USPP32949P2 - Grapevine plant named ‘Ambulo Blanc’ - Google Patents
Grapevine plant named ‘Ambulo Blanc’ Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP32949P2 USPP32949P2 US16/602,591 US201916602591V USPP32949P2 US PP32949 P2 USPP32949 P2 US PP32949P2 US 201916602591 V US201916602591 V US 201916602591V US PP32949 P2 USPP32949 P2 US PP32949P2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- blanc
- ambulo
- vinifera
- wine
- resistance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 240000006365 Vitis vinifera Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 63
- 235000014101 wine Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 15
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 12
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 abstract description 11
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 abstract description 11
- 235000014787 Vitis vinifera Nutrition 0.000 description 22
- 241000204362 Xylella fastidiosa Species 0.000 description 14
- 235000021028 berry Nutrition 0.000 description 14
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 8
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 8
- 235000011389 fruit/vegetable juice Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- 238000012353 t test Methods 0.000 description 8
- 108091092878 Microsatellite Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 235000009754 Vitis X bourquina Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 235000012333 Vitis X labruscana Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 3
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 241000219094 Vitaceae Species 0.000 description 3
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000002532 grape seed extract Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 235000021021 grapes Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 3
- 108700028369 Alleles Proteins 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108700003861 Dominant Genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241001476352 Vitis arizonica Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012677 causal agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001332 colony forming effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000018553 tannin Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000001648 tannin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001864 tannin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000011514 vinification Methods 0.000 description 2
- RZVAJINKPMORJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetaminophen Chemical compound CC(=O)NC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 RZVAJINKPMORJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241001414720 Cicadellidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000207199 Citrus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000592374 Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000031888 Mycoses Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000244206 Nematoda Species 0.000 description 1
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000014443 Pyrus communis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002357 Ribes grossularia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000171263 Ribes grossularia Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001158692 Sonoma Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000004285 Vitis arizonica Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001512058 Vitis labrusca x Vitis vinifera Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000070471 Vitis rupestris Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000010208 anthocyanin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004410 anthocyanin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930002877 anthocyanin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000004636 anthocyanins Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000000443 biocontrol Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000034303 cell budding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000020971 citrus fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008124 floral development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000002917 insecticide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008774 maternal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229940023569 palmate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000008775 paternal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000013138 pruning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000020095 red wine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000013599 spices Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010902 straw Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000001782 transverse sinus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000020097 white wine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004149 wine analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/88—Vitaceae, e.g. Vitus [grape]
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H5/08—Fruits
Definitions
- Botanical classification Vitis vinifera L.
- Varietal denomination The varietal denomination of the claimed variety of grapevine plant is ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
- Pierce's disease is common across the southern United States from Virginia to northern California. It is also common across Mexico and Central America. The disease is caused by the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa , which is hosted by a very wide range of native and ornamental plants. The bacterium is spread by xylem feeding insects as vectors, primarily sharpshooters. PD is one of the few diseases that rapidly kills wine, table, and raisin grape cultivars of the cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera . Vector populations can be limited with insecticides, but these are difficult to use near their typically riparian native habitat or in the ornamental landscapes in which they flourish.
- Grapevine is an important and valuable crop. Accordingly, there is a need for new varieties of grapevine plant. In particular, there is a need for improved varieties of grapevine plant that produce high quality fruit for winemaking and are resistant to Pierce's disease.
- the present invention is directed to an improved variety of grapevine plant.
- the invention relates to a new and distinct variety of grapevine plant ( Vitis vinifera L.), which has been denominated as ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
- Grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’ possesses very strong resistance to the bacterial causal agent of Pierce's disease (PD), and produces very high quality fruit and wines therefrom that are indistinguishable from the widely grown European wine grape cultivars.
- PD resistant cultivars are known, but their fruit and winemaking quality are poor in comparison to ‘Ambulo Blanc’ and their resistance is much lower.
- grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is a white wine grape selection that is about 97% V. vinifera (including 62.5% ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, 12.5% ‘Carignane’, and 12.5% ‘Chardonnay’) and is highly resistant to PD as shown in repeated greenhouse evaluations.
- the two most commonly grown PD resistant varieties, ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’ are only about 50% of V. vinifera .
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has been tested in Ojai, Sonoma, and along the Napa River in California.
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has an early bloom and its fruit ripen early. It has small to medium berries and relatively large clusters, and is highly productive.
- the resistance from ‘b43-17’ was found to be inherited as a single dominant gene (locus), and this resistance gene, PdRl, was genetically mapped using the F8909 population by a grapevine breeding program. Tightly linked simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were developed and were used in marker-assisted selection to exclude susceptible plants from evaluation in each round of selection. All the progeny with PdRl were tested for PD resistance and only those with strong resistance were considered for use as parents. Potential parents were also screened for fruit quality over generations and only those with good quality fruit and that appeared like V. vinifera were selected.
- SSR simple sequence repeat
- Line ‘F8909-08’ from the F8909 population was crossed to ‘P79-101’, a highly susceptible, advanced V. vinifera table grape selection a grape breeding program.
- the resulting ‘F8909-08’ X ‘P79-101’ F 1 generation and progeny thereof were screened with the SSR markers for resistance to X. fastidiosa under greenhouse conditions.
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ V. vinifera ‘F2-35’ (‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ X ‘Carignane’) X ‘U0502-38’ (‘A81-138’ X V. vinifera ‘Chardonnay’)).
- ‘07370-028’ was crossed with V. vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ to produce ‘09314-102’ and this selection was later named ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ was particularly selected for its high resistance to Pierce's disease, as well as the quality of its fruit and wines produced therefrom.
- ‘09314-102’ is a cross between ‘07370-28’ X ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’.
- ‘07370-28’ is highly resistant to X. fastidiosa has lobed leaves.
- ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ is not only very susceptible to X. fastidiosa , it has deeply lobed leaves with relatively short teeth on the leaf margin, has short sinuses on the lateral lobes and is a red wine grape. None of the parents across the multiple backcross generations are patented.
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ can be distinguished from its male parent ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ by its high resistance to X. fastidiosa .
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ can be distinguished from its female parent ‘07370-028’ in that ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has perfect flowers whereas ‘07370-028’ has pistillate flowers.
- FIG. 1 shows simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker data establishing a DNA fingerprint for ‘Ambulo Blanc’ with nine pure Vitis vinifera cultivars for comparison. Alleles for marker-assisted selection of the Xylella fastidiosa locus (PdRl) are shown in red.
- SSR simple sequence repeat
- FIG. 2 illustrates the upper surface of a leaf of grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
- FIG. 3 illustrates the lower surface of a leaf of grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a section of a shoot tip of grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
- FIG. 5 illustrates clusters of berries of grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a plant of grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has the highest form of resistance to X. fastidiosa coupled with the highest wine quality of any PD resistant wine grape yet produced. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is selected for very high resistance, not the more commonly found tolerance, to prevent the production of host plants capable of further spreading PD to surrounding vineyards.
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has a very strong PD resistance and the highest wine quality of any currently used PD resistant wine grape.
- PD is one of the few diseases that kill susceptible grapevines.
- Two most popular PD resistant wine grape varieties, ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’ (‘Lenoir’ is also known as ‘Black Spanish’ or ‘Jacquez’) were used as controls or standards in all testing so that the wine quality and resistance of the candidate variety could be compared to available PD resistant varieties used across the southern United States. It is noted that ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’ have relatively poor wine quality and are tolerant, not resistant, to PD. Neither ‘Blanc du Bois’ nor ‘Lenoir’ are patented.
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has far better PD resistance and wine quality when compared with ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’. In other words, ‘Ambulo Blanc’ combines very strong resistance to X. fastidiosa with the wine quality of internationally acclaimed wine grape cultivars. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ was selected as a variety that exhibits high resistance to X. fastidiosa and V. vinifera -like wine quality. The data presented below are intended to further characterize ‘Ambulo Blanc’. The appearance of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is illustrated in FIGS. 2-6 , and further characteristics of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ are shown in Tables 1-5.
- FIG. 1 presents the DNA fingerprinting profile for ‘Ambulo Blanc’ and nine pure Vitis vinifera cultivars for comparison with the standard set of internationally agreed-upon genetic markers. This SSR fingerprinting profile can be used for DNA-based identification.
- Table 1 presents typical phenological data for ‘Ambulo Blanc’ grown in vineyards. These data are for 2016, but the ranking of the selections in regard to an early cultivar (‘Pinot noir’) and a late cultivar (‘Cabernet Sauvignon’) have been typical over years. In general, ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is phenologically mid-season. Based upon the percentage of V. vinifera in the present variety and the data regarding its parents, the variety is expected to grow in USDA Hardiness Zone 6-7. It is not expected to be drought tolerant.
- Table 2 presents the average cluster and berry data for ‘Ambulo Blanc’ and averaged over multiple years.
- Table 3 presents the average yield per vine data taken over 2016 to 2018.
- Genotype g/L
- TA g/L
- MA ‘Ambulo 7.0 b 4.5 a Blanc’ ‘Blanc du 5.2 de 2.3 bcd Bois’ ‘Cabernet 5.2 de 1.9 bcd Sauvignon’ ‘Chardonnay’ 5.9 cd 2.4 bc ‘Lenoir’ 9.1 a 4.5 a
- Xylella fastidiosa susceptibility data are presented in Table 5, which presents the levels of X. fastidiosa in relationship to tolerant (‘Blanc du Bois’ and to a lesser extent, ‘Lenoir’) and susceptible (‘Chardonnay’ and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’) cultivars. These are also mean data from repeated testing over seasons and greenhouses. Because of the high variation in greenhouse conditions, at least four standards (bio-controls) were always used: ‘b43-17’, ‘Blanc du Bois’, ‘Lenoir’, and ‘Chardonnay’ (and occasionally other V. vinifera cultivars), which allows the data to be compared across greenhouses, tests and seasons. None of these varieties are patented. These varieties tend to be very consistent in the amounts of bacteria they support as well as the severity of their disease expression. The cut-off between resistant and susceptible is usually between 75,000 and 250,000 colony forming units per milliliter (cfu/ml).
- Vitis arizonica ‘b43-17’ is the source of resistance in the breeding program. Geometric Number Mean Least Sq. Std.
- the floral buds and flower clusters are formed with in the latent (dormant) bud in the year before flowering. As the pre-formed nodes on the compressed stems within the latent bud expand and the flower clusters begin developing and the individual flowers on the panicle begin forming. They are very small 2-4 mm and closer to 2 mm with wine grapes.
- the variety is not a “slip-skin” type grape. They have skin that adheres to the flesh tightly. They are not firm at ripeness and are soft compared to modern era table grapes at harvest. The pedicels have normal attachment to the berries and are not distinguishable from other V. vinifera wine grapes in this or other morphological features, nor in juice and wine analysis.
- YAN is yeast assimilable nitrogen and helps predict fermentation success.
- the white grapes have no tannin or anthocyanin values. Seed color is rated as green to brown for mature seeds.
- ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has excellent PD resistance. However, it is highly susceptible to a wide range of pests and diseases in a manner similar to other V. vinifera cultivars, and thus it must be treated as a pure V. vinifera cultivar in terms of susceptibility to fungal diseases and pests. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has no known tolerance to adverse weather.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
A new and distinct variety of grapevine plant named ‘Ambulo Blanc’, particularly selected for its high resistance to Pierce's disease, as well as quality of fruit and wines produced is disclosed.
Description
Botanical classification: Vitis vinifera L.
Varietal denomination: The varietal denomination of the claimed variety of grapevine plant is ‘Ambulo Blanc’.
Pierce's disease (PD) is common across the southern United States from Virginia to northern California. It is also common across Mexico and Central America. The disease is caused by the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa, which is hosted by a very wide range of native and ornamental plants. The bacterium is spread by xylem feeding insects as vectors, primarily sharpshooters. PD is one of the few diseases that rapidly kills wine, table, and raisin grape cultivars of the cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera. Vector populations can be limited with insecticides, but these are difficult to use near their typically riparian native habitat or in the ornamental landscapes in which they flourish. Breeding for PD resistance has been active for over 70 years, but progress has been very slow due to a poor understanding of the germplasm and the typically multigenic nature of the resistance in most of the resistant grape species. The two most commonly grown PD resistant varieties, ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’ (‘Lenoir’ is also known as ‘Black Spanish’ or ‘Jacquet’), are F1 hybrids between V. vinifera cultivars and resistant American grape species from the southern United States, and are therefore only about 50% of V. vinifera. ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’ produce wines with lower quality than V. vinifera wine grape varieties, and they are tolerant of, rather than resistant to, X. fastidiosa infection, which results in their potential to expand areas damaged by PD due to their ability to act as host plants for the bacteria and vectors.
Grapevine is an important and valuable crop. Accordingly, there is a need for new varieties of grapevine plant. In particular, there is a need for improved varieties of grapevine plant that produce high quality fruit for winemaking and are resistant to Pierce's disease.
In order to meet these needs, the present invention is directed to an improved variety of grapevine plant. In particular, the invention relates to a new and distinct variety of grapevine plant (Vitis vinifera L.), which has been denominated as ‘Ambulo Blanc’. Grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’ possesses very strong resistance to the bacterial causal agent of Pierce's disease (PD), and produces very high quality fruit and wines therefrom that are indistinguishable from the widely grown European wine grape cultivars. Other PD resistant cultivars are known, but their fruit and winemaking quality are poor in comparison to ‘Ambulo Blanc’ and their resistance is much lower.
In particular, grapevine plant variety ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is a white wine grape selection that is about 97% V. vinifera (including 62.5% ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, 12.5% ‘Carignane’, and 12.5% ‘Chardonnay’) and is highly resistant to PD as shown in repeated greenhouse evaluations. In comparison, the two most commonly grown PD resistant varieties, ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’, are only about 50% of V. vinifera. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has been tested in Ojai, Sonoma, and along the Napa River in California. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has an early bloom and its fruit ripen early. It has small to medium berries and relatively large clusters, and is highly productive. Wines made from fruit of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ are reminiscent of ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ and may be described as: ‘light straw to clear color’, ‘citrus’, ‘lime’, ‘tropical’, ‘gooseberry and golden delicious apple flavors’, ‘bright fruit’, ‘slightly bitter’, and ‘textured’.
The development of this new grapevine variety is in part a result of the discovery of a single dominant gene for resistance to Xylella fastidiosa, the bacterial causal agent of Pierce's disease (PD). The source of the PD resistance is a form of V. arizonica (‘b43-17’) that appears to have some candicans parentage and is from Monterrey, Mexico. ‘b43-17’ was crossed to the susceptible V. rupestris ‘A. de Serres’ to create the F8909 population. Neither ‘b43-17’ nor ‘A. de Serres’ are patented. The resistance from ‘b43-17’ was found to be inherited as a single dominant gene (locus), and this resistance gene, PdRl, was genetically mapped using the F8909 population by a grapevine breeding program. Tightly linked simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were developed and were used in marker-assisted selection to exclude susceptible plants from evaluation in each round of selection. All the progeny with PdRl were tested for PD resistance and only those with strong resistance were considered for use as parents. Potential parents were also screened for fruit quality over generations and only those with good quality fruit and that appeared like V. vinifera were selected.
Line ‘F8909-08’ from the F8909 population was crossed to ‘P79-101’, a highly susceptible, advanced V. vinifera table grape selection a grape breeding program. The resulting ‘F8909-08’ X ‘P79-101’ F1 generation and progeny thereof were screened with the SSR markers for resistance to X. fastidiosa under greenhouse conditions. A highly resistant selection from the ‘F8909-08’ X ‘P79-101’ cross, ‘00504-20’, was crossed to another V. vinifera table grape from a grape breeding program, ‘B52-89’, to create ‘A81-138’, which was also selected for its very high resistance to PD. ‘A81-138’ was then used to cross to V. vinifera wine grapes for several generations of modified backcrossing to obtain the candidate selection ‘09314-102’, which was later named as ‘Ambulo Blanc’. These backcrosses were modified because of the high heterozygosity and recessive load found in grapes. Hence, to avoid exposure of deleterious recessive alleles, each generation of backcrossing was to a different and unrelated high quality V. vinifera cultivar.
Accordingly, the parentage of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is ‘07370-028’ (V. vinifera ‘F2-35’ (‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ X ‘Carignane’) X ‘U0502-38’ (‘A81-138’ X V. vinifera ‘Chardonnay’)). ‘07370-028’ was crossed with V. vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ to produce ‘09314-102’ and this selection was later named ‘Ambulo Blanc’. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ was particularly selected for its high resistance to Pierce's disease, as well as the quality of its fruit and wines produced therefrom. ‘09314-102’ is a cross between ‘07370-28’ X ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’. ‘07370-28’ is highly resistant to X. fastidiosa has lobed leaves. ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ is not only very susceptible to X. fastidiosa, it has deeply lobed leaves with relatively short teeth on the leaf margin, has short sinuses on the lateral lobes and is a red wine grape. None of the parents across the multiple backcross generations are patented. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ can be distinguished from its male parent ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ by its high resistance to X. fastidiosa. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ can be distinguished from its female parent ‘07370-028’ in that ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has perfect flowers whereas ‘07370-028’ has pistillate flowers.
This new grapevine plant variety is illustrated by the accompanying photographs. The colors shown are as true as can be reasonably obtained by conventional photographic procedures. The photographs are of plants that are five to seven years old. Colors referred to are in reference to The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Charts Edition V.
The following is a detailed description of the new grapevine plant variety designated as ‘Ambulo Blanc’, including the key differentiating characteristics of this variety and comparisons of characteristics of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ to other grapevine varieties. Unless otherwise indicated, evaluation data were taken from five- to seven-year-old plants, grown in Davis, Calif.
- Classification:
-
- Family.—Vitaceae.
- Botanical name.—Vitis vinifera L.
- Common name.—Grapevine.
- Variety name.—‘Ambulo Blanc’.
-
- Parentage:
-
- Female parent.—‘07370-028’ (unpatented).
- Male parent.—‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (unpatented) Note that ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ is a hermaphroditic cultivar and thus can be used as a maternal or paternal parent.
-
- Plant:
-
- Berries.—Small to medium, spherical, green to yellow green, thin green/white bloom.
- Clusters.—Medium to large, long conical, compact to well-filled.
- Leaves.—Five-lobed, overlapping lobes with occasional teeth in the sinus, overlapping circular petiolar sinus, relatively short 2-ranked teeth on leaf margin, glabrous adaxial surface, short sparse tomentum on the abaxial surface, brown-red petioles, and color diffuses into the veins.
- Shoot tips.—Erect green/white tomentum.
- Production.—Early bloom and ripens early, highly productive.
- Method of propagation.—Vegetative propagation via woody or herbaceous cuttings, or budding and grafting to rootstock. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has been asexually reproduced in Davis, Calif. Any rootstock can be used with the variety. Most often it will be grown on rootstocks that resist grape phylloxera and or nematodes. In testing, selections were evaluated grafted on ‘1103P’ rootstock which is not patented. It was chosen for ease of propagation and because it is widely used in CA. The variety has been grafted on many other rootstocks for testing in field trials as well.
-
‘Ambulo Blanc’ has the highest form of resistance to X. fastidiosa coupled with the highest wine quality of any PD resistant wine grape yet produced. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is selected for very high resistance, not the more commonly found tolerance, to prevent the production of host plants capable of further spreading PD to surrounding vineyards.
‘Ambulo Blanc’ has a very strong PD resistance and the highest wine quality of any currently used PD resistant wine grape. PD is one of the few diseases that kill susceptible grapevines. Two most popular PD resistant wine grape varieties, ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’ (‘Lenoir’ is also known as ‘Black Spanish’ or ‘Jacquez’), were used as controls or standards in all testing so that the wine quality and resistance of the candidate variety could be compared to available PD resistant varieties used across the southern United States. It is noted that ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’ have relatively poor wine quality and are tolerant, not resistant, to PD. Neither ‘Blanc du Bois’ nor ‘Lenoir’ are patented.
‘Ambulo Blanc’ has far better PD resistance and wine quality when compared with ‘Blanc du Bois’ and ‘Lenoir’. In other words, ‘Ambulo Blanc’ combines very strong resistance to X. fastidiosa with the wine quality of internationally acclaimed wine grape cultivars. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ was selected as a variety that exhibits high resistance to X. fastidiosa and V. vinifera-like wine quality. The data presented below are intended to further characterize ‘Ambulo Blanc’. The appearance of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is illustrated in FIGS. 2-6 , and further characteristics of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ are shown in Tables 1-5.
Table 1 presents typical phenological data for ‘Ambulo Blanc’ grown in vineyards. These data are for 2016, but the ranking of the selections in regard to an early cultivar (‘Pinot noir’) and a late cultivar (‘Cabernet Sauvignon’) have been typical over years. In general, ‘Ambulo Blanc’ is phenologically mid-season. Based upon the percentage of V. vinifera in the present variety and the data regarding its parents, the variety is expected to grow in USDA Hardiness Zone 6-7. It is not expected to be drought tolerant.
| TABLE 1 |
| Average phenological states for ‘Ambulo Blanc’. ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ |
| (late) and ‘Pinot noir’ (early) are included as comparisons. |
| All data were taken from vineyards. |
| 50% | ||||
| Cultivar | Budbreak | 50% bloom | veraison | 24 °Brix |
| ‘Ambulo Blanc’ | 3/17 | 5/1 | 7/17 | 8/16 |
| ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ | 3/24 | 5/7 | 7/21 | 8/30 |
| ‘Pinot Noir’ | 3/10 | 4/30 | 7/9 | 8/9 |
Table 2 presents the average cluster and berry data for ‘Ambulo Blanc’ and averaged over multiple years.
| TABLE 2 |
| Average cluster and berry sizes of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ and its |
| comparison varieties. Data are averages over multiple years. |
| Avg. | t-test | Avg. | t-test | |||
| Number | Cluster | Cluster | Berry | Berry | ||
| Genotype | of Years | Wt. (g) | Wt. | Wt. (g) | Wt | Clusters |
| ‘Ambulo | 6 | 340 | a | 1.3 | bc | Well-filled |
| Blanc’ | to compact | |||||
| ‘Blanc du | 6 | 148 | d | 1.5 | a | Well-filled |
| Bois’ | ||||||
| ‘Cabernet | 6 | 132 | d | 1.2 | c | Loose to |
| Sauvignon’ | well-filled | |||||
| ‘Chardonnay’ | 6 | 196 | cd | 1.5 | ab | Well-filled |
| to compact | ||||||
| ‘Lenoir’ | 6 | 157 | d | 1.3 | bc | Loose |
Table 3 presents the average yield per vine data taken over 2016 to 2018.
| TABLE 3 |
| Average production data for ‘Ambulo Blanc’ |
| and its comparison varieties. Data are |
| averages from three years (2016 to 2018). |
| Avg. Yield/ | Std. Dev. | Number | ||
| Genotype | Vine (kg) | (kg) | t-test | of Years |
| ‘Ambulo Blanc’ | 11.4 | 3.6 | a | 3 |
| ‘Blanc du Bois’ | 12.7 | 1.8 | a | 3 |
| ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ | 10.9 | 1.8 | a | 3 |
| ‘Chardonnay’ | 10.9 | 3.2 | a | 3 |
| ‘Lenoir’ | 20.0 | 6.8 | b | 3 |
Mean berry juice data were also taken and Table 4 presents this data over a five-year period between 2014 and 2018. These values are consistent with cultivars that produce high quality wines.
| TABLE 4 |
| Average juice data for ‘Ambulo Blanc’ and its comparison |
| varieties. Data are averages from five years (2014 to 2018). |
| t-test | t-test | |||
| Avg. | Avg. | Avg. | Avg. | |
| Genotype | ° Brix | ° Brix | pH | pH |
| ‘Ambulo | 23.7 | c | 3.66 | bc |
| Blanc’ | ||||
| ‘Blanc du | 23.5 | c | 3.58 | bc |
| Bois’ | ||||
| ‘Cabernet | 25.8 | b | 3.74 | abc |
| Sauvignon’ | ||||
| ‘Chardonnay’ | 23.3 | cd | 3.68 | bc |
| ‘Lenoir’ | 21.3 | e | 3.96 | a |
| Avg. | Avg. L- | |||
| titratable | t-test | malic | t-test | |
| acidity | Avg. | acid | Avg. | |
| Genotype | (g/L) | TA | (g/L) | MA |
| ‘Ambulo | 7.0 | b | 4.5 | a |
| Blanc’ | ||||
| ‘Blanc du | 5.2 | de | 2.3 | bcd |
| Bois’ | ||||
| ‘Cabernet | 5.2 | de | 1.9 | bcd |
| Sauvignon’ | ||||
| ‘Chardonnay’ | 5.9 | cd | 2.4 | bc |
| ‘Lenoir’ | 9.1 | a | 4.5 | a |
Xylella fastidiosa susceptibility data are presented in Table 5, which presents the levels of X. fastidiosa in relationship to tolerant (‘Blanc du Bois’ and to a lesser extent, ‘Lenoir’) and susceptible (‘Chardonnay’ and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’) cultivars. These are also mean data from repeated testing over seasons and greenhouses. Because of the high variation in greenhouse conditions, at least four standards (bio-controls) were always used: ‘b43-17’, ‘Blanc du Bois’, ‘Lenoir’, and ‘Chardonnay’ (and occasionally other V. vinifera cultivars), which allows the data to be compared across greenhouses, tests and seasons. None of these varieties are patented. These varieties tend to be very consistent in the amounts of bacteria they support as well as the severity of their disease expression. The cut-off between resistant and susceptible is usually between 75,000 and 250,000 colony forming units per milliliter (cfu/ml).
| TABLE 5 |
| Xylella fastidiosa concentrations based on ELISA readings and |
| converted to colony forming units (cfu/ml). Vitis arizonica ‘b43-17’ |
| is the source of resistance in the breeding program. |
| Geometric | Number | ||||
| Mean | Least Sq. | Std. | of Times | ||
| Cultivar | cfu/ml | t-test | Mean | Error | Tested |
| ‘b43-17’ | 12423 | a | 9.4 | 0.2 | 11 |
| ‘Ambulo Blanc’ | 102893 | b | 11.5 | 0.3 | 5 |
| ‘Blanc du Bois’ | 859096 | c | 13.7 | 0.2 | 11 |
| ‘Lenoir’ | 2421748 | d | 14.7 | 0.6 | 2 |
| ‘Chardonnay’ | 5197228 | d | 15.5 | 0.2 | 11 |
| ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ | 6582993 | d | 15.7 | 0.8 | 1 |
| TABLE 6 |
| shows phenotype of ‘Ambulo Blanc’. The variety has normal |
| hermaphroditic flowers and typical floral development as is found |
| in commercial V. vinifera wine grapes. |
| ‘Ambulo Blanc’ | |||
| Berry size (L, W) | 1.4 × 1.3 cm | ||
| Berry weight, shape | 1.0 g/round | ||
| On average, two seeds | 2 | ||
| per berry. Seed | |||
| number, length and | |||
| width typical for V. | |||
| vinifera wine grapes, | |||
| but not measured | |||
| Cluster #, L, W, | 11.0 × 27.0 cm, | ||
| shape, compactness, 2 | long cylindrical | ||
| clusters/shoot | single to winged, | ||
| well-filled to | |||
| compact | |||
| Yield kg | 15.6 | ||
| Pruning weights | 2.8 kg | ||
| Trunk width at 30 cm | 3.8 cm | ||
| Trunk color and | Rough shaggy | ||
| texture | bark | ||
| 178D | |||
| Woody shoots | 0.9 cm/5.3 cm | ||
| diameter above cluster/ | |||
| and internode length | |||
| Woody shoot texture | First year bark | ||
| and color | adheres but peels | ||
| in strips in second | |||
| year | |||
| 164B | |||
| Active shoot color, | 142C | ||
| internode color above | 144C | ||
| the cluster zone/ | 0.9/5.3 cm | ||
| cluster zone shoot | |||
| diameter/internode | |||
| length (shoots same | |||
| size as woody canes in | |||
| the cluster zone) | |||
| Tendril length, | 8.0 | ||
| diameter | 0.1 | ||
| Tendril color, | N144C | ||
| Opposite leaves and | |||
| alternating 2 nodes | |||
| skip 2 nodes skip | |||
| Seed color | 165B | ||
| Cluster size L, W | 11.0 × 27.0 cm | ||
| #Berries/cluster | 452 | ||
| Berry color skin and | 144A | ||
| waxy bloom | 190D | ||
| Berry flesh color | 144A | ||
| Leaves L, W | 21.0 × 23.0 | ||
| Leaf arrangement, | Alternate, | ||
| shape, and color | palmate with 5 | ||
| Top/Bottom | lobes | ||
| 143A/142B | |||
| Petiole L, diameter, | 14.0 | ||
| texture | 0.4 | ||
| smooth | |||
| Petiole color | N77B | ||
| Shoot tip color (first | 144D | ||
| opened leaf) | |||
| Budbreak | Mar. 15 | ||
| Bloom date | May 15 | ||
| Harvest date | Aug. 13 | ||
| Peduncle L, diam., | 5.5 | ||
| color, texture | 0.7 | ||
| 144B | |||
| Smooth | |||
The floral buds and flower clusters are formed with in the latent (dormant) bud in the year before flowering. As the pre-formed nodes on the compressed stems within the latent bud expand and the flower clusters begin developing and the individual flowers on the panicle begin forming. They are very small 2-4 mm and closer to 2 mm with wine grapes.
The variety is not a “slip-skin” type grape. They have skin that adheres to the flesh tightly. They are not firm at ripeness and are soft compared to modern era table grapes at harvest. The pedicels have normal attachment to the berries and are not distinguishable from other V. vinifera wine grapes in this or other morphological features, nor in juice and wine analysis.
Rounded leaves with overlapping relatively shallow lateral sinuses, circular overlapping petiolar sinus, short sharp teeth, light tomentum, petioles with light red (N77B) color with limited diffusion into the main veins
YAN is yeast assimilable nitrogen and helps predict fermentation success. The white grapes have no tannin or anthocyanin values. Seed color is rated as green to brown for mature seeds.
| TABLE 7 |
| presents the wine characteristics of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ |
| YAN | ||||||
| ° Bri | TA | L-malic | Potassium | (mg/L, | ||
| x | (g/L) | pH | acid (g/L) | (mg/L ) | as N) | |
| ‘Ambulo | 24.2 | 6.4 | 3.64 | 3.6 | 2160 | 223 |
| Blanc’ | ||||||
| TABLE 8 |
| presents the juice, fruit and seed phenotype of ‘Ambulo Blanc’ |
| Juice | Juice | Juice | Skin | |
| Hue | Intensity | Flavor | Flavor | |
| ‘Ambulo | green- | Lt Light | pear, s1 | neutral, |
| Blanc’ | yellow | spice | fruity, sl | |
| veg | ||||
| Skin | Seed | Seed | ||
| Tannin | Color | Tannin | ||
| (1 = low, | (1 = gr, | Seed | (1 = high, | |
| 4 = high) | 4 = br) | Flavor | 4 = low) | |
| ‘Ambulo | 1 | 4 | buttery, s1 | 4 |
| Blanc’ | woody | |||
‘Ambulo Blanc’ has excellent PD resistance. However, it is highly susceptible to a wide range of pests and diseases in a manner similar to other V. vinifera cultivars, and thus it must be treated as a pure V. vinifera cultivar in terms of susceptibility to fungal diseases and pests. ‘Ambulo Blanc’ has no known tolerance to adverse weather.
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct variety of grapevine plant designated ‘Ambulo Blanc’ as shown and described herein.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/602,591 USPP32949P2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2019-11-05 | Grapevine plant named ‘Ambulo Blanc’ |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/602,591 USPP32949P2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2019-11-05 | Grapevine plant named ‘Ambulo Blanc’ |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP32949P2 true USPP32949P2 (en) | 2021-04-06 |
Family
ID=75275320
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/602,591 Active USPP32949P2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2019-11-05 | Grapevine plant named ‘Ambulo Blanc’ |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP32949P2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP34483P2 (en) * | 2021-09-20 | 2022-08-09 | Florida A&M University | White wine grapevine plant named ‘Blanc du Soleil’ |
-
2019
- 2019-11-05 US US16/602,591 patent/USPP32949P2/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (6)
| Title |
|---|
| The Apr. 1, 2014 Test Agreement For Grape vines (No. 2015-5011) between Silverado Vineyards and The Regents of the University of California, 7 pages. |
| The May 1, 2014 Test Agreement For Grape vines (No. 2016-5008) between Ben R. Drake Enterprises, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California, 7 pages. |
| The May 16, 2017 Test Agreement For Grapevines (No. 2017-5008) between Wonderful Nurseries, LLC and The Regents of the University of California, 7 pages. |
| The May 17, 2017 Test Agreement For Grapevines (No. 2017-5011) between Sunridge Nurseries, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California, 6 pages. |
| The May 18, 2017 Test Agreement For Grapevines (No. 2017-5009) between Novavine and The Regents of the University of California, 6 pages. |
| The May 24, 2017 Test Agreement For Grapevines (No. 2017-5010) between Sutter Home Winery, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California, 7 pages. |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP34483P2 (en) * | 2021-09-20 | 2022-08-09 | Florida A&M University | White wine grapevine plant named ‘Blanc du Soleil’ |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Chan et al. | Breeding and variety improvement. | |
| US20180042153P1 (en) | Pepper plant named 'RY5' | |
| US11185048B2 (en) | Hybrid tomato variety ‘Espartano’ | |
| USPP32949P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘Ambulo Blanc’ | |
| USPP33015P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘Caminante Blanc’ | |
| USPP33039P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘Paseante Noir’ | |
| USPP32999P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘Errante Noir’ | |
| USPP32929P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘Camminare Noir’ | |
| USPP9865P (en) | Table grape named `Ralli Seedless` | |
| USPP34376P2 (en) | Seedless grapevine named ‘ARDFORTYTWO’ | |
| USPP16478P3 (en) | Grape plant named ‘Frontenac gris’ | |
| US20060130195P1 (en) | Apple tree rootstock named 'G.202' | |
| USPP37225P2 (en) | Grapevine named ‘SV36-21-170’ | |
| USPP35387P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘ARD44’ | |
| USPP5171P (en) | Tomato plant | |
| USPP35728P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘ARAVELLE’ | |
| USPP36565P2 (en) | Seedless grapevine plant named ‘ARD49’ | |
| USPP35377P2 (en) | Seedless grapevine plant named ‘ARD45’ | |
| USPP32578P3 (en) | Seedless table grape (grapevine) named ‘ARRATWENTYTHREE’ | |
| USPP37294P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘BLOMG04’ | |
| USPP37171P2 (en) | Grapevine named ‘SV34-161-275’ | |
| USPP36873P3 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘SV34-130-92’ | |
| USPP34482P2 (en) | Grapevine named ‘SV33-101-337’ | |
| USPP34881P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘SV35-186-427’ | |
| US20260076334A1 (en) | Hybrid tomato variety 'e15t43094' |