USPP11378P - Cherry tree named `Sumleta` - Google Patents
Cherry tree named `Sumleta` Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP11378P USPP11378P US09/104,278 US10427898V US11378P US PP11378 P USPP11378 P US PP11378P US 10427898 V US10427898 V US 10427898V US 11378 P US11378 P US 11378P
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- fruit
- sumleta
- lapins
- variety
- tree
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 235000019693 cherries Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 15
- 241000167854 Bourreria succulenta Species 0.000 title claims abstract 4
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 241000158728 Meliaceae Species 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 229930002877 anthocyanin Natural products 0.000 claims description 9
- 235000010208 anthocyanin Nutrition 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000004410 anthocyanin Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 150000004636 anthocyanins Chemical class 0.000 claims description 9
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 claims description 6
- 102000011842 Serrate-Jagged Proteins Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010036039 Serrate-Jagged Proteins Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000019640 taste Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 abstract description 14
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 abstract description 13
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 235000019606 astringent taste Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 4
- 235000019605 sweet taste sensations Nutrition 0.000 abstract 1
- 241001290151 Prunus avium subsp. avium Species 0.000 description 11
- 244000007021 Prunus avium Species 0.000 description 5
- 235000010401 Prunus avium Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 4
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 4
- 241000220299 Prunus Species 0.000 description 4
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 4
- 235000021185 dessert Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 208000035240 Disease Resistance Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 3
- 208000022602 disease susceptibility Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000034303 cell budding Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007373 indentation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002932 luster Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002420 orchard Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000033458 reproduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010013911 Dysgeusia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 244000141359 Malus pumila Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000186561 Swietenia macrophylla Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001464 adherent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000021016 apples Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000023753 dehiscence Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005094 fruit set Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000011389 fruit/vegetable juice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000004907 gland Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009448 modified atmosphere packaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001672 ovary Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005070 ripening Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001953 sensory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/74—Rosaceae, e.g. strawberry, apple, almonds, pear, rose, blackberries or raspberries
- A01H6/7427—Prunus, e.g. almonds
- A01H6/7445—Cherries
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H5/08—Fruits
Definitions
- This invention relates to cherry trees and particularly to a seedling cherry tree from a controlled cross made by Dr. W. David Lane of the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre Summerland cherry breeding program located at Summerland, British Columbia, Canada.
- the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada research facility at Summerland was established in 1914. Originally called the Dominion Experimental Farm at Summerland, the name was changed to the Summerland Research Station in 1959, the Summerland Research Centre in 1994 and to the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (PARC) Summerland in 1996.
- the tree fruit breeding program was established in 1924 to provide new varieties for the tree fruit industry of British Columbia, Canada, and the world.
- the breeding program at Summerland has produced several tree fruit varieties including ⁇ Spartan ⁇ (unpatented), ⁇ Summerred ⁇ (unpatented), and ⁇ Sunrise ⁇ (unpatented), apples and ⁇ Van ⁇ (unpatented), ⁇ Lapins ⁇ (unpatented), and ⁇ Sweetheart ⁇ (unpatented) sweet cherries.
- the tree fruit breeders typically produce several thousand seedlings each year.
- the three broad objectives of the cherry breeding program are: 1) to diversify the product to allow growers to take advantage of niche markets; 2) to improve environmental adaptation to major fruit growing areas, for consistent production of high quality fruit; 3) to reduce the cost of production.
- the varieties are evaluated for the following traits to insure that the objectives are met.
- Primary traits include: early onset of bearing, self-compatibility, extended ripening season, fruit size, fruit firmness, and resistance to cracking.
- Secondary traits include: disease resistance, winter hardiness, resistance to spring frosts, and compact tree growth habit.
- the seedlings are evaluated for fruit and tree quality. Bloom and harvest indices, disease susceptibility and growth habit are evaluated in the field. Promising seedlings are re-propagated by budding or grafting onto rootstocks, and planted out as first selections in variety evaluation plots. The reproductions are evaluated for varietal stability, disease susceptibility, and fruit and tree quality. The most promising selections are re-propagated again and planted out in randomized evaluation plots complete with reference varieties (commercial varieties). Upon fruiting, selections are evaluated for varietal stability in the field, and for fruit quality, in "in-house” sensory evaluation panels. The new varieties are compared to reference varieties to establish uniqueness.
- the present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of cherry tree which was named ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ in 1995.
- the original cross was made in 1976 by breeder Dr. W. David Lane.
- the variety is the offspring of the seed parent ⁇ Lapins ⁇ and the pollen parent ⁇ 2N-39-5 ⁇ (unpatented) (a ⁇ Van ⁇ Stella ⁇ cross from the summerland program).
- the variety was planted out as a seedling and given the Breeders Reference Number ⁇ 13N-6-59 ⁇ in 1985.
- the variety ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ consistently has the following characteristics.
- the variety is a self-compatible, mid-season cherry maturing about 6 or 7 days after ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ and 4 to 5 days before ⁇ Lapins ⁇ .
- the fruit of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is kidney shaped and has medium-long, thick stems. The fruit has mahogany-colored skin with a brilliant luster, dark red flesh, and a slightly astringent taste. The fruit is very large and firm averaging 12.7 g in weight and a rating of 77 in firmness as measured by Shores Durometer.
- the fruit has a prominent suture and a distinctive prominent hollow apex (blossom end).
- the stone of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is medium in size (averaging about 10 mm in diameter) and is medium relative to the size of the fruit.
- the stone is round in the lateral and basal views and elliptic in frontal view.
- the keel development is moderate.
- the leaves of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ have weak glossiness on the upper side, are elliptical in shape and have shallow to medium depth, serrate margins. The leaves are oriented obliquely downwards in relation to the shoot and have acute tips and rounded bases.
- the petioles are long (over 2.5 cm), have anthocyanin coloration on both sides and have two to four red kidney-shaped nectaries at the base.
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ flowers in the middle of the blossom season with ⁇ Bing ⁇ , 1 to 2 days after ⁇ Van ⁇ , and 3 to 4 days after ⁇ Lapins ⁇ .
- the variety is self-compatible.
- the flowers are white, medium in size, single in type, and appear in clusters.
- the petals are small, broad elliptic in shape and overlapping.
- the tree of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is of moderate vigor and hardy to Zone 6A.
- the tree is precocious, and productive, and has produced good crops annually since first fruiting.
- the one-year-old dormant shoots show little or no anthocyanin coloration and are of medium to thick diameter at the middle of the shoot (averaging about 6.5 mm).
- the internodes are medium to long (averaging about 41 mm) and have a few to a medium number of lenticels.
- the buds on the one year old dormant shoots are ovate and are slightly held out in relation to the shoot.
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is the result of a controlled cross of the seed parent ⁇ Lapins ⁇ and the pollen parent ⁇ 2N-39-5 ⁇ (unpatented) made in 1976.
- ⁇ Lapins ⁇ is a result of a controlled cross of the seed parent ⁇ Van ⁇ and the pollen parent ⁇ Stella ⁇ made at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre in 1965.
- ⁇ 2N-39-5 ⁇ is a result of a controlled cross of the seed parent ⁇ Van ⁇ and the pollen parent ⁇ Stella ⁇ made at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Summerland in 1965. ⁇ 2N-39-5 ⁇ was not of commercial quality and was dropped from the program. The variety was used as parent because of its potential to pass on self-fertility.
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ matures 6 to 7 days after ⁇ Van ⁇ and 4 to 5 days before ⁇ Lapins ⁇ .
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ fruit is kidney-shaped, has a hollow apex end and obvious dimple, and a prominent suture, whereas ⁇ Lapins ⁇ is flat to round in shape, flat at the apex and has a non-prominent suture.
- the stone of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is round in lateral view, medium to large in size, and has moderately developed keel.
- the stone of ⁇ Lapins ⁇ is narrow elliptic in lateral view, large, with a undeveloped keel.
- the tree habit of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is upright and moderately vigorous while the tree habit of ⁇ Lapins ⁇ is upright and very vigourous.
- the new and distinct variety of Prunus avium fruiting cherry tree, ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ resulted from a controlled cross made in 1976 at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre in Summerland, British Columbia, Canada by breeder Dr. W. David Lane.
- the resulting seedling was established in a selection block in 1985 and given the breeder's reference number ⁇ 13N-6-59 ⁇ .
- the variety has been established and is being maintained at the research facility. Evaluations began upon fruiting.
- the variety is stable with no variations occurring, and demonstrates significant differences from its parents and other fruiting cherry varieties in that the fruit of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ matures about the middle of cherry season is large and firm with a hollow apex and distinctive obvious dimple at the blossom end.
- the skin of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is mahogany in color and highly lustrous with fine light colored highlights. The flesh is dark red.
- the fruit is sweet (19% soluble solids) with some astringency and medium acidity (595 titratable units).
- the fruit is moderately susceptible to rain splitting (42% natural rain splits).
- the stone of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is round in the lateral view and has a moderately developed keel. The tree habit is upright, somewhat spreading, and moderately vigorous.
- the variety was first propagated in 1985 by budding on Mazzard F12/1 rootstock was established in a second selection field at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre at Summerland, British Columbia, Canada in 1987.
- FIG. 1 a typical tree is shown. This Figure shows the growth habit of the tree, approximately 7 years old, at bloom.
- FIG. 2 a typical branch at blossom is shown.
- the figure displays the blossoms of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ at about full bloom.
- FIG. 3 shows a typical branch with fruit somewhat prior to harvest. This figure illustrates the cluster of fruit and the leaves of the variety.
- FIG. 4 illustrates the mature fruit of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ in large scale.
- the fruit is arranged to display the blossom end (top) and the side view (middle left) of the fruit. These views show the color of the fruit at maturity in the middle right the fruit is displayed in cross section after being cut centrally across the midline. The flesh color and the arrangement of the flesh in relation to the stone is displayed.
- FIG. 5 shows various views of the stone of the fruit, after drying and the flesh is removed.
- the basal, lateral and front views are displayed as well as views of the keel. All colors as set forth in the specification refer to those set forth by The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart (R.H.S.). Colors as shown are as close as is possible to attain in a color illustration of this character.
- a seedling resulting from a controlled cross made in 1976 was planted into a seedling block and given the Breeders' Reference Number ⁇ 13N-6-59 ⁇ in 1985.
- ⁇ 13N-6-59 ⁇ was reproduced and planted in cultivated variety blocks, complete with standards at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (PARC), Summerland orchards in 1985.
- PARC Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre
- the reproductions have shown ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ ( ⁇ 13N-6-59 ⁇ ) to be stable with no variations occurring. The variety has been observed and evaluated since first fruiting.
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ was evaluated for fruit size, fruit firmness, maturity date, fruit taste (soluble solids and titratable acids), natural rain splits, tree growth habit, fruit shape, productivity, prococity and disease resistance from first fruiting in 1985 until the present.
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ Under growing conditions at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (PARC) Summerland located at Summerland in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia, Canada, the variety ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ consistently has the following characteristics. ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ has larger average fruit size (12.7 g.) than ⁇ Van ⁇ (8.7 g) ⁇ Bing ⁇ (9.0 g.) and ⁇ Lapins ⁇ (10.6 g.). The variety matures on average 6 to 7 days later than ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ and 4 to 5 days earlier than ⁇ Lapins ⁇ . ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ mature on average about the first week of July in Summerland.
- PARC Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ averages a rating of 77 in firmness as measured by Shores Durometer, ⁇ Bing ⁇ has a rating of 70, ⁇ Van ⁇ 78 and ⁇ Lapins ⁇ 76.
- the fruit of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ on average is as sweet as ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ and sweeter than ⁇ Lapins ⁇ and has more titratable acids than ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Lapins ⁇ (no measurements were taken for ⁇ Bing ⁇ ).
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ has a slightly more astringent taste than the refence varieties.
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ has a slightly higher tendency to rain split than ⁇ Van ⁇ and significantly higher rain splitting tendency than ⁇ Bing ⁇ and ⁇ Lapins ⁇ .
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is significantly more prone to splitting than ⁇ Van ⁇ or ⁇ Lapins ⁇ (no trials were done on ⁇ Bing ⁇ ).
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ has a prominent suture and hollow spex which are not evident in the reference varieties.
- ⁇ Bing ⁇ and ⁇ Van ⁇ have more pointed apices and ⁇ Lapins ⁇ has a flat apex.
- the stone of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ has a moderately developed keel as does ⁇ Bing ⁇ and ⁇ Van ⁇ ; the keel in ⁇ Lapins ⁇ is undeveloped.
- the fruit of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is kidney shaped and has medium-long, thick stems.
- ⁇ Lapins ⁇ And ⁇ Bing ⁇ are kidney-shaped while ⁇ Van ⁇ is flat-round to round in shape.
- the stems of ⁇ Van ⁇ are on average shorter than ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ and ⁇ Lapins ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ are longer.
- the skin of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is more lustrous than the reference varieties.
- the leaves of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ have weak glossiness on the upper side, have shallow to medium depth, serrate margins. ⁇ Lapins ⁇ has very glossy leaves and medium depth, dentate margins.
- the leaves of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ oriented obliquely downwards in relation to the shoot, whereas ⁇ Bing ⁇ leaves are horizontal.
- the petioles have anthocyanin coloration on both sides (anthocyanin coloration is absent in ⁇ Lapins ⁇ ) and have 2 to 4 nectaries at the base. On average ⁇ Lapins ⁇ has 2 to 4 nectaries while ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ have 2.
- ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is self-compatible, as is ⁇ Lapins ⁇ while ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ are not.
- the flowers are white, medium in size, single in type, and appear in clusters.
- ⁇ Lapins ⁇ has a slightly larger flower and ⁇ Van ⁇ a slightly smaller flower.
- the petals of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ are small and overlapping.
- ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ have large partially overlapping petals and ⁇ Lapins ⁇ has petals that are medium-sized and touching.
- the tree of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ is upright somewhat spreading and has moderate vigor while ⁇ Lapins ⁇ is upright and vigorous.
- the attitude of the one-year-old shoots is upright while ⁇ Van ⁇ and ⁇ Bing ⁇ are horizontal.
- the shoots, on average, are of medium to thick diameter, slightly larger than ⁇ Lapins ⁇ which in turn is slightly larger than ⁇ Van ⁇ .
- the internodes of ⁇ Sumleta ⁇ are, on average, longer than ⁇ Lapins ⁇ and shorter than ⁇ Van ⁇ .
- the buds on the one year old shoots are slightly held out in relation to the shoot, while the buds of ⁇ Lapins ⁇ are clearly held out.
- ⁇ Bing ⁇ has appressed buds.
- Wood of Sumleta is being virus indexed at the Centre for Plant Health at Sidney B.C. Upon release of certified material Virus Certified trees will be established and maintained at the okanagan Plant Improvement Companies certified budwood orchard at Summerland, B.C.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
A new and distinct variety of cherry tree, originating from a controlled cross of `Lapins`×`2N-39-5` made in 1976 is described. The resulting seedling was established in a selection block in 1985 and given the breeder's reference number `13N-6-59`. The variety has been established and is being maintained at the research facility. Evaluations began upon fruiting. The variety is stable with no variations occurring, and demonstrates qualities of the tree, flower, and fruit that in combination make the variety significantly different from from its parents and other fruiting cherry varieties, in that `Sumleta` has large kidney shaped fruit, with shiny, mahogany skin with fine light dots and dark red flesh. The fruit has a prominent suture and a hollow apex with and obvious dimple. The fruit matures mid season, about 5 to 6 days after `Van` and `Bing` and 4 to 5 days before `Lapins`. The fruit is very firm, has a sweet taste with some astringency, and is moderately susceptible to rain splitting. The stone of `Sumleta` is round in lateral view, medium to large in size, and has moderately developed keel. The tree is upright, self-compatible, and moderately vigorous and has produced good crops annually since fruiting commenced. The variety was named `Sumleta` in 1995.
Description
______________________________________
Name: `Sumleta`
Synonym: `Sonata`
Breeders Reference Number
`13N-6-59`
Genus: Prunus
Species: avium
Type: Fruiting sweet cherry
Market Use: Dessert quality cherry
______________________________________
This invention relates to cherry trees and particularly to a seedling cherry tree from a controlled cross made by Dr. W. David Lane of the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre Summerland cherry breeding program located at Summerland, British Columbia, Canada.
The Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada research facility at Summerland was established in 1914. Originally called the Dominion Experimental Farm at Summerland, the name was changed to the Summerland Research Station in 1959, the Summerland Research Centre in 1994 and to the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (PARC) Summerland in 1996. The tree fruit breeding program was established in 1924 to provide new varieties for the tree fruit industry of British Columbia, Canada, and the world. The breeding program at Summerland has produced several tree fruit varieties including `Spartan` (unpatented), `Summerred` (unpatented), and `Sunrise` (unpatented), apples and `Van` (unpatented), `Lapins` (unpatented), and `Sweetheart` (unpatented) sweet cherries. The tree fruit breeders typically produce several thousand seedlings each year.
The three broad objectives of the cherry breeding program are: 1) to diversify the product to allow growers to take advantage of niche markets; 2) to improve environmental adaptation to major fruit growing areas, for consistent production of high quality fruit; 3) to reduce the cost of production. The varieties are evaluated for the following traits to insure that the objectives are met. Primary traits include: early onset of bearing, self-compatibility, extended ripening season, fruit size, fruit firmness, and resistance to cracking. Secondary traits include: disease resistance, winter hardiness, resistance to spring frosts, and compact tree growth habit.
Upon fruiting, the seedlings are evaluated for fruit and tree quality. Bloom and harvest indices, disease susceptibility and growth habit are evaluated in the field. Promising seedlings are re-propagated by budding or grafting onto rootstocks, and planted out as first selections in variety evaluation plots. The reproductions are evaluated for varietal stability, disease susceptibility, and fruit and tree quality. The most promising selections are re-propagated again and planted out in randomized evaluation plots complete with reference varieties (commercial varieties). Upon fruiting, selections are evaluated for varietal stability in the field, and for fruit quality, in "in-house" sensory evaluation panels. The new varieties are compared to reference varieties to establish uniqueness.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of cherry tree which was named `Sumleta` in 1995. The original cross was made in 1976 by breeder Dr. W. David Lane. The variety is the offspring of the seed parent `Lapins` and the pollen parent `2N-39-5` (unpatented) (a `Van`×`Stella` cross from the summerland program). The variety was planted out as a seedling and given the Breeders Reference Number `13N-6-59` in 1985.
Under growing conditions at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (PARC) Summerland located at Summerland in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia, Canada, the variety `Sumleta` consistently has the following characteristics. The variety is a self-compatible, mid-season cherry maturing about 6 or 7 days after `Van` and `Bing` and 4 to 5 days before `Lapins`. The fruit of `Sumleta` is kidney shaped and has medium-long, thick stems. The fruit has mahogany-colored skin with a brilliant luster, dark red flesh, and a slightly astringent taste. The fruit is very large and firm averaging 12.7 g in weight and a rating of 77 in firmness as measured by Shores Durometer. It is moderately resistant to rain splitting. The fruit has a prominent suture and a distinctive prominent hollow apex (blossom end). The stone of `Sumleta` is medium in size (averaging about 10 mm in diameter) and is medium relative to the size of the fruit. The stone is round in the lateral and basal views and elliptic in frontal view. The keel development is moderate.
The leaves of `Sumleta` have weak glossiness on the upper side, are elliptical in shape and have shallow to medium depth, serrate margins. The leaves are oriented obliquely downwards in relation to the shoot and have acute tips and rounded bases. The petioles are long (over 2.5 cm), have anthocyanin coloration on both sides and have two to four red kidney-shaped nectaries at the base.
`Sumleta` flowers in the middle of the blossom season, with `Bing`, 1 to 2 days after `Van`, and 3 to 4 days after `Lapins`. The variety is self-compatible. The flowers are white, medium in size, single in type, and appear in clusters. The petals are small, broad elliptic in shape and overlapping.
The tree of `Sumleta` is of moderate vigor and hardy to Zone 6A. The tree is precocious, and productive, and has produced good crops annually since first fruiting. The one-year-old dormant shoots show little or no anthocyanin coloration and are of medium to thick diameter at the middle of the shoot (averaging about 6.5 mm). On average the internodes are medium to long (averaging about 41 mm) and have a few to a medium number of lenticels. The buds on the one year old dormant shoots are ovate and are slightly held out in relation to the shoot.
`Sumleta` is the result of a controlled cross of the seed parent `Lapins` and the pollen parent `2N-39-5` (unpatented) made in 1976.
`Lapins` is a result of a controlled cross of the seed parent `Van` and the pollen parent `Stella` made at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre in 1965.
`2N-39-5` is a result of a controlled cross of the seed parent `Van` and the pollen parent `Stella` made at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Summerland in 1965. `2N-39-5` was not of commercial quality and was dropped from the program. The variety was used as parent because of its potential to pass on self-fertility.
The fruit of `Sumleta` matures 6 to 7 days after `Van` and 4 to 5 days before `Lapins`. `Sumleta` fruit is kidney-shaped, has a hollow apex end and obvious dimple, and a prominent suture, whereas `Lapins` is flat to round in shape, flat at the apex and has a non-prominent suture. The stone of `Sumleta` is round in lateral view, medium to large in size, and has moderately developed keel. The stone of `Lapins` is narrow elliptic in lateral view, large, with a undeveloped keel. The tree habit of `Sumleta` is upright and moderately vigorous while the tree habit of `Lapins` is upright and very vigourous.
The new and distinct variety of Prunus avium fruiting cherry tree, `Sumleta`, resulted from a controlled cross made in 1976 at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre in Summerland, British Columbia, Canada by breeder Dr. W. David Lane. The resulting seedling was established in a selection block in 1985 and given the breeder's reference number `13N-6-59`. The variety has been established and is being maintained at the research facility. Evaluations began upon fruiting.
The variety is stable with no variations occurring, and demonstrates significant differences from its parents and other fruiting cherry varieties in that the fruit of `Sumleta` matures about the middle of cherry season is large and firm with a hollow apex and distinctive obvious dimple at the blossom end. The skin of `Sumleta` is mahogany in color and highly lustrous with fine light colored highlights. The flesh is dark red. The fruit is sweet (19% soluble solids) with some astringency and medium acidity (595 titratable units). The fruit is moderately susceptible to rain splitting (42% natural rain splits). The stone of `Sumleta` is round in the lateral view and has a moderately developed keel. The tree habit is upright, somewhat spreading, and moderately vigorous. The variety was first propagated in 1985 by budding on Mazzard F12/1 rootstock was established in a second selection field at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre at Summerland, British Columbia, Canada in 1987.
The accompanying photographs show various characteristics of the cherry variety `Sumleta`.
In FIG. 1 a typical tree is shown. This Figure shows the growth habit of the tree, approximately 7 years old, at bloom.
In FIG. 2 a typical branch at blossom is shown. The figure displays the blossoms of `Sumleta` at about full bloom.
FIG. 3 shows a typical branch with fruit somewhat prior to harvest. This figure illustrates the cluster of fruit and the leaves of the variety.
FIG. 4 illustrates the mature fruit of `Sumleta` in large scale. The fruit is arranged to display the blossom end (top) and the side view (middle left) of the fruit. These views show the color of the fruit at maturity in the middle right the fruit is displayed in cross section after being cut centrally across the midline. The flesh color and the arrangement of the flesh in relation to the stone is displayed.
FIG. 5 shows various views of the stone of the fruit, after drying and the flesh is removed. The basal, lateral and front views are displayed as well as views of the keel. All colors as set forth in the specification refer to those set forth by The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart (R.H.S.). Colors as shown are as close as is possible to attain in a color illustration of this character.
A seedling resulting from a controlled cross made in 1976 was planted into a seedling block and given the Breeders' Reference Number `13N-6-59` in 1985. `13N-6-59` was reproduced and planted in cultivated variety blocks, complete with standards at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (PARC), Summerland orchards in 1985. The reproductions have shown `Sumleta` (`13N-6-59`) to be stable with no variations occurring. The variety has been observed and evaluated since first fruiting.
Test plots established at PARC Summerland consisting of 4 trees of `Sumleta` (`13N-6-59`) were established in 1987. The variety was compared to the reference varieties `Bing` (unpatented), `Van`, and `Lapins` of approximately the same age and planted in the same area. Controlled grower trials, under test agreements, have been established in British Columbia and in selected sites in the United States.
`Sumleta` was evaluated for fruit size, fruit firmness, maturity date, fruit taste (soluble solids and titratable acids), natural rain splits, tree growth habit, fruit shape, productivity, prococity and disease resistance from first fruiting in 1985 until the present.
Under growing conditions at the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (PARC) Summerland located at Summerland in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia, Canada, the variety `Sumleta` consistently has the following characteristics. `Sumleta` has larger average fruit size (12.7 g.) than `Van` (8.7 g) `Bing` (9.0 g.) and `Lapins` (10.6 g.). The variety matures on average 6 to 7 days later than `Van` and `Bing` and 4 to 5 days earlier than `Lapins`. `Van` and `Bing` mature on average about the first week of July in Summerland. The flesh is significantly more firm than `Bing` and is as firm as `Van` and `Lapins`. `Sumleta` averages a rating of 77 in firmness as measured by Shores Durometer, `Bing` has a rating of 70, `Van` 78 and `Lapins` 76. The fruit of `Sumleta` on average is as sweet as `Van` and `Bing` and sweeter than `Lapins` and has more titratable acids than `Van` and `Lapins` (no measurements were taken for `Bing`). `Sumleta` has a slightly more astringent taste than the refence varieties. `Sumleta` has a slightly higher tendency to rain split than `Van` and significantly higher rain splitting tendency than `Bing` and `Lapins`. In controlled cracking index trials in the laboratory. `Sumleta` is significantly more prone to splitting than `Van` or `Lapins` (no trials were done on `Bing`). `Sumleta`has a prominent suture and hollow spex which are not evident in the reference varieties. `Bing` and `Van` have more pointed apices and `Lapins` has a flat apex. The stone of `Sumleta` has a moderately developed keel as does `Bing` and `Van`; the keel in `Lapins` is undeveloped. The fruit of `Sumleta` is kidney shaped and has medium-long, thick stems. `Lapins` And `Bing` are kidney-shaped while `Van` is flat-round to round in shape. The stems of `Van` are on average shorter than `Sumleta` and `Lapins` and `Bing` are longer. The skin of `Sumleta` is more lustrous than the reference varieties.
The leaves of `Sumleta` have weak glossiness on the upper side, have shallow to medium depth, serrate margins. `Lapins` has very glossy leaves and medium depth, dentate margins. The leaves of `Sumleta` oriented obliquely downwards in relation to the shoot, whereas `Bing` leaves are horizontal. The petioles have anthocyanin coloration on both sides (anthocyanin coloration is absent in `Lapins`) and have 2 to 4 nectaries at the base. On average `Lapins` has 2 to 4 nectaries while `Van` and `Bing` have 2.
`Sumleta` flowers in the middle of the blossom season, with `Bing`, 1 to 2 days after `Van`, and 3 to 4 days after `Lapins`. `Sumleta` is self-compatible, as is `Lapins` while `Van` and `Bing` are not. The flowers are white, medium in size, single in type, and appear in clusters. `Lapins` has a slightly larger flower and `Van` a slightly smaller flower. The petals of `Sumleta` are small and overlapping. `Van` and `Bing` have large partially overlapping petals and `Lapins` has petals that are medium-sized and touching.
The tree of `Sumleta` is upright somewhat spreading and has moderate vigor while `Lapins` is upright and vigorous. The attitude of the one-year-old shoots is upright while `Van` and `Bing` are horizontal. The shoots, on average, are of medium to thick diameter, slightly larger than `Lapins` which in turn is slightly larger than `Van`. The internodes of `Sumleta` are, on average, longer than `Lapins` and shorter than `Van`. The buds on the one year old shoots are slightly held out in relation to the shoot, while the buds of `Lapins` are clearly held out. `Bing` has appressed buds.
Wood of Sumleta is being virus indexed at the Centre for Plant Health at Sidney B.C. Upon release of certified material Virus Certified trees will be established and maintained at the okanagan Plant Improvement Companies certified budwood orchard at Summerland, B.C.
Sumleta has shown no unusual susceptibility nor resistance to any plant or fruit pests and/or diseases.
______________________________________
Pomological Characteristics
`Sumleta`
______________________________________
Fruit end use: Dessert
Group Sweet
All trees are of approximately the same
age and have Mazzard F12/1 for rootstock.
______________________________________
Growth Characteristics:
Observations are measurerments
from 6 year
old bearing trees
Tree vigor Moderate
Tree height Less than 7 m
Tree width Less than 7 m
Growth habit Upright
Branch pubescence Very slight
Bearing Annual and
regular
______________________________________
Shoot Characteristics:
Observations one-year old dormant
shoots
Shoot attitude Erect
Wood bud shape Ovate
Position of bud Slightly held out
Number of lenticels
Few to medium
Shoot diameter (middle of internode)
Mean: 6.5 mm
Range: 3 mm
Intemode length (middle of shoot)
Mean: 40.9 mm
Range: 35.7 mm
Anthocyanin coloration (shoot tip)
Absent
Bark Coloration 1st year wood
165B (RHS) (at maturity)
Bark Coloration Mature Branch
199A (RHS) (at maturity)
Bark Coloration Trunk
166A (RHS) (at
______________________________________
maturity)
Leaf Characteristics:
Measurements are the mean of 10
leaves
Bud Burst Mid period as
compared to other
varieties
Attitude to shoot Oblique downwards
Leaf shape Elliptical
Angle at blade tip
Acute
Shape of base U-shape
Shape of apex Cuspidate
Leaf color upper side
137A (RHS)
Leaf color lower side
147B (RHS)
Anthocyanin upper side
Absent
Anthocyanin (leaf glands)
Present
Glossiness Weak-medium
Margin indentation
Serrate
Degree of indentation
Shallow-medium
Leaf length
Mean 14.3 cm
Range
5.5 cm
Leaf width
Mean
6.3 cm
Range
1.8 cm
Blade ratio
Length/width
2.3
Petiole length
Mean 3.3 cm
Range 2.2 cm
Petiole anthocyanin
59A
Number of nectaries (out of 10)
2-4
Nectaries color 45A (RHS)
______________________________________
FLOWER CHARACTERISTICS:
Measurements are the mean of 10
flowers
Bloom Period 1-2 days after Van and
with Bing
Flowers per cluster
3 to 10 per cluster
Duration of Bloom 5 to 7 days
Flowering density Sparse to medium
Flower appearance ln clusters
Flower type Single
Flower size 34.6 mm
Pedicel length 20.9 mm
Pedicel thickness 1.3 mm
Petal size (length)
12.7 mm
Petal shape Broad elliptic
Petal position of margins
Overlapping
Petal color 155D (RHS)
Anther color (at dehiscence)
Yellowish green
Frequency of supplementary pistil
Absent
Pistil presence Normal pistil
Ovary pubescence Absent
______________________________________
Fruit Characteristics:
Measurements are the means from
a 10 fruit
sample
Maturity date 10-15th of JuIy (at
Summerland)
Weight (average) 12.5 g
Large diameter Average about 31 mm
Fruit length Average about 26.5
mm
Shape Kidney
Symmetry of fruit Symmetrical
Position of largest diameter
Middle
Profile in lateral view
Rounded
Suture Pronouneed
Fruit apex Hollow (dimpled)
Color of flesh 187B (RHS)
Color of skin 187A (RHS)
Dots on skin Fine (light color)
Glossiness Brilliant luster
Firmness of flesh 77 on shores durometer
Natural rain splits
Moderately susceptible
(43%)
Skin cracking susceptibility
63 (on cracking index)
Fruit taste Sweet-tart
Juice color 187C (black red)
Fruit juiciness Medium
Soluble solids 18.5%
Length of stalk 3.5 cm
Stalk thickness 1.6 mm
Adherence of flesh to stone
Not adherent
Stone Color 165C (RHS)
Stone size 9.9 mm
Shape in lateral view
Round
Stone size relative to fruit
Medium
Stone shape front view
Elliptic
Stone Keel Medium
developed
Compatibility Self-compatible
Fruit set (yield efficiency)
High annual cropping
Storage At least 2
weeks at 0 degrees C.
Storage At least 4
weeks in Modified
Atmosphere
Packaging
______________________________________
Botanical Description of the Plant:
Name: `Sumleta`
Genus: Prunus
Species: avium
Market Class: Sweet dessert
Parentage: `Lapins` X `2N-39-5`
Name: `Lapins`
Genus: Prunus
Species: avium
Market Class: Sweet dessert
Parentage: `Van` X `Stella`
Name: `2N-39-5`
Genus: Prunus
Species: avium
Market Class: For breeding purposes only
Parentage: `Van` X `Stella`
______________________________________
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct variety of cherry tree named `Sumleta` originating from a controlled cross of `Lapins`×`2N-39-5` substantially illustrated and described and distinguished from other varieties in that the fruit matures later than `Van` and `Bing` and earlier than `Lapins`, is very large, very firm, sweet and slightly astringent in taste, has shiny mahogany skin and dark red flesh, is kidney shaped with a prominent suture and hollow apex with an obvious dimple, is moderately resistant to rain splitting and is produced on a tree that is upright, self-compatible, moderately vigorous and produces good crops annually, that has leaves oriented obliquely downwards with medium depth, serrate margins and petioles that have anthocyanin coloration on both sides and two to four kidney-shaped nectaries at the base, and that flowers in the middle of the blossom season producing medium sized single type flowers arranged in clusters that have small, broad elliptic shaped and overlapping petals under growing conditions at Summerland, British Columbia, Canada.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/104,278 USPP11378P (en) | 1998-06-25 | 1998-06-25 | Cherry tree named `Sumleta` |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/104,278 USPP11378P (en) | 1998-06-25 | 1998-06-25 | Cherry tree named `Sumleta` |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP11378P true USPP11378P (en) | 2000-05-09 |
Family
ID=22299593
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/104,278 Expired - Lifetime USPP11378P (en) | 1998-06-25 | 1998-06-25 | Cherry tree named `Sumleta` |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP11378P (en) |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP8721P (en) * | 1992-01-08 | 1994-05-10 | Calder Donald A | Sweet cherry tree named `Redlac` |
| USPP9857P (en) * | 1995-08-21 | 1997-04-15 | Nies; Marvin L. | Cherry tree `Firm Red` |
-
1998
- 1998-06-25 US US09/104,278 patent/USPP11378P/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USPP8721P (en) * | 1992-01-08 | 1994-05-10 | Calder Donald A | Sweet cherry tree named `Redlac` |
| USPP9857P (en) * | 1995-08-21 | 1997-04-15 | Nies; Marvin L. | Cherry tree `Firm Red` |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| USPP14627P3 (en) | Peach tree named ‘TexKing’ | |
| USPP16399P3 (en) | Grape plant named ‘G1-6819’ | |
| USPP35408P2 (en) | Passion fruit plant ‘Grand Passion’ | |
| USPP20294P2 (en) | Peach tree named ‘Flordabest’ | |
| USPP11378P (en) | Cherry tree named `Sumleta` | |
| USPP28172P3 (en) | Peach tree named ‘Royal Zest Two’ | |
| USPP11392P (en) | Cherry tree named `Skeena` | |
| USPP20551P3 (en) | Cherry tree named ‘13S2009’ | |
| USPP36565P2 (en) | Seedless grapevine plant named ‘ARD49’ | |
| USPP35801P2 (en) | Seedless grapevine plant named ‘ARD7’ | |
| USPP36909P2 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘BLOMG01’ | |
| USPP36331P2 (en) | Kiwi plant named ‘W11’ | |
| USPP35326P2 (en) | Prunus plant named ‘SPC414’ | |
| USPP34375P2 (en) | Seedless grapevine named ‘ARDFORTYTHREE’ | |
| USPP34792P2 (en) | Peach tree named ‘UFRuby’ | |
| USPP20174P2 (en) | Peach tree named ‘Gulfcrimson’ | |
| USPP33251P3 (en) | Grapevine plant named ‘Arrathirythree’ | |
| USPP17182P3 (en) | Peach tree plant named ‘Plawhite 5’ | |
| USPP8032P (en) | Fuji apple tree: T.A.C. #114 strain | |
| USPP32391P2 (en) | Apple tree named ‘CIVM49’ | |
| USPP14020P3 (en) | Plum tree named ‘Kenmore Plum’ | |
| USPP9368P (en) | Cherry tree `Early Red` | |
| USPP21315P3 (en) | Apple tree named ‘Jugala’ | |
| USPP15062P3 (en) | Nectarine tree named ‘Sunbest’ | |
| USPP13881P3 (en) | Plum tree named ‘Jayfree Plum’ |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NURSERY LICENSING ASSOCIATION, LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIMS FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT;ASSIGNOR:OKANAGAN PLANT IMPROVEMENT CO., LTD.;REEL/FRAME:013933/0652 Effective date: 20030319 |