USPP9310P - Strawberry plant `Puget Reliance` - Google Patents
Strawberry plant `Puget Reliance` Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP9310P USPP9310P US08/304,343 US30434394V US9310P US PP9310 P USPP9310 P US PP9310P US 30434394 V US30434394 V US 30434394V US 9310 P US9310 P US 9310P
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- wsu
- sup
- puget
- reliance
- fruit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 244000307700 Fragaria vesca Species 0.000 title 1
- 240000009088 Fragaria x ananassa Species 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 55
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 abstract description 13
- 235000016623 Fragaria vesca Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 8
- 235000011363 Fragaria x ananassa Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 24
- 241000220223 Fragaria Species 0.000 description 19
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 16
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 235000021012 strawberries Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 10
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 8
- 241001124076 Aphididae Species 0.000 description 6
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000499489 Castor canadensis Species 0.000 description 4
- 235000011779 Menyanthes trifoliata Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N citric acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CC(O)(C(O)=O)CC(O)=O KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241001094931 Chaetosiphon fragaefolii Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000254171 Curculionidae Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000532856 Otiorhynchus sulcatus Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000013238 Rhus integrifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 244000262969 Rhus integrifolia Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000005441 aurora Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000005711 Benzoic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241001164374 Calyx Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000461780 Diplocarpon Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001511881 Sciopithes obscurus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010208 anthocyanin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004410 anthocyanin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930002877 anthocyanin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000004636 anthocyanins Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000001678 brown HT Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011692 calcium ascorbate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N formic acid Substances OC=O BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000021022 fresh fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012520 frozen sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004335 litholrubine BK Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002402 nanowire electron scattering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004962 physiological condition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012794 pre-harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/74—Rosaceae, e.g. strawberry, apple, almonds, pear, rose, blackberries or raspberries
- A01H6/7409—Fragaria, i.e. strawberries
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H5/08—Fruits
Definitions
- This invention relates to a new and distinct short day, June bearing variety of strawberry plant named ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ which is a result of a cross of non-patented selections BC 72-2-72 and WSU 1945.
- the variety is botanically identified as F. ⁇ annanassa Duch.
- the cross was made in an attempt to develop a virus tolerant and aphid resistant cultivar.
- ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ was inoculated with a virus complex in the greenhouse prior to planting in the field and evaluated for aphid resistance in 1985 at the Washington State University (WSU) Vancouver Research and Extension Unit.
- the parent, ⁇ WSU 1945 ⁇ was known as an aphid resistant selection.
- the selection was considered aphid resistant.
- later evaluations disclosed that the selection was not aphid resistant but extremely virus tolerant, equal to or exceeding any Pacific Northwest cultivar.
- FIG. 1 shows the typical plant growth and fruiting habit of the new variety.
- FIG. 2 depicts typical leaf and primary, secondary and tertiary fruit of plants in the first fruiting season (right) and second fruiting season (left) and longitudinal and cross-sections of typical fruit.
- FIG. 3 sets forth the genealogy of ⁇ Puget Reliances ⁇ .
- the fruit of the new variety is medium red with good internal color and is not as dark as ⁇ Totem ⁇ (see Table 15).
- ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ was included in a second planting in 1991 and the harvest from that planting in 1992 and 1993 showed it had the highest yield and largest fruit of comparative varieties (see Tables 3 and 4).
- ⁇ Puget Reliances ⁇ outyielded ⁇ Totem ⁇ by 39% in its first harvest season and by 31% in its second season. It outyielded ⁇ Sumas ⁇ by 31% in the first harvest season and by 30% in the second harvest season.
- ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ had fruit which was 36% larger than ⁇ Totem ⁇ in the first season and 57% larger in the second season. Its fruit was 47% larger than ⁇ Sumas ⁇ in the first season and 30% larger in the second season.
- Table 7 is a summary of the 1994 harvest season data. As seen from the table, ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ clearly had superior yield and fruit size compared to other cultivars.
- Plant Large and vigorous, with an erect growth habit. Produces abundant runners.
- Leaves Medium in size.
- Leaf characteristics of ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ are compared to other Pacific Northwest varieties in Table 13.
- the central leaflet of ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ is longer than ⁇ Benton ⁇ or ⁇ Totem ⁇ and the same as ⁇ Sumas ⁇ .
- the width of ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ is the same as ⁇ Benton ⁇ and ⁇ Totem ⁇ and narrower than ⁇ Sumas ⁇ .
- the shape of the central leaflet is much longer and narrower for ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ than for ⁇ Benton ⁇ , ⁇ Sumas ⁇ or ⁇ Totem ⁇ as indicated by greater length/width ratio.
- the number of serrations on the terminal leaflet for ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ were less than for ⁇ Sumas ⁇ but did not differ from ⁇ Benton ⁇ or ⁇ Totem ⁇ .
- ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ had a long petiolule similar in length to ⁇ Sumas ⁇ .
- the petiole length is similar for ⁇ Puget Reliance, ⁇ ⁇ Benton ⁇ and ⁇ Sumas ⁇ but longer than ⁇ Totem ⁇ .
- the leaf color is the same for all four varieties, 5GY 4/4 on the upper surface and 5 GY 5/4 for the lower surface.
- the petiole hairs are irregularly perpendicular to the axis of the petiole.
- Inflorescence characteristics of ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ are compared to other Pacific Northwest varieties in Table 14.
- the common peduncle of ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ is the same as ⁇ Totem ⁇ and shorter than ⁇ Benton ⁇ or ⁇ Sumas ⁇ .
- the length of the pedicel is similar to ⁇ Benton ⁇ , but shorter than ⁇ Sumas ⁇ and longer than ⁇ Totem ⁇ .
- the diameter of the pedicel is similar to ⁇ Benton ⁇ and thicker than ⁇ Sumas ⁇ and ⁇ Totem ⁇ .
- the pedicel hairs are irregularly perpendicular to the axis of the pedicel.
- Fruit characteristics of ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ are compared to Pacific Northwest varieties in Table 15. The primary fruit of all four varieties is approximately 4 cm. The diameter of ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ fruit is larger resulting in a shorter conic fruit. Fruit is usually smooth and symmetrically conic with inserted seeds.
- the exterior fruit color of ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ (5R 3/6) and ⁇ Totem ⁇ (5R 3/6) is slightly darker than ⁇ Benton ⁇ and ⁇ Sumas ⁇ (5R 3/9).
- the fruit color at the apex of a longitudinal slice of both ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ and ⁇ Totem ⁇ is darker than for ⁇ Benton ⁇ and ⁇ Sumas ⁇ .
- the harvest season is the same as ⁇ Totem ⁇ , later than ⁇ Hood ⁇ or ⁇ Sumas ⁇ and earlier than ⁇ Benton ⁇ .
- ⁇ Puget Reliance ⁇ is susceptible to strawberry aphid (Chaetosiphon fragaefolii) an aphid vector of viruses, but is highly tolerant to virus complexes common in Washington. It is susceptible to leaf scorch (Diplocarpon), anthracnose fruit rot (Collectotrichum), and is susceptible to both adult and larva root weevils in a field with both black vine weevil (Otiorhynchus sulcatus) and obscure room weevil (Sciopithes obscurus).
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Plant Substances (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
'Puget Reliance' is large fruited, high yielding, medium red strawberry suited to processing that is very virus tolerant and moderately cold hardy, producing fruit at the same time as 'Totem'.
Description
This invention relates to a new and distinct short day, June bearing variety of strawberry plant named `Puget Reliance` which is a result of a cross of non-patented selections BC 72-2-72 and WSU 1945. The variety is botanically identified as F.×annanassa Duch.
The seedlings resulting from the aforementioned cross were grown asexually by stolen runners in observation plots at WSU Puyallup, Wash. The genealogy of `Puget Reliance` is shown below in FIG. 3.
The cross was made in an attempt to develop a virus tolerant and aphid resistant cultivar. `Puget Reliance` was inoculated with a virus complex in the greenhouse prior to planting in the field and evaluated for aphid resistance in 1985 at the Washington State University (WSU) Vancouver Research and Extension Unit. The parent, `WSU 1945`, was known as an aphid resistant selection. In the first evaluation of `Puget Reliance` the selection was considered aphid resistant. However, later evaluations disclosed that the selection was not aphid resistant but extremely virus tolerant, equal to or exceeding any Pacific Northwest cultivar.
As a sufficient number of plants for replication tests was not available earlier, `Puget Reliance` was not planted until 1989. This planting was harvested in 1990 and 1991 and had the highest two-year yield, the largest fruit and the lowest preharvest fruit rot of comparable varieties as is shown in Tables 1 and 2 below.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
1990 harvest of 1989 planted strawberries at WSU Puyallup.
TOTAL HIGH FRUIT
YIELD PICK ROT
(t/a) (t/a) (%)
______________________________________
`PUGET RELIANCE`
16.6 a 7.0 a 11.9 qr
WSU 2187 14.2 ab 6.9 ab 28.0 d-n
ORUS 965-46 12.4 bc 5.5 a-f 33.6 a-i
BC 76-26-4 12.2 b-d 4.8 a-i 44.1 a
WSU 1980 11.6 b-e 5.5 a-f 21.6 i-r
WSU 2047 11.5 b-e 5.4 a-f 10.9 r
WSU 1998 11.5 b-e 5.9 a-e 37.9 a-e
WSU 1973 11.2 b-f 4.4 c-j 15.9 n-r
SUMAS 11.1 b-f 5.5 a-f 23.3 g-r
WSU 2174 10.9 b-g 4.9 a-h 17.8 k-r
REDCREST 10.7 b-h 5.5 a-f 28.1 d-n
RAINIER 10.3 b-i 4.8 a-i 32.3 a-j
BC 76-26-14 10.3 b-i 5.0 a-g 35.2 a-h
OLYMPUS 10.2 b-j 6.1 a-d 24.2 f-r
WSU 2175 10.1 b-j 4.4 c-k 20.5 i-r
WSU 1987 10.1 b-j 6.3 a-c 30.9 b-k
TOTEM 10.0 b- j 4.0 c-k 17.2 l-r
WSU 2012 9.9 b-j 5.1 a-g 30.4 c-l
BC 84-16-10 9.9 b-k 5.0 a-g 30.6 c-l
BC 35-14-4 9.6 c-k 4.7 b-i 27.0 d-o
ORUS 980R-185 9.3 c-k 4.8 a-i 39.3 a-d
WSU 2035 8.9 c-k 3.3 f-n 13.3 p-r
WSU 2172 8.9 c-k 3.6 e-m 36.2 a-g
WSU 1971 8.9 c-k 4.6 c-i 18.0 k-r
WSU 2032 3.2 c-l 3.6 e-m 16.1 n-r
BC 84-15-161 8.1 c-l 3.8 d-l 16.5 m-r
HOOD 8.1 c-l 3.4 f-n 27.8 d-n
WSU 1972 8.1 c-l 3.9 d-k 18.8 k-r
WSU 2171 7.8 d-l 4.2 c-k 27.4 d-m
SHUSWAP 7.7 e-l 3.6 e-m 42.5 a-c
SHUKSAN 7.6 e-m 3.6 e-m 24.9 e-q
WSU 2033 7.6 e-m 2.9 g-n 16.3 m-r
WSU 2004 7.5 e-m 3.7 e-m 29.7 c-l
BENTON 7.3 e- m 3.4 f-m 19.8 j-r
WSU 1978 6.8 f-n 4.4 c-k 18.3 k-q
WSU 2041 6.6 g-n 3.4 f-n 22.6 h-r
WSU 2176 6.3 h-n 2.5 i-n 20.5 i-r
BC 84-2-3 6.0 i-n 2.6 h-n 43.1 ab
WSU 2180 5.9 i-n 2.5 i-n 37.4 a-f
WSU 2173 5.8 j-n 2.7 h-n 22.0 h-q
WSU 2044 5.7 j-n 2.5 i-n 13.6 o-r
WSU 2188 5.4 k-n 2.0 k-n 30.9 b-k
WSU 2177 4.3 l-n 2.2 k-n 36.2 a-g
WSU 2183 4.2 l-n 1.6 l-n 25.8 e-p
WSU 2185 3.3 mn 1.5 m-n 21.3 i-r
WSU 2181 2.7 n 1.2 n 37.1 a-f
MEAN 8.7 4.1 26.0
______________________________________
FRUIT FRUIT MIDPOINT
WEIGHT FIRM- OF
(g) NESS (g) HARVEST
______________________________________
`PUGET RELIANCE`
15.6 a 223 l-n 6/23 g-l
WSU 2187 14.4 ab 245 j-n 6/23 h-l
ORUS 965-46 13.3 a-c 284 e-l 6/24 f-j
BC 76-26-4 14.2 ab 272 g-m 6/26 b-f
WSU 1980 7.3 n-p 284 e-k 6/23 i-m
WSU 2047 8.2 i-p 257 h-m 6/24 g-k
WSU 1998 13.0 a-d 235 j-n 6/21 l-o
WSU 1973 11.8 b-f 258 h-m 6/23 h-i
SUMAS 10.3 c-j 252 i-n 6/20 m-p
WSU 2174 11.2 c-h 340 b-e 6/24 e-j
REDCREST 10.3 d-l 362 c-d 6/27 b-e
RAINIER 10.8 c-k 238 j-n 6/24 f-j
BC 76-26-14 11.8 b-f 316 d-h 6/27 b-d
OLYMPUS 8.4 g-p 196 n 6/24 e-j
WSU 2175 12.5 b-e 280 f-l 6/25 d-i
WSU 1987 8.7 g-o 223 k-n 6/28 a-c
TOTEM 11.1 c-h 277 g-m 6/23 i-m
WSU 2012 11.0 c-i 390 ab 6/23 g-l
BC 84-16-10 10.8 c-j 264 g-m 6/24 g-k
BC 35-14-4 11.8 b-f 267 g-m 6/28 a-c
ORUS 980R-185 9.1 f-o 239 j-n 6/21 k-n
WSU 2035 7.4 m-p 310 d-i 6/17 q-s
WSU 2172 8.3 h-p 390 ab 6/21 k-n
WSU 1971 5.8 p 224 k-n 6/25 d-h
WSU 2032 8.5 g-p 233 j-n 6/20 n-p
BC 84-15-161 7.5 l-p 425 a 6/29 ab
HOOD 7.3 n-p 259 h-m 6/20 n-p
WSU 1972 10.4 d-l 217 mn 6/21 l-o
WSU 2171 10.8 c-j 239 j-n 6/15 st
SHUSWAP 7.7 l-p 356 b-d 6/25 d-h
SHUKSAN 10.1 d-n 265 g-m 6/22 j-n
WSU 2033 8.9 g-o 250 i-n 6/19 o-q
WSU 2004 13.3 a-c 258 h-m 6/23 g-l
BENTON 7.3 n-p 237 j-n 6/26 c-g
WSU 1978 8.7 g-o 390 ab 6/30 a
WSU 2041 10.9 c-j 321 c-g 6/23 h-l
WSU 2176 9.0 f-o 294 e-j 6/18 pq
BC 84-2-3 7.9 k-p 337 b-f 6/27 b-d
WSU 2180 11.2 c-g 246 j-n 6/17 q-s
WSU 2173 8.0 j- p 274 g-m 6/17 qr
WSU 2044 6.7 op 230 k-n 6/23 g-l
WSU 2188 10.0 e-n 376 a-c 6/16 q-t
WSU 2177 10.2 d-m 284 e-l 6/20 n-p
WSU 2183 8.2 i-p 292 e-j 6/15 r-t
WSU 2185 10.1 d-n 195 n 6/14 t
WSU 2181 8.8 g-o 340 b-e 6/14 t
MEAN 10.0 281 6/22
______________________________________
Means of three replications of 10 foot rows.
Means followed by the same letter are not statistically significant using
Duncan's Multiple Range Test, p = 0.05.
TABLE 2(a)
______________________________________
1990-91 harvest of 1989 planted strawberries, Puyallup,
______________________________________
WA
Yield (t/a)
1990-91
Clone 1991 1990 Total
______________________________________
`PUGET RELIANCE`
13.4 a-b 16.6 30.1
WSU 2187 15.2 a 14.2 29.4
WSU 2047 11.3 a-c 11.5 22.9
SUMAS 10.8 b-d 11.1 21.9
WSU 1980 9.0 c-f 11.6 20.6
ORUS 965-46 8.0 c-g 12.4 20.4
BC 85-14-4 10.8 b-d 9.6 20.4
TOTEM 10.3 b-e 10.0 20.3
BC 76-26-4 7.2 c-g 12.2 19.4
RAINIER 8.9 c-f 10.3 19.3
WSU 1987 9.2 b-f 10.1 19.3
WSU 2174 8.3 c-f 10.9 19.1
WSU 1998 7.2 c-g 11.5 18.6
WSU 2101 5.7 e-g 12.4 18.1
BC 76-26-14 7.4 c-g 10.3 17.6
OLYMPUS 7.2 c-g 10.2 17.4
BC 84-16-10 7.4 c-g 9.9 17.2
REDCREST 6.3 d-g 10.7 17.0
WSU 2172 7.7 c-g 8.9 16.6
BC 84-15-16 7.8 c-g 8.1 15.9
WSU 1971 6.9 c-g 8.9 15.8
WSU 2012 5.9 e- g 9.9 15.8
BENTON 5.7 e-g 7.3 13.1
SHUKSAN 4.7 f-g 7.6 12.3
HOOD 3.5 g 8.1 11.6
AVERAGE 8.2 10.6 18.8
______________________________________
Fruit Fruit Fruit
Rot (%) Weight (g)
Firmness (g)
______________________________________
`PUGET RELIANCE`
16 b-e 11.7 a-b 193 j-k
WSU 2187 25 b-d 12.2 a-b 212 h-k
WSU 2047 11 e 6.8 f-g 231 f-j
SUMAS 18 b-e 9.2 c-f 237 e-j
WSU 1980 22 b-d 6.7 f-g 258 c-g
ORUS 965-46 14 d-e 13.0 a 348 b
BC 85-14-4 19 b-e 10.6 a-d 274 c-f
TOTEM 14 d-e 8.0 d-g 259 c-g
BC 76-26-4 16 c-e 11.5 a-c 281 c-e
RAINIER 27 a-b 9.7 b-e 194 j-k
WSU 1987 16 c-e 9.2 c-g 205 j-k
WSU 2174 16 c-e 8.1 d-g 302 c
WSU 1998 21 b-e 10.2 b-e 200 j-k
WSU 2101 36 a 12.1 a-b 254 d-i
BC 76-26-14 18 b-e 8.0 d-g 257 c-h
OLYMPUS 19 b-e 8.0 d-g 179 k
BC 84-16-10 16 c-e 8.5 d-g 288 c-d
REDCREST 18 b-e 8.3 d-g 296 c-d
WSU 2172 18 b-e 7.8 e-g 283 c-d
BC 84-15-16 14 d-e 8.4 d-g 399 a
WSU 1971 24 b-d 6.6 g 268 c-f
WSU 2012 25 b-d 8.2 d-g 293 c-d
BENTON 14 d-e 8.3 d-g 223 g-k
SHUKSAN 23 b-d 7.6 e-g 210 h-k
HOOD 26 b-c 7.7 e-g 222 g-k
AVERAGE 19 9.1 255
______________________________________
Means are averages of three 10 foot replications.
Means within colunms followed by same letter are not significantly
different using Duncan's Multiple Range Test, P = 0.05.
TABLE 2(b)
______________________________________
Time of 1991 Harvest Season of 1989 Planted
Strawberries, Puyallup, WA.
5% 50% 95% length
Clone harvest harvest harvest
of season
______________________________________
HOOD 6/4 f 6/19 g-h 7/5 i 31 a
WSU 2101 6/6 e-f 6/18 h 6/28 j 22 d
SUMAS 6/9 d-e 6/22 f-g 7/10 d-g
31 a
BC 76-26-4 6/9 d-e 6/22 f-g 7/7 f-i
28 a-c
ORUS 965-46 6/9 d-e 6/23 e-f 7/6 h-i
27 a-d
BENTON 6/13 c-d 6/25 d-f 7/6 g-i
23 c-d
WSU 2187 6/13 b-d 6/25 d-f 7/10 e-h
26 a-d
WSU 1980 6/14 a-c 6/26 d-f 7/10 e-h
25 b-d
TOTEM 6/14 a-c 6/26 d-f 7/11 c-f
26 a-d
WSU 1998 6/15 a-c 6/28 a-d 7/14 a-c
30 a-b
WSU 1971 6/15 a-c 6/28 a-d 7/13 a-e
28 a-c
`PUGET 6/15 a-c 6/26 d-f 7/10 e- h
25 b-d
RELIANCE`
BC 76-26-14 6/15 a-c 6/28 a-d 7/12 a-e
27 a-c
SHUKSAN 6/15 a-c 6/28 a-d 7/16 a 31 a
BC 84-16-10 6/15 a-c 6/28 a-d 7/14 a-d
28 a-c
WSU 2172 6/16 a-c 6/27 b-d 7/9 e-h
24 c-d
OLYMPUS 6/16 a-c 6/26 c-e 7/12 b-e
26 a-d
REDCREST 6/17 a-c 6/28 a-d 7/14 a-d
27 a-d
BC 84-14-4 6/17 a-c 6/30 a-c 7/14 a-c
27 a-c
WSU 2012 6/17 a-c 7/1 a 7/14 a-c
27 a-c
WSU 2047 6/17 a-c 6/28 a-d 7/13 a-e
26 a-d
RAINIER 6/18 a-b 6/28 a-b 7/14 a-d
25 b-d
WSU 2174 6/18 a-b 7/1 a-b 7/16 a 28 a-c
WSU 1987 6/19 a 7/1 a-a 7/15 a-b
26 a-d
BC 84-15-16 6/19 a 7/2 a 7/15 a-b
26 a-d
AVERAGE 6/14 6/26 7/11 27
______________________________________
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 shows the typical plant growth and fruiting habit of the new variety.
FIG. 2 depicts typical leaf and primary, secondary and tertiary fruit of plants in the first fruiting season (right) and second fruiting season (left) and longitudinal and cross-sections of typical fruit.
FIG. 3 sets forth the genealogy of `Puget Reliances`.
The fruit of the new variety is medium red with good internal color and is not as dark as `Totem` (see Table 15). `Puget Reliance` was included in a second planting in 1991 and the harvest from that planting in 1992 and 1993 showed it had the highest yield and largest fruit of comparative varieties (see Tables 3 and 4).
TABLE 3
______________________________________
1992 yield of 1991 planted June-bearing strawberries,
Puyallup, WA
______________________________________
Fruit Fruit
Yield Fruit Weight Firmness
Clone (t/a) Rot (%) (g) (g)
______________________________________
`PUGET 17.6 A 7% D-E 15.1 A 155 C-E
RELIANCE`
WSU 2213 15.1 A 21% A-C 11.6 B-C
182 B-D
WSU 2212 12.5 B 16% B-D 9.8 C-D
183 B-D
TOTEM 12.3 B 8% D-E 11.4 B-C
158 C-E
WSU 2122 12.0 B 32% A 11.1 B-C
129 E
ORUS 4688 10.5 B-C 13% C-E 9.7 C-D
178 B-D
REDCREST 10.5 B-C 13% C-E 9.8 C-D
219 B
SUMAS 10.5 B-C 21% B-C 8.9 D-
191 B-C
ORUS 1083-135
10.3 B-C 28% A-B 9.8 C-D
144 D-E
BC 86-27-1 8.7 C-D 23% A-C 9.5 C-D
176 B-D
MDUS 4740 8.6 * 35% 13.7 204
BC 84-16-10 8.3 * 8% 8.1 219
WSU 2080 8.0 C-D 4% E 9.5 C-D
175 B-D
BC 86-33-2 7.6 C-D 14% C-E 8.4 D 146 D-E
WSU 2210 7.1 D 16% B-D 11.2 B-C
175 B-D
DOUGLAS 6.4 * 15% 9.4 142
CAVENDISH 6.3 * 22% 13.5 193
ANNAPOLIS 5.4 * 7% 12.4 243
PARKER 5.2 * 22% 10.3 325
MDUS 4594 4.8 * 24% 6.5 202
MDUS 5120 4.0 * 22% 10.4 257
WSU 2218 3.7 E 21% A-C 12.6 B 297 A
EARLIGLOW 3.5 * 11% 7.4 241
HONEOYE 3.0 * 23% 12.0 175
WSU 2219 2.8 E 14% C-E 5.7 E 155 C-E
BC 86-23-6 2.6 E 23% A-C 6.4 E 180 B-D
MDUS 4587 2.5 * 2% 6.3 228
MDUS 5149 2.0 * 6% 6.0 185
MDUS 5122 1.6 * 5% 8.8 166
OSO GRANDE 0.6 * 14% 5.8 357
Average 7.1 16% 9.7 199
______________________________________
Harvest Season Length
Clone 5% 50% 95% of Season
______________________________________
`PUGET 5/27 B-C 6/5 A-B 6/15 A-B
20 A-D
RELIANCE`
WSU 2213 5/24 C-E 6/2 B-C 6/14 B 21 A-C
WSU 2212 5/23 D-E 5/31 C-D 6/13 B-C
21 A-C
TOTEM 5/27 B-C 6/5 A-B 6/14 B 18 C-E
WSU 2122 5/24 C-E 6/3 B-C 6/14 B 21 A-C
ORUS 4688 5/31 A 6/6 A 6/16 A-B
16 D-E
REDCREST 5/27 B-C 6/7 A 6/18 A 22 A-B
SUMAS 5/28 B 6/3 B-C 6/13 B-C
16 D-E
ORUS 1083-135
5/22 E 5/30 D 6/11 C-D
20 A-C
BC 86-27-1 5/24 C-E 6/3 B-C 6/13 B-C
20 A-D
MDUS 4740 6/2 6/10 6/23 21
BC 84-16-10 5/25 6/1 6/12 18
WSU 2080 5/27 B-C 6/5 A-B 6/15 B 19 B-E
BC 86-33-2 5/27 B-C 6/5 A-B 6/14 B 18 B-E
WSU 2210 5/22 E 5/30 D 6/10 D 15 E
DOUGLAS 5/21 5/30 6/12 22
CAVENDISH 5/23 5/31 6/13 21
ANNAPOLIS 5/20 5/27 6/5 16
PARKER 5/21 6/1 6/14 24
MDUS 4594 5/26 6/5 6/13 18
MDUS 5120 5/22 5/30 6/13 22
WSU 2218 5/26 B-D 6/2 B-C 6/14 B 19 A-D
EARLIGLOW -- -- 6/9
HONEOYE -- 5/25 6/8
WSU 2219 5/23 E 5/29 D 6/9 D 17 C-E
BC 86-23-6 5/26 B-D 6/2 B-C 6/18 A 23 A
MDUS 4587 -- 5/26 6/8
MDUS 5149 -- 5/28 6/9
MDUS 5122 -- 5/24 6/8
OSO GRANDE -- 5/27 6/13
Average 5/25 6/1 6/12 20
______________________________________
Means followed by letters are averages of three 10 foot plots.
Means not followed by letters are based on a single 10 foot plot.
Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly
different using Duncan's Multiple Range Test, P = 0.05.
TABLE 4
______________________________________
1992-93 harvests of 1991 planted strawberries at Puyallup,
______________________________________
WA.
Yield (t/a) Fruit
1993 1992 total
weight (g)
______________________________________
`PUGET RELIANCE`
10.6 A 17.6 28.2 11.6 A
TOTEM 8.0 A-B 12.3 20.3 6.8 B-C
WSU 2213 4.5 B 15.1 19.7 8.4 B
BOUNTIFUL 8.0 A-B 10.5 18.5 7.1 B-C
ORUS 1083-135 8.1 A-B 10.3 18.4 9.0 B
SUMAS 7.6 A-B 10.5 18.1 8.7 B
WSU 2212 5.2 B 12.5 17.7 6.9 B-C
WSU 2122 5.5 B 12.0 17.4 8.5 B
REDCREST 3.8 B 10.5 14.3 5.4 C
BC 86-33-2 4.2 B 7.6 11.9 6.6 B-C
Average 6.5 11.9 18.5 7.9
______________________________________
Fruit Fruit Midpoint of
firmness (g)
rot (%) harvest
______________________________________
`PUGET RELIANCE`
201 A 55.4 A-C 6/13 B-C
TOTEM 220 A 30.9 D 6/16 A-B
WSU 2213 201 A 42.3 C-D 6/16 A-B
BOUNTIFUL 175 A 33.1 D 6/16 A
ORUS 1083-135 192 A 59.1 A-B 6/10 D-E
SUMAS 218 A 39.2 C-D 6/10 D-E
WSU 2212 183 A 52.3 A-C 6/15 A-C
WSU 2122 183 A 66.4 A 6/9 E
REDCREST 199 A 44.0 B-D 6/14 A-C
BC 86-33-2 174 A 33.6 D 6/13 C-D
Average 195.sup. 45.6 6/13
______________________________________
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different using
Duncan's Multiple Range Test, P = 0.05.
In plantings established at Puyallup and Mt. Vernon, Wash. in 1992 the yields were less than in previous tests. However, they were not significantly different than the highest yielding clones (see Tables 5 and 6).
TABLE 5
______________________________________
1993 harvest of 1992 planted strawberries at Puyallup, WA.
______________________________________
Fruit Fruit
Yield (t/a)
weight (g)
firmness (g)
______________________________________
ORUS 4817 17.3 9.2 236
REDGEM 15.5 9.8 220
HONEOYE 13.6 12.3 231
BC 86-27-1 12.8 A 12.1 C-F 192 F-I
BC 86-33-2 12.7 A-B 13.6 A-C 211 D-I
SUMAS 12.4 A-B 12.1 C-F 227 C-H
BC 86-30-56 12.3 A-B 13.5 A-D 205 F-I
`PUGET RELIANCE`
12.0 16.9 274
`PUGET 11.9 A-C 16.3 A 240 C-G
RELIANCE`-VF
WSU 2006 11.7 A-D 11.0 C-G 176 G-I
WSU 2169 11.5 11.0 283
BC 86-22-33 11.3 A-D 15.4 A-B 228 C-H
BC 84-15-161-D 205 F-I
`PUGET RELIANCE`
12.0 16.9 274
`PUGET 11.9 A-C 16.3 A 240 C-G
RELIANCE`-VF
WSU 2006 11.7 A-D 11.0 C-G 176 G-I
WSU 2169 11.5 11.0 283
BC 86-22-33 11.3 A-D 15.4 A-B 228 C-H
BC 84-15-161 11.1 A-D 10.1 E-H 251 C-G
CAVENDISH 10.8 A-D 15.2 A-B 248 C-G
BC 84-16-10 10.7 A-D 11.9 C-F 199 F-I
RAINIER 9.9 A-E 11.2 C-G 278 B-F
ORUS 1083-135 9.8 A-E 10.0 E-H 229 C-H
TOTEM 9.8 A-E 12.0 C-F 244 C-G
BOUNTIFUL 9.1 A-F 11.8 C-G 144 H-I
BC 85-13-14 8.6 A-G 7.2 H 134 I
WSU 2187 8.4 A-G 12.5 B-E 210 D-I
WSU 2077 8.2 A-G 12.1 C-F 260 B-G
BENTON 8.0 A-H 8.6 G-H 201 F-I
WSU 2244 7.8 A-H 8.9 F-H 248 C-G
REDCREST 7.7 B-H 10.4 D-G 317 B-C
VEESTAR 7.0 9.5 182
BC 86-22-9 7.0 C-H 11.5 C-G 214 D-I
SHUKSAN 6.8 D-H 11.1 C-G 206 E-I
ORUS 4357 6.4 9.9 202
R8607-2 6.0 9.5 253
WSU 2133E 5.7 E-H 12.6 B-E 236 C-G
WSU 2229E 5.6 11.7 155
SENECA 5.5 E-H 12.1 C-F 465 A
HOOD 5.1 E-H 8.7 G-H 266 B-G
WSU 2143E 5.1 E-H 9.1 F-H 195 F-I
TOKLAT 5.0 5.0 137
R8614-2 4.9 7.4 218
WSU 2139E 4.6 F-H 12.5 B-E 302 B-D
NY 1593 4.1 H-I 9.1 F-H 343 B
WSU 2106E 3.9 9.7 271
MD 4589 3.9 8.5 423
R8713-8 3.6 14.5 342
WSU 2140E 3.2 H-I 9.2 F-H 298 B-E
BEAVER BELLE 2.6 9.7 259
R8614-3 1.7 5.5 249
BEAVER SWEET 0.7 -- --
WSU 2086E 0.4 6.5 134
WSU 2089E 0.1 3.6 140 H-I
Average 7.8 10.7 238
______________________________________
Fruit rot (%)
Midpoint of harvest
______________________________________
ORUS 4817 22 6/15
REDGEM 46 6/15
HONEOYE 48 6/5
BC 86-27-1 34 G-J 6/13 D-G
BC 86-33-2 32 H-J 6/11 E-H
SUMAS 36 G-J 6/11 F-I
BC 86-30-56 62 A-E 6/15 B-D
`PUGET RELIANCE`
86 6/8
`PUGET RELIANCE `-VF
53 C-G 6/10 G-I
WSU 2006 31 H-J 6/15 B-D
WSU 2169 61 6/12
BC 86-22-33 49 D-I 6/13 D-G
BC 84-15-161 19 J 6/20 A
CAVENDISH 73 A-B 6/10 H-K
BC 84-16-10 47 D-I 6/14 B-E
RAINIER 72 A-C --
ORUS 1083-135 64 A-D 6/10 H-J
TOTEM 56 B-F 6/12 E-H
BOUNTIFUL 46 D-I 6/16 B
BC 85-13-14 44 E-I 6/16
WSU 2187 47 D-I 6/15 B-D
WSU 2077 68 A-C 6/11 F-I
BENTON 29 I-J 6/16 B-C
WSU 2244 47 D-I 6/7 K
REDCREST 57 A-F 6/13 C-F
VEESTAR 54 6/4
BC 86-22-9 46 D-I 6/8
SHUKSAN 42 F-I 6/14 B-E
ORUS 4357 51 6/13
R8607-2 57 --
WSU 2133E 64 A-D 6/10
WSU 2229E 54 6/17
SENECA 73 A-B 6/7 J-K
HOOD 49 D-H 6/8 I-K
WSU 2143E 62 A-E 6/10 H-K
TOKLAT 83 --
R8614-2 71 6/6
WSU 2139E 68 A-C 6/10
NY 1593 76 A --
WSU 2106E 57 6/9
MD 4589 71 --
R8713-8 70 --
WSU 2140E 64 A-D 6/7
BEAVER BELLE 73 --
R8614-3 62 --
BEAVER SWEET 98 6/8
WSU 2086E 33 --
WSU 2089E 29 H-J --
Average 55 6/11
______________________________________
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different using
Duncan's Multiple Range Test, P = 0.05.
Numbers in bold represent means of three 10 foot plots, light print
represents means of one or two 10 foot plots and were not included in the
statistical analysis.
TABLE 6
______________________________________
1993 harvests of 1992 planted strawberries at Mt. Vernon,
______________________________________
WA.
Fruit Fruit
Yield (t/a)
weight (g)
rot (%)
______________________________________
BOUNTIFUL 14.4 A 13.4 B-E 20.3 D-H
SUMAS 13.4 A-B 13.3 B-E 28.7 B-H
`PUGET RELIANCE`
13.2 A-B 13.2 B-F 14.0 H
`PUGET 12.5 A-B 15.0 A-C 16.0 F-H
RELIANCE`-VF
ORUS 1083-135 11.1 A-C 12.0 C-G 36.0 B-C
REDCREST 11.0 A-D 12.6 B-F 16.0 F-H
BC 86-22-23 10.7 A-D 14.0 B-D 17.0 E-H
BC 84-16-10 10.1 A-D 12.7 B-F 18.0 E-H
HOOD 9.5 A-E 11.2 D-H 31.7 B-E
BC 86-30-56 9.1 B-F 17.1 A 18.7 E-H
HONEOYE 8.9 B-G 12.9 B-F 22.3 C-H
BC 86-33-2 8.6 B-G 13.9 B-D 18.0 B-H
BC 86-22-9 8.1 B-H 10.6 B-H 14.0 H
RAINIER 8.1 B-H 15.3 A-B 21.7 C-H
NY 1593 6.7 C-I 13.0 B-F 41.7 B
BENTON 6.2 C-J 8.7 H-I 14.0 H
CAVENDISH 5.9 C-J 15.0 A-C 15.3 G-H
SHUKSAN 5.8 C-J 12.0 C-G 20.0 D-H
BC 84-15-161 5.6 D-J 10.1 F-H 13.0 H
EC 85-13-14 4.3 E-J 9.3 G-H 22.3 C-H
BC 86-27-1 4.0 F-J 11.3 D-H 13.0 H
TOTEM 4.0 F-J 10.3 E-H 30.0 B-G
WSU 2187 3.6 G-J 10.3 E-H 26.7 C-H
WSU 2068 3.1 H-J 8.8 H-I 24.7 C-H
SENECA 1.6 I-J 8.3 H-I 31.3 B-F
GLOOSCAP 1.5 I-J 6.2 I-J 34.7 B-D
TOKLAT 1.3 J 5.4 J 65.0 A
Average 7.5 11.7 23.9
______________________________________
Midpoint
Stand
of Harvest
establishment (%)
______________________________________
BOUNTIFUL 6/13 B-D 100 A
SUMAS 6/8 G-J 100 A
`PUGET RELIANCE` 6/11 C-F 100 A
`PUGET RELIANCE`-VF
6/10 E-H 100 A
ORUS 1083-135 6/9 F-J 100 A
REDCREST 6/13 B-D 100 A
BC 86-22-23 6/15 B 100 A
BC 84-16-10 6/13 B-D 100 A
HOOD 6/11 C-F 100 A
BC 86-30-56 6/14 B-C 100 A
HONEOYE 6/4 46 C-D
BC 86-33-2 6/11 D-G 96 A
BC 86-22-9 6/7 I-J 96 A
RAINIER 6/4 42 D
NY 1593 6/10 92 A
BENTON 6/14 B 92 A
CAVENDISH 6/8 H-J 71 A-C
SHUKSAN 6/10 E-I 71 A-C
BC 84-15-161 6/18 A 100 A
EC 85-13-14 6/12 B-E 75 A-B
BC 86-27-1 6/6 J 75 A-B
TOTEM 6/9 F-J 96 A
WSU 2187 6/10 E-H 92 A
WSU 2068 6/10 E-H 88 A
SENECA 6/3 K 59 B-D
GLOOSCAP 6/8 G-J 79 A-B
TOKLAT 6/2 92 A
Average 6/10 87
______________________________________
Means are averages of three 10 foot plots.
Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly
different using Duncan's Multiple Range Test, P = 0.05.
The plants in the last two plantings were in poor physiological condition and in an effort to produce as many plants as possible for testing in 1992, the plants were placed in a heated, lighted greenhouse to produce runners. Possibly because of lack of chilling these plants did not produce runners and at planting time the plants were large and woody and in poor condition. Nonetheless, they performed well and were not significantly lower yielding than the highest yielding clones. At both locations plants which were virus negative were planted. There were no differences between the virus infected plants and the virus negative plants. Accordingly, `Puget Reliance` appears to be extremely virus tolerant.
Subsequently, the new variety was tested by Oregon State University at Aurora, Ore. and by Agriculture Canada at Abbotsford, British Columbia.
In 1992 a single unreplicated plot of `Puget Reliance` was the highest yielding clone at Aurora. The variety was rated as one of the best for fruit quality at Abbotsford. However, it displayed susceptibility to post-harvest fruit rot. To date the variety has not been tested for resistance to specific races of red stele but it performed well at Mt. Vernon on non-fumigated land.
In test plantings established at Puyallup from 1989 to 1992 with virus infected plants, the new variety outperformed two of the most widely grown Pacific Northwest cultivars, `Totem` and `Sumas`.
`Puget Reliances` outyielded `Totem` by 39% in its first harvest season and by 31% in its second season. It outyielded `Sumas` by 31% in the first harvest season and by 30% in the second harvest season. In the same plantings `Puget Reliance` had fruit which was 36% larger than `Totem` in the first season and 57% larger in the second season. Its fruit was 47% larger than `Sumas` in the first season and 30% larger in the second season.
Table 7 is a summary of the 1994 harvest season data. As seen from the table, `Puget Reliance` clearly had superior yield and fruit size compared to other cultivars.
TABLE 7
______________________________________
1994 yield of 1993 planted strawberries, Puyallup, WA.
______________________________________
Market- per-
able rot Total cent Fruit Fruit
yield yield yield Fruit
Weight
Firmness
(t/a) (t/a) (t/a) Rot (g) (g)
______________________________________
`PUGET 17.5 5.9 23.4 25% 17.0 213
RELIANCE`
BENTON 12.1 5.3 17.4 31% 12.7 181
ORUS917-123
12.7 4.5 17.2 26% 10.4 289
ORUS1077-47
12.1 4.0 16.2 25% 17.3 253
WSU 2211 8.1 7.8 15.9 49% 20.6 194
TOTEM 10.0 5.3 15.3 34% 12.4 234
RAINIER 8.9 6.4 15.3 42% 15.1 233
REDGEM 8.9 5.7 14.5 39% 11.9 195
SUMAS 7.1 7.4 14.5 52% 15.1 227
WSU 2225 8.9 5.5 14.4 38% 11.9 201
BC 86-27-1
9.0 5.3 14.2 37% 12.7 291
WSU 2253A
8.7 3.7 12.4 32% 15.3 311
WSU 2170 8.0 3.5 11.5 30% 8.9 233
REDCREST 7.2 4.1 11.4 37% 9.3 296
WSU 2265 7.6 3.4 11.0 33% 12.5 253
MELODY 6.9 3.7 10.6 35% 9.7 244
SHUKSAN 5.7 4.6 10.3 45% 12.5 239
WSU 2241 2.6 6.7 9.4 73% 17.0 285
WSU 2081 2.6 6.5 9.1 71% 13.4 164
BC 86-33-2
4.3 4.6 8.9 47% 10.9 266
WSU 2076 5.3 3.6 8.9 40% 13.7 246
WSU 2260 5.1 3.4 8.4 40% 12.7 329
WSU 1983 4.1 4.1 8.2 52% 15.2 274
WSU 2235 4.3 3.7 8.0 47% 13.4 228
HOOD 5.2 2.2 7.4 28% 11.3 237
WSU 2239 3.9 2.6 6.5 40% 14.8 192
EVITA 3.5 2.9 6.3 42% 15.3 247
BC 89-28-41
3.2 2.7 5.9 45% 8.6 325
WSU 2168 3.1 1.2 4.3 27% 5.4 207
______________________________________
Harvest Season
Length
5% 50% 95% of
harvest harvest harvest
harvest
______________________________________
`PUGET RELIANCE`
6/4/94 6/15/94 6/27/94
23
BENTON 6/7/94 6/17/94 6/30/94
23
ORUS917-123 6/10/94 6/20/94 7/2/94 22
ORUS1077-47 6/10/94 6/21/94 7/5/94 24
WSU 2211 6/1/94 6/11/94 6/23/94
22
TOTEM 6/3/94 6/14/94 6/28/94
25
RAINIER 6/5/94 6/15/94 6/29/94
24
REDGEM 6/2/94 6/13/94 6/27/94
25
SUMAS 6/1/94 6/10/94 6/23/94
22
WSU 2225 6/3/94 6/14/94 6/28/94
25
BC 86-27-1 6/1/94 6/11/94 6/26/94
25
WSU 2253A 5/27/94 6/9/94 6/27/94
30
WSU 2170 6/5/94 6/18/94 7/1/94 25
REDCREST 6/3/94 6/15/94 6/30/94
27
WSU 2265 5/31/94 6/8/94 6/21/94
21
MELODY 5/31/94 6/9/94 6/25/94
25
SHUKSAN 6/5/94 6/13/94 6/25/94
20
WSU 2241 6/3/94 6/12/94 6/28/94
25
WSU 2081 6/1/94 6/12/94 6/27/94
26
BC 86-33-2 6/2/94 6/12/94 6/27/94
25
WSU 2076 6/4/94 6/15/94 7/1/94 27
WSU 2260 6/6/94 6/18/94 7/2/94 26
WSU 1983 5/28/94 6/7/94 6/18/94
20
WSU 2235 6/3/94 6/13/94 6/27/94
25
HOOD 5/30/94 6/9/94 6/23/94
23
WSU 2239 6/1/94 6/12/94 6/29/94
28
EVITA 5/25/94 6/6/94 6/22/94
28
BC 89-28-41 6/3/94 6/16/94 6/30/94
27
WSU 2168 5/30/94 6/10/94 6/27/94
28
______________________________________
Although the fruit is large and attractive, its softness and susceptibility to post-harvest fruit rot make it unsuited for most fresh market uses.
The fruit from Puyallup and Aurora was sent to the Food Science and Technology Department of Oregon State University for evaluation in 1992. These evaluations were as (a) fresh fruit, (b) IQF fruit* and (c) frozen sliced fruit. The comparison varieties were `Totem`, three `ORUS` selections, and one `Agriculture Canada` selection. These evaluations were reported to the Oregon Strawberry Commission and are set forth in Tables 8 through 10 below.
TABLE 8
______________________________________
(From 1993 progress report to Oregon Strawberry Commission
by Brian Yorgey)
Fresh Strawberries, 1992-93 Consumer Panel
Means, Standard Deviations (in parentheses),
Least Significant Difference (LSD) and
Significance Level for Flavor and Appearance
(Means with the same superscripts within each column are not
significantly different: p ≦ .05.)
______________________________________
Flavor
Straw-
Overall Sweet- Sour- berry Firm-
Selection
Flavor ness ness Flavor ness
______________________________________
1076-124 4.99.sup.b
5.11.sup.c
4.83.sup.b
5.05.sup.c
5.82
(1.93) (1.96) (1.96) (2.06) (1.57)
1267-314 5.52.sup.b
5.86.sup.b
5.33.sup.b
5.29.sup.bc
5.26
(2.08) (1.66) (1.78) (2.07) (1.92)
1267-236 5.42.sup.b
5.42.sup.bc
5.14.sup.b
5.23.sup.bc
5.62
(1.91) (1.78) (1.86) (2.04) (1.57)
`PUGET 3.80.sup.c
4.14.sup.d
4.17.sup.c
4.03.sup.d
5.24
RELIANCE`
(1.81) (1.56) (1.64) (1.95) (1.79)
BC 86-33-2
6.52.sup.a
6.62.sup.a
5.97.sup.a
6.33.sup.a
5.77
(1.83) (1.62) (1.81) (1.93) (1.81)
Totem 5.44.sup.b
5.77.sup.b
5.26.sup.b
5.79.sup.ab
5.46
(1.92) (1.66) (1.77) (1.81) (1.52)
LSD .57 .53 .54 .58 --
Sig. Level
.0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 NS
______________________________________
Appearance
Overall
Appear- Seedi-
Selection
rance Color Size Shape ness
______________________________________
1076-124 6.47.sup.b
6.72.sup.a
6.68.sup.b
6.35.sup.b
5.88.sup.b
(1.73) (1.48) (1.60) (1.89) (1.55)
1267-314 7.17.sup.a
7.07.sup.a
7.46.sup.a
7.15.sup.a
6.53.sup.a
(1.40) (1.47) (1.28) (1.32) (1.38)
1267-236 5.76.sup.c
6.11.sup.b
5.89.sup.dc
5.62.sup.c
5.91.sup.b
(1.63) (1.66) (1.57) (1.80) (1.47)
`PUGET 5.50.sup.c
5.27.sup.c
5.99.sup.c
6.56.sup.b
5.73.sup.b
RELIANCE`
(1.84) (2.12) (1.60) (1.48) (1.65)
BC 86-33-2
5.50.sup.c
5.96.sup.b
5.50.sup.d
5.29.sup.c
5.18.sup.c
(1.55) (1.86) (1.77) (1.78) (1.57)
Totem 6.77.sup.ab
6.70.sup.a
6.79.sup.b
6.74.sup.ab
6.39.sup.a
(1.24) (1.47) (1.23) (1.37) (1.46)
LSD .44 .49 .41 .46 .40
Sig. Level
.0001 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0001
______________________________________
TABLE 9
______________________________________
(From 1993 progress report to Oregon Strawberry Commission
by Brian Yorgey)
IQF Strawberries, 1992-93 Consumer Panel
Means, Standard Deviations (in parentheses),
Least Significant Difference (LSD) and
Significance Level for Flavor and Appearance
(Means with the same superscripts within each column are not
significantly different: p ≦ .05.)
______________________________________
Flavor
Straw-
Overall Sweet- Sour- berry Firm-
Selection
Flavor ness ness Flavor ness
______________________________________
1076-124 4.95 4.68 4.53 4.95 5.03.sup.a
(1.89) (1.97) (1.66) (1.85) (2.10)
1077-47 4.58 4.70 4.57 4.85 4.43.sup.bc
(1.93) (1.89) (1.82) (1.98) (1.95)
1267-236 4.82 4.65 4.60 4.70 4.86.sup.ab
(1.75) (1.71) (1.69) (1.72) (1.95)
`PUGET 4.58 4.35 4.42 4.44 4.61.sup.abc
RELIANCE`
(2.04) (1.90) (1.96) (2.04) (1.98)
BC 86-33-2
4.79 4.82 4.60 4.98 4.35.sup.c
(1.91) (1.81) (1.84) (1.96) (2.10)
Totem 4.77 4.79 4.72 4.81 4.85.sup.ab
(1.95) (1.84) (1.69) (1.88) (1.96)
LSD -- -- -- -- .48
Sig. Level
NS NS NS NS .04
______________________________________
Appearance
Overall
Appear- Seedi-
Selection
rance Color Size Shape ness
______________________________________
1076-124 5.52.sup.abc
5.87.sup.c
5.63.sup.c
5.65.sup.bcd
5.75.sup.bc
(1.72) (1.67) (1.65) (1.78) (1.43)
1077-47 6.01.sup.a
6.32.sup.a
6.27.sup.a
5.98.sup.abc
6.20.sup.a
(1.52) (1.51) (1.48) (1.90) (1.41)
1267-236 5.49.sup.bc
5.63.sup.bc
5.66.sup.bc
5.52.sup.cd
5.2.sup.d
(1.60) (1.72) (1.72) (1.68) (1.53)
`PUGET 5.94.sup.ab
5.92.sup.ab
6.11.sup.ab
6.23.sup.a
6.09.sup.ab
RELIANCE`
(1.70) (1.67) (1.59) (1.67) (1.55)
BC 86-33-2
5.05.sup.c
5.38.sup.abc
5.89.sup.abc
5.38.sup.d
5.61.sup.cd
(1.97) (2.05) (1.63) (1.95) (1.51)
Totem 5.70.sup.ab
5.72.sup.a
6.23.sup.a
6.10.sup.ab
6.29.sup.a
(1.82) (1.66) (1.61) (1.63) (1.47)
LSD .50 .50 .47 .51 .41
Sig. Level
.002 .01 .02 .005 .0001
______________________________________
TABLE 10
______________________________________
(From 1993 progress report to Oregon Strawberry Commission
by Brian Yorgey)
Sugared and Sliced Strawberries, 1992-93 Consumer Panel
Means, Standard Deviations (in parentheses),
Least Significant Difference (LSD) and
Significance Level for Flavor and Appearance
(Means with the same superscripts within each column are not
significantly different: p ≦ .05.)
______________________________________
Flavor
Straw-
Overall Sweet- Sour- berry Firm-
Selection
Flavor ness ness Flavor ness
______________________________________
1076-124 6.39 6.40 5.88.sup.a
6.15 5.56.sup.ab
(1.75) (1.64) (1.54) (1.77) (2.04)
1077-47 6.16 6.21 5.51.sup.b
5.92 5.21.sup.bc
(1.60) (1.58) (1.48) (1.76) (1.59)
1267-236 6.35 6.55 5.98.sup.a
6.31 5.84.sup.a
(1.54) (1.43) (1.47) (1.42) (1.84)
`PUGET 5.84 6.10 5.71.sup.ab
5.84 4.92.sup.c
RELIANCE`
(1.77) (1.68) (1.40) (1.78) (1.98)
BC 86-33-2
5.28 6.33 6.06.sup.a
6.16 5.38.sup.b
(1.49) (1.58) (1.52) (1.50) (1.72)
Totem 6.26 6.35 5.88.sup.a
6.21 5.20.sup.bc
(1.67) (1.67) (1.34) (1.80) (1.82)
LSD -- -- .36 -- .44
Sig. Level
NS NS .04 NS .001
______________________________________
Appearance
Overall
Appear- Seedi-
Selection
rance Color Size Shape ness
______________________________________
1076-124 4.87.sup.bc
5.62.sup.b
5.95.sup.a
5.18.sup.ab
5.40.sup.b
(1.86) (1.88) (1.30) (1.83) (1.40)
1077-47 5.22.sup.ab
6.39.sup.a
6.07.sup.a
4.92.sup.b
5.42.sup.b
(1.71) (1.37) (1.46) (1.78) (1.41)
1267-236 4.63.sup.cd
5.89.sup.b
4.54.sup.c
4.44.sup.c
5.24.sup.b
(2.00) (1.73) (1.90) (1.95) (1.53)
`PUGET 4.45.sup.d
5.60.sup.b
5.57.sup.b
4.45.sup.c
5.20.sup.b
RELIANCE`
(1.73) (1.72) (1.57) (1.78) (1.50)
BC 86-33-2
5.29.sup.a
5.70.sup.b
6.02.sup.a
5.54.sup.a
5.78.sup.a
(1.79) (1.99) (1.62) (1.95) (1.44)
Totem 5.07.sup.ab
6.34.sup.a
6.10.sup.a
4.88.sup.bc
5.31.sup.b
(1.75) (1.58) (1.54) (1.91) (1.43)
LSD .41 .41 .34 .44 .34
Sig. Level
.0002 .0001 .0001 .0001 .0125
______________________________________
`Puget Reliance` did not rate highly for flavor as a fresh strawberry but did for all appearance attributes of IQF fruit. Its flavor was not significantly different from `Totem` as IQF or sugared and sliced strawberries. The physical and chemical attributes of the new variety are set forth in Table 11 below.
TABLE 11
______________________________________
(From 1993 progress report to Oregon Strawberry
Commission by Brian Yorgey)
______________________________________
Asc. Acid
selection date *Brix pH TA mc/100 g
______________________________________
ORUS 1076-124 6/2 10.2 3.38 1.33 84.1
6/11 12.5 3.28 1.26 84.2
6/18 14.2 3.44 1.22 72.5
ORUS 1077-47 6/4 9.9 3.21 1.35 56.6
6/11 12.1 3.31 1.27 60.7
6/18 11.2 3.38 1.36 62.1
ORUS 1267-236 5/21 10.1 3.46 1.18 80.2
5/26 10.1 3.36 1.29 85.1
6/2 10.6 3.50 1.07 61.6
6/11 13.2 3.46 1.08 73.0
ORUS 1267-314 5/26 10.4 3.54 0.93 70.0
6/2 display sample only
6/11 14.3 3.48 1.06 76.5
ORUS 1375-24 5/19 10.1 3.45 1.00 54.4
5/26 9.7 3.53 0.95 75.5
6/11 11.5 3.62 0.85 76.9
ORUS 1182-53 5/19 9.0 3.56 0.96 53.6
ORUS 1182-118 5/21 8.8 3.54 0.87 71.8
ORUS 1284-79 5/19 8.7 3.36 1.10 23.6
5/26 8.9 3.28 1.18 56.5
ORUS 1274-9 5/19 9.7 3.55 0.96 84.7
ORUS 1376-16 5/21 9.6 3.34 1.31 100.1
NW8808-79 5/21 8.2 3.57 0.88 71.3
W84025-26 5/26 9.2 3.61 0.94 103.8
W87010-7P 5/26 9.1 3.38 1.08 99.9
W88017-49 6/4 9.1 3.33 1.24 59.4
W88127-73 5/21 9.3 3.62 0.85 72.0
W88128-51 6/4 display sample only
BC 86-33-2 5/26 12.1 3.40 1.40 82.5
6/2 12.5 3.53 1.14 62.8
WSU 2009 (WA) 6/4 6.8 3.32 0.71 37.3
WSU 2068 (WA) 6/4 7.0 3.30 0.98 63.7
`PUGET RELIANCE`
6/4 8.4 3.25 1.05 54.1
`PUGET RELIANCE`
6/2 8.7 3.38 1.14 46.0
(NWREC) 6/4 8.2 3.20 1.06 46.6
Totem 5/19 9.9 3.48 1.00 78.4
5/26 10.0 3.45 1.12 106.8
6/2 10.8 3.58 0.96 73.7
6/4 9.7 3.50 0.92 72.9
Redcrest 6/4 display sample only
6/11 display sample only
Hood 6/2 display sample only
Benton 6/4 display sample only
______________________________________
selection date penetremeter
L a b
______________________________________
ORUS 1076-124 6/2 529 29.48
23.15
8.03
6/11 479 28.91
22.99
7.48
6/18 417 27.85
20.59
6.46
ORUS 1077-47 6/4 366 29.12
22.72
8.08
6/11 354 28.72
21.97
7.45
6/18 395 28.22
21.33
7.48
ORUS 1267-236 5/21 373 30.23
21.98
7.78
5/26 388 29.70
22.31
8.06
6/2 403 27.54
19.16
6.55
6/11 307 29.93
20.70
7.05
ORUS 1267-314 5/26 389 30.24
20.64
7.37
6/2
6/11 346 30.05
19.61
6.41
ORUS 1375-24 5/19 474 29.90
21.05
7.26
5/26 465 30.90
21.95
7.60
6/11 377 30.20
19.04
5.93
ORUS 1182-53 5/19 413 27.97
19.59
6.50
ORUS 1182-118 5/21 324 29.24
20.22
7.11
ORUS 1284-79 5/19 334 31.61
21.08
8.14
5/26 323 31.57
22.83
8.83
ORUS 1274-9 5/19 382 28.28
19.82
6.72
ORUS 1376-16 5/21 458 26.75
18.11
6.15
NW8808-79 5/21 364 29.14
19.58
6.70
W84025-26 5/26 434 26.09
16.88
5.24
W87010-7P 5/26 523 24.14
13.74
4.29
W88017-49 6/4 336 29.70
21.91
7.70
W88127-73 5/21 351 28.38
19.56
6.50
W88128-51 6/4
BC 86-33-2 5/26 390 27.70
20.14
6.94
6/2 419 27.55
20.20
6.72
WSU 2009 (WA) 6/4 458 27.65
18.04
6.40
WSU 2068 (WA) 6/4 531 28.92
20.76
7.33
`PUGET RELIANCE`
6/4 377 29.43
21.31
7.95
`PUGET RELIANCE`
6/2 316 27.82
19.83
7.08
(NWREC) 6/4 343 29.99
21.29
8.03
Totem 5/19 320 27.28
18.91
6.46
5/26 343 27.89
20.42
7.12
6/2 367 27.54
19.16
6.55
6/4 295 27.17
18.66
6.17
Redcrest 6/4
6/11
Hood 6/2
Benton 6/4
______________________________________
Analysis of frozen samples of the fruit of `Puget Reliance` taken from the 1992 season at Puyallup appear in Table 12 below.
TABLE 12
______________________________________
Analysis of 1992 strawberry fruit grown at Puyallup, WA.
______________________________________
Number Titratable Acidity
of sample
pH as % Citric Acid
ANNAPOLIS 1 3.56 0.21
BC 86-33-2 3 3.47 A-B 0.63 B-C
CAVENDISH 1 3.72 0.51
MDUS 4740 1 3.41 0.57
REDCREST 3 3.24 C 0.87 A
SUMAS-1990 3 3.34 B-C 0.37 D
SUMAS-1991 3 3.47 A-B 0.58 B-D
TOTEM-1990 3 3.48 A-B 0.42 C-D
TOTEM-1991 3 3.57 A 0.42 C-D
`PUGET RELIANCE`
3 3.27 C 0.70 A-B
WSU 1990 2 3.43 0.38
WSU 2068 2 3.42 0.45
WSU 2122 1 3.42 0.62
WSU 2212 3 3.48 A-B 0.58 B-D
WSU 2213 3 3.53 A 0.56 B-D
Average 3.45 0.52
______________________________________
Anthocyanins A
Number @ 520 nm
of sample
S.S. % 10 g fr in 1000 ml
______________________________________
ANNAPOLIS 1 7.80 0.350
BC 86-33-2 3 9.60 A 0.372 A
CAVENDISH 1 10.20 0.380
MDUS 4740 1 7.60 0.197
REDCREST 3 8.63 A-C 0.410 A
SUMAS-1990 3 8.03 B-D 0.358 A
SUMAS-1991 3 9.27 A- B
0.296 A
TOTEM-1990 3 6.27 E 0.396 A
TOTEM-1991 3 8.73 A-C 0.358 A
`PUGET RELIANCE`
3 7.80 C-D 0.325 A
WSU 1990 2 6.70 0.432
WSU 2068 2 7.25 0.424
WSU 2122 1 9.40 0.309
WSU 2212 3 6.97 D-E 0.397 A
WSU 2213 3 7.03 D-E 0.375 A
Average 8.09 0.359
______________________________________
Means of samples of 10 grams for each clone.
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly
different using Duncan's Multiple Range Test, P = 0.05.
It was concluded that fruit of `Puget Reliance` would be satisfactory as a processed strawberry and under the standard Washington State University Test Agreement (a copy of which is made of record), one hundred twenty-five virus infected plants were sent to each of four growers in Washington and Oregon. Despite the poor plant quality and low survival at several sites, the fruit produced was received favorably. Six hundred virus negative plants were then sent to one grower and four hundred plants to another in 1993 and these also tested favorably.
Throughout the testing of `Puget Reliance` at research facilities in Oregon, Washington and British Columbia the variety displayed consistently high yields and large fruit.
The specific morphological characteristics which distinguish `Puget Reliance` from other Pacific Northwest cultivars are set forth in Tables 13, 14 and 15. These concern the length, width and serration numbers of the central leaflet, the Petiolule and Petiole length and diameters and the length, width and color of the fruit as compared with closely related known varieties.
The color terminology is in accordance with the Munsell color system.
Plant: Large and vigorous, with an erect growth habit. Produces abundant runners.
Leaves: Medium in size. Leaf characteristics of `Puget Reliance` are compared to other Pacific Northwest varieties in Table 13. The central leaflet of `Puget Reliance` is longer than `Benton` or `Totem` and the same as `Sumas`. The width of `Puget Reliance` is the same as `Benton` and `Totem` and narrower than `Sumas`. The shape of the central leaflet is much longer and narrower for `Puget Reliance` than for `Benton`, `Sumas` or `Totem` as indicated by greater length/width ratio. The number of serrations on the terminal leaflet for `Puget Reliance` were less than for `Sumas` but did not differ from `Benton` or `Totem`. `Puget Reliance` had a long petiolule similar in length to `Sumas`. The petiole length is similar for `Puget Reliance,` `Benton` and `Sumas` but longer than `Totem`. The leaf color is the same for all four varieties, 5GY 4/4 on the upper surface and 5 GY 5/4 for the lower surface. The petiole hairs are irregularly perpendicular to the axis of the petiole.
Inflorescence: Inflorescence characteristics of `Puget Reliance` are compared to other Pacific Northwest varieties in Table 14. The common peduncle of `Puget Reliance` is the same as `Totem` and shorter than `Benton` or `Sumas`. The length of the pedicel is similar to `Benton`, but shorter than `Sumas` and longer than `Totem`. The diameter of the pedicel is similar to `Benton` and thicker than `Sumas` and `Totem`. The pedicel hairs are irregularly perpendicular to the axis of the pedicel.
Fruit: Fruit characteristics of `Puget Reliance` are compared to Pacific Northwest varieties in Table 15. The primary fruit of all four varieties is approximately 4 cm. The diameter of `Puget Reliance` fruit is larger resulting in a shorter conic fruit. Fruit is usually smooth and symmetrically conic with inserted seeds. The exterior fruit color of `Puget Reliance` (5R 3/6) and `Totem` (5R 3/6) is slightly darker than `Benton` and `Sumas` (5R 3/9). As shown in Table 15, the fruit color at the apex of a longitudinal slice of both `Puget Reliance` and `Totem` is darker than for `Benton` and `Sumas`. The harvest season is the same as `Totem`, later than `Hood` or `Sumas` and earlier than `Benton`.
Disease and pest reaction: `Puget Reliance` is susceptible to strawberry aphid (Chaetosiphon fragaefolii) an aphid vector of viruses, but is highly tolerant to virus complexes common in Washington. It is susceptible to leaf scorch (Diplocarpon), anthracnose fruit rot (Collectotrichum), and is susceptible to both adult and larva root weevils in a field with both black vine weevil (Otiorhynchus sulcatus) and obscure room weevil (Sciopithes obscurus).
TABLE 13
______________________________________
Leaf characteristics of `Puget Reliance`, `Benton`,
`Sumas`, and `Totem`. Puyallup, WA (June 29, 1994)
______________________________________
Central Leaflet
Length Width Length/ Serration
cm cm width Number
______________________________________
`Puget Reliance`
8.46 a 6.68 b 1.27 20.0 bc
`Benton` 6.89 b 6.34 b 1.09 18.6 c
`Sumas` 9.14 a 8.33 a 1.10 24.3 a
`Totem` 6.54 b 6.06 b 1.08 21.3 b
______________________________________
Petiolule Length mm
Petiole Length cm
______________________________________
`Puget Reliance`
15.5 a 20.9 a
`Benton` 6.1 b 21.8 a
`Sumas` 12.1 a 21.4 a
`Totem` 7.8 b 13.2 b
______________________________________
TABLE 14
______________________________________
Inflorescence characteristics of `Puget Reliance`, `Benton`,
`Sumas`, and `Totem`. Puyallup, WA (June 22, 1994)
Peduncle Pedicel
length diameter length diameter
cm mm cm mm
______________________________________
`Puget Reliance`
15.1 b 2.52 4.24 b 1.77 a
`Benton` 20.4 a 2.35 4.44 b 1.56 a
`Sumas` 20.9 a 2.50 7.16 a 1.14 b
`Totem` 15.6 b 2.04 2.75 c 1.02 b
______________________________________
TABLE 15
______________________________________
Fruit characteristics of `Puget Reliance`, `Benton`,
`Sumas`, and `Totem`. Puyallup, WA (Color measured on
June 11, 1992 other measurements June 22, 1994)
Fruit Calyx
Ex- diam-
Length Width Length/ ternal
Internal
eter
cm cm width color color cm
______________________________________
`Puget 4.08 3.50 a 1.15 5R 3/6
7.5R 4/9
3.00
Reliance`
`Benton`
3.64 2.98 b 1.22 5R 3/9
10R 5/10
2.89
`Sumas`
3.87 3.13 b 1.24 5R 3/9
10R 5/10
2.70
`Totem`
3.75 2.97 b 1.29 5R 3/6
7.5R 5/10
2.93
______________________________________
Claims (1)
1. The new and distinct variety of strawberry plant described and illustrated and identified by the characteristics enumerated above.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/304,343 USPP9310P (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1994-09-12 | Strawberry plant `Puget Reliance` |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/304,343 USPP9310P (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1994-09-12 | Strawberry plant `Puget Reliance` |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP9310P true USPP9310P (en) | 1995-10-03 |
Family
ID=23176121
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/304,343 Expired - Lifetime USPP9310P (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1994-09-12 | Strawberry plant `Puget Reliance` |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP9310P (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP25223P2 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2015-01-13 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Strawberry plant named ‘Sweet Sunrise’ |
| USPP25300P2 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2015-02-24 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Strawberry plant named ‘Charm’ |
-
1994
- 1994-09-12 US US08/304,343 patent/USPP9310P/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP25223P2 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2015-01-13 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Strawberry plant named ‘Sweet Sunrise’ |
| USPP25300P2 (en) | 2013-01-22 | 2015-02-24 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Strawberry plant named ‘Charm’ |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Laurens | Review of the current apple breeding programmes in the world: objectives for scion cultivar improvement | |
| McCreight et al. | Gone global: familiar and exotic cucurbits have Asian origins | |
| Finn et al. | Blackberry | |
| US6143349A (en) | No-heat jalapenos and products comprising no-heat jalapenos | |
| Okie et al. | Fresh market cultivar development. | |
| Gasic et al. | Register of new fruit and nut cultivars list 47 | |
| Lewers et al. | ‘Flavorfest’strawberry | |
| Conner et al. | Muscadine grape breeding | |
| USPP9310P (en) | Strawberry plant `Puget Reliance` | |
| Stevenson et al. | Breeding and genetics in potato improvement | |
| Finn et al. | Register of new fruit and nut cultivars list 44 | |
| De Carvalho et al. | Free choice profiling sensory analysis and principal component analysis as tools to support an apple breeding program | |
| Moskalets et al. | Bio-ecological characteristics of Malus genus species in the context of prospective directions in horticulture and landscape forestry | |
| Jones et al. | ‘Excel’sweet potato | |
| USPP16478P3 (en) | Grape plant named ‘Frontenac gris’ | |
| Lyrene | Fertility and other characteristics of F1 and backcross1 progeny from an intersectional blueberry cross [(highbush cultivar× Vaccinium arboreum)× highbush cultivar] | |
| USPP8853P (en) | June-bearing strawberry named Chambly | |
| USPP36249P3 (en) | Hop plant named ‘HS15619’ | |
| USPP11545P (en) | Japanese pear tree named `Kotobuki Shinsui` | |
| USPP9835P (en) | Asian pear tree named `Asio 1` | |
| USPP9827P (en) | Asian pear tree named `Asio 2` | |
| US6340785B1 (en) | Inbred tomato line FDR 26-682 | |
| USPP5918P (en) | Variety of Ribes nidigrolaria named Jostaki | |
| USPP12067P2 (en) | Strawberry plant named ‘Schwartze’ | |
| Badenes et al. | SEOPA-1 and GOLGI-2 apricot seedlings are resistant to plum pox virus |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, W Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOORE, PATRICK P.;REEL/FRAME:007151/0996 Effective date: 19940906 |