USRE40398E1 - ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic - Google Patents

ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE40398E1
USRE40398E1 US11/055,787 US5578797A USRE40398E US RE40398 E1 USRE40398 E1 US RE40398E1 US 5578797 A US5578797 A US 5578797A US RE40398 E USRE40398 E US RE40398E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
network
agr
traffic
atm
telecommunications system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US11/055,787
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Simon Daniel Brueckheimer
David John Stacey
Roy Harold Mauger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
RPX Clearinghouse LLC
Original Assignee
Nortel Networks Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nortel Networks Ltd filed Critical Nortel Networks Ltd
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE40398E1 publication Critical patent/USRE40398E1/en
Assigned to Rockstar Bidco, LP reassignment Rockstar Bidco, LP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
Assigned to ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP reassignment ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: Rockstar Bidco, LP
Assigned to RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC reassignment RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BOCKSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC, CONSTELLATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC, NETSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC, ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM LLC, ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC, RPX CORPORATION
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to RPX CORPORATION, RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC reassignment RPX CORPORATION RELEASE (REEL 038041 / FRAME 0001) Assignors: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L49/00Packet switching elements
    • H04L49/25Routing or path finding in a switch fabric
    • H04L49/253Routing or path finding in a switch fabric using establishment or release of connections between ports
    • H04L49/255Control mechanisms for ATM switching fabrics
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L49/00Packet switching elements
    • H04L49/30Peripheral units, e.g. input or output ports
    • H04L49/3081ATM peripheral units, e.g. policing, insertion or extraction
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q11/00Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
    • H04Q11/04Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems for time-division multiplexing
    • H04Q11/0428Integrated services digital network, i.e. systems for transmission of different types of digitised signals, e.g. speech, data, telecentral, television signals
    • H04Q11/0478Provisions for broadband connections
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J2203/00Aspects of optical multiplex systems other than those covered by H04J14/05 and H04J14/07
    • H04J2203/0001Provisions for broadband connections in integrated services digital network using frames of the Optical Transport Network [OTN] or using synchronous transfer mode [STM], e.g. SONET, SDH
    • H04J2203/0064Admission Control
    • H04J2203/0066Signalling, e.g. protocols, reference model
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J2203/00Aspects of optical multiplex systems other than those covered by H04J14/05 and H04J14/07
    • H04J2203/0001Provisions for broadband connections in integrated services digital network using frames of the Optical Transport Network [OTN] or using synchronous transfer mode [STM], e.g. SONET, SDH
    • H04J2203/0064Admission Control
    • H04J2203/0067Resource management and allocation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • H04L2012/5619Network Node Interface, e.g. tandem connections, transit switching
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • H04L2012/5629Admission control
    • H04L2012/563Signalling, e.g. protocols, reference model
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • H04L2012/5638Services, e.g. multimedia, GOS, QOS
    • H04L2012/5663Support of N-ISDN

Definitions

  • More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6 , 519 , 257 .
  • the reissue application Ser. Nos. are: 11 / 759 , 494 ; 11 / 759 , 508 ; 11 / 759 , 481 ; and 11 / 055 , 787 .
  • Application Ser. Nos. 11 / 757 , 494 and 11 / 759 , 508 are divisional applications of parent reissue application Ser. Nos. 11 / 055 , 787 and 11 / 759 , 481 is a continuation of parent reissue application Ser. No. 11 / 055 , 787 .
  • This invention relates to digital communications systems and in particular to systems embodying asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) technology.
  • ATM asynchronous transfer mode
  • ATM asynchronous transfer mode
  • the object of the invention is to minimise or to overcome these disadvantages.
  • a distributed telecommunications exchange system having independent call routing and connection control for setting up connections across the system.
  • a telecommunications system including an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network, and a plurality of adaptive grooming routers (AGR) coupled to the network, wherein the AGRs comprise a group adapted to function as a single distributed or virtual transit exchange whereby in use to set up narrow band connections across the ATM network.
  • ATM asynchronous transfer mode
  • AGR adaptive grooming routers
  • a distributed telecommunications exchange system having means for determining the current status of the system whereby to effect routing of narrow band traffic across the system.
  • a method of routing telecommunications traffic in a system including an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network having uncommitted bandwidth, and a plurality of adaptive grooming routers (AGR) coupled to the ATM network, which AGRs comprise a group adapted to function as a virtual transit exchange whose fabric and control are distributed over the group, the method including determining the current system status whereby to set up narrow band connections across the ATM network based on that status determination.
  • ATM asynchronous transfer mode
  • AGR adaptive grooming routers
  • the technique provides for the separation of call routing and connection control together with the advertising of the system status. This ensures a wide range of scaleability so that the application of dynamic trunking technology provides scaleability in a traffic sense. Further, the separation of call routing and connection control provides a distributed computing environment which is scaleable and managed by this advertisement resource. Because the distributed exchange manages its own internal traffic, effectively it provides means for balancing that traffic to the fabric and makes its own internal routing decisions.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an AGR network system that is the preferred embodiment of a large distributed exchange system
  • FIG. 2 illustrates signalling separation in the network of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the provision of advanced services in the network of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the principle of dual homing and diverse path routing external narrow-band exchanges to the distributed exchange system
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the connection of the large distributed exchange to a hierarchy of narrow-band exchanges
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an overview of handling a connection set-up request and the roles of call routing, connection control and voice-path connection termed wormholes;
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the principle of using existing N-ISUP signalling as the means for routing calls across the distributed exchange system at the Call Routing layer
  • FIG. 8 illustrates the principle of controlling routing and congestion in the Call Routing and Connection Control layers
  • FIG. 9 shows a AGR protocol stack for the network of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 10 illustrates a means for specifying a speech path across the distributed exchange system
  • FIG. 11 illustrates the functional topology of the physically distributed exchange system
  • FIG. 12 illustrates an arrangement for determining available trunk capacity on a Virtual Trunk Route (VTR);
  • VTR Virtual Trunk Route
  • FIG. 13 illustrates an arrangement for determining a Virtual Trunk Group's (VTG) capacity
  • FIG. 14 illustrates an arrangement for advertising congestion on a remote node's VTG in the distributed exchange system
  • FIG. 15 illustrates an arrangement for advertising congestion on a remote node's VTR in the distributed exchange system
  • FIG. 16 illustrates an extension of the arrangement of FIG. 13 for specifying available voice band processor capacity
  • FIG. 17 illustrates a preferred signalling process to create a speech path between AVJs in the network of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 18 illustrates the information content required to establish or remove a narrow-band connection
  • FIG. 19 illustrates a method for tracing a narrow-band connection through the large distributed exchange from a trunk circuit
  • FIG. 20 illustrates the overall protocol for establishing a connection end to end in the layers Call Routing and Connection Control and at physical layers;
  • FIG. 1 this depicts the functional architecture of the Adaptive Grooming Router (AGR) network system.
  • the AGR works on the principle of a single fabric switch (SFS) incorporating a novel device an adaptive virtual junctor (AVJ), that adapts narrow-band traffic to and from the ATM adaptation layer e.g. (AAL-1), and also provides the means to time switch narrow-band channels.
  • FSS single fabric switch
  • AVJ adaptive virtual junctor
  • AAL-1 ATM adaptation layer
  • the AVJ allows a fully scalable narrow-band exchange to be built, by communicating through the switch fabric using a fully interconnected mesh of dynamically sized trunk groups or virtual channel junctors (VCJ), which gives a non-blocking space switching performance.
  • VCJ virtual channel junctors
  • the AGR extends the scale of this principle to the wide area by using dynamically sized Virtual Trunk Groups VTGs to construct a fully interconnected mesh of AGRs that can dynamically adapt to the community-of-interest in the wide area network.
  • the network of AGRs is termed an AGR network system, and functions as a large distributed narrow-band exchange, that at a minimum can replace a single transit exchange, and at a maximum replace the existing trunk/transit layers of an hierarchical narrow-band exchange network.
  • the term Adaptive Grooming Router (AGR) is used since the node grooms traffic to/from local exchanges according to instantaneous demand for a trunk/transit connection.
  • the VCJs and VTGs function on the principle of dynamic structured data transfer (DSDT) to provide a end-to-end narrow-band connection capability, and the ability to perform path tracing.
  • DSDT dynamic structured data transfer
  • the capacity of a single AGR node is dependent on the size of the host ATM switch, the number of connected AVJ devices and the capacity of the AVJ device itself. Further, the AVJ device can be dedicated to perform either a trunking function (termination of synchronous narrow-band circuits) or a grooming function (generation of traffic groups for transmission across the WAN) equivalent to a tandem switching function of NB networks. Therefore both the overall capacity of the node and the mix of traffic (intra and inter node) can be dimensioned according to need. For example, consider a node built using 8,000 channel AVJ devices, hosted to a 10 Gb/s ATM switch.
  • a total of 11 fully interconnected AVJ devices with four dedicated to trunking and 7 to grooming yields node with a total of 70,000 circuits (32,000 TDM trunks and 28,000 WAN trunks).
  • the node can terminate up to 28,000 Erlangs of traffic from the synchronous local exchange network with over 80% of this traffic capable of being carried across the WAN. If however, the amount of WAN traffic is less, then one or more of the grooming AVJ devices could be sacrificed for a further trunking AVJ thus increasing the amount of synchronous trunking capacity.
  • VTGs For AGR network resilience, a minimum of two VTGs will interconnect all of the nodes within a network.
  • the capacity of the routes can be dimensioned according to the communication demand—high capacity VTGs connecting high traffic routes, 47 trunks and up and low capacity VTGs connecting low demand routes 6-46 trunks.
  • the overall grooming capacity of a node can be flexibly dimensioned to connect to either a very large number of nodes (with modest traffic on each route) or to a lower number of nodes (but with a large amount of inter-nodal traffic or a mix of both.
  • a very large number of nodes with modest traffic on each route
  • a lower number of nodes but with a large amount of inter-nodal traffic or a mix of both.
  • FIG. 1 also shows the manner in which the AGR node provides e.g. N-ISDN SS7 signalling capability and call routing.
  • the arrangement provides a means for establishing, maintaining and removing connections in an AGR network.
  • the AGR network system is controlled from a proxy call routing server in an ATM network to provide new services to users in the network, stemming directly from the aforementioned separation of call routing from connection control which is illustrated in FIG. 2 which illustrates the manner in which adaptating signalling physical layers to ATM allows evolution from STP based signalling to signalling as an ATM network service.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the principle of an AGRNS that provides a connection engine, controlling narrow-band connections between endpoints specified by the local Call Routing subsystem, or by a proxy server. Therefore the proxy server may implement signalling systems that go beyond the capabilities of the N-ISDN SS7 signalling subsystem in the AGR node, and provide for example multimedia services and control the point-to-multipoint hardware capability of the AGR.
  • the D channels of ISDN Primary Rate Access are routed to a frame processor located in the ATM network, accessed by a Virtual Channel Connection.
  • the frame processor takes HDLC frames and adapts them to/from AAL-5.
  • the D channels may carry HDLC frames that are adapted to the broadband MTP-2 protocol Signalling ATM Adaptation Layer (SAAL) and then routed to the proxy server.
  • the HDLC frames may contain any layer 3 or higher layer of the OSI model as signalling messages for direct interpretation by the software within the proxy server. These messages are translated into commands that use the Applications Interface of the connection control of the AGR node or are formed into SS7 messages or any other suitable proxy signalling protocol that can be interpreted by the Connection Control layer of the AGR software to instruct it to control narrow-band connections between specified endpoints.
  • SAAL Signalling ATM Adaptation Layer
  • this illustrates the principle of dual homing of narrow-band exchanges to the AGR network system.
  • a local exchange in the lowest tier must prioritise its traffic across many small routes depending on geographical destination of a call and traffic congestion levels. Since the AGR network system performs a grooming and dynamic handling of traffic demand, the local exchange can now simply “hook on” to the AGR network system using a large voice route. The large voice route has increased Erlang efficiency, and providing two large voice routes provides a degree of resilience if the traffic is balanced across the two routes.
  • the AGR network system can also make use of the dual homing facility to balance traffic internally, since there is a choice of destination AGR when communicating with any dual homed narrow-band local exchange.
  • FIGS. 6 to 20 illustrate stages of the connection set up in the network of FIG. 1 in response to a set up request.
  • the diagram of FIG. 6 shows two separate functions, call routing and connection control.
  • FIG. 6 also shows the stages of progression of the call.
  • the incoming initial address message (IAM) which may comprise the initial address message of the number 7 signalling system, goes to call routing which makes decisions based on a digit analysis by using as many digits as it needs to determine the outgoing voice route or set of voice routes in the narrow-band network (see FIG. 2b ) and it may, if necessary, wait for other signalling messages.
  • call routing Once call routing has chosen the candidate set of voice routes it can then make decisions based on static prioritisation of those voice routes. I.e.
  • a voice route through a local exchange can be used in preference to one through a transit exchange, which preferably is used less often.
  • the call routing then makes an assessment of congestion on those voice routes. This could either be a total circuit occupancy of the voice route or it could be congestion associated with an exchange and the processing power it has available to handle signalling messages, e.g. in accordance with ITU standards on SS7. It will be appreciated that congestion can arise both from excess voice route utilisation which is using up circuits in those voice routes and from exchange loading which is a congestion indication which is exchange specific but not necessarily associated with the voice route which is to go between the AGR network system and the exchange.
  • Connection control is responsible for ensuring that a connection can be made between the end points P and Q through the AGR network system. Messages can be passed from call routing (CR) to connection control (CC) which can then eliminate routes with respect to internal congestion, or may be continually passed from connection control to CR such that call routing may eliminate candidate routes in priority order.
  • Internal congestion can be due to having to share the ATM network with other types of traffic so that voice traffic demands have to compete with other demands for the same resources, and also because inherently in the design of the AGR there is a fragmentation of resources in the physical devices. Whilst there may be a certain amount of capacity available on a pooled resource, it may in fact be fragmented over a number of physical devices and therefore steps should be taken to balance the load between the physical devices.
  • connection control eliminates the corresponding route and then passes the message back to call routing for forwarding to a destination AGR.
  • the destination AGR choice is based on the highest priority accessible, reachable, voice route which immediately identifies the AGR from which that voice route emanates so from that point on signalling messages are forwarded to the outgoing (OG) call routing on the other side of the network.
  • the outgoing Call Routing is responsible for determining whether it can make a particular trunk circuit selection.
  • a voice route consists of many trunk circuits, so call routing has to deal with the possible race conditions of incoming signalling on that side which may want to select the same voice circuit, because they are both way circuits, from that same voice route. There may be various circuit selection policies.
  • Call routing monitors the progress of those signals and will then perform the final selection of the trunk circuit in that given voice route with respect to whether there is a race condition, which is termed glare, and also taking into account whether certain circuits are out of service, not provisioned, or the type of call, e.g. whether it is a test call.
  • call routing passes this information to connection control and begins the third stage of the process to actually connect the voice path between the end points P and Q, either in a unidirectional or bidirectional manner in the network system, this being referred to as a worm which is a specification of the nodes that the voice path will pass through.
  • the content of the worm specifies the connection of the circuit at each stage of the connection in turn from trunking AVJ to grooming AVJ and back from grooming AVJ to trunking AVJ in the other remote AGR.
  • the mechanism is driven by the worm being passed forward in a chain and then passed back as a form of acknowledgement.
  • the trunking AVJ responsible passes it to connection control which passes out a message to Call Routing which can then send out the outgoing IAM signal.
  • This illustration of the worm is in fact a main path which shows the whole passage of a call set up.
  • the call handling that is encompassed on the AGR has taken into account external and internal congestion.
  • the call routing is a proxy call routing, i.e.
  • connection control is connection control's responsibility to handle internal congestion, and the particular form of call routing or special services would take into account their own means of determining external congestion, for the signalling scheme in use, and the handshake between Call Routing and connection control and the selection of the outgoing voice route applies equally to these proxy servers.
  • Outgoing AGRs are illustrated just to illustrate a means for balancing traffic load to local exchange LEC which happens to be dual homed onto these two outgoing AGRs.
  • the local exchange LEA can select a destination point code.
  • the LEA when it has performed digit analysis on the call derives a destination point codes (DPC) and from the destination point code derives particular signalling route and then a particular signalling link set and a particular signalling link to reach the AGR system layer MTP-3 (Message Transfer Part 3) whereby to determine whether the messages are indeed for this AGR, which from the DPC determines whether the messages are being forwarded to another exchange, either in the AGR system, or external to the AGR system, or whether they have in fact been routed incorrectly.
  • DPC destination point codes
  • MTP-3 Message Transfer Part 3
  • the message is passed to N-ISUP, which from the destination point code and the originating point code associates that signalling route with a particular incoming voice route, and the CR entity that takes the signalling messages and, by digit analysis, determines the possible set of destination point codes, i.e. the point code implies a possible set of outgoing voice routes that connect between the AGR network system and destination NB exchanges which therefore implies a possible set of outgoing AGRs which head-up those voice routes.
  • FIG. 8 this illustrates the way in which call routing prioritises voice routes statically or dynamically according to network congestion statistics.
  • Statically means a static prioritisation of route according to the three tier network where there is a first priority, a second priority and so on, or joint first priority
  • dynamically means the use of more advanced algorithms such as dynamic call routing algorithms.
  • Connection Control passes the set of potential destination AGRs to Connection Control.
  • Connection Control is aware of the topology of the AGR network system, which AGRs are connected together by virtual trunk groups. There may be more than one virtual trunk group (VTG) between any given pair of AGRs. Therefore there is a choice for load balancing between VTGs, but combined with the candidate set of AGRs there could be more than one VTG to choose from overall.
  • Connection control maps the set of AGRs onto the set of candidate VTGs which are carried in virtual paths in the ATM sense, referred to as virtual trunk routes, and connection control can establish from the set of VTGs those voice routes which are not reachable due to internal congestion.
  • Connection control does not necessarily know the prioritisation of voice routes, but it will eliminate those voice routes which are not reachable without actually changing the priority and therefore it can achieve a load balancing capability with voice routes which are of equal priority or may have changed their dynamic priority from the call routing perspective. Call routing can thus select one given route which has a high degree or certainty of success and therefore need be only indirectly aware of the internal resource availability.
  • the worm thus contains five identifying features which are illustrated here as being, the outgoing circuit Q, the next stage which identifies a grooming AVJ that will connect us to our chosen VTG, which therefore implies a particular VCJ, the VTG chosen by Connection Control and the VCJ which will take us to the trunking AVJ which interfaces directly with circuit P.
  • controllers built into the AVJ they can each set up their connection maps to ensure that there is a voice path continuously from circuit P to circuit Q in either a unidirectional or a bidirectional scheme and that could form a forward or a reverse voice path. Passing the worm to and fro to one end and then back is a ready form of acknowledgement of the signalling scheme.
  • FIG. 11 illustrates the functional topology of the system and shows a method for achieving both load balancing through a number different routes between AGRs and also for providing physically diverse routes for resilience purposes.
  • Each AGR consists of trunking AVJs, and grooming AVJs which interface to a wide area network which has an ATM switch. This is a non-blocking ATM switch described earlier. Any local traffic in an AGR would simply be passed between its trunking AVJs. Any wide area network would be passed to a grooming AVJ for grooming on to a VTG. To achieve physically diverse paths one must ensure that those paths pass through a minimum of at least two switches in the ATM network.
  • a VTR can pass through any number of intermediate switches in the ATM network functioning as virtual path cross-connects which have not been shown for clarity, but logically it is a path from AGR to VC cross-connect and whatever bandwidth is associated with the virtual trunk route as it emanates from the AGR is identical to the capacity it has arrives at the virtual cross-connect.
  • each VTG and its potentially physically diverse pair is contained in at most two VTRs between any two AGRS.
  • an AGR can determine in its local section of VTR 1 to the left hand side, VTR 2 to the right hand side, what capacity has been negotiated with the ATM network, and what the available bandwidth is currently for calls in progress.
  • this shows a method of determining the spare capacity on a virtual trunk route.
  • the virtual trunk route statistics are processed by a VTR capacity monitor which retains the maximum VTR size which is the bandwidth/capacity negotiated with the ATM network, and the maximum bandwidth that one could use on the route. Some of this bandwidth may be reserved for maintenance purposes, but the rest is devoted to VTG bandwidth.
  • the VTR CU also has information on the VTGs that the VTR comprises and, by subtracting the current absolute sizes of the VTGs from the maximum usable bandwidth of the VTR, results in the spare capacity of the VTR, and whether that route is be congested or not.
  • the VTR CU is ideally located in the Connection Control layer of the AGR control system.
  • a VTR is a shared resource in the Connection Control, and therefore interrogation for its spare capacity can be single threaded on a call by call basis, providing a ready means to share out the spare capacity.
  • the VTR CU information could be updated every time a call is modified in a VTG; it comprises as a means to reduce signalling, one could have a fixed time interval, for update, between which the VTR CU grants a credit per interval to each VTG it comprises based on that VTG's absolute—and change in utilisation in the previous interval, or any other appropriate scheme is applicable, so in this manner the VTR capacity monitor need not be precise in operation.
  • the VTR capacity monitor When the VTR capacity monitor has crossed a certain predefined threshold, and there may be several such thresholds, it flags processed calls a corresponding degree of congestion, and thresholds would be determined according to a desired network performance and efficiency.
  • Bandwidth for VTRs may be decided according to desired network performance and those thresholds can be used as an indication of internal congestion in place of or in conjunction with the absolute spare capacity, the indication of having crossed the threshold may provide a direct means of comparison and suitability between candidate VTRs in routing a call, and as a means for data/signalling compression.
  • FIG. 13 illustrates the provision of grooming capacity information in the AVJ device. Whilst there may be spare capacity on a VTR, the VTGs it comprises could be controlled by distinct physical devices, i.e. grooming AVJs. Consequently whilst there may be spare capacity in the VTR there may no longer be any capacity on a grooming AVJ that controls a VTG of interest, i.e. a VTG that is candidate for end-to-end routing.
  • a grooming AVJ can signal call-by-call or, on occasion, the current sizes of the VTGs that it operates to the respective VTR CUs, such that they know the size of VTGs, but a grooming AVJ can also send its spare grooming capacity resource, and associate that spare resource with the relevant and respective VTGs to which it may apply in unequal measure due to implementation compromises.
  • the VTR capacity monitor can check the quality of a candidate route to VTG resolution, whether it has crossed a threshold of congestion or whether any of the VTGs have crossed a threshold of congestion by lack of capacity on their grooming AVJ.
  • VTGs may include padding to ensure constant end-to-end delay in the network.
  • a VTR capacity monitor can advertise its local congestion status in terms of thresholds or absolute capacity to all or select remote VTR capacity monitors to which it is connected, by VTGs through the VTGs it comprises, by using for example the ATM F 5 cell method or any other equivalent signalling scheme which can be associated with a virtual channel connection or VTG.
  • a VTRCU can advertise to all those VTRCUs or to a selection, based on any selection criteria, for example geographical distance or logical hierarchical placement.
  • the VTGs could be given for example a geographic location or, reach or distance indicator, and thereby the congestion could be sent out as an indication to only a local area if the distance is below a certain threshold with an associated congestion threshold, thereby only AGRs within a given geographic locale will get signalled first and as congestion increases then it could spread to the wider AGR network system.
  • a VTR capacity monitor obtains remote VTR congestion indication for any VTG that it comprises and with regard to FIG.
  • FIGS. 17 to 20 show in sequence the means for actually setting up the voice path between trunk circuits P and Q.
  • Each stage comprises an ingress and a egress process defined with respect to the ATM domain, egress being traffic that emanates from the ATM domain into the TDM domain in all cases.
  • the egress process keeps a record of free channel timeslots and therefore dictates where the offset in any given trunk group, VTG or VCJ of a new channel is going to be by determining where a free timeslot is in relation to the other active channels already in the trunk group and therefore the offset into that group when the new channel is added.
  • a similar process applies to the criteria for removal of an existing channel from the trunk group.
  • the egress process can signal to the ingress process which is responsible for assembly of that trunk group into ATM cells, and the ingress process is responsible for adding the channel through the dynamic structure data transfer function of our earlier patent, and the agress process can detect the occurrence of changes in trunk group size and therefore knows that the channel has been connected and can receive subsequently further changes on that particular VTG cor VCJ.
  • This operation process firstly is single threaded by VTG or VCJ, and the figure illustrates the two parts of the process, firstly signalling an offset from egress to ingress, and secondly making the change to trunk group size, and forwarding the next stage's offset as a fully pipelined process in a unidirectional manner, in which, connecting a voice path in the upstream direction from P to Q is achieved by signalling in the reverse direction from Q to P which is a preferred embodiment, because it minimises the signalling transactions involved, but does not imply the exclusion of signalling in the same direction as the voice circuit and moreover the unidirectional mechanism may be used to effect a bidirectional mechanism by signalling first from Q to P and then in an identical manner for the reverse downstream voice path signalling from P to Q.
  • a backtracking capability is built into the AVJ connection entities and provision is made for the means to function correctly in the absence of an advertising mechanism in part or in total. Provision is also made for correct operation in the absence of a VTR capacity monitor by a backtrack capability or similar recovery means.
  • the AVJs at stages 1 and 2 may optionally have capability to send a digital signature thereby guarding against any false simulation of that identity intentionally or otherwise. This provides a means of authentication such that each trunking AVJ at the end of a communication path known that it has connected the voice path through to AGR network correctly providing analogous integrity checks in existing narrow-band exchanges which have, for example, a additional integrity pattern or other signalling schemes to ensure proper cross-connection of narrow band channels through the fabric.
  • the grooming AVJs are free to choose any free time slot in their connection map. This need not be prescribed by the worm, but the worm can be annotated with that information so that connection control software can readily use the returned worm acknowledgement to check that the AVJ devices are performing the intended function. This is not a strict requirement, there still being a means for disconnection of any trunk circuit Q from any trunk circuit P by a voice path trace operation.
  • FIG. 18 shows an example of the main contents of the worm.
  • TID Trunking Identity
  • GID Grooming Identity
  • the remote end AGR is the incoming end of the call
  • the local end is the outgoing end of the call since the worm begins at the outgoing end.
  • the incoming half echo canceller and the outgoing half echo canceller are positioned relative to the respective ends of the call.
  • the incoming side is the left hand side, the remote side, because call routing forwarded messages to the right hand side and the preferred embodiment is to send information in the backwards direction initially to minimise transactions.
  • the items in heavy type are those items which are necessary to connect a unique path through the system
  • the remote trunking time slot P and the remote trunking AVJ identity can be forwarded from the remote end as part of a call routing signalling message and no other topology information regarding the remote AGR is required.
  • a remote AGR could independently change its configuration, and the information forwarded need only be valid on a call-by-call basis.
  • the trunking AVJ ID at the local end, the trunking time slot and the grooming identity which heads the selected VTG are all locally stored topological information.
  • the inclusion or exclusion of echo cancellers is a call-by-call decision process.
  • the central part of FIG. 18 shows that in the AGR network system which connects to peripheral exchanges, any signalling for inclusion or exclusion of incoming or outgoing echo cancellers is associated with the respective side of the call, the exchange on the local side only affects incoming echo cancellers.
  • the exchange on the remote side can be arranged to signal only for outgoing half echo cancellers and this avoids the need to store any information or configuration supervision of echo cancellers in the remote AGR, and local information need be retained during the lifetime and dissolution of a call.
  • the lower portion of FIG. 18 shows three main types of worm operation namely, the connect, the disconnect and the modify commands.
  • the connect command is for setting up the initial voice path and the items which are greyed out are those which can be annotated by the grooming AVJs and stored by connection control if necessary, but which are not absolutely necessary for the system operation. In total these comprise an indication of inclusion or exclusion half echo cancellers and a specification of the exact route that the voice path should take. This facilitates the setting up of point to multi-point connections in the AGR network system.
  • the disconnect command can optionally include the local information which is circled in the figure. In a point-to-multipoint connection, then this information would be needed to specify unambiguously the grooming AVJ identity and there may be more than one voice path through that same grooming AVJ, distinguished by the grooming time slots, which must be passed back from the original connect message.
  • any time slot P to any other time slot Q has just one unique connection.
  • a disconnect ion can be facilitated by a bare minimum of information of just one end of the connection, for example timeslot Q, and both are not necessary to be known as described herein.
  • the notepad area is used for annotation as the worm is passed forward, for example to hold the offset into the trunk group between each successive AVJ stage. It is distinct from the annotated information uniquely identifying the voice path such as the choice of a grooming time slot.
  • the modify command is associated with further subsequent inclusion or exclusion of echo cancellers in the voice path, which is just one specific example of path modification, all types of modification are envisaged, in this particular case it may be desirable to move a grooming time slot away from a half echo canceller device to a grooming time slot which is a simple loop-back function or vice versa, to free up resources by inverting the original echo canceller indication with an optional facility to specify the grooming time slot and the worm could be subsequently annotated with the new time slot, specifying at minimum, the thinking time slot, the grooming AVJ identity, the indication of half echo canceller and for point-to-multipoint connections above the grooming time slots and the VTG.
  • FIG. 19 shows the way in which a voice path is traced through the AGR network system.
  • the trunking time slot is common to both the ingress and the egress process for a both-way circuit, and is readily available in the TDM domain.
  • the trunking time slot for both ingress and egress processes with respect to the ATM is known such that, at step 1 , the trunking timeslot location in the egress connection map contains a particular VCJ identity and the connection entity for that VCJ the offset of that trunking time slot in the VCJ trunk group, Trunking Time Slot (T.TS) in the upstream direction. That offset can be passed to the next AVJ stage, the grooming AVJ.
  • T.TS Trunking Time Slot
  • knowing the upstream VCJ also means knowing the downstream VCJ.
  • the ingress process can then, from the VCJ connection map, determine the offset of the trunking time slot T.TS (step 3 ) in that particular VCJ, the offset downstream, offset D. (step 4 )
  • the offset of the upstream and the downstream direction in the trunking AVJ have now been determined and can be passed by signalling as described above to the grooming AVJ in the next stage of the connection.
  • the ingress process at step 2 can determine the grooming timeslot in the upstream direction (step 3 ) which is the timeslot used in the upstream direction on the VCJ side and on the VTG side. From the grooming timeslot in the upstream direction the egress process can determine the VTG from the contents of the location in the map and in an identical manner to the trunking AVJ stage, can determine the offset of that grooming timeslot in the VTG trunk group, the offset in the upstream direction (step 3 ).
  • FIG. 20 shows the overview of the whole wormhole protocol.
  • Step 1 shows the ITU SS7 message, i.e. the IAM message identifying trunk circuit P. This also contains dialled digits which call routing processes, determines the voice route by consideration for external congestion and a prioritised set of external voice routes (step 2 ) which it passes to connection control at step 3 .
  • Connection control checks the internal congestion from the VTR capacity monitors and, if necessary, (step 4 ), connection control may also initiate any SS7 loop back continuity checks on trunk circuit P or any other type of continuity check appropriate to the signalling system employed. Connection control eliminates those routes which are unreachable through internal congestion and puts forward its preferred route for load balancing where there is an equal external voice route.
  • Call routing determines the final choice of voice route and forwards the message.
  • the outgoing call routing selects the outgoing trunk circuit and resolves any glare (contention for trunk circuits that may be coming in from its own incoming process on this AGR).
  • connection control checks internal congestion again through the VTR capacity monitors and makes a final selection of the VTG that connects the associated pair of AGRs and creates a worm which comprises sufficient topological information to connect trunk circuit Q to trunk circuit P via the chosen VTG and forwards this at step 7 to the connection entity inside the trunking AVJ hosting Q, which may also initiate a continuity check or any other scheme provided by the signalling system on trunk circuit Q step 8 .
  • the worm is passed forward through the grooming AVJ stages which may optionally include or exclude half echo cancellers in this path initially, and they may be excluded at any later stage by a modified worm.
  • the grooming AVJ forwards the worm through the VTG to the remote AGR on the incoming side (step 9 ) which connects the path through to trunk circuit P and also then passes the worm back in the reverse direction (step 10 ) to set up in the reverse direction.
  • the annotated information as to what the path was in the worm information is stored in connection control at both ends so that the path can be torn down from either end using any of the existing schemes in the signalling system.
  • Step 11 is an optional stage to check the integrity of the voice path to enable the through connection and the outgoing IAM message.
  • the arrangement and method described provide for the distribution of the exchange in terms of its fabric and its control and its enabling technologies with reference to the dynamic structure data transfer.
  • the distributed fabric can, because of this unallocated bandwidth use separate connections to the control layer for establishing the connections through the fabric and this in no way compromises external decisions that are made except when an overload situation is encountered.
  • An advertising process provides knowledge of the distributed fabric. This includes local knowledge about a remote site such that routing decisions can be made and modified where necessary so as to reject traffic at source.
  • the dynamic trunking enables the separation of call routing and connection control.
  • the arrangement also provides a means of ensuring stability under overload situations and minimising the cost of handling traffic which would be rejected by destinations.
  • the separation of call routing and connection control together with advertising the system status ensures a wide range of scalability so that the application of dynamic trunking technology provides scalability in a traffic sense. Further, the separation of call routing and connection control provides a distributed computing environment which is scaleable and managed by this advertisement resource. Because the distributed exchange manages its own internal traffic, effectively it provides means for balancing that traffic to the fabric and makes its own internal routing decisions. Once that network grows through its scalability, a local exchange can dual home on to it and allow it to make its own routing decisions. The local exchange does not have to make any individual routing decisions to a variety of traffic exchanges.
  • the separation further provides a facility to support a wide range of services using other signalling schemes.
  • the fabric provides a connection engine that can accommodate a wide variety of signalling protocols appropriate for the type of service to be provided and that can set up connections.
  • the full knowledge of the network connectivity and the release of resources can be enabled by any node within the network, as it can trace through all connections from any starting point. This can be used to support failure recovery.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
  • Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
US11/055,787 1996-07-05 1997-07-03 ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic Expired - Lifetime USRE40398E1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9614138A GB2314995B (en) 1996-07-05 1996-07-05 Telecommunication system
PCT/GB1997/001779 WO1998002012A1 (en) 1996-07-05 1997-07-03 Atm telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/202,423 Reissue US6519257B1 (en) 1996-07-05 1997-07-03 ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE40398E1 true USRE40398E1 (en) 2008-06-24

Family

ID=10796407

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/055,787 Expired - Lifetime USRE40398E1 (en) 1996-07-05 1997-07-03 ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic
US09/202,423 Ceased US6519257B1 (en) 1996-07-05 1997-07-03 ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/202,423 Ceased US6519257B1 (en) 1996-07-05 1997-07-03 ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) USRE40398E1 (de)
EP (2) EP0909525B1 (de)
JP (1) JP3826181B2 (de)
DE (1) DE69731469T2 (de)
GB (1) GB2314995B (de)
WO (1) WO1998002012A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE69932461T2 (de) * 1998-02-16 2007-08-23 Ericsson Ab Telekommunikationssysteme
GB2334408B (en) * 1998-02-16 2003-02-26 Marconi Comm Ltd Telecommunications systems
GB2343582B (en) 1998-11-06 2000-10-11 Marconi Comm Ltd Telecommunications system
US7009982B2 (en) * 1999-07-14 2006-03-07 Ericsson Inc. Combining narrowband applications with broadband transport
US6980544B2 (en) * 1999-07-14 2005-12-27 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Combining narrowband applications with broadband transport
US7054273B1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2006-05-30 Tellabs Operations, Inc. Circuit integrity in a packet-switched network
KR100476649B1 (ko) * 1999-10-12 2005-03-18 주식회사 케이티 인터넷 프로토콜(IP)망에서 서비스품질(QoS) 보장을 위한 동적 부하 제어 방법
US8396950B1 (en) * 2000-03-02 2013-03-12 Rockstar Consortium Us Lp Method and apparatus for the fast detection of connectivity loss between devices in a network
US7016369B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2006-03-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Binding information for telecommunications network
JP3664109B2 (ja) * 2001-06-29 2005-06-22 日本電気株式会社 音声チャネルの選択システム、及び、その選択方法
US7468988B2 (en) 2001-08-22 2008-12-23 Tekelec Methods and systems for improving utilization of high-speed time division multiplexed communications links at signal transfer point
US7480283B1 (en) 2002-03-26 2009-01-20 Nortel Networks Limited Virtual trunking over packet networks
ITTO20020441A1 (it) * 2002-05-24 2003-11-24 Telecom Italia Lab Spa Metodo per determinare l'installazione di costo minimo per le apparecchiature di una rete fissa di telecomunicazione.
US20040239507A1 (en) 2003-05-29 2004-12-02 Neary Anton M. Method and apparatus for perimeter detection
US7535895B2 (en) * 2003-05-29 2009-05-19 Hammerhead Systems, Inc. Selectively switching data between link interfaces and processing engines in a network switch
US7301958B2 (en) * 2003-11-26 2007-11-27 Intel Corporation Cycle-efficient TDM timeslot remapping for network processing engines
US7573886B1 (en) * 2004-07-06 2009-08-11 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for adaptive bandwidth determination
US20070280223A1 (en) * 2006-04-14 2007-12-06 Hammerhead Systems, Inc. Hybrid data switching for efficient packet processing
US8285900B2 (en) 2009-02-17 2012-10-09 The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System Method and apparatus for congestion-aware routing in a computer interconnection network
JP5322058B2 (ja) * 2009-09-11 2013-10-23 国立大学法人名古屋大学 階層化光パスクロスコネクト装置

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2269724A (en) 1992-08-12 1994-02-16 Plessey Telecomm ATM Network addressing
EP0599764A1 (de) 1992-11-24 1994-06-01 International Business Machines Corporation Verteilte Durchführung von Routenauswahl über Netzwerke und Teilnetzwerke
US5428607A (en) * 1993-12-20 1995-06-27 At&T Corp. Intra-switch communications in narrow band ATM networks
GB2288297A (en) 1994-03-30 1995-10-11 Plessey Telecomm B-ISDN access
GB2290433A (en) 1994-06-14 1995-12-20 Northern Telecom Ltd ATM communications system
US5479402A (en) * 1991-03-05 1995-12-26 Fujitsu Limited Logical channel setting system for ATM network
US5483527A (en) 1994-12-21 1996-01-09 At&T Corp. Terminal adapter for interfacing an ATM network with a STM network
US5600641A (en) 1994-07-07 1997-02-04 International Business Machines Corporation Voice circuit emulation system in a packet switching network
GB2305812A (en) 1995-09-29 1997-04-16 Northern Telecom Ltd ATM network
US5790522A (en) 1994-10-07 1998-08-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for performing traffic congestion control in a data communication network
US6016319A (en) 1995-10-31 2000-01-18 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Communications system for transmission of datagram packets over connection-oriented networks

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5479402A (en) * 1991-03-05 1995-12-26 Fujitsu Limited Logical channel setting system for ATM network
GB2269724A (en) 1992-08-12 1994-02-16 Plessey Telecomm ATM Network addressing
EP0599764A1 (de) 1992-11-24 1994-06-01 International Business Machines Corporation Verteilte Durchführung von Routenauswahl über Netzwerke und Teilnetzwerke
US5428607A (en) * 1993-12-20 1995-06-27 At&T Corp. Intra-switch communications in narrow band ATM networks
GB2288297A (en) 1994-03-30 1995-10-11 Plessey Telecomm B-ISDN access
GB2290433A (en) 1994-06-14 1995-12-20 Northern Telecom Ltd ATM communications system
US5600641A (en) 1994-07-07 1997-02-04 International Business Machines Corporation Voice circuit emulation system in a packet switching network
US5790522A (en) 1994-10-07 1998-08-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for performing traffic congestion control in a data communication network
US5483527A (en) 1994-12-21 1996-01-09 At&T Corp. Terminal adapter for interfacing an ATM network with a STM network
GB2305812A (en) 1995-09-29 1997-04-16 Northern Telecom Ltd ATM network
US6016319A (en) 1995-10-31 2000-01-18 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Communications system for transmission of datagram packets over connection-oriented networks

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Georgatsos et al, A Management System for Load Balancing Through Adaptive Routing in Multi-Service ATM Networks, Mar. 1996, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM '96, p. 863-870.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3826181B2 (ja) 2006-09-27
EP0909525A1 (de) 1999-04-21
EP1517579A3 (de) 2010-09-15
GB9614138D0 (en) 1996-09-04
EP0909525B1 (de) 2004-11-03
US6519257B1 (en) 2003-02-11
DE69731469T2 (de) 2005-03-24
DE69731469D1 (de) 2004-12-09
EP1517579A2 (de) 2005-03-23
WO1998002012A1 (en) 1998-01-15
GB2314995B (en) 2000-11-01
JP2000514270A (ja) 2000-10-24
GB2314995A (en) 1998-01-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE40398E1 (en) ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic
US5956334A (en) Method for interfacing a telephony and an ATM network to establish voice communication
US6069895A (en) Distributed route server
US6275493B1 (en) Method and apparatus for caching switched virtual circuits in an ATM network
EP0961518B1 (de) Von einer Bedienungsperson durchgeführte Verbindungssteuerung (Routing) in einem digitalen Kommunikationsnetz
US7103068B1 (en) System and method for configuring bandwidth transmission rates for call connections
US6633569B2 (en) System and method for routing data cells through an ATM architecture using quality of service data in a service control point
CA2195495C (en) Control of telecommunications networks
US5953312A (en) Method and apparatus for determining alternate routes in a network using a connection-oriented protocol
US20050002339A1 (en) Distributed protection switching
US5432783A (en) System and method for providing egress policing for broadband virtual private networks
US20020039372A1 (en) Method, system and apparatus for telecommunications control
US8547849B2 (en) ATM telecommunications systems and method for routing narrow band traffic
US6493344B1 (en) Telecommunications system
US6785280B1 (en) Mechanism and method dynamically allocating ATM connections between exchanges
Tirtaatmadja et al. The application of virtual-paths to the interconnection of IEEE 802.6 metropolitan area networks
US7855949B1 (en) Method and apparatus for bundling signaling messages for scaling communication networks
US7483372B2 (en) Communication network
KR950012324B1 (ko) 부분 집중형 atm 교환 노드의 호설정 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:027164/0356

Effective date: 20110729

AS Assignment

Owner name: ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP;REEL/FRAME:030494/0804

Effective date: 20120509

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP;ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM LLC;BOCKSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:034924/0779

Effective date: 20150128

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, IL

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:RPX CORPORATION;RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC;REEL/FRAME:038041/0001

Effective date: 20160226

AS Assignment

Owner name: RPX CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: RELEASE (REEL 038041 / FRAME 0001);ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044970/0030

Effective date: 20171222

Owner name: RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: RELEASE (REEL 038041 / FRAME 0001);ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:044970/0030

Effective date: 20171222