USRE46051E1 - Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares, and method for dispensing flare material - Google Patents

Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares, and method for dispensing flare material Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE46051E1
USRE46051E1 US10/137,107 US13710702A USRE46051E US RE46051 E1 USRE46051 E1 US RE46051E1 US 13710702 A US13710702 A US 13710702A US RE46051 E USRE46051 E US RE46051E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
aircraft
decoy
dispensing
flare
infrared
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US10/137,107
Inventor
L. Ray Sweeny
Mary Dominique O'Neill
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Co
Original Assignee
Raytheon Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US09/162,104 priority Critical patent/US6055909A/en
Application filed by Raytheon Co filed Critical Raytheon Co
Priority to US10/137,107 priority patent/USRE46051E1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE46051E1 publication Critical patent/USRE46051E1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64DEQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLYING SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENTS OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D3/00Aircraft adaptations to facilitate towing or being towed
    • B64D3/02Aircraft adaptations to facilitate towing or being towed for towing targets
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41JTARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J2/00Reflecting targets, e.g. radar-reflector targets; Active targets transmitting electromagnetic or acoustic waves
    • F41J2/02Active targets transmitting infra-red radiation
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41JTARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J9/00Moving targets, i.e. moving when fired at
    • F41J9/08Airborne targets, e.g. drones, kites, balloons
    • F41J9/10Airborne targets, e.g. drones, kites, balloons towed

Abstract

This invention proposes to make use of an already developed set of hardware which dispenses and controls the performance of towed decoys capable of defeating radar guided weapons. Using this same hardware, a new and unique payload, payload control and dispensing mechanism is inserted into a decoy towbody. The payload consists of foils and/or foil packs of a pyrophoric material. This material creates an infrared (IR) signature behind the decoy that is more attractive than the infrared plume emitted by the aircraft engine. The fact that the IR decoy is towed insures that it will be kinematically correct by flying the same profile as the aircraft so as to remain within the field of view of the missile's seeker. Because the pyrophoric material can be metered (dispensed at varying and controllable rates) its radiant intensity can be matched with that of the engine of the towing aircraft. As the burn characteristics of the selected pyrophoric material match the burn profile of hydrocarbon based jet fuels, the towed IR decoy also emits a plume that spectrally matches that of its host aircraft's engine.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

This invention relates to a infrared (IR) flare dispensing towed decoy, and more particularly, to such an IR flare dispensing towed decoy that is electronically configurable to vary its IR emissions and burn duration.

2. Background Art

Infrared-guided and radar-guided missiles pose the primary threats to military aircraft engaged in a combat environment. These missiles use their radar and IR guidance to home in on aircraft, thereby substantially increasing their probability of a “hit”.

One method of defeating radar-guided missile attacks is to tow a decoy behind the host aircraft that is a more attractive radar target than the aircraft itself, so that the attacking missile chooses the towed decoy as opposed to the aircraft. The assignee hereto has pioneered this particular technology, developing a system for countering radar-guided weapons which is currently entering production for Air Force and Navy combat aircraft under the nomenclature of AN/ALE-50. However, to date no similar capability for defeating non-imaging IR-guided missiles has been developed.

Current military aircraft are particularly vulnerable to attack from IR-guided surface-to-air and air-to-air missiles. Statistics gathered from analysis of aircraft losses in hostile actions since 1980 show that almost 90% of these losses have been the result of IR-guided missile attacks. Thus, IR-guided missiles have become a formidable threat to military aircraft. These missiles can either be guided to their target entirely using IR-guidance or can initially utilize radar guidance and then switch over to IR guidance as they come into closer proximity to the target. In regards to the latter approach, IR-guided missiles can be cued via radar, or a passive Infrared Search and Track (IRST) system employed with the missiles can be alerted and properly oriented via a data link from a ground based surveillance or early warning radar. Optimally, however, IR-guided missiles are launched at an aircraft without the use of radar cueing, which often alerts an aircrew to an impending missile attack when the radar signals are detected by an on-board radar warning receiver. These IR-guidance only missiles are essentially passive and can be launched as a result of visual observation of the approaching aircraft, via self cueing or with assistance from a IRST system. In the absence of warning to the target aircraft, these missiles have a high degree of lethality.

The number and variety of infrared guided missiles pose a significant challenge to the development of an effective countermeasure in that the missiles tend to employ a wide variety of IR counter-countermeasure (IRCCM) capabilities. This makes it difficult to devise techniques that will be effective across the spectrum of IR guided missile threats and insensitive to the presence/absence or type of IRCCM being employed.

A number of methods have been used in an attempt to reduce the lethality of IR-guided missiles. Aggressive maneuvering of the target aircraft is often attempted if there is sufficient warning of an approaching missile. Also, pyrotechnic or pyrophoric flares that are forcibly ejected from on-board magazines using pyrotechnic squibs as the motive source have been employed. However, these devices burn at the necessary intensity for only a short period of time. In addition, gravity quickly separates the flares from the dispensing aircraft removing them from the missile seeker's field of view—thus limiting or reducing their effectiveness. These IR flares can also be identified by some missiles and rejected because they tend to initially provide more intense IR emissions than the aircraft. Furthermore, some missiles can also identify IR emitting flares by their IR spectrum.

Another current countermeasure involves the use of an IR jammer. Infrared jammers attempt to confuse missile seekers by “blinking” IR energy at an approaching missile. This energy is modulated at rates designed to confuse the signal processing circuitry of the attacking missile and induce sufficient angle error in its guidance mechanism so as to cause a miss. However, IR jammers have not been particularly successful for a number of reasons. The lamp sources of IR energy have difficulty generating sufficient intensity to overcome the aircraft engine's IR signature. They normally are required to be omni-directional since the direction of missile attack is not generally known. This further dilutes their energy density. If they are focused into a controlled beam to increase their energy on the IR missile seeker, they require fairly accurate pointing information which is not currently available on fighter aircraft. Finally, since different types of IR-guided missiles rarely use the same signal processing technology, it has not been possible to create a generic jamming modulation effective against all missiles. This can only be accomplished if the jammer designer has intimate knowledge of the missile seeker which allows him/her to exploit its design vulnerabilities. Clearly, this requires knowledge gained via exploitation of captured or covertly obtained missiles or through other intelligence sources. However, this is an impractical approach given the number and variety of IR-guided missile types.

In conclusion, the aforementioned approaches have proven to be individually and collectively inadequate to assure the survivability of military aircraft threatened by IR guided missiles. Therefore, what is needed is a system for distracting IR missiles from a target aircraft that tracks with the movement of the aircraft and provides the same IR spectral characteristics as the aircraft to be protected. Furthermore, this system should be able to control its radiant intensity so as to attract IR-guided missiles which are able to more closely discriminate between aircraft IR signatures and IR decoy launched flares. Additionally, the system should exhibit a sufficient burn duration to provide protection over a reasonable length of time against a possible missile attack.

SUMMARY

These needs are fulfilled by a towed IR decoy that flies the same profile as the aircraft it is protecting, such that the decoy remains in the IR-guided missile's field of view unlike current aircraft deployed flares which quickly fall away from the aircraft. This decoy also exhibits the same IR spectral characteristics such that the attacking missile cannot discriminate between the decoy and the aircraft to be protected on the basis of these characteristics. Furthermore, this decoy is able to vary its radiant intensity so as to provide an irresistible distraction to the incoming missile. Finally, the decoy is long-lived so that it provides protection against a possible missile attack over an appropriate period of time. This allows the towed IR decoy to be used preemptively (i.e., without need of warning of missile attack) at the option of the aircrew whenever they are likely to be immediately vulnerable to IR missile attack.

Generally, the towed decoy of the present invention creates an irresistible distraction which is effective against all of the current generation of attacking IR-guided missile, regardless of the IR counter-countermeasures (IRCCM) employed by the attacking missile. Specifically, the decoy is designed to eliminate, or render ineffective, the key discriminants used by most current generation, non-imaging, IR-guided missiles as IRCCMs. This invention proposes to make use of an already developed set of hardware which dispenses and controls the performance of towed decoys capable of defeating radar-guided weapons (i.e. the AN/ALE-50 system). Using this deployment hardware, a new and unique payload, payload control and dispensing mechanism is inserted into a decoy towbody. The payload consists of foils and/or foil packs (containing multiple foils or packets of powders) of pyrophoric material. Suitable pyrophoric foil flare materials are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,699. This material will create an infrared signature behind the decoy that is more attractive than the infrared plume emitted by the aircraft engine or distracts the missile enough to cause it to miss its intended target. The fact that the IR decoy is towed insures that it will be kinematically correct (flying the same profile as the aircraft and within the field of view of the missile seeker), and because the pyrophoric material will be metered (dispensed at varying and controllable rates) its radiant intensity can be matched with that of the engine of the towing aircraft. In addition, the burn characteristics of the selected pyrophoric material match the burn profile of hydrocarbon based jet fuels. Thus, the towed IR decoy also emits a plume that spectrally matches that of its host aircraft's engine. The decoy's ability to meter its payload and it relatively large flare capacity combine to provide a long life that effectively defeats any temporal discriminants used by current IR-guided missiles.

One embodiment of a decoy according to the present invention includes a cylindrical housing. This housing is made up of two independent sections which are joined together in the area where a towline is attached. The forward section contains electronics and a motor which act as a motive source for the payload dispensing mechanism. The aft section contains the payload dispensing mechanism and the pyrophoric material payload in hermetically sealed packages. Mounted at the aft end of the aft section are stabilizing fins.

By separating the decoy housing into two primary sections, it is possible to adopt a manufacturing approach which gives cognizance to the fact that the payload section contains a hazardous material which is subject to the special handling and treatment requirements normally accorded fuels or munitions. The two sections can be built and tested independently, then joined prior to being encapsulated for extended storage. The forward section encompasses a structure for mounting a number of circuit cards, a towline attachment mechanism, and a structure for mounting an electric stepper motor. It also contains a ballast which assures aerodynamic stability via controlling the decoy center-of-gravity/center-of-pressure. This ballast also provides structural rigidity and attachment points for securing the aft (payload) section.

Power is delivered down a towline via appropriate electrical cabling to the decoy from a power supply contained in the on-aircraft launch controller. This power is conditioned in the circuit card area to provide three discrete voltages necessary to operate the decoy. The circuit cards perform communication, motor control and power conditioning functions. More particularly, a modem provides a communication interface between the aircraft and the decoy. This two-way communication involves commands from the aircraft to the decoy for controlling payload dispensing initiation/stop and dispensing rates for the pyrophoric material, and from the decoy to the aircraft for relaying decoy health and status. A motor provides the motive force for the payload dispensing mechanism. This motor is releasably connected to a screw shaft in the aft section of the decoy via a “blind-mating” connector. A motor controller circuit board establishes the parameters of motor operation (e.g. rotation speed) and provides commands directly to the motor. Power conditioning is provided by the power conditioning circuitry which provides appropriate voltages to the motor, motor controller and modem.

The aft (payload) section is comprised of a non-rotating piston riding on the aforementioned screw shaft. The screw shaft runs the length of the payload section terminating at a spin-off end cap which seals the payload in the decoy prior to deployment. The payload consists of approximately 6,000-7,000 disks/foils of pyrophoric material which are mounted with a preload on the screw shaft. The preload allows the payload to act as a solid object instead of a compressible object, thus affording accurate metering of the material. In addition, the preload causes each foil to “spring” out of the back of the payload section, thereby facilitating the dispensing of the material. Upon command, the electric motor turns the screw shaft causing the end cap to spin-off and the piston to ride down the screw shaft pushing the pyrophoric foils ahead of it. The rate at which the motor turns determines the rate at which the foils are dispensed into the atmosphere, and in turn, the intensity of the IR signature. The more units of material dispensed per unit time, the higher the radiant intensity generated. The dispensing rates (and so motor speed) are calculated to generate the IR signature necessary to cause an attacking IR missile to miss the host aircraft. The motor speed requirements are programmed into the memory of the on-aircraft launch controller and in turn transmitted to the motor controller of decoy. This controllability allows the decoy to defeat IRCCM intensity discriminants and also provides suitable burn duration to permit preemptive usage.

In addition to the just described benefits, other objectives and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description which follows hereinafter when taken in conjunction with the drawing figures which accompany it.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The specific features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings where:

FIG. 1 is a drawing of the decoy constructed in accordance with this invention showing the two sections of the towbody.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the major components embodying the present invention.

FIG. 3 shows the shifting of the IR centroid calculated by a missile seeker due to the presence of the towed decoy of the present invention.

FIG. 4 shows an IR modulation pattern entailing high and low intensity spikes.

FIG. 5 shows another IR modulation pattern entailing a high and low intensity spikes followed by a waiting period.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the following description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and which is shown by way of illustration of specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.

FIG. 1 provides an overall schematic of a decoy 5 which provides the kinematic, spectral, intensity and temporal features capable of defeating all types of current non-imaging IR missiles. FIG. 2 provides a block diagram of some of the more important components of the decoy 5. Referring to these FIGS. 1 and 2, the decoy 5 has two basic sections, the forward section 10 and the aft section 20. The sections can be made separately, and then joined and tested at a later date. Since the decoy 5 is manufactured in two separate sections, it has the advantage of allowing the aft section 20, which contains hazardous material and is subject to special handling and treatment requirements normally accorded fuels or munitions, to be manufactured and stored separately from the forward section 10. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 the decoy has a cylindrical housing and is approximately 16.7 inches in length and 2.4 inches in diameter. In general, the forward section contains electronics and a motor which act as a motive source for the payload dispensing mechanism. More specifically, the forward section 10 comprises a towline attachment 11 for attaching a towline 12, and an electrical interconnect 13. The electrical interconnect 13 brings power and communications from on-board a host aircraft 30 via appropriate electrical cabling disposed along the towline 12 to an on-decoy communications modem 15, motor controller 16 and power conditioning circuitry 17. The communications between the host aircraft 30 and the decoy are two-way. Commands involving dispense initiation start and stop and dispensing rates for the pyrophoric materials 25 in the aft section 20 are sent from the aircraft 30 to the decoy. The decoy 5 sends to the host aircraft 30 decoy health and status information. The motor controller 16 establishes the parameters for motor operation and operates the motor 18. The motor shaft 18a has a blindmate connector 19 that connects to a coupling 26 on the aft section 20 of the decoy. The motor 18 is preferably an electric stepper motor. Additionally, the forward section 10 includes a ballast (not shown) which assures aerodynamic stability by controlling the decoy's center of gravity and center of pressure. The ballast also provides structural rigidity and attachment points for securing the aft section.

In general, the aft section 20 contains a payload dispensing mechanism and a payload of pyrophoric materials in hermetically sealed packages. More particularly, the aft section 20 includes a non-rotating piston 21, a screw shaft 23, a “spin-off” end cap 24 and several thousand foils or packets of pyrophoric material 25. There are also four equally space, spring-erected, stabilizing fins 29 mounted at the aft section 20. These fins 29 spring into place when the decoy is deployed. The piston 21 is prevented from rotating on the screw 23 by an anti-rotation mechanism. This anti-rotation mechanism can be of any appropriate design. However, a wheel-stabilizer configuration is preferred. In this preferred configuration there is a longitudinally oriented slot on the inner surface of the aft section 20 into which extends a portion of a rotating wheel incorporated into the external surface of the piston. The wheel is fitted in a slot within the body of the piston and affixed such that a portion of the wheel extends beyond the surface of the piston and is capable of rotating within the slot. As the piston 21 is driven forward the wheel rotates as it moves through the slot, thereby preventing binding of the piston within the aft housing. However, contact between the sides of the wheel and the walls of the slot prevents the piston from rotating within the aft body.

The screw shaft 23 is preferably an acme screw and runs the length of the payload section terminating at the end cap 24. In this embodiment the foils 25 are doughnut shaped and are mounted on the screw 23. The foils are preferably 1.5 to 2.0 mils thick and preferably 6000 to 7000 disks/foils of pyrophoric material are used. Packets of pyrophoric powder can also be used, either alone or in conjunction with the foils 25.

Upon command, the electric motor 18 turns the acme screw 23 causing the end cap 24 to spin off and the piston 21 to ride down the screw 23 pushing the pyrophoric foils 25 ahead of it. Each foil and/or powder packet is hermetically sealed using a casing made from, for example, mylar or another plastic material. As the packets are pushed out of the back of the decoy, they are cut open by a sharp projection located at the back of the aft section. The pyrophoric materials 25 burn or glow when exposed to air and emit IR radiation. The packets of pyrophoric material are mounted on the screw 23 with a preload that compresses the packets together in the longitudinal direction within the aft section 20. The compressed packets act as a solid object when pushed aftward by the piston 21. As a result, the packets at the aft end of the section 20 begin dispensing immediately when the piston 21 is moved and are dispensed at a rate dictated solely by the speed of the piston. This ensures an accurate metering of the material. In addition, the preload causes each foil to “spring” out of the back of the payload section, thereby facilitating the dispensing of the material.

An O-ring 27, disposed at the back end of the aft section 20, extends into the interior of the section far enough to contact a peripheral portion of the face of each foil 25 as it reach the back end just prior to being dispensed. This O-ring 27 has a dual purpose. First, it acts as a seal preventing outside air from gaining access to the interior of the aft section 20 where it could react with the remaining pryrophoric foils 25. In addition, the O-ring 27 imposes a slight resistive force against each foil 25 as it is dispensed from the back end of the aft section 20. This resistance causes each foil to “spring” out of the back of the payload section, thereby facilitating dispensing of the material. While an O-ring is preferred, it should be noted that any similar structure which provides both the sealing and the resistance function could be employed instead. For example, a shoulder or flap might be employed with equal success.

A braking mechanism is contained in a towline reel on the aircraft which holds the towline 12. The braking mechanism allows the decoy to be towed in a discrete position relative to the host aircraft 30 unique to the type of aircraft and the location on the aircraft where the decoy deploying mechanism is housed. The distance the decoy is positioned behind the aircraft is be chosen to be close enough to allow the decoy to be in proximity to the host aircraft's exhaust plume such that both the aircraft's plume and decoy's flares are in the missile seeker's field of view at the onset of missile engagement. However, the distance should also be far enough that the decoy clears the aircraft's superstructure and can provide an effective distraction for an attacking IR missile. This braking mechanism and towline reel are essentially the same as used for the aforementioned radar decoy system and so no greater detail will be provided herein.

Power is delivered down the towline 12 to the decoy 5 from a power supply 32 contained on the on-aircraft launch controller 31. In a tested embodiment a 350V power source was used. The power provided by the source 32 is further conditioned by the power conditioning circuitry 17 in the decoy to provide three discrete voltages necessary to operate the decoy and electronic components.

The decoy embodying the present invention is electronically configurable such that it can be made to replicate a variety of aircraft engine infrared plume signatures. This allows the same decoy to be used on a number of tactical and combat support aircraft whose plume signatures appear within a range of approximately 300 to 3000 watts per steradian. This intensity range is accomplished via material dispensing commands transferred from a launch controller 31 onboard the host aircraft 30 down the towline 12 to the decoy and then through the on-decoy modem 15 to the motor control circuitry 16. The commands instruct the motor controller 16 to control payload dispensing at a rate sufficient to achieve decoy IR signature to aircraft IR signature matching. Specifically, the rate at which the motor 18 turns, which in turn dictates the translation speed of the piston and determines the rate at which the foils are dispensed into the atmosphere (and thus, the intensity of the IR signature). The more units of material dispensed per unit of time, the higher the IR intensity generated. It is noted that the dispensing rate required to mimic a particular aircraft's IR signature can be readily determined using currently known methods. Therefore, no detailed listing of the dispensing rates associated with particular aircraft will be provided herein.

Modeling and analysis of the current generation of non-imaging IR threat missiles, played against an array of aircraft-launched flare decoys deployed from U.S. military aircraft, has resulted in a more comprehensive understanding of the key elements required to be effective against these threat missiles. The key elements are directly related to the methodologies used by IR-guided missiles to discriminate between real (aircraft) targets and decoy (flare) targets. Specifically, current non-imaging IR-guided missile employ kinematic, spectral, radiant intensity, and temporal discriminants to avoid being deceived by the deployment of IR emitting flares. These discriminants will be described below, as well as how the preferred embodiments of the present invention overcome these discriminants.

1.0 Kinematic

In order to be effective the decoy flare must be kinematically equivalent to its host aircraft. Ideally, it should follow the movements of the aircraft it is protecting. It cannot be allowed to fall out of the field of view of the attacking missile else it loses its ability to divert the attacking missile. Towing the decoy is one way (and perhaps the best way) to accomplish this. A towed IR decoy's ability to appear kinematically equivalent to the host aircraft is particularly advantageous when the aircraft is diving. Military aircraft usually fly at a sanctuary altitude where they are too high to be reached by any missile threat. The planes then dive on a target, fire and pull back up to sanctuary altitude. IR flares fall away too quickly when the aircraft is in a high speed dive, providing little protection when compared to the towed IR decoy of the present invention.

2.0 Spectral

In order to be effective the decoy flare must exhibit approximately the same IR spectral characteristics as are exhibited by the aircraft's exhaust plume. This is necessary to preclude the attacking IR missile from discriminating between real (aircraft) and decoy (flare) targets by seeing or comparing the presence or absence of certain wavelengths within the IR spectrum. The optimal method of achieving this is to use the aforementioned pyrophoric flare materials which burn at approximately the same spectra as hydrocarbon based jet aircraft fuels.

3.0 Radiant Intensity

In order to be effective the decoy flares must be able to achieve radiant intensity levels exhibited by the engines on the various military aircraft it will be protecting. Obviously, since the engines of these fighter and combat support aircraft tend to produce widely varying levels of IR emissions, the IR decoy's flares must also be capable of duplicating this range of intensities.

Some IR-guided missiles calculate the location of the target aircraft by calculating the centroid of the IR emissions present in the missile seeker's field of view. These seekers then calculate the distance from the centroid to where the actual aircraft body would most likely be located. For example, as depicted in FIG. 3, the host aircraft's engine plume 50 would normally be perceived by the missile seeker as having an IR intensity centroid at C1 and would calculate the distance d1 that the centroid of the plume should be from the aircraft. However, with the addition of the towed decoy 5, and its IR intensity centroid C2 at a distance d2 in the missile seeker's field of view, the missile seeker will calculate the IR centroid Ct between C1 and C2 at a distance dt behind the aircraft. As a result the missile seeker will miscalculate the position of the aircraft. Hence, the towed decoy of the present invention is placed at a distance close enough to be in the missile seeker's field of view, but also far enough behind the host aircraft to cause sufficient error in the missile seeker's infrared centroid calculation such that the missile misses its target aircraft. To counter such missiles, the IR radiation intensity pattern produced by the decoy need not vary and so the IR emitting pyrophoric packets can be dispensed at a steady rate. However, there are advantages to varying the intensity as will be discussed next.

Varying the intensity of the IR radiation intensity emitted by the decoy can be used to deceive the seekers of some missile employing intensity discriminants other than just the centroid scheme described above. In one preferred IR radiation intensity modulation pattern depicted in FIG. 4, the radiant intensity is varied from somewhat higher to somewhat lower than the aircraft engine's IR signature. This is accomplished by varying the speed of the of the piston 21 on the screw 23 pushing the pyrophoric payload 25 out of the back of the decoy into the air stream. Some current generation IR missiles attempt to counter IR flare countermeasures by rejecting the brighter IR sources (or weaker in some cases), when more than one source is detected. This is done on the assumption that the presence of an additional source or sources indicates the presence of IR emitting flares. The above-described modulated IR radiation intensity pattern tends to deceive these intensity discriminating missiles by attracting the missile to the decoy or at least away from the aircraft. If the missile is the type that rejects the brighter of the IR sources, the repeated IR bursts having a radiant intensity below that of the aircraft's exhaust plume will cause the missile to be distracted from the aircraft and toward the decoy instead. However, if the missile is of the type that seeks the brighter IR source, the portion of the modulated IR radiation intensity pattern that exceeds the IR emissions of the aircraft's exhaust plume will attract the missile and spare the aircraft. Thus, the “high-low” intensity pattern will defeat the missile, regardless of the which CCM it employs.

The aforementioned IR radiation intensity pattern exhibiting a high IR energy spike compared to the aircraft's exhaust plume, followed by a low energy spike compared to the aircraft exhaust plume (as depicted in FIG. 3) will also deceive IR guided missile employing the centroid scheme as a IRCCM. Essentially, the pattern causes the missile's centroid calculations to be skewed aftward just as it would if the a steady intensity pattern were employed. This will result in the missile miscalculating the location of the target aircraft, causing the attacking missile to miss its mark.

Further, some missiles that employ the centroid scheme as a IRCCM add a feature by which the missile temporarily ceases tracking the target when a high intensity IR spike is detected on the assumption that it is an IR emitting flare. While temporarily out of its seeking mode, the missile steers toward the projected location for the aircraft based on it last known position. It is believed that when the missile resumes its IR tracking a few seconds later, the flare will have fallen out of the missile seekers field of view and only the aircraft will remain. The intensity spikes exceeding the IR emissions of the aircraft's engine plume associated with the decoy IR intensity modulation pattern will trigger the above-described missile's IR tracking shut-down mode. However, when the missile resumes tracking and reacquires what is assumed to be the aircraft alone, it will actually be the aircraft with its decoy. Either this scenario will cause the missile to miscalculate the position of the aircraft in relation to the IR radiation field or it will cause the missile to continuously shut-down its IR seeking function making it unlikely to actually hit the aircraft.

To even further skew the IR centroid calculations of missile seekers which calculate the IR centroid in their seeker field of vision, the towed decoy can dispense pyrophoric material in a manner which results in a large IR radiation intensity spike (higher than that of the aircraft's exhaust plume), a low IR radiation intensity spike (lower than that of the plume), and then wait for a short period of time before repeating the cycle (high spike, low spike, waiting period) as shown in FIG. 5. This IR radiation intensity pattern will further skew the centroid that the missile seeker calculates because by waiting after the high spike, low spike combination a series of flare intensities which stretch out further in distance behind the aircraft than with the previously-described alternating high spike, low spike combination. Thus, this pattern would defeat all the IR radiation intensity-based CCMs described previously.

4.0 Temporal

In order to be effective, the decoy must be able to overcome temporal based IRCCMs employed by some IR-guided missiles. Essentially, these missiles have the capacity to distinguish between the relatively continuous IR emission levels associated with the aircraft's exhaust plume and the rapidly decreasing IR emissions associated with an IR emitting flare. The towed decoy of the present invention is able to defeat the temporal discriminants of an IR-guided missile because, once activated, the pyrophoric material packets can be continuously dispensed over a relatively long period of time (as compared to current aircraft-launched flare systems), thereby maintaining the desired IR emission levels. It is the decoy's ability to dispense the IR emitting flares one at a time at controlled rates that provides the relatively long life, i.e. on the order of tens of seconds. Further, if the decoy is damaged or destroyed or simply uses up all its pyrophoric material, it can be automatically and almost instantaneously replaced. For example, if communication is interrupted between the aircraft and the decoy, this event can, at operator option, be used as an automatic cue to deploy another decoy. This provides a nearly continuous protection from IR missiles and allows the towed decoy to be used preemptively by deploying it whenever the aircraft is susceptible to attack from an IR-guided missile. The IR emitting flares are dispensed from the decoy, and the decoys are continuously replaced as long as the aircraft remains in the threat area. The long life of the decoy is also enhanced by a capability to cease dispensing of the flare material if the aircraft successfully evades missile engagement, thereby reserving flare material for potential future missile threats. Finally, when employed, the aforementioned “high-low-pause” IR emission pattern will allow the towed decoy to conserve flare material so as to remain viable for a longer period of time.

In summary, the foregoing description has shown the unique towed IR decoy according to the present invention overcomes the key kinematic, spectral, intensity and temporal IRCCMs employed by the current generation of non-imaging IR-guided missiles and significantly increases aircraft survivability against these threats.

While the invention has been described in detail by specific reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it is understood that variations and modifications thereof may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. For example, different payloads might be used to simulate aircraft IR signatures. Pyrophoric foils of different thicknesses and in different numbers may be used. For instance, the foils can be packaged individually or in groups of foils. This packaging method provides an alternate way of varying the IR intensity of the material that is deployed from the decoy by having greater or lesser numbers of foils packed in one package. Pyrophoric powders can also be used either alone or in conjunction with the foils. The decoy of the present invention could also be different sizes or shapes. For instance, the towed IR decoy could be made with a non-circular cross-section such as a square shape. This square-shaped cross section, or any shape that is not circular, would obviate the need for the wheel-stabilizer or other non-rotation mechanism that is employed in the decoy having a circular cross-section. The towbody of the decoy could also be made of more than two sections, or alternately could take the form of a single integrated structure.

Claims (41)

Wherefore, having thus described the present invention, what is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for defeating infrared (IR)-guided missile attacks on an aircraft comprising:
a decoy towed behind the aircraft, said decoy being capable of receiving commands transmitted from said aircraft; and
means, disposed within said decoy, for dispensing IR emitting flares, wherein the rate at which said flares are dispensed is determined by said commands.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 An apparatus for defeating infrared (IR)-guided missile attacks on an aircraft, comprising:
a decoy towed behind the aircraft, said decoy being capable of receiving commands transmitted from said aircraft; and
means, disposed within said decoy, for dispensing IR emitting flares carried on the decoy in solid form, wherein the rate at which said flares are dispensed is determined by said commands,
wherein the decoy is towed at a distance behind the aircraft that places it close enough to the aircraft's an exhaust plume of the aircraft that both the IR emissions from the aircraft's exhaust plume and the IR emissions of at least some of the flares dispensed from the towed decoy are in the a field of view of a seeker of an IR guided missile, but far enough behind the aircraft's exhaust plume that the seeker of the missile miscalculates the a location of the aircraft.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, An apparatus for defeating infrared (IR)-guided missile attacks on an aircraft, comprising:
a decoy towed behind the aircraft, said decoy being capable of receiving commands transmitted from said aircraft; and
means, disposed within said decoy, for dispensing IR emitting flares carried on the decoy in solid form, wherein the rate at which said flares are dispensed is determined by said commands,
wherein the apparatus is for use to defeat an IR guided missile employing kinematic counter--counter measures (CCMs) designed to discriminate between an aircraft moving through the air and an IR emitting flare falling away from the aircraft once deployed therefrom,
wherein said dispensing means continuously dispenses flares at a distance behind the aircraft that ensures both the IR emissions from the aircraft's an exhaust plume of the aircraft and the IR emissions of at least some of the flares dispensed from said decoy are in the a field of view of a seeker of the IR guided missile, thereby preventing the IR guided missile from distinguishing between the aircraft's exhaust plume and the flares, thereby defeating said kinematic CCMs.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, An apparatus for defeating infrared (IR)-guided missile attacks on an aircraft, comprising:
a decoy towed behind the aircraft, said decoy being capable of receiving commands transmitted from said aircraft; and
means, disposed within said decoy, for dispensing IR emitting flares carried on the decoy in solid form, wherein the rate at which said flares are dispensed is determined by said commands,
wherein the apparatus is for use to defeat an IR guided missile employing spectral CCMs designed to discriminate between the an IR spectra of an aircraft's exhaust plume of the aircraft and the an IR spectra of an IR emitting flare, wherein said dispensing means dispenses IR emitting flares comprising pyrophoric flare materials which emit, when exposed to air, an IR spectra similar to that emitted by the aircraft's exhaust plume, thereby defeating said spectral CCMs.
5. The apparatus of claim 1, An apparatus for defeating infrared (IR)-guided missile attacks on an aircraft, comprising:
a decoy towed behind the aircraft, said decoy being capable of receiving commands transmitted from said aircraft; and
means, disposed within said decoy, for dispensing IR emitting flares carried on the decoy in solid form, wherein the rate at which said flares are dispensed is determined by said commands,
wherein the apparatus is for use to defeat an IR guided missile employing IR radiation intensity CCMs designed to discriminate between the a radiant intensity of the IR emissions from the aircraft's an exhaust plume of the aircraft and the a radiant intensity of the IR emissions from an IR emitting flare, wherein said dispensing means dispenses the IR emitting flares at rates which create IR energy levels behind the decoy which cannot be effectively distinguished from that of the aircraft's exhaust plume, thereby defeating said intensity CCMs.
6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the IR emitting flares are dispensed at a steady rate which creates IR energy levels behind the decoy that substantially match the IR energy levels associated with the aircraft's exhaust plume.
7. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the IR emitting flares are dispensed at rates which produce a varying IR radiation intensity pattern behind the decoy, said pattern comprising a repeating sequence of at least two IR radiation intensity spikes wherein one of the at least two spikes peaks at an IR radiation intensity above that of the aircraft's exhaust plume and another of the at least two spikes peaks at an IR radiation intensity below that of the aircraft's exhaust plume.
8. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the IR emitting flares are dispensed at rates which produce a varying IR radiation intensity pattern behind the decoy, said pattern comprising a repeating sequence of at least two IR radiation intensity spikes followed by a period of time in which no flares are dispensed, wherein one of the at least two spikes peaks at an IR radiation intensity above that of the aircraft's exhaust plume and another of the at least two spikes peaks at an IR radiation intensity below that of the aircraft's exhaust plume.
9. The apparatus of claim 1, An apparatus for defeating infrared (IR)-guided missile attacks on an aircraft, comprising:
a decoy towed behind the aircraft, said decoy being capable of receiving commands transmitted from said aircraft; and
means, disposed within said decoy, for dispensing IR emitting flares carried on the decoy in solid form, wherein the rate at which said flares are dispensed is determined by said commands,
wherein the apparatus is for use to defeat an IR-guided missile employing temporal CCMs designed to distinguish between continuous IR emissions associated with the aircraft's an exhaust plume of the aircraft and rapidly decreasing IR emissions associated with aircraft-launch IR emitting flares as sensed by the IR-guided missile, wherein said dispensing means dispenses IR emitting flares from the decoy at rates that prevent the average IR emissions associated with the decoy's flares from decreasing in intensity over time, thereby defeating said temporal CCMs.
10. The apparatus of claim 1 An apparatus for defeating infrared (IR)-guided missile attacks on an aircraft, comprising:
a decoy towed behind the aircraft, said decoy being capable of receiving commands transmitted from said aircraft; and
means, disposed within said decoy, for dispensing IR emitting flares carried on the decoy in solid form, wherein the rate at which said flares are dispensed is determined by said commands,
wherein the towed IR decoy has a forward and an aft section, said forward section comprising:
a housing;
a towline attachment connected to the housing for attaching a towline from the aircraft;
a motor disposed within the housing;
a motor controller disposed within the housing and connected to the motor, said controller being capable of controlling the motor's a speed of the motor;
a communications modem disposed within said housing and connected to the motor controller, said modem being capable of receiving said commands communicated from the aircraft and passing said commands on to the motor controller; and
an electrical interconnect connected to the communications modem, said interconnect being mateable to an electrical cable capable of transmitting communications from the aircraft, said electrical cable following the towline from the aircraft to the decoy.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the commands communicated from the aircraft comprise motor control instructions dictating the speeds at which the motor is to be operated over time.
12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the communications modem is further capable of transmitting communications from the decoy to the aircraft, wherein said communications comprise information concerning the a status of the decoy.
13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the a absence of transmitted status information from the decoy for a prescribed period of time is interpreted as a failure of the decoy prompting its replacement.
14. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the aft sections section comprises:
a housing having a forward and an aft end;
a payload disposed within the housing comprising pyrophoric materials; and
a payload dispensing mechanism capable of dispensing the pyrophoric materials from the aft end of the housing at prescribed rates.
15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein said pyrophoric material comprises hermetically sealed packets and wherein the aft section further comprises a cutting device disposed at the aft end of the housing, said cutting device being capable of cutting open each packet of pryrophoric pyrophoric material as it is dispensed from the aft end of the housing, thereby exposing the pyrophoric material to the an atmosphere and causing it said pyrophoric material to emit IR radiation.
16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein each packet of pyrophoric material is 1.5 to 2.0 mils thick and at least about 6000 packets are disposed within the aft section housing.
17. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein each packet comprises at least one of (i) a foil covered with powderized pyrophoric material and (ii) powderized pyrophoric material.
18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein each packet comprises at least one foil covered with powderized pyrophoric material, and wherein the a number of foils contained in each packet once cut open and exposed to the atmosphere determines the an intensity of the IR radiation emitted form that from a cut-open packet, and wherein the number of foils contained in each package and the an order in which the packets are placed into the aft section is selected to provide a desired IR emission pattern behind the decoy.
19. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the payload dispensing mechanism comprises:
a threaded screw shaft longitudinally mounted within said housing, said screw shaft being capable of rotating about its longitudinal axis;
an endcap enclosing the aft end of the housing, said endcap being in correspondence with an aft end of the screw shaft such that whenever the screw shaft is rotated in a first direction, the end cap detaches from the aft end of the housing and falls away;
a piston disposed within the aft section housing, wherein said piston comprises a treaded threaded central channel threadably mated to the screw shaft and an anti-rotation mechanism capable of preventing the piston from rotating in relation to the aft housing, and wherein said piston moves aftward within the housing whenever the screw shaft is rotated in said first direction; and wherein
packets of pyrophoric material are mounted on the screw shaft aft of the piston such that whenever the screw shaft is rotated in said first direction, the piston pushes the packets aftward causing the packets to be dispensed one by one from the aft end of the housing.
20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the packets of pyrophoric material are compressed together in the longitudinal direction of the housing so as to prevent any additional compression whenever the screw shaft is rotated in said first direction and to maximize the number of packets disposed within the housing.
21. The apparatus of claim 19 wherein the forward section's motor has an output connector which is releasably mateable with a forward end of the screw shaft of the aft section, such that whenever the motor is operated it rotates the screw shaft in said first direction.
22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the speed at which the motor is operated by the motor controller dictates a speed of rotation of the screw shaft, thereby controlling the a speed at which the piston moves aftward and so the a rate at which the packets of pyrophoric material are dispensed from the towed decoy, said rate of dispensing dictating the IR emission levels behind the decoy.
23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the motor controller is instructed via communications comprising motor speed instructions to vary the speed of the motor over time, thereby modulating the IR emissions levels behind the decoy.
24. A method for defeating infrared (IR) guided missile attacks on an aircraft comprising the steps of:
towing an IR flare-dispensing decoy behind the aircraft; and
dispensing the IR flares behind the towed decoy to cause an IR guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft, wherein the rate at which said IR emitting flares are dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said decoy.
25. The method of claim 24 A method for defeating infrared (IR) guided missile attacks on an aircraft, comprising:
towing an IR flare-dispensing decoy behind the aircraft, wherein IR-emitting flares are carried on the decoy in solid form; and
dispensing the IR emitting flares behind the towed decoy to cause an IR guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft, wherein a rate at which said IR emitting flares are dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said decoy,
wherein the towing step comprises towing the decoy at a distance behind the aircraft that places it close enough to the aircraft's an exhaust plume of the aircraft such that both the IR emissions from the aircraft's exhaust plume and the IR emissions of at least some of the flares dispensed from the towed decoy are in the a field of view of a seeker of an IR-guided missile, but far enough behind the aircraft's exhaust plume that the seeker of the missile miscalculates the a location of the aircraft.
26. The method of claim 24, A method for defeating infrared (IR) guided missile attacks on an aircraft, comprising:
towing an IR flare-dispensing decoy behind the aircraft, wherein IR-emitting flares are carried on the decoy in solid form; and
dispensing the IR emitting flares behind the towed decoy to cause an IR guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft, wherein a rate at which said IR emitting flares are dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said decoy,
wherein the IR guided missile employs kinematic counter-countermeasures (CCMs) designed to discriminate between an aircraft moving through the air and a an IR emitting flare falling away from the aircraft once deployed therefrom, and wherein the towed decoy defeats the kinematic CCMs by continuously dispensing IR emitting flares at a distance behind the aircraft that ensures both the IR emissions from the aircraft's exhaust plume and the IR emissions of at least some of the flares dispensed from the towed decoy are in the a field of view of a seeker of the IR guided missile, thereby preventing the missile from distinguishing between the aircraft's exhaust plume and the flares.
27. The method of claim 24, A method for defeating infrared (IR) guided missile attacks on an aircraft comprising:
towing an IR flare-dispensing decoy behind the aircraft, wherein IR-emitting flares are carried on the decoy in solid form; and
dispensing the IR emitting flares behind the towed decoy to cause an IR guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft, wherein a rate at which said IR emitting flares are dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said decoy,
wherein the IR guided missile employs spectral CCMs designed to discriminate between the IR spectra of an aircraft's exhaust plume and the IR spectra of an IR emitting flare, and wherein the spectral CCMs are defeated by the step of employing IR emitting flares comprising pyrophoric flare materials which emit, when exposed to air, an IR spectra similar to that emitted by the aircraft's exhaust plume.
28. The method of claim 24, A method for defeating infrared (IR) guided missile attacks on an aircraft comprising:
towing an IR flare-dispensing decoy behind the aircraft, wherein IR-emitting flares are carried on the decoy in solid form; and
dispensing the IR emitting flares behind the towed decoy to cause an IR guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft, wherein a rate at which said IR emitting flares are dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said decoy,
wherein the IR guided missile employs IR radiation intensity CCMs designed to discriminate between the a radiant intensity of the IR emissions from the aircraft's an exhaust plume of the aircraft and the a radiant intensity of the IR emissions from an IR emitting flare, and wherein the IR radiation intensity CCMs are defeated by the step of causing the decoy to dispense the IR emitting flares at rates which create IR energy levels behind the decoy which cannot be effectively distinguished from that IR energy levels of the aircraft's exhaust plume.
29. The method of claim 28, wherein the dispensing step comprises dispensing the IR emitting flares at a steady rate to create IR energy levels behind the decoy that substantially match the IR energy levels associated with the aircraft's exhaust plume.
30. The method of claim 28, wherein the dispensing step comprises dispensing the IR emitting flares at rates which produce a varying IR radiation intensity pattern behind the decoy, said pattern comprising a repeating sequence of at least two IR radiation intensity spikes wherein one of the at least two spikes peaks at an IR radiation intensity above that of the aircraft's exhaust plume and another of the at least two spikes peaks at an IR radiation intensity below that of the aircraft's exhaust plume.
31. The method of claim 28, wherein the dispensing step comprises dispensing the IR emitting flares at rates which produce a varying IR radiation intensity pattern behind the decoy, said pattern comprising a repeating sequence of at least two IR radiation intensity spikes followed by a period of time in which no flares are dispensed, wherein one of the at least two spikes peaks at an IR radiation intensity above that of the aircraft's exhaust plume and another of the at least two spikes peaks at an IR radiation intensity below that of the aircraft's exhaust plume.
32. The method of claim 24, A method for defeating infrared (IR) guided missile attacks on an aircraft comprising:
towing an IR flare-dispensing decoy behind the aircraft, wherein IR-emitting flares are carried on the decoy in solid form; and
dispensing the IR emitting flares behind the towed decoy to cause an IR guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft, wherein a rate at which said IR emitting flares are dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said decoy,
wherein the IR guided missile employs temporal CCMs designed to distinguish between continuous IR emissions associated with the an aircraft's exhaust plume and rapidly decreasing IR emissions associated with aircraft-launched IR emitting flares as sensed by the IR guided missile, and wherein the temporal CCMs are defeated by a step of dispensing IR emitting flares from the decoy at rates that prevent the average IR emissions associated with the decoy's flares from decreasing in intensity over time, and dispensing the flares from the decoy for a longer period of time relative to the dispensing of aircraft-launched flares.
33. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the aft section further comprises a sealing structure disposed at its aft end which seals the interior of the aft section from intrusion by outside air, while still allowing the pyrophoric foils material to be dispensed from the aft end of the section.
34. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the sealing structure comprises an O-ring which projects into the an interior of the aft section's housing to an extent that causes it to contact a periphery of a rearward directed face of each pyrophoric foil whenever the foil is in the aftmost position in the payload.
35. A method for dispensing infrared flare material from an aircraft having an engine, comprising:
providing an infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism that moves with the aircraft in a kinematically equivalent fashion; and
dispensing the infrared flare material from the infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism to cause an infrared guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft,
wherein a rate at which said infrared flare material is dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism,
wherein a dispensed pattern of the infrared flare material is selected responsive to a characteristic of a seeker of the infrared guided missile,
wherein the step of dispensing includes dispensing the infrared, flare material responsive to a counter-countermeasure of the infrared guided missile.
36. A method for dispensing infrared flare material from an aircraft having an engine, comprising:
providing an infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism that moves with the aircraft in a kinematically equivalent fashion; and
dispensing the infrared flare material from the infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism to cause an infrared guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft,
wherein a rate at which said infrared flare material is dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism,
wherein a dispensed pattern of the infrared flare material is selected responsive to a characteristic of a seeker of the infrared guided missile,
wherein said infrared flare material comprises a pyrophoric material.
37. A method for dispensing solid flare material from an aircraft having an engine, comprising:
providing an infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism that moves with an aircraft in a kinematically equivalent fashion and is controllable to dispense therefrom infrared flare material that is carried in the mechanism in solid form; and
controllably dispensing a pattern of the infrared flare material from the dispensing mechanism as the aircraft flies,
wherein a rate at which said pattern is dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism,
wherein the pattern includes spikes of different radiant intensities, and wherein the more units of flare material dispensed per unit time during each spike, the higher a radiant intensity of each spike,
wherein the infrared flare material comprises a pyrophoric material.
38. A method for dispensing solid flare material from an aircraft having an engine, comprising:
providing an infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism that moves with an aircraft in a kinematically equivalent fashion and is controllable to dispense therefrom infrared flare material that is carried in the mechanism in solid form; and
controllably dispensing a pattern of the infrared flare material from the dispensing mechanism as the aircraft flies,
wherein a rate at which said pattern is dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism,
wherein the pattern includes spikes of different radiant intensities, and wherein the more units of flare material dispensed per unit time during each spike, the higher a radiant intensity of each spike,
wherein the step of controllably dispensing comprises dispensing the pattern of the infrared flare material to have approximately a same infrared spectral characteristics as an exhaust plume of the engine of the aircraft.
39. A method for dispensing solid flare material from an aircraft having an engine, comprising the steps of:
providing an infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism that moves with an aircraft in a kinematically equivalent fashion and is controllable to dispense therefrom infrared flare material that is carried in the mechanism in solid form;
controllably dispensing a pattern of the infrared flare material from the dispensing mechanism as the aircraft flies,
wherein a rate at which said pattern is dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism,
wherein the pattern includes spikes of different radiant intensities, and wherein the more units of flare material dispensed per unit time during each spike, the higher a radiant intensity of each spike,
wherein the step of controllably dispensing includes dispensing the pattern of the infrared flare material, wherein a dispensed pattern has a first spike having a first-spike radiant intensity, and a second spike having a second-spike radiant intensity less than the first-spike radiant intensity; and
after the step of dispensing, repeating the step of dispensing the infrared flare material after a waiting period of time.
40. A method for dispensing infrared flare material from an aircraft having an engine, comprising:
providing an infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism that moves with the aircraft in a kinematically equivalent fashion; and
dispensing the infrared flare material from the infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism to cause an infrared guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft,
wherein a rate at which said infrared flare material is dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism,
wherein the flare material is carried in the flare material-dispensing mechanism in a solid form, and wherein a set of infrared-emitting properties of the flare material is selected responsive to a set of operating characteristics of the aircraft,
wherein the step of dispensing includes the step of dispensing the infrared flare material responsive to a counter-countermeasure of the infrared guided missile.
41. A method for dispensing infrared flare material from an aircraft having an engine, comprising the steps of:
providing an infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism that moves with the aircraft in a kinematically equivalent fashion; and
dispensing the infrared flare material from the infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism to cause an infrared guided missile targeting the aircraft to miss the aircraft,
wherein a rate at which said infrared flare material is dispensed is controlled by commands communicated from said aircraft to said infrared flare material-dispensing mechanism,
wherein the flare material is carried in the flare material-dispensing mechanism in a solid form, and wherein a set of infrared-emitting properties of the flare material is selected responsive to a set of operating characteristics of the aircraft,
wherein the infrared flare material comprises a pyrophoric material.
US10/137,107 1998-09-28 2002-05-02 Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares, and method for dispensing flare material Expired - Lifetime USRE46051E1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/162,104 US6055909A (en) 1998-09-28 1998-09-28 Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares
US10/137,107 USRE46051E1 (en) 1998-09-28 2002-05-02 Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares, and method for dispensing flare material

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/137,107 USRE46051E1 (en) 1998-09-28 2002-05-02 Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares, and method for dispensing flare material

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/162,104 Reissue US6055909A (en) 1998-09-28 1998-09-28 Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE46051E1 true USRE46051E1 (en) 2016-07-05

Family

ID=22584188

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/162,104 Expired - Lifetime US6055909A (en) 1998-09-28 1998-09-28 Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares
US10/137,107 Expired - Lifetime USRE46051E1 (en) 1998-09-28 2002-05-02 Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares, and method for dispensing flare material

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/162,104 Expired - Lifetime US6055909A (en) 1998-09-28 1998-09-28 Electronically configurable towed decoy for dispensing infrared emitting flares

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (2) US6055909A (en)
EP (1) EP1032802B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3429276B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100398008B1 (en)
AU (1) AU739779B2 (en)
DE (1) DE69912575T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1032802T3 (en)
IL (2) IL136265D0 (en)
NO (1) NO317817B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000019164A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (46)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19814936C1 (en) * 1998-04-03 1999-10-07 Dornier Gmbh Tow body for flight target display with IR flares
DE19914670A1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2000-10-05 Piepenbrock Pyrotechnik Gmbh Electronic-mechanical squib delay for fitting to designed pyrotechnic dummy target luminous ammunition includes an electrical fuse and a propelling charge to blow out a flammable active mass.
DE60009333T2 (en) * 1999-11-23 2005-03-10 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Process for inhibiting atrophy or promoting hypertrophy
WO2001050135A2 (en) * 1999-12-30 2001-07-12 Advanced Aerospace Technologies, Inc. Survivability and mission flexibility enhancements for reconnaissance aircraft
DE10061748C1 (en) * 2000-12-12 2002-06-13 Dornier Gmbh Tow body for flight target display
EP1342047B1 (en) * 2000-12-13 2006-02-22 The Secretary of State for Defence Infra-red emitting decoy flare
US6499407B2 (en) * 2001-02-23 2002-12-31 Meggitt Defense Systems Packaging method for infrared special material
AU2002242932A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-10-03 Steadicopter Ltd. Stealth airborne system suspended below an aircraft
SE520197C2 (en) * 2001-05-07 2003-06-10 Saab Ab Method for outputting infrared and radar countermeasures and / or laser reflectors from a designated feller and outputting of such countermeasures or reflectors intended feller
US6424286B1 (en) * 2001-05-30 2002-07-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army In-seeker jamming device
US6666351B1 (en) 2002-01-03 2003-12-23 Raytheon Company Dispenser structure for chaff countermeasures
US6662700B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2003-12-16 Raytheon Company Method for protecting an aircraft against a threat that utilizes an infrared sensor
WO2005056384A2 (en) * 2003-06-13 2005-06-23 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Anti-missile defense suite
US6857596B1 (en) * 2003-07-10 2005-02-22 Ae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. High speed electro-optic payout system incorporating a stationary optical terminus
US7640858B1 (en) * 2004-01-23 2010-01-05 Kilgore Flares Company, Llc Stacked pellet flare assembly and methods of making and using the same
US20060065774A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2006-03-30 Airbus Anti-missile protection device for an aircraft
FR2866420B1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2008-02-29 Airbus Device for protecting missiles for a transport aircraft
US8339580B2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2012-12-25 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc Sensor-guided threat countermeasure system
ES2638241T3 (en) * 2004-09-15 2017-10-19 Saab Ab Heat generating countermeasures package
US7617776B1 (en) * 2004-09-27 2009-11-17 Diffraction, Ltd. Selective emitting flare nanosensors
US7154429B1 (en) * 2004-12-06 2006-12-26 Roberts Jr Charles C Device for protecting military vehicles from infrared guided munitions
WO2006109288A2 (en) * 2005-04-14 2006-10-19 Rafael-Armament Development Authority Ltd. Separate communication line for towed body
WO2007075187A2 (en) * 2005-04-28 2007-07-05 Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc. Decoys for infra-red radiation seeking missiles and methods of producing and using the same
US7992496B2 (en) * 2005-04-28 2011-08-09 Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc. Decoys for infra-red radiation seeking missiles and methods of producing and using the same
US7467758B2 (en) * 2005-09-09 2008-12-23 Meggitt Defense Systems Reel-out, reel-in magazine and towline cartridge
US20070234922A1 (en) * 2006-04-11 2007-10-11 Van Laar Kurt D Countermeasures radiation source for missile decoys
US7469640B2 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-12-30 Alliant Techsystems Inc. Flares including reactive foil for igniting a combustible grain thereof and methods of fabricating and igniting such flares
GB2443671B (en) * 2006-11-13 2011-03-09 Steven Martin Hudson Data transmission between electro-statically charged bodies
DE602007007289D1 (en) * 2007-03-27 2010-08-05 Saab Ab Safety arrangement for a discharge signal system
IL191445A (en) * 2008-05-14 2012-08-30 Elbit Systems Ew And Sigint Elisra Ltd Aircraft decoy arrangement
DE102008028245A1 (en) * 2008-06-16 2009-12-17 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Flare Ignition and use in an exhaust system
US8132492B1 (en) 2009-02-09 2012-03-13 Meggitt Defense Systems Dispensing device for infrared special material
IL197522A (en) * 2009-03-10 2013-10-31 Bird Aerosystems Ltd System and method for protecting an aircraft against an incoming threat
US8403253B1 (en) 2009-03-18 2013-03-26 Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. Active IR signature target simulation system and a method thereof
WO2010123955A1 (en) 2009-04-21 2010-10-28 Kilgore Flares Company, Llc Low foreign object damage (fod) weighted nose decoy flare
DE102009020558A1 (en) * 2009-05-08 2010-11-18 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Activation unit for ammunition-free decoys
EP2427720B1 (en) 2009-05-08 2014-02-26 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH Activation unit for explosive masses or explosive bodies
DE102009030870A1 (en) 2009-06-26 2010-12-30 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh submunitions
DE102009030871B4 (en) * 2009-06-26 2013-05-29 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Combustible mass container
DE102009030869A1 (en) 2009-06-26 2011-02-10 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh submunitions
US8167213B1 (en) 2010-05-19 2012-05-01 Williams-Pyro, Inc. System and method of tagging an ordnance
EP2616757B1 (en) * 2010-09-17 2018-08-22 Amtec Corporation Pyrophoric projectile
SG10201508675RA (en) * 2010-10-20 2015-11-27 Alloy Surfaces Co Inc Training Munition With A Payload Of Pyrophoric Material
US9025226B2 (en) 2013-05-28 2015-05-05 Raytheon Company Infrared holographic projector for thermal masking and decoys
US9897413B1 (en) * 2016-07-22 2018-02-20 Florida Turbine Technologies, Inc. Process for launching a cruise missile from an aircraft
US10775140B2 (en) * 2018-05-07 2020-09-15 Omnitek Partners Llc Controlled payload release mechanism for multiple stacks of pyrophoric foils to be contained in a single decoy device cartridge

Citations (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3150848A (en) 1961-06-28 1964-09-29 Samuel E Lager Method of decoying a missile from its intended target
US3362289A (en) 1965-04-01 1968-01-09 Joel B. Guin Jungle warfare aircraft weapon
US3458197A (en) 1966-07-15 1969-07-29 Us Navy Consumable infrared flare tow target
US4183302A (en) 1967-11-06 1980-01-15 General Dynamics Pomona Division Sequential burst system
US4354419A (en) * 1980-08-08 1982-10-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Survivable target acquisition and designation system
US4428583A (en) 1982-11-19 1984-01-31 Hayes International Corporation Airborne target for generating an exhaust plume simulating that of a jet powered aircraft
US4498392A (en) 1981-06-03 1985-02-12 Etienne Lacroix - Tous Artifices Infrared decoy launching device to be deployed rapidly with a double safety device
US4621579A (en) 1984-06-12 1986-11-11 Buck Chemisch-Technische Werke Gmbh & Co. Device for producing a decoy cloud, in particular an infrared decoy cloud
US4697521A (en) 1982-07-27 1987-10-06 Etat Francais Method for opaquing visible and infrared radiance and smoke-producing ammunition which implements this method
US4765244A (en) 1983-04-15 1988-08-23 Spectronix Ltd. Apparatus for the detection and destruction of incoming objects
US4852455A (en) 1987-01-12 1989-08-01 Southwest Aerospace Corporation Decoy system
US5074216A (en) 1987-09-03 1991-12-24 Loral Corporation Infrared signature enhancement decoy
US5102063A (en) * 1991-03-26 1992-04-07 Southwest Aerospace Corporation Aerodynamically braked towed vehicle deployment device
US5136950A (en) * 1990-10-10 1992-08-11 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National Defence Flame-stabilized pyrophoric IR decoy flare
US5223795A (en) 1992-07-30 1993-06-29 Blades Frederick K Method and apparatus for detecting arcing in electrical connections by monitoring high frequency noise
US5307230A (en) 1991-09-26 1994-04-26 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Circuit breaker with protection against sputtering arc faults
US5333814A (en) 1992-04-25 1994-08-02 British Aerospace Public Limited Co. Towed aerodynamic bodies
US5381721A (en) 1991-10-02 1995-01-17 Nobeltech Electronics Release unit, and release system comprising at least one such release unit
US5400712A (en) 1993-04-30 1995-03-28 Alliant Techsystems Inc. Decoy flare
US5411225A (en) 1993-07-26 1995-05-02 Lannon; Robert G. Reusable non-pyrotechnic countermeasure dispenser cartridge for aircraft
US5497156A (en) 1994-04-15 1996-03-05 Lockheed Corporation Towed target
US5495787A (en) 1994-06-17 1996-03-05 Boyer, Iii; Lynn L. Anti-missile missiles having means to "blind", and thus render ineffective, precision, seeker guided munitions
US5565645A (en) 1995-04-24 1996-10-15 Thiokol Corporation High-intensity infrared decoy flare
US5585594A (en) 1991-10-01 1996-12-17 The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland High intensity infra-red pyrotechnic decoy flare
US5603470A (en) 1995-01-11 1997-02-18 Hughes Electronics Airborne towed aerobody employing an expendable towing/deployment mechanism
US5679921A (en) 1958-08-27 1997-10-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Infra-red tracking flare
US5714711A (en) * 1990-12-31 1998-02-03 Mei Corporation Encapsulated propellant grain composition, method of preparation, article fabricated therefrom and method of fabrication
US5773745A (en) 1994-06-06 1998-06-30 Alliant Defense Electronic Systems, Inc. Method and device for cutting and dispensing of adversarial interaction countermeasures
US5852254A (en) 1995-11-22 1998-12-22 Buck Werke Gmbh & Co. Protective means for fast-moving objects
US5866840A (en) * 1997-09-17 1999-02-02 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National Nozzles for pyrophoric IR decoy flares
US5915694A (en) 1998-01-09 1999-06-29 Brum; Roger D. Decoy utilizing infrared special material
US6116606A (en) * 1998-08-21 2000-09-12 Meggitt Defense Systems High speed glide target
US6305288B1 (en) * 1997-08-14 2001-10-23 Bofors Defence Aktiebolag Propellant charge module
JP2001356000A (en) 2000-06-14 2001-12-26 Asahi Kasei Corp Tow type flare for aircraft
US6352031B1 (en) 1972-08-18 2002-03-05 Northrop Grumman Corporation Radiative countermeasures method
US6463856B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2002-10-15 Pepete Gmbh Electronically and mechanically-operated ignition delay for cartridge-type pyrotechnic decoy flare ammunition

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2300035B (en) * 1993-07-29 1997-09-24 Lacroix Soc E An infrared decoy cartridge, and decoy apparatus including such a cartridge
FR2712683B1 (en) * 1993-11-17 1995-12-29 Mulleman Michel Aircraft protection bomb and method of use.

Patent Citations (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5679921A (en) 1958-08-27 1997-10-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Infra-red tracking flare
US3150848A (en) 1961-06-28 1964-09-29 Samuel E Lager Method of decoying a missile from its intended target
US3362289A (en) 1965-04-01 1968-01-09 Joel B. Guin Jungle warfare aircraft weapon
US3458197A (en) 1966-07-15 1969-07-29 Us Navy Consumable infrared flare tow target
US4183302A (en) 1967-11-06 1980-01-15 General Dynamics Pomona Division Sequential burst system
US6352031B1 (en) 1972-08-18 2002-03-05 Northrop Grumman Corporation Radiative countermeasures method
US4354419A (en) * 1980-08-08 1982-10-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Survivable target acquisition and designation system
US4498392A (en) 1981-06-03 1985-02-12 Etienne Lacroix - Tous Artifices Infrared decoy launching device to be deployed rapidly with a double safety device
US4697521A (en) 1982-07-27 1987-10-06 Etat Francais Method for opaquing visible and infrared radiance and smoke-producing ammunition which implements this method
US4428583A (en) 1982-11-19 1984-01-31 Hayes International Corporation Airborne target for generating an exhaust plume simulating that of a jet powered aircraft
US4428583B1 (en) 1982-11-19 1996-03-05 Hayes Int Corp Airborne target for generating an exhaust plume simulating that of a jet powered aircraft
US4765244A (en) 1983-04-15 1988-08-23 Spectronix Ltd. Apparatus for the detection and destruction of incoming objects
US4621579A (en) 1984-06-12 1986-11-11 Buck Chemisch-Technische Werke Gmbh & Co. Device for producing a decoy cloud, in particular an infrared decoy cloud
US4852455A (en) 1987-01-12 1989-08-01 Southwest Aerospace Corporation Decoy system
US5074216A (en) 1987-09-03 1991-12-24 Loral Corporation Infrared signature enhancement decoy
US5136950A (en) * 1990-10-10 1992-08-11 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National Defence Flame-stabilized pyrophoric IR decoy flare
US5714711A (en) * 1990-12-31 1998-02-03 Mei Corporation Encapsulated propellant grain composition, method of preparation, article fabricated therefrom and method of fabrication
US5102063A (en) * 1991-03-26 1992-04-07 Southwest Aerospace Corporation Aerodynamically braked towed vehicle deployment device
US5307230A (en) 1991-09-26 1994-04-26 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Circuit breaker with protection against sputtering arc faults
US5585594A (en) 1991-10-01 1996-12-17 The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland High intensity infra-red pyrotechnic decoy flare
US5381721A (en) 1991-10-02 1995-01-17 Nobeltech Electronics Release unit, and release system comprising at least one such release unit
US5333814A (en) 1992-04-25 1994-08-02 British Aerospace Public Limited Co. Towed aerodynamic bodies
US5223795A (en) 1992-07-30 1993-06-29 Blades Frederick K Method and apparatus for detecting arcing in electrical connections by monitoring high frequency noise
US5400712A (en) 1993-04-30 1995-03-28 Alliant Techsystems Inc. Decoy flare
US5411225A (en) 1993-07-26 1995-05-02 Lannon; Robert G. Reusable non-pyrotechnic countermeasure dispenser cartridge for aircraft
US5497156A (en) 1994-04-15 1996-03-05 Lockheed Corporation Towed target
US5773745A (en) 1994-06-06 1998-06-30 Alliant Defense Electronic Systems, Inc. Method and device for cutting and dispensing of adversarial interaction countermeasures
US5495787A (en) 1994-06-17 1996-03-05 Boyer, Iii; Lynn L. Anti-missile missiles having means to "blind", and thus render ineffective, precision, seeker guided munitions
US5603470A (en) 1995-01-11 1997-02-18 Hughes Electronics Airborne towed aerobody employing an expendable towing/deployment mechanism
US5565645A (en) 1995-04-24 1996-10-15 Thiokol Corporation High-intensity infrared decoy flare
US5852254A (en) 1995-11-22 1998-12-22 Buck Werke Gmbh & Co. Protective means for fast-moving objects
US6305288B1 (en) * 1997-08-14 2001-10-23 Bofors Defence Aktiebolag Propellant charge module
US5866840A (en) * 1997-09-17 1999-02-02 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National Nozzles for pyrophoric IR decoy flares
US5915694A (en) 1998-01-09 1999-06-29 Brum; Roger D. Decoy utilizing infrared special material
US6116606A (en) * 1998-08-21 2000-09-12 Meggitt Defense Systems High speed glide target
US6463856B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2002-10-15 Pepete Gmbh Electronically and mechanically-operated ignition delay for cartridge-type pyrotechnic decoy flare ammunition
JP2001356000A (en) 2000-06-14 2001-12-26 Asahi Kasei Corp Tow type flare for aircraft

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Bill Gunston & Mike Spick, "Modern Air Combat", © 1983, p. 57. *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1032802A1 (en) 2000-09-06
DK1032802T3 (en) 2004-02-16
DE69912575T2 (en) 2004-09-16
NO20002722L (en) 2000-07-11
IL136265D0 (en) 2001-05-20
DE69912575D1 (en) 2003-12-11
US6055909A (en) 2000-05-02
KR100398008B1 (en) 2003-09-19
WO2000019164A1 (en) 2000-04-06
EP1032802B1 (en) 2003-11-05
NO20002722D0 (en) 2000-05-26
AU6276999A (en) 2000-04-17
KR20010032561A (en) 2001-04-25
NO317817B1 (en) 2004-12-13
AU739779B2 (en) 2001-10-18
JP2002525557A (en) 2002-08-13
JP3429276B2 (en) 2003-07-22
IL136265A (en) 2011-02-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69828333T2 (en) Electric shock generating weapon
Shaw Fighter Combat
US4307665A (en) Decoy rounds
US7066427B2 (en) Active protection device and associated apparatus, system, and method
US8096076B1 (en) Systems and methods for a covered deployment unit for electronic weaponry
US7327549B2 (en) Systems and methods for target impact
US7042696B2 (en) Systems and methods using an electrified projectile
US8596178B2 (en) Expanding countermeasure and launcher system
US8205537B1 (en) Interceptor projectile with net and tether
US7631833B1 (en) Smart counter asymmetric threat micromunition with autonomous target selection and homing
US6825791B2 (en) Deceptive signature broadcast system for aircraft
US5458041A (en) Air defense destruction missile weapon system
US5400688A (en) Missile defense system
US7104496B2 (en) Active protection device and associated apparatus, system, and method
US8066218B2 (en) Anti-missile defense suite
US7130624B1 (en) System and method for destabilizing improvised explosive devices
US5661257A (en) Multispectral covert target marker
CN106767172B (en) A kind of pickaback portable anti-unmanned aerial vehicle ejecting is soft to injure retracting device
US8122810B2 (en) Rocket propelled barrier defense system
RU2293281C2 (en) Missile for throwing charges and modes of its using
CA2611995C (en) Method for antimissile protection of vehicles and implementing device
US20050139363A1 (en) Fire suppression delivery system
US6231002B1 (en) System and method for defending a vehicle
US6269726B1 (en) Multi-shot, non-lethal, taser cartridge remote firing system for protection of facilities and vehicles against personnel
RU2646964C2 (en) Assaulter facility countermeasures system deployable by using missile and appropriate method