USPP220P - bourne - Google Patents
bourne Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP220P USPP220P US PP220 P USPP220 P US PP220P
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- cane
- stalk
- stalks
- centimeters
- sugar
- Prior art date
Links
- 241000209134 Arundinaria Species 0.000 description 16
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N D-sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 240000000111 Saccharum officinarum Species 0.000 description 12
- 235000007201 Saccharum officinarum Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 229960004793 Sucrose Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 10
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 8
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-GDQSFJPYSA-N Sucrose Natural products O([C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1)[C@@]1(CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-GDQSFJPYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 6
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 4
- 241000252254 Catostomidae Species 0.000 description 4
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 4
- 210000002615 Epidermis Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 239000007799 cork Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 4
- 241000626656 Colletotrichum falcatum Species 0.000 description 2
- 210000004207 Dermis Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000592921 Helminthosporium Species 0.000 description 2
- 210000001672 Ovary Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000001488 breeding Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000254 damaging Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002062 proliferating Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000241 scar Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 238000009340 sequential cropping Methods 0.000 description 2
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon dioxide Inorganic materials O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 description 2
Images
Definitions
- This variety has stalks very large in diameter and solid in cross-section. It is moderately early in rate of maturity in the fall. As a germinator it is excellent, producing a large number of primary shoots early in growth, thus cutting down re-planting and cultivation costs. It does not have the objectionable character of producing suckers late in the season which would result A in immature stalks at harvest time. Because of the excellent stalk diameter, solidity and weight, it can be harvested readily at the cheapest rate per ton.
- Fig. Imidsections of typical stalks showing the color variaticns
- the stalk StructuTc.--Stalks are very solid in cross-section and firm. When compared with other sugar canes, they are low in fiber content.
- Growth.Stalks are semi-erect from the start and either remain thus, or are recumbent later in the growth cycle. They may attain a length of from 7 to 10 feet or more, depending on soil type, weather conditions, fertilization and period 01 growth.
- Furrows or eye grooves immediately above the eyes.-Usually absent, but a very slight one has been noted to occur rarely. (Fig. Iabove 1).
- Root band.Color is purplish red and green; shape is oblique. Width varies from 0.3 to 0.7 centimeter. (Fig. Id).
- the tip of the bud pro- .itrudes above the growth ring (Fig. I1) and the base is usually situated near the base of the leaf sheath.
- Stem epidermal cells The average width of epidermal cells is approximately 14.6 microns, which places the variety in a group of canes having what is considered wide epidermal cells.
- the number of short-cell groups (Fig. II, 1 and 2) per square millimeter is approximately 690.
- Inflorescence This variety frequently blooms fairly abundantly late in the season (March) on muck lands protected from frost and of high mineral content in the Florida Everglades. Inflorescences are large and well formed. No fertile pollen has yet been observed, but the ovaries appear to be normal and have purple, fully developed stigmas.
- sugar cane herein shown and described, characterized particularly by its resistance and immunity to certain diseases, high tonnage of cane, moderate earliness, distinctive color and shape of stalk and bud, distinctive pattern of stem epidermis, very large diameter and. solid, heavy stalks.
Description
Jan. 19, 1937. BQURNE Plant Pat. 220
SUGARCANE Filed Oct. 1, 1936 INVENTOR PLANT PATENT AGE NT Patented Jan. 19, 1937 Plant Fat. 220
Benjamin Arthur Bourne, Clewiston, Fla.
Application October 1,
1 Claim.
My new variety originated as a seedling and is the result of definite breeding efforts carried on by me in December, 1931. It was secured by crossing the mother cane P. O. J. 2725 with the 5 male parent C. P. 27-35.
This variety has stalks very large in diameter and solid in cross-section. It is moderately early in rate of maturity in the fall. As a germinator it is excellent, producing a large number of primary shoots early in growth, thus cutting down re-planting and cultivation costs. It does not have the objectionable character of producing suckers late in the season which would result A in immature stalks at harvest time. Because of the excellent stalk diameter, solidity and weight, it can be harvested readily at the cheapest rate per ton.
When planted in the Everglades of Florida during the fall or early winter, it will by the end of the following November give satisfactory yields of cane sugar (sucrose) amounting to from 7 to 8 percent by weight of the cane. If not harvested in the fall (or about a year from date of planting, if same was done in the fall) it will gradually increase in sugar (sucrose) content for from 4 to 5 months, reaching a maximum of 9 to 14 percent cane sugar (by weight of the cane) depending on soil type, weather conditions and suitable fertilization. If frozen after reaching a stage of 30 maturity suitable for harvesting (8% cane sugar by weight), the rate of deterioration of sucrose in the stalks is decidedly slow, enabling milling operations to proceed for a long period without difiiculty.
As a result of studies conducted over a period of 5 years in Florida, this variety has been found to be very resistant to leaf diseases due to Helminthosporium, very resistant to red rot of the stalk (due to Colletotrichum falcatum) and immum to present strains of mosaic disease. It has also proved to be Very resistant to wind damage, its strong root system preventing uprooting of stools under severe weather conditions.
When harvested from early November onwards, it exhibits excellent ratooning power, in spite of being frosted back several times during the winter. Ratoon growth is so strong in the spring that the rows soon close in, thus cutting down cultivation costs.
In tonnage production of millable cane, it has proved in comparative tests in the Florida Everglades to rank very high, especially if harvested during the mid-winter period. Yields of 49 to 6Q tons per acre as plant cane have been secured, the highest returns being from muck lands in 1935, Serial No. 103,601
frost-free location and with good mineral content.
The original illustration shows: Fig. Imidsections of typical stalks showing the color variaticns, Fig. II-typical structure of stem epi- .5 dermis magnified 295 times and Fig. III--the front and back views of a typical stem loud.
The following is a detailed description of my new variety of sugar cane.
The stalk StructuTc.--Stalks are very solid in cross-section and firm. When compared with other sugar canes, they are low in fiber content.
Growth.Stalks are semi-erect from the start and either remain thus, or are recumbent later in the growth cycle. They may attain a length of from 7 to 10 feet or more, depending on soil type, weather conditions, fertilization and period 01 growth.
Size-Diameter of stalk as measured from the middles of stalks selected at random (on good Okeechobee soil type), varied from 2.5 centimeters to 3.7 centimeters, averaging 3.25 centimeters.
Internodes-Fig. I-5.-In middle of stalk frequently reach a length of 15 centimeters, but varied from 12 centimeters to 16 centimeters, averaging from ten random measurements 14.3 centimeters. They follow one another almost in a straight line, but are frequently definitely staggered.
Nodes.Somewhat constricted, especially in the vicinity of the wax rings toward the top 01' the stalk, when compared with the middle of the internodal portion. (Fig. I6.)
COZor.Greenish-brown or green at base, but becoming reddish-purple-brown or red and green toward middle and top. iypical colors and markings on middle stalk portions are shown in Fig. I.
Furrows (or eye grooves immediately above the eyes.)--Usually absent, but a very slight one has been noted to occur rarely. (Fig. Iabove 1).
War or bloom. Only a very slight bloom present on surface of stem. The wax ring is usually plainly present below the node. (Fig. I2.)
Root band.Color is purplish red and green; shape is oblique. Width varies from 0.3 to 0.7 centimeter. (Fig. Id).
Growth ring.Color is yellow-green at first and later reddish-brown. Shape is slightly elevated. (Fig. I--3).
Ri1td.Splitting or cracking of the rind almost 55 never occurs and when it does, no damaging effects result.
Leaf scar.Prominent. (Fig. I-'7.)
Leaves Stem buds Si2e.Good, ranging from 1.0 to 1.3 centimeters wide by 1.1 to 1.7 centimeters long.
Position-Not prominent, that is, they do not protrude much from the surface of the stalk. Thus in handling the cane for planting purposes, little bud damage occurs. The tip of the bud pro- .itrudes above the growth ring (Fig. I1) and the base is usually situated near the base of the leaf sheath.
Form.-For typical form and hair groups, see Fig. III, showing both front and back views.
Stem epidermal cells The average width of epidermal cells is approximately 14.6 microns, which places the variety in a group of canes having what is considered wide epidermal cells. The number of short-cell groups (Fig. II, 1 and 2) per square millimeter is approximately 690. The number of stomata per microscopic circular field of 1.9 square millimeters averaged from ten observations 1.3, varying usually from 1-2. Pointed, elongated cork cells are occasionally present. Solitary cork cells are abundant (Fig. II3). No solitary silica cells (Fig. II-1) have ever been observed to occur.
Inflorescence This variety frequently blooms fairly abundantly late in the season (March) on muck lands protected from frost and of high mineral content in the Florida Everglades. Inflorescences are large and well formed. No fertile pollen has yet been observed, but the ovaries appear to be normal and have purple, fully developed stigmas.
The principal characteristics which in combination help to distinguish my new variety from all other known varieties of sugar cane are:
l. Moderately early in maturity.
2. Different color and shape of (a) stalk and (b) bud.
3. Different pattern of stem epidermis.
4. Semi-erect growth habit of' leaves and stalks, the latter becoming recumbent toward maturity. Leaves medium green in color.
5. High tonnage and sugar producing ability per acre on the better as well as some of the poorer types of Everglades soils.
6. Marked resistance tocertain fungus leaf diseases common to sugar cane and also immunity to certain existing strains of mosaic virus.
7. Strength of root system.
8. Absence of damage due to splitting of rind.
9. Very large size and solidity of stalk.
10. Good sized buds, located in a protected position.
11. Prolific, early stooler without producing late suckers.
12. Production of large, well formed infiores cences on certain soils in the Everglades of Florida only late in the flowering season.
Having thus disclosed my invention, what I claim as new is:
The variety of sugar cane herein shown and described, characterized particularly by its resistance and immunity to certain diseases, high tonnage of cane, moderate earliness, distinctive color and shape of stalk and bud, distinctive pattern of stem epidermis, very large diameter and. solid, heavy stalks.
BENJAMIN ARTHUR BOURNE.
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| USPP6782P (en) | Blackberry plant--Loch Ness cultivar | |
| USPP26368P3 (en) | Blackberry plant named ‘Camila’ | |
| US20140373228P1 (en) | Blackberry plant named 'Amara' | |
| USPP26313P2 (en) | Blueberry plant named ‘FL07-399’ | |
| Brooks et al. | Vegetative anatomy of Theobroma cacao | |
| USPP220P (en) | bourne | |
| Fanshawe | The Dum Palm—Hyphaene thebaica (Del.) Mart | |
| USPP210P (en) | Sugarcane | |
| USPP203P (en) | Sugar cane | |
| USPP10839P (en) | Sugar cane variety CL77-797 | |
| Sanford et al. | 'Titan'Red Raspberry | |
| USPP1730P (en) | Almond tree | |
| USPP21299P3 (en) | Tamarillo plant named ‘Sweeten’ | |
| USPP2584P (en) | Sugar cane plant | |
| USPP3982P (en) | ||
| USPP8050P (en) | Ornamental pear tree named Valzam | |
| US20220256753P1 (en) | Asclepias linaria plant named 'Monarch Magnet 2.0' | |
| USPP81P (en) | Plant | |
| USPP706P (en) | Buddleia plant | |
| USPP2846P (en) | Sugarcane | |
| USPP2715P (en) | Sugar cane | |
| USPP2923P (en) | Poinsettia plant | |
| USPP2469P (en) | Blackberry plant | |
| USPP371P (en) | Delphinium | |
| USPP2461P (en) | weetman etal p |