USRE22010E

USRE22010E - Electromagnetic tool of the

Info

Publication number: USRE22010E
Authority: US
Publication date: 1942-01-20

Description

Jan. 20, 1942. GRElNER Re. 22,010

ELECTROMAGNETIC .TOOL OF THE PERCUSSION! TYPE Original Filed Oct. 31, 1955 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 Jan. 20, 1942. GRElNER Re. 22,010

ELECTROMAGNETIC TOOL OF THE PERCUS S ION TYPE Original Filed 001;. 51, 1935 Sheets-Sheet 2 Fig- 8 Fig.9

\l Y\\ Y\ E I l i i S s I. 7 A15 2 K 4 I j j 1 g j z z z z A J A 1 z 1-444 7:44

I j 4 w I 7 r a z I I 4 I Inventor:

Reissued Jan. 20, 1942 ELEcTaoMAGNETm TOOL OF THE PERCUSSION TYPE Max Greiner, Berlin-Charlottenburg, Germany Original No. 2,100,660, dated November 30, 1937,

Serial No. 47,713, October 31, 1935. Application for reissue November 10, 1939, Serial No.

I 26 Claims.

My invention relates to electr c-magnetically operated reciprocatory tools of the percussion type, such as chisels or hammers, and, more particularly, to tools of this type operated by direct current controlled by the reciprocatory mechanism of this tool.

An object of my invention is the provision of an electro-magnetically operated reciprocatory tool which is adapted for continuous service and will give a high specific power output in relation to its weight.

I attain this object by so dimensioning and combining the elements of the tool that the electric and magnetic losses and the consequent rise of temperature in continuous service is kept below satisfactory limits.

Further objects of my invention are to provide improved means to intermittently interrupt and close the electric circuits of the magnet coils of the tool and to provide improved spark-quenching condensers, whereby an unexcelled reliability of the interrupting contacts in continuous service is attained.

Further objects of my invention will appear from the description following hereinafter and the features of novelty will be pointed out in the claims.

My invention will be described hereinafter by way of its application to a reciprocatory tool of the percussion type, various modifications of which are illustrated in the drawings.

Fig. 1 is an axial section through my improved tool,

Fig. 2 is a section taken along line 2-2 of Fig. 1,

Fig. 3 illustrates a side-view of the upper portion of Fig. l, the casing being shown in section along line 33 of Fig. 2,

Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 7 represent various elements of the mechanism illustrated in Fig. 1, Fig. 4 being a section of the armature taken along line 44 of Fig. 1,

Figs. 8 and 9 are partial axial sections through modified embodiments, the electrical controlling means and coils being omitted,

,Fig. 10 is an elevation of a modified circuit interrupter for a tool constructed in accordance with the preceding figures,

Fig. 10a is a modification of a detail of Fig. 10,

Fig. 11 is a plan-view of the mechanism shown in Fig. 10,

Fig. 12 is an elevation of a further modification of the circuit interrupter,

Fig. 13 shows a plan-view of Fig. 12.

In Fig. 1, l designates a mantle tube of suit In Germany April 18, 1934 steel which is closed at its upper end by a polepiece I3 having a peripheral flange overlying the end face of the tube l5 and is closed at its lower end by a pole-piece I2 each pole-piece having an axial boring. The parts l2 and I3 consist of soft steel too and are firmly united with the tube l5. For this purpose, they may be threaded and screwed into the tube 15. An annular member 14 preferably of a laminated structure comprising a plurality of sheet-steel rings of a thickness of about one-sixteenth of an inch riveted together is loosely inserted in the tube l5 intermediate the ends thereof.

As shown in Fig. 6, the laminated annular member 14 is preferably provided with a plurality of radial slots, the object of which will be explained later. The pole-pieces I2 and 13 which are preferably likewise provided with radial slots or recesses, as shown in Fig. 5, support a coaxially arranged tube I6 of smaller diameter which is fitted on cylindrical projections of the polepieces. This tube may consist of a suitable insulating material of high mechanical strength such as Bakelized paper or fabric, or it may consist of a diamagnetic metal, such as bronze. In the latter case, the tube [6 is provided with two longitudinal slots separated from each other and from the end faces of the tube by bridgepieces Ilia. These slots will reduce eddy-currents. The tube I6 extends through and engages the inner periphery of the annular member l4.

Within the tube I 6, a reciprocatory armature plunger H is guided which also consists of soft steel and has an axial boring at its lower end, in which a member I I of hardened steel is firmly fitted which is adapted to impart percussive blows to a shank 24 of an interchangeable tool, such as a chisel, a riveting stock or the like. The sh-ank 24 is slidably guided in the axial boring of the member l2 and has a collar normally bearing against the lower end face thereof. A helical spring 24' keeps the shank 24 resiliently in its normal position and prevents the shank from being thrown out of the boring of the member I2. The spring 24' is screwed on threads provided on a lower cylindrical projection of the member I 2 and its lower end of smaller diameter engages below the collar of the shank 24.

The frame elements l2, l3, l4 and I5 and the armature plunger ll guided therein constitute two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits of two

coils

25 and 26, the plunger ll acting as a reciprocatory armature and the ring I4 being alternately effective in one or the other of the twofiux circuits. The function of the peculiar form of the inner projections of the pole-pieces I2 and I3 and of the associated ends of the plunger II will be explained later. The

coils

25, 26 which are alternately energized cause the plunger to be reciprocated. At the end of its downward stroke, the plunger strikes the tool shank 24. The upward movement of the plunger is limited by a rod I1 which is screwed or pressed into an upper cylindrical projection 64 of the plunger and projects into a tube-shaped cap I9 provided with a cover-wall forming a stop for the rod H. The cap I 9 is guided for ready axial movement within a housing 2| provided with a cover plate 22 and enclosing a helical buffer spring 20. The upper end of this spring bears against the cover plate 22 and the lower end against a collar of the cap I9, whereby the cap is resiliently held in the normal position shown in Fig. 1.

The cap I9 is preferably made of a high-grade steel, such as chromium-nickel steel, whereas the rod I1 consists preferably of a diamagnetic material of high mechanical strength, such as diamagnetic nickel-steel, beryllium bronze or the like in order to improve the magnetic properties of the device.

The upper end of the rod I1 is reduced and threaded and provided with two annular nuts I8 and I8" which serve to slidably guide the upper end of the rod in the cap I9 with little play and to operate the contact mechanism which will be described later. The spring-housing 2| of which a plan view is shown in Fig. 7 has two vertical borings through which the upper reduced ends of bolts 23 pass for attachment of the spring housing to a casting 44, as shown in Fig. 3, the housing being held in position on the bolts by nuts I 23. The bolts 23 are screwed into the flange of the member l3 and are provided with outer nuts 23' bearing on the top of the casting 44.

This casting 44 has a tubular lower end engaging over the upper end of the tube I and having an inner collar bearing upon the member l3. Hence, the bolts 23 and the nuts I23 and 23 will firmly unite the tube I5, the cover plate I3, the housing 2| and the casting 44, The upper end of the casting 44 is formed as a handle. To reduce its weight, it is preferably made of light metal.

The

magnet coils

25 and 26 are wound of insulated copper wire or aluminum wire and are impregnated with varnish or another suitable compound and are baked in an oven, whereby the coils will be given the required rigidity which must be comparatively high because of the strong percussions acting on them in operation. Preferably, the coils are directly wound on the tube I6. If this tube is made of metal, an insulating layer 21' must be interposed, and discs 21 of insulating material are provided for supporting the coils on the interposed annular member I4 and on the pole-pieces I2 and I3. After the baking operation, the tube I6 and the coils, the annular member I4 and the insulating discs will constitute a rigid body which is preferably inserted in the tube l5 from below and is firmly clamped in position therein by the member I 2 inserted into the lower end of tube I5.

Having now described the organization of the mechanical and magnetical elements of the device, I shall now proceed to explain the circuit controlling means.

The intermittent energization and de-energization of the coils is ffected by two pairs of contacts, one

pair

28, 28 being coordinated to coil 25 and one

pair

29, 29 being coordinated to coil 26, compare Fig. 22. Preferably, each contact consists of a member of steel on which a thin plate of tungsten is welded. One of the contacts 28 which is not shown and the contact 29 are rigidly attached one above the other by welding, riveting or screwing in an angular bracket 30 of brass, bronze or steel which is firmly attached to the flange of member I3 by suitable bolts. The counter-contacts 28 and 29 are attached. to spring-leaves 3| and 32 respectively, which consist of steel or bronze and are suitably clamped by bolts between a second bracket 36 (Fig. 2) and a counterplate 31, insulating plates being interposed between the spring-leaves 3|, 32 and the

elements

36, 31. The bracket 36 is attached to the flange of member l3 by bolts.

In order to conduct the current to and from the contacts, two terminal members 38 of copper or brass are clamped in position below the counterplate 31, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3. The contact springs 3| and 32 are so bent near their points of attachment to the bracket 36 that they tend to normally press the

counter contacts

28 or 29 firmly against the contacts 28 or 29', whereby the pairs of contacts will be given the tendency to resiliently stay in and return to closed position.

Cams 33 of bronze or steel are riveted to the springs 3| and 32 as shown in Fig. 3. These cams cooperate with a sliding member 34 of insulating material of high mechanical strength such as Bakelized fabric which is slidably guided on the vertical arm of bracket 30 and is attached to a lateral lug of a sleeve 35 slidably mounted on the rod I1. The sliding member 34 is so shaped that it may alternately ride on the twocams 33 and thereby open one or the other of the two pairs of contacts, whereas both contacts are temporarily closed when the sliding member 34 passes through its intermediate position.

The sleeve 35 which may be bent of steel sheetmetal or may consist of a short piece of tube, may be alternately engaged by a shoulder 59 of the rod I1 and by the nut I8. Its length is so limited with regard to the distance of the shoulder from the nut that the sleeve 35 is positively carried along a short distance by the plunger only, whenever the same approaches the ends of its strokes, and may then freely continue its movements under its inertia a little farther, whereby a rebound incident to the arrival of the sleeve 35 in its end positions will be avoided.

For putting the tool in and out of operation, I have provided a switch comprising two springleaves 42 carrying contacts 42 riveted thereto. The spring-leaves are bolted to the housing 2|, suitable insulating plates 43 being interposed. The end of the longer spring leaf carries an insulating piece 42" which engages a lug of a finger piece 45 which is pivoted to the casting 44 and extends outwardly through a slot provided therein. Pressure exerted on the finger piece by the operators thumb will close the

contacts

42, 42.

Current is supplied to the tool from a suitable source by a flexible cable 46 containing four conductors, two of which serve to conduct the operating current, while two additional conductors of smaller cross-section connect the device with condensers 39 and 48 which are diagrammatically shown in Fig. 1 and will be described later; The cable 46 is attached to the casting 44 by a suitable clamping member 41.

In Fig. 1, I have diagrammatically shown the circuit connections of the coils, the contacts and the cable.

The positive terminal of a suitable source 4| of direct current which may be a generator or a battery, is connected by a lead 60 with the switch 42 from which the lead 60 extends to the terminals of the coils and 26. The coils are so connected up as to energize their magnetic circuits in opposite directions, that is to say, the flux of coil 25 passes upwardly relative to the plunger l I, whereas the flux of coil 26 passes downwardly. Owing to this arrangement, any residual magnetism which otherwise might remain in the steel parts of the device after the reversal of the circuits will be eliminated whereby the plunger I l is prevented from sticking magnetically in one of its end positions. 1

The ends of the coils are connected with the terminals 38 by leads 62, 63, as illustrated in Fig. 2, the coil 25 being connected to the contact spring 3| and the coil 26 to the contact spring 32 and thereby to the

contacts

28 and 29 respectively. The countercontacts are alternately connected through the bracket 30 with the structure of the device comprising the casting 44 and the tube l5, wherefrom a conductor 6! leads to the negative terminal of the source 4| of current. To reduce the sparking of the contacts, quenching

condensers

39 or 40 respectively, are arranged in shunt to the pairs of contacts. The condenser 40 has a substantially larger capacity than the condenser 39 for a reason which will be explained later.

The operation of the tool is as follows: When the sliding member 34 assumes the position shown in Figs. 1 and 3 and when the operator closes the contacts 42' by depressing the finger piece 45, the currentflows by way of the pair of contacts 29, 29' through the coil 26 only, whereas the coil 25 is not energized. Consequently, a flux is produced which will drive plunger l'l upwardly with increasing velocity until the upper end of rod l'l abuts against the end face of the cap I9. Shortly before the arrival of the plunger in its upper end position the sleeve 35 is engaged by the shoulder 59 and carried along upwardly together with the sliding member 34, whereby the sliding member 34 first permits the pair of

contacts

28, 28 to contact with each other and shortly afterwards opens the pair of contacts 29, 29'. For a short period both contacts are closed at the same time, whereby both coils will be energized simultaneously. Immediately after the contacts 29, 29' have been opened, the plunger II is resiliently arrested by the spring 29 which will reverse the motion and accelerate the plunger in downward direction.

Because of this fact, the plunger will immediately attain a considerable initial velocity on its downward effective stroke, this initial velocity corresponding to the energy mechanically imparted to the plunger by the spring 20. The energization of coil 25 whose circuit is closed shortly prior to the reversal of motion further increases the speed of the plunger II on its effective stroke until the plunger strikes the shank 24 of the tool and transmits thereto all or nearly all of its momentum as the effective power output, the proportion of the momentum so transmitted depending on the particular conditions of operation of the tool, for instance on the material worked upon. On the downward stroke of the plunger, the nut IE will engage the sleeve 35 and carry the same along downwardly, whereby the sliding member 34 will so control the contacts as todeenergize coil 25 and as to energize.

coil 26, thereby causing a reversal of motion, and the cycle of operation above described will be repeated.

The rod l'l may be considered part of the armature as far as its mechanical cooperation with the buffer spring 20 is concerned, and could be made integral with the armature, if desired. The cap I9, on the other hand, may be regarded as a part of the bufier spring. briefly refer in the claims to the cooperation between the armature and the buffer spring by stating that the buffer spring is arranged to be struck by the armature.

The fact that the downward or striking stroke of the plunger takes place at a higher velocity than the upward or return stroke because of the initial speed imparted to the plunger by the buffer spring 20, and, therefore, takes place within a substantially shorter period of time, is of controlling importance for my invention, as will appear later. As the plunger itself positively controls the operation of the interrupter, the period of energization of the striking coil 25 is substantially shorter than that of the returning coil 26.

The broad principle of operation of the device and the combination of its elements were known prior to my invention except for certain features to be described later. I have been able for the first time to avoid excessive heating of the device upon continued operation by so constructing, dimensioning and mutually arranging the elements of the device that the efficiency is considerably increased by a reduction of the losses, particularly the ohmic losses, in relation to the electric energy consumed. Furthermore, my invention results in a considerable increase of the effective energy of the percussion produced in relation to the weight of the device.

As a result of an extended investigation of the theory underlying the function of the device and of extended tests, I have found that the ohmic losses may be reduced to quite satisfactory limits by providing for a definite relationship between the mechanical motion of the armature plunger II and the timed variable energization of the magnet coils. More particular- 1y, I have found that this relationship may be defined with satisfactory exactness by the ratio of the electric time constant of each magnet coil (computed for the position of the armature at the beginning of its stroke produced by this coil) divided by the period of energization of the coil. This ratio will be termed the time constant ratio hereinafter. The period of energization depends on the number of reciprocations per time unitdue consideration to be givento the properties and timed operation of the interrupterand is substantially shorter for the striking coil 25 than for the returning coil 26, as above explained. I have found that the percentage of the ohmic losses Will become smaller the larger the time constant ratio is.

Therefore, according to my invention the electrical and mechanical elements of a reciprocatory tool of the percussion type are so dimensioned and organized that the time constant ratio of each coil will exceed the amount of .5 and will preferably vary between the limits of .7 and 1.0. As a rule, a further increase of this ratio beyond 1.0 would result in a design requiring excessive cost of manufacture and would not materially improve the efficiency.

My invention is based on the following phenomena: When the circuit of a coil constant in.-

Therefore, I shall ductivity is closed, the current will gradually rise to a maximum limit according to an exponential function of the time and will finally reach such limit determined by the voltage and the resistance. The rate at which the current increases depends on the time constant of the coil. In any instant during the initial energization of the coil, the relative ohmic loss computed as a fraction of the final maximum input of the coil is proportional to the square of the current computed as a fraction of the final maximum current. Hence, the specific ohmic loss at any instant computed as a percentage of the instantaneous input (which percentage determines the degree of efficiency) is directly proportional to the ratio of the instantaneous current to the final maximum current. Therefore, I endeavor to keep the instantaneous current as low as possible compared with the final value it would reach upon a continued energization of the coil. The same theory applies to a coil having a variable inductivity such as is the case with the coil of a reciprocatory tool because of the variation of its inductivity by the motion of the armature. If the motion of the armature is sufliciently rapid compared with the rate of the current increase, the current will never attain its theoretical final limit but will reach a certain maximum less than the final limit and will then drop because of the rapid increase in inductance consequent to the acceleration of the plunger until finally the coil will be de-energized.

By properly controlling these conditions in accordance with the above rule regarding the magnitude of the time constant ratio, it has been possible to reduce the relative ohmic losses to a degree permitting of a continuous operation of an electric hammer of considerable power.

The above rule is a result of extremely difficult and complicated theoretical investigations dealing with the timed development of the current and of the transformation of energy in the coils of tools of the reciprocatory armature type.

How the above-stated lower limits of the time constant ratio for both magnet coils can be attained will be evident for anyone skilled in the art, as the formulae for computing this ratio directly indicate the steps to be taken for increasing the ratio above the limit .5 or preferably above a limit between .7 and 1.0.

The attainment of this ratio will be considerably facilitated, however, by certain special measures which will be explained hereinafter.

The magnitude of the electric time constant of a coil at the beginning of the stroke to be produced thereby is proportional to the product. Square of the number of turns or windings multiplied with the permeance of the magnetic circuit interlinked with the coil (the flux being computed for the initial position of the armature) and further multiplied with the electric conductance of the coil. The magnetic permeance and the electric conductance are proportional to the ratio of the cross-section to the length of the circuit. Therefore, the time constant ratio may be increased by the following measures:

(1) Increase of the number of turns and of the cross-section of the conductor. This measure, however, is apt to result in large dimensions with a consequent prohibitive cost of manufacture and weight of the tool and, therefore, is applicable with narrow limits only.

('2) Increase of the permeance by a reduction of the length of the stroke and by increasing the diameter and by a suitable design of the ends faces of the armature II in the initial position of the latter. Preferably, the opposed faces are given a conical or a stepped cylindrical form, the end of the armature extending into the associated pole-piece or vice versa.

Various arrangements of this kind are shown in Figs. 1 and 8.

In the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 1, the lower end of the pole-piece I3 is provided with a cylindrical recess, into which the cylindrical projection 64 of the armature plunger Il may enter when approaching the upper end of its stroke. Similarly, the shank 24 of the tool which leads the flux passing through member l2 projects a certain distance into a cylindrical lower recess 65 of th armature plunger II. This arrangement reduces the'reluctance produced by the air gap.

As pointed out hereinabove, the period of energization of the striking coil 25 is substantially shorter than that of the returning coil 26. Because of this fact, I prefer under certain circumstances, particularly for tools of higher power, to dimension both coils and/or the permeance thereof difierently. Preferably, the permeance of the magnetic circuit interlinked with the returning coil i made larger than that of the striking coil. This will considerably aid in attaining a high time constant ratio of the returning coil.

In Fig. 9, I have illustrated a structure in which the initial permeance of the magnetic circuit of the returning coil is greater than that of the striking coil. The scale in which Fig. 9 is drawn is the same as that of Figs. 1 and 8, and the same reference numerals are applied to corresponding parts. It will be noted, however, that the cooperating faces of the pole-piece 2I3 and the armature plunger 2 are conical, whereas the cooperating faces of the pole-piece H2 and the armature plunger 2 are plane. Owing to this arrangement, the permeance of the magnetic circuit of the upper or returning coil 26 is larger than that of the lower or striking coil 25. If desired, the conical profile of the elements H3 and 2| I may be replaced by a stepped profile as shown in Fig. 8.

(3) Increase of the frequency of oscillation of the armature by reducing the mass of the armature plunger without, however, reducing the cross-section thereof. The reduction of the mass need not impair the effective power of the tool, as the reduction in mass is compensated for by the incident increase of the velocity of the armature plunger.

The second object of my invention-increase of thespecific percussive p0Weris attained by differently proportioning the magnet coils. This i an important feature of my invention. Preferably, the striking coil 25 is given a number of turns which is about half of that of the returning coil 26, and the cross-section of the wire of the striking coil 25 is about twice that of the wire of the returning coil. Owing to this arrangement, the ohmic resistance of the striking coil 25 is but a fraction of the resistance of the returning coil. As the ohmic resistance of each coil circuit includes the resistance of the leads, the contacts etc., the ratio of the ohmic resistances of both circuits may be in the approximate order of from one-half to one-sixth depending on the particular requirements of the tool under consideration. I have found that in most instances, the ratio to be preferred is about onefourth. A consequence of the different dimensions of the coils is that the striking coil will take up a substantially larger electric energy than the returning coil, whereby the difference between the periods of energization is compensated for. In spite of the substantially shorter period of energization, the striking coil may produce the same or even a larger percussive power per stroke thanthe returning coil, and the unavoidable production of heat by both coils in operation will be substantially alike. Therefore, the number of turns and the wire cross-sections of both coils may be so proportioned that with a given voltage the current taken up by both coils will reach the maximum limit which is permissi ble with regard to a rise of temperature in operation. It will be appreciated that the theoretical maximum of working power will be thus attained with a tool of given size.

As a part of the mechanical energy imparted to the plunger by the returning coil i dissipated when the motion of the plunger is reversed by the buffer spring 20 owing to imperfect elasticity thereof and to mechanical friction, I prefer to increase the energy imparted to the plunger by the striking coil in proportion to that imparted by the returning coil. To this end, I make the space accommodating the striking coil larger than that accommodating the returning coil, for instance in the manner indicated in Figs. 8 and 9, in which the annular member I4 is arranged at a slightly smaller distance from the upper pole-piece than from the lower pole-piece. This has the further advantage of a reduction of the rebound of the plunger in its upper position and of the consequent loss of mechanical energy owing toimperfect elasticity of the buffer spring 20 and of mechanical friction.

While each of the above-described novel features of my invention, to wit .a certain minimum limit of the time constant ratio and a difference between the dimensions of the'coils, results in a substantial improvement per se, I prefer to combine both features and thu obtain a tool in which the mechanical energy transferred on the plunger in dependence of the electric energy taken up by the coils is so great and the mass of the armature plunger is so selected that the consequent frequency of oscillation will result in the desired magnitude of the time constant ratio.

While I prefer that each of the two coils should have a time constant ratio exceeding the afore-' stated limits, it is evident that a considerable improvement will result even if the striking coil only should have a time constant ratio of not less than .7, particularly if the returning coil consumes a small share of the total electric energy only.

Further measures for reducing the losses are concerned with the elements conducting the magnetic flux. It is well known in the art that the losses owing to eddy-currents may be reduced by forming the entire flux circuit of a laminated structure. Because of the extraordinary stresses set up in a tool of the percussion type, I recommend, however, to make all those parts at least of compact steel which directly participate in the striking function. In the device shown in Fig. 1, these elements are the armature plunger I l and the pole-pieces l2 and I3. These elements are subject to a variable magnetic flux even if the device is operated with direct current. While this flux will induce a useful counter-electromotive force in the coil energized at any time, it will at the same time produce undesired eddy-currents in the magnetic material. If the magnetic elements would be formed by solid compact parts, these eddy-currents would become so strong as to materially reduce the efficiency. The production of eddy-currents would have the further disadvantage that the energy of the same will have to be supplied by the magnet coils, thus necessitating a larger current consumed and higher ohmic losses. Furthermore, the eddy-currents would partly countermagnetize the magnetic material, whereby the flux in the interior thereof would be considerablyreduced, thus decreasing the permeance. In fact, the production of eddy-currents could practically jeopardize all of the above-explained advantages of my improvements.

In order to reduce the production of eddy-currents to an innocuous degree, I provide those elements conducting the flux, which promote the production of eddy-currents owing to a small circumference and a large cross-section, with suitably positioned slots subdividing the elements, these slots being so positioned that the mechanical strength of the elements with regard to the percussive stresses set up therein will not be materially affected. This is the reason why in Fig. 1 the armature II and the pole-pieces l2 and I3 and the annular member M are provided with radial slots disposed parallel to the axis of the tool.

Fig. 4 illustrates a cross-section of the plunger II. It will be noted that the radial slots 66 extend to a depth of about one-third of the diameter and are substantially coextensive with the plunger in the axial direction thereof. Towards the ends of the plunger, however, the depth of the slots is slightly reduced with. regard to the mechanical strength of the plunger. According to Fig. 2, eight such slots are provided. The

larger the number of theslots is, the more efiective will they be. The radial slots 61 provided in the pole-pieces l2 and I3 extend clear through the pole-piece, as will appear from Fig. 5 showing a plan view of the polepiece 12. The different numerous axially extending fingers formed by the slots 61 are united by a comparatively thin plate or flange integral with the sectors. Preferably, the radial slots 61 extend into the flange or plate to a certain. depth, for instance, half of the thickness of the flange, as shown in Fig. 1, whereby the induction of eddy-currents therein is reduced.

In these flanges and in the annular member [4, the eddy-currents flow in a peripheral direction. For this reason, the annular member I4 is pro- L vided with radial slots 68 too, as shown in Fig. 6,

to increase the electric resistance to eddy-currents. The slots may be provided in the outer periphery of the annular member I4 only, as shown in the upper part of Fig. 6, or the slots may be alternately provided in the outer and in the inner periphery, as shown in the lower part tube I5, as shown in Fig. 1. The air flows through a gap left between the periphery of the coil 25 and the inner surface of the mantle tube l5 and flows through the slots 61 and enters the interior of the tube l5, thus cooling all of these elements.

When the tool is to be used in an atmosphere filled with dust, no holes I should be provided. Nevertheless, the intense circulation of the air agitated by the reciprocatory armature will promote the conveyance of the heat produced in the 1 interior of the coils towards the outer surfaces,

particularly to the mantle tube I5.

To reduce sparking and arcing on the

contacts

28, 28 and 29, 29'

quenching condensers

38 and 40 are provided. The capacity of these condensers is of controlling importance for the development of the electric current upon interruption of the circuits and thus for the efiiciency of the tool and, for this reason, should depend on the characters of the coils. This means that the capacity of the condenser coordinated to the striking coil should be substantially larger, about twice, three times, or four times as large, than that of the condenser coordinated to the returning coil. As very high capacities amounting to several thousand micro/ farads are required when direct current of a low voltage is employed, I prefer to employ electrolytic condensers.

The operation of electromagnetic tools of the percussion type with current of a low voltage ofiers important advantages regarding the reliability in operation. Preferably, the voltage should be less than the arcing voltage of the contact material employed for the

contacts

28, 28 and 29, 29, that is to say, should lie below a limit from 25 to 30 volts. In this event, the risk is eliminated that an are which might form on account of a temporary disturbance in the contact operation, would stay and would destroy the interrupter. If the tool were operated with a current of higher voltage, the formation of an arc would have destructive effects. Furthermore, the use of a low voltage permits a further simplification of the interrupter, as the gap between the contacts need not be larger than one-fourth to 1 mm. Moreover, the insulation may be thin. As to the magnet coils, the low voltage has the advantage that on account of the smaller number of turns and of the greater cross-section of the conductors, the coils will represent a rugged structure which is not liable to be affected by the percussive stresses. The use of a low voltage of operation is not limited to tools of small power. I have found that it ofiers particular advantages if applied to large tools having a power of 1 kilowatt or more.

Although the above explanation of my invention will enable any electrical engineer to so design the electric tool and to so dimension its elements that the beneficial results of my invention will be obtained, suitable dimensions of the specific embodiment shown in Fig. 1 will be given hereinafter by way of example. It is to be clearly understood, however, that my invention is in no way limited to these specific dimensions.

The diameter of the armature plunger may be 32 mm. and its stroke 35 mm. In this event, the striking coil 25 is preferably wound of wire having a cross-section of 3.8 mm. and a diameter of 2.2 mm. The number of its turns is 180. The wire of which the returning coil 26 is wound has a diameter of 1.3 mm. and a cross-section of 1.32 mm. The number of turns is 358. The operating voltage amounts to from 20 to 22 volts. With the interrupter as shown, the tool will have a frequency of percussion amounting to 22 strokes per second, on the average.

A calculation taking in consideration that the circuits of both coils are simultaneously closed for a short period of time and that the striking stroke and the returning stroke require a difierent time, has the following result:

Th period of energization of the striking coil is about .015 second. The period of energization of the returning coil is approximately .036 second. The resistance of the entire circuit of the striking coil is .21 ohm. The magnetic conductivity of the flux at the beginning of the downward stroke is 8.2 cm. The resulting time constant of the striking coil is .016 second. The time constant ratio of the striking coil is 1.06. The resistance of the entire circuit of the returning coil amounts to .89 ohm. The permeance at the beginning of the upward stroke (with rod II consisting of magnetic material) amounts to 12.2 cm. and the resulting time constant of the returning coil computed for the beginning of the upward stroke is .022 second. The time constant ratio of the returning coil is .61. The electric energy consumption of both coils is about 420 watts.

The attainment of a high efiiciency of the tool requires that the closure and the interruption of the circuit of the magnet coils be very accurate. While the accuracy of the interrupter illustrated in Figs. 1, 2 and 3 is quite satisfactory, I have devised improved interrupters of which two modifications are shown in Figs. 10, 11, 12 and 13. These interrupters operate on the principle of the overcentering toggle. In Figs. 10 and 11, the elements corresponding to the embodiment shown in Fig. 1 are designated by the same reference numerals. I have modified the arrangement of the pairs of contacts I28, I28 and I29, I29 and of the spring-leaves I3I and I32 and of the terminals I38, while the function of these elements is the same as that of the corresponding elements in Fig. 1. It will be noted that the contacts I28 and I29 are mounted on a common spring-leaf I48 which may be bent upwardly or downwardly to interrupt and close the circuits alternately. The spring-leaves I3I and I 32 mounted above and below the spring-leaf I48 may be reinforced by auxiliary leaves I3I' and I32. All of the spring-leaves and the terminals I38 are mounted on the flange of the pole-piece I3 and are bolted thereto by insulated bolts I50, suitable insulating pieces I48 being interposed. A short link I5I has one end hinged to the free end of the middle spring-leaf I 48 and the other end pivotally mounted in a rigid bracket I52 attached to the pole-piece. In the embodiment shown in Fig. 10, link I5I is formed by a helical spring which is so biased as to exert pressure on the free end of the spring I48. For the reduction of wear of the hinges or pivot points, small bushings I53 of bronze may be provided which are freely rotatable on pins I54 inserted in the free ends of the spring I48 and of the bracket I52 and are engaged by the ends of the link I5I as shown in Fig. 11.

In the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 10a, the link 25I corresponding to the link I5I of Fig. 10, is rigid while the bracket 252 is made of springmaterial, for instance of a thin steel ribbon. The link I5I or 25I and the spring-lead I48 form an overcentering toggle tending under the pressure exerted by the link I 5| or by the bracket 252 to assume thecollapsed upper or lower position in which the spring I48 is deflected upwardly or downwardly, thus closing one or the other of the pairs of contacts. The alternate closure and interruption of the circuits. of the magnet coils is directlyeffected by the armature.

To this end, the shoulder 59 and the nut I8. act on the spring-leaf I48 in upward or downward direction through the intermediary of interposed helical springs I55 and I55. Owing to the provision of the springs, a percussive efiect on the spring-leaf I48 is avoided. The springleaves I3I and I32 are provided with large openings aifording a free passage to the rod I1 and the helical springs I55 and I55, whereas the opening provided in the spring-leaf I48 for the passage of the rod I1 is so small that the springs I55 and I55 may abut against the spring-leaf I48.

The modification illustrated in Figs. 12 and 13 is similar to that of Figs. 10 and 11 differing therefrom by the provision of a single comparatively thin spring-leaf 348 acting as a toggle. Both ends of this spring-leaf are firmly clamped between insulating elements 349 and 56 attached to the pole-piece I3 by bolts 359 and 51 in such a way that thespacing of these clamping elements is slightly smaller than the free length of the interposed spring-leaf 348. Therefore, the spring-leaf is slightly biased and tends to assume an upper or a lower position in which it is bent.

leaves 348 and 348" are provided with openings for the free passage of the rod II. It is evident that the alternate engagement of one or the other of the spring-leaves 348" by the shoulder 59 or the nut 3I8 causes the spring-leaf 348 to jump into its other resting positon. The springleaf 348 carries the two contacts I28 and I29 which cooperate with the counter-contacts I28 and I29 mounted on spring-

leaves

331 and 332. As described with reference to Fig. 10, the various spring-leaves and the associated terminals 338 are rigidly mounted on the pole-piece l3 by means of interposed insulatingplates 349 and of the insulated bolts 350.

If the right-hand end of the leaf 348 clamped between the insulating blocks 56 were cut ofi, the rod I! would still actuate the contacts but, in this event, there would be no snap action. From this consideration, it will become apparent that the spring-leaf 3 may be regarded as composed of two sections, one constituting the contact carrier supported between the insulating blocks 349 for operation by the reciprocating rod I1 and the other section clamped between the insulating block 55 constituting over-centering means.

There-fore, the overcentering means is integral I tools of any kind which are operated by direct current on the self-control principle.

The expression volume, when used in the description of the two coils, means the product of the conductor cross-section multiplied by the number of windings.

Although I have described my invention with reference to certain species, I wish it to be clearly understood that numerous modifications may be made without departing from the spirit of my invention.

What I claim is: v

1. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type, comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, two coils each associated with one of said circuits to induce a flux therein, a source of current, and an interrupter interposed between said coils and said source of current and adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately close and interrupt the electric circuits of said coils, whereby said armature will be reciprocated by the alternate effect of the fluxes in said magnetic circuits, the interrupter, the number and crosssection of the turns of said coils and the mass,

cross-section and stroke of the armature and of said frame elements being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a ratio of the electric time constant of each coil which, when computed for the position assumed by the armature before the stroke thereof produced by said coil, divided by the period of energization of said coil is not less than .5.

2. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type,

comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, two coils each associated with one of said circuits to induce a flux therein, a source of current, and an interrupter interposed between said coils and said source of current and adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately close and interrupt the electric circuits of said coils, whereby said armature will be reciprocated by the alternate effect of the fluxes in said magnetic circuits, theinterrupter, the number and crosssection of the turns of said coils and the mass, cross-section and stroke of the armature and of said frame elements being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a ratio of the electric time constant of at least one of the coils which, when computed for the position assumed by the armature before the stroke thereof produced by said coil, divided by the period of energization of said coil is not less than .7.

3. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, resilient buffer means and a tool-shank arranged on opposite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returning coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer means, a striking coil having a smaller number of turns than said returning coil and being associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool shank, a source of current, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, the resistance of the entire electric circult of said returning coil being from three to six times as large as the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said striking coil.

4. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, a buffer spring and a tool shank arranged on opposite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returning coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer spring, a striking coil having a smaller number of turns than said returning coil and being associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool shank, a source of current and an interrupter interposed between said source of current and said coils and adapted to be operated by said armature, the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said returning coil being from three to six times as large as the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said striking coil, the interrupter, the cross-section and stroke of said armature and of said frame elements and the number and crosssection of the turns of said coils being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a ratio of the electric time constant of said striking coil which, when computed for the end position of the armature abutting against said buffer spring, divided by the period of energization of said striking coil exceeds the amount of .7.

5. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein, two coils of different dimensions arranged to produce alternate fluxes causing said armature to reciprocate, a source of current, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, the aforestated elements being so dimensioned that the consequent frequency of oscillation of said armature will result in a time constant ratio of each coil exceeding .5.

6. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising a mantle-tube of magnetic material, pole-pieces inserted in the ends of said tube and having inward projections, an annular pole member inserted in said mantle tube between the ends thereof, an inner tube of diamagnetic materials carried by said projections and extending through said pole member, an armature guided for reciprocation between said projections within said inner tube, two coils mounted between said tubes on either side of said annular pole member, each adapted to induce a magnetic flux through one half of said mantle-tube, through the pole-piece coordinated therewith, through said armature and through the annular pole member, a source of current, and an interrupter interposed between said source of current and said coils and adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately close and interrupt the electric circuits of said coils, whereby said armature will be reciprocated by the alternate effect of the fluxes produced by said coils, the aforestated elements being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a time constant ratio of each of said coils exceeding the amount of .5.

7. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising a mantle-tube of magnetic material, pole-pieces inserted in the ends of said tube and having inward projections, an annular pole-member inserted in said mantle-tube between the ends thereof, an inner tube of diamagnetic material carried by said projections and extending through said annular pole member, an armature guided for reciprocation between said projections within said inner tube, a buffer spring and a tool shank arranged near the opposite ends of said mantle tube to be struck by said armature, a returning coil mounted between said tubes adjacent to said buffer spring, a striking coil having a smaller number of turns and a larger conductor cross section than said returning coil and being mounted between said tubes adjacent to said tool shank, a source of current and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said returning coil being from three to six times as large as the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said striking coil.

8. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising a mantle-tube of magnetic material, pole-pieces inserted in the ends of said tube and having inward projections, an annular polemember inserted in said mantle-tube between the ends thereof, an inner tube of diamagnetic material carried by said projections and extending through said annular pole member, an armature guided for reciprocation between said projections within said inner tube, a buffer spring and a tool shank arranged near the opposite ends of said mantle-tube to be struck by said armature, a returning coil mounted between said tubes adjacent to said buffer spring, a striking coil having a smaller number of turns than said returning coil and being mounted between said tubes adjacent to said tool shank, a source of current, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said returning coil being from three to six times as large as the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said striking coil, the interrupter, the cross-.

section and stroke of said armature and the dimensions of said mantle-tube and said pole elements and the number and cross-section of the turns of said coils being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a ratio of the electric time constant of said striking coil which, when computed for the end position of the armature abutting against said buifer spring, divided by the period of energization of said striking coil exceeds the amount of .7,

9. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, resilient buffer means and a tool shank arranged on opposite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returning coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer means, a striking coil having a smaller number of turns than said returning coil and being associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool shank, a source of current, an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, and two quenching condensers each coordinated to one of said coils, the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said returning coil being from three to six times as large as the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said striking coil, and the capacity of the condenser coordinated to the striking coil being from two to four times as large as the capacity of the condenser coordinated to the returning coil.

10. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits of different length, resilient buffer means and a tool shank arranged on opposite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returne ing coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer means, a striking coil having a smaller number of turns than said returning coil and being associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool shank, a source of current, an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, and two electrolytic condensers each coordinated to one of said coils and arranged in-shunt with the contacts of said interrupter, the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said returning coil being from three to six times as large as the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said striking coil, and the capacity of the electrolytic condenser coordinated to the striking coil being from two to four times as large as the capacity of the electrolytic condenser coordinated to the returning coil.

11. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein, two coils arranged to produce alternate fluxes causing said armature to reciprocate, a source of current, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, said interrupter consisting of two pairs of contacts, each pair comprising one contact mounted on said frame elements and one contact mounted on a spring-leaf common to both of said pairs and adapted to be deflected by said armature in alternate directions, and overcentering means associated with said spring-leaf, the afore-stated elements being so dimensioned that the consequent frequency of oscillation of said armature will result in a time constant ratio of each coil exceeding .5.

12. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein, two coils arranged to produce alternate fluxes causing said armature to reciprocate, a source of current, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, said interrupter including a contact-carrying spring-leaf, springs interposed between said spring-leaf and opposed abutting faces of said armature, and over-centering means associated with said spring-leaf, the aforestated elements being so dimensioned that the consequent frequency of oscillation of said armature will result in a time constant ratio of each coil exceeding .5.

l3. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein, two coils arranged to produce alternate fluxes causing said armature to reciprocate, a source of current, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, said interrupter including a contact-carrying spring-leaf, means for holding the ends of said leaf in fixed relationship to said frame elements at a distance smaller than the length of said leaf, whereby the springleaf will bulge downwardly or upwardly, and resilient means cooperating with the armature and adapted, owing to the reoiprocatory movement of the same, to alternately cause said springleaf to jump to one or the other of its bulged positions, the afore-stated elements being so dimensioned that the consequent frequency of oscillation of said armature will result in a time constant ratio of each coil exceeding .5.

14. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type, comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits,

two coils each associated with one of said circuits to induce a flux therein, a source of direct current having a voltage below a limit of 25 to 30 volts, and an interrupter interposed between said coils and said source of current and adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately close and interrupt the electric circuits of said coils, whereby said armature will be reciprocated by the alternate effect of the fluxes in said magnetic circuits, the interrupter, the number and cross-section of the turns of said coils and the mass, cross-section and stroke of the armature and of said frame elements being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a ratio of the electric time constant of each coil which, when computed for the position assumed by the armature before the stroke thereof produced by said coil, divided by the period of energization of said coil is not less than .5.

15. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type, comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, two coils each associated with one of said circuits to induce a flux therein, a source of direct current having a voltage below a limit of 25 to 30 volts, and an interrupter interposed between said coils and said source of current and adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately close and interrupt the electric circuits of said coils, whereby said armature will be reciprocated by the alternate elfect of the fluxes in said magnetic circuits, the interrupter, the number and cross-section of the turns of said coils and the mass, cross-section and stroke of the armature and of said frame elements being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a ratio of the electric time constant of at least one of the coils which, when computed for the position assumed by the armature before the stroke thereof produced by said coil, divided by the period of energization of said coil is not less than .7.

l6. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits of different length, resilient buffer means and a tool shank arranged on opposite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returning coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer means, a striking coil having a smaller number of turns than said returning coil and being associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool shank, a source of direct current having a voltage below a limit of 25 to 30 volts, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, the resistance of the entire electric circuit of said returning coil being from type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein, two coils of dif ferent dimensions arranged to produce alternate fluxes causing said armature to reciprocate, a source of direct current having a voltage below a limit of 25 to 30 volts, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, the afore-stated elements being so dimensioned that the consequent frequency of oscillation of said armature will result in a time constant ratio of each coil exceeding .5.

18. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein, two coils arranged to produce alternate fluxes causing said armature to reciprocate, a source of current, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, said interrupter consisting of two pairs of contacts, each pair comprising one contact mounted on said frame elements and one contact mounted on a spring-leaf common to both of said pairs and adapted to be deflected by said armature in alternate directions, mounting means for said spring-leaf, and overcentering means connected with said mounting means and integral with said spring-leaf, the aforestated elements being so dimensioned that the consequent frequency of oscillation of said armature will result in a time constant ratio of each coil exceeding .5.

l9. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, two coils each associated with one of said circuits to induce a flux therein, the first coil having a larger number of turns and a smaller conductor cross-section than the second coil, the volumes of said coils being equal to one another, a resilient buffer means for said armature arranged adjacent to said first coil, a tool shank adapted to be struck by said armature and arranged adjacent to said second coil, a source of current, and an interrupter adapted to be operated by said armature and to alternately connect said coils to said source of current, the electrical time constant ratio of the second coil, with reference to the initial position of the armature, being not larger than that of the first coil.

20. Electromagnetic tool of the percussion type, comprising frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, two coils each associated with one of said circuits to induce a flux therein, a source of current, means for alternately energizing said two coils whereby said armature will be reciprocated by the alternate effect of the fluxes, the number and cross-section of the turns of said coils and the mass, cross-section and stroke of the armature and of said frame elements being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a ratio of the electric time constant of each coil which, when computed for the position assumed by the armature before the stroke thereof produced by said coil, divided by the period of energization of said coil is not less than .5.

21. In an electromagnetic tool of the percussion type, frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, two coils each associated with one of said circuits to induce a flux therein, a source of current, and means for alternately energizing said two coils whereby said armature will be reciprocated by the alternate effect of the fluxes, the number and cross-section of the turns of said coils and the mass, cross-section and stroke of the armature and of said frame elements being so dimensioned that the consequent electric energy consumption of the coils and the consequent frequency of oscillation of the armature will result in a ratio of the electric time constant of at least one of the coil which, when computed for the position assumed by the armature before the stroke thereof produced by said coil, divided by the period of energization of said coil is not less than .7.

22. In an electromagnetic tool of the percussion type frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein, two coils of different dimensions arranged to produce alternate fluxes causing said armature to reciprocate, a source of current, and means for alternately energizing said two coils, the afore-stated elements being so dimensioned that the consequent frequency of oscillation of said armature will result in a time constant ratio of each coil exceeding .5.

23. In an electromagnetic tool of the percussion type frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, resilient bufier means and a tool-shank arranged on opposite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returning coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer means, a striking coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool-shank, and means for alternately energizing the two coils in accordance with the movements of said armature, the coils being so dimensioned with respect to the impressed voltage that the instantaneous values of the input energy of said striking coil are substantially larger than the corresponding values of the input energy of said returning coil.

24. In an electromagnetic tool of the percussion type frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, resilient buffer means and a tool-shank arranged on op- I posite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returning coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer means, a striking coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool-shank, and means for alternately energizing the two coils in accordance with the movements of said armature, the coils being so dimensioned with respect to the impressed voltage that the power intake of said two coils is substantially equal.

25. In an electromagnetic tool of the percussion type frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, resilient buffer means and a tool-shank arranged on opposite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returning coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer means, a striking coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool-shank, and means for alternately energizing the two coils in accordance with the movements of said armature, the coils being so dimensioned with respect to the impressed voltage that the power intake of the returning coil is not in excess of that of the striking coil.

26. In an electromagnetic tool of the percussion type frame elements and a reciprocatory armature guided therein constituting two substantially closed magnetic flux circuits, resilient bufier means and a tool-shank arranged on opposite sides of said flux circuits to be struck by said armature, a returning coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said buffer means, a striking coil associated with the flux circuit adjacent to said tool-shank, and means for alternately energizing the two coils in accordance with the movements of said armature, the electrical resistance of the two coils depending on the number of turns and on the-conductor crosssection being so differently proportioned relative to the impressed voltages that the square of the voltage impressed on the striking coil divided by the resistance of the latter is materially larger than the square of the voltage impressed on the returning coil divided by the resistance of the latter.

MAX GREINER.