FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to systems and methods for ion implantation of semiconductor wafers or other workpieces and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for adjusting beam parallelism in ion implanters.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Ion implantation is a standard technique for introducing conductivity-altering impurities into semiconductor wafers. A desired impurity material is ionized in an ion source, the ions are accelerated to form an ion beam of prescribed energy, and the ion beam is directed at the surface of the wafer. The energetic ions in the beam penetrate into the bulk of the semiconductor material and are embedded into the crystalline lattice of the semiconductor material to form a region of desired conductivity.
Ion implantation systems usually include an ion source for converting a gas or a solid material into a well-defined ion beam. The ion beam is mass analyzed to eliminate undesired ion species, is accelerated to a desired energy and is directed onto a target plane. The beam is distributed over the target area by beam scanning, by target movement or by a combination of beam scanning and target movement. An ion implanter which utilizes a combination of beam scanning and target movement is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,922,106 issued May 1, 1990 to Berrian et al.
The delivery of a parallel ion beam to the semiconductor wafer is an important requirement in many applications. A parallel ion beam is one which has parallel ion trajectories over the surface of the semiconductor wafer. In cases where the ion beam is scanned, the scanned beam is required to maintain parallelism over the wafer surface. The parallel ion beam prevents channeling of incident ions in the crystal structure of the semiconductor wafer or permits uniform channeling in cases where channeling is desired. Typically, a serial ion implanter is utilized when a high degree of beam parallelism is required.
In one approach, the beam is scanned in one dimension so that it appears to diverge from a point, referred to as the scan origin. The scanned beam then is passed through an ion optical element which performs focusing. The ion optical element converts the diverging ion trajectories to parallel ion trajectories for delivery to the semiconductor wafer. Focusing can be performed with an angle corrector magnet or with an electrostatic lens. The angle correction magnet produces both bending and focusing of the scanned ion beam. Parallelism may be achieved with an electrostatic lens, but energy contamination can be a drawback.
The output ion beam from the angle corrector magnet or other focusing element may be parallel or may be converging or diverging, depending on the parameters of the ion beam and the parameters of the focusing element. When an angle corrector magnet is utilized, parallelism can be adjusted by varying the magnetic field of the angle corrector magnet. The angle corrector magnet typically has a single magnetic field adjustment which varies both parallelism and bend angle, or beam direction. It will be understood that the ion implanter is often required to run a variety of different ion species and ion energies. When the beam parameters are changed, readjustment of the angle corrector magnet is required to restore beam parallelism.
In prior art ion implanters, the angle corrector magnet is typically adjusted so that the ion beam has normal incidence on a wafer plane of the ion implanter end station. However, the angle corrector adjustment which achieves normal incidence on the wafer plane may result in less than optimum parallelism. In particular, an ion beam that is adjusted for normal incidence on the wafer plane may be somewhat diverging or converging. As shown in
FIG. 8, the angle corrector magnet is adjusted such that the center ray of
ion beam 200 is normal to wafer
plane 202. However, when the
beam 200 is adjusted to be normal to wafer
plane 202, the parallelism of
beam 200 may be degraded such that the beam converges or diverges. The lack of parallelism is unacceptable in highly critical applications.
In another approach, the angle corrector magnet is designed for best parallelism under typical conditions, and the ion implanter end station is positioned for normal incidence of the ion beam on the wafer. However, beam parallelism and normal incidence are not maintained over a wide range of beam parameters, and changing the position of the end station is very difficult.
Accordingly, there is a need for improved methods and apparatus for adjusting beam parallelism in ion implanters.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a first aspect of the invention, a method is provided for implanting ions into a workpiece. The method comprises the steps of generating an ion beam, adjusting the ion beam for a desired measure of parallelism, measuring a beam direction of the adjusted ion beam, orienting a workpiece at an implant angle referenced to the measured beam direction, and performing an implant with the workpiece oriented at the implant angle.
The step of adjusting the ion beam may comprise adjusting the ion beam for substantially parallel ion trajectories. In general, the beam direction may differ from the beam axis of the ion implanter. The implant angle may be zero degrees, in which case the workpiece is oriented normal to the measured beam direction.
The workpiece may comprise a semiconductor wafer, and the step of orienting the workpiece may comprise tilting the semiconductor wafer at the implant angle referenced to the measured beam direction.
The method may further comprise the step of measuring an angle of non-parallelism of the ion beam. The step of adjusting the ion beam may be based on the measured angle of non-parallelism. The beam direction and the angle of non-parallelism of the ion beam may be measured with a movable beam profiler and one or more beam detectors.
According to another aspect of the invention, apparatus is provided for implanting ions into a workpiece. The apparatus comprises means for generating an ion beam, means for measuring parallelism of the ion beam, means for adjusting the ion beam for a desired parallelism based on the measured parallelism, means for measuring a beam direction of the adjusted ion beam, means for tilting a workpiece at an implant angle referenced to the measured beam direction, and means for performing an implant with the workpiece tilted at the implant angle referenced to the measured beam direction.
According to a further aspect of the invention, apparatus is provided for implanting ions into a workpiece. The apparatus comprises an ion beam generator, an ion optical element for adjusting the ion beam for a desired parallelism, a measuring system for measuring a beam direction of the adjusted ion beam, and a tilt mechanism for tilting a workpiece at an implant angle referenced to the measured beam direction. An implant is performed with the workpiece tilted at the implant angle referenced to the measured beam direction.
The ion optical element may comprise an angle corrector magnet for adjusting the ion beam for substantially parallel ion trajectories. The measuring system may comprise a movable beam profiler and one or more beam detectors. Where the implant angle is zero degrees, the workpiece is tilted normal to the measured beam direction.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein by reference and in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an ion implanter suitable for implementing the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram that illustrates the operation of an angle corrector magnet for the case of a relatively large bend angle and converging ion trajectories;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram that illustrates the operation of an angle corrector magnet for the case of a relatively small bend angle and diverging ion trajectories;
FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a process for adjusting an ion implanter in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a parallel ion beam incident on a tilted wafer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
FIGS. 6A-6C are schematic diagrams that illustrate operation of a device for measuring beam parallelism and beam direction;
FIGS. 7A-7C are graphs of beam detector output as a function of beam profiler position for the beam conditions illustrated in FIGS. 6A-6C, respectively; and
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram that illustrates the prior art method of adjusting beam parallelism.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
A simplified block diagram of an example of an ion implanter suitable for incorporating the present invention is shown in FIG.
1. An
ion beam generator 10 generates an ion beam of a desired species, accelerates ions in the ion beam to desired energies, performs mass/energy analysis of the ion beam to remove energy and mass contaminants and supplies an
energetic ion beam 12 having low level of energy and mass contaminants. A
scanning system 16, which includes a
scanner 20 and an
angle corrector 24, deflects the
ion beam 12 to produce a scanned
ion beam 30 having parallel or nearly parallel ion trajectories. An
end station 32 includes a
platen 36 that supports a
semiconductor wafer 34 or other workpiece in the path of scanned
ion beam 30 such that ions of the desired species are implanted into the
semiconductor wafer 34. The ion implanter may include additional components well known to those skilled in the art. For example, the
end station 32 typically includes automated wafer handling equipment for introducing wafers into the ion implanter and for removing wafers after implantation, a dose measuring system, an electron flood gun, etc. It will be understood that the entire path traversed by the ion beam is evacuated during ion implantation.
The principal components of
ion beam generator 10 include an
ion beam source 40, a
source filter 42, an acceleration/
deceleration column 44 and a
mass analyzer 50. The
source filter 42 is preferably positioned in close proximity to
ion beam source 40. The acceleration/
deceleration column 44 is positioned between
source filter 42 and
mass analyzer 50. The
mass analyzer 50 includes a
dipole analyzing magnet 52 and a
mask 54 having a resolving
aperture 56.
The
scanner 20, which may be an electrostatic scanner, deflects
ion beam 12 to produce a scanned ion beam having ion trajectories which diverge from a
scan origin 60. The
scanner 20 may comprise spaced-apart scan plates connected to a scan generator. The scan generator applies a scan voltage waveform, such as a sawtooth waveform, for scanning the ion beam in accordance with the electric field between the scan plates.
Angle corrector 24 is designed to deflect ions in the scanned ion beam to produce scanned
ion beam 30 having parallel ion trajectories, thus focusing the scanned ion beam. In particular,
angle corrector 24 may comprise
magnetic pole pieces 26 which are spaced apart to define a gap and a magnet coil (not shown) which is coupled to a
power supply 28. The scanned ion beam passes through the gap between the
pole pieces 26 and is deflected in accordance with the magnetic field in the gap. The magnetic field may be adjusted by varying the current through the magnet coil. Beam scanning and beam focusing are performed in a selected plane, such as a horizontal plane.
In the embodiment of
FIG. 1,
end station 32 includes a beam parallelism and
direction measuring system 80.
System 80 measures beam parallelism and direction as described below. In addition,
end station 32 includes a
tilt mechanism 84 for tilting
wafer support platen 36 with respect to the scanned
ion beam 30. In one embodiment,
tilt mechanism 84 may tilt
wafer support platen 36 with respect to two orthogonal axes.
Examples of operation of
angle corrector 24 are shown in
FIGS. 2 and 3. As shown, the
pole pieces 26 of
angle corrector 24 may be wedged shaped or similarly shaped so that different ion trajectories have different path lengths through the gap between the pole pieces. In
FIG. 2, a relatively high intensity magnetic field is applied. The ion trajectories have a relatively large bend angle and may be converging as they exit from
angle corrector 24. In the example of
FIG. 3, a relatively low intensity magnetic field is applied. The ion trajectories have a relatively small bend angle and may be diverging as they exit from
angle corrector 24. Thus, scanned
ion beam 30 is incident on a
wafer plane 70 at a
positive angle 72 with respect to a normal to
wafer plane 70 in the example of FIG.
2 and is incident on
wafer plane 70 at a
negative angle 74 with respect to a normal to
wafer plane 70 in the example of FIG.
3. It will be understood that parallel or nearly parallel ion trajectories can be produced by appropriate adjustment of the magnetic field in
angle corrector 24. However in general, the magnetic field that provides the best parallelism does not necessarily result in normal incidence of scanned
ion beam 30 on
wafer plane 70.
A flow chart of a process for adjusting an ion implanter and performing ion implantation in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG.
4. In
step 100, an ion beam is generated and is transported through the beamline of an ion implanter. As shown in
FIG. 1,
ion beam 12 is generated by
ion beam generator 12 and is transported through
scanner 20 and
angle corrector 24 to end
station 32.
In
step 102, the parallelism of the ion beam is measured at or near the plane where the ion beam is incident on the semiconductor wafer or other workpiece. An example of a technique for measuring ion beam parallelism is described below in connection with
FIGS. 6A-6C and
7A-
7C. The parallelism measurement typically provides an angle of non-parallelism of the ion beam and, in particular, provides a half angle of convergence or divergence of the ion beam. The measured angle of non-parallelism represents the maximum excursion of the ion beam trajectories from the center ray of the ion beam.
In
step 104, the ion beam is adjusted for a desired measure of parallelism, typically near zero divergence or convergence. As shown in
FIG. 5, the parallelism of the ion beam may be changed by adjusting the current supplied by
power supply 28 to the magnet coil. The adjusted current causes a change in the magnetic field of
angle corrector 24, which in turn changes the ion trajectories in the ion beam. The adjustment is made by monitoring the measured parallelism of scanned
ion beam 30 as
power supply 28 is adjusted. When the best parallelism is achieved, the adjustment process of
step 104 is terminated. Typically, the ion beam may be adjusted within 0.1° half angle of divergence or convergence.
The magnetic field which provides the best parallelism is, in general, not the same magnetic field which directs scanned
ion beam 30 normal to
wafer plane 70 of the ion implanter end station. Instead,
parallel ion beam 30 is incident on
wafer plane 70 at an
angle 120 relative to a normal to
wafer plane 70, as shown in FIG.
5. It will be understood that the
angle 120 is exaggerated in
FIG. 5 for purposes of illustration.
In
step 106, the direction of the adjusted ion beam is measured. In particular, the
angle 120 of the adjusted ion beam relative to the normal to
wafer plane 70 is measured. An example of a technique for measuring ion beam direction is described below in connection with
FIGS. 6A-6C and
7A-
7C. Beam parallelism and beam direction are measured in the plane of scanning and focusing of the ion beam.
In
step 108, the implant angle is set relative to the direction of the adjusted ion beam and, in particular, referenced to
angle 120. The implant angle is set by tilting
wafer support platen 36 relative to the
wafer plane 70 of the implanter using
tilt mechanism 84. Where normal incidence of the parallel scanned
ion beam 30 on the
wafer 34 is desired,
wafer support platen 36 is tilted by an
angle 122 that is equal to
angle 120. Thus, the wafer support surface of
platen 36 is normal to parallel scanned
ion beam 30. Where non-zero implant angles are desired,
wafer support platen 36 is tilted relative to the measured beam direction. The measured beam direction is thus the reference for setting the implant angle. The non-zero implant angle may be set by tilting the wafer in a direction parallel to the plane of scanning and focusing or may be set by tilting the wafer in a direction orthogonal to the plane of scanning and focusing. In each case, the non-zero implant angle is referenced to the measured beam direction.
In
step 110, the implant is performed with the wafer support platen at the desired implant angle referenced to the measured beam direction and with the scanned
ion beam 30 adjusted for best parallelism. Thus, the best parallelism is achieved at the desired implant angle.
An example of a technique for measuring ion beam parallelism and direction is described with reference to FIGS. 6A-6C and 7A-7C. FIGS. 6A-6C are schematic diagrams which illustrate the measurement of different ion beams with a beam profiler and two beam detectors. FIGS. 7A-7C are graphs that illustrate the outputs of the beam detectors as a function of profiler position.
As shown in
FIGS. 6A-6C, ion beam parallelism and direction are measured using a moving
beam profiler 150 and spaced-apart
beam detectors 152 and
154, which correspond to beam parallelism and direction measuring system
80 (FIG.
1).
Beam profiler 150 may be any element that partially blocks the ion beam and is laterally movable relative to the ion beam.
Detectors 152 and
154, for example, may be Faraday cups which produce an electrical output signal in response to an incident ion beam. As the
profiler 150 is moved across the ion beam, it blocks a portion of the ion beam and produces an ion beam shadow. The beam shadow moves across
detectors 152 and
154 and produces output signals in the form of negative-going output current pulses.
As shown in
FIG. 6A, a parallel scanned
ion beam 160 has normal incidence on a wafer plane
170.
Detectors 152 and
154 produce output pulses as shown in
FIG. 7A when the
profiler 150 is positioned in alignment with each detector. The profiler positions at which detector output pulses are generated can be used to determine that
ion beam 160 has parallel trajectories and is normal to wafer plane
170.
Referring to
FIG. 6B, a diverging
ion beam 162 has normal incidence on wafer plane
170. In this case,
detector 152 produces an output pulse as shown in
FIG. 7B when
profiler 150 is positioned to the right of
detector 152, and
detector 154 produces an output pulse when
profiler 150 is positioned to the left of
detector 154. The profiler positions at which detector output pulses are generated can be used to determine the angle of divergence of
ion beam 162. In response to a converging ion beam (not shown),
detector 152 produces an output pulse when
profiler 150 is positioned to the left of
detector 152, and
detector 154 produces an output pulse when
profiler 150 is positioned to the right of
detector 154. The profiler positions at which detector output pulses are generated can be used to determine the angle of convergence of the ion beam.
As shown in
FIG. 6C, a
parallel ion beam 164 is incident on wafer plane
170 at an
angle 166. In this case,
detectors 152 and
154 produce output pulses as shown in
FIG. 7C when the
profiler 150 is positioned to the left of the
respective detectors 152 and
154. The profiler positions at which detector output pulses are generated can be used to determine the direction and parallelism of
ion beam 164.
In general, the ion beam may be converging or diverging and may have a non-zero beam angle relative to the wafer plane. The profiler positions when detector outputs pulses are generated can be analyzed to determine both the parallelism and direction of the ion beam. The parallelism may be specified as the half angle of divergence or convergence, and the beam direction may be specified relative to a normal to a wafer plane 170. Additional details regarding techniques for measuring ion beam parallelism and direction are provided in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/588,419, filed Jun. 6, 2000, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
It will be understood that different techniques may be used for measuring beam parallelism and direction within the scope of the invention. In addition, the invention is not limited to use with a scanned ion beam. For example, the invention may be used with a ribbon ion beam as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,350,926, issued Sep. 27, 1994 to White et al.
While there have been shown and described what are at present considered the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.