WO1990000445A1

WO1990000445A1 - Pneumatic separation of particulate material

Info

Publication number: WO1990000445A1
Application number: PCT/GB1989/000774
Authority: WO
Inventors: Victor Albert Montgomery White
Original assignee: Gbe International Plc
Priority date: 1988-07-08
Filing date: 1989-07-07
Publication date: 1990-01-25
Also published as: JPH03505700A; DE68911533D1; EP0423208B1; EP0423208A1; US5148921A; DE68911533T2

Abstract

The invention relates to apparatus for the pneumatic specification of particulate material particularly but not solely for the separation of objectionable material such as stem from cut lamina or cut rolled stem tobacco (CRS). Apparatus for the pneumatic separation of particular material comprises a substantially horizontal vibrating conveyor having a plurality of grooves having apertures (14) through which air passes to partially or wholly fluidise the material under treatment.

Description

PNEUMATIC SEPARATION OF PARTICULATE MATERIAL

The invention relates to apparatus for the pneumatic specification of particulate material particularly but not solely for the separation of objectionable material such as stem from cut lamina or cut rolled stem tobacco (CRS).

In the tobacco industry such products are unthreshed tobacco, threshed tobacco, cut dried ste , cut dried lamina, cut tobacco generally in the primary process, in the feed systems to cigarette makers and within the makers.

It is well known in the tobacco industry to use a vertical upward flow of air to separate tobacco particles of differing terminal velocity, into two fractions. The particles with terminal velocity below that of the air (lights) being carried upward by the air stream and those with terminal velocity above that of the air (heavies) falling downwardly against the air stream, the particle fraction being adjusted by the air velocity.

The unseparated particles are normally thrown horizontally into the air stream by a winnower. The light particles carried upwardly by the air are removed from the air by a tangential separator (eg cyclone) or screen separator and the heavy particles are dropped out through a chute, preferably with an air lock.

Typically the screen separator contains a screen through which air but not desired product can pass and also an airlock in the form of a paddle wheel assembly. The tangential separator also has an airlock of paddle type. In either arrangement the rotation of the paddle wheel limits air interchange and allows the product to be discharged.

Product size degradation can be caused by impaction against the screen, material sliding across the screen, by abrasion and chopping within the paddle wheel. Degradation can also occur by impaction and abrasion in the conveying tube.

The heavy particles may instead fall on to a horizontal gauze screen in the air stream which is vibrated in the manner of a jigging conveyor to convey the particles out of the air stream. The vibrating screen can also be used to feed the unseparated particles into the air stream.

To provide an accurate classification it is clearly important to have an air flow of uniform velocity. In one form of the equipment this is achieved by adjustable air guides^' below the gauze screen. In another the gauze screen is replaced by a perforated diffusion plate with fine holes.

The plate has a low percentage free area of typically 2.5% and builds up enough pressure on its under side to diffuse the air uniformly.

Tobacco leaf comprises thin lamina and a relatively thick mid-rib (known as stem) and veins which are structural and vascular. These are separated during manufacture by a threshing process into mid-rib and lamina with veins and then processed separately including cutting or shredding.

The cutting of mid-rib or stem produces some stick-like pieces or slivers, which when made into cigarettes can penetrate the paper tube. These can be effectively separated by the known methods described above, usually following drying, where the separating air also cools the tobacco.

The cutting of the lamina also produces some slivers partly from the 1 or 2% of stem which has not been separated from lamina, but also from the veins and tip of the mid-rib which are not separated by threshing.

The cigarette making machine is fitted with a winnower to remove these slivers but is only 75% successful^*. It is desirable to remove these slivers before they reach the making machine.

In some parts of the world the leaf is hand cut by the farmer before it reaches the cigarette manufacturer. The cut is at right angles to the stem, so the strands of cut lamina include a cross section of the stem known as a 'birds eye' . This is broken away from the cut lamina by the carding drums in the cigarette maker to produce an undesirable drop out from the cigarette.

It is possible to break the birds eyes from the cut lamina before the cigarette maker by the use of prior carding drums. It then becomes necessary to remove the birds eyes from the cut lamina before they reach the making machine.

A disadvantage of the pneumatic method of separation described above is that the light particles are lifted and conveyed away by the air so that an additional separator is required to remove the particles from the air. If light particles are the majority then large air flows and powers are required to lift and convey them and a large separator is required to separate them from the air.

The pneumatic method described above is successful with cut stem because the particle size is more uniform and granular. It is less successful with cut lamina because the shreds are long and entangled forming clumps which need to be opened to release the heavies.

Another disadvantage of pneumatic separators is that the ability to discriminate between lights and heavies (and therefore to separate them) is poor principally because of difficulties in uniform presentation of the product into the chamber airstream and setting the required air velocity profile and gradients. If the local air velocity exceeds the terminal velocity of the particle it will be entrained; if the local air velocity is less than the terminal velocity of the particle it will not be entrained and will separate from those which are entrained. Terminal velocities vary with the ratio of particle mass to particle size and consequently vary with the shape, size and density of individual particles. The likely range of terminal velocities is given below for two types of CRS.

TABLE 1

TYPE A B A B

Terminal Velocity m/sec Velocity Ratios min max min max min max min max Desired lights

0.7 1.1 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.57 1.0 1.7

Non desired heavies

1.22 2.4 1.9 3.0 1.74 3.43 1.9 3.0 From these velocities it is evident that a system set to discriminate at 1.15m/sec for product A would reject as undesirable a substantial proportion of B which should be accepted, while a system set up for product B would incorrectly accept most of the A heavies. Such systems are very sensitive to product type.

In the case f cut rolled stem, a further disadvantage is that adjusting the air velocity to suit the material type changes causes changes in the degree of cooling occurring by altering both the air volume available to absorb heat and the cooling time. Changes in cooling alter the moisture loss during cooling ^**^'and can cause the cooled product to go out side the permitted moisture limits. In extreme cases the rate of heat and moisture loss from the particle surface may exceed the rate of their transfer from within the particle. This is known as case hardening and causes the material to become temporarily embrittled and more likely to size degrade.

It is an object of this invention to provide means for air separation into heavy and light fractions which does not require a separate separator particularly a pneumatic separator which uses less air and which provides enough vibration to separate heavy particles from clumps.

According to the present invention there is provided apparatus for the pneumatic separation of particulate material comprising a substantially horizontal vibratory conveyor having a plurality of grooves, arranged side by side, having apertures through which air passes to partially or wholly fluidise the material under treatment.

The invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIGURE 1 is a schematic view plan of an embodiment which includes a conveyor having a plurality of perforated grooves and a dividing plate disposed at the plane of separation,

FIGURE 2 is a schematic side elevation of said first embodiment,

FIGURE 3 is a schematic section taken along the line A-A of Figure 1,

FIGURE 4 is a schematic section taken along the line A-A of Figure 1 with an alternative conveyor section,

FIGURE 5 is a plan view of a vibrating conveyor in a second embodiment having transverse channel at the region of separation,

FIGURE 6 is a longitudinal section to B-B of Figure 5 of a third embodiment modified by the provision of an inclined imperforate transverse channel instead of a perforated channel,

FIGURE 7 is a similar longitudinal section to B- B of Figure 5 of a third embodiment modified by the provision of an imperforate transverse channel, having an inclined exit surface, instead of a perforated channel,

FIGURE 8 is a similar longitudinal section to B- B of Figure 5 of a fourth embodiment modified by the provision of passages extending vertically from the bottoms of the grooves instead of a transverse channel,

FIGURES 9 and 10 show yet further forms of vibratory conveyor in schematic plan view,

FIGURE 11 is a cross-section taken along the line C-C in Figure 1 and

FIGURE 12 is a cross-section similar to Figure 11 showing an alternative profile. DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS.

The separator more suited to cut lamina applications shown in Figures 1,2 and 3 comprising a conveyor 10 over which the material is transported having a delivery region 11 on which the cut tobacco stem is delivered, a . rectification region 12 having a plurality of grooves 13 extending in the direction of transport, said grooves having perforations 14 through which air can be forced, and a separation region 15 at which there is disposed a flat plate 16 extending transversely of the direction of transport.

The grooves 13 which run in the direction of conveying are typically 15mm to 50mm wide and deep and are repeated across the full width of the conveyor. The plate 16 lies between the two planes defined by the top and bottom of the grooves and which vibrates with the grooved conveyor. As shown in Figure 3, the level of the plate 16 is such that a major portion of the ends of the grooves 13 communicate with the region below the plate 16.

A plenum chamber 17 extends for the whole area below the perforated tray and is flexibly connected to a fan 18 to provide the air flow through the conveyor perforations. The purpose of the perforated groove profile is to produce a vertical air flow of diminishing air velocity towards the top of the groove.

The perforations are small, typically less than 1.5mm diameter and the free area of the holes in the conveyor material is typically less than 2.5%. This creates a pressure below the conveyor which ensures a uniform distribution of the air.

The vibrating conveyor can be of a well known type with inclined tray support links 23,24 and eccentric drive 21 or with the tray supported on flexible mountings and oscillated by two throw weight motors.

In operation the high terminal velocity slivers or birds eyes separate from the cut lamina and fall to the bottom of the grooves 13 and are conveyed beyond the air stream where they are discharged separately below the flat plate 16. The low terminal velocity cut tobacco remains near the top of the grooves and is conveyed onto the flat plate from whence it is discharged.

The clumps of cut lamina will have a higher terminal velocity and will sit more heavily on the top of the grooves where they are subjected to vibration which will release the heavy material and open the clump.

The flat plate 16 which extends beyond the grooves is preferably adjustable for height relative to the grooves to that the line of separation can be optimised according to the type of material undergoing the separation process. In addition the air flow can be adjusted to give a similar result or to correct for different materials.

The separated slivers of birds eyes, which are high fibre stem, can be re-processed into tobacco sheet for inclusion in later production.

The grooves can have various forms other than shown in Figure 3 provided they achieve the required air velocity gradient. For example in Figure 4 the grooves are flat bottomed and only the bottom is perforated. The grooves are widely separated by a low angled roof section, which ensures that the majority of the cut lamina is subjected to vibration, and that the released heavies slide down into the grooves.

In the separator shown in Figures 5 and 6, the vibratory conveyor 10 is again provided with a delivery region 11 on which the product is delivered, a separation region 12 having a plurality of grooves 13 extending in the direction of transport, said groove having perforations 14 through which air can be forced, and a separation region 15 which in this embodiment is in the form of a channel extending transversely and obliquely of the direction of the transport.

The conveyor of the embodiment shown in Figures 5 and 6 may be modified in accordance with any of the arrangements shown in Figures 7 - 10.

In Figure 7 the oblique groove 15 which is imperforate, has an inclined exit surface 15'. The heavies are chunky so cannot climb the exit surface and are discharged to one side. The lights form a carpet which can climb the exit surface 15'.

The modification shown in Figure 8 the collection groove 15 has been omitted and instead conical tubes 17' are provided which communicate with the bottoms of the grooves and pass through the plenum chamber 17. The heavies pass through the tubes and may be collected on a tray (not shown) disposed beneath the plenum chamber.

Beneath the transport surface at least in the region of the grooves 13 is a, or a series of, plenum chambers 17 which supply air or other gaseous fluid to the separation region and collection groove 15.

The arrangement of the grooved separation region collection groove and discharge exit surface 15' may be repeated sequentially.

The vibratory conveyor therefore includes regions with defined functions. The input receiving region 11 which accepts the incoming product and presents it to the separation region 12. The grooves 13 in the separation region over which the main product flows carry objectionable heavy particles. The collection groove 15 receives material from within the separation grooves, that is material including the objectionable heavies. Material in the collection groove 15 moves along the length thereof to be discharged from the end of the collection groove.

The input area is dimensioned to allow the material to spread out and present uniformly to the separation region.

Alternative embodiments of the conveyor are shown in Figures 9 and 10, the former embodiment including a series of transverse and oblique collection grooves 15, 15', 15" communicating with a common side channel C and the latter embodiment having two transverse collection channels 15c, 15d obliquely arranged respectively in opposite senses and communicating with a central vertical outlet V.

The profiles of the grooved conveyor of any of the embodiments disclosed herein may be sharp V grooves or may be flat bottomed with sloping sides (Figure 4) or may be in sinusoidal form as in Figure 11 or may be defined by semi-circular grooves 13 contiguous with intermediate ridges 13' as shown in Figure 12.

The pressure drop of the perforated separation region is preferably high in relation to that of the material above it. Preferably the tray is arranged to provide two thirds of the combined pressure drop of the tray and material above it.

The groove apertures may be of the cheese grater or rasp type in which the holes in a sheet are formed by displacing metal instead of by punching and in which one side of the hole is raised above the surface of the sheet. This displacement imparts to air passing through the holes a velocity component parallel with the sheet in addition to the normal component at right angles to the sheet. A characteristic of this sheet is that the parallel velocity component only exists near to the sheet surface so that its influence *is only felt in the vicinity of the sheet. (^See inset Sheet 1)

This type of sheet may be used within the grooves with the parallel velocity component opposing the vibratory conveying action so that the heavies at the bottom of the groove are conveyed by the air in the opposite direction to the lights which are conveyed by the vibratory action in order to separate the heavies from the lights. Since the grooves communicate with the space below the delivery plate 11, the heavies may pass under the plate 11.

In this 'reverse movement' arrangement no separation plate or inclined exit surface is required.

The size and spacing of the perforation holes and the profile of the grooved rectification deck are deliberately arranged so that a preferred relative velocity profile is obtained (Figs 11 and 12). The relative velocity ratio of fluid above zone A should be just below that required to entrain the undesired heavies, that is 1.7 from Table 1. Hence in operation once undesired particles have entered this region the fluid velocity cannot lift them to a higher zone, but any desired lights would be lifted from this region. It is required that undesired heavies can sink through the region above zone B, but that desired lights are mainly lifted out of this region. Hence a velocity ratio of 1.5 could be targeted.

Similarly the velocity in the region over zone C must be such that it does not lift excessively any of the desired lights or undesired heavies; there could be a category of undesired lights such as dust which it would be preferable to remove. Hence a velocity ratio of less than 1.0 is required above zone C.

By means of creating velocity profiles the situation is generated where the various materials will tend to concentrate at different levels above the perforated deck according to their aerodynamic characteristics, basically into two levels, undesired heavies at the lower level and desired lights at the higher level.

The vibratory transport action of the entire unit will also encourage heavies to sink down through the floating mass of lights.

The input material mixture will contain an expected range in the proportion of undesired heavies. This range of expected proportion is taken into account when designing the deck profile and the extent of each perforated zone. These proportions are normally expressed in mass terms and 2 and 5% objectionable heavies by mass would not be untypical in a tobacco cut rolled stem process. However, for this application the proportion range may be expressed in terms of volumetric proportions when in a vibrated situation. This is because the desired and undesired materials have different specific volumes and it is these volumes which are important. If, for example, it is found that the r proportion of undesired heavies on a volumetric transport basis is 4 to 10% then the situation in Figure

12 may be used where the cross sectional area above all zone A regions corresponds approximately to the minimum expected objectionable product volume, while that above

A and B corresponds approximately to the maximum expected ob ectionable product volume• The total volumes and consequently cross sectional areas_ of the velocity regions A and B correspond approximately to the expected in transit volumes of the undesired heavy materials. As heavies enter these regions they displace any lights which may have been there, this action reduces the consequences of any inaccuracy of relative velocity design and the effects of changes in material type.

By consideration of velocity profiles and material volumes the situation is created by which undesired particles are separated and concentrated.

This material eventually enters the collection groove.

The collection groove is sized and zoned in a similar way to the separation grooves except that the cross sectional area of velocity regions A and B now corresponds to less than maximum but more nearly to the minimum volumetric proportion of undesired heavies.

This should take into account the change in transport volume experienced as particles now move across instead of along the deck.

Desired material and excess undesired material moves on to the discharge surface. Where applicable the angle of incline of the discharge surface is such that desired material can easily transport up the incline but heavies stay near the base of the incline. If desired the incline may be perforated and zoned to further encourage distinction between desired and undesired materials.

It may be arranged that material leaving the conveyor can enter a subsequent rectification area and this action can be repeated a number of times.

The rectified and concentrated undesired materials in the collection groove may be discharged out of the process line or passed to another rectification deck or special purpose machine.

By means of the above described embodiments separation is achieved which does not necessitate the use of lifting the light fraction by vacuum means resulting in less air being used. A greater emphasis is placed on vibration to separate the heavies.

This treatment is preferably carried out between cutting and drying to minimise degradation, but also as soon as possible after cutting to minimise clumping which occurs as soon as the cut tobacco is mechanically handle .

Such an arrangement as described above may be combined with a distribution system for supplying cut tobacco.

Claims

1. Apparatus for the pneumatic separation of particular material comprising a substantially horizontal vibrating conveyor having a plurality of grooves having apertures (14) through which air passes to partially or wholly fluidise the material under treatment.

2. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1, wherein a substantially horizontal plate (16) is provided at the exit end of the grooves at a level lying between planes defined by the top and bottom of the grooves thus providing a line of separation between light and heavy fractions, the heavy fraction passing beneath the-plate.

3. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 2, wherein said plate is vertically adjustable relative to the grooves so that separation can be optimised according to the type of material under treatment.

4. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1, wherein the conveyor is formed with an oblique collection (15) extending transversely of the direction of material travel and disposed at the exit ends of the grooves.

5. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 4, wherein a plurality of transverse and oblique collection channels (15) are provided, said channels being parallel to each other.

6. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 5, wherein the collection channels communicate with a longitudinally extending channel (C) disposed at one side of the conveyor for transport of the separated heavy fraction.

7. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 5, wherein two collection channels are provided which extend respectively obliquely on opposite sense each communicating with a centrally arranged outlet (V).

8. Apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 4 - 7, wherein air feed apertures are provided also the collection channels (15).

9. Apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 1 - 8, wherein air to feed the apertures is passed by way of a plenum chamber or a plurality of plenum chambers (17) arranged beneath the conveyor.

10. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 4, wherein the collection channel (15) extending transversely of the direction of material travel is imperforate and is provided with an inclined exit surface (15¹).

11. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1, wherein air to feed the apertures is passed by way of a plenum chamber (17) arranged beneath the conveyor, said plenum chamber having tubes extending vertically there through and communicating with the bottoms of the grooves whereby the heavy fraction can pass from the groove bottoms to the exterior beneath the plenum chamber or chambers.

12. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 11, wherein the tubes are conical and their smaller ends at the top.

13. Apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 1 - 12, wherein the profile of the grooved conveyor is V-shaped or sinusoidal.

14. Apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 1 - 12, wherein the profile of the conveyor is defined by semi¬ circular sectioned or flat bottomed grooves (13) and intermediate ridges (13*).

15. Apparatus as claimed in any one claims 1 -14, in which the conveyor grooves are wholly or partly made with a perforated sheet in which the apertures in the sheet are formed by displacing metal to one side of the surface of the sheet whereby on passing air through the apertures a velocity component parallel with the sheet is achieved in addition to the component normal to the sheet.

16. Apparatus as claimed in claim 15, wherein the apertures are so arranged that he parallel velocity component opposes the effective direction of travel of the conveyor, whereby the heavy fraction is conveyed in the opposite direction to that of the light fraction.

17. Apparatus as claimed in claim 16, wherein the ends of the grooves are open at the end adjacent to the delivery region so as to communicate with the space beneath the delivery plate (11) .