USH1156H - Downhole fracture detection and characterization - Google Patents
Downhole fracture detection and characterization Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USH1156H USH1156H US07/796,515 US79651591A USH1156H US H1156 H USH1156 H US H1156H US 79651591 A US79651591 A US 79651591A US H1156 H USH1156 H US H1156H
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- borehole
- pressure
- logging tool
- fractures
- earth formation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 title description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 18
- 206010017076 Fracture Diseases 0.000 description 24
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 208000010392 Bone Fractures Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000013201 Stress fracture Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000002565 Open Fractures Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006101 laboratory sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/40—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging
- G01V1/44—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging using generators and receivers in the same well
- G01V1/48—Processing data
- G01V1/50—Analysing data
Definitions
- the present invention relates to borehole logging methods for detecting and characterizing fractures in earth formations and more particularly to a method wherein borehole pressure is intentionally changed between measurements of sonic velocity in order to detect and characterize the presence of formation fracturing.
- Well logging techniques to identify fractures include high resolution borehole imaging, for example, the borehole televiewer, low resolution borehole imaging, such as circumferential acoustic measurements and dipmeter, and sonic waveform analysis.
- the various borehole imaging techniques provide only information regarding the zone within about one inch of the borehole wall and do not always distinguish high permeability fractures from features with low permeability.
- Sonic waveform analysis involves the detection of attenuation or reflection of sound waves from fractures. This technique is most useful for fractures oriented normal to the borehole axis, which prevents effective detection of vertical fractures from vertical wells. In addition, none of these techniques is sensitive to microfractures, which may have apertures of 0.1 mm or less.
- conventional acoustic logging tools are used to measure one or more acoustic properties, such as sonic velocity, of earth formations surrounding a wellbore while the pressure within the wellbore is varied. That is, multiple measurements are made with pressure changes being made between measurements.
- the variation of wellbore pressure causes a variation of the effective stress in the formation being examined for fractures.
- acoustic properties, such as sonic velocity are generally a strong function of effective stress.
- both compressional sonic logging tools and shear wave tools using different orientations and polarizations are employed in order to obtain an indication of fracture orientation.
- FIG. 1 is a cross section illustration of a partially cased borehole with a sonic logging tool in place for use in the method of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a cross section illustration of an open borehole with a sonic logging tool supported by coiled tubing for use in the method of the present invention.
- the present invention is based on the principle that acoustic properties of the rock forming earth formations are strongly affected by the intensity or concentration of fractures or microcracks in the rock. For example, the presence of open fractures reduces the acoustic velocity. Fractures can be closed by application of external forces and measured velocity can be increased as a result. Such pressure changes have been used to characterize cracks and their orientation in laboratory samples. See, for example, the paper entitled “Characterization of Oriented Cracks with Differential Strain Analysis", Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 83, No. B3, Mar. 10, 1978 of which the Applicant is a co-author. In the experiments described in that paper, external forces were applied to samples to progressively close the microcracks while the increases in elastic moduli were used to determine closure of the microcracks.
- the present invention is directed towards measurement of fracturing in the rock forming earth formations in situ.
- Such rock is at the time of measurement subject to the natural overburden and tectonic stresses. It is not possible to apply forces in the same way as is normally done with laboratory rock samples.
- the natural overburden forces tend to at least partially close the naturally occurring or induced microcracks or fractures.
- borehole pressure is increased in steps and the measurements are repeated. The increasing borehole pressure counteracts overburden and tectonic stresses allowing fractures or microcracks to open, thus reducing measured acoustic velocity and indicating the presence of fracturing.
- FIG. 1 a typical arrangement for practice of the present invention is illustrated.
- a borehole 10 is open at its lower end, but has surface casing 12 installed at its upper end. The casing is sealed in place by cement 14.
- a conventional sonic logging tool 16 is suspended in the open hole portion on a conventional wireline 18 extending through a pressure seal 20 to conventional control and recording equipment at the earth's surface.
- a conduit 22 is connected to casing 12 for pressurizing borehole 10.
- a gauge 24 is provided for measuring borehole pressure at the surface location. Pressure at the location of logging tool 16 must, of course, be adjusted for the weight of drilling fluid within borehole 10.
- sonic logging tool 16 is a conventional pressure wave device, having a transmitting transducer 26 on its upper end and a pair of receiving transducers 28 and 30 on its lower end. Acoustic pulses generated by transducer 26 pass through borehole fluid into the wall of borehole 10 and are detected by transducers 28 and 30 as they pass by the lower end of tool 16. The time delay between receipt of the signal at transducers 28 and 30 and the known distance between the transducers is used to determine acoustic velocity. In a typical logging operation, the acoustic tool 16 is slowly moved through the borehole 10 while repetitive measurements of acoustic velocity are made and recorded. The velocity measurements are plotted versus depth from the surface to generate a velocity log.
- the first step of the present invention is to make such a conventional measurement at least at the depths of interest.
- the pressure within borehole 10 is increased by application of an appropriate fluid through conduit 22.
- the velocity logging run is then repeated to generate a second velocity log.
- the two velocity logs can be compared to determine areas where significant increases in acoustic velocity occur. Such increases would indicate the presence of fracturing or microcracks.
- the pressure may be again increased and the logging run repeated a number of times.
- the limiting value of borehole pressure would be the formation breakdown pressure, at which new hydraulic fractures are induced in the formation.
- borehole 10 is illustrated as being uncased or in open hole condition at the lower end where measurements are taken, it is possible to practice the present invention in cased borehole sections which have been perforated. The perforations will allow the fluids within the borehole to flow into and increase the formation pressures at least in the fractured zones.
- FIG. 2 there is illustrated apparatus which would allow practice of the present invention in an open borehole with no casing installed.
- the logging tool 32 is supported within open borehole 34 by coiled tubing 36.
- a conventional wireline 38 extends through coiled tubing 36 for providing control and recording functions to the logging device 32.
- Logging tool 32 is provided at its upper and lower ends with packers 40 and 42 to isolate a portion 44 of the borehole 34. Pressure within portion 44 can be adjusted by application of fluids through the coiled tubing 36.
- Packers 40 and 42 may likewise be inflated and deflated by application of the fluids through the coiled tubing 36.
- measurements must be taken while the logging tool 32 is stationary since packers 40 and 42 must be sealed in place to allow application of pressure to zone 44.
- the conventional logging tool illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 uses pressure waves traveling down the borehole to measure formation velocity.
- the velocity of such waves is affected by generally horizontal fractures, but would be substantially unaffected by vertically oriented fractures.
- Such vertically oriented fractures may be detected by use of a shear wave logging tool such as that taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,794,572 issued to Sondergeld, et al. on Dec. 27, 1988.
- This patent is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. It is preferred that at least two shear wave transmitters and receiver sets operating with different orientations be employed so that formation anisotropy and the azimuthal orientation of vertical fractures can be determined. The equipment and methods for making such determinations are described in the above-referenced patent. It is further preferred that a logging tool 16 or 32 include both pressure wave transducers and shear wave transducers so that fractures having any orientation may be detected.
- acoustic properties may also be used to determine the presence of fracturing in the method of the present invention.
- the amplitudes and phase shifts of the sonic waveforms may also be measured to determine formation properties. Such properties can also be used to indicate wave splitting caused by formation anisotropy. Differences in any of these acoustic properties which result from changes in pressure are useful in characterizing fracturing in the present invention.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
In the present invention, characteristics of fractures or microcracks in earth formations surrounding a borehole are detected by use of conventional sonic logging devices used in combination with internal variations of wellborne pressure. A sonic logging tool is first used to generate a log of acoustic velocity at a first pressure. Borehole pressure is then changed and a second log is obtained. Significant changes in formation velocity in response to the pressure change indicates the presence of fractures.
Description
The present invention relates to borehole logging methods for detecting and characterizing fractures in earth formations and more particularly to a method wherein borehole pressure is intentionally changed between measurements of sonic velocity in order to detect and characterize the presence of formation fracturing.
In many cases, the presence of fractures, either natural or induced, is an important feature governing the production of fluids from a subsurface reservoir. Knowledge of the extent of fracturing and fracture orientation is necessary to plan and evaluate completion, production and stimulation operations. Techniques currently available for characterizing fractures in the vicinity of a borehole involve either core analysis or logging measurements. Collection of core samples is expensive and may not provide the desired information. For example, important large scale fractures may not be sampled in the recovered core. Fractures present in core samples may have been induced by the coring process or by the stress relief associated with bringing a core to the surface. Well logging techniques to identify fractures include high resolution borehole imaging, for example, the borehole televiewer, low resolution borehole imaging, such as circumferential acoustic measurements and dipmeter, and sonic waveform analysis. The various borehole imaging techniques provide only information regarding the zone within about one inch of the borehole wall and do not always distinguish high permeability fractures from features with low permeability. Sonic waveform analysis involves the detection of attenuation or reflection of sound waves from fractures. This technique is most useful for fractures oriented normal to the borehole axis, which prevents effective detection of vertical fractures from vertical wells. In addition, none of these techniques is sensitive to microfractures, which may have apertures of 0.1 mm or less.
In the present invention, conventional acoustic logging tools are used to measure one or more acoustic properties, such as sonic velocity, of earth formations surrounding a wellbore while the pressure within the wellbore is varied. That is, multiple measurements are made with pressure changes being made between measurements. The variation of wellbore pressure causes a variation of the effective stress in the formation being examined for fractures. In formations containing fractures, acoustic properties, such as sonic velocity, are generally a strong function of effective stress. Preferably, both compressional sonic logging tools and shear wave tools using different orientations and polarizations are employed in order to obtain an indication of fracture orientation.
The present invention may be better understood by reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is a cross section illustration of a partially cased borehole with a sonic logging tool in place for use in the method of the present invention; and
FIG. 2 is a cross section illustration of an open borehole with a sonic logging tool supported by coiled tubing for use in the method of the present invention.
The present invention is based on the principle that acoustic properties of the rock forming earth formations are strongly affected by the intensity or concentration of fractures or microcracks in the rock. For example, the presence of open fractures reduces the acoustic velocity. Fractures can be closed by application of external forces and measured velocity can be increased as a result. Such pressure changes have been used to characterize cracks and their orientation in laboratory samples. See, for example, the paper entitled "Characterization of Oriented Cracks with Differential Strain Analysis", Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 83, No. B3, Mar. 10, 1978 of which the Applicant is a co-author. In the experiments described in that paper, external forces were applied to samples to progressively close the microcracks while the increases in elastic moduli were used to determine closure of the microcracks.
The present invention is directed towards measurement of fracturing in the rock forming earth formations in situ. Such rock is at the time of measurement subject to the natural overburden and tectonic stresses. It is not possible to apply forces in the same way as is normally done with laboratory rock samples. The natural overburden forces tend to at least partially close the naturally occurring or induced microcracks or fractures. In the present invention, after making initial measurements, borehole pressure is increased in steps and the measurements are repeated. The increasing borehole pressure counteracts overburden and tectonic stresses allowing fractures or microcracks to open, thus reducing measured acoustic velocity and indicating the presence of fracturing.
With reference to FIG. 1, a typical arrangement for practice of the present invention is illustrated. In FIG. 1, a borehole 10 is open at its lower end, but has surface casing 12 installed at its upper end. The casing is sealed in place by cement 14. A conventional sonic logging tool 16 is suspended in the open hole portion on a conventional wireline 18 extending through a pressure seal 20 to conventional control and recording equipment at the earth's surface. A conduit 22 is connected to casing 12 for pressurizing borehole 10. A gauge 24 is provided for measuring borehole pressure at the surface location. Pressure at the location of logging tool 16 must, of course, be adjusted for the weight of drilling fluid within borehole 10.
As illustrated, sonic logging tool 16 is a conventional pressure wave device, having a transmitting transducer 26 on its upper end and a pair of receiving transducers 28 and 30 on its lower end. Acoustic pulses generated by transducer 26 pass through borehole fluid into the wall of borehole 10 and are detected by transducers 28 and 30 as they pass by the lower end of tool 16. The time delay between receipt of the signal at transducers 28 and 30 and the known distance between the transducers is used to determine acoustic velocity. In a typical logging operation, the acoustic tool 16 is slowly moved through the borehole 10 while repetitive measurements of acoustic velocity are made and recorded. The velocity measurements are plotted versus depth from the surface to generate a velocity log. The first step of the present invention is to make such a conventional measurement at least at the depths of interest. After the initial run, the pressure within borehole 10 is increased by application of an appropriate fluid through conduit 22. The velocity logging run is then repeated to generate a second velocity log. The two velocity logs can be compared to determine areas where significant increases in acoustic velocity occur. Such increases would indicate the presence of fracturing or microcracks. The pressure may be again increased and the logging run repeated a number of times. The limiting value of borehole pressure would be the formation breakdown pressure, at which new hydraulic fractures are induced in the formation.
While borehole 10 is illustrated as being uncased or in open hole condition at the lower end where measurements are taken, it is possible to practice the present invention in cased borehole sections which have been perforated. The perforations will allow the fluids within the borehole to flow into and increase the formation pressures at least in the fractured zones.
With reference to FIG. 2, there is illustrated apparatus which would allow practice of the present invention in an open borehole with no casing installed. In FIG. 2, the logging tool 32 is supported within open borehole 34 by coiled tubing 36. A conventional wireline 38 extends through coiled tubing 36 for providing control and recording functions to the logging device 32. Logging tool 32 is provided at its upper and lower ends with packers 40 and 42 to isolate a portion 44 of the borehole 34. Pressure within portion 44 can be adjusted by application of fluids through the coiled tubing 36. Packers 40 and 42 may likewise be inflated and deflated by application of the fluids through the coiled tubing 36. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, measurements must be taken while the logging tool 32 is stationary since packers 40 and 42 must be sealed in place to allow application of pressure to zone 44. In this embodiment it is preferred to leave the tool 32 at a single location while alternately measuring velocity and increasing pressure within zone 44 in small steps. In this way a plot of velocity versus pressure may be produced for each station or depth at which logging tool 32 is operated. Such measurements can be converted to a conventional log if desired.
The conventional logging tool illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, uses pressure waves traveling down the borehole to measure formation velocity. The velocity of such waves is affected by generally horizontal fractures, but would be substantially unaffected by vertically oriented fractures. Such vertically oriented fractures may be detected by use of a shear wave logging tool such as that taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,794,572 issued to Sondergeld, et al. on Dec. 27, 1988. This patent is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. It is preferred that at least two shear wave transmitters and receiver sets operating with different orientations be employed so that formation anisotropy and the azimuthal orientation of vertical fractures can be determined. The equipment and methods for making such determinations are described in the above-referenced patent. It is further preferred that a logging tool 16 or 32 include both pressure wave transducers and shear wave transducers so that fractures having any orientation may be detected.
While the above description of preferred embodiments are based on measurement of sonic velocity in the formation, other acoustic properties may also be used to determine the presence of fracturing in the method of the present invention. As taught in the above referenced patent, the amplitudes and phase shifts of the sonic waveforms may also be measured to determine formation properties. Such properties can also be used to indicate wave splitting caused by formation anisotropy. Differences in any of these acoustic properties which result from changes in pressure are useful in characterizing fracturing in the present invention.
All of these conventional sonic logging tools and their methods of operation effectively evaluate a large volume of rock relative to previous image logging techniques. For example, borehole televiewer devices essentially see only the surface of the borehole. Microfractures which are too small to be seen by such image logging devices will still be detected by velocity measurement devices. The method of the present invention therefore provides a better characterization of the bulk of the formation being investigated.
While the present invention has been described and illustrated with reference to particular apparatus and methods of use, various modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
Claims (6)
1. A method for evaluating fractures in an earth formation surrounding a borehole, comprising:
using a sonic logging tool in a borehole to measure a first acoustic property of an earth formation surrounding a borehole at a first pressure, said logging tool having at least one transducer for generating an acoustic signal and at least one transducer for receiving the acoustic signal after it has passed through at least a portion of the formation surrounding the borehole;
changing the pressure in said borehole adjacent said earth formation;
using said sonic logging tool in said borehole to measure a second acoustic property of said earth formation after said pressure change; and,
comparing said first and second measurements to determine the amount of fracturing present in said earth formation.
2. The method of claim 1 further including,
changing the pressure in said borehole adjacent said earth formation a second time;
using said sonic logging tool in said borehole to measure a third acoustic property after said second pressure change; and
comparing said third measurement with said first and second measurements to determine the amount of fracturing present in said earth formation.
3. The method of claims 1 or 2 wherein the acoustic property measured is sonic velocity.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said logging tool generates pressure waves.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said logging tool generates shear waves.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said logging tool generates shear waves having two orthogonal polarizations, whereby differences in measured velocities indicates anisotropy in said formation.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/796,515 USH1156H (en) | 1991-11-21 | 1991-11-21 | Downhole fracture detection and characterization |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/796,515 USH1156H (en) | 1991-11-21 | 1991-11-21 | Downhole fracture detection and characterization |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USH1156H true USH1156H (en) | 1993-03-02 |
Family
ID=25168370
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/796,515 Abandoned USH1156H (en) | 1991-11-21 | 1991-11-21 | Downhole fracture detection and characterization |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USH1156H (en) |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5619475A (en) * | 1994-03-30 | 1997-04-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corportion | Method of predicting mechanical failure in formation utilizing stress derivatives which measure formation nonlinearity |
| US20040176911A1 (en) * | 2003-03-06 | 2004-09-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for determining formation properties and in-situ stresses |
| EP1619520A1 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2006-01-25 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | Method and apparatus for estimating a permeability distribution during a well test |
| US20110042080A1 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2011-02-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Determining fracture orientation using wellbore acoustic radial profiles |
| US20150083519A1 (en) * | 2012-10-15 | 2015-03-26 | Stephen Chelminski | System and method for producing high quality seismic records within bore holes |
| US9045970B1 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2015-06-02 | Global Microseismic Services, Inc. | Methods, device and components for securing or coupling geophysical sensors to a borehole |
| US10684384B2 (en) | 2017-05-24 | 2020-06-16 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Systems and method for formation evaluation from borehole |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3205941A (en) | 1962-06-15 | 1965-09-14 | Halliburton Co | Techniques useful in determining fractures or density discontinuities in formations |
| US4282587A (en) | 1979-05-21 | 1981-08-04 | Daniel Silverman | Method for monitoring the recovery of minerals from shallow geological formations |
| US4432078A (en) | 1979-01-17 | 1984-02-14 | Daniel Silverman | Method and apparatus for fracturing a deep borehole and determining the fracture azimuth |
| US4713968A (en) | 1986-05-22 | 1987-12-22 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring the mechanical anisotropy of a material |
| US4794572A (en) | 1986-09-30 | 1988-12-27 | Amoco Corporation | Acoustic well logging method and system for obtaining a measure of formation anisotropy |
| US5010527A (en) | 1988-11-29 | 1991-04-23 | Gas Research Institute | Method for determining the depth of a hydraulic fracture zone in the earth |
-
1991
- 1991-11-21 US US07/796,515 patent/USH1156H/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3205941A (en) | 1962-06-15 | 1965-09-14 | Halliburton Co | Techniques useful in determining fractures or density discontinuities in formations |
| US4432078A (en) | 1979-01-17 | 1984-02-14 | Daniel Silverman | Method and apparatus for fracturing a deep borehole and determining the fracture azimuth |
| US4282587A (en) | 1979-05-21 | 1981-08-04 | Daniel Silverman | Method for monitoring the recovery of minerals from shallow geological formations |
| US4713968A (en) | 1986-05-22 | 1987-12-22 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring the mechanical anisotropy of a material |
| US4794572A (en) | 1986-09-30 | 1988-12-27 | Amoco Corporation | Acoustic well logging method and system for obtaining a measure of formation anisotropy |
| US5010527A (en) | 1988-11-29 | 1991-04-23 | Gas Research Institute | Method for determining the depth of a hydraulic fracture zone in the earth |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| Sarda et al, Oil & Gas Journal Apr. 6, 1987, pp. 40, 41, 44 & 46. |
| Siegfried et al, Jour. of Geophysical Research, Mar. 10, 1988, vol. 83, No. B3, pp. 1269-1277. |
| Wittrisch et al, SPWLA 28th Ann. Log. Symp., Jun. 29-Jul. 2, 1987, pp. 1-14. |
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5619475A (en) * | 1994-03-30 | 1997-04-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corportion | Method of predicting mechanical failure in formation utilizing stress derivatives which measure formation nonlinearity |
| US20040176911A1 (en) * | 2003-03-06 | 2004-09-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for determining formation properties and in-situ stresses |
| US6904365B2 (en) | 2003-03-06 | 2005-06-07 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for determining formation properties and in-situ stresses |
| AU2005263631B2 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2011-11-17 | Schlumberger Technology B.V. | Method and apparatus for estimating a permeability distribution during a well test |
| EP1619520A1 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2006-01-25 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | Method and apparatus for estimating a permeability distribution during a well test |
| WO2006008172A3 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2006-04-06 | Schlumberger Services Petrol | Method and apparatus for estimating a permeability distribution during a well test |
| US20080105426A1 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2008-05-08 | Schlumberger Tecnhnoloogy Corporation | Method and Apparatus for Estimating the Permeability Distribution During a Well Test |
| US20110042080A1 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2011-02-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Determining fracture orientation using wellbore acoustic radial profiles |
| US8490693B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2013-07-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Determining fracture orientation using wellbore acoustic radial profiles |
| US9045970B1 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2015-06-02 | Global Microseismic Services, Inc. | Methods, device and components for securing or coupling geophysical sensors to a borehole |
| US20150083519A1 (en) * | 2012-10-15 | 2015-03-26 | Stephen Chelminski | System and method for producing high quality seismic records within bore holes |
| US9581705B2 (en) * | 2012-10-15 | 2017-02-28 | Stephen Chelminski | System and method for producing high quality seismic records within bore holes |
| US10684384B2 (en) | 2017-05-24 | 2020-06-16 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Systems and method for formation evaluation from borehole |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2540995C (en) | System and method for detection of near-wellbore alteration using acoustic data | |
| US7289909B2 (en) | Method for borehole measurement of formation properties | |
| US9477002B2 (en) | Microhydraulic fracturing with downhole acoustic measurement | |
| AU2002335137B2 (en) | Use of cutting velocities for real time pore pressure and fracture gradient prediction | |
| Zhang et al. | Stress, porosity, and failure-dependent compressional and shear velocity ratio and its application to wellbore stability | |
| US4575828A (en) | Method for distinguishing between total formation permeability and fracture permeability | |
| EP0127548B1 (en) | Low frequency sonic logging | |
| NO318894B1 (en) | Method of a estimates the hydraulic conductivity of a petrophysical discontinuity in the sidewall of a borehole | |
| Anderson et al. | A study of induced fracturing using an instrumental approach | |
| US4797859A (en) | Method for determining formation permeability by comparing measured tube waves with formation and borehole parameters | |
| USH1156H (en) | Downhole fracture detection and characterization | |
| US8077545B2 (en) | Method for detecting gas influx in wellbores and its application to identifying gas bearing formations | |
| Marsala et al. | Sonic while drilling: Have you thought about cuttings? | |
| Bigelow | A practical approach to the interpretation of cement bond logs | |
| US4354381A (en) | Sonic attenuating method for distinguishing between oil, water and gas | |
| Ikeda et al. | Hydraulic fracturing technique: pore pressure effect and stress heterogeneity | |
| EP0587405A2 (en) | Acoustic well logging method | |
| Meehan | Rock mechanics issues in petroleum engineering | |
| Taylor | Interpretation and application of borehole televiewer surveys | |
| Ma et al. | Natural and induced fracture classification using image analysis | |
| Griffin | Induced fracture orientation determination in the Kuparuk Reservoir | |
| Sinha et al. | Applications of sonics and ultrasonics in geophysical prospecting | |
| Paillet | Applications of borehole-acoustic methods in rock mechanics | |
| Laubach et al. | Stress directions in cretaceous Frontier formation, Green River basin, Wyoming | |
| Skopec | Rock characterization in reservoirs targeted for horizontal drilling |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY A CORP. OF DELAWARE, Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:SIEGFRIED, ROBERT W., II;REEL/FRAME:005975/0298 Effective date: 19911115 |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |