-17 Liposomal formulations for administering to cancer patients WO1993025225A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU46338/93A AU4633893A (en) 1992-06-17 1993-06-17 Liposomal formulations for administering to cancer patients

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US89983492A 1992-06-17 1992-06-17
US07/899,834 1992-06-17

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1993025225A1 true WO1993025225A1 (en) 1993-12-23
WO1993025225A9 WO1993025225A9 (en) 1994-03-31

Family

ID=25411625

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1993/005654 WO1993025225A1 (en) 1992-06-17 1993-06-17 Liposomal formulations for administering to cancer patients

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU4633893A (en)
WO (1) WO1993025225A1 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996005821A1 (en) * 1994-08-20 1996-02-29 Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin Liposome-encapsulated taxol, its preparation and its use
EP0702563A1 (en) * 1993-05-27 1996-03-27 EntreMed, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating cancer and hyperproliferative disorders
WO1996040060A1 (en) * 1995-06-07 1996-12-19 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Intracellular delivery of macromolecules
WO1999020252A1 (en) * 1997-10-16 1999-04-29 The Victoria University Of Manchester Particles
US6287602B1 (en) * 1998-09-16 2001-09-11 Oncopharmaceutical, Inc. Treatment of oncologic tumors with an injectable formulation of a Golgi apparatus disturbing agent
US6696483B2 (en) 2000-10-03 2004-02-24 Oncopharmaceutical, Inc. Inhibitors of angiogenesis and tumor growth for local and systemic administration
EP1618897A1 (en) * 2003-04-04 2006-01-25 The University of Tokyo Lipid membrane structure containing anti-mt-mmp monoclonal antibody
WO2010033507A1 (en) 2008-09-16 2010-03-25 St. Louis University Method of enhancing tgf-beta signalling
EP2606884A1 (en) * 2011-12-21 2013-06-26 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Inhibitors of notch signaling pathway and use thereof in treatment of cancers
US8946201B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2015-02-03 Saint Louis University Methods for inhibiting TGF-β
EP2953624A4 (en) * 2013-02-08 2016-07-13 Luoda Pharma Pty Ltd Methods of treating microbial infections, including mastitis
CN108938569A (en) * 2018-08-28 2018-12-07 淮南师范学院 A kind of solid lipid nanoparticle and preparation method thereof coating brefeldin A
US12030855B2 (en) 2018-06-21 2024-07-09 Cellestia Biotech Ag Process for making amino diaryl ethers and amino diaryl ethers hydrochloride salts

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5019369A (en) * 1984-10-22 1991-05-28 Vestar, Inc. Method of targeting tumors in humans

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5019369A (en) * 1984-10-22 1991-05-28 Vestar, Inc. Method of targeting tumors in humans

Non-Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Volume 37, Number 17, issued 1988, M. SEHESTED et al., "The Carboxylic Ionophore Monensin Inhibits Active Drug Efflux and Modulates In Vitro Resistance in Daunorubicin Resistant Ehrlich Ascites Tumor Cells", pages 3305-3310. *
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, Volume 1062, issued 1991, A.L. KLIBANOV et al., "Activity of Amphipathic Poly(Ethylene Glycol) 5000 to Prolong the Circulation Time of Liposomes Depends on the Liposome Size and is Unfavorable for Immunoliposome Binding to Target", pages 142-148. *
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, Volume 1068, issued 1991, "Pharmacokinetics of Stealth Versus Conventional Liposomes: Effect of Dose", pages 133-141. *
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, Volume 1116, Number 3, issued 12 June 1992, V.M. VASANDANI et al., "In Vivo Potentiation of Ricin Toxicity by Monensin Delivered Through Liposomes", pages 315-323. *
CANCER RESEARCH, Volume 43, issued June 1983, H. ELLENS et al., "Effects of Liposome Dose and the Presence of Lymphosarcoma Cells on Blood Clearance and Tissue Distribution of Large Unilamellar Liposomes in Mice", pages 2927-2934. *
CANCER RESEARCH, Volume 50, issued 01 March 1990, M. COLOMBATTI et al., "Carrier Protein-Monensin Conjugates: Enhancement of Immunotoxin Cytoxicity and Potential in Tumor Treatment", pages 1385-1391. *
CANCER RESEARCH, Volume 50, issued 15 February 1990, O.W. PRESS et al., "Inhibition of Catabolism of Radiolabeled Antibodies by Tumor Cells Ussing Lysosomotropic Amines and Carboxylic Ionophores", pages 1243-1250. *
CANCER RESEARCH, Volume 51, issued 15 August 1991, T. GRIFFIN et al., "Monensin in Lipid Emulsion for the Potentiation of Ricin A Chain Immunotoxins", pages 4316-4322. *
D.P. STITES et al., "Basic and Clinical Immunology", Published 1991, by APPLETON & LANGE (CONNECTICUT), pages 78-100. *
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE MODIFIERS, Volume 6, Number 5, issued 1987, T.W. GRIFFIN et al., "Enhancement of the Specific Cytotoxicity of a Breast Cancer-Associated Antigen Immunotoxin by the Carboxylic Ionophore Monensin", pages 537-545. *
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY, Volume 11, Number 1, issued January 1992, T.W. GRIFFIN et al., "Combined Antitumor Therapy with the Chemotherapeutic Drug Doxorubicin and an Anti-Transferrin Receptor Immunotoxin: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies", pages 1-7. *

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0702563A1 (en) * 1993-05-27 1996-03-27 EntreMed, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating cancer and hyperproliferative disorders
EP0702563A4 (en) * 1993-05-27 1997-10-01 Entremed Inc Compositions and methods for treating cancer and hyperproliferative disorders
US5919459A (en) * 1993-05-27 1999-07-06 Entremed, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating cancer and hyperproliferative disorders
WO1996005821A1 (en) * 1994-08-20 1996-02-29 Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin Liposome-encapsulated taxol, its preparation and its use
WO1996040060A1 (en) * 1995-06-07 1996-12-19 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Intracellular delivery of macromolecules
US5643599A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-07-01 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Intracellular delivery of macromolecules
US7723056B1 (en) 1997-10-16 2010-05-25 The University Of Manchester Particles
WO1999020252A1 (en) * 1997-10-16 1999-04-29 The Victoria University Of Manchester Particles
AU742846B2 (en) * 1997-10-16 2002-01-17 University Of Manchester, The Particles
US6287602B1 (en) * 1998-09-16 2001-09-11 Oncopharmaceutical, Inc. Treatment of oncologic tumors with an injectable formulation of a Golgi apparatus disturbing agent
US6497904B2 (en) 1998-09-16 2002-12-24 Saira Sayed Singh Treatment of oncologic tumors with an injectable formulation of a golgi apparatus disturbing agent
US6696483B2 (en) 2000-10-03 2004-02-24 Oncopharmaceutical, Inc. Inhibitors of angiogenesis and tumor growth for local and systemic administration
EP1618897A4 (en) * 2003-04-04 2010-09-29 Eisai R&D Man Co Ltd Lipid membrane structure containing anti-mt-mmp monoclonal antibody
EP1618897A1 (en) * 2003-04-04 2006-01-25 The University of Tokyo Lipid membrane structure containing anti-mt-mmp monoclonal antibody
US8946201B2 (en) 2007-08-27 2015-02-03 Saint Louis University Methods for inhibiting TGF-β
EP2341913A4 (en) * 2008-09-16 2012-02-22 Univ Saint Louis Method of enhancing tgf-beta signalling
WO2010033507A1 (en) 2008-09-16 2010-03-25 St. Louis University Method of enhancing tgf-beta signalling
US8487006B2 (en) 2008-09-16 2013-07-16 Auxagen, Inc. Method of enhancing TGF-β signalling
EP2341913A1 (en) * 2008-09-16 2011-07-13 Saint Louis University Method of enhancing tgf-beta signalling
CN102159219B (en) * 2008-09-16 2015-06-24 圣路易斯大学 Method of enhancing tgf-beta signalling
EP2606884A1 (en) * 2011-12-21 2013-06-26 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Inhibitors of notch signaling pathway and use thereof in treatment of cancers
US10054581B1 (en) 2011-12-21 2018-08-21 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) Inhibitors of notch signaling pathway and use thereof in treatment of cancers
US10274481B2 (en) 2011-12-21 2019-04-30 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) Method for identifying modulators of notch signaling
US11085918B2 (en) 2011-12-21 2021-08-10 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) Method for identifying modulators of notch signaling
EP2953624A4 (en) * 2013-02-08 2016-07-13 Luoda Pharma Pty Ltd Methods of treating microbial infections, including mastitis
AU2014214548B2 (en) * 2013-02-08 2018-03-29 Luoda Pharma Limited Methods of treating microbial infections, including mastitis
US12030855B2 (en) 2018-06-21 2024-07-09 Cellestia Biotech Ag Process for making amino diaryl ethers and amino diaryl ethers hydrochloride salts
CN108938569A (en) * 2018-08-28 2018-12-07 淮南师范学院 A kind of solid lipid nanoparticle and preparation method thereof coating brefeldin A

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU4633893A (en) 1994-01-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Nässander et al. In vivo targeting of OV-TL 3 immunoliposomes to ascitic ovarian carcinoma cells (OVCAR-3) in athymic nude mice
Heath et al. Antibody-targeted liposomes: increase in specific toxicity of methotrexate-gamma-aspartate.
US4997913A (en) pH-sensitive immunoconjugates and methods for their use in tumor therapy
Reddy et al. Targeting therapeutic and imaging agents to folate receptor positive tumors
CA2067178C (en) Solid tumor treatment method and composition
FI102355B (en) A method for preparing anthracycline immunoconjugates having a linking spacer
Pagnan et al. GD2‐mediated melanoma cell targeting and cytotoxicity of liposome‐entrapped fenretinide
Guo et al. Receptor-specific delivery of liposomes via folate-PEG-chol
Straubinger et al. Liposome-based therapy of human ovarian cancer: parameters determining potency of negatively charged and antibody-targeted liposomes
MXPA03008864A (en) Liposome composition for improved intracellular delivery of a therapeutic agent.
WO1996010585A1 (en) Glycosylated protein-liposome conjugates and methods for their preparation
Roby et al. Enhanced in vivo antitumor efficacy of poorly soluble PDT agent, meso-tetraphenylporphine, in PEG-PE-based tumor-targeted immunomicelles
WO1993025225A1 (en) Liposomal formulations for administering to cancer patients
WO1993025225A9 (en) Liposomal formulations for administering to cancer patients
Vingerhoeds et al. A new application for liposomes in cancer therapy: Immunoliposomes bearing enzymes (immuno‐enzymosomes) for site‐specific activation of prodrugs
Konno et al. Antitumor effect of adriamycin entrapped in liposomes conjugated with anti-human α-fetoprotein monoclonal antibody
Singh et al. Targeting of methotrexate-containing liposomes with a monoclonal antibody against human renal cancer
Raffaghello et al. In vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of liposomal Fenretinide targeted to human neuroblastoma
Griffin et al. Potentiation of antitumor immunotoxins by liposomal monensin
FI97692B (en) Process for preparing a therapeutically useful conjugate of an activator and a targeting moiety
KR19990029749A (en) Divalent reactive water soluble polymer derivatives and composites containing them
Colombatti et al. Carrier protein-monensin conjugates: enhancement of immunotoxin cytotoxicity and potential in tumor treatment
US5690935A (en) Biotherapy of cancer by targeting TP-3/P80
JPH03505576A (en) Improvements related to organic compounds
US5084560A (en) Immunoconjugates and methods for their use in tumor therapy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CZ DE DK ES FI GB HU JP KP KR KZ LK LU MG MN MW NL NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SK UA US VN

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGES 1-39,DESCRIPTION,PAGES 40-43,CLAIMS,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES BEARING THE SAME NUMBER;PAGES 1/5-5/5,DRAWINGS,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/7-7/7;DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA