USRE32339E - Blade to blade vibration damper - Google Patents

Blade to blade vibration damper Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE32339E
USRE32339E US06/636,442 US63644284A USRE32339E US RE32339 E USRE32339 E US RE32339E US 63644284 A US63644284 A US 63644284A US RE32339 E USRE32339 E US RE32339E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
blade
damper
thousandths
approximately
invention according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US06/636,442
Inventor
John C. Jones
Perry P. Sifford
Joel F. Sutton
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Technologies Corp
Original Assignee
United Technologies Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US06/193,514 external-priority patent/US4347040A/en
Application filed by United Technologies Corp filed Critical United Technologies Corp
Priority to US06/636,442 priority Critical patent/USRE32339E/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE32339E publication Critical patent/USRE32339E/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/30Fixing blades to rotors; Blade roots ; Blade spacers
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/12Blades
    • F01D5/22Blade-to-blade connections, e.g. for damping vibrations

Definitions

  • This invention relates to axial flow rotary machines and specifically to the damping of vibratory energy in the blades of such machines.
  • a plurality of rotor blades extend outwardly from a disk, or drum shaped structure.
  • the blades extend across an annular flowpath for working medium, and in turbine embodiments extract energy from the working medium gases flowing across the blades.
  • Each of the blades is formed of an airfoil section extending into the flowpath, a root section interlockingly engaging the disk or drum, and a platform section defining the inner boundary of the working medium flowpath.
  • the sequence of rotor blades passing through local aerodynamic perturbations in the working medium flowpath initiate alternatingly increased and decreased loadings on the blades.
  • This variation in loading characteristic induces blade deflection and imparts a stress on the blade material. If the frequency at which the loading characteristic varies is coincident with the natural frequency of the blade resonance occurs; the deflection amplitudes become reinforcing and vibratory damage likely results.
  • Each of the structures described in the above patents is of the blade to blade type configuration in which the damper under centrifugal loads is urged outwardly against the platforms of two adjacent blades.
  • Each of the dampers extends axially across the disk or drum in the cavity beneath the blade platforms.
  • a blade to blade vibration damper extending circumferentially on a rotor between adjacent blades is provided with a "T" shaped cross section geometry.
  • a principle feature of the present invention is the circumferential extension of the damper.
  • the damper has a "T" shaped cross section geometry with the top bar of the "T” being oriented to press against the undersides of the platforms of two adjacent rotor blades in the operation mode.
  • a coverplate assembly holds a plurality of the dampers in proximity to the undersides of the respective blade platforms. Sufficient clearance between the pin or rivet holding each damper in the coverplate assembly is provided to enable the damper to freely seat against the undersides of the platforms in response to centrifugal loads as the machine is operated. Good longitudinal stiffness and extremely low weight are important characteristics of the damper.
  • a principle advantage of the present invention is effective damping of rotor blade vibration. Vibratory stresses in the blades of an operating machine are reduced. Sliding contact of the top bar of the damper along the undersurfaces of the adjacent blade platforms is encouraged through a reduction in the required slip load forces for structures incorporating the disclosed concepts.
  • the damper cross section geometry provides the longitudinal stiffness and low weight which are essential to the enablement of friction damping slippage between the damper and the blade platforms.
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified cross section view taken through a portion of the turbine section of a gas turbine engine
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified elevation view of a portion of the turbine section of FIG. 1 including portions thereof broken away to reveal the blade vibration dampers;
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a blade vibration damper constructed in accordance with the concepts of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of damper force loading.
  • the FIG. 1 rotor assembly 10 is of the type utilized in the turbine section of a gas turbine engine.
  • the principal structural component is the rotor disk 12.
  • Each rotor blade has a root section 18 which engages the rotor disk and an airfoil section 20 which spans the flowpath.
  • a platform section 22 forms the inner boundary of the working medium flowpath.
  • a coverplate assembly 24 illustrated at the upstream end of the rotor disk in part holds the root sections of the rotor blades in engagement with the rotor disk and in part blocks the flow of working medium gases across the rotor assembly beneath the blade platforms.
  • the coverplate assembly has affixed thereto a plurality of rotor blade dampers, as represented by the single damper 26.
  • the damper has a "T" shaped cross section geometry and as illustrated is attached to the coverplate assembly by a rivet 28.
  • the top bar 30 of the "T" shaped damper rests against the underside of the platform section 20.
  • the web 32 of the damper is penetrated by the attaching rivet.
  • one damper 26 is disposed between each pair of adjacent rotor blades 14.
  • the top bar 30 rests against the undersides of each of the two adjacent platform sections.
  • Each of the attaching rivets 28 passes through a corresponding hole 34 in the web of the damper. A generous clearance is provided between each rivet and the connecting web hole so as to enable the damper to readily seat against the adjacent blade platform sections.
  • the damper 26 is of the generic "blade to blade” type. Vibratory deflection in each blade is transmitted across the damper to the adjacent blade. Vibratory energy is removed from the system at the interfaces A between the damper and the platform sections. Frictional forces generate heat at the interfaces A as the damper is caused to slide over the undersides of the platforms.
  • the damper is provided with a very high ratio of longitudinal stiffness to weight. Effective transmission of forces circumferentially around the disk from blade to blade along the longitudinal axis of the damper is accomplished.
  • the "T" shaped cross section geometry is resistant to deflection under longitudinal loads resulting from the inter-blade transfer of vibratory energy and is resistant to transverse bending under centrifugal force loading in the operative environment at the interfaces A.
  • the damper is fabricated of nickel alloy material and has a weight of approximately .[.four one hundredths of a pound (0.04 lbs.)..]. .Iadd.four one thousandths of a pound (0.004 lb). .Iaddend.In contrast to the blade dampers of the prior art, it is readily apparent that the present damper is of extremely small size. Material has been distributed, nevertheless, for maximum effect in providing longitudinal and transverse stiffness.
  • the top bar 30 of the damper has a width W T of approximately one hundred twenty thousandths of an inch (0.120 in.) and a heighth H T of approximately sixty thousandths of an inch (0.060 in.).
  • the principal structural portion of the web has a width W W of approximately eighty thousandths of an inch (0.080 in.) and a heighth H W of approximately one hundred thirty five thousandths of an inch (0.135 in.).
  • the full height H F of the damper including the portion through which the hole passes is approximately one half inch (1/2 in.).
  • the overall length L of the damper is also approximately one half inch (1/2 in.).
  • spacing tabs 36 are provided to assist in stabilizing the damper within the coverplate assembly.
  • the fundamental principal of operation of the present damper can be visualized in the FIG. 4 illustration.
  • the interfaces A between a damper 26 and the blade platform sections 20 is shown.
  • the damper In order to be effective the damper must be capable of sliding along the points of interface A such that vibratory energy can be dissipated in the form of friction generated heat.
  • the force F required to cause movement between the damper and the platforms is termed .[.”slipboard force”.]. .Iadd.”slipload force" .Iaddend.and is calculable in accordance with the formula below.
  • the normal load is a function damper weight and rotor speed of rotation and is the dominant factor in determining slipload force.
  • the slipload factor ⁇ is required to account for phase angle effects between leading or lagging blades.
  • the corresponding slipload force is eighteen pounds (18 lbs.).
  • a vibrating blade must be capable of generating a force along the axis of the damper of eighteen pounds (18 lbs.) before frictional damping and dissipation of energy can occur.
  • the achieved low slipload force enabled by the present structure is a significant advance in the art and is sufficiently low to prevent the damper from locking up without sliding under centrifugal loads.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)

Abstract

Effective damping of blade vibratory energy is sought by the apparatus described herein. The concepts relate specifically to what is known as blade to blade damping as is distinguished from blade to ground damping.
The dampers employed have a "T" shaped cross section geometry and are designed to extend circumferentially on an engine rotor between the platform sections of each pair of rotor blades. The dampers are of extreme light weight such that the slipload forces required to generate sliding contact between the damper and the blade platforms is low.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to axial flow rotary machines and specifically to the damping of vibratory energy in the blades of such machines.
The concepts were developed in the gas turbine engine industry for use in the turbine section of gas turbine engines, but have wider applicability in other industrial applications as well.
BACKGROUND ART
In a typical rotor assembly of an axial flow turbine, a plurality of rotor blades extend outwardly from a disk, or drum shaped structure. The blades extend across an annular flowpath for working medium, and in turbine embodiments extract energy from the working medium gases flowing across the blades. Each of the blades is formed of an airfoil section extending into the flowpath, a root section interlockingly engaging the disk or drum, and a platform section defining the inner boundary of the working medium flowpath.
The sequence of rotor blades passing through local aerodynamic perturbations in the working medium flowpath initiate alternatingly increased and decreased loadings on the blades. This variation in loading characteristic induces blade deflection and imparts a stress on the blade material. If the frequency at which the loading characteristic varies is coincident with the natural frequency of the blade resonance occurs; the deflection amplitudes become reinforcing and vibratory damage likely results.
Vibratory phenomenon and the need to attend to such problems in rotary machines has long been recognized. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,112,915 to Morris entitled "Rotor Assembly Air Baffle"; 2,266,770 to Harlow entitled "Turbomachine Rotor Assembly"; 3,610,778 to Schottikon entitled "Support For Rotor Blades In A Rotor"; 3,666,376 to Damlis entitled "Turbine Blade Damper"; 3,709,631 to Karstensen et al entitled "Turbine Blade Seal Arrangement"; 3,751,183 to Nichols et al entitled "Interblade Baffle And Damper"; 3,887,298 to Hess et al entitled "Apparatus For Sealing Turbine Blade Damper Cavities"; 4,182,598 to Nelson entitled "Turbine Blade Damper"; and British Pat. No. 1,259,750 entitled "Rotor For A Fluid Flow Machine" are representative of the substantial attempts to solve rotor blade vibration problems in the past.
Each of the structures described in the above patents is of the blade to blade type configuration in which the damper under centrifugal loads is urged outwardly against the platforms of two adjacent blades. Each of the dampers extends axially across the disk or drum in the cavity beneath the blade platforms.
As will become apparent in the specification which follows, the concepts of the present invention depart both structurally and functionally from those previously utilized in the industry.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
According to the present invention a blade to blade vibration damper extending circumferentially on a rotor between adjacent blades is provided with a "T" shaped cross section geometry.
A principle feature of the present invention is the circumferential extension of the damper. The damper has a "T" shaped cross section geometry with the top bar of the "T" being oriented to press against the undersides of the platforms of two adjacent rotor blades in the operation mode. A coverplate assembly holds a plurality of the dampers in proximity to the undersides of the respective blade platforms. Sufficient clearance between the pin or rivet holding each damper in the coverplate assembly is provided to enable the damper to freely seat against the undersides of the platforms in response to centrifugal loads as the machine is operated. Good longitudinal stiffness and extremely low weight are important characteristics of the damper.
A principle advantage of the present invention is effective damping of rotor blade vibration. Vibratory stresses in the blades of an operating machine are reduced. Sliding contact of the top bar of the damper along the undersurfaces of the adjacent blade platforms is encouraged through a reduction in the required slip load forces for structures incorporating the disclosed concepts. The damper cross section geometry provides the longitudinal stiffness and low weight which are essential to the enablement of friction damping slippage between the damper and the blade platforms.
The foregoing, and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in the light of the following description and accompanying drawing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a simplified cross section view taken through a portion of the turbine section of a gas turbine engine;
FIG. 2 is a simplified elevation view of a portion of the turbine section of FIG. 1 including portions thereof broken away to reveal the blade vibration dampers;
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a blade vibration damper constructed in accordance with the concepts of the present invention; and
FIG. 4 is an illustration of damper force loading.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
The FIG. 1 rotor assembly 10 is of the type utilized in the turbine section of a gas turbine engine. The principal structural component is the rotor disk 12. A plurality of rotor blades, as represented by the single blade 14, interlockingly engage the rotor disk and extend radially outwardly therefrom into a flowpath 16. Each rotor blade has a root section 18 which engages the rotor disk and an airfoil section 20 which spans the flowpath. A platform section 22 forms the inner boundary of the working medium flowpath. A coverplate assembly 24 illustrated at the upstream end of the rotor disk in part holds the root sections of the rotor blades in engagement with the rotor disk and in part blocks the flow of working medium gases across the rotor assembly beneath the blade platforms. The coverplate assembly has affixed thereto a plurality of rotor blade dampers, as represented by the single damper 26. The damper has a "T" shaped cross section geometry and as illustrated is attached to the coverplate assembly by a rivet 28. The top bar 30 of the "T" shaped damper rests against the underside of the platform section 20. The web 32 of the damper is penetrated by the attaching rivet.
As is illustrated in FIG. 2 one damper 26 is disposed between each pair of adjacent rotor blades 14. The top bar 30 rests against the undersides of each of the two adjacent platform sections. Each of the attaching rivets 28 passes through a corresponding hole 34 in the web of the damper. A generous clearance is provided between each rivet and the connecting web hole so as to enable the damper to readily seat against the adjacent blade platform sections.
The damper 26 is of the generic "blade to blade" type. Vibratory deflection in each blade is transmitted across the damper to the adjacent blade. Vibratory energy is removed from the system at the interfaces A between the damper and the platform sections. Frictional forces generate heat at the interfaces A as the damper is caused to slide over the undersides of the platforms.
It is an essential feature of the present invention that sliding friction is enabled. To this end the damper is provided with a very high ratio of longitudinal stiffness to weight. Effective transmission of forces circumferentially around the disk from blade to blade along the longitudinal axis of the damper is accomplished. The "T" shaped cross section geometry is resistant to deflection under longitudinal loads resulting from the inter-blade transfer of vibratory energy and is resistant to transverse bending under centrifugal force loading in the operative environment at the interfaces A.
Detailed aspects of such dampers are illustrated in the FIG. 3 perspective view. The damper is fabricated of nickel alloy material and has a weight of approximately .[.four one hundredths of a pound (0.04 lbs.)..]. .Iadd.four one thousandths of a pound (0.004 lb). .Iaddend.In contrast to the blade dampers of the prior art, it is readily apparent that the present damper is of extremely small size. Material has been distributed, nevertheless, for maximum effect in providing longitudinal and transverse stiffness. The top bar 30 of the damper has a width WT of approximately one hundred twenty thousandths of an inch (0.120 in.) and a heighth HT of approximately sixty thousandths of an inch (0.060 in.). The principal structural portion of the web has a width WW of approximately eighty thousandths of an inch (0.080 in.) and a heighth HW of approximately one hundred thirty five thousandths of an inch (0.135 in.). The full height HF of the damper including the portion through which the hole passes is approximately one half inch (1/2 in.). The overall length L of the damper is also approximately one half inch (1/2 in.). In the damper illustrated spacing tabs 36 are provided to assist in stabilizing the damper within the coverplate assembly.
The fundamental principal of operation of the present damper can be visualized in the FIG. 4 illustration. The interfaces A between a damper 26 and the blade platform sections 20 is shown. In order to be effective the damper must be capable of sliding along the points of interface A such that vibratory energy can be dissipated in the form of friction generated heat. The force F required to cause movement between the damper and the platforms is termed .[."slipboard force".]. .Iadd."slipload force" .Iaddend.and is calculable in accordance with the formula below.
F=μNφ
where
F=slipload force;
μ=coefficient of friction;
N=normal load; and
φ=slipload factor
The normal load is a function damper weight and rotor speed of rotation and is the dominant factor in determining slipload force. The slipload factor φ is required to account for phase angle effects between leading or lagging blades.
As incredible as it may seem, the damper described by FIG. 3 and weighing only .[.four one hundredths of a pound (0.04 lb.).]. .Iadd.four one thousandths of a pound (0.004 lb.) .Iaddend.generates a normal force at each point of interface A of eighty five pounds (85 lbs) in a typical high performance aircraft engine. The corresponding slipload force is eighteen pounds (18 lbs.). In other words, a vibrating blade must be capable of generating a force along the axis of the damper of eighteen pounds (18 lbs.) before frictional damping and dissipation of energy can occur.
The achieved low slipload force enabled by the present structure is a significant advance in the art and is sufficiently low to prevent the damper from locking up without sliding under centrifugal loads.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to preferred embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and omissions in the form and detail thereof may be made therein without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention.

Claims (8)

We claim:
1. In a rotor assembly of the axial flow rotary machine type in which a plurality of individually mounted blades, each having a platform section, extend outwardly on the machine, the improvement comprising:
a blade to blade damper adapted to seat against a pair of adjacent blade platform sections in response to centrifugally generated loads in an operating engine and of essentially "T" shaped cross section geometry including a top bar and a web extending circumferentially with respect to the machine between said pair of adjacent blade platform sections wherein the top bar provides longitudinal stiffness in the direction of expected slip load forces and the web provides transverse stiffness in the direction normal to the expected slip load forces.
2. The invention according to claim 1 which further includes a coverplate assembly within which each of said blade to blade dampers is trapped.
3. The invention according to claims 1 or 2 in which said blade to blade dampers are of sufficiently light weight to limit the magnitude of the slipload force required to cause relative movement between said damper and said platform sections in an operative environment to a value below that which is generated by blade vibration such that energy in the vibrating blade is capable of being dissipated in the form of heat energy at the points of contact between the damper and platform sections.
4. The invention according to claim 3 wherein the weight of said dampers is approximately .[.four one hundredths of a pound (0.04 lb.)..]. .Iadd.four one thousandths of a pound (0.004 lb.). .Iaddend.
5. A blade to blade vibration damper of the type suited for use circumferentially between the platforms of adjacent rotor blades in a gas turbine engine wherein said damper extends longitudinally between the platforms of adjacent rotor blades and has a "T" shaped cross section geometry for providing good longitudinal stiffness and resistance to transverse bending in response to vibration loads and centrifugal loads respectively.
6. The invention according to claim 5 wherein said damper is of extreme light weight, on the order of .[.four one hundredths of a pound (0.04 lb.)..]. .Iadd.four one thousandths of a pound (0.004 lb.). .Iaddend.
7. The invention according to claim 6 wherein said damper has a length L of approximately one half inch (1/2 in.) and wherein said damper has a top bar portion having a width WT of approximately one hundred twenty thousandths of an inch (0.120 in.) and a heighth HT of approximately sixty thousandths of an inch (0.060 in.).
8. The invention according to claim 7 wherein said damper has a web portion having a width WW of approximately eighty thousandths of an inch (0.080 in.) and a heighth HW of approximately one hundred thirty five thousandths of an inch (0.135 in.).
US06/636,442 1980-10-02 1984-07-31 Blade to blade vibration damper Expired - Lifetime USRE32339E (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/636,442 USRE32339E (en) 1980-10-02 1984-07-31 Blade to blade vibration damper

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/193,514 US4347040A (en) 1980-10-02 1980-10-02 Blade to blade vibration damper
US06/636,442 USRE32339E (en) 1980-10-02 1984-07-31 Blade to blade vibration damper

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/193,514 Reissue US4347040A (en) 1980-10-02 1980-10-02 Blade to blade vibration damper

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE32339E true USRE32339E (en) 1987-01-27

Family

ID=26889076

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/636,442 Expired - Lifetime USRE32339E (en) 1980-10-02 1984-07-31 Blade to blade vibration damper

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USRE32339E (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5281097A (en) * 1992-11-20 1994-01-25 General Electric Company Thermal control damper for turbine rotors
US5478207A (en) * 1994-09-19 1995-12-26 General Electric Company Stable blade vibration damper for gas turbine engine
US6607359B2 (en) 2001-03-02 2003-08-19 Hood Technology Corporation Apparatus for passive damping of flexural blade vibration in turbo-machinery
US8066479B2 (en) * 2010-04-05 2011-11-29 Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc. Non-integral platform and damper for an airfoil
US10415425B2 (en) * 2016-01-19 2019-09-17 MTU Aero Engines AG Turbomachine stage
US10619886B2 (en) 2015-10-01 2020-04-14 Acme Engineering And Manufacturing Corp. Airfoil damper
DE102018218942A1 (en) * 2018-11-07 2020-05-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Rotor with seal between the blades

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR989556A (en) * 1949-06-25 1951-09-11 Cem Comp Electro Mec Improvement in turbo-machine blades
US2942843A (en) * 1956-06-15 1960-06-28 Westinghouse Electric Corp Blade vibration damping structure
US2999668A (en) * 1958-08-28 1961-09-12 Curtiss Wright Corp Self-balanced rotor blade
FR1374917A (en) * 1963-11-21 1964-10-09 Ass Elect Ind Improvements to sealing deflectors for moving blades of axial flow turbines and compressors
US3181835A (en) * 1964-01-07 1965-05-04 Carroll C Davis Blade vibration damping device
GB995514A (en) * 1962-07-06 1965-06-16 United Aircraft Corp Turbine or compressor blade damping device
US3723023A (en) * 1971-05-05 1973-03-27 Us Air Force Independent self adjusting vibration damper
US3748060A (en) * 1971-09-14 1973-07-24 Westinghouse Electric Corp Sideplate for turbine blade
US3881844A (en) * 1974-05-28 1975-05-06 Gen Electric Blade platform vibration dampers
US3888601A (en) * 1974-05-23 1975-06-10 Gen Electric Turbomachine with balancing means
US4101245A (en) * 1976-12-27 1978-07-18 United Technologies Corporation Interblade damper and seal for turbomachinery rotor
US4182598A (en) * 1977-08-29 1980-01-08 United Technologies Corporation Turbine blade damper
DE3008890A1 (en) * 1979-03-10 1980-09-11 Rolls Royce BLADED ROTOR FOR A GAS TURBINE ENGINE
US4343594A (en) * 1979-03-10 1982-08-10 Rolls-Royce Limited Bladed rotor for a gas turbine engine
US4355957A (en) * 1981-06-18 1982-10-26 United Technologies Corporation Blade damper

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR989556A (en) * 1949-06-25 1951-09-11 Cem Comp Electro Mec Improvement in turbo-machine blades
US2942843A (en) * 1956-06-15 1960-06-28 Westinghouse Electric Corp Blade vibration damping structure
US2999668A (en) * 1958-08-28 1961-09-12 Curtiss Wright Corp Self-balanced rotor blade
GB995514A (en) * 1962-07-06 1965-06-16 United Aircraft Corp Turbine or compressor blade damping device
FR1374917A (en) * 1963-11-21 1964-10-09 Ass Elect Ind Improvements to sealing deflectors for moving blades of axial flow turbines and compressors
US3181835A (en) * 1964-01-07 1965-05-04 Carroll C Davis Blade vibration damping device
US3723023A (en) * 1971-05-05 1973-03-27 Us Air Force Independent self adjusting vibration damper
US3748060A (en) * 1971-09-14 1973-07-24 Westinghouse Electric Corp Sideplate for turbine blade
US3888601A (en) * 1974-05-23 1975-06-10 Gen Electric Turbomachine with balancing means
US3881844A (en) * 1974-05-28 1975-05-06 Gen Electric Blade platform vibration dampers
US4101245A (en) * 1976-12-27 1978-07-18 United Technologies Corporation Interblade damper and seal for turbomachinery rotor
US4182598A (en) * 1977-08-29 1980-01-08 United Technologies Corporation Turbine blade damper
DE3008890A1 (en) * 1979-03-10 1980-09-11 Rolls Royce BLADED ROTOR FOR A GAS TURBINE ENGINE
US4343594A (en) * 1979-03-10 1982-08-10 Rolls-Royce Limited Bladed rotor for a gas turbine engine
US4355957A (en) * 1981-06-18 1982-10-26 United Technologies Corporation Blade damper

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5281097A (en) * 1992-11-20 1994-01-25 General Electric Company Thermal control damper for turbine rotors
US5478207A (en) * 1994-09-19 1995-12-26 General Electric Company Stable blade vibration damper for gas turbine engine
US6607359B2 (en) 2001-03-02 2003-08-19 Hood Technology Corporation Apparatus for passive damping of flexural blade vibration in turbo-machinery
US8066479B2 (en) * 2010-04-05 2011-11-29 Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc. Non-integral platform and damper for an airfoil
US10619886B2 (en) 2015-10-01 2020-04-14 Acme Engineering And Manufacturing Corp. Airfoil damper
US10415425B2 (en) * 2016-01-19 2019-09-17 MTU Aero Engines AG Turbomachine stage
DE102018218942A1 (en) * 2018-11-07 2020-05-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Rotor with seal between the blades

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5232344A (en) Internally damped blades
US4347040A (en) Blade to blade vibration damper
US4076455A (en) Rotor blade system for a gas turbine engine
US5522705A (en) Friction damper for gas turbine engine blades
EP1867837B1 (en) Bucket vibration damper system
EP2305954B1 (en) Internally damped blade
EP1451446B1 (en) Turbine blade pocket shroud
US3377050A (en) Shrouded rotor blades
US4088421A (en) Coverplate damping arrangement
US9151170B2 (en) Damper for an integrally bladed rotor
US8616848B2 (en) Turbine blade damping device with controlled loading
EP3139001B1 (en) Damper pin for turbine blades and corresponding turbine engine
US5681142A (en) Damping means for a stator assembly of a gas turbine engine
EP3139003A1 (en) Damper pin for turbine blades and corresponding turbine engine
EP3139002A1 (en) Damper pin for turbine blades and corresponding turbine engine
CN111630249B (en) Damping device
US4568247A (en) Balanced blade vibration damper
USRE32339E (en) Blade to blade vibration damper
JP6786304B2 (en) Damper pin with slot for turbine blades
CN108474260A (en) Flexible damper for turbine bucket
US3027138A (en) Turbine blades
EP3138998B1 (en) Damper pins
US3314652A (en) Vibration damped turbo machinery
CN111615584B (en) Damping device
CA1048413A (en) Lashing and damping arrangement for rotating turbine blades

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY