USPP11295P - Lacebark elm tree named `UPMTF` - Google Patents

Lacebark elm tree named `UPMTF` Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USPP11295P
USPP11295P US09/020,069 US2006998V US11295P US PP11295 P USPP11295 P US PP11295P US 2006998 V US2006998 V US 2006998V US 11295 P US11295 P US 11295P
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
lacebark
tree
new variety
upmtf
elm
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US09/020,069
Inventor
Dwayne C. Moon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MOON'S TREE FARM Inc
Original Assignee
Tree Introductions Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tree Introductions Inc filed Critical Tree Introductions Inc
Priority to US09/020,069 priority Critical patent/USPP11295P/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USPP11295P publication Critical patent/USPP11295P/en
Assigned to MOON'S TREE FARM, INC. reassignment MOON'S TREE FARM, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TREE INTRODUCTIONS, INC.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01HNEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H6/00Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of Ulmus parvifolia, Lacebark Elm, which has been given the varietal name ⁇ UPMTF ⁇ .
  • cultivars In contrast, cultivated lacebark elm trees are still somewhat represented by seedling material that is extremely variable in growth habit, and several other varieties ranging form oval to vase-shaped to broad-rounded. The single dominant leader trait of my new variety has not been observed by me in any lacebark elm seedling or cultivar.
  • Lacebark elm typically is a large tree that matures between forty to fifty feet high and wide, is adaptable to soil and climate, and has a native range from southern China in a broad arc over to Korea and into northern Japan. Its United States adaptability, based on observed successful culture, ranges from Massachusetts to central Florida to Iowa, south to Texas and west to Washington State and California. There is a need for adaptable and tolerant trees that can be grown over a wide geographic area. Consequently, a new variety of lacebark elm which has a narrow, pyramidal habit and displays clonal consistency is particularly useful.
  • FIG. 1 is a photograph of an entire tree of my new variety.
  • FIG. 2 is a photograph of an entire tree of my new variety showing winter habit and branch structure.
  • FIG. 4 is a close up of the upper surface of several leaves from a tree of my new variety.
  • FIG. 5 is a close up of the lower surface of a several leaves from a tree of my new variety.
  • FIG. 6 is a close up of the upper surface of a number of leaves from a tree of my new variety showing the fall color.
  • My new variety of lacebark elm is characterized by its central dominant leader and pyramidal habit.
  • the initially discovered tree of my new variety was four years old and was transplanted form a liner row to a production field at the Moon Tree Farm site in Loganville, Ga. It was then discovered in 1993.
  • the original tree was eighteen feet high and eight feet wide with four inches of caliper six inches above the ground with a height to width ratio of 2.25.
  • This upright pyramidal form with a dominant leader distinguishes my new variety from typical Ulmus parvifolia trees.
  • Most lacebark elms are round-headed, often with pendulous branches, with some forms being upright-spreading.
  • My new tree maintains a dominant leader with strongly ascending secondary branches forming an upright pyramidal outline.
  • seedlings and other cultivars which I have observed do not have a dominant leader.
  • the unique growth habit insures its capacity for use in areas where growing space is restricted, particularly along streets with buildings or sites which will not accommodate a broader canopy.
  • my new tree has a branching habit and dendritic pattern of a dominant single lead (bole) with secondary branches that emerge at sixty degree angles (base) and thirty degree angles (top) to the main leader. Branches are uniformly and densely borne around the central leader with no large gaps from one branch insertion to the next. As a result, as can be seen from FIG. 2, the tree of my new variety is uniformly branched and symmetrical with a dense canopy. In contrast, traditional seedling lacebark elms and some of the cultivars are usually open and in youth must be pruned often to produce an upright habit.
  • the summer leaves are similar to those of the species, being dark green above, lighter below. In fall, the leaves turn yellow-orange.
  • the upper leaf surface is lustrous dark green (R.H.S. 133A).
  • the lower leaf surface is flat green (R.H.S. 135A).
  • the leaves turn yellow-orange (R.H.S. 21A) and rival those of paper birch.
  • the mature leaf averages three-fourths to two and one-half inches long, one-third to one and one-third inches wide, ten to twelve vein pairs, with one-fourth to one-half inch long petioles and is elliptical, as is typical of the species. Leaves are essentially glabrous at maturity.
  • Chance lacebark elm seedling of unknown origin growing in a cultivated area of the Moon Tree Farm in Loganville, Ga.
  • Tree shape and growth Upright-pyramidal. The growth rate is characterized as being very vigorous. Progeny of the original tree growing in USDA Zone 7a in Loganville, Ga., on average grew 11/4 inch caliper during the 1998 growing season. In computing this average, measurements were taken from 125 trees.
  • Trunk Dominant leader, exfoliating with maturity.
  • Bark Rich brown. Exfoliating on three inch caliper and larger trunk.
  • Mature bark color (Observed in the original tree) Exfoliating on three inch caliper and larger branches to reveal patches of gray-orange and gray-brown coloration (R.H.S. 164B and R.H.S. 177B). The texture of the bark prior to exfoliation is somewhat smooth. The color prior to exfoliation is a gray brown (R.H.S. 199A.
  • Branches Ascending, emerging from the dominant leader at an angle of sixty degrees (base) and thirty degrees (top).
  • Leaves Leaf shape is elliptical and typical of the species.
  • Leaf surface Upper leaf surface is lustrous dark green (R.H.S. 133A) and glabrous.
  • the lower surface is flat green (R.H.S. 135A) and glabrous.
  • Leaf size Leaves average three-fourths to two and one-half inches long, one third to one and one-third inches wide, ten to twelve vein pairs, with one-fourth to one-half inch long petioles.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)

Abstract

A lacebark elm tree named `UPMTF` having an upright pyramidal growth habit with a dense foliage canopy, a dominant leader with secondary branches ascending upwardly, early exfoliating bark, consistent rich yellow-orange fall color, and also capable of being reproduced reliably from vegetative cuttings.

Description

DESCRIPTION
The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of Ulmus parvifolia, Lacebark Elm, which has been given the varietal name `UPMTF`.
I discovered the original tree of my new variety as a chance seedling growing in 1993 in a production field in a cultivated area at Moon Tree Farm in Loganville, Ga. This initial tree of my new variety originated as a seedling, was grown for two years in a liner row, and was then transplanted into the field. It is now nine years old. As I observed the original tree of my new variety, the uniqueness of this tree became apparent because of its dominant leader and upright growing form.
I observed this initial tree of my new variety for a period of time and believe it is particularly useful in landscape settings where structurally sound, upright tree forms are important, such as along streets, buildings, and in parking areas.
In contrast, cultivated lacebark elm trees are still somewhat represented by seedling material that is extremely variable in growth habit, and several other varieties ranging form oval to vase-shaped to broad-rounded. The single dominant leader trait of my new variety has not been observed by me in any lacebark elm seedling or cultivar.
Lacebark elm typically is a large tree that matures between forty to fifty feet high and wide, is adaptable to soil and climate, and has a native range from southern China in a broad arc over to Korea and into northern Japan. Its United States adaptability, based on observed successful culture, ranges from Massachusetts to central Florida to Iowa, south to Texas and west to Washington State and California. There is a need for adaptable and tolerant trees that can be grown over a wide geographic area. Consequently, a new variety of lacebark elm which has a narrow, pyramidal habit and displays clonal consistency is particularly useful.
My new variety has been asexually propagated in Georgia from softwood cuttings at my direction.
This propagation and observation of the resulting progeny have proven the characteristics of my new variety of lacebark elm to be firmly fixed. Furthermore, these observations have confirmed that my new variety represents a new and improved variety of lacebark elm as particularly evidenced by the unique narrow, pyramidal growth habit and which can reliably be asexually propagated using vegetative propagation techniques.
The accompanying photographs depict the color of the tree and foliage of my new variety as nearly true as is reasonably possible to make the same in a color illustration of this character.
FIG. 1 is a photograph of an entire tree of my new variety.
FIG. 2 is a photograph of an entire tree of my new variety showing winter habit and branch structure.
FIG. 3 is a close up of a trunk of my new variety showing mature bark.
FIG. 4 is a close up of the upper surface of several leaves from a tree of my new variety.
FIG. 5 is a close up of the lower surface of a several leaves from a tree of my new variety.
FIG. 6 is a close up of the upper surface of a number of leaves from a tree of my new variety showing the fall color.
My `UPMTF` variety of lacebark elm has not been observed under all growing conditions and thus variations may occur as a result of different growing conditions. The following is a detailed description of my new variety of lacebark elm with color terminology in accordance with The Royal Horticultural Society color chart (R.H.S.) published by The Royal Horticultural Society of London. The observations are of the original tree of my new variety growing at the Moon Tree Farm site in Loganville, Ga.
My new variety of lacebark elm is characterized by its central dominant leader and pyramidal habit. In 1992, the initially discovered tree of my new variety was four years old and was transplanted form a liner row to a production field at the Moon Tree Farm site in Loganville, Ga. It was then discovered in 1993. In December of 1995, the original tree was eighteen feet high and eight feet wide with four inches of caliper six inches above the ground with a height to width ratio of 2.25. This upright pyramidal form with a dominant leader distinguishes my new variety from typical Ulmus parvifolia trees. Most lacebark elms are round-headed, often with pendulous branches, with some forms being upright-spreading.
My new tree maintains a dominant leader with strongly ascending secondary branches forming an upright pyramidal outline. In contrast, seedlings and other cultivars which I have observed do not have a dominant leader. The unique growth habit insures its capacity for use in areas where growing space is restricted, particularly along streets with buildings or sites which will not accommodate a broader canopy.
More specifically, my new tree has a branching habit and dendritic pattern of a dominant single lead (bole) with secondary branches that emerge at sixty degree angles (base) and thirty degree angles (top) to the main leader. Branches are uniformly and densely borne around the central leader with no large gaps from one branch insertion to the next. As a result, as can be seen from FIG. 2, the tree of my new variety is uniformly branched and symmetrical with a dense canopy. In contrast, traditional seedling lacebark elms and some of the cultivars are usually open and in youth must be pruned often to produce an upright habit.
The lower trunk and larger branches exfoliate at three inch caliper or larger. This is a desirable and unique characteristic of the variety, not typical of most seedling plants and found to varying degrees in the cultivars. The gray-orange and gray-brown coloration (R.H.S. 164B and R.H.S. 177B) is evident in FIG. 3.
The summer leaves are similar to those of the species, being dark green above, lighter below. In fall, the leaves turn yellow-orange. The upper leaf surface is lustrous dark green (R.H.S. 133A). The lower leaf surface is flat green (R.H.S. 135A). In fall, the leaves turn yellow-orange (R.H.S. 21A) and rival those of paper birch. The mature leaf averages three-fourths to two and one-half inches long, one-third to one and one-third inches wide, ten to twelve vein pairs, with one-fourth to one-half inch long petioles and is elliptical, as is typical of the species. Leaves are essentially glabrous at maturity.
Flowers and fruits have been observed only in the original tree and are typical for the species. My new tree initiated flowers in its fifth growing season.
THE PLANT
Parentage: Chance lacebark elm seedling of unknown origin, growing in a cultivated area of the Moon Tree Farm in Loganville, Ga.
Tree shape and growth: Upright-pyramidal. The growth rate is characterized as being very vigorous. Progeny of the original tree growing in USDA Zone 7a in Loganville, Ga., on average grew 11/4 inch caliper during the 1998 growing season. In computing this average, measurements were taken from 125 trees.
Trunk: Dominant leader, exfoliating with maturity.
Bark: Rich brown. Exfoliating on three inch caliper and larger trunk.
Mature bark color: (Observed in the original tree) Exfoliating on three inch caliper and larger branches to reveal patches of gray-orange and gray-brown coloration (R.H.S. 164B and R.H.S. 177B). The texture of the bark prior to exfoliation is somewhat smooth. The color prior to exfoliation is a gray brown (R.H.S. 199A.
Branches: Ascending, emerging from the dominant leader at an angle of sixty degrees (base) and thirty degrees (top).
Leaves: Leaf shape is elliptical and typical of the species.
Leaf surface: Upper leaf surface is lustrous dark green (R.H.S. 133A) and glabrous. The lower surface is flat green (R.H.S. 135A) and glabrous.
Leaf size: Leaves average three-fourths to two and one-half inches long, one third to one and one-third inches wide, ten to twelve vein pairs, with one-fourth to one-half inch long petioles.
Buds, flowers, and fruit: Observed in the original tree to be like those of the species. Flowers are inconspicuous and typically occur early in September in Georgia where the original tree is growing. The fruit is an elliptic-ovate samara, one-third of an inch long and glabrous.
Disease resistance: The original tree seems to be fairly disease resistant and has not shown any signs of significant heat scorch or dieback. While the tree has not been inoculation tested for resistance to Dutch Elm Disease, the species is not known to be affected.
Winter hardiness: The original tree withstood 4 degrees F. without injury and laboratory tests have showed it to be hardy to -16 degrees F. It is expected to be hardy to USDA Zone 6, but has not been tested outdoors yet in those areas.

Claims (1)

I claim:
1. A new and distinct variety of lacebark elm tree substantially as herein shown and described, characterized particularly as to novelty by its unique upright pyramidal growth habit, thirty to sixty degree ascending branch angles, early developing and spectacular
US09/020,069 1998-02-06 1998-02-06 Lacebark elm tree named `UPMTF` Expired - Lifetime USPP11295P (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/020,069 USPP11295P (en) 1998-02-06 1998-02-06 Lacebark elm tree named `UPMTF`

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/020,069 USPP11295P (en) 1998-02-06 1998-02-06 Lacebark elm tree named `UPMTF`

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USPP11295P true USPP11295P (en) 2000-03-21

Family

ID=21796575

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/020,069 Expired - Lifetime USPP11295P (en) 1998-02-06 1998-02-06 Lacebark elm tree named `UPMTF`

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) USPP11295P (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060137052P1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Whitcomb Carl E Lacebark elm tree named 'whit xxx'
USPP17367P3 (en) 2005-04-12 2007-01-16 Johansson Keith G Maple tree (Acer truncatum) variety named ‘Fire Dragon’
USPP26414P3 (en) 2013-05-22 2016-02-16 Keith G. Johansson Maple tree (Acer truncatum)named ‘Super Dragon’
USPP26612P3 (en) 2013-05-22 2016-04-19 Keith G. Johansson Maple tree (Acer truncatum) named ‘Baby Dragon’

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060137052P1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Whitcomb Carl E Lacebark elm tree named 'whit xxx'
USPP16883P3 (en) 2004-12-22 2006-07-25 Lacebark, Inc. Lacebark elm tree named ‘Whit XXX’
USPP17367P3 (en) 2005-04-12 2007-01-16 Johansson Keith G Maple tree (Acer truncatum) variety named ‘Fire Dragon’
USPP26414P3 (en) 2013-05-22 2016-02-16 Keith G. Johansson Maple tree (Acer truncatum)named ‘Super Dragon’
USPP26612P3 (en) 2013-05-22 2016-04-19 Keith G. Johansson Maple tree (Acer truncatum) named ‘Baby Dragon’

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USPP11295P (en) Lacebark elm tree named `UPMTF`
USPP8793P (en) Holly plant named `Wyeriv`
USPP11219P (en) Live oak tree named `QVTIA`
USPP8792P (en) Holly plant named `Wyebec`
USPP17220P3 (en) Japanese Zelkova tree named ‘ZSFKF’
USPP35752P2 (en) Holly tree named ‘CDAV247’
USPP9346P (en) Dawn Redwood variety "Golden Oji"
USPP20550P2 (en) Nuttall Oak Tree Named ‘QNMTF’
KR100418079B1 (en) Stewartia variety plant with variegated leaves
USPP16883P3 (en) Lacebark elm tree named ‘Whit XXX’
USPP9256P (en) Texas native thornless mesquite `Beth`
USPP16652P3 (en) Red Maple tree named ‘RT4’
USPP11612P (en) Southern Magnolia tree named `TMGH`
USPP11391P (en) Black tupelo named `NXSXF`
US20190246542P1 (en) Crapemyrtle plant named 'DJ 01-14'
USPP2778P (en) Poinsettia plant
USPP13470P3 (en) Overcup oak tree named ‘QLFTB’
Jean et al. Incorporating Chokeberry (Aronia) into a Home Landscape
USPP4864P (en) Red maple
USPP15217P3 (en) Willow oak tree named ‘QPMTF’
USPP5861P (en) Hebe plant named Lavender Lace
USPP16573P3 (en) River birch tree named ‘WHIT XXV’
US20070136906P1 (en) Trident maple tree named 'ABFSS'
US20020152525P1 (en) Willow oak named 'QPSTA'
USPP19608P2 (en) Southern live oak tree named ‘Cannon-Sharp’

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MOON S TREE FARM, INC., GEORGIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TREE INTRODUCTIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016700/0349

Effective date: 20050819