USPP4698P - Bluegrass plant - Google Patents

Bluegrass plant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USPP4698P
USPP4698P US06/070,273 US7027379V US4698P US PP4698 P USPP4698 P US PP4698P US 7027379 V US7027379 V US 7027379V US 4698 P US4698 P US 4698P
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sup
wtn
turf
equals
variety
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US06/070,273
Inventor
Benedict O. Warren
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chrysanthemum Breeders Association NV
Warren s Turf Nursery Inc
Original Assignee
Warren s Turf Nursery Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Warren s Turf Nursery Inc filed Critical Warren s Turf Nursery Inc
Priority to US06/070,273 priority Critical patent/USPP4698P/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USPP4698P publication Critical patent/USPP4698P/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to CHRYSANTHEMUM BREEDERS ASSOCIATION N. V. reassignment CHRYSANTHEMUM BREEDERS ASSOCIATION N. V. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NOODELIJK, ROBERT
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of Kentucky bluegrass plant which exhibits excellent shade tolerance, a relative degree of tolerance to Fusarium blight and smut, high tiller density and excellent turf quality as indicated by data taken at research centers throughout the country.
  • the new variety was selected from space planted open pollinated A20 Kentucky bluegrass plants that were being grown at Palos Hills, Ill., in 1967.
  • the variety in question exhibited excellent aggressiveness and uniformity as well as a medium fine leaf texture that set it apart from the other grasses.
  • the grass was asexually propagated by rhizomes and tillers at Palos Hills, and was labeled A20-6 or WTN-H6 with the WTN-H6 being the official designated experimental name. Since that time, the grass has been tested using both vegetative material of the variety as well as seeded material of the said plant without any differences being noted between the two methods of propagating or increasing the stock of the new plant.
  • the variety is being maintained vegetatively at Suisun City, Calif.
  • WTN-H6 Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) is perennial with a high degree of uniformity in its growth habit that makes it very attractive at cutting heights of 1.3 cm., to the standard height of 2.5 to 3.7 cm. It is a turf type that has a leafy, medium dark green color with a tiller density of 1500 plus tillers per square foot. Of special importance is its ability to withstand shade of plus 65 percent.
  • the new variety exhibits good to excellent resistance to the fungi Fusarium roseum, Fusarium tricintum, Ustilago striiformis, Drechslera poae and Erysiphe graminia.
  • the WTN-H6 is new and distinct from other grasses based on the aforementioned characteristics. Further value and importance of this invention will be seen as more detail is given of the above-mentioned qualities together with other information that will be detailed such as the following illustrations and detailed descriptions.
  • FIG. 1 shows a panicle of the new variety three weeks after the completion of flowering
  • FIG. 2 shows a plant after the completion of flowering
  • FIG. 3 shows some typical tillers of WTN-H6 extracted from a closely mowed turf.
  • the WTN-H6 exhibits its uniqueness in the following ways:
  • the culms of the new invention are moderately bending and are usually three noded.
  • the stems are cylindrical, smooth, relatively slim, and moderately shiny to glossy with a medium green color.
  • the culms are tufted, average 61.1 cm. in height when uncut, have a panicle length of 13.8 cm. a flag leaf length of 12.1 cm. and a flag leaf width of 4.9 mm.
  • the leaves are medium to dark green in color (137 A Green Group) and the sheaths are smooth and hairless with an average ligule length of 0.5 mm.
  • the panicles are semi-pyramidal with the main axis erect and the branches semi-erect even during seed set.
  • the spikelets are delicate in nature; average 3.8 mm.
  • the spikelets are ovate and compressed with the upper spikelets in clusters and close branching and the lower branching wider spaced.
  • the glumes are unequal with the upper ovate to eliptic averaging 2.0 mm. and the lower averaging 2.1 mm.
  • Lemmas are overlapping, oblong to ovate measuring approximately 2.6 mm. in length and there are fine hairs at the base and the lower half of the lemmas.
  • the paleas average out to 2.3 mm. in length.
  • the caryopses are tightly enclosed in the lemma and palea.
  • the number of tillers per square inch averages 23.3 with 3.8 leaves per tiller and each leaf (2d leaf) measuring 2.1 mm. on the average.
  • the ligules are short (not extending beyond the edge of the collar) and the leaf is medium to dark green in color (137 A Green Group) with a keel shape and boat-shaped tip.
  • Turf Characteristics The new variety has consistently maintained a high quality turf relative to other Kentucky bluegrasses in test plots located across the country. It is a fine textured bluegrass that is vigorous and aggressive. Overall turf performance with WTN-H6 as compared with other recognized bluegrasses are listed in Tables One, Two, Three, Four and Five.
  • WTN-H6 has thus far been able to withstand adverse weather conditions very favorably. It has good heat and drought tolerance as indicated by Tables Two and Four. It maintains a good color under dry conditions. In hot dry conditions such as experienced in Suisun City, Calif., it has survived very well for over six years.
  • WTN-H6 is one of a few select bluegrasses that maintain quality.
  • Tables Six and Seven indicate the relative turf qualities of the new invention to other bluegrasses.
  • Percent cover is based on a base of 100 percent which is the original size of the plots.

Landscapes

  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)

Abstract

A new and distinct variety of Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) characterized particularly by very good turf performance, excellent shade tolerance, excellent uniformity, and high resistance to most of the common bluegrass diseases. The plant tolerates a close cut, maintains a medium dark green color and does very well in early spring.

Description

The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of Kentucky bluegrass plant which exhibits excellent shade tolerance, a relative degree of tolerance to Fusarium blight and smut, high tiller density and excellent turf quality as indicated by data taken at research centers throughout the country.
The new variety was selected from space planted open pollinated A20 Kentucky bluegrass plants that were being grown at Palos Hills, Ill., in 1967. The variety in question exhibited excellent aggressiveness and uniformity as well as a medium fine leaf texture that set it apart from the other grasses. The grass was asexually propagated by rhizomes and tillers at Palos Hills, and was labeled A20-6 or WTN-H6 with the WTN-H6 being the official designated experimental name. Since that time, the grass has been tested using both vegetative material of the variety as well as seeded material of the said plant without any differences being noted between the two methods of propagating or increasing the stock of the new plant. The variety is being maintained vegetatively at Suisun City, Calif.
WTN-H6 Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) is perennial with a high degree of uniformity in its growth habit that makes it very attractive at cutting heights of 1.3 cm., to the standard height of 2.5 to 3.7 cm. It is a turf type that has a leafy, medium dark green color with a tiller density of 1500 plus tillers per square foot. Of special importance is its ability to withstand shade of plus 65 percent. The new variety exhibits good to excellent resistance to the fungi Fusarium roseum, Fusarium tricintum, Ustilago striiformis, Drechslera poae and Erysiphe graminia.
The WTN-H6 is new and distinct from other grasses based on the aforementioned characteristics. Further value and importance of this invention will be seen as more detail is given of the above-mentioned qualities together with other information that will be detailed such as the following illustrations and detailed descriptions.
FIG. 1 shows a panicle of the new variety three weeks after the completion of flowering;
FIG. 2 shows a plant after the completion of flowering;
FIG. 3 shows some typical tillers of WTN-H6 extracted from a closely mowed turf.
The WTN-H6 exhibits its uniqueness in the following ways:
(1) excellent shade tolerance;
(2) a leafy turf type capable of withstanding a close cut;
(3) petite panicles and spikelets;
(4) excellent rhizome and tiller development;
(5) excellent turf quality;
(6) an attractive medium dark green color;
(7) excellent density;
(8) moderately fine leaf texture.
The color references herein are to Royal Horticultural Society Color Chart (1941), by Robert F. Wilson. The readings were taken on July 24, 1979 on mature tillers using the first leaf on each tiller on heavily watered, fertilized turf, at Suisun City, Calif.
Plant Description: Under conditions such as those experienced in the summer of 1976 at Palos Hills, Ill., and in the summer of 1978 at Hubbard, Oreg., the following plant description of WTN-H6 can be made based on average measurements.
Under conditions of flowering, the culms of the new invention are moderately bending and are usually three noded. The stems are cylindrical, smooth, relatively slim, and moderately shiny to glossy with a medium green color. The culms are tufted, average 61.1 cm. in height when uncut, have a panicle length of 13.8 cm. a flag leaf length of 12.1 cm. and a flag leaf width of 4.9 mm. The leaves are medium to dark green in color (137 A Green Group) and the sheaths are smooth and hairless with an average ligule length of 0.5 mm. The panicles are semi-pyramidal with the main axis erect and the branches semi-erect even during seed set. The spikelets are delicate in nature; average 3.8 mm. in length with about 4.5 branches at the lower branches of the panicle. There are approximately 3.9 florets per spikelet. The spikelets are ovate and compressed with the upper spikelets in clusters and close branching and the lower branching wider spaced. The glumes are unequal with the upper ovate to eliptic averaging 2.0 mm. and the lower averaging 2.1 mm. Lemmas are overlapping, oblong to ovate measuring approximately 2.6 mm. in length and there are fine hairs at the base and the lower half of the lemmas. The paleas average out to 2.3 mm. in length. The caryopses are tightly enclosed in the lemma and palea.
Under mowing (3.2 cm.), the number of tillers per square inch averages 23.3 with 3.8 leaves per tiller and each leaf (2d leaf) measuring 2.1 mm. on the average. The ligules are short (not extending beyond the edge of the collar) and the leaf is medium to dark green in color (137 A Green Group) with a keel shape and boat-shaped tip. The chromosome count is approximately 2n=36.
Turf Characteristics: The new variety has consistently maintained a high quality turf relative to other Kentucky bluegrasses in test plots located across the country. It is a fine textured bluegrass that is vigorous and aggressive. Overall turf performance with WTN-H6 as compared with other recognized bluegrasses are listed in Tables One, Two, Three, Four and Five.
              TABLE ONE                                                   
______________________________________                                    
Comparisons for Relative Turf Quality of WTN-H6                           
and Other Bluegrasses at Palos Hills, Illinois:                           
Variety     1976.sup.* 1                                                  
                       1977.sup.* 2                                       
                                  1978.sup.* 3                            
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6      5.5        5.0        5.9                                     
A20         5.3        3.7        5.0                                     
Adelphi     4.8        4.0        4.7                                     
Baron       4.3        4.3        4.7                                     
Glade       4.7        4.0        4.1                                     
______________________________________                                    
  *Scale: 9 equals best                                                   
 .sup.1 Based on 6 observations.                                          
 .sup.2 Based on 9 observations.                                          
 .sup.3 Based on 15 observations                                          
              TABLE TWO                                                   
______________________________________                                    
Relative Comparisons of WTN-H6 and Other                                  
Bluegrasses for Turf Quality, Density, Color, and Drought                 
Tolerance Taken in 1978 on Replicated Plots Established                   
in 1975 at Anderson, Indiana:                                             
          Turf.sup.1                Drought.sup.4                         
Variety   Quality  Density.sup.2                                          
                             Color.sup.3                                  
                                    Tolerance                             
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6    5.6      3.7       4.0    3.7                                   
Glade     4.0      3.0       2.0    2.5                                   
Adelphi   4.3      3.5       3.3    3.7                                   
Brunswick 4.6      3.0       2.3    2.7                                   
Baron     4.0      2.7       2.7    2.7                                   
Touchdown 3.9      2.7       2.0    1.7                                   
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 Scale: 9 equals best. Based on 6 observations.                    
 .sup.2 Scale: 5 equals best. Based on 3 observations.                    
 .sup.3 Scale: 5 equals best. Based on 3 observations. Drought tolerance  
 was a factor.                                                            
 .sup.4 Scale: 5 equals best. Based on 3 observations.                    
 Three weeks of temperatures in the 90's preceeded these readings.        
              TABLE THREE                                                 
______________________________________                                    
Relative Comparisons for Turf Performance, Stem                           
Rust, and Dollar Spot Tolerances for WTN-H6 and Other                     
Bluegrasses Taken in 1976 at Adelphia, New Jersey on                      
Plots Established in 1974 by Rutgers University..sup.1                    
                    Dollar Spot.sup.3                                     
                                Turf.sup.4                                
Variety   Rust.sup.2                                                      
                    Mean        Performance                               
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6    1.0       17          6.2                                       
A34       1.5       56          6.0                                       
Nugget    2.5       231         5.6                                       
Victa     1.9       48          6.4                                       
Merion    7.5       43          5.5                                       
Baron     2.5       75          5.9                                       
Touchdown 6.3       101         6.3                                       
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 Turf plots for WTNH6 were in the same area as the commercial      
 grasses.                                                                 
 .sup.2 Scale: 1 equals best; 9 equals worst.                             
 .sup.3 Average number of spots.                                          
 .sup.4 Scale: 9 equals best; 1 equals worst.                             
              TABLE FOUR                                                  
______________________________________                                    
Heat Tolerance, General Appearance, and Density                           
Ratings for WTN-H6 and Other Blugrasses Observed in 1978                  
at New Mexico State at Las Cruces, New Mexico.                            
          Heat        General                                             
Variety   Tolerance.sup.1                                                 
                      Appearance.sup.2                                    
                                  Density.sup.3                           
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6    7.0         6.2         7.0                                     
Glade     7.0         7.0         7.7                                     
Touchdown 6.5         5.8         5.7                                     
A34       6.0         6.8         7.3                                     
Baron     6.0         6.0         6.7                                     
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 Scale: 1 equals least to 9 equals most; based on averages for     
 general appearance and color scores taken on July 5 following 17 days of 
 100 degree temperatures or above during late June and early July.        
 .sup.2 Scale: 1 equals poor to 9 equals best; based on 5 observation.    
 .sup.3 Scale: 1 equals least to 9 equals most dense; based on 3          
 observations.                                                            
              TABLE FIVE                                                  
______________________________________                                    
General Quality Ratings of WTN-H6 and Other                               
Bluegrasses on Replicated Plots Estabished in 1972                        
at the University of Illinois.                                            
______________________________________                                    
Cultivar   3/16/77*   4/28/77*   6/24/77*                                 
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6     4.3        2.3        2.0                                      
Adelphi    4.0        4.0        2.3                                      
Baron      4.0        4.0        2.3                                      
Brunswick  4.3        3.3        2.3                                      
Fylking    4.3        4.0        3.0                                      
Nugget     6.3        4.3        2.0                                      
Glade      4.7        4.7        2.3                                      
______________________________________                                    
Cultivar   7/14/77*   8/2/77*    10/11/77*                                
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6     2.0        2.0        1.7                                      
Adelphi    2.3        4.0        3.0                                      
Baron      3.7        3.0        4.0                                      
Brunswick  2.3        3.7        5.3                                      
Fylking    4.3        5.3        5.7                                      
Nugget     3.7        5.3        6.0                                      
Glade      2.7        2.7        4.7                                      
______________________________________                                    
 *Quality was based on a scale of 1-9 with 1 being best.                  
WTN-H6 has thus far been able to withstand adverse weather conditions very favorably. It has good heat and drought tolerance as indicated by Tables Two and Four. It maintains a good color under dry conditions. In hot dry conditions such as experienced in Suisun City, Calif., it has survived very well for over six years.
In shade trials, WTN-H6 is one of a few select bluegrasses that maintain quality. Tables Six and Seven indicate the relative turf qualities of the new invention to other bluegrasses.
              TABLE SIX                                                   
______________________________________                                    
Relative Comparisons of Shade Tolerance for                               
WTN-H6 and Other Bluegrasses Taken in 1976, 1977, and                     
overall Average for 1976, 1977 and 1978 at Columbus,                      
Ohio, on Plots Established in 1975.                                       
            Turf*(76) Turf*(77) Overall                                   
Variety     Quality   Quality   *(76, 77, & 78)                           
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6      5.1       5.0       5.3                                       
Nugget      5.0       4.3       5.2                                       
Glade       4.9       5.0       4.4                                       
A34         4.4       4.3       4.4                                       
Victa       3.1       2.0       2.8                                       
Merion      3.0       3.3       2.9                                       
Bristol     5.5       4.5       5.1                                       
______________________________________                                    
 *Scale: 1 equals worst; 9 equals best.                                   
              TABLE SEVEN                                                 
______________________________________                                    
Relative Comparisons of Shade Tolerances for                              
WTN-H6 and Other Bluegrasses Taken in 1974, 1975 and 1976                 
at Palos Hills, Illinois, Under Conditions of Artificial                  
Shade of 65 percent.                                                      
         Turf Quality                                                     
                     Turf Quality                                         
                                 Turf Quality                             
Variety  1974 (8).sup.1                                                   
                     1975 (12.sup.1 2                                     
                                 1976 (4).sup.1                           
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6   7.8         5.7         5.8                                      
Nugget   6.7         3.2         3.0                                      
Glade    6.5         3.2         3.8                                      
A34      7.0         4.8         5.3                                      
______________________________________                                    
 () Number of observations.                                               
 .sup.1 Scale: 1 equals poorest; 9 equals best.                           
 .sup.2 No water applied to plots, very dry year.                         
Disease Tolerances: A comparison WTN-H6 with other bluegrasses for resistance or tolerance to various turfgrass diseases are indicated in Tables Three, Eight, Nine and Ten.
              TABLE EIGHT                                                 
______________________________________                                    
Relative Comparisons for Fusarium Blight Resis-                           
tance and Relative Agressiveness or Percent Cover of the                  
Grasses in 1975 and 1978 at the Danville Country Club,                    
Danville, Illinois.                                                       
Variety Fusarium*(75)                                                     
                     % Cover (75)                                         
                                 % Cover (78)                             
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6  1.5          83          117                                      
A20     2.2          87          106                                      
Baron   2.5          41          82                                       
Fylking 6.8          70          82                                       
______________________________________                                    
 *Scale: 1 equals best; 9 equals worst.                                   
 Based on 3 replications.                                                 
Percent cover is based on a base of 100 percent which is the original size of the plots.
              TABLE NINE                                                  
______________________________________                                    
Relative Comparisons for Resistance to Powdery                            
Mildew for WTN-H6 and Other Bluegrasses on Plots Estab-                   
lished at Ohio State University in 1975.                                  
Variety     Disease Rating* (76)                                          
                          Disease Rating* (77)                            
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6      2.3*          1.0*                                            
Nugget      2.0*          2.0*                                            
Glade       1.7*          1.3*                                            
A34         5.7           7.3                                             
Victa       9.0           9.0                                             
Merion      8.7           9.0                                             
______________________________________                                    
 *Disease severity based on a 9 point scale: 1 equals no disease; 9 equals
 70-100 percent.                                                          
 **Not statistically different at the 5 percent level.                    
              TABLE TEN                                                   
______________________________________                                    
Relative Comparisons for Resistance to Striped smut.                      
CULTIVAR          STRIPED SMUT.sup.1                                      
______________________________________                                    
WTN-H6            0                                                       
Adelphi           0                                                       
Baron             2.3                                                     
Geronimo          53.3                                                    
Park              20.3                                                    
Merion            76.7                                                    
______________________________________                                    
 .sup.1 Stripe Smut was rated as the estimated percent infected tillers   
 within two 1ft.sup.2 squares per plot. The data is from 1977 at the      
 University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.                                
Both the flag smut and stripe smut have occurred on the test plots in Palos Hills, Ill. Thus far, the smutted plants have been in plots surrounding the WTN-H6, but no infection of the smut organism has occurred in the plots containing the WTN-H6.

Claims (1)

I claim:
1. The new and distinct variety of Bluegrass Plant herein described and illustrated and identified by the characteristics enumerated above.
US06/070,273 1979-08-27 1979-08-27 Bluegrass plant Expired - Lifetime USPP4698P (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/070,273 USPP4698P (en) 1979-08-27 1979-08-27 Bluegrass plant

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/070,273 USPP4698P (en) 1979-08-27 1979-08-27 Bluegrass plant

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USPP4698P true USPP4698P (en) 1981-04-21

Family

ID=22094272

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/070,273 Expired - Lifetime USPP4698P (en) 1979-08-27 1979-08-27 Bluegrass plant

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USPP4698P (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7868225B2 (en) Artichoke hybrid named ‘PS-H2015’
USPP7831P (en) Ba 73-626 Kentucky Bluegrass
USPP8490P (en) BA 73-540 Kentucky Bluegrass
USPP6538P (en) Kentucky bluegrass--BA 70-139
USPP9036P (en) BA 73-366 Kentucky bluegrass
USPP6537P (en) Kentucky bluegrass `Ba 72-492`
USPP6585P (en) Kentucky bluegrass
USPP9209P (en) `BA 73-381` Kentucky bluegrass
USPP9611P (en) `Ba 69-82 ` Kentucky Bluegrass
USPP4698P (en) Bluegrass plant
USPP11536P (en) Kentucky bluegrass designated `Ba87-102`
USPP9127P (en) Zoysiagrass plant named `De Anza`
US5945582A (en) Inbred broccoli line BC-403
USPP4097P (en) St. Augustine grass
USPP4703P (en) Bluegrass plant
USPP11520P (en) Kentucky bluegrass designated `Ba79-260`
USPP9135P (en) Zoysiagrass plant named `Victoria`
USPP4704P (en) Bluegrass
USPP12435P2 (en) Kentucky bluegrass designated ‘Ba81-227’
USPP6372P (en) St. Augustine grass
USPP6921P (en) St. Augustine grass `6-72-182`
USPP6922P (en) St. Augustine Grass `6-72-130-`
US20240049671A1 (en) Hexaploid-octoploid perennial ryegrass, hexaploid-octoploid ryegrass american ryegrass, and hybrids thereof
USPP7699P (en) St. Augustinegrass named `FX-33`
USPP8162P (en) Midlawn Bermudagrass

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CHRYSANTHEMUM BREEDERS ASSOCIATION N. V., NETHERLA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NOODELIJK, ROBERT;REEL/FRAME:013568/0604

Effective date: 20021128