USPP20649P3 - Walnut rootstock ‘RX1’ - Google Patents
Walnut rootstock ‘RX1’ Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP20649P3 USPP20649P3 US11/821,845 US82184507V USPP20649P3 US PP20649 P3 USPP20649 P3 US PP20649P3 US 82184507 V US82184507 V US 82184507V US PP20649 P3 USPP20649 P3 US PP20649P3
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- citricola
- walnut
- rootstock
- phytophthora
- new
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 235000009496 Juglans regia Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 235000020234 walnut Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 12
- 240000007049 Juglans regia Species 0.000 title claims description 24
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims description 16
- 241000522468 Phytophthora citricola Species 0.000 abstract description 35
- 239000002420 orchard Substances 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 241000758789 Juglans Species 0.000 abstract description 4
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 14
- 241000233614 Phytophthora Species 0.000 description 9
- 240000002220 Juglans microcarpa Species 0.000 description 7
- 240000004869 Juglans hindsii Species 0.000 description 6
- 235000014071 Juglans microcarpa Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000005059 dormancy Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 4
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 4
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 4
- 101150097607 WIP3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012808 pre-inoculation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000013757 Juglans Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000014068 Juglans hindsii Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 244000276162 Juglans x intermedia Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000305548 Pterocarya stenoptera Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000589155 Agrobacterium tumefaciens Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000015185 California walnut Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001164374 Calyx Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000035240 Disease Resistance Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000026839 Juglans californica Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000184861 Juglans nigra Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000013740 Juglans nigra Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000001140 Mimosa pudica Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000244206 Nematoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000233618 Phytophthora cinnamomi Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000193966 Pratylenchus vulnus Species 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000022602 disease susceptibility Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002054 inoculum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008774 maternal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001338 necrotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000014571 nuts Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004382 potting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000029395 response to nematode Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052902 vermiculite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010455 vermiculite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/54—Leguminosae or Fabaceae, e.g. soybean, alfalfa or peanut
Definitions
- Botanical/commercial classification Juglans microcarpa ⁇ Juglans regia /new walnut rootstock. Varietal denomination: ‘RX1’.
- the present invention relates to a new and distinct clonal rootstock for English walnut ( Juglans regia ) that has been denominated varietally as ‘RX1’, and more particularly to such a walnut rootstock that has reduced susceptibility to cankering by Phytophthora ( Phytophthora citricola ), and that further is easily clonally propagated by micropropagation.
- the walnut rootstock ‘RX1’ of the present invention exhibits the following combination of characteristics:
- Table 1 shows comparative nursery performance of ‘RX1’ and other rootstock clones grown in Stanislaus County, Calif. in 2004.
- Table 2 shows comparative nursery performance of ‘RX1’ and other rootstock clones grown at in Butte County, Calif. in 2004.
- Table 3 shows field performance of ‘RX1’ and other clonal and seedling rootstocks in non-infested soil and soil infested with Phytophthora citricola.
- FIG. 1 shows relative susceptibility of ‘RX1’ and two other potential rootstock clones to Phytophthora citricola, and the effect of pre-inoculation chilling on disease severity, 2003 greenhouse screen.
- FIG. 2 shows relative susceptibility of ‘RX1’ and two other potential rootstock clones to Phytophthora citricola, data combined for plants subjected to pre-inoculation chilling and non-chilled plants, 2003 greenhouse screen.
- FIG. 3 shows relative susceptibility of ‘RX1’ and six other potential rootstock clones to Phytophthora citricola, 2003 greenhouse screen.
- FIG. 4 shows relative susceptibility of 10 hybrid walnut clones to Phytophthora citricola, 2004 greenhouse screen.
- FIG. 5 shows relative susceptibility of 17 hybrid walnut clones and Northern California black walnut to Phytophthora citricola, 2006 greenhouse screen.
- FIG. 6 shows grafted ‘RX1’ in a new orchard.
- FIG. 7 shows ‘RX1’ in Phytophthora field trial.
- FIG. 8 shows grafted ‘RX1’ in replant situation.
- FIG. 9 shows visual rating of tree growth and condition of clonal and seedling test trees at a California field site in 2006.
- FIG. 10 shows percent mortality for clonal selections and other rootstocks at a California field site.
- FIG. 11 shows percent mortality for clonal selections and other rootstocks at a California field site.
- FIG. 12 shows bark and new leaves of three-year old ‘RX1’ tree.
- FIG. 13 shows greenhouse grown ‘RX1’ tree about 6 months old.
- FIG. 14 shows upper side of leaf of ‘RX1’.
- FIG. 15 shows lower side of leaf of ‘RX1’.
- FIG. 16 shows the flower of ‘RX1’.
- the new rootstock, ‘RX1’ was selected as part of the “Paradox Diversity Study” (PDS) which was initiated in 1996 to study the genetic diversity of commercial walnut rootstocks.
- Seed or seedlings were distributed to cooperating researchers for tests of response to nematodes ( Pratylenchus vulnus ), Phytophthora (seed supplied), crown gall ( Agrobacterium tumefaciens ) and the orchard environment (field trials). The study was repeated in 1997.
- the male parent is identified to be of the species J. regia, or English walnut.
- J. regia typically has 7–9 leaflets while J. microcarpa, the female patent, typically has 15–23 leaflets.
- ‘RX1’ differs from its female parent by having fewer leaflets/leaf, broader leaflets and more vigor.
- ‘RX1’ differs from its male parent by having more leaflets/leaf and narrower leaflets.
Abstract
A new and distinct variety of walnut rootstock denominated ‘RX1’ is described. This new variety, ‘RX1’, can be propagated through standard tissue culture micropropagation. It has excellent survivability in the nursery and orchard. The new variety also has reduced susceptibility to damage from Phytophthora citricola in greenhouse screens and in the field compared to other available walnut rootstocks.
Description
Botanical/commercial classification: Juglans microcarpa×Juglans regia/new walnut rootstock. Varietal denomination: ‘RX1’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct clonal rootstock for English walnut (Juglans regia) that has been denominated varietally as ‘RX1’, and more particularly to such a walnut rootstock that has reduced susceptibility to cankering by Phytophthora (Phytophthora citricola), and that further is easily clonally propagated by micropropagation.
It has long been recognized that Phytophthora root and crown rots are some of the most serious diseases of walnut worldwide. In California, Phytophthora citricola and P. cinnamomi are recognized as the most virulent species of the fungus, but P. citricola is more widespread. The rootstock of the present invention, ‘RX1’, has been identified as being more resistant to P. citricola than other available clonal walnut (Juglans) rootstocks.
It was found that the walnut rootstock ‘RX1’ of the present invention exhibits the following combination of characteristics:
-
- a) can be propagated through standard tissue culture micropropagation;
- b) has excellent survivability in the nursery and orchard; and
- c) has reduced susceptibility to damage from Phytophthora citricola in greenhouse screens and in the field compared to other available walnut rootstocks.
Table 1 shows comparative nursery performance of ‘RX1’ and other rootstock clones grown in Stanislaus County, Calif. in 2004.
Table 2 shows comparative nursery performance of ‘RX1’ and other rootstock clones grown at in Butte County, Calif. in 2004.
Table 3 shows field performance of ‘RX1’ and other clonal and seedling rootstocks in non-infested soil and soil infested with Phytophthora citricola.
The new rootstock, ‘RX1’ was selected as part of the “Paradox Diversity Study” (PDS) which was initiated in 1996 to study the genetic diversity of commercial walnut rootstocks. The hybrid of J. hindsii×J. regia, commonly known as ‘Paradox’ (not patented), is the most frequently planted rootstock for English walnut in California. The study included approximately 300–500 seed (depending on the predicted percent ‘Paradox’), from 37 black walnut sources of ‘Paradox’ supplied by California walnut nurseries, and 7 controlled crosses and open-pollinated controls from several different walnut species including Texas black, Juglans microcarpa. Seed or seedlings were distributed to cooperating researchers for tests of response to nematodes (Pratylenchus vulnus), Phytophthora (seed supplied), crown gall (Agrobacterium tumefaciens) and the orchard environment (field trials). The study was repeated in 1997.
In fall of 1997, seed from a Juglans microcarpa designated as DJUG 29.11 in location B6-3 at the National Germplasm Repository, Davis and growing in Winters, Calif. was tested against Phytophthora citricola. From results of the previous year, about 50% germination and about 50% hybrids with J. regia from this tree was expected. In fact in 1998, germination was better (70%) but percent hybrids were very low (5%). Due to lack of sufficient seedlings for screening, a representative of the J. microcarpa×J. regia hybrid family was asexually reproduced by standard tissue culture micropropagation in Davis, Calif. The seedling chosen (98-RX-SD8) later became ‘RX1’. Thus, ‘RX1’ originated as a single plant. It was introduced into culture in summer 1998 using the standard tissue culture micropropagation protocol. In fall 1998, the cultures were transferred to a nursery for further multiplication and rooting.
In summer 2001, a replicated trial in the greenhouse to determine the relative susceptibility of ‘RX1’ to Phytophthora citricola was initiated. The clone appeared to have resistance to the pathogen in preliminary tests. In September, 2001, the clone was evaluated for further production of plants. Between 2001 and 2005, ‘RX1’ was multiplied, rooted and acclimatized for trials for response to Phytophthora citricola and for additional field trials. During summers 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2006, plants were transplanted into appropriate containers, grown to appropriate size for screening, grown on appropriate inocula, and subjected to repeated greenhouse experiments to evaluate resistance of ‘RX1’ and other selected clones to P. citricola . Several modifications in propagation and pre-inoculation treatments were made including induction of dormancy of plants and treatment with hormones. ‘RX1’ was consistently at least moderately resistant to the pathogen (FIGS. 1–4 ).
In August 2006 a screen for P. citricola response was conducted with plants of ‘RX1’ that had been through cycles of dormancy which tended to equalize growth and kept them small enough to facilitate mass screening. The cycles included dormancy induced by storage at 6C for 3–5 months (2004), growth in the greenhouse for one year (2005) and natural dormancy in a lath house followed by growth in the greenhouse (2006). The screen for resistance was initiated in August 2006 by transplanting individual plants from one-liter pots to two-liter pots filled with potting mix soil that was either artificially infested with P. citricola (45 ml of P. citricola-infested V8 juice-oat-vermiculite substrate per liter of soil) or treated as a control (45 ml sterile substrate per liter of soil). There were 5 replicate plants planted in non-infested soil and 10–20 replicate plants in infested soil, evenly distributed in a split-plot design (main plots were inoculum treatments, subplots were rootstock) among 5 blocks. Every two weeks after transplanting, the soil in each pot was flooded for 48 hours. Three months after transplanting, the root and crown systems were washed free from soil and evaluated visually for incidence and severity of crown and root rot. Among the 17 clonal hybrids evaluated in the screen, ‘RX1’ was one of the hybrids most resistant to P. citricola (FIG. 5 ).
During the propagation of plants for Phytophthora testing, plants were also being propagated for field trials. These were grown at two nurseries in 2004. ‘RX1’ was one of the smallest plants at both nurseries (Tables 1 and 2), but produced between 70% and 75% graftable rootstocks as determined by the nursery. These were either grafted in place with ‘Chandler’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 4,388) or distributed for grafted field trials for replant situations or Phytophthora field screening in 2005. The ‘Chandler’-grafted ‘RX1’ (n=80) was planted in a new orchard with another promising clone AZ2 (n=80) and seedling ‘Paradox’ (J. hindsii×J. regia) provided by the nursery. AZ2 turned out to be a weak clone that could not be transplanted bare root, and survival was very poor after transplanting. Nearly all the ‘RX1’ survived and were indistinguishable from the seedling ‘Paradox’ (FIG. 6 ).
For the Phytopthora field trial, 30 each of 11 different genotypes including ‘RX1’ were planted in May, 2005 in Davis, Calif. and were artificially inoculated with Phytophthora citricola. A randomized block split plot design was used. For each rootstock clone, there were six four-tree plots to be infested and six single tree plots to serve as uninoculated controls. Northern California black (J. hindsii) and wingnut (Pterocarya stenoptera) were included as susceptible and resistant controls, respectively. In January 2006, 100 ml of a V8 juice-oat mixture infested with P. citricola was mixed into the upper 5 cm of soil around the trunk of each tree. A sterile mixture was applied to the uninoculated controls.
The block artificially inoculated with Phytophthora was assessed for growth in trunk circumference and development of crown rot as indicated by trunk cankers extending up from the soil surface in November 2006. Sixty-two percent of the susceptible controls were rotted or dead. ‘RX1’ was one of the smaller clones (Table 3), but it was thriving (FIG. 7 ) and not affected by the inoculation (Table 3).
Preliminary results from grafted field trials suggest that ‘RX1’ is a survivor in spite of the challenge of being in replant sites (FIGS. 8–11 ).
This description is based on a 6-month old greenhouse grown clone of ‘RX1’ produced through standard tissue culture micropropagation, a 3-year old ‘RX1’ in the Phytophthora field screen and a 2-year old RX1 growing in Davis, Calif. Data for the botanical description were collected in spring, 2007.
The Munsell Color Charts for Plant Tissues (1977. GretagMacbeth, New Windsor, N.Y.) is used in the identification of color. Also, common color terms are to be accorded their ordinary dictionary significance.
- Botanical classification: Juglans microcarpa×Juglans regia.
- Female parent: Juglans microcarpa
- Male parent: Juglans regia
The male parent is identified to be of the species J. regia, or English walnut. J. regia typically has 7–9 leaflets while J. microcarpa, the female patent, typically has 15–23 leaflets. ‘RX1’ differs from its female parent by having fewer leaflets/leaf, broader leaflets and more vigor. ‘RX1’ differs from its male parent by having more leaflets/leaf and narrower leaflets.
- Plant: The growth habit of the tree is illustrated in
FIG. 7 . This 3-year old tree is approximately 3.05 meters tall. Bark of two-year old wood is dark brown (2.5Y 5/2). Bark color of one-year old wood is lighter and redder (7.5YR 5/4) (FIG. 12 ). Lenticels, about 48 in one square cm, are buff-colored (7.5YR 8/2). The six month old, greenhouse-grown tree is about 45 cm tall with a stem diameter of about 0.8 cm (FIG. 13 ). The stem is green (5GY 5/10) with scattered lenticels (2.5Y 8/4) more dense towards the base and about 0.5 mm long. - Trunk diameter: ‘RX1’ is 6.1 meters in height and 11 cm diameter DBH at four years of age.
- Foliage: The leaves are pinnately compound and alternate. The slightly pubescent new spring foliage (
FIG. 12 ) has reddish new leaves (10R 5/8) and green older leaves (5GY 5/6). There are 13–15 leaflets. The six-month old greenhouse-grown tree has fewer leaflets (9–11). Leaves are 30 cm long and 28–30 cm wide with petioles 5–8 cm long. Leaflets are 12–14 cm long and 5–7 cm wide, dark green on the upper surface (5GY 5/10) (FIG. 14 ) and slightly lighter on the lower surface (5GY 7/4) (FIG. 15 ). Leaflet margins are entire i.e. no serration. The pubescence on young, unfolding leaves is found on the adaxial and abaxial surfaces as well as on the rachis. The mature leaves are not pubescent and are very smooth. The venation is pinnate. - Inflorescence: The flowers are small (2 mm×5 mm) and borne in two or three at the shoot tip (
FIG. 16 ). The stigma surface is red (5R 5/8) and the involucre is green (2.5GY 6/6) covered with sticky hairs. There is no calyx. ‘RX1’ produces a light crop of nuts. - Disease resistance and susceptibility: This rootstock is more resistant to Phytophthora citricola in greenhouse tests than other Juglans rootstocks. It is the most resistant variety to P. citricola known to the inventors.
- Usage: The new rootstock of the present invention provides walnut growers with a new clonally propagated rootstock. It can be easily micropropagated through standard tissure culture micropropagation.
TABLE 1 |
Clones grown in Stanislaus County, California in 2004 |
Planted | Graft- | Graftable | Diameter (mm) |
Clone | N | able N | % | Mean | SD | Range | CV |
Nematodes | |||||||
VX211 | 106 | 87 | 82 | 31 | 4.9 | 21-44 | 12.6 |
Phytophthora | |||||||
AZ2 | 230 | 151 | 66 | 26 | 5 | 13-38 | 19.2 |
AZ3 | 49 | 24 | 49 | 25 | 6.7 | 11-37 | 26.8 |
NZ1 | 172 | 111 | 64 | 26 | 4.4 | 10-39 | 16.9 |
JX2 | 246 | 191 | 78 | 29 | 4.1 | 13-39 | 14.1 |
RX1 | 104 | 78 | 75 | 18 | 1.6 | 14-22 | 8.8 |
AX1 | 163 | 86 | 53 | 27 | 4.3 | 14-40 | 15.9 |
GZ1 | 108 | 83 | 77 | 26 | 5.4 | 13-40 | 20.8 |
Px1 | 247 | 154 | 62 | 26 | 4.6 | 12-40 | 17.7 |
AZ1 | 52 | 38 | 73 | 30 | 4.4 | 22-43 | 14.7 |
UX1 | 27 | 23 | 85 | 25 | 4 | 15-30 | 16 |
GZ2 | 47 | 38 | 81 | 26 | 4.5 | 15-33 | 17.3 |
Blackline | |||||||
WIP3 | 158 | 66 | 42 | 26 | 5 | 12-35 | 19.2 |
WIP9 | 10 | 6 | 60 | 25 | 2.3 | 23-99 | 9.2 |
Control | |||||||
UX022 | 71 | 59 | 83 | 23 | 3.7 | 14-29 | 16.1 |
| |||||||
Vina | |||||||
14 | 10 | 71 | 18 | 3.7 | 13-24 | 20.5 | |
Sunland | 64 | 20 | 31 | 26 | 3.8 | 18-31 | 14.6 |
Totals | 1868 | 1225 | 66 | 25 | |||
TABLE 2 |
Clones grown in Butte County, California in 2004. |
Planted | Graftable | Graftable | Diameter (mm) |
Clone | N | N | % | Mean | SD | Range | CV |
AX1 | 120 | 107 | 89 | 19 | 4.6 | 10-30 | 26 |
AZ2 | 120 | 102 | 85 | 21 | 4.7 | 10-31 | 22 |
RX1 | 120 | 84 | 70 | 19 | 3.2 | 10-27 | 17 |
Totals | 360 | 293 | 81 | 20 | |||
TABLE 3 |
Field performance of clonal Paradox hybrids, Northern California |
black walnut, and Chinese wingnut rootstocks in non-infested |
soil and soil infested with Phytophthora citricola, Davis. |
Maternal background | Incidence of | ||
Clone | of hybrid | Soil treatment | crown |
(or species) | (or species of standard) | (January 2006) | rot (%) |
AX1 | californica | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 4 c | ||
AZ2 | (major x hindsii)x nigra | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 0 c | ||
NZ1 | (major x hindsii)x nigra | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 0 c | ||
GZ1 | hindsii | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 4 c | ||
JX2 | hindsii | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 0 c | ||
PX1 | hindsii | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 8 c | ||
VX211 | hindsii | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 0 c | ||
RX1 | microcarpa | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 0 c | ||
WIP3 | hindsii x regia | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 8 bc | ||
(NCB) | (J. hindsii) | Control | 16 b |
P. citricola | 62 a | ||
(Wingnut) | (Pt. stenopiera) | Control | 0 c |
P. citricola | 0 c | ||
Percent of | Incidence of | Increase in | |||
Clone | trunk circ. | tree mortality | trunk circ. | ||
(or species) | Necrotic | % | (mm) | ||
AX1 | 0 c | 0 c | 163 c | ||
1 c | 0 c | 146 cde | |||
AZ2 | 0 c | 0 c | 116 fg | ||
0 c | 0 c | 117 fg | |||
NZ1 | 0 c | 0 c | 116 fg | ||
0 c | 0 c | 130 def | |||
GZ1 | 0 c | 0 c | 157 cd | ||
1 c | 0 c | 150 cd | |||
JX2 | 0 c | 0 c | 166 bc | ||
0 c | 0 c | 135 def | |||
PX1 | 0 c | 0 c | 169 bc | ||
1 c | 0 c | 157 cd | |||
VX211 | 0 c | 0 c | 191 b | ||
0 c | 0 c | 147 cde | |||
RX1 | 0 c | 0 c | 112 fg | ||
0 c | 0 c | 116 fg | |||
WIP3 | 0 c | 0 c | 100 g | ||
2 c | 0 c | 121 efg | |||
(NCB) | 17 b | 17 b | 68 h | ||
59 a | 59 a | 57 h | |||
(Wingnut) | 0 b | 0 e | 226 a | ||
0 b | 0 c | 193 b | |||
2All trees were planted May 2005. The assements of crown rot and mortality were made Nov. 21, 2006. Means within a column and without letters in common are significantly different (Waller k ratio). |
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct variety of walnut rootstock plant designated ‘RX1’ as shown and described herein.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/821,845 USPP20649P3 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-06-25 | Walnut rootstock ‘RX1’ |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/821,845 USPP20649P3 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-06-25 | Walnut rootstock ‘RX1’ |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080320619P1 US20080320619P1 (en) | 2008-12-25 |
USPP20649P3 true USPP20649P3 (en) | 2010-01-19 |
Family
ID=40137938
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/821,845 Active 2027-08-28 USPP20649P3 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-06-25 | Walnut rootstock ‘RX1’ |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | USPP20649P3 (en) |
-
2007
- 2007-06-25 US US11/821,845 patent/USPP20649P3/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (26)
Title |
---|
Browne, G. (2001). "Strategies for Management of Phytophthora on Walnut: Evaluating Potential of Elite Paradox Clones and Wingnut Families," Walnut Research Reports 2000, pp. 429-436. |
Browne, G. (2002). "Strategies for Management of Phytophthora on Walnut: Evaluating Potential of Elite Paradox Clones and Wingnut Families," Walnut Research Reports 2001, pp. 101-109. |
Browne, G. et al. (2005). "Determining Phytophthora Resistance in Elite Paradox Clones and Specific Etiology of a Paradox Crown and Root Rot," Walnut Research Reports 2004, pp. 379-387. |
Browne, G. et al. (2006). "Biology and Management of Phytophthora Crown and Root Rot of Walnut," Walnut Research Reports 2005, pp. 335-344. |
Browne, G. T. et al. (1999-2000). Project Plan/Research Grant Proposal for Year 4 of 5 of "Strategies for Control of Phytophthora Root and Crown Rots of Walnut," University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences, 6 pages. |
Browne, G. T. et al. (2000-2001). Project Plan/Research Grant Proposal for "Strategies for Management of Phytophthora Crown and Root Rots: Evaluating Potential of Elite Paradox Clones and Wingnut Families," University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences, 5 pages. |
Browne, G. T. et al. (2001-2002). Project Plan/Research Grant Proposal for Year 2 of 3 of "Strategies for Management of Phytophthora Crown and Root Rots: Evaluating Potential of Elite Paradox Clones and Wingnut Families," University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences, 5 pages. |
Browne, G. T. et al. (2004-2005). Project Plan/Research Grant Proposal for Year 1 of 2 of "Determining Phytophthora Resistance in Elite Paradox Clones and Specific Etiology of a Paradox Crown and Root Rot," University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences, 5 pages. |
Browne, G.T. et al. (1998). "Strategies For Control of Phytophthora Root and Crown Rots of Walnut," Walnut Research Reports 1997, pp. 381-391. |
Browne, G.T. et al. (1999). "Strategies for Control of Phytophthora Root and Crown Rots of Walnut," Walnut Research Reports 1998, pp. 361-371. |
Browne, G.T. et al. (2004). "Evaluation of Resistance to Phytophthora citricola Among Diverse Clones of Paradox Hybrid Rootstocks," Proceedings of the Vth International Walnut Symposium, Sorrento, Italy, pp. 395-405. |
Grant, J. et al. (2007). "Orchard Performance of Selected Clonal Paradox Rootstocks," Walnut Research Reports 2006, pp. 79-81. |
Hackett, W.P. et al. (2003). "Propagation and Retesting of Walnut Rootstock Genotypes Putatively Resistant to Pests and Diseases," Walnut Research Reports 2002, pp. 99-107. |
Hackett, W.P. et al. (2004). "Propagation and Retesting of Walnut Rootstock Genotypes Putatively Resistant to Pests and Diseases," Walnut Research Reports 2003, pp. 85-95. |
Hackett, W.P. et al. (2005). "Propagation and Retesting of Walnut Rootstock Genotypes Putatively Resistant to Pests and Diseases," Walnut Research Reports 2004, pp. 89-95. |
McGranahan, G. et al. (1996). "The Paradox Diversity Study," Walnut Research Reports 1996, pp. 43-48. |
McGranahan, G. et al. (1998). "The Paradox Diversity Study," Walnut Research Reports 1997, pp. 55-63. |
McGranahan, G. et al. (2006). "Clonal Propagation of Walnut Rootstock Genotypes for Genetic Improvement," Walnut Research Reports 2005, pp. 85-93. |
McGranahan, G. et al. (2007). "Clonal Propagation of Walnut Rootstock Genotypes for Genetic Improvement 2006," Walnut Research Reports 2006, pp. 71-78. |
McGranahan, Gail. Nurseries Licensed to Sell New Clonal Rootstocks. May 1, 2008 available at: http://cesutter.ucdavis.edu/files/51594.pdf. * |
McKenna, J. et al. (1999). "The Paradox Genetic Diversity Study," Walnut Research Reports 1998, pp. 40-65. |
McKenry, M. (2004). "Field Evaluations/Inputs for Grower Replant Settings and New Lines of Nematode Resistance," Walnut Research Reports 2003, pp. 431-439. |
McKenry, M. (2005). "Field Evaluations/Inputs for Grower Replant Settings and New Lines of Nematode Resistance," Walnut Research Reports 2004, pp. 407-415. |
McKenry, M. (2006). "Field Evaluations/Inputs for Grower Replant Settings and New Lines of Nematode Resistance," Walnut Research Reports 2005, pp. 365-371. |
McKenry, M. (2007). "Filed Evaluations/Inputs for Grower Replant Settings and New Lines of Nematode Resistance," Walnut Research Reports 2006, pp. 279-283. |
McKenry, M. et al. (2001). "A Three-Year Search for Nematode Resistance in Walnut-Final Report," Walnut Research Reports 2000, pp. 509-512. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20080320619P1 (en) | 2008-12-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Thompson et al. | Pecan | |
Browne et al. | Resistance to species of Phytophthora identified among clones of Juglans microcarpa× J. regia | |
Robinson et al. | The Geneva series of apple rootstocks from Cornell: performance, disease resistance, and commercialization | |
USPP21179P3 (en) | Walnut rootstock ‘VX211’ | |
Boyaci et al. | Screening for resistance to Fusarium wilt of some cultivated eggplants and wild Solanum accessions | |
USPP24073P3 (en) | Apple tree rootstock named ‘G.969’ | |
USPP20649P3 (en) | Walnut rootstock ‘RX1’ | |
USPP23337P3 (en) | Apple tree rootstock named ‘G.210’ | |
USPP32461P2 (en) | Corylus plant named ‘Hunterdon’ | |
Jones | Selection of Intercompatible Almond and Root-Knot Nematode Resistant Peach Rootstocks as Parents for Production of Hybrid Rootstock Seed1 | |
USPP35046P2 (en) | Apple tree rootstock named ‘G.484’ | |
US11793133B2 (en) | Phytophthora resistant Catharanthus roseus plant | |
USPP35016P2 (en) | Apple tree rootstock named ‘G.257’ | |
USPP32494P2 (en) | Corylus plant named ‘Somerset’ | |
US20210204458P1 (en) | Sycamore plant named drabrot | |
Sharma et al. | Morphological traits, growth and yield performance, and Papaya ringspot virus strain papaya reaction in Vasconcellea cauliflora in Pune, India | |
USPP23327P3 (en) | Apple tree rootstock named ‘G.890’ | |
USPP32422P2 (en) | Nandina plant named ‘ZhNan53’ | |
Drew | The use of non-transgenic technologies for the development of papaya ringspot virus resistance in Carica papaya | |
USPP32462P2 (en) | Corylus plant named ‘Monmouth’ | |
Cropley | The selection of virus-free clones of fruit plants in Britain | |
Tamilselvi et al. | DEVELOPMENT OF INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID ROOTSTOCKS USING CUCURBITAMOSCHATA DUCH EX. POIR AND CUCURBITA MAXIMA LINES. | |
Mushtaq et al. | Achievements in Rootstock Breeding For Temperate Fruit Crops | |
Afful et al. | In-vitro regeneration of interspecific hybrids in eggplant species via seed and embryo culture. | |
US20150342101P1 (en) | Apple tree named 'G.814' |