US9270388B2 - Method and apparatus for impulse noise mitigation for power line networking - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for impulse noise mitigation for power line networking Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9270388B2 US9270388B2 US14/665,782 US201514665782A US9270388B2 US 9270388 B2 US9270388 B2 US 9270388B2 US 201514665782 A US201514665782 A US 201514665782A US 9270388 B2 US9270388 B2 US 9270388B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- impulse noise
- samples
- correlation
- threshold
- moving average
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B15/00—Suppression or limitation of noise or interference
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
- H04B3/54—Systems for transmission via power distribution lines
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B15/00—Suppression or limitation of noise or interference
- H04B15/02—Reducing interference from electric apparatus by means located at or near the interfering apparatus
- H04B15/04—Reducing interference from electric apparatus by means located at or near the interfering apparatus the interference being caused by substantially sinusoidal oscillations, e.g. in a receiver or in a tape-recorder
Definitions
- Embodiments of the present disclosure relate generally to impulse noise mitigation, and, in particular, to mitigating impulse noise impact on packet preamble detection.
- Impulse noise in communications systems is a category of noise which includes unwanted spikes or sharp pulses.
- Impulse noise is one of the most difficult transmission impairments to suppress and can cause severe performance degradation in communications.
- PLC power line communication
- Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to impulse noise mitigation as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a communication system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of a receiver in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an impulse noise mitigation module in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system for power conversion using one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of another embodiment of a receiver in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 (comprised of FIGS. 6 a and 6 b ) is a flow diagram of a method for generating erasures for impulse noise mitigation during power line communication packet preamble detection in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a method for using erasures for power line communication impulse noise mitigation during packet preamble detection in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a communication system 100 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention. This diagram only portrays one variation of the myriad of possible system configurations. The present invention can function in a variety of environments and systems.
- the system 100 comprises a device 102 - 1 coupled to a power line communications transceiver (PLCT) 104 - 1 , which is further coupled to an AC power line 120 (“power line 120 ”) via a junction box 114 - 1 . Additionally, the system 100 comprises a device 102 - 2 coupled to a PLCT 104 - 2 , which is further coupled to the power line 120 via a junction box 114 - 2 .
- PLCT power line communications transceiver
- the devices 102 - 1 and 102 - 2 are devices requiring communications bandwidth for transmitting and/or receiving data, such as a home computer, peripheral device, power converters, and the like, and are capable of communicating with one another over the power line 120 via the PLCTs 104 - 1 and 104 - 2 , respectively.
- the PLCT 104 - 1 and/or the PLCT 104 - 2 may be coupled directly to the power line 120 without the use of junction boxes 114 - 1 / 114 - 2 .
- junction boxes 114 - 1 / 114 - 2 One particular embodiment that uses the inventive system is described below with respect to FIG. 4 .
- the PLCT 104 - 1 comprises a transmitter 106 - 1 and a receiver 108 - 1 , each coupled to the device 102 - 1 , and a coupler 110 - 1 that couples both the transmitter 106 - 1 and the receiver 108 - 1 to the junction box 114 - 1 .
- the transmitter 106 - 1 is capable of transmitting data to the device 102 - 2 via the power line 120 .
- the receiver 108 - 1 is capable of receiving data from the device 102 - 2 via the power line 120 .
- the PLCT 104 - 1 may be able to simultaneously receive and transmit data; however, the transmitter 106 - 1 may generally blind the receiver 108 - 1 while active.
- a PLCT controller 116 - 1 is coupled to the PLCT 104 - 1 and provides various control for the PLCT 104 - 1 .
- the PLCT controller 116 may be separate from the PLCT 104 - 1 as depicted in FIG. 1 , or, alternatively, the PLCT controller 116 - 1 may be a component of the PLCT 104 - 1 .
- the PLCT 104 - 2 comprises a transmitter 106 - 2 , a receiver 108 - 2 , and a coupler 110 - 2 .
- the transmitter 106 - 2 and receiver 108 - 2 are coupled to the device 102 - 2 as well as the coupler 110 - 2 , and the coupler 110 - 2 is further coupled to the junction box 114 - 2 .
- a PLCT controller 116 - 2 is coupled to the PLCT 104 - 2 and provides various controls for the PLCT 104 - 2 .
- the PLCT controller 116 - 2 may be separate from the PLCT 104 - 2 as depicted in FIG. 1 , or, alternatively, the PLCT controller 116 - 2 may be a component of the PLCT 104 - 2 .
- the PLCT 104 - 2 transmits and receives analogous to the PLCT 104 - 1 .
- the transmitters 106 receive data from the corresponding devices 102 and, based on the received data, generate and transmit data packets for reception by the corresponding downstream receiver 108 .
- the data transmission may be based on a protocol where packets are not scheduled on the medium in advance, such as carrier sense multiple access (CSMA).
- CSMA carrier sense multiple access
- Each of the data packets comprises a preamble at the beginning of the packet for synchronization at the receiver 108 .
- the receivers 108 - 1 and 108 - 2 comprise impulse noise mitigation modules 122 - 1 and 122 - 2 , respectively, for mitigating the effects of impulse noise in detecting the preambles of received packets as described in detail below.
- FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of a receiver 108 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- frequency shift keying (FSK) modulation is used in the system 100 , as well as Reed Solomon coding.
- FIG. 5 depicts another embodiment of a receiver 108 in which other modulation techniques may be used (described further below with respect to FIG. 5 ).
- the receiver 108 of FIG. 2 comprises an analog to digital converter (ADC) 220 that receives an analog input from the coupler 110 and converts the received analog input to a digital output that is coupled to a down-conversion module 222 .
- ADC analog to digital converter
- the down-conversion module 222 comprises a mixer and a filter and converts the received signal to a baseband signal and performs low-pass filtering to remove high-frequency content.
- the output from the down-conversion module 222 is coupled to an automatic gain control (AGC) module 224 , and an output from the AGC module 224 is coupled to a delay module 226 and to an impulse noise erasure detector (ED) module 204 (an implementation of the impulse noise ED module 318 described below with respect to FIG. 3 ).
- An output from the AGC module 224 is coupled to a delay module 202 , and the output from the delay module 202 is coupled to a polar discriminator 228 .
- the outputs from the polar discriminator 228 and the impulse noise ED module 204 are coupled to a modified packet detector (PD) module 206 (an implementation of the modified PD module 320 described below with respect to FIG. 3 ).
- PD packet detector
- the delay module 202 , the impulse noise ED module 204 , the polar discriminator 228 , and the PD 206 form an erasure detection for packet detector (EDPD) module 122 for impulse noise mitigation.
- the output from the PD 206 i.e., the output from the EDPD module 122
- the AGC module 224 couples an output to the delay module 226 , and the output from the delay module 226 is coupled to an erasure detector (ED) module 210 .
- the outputs from the ED module 210 and the synchronization/equalization and symbol decision module 230 are each coupled to a Reed-Solomon (RS) decoder 208 .
- the RS-corrected symbols output from the RS decoder 208 are coupled to a de-scrambler module 232 for de-scrambling; and the output from the de-scrambler 232 is coupled to the device 102 .
- the ED module 210 may couple an output to the synchronization/equalization and symbol decision module 230 .
- the ED module 210 feeds erasures to the RS decoder 208 for correcting symbols in the payload that have been corrupted by impulse noise (the RD decoder 208 has the capability to accept erasures and correct them, up to a theoretical limit) as known in the art.
- the EDPD module 122 employs impulse noise mitigation for packet preamble detection.
- the impulse noise ED 204 receives a smoothed AGC gain signal, detects impulse noise and creates erasures (i.e., samples marked for erasure) for the modified PD 206 , which uses these erasures to adaptively control a correlation threshold used in detection of a packet preamble.
- the modified PD 206 effectively treats the erasures as zeroes during a correlation between a known sequence and the received samples; the result of the correlation is compared to the correlation threshold for determining whether a packet preamble has been detected.
- the modified PD 206 adjusts its correlation threshold based on the number of erasures received; because the erased preamble samples produce a correlation intermediate result of zero, the correlation threshold must be reduced accordingly as the number of erasures increases.
- the correlation threshold for preamble detection would be adjusted by the number of erasures divided by 64.
- the modified PD 206 may be bypassed and the erasures not used (for example, by suitably setting a control bit).
- the impulse noise ED module 204 uses two moving average (MA) circuits in parallel operating on the AGC gain signal—one long MA, and one short MA. Based on the outputs from the MA circuits, thresholds and comparison logic determine the location of impulse noise-affected samples and insert erasures for these samples. These erasures are transmitted to the modified PD 206 , which detects preamble via correlation.
- the modified PD 206 performs a hard decision cross correlation (HDCC) for packet detection and a soft decision cross correlation (SDCC) for header start and symbol boundary using these erasures.
- HDCC hard decision cross correlation
- SDCC soft decision cross correlation
- the modified PD 206 computes and scales the number of erasures during the preamble and uses such information to adaptively scale the correlation thresholds for both the HDCC and SDCC. By using this adaptive scaling, a preamble where 48 out of 64 symbols have been erased and only 16 symbols are valid can still be detected. In some embodiments, these techniques can be utilized with a longer preamble to realize 4 msec impulse noise mitigation.
- the impulse noise ED module 204 employs a threshold (referred to as an “AGC gain sample threshold” in FIG. 6 described below) to detect when the (inter-frame) gap stops and the signal starts.
- Ramp-up of the MAs is replaced with an extension of the first MA after ramp-up is complete in order to eliminate the false or mis-detection of erasures during the MA ramp-up.
- CSMA carrier sense multiple access
- IIR Infinite impulse response
- the IIR filter is a 1 pole Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) filter with one programmable coefficient having values such as 0.5, 0.75, 0.875, 0.9375, 0.96875, 0.984375, and the like. Additional logic is used to properly keep track of SOG/EOG for corner cases. An example of such a case is where a bad header is detected (and the packet length is unknown) mid-packet.
- IIR Infinite Impulse Response
- a media access control (MAC) layer (OSI layer 2) maintenance cycle that enables proper threshold settings in the EDPD module 122 is employed.
- the maintenance cycle contains a ‘quiet’ period so that the EDPD module 122 can train to the background noise, and a constant envelope maintenance packet or burst signal that allows the EDPD module 122 to train to the signal level.
- the maintenance cycle can be invoked periodically or ‘on demand’ when sudden signal degradation has been detected (relative to previous signals). The latter could be caused when a light dimmer has been turned on, for example.
- the impulse noise mitigation techniques described herein using an adaptive threshold allow a smaller preamble to be used and reduce overhead relative to a modem which does not use this technique and is required to mitigate the same impulse noise durations.
- the length of the preamble has practical limitations whereby a longer preamble may not always improve the performance.
- the present invention mitigates the impulse noise from certain compact fluorescent lights and LEDs, common sources of impulse noise that can be difficult to compensate for.
- symbol rates of 5 kB or 20 kB may be used, although in other embodiments other symbol rates may be used.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a receiver 108 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- the receiver 108 may be comprised of hardware, software, or a combination thereof, and may in certain embodiments comprise a central processing unit (CPU) 340 coupled to support circuits 342 and memory 344 .
- the CPU 340 may comprise one or more conventionally available microprocessors, microcontrollers and the like, which are capable of performing the processing described herein; in some embodiments, the CPU 340 may be a microcontroller comprising internal memory for storing controller firmware that, when executed, provides the functionality described herein.
- the CPU 340 may include one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs).
- ASICs application specific integrated circuits
- the support circuits 342 are well known circuits used to promote functionality of the CPU 340 . Such circuits include, but are not limited to, a cache, power supplies, clock circuits, buses, network cards, input/output (I/O) circuits, and the like.
- the receiver 108 may be implemented using a general purpose computer that, when executing particular software, becomes a specific purpose computer for performing various embodiments of the present invention.
- the memory 344 may comprise random access memory, read only memory, removable disk memory, flash memory, and various combinations of these types of memory.
- the memory 344 is sometimes referred to as main memory and may, in part, be used as cache memory or buffer memory.
- the memory 344 generally stores the operating system (OS) 346 of the receiver 108 .
- the OS 346 may be one of a number of commercially available OSs such as, but not limited to, Linux, Real-Time Operating System (RTOS), and the like.
- the memory 344 may store various forms of application software, such as an impulse noise ED module 304 and a modified PD module 306 for performing the impulse noise mitigation techniques described herein.
- the functionality of the impulse noise ED module 318 is described in detail below with respect to FIG. 6
- the functionality of the modified PD module 320 is described in detail below with respect to FIG. 7 .
- the memory 314 may further store modules for performing the functions of the additional receiver components, such as an ADC module 320 , a downconverter/filtering module 322 , a delay module 326 , an erasure detector module 310 , a RS decoder module 308 , a de-scrambler module 332 , an AGC module 324 , a delay module 302 , a polar discriminator module 328 , and a synchronization/equalization and symbol decision module 330 .
- the memory 314 may further store a database 360 for storing data, such as data related to the present invention (e.g., one or more thresholds as well as other types of data).
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system 400 for power conversion using one or more embodiments of the present invention. This diagram only portrays one variation of the myriad of possible system configurations and devices that may utilize the present invention.
- the present invention can be utilized by any packet communication device that may experience impulse noise, and can function in a variety of distributed environments and systems requiring communications that may experience impulse noise.
- the system 400 comprises a plurality of DC-AC inverters 402 1 , 402 2 . . . 402 n , collectively referred to as inverters 402 , a plurality of DC power sources 404 - 1 , 404 - 2 , 404 - 3 . . . 404 -N, collectively referred to as DC power sources 404 , a plurality of power line communications transceiver (PLCTs) 104 1 , 104 2 . . . 104 n , 104 n+1 , collectively referred to as PLCTs 104 , AC power line 406 , an inverter controller 410 , and a load center 408 .
- PLCTs power line communications transceiver
- the DC power sources 404 may be any suitable DC source, such as an output from a previous power conversion stage, a battery, a renewable energy source (e.g., a solar panel or photovoltaic (PV) module, a wind turbine, a hydroelectric system, or similar renewable energy source), or the like, for providing DC power.
- a renewable energy source e.g., a solar panel or photovoltaic (PV) module, a wind turbine, a hydroelectric system, or similar renewable energy source
- DC-AC inverters are shown in FIG. 4 , in other embodiments other types of power conversion devices may be employed (e.g., DC-DC converters).
- Each inverter 402 1 , 402 2 . . . 402 n is coupled to a PLCT 104 1 , 104 2 . . . 104 n , respectively; in some alternative embodiments, each of the PLCTs 104 1 , 104 2 . . . 104 n may be contained within the corresponding inverter 402 1 , 402 2 . . . 402 n .
- Each inverter 402 1 , 402 2 . . . 402 n is additionally coupled to a DC power source 404 1 , 404 2 . . . 404 n , respectively.
- the inverter controller 410 is coupled to the PLCT 104 n+1 and is capable of communicating with the inverters 402 via the PLCTs 104 and/or via wireless communication for receiving data from the inverters 402 and providing operative control of the inverters 402 .
- the AC power line 406 is further coupled to the load center 408 which houses connections between incoming commercial AC power lines from a commercial AC power grid distribution system and the AC power line 406 .
- the inverters 402 convert DC power generated by the DC power sources 404 into AC power, and couple the generated AC power to the commercial AC power grid via the load center 408 ; additionally or alternatively, the generated power may be distributed for use, for example to one or more appliances, and/or the generated energy may be stored for later use, for example using batteries, heated water, hydro pumping, H 2 O-to-hydrogen conversion, or the like.
- the inverters 402 communicate with other devices (such as among one another, with the inverter controller 410 , and/or other devices not shown) using power line communications over the AC power lines 406 via the PLCTs 104 .
- receivers of the PLCTs 104 each comprise the impulse noise mitigation module 122 described herein to perform the impulse noise mitigation techniques described herein.
- FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of another embodiment of a receiver 108 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- modulation techniques other than FSK are used, such as minimum-shift keying (MSK), binary phase-shift keying (BPSK), quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK), quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), or the like.
- MSK minimum-shift keying
- BPSK binary phase-shift keying
- QPSK quadrature phase-shift keying
- QAM quadrature amplitude modulation
- the receiver 108 of FIG. 5 comprises the ADC 220 that receives an analog input from the coupler 110 and converts the received analog input to a digital output that is coupled to the down-conversion module 222 .
- the down-conversion module 222 converts the received signal to a baseband signal and performs low-pass filtering to remove high-frequency content.
- the output from the down-conversion module 222 is coupled to the AGC module 224 , and an output from the AGC module 224 is coupled to the delay module 226 and an impulse noise erasure detector (ED) module 504 (an implementation of the impulse noise ED module 318 ) which operates analogous to the ED module 204 described above.
- An output from the AGC module 224 is coupled to a delay module 502 (analogous to the delay module 202 described above), and the outputs from the delay module 502 and the impulse noise ED module 504 are coupled to a modified PD module 506 (an implementation of the modified PD module 320 ) which operates analogous to the modified PD module 206 described above.
- the delay module 502 , the impulse noise ED module 504 , and the PD module 506 form the EDPD module 122 for impulse noise mitigation.
- the output from the PD 506 i.e., the output from the EDPD module 122
- the synchronization/equalization and symbol decision module 230 is coupled to the synchronization/equalization and symbol decision module 230 .
- the AGC module 224 couples an output to the delay module 226 , and the output from the delay module 226 is coupled to the ED module 210 .
- the outputs from the ED module 210 and the synchronization/equalization and symbol decision module 230 are each coupled to a de-interleaver/RS decoder 508 .
- the RS-corrected symbols output from the de-interleaver/RS decoder 508 are coupled to the de-scrambler module 232 for de-scrambling; and the output from the de-scrambler 232 is coupled to the device 102 .
- the ED module 210 may couple an output to the synchronization/equalization and symbol decision module 230 .
- the ED module 210 feeds erasures to the de-interleaver/RS decoder 508 which performs both de-interleaving and RS decoder functions for correcting symbols in the payload that have been corrupted by impulse noise as known in the art. Additionally, the EDPD module 122 employs impulse noise mitigation for packet preamble detection as described above.
- FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a method 600 for generating erasures for impulse noise mitigation during power line communication packet preamble detection in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- the method 600 is an implementation of the impulse noise ED module 318 .
- a computer readable medium comprises a program that, when executed by a processor, performs the method 600 that is described below.
- the method 600 starts at step 602 and proceeds to step 604 .
- a moving average referred to as “moving average 2”
- another moving average referred to as “moving average 1”
- EOG end of gap
- a smoothed AGC gain sample is received.
- the AGC gain is smoothed using a 1 pole Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) filter with one programmable coefficient having values such as 0.5, 0.75, 0.875, 0.9375, 0.96875, 0.984375, and the like.
- IIR Infinite Impulse Response
- the method 600 proceeds to step 610 , where a determination is made whether the received sample is less than an AGC gain sample threshold.
- the AGC gain sample threshold is employed to detect when an (inter-frame) gap stops and the signal starts.
- the AGC gain sample threshold is set based on a measured signal-to-noise ratio.
- the sample represents a gap sample.
- the method 600 proceeds to step 611 where a determination is made whether an EOG has been detected. If the result of the determination is yes, than an EOG has been detected, the method 600 proceeds to step 616 . If the result of the determination at step 611 is no, that an EOG has not been determined, the method 600 returns to step 606 .
- step 610 If, at step 610 , the result of the determination is yes (i.e., the sample is less than the threshold), the sample represents a packet sample and the method 600 proceeds to step 612 .
- step 612 a determination is made whether an EOG has been detected based on the EOG count. If the result of the determination at step 612 is no, that an EOG has not been detected based on the EOG count, the method 600 proceeds to step 614 where the EOG count is incremented and the method 600 then proceeds to step 616 .
- step 612 the method 600 proceeds to step 616 .
- the moving average 1 and the moving average 2 are each computed using the received sample.
- the ramp-up length of moving average 1 is configurable; for example, the ramp-up length may be set to 32, 64, 128, or the like.
- the method 600 then proceeds to step 617 where a determination is made if ramp up is done. If at step 617 it is determined that the ramp up is not done, the method 600 proceeds to step 618 where a determination is made whether the moving average 1 is equal to a particular moving average length (e.g., 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 or 128).
- a particular moving average length e.g., 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 or 128).
- step 642 the moving average 2 is stored in a buffer.
- the method 600 then returns to step 608 . If, at step 618 , the result of the determination is yes, that the moving average 1 is equal to the moving average length, the method 600 proceeds to step 619 where the ramp up is done and the address of the moving average 2 buffer is set to zero. The method 600 then proceeds step 620 where the final ramp-up moving average 1 value is registered and the final moving average 1 value will be used for the previous samples that were in the ramp-up window. The method 600 then proceeds to step 630 .
- the registered moving average 1 is used for ramp up samples.
- the moving average 2 is read from the buffer.
- a determination is made whether the moving average 1 is greater than the moving average 2 plus an erasure margin.
- the erasure margin may be set based on a measured signal-to-background noise ratio. If the result of the determination at step 634 is no, i.e., that the moving average 1 is less than or equal to the moving average 2 plus the erasure margin, no erasure has been detected and the method 600 returns to step 608 . If the result of the determination at step 634 is yes, an erasure has been detected and the method 600 proceeds to step 636 where the sample is marked as an erasure.
- step 638 a determination is made whether reading of the moving average 2 buffer is done. If the result of the determination at step 638 is yes, the method 600 returns to step 608 ; if the result of the determination at step 638 is no, the method 600 proceeds to step 640 . At step 640 , the address of the moving average 2 buffer is incremented and the method 600 returns to step 630 .
- step 622 a determination is made whether the moving average 1 is greater than the moving average 2 plus an erasure margin.
- the erasure margin may be set based on a measured signal-to-background noise ratio. If the result of the determination at step 622 is no, i.e., that the moving average 1 is less than or equal to the moving average 2 plus the erasure margin, no erasure has been detected and the method 600 returns to step 608 .
- step 622 If the result of the determination at step 622 is yes, i.e., that the moving average 1 is greater than the moving average 2 plus the erasure margin, an erasure has been detected and the method 600 proceeds to step 624 .
- the sample is marked as an erasure.
- the identified erasure may then be used in packet preamble detection, for example as described below with respect to FIG. 7 .
- step 626 a determination is made whether to continue. If the result of the determination at step 626 is yes, the method 600 returns to step 608 . If the result of the determination at step 626 is no, the method 600 proceeds to step 628 where it ends.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a method 700 for using erasures for power line communication impulse noise mitigation during packet preamble detection in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present invention.
- the method 700 is an implementation of the modified PD module 320 .
- a computer readable medium comprises a program that, when executed by a processor, performs the method 700 that is described below.
- the method 700 begins at step 702 and proceeds to step 704 .
- an erasure is received, such as an erasure generated by the method 600 described above.
- a cross correlation is performed between a known sequence and received samples, where the erasures are treated as zeroes during the correlation.
- a hard decision cross correlation (HDCC) for packet detection and a soft decision cross correlation (SDCC) for header start and symbol boundary are performed using the erasures.
- the number of erasures in a preamble-length window is computed and scaled.
- the method 700 proceeds to step 710 , where the information generated at step 708 is used to adaptively scale a correlation threshold for packet preamble detection. Because the erased preamble samples produce a correlation intermediate result of zero, the correlation threshold must be reduced accordingly as the number of erasures increases. For example, in one or more embodiments where a 64-symbol correlation is used, the correlation threshold for preamble detection would be adjusted by (number of erasures)/64. By using this adaptive scaling, a preamble where 48 out of 64 symbols have been erased and only 16 symbols are valid can still be detected. In some embodiments, these techniques can be utilized with a longer preamble to realize 4 msec impulse noise mitigation.
- correlation thresholds for each of the HDCC and the SDCC are adaptively set.
- step 716 a determination is made whether to continue. If the result of the determination is yes, the method 700 returns to step 704 ; if the result of the determination is no, the method 700 proceeds to step 718 where it ends.
Abstract
Description
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/665,782 US9270388B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2015-03-23 | Method and apparatus for impulse noise mitigation for power line networking |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201461968944P | 2014-03-21 | 2014-03-21 | |
US14/665,782 US9270388B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2015-03-23 | Method and apparatus for impulse noise mitigation for power line networking |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150270910A1 US20150270910A1 (en) | 2015-09-24 |
US9270388B2 true US9270388B2 (en) | 2016-02-23 |
Family
ID=54143070
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/665,782 Active US9270388B2 (en) | 2014-03-21 | 2015-03-23 | Method and apparatus for impulse noise mitigation for power line networking |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9270388B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015143437A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9479288B2 (en) * | 2014-06-17 | 2016-10-25 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Techniques for time-domain frame synchronization of packets |
CN107359905B (en) * | 2017-07-11 | 2021-07-23 | 吴泳澎 | Digital front end and frame detection method for frequency division power line carrier communication |
US10447313B2 (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2019-10-15 | X Development Llc | Communication method and system with on demand temporal diversity |
US11140008B2 (en) | 2017-12-07 | 2021-10-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Noise compensation for communication on power line downhole |
CN111212011A (en) * | 2019-12-24 | 2020-05-29 | 东北电力大学 | Power line carrier communication pulse noise suppression method for electric automobile and charging pile |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5724384A (en) * | 1994-07-14 | 1998-03-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | PN code sync device using an adaptive threshold |
US6404803B1 (en) * | 2000-10-24 | 2002-06-11 | Neoreach, Inc. | PN code acquisition with adaptive antenna array and adaptive threshold for CDMA wireless communications |
US6714677B1 (en) * | 1999-12-17 | 2004-03-30 | Xerox Corporation | Use of correlation histograms for improved glyph decoding |
US6859488B2 (en) | 2002-09-25 | 2005-02-22 | Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. | Detection of impulse noise using unused codes in CDMA systems |
US20050047489A1 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2005-03-03 | Yousef Nabil R. | Chip blanking and processing in SCDMA to mitigate impulse and burst noise and/or distortion |
US20050286566A1 (en) | 2004-06-23 | 2005-12-29 | Po Tong | Versatile erasure forecasting system for impulse noise mitigation |
US20060078044A1 (en) | 2004-10-11 | 2006-04-13 | Norrell Andrew L | Various methods and apparatuses for imulse noise mitigation |
US7394877B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2008-07-01 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Low-power packet detection using decimated correlation |
JP2008244821A (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2008-10-09 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Communications device, communication system and method for controlling communication |
US7813439B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2010-10-12 | Broadcom Corporation | Various methods and apparatuses for impulse noise detection |
JP2010288287A (en) | 2005-10-12 | 2010-12-24 | Panasonic Corp | Method for power line communication, integrated circuit, and apparatus for power line communication |
US20110058470A1 (en) * | 2009-09-04 | 2011-03-10 | Inha-Industry Partnership Institute | Ranging apparatus and method for improving ranging performance in ofdma system |
US20120082253A1 (en) | 2010-07-12 | 2012-04-05 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Pilot Structure for Coherent Modulation |
US20120093198A1 (en) * | 2010-10-08 | 2012-04-19 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Building, Transmitting, and Receiving Frame Structures in Power Line Communications |
US8385399B2 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2013-02-26 | Ralink Technology Corp. | Method for impulse noise mitigation |
US8488663B2 (en) | 2009-09-23 | 2013-07-16 | Maxlinear, Inc. | Impulse noise mitigation under out-of-band interference conditions |
US8653689B2 (en) | 2008-11-12 | 2014-02-18 | Tigo Energy, Inc. | Method and system for current-mode power line communications |
-
2015
- 2015-03-23 WO PCT/US2015/022027 patent/WO2015143437A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-03-23 US US14/665,782 patent/US9270388B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5724384A (en) * | 1994-07-14 | 1998-03-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | PN code sync device using an adaptive threshold |
US6714677B1 (en) * | 1999-12-17 | 2004-03-30 | Xerox Corporation | Use of correlation histograms for improved glyph decoding |
US6404803B1 (en) * | 2000-10-24 | 2002-06-11 | Neoreach, Inc. | PN code acquisition with adaptive antenna array and adaptive threshold for CDMA wireless communications |
US8170154B2 (en) | 2001-06-08 | 2012-05-01 | Broadcom Corporation | Chip blanking and processing in SCDMA to mitigate impulse and burst noise and/or distortion |
US20050047489A1 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2005-03-03 | Yousef Nabil R. | Chip blanking and processing in SCDMA to mitigate impulse and burst noise and/or distortion |
US7394877B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2008-07-01 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Low-power packet detection using decimated correlation |
US6859488B2 (en) | 2002-09-25 | 2005-02-22 | Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. | Detection of impulse noise using unused codes in CDMA systems |
US20050286566A1 (en) | 2004-06-23 | 2005-12-29 | Po Tong | Versatile erasure forecasting system for impulse noise mitigation |
US20060078044A1 (en) | 2004-10-11 | 2006-04-13 | Norrell Andrew L | Various methods and apparatuses for imulse noise mitigation |
US8194722B2 (en) | 2004-10-11 | 2012-06-05 | Broadcom Corporation | Various methods and apparatuses for impulse noise mitigation |
JP2010288287A (en) | 2005-10-12 | 2010-12-24 | Panasonic Corp | Method for power line communication, integrated circuit, and apparatus for power line communication |
US7813439B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2010-10-12 | Broadcom Corporation | Various methods and apparatuses for impulse noise detection |
JP2008244821A (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2008-10-09 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Communications device, communication system and method for controlling communication |
US8653689B2 (en) | 2008-11-12 | 2014-02-18 | Tigo Energy, Inc. | Method and system for current-mode power line communications |
US20110058470A1 (en) * | 2009-09-04 | 2011-03-10 | Inha-Industry Partnership Institute | Ranging apparatus and method for improving ranging performance in ofdma system |
US8488663B2 (en) | 2009-09-23 | 2013-07-16 | Maxlinear, Inc. | Impulse noise mitigation under out-of-band interference conditions |
US8385399B2 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2013-02-26 | Ralink Technology Corp. | Method for impulse noise mitigation |
US20120082253A1 (en) | 2010-07-12 | 2012-04-05 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Pilot Structure for Coherent Modulation |
US20120093198A1 (en) * | 2010-10-08 | 2012-04-19 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Building, Transmitting, and Receiving Frame Structures in Power Line Communications |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 11, 2015 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/022027. |
Lin et al., "Impulsive Noise Mitigation in Powerline Communications Using Sparse Bayesian Learning", IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communications, 26 Pages, Mar. 5, 2013. |
Ribeiro et al., "Impulse Noise Mitigation Based on Computational Intelligence for Improved Bit Rate in PLC-DMT", IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, Issue 1, pp. 94-101, Jan. 2006. |
Seo et al., "Improved Impulse Detection in Power Line Communication Systems", IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications, pp. 374-379, Apr. 2008. |
Zhao et al., "Efficient Erasure Marking Technique for Interleaving Delay Reduction in DSL Systems Impaired by Impulse Noise", IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 3170-3174, Jun. 2012. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20150270910A1 (en) | 2015-09-24 |
WO2015143437A1 (en) | 2015-09-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9270388B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for impulse noise mitigation for power line networking | |
US10292104B2 (en) | Quick decision preamble detector with hierarchical processing | |
US5553081A (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting a signal in a communications system | |
TWI295883B (en) | Rate selection for an ofdm system | |
US9077489B2 (en) | Adjusting multi-carrier modulation and transmission power properties | |
US8014442B2 (en) | Communicating data using wideband communications | |
Ma et al. | Appropriate modulation scheme for visible light communication systems considering illumination | |
WO2011082145A2 (en) | Transmit power control | |
US10721092B2 (en) | High-speed CAN communication system using passband modulation | |
WO2014111795A1 (en) | Devices and methods for power consumption control in powerline communications systems and apparatus | |
US8243859B2 (en) | Joint frequency and unique word detection | |
US20100020863A1 (en) | Determination of receive data values | |
US20150358050A1 (en) | Adaptive modulation system and method to minimize energy consumption | |
US9838077B2 (en) | Method for estimating a cyclostationary transmission channel, and corresponding receiver | |
Ghassemlooy | Investigation of the baseline wander effect on indoor optical wireless system employing digital pulse interval modulation | |
US7149252B2 (en) | Communicating data using wideband communications | |
Song et al. | AARC: Cross-layer wireless rate control driven by fine-grained channel assessment | |
TW201822494A (en) | Clear channel assessment | |
US9332492B2 (en) | Rapid acknowledgement of radio transmissions for energy minimization | |
CN117714245B (en) | Interference suppression system, method, equipment and medium in wireless ad hoc network system | |
JP2012239027A (en) | Transmission method and transmitter of 4-level ppm signal | |
US10673559B2 (en) | Optimal preamble length and detection threshold | |
US11546199B2 (en) | Packet detection and timing synchronization for high performance wireless communications in substation automation | |
EP3471358A1 (en) | Ami system with link budget dynamics |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENPHASE ENERGY, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BERNSTEIN, ZVI;LAUDEL, KENNAN;ANUGU, MADHAVI;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150323 TO 20150324;REEL/FRAME:035275/0760 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:041210/0283 Effective date: 20161227 Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT, Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:041210/0283 Effective date: 20161227 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OBSIDIAN AGENCY SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:041225/0509 Effective date: 20161227 Owner name: FLEXTRONICS AMERICA, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:041936/0109 Effective date: 20161230 Owner name: FLEXTRONICS INDUSTRIAL, LTD, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:041958/0820 Effective date: 20161230 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FLEXTRONICS INDUSTRIAL, LTD, CALIFORNIA Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 041936 FRAME: 0109. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:043339/0856 Effective date: 20161230 Owner name: FLEXTRONICS AMERICA, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 041936 FRAME: 0109. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:043339/0856 Effective date: 20161230 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ENPHASE ENERGY, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:FLEXTRONICS INDUSTRIAL, LTD.;FLEXTRONICS AMERICA, LLC;REEL/FRAME:052022/0954 Effective date: 20181211 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |