US9776194B2 - Froth flotation separation and analysis - Google Patents

Froth flotation separation and analysis Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US9776194B2
US9776194B2 US14/779,054 US201414779054A US9776194B2 US 9776194 B2 US9776194 B2 US 9776194B2 US 201414779054 A US201414779054 A US 201414779054A US 9776194 B2 US9776194 B2 US 9776194B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
quartz
pulp
heavy mineral
froth
flotation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US14/779,054
Other versions
US20160051993A1 (en
Inventor
Michael Schindler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Heraeus Conamic UK Ltd
Original Assignee
Heraeus Quartz UK Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Heraeus Quartz UK Ltd filed Critical Heraeus Quartz UK Ltd
Assigned to HERAEUS QUARTZ UK LIMITED reassignment HERAEUS QUARTZ UK LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SCHINDLER, MICHAEL
Publication of US20160051993A1 publication Critical patent/US20160051993A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9776194B2 publication Critical patent/US9776194B2/en
Assigned to HERAEUS CONAMIC UK LIMITED reassignment HERAEUS CONAMIC UK LIMITED CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HERAEUS QUARTZ UK LIMITED
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/08Subsequent treatment of concentrated product
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/08Subsequent treatment of concentrated product
    • B03D1/087Subsequent treatment of concentrated product of the sediment, e.g. regrinding
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B04CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
    • B04BCENTRIFUGES
    • B04B5/00Other centrifuges
    • B04B5/10Centrifuges combined with other apparatus, e.g. electrostatic separators; Sets or systems of several centrifuges
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B04CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
    • B04CAPPARATUS USING FREE VORTEX FLOW, e.g. CYCLONES
    • B04C9/00Combinations with other devices, e.g. fans, expansion chambers, diffusors, water locks
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03CCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C1/00Ingredients generally applicable to manufacture of glasses, glazes, or vitreous enamels
    • C03C1/02Pretreated ingredients
    • C03C1/022Purification of silica sand or other minerals
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume or surface-area of porous materials
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; Specified applications
    • B03D2203/005Fine and commodity chemicals

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method of separating heavy minerals from a quartz powder and a method of analysing heavy minerals contained in a quartz powder.
  • the term “heavy minerals” includes, without limitation, zircon (zirconium silicate), monazites of all kinds (mixed rare earth phosphates), especially xenotime (a mineral containing yttrium phosphate).
  • rare earth metals they may include low levels of radioactive metals such as thorium and uranium.
  • Such minerals may be present in relatively small quantities (less than 1 ppm) in bulk quartz crystal powders, but they have proved difficult to remove by methods standard in the industry, and even such low levels are undesirable in transparent fused quartz glass products.
  • quartz powders from a variety of raw materials, and these sources may include pegmatites, i.e. coarse-grained granitic igneous rock. These typically comprise an intimate mixture of feldspars, mica and quartz crystals as well as a diverse range of heavy minerals. By such processes as crushing, leaching, froth flotation etc. a considerable degree of refinement of the quartz is possible, indeed froth flotation is a standard technique in the industry.
  • McEwen et al “Single-Stage Flotation of Alkali Feldspars, Ilmenite, Rutile, Garnet, and Monazite, with Mixed Cationic/Anionic Collectors”, Society of Mining Engineers, AIME , vol.
  • An aim of the present invention is to separate sub part per million by number (and low ppb levels by weight) occurrences of fine particle heavy minerals from samples of quartz powder, more efficiently than by any known method, and thereby to permit the accurate identification and quantification of the various contaminants.
  • the present invention provides a method of separating heavy mineral particles from a sample of quartz crystal powder, comprising the steps of:
  • the froth-flotation agent may comprise an anionic promoter, in particular a petroleum based sulphonate promoter.
  • the pH of the aqueous pulp may be controlled, for example to be acidic, in particular between 2 and 3.5, more particularly between 2.5 and 3.
  • the promoter may be added in a dosage of between 0.5 and 5 ml per kilogram of quartz powder, preferably between 1 and 3 ml.
  • the quartz powder has a particle size of between 25 and 1000 ⁇ m, preferably between 50 and 500 ⁇ m, and the heavy mineral particles in question are typically of particle size in the range 5-50 ⁇ m.
  • the pulp may be 65 to 75% solids by weight, preferably 68 to 72% solids by weight. Conditioning may take place for 5 to 20 minutes, preferably 5 to 10 minutes.
  • the pulp may be 10 to 30% solids by weight, preferably 20 to 25% solids by weight. Froth flotation may take place for 5 to 60 minutes, preferably for 5 to 30 minutes.
  • the aqueous solution may be a solution of one or more polytungstates or heteropolytungstates, in a particular an alkaline metal polytungstate such as sodium heteropolytungstate and may have a density of 2.68 to 2.95 g/cm 3 , preferably 2.70 to 2.85 g/cm 3 .
  • a floating layer primarily of quartz in the centrifuged product may be agitated, and centrifuging repeated.
  • the laboratory centrifuge used to aid settlement of the heavy mineral particles may operate at 200-1000 rpm, exerting a relative centrifugal acceleration of 5-100 g.
  • a typical laboratory centrifuge operates at 600 rpm, exerting a relative centrifugal acceleration of 50 g on each sample.
  • a non-vitreous centrifuging vessel may be used.
  • the invention also provides a method of analysing heavy minerals present in a quartz powder, comprising the steps of separating the heavy minerals using the method described above; and characterising the separated heavy mineral crystals using an appropriate technique, such as for example optical and/or Raman microscopy, Energy Dispersive Analysis by X-ray (EDAX), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), Laser Mass-spectrometry, etc.
  • an appropriate technique such as for example optical and/or Raman microscopy, Energy Dispersive Analysis by X-ray (EDAX), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), Laser Mass-spectrometry, etc.
  • EDAX Energy Dispersive Analysis by X-ray
  • XRD X-ray Diffraction
  • XRF X-ray Fluorescence
  • Laser Mass-spectrometry etc.
  • optical microscopy provides a convenient analytical tool permitting identification of the more comment heavy minerals.
  • the present technique has been used together with appropriate analytical techniques to separate and subsequently identify particles of each of the contaminating species shown in Table 1 below, in batches of refined quartz crystal being prepared for fusion to quartz glass.
  • Aerofloat® 869F an anionic petroleum based sulfonate promoter, containing a frothing agent, at a dosage of 2.5 ml of promoter per kilogram of quartz.
  • the conditioned pulp had a density of approximately 71% solids by weight.
  • the conditioned pulp was subjected to reverse froth flotation in a supercharged flotation cell, for a period of 25 minutes, to obtain quartz tailings (a float fraction) containing a high concentration of heavy mineral grains, which were carried over in the overflowing froth
  • the tailings were collected in a beaker, washed using acetone, dried, cooled and then suspended in LST Fastfloat from Pangea UK, a low-viscosity aqueous salt solution prepared using sodium heteropolytungstate and having a density (i.e. specific gravity) of about 2.82 g/cm 3 , in a plastic tube.
  • a density i.e. specific gravity
  • Other alkali metal polytungstates and heteropolytungstates, such as lithium heteropolytungstate have a similar specific gravity and could alternatively be used. Note that the specific gravity of quartz is approximately 2.65 g/cm 3 .
  • the tube was centrifuged in a laboratory centrifuge to obtain a floating layer of quartz powder and a sediment of heavy minerals. Complete separation was not achieved in a first centrifugation as some heavy minerals were entrained in the quartz powder. This layer was carefully stirred within the plastic tube, without disturbing the contents below. A further three centrifugations and stirrings of the quartz fraction were carried out alternately.
  • the supernatant liquid was removed and the fine particle heavy mineral residue was washed first with deionised water and then with industrial methylated spirit (IMS) with intermediate centrifugation.
  • IMS industrial methylated spirit
  • the IMS suspension was finally removed with a pipette, deposited on a microscope slide and the liquid was allowed to dry.
  • the particles were then viewed under an optical microscope, permitting an estimate to be made of the number of particles and a preliminary assessment of their constitution.
  • Monazite grains could be distinguished by their orange or brown colour.
  • Raman spectroscopy, EDAX or an X-ray diffraction technique could be employed. Counts of the numbers of grains of each heavy mineral could be made, and numbers per kilogram of quartz powder estimated.
  • quartz powders were of particle size nominally 75 to 150 ⁇ m, and were supplied by a commercial source of high purity quartz powders, of a quality intended for the manufacture of fused silica for semiconductor applications.
  • the invention has thus enabled the detection, quantification and analysis of small amounts of fine particle heavy minerals in quartz powder and thus an assessment of the quality of the powder and its potential for the manufacture of transparent fused quartz. Until the present analytical method was developed the number of such heavy mineral particles was either unknown, or grossly underestimated.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Glass Compositions (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
  • Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
  • Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)

Abstract

A method of separating heavy mineral particles, such as zircon, monazites, xenotime etc., from a sample of quartz crystal powder, comprises the steps of:
    • a. conditioning the quartz powder suspected of containing heavy mineral particles as an aqueous pulp using a froth-flotation agent;
    • b. subjecting the conditioned pulp to froth flotation to obtain a tailing;
    • c. combining the tailing with an aqueous solution having a density greater than that of quartz and less than that of a heavy mineral which it is desired to separate; and
    • d. centrifuging the combination.
The separated heavy mineral crystals can then be characterized using a micro-analysis technique.

Description

BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method of separating heavy minerals from a quartz powder and a method of analysing heavy minerals contained in a quartz powder.
In the present context the term “heavy minerals” includes, without limitation, zircon (zirconium silicate), monazites of all kinds (mixed rare earth phosphates), especially xenotime (a mineral containing yttrium phosphate). In addition to rare earth metals they may include low levels of radioactive metals such as thorium and uranium. Such minerals may be present in relatively small quantities (less than 1 ppm) in bulk quartz crystal powders, but they have proved difficult to remove by methods standard in the industry, and even such low levels are undesirable in transparent fused quartz glass products.
Commercial suppliers of high purity quartz powder may produce their powders from a variety of raw materials, and these sources may include pegmatites, i.e. coarse-grained granitic igneous rock. These typically comprise an intimate mixture of feldspars, mica and quartz crystals as well as a diverse range of heavy minerals. By such processes as crushing, leaching, froth flotation etc. a considerable degree of refinement of the quartz is possible, indeed froth flotation is a standard technique in the industry. McEwen et al, “Single-Stage Flotation of Alkali Feldspars, Ilmenite, Rutile, Garnet, and Monazite, with Mixed Cationic/Anionic Collectors”, Society of Mining Engineers, AIME, vol. 260, pp 97-100 (1976), describes the flotation of feldspar and other heavy minerals from quartz using cationic and/or anionic collectors. However, these techniques do not provide complete separation of contaminating species, and many smaller crystals of heavy minerals remain in the quartz powder and are not removed by conventional methods of quartz refinement.
Thus commercially available refined quartz powders have been found to contain heavy mineral particles, typically in the range 5-50 μm in size. Despite the apparently low analytical concentration they exist in large numbers, and are a potential source of defects, some visible with the naked eye and some fluorescing under UV light. In fused quartz glass these particles may dissolve to form a locally contaminated region; they may not dissolve entirely, in which case they may form a local region of phase-separated glass; they may act as nuclei for devitrification of the glass, when typically they may be found at the centre of a roughly spherical region of cristobalite, and finally some of these defects may be found to be associated with a small bubble of gas, which has been liberated by decomposition of the contaminating particle.
Some of these defects would render the glass unsuitable for certain optical applications, and they would also be undesirable in many quartz glass products for the semiconductor industry. When incorporated in a fused quartz crucible as used in the growth of silicon crystal there is the possibility of detachment of a particle leading to contamination of the silicon melt. When present in a fused silica semiconductor jig or window, which may be subject to etching in the course of its use, there is the possibility of detachment of a particle which may be transferred to the surface of the silicon wafer being processed, causing an irreparable defect in a circuit. Where the particle is radioactive, there is the possibility of longer range damage to the semiconductor product. Conventional chemical analysis is an unreliable measure of the content of heavy minerals, many of which are insoluble under normal analytical conditions. Even when chemical analysis is accurate it may not provide a reliable indication of the number of point defects likely to be generated in a transparent glass product.
In gauging the suitability of a given powder for the manufacture of a high quality fused quartz product it is important to be able to assess the number and size of these particulate contaminants, however past analytical techniques have proved to be inadequate.
In mineralogy in general, specific gravity methods have been used for heavy mineral separation. Halogenated hydrocarbon liquids such as bromoform and tetrabromomethane are used in standard glass separating funnels. These methods suffer from a number of disadvantages. Heavy mineral grains are retained on the glass walls of the funnel by electrostatic attraction. The minerals can also be trapped by the quartz grains and prevented from settling. The mineral grains can additionally be entrapped between the stop-cock sliding surfaces. Sealing times in such a separation are prolonged, and for particles in the size range of interest range from many hours to several days, or longer. Finally the liquids which have been used are toxic, and may be absorbed through the skin, or by inhalation of the vapour.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An aim of the present invention is to separate sub part per million by number (and low ppb levels by weight) occurrences of fine particle heavy minerals from samples of quartz powder, more efficiently than by any known method, and thereby to permit the accurate identification and quantification of the various contaminants.
The present invention provides a method of separating heavy mineral particles from a sample of quartz crystal powder, comprising the steps of:
    • a. conditioning the quartz powder suspected of containing heavy mineral particles as an aqueous pulp using promoter froth-flotation agent;
    • b. subjecting the conditioned pulp to froth flotation to obtain a tailing; and
    • c. combining the tailing with an aqueous solution having a density greater than that of quartz and less than that of a heavy mineral which it is desired to separate; and
    • d. centrifuging the combination in the vessel.
The froth-flotation agent may comprise an anionic promoter, in particular a petroleum based sulphonate promoter. The pH of the aqueous pulp may be controlled, for example to be acidic, in particular between 2 and 3.5, more particularly between 2.5 and 3. The promoter may be added in a dosage of between 0.5 and 5 ml per kilogram of quartz powder, preferably between 1 and 3 ml.
The quartz powder has a particle size of between 25 and 1000 μm, preferably between 50 and 500 μm, and the heavy mineral particles in question are typically of particle size in the range 5-50 μm.
During conditioning, the pulp may be 65 to 75% solids by weight, preferably 68 to 72% solids by weight. Conditioning may take place for 5 to 20 minutes, preferably 5 to 10 minutes.
During froth flotation, the pulp may be 10 to 30% solids by weight, preferably 20 to 25% solids by weight. Froth flotation may take place for 5 to 60 minutes, preferably for 5 to 30 minutes.
The aqueous solution may be a solution of one or more polytungstates or heteropolytungstates, in a particular an alkaline metal polytungstate such as sodium heteropolytungstate and may have a density of 2.68 to 2.95 g/cm3, preferably 2.70 to 2.85 g/cm3. A floating layer primarily of quartz in the centrifuged product may be agitated, and centrifuging repeated.
The laboratory centrifuge used to aid settlement of the heavy mineral particles may operate at 200-1000 rpm, exerting a relative centrifugal acceleration of 5-100 g. A typical laboratory centrifuge operates at 600 rpm, exerting a relative centrifugal acceleration of 50 g on each sample. A non-vitreous centrifuging vessel may be used.
The invention also provides a method of analysing heavy minerals present in a quartz powder, comprising the steps of separating the heavy minerals using the method described above; and characterising the separated heavy mineral crystals using an appropriate technique, such as for example optical and/or Raman microscopy, Energy Dispersive Analysis by X-ray (EDAX), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), Laser Mass-spectrometry, etc. Generally optical microscopy provides a convenient analytical tool permitting identification of the more comment heavy minerals. However, zircon and xenotime have similar optical and crystallographic properties and are frequently counted together.
The present technique has been used together with appropriate analytical techniques to separate and subsequently identify particles of each of the contaminating species shown in Table 1 below, in batches of refined quartz crystal being prepared for fusion to quartz glass.
TABLE 1
Typical size
S.G. (μm)
Mineral Particles derived from quartz
Apatite Calcium phosphate 3.16-3.22 10-20
Barytes Barium Sulphate 4.3-5 10-40
Biotite Potassium (magnesium etc.) 2.7-3.1 40-80
aluminium silicate
Epidote Calcium aluminium silicate 3.3-3.6  40-100
Garnet - Iron aluminium silicate 4.05 20-60
Almandine
Garnet - Manganese aluminium silicate 4.12-4.32 20-60
Spessartine
Gold Native gold 19.3   5-30
Monazites Mixed rare earth phosphates - 4.6-5.7  5-60
may include thorium
Pyrite Iron sulphide 4.8-5.0 10-50
Rutile Titanium dioxide 4.23 10-50
Thorite Thorium uranium silicate 6.63-7.2  10-30
Tourmalines Boron-containing complex 2.82-3.32 20-60
silicates
Xenotime Yttrium phosphate 4.4-5.1 10-50
Zircon Zirconium silicate 4.6-4.7  5-80
Ilmenite Iron Titanium oxide 4.7-4.8 10-50
Impurity particles due to processing
Iron oxide (rust) 5.24  10-100
Silicon carbide 3.21  30-150
Tramp metal, weld spheres 7.87  5-80
(e.g. iron)
Manganese steel 7.7-7.9  5-80
Stainless steel 7.7-7.9  10-100
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS
The invention will now be described in more detail by way of example only.
A weighed sample (1500 g) of commercially available quartz powder, sold for the manufacture of high grade fused quartz products, was taken and conditioned for 6 minutes as an aqueous acidic pulp using Aerofloat® 869F, from Cytec Corporation, an anionic petroleum based sulfonate promoter, containing a frothing agent, at a dosage of 2.5 ml of promoter per kilogram of quartz. The conditioned pulp had a density of approximately 71% solids by weight.
The conditioned pulp was subjected to reverse froth flotation in a supercharged flotation cell, for a period of 25 minutes, to obtain quartz tailings (a float fraction) containing a high concentration of heavy mineral grains, which were carried over in the overflowing froth
The tailings were collected in a beaker, washed using acetone, dried, cooled and then suspended in LST Fastfloat from Pangea UK, a low-viscosity aqueous salt solution prepared using sodium heteropolytungstate and having a density (i.e. specific gravity) of about 2.82 g/cm3, in a plastic tube. Other alkali metal polytungstates and heteropolytungstates, such as lithium heteropolytungstate, have a similar specific gravity and could alternatively be used. Note that the specific gravity of quartz is approximately 2.65 g/cm3.
The tube was centrifuged in a laboratory centrifuge to obtain a floating layer of quartz powder and a sediment of heavy minerals. Complete separation was not achieved in a first centrifugation as some heavy minerals were entrained in the quartz powder. This layer was carefully stirred within the plastic tube, without disturbing the contents below. A further three centrifugations and stirrings of the quartz fraction were carried out alternately.
The supernatant liquid was removed and the fine particle heavy mineral residue was washed first with deionised water and then with industrial methylated spirit (IMS) with intermediate centrifugation. The IMS suspension was finally removed with a pipette, deposited on a microscope slide and the liquid was allowed to dry. The particles were then viewed under an optical microscope, permitting an estimate to be made of the number of particles and a preliminary assessment of their constitution. Monazite grains could be distinguished by their orange or brown colour. In order to distinguish between grains of zircon and xenotime, Raman spectroscopy, EDAX or an X-ray diffraction technique could be employed. Counts of the numbers of grains of each heavy mineral could be made, and numbers per kilogram of quartz powder estimated.
Examples of analyses for four different samples of quartz powder are set out below. These powders were of particle size nominally 75 to 150 μm, and were supplied by a commercial source of high purity quartz powders, of a quality intended for the manufacture of fused silica for semiconductor applications.
EXAMPLE 1
Approx. ppm
Mineral Particles/kg by number by weight
Zircon/Xenotime 11900 12 1.9
Monazite 1200 1.2 0.2
Gold 47 0.05 0.03
EXAMPLE 2
Approx. ppm
Mineral Particles/kg by number by weight
Zircon/Xenotime 3300 3.3 0.53
Monazite 200 0.2 0.035
Gold 27 0.027 0.017
Silicon Carbide 14 0.014 0.002
EXAMPLE 3
Approx. ppm
Mineral Particles/kg by number by weight
Zircon/Xenotime 11100 11.1 1.2
Monazite 900 0.9 0.16
Silicon Carbide 14 0.014 0.002
Rust 40 0.04 0.04
Ferrous Metal 20 0.02 0.005
EXAMPLE 4
Approx. ppm
Mineral Particles/kg by number by weight
Zircon/Xenotime 9700 9.7 1.54
Monazite 340 0.34 0.059
Silicon Carbide 7 0.007 0.001
Rust 110 0.1 0.2
Ferrous Metal 180 0.18 0.03
The invention has thus enabled the detection, quantification and analysis of small amounts of fine particle heavy minerals in quartz powder and thus an assessment of the quality of the powder and its potential for the manufacture of transparent fused quartz. Until the present analytical method was developed the number of such heavy mineral particles was either unknown, or grossly underestimated.

Claims (19)

The invention claimed is:
1. A method of separating heavy mineral particles from a sample of quartz crystal powder, comprising the steps of:
a. conditioning the quartz powder suspected of containing heavy mineral particles as an aqueous pulp using a froth-flotation agent;
b. subjecting the conditioned pulp to froth flotation to obtain a tailing;
c. combining the tailing with an aqueous solution having a density greater than that of quartz and less than that of a heavy mineral which it is desired to separate; and
d. centrifuging the combination.
2. A method of analysing heavy minerals present in a quartz powder, comprising the steps of separating the heavy minerals using a method according to claim 1; and characterising the separated heavy mineral crystals using a micro-analysis technique.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the micro-analysis technique comprises at least one of optical microscopy, Raman microscopy, Energy Dispersive Analysis by X-ray (EDAX), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), or Laser Mass-spectrometry.
4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous pulp is pH-controlled.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the aqueous pulp is acidic.
6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the froth-flotation agent comprises an anionic promoter.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the anionic promoter is a petroleum based sulphonate promoter.
8. A method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous pulp has a pH of between 2 and 3.5.
9. A method according to claim 6, wherein the promoter is added in a dosage of between 0.5 and 5 ml per kilogram of quartz powder.
10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the quartz powder has a particle size of between 25 and 1000 μm.
11. A method according to claim 1, wherein during conditioning the pulp is 65 to 75% solids by weight.
12. A method according to claim 1, wherein conditioning takes place for 5 to 20 minutes.
13. A method according to claim 1, wherein during froth flotation, the pulp is 10 to 30% solids by weight.
14. A method according to claim 1, wherein flotation takes place for 5 to 60 minutes.
15. A method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous solution is a solution of one or more alkali metal polytungstates or heteropolytungstates.
16. A method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous solution is a solution of sodium heteropolytungstate.
17. A method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous solution has a density of 2.68 to 2.95 g/cm3.
18. A method according to claim 1, wherein a non-vitreous vessel is used for centrifuging in step (d).
19. A method according to claim 1, including the step of agitating a floating layer primarily of quartz in the centrifuged product, and re-centrifuging.
US14/779,054 2013-05-13 2014-05-09 Froth flotation separation and analysis Active 2034-12-14 US9776194B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1308576.6 2013-05-13
GB1308576.6A GB2514118B (en) 2013-05-13 2013-05-13 Froth floatation separation and analysis
PCT/GB2014/051437 WO2014184523A1 (en) 2013-05-13 2014-05-09 Froth flotation separation for quartz purification and analysis of a quartz sample

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160051993A1 US20160051993A1 (en) 2016-02-25
US9776194B2 true US9776194B2 (en) 2017-10-03

Family

ID=48672234

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/779,054 Active 2034-12-14 US9776194B2 (en) 2013-05-13 2014-05-09 Froth flotation separation and analysis

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US9776194B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2996811B1 (en)
GB (1) GB2514118B (en)
WO (1) WO2014184523A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3763683A1 (en) 2019-07-12 2021-01-13 Heraeus Quarzglas GmbH & Co. KG Purification of quartz powders by removal of microparticles of refractory materials
US11912608B2 (en) 2019-10-01 2024-02-27 Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. Glass manufacturing

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105300954B (en) * 2015-09-02 2018-04-13 中南大学 A kind of Raman Characterization method of the heterogeneous froth bed mineral of antimony ore flotation
CN107649295A (en) * 2017-09-29 2018-02-02 江苏闽江矿业有限公司 A kind of silica sand flotation experiments method
CN109675456A (en) * 2019-03-01 2019-04-26 六盘水师范学院 A kind of multi-stage booster Gas Stirring slot
CN110976071B (en) * 2019-11-05 2020-10-16 广州粤有研矿物资源科技有限公司 Quartz sand purification processing method for petroleum fracturing propping agent
CN111203328A (en) * 2020-01-10 2020-05-29 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院 Method for purifying quartz sand
CN111515029B (en) * 2020-04-30 2022-05-17 江西理工大学 Collecting agent for separating monazite and ilmenite and using method thereof
CN111515030B (en) * 2020-04-30 2022-05-17 江西理工大学 Mineral processing technology for separating monazite and rutile by using composite collecting agent and application of mineral processing technology
JP7509005B2 (en) 2020-11-16 2024-07-02 住友金属鉱山株式会社 Methods for analyzing useful minerals contained in ores

Citations (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB462213A (en) 1936-04-06 1937-03-04 Corning Glass Works Process for the preparation of silica for glass batches
US2409665A (en) * 1943-10-19 1946-10-22 Minerals Separation North Us Purification of industrial sands
US2433633A (en) * 1945-05-01 1947-12-30 Minerals Separation North Us Two-stage amine flotation of glass sands
US4401638A (en) * 1981-12-21 1983-08-30 Materias Primas, Monterrey, S.A. Process for purifying silica sand
US4725351A (en) 1986-09-29 1988-02-16 International Minerals & Chemical Corp. Collecting agents for use in the froth flotation of silica-containing ores
US4804422A (en) 1986-02-06 1989-02-14 U.S. Philips Corporation Method of purifying quartz sand
JPH02164740A (en) 1988-12-19 1990-06-25 Mitsubishi Metal Corp Production of raw material for quartz glass
US4983370A (en) 1990-02-06 1991-01-08 The Feldspar Corporation Purified quartz and process for purifying quartz
US5037625A (en) 1990-02-06 1991-08-06 The Feldspar Corporation Purified quartz and process for purifying quartz
US5102837A (en) 1989-09-18 1992-04-07 Research And Development Of Natural Resources, Ltd. Process for the preparation of opaliform porcellanite
US5311997A (en) 1991-07-03 1994-05-17 Engelhard Corporation Selective separation of finely-divided minerals by addition of selective collector reagent and centrifugation
US5735928A (en) 1993-06-18 1998-04-07 Tsl Group Plc Apparatus for manufacturing a vitreous silica article
US5914034A (en) 1997-06-09 1999-06-22 Inter-Citic Envirotec, Inc. Centrifugal flotation cell with rotating feed
US5928125A (en) 1997-06-09 1999-07-27 Inter-Citic Envirotec, Inc. Centrifugal flotation cell with rotating drum
US5985779A (en) 1996-02-15 1999-11-16 Tsl Group Plc Opaque quartz glass product and method of manufacture
WO2000024918A1 (en) 1998-10-27 2000-05-04 Cargill, Incorporated Method for purifying a polyol product stream
AT406739B (en) 1998-11-27 2000-08-25 Arp Aufbereitung Recycling Pru Process for treating leucophyllites, laminated silicates and for utilising their treatment wastes, in particular slip
US6763682B1 (en) 1998-07-15 2004-07-20 Saint-Gobain Quartz Plc Process and apparatus for manufacturing a glass ingot from synthetic silica
US20070271964A1 (en) 2004-07-20 2007-11-29 Heraeus Tenevo Gmbh Method and Device for Producing a Hollow Quartz-Glass Cylinder
CN101293222A (en) 2008-06-13 2008-10-29 张美怡 Separation method for quartz and femic mineral compound body
US20090104454A1 (en) 2006-03-17 2009-04-23 Saint-Gobain Quartz Plc Manufacture of Large Articles in Synthetic Vitreous Silica
WO2010004941A1 (en) 2008-07-08 2010-01-14 三井造船株式会社 Method and apparatus for removing unburned carbon in fly ash
US20120103017A1 (en) 2009-07-09 2012-05-03 Ludwig Frank-Peter Method for producing a highly pure quartz granulate
US20130115391A1 (en) 2010-07-09 2013-05-09 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited High purity synthetic silica and items such as semiconductor jigs manufactured therefrom
US20140106094A1 (en) 2011-04-08 2014-04-17 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Production of silica soot bodies
US8959957B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2015-02-24 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Manufacture of synthetic silica glass
US20150135772A1 (en) 2013-11-18 2015-05-21 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Furnace for Sintering Silica Soot Bodies

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS60153959A (en) * 1984-01-20 1985-08-13 Nippon Sheet Glass Co Ltd Purification of high purity quartz

Patent Citations (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB462213A (en) 1936-04-06 1937-03-04 Corning Glass Works Process for the preparation of silica for glass batches
US2409665A (en) * 1943-10-19 1946-10-22 Minerals Separation North Us Purification of industrial sands
US2433633A (en) * 1945-05-01 1947-12-30 Minerals Separation North Us Two-stage amine flotation of glass sands
US4401638A (en) * 1981-12-21 1983-08-30 Materias Primas, Monterrey, S.A. Process for purifying silica sand
US4804422A (en) 1986-02-06 1989-02-14 U.S. Philips Corporation Method of purifying quartz sand
US4725351A (en) 1986-09-29 1988-02-16 International Minerals & Chemical Corp. Collecting agents for use in the froth flotation of silica-containing ores
JPH02164740A (en) 1988-12-19 1990-06-25 Mitsubishi Metal Corp Production of raw material for quartz glass
US5102837A (en) 1989-09-18 1992-04-07 Research And Development Of Natural Resources, Ltd. Process for the preparation of opaliform porcellanite
US4983370A (en) 1990-02-06 1991-01-08 The Feldspar Corporation Purified quartz and process for purifying quartz
US5037625A (en) 1990-02-06 1991-08-06 The Feldspar Corporation Purified quartz and process for purifying quartz
US5311997A (en) 1991-07-03 1994-05-17 Engelhard Corporation Selective separation of finely-divided minerals by addition of selective collector reagent and centrifugation
US5358120A (en) 1991-07-03 1994-10-25 Engelhard Corporation Selective separation of finely-divided minerals by addition of selective collector reagent and centrifugation
US5735928A (en) 1993-06-18 1998-04-07 Tsl Group Plc Apparatus for manufacturing a vitreous silica article
US5985779A (en) 1996-02-15 1999-11-16 Tsl Group Plc Opaque quartz glass product and method of manufacture
US5928125A (en) 1997-06-09 1999-07-27 Inter-Citic Envirotec, Inc. Centrifugal flotation cell with rotating drum
US5914034A (en) 1997-06-09 1999-06-22 Inter-Citic Envirotec, Inc. Centrifugal flotation cell with rotating feed
US6059118A (en) 1997-06-09 2000-05-09 Inter-Citic Mineral Technologies, Inc. Process for recovering fine particulates in a centrifugal flotation cell with rotating drum
US6126836A (en) 1997-06-09 2000-10-03 Inter-Citic Mineral Technologies, Inc. Centrifugal flotation cell with rotating feed
US6763682B1 (en) 1998-07-15 2004-07-20 Saint-Gobain Quartz Plc Process and apparatus for manufacturing a glass ingot from synthetic silica
WO2000024918A1 (en) 1998-10-27 2000-05-04 Cargill, Incorporated Method for purifying a polyol product stream
AT406739B (en) 1998-11-27 2000-08-25 Arp Aufbereitung Recycling Pru Process for treating leucophyllites, laminated silicates and for utilising their treatment wastes, in particular slip
US20070271964A1 (en) 2004-07-20 2007-11-29 Heraeus Tenevo Gmbh Method and Device for Producing a Hollow Quartz-Glass Cylinder
US20090104454A1 (en) 2006-03-17 2009-04-23 Saint-Gobain Quartz Plc Manufacture of Large Articles in Synthetic Vitreous Silica
CN101293222A (en) 2008-06-13 2008-10-29 张美怡 Separation method for quartz and femic mineral compound body
WO2010004941A1 (en) 2008-07-08 2010-01-14 三井造船株式会社 Method and apparatus for removing unburned carbon in fly ash
US20120103017A1 (en) 2009-07-09 2012-05-03 Ludwig Frank-Peter Method for producing a highly pure quartz granulate
US8959957B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2015-02-24 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Manufacture of synthetic silica glass
US20130115391A1 (en) 2010-07-09 2013-05-09 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited High purity synthetic silica and items such as semiconductor jigs manufactured therefrom
US20140106094A1 (en) 2011-04-08 2014-04-17 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Production of silica soot bodies
US20150135772A1 (en) 2013-11-18 2015-05-21 Heraeus Quartz Uk Limited Furnace for Sintering Silica Soot Bodies

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
R. McEwen et al., "Single-Stage Flotation of Alkali Feldspar, Limenite, Rutile, Garnet, and Monazite, with Mixed Catonic/Anionic Collectors", Society of Mining Engineers, AIME, vol. 260, pp. 97-100, Mar. 1976.

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3763683A1 (en) 2019-07-12 2021-01-13 Heraeus Quarzglas GmbH & Co. KG Purification of quartz powders by removal of microparticles of refractory materials
EP3763682A1 (en) 2019-07-12 2021-01-13 Heraeus Quarzglas GmbH & Co. KG Purification of quartz powders by removal of microparticles of refractory materials
US11878937B2 (en) 2019-07-12 2024-01-23 Heraeus Quarzglas Gmbh & Co. Kg Purification of quartz powders by removal of microparticles of refractory materials
US11912608B2 (en) 2019-10-01 2024-02-27 Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. Glass manufacturing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2514118A (en) 2014-11-19
GB2514118B (en) 2015-11-11
US20160051993A1 (en) 2016-02-25
WO2014184523A1 (en) 2014-11-20
EP2996811A1 (en) 2016-03-23
GB201308576D0 (en) 2013-06-19
EP2996811B1 (en) 2019-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9776194B2 (en) Froth flotation separation and analysis
Mahan et al. Elemental partitioning and isotopic fractionation of Zn between metal and silicate and geochemical estimation of the S content of the Earth’s core
Abouzeid et al. Characterization and beneficiation of an Egyptian nepheline syenite ore
Edem et al. Characterization and beneficiation of the glass making potentials of silica sand deposit from River Benue North Central Nigeria
Chu et al. Ultrasonic pretreatment of spodumene with different size fractions and its influence on flotation
Bayat et al. Combined application of different collectors in the floatation concentration of Turkish feldspars
Burat et al. Quartz-feldspar separation for the glass and ceramics industries
Nazir et al. Flotation performance of calcined spodumene
Grammatikopoulos et al. Mineralogical characterization and preliminary beneficiation of the Zoro Lithium Project, Manitoba, Canada
KR20130104164A (en) Method for preparing high purity silica using reverse flotation
Alemaka et al. Characterization of Makkoda silica sand deposit in Kano State Northwest Nigeria for use in glass manufacturing
Labidi Flotation of barium sulfate contaminants soils
Abdel-Khalek et al. Upgrading of Low-Grade Egyptian Kaolin Ore Using Magnetic Separation
Rashid Optimization alkaline leaching of silicon element from bauxite ore
Alabia et al. Investigating the Production of Ultrafine Engineering Material from Low-Grade Gariti Barite Ore Using Gravity Concentration Methods
Kilinc-Aksay Multi-stage flotation of colored impurities from albite ore in the presence of some cationic and anionic collectors
US6026965A (en) Process for recovering mineral particles, metal particles or small precious stones from an aqueous slim associated with an ore body or mineral deposit or processing thereof
Semushkina et al. On the possibility of flotation processing of technogenic gold-containing waste from enrichment plants
Yassin et al. Improving Feldspar Flotation Using CTAB As Amine Collector (Part Two)
Lukomona et al. The beneficiation of Mumbwa phosphate deposit by various techniques
Smith et al. CONCENTRATION OF FELDSPATHIC WASTE FROM A TITANIUM MINE NEAR ROSELAND, VIRGINIA
Singh et al. Flotation kinetics on upgraded rare earth bearing placer monazite, Bramhagiri coast, Odisha, India
Mtneralurgii Nepheline syenite processing for glass and ceramic industries
OO et al. Desliming process of kuru columbite (Plateau state) using scrubbing method towards niobium pentoxide recovery
Yassin et al. Optimizing the removal of iron oxide from Egyptian feldspar ore

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HERAEUS QUARTZ UK LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHINDLER, MICHAEL;REEL/FRAME:036624/0535

Effective date: 20150818

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: HERAEUS CONAMIC UK LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:HERAEUS QUARTZ UK LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:051923/0953

Effective date: 20190613

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4