USPP30326P2

USPP30326P2 - Strawberry plant named ‘Camila’

Info

Publication number: USPP30326P2
Application number: US15/732,748
Authority: US
Inventors: Jimmy Haig Bagdasarian
Original assignee: Lassen Canyon Nursery Inc
Current assignee: Lassen Canyon Nursery Inc
Priority date: 2017-12-23
Filing date: 2017-12-23
Publication date: 2019-04-02
Anticipated expiration: 2037-12-23

Abstract

A new and distinct variety of strawberry plant (Fragaria X ananassa) named ‘Camila.’ This new short-day strawberry variety is characterized by a vigorous plant which produces mostly long conical fruit with a good sweet strawberry flavor, and a very desirable lighter red exterior and interior color. The variety, while short-day, is fully remontant in cool coastal environments of California.

Description

Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed:

Botanical classification: Fragaria x ananassa.

Variety denomination: The new strawberry variety denomination is ‘Camila.’

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of Invention

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry variety named ‘Camila.’ This new short-day variety is the result of a controlled cross in an ongoing breeding program by the inventor, Jimmy Bagdasarian, in 2009. The variety is botanically known as Fragaria X ananassa. The primary market of this variety is for the fresh market sales of the fruit. ‘Camila’ produces large, conical berries, which are firm, have good flavor and a light red color.

Comparison with Parent Varieties

The controlled cross which produced ‘Camila’ was the result of a cross in 2009 between a strawberry variety used as a female parent designated ‘1D12’ (an unreleased and non-patented proprietary variety,) and a strawberry variety used as the male pollen parent designated ‘Sweet Ann,’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 22,472).

The characteristics of the female parent ‘1D12’ are: short-day variety with very firm fruit which are light in color and can be a bit irregular in shape. The plant exhibits medium vigor with lighter green leaves.

The male pollen parent ‘Sweet Ann’ has the following characteristics: day-neutral with an open plant density and high vigor plant; leaves are medium glossy with little to no blistering; fruit are very large, conical, and sweet, with a glossy medium red color both interior and exterior, often with a white shoulder near the calyx.

‘Camila,’ is a short-day plant, unlike its male parent ‘Sweet Ann.’ It has intermediate vigor to its parents with that more closely aligning the more vigorous ‘Sweet Ann’ in nature. It has firmer fruit than that of the pollen parent ‘Sweet Ann,’ but not quite as firm as that of the female parent ‘1D12.’ The fruit of ‘Camila’ is quite uniform like that of ‘Sweet Ann,’ and unlike the sometimes misshapen ‘1D12.’

The cross made to create ‘Camila’ was carried out in Santa Cruz, Calif., USA. Pollen taken from ‘Sweet Ann’ was placed onto a flower with male parts removed on ‘1D12’ and then covered so that no other pollen could contaminate the procedure.

Once the strawberries developed from this cross, they were harvested and the resulting seed was extracted and germinated in a greenhouse in Redding, Calif., USA. The resulting seedlings were transplanted to Shastina, Calif. in 2010, grown out for an additional period and allowed to propagate asexually through runners. Clones were then harvested and planted in breeding plots in fruiting fields in mid-October in: Oxnard, Calif. (Ventura County); and Watsonville, Calif. (Monterey County). The selection of the new variety was first made in Watsonville, Calif., and given the designation ‘23K18’ in 2011. This selection was later named ‘Camila.’

The variety was further propagated asexually by runners (stolens) in breeding plots in: Macdoel, Calif. (Siskiyou County); and Manteca, Calif. (San Joaquin County).

The new variety has also been “meristemed.” Small pieces of plant material of approximately 0.5 mm in diameter and consisting of the undifferentiated meristem tissue and one or two leaf primordia were removed from the buds on crowns of young daughter plants, then placed on nutrient medium, and new plants were grown from them. Planting stock from the “meristemed” plants are growing in a screenhouse located in Redding, Calif. These propagules of ‘Camila’ are identical to the original plant in all distinguishing characteristics. The propagation has been monitored throughout the process, and all traits disclosed here remain fixed and true to type through successive generations of asexual reproduction.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

‘Camila’ is a short-day variety exhibiting the following combination of characteristics, which have been observed repeatedly, and which distinguish this strawberry plant as a new and distinct variety:

- 1. The variety produces large sized fruit;
- 2. The fruit is mostly a long conic shape;
- 3. The fruit is attractive, having a glossy medium red exterior and light red interior;
- 4. The fruit is sweet tasting, with good flavor;
- 5. The variety produces a high volume of fruit;
- 6. The plants of the variety are vigorous and maintain a fairly open and upright architecture;
- 7. The variety is fully remontant in cool coastal environments.

‘Camila’ fruit is larger than that of its female parent ‘1D12,’ but smaller than that of its paternal parent ‘Sweet Ann.’ The ripening pattern of ‘Camila’ is more desirable than that of ‘Sweet Ann’ as it ripens more fully to the top, whereas in certain conditions, ‘Sweet Ann’ does not color all the way to the calyx. While the fruit of ‘Camila’ are of similar firmness to ‘1D12,’ it is much firmer than that of ‘Sweet Ann.’ Another good quality of ‘Camila’ is that it has a lighter, medium red color which is more preferred by shippers of fresh strawberries, because darker colored berries are perceived as being overly ripe.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying color photographs, identified as FIGS. 1 through 6, show the appearance of typical specimens of the new strawberry variety ‘Camila.’ These figures depict the colors as nearly true as it is reasonably possible given differences in color illustrations of this character. Accordingly, color in the photographs may differ slightly from the colors discussed in the botanical description. The photographs of the depicted plant, plant parts, and fruit of ‘Camila’ (previously designated as ‘23K18’) were taken in October/November of 2017.

FIG. 1 shows the top and bottom of a typical leaf and petiole structures of ‘23K18,’ now denominated as ‘Camila.’

FIG. 2 shows a selection of late-season fruit;

FIG. 3 shows two typical inflorescences;

FIG. 4 shows a transverse cross-section of typical fruit, internal coloration and core size;

FIG. 5 shows calyx shape and position in relationship to fruit in late season; and,

FIG. 6 shows typical late season plants in a fruiting field.

DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANT

‘Camila’ is a new and distinct variety of strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa). It is the result of a cross between its female parent, ‘1D12,’ and ‘Sweet Ann.’ The female parent ‘1D12,’ is a short-day plant, and the male parent ‘Sweet Ann’ is a day neutral variety. While ‘Camila’ is short-day, it is remontant (day-neutral tendencies) in cool coastal environments, and partially remontant in warmer inland environments, but blooms only once in a high elevation nursery, consistent with a short-day variety. The plants of the new variety are vigorous and produce multiple crowns early after planting. ‘Camila’ exhibits several characteristics which are improvements over one or both of its parent varieties, and other known cultivars. The characteristics of ‘Camila’ were observed in plants in late season. These characteristics and comparisons with other cultivars are discussed below.

The fruiting pattern of ‘Camila’ is similar to that of ‘Sweet Ann.’ The fruit size of ‘Camila’ is uniformly large, slightly smaller than the fruit produced by ‘Sweet Ann,’ but larger than the fruit produced by ‘1D12.’ This slightly smaller size of fruit of ‘Camila’ provides an advantage in packaging fruit, where fruit too large can be damaged, but fruit too small can take longer to pick, and is less marketable.

The fruit of ‘Camila,’ the female parent ‘1D12,’ and the male parent ‘Sweet Ann’ produce long conic fruit, however the fruit of ‘1D12’ is not as uniformly smooth. The fruit of ‘Camila’ ripens more throughout the fruit rather than from the tip to the shoulders of the berry, resulting in a more uniform red color over the whole fruit when fully ripe. In contrast, the shoulders of the fruit of “Sweet Ann’ are the last portion to ripen, and in some cases do not fully turn red. The fruit of ‘Camila’ is nearly absent of any creases and is smoother than that of ‘Sweet Ann’ and ‘1D12.’ While ‘1D12 is slightly firmer, ‘Camila’ is still firm, and in fact is firmer than ‘Sweet Ann.’

The data set forth for ‘Camila’ in Table 1 was collected in October/November in 2017 from plants grown in a test plot in Moss Landing, Monterey County, Calif. Color terminology where noted is in accordance with the Pantone Color Formula Guide GP 1201.

TABLE 1

Detailed Description of Characteristics of ‘Camila’

	SPECIFICATION:
	Genus/Species	Fragaria X ananassa
	Market Name	Strawberry
	PARENTS:
	Female	Proprietary variety ‘1D12’ (Unpatented)
	Male	‘Sweet Ann’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 22,472).
	PLANT:
	Type	Short Day.
	Growth Habit	Semi-upright.
	Foliage density	Dense.
	Vigor	High.
	Height	Average: 39.2 cm;
		range: 34 cm to 43 cm.
	Width	Average: 60.1 cm;
		range: 47 cm to 68 cm.
	Crowns	Multiple crowns produced
		early after planting.
	Disease tolerance	Test plots from Cal Poly
		showed susceptibility to
		Macrophomina phaseolina
		(Crown rot) but a moderate
		tolerance to Verticillium dahliae.
	LEAF:
	Width	Average: 151 cm;
		range: 115 cm to 200 cm.
	Color	Adaxial surface: green 357 C.
		Abaxial surface: green 371 U.
	Pubescens	Medium density.
	Inter-vein blistering	Low-moderate.
	Glossiness	Medium.
	Variegation	None.
	TERMINAL
	LEAFLET:
	Length	Average: 90.1 mm;
		range: 70 mm to 115 mm.
	Width	Average: 82.6 mm;
		range: 70 mm to 100 mm.
	Ratio length to width	1.09.
	Margins	Serrate to crenate.
	Leaf shape	Orbicular.
	Base shape	Acute.
	Cross-section shape	Concave.
	PETIOLE:
	Pubescens	Medium density; direction: perpendicular.
	Petiole color	Green 381 U.
	Petiole length	Average. 26.5 cm;
		Range: 22.5 cm to 30.2 cm.
	Petiole diameter	Average: 3.25 mm;
		Range: 2.67 mm to 3.57 mm.
	STIPULE:
	Anthocyanin	Present, moderate.
	coloration
	Length	Average: 30.3 mm;
		Range: 19 mm to 42 mm.
	Width	Average: 11.1 mm;
		Range: 9 mm to 13 mm.
	STOLEN:
	Anthocyanin	Present.
	coloration
	Pubescens	Low to medium; upward
		to perpendicular direction.
	Diameter	Average: 3.1 mm;
		Range: 1.78 mm to 3.57 mm.
	INFLORESCENCE:
	Flowering time	Moderately early.
	Position	At, or slightly below the canopy.
	Number of blooms	Average: 4.4; Range: 3 to 9.
	Length	Average: 31.5 cm;
		Range: 27 cm to 36 cm.
	Flower	Average dictilieter: 29.8 mm;
		Range: 26 mm to 35 mm.
	Petal arrangement	Mostly overlapping.
	Petal number	Average: 5.5; Range: 5 to 7.
	Petal length	Average: 10.9 mm;
		Range: 10 mm to 12 mm.
	Petal width	Average: 11.5 mm;
		Range: 10 mm to 13 mm.
	Ratio length to width	0.95.
	Petal color	Bright white 11-0601 TPX,
		but can transition to 1905 U when
	mature.
	Calyx	Slightly larger to much larger
		than the corolla.
	Calyx color	Adaxial surface: green 3435 C.
		Abaxial Surface: green 371 U.
	Stamens	Average number: 29.3;
		Range: 25 to 32.
	Pedicel	Attitude of hairs is perpendicular.
	FRUIT
	Bearing	Remontant in cool coastal
		environments; partial remontance
		inland.
	Shape	Well shaped, long conical.
	Size	Seasonal average: 23 g.
	Achenes	Approximately
		level with the fruit surface.
	Glossiness	Strong.
	External color	Red 186 C.
	Internal color	Flesh (excluding core):
		Red 186 U.
	Evenness of external	Nearly to the top of the
	color	berry when fully ripe.
	Width of band at	Small.
	top devoid of achencs
	Fruit center	Some hollowness.
	Yield	Average grams per plant: 1857 g.
	Firmness	Firm, firmer than parent
		and cultivar ‘Sweet Ann.’
	% Brix	Average: 8.6; Range: 7.8-9.7.

The comparison statistics set forth in the following Tables are with respect to characteristics observed in the late season of ‘Camila.’ All measurements for ‘Camila’ were taken in Moss Landing, Calif. in 2017. In Tables 2 and 3, the characteristics of ‘Camila’ are compared with the varieties ‘Sweet Ann’ and ‘Lucia’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 26,974) historical data. Color identifications where noted are in accordance with the Pantone Color Formula Guide GP 1201.

Plants and Foliage

The vigor of ‘Camila’ is similar to that of ‘Sweet Ann,’ while ‘Sweet Ann’ has a more open architecture. The plant spread of ‘Camila’ is quite a bit larger than the compared varieties, but has a leaf spread that is smaller on average. The petiole diameter of ‘Camila’ is also smaller on average than that of the compared varieties.

TABLE 2

Foliar Characteristics of ‘Camila’ Compared to ‘Lucia’ and ‘Sweet Ann’

Foliar

Cultivar

Characteristics	‘Camila’	‘Lucia’	‘Sweet Ann’

Plant height	Average	392	391	380
(mm)	Range	340-430	292-490	290-480
Plant spread	Average	601	472	420
(mm)	Range	470-680	430-550	330-510
Leaf width	Average	151	195	165
(mm)	Range	115-200	165-220	130-195
Mid-ticr leaflet	Average	90	103	88
length (mm)	Range	70-115	82-116	72-105
Mid-tier leaflet	Average	83	91	67
width (mm)	Range	64-100	73-102	52-88
Petiole length	Average	265	268	220
(mm)	Range	225-302	230-335	150-280
Petiole diameter	Average	3.25	4.48	3.74
(mm)	Range	2.67-3.78	3.70-5.80	3.01-4.29

Number of leaflets per	3	3	3
leaf
Leaf convexity	Concave	Slight concave	Slight concave
Shape of leaflet base	Acute	Rounded to	Obtuse
		obtuse
Leaf pubescence	Medium	Medium	Medium
Petiole pubescence	Medium	Medium	Medium
Direction	Perpendicular	Perpendicular	Perpendicular

Stipule length	Average	30.3	35.7	Not available
(mm)	Range	19-42	30-40

Stipule anthocyanin	Yes	Yes	Yes-weak
coloration
Leaf margins	Serrate to	Serrate to	Commonly
	crenate	crenate	crenate
Leaf color adaxial surface	357 C	364 U	364 U
Leaf color abaxial surface	371 U	363 U	370 U
Petiole color	381 U	366 U	383 U
Leaf surface blistering	Low-medium	Medium	Very weak
Leaf surface glossiness	Medium	High	Medium

Flowers and Fruit

‘Camila’ is a short-day variety as it blooms only once in high-elevation nurseries. It is, however, remontant in cool, coastal environments, and partially remontant in warmer inland environments. While ‘Lucia’ tends to have a steady number of 5 petals, ‘Camila’ fluctuates from 5 to 7 petals; more than that of ‘Sweet Ann’ (5-6 petals). The mature petals of ‘Camila’ have occasionally been seen to transition from bright white to a pink color in certain conditions, whereas this does not happen in ‘Lucia’ or in ‘Sweet Ann.’

The external color of ‘Camila’ fruit is slightly darker than that of ‘Lucia,’ but similar in color to ‘Sweet Ann.’ The fruit of ‘Camila’ has excellent fresh-market qualities, including: good conic shape and large size, lighter red color, good firmness, and good flavor.

In Table 3, comparative data for flower and fruit characteristics for ‘Camila,’ ‘Lucia,’ and ‘Sweet Ann’ are set forth.

TABLE 3

Flower and Fruit Characteristics of ‘Camila’
Compared to ‘Lucia’ and ‘Sweet Ann’

Cultivar

Characteristic		‘Camila	‘Lucia’	‘Sweet Ann’

Petal number	Average	5.5	5	5.4
	Range	5-7	5	5-6
Petal length (mm)	Average	10.9	12.44	11.21
	Range	10-12	10.6-14.3	9.2-13
Petal width (mm)	Average	11.5	11.86	11.1
	Range	10-13	10-13	9-13
Position of flower		Most	mostly	most
(relative to canopy)		exposed,	exposed	exposed,
		some below		some even
Pedicel length (mm)	Average	315	430	330
	Range	270-360	380-540	240-420
Sepal color	Adaxial	3435 C	364 U	364 U
	Abaxial	371 U	371 U	370 U
Corolla diameter (mm)	Average	29.8	28.2	30.3
	Range	26-35	23.5-34	27-33
Fruit color	External	186 C	1788 C	185 C
	Internal	186U	179C	1788C

Leaf samples from ‘Camila,’ along with three other patented selections from the breeding program including ‘Lucia,’ ‘Scarlet,’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 27,034) and ‘Ruby June’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 27,190) were submitted to a lab for allelic fingerprint comparison to over two hundred other varieties of strawberry in its data base. The allelic fingerprint analysis establishes that ‘Camila’ is distinct and unique compared to the lab's large database of allelic fingerprints. Table 4 sets forth test results of three markers which differentiate ‘Camila.’

TABLE 4

Allelic Fingerprint Analysis

Cultivar	Marker 1	Marker 2	Marker 3

‘Camila’	204, 206, 224, 229	190, 232	121, 124, 130
‘Lucia’	202, 204, 206, 229	188, 216, 232	121, 124, 130,
			136
‘Scarlet’	204, 206, 214, 229	173, 190, 232	121, 130
‘Ruby June’	206, 224, 229	188, 190, 216, 232	121, 130

Performance

Performance with respect to fruit size, yield and appearance for ‘Camila’ was assessed by making comparisons with several other varieties in the breeding program, including ‘Sweet Ann,’ ‘Lucia,’ ‘Ruby June,’ and ‘Scarlet.’ All the plants for this trial were initially grown at a high elevation nursery in Macdoel, Siskiyou County, Calif. Plants of ‘Camila’ and the comparison varieties were then planted and evaluated in a test plot in Moss Landing, Monterey County, Calif. in the end of 2016, through 2017.

Of the varieties tested, ‘Camila’ had the second highest average seasonal yield (1,857 grams/plant), where it was only outperformed by ‘Sweet Ann’ (2,003 grams/plant). While ‘Camila’ had smaller average fruit weight though the season, it averaged the same as that of ‘Ruby June’ for fruit size.

The fruit of ‘Camila’ was rated based upon commercial appeal on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best) along with several other varieties. ‘Camila’ had a high score of 4.0 (tied with ‘Sweet Ann’) which was better than that of both ‘Ruby June’ (3.75) and ‘Scarlet’ (3.5). Only ‘Lucia’ outperformed ‘Camila’ in this comparison with a rating of 4.5, due to it near uniform berries.

Table 5 shows the fruit performance of ‘Camila’ as compared to ‘Sweet Ann,’ ‘Lucia,’ ‘Ruby June,’ and ‘Scarlet.’

TABLE 5

Comparison of Performance of ‘Camila’ to Other Varieties

	Seasonal	Seasonal Average	Appearance
	Yield	berry weight	Score
Cultivar	grams/plant	grams/berry	Rating 5 = Best

‘Camila’	1,857	23	4.0
‘Sweet Ann’	2,003	31	4.0
‘Ruby June’	1,597	23	3.75
‘Lucia’	1,584	25	4.5
‘Scarlet’	1,460	27	3.5

Claims

I claim:

1. A new and distinct strawberry plant named ‘Camila’ as described and illustrated by the characterizations set forth above.