US9030677B2 - Automatic environmentally friendly font substitution using print control policies and governance logs - Google Patents

Automatic environmentally friendly font substitution using print control policies and governance logs Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US9030677B2
US9030677B2 US12/614,117 US61411709A US9030677B2 US 9030677 B2 US9030677 B2 US 9030677B2 US 61411709 A US61411709 A US 61411709A US 9030677 B2 US9030677 B2 US 9030677B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
font
substitution
document
toner saving
mandated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related, expires
Application number
US12/614,117
Other versions
US20110109929A1 (en
Inventor
Stephen Kyle Korndoerfer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Xerox Corp
Original Assignee
Xerox Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xerox Corp filed Critical Xerox Corp
Priority to US12/614,117 priority Critical patent/US9030677B2/en
Assigned to XEROX CORPORATION reassignment XEROX CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KORNDOERFER, STEPHEN KYLE
Publication of US20110109929A1 publication Critical patent/US20110109929A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9030677B2 publication Critical patent/US9030677B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K15/00Arrangements for producing a permanent visual presentation of the output data, e.g. computer output printers
    • G06K15/02Arrangements for producing a permanent visual presentation of the output data, e.g. computer output printers using printers
    • G06K15/18Conditioning data for presenting it to the physical printing elements
    • G06K15/1801Input data handling means
    • G06K15/1822Analysing the received data before processing
    • G06K15/1823Analysing the received data before processing for evaluating the resources needed, e.g. rasterizing time, ink, paper stock

Definitions

  • Embodiments are generally related to print controls and print governance for the automatic substitution of font. Embodiments are also related to substitution of font with environmentally friendly font in order to reduce toner usage.
  • Reducing materials utilized during printing is not only economically beneficial, but can also benefit the environment.
  • Current print control policies can enforce environmentally friendly, as well as cost saving, rules on end users when they print their documents by suggesting (or enforcing) printing on both sides of the paper when the document is larger than a specified number of pages. While reducing the use of paper can result in large cost savings, it is not the most expensive component involved in the printing process. Toner is far more expensive than paper and anything that effectively reduces the amount of toner used without affecting output quality can result in substantial savings.
  • Traditional methods involve varying the density of the toner applied to the page (e.g. use of “draft” mode), but this often results in the document looking faded or washed out.
  • EcoPrint2TM by CoGen Media ⁇ .
  • substitution software configured to determine whether a document print request matches a set of predefined conditions and whether font substitution is selected/mandated at any level of print control.
  • substitution software being further configured to perform font substitution of a toner saving font when a document print request matches the set of predefined conditions and when font substitution is selected/mandated at any level of print control.
  • a method and system are disclosed for the automatic substitution of font with a toner saving font.
  • Substitution software first determines whether a document print request matches a set of predefined conditions and whether font substitution is selected or mandated at any level of print control. Where a document print request matches all of the predefined conditions and where font substitution is selected or mandated at any level of print controls, the substitution software performs a font substitution to replace the original font with a toner saving font.
  • FIG. 1 labeled as “Prior Art”, illustrates a system in the context of a data processing apparatus, a server, a network, and a MFD;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart of a method by which substitution software determines whether a document print request matches a predefined set of conditions related to whether font substitution is appropriate for the document print request, in accordance with the disclosed embodiments;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart of the method by which substitution software determines whether font substitution is selected or mandated at any level of print control and whether font substitution will be performed on the document print request, in accordance with the disclosed embodiments.
  • the method disclosed herein proposes substitution software to dynamically substitute document specified fonts with a toner saving font to reduce the amount of toner used and to minimize system resource usage that can slow printing speeds.
  • One method for performing font substitution is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,013, herein incorporated in its entirety.
  • Toner saving fonts may be alternatively available fonts requiring less toner usage than the originally selected font or an “environmentally friendly” font, which is a font that has small holes, or other omissions, of varying sizes placed within the borders of each character in order to reduce the amount of toner needed to render that character. Because the environmentally friendly font is based on the original font used in a document, substitution will not result in any changes to the original document structure or formatting.
  • system 100 includes a multi-function device (MFD) 140 coupled to a data-processing apparatus through a network 135 .
  • the data-processing apparatus can be, for example, a personal computer or other computing device and can generally include a central processor 120 , a display device 110 , a keyboard 131 , and a pointing device 130 (e.g., mouse, track ball, pen device, or the like). Additional input/output devices, such as the MFD 140 , may be included in association with the data-processing apparatus as desired.
  • MFD 140 may refer to an apparatus or system such as a printer, scanner, fax machine, copy machine, etc., and/or a combination thereof.
  • MFD 140 is capable of multiple rendering functions such as printing, copying, scanning, faxing, etc.
  • MFD 140 may be implemented with a single rendering function such as printing.
  • MFD 140 can be configured to provide multiple rendering functions such as scanning, faxing, printing, and copying and can be connected to a network.
  • MFD 140 also generally includes a controller (not shown) for loading files from networked sources and processing files to be rendered.
  • the data-processing apparatus can be coupled to the MFD 140 through a computer network 135 .
  • Network 135 may employ any network topology, transmission medium, or network protocol such as, for example, a computer network, Ethernet, Internet, Intranet, etc.
  • Network 135 may include connections such as wire, wireless communication links, or fiber optic cables.
  • the data-processing apparatus includes a graphical user interface (GUI) 125 that displays information and receives data through the display device 110 and/or the keyboard/mouse 131 / 130 combination.
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • the data-processing apparatus can be, for example, any computing device capable of being integrated within a network such as a PDA, personal computer, cellular telephone, point-of-sale terminal, server, etc. Note also that in FIGS. 1-3 herein, identical or similar parts or elements are generally indicated by identical reference numerals.
  • a MFD driver program can be installed on the data-processing apparatus, or on a server 185 , and can reside on the host device's hard drive 150 .
  • the MFD driver program may be activated through an application interface so that a user may generate a print job with the MFD driver for processing by the MFD 140 .
  • Substitution software (not shown) can be installed on the data-processing apparatus, the server 185 or on the MFD 140 itself. The functions of substitution software will be discussed in greater detail below.
  • substitution software can be employed to inspect a document print request 210 to determine if the document print request meets certain predefined conditions wherein font substitution would be appropriate and beneficial with respect to reducing toner usage.
  • Font substitution generally refers to the substitution of text originally contained in a document with a toner saving font. Initially, as illustrated in block 220 , substitution software evaluates whether the document print request 210 contains replaceable fonts (e.g., does an environmentally friendly version of the original font exist?). Replaceable fonts can also be fonts that require greater toner usage compared to other available fonts (e.g., Arial Black vs. Arial).
  • substitution software determines whether there is a minimum percentage of replaceable fonts contained in the document, as indicated in block 230 .
  • Block 240 illustrates where a document print request is found to have a minimum percentage of replaceable font, substitution software then determines whether a minimum percentage of the replaceable font is of a particular character size.
  • Environmentally friendly fonts are generally undetectable by the unaided eye at character sizes of 12 points or less. Therefore, substitution of fonts larger than 12 points may result in decreased print quality. If all of the foregoing conditions are present, substitution software then determines whether the user has selected a print mode below a predetermined level, such as “High” or “Presentation”, as shown in block 250 .
  • substitution software ends the inspection and no font substitution is performed.
  • substitution software proceeds to inspecting different levels of the print controls to determine if font substitution is selected or mandated.
  • substitution software proceeds, as shown in block 320 , to determine whether font substitution has been selected in “print preferences” (i.e. at the MFD driver level). If it is not, substitution software proceeds to determine if font substitution is mandated by print governance tools, as illustrated in block 330 .
  • Print governance tools can be put into effect by a system administrator and can be configured to silently apply font substitution across an entire organization or to only certain groups within an organization (e.g. Finance, Engineering, etc.). Print governance tools may also be put into effect for documents originating from a particular program. Where it is found that font substitution is not mandated in print preferences or by print governance tools, substitution software proceeds to query the user if they would like to reduce toner usage, as shown in block 340 .
  • the document print request 210 is automatically altered to include a toner saving font call, as illustrated in box 360 .
  • font substitution can then be performed either at the MFD driver, as shown in block 370 , or at the MFD controller prior to rasterizing the document print request 210 , as indicated in block 380 .
  • the document print request is not altered and no font substitution is performed. Thus, the document will be rendered as it was originally requested.
  • print governance logs can be configured to produce a report showing the amount of toner saved over a certain period of time. This report can also include potential savings if the policy were structured differently. Additional reports can then be produced showing the number of toner cartridges saved, the cost savings associated with the reduced toner usage, and carbon emission reduction, as just a few examples.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Control Or Security For Electrophotography (AREA)

Abstract

A method and a system are disclosed for the automatic substitution of font with a toner saving font. Dynamic substitution of document specified fonts with a toner saving font can reduce the amount of toner used and minimize system resource usage that can slow printing speeds. Substitution software first determines whether a document print request matches a set of predefined conditions. If the document print request does not match all of the conditions, the inquiry ends. Substitution software then determines whether font substitution is selected or mandated at any level of print control. Where a document print request matches all of the predefined conditions and where font substitution is selected or mandated at any level of print controls, the substitution software performs a font substitution to replace original font with a toner saving font.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
Embodiments are generally related to print controls and print governance for the automatic substitution of font. Embodiments are also related to substitution of font with environmentally friendly font in order to reduce toner usage.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Reducing materials utilized during printing is not only economically beneficial, but can also benefit the environment. Current print control policies can enforce environmentally friendly, as well as cost saving, rules on end users when they print their documents by suggesting (or enforcing) printing on both sides of the paper when the document is larger than a specified number of pages. While reducing the use of paper can result in large cost savings, it is not the most expensive component involved in the printing process. Toner is far more expensive than paper and anything that effectively reduces the amount of toner used without affecting output quality can result in substantial savings. Traditional methods involve varying the density of the toner applied to the page (e.g. use of “draft” mode), but this often results in the document looking faded or washed out. One such software program is EcoPrint2™ by CoGen Media©.
Alternative approaches to saving toner, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,791,714 B1, generally involve a post-processing step of analyzing each rendered/rasterized page using an algorithm for determining which pixels can be safely removed without affecting the formatting or layout of the original document. One of the drawbacks of this approach is that, while it does indeed save toner, it usually results in the document looking ‘washed out’ when color is used or ‘grayed out’ when black is used. Additionally, because these algorithms are applied to the entire rendered/rasterized page, any images contained within the page are affected as well. Print speeds may also be reduced in this type of post-processing step that is run against each rendered/rasterized page due to increased system resource usage.
Therefore, a need exists for a system and method for reducing toner usage while preserving the quality of the printout and without reducing print speed or affecting print layout.
BRIEF SUMMARY
It is one aspect of the disclosed embodiments to provide for an improved method and system for the automatic substitution of font.
It is another aspect of the disclosed embodiments to provide for an improved method of substituting original font with a toner saving font in order to reduce toner usage.
It is yet another aspect of the disclosed embodiments to provide for substitution software configured to determine whether a document print request matches a set of predefined conditions and whether font substitution is selected/mandated at any level of print control.
It is a further aspect of the disclosed embodiments to provide for substitution software being further configured to perform font substitution of a toner saving font when a document print request matches the set of predefined conditions and when font substitution is selected/mandated at any level of print control.
The aforementioned aspects and other objectives and advantages can be achieved as described herein. A method and system are disclosed for the automatic substitution of font with a toner saving font. Substitution software first determines whether a document print request matches a set of predefined conditions and whether font substitution is selected or mandated at any level of print control. Where a document print request matches all of the predefined conditions and where font substitution is selected or mandated at any level of print controls, the substitution software performs a font substitution to replace the original font with a toner saving font.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying figures, in which like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally-similar elements throughout the separate views and which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, further illustrate the embodiments and, together with the detailed description, serve to explain the embodiments disclosed herein.
FIG. 1, labeled as “Prior Art”, illustrates a system in the context of a data processing apparatus, a server, a network, and a MFD;
FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart of a method by which substitution software determines whether a document print request matches a predefined set of conditions related to whether font substitution is appropriate for the document print request, in accordance with the disclosed embodiments; and
FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart of the method by which substitution software determines whether font substitution is selected or mandated at any level of print control and whether font substitution will be performed on the document print request, in accordance with the disclosed embodiments.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
It is to be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art that the following descriptions are provided for purposes of illustration and not for limitation. An artisan understands there are many variations that lie within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the appended claims. Unnecessary detail of known functions and operations may be omitted from the current description so as not to obscure the present invention.
The method disclosed herein proposes substitution software to dynamically substitute document specified fonts with a toner saving font to reduce the amount of toner used and to minimize system resource usage that can slow printing speeds. One method for performing font substitution is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,013, herein incorporated in its entirety. Toner saving fonts may be alternatively available fonts requiring less toner usage than the originally selected font or an “environmentally friendly” font, which is a font that has small holes, or other omissions, of varying sizes placed within the borders of each character in order to reduce the amount of toner needed to render that character. Because the environmentally friendly font is based on the original font used in a document, substitution will not result in any changes to the original document structure or formatting.
Referring to FIG. 1, system 100 includes a multi-function device (MFD) 140 coupled to a data-processing apparatus through a network 135. The data-processing apparatus can be, for example, a personal computer or other computing device and can generally include a central processor 120, a display device 110, a keyboard 131, and a pointing device 130 (e.g., mouse, track ball, pen device, or the like). Additional input/output devices, such as the MFD 140, may be included in association with the data-processing apparatus as desired.
Note that as utilized herein, the term multi-function device (including the acronym MFD) may refer to an apparatus or system such as a printer, scanner, fax machine, copy machine, etc., and/or a combination thereof. Preferably, MFD 140 is capable of multiple rendering functions such as printing, copying, scanning, faxing, etc. In some embodiments, MFD 140 may be implemented with a single rendering function such as printing. In other embodiments, MFD 140 can be configured to provide multiple rendering functions such as scanning, faxing, printing, and copying and can be connected to a network. MFD 140 also generally includes a controller (not shown) for loading files from networked sources and processing files to be rendered.
The data-processing apparatus can be coupled to the MFD 140 through a computer network 135. Network 135 may employ any network topology, transmission medium, or network protocol such as, for example, a computer network, Ethernet, Internet, Intranet, etc. Network 135 may include connections such as wire, wireless communication links, or fiber optic cables. The data-processing apparatus includes a graphical user interface (GUI) 125 that displays information and receives data through the display device 110 and/or the keyboard/mouse 131/130 combination. The data-processing apparatus can be, for example, any computing device capable of being integrated within a network such as a PDA, personal computer, cellular telephone, point-of-sale terminal, server, etc. Note also that in FIGS. 1-3 herein, identical or similar parts or elements are generally indicated by identical reference numerals.
A MFD driver program can be installed on the data-processing apparatus, or on a server 185, and can reside on the host device's hard drive 150. The MFD driver program may be activated through an application interface so that a user may generate a print job with the MFD driver for processing by the MFD 140. Substitution software (not shown) can be installed on the data-processing apparatus, the server 185 or on the MFD 140 itself. The functions of substitution software will be discussed in greater detail below.
The following description is presented with respect to embodiments of the present invention, which can be embodied in the context of a data-processing apparatus, server 185, and MFD 140 depicted in FIG. 1. The present invention, however, is not limited to any particular application or any particular environment. Instead, those skilled in the art will find that the system and methods of the present invention may be advantageously applied to a variety of system and application software, including database management systems, word processors, and the like. Moreover, the present invention may be embodied on a variety of different platforms including Macintosh, UNIX, LINUX, and the like. Therefore, the description of the exemplary embodiments, which follows, is for purposes of illustration and not considered a limitation.
Referring to FIG. 2, substitution software can be employed to inspect a document print request 210 to determine if the document print request meets certain predefined conditions wherein font substitution would be appropriate and beneficial with respect to reducing toner usage. Font substitution, as used herein, generally refers to the substitution of text originally contained in a document with a toner saving font. Initially, as illustrated in block 220, substitution software evaluates whether the document print request 210 contains replaceable fonts (e.g., does an environmentally friendly version of the original font exist?). Replaceable fonts can also be fonts that require greater toner usage compared to other available fonts (e.g., Arial Black vs. Arial).
If a document print request 210 is found to contain replaceable fonts, substitution software then determines whether there is a minimum percentage of replaceable fonts contained in the document, as indicated in block 230. Block 240 illustrates where a document print request is found to have a minimum percentage of replaceable font, substitution software then determines whether a minimum percentage of the replaceable font is of a particular character size. Environmentally friendly fonts are generally undetectable by the unaided eye at character sizes of 12 points or less. Therefore, substitution of fonts larger than 12 points may result in decreased print quality. If all of the foregoing conditions are present, substitution software then determines whether the user has selected a print mode below a predetermined level, such as “High” or “Presentation”, as shown in block 250.
Further referring to FIG. 2, as illustrated in block 270, if any of the aforementioned conditions are not met, substitution software ends the inspection and no font substitution is performed. Alternatively, as shown in block 260, if all of the conditions for font substitution are present, substitution software proceeds to inspecting different levels of the print controls to determine if font substitution is selected or mandated.
Referring to FIG. 3, substitution software proceeds, as shown in block 320, to determine whether font substitution has been selected in “print preferences” (i.e. at the MFD driver level). If it is not, substitution software proceeds to determine if font substitution is mandated by print governance tools, as illustrated in block 330. Print governance tools can be put into effect by a system administrator and can be configured to silently apply font substitution across an entire organization or to only certain groups within an organization (e.g. Finance, Engineering, etc.). Print governance tools may also be put into effect for documents originating from a particular program. Where it is found that font substitution is not mandated in print preferences or by print governance tools, substitution software proceeds to query the user if they would like to reduce toner usage, as shown in block 340. If font substitution is selected or mandated at any of the print control levels, the document print request 210 is automatically altered to include a toner saving font call, as illustrated in box 360. Based on the toner saving font call, font substitution can then be performed either at the MFD driver, as shown in block 370, or at the MFD controller prior to rasterizing the document print request 210, as indicated in block 380. Alternatively, as illustrated in block 350, if font substitution is not selected or mandated in at least one print control level, the document print request is not altered and no font substitution is performed. Thus, the document will be rendered as it was originally requested.
In order to assess toner savings and the effectiveness of the policy guiding font substitution, print governance logs can be configured to produce a report showing the amount of toner saved over a certain period of time. This report can also include potential savings if the policy were structured differently. Additional reports can then be produced showing the number of toner cartridges saved, the cost savings associated with the reduced toner usage, and carbon emission reduction, as just a few examples.

Claims (15)

What is claimed is:
1. A system for automatic toner saving font substitution with respect to a document, comprising:
a data processing subsystem, said data processing subsystem creating a print job request corresponding with said document; and
a memory in which a plurality of instructions, to be executed with said data processing subsystem, are stored, said instructions including:
determining whether said document contains replaceable text based on whether an environmentally friendly version of the text font is available;
upon a determination that said document contains replaceable text, determining whether said document contains a threshold percentage of replaceable text;
upon a determination that said document contains a threshold percentage of replaceable text, determining whether said document contains a threshold percentage of replaceable text of a predetermined character size;
upon a determination that said document contains a threshold percentage of replaceable text of a predetermined character size, determining whether a print quality below predetermined level is selected for said document;
upon a determination that a print quality below a predetermined level has been selected or mandated for said document, determining if a toner saving font substitution is selected or mandated for said print job request, wherein said toner saving font substitution is performed with a toner saving font; and
upon a determination that said toner saving font substitution is selected or mandated for said print job request, altering said print job request so that pursuant to executing said print job request, said toner saving font substitution is performed automatically for said document.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein said toner saving font comprises an environmentally friendly font.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein said toner saving font comprises alternatively available typeface.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein said document further comprises a structure and formatting wherein said structure and formatting are maintained during said font substitution.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein said predetermined character size comprises 12 point or less.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein said toner saving font substitution is mandated by print control governance tools.
7. The system of claim 1 wherein said toner saving font substitution is selectable.
8. A non-transitory computer-usable medium for automatic font substitution, said computer-usable medium embodying computer program code, said computer program code comprising computer executable instructions configured for:
determining whether said document contains replaceable text based on whether an environmentally friendly version of the text font is available;
upon a determination that said document contains replaceable text, determining whether said document contains a threshold percentage of replaceable text;
upon a determination that said document contains a threshold percentage of replaceable text, determining whether said document contains a threshold percentage of replaceable text of a predetermined character size;
upon a determination that said document contains a threshold percentage of replaceable text of a predetermined character size, determining whether a print quality below predetermined level is selected for said document;
upon a determination that a print quality below a predetermined level has been selected or mandated for said document, determining if a toner saving font substitution is selected or mandated for said print job request, wherein said toner saving font substitution is performed with a toner saving font; and
upon a determination that said toner saving font substitution is selected or mandated for said print job request, altering said print job request so that pursuant to executing said print job request, said toner saving font substitution is performed automatically for said document.
9. The non-transitory computer-usable medium of claim 8 wherein said predetermined font size comprises 12 point font size.
10. The non-transitory computer-usable medium of claim 8 wherein said toner saving font comprises an environmentally friendly font.
11. The non-transitory computer-usable medium of claim 8 wherein said toner saving font comprises an alternatively available typeface.
12. The non-transitory computer-usable medium of claim 8 wherein said document further comprises a structure and formatting wherein said structure and formatting are maintained during said font substitution.
13. The non-transitory computer-usable medium of claim 8 wherein said font substitution is mandated by print control governance tools.
14. The non-transitory computer-usable medium of claim 8 wherein said font substitution is selectable.
15. The non-transitory computer-usable medium of claim 8 wherein:
said font substitution is mandated by print control governance tools; and
said font substitution is selectable.
US12/614,117 2009-11-06 2009-11-06 Automatic environmentally friendly font substitution using print control policies and governance logs Expired - Fee Related US9030677B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/614,117 US9030677B2 (en) 2009-11-06 2009-11-06 Automatic environmentally friendly font substitution using print control policies and governance logs

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/614,117 US9030677B2 (en) 2009-11-06 2009-11-06 Automatic environmentally friendly font substitution using print control policies and governance logs

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110109929A1 US20110109929A1 (en) 2011-05-12
US9030677B2 true US9030677B2 (en) 2015-05-12

Family

ID=43973978

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/614,117 Expired - Fee Related US9030677B2 (en) 2009-11-06 2009-11-06 Automatic environmentally friendly font substitution using print control policies and governance logs

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US9030677B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8891125B2 (en) * 2009-08-18 2014-11-18 Xerox Corporation Method and system for automatically reducing page count in a document printing process
JP5359800B2 (en) * 2009-11-13 2013-12-04 ブラザー工業株式会社 Image processing apparatus and program
JP4952821B2 (en) * 2010-05-17 2012-06-13 コニカミノルタビジネステクノロジーズ株式会社 Image forming system, image forming apparatus, image forming method, and image forming program
US9513851B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2016-12-06 Xerox Corporation System and method for user-selectable font substitution to facilitate printing
KR20150108192A (en) 2014-03-17 2015-09-25 삼성전자주식회사 Image forming apparatus having toner saving function and method for printing

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040051893A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2004-03-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Document printing control apparatus and method
US6738149B2 (en) * 1992-01-27 2004-05-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for selecting a preferential font
US20050190408A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Vittitoe Neal F. Font sharpening for image output device
US20060126133A1 (en) * 2004-12-09 2006-06-15 Xerox Corporation System for matching outputs of multiple digital printers
US20060238792A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Color rendering for toner-save printing
US20070039504A1 (en) * 2005-08-19 2007-02-22 Lexmark International, Inc. Method for operating a printer which requests print density approval
US20070171446A1 (en) * 2006-01-20 2007-07-26 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Font downloading apparatus, font downloading program, font downloading method and recording medium
US20080100624A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus and method, and program

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6738149B2 (en) * 1992-01-27 2004-05-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for selecting a preferential font
US20040051893A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2004-03-18 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Document printing control apparatus and method
US20050190408A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Vittitoe Neal F. Font sharpening for image output device
US20060126133A1 (en) * 2004-12-09 2006-06-15 Xerox Corporation System for matching outputs of multiple digital printers
US20060238792A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Color rendering for toner-save printing
US20070039504A1 (en) * 2005-08-19 2007-02-22 Lexmark International, Inc. Method for operating a printer which requests print density approval
US20070171446A1 (en) * 2006-01-20 2007-07-26 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Font downloading apparatus, font downloading program, font downloading method and recording medium
US20080100624A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus and method, and program

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Fox News, Dutch Company's ‘Ecofont’ Saves Printer Ink, Dec. 22, 2008. *
Fox News, Dutch Company's 'Ecofont' Saves Printer Ink, Dec. 22, 2008. *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20110109929A1 (en) 2011-05-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8891125B2 (en) Method and system for automatically reducing page count in a document printing process
US8335012B2 (en) Image forming apparatus, method, and storage medium for selecting different mode to increase a degree of gloss of a print product
US9030677B2 (en) Automatic environmentally friendly font substitution using print control policies and governance logs
US20070121131A1 (en) Systems and methods for printing artwork containing overlapped inks
EP2393043B1 (en) Method and apparatus for dynamic printer performance tuning using bayesian analysis
US20100214614A1 (en) Context-aware printing method and system
US20140233055A1 (en) Method, device and computer readable medium for managing print jobs
US10558411B2 (en) Server apparatus, method of controlling the server apparatus, storage medium, and printing system that determine whether to perform, in the server apparatus, rendering processing on a page of a print job
US11720769B2 (en) Methods and systems for enhancing raster image processing using artificial intelligence
US8279487B2 (en) Color detection during document analysis prior to printing
US9292234B2 (en) Print job correction mechanism
JP2010182300A (en) System and method for memory management in print device
JP2005534105A (en) Printing system that reduces printer usage
JP2009245433A (en) System, method and computer-readable medium for processing page description language
KR20100040578A (en) Image forming apparatus and method for printing thereof
US7793204B2 (en) Copy protecting documents
US10678488B2 (en) Dynamic splitting of portable document format print jobs
US10303408B2 (en) Printing via printing device-independent instructions
US20130194616A1 (en) Raster application instances
US11334302B1 (en) Methods and systems for indicating and replacing missing element(s) in print job files prior to printing
JP5885956B2 (en) Font matching
US8749812B2 (en) Variable data printing method utilizing separate printers for different content
US9165225B2 (en) Program and information processing apparatus
JP4710743B2 (en) Print server, print server program
US10341507B1 (en) Identifying a foreign object in an electronic document

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: XEROX CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KORNDOERFER, STEPHEN KYLE;REEL/FRAME:023484/0195

Effective date: 20091022

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20230512