USPP20200P3 - Hop plant named ‘APOLLO’ - Google Patents
Hop plant named ‘APOLLO’ Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP20200P3 USPP20200P3 US11/344,246 US34424606V USPP20200P3 US PP20200 P3 USPP20200 P3 US PP20200P3 US 34424606 V US34424606 V US 34424606V US PP20200 P3 USPP20200 P3 US PP20200P3
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- hop
- apollo
- variety
- alpha
- wash
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 244000025221 Humulus lupulus Species 0.000 title abstract description 57
- 241000218228 Humulus Species 0.000 claims abstract 3
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 abstract description 22
- 235000008694 Humulus lupulus Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 16
- 241000221785 Erysiphales Species 0.000 abstract description 14
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 20
- FAMPSKZZVDUYOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,6,6,9-tetramethylcycloundeca-1,4,8-triene Chemical compound CC1=CCC(C)(C)C=CCC(C)=CCC1 FAMPSKZZVDUYOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 10
- NPNUFJAVOOONJE-ZIAGYGMSSA-N β-(E)-Caryophyllene Chemical compound C1CC(C)=CCCC(=C)[C@H]2CC(C)(C)[C@@H]21 NPNUFJAVOOONJE-ZIAGYGMSSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 230000009418 agronomic effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000010154 cross-pollination Effects 0.000 description 5
- NVEQFIOZRFFVFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9-epi-beta-caryophyllene oxide Natural products C=C1CCC2OC2(C)CCC2C(C)(C)CC21 NVEQFIOZRFFVFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- NPNUFJAVOOONJE-UHFFFAOYSA-N beta-cariophyllene Natural products C1CC(C)=CCCC(=C)C2CC(C)(C)C21 NPNUFJAVOOONJE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229940117948 caryophyllene Drugs 0.000 description 4
- NPNUFJAVOOONJE-UONOGXRCSA-N caryophyllene Natural products C1CC(C)=CCCC(=C)[C@@H]2CC(C)(C)[C@@H]21 NPNUFJAVOOONJE-UONOGXRCSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 4
- BXWQUXUDAGDUOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N gamma-humulene Natural products CC1=CCCC(C)(C)C=CC(=C)CCC1 BXWQUXUDAGDUOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- QBNFBHXQESNSNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N humulene Natural products CC1=CC=CC(C)(C)CC=C(/C)CCC1 QBNFBHXQESNSNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 4
- 208000035240 Disease Resistance Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052949 galena Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 210000004907 gland Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- XCAUINMIESBTBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N lead(ii) sulfide Chemical compound [Pb]=S XCAUINMIESBTBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229930186179 lupulin Natural products 0.000 description 3
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002798 spectrophotometry method Methods 0.000 description 3
- JSNRRGGBADWTMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N (6E)-7,11-dimethyl-3-methylene-1,6,10-dodecatriene Chemical compound CC(C)=CCCC(C)=CCCC(=C)C=C JSNRRGGBADWTMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- VMSLCPKYRPDHLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N (R)-Humulone Chemical compound CC(C)CC(=O)C1=C(O)C(CC=C(C)C)=C(O)C(O)(CC=C(C)C)C1=O VMSLCPKYRPDHLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000000845 anti-microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000011681 asexual reproduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013465 asexual reproduction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000013405 beer Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- UAHWPYUMFXYFJY-UHFFFAOYSA-N beta-myrcene Chemical compound CC(C)=CCCC(=C)C=C UAHWPYUMFXYFJY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000013361 beverage Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002537 cosmetic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002417 nutraceutical Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000021436 nutraceutical agent Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001850 reproductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011122 softwood Substances 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CXENHBSYCFFKJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N (3E,6E)-3,7,11-Trimethyl-1,3,6,10-dodecatetraene Natural products CC(C)=CCCC(C)=CCC=C(C)C=C CXENHBSYCFFKJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- DRSITEVYZGOOQG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Cohumulone Chemical compound CC(C)C(=O)C1=C(O)C(CC=C(C)C)=C(O)C(O)(CC=C(C)C)C1=O DRSITEVYZGOOQG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DRSITEVYZGOOQG-HXUWFJFHSA-N Cohumulone Natural products CC(C)C(=O)C1=C(O)C(CC=C(C)C)=C(O)[C@](O)(CC=C(C)C)C1=O DRSITEVYZGOOQG-HXUWFJFHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- GEXOPZHAKQAGLU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Colupulone Natural products CC(C)C(=O)C1=C(O)C(CC=C(C)C)(CC=C(C)C)C(=O)C(CC=C(C)C)=C1O GEXOPZHAKQAGLU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000009809 Humulus lupulus var lupuloides Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000006878 Humulus lupulus var neomexicanus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000009800 Humulus lupulus var pubescens Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000009808 Humulus lupulus var. lupulus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000233679 Peronosporaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000233614 Phytophthora Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000011842 Serrate-Jagged Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010036039 Serrate-Jagged Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000082085 Verticillium <Phyllachorales> Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- VYBREYKSZAROCT-UHFFFAOYSA-N alpha-myrcene Natural products CC(=C)CCCC(=C)C=C VYBREYKSZAROCT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002280 anti-androgenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001093 anti-cancer Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003110 anti-inflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003262 anti-osteoporosis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002421 anti-septic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004599 antimicrobial Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003078 antioxidant effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000975 bioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002551 biofuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019658 bitter taste Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009194 climbing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- UNCDMWKTFLUPHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N colupulone Chemical compound CC(C)C(=O)C1=C(O)C(CC=C(C)C)=C(O)C(CC=C(C)C)(CC=C(C)C)C1=O UNCDMWKTFLUPHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002361 compost Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009264 composting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005059 dormancy Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001076 estrogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930009668 farnesene Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002674 ointment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229940023569 palmate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010152 pollination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013138 pruning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002557 soporific effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019640 taste Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/28—Cannabaceae, e.g. cannabis
Definitions
- the flowers (cones) of the female hop plant, Humulus lupulus L, are used in the making of beverages, especially beer, as a flavoring and processing component. Hops contribute towards the bitterness and aroma in beer as well as foam quality and flavor and taste stability.
- Hop plants, hops cones, male hop flowers, hop plant parts, hop tissue cultures and hop extracts also have bioactive properties; including anti-microbial, anti-cancer, anti-osteoporosis, anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, soporific, anti-androgenic, and pro-estrogenic activities, among others; which may be used in herbal remedies, in antimicrobial preparations for food, fodder, food fermentation, food process, animal husbandry; or in non-food uses, such as composting, biofuel processing, fermentation process, water treatment, animal bedding and phytoremediation; and uses in cosmetics, in nutraceutical and in pharmaceutical applications and in research thereof. Examples activities and non-berverage uses are included herein by references: J Hazard Mater.
- Agricultural end-product users, growers, handlers and processors of hops, of hop plants, of hop tissues and of hop products use hops and are affected by the agronomic, developmental, morphological, chemical and physical properties that vary among unique and distinct asexually reproduced varieties.
- This invention relates to an asexually produced hop variety, named “APOLLO”, invented in a planned and systematically executed breeding program.
- This invention relates to a new genetically, chemically, and morphologically distinct variety of hop selected from among the multitude of hop plants resulting from a controlled cross-pollination during the summer of 2000.
- the cross-pollination was between a proprietary female hop plant referred to as “Zeus” (non-patented) with a proprietary non-patented male hop plant (98001 X USDA 19058m)m.
- the parents of “98001” (non-patented) are female hop plant “Galena” (non-patented) and a male progeny of open pollinated “Nugget” (non-patented).
- the cross-pollination resulting in “APOLLO” was performed in 2000 by Roger Jeske, one of the named inventors in a field in Prosser, Wash. During 2001 seeds collected from the cross-pollination were germinated and screened for powdery mildew resistance in a greenhouse in Prosser, Wash. These seedlings were planted in a field nursery and further screened for gender, vigor, cone type, and disease resistance with the best genotypes being advanced to a single hill hop nursery during the spring of 2002. Mr. Jeske discovered the “APOLLO” variety during the summer of 2002 among the numerous hop genotypes growing in a single hill hop nursery in Prosser, Wash. These hop genotypes growing in the single hill hop nursery were grown in a 3.5′ ⁇ 14′ spacing on twine attached to an 18′ trellis system.
- the 2004 and 2005 commercially harvested two-acre test plot of second-generation “APOLLO” produced an average of 3000 lbs./acre.
- Commercially harvested hop cones were kiln dried to approximately 10% moisture, then were pressed into 200 lb. bales.
- Bale samples from the 2004-2005 second generation “APOLLO” hops grown in the Prosser, Wash. location showed an average alpha-acids level of 20.5% and beta-acids level of 6.2% (American Society of Brewing Chemists spectrophotometric method).
- the two acre plot of “APOLLO” produced >600 lbs./acre of alpha during both years.
- the highest producing commercial variety is “Zeus” (non-patented) (mother of “APOLLO”) that routinely produces in excess of 500 lbs./acre of alpha, but seldom approaches the 600 lbs./acre level of alpha production.
- Storage stability of second generation “APOLLO” had an average (2003 and 2004) loss of alpha-acids of the harvested hop cones stored at room temperature (22° C.) for six months of 15%. This is comparable to the most stable commercial high alpha hop “Nugget” (non-patented).
- the variety “APOLLO” is mid maturing and is usually ready to pick between the 5th to the 20th of September.
- the very compact and ovoid shape cones of this variety are mid sized (200-250 mg.) and very plentiful resulting in easy mechanical picking and cleaning.
- the cones detach easily from stems, and the cones do not shatter during commercial harvesting and drying.
- APOLLO is compared to its mother and to other agronomically important varieties.
- Zeus (non-patented) is the parent of “APOLLO” and therefore similarities would be expected.
- the primary differences between the new “APOLLO” variety and “Zeus” is the complete resistance of “APOLLO” to the powdery mildew strains found in the Yakima Valley, higher alpha-acid percentages, a much better storage stability of alpha acids, and a lower CoH value as compared to “Zeus”. Similarities include main vine inter-node lengths averaging 20 cm., which is 5-8 cm. shorter than most commercial hop varieties.
- both varieties have five lobed main vine leaves, a columnar to fusiform growth habit and excellent production (>2800 lbs./acre).
- Chemical similarities show that both have an alpha/beta ratio of 3.0-3.5 and a humulene/caryophyllene ratio of 1.7-1.9
- FIG. 1 depicts a close up of whole cones and a mature main vine leaf.
- FIG. 2 depicts the appearance of the plants and cones as they are growing in the field on high trellis (18′) approaching harvest time.
- This new hop variety “APOLLO” can be distinguished from all other USA commercial varieties by its resistance to powdery mildew in combination with a very high percentage of alpha-acids, low CoH, and excellent yield. There are currently no commercial varieties grown in the USA exhibiting complete powdery mildew resistance and providing a high alpha-acid yield.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
A new and distinct variety of hop, Humulus lupulus L., named “APOLLO” is characterized by its exceptional high percentage of alpha acids, excellent storage stability of alpha acids, low CoH value for an alpha variety, and resistance to hop powdery mildew strains found in Washington. The new variety was cultivated as a result of a cross in 2000 at Golden Gate Roza Hop Ranches in Prosser, Wash., United States and has been asexually reproduced in Prosser, Wash., United States.
Description
The flowers (cones) of the female hop plant, Humulus lupulus L, are used in the making of beverages, especially beer, as a flavoring and processing component. Hops contribute towards the bitterness and aroma in beer as well as foam quality and flavor and taste stability.
Hop plants, hops cones, male hop flowers, hop plant parts, hop tissue cultures and hop extracts also have bioactive properties; including anti-microbial, anti-cancer, anti-osteoporosis, anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, soporific, anti-androgenic, and pro-estrogenic activities, among others; which may be used in herbal remedies, in antimicrobial preparations for food, fodder, food fermentation, food process, animal husbandry; or in non-food uses, such as composting, biofuel processing, fermentation process, water treatment, animal bedding and phytoremediation; and uses in cosmetics, in nutraceutical and in pharmaceutical applications and in research thereof. Examples activities and non-berverage uses are included herein by references: J Hazard Mater. Apr 26;91(1-3):95-112; Mol Cancer Ther. Sep; 1(11):959-69; Phytochemistry. May;65(10):1317-30; U.S. Pat. No 6,423,317 (2002); U.S. Pat. No. 6,623,775 (2003).
Agricultural end-product users, growers, handlers and processors of hops, of hop plants, of hop tissues and of hop products use hops and are affected by the agronomic, developmental, morphological, chemical and physical properties that vary among unique and distinct asexually reproduced varieties. This invention relates to an asexually produced hop variety, named “APOLLO”, invented in a planned and systematically executed breeding program.
This invention relates to a new genetically, chemically, and morphologically distinct variety of hop selected from among the multitude of hop plants resulting from a controlled cross-pollination during the summer of 2000. The cross-pollination was between a proprietary female hop plant referred to as “Zeus” (non-patented) with a proprietary non-patented male hop plant (98001 X USDA 19058m)m. The parents of “98001” (non-patented) are female hop plant “Galena” (non-patented) and a male progeny of open pollinated “Nugget” (non-patented).
The cross-pollination resulting in “APOLLO” was performed in 2000 by Roger Jeske, one of the named inventors in a field in Prosser, Wash. During 2001 seeds collected from the cross-pollination were germinated and screened for powdery mildew resistance in a greenhouse in Prosser, Wash. These seedlings were planted in a field nursery and further screened for gender, vigor, cone type, and disease resistance with the best genotypes being advanced to a single hill hop nursery during the spring of 2002. Mr. Jeske discovered the “APOLLO” variety during the summer of 2002 among the numerous hop genotypes growing in a single hill hop nursery in Prosser, Wash. These hop genotypes growing in the single hill hop nursery were grown in a 3.5′×14′ spacing on twine attached to an 18′ trellis system.
Chemical analysis and field observations in 2002 demonstrated the “APOLLO” hop plant had unusually high percentage of alpha-acids (20-21%), lack of powdery mildew in the leaves and cones, low CoH value (25-26%) and an exceptional cone set. Cones were very dense, compact, and had high densities of lupulin glands. Vigor was average and yield potential appeared to be very good as the plant exhibited a columnar growth habit that was evenly distributed with cones from the trellis top to within 2 feet of the ground.
In 2003, “APOLLO” was asexually propagated in greenhouses at Prosser, Wash. Rhizomes from the original single hill plant of “APOLLO” were dug, divided and planted into multiple greenhouse grown containers. Softwood cuttings were periodically taken from these original containers until approximately 4,000 softwood-cutting plants were made. These plants constituted the first asexual reproduction of the “APOLLO” variety and represent the second generation. During 2003, these second generation plants were grown at two distinct geographical locations with no powdery mildew observed, even though powdery mildew was prevalent in the surrounding hop varieties. These two small scale trials consisted of a multi-hill planting (7 plants) located in fields in Prosser, Wash. and a multi-hill planting (7 plants) in fields located near Sunnyside, Wash. These trials were subjected to standard agronomic, cultural and management practices for the purpose of determining harvest ability, yield, chemical characteristic, and process ability. Also, established in 2003 was a large-scale trial of second-generation plants north of Prosser, Wash. This consisted of planting two acres in a 3.5′×14′ configuration (1778 hills), with two softwood cuttings of “APOLLO” planted per hill.
During 2003, 2004, and 2005 second-generation plants in the two small-scale trials and one large-scale trial in fields located in Prosser, Wash. were sampled for chemical analysis and harvested for yield evaluations. Results from the test plots provided additional information supporting the disease resistance, yield potential, and alpha-acids projections made from the original “APOLLO” plant (first generation) selected in 2002. This confirmed the exceptionally high yield and high alpha-acids percentages of the new variety. Greenhouse potted plants of second generation “APOLLO” that were grown in the two-acre test plot north of Prosser, Wash. were not harvested as babies in 2003, but sampling for alpha-acids confirmed the 20-21% values seen in 2002. The 2004 and 2005 commercially harvested two-acre test plot of second-generation “APOLLO” produced an average of 3000 lbs./acre. Commercially harvested hop cones were kiln dried to approximately 10% moisture, then were pressed into 200 lb. bales. Bale samples from the 2004-2005 second generation “APOLLO” hops grown in the Prosser, Wash. location showed an average alpha-acids level of 20.5% and beta-acids level of 6.2% (American Society of Brewing Chemists spectrophotometric method). The two acre plot of “APOLLO” produced >600 lbs./acre of alpha during both years. The highest producing commercial variety is “Zeus” (non-patented) (mother of “APOLLO”) that routinely produces in excess of 500 lbs./acre of alpha, but seldom approaches the 600 lbs./acre level of alpha production. Storage stability of second generation “APOLLO” had an average (2003 and 2004) loss of alpha-acids of the harvested hop cones stored at room temperature (22° C.) for six months of 15%. This is comparable to the most stable commercial high alpha hop “Nugget” (non-patented).
In 2005, the second asexual reproduction of the “APOLLO” variety took place. The second-generation rootstock from the two acres was dug, divided and planted into two larger acreage test plots near Prosser, Wash. and near Sunnyside, Wash. These third generation plants were grown utilizing standard agricultural practices that are common for hop production, except no powdery mildew fungicides application was made. Third generation plants in both locations were sampled for chemical analysis and harvested for yield evaluations. Results from these third generation large-scale test plots provided additional information supporting the powdery mildew resistance and high alpha-acids percentages. The 2005 yield from these baby “APOLLO” plants was very good as compared to the baby yield of other commercial varieties (approximately 2000 lbs./acre).
Based on agronomic and chemical evaluations over a number of growing seasons both secondary and tertiary clones (second and third generations) of “APOLLO” exhibited genetic stability with respect to its novel characteristics. Including complete powdery mildew resistance to powdery mildew strains currently in the Yakima Valley, Wash., very high yield (>2800 lb./ac), exceptionally high alpha-acids percentages (>20%), low CoH values (25-27%), and excellent alpha acids stability during storage.
All observations, evaluations and testing of the “APOLLO” variety's agronomic, morphological, physical, and chemical properties were carried out by or directed by the inventors.
The variety “APOLLO” is mid maturing and is usually ready to pick between the 5th to the 20th of September. The very compact and ovoid shape cones of this variety are mid sized (200-250 mg.) and very plentiful resulting in easy mechanical picking and cleaning. The cones detach easily from stems, and the cones do not shatter during commercial harvesting and drying.
In order to demonstrate genetic and phenotypic distinctiveness to closely related varieties, “APOLLO” is compared to its mother and to other agronomically important varieties. “Zeus” (non-patented) is the parent of “APOLLO” and therefore similarities would be expected. The primary differences between the new “APOLLO” variety and “Zeus” is the complete resistance of “APOLLO” to the powdery mildew strains found in the Yakima Valley, higher alpha-acid percentages, a much better storage stability of alpha acids, and a lower CoH value as compared to “Zeus”. Similarities include main vine inter-node lengths averaging 20 cm., which is 5-8 cm. shorter than most commercial hop varieties. Also, both varieties have five lobed main vine leaves, a columnar to fusiform growth habit and excellent production (>2800 lbs./acre). Chemical similarities show that both have an alpha/beta ratio of 3.0-3.5 and a humulene/caryophyllene ratio of 1.7-1.9
The detailed botanical description and drawings herein below allow distinction of the variety from related varieties. For illustration, comparisons of select distinguishing traits to further selected commercial varieties are set forth in Table 1.
TABLE 1 | |||||
“APOLLO” | “Galena” | “Nugget” | “Zeus” | ||
Alpha acids % | 15-19 | 10-13.5 | 11-14 | 12-16.5 |
w/w | ||||
Beta acids % | 5.5-8.0 | 7.0-9.0 | 4.0-6.0 | 4.0-6.0 |
w/w | ||||
CoH % w/w | 24-28 | 35-40 | 24-30 | 27-35 |
of alpha acids | ||||
Total Oil | 1.5-2.5 | 0.9-1.2 | 1.5-3.0 | 1.0-2.0 |
ml/100 g | ||||
Humulene % | 20-35 | 10-15 | 12-22 | 10-25 |
Caryophyllene | 14-20 | 3.0-5.0 | 7-10 | 5.0-15 |
% | ||||
Powdery | Resistant | Susceptible | Resistant | Susceptible |
Mildew | ||||
Disease | ||||
Cone Yield | 2800-3200 | 1600-2220 | 1700-2200 | 2400-3000 |
lbs/acre | ||||
The accompanying photographs illustrate the cones, leaves and growth habit of the new “APOLLO” variety:
This description provides information on agronomic, morphological, chemical and processing characteristics of the new variety that are used in distinction and identification of a new hop variety and its parts and products by practitioners of the industries that use hops as described herein above.
General information on the botanical characteristics and cultural aspects of hop plants as they relate to agronomics, breeding and food use are particularly well discussed in the prior art, especially, U.S. Pat. Nos. PP10,956 and PP13,132 and the literature; “Steiner's Guide to American Hops Book III”, 1986; “Hops” Published by Chapman and Hall, 1991. Detailed botanical information below of the present variety is directly comparable to the prior art, as contained by reference herein.
Following is a detailed description of the botanical and analytical chemical characteristics of the new variety. The information for this botanical description was either collected or verified during the growing seasons of 2002 through 2005 in the growing areas north of Prosser, Wash. and south of Sunnyside, Wash. Botanical characteristics, and to a lesser degree the analytical characteristics are somewhat dependent on cultural practices and climatic conditions and can vary with location or year:
- 1. Parentage: A hop plant originating from a controlled cross-pollination between proprietary non-patented female hop plant referred to as “Zeus” with a proprietary non-patented male hop plant (98001 X USDA 19058m)m.
- 2. Locality where grown and observed: North of Prosser, Wash. and south of Sunnyside, Wash.
- 3. Agronomic factors: “APOLLO” exhibits moderate growth rates. Dates of first and last harvest are approximately September 5 and September 20. Shoots of “APOLLO” emerge from winter dormancy approximately 1 week later than the commercial variety “Zeus” (non-patented) and I week earlier than the commercial variety “Galena” (non-patented). Emergence is typically late in March. Initial stem or shoot growth rate is moderate. After spring pruning, growth continues to be average when compared to other commercial varieties. The main vine stems are green (RHS 137C) with 6 faint purple (RHS N77B) stripes unlike “Zeus”, which has distinct purple stripes. The main vine stems are hexagonal in cross-section shape. Inflorescence of “APOLLO” begins to appear in early July and mature during the second week of September. Cone shape is fairly uniform in the “APOLLO” variety. The hop cones of “APOLLO” are well adapted to mechanical harvest because of their compactness and ovoid shape. The cones do not shatter during harvest. In the following description color code designations are by reference to the RHS Colour Chart, 4th Edition, provided by the Royal Horticultural Society of Great Britain.
- 4. Plant characteristics:
-
- Plant.—Is made of up many parts and colors vigorous, climbing vine.
- Plant shape.—Columnar to fusiform. Bine color green (RHS 137C).
- Bine stripe.—Pink violet (RHS N77B).
- Bine inter-node length (at 6′ high).—20 cm.
- Bine diameter (at 6′ high).—1 cm.
- Bine length.—18′.
- Petiole length.—6-7 cm. Petiole color green (RHS 144A).
- Petiole shape.—Slightly channeled (flat upper surface).
- Leaf arrangement.—Opposite.
- Leaf shape.—Cordate to palmate. Leaf color— upper surface— dark green— (RHS 137A). Leaf color— lower surface— green— (RHS 137C).
- Mature leaf width.—13-15 cm.
- Mature leaf length.—13-15 cm.
- Number of main bine leaf lobes.—Five.
- Veination pattern.—Reticulate.
- Vein color.—Green (RHS 144A).
- Leaf margin.—Moderately serrate to dentate. Lateral branch length (at 6′ high)” 0.5-1.0 m. Internode length of lateral branch (at 6′ high): 8-12 cm. Stipulate growth direction up-forked.
- Stipule color.—Green (RHS 146C).
-
- 5. Reproductive organs, cones, cone parts, seeds:
-
- Bract color.—(RHS 137C).
- Bract tips shape.—Acuminate.
- Bract tip position.—Mostly appressed, some bracts are slightly everted at full maturity.
- Bract diameter.—1.2 cm.
- Bracteole shape.—Lanceolate.
- Bracteole color.—(RHS 145B).
- Compactness.—Tight, very dense.
- Shape.—Ovoid to cylidrical.
- Cone length.—4 cm.
- Cone tip shape.—Bluntly pointed.
- Cone weight.—200-250 mg.
- Strig.—Compact.
- Lupulin glands.—The cone of the present variety contains numerous lupulin glands.
- Yield per acre.—2900-3350 pounds on average. However, this yield is contingent upon temperature, soil conditions and cultural practices, and is therefore not distinctive of the present variety.
- Seeds.—Highly variable in size and color depending on male parent.
- Date of maturity.—Considered to be middle (Sept. 5-Sept. 20) as compared to other common hop varieties grown in central Washington.
-
- 6. Analytical data of cones:
-
- % Alpha-acids (bale).—15.0-19.0% (ASBC Spectrophotometric method).
- % Beta-acids (bale).—5.5-8.0% (ASBC Spectrophotometric method).
- Alpha/beta ratio.—3.0-3.5.
- Cohumulone (% of alpha-acids).—24-28%.
- Colupulone (% of beta-acids).—52%.
- Storage characteristics.—15% transformation of alpha acids after 6 months at 22° C.
- Total oils (mls/100 g).—1.5-2.5.
- Humulene (% of total oils).—20-35%.
- Caryophyllene (% of total oils).—14-20%.
- Humulene/caryophyllene ratio.—1.9.
- Farnesene (% of total oils).—0%.
- Myrcene (% of total oils).—30-55%.
-
- 7. Disease resistance: The variety “APOLLO” is resistant to the strains of powdery mildew fungus found in the Yakima valley as of 2005, but since not all strains are present no future powdery mildew resistance can be assured. “APOLLO” appears to be tolerant to strains of Verticillium wilt and the virus diseases found in the USA growing areas. Tolerance to hop downy mildew fungus is very good and preventative measures are not necessary in the Yakima Valley growing region. Tolerance to the major soil borne pests and diseases, such as Phytophthora root rot is not known at this time.
- 8. Regional adaptation: The “APOLLO” variety is well adapted to the drier growing regions of Washington State, specifically the Yakima Valley. “APOLLO” has not been tested in other growing locations.
- 9. Ploidy: Hop variety “APOLLO” is diploid. The mother is diploid and the father is diploid.
- 10. Life expectancy: Indefinite similar to other hop varieties.
- 11. Use: Flavoring and conditioning of beverages and foods and use as a vegetable. Constituent of herbal remedies, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, drugs, ointments, antiseptic washes and cosmetics for humans and animals. Constituent of fodder, bedding, compost, agricultural treatments, phytoremediation treatments, water and soil treatments, conditioning of fermentation and other industrial processes. Used in breeding novel hop varieties.
- 12. Propagation status: “APOLLO” rootstock and plant propagation material exists. Asexual plant propagation has been demonstrated.
- 13. Reproductive status: “APOLLO” is fertile and produces seeds upon pollination with male hop plants.
This new hop variety “APOLLO” can be distinguished from all other USA commercial varieties by its resistance to powdery mildew in combination with a very high percentage of alpha-acids, low CoH, and excellent yield. There are currently no commercial varieties grown in the USA exhibiting complete powdery mildew resistance and providing a high alpha-acid yield.
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct hop plant named “APOLLO”, as herein described and illustrated.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/344,246 USPP20200P3 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2006-01-31 | Hop plant named ‘APOLLO’ |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/344,246 USPP20200P3 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2006-01-31 | Hop plant named ‘APOLLO’ |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060218684P1 US20060218684P1 (en) | 2006-09-28 |
USPP20200P3 true USPP20200P3 (en) | 2009-08-04 |
Family
ID=37036755
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/344,246 Active 2026-08-04 USPP20200P3 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2006-01-31 | Hop plant named ‘APOLLO’ |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | USPP20200P3 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
USPP23674P2 (en) | 2011-02-16 | 2013-06-18 | S.S. Steiner, Inc. | Hop plant named ‘Delta’ |
-
2006
- 2006-01-31 US US11/344,246 patent/USPP20200P3/en active Active
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
USPP23674P2 (en) | 2011-02-16 | 2013-06-18 | S.S. Steiner, Inc. | Hop plant named ‘Delta’ |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20060218684P1 (en) | 2006-09-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
USPP23674P2 (en) | Hop plant named ‘Delta’ | |
USPP20200P3 (en) | Hop plant named ‘APOLLO’ | |
USPP18602P3 (en) | Hop plant named ‘BRAVO’ | |
Brand et al. | Four sterile or Near-sterile cultivars of Japanese barberry in three foliage colors | |
USPP8812P (en) | Hop plant named H87311-3 | |
USPP20227P3 (en) | Hop plant named ‘Super Galena’ | |
USPP32461P2 (en) | Corylus plant named ‘Hunterdon’ | |
USPP10147P (en) | Hop plant named `H900322-4` | |
US20240147880P1 (en) | Hop plant named 'hs15619' | |
USPP24299P2 (en) | Hop plant named ‘Calypso’ | |
US6294715B1 (en) | Heat tolerant broccoli | |
USPP34073P2 (en) | Thuja tree named ‘CMA04271964’ | |
USPP32879P2 (en) | Willow oak tree named ‘TGO-GAL’ | |
USPP32494P2 (en) | Corylus plant named ‘Somerset’ | |
US20210227770A1 (en) | Cannabis plant named 'frb005' | |
USPP34790P2 (en) | Hazelnut tree named ‘Photon’ | |
USPP32462P2 (en) | Corylus plant named ‘Monmouth’ | |
USPP32460P2 (en) | Corylus plant named ‘Raritan’ | |
USPP31616P3 (en) | Hop plant named ‘HBC 353’ | |
USPP24978P3 (en) | Crapemyrtle plant named ‘CREC-0077’ | |
USPP32736P2 (en) | Panicum virgatum plant named ‘Prairie Dog’ | |
USPP29750P2 (en) | Clusia plant named ‘LICLUS02’ | |
USPP29917P2 (en) | X Mangave plant named ‘Spotty Dotty’ | |
USPP30111P3 (en) | Anthurium plant named ‘ARAANTBRO1’ | |
US20210329823P1 (en) | Hop plant named 'HBC 695' |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:S.S. STEINER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:062190/0019 Effective date: 20221222 |