US9022688B2 - Subsurface induced pore clogging to prevent spill flow - Google Patents
Subsurface induced pore clogging to prevent spill flow Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9022688B2 US9022688B2 US13/129,531 US201013129531A US9022688B2 US 9022688 B2 US9022688 B2 US 9022688B2 US 201013129531 A US201013129531 A US 201013129531A US 9022688 B2 US9022688 B2 US 9022688B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- subsurface
- surfactant
- soil volume
- electrode
- anode electrode
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/08—Reclamation of contaminated soil chemically
Definitions
- the first step is typically containment, even though it may take years for a pollutant to spread.
- Conventional spill containment typically involves digging a trench and filling the trench with clay material. Sometimes surface structures must be demolished or otherwise damaged to form the containment trenches. It might be useful to devise a spill containment response that leverages electro-remediation techniques in order to avoid damage to surface structures while still impeding the spread of harmful pollution.
- methods for method for forming subsurface permeation barriers may generally include providing surfactant material to a subsurface soil volume and acidifying the subsurface soil volume.
- surfactant material may be provided to a cathode module or an anode module, where the cathode module and the anode module have been arranged to provide permeation of the surfactant material within a subsurface soil volume.
- the surfactant material may then be caused to permeate at least a portion of the subsurface soil volume.
- Acidifying material may also be provided to the cathode module and/or the anode module. The acidifying material may then be caused to permeate the portion of the subsurface soil volume.
- pollution containment systems may include multiple electrodes and a subsurface permeation barrier including at least one barrier segment extending between two of the electrodes.
- the barrier segment may include surfactant adhered material.
- FIG. 1 is an illustrative diagram of an example system
- FIG. 2 is an illustration of a portion of the example system of FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 3 is an illustration of a portion of the example system of FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an example process
- FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating another example process
- FIG. 6 is an illustrative diagram of another example system
- FIG. 7 is an illustrative diagram of an example system for implementing at least portions of the processes of FIGS. 4 and 5 ;
- FIG. 8 is an illustration of an example computer program product
- FIG. 9 is an illustration of an example computing device, all arranged in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present disclosure.
- This disclosure relates to methods, apparatus, and systems generally related to the containment of underground pollution sources and more particularly to the in situ formation of underground permeation barriers.
- electro-remediation equipment such as arrangements of electro-remediation electrode structures may be used to generate an in ground permeation barrier with the ability to substantially prevent permeation of subsurface contaminants through the barrier.
- an underground area or region may be permeated with a basic (high pH) and/or buffered surfactant solution and the barrier structure may then be formed in situ by subsequently permeating that region with an aqueous solution, an un-buffered solution and/or an acidic (low pH) solution to cause the surfactant to adhere to soil particles in the region.
- an underground region may be permeated with a buffered and/or acidic solution surfactant solution and the barrier structure may then be formed in situ by subsequently permeating that region with a buffered and/or basic surfactant solution to cause the surfactant to adhere to soil particles in the region.
- Electro-remediation techniques may be employed to effect the movement and/or permeation of chemical compounds, including surfactants, buffer, acid and/or base compounds, within a subsurface soil volume.
- the transport or permeation of such materials through the soil volume may take place by electro-osmosis, electro-migration and/or electrophoresis.
- Soil material may include gravel, sand, silt and/or clay material.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a top down view of an example pollution containment system 100 in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present disclosure.
- System 100 includes a subsurface pollution containment dike or permeation barrier 102 having barrier segments 103 , 104 , 105 and 106 .
- Permeation barrier 102 is associated with electrode modules 108 , 110 , 112 , 114 and 116 that may be, in some implementations, components of an electro-remediation system.
- Electrode modules 108 , 110 , 112 , 114 and 116 may be configured to facilitate permeation of surfactant material within a subsurface soil volume corresponding, at least in part, to barrier 102 .
- Individual barrier segments 103 , 104 , 105 and 106 may be associated with electrode modules pairs 108 / 110 , 110 / 112 , 112 / 114 and 114 / 116 respectively.
- barrier 102 may be formed in situ to control pollution by, for example, inhibiting a pollution plume 118 (shown in FIG. 1 as flowing from right to left) from passing through barrier 102 .
- Barrier 102 may include surfactant adhered soil material formed from surfactant molecules that have undergone sorption to soil particles within the barrier volume. The surfactant adhered soil material of barrier 102 may inhibit the flow of plume 118 by at least partially blocking soil pores within barrier segments 103 , 104 , 105 and/or 106 .
- FIG. 2 illustrates an elevational side view of portions of example system 100 taken along transect A′-A′′ as illustrated in FIG. 1 in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present disclosure.
- electrode module 112 includes an electrode 202 positioned in an electrode reservoir or well 204 .
- electrode module 112 may be part of an electro-remediation system.
- Electrode module 112 may be positioned such that it extends from soil surface 206 downward into subsurface soil 208 such that barrier segment 104 may be formed in a location suitable to at least partially contain the flow of plume 118 .
- FIG. 3 illustrates another elevational side view of portions of example system 100 taken along transect B′-B′′ as illustrated in FIG. 1 in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present disclosure.
- electrode modules 110 , 112 and 114 include respective electrodes 302 , 202 and 306 positioned in corresponding electrode wells 304 , 204 and 308 .
- any one of electrodes 202 , 302 and/or 306 may be a cathode electrode or an anode electrode.
- adjacent electrodes may be the same or different in type, that is, an anode electrode can be adjacent to a cathode electrode, or adjacent to another anode electrode.
- electrode 202 may be a cathode electrode and electrodes 302 and 306 may be anode electrodes.
- electrode 202 may be an anode electrode and electrodes 302 and 306 may be cathode electrodes.
- an electrode such as electrode 202 of electrode module 112
- an electrode may be formed from conductive material.
- an electrode may be formed from metallic materials such as copper, stainless steel, activated titanium, iron etc and/or from non-metallic conductive material such as graphite.
- an electrode may be formed from a conductive metal such as copper that has been coated with another material such as a conductive ceramic.
- an electrode well such as electrode well 204
- Placement of electrode modules 108 , 110 , 112 , 114 and 116 may depend on soil type, soil density and/or pore size, thus, prior to forming barrier 102 , subsurface soil 208 may be tested using known techniques to characterize permeation rates for various materials. Such techniques may be employed to determine the separation between electrodes. Generally, the separation between electrodes may be any distance. In some non-limiting examples, the separation between electrodes may be about 10-30 meters resulting in barrier segments 103 , 104 , 105 and 106 having corresponding lengths of about 10-30 meters and having widths of about 30 cm. The separation between adjacent electrodes may be uniform in distance, or variable in distance.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of an example process 400 according to various implementations of the present disclosure.
- Process 400 may include one or more operations, functions or actions as illustrated by one or more of blocks 402 and/or 404 .
- Process 400 may begin at block 402 .
- surfactant material may be provided to a subsurface soil volume.
- block 402 may involve providing a solution of surfactant material to one or more of electrode modules 108 , 110 , 112 , 114 and 116 and then employing known electro-remediation electrokinetic techniques to cause the surfactant material to permeate a subsurface soil volume located between two or more electrode modules.
- a soil volume corresponding to barrier segment 104 may be permeated by surfactant material by placing a solution of surfactant material in electrode well 204 , adjacent to electrode 202 , and configuring electrodes 202 and 302 as a cathode/anode pair of an electro-remediation system.
- Surfactant material may then be caused to permeate through at least portions of the subsurface soil volume by applying an electric field between the cathode/anode electrode pair.
- a surfactant solution employed at block 402 may include one or more surfactant compounds added to an aqueous solution.
- surfactant may be added to water at a concentration of 1-2 grams per liter although specific types of surfactant compounds and/or concentrations of surfactant compounds employed may depend on specific soil types and/or conditions.
- the surfactant material may be provided to the subsurface soil volume in a basic and/or buffered solution.
- surfactant material may be provided in the form of a pH buffered solution, for example, a solution containing surfactant compounds that has been buffered to a neutral or basic pH using electrolytes such as NaCl, Na 2 CO 3 , etc.
- a solution employed at block 402 may include surfactant compounds dissolved in a 0.003 M Na 2 CO 3 solution.
- the surfactant material employed at block 402 may be provided without a solvent or not in solution. This may be convenient when the subsurface soil volume already contains water sufficient to dissolve the surfactant material or when the subsurface soil volume is already saturated with water.
- the surfactant material may be provided to the subsurface soil volume all at once, in separate portions, or continuously over time.
- various surfactant compounds and/or combinations of surfactant compounds may be employed at block 402 .
- anionic, non-ionic, cationic and/or amphoteric surfactants may be employed.
- surfactants such as, but not limited to, hydroxypropyl beta cyclodextrin (HPCD), polysorbate 80, trimethylammonium bromide, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide, octadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, polyacrylamide, methyl cellulose, dioctyl sulfonate, diphenyl oxide disulfonate, polyoxyalkylated fatty acid ester and/or a sodium dodecyl sulfate may be employed.
- HPCD hydroxypropyl beta cyclodextrin
- polysorbate 80 trimethylammonium bromide
- cetyltrimethylammonium bromide cetyltrimethylam
- surfactant material employed at block 402 may include biodegradable surfactants and/or biosurfactants.
- biosurfactants such as, but not limited to, trehalolipids, rhamnolipids, sophorolipids, glycolipids, diglycosyl diglycerides, surfactin, liposan and/or emulsan may be employed.
- surfactant material employed at block 402 may include coating and/or binding polymeric material such as, but not limited to, polysiloxanes.
- various direct current (DC) voltages may be placed across two or more electrodes. For instance, in various non-limiting examples, voltages of between about 100 volts and about 10,000 volts may be applied to the electrodes, although electrical conditions employed may depend on specific soil types and/or conditions.
- block 402 may be undertaken using pulsed DC voltages. For instance, in a non-limiting example, DC voltage pulses of one second in duration may be applied every ten seconds over a span of three to seven days during which surfactant molecules may be electro-osmotically transferred into the subsurface soil volume.
- Process 400 may continue with the acidification of the subsurface soil volume at block 404 .
- block 404 may involve providing an acidic or low pH solution adjacent to the same electrode employed at block 402 .
- the acidic or low pH solution may be provided adjacent to another electrode.
- block 404 may involve providing an acidic or low pH solution to either electrode well 204 or electrode well 308 .
- the acidic or low pH solution may then be caused to permeate and thereby acidify at least portions of the subsurface soil volume by applying an electric field between the cathode/anode electrode pair. Similar electrical conditions to those previously described may be employed.
- the acidification may be performed all at once, in separate portions, or continuously over time.
- the un-buffered and/or acidic solutions employed at block 404 may include un-buffered and/or acidic surfactant solutions having the same and/or different surfactant compounds employed at block 402 .
- block 402 may involve using a buffered HPCD solution to permeate the subsurface soil volume with HPCD and block 404 may involve using an un-buffered HPCD solution to cause acidification of that subsurface volume resulting in the formation of HPCD adhered soil within that subsurface volume.
- the un-buffered and/or acidic solutions may also be aqueous acidic solutions including hydrochloric, sulfuric, and/or acetic acid solutions to name just a few non-limiting examples.
- block 404 may be implemented before, during or after block 402 .
- block 404 may be undertaken by, for example, causing an acidic solution to permeate a subsurface soil volume resulting in acidification of the soil volume.
- block 402 may be undertaken by causing a high pH or buffered surfactant solution to permeate the same soil volume resulting in the formation of surfactant adhered soil within that subsurface volume.
- block 402 and/or block 404 may be implemented multiple times to form a permeation barrier in accordance with the present disclosure. For example, blocks 402 and 404 may be followed by another iteration of block 402 and/or another iteration of block 404 .
- FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of an example process 500 according to various implementations of the present disclosure.
- Process 500 may include one or more operations, functions or actions as illustrated by one or more of blocks 502 , 504 , 506 and/or 508 .
- Process 500 may begin at block 502 .
- surfactant material may be provided adjacent to at least one of a cathode electrode or an anode electrode.
- block 502 may involve providing a solution of surfactant material, such as a buffered HPCD solution, to one or more of electrode modules 108 , 110 , 112 , 114 and 116 .
- the surfactant material may be caused to permeate at least a portion of a subsurface soil volume. For instance, electro-remediation techniques may be employed to cause HPCD surfactant to permeate a subsurface soil volume located between two or more of electrode modules 108 , 110 , 112 , 114 and 116 .
- acidifying material may be provided adjacent to at least one of the cathode electrode or anode electrode and, at block 508 , the acidifying material may be caused to permeate the portion of the subsurface soil volume permeated by surfactant material at block 504 .
- blocks 506 and 508 may involve providing an un-buffered or acidic solution to one or more of electrode modules 110 , 112 and/or 114 and then causing the un-buffered or acidic solution to permeate the soil volume corresponding to barrier segments 104 and 105 .
- FIG. 6 illustrates portions of another example pollution containment system 600 in accordance with at least some embodiments of the present disclosure.
- System 600 includes four example permeation barriers 602 , 604 , 606 and 607 that may be implemented to contain a pollution plume 605 .
- Barrier 602 may have been formed, employing techniques described herein, using selected electrode modules 608 of an existing electro-remediation field 610 as well as additional electrode modules 612 provided for the purposes of forming barrier 602 .
- example barriers 602 and 607 are not linear in arrangement.
- Example barriers 604 , 606 and 607 of system 600 may have been formed, employing techniques described herein, using selected electrode modules of existing electro-remediation field 610 .
- Barriers 604 and 606 as shown in this example arranged adjacent to each other, may act to provide additional containment of plume 605 .
- barriers 604 and 606 are linear in arrangement.
- example barrier 607 intersects barriers 604 and 606 and employs some electrode modules of field 610 in common with barriers 604 and 606 . While FIG.
- barrier 6 illustrates several example barrier configurations such example configurations are non-limiting and permeation barriers in accordance with the present disclosure may take any configuration having any shape including open configurations such as lines, linear or otherwise, as well as closed configurations such as rectangular configurations, circular configurations, etc.
- additional barrier segments 609 and 611 may be combined with barriers 602 and 604 to provide a closed circular-shaped barrier configuration surrounding plume 605 .
- FIG. 7 illustrates an example system 700 for providing and/or implementing pollution control systems in accordance with at least some implementations of the present disclosure.
- System 700 may include a processing unit 702 operably coupled to a processor 706 that may include processing unit control logic 704 .
- Processing unit 702 may include any arrangement of devices or subsystems configured to undertake the manufacture of systems such as those illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 6 using, for example, processes 400 and/or 500 .
- Processing unit control logic 704 may be configured to provide functional control of any arrangement of devices or subsystems and may include hardware, software or firmware logic and/or any combination thereof although claimed subject matter is not limited to specific types or manifestations of processing unit control logic.
- Processor 706 may be a microprocessor or Central Processing Unit (CPU). In other implementations, processor 706 may be an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), a digital signal processor (DSP), or other integrated formats.
- ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit
- FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array
- DSP digital signal processor
- Processor 706 and processing unit 702 may be configured to communicate by any suitable means, such as, for example, by wired connections or wireless connections.
- FIG. 8 illustrates an example computer program product 800 arranged in accordance with at least some examples of the present disclosure.
- Program product 800 may include a signal bearing medium 802 .
- Signal bearing medium 802 may include one or more instructions 804 that, when executed by, for example, a processor, may provide the functionality described above with respect to FIGS. 4 and 5 .
- control logic 704 and/or processor 706 may undertake one or more of the blocks shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 in response to instructions 804 conveyed by medium 802 .
- signal bearing medium 802 may encompass a computer-readable medium 806 , such as, but not limited to, a hard disk drive, a Compact Disc (CD), a Digital Versatile Disk (DVD), a digital tape, memory, etc.
- signal bearing medium 802 may encompass a recordable medium 808 , such as, but not limited to, memory, read/write (R/W) CDs, R/W DVDs, etc.
- signal bearing medium 802 may encompass a communications medium 810 , such as, but not limited to, a digital and/or an analog communication medium (e.g., a fiber optic cable, a waveguide, a wired communications link, a wireless communication link, etc.).
- program product 800 may be wirelessly conveyed to processing unit 702 by signal bearing medium 802 , where signal bearing medium 802 is conveyed to processing unit 702 by a wireless communications medium 810 (e.g., an wireless communications medium conforming with the 802.11 standard).
- a wireless communications medium 810 e.g., an wireless communications medium conforming with the 802.11 standard.
- FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an example computing device 900 in accordance with various implementations of the present disclosure.
- computing device 900 typically includes one or more processors 910 and system memory 920 .
- a memory bus 930 can be used for communicating between the processor 910 and the system memory 920 .
- system memory 920 can be of any type including but not limited to volatile memory (such as RAM), non-volatile memory (such as ROM, flash memory, etc.) or any combination thereof.
- System memory 920 typically includes an operating system 921 , one or more applications 922 , and program data 924 .
- Application 922 may include instructions 923 that are arranged to perform the functions as described herein including the actions described with respect to the flow charts shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 .
- Program Data 924 may include electro-remediation (ER) data 925 , such as voltages, voltage pulsing schemes etc. that may be useful for implementing instructions 923 .
- ER electro-remediation
- application 922 can be arranged to operate with program data 924 on an operating system 921 such that implementations of the present disclosure, as described herein, may be provided.
- This described basic configuration is illustrated in FIG. 9 by those components within dashed line 901 .
- Computing device 900 can have additional features or functionality, and additional interfaces to facilitate communications between the basic configuration 901 and any required devices and interfaces.
- a bus/interface controller 940 can be used to facilitate communications between the basic configuration 901 and one or more data storage devices 950 via a storage interface bus 941 .
- the data storage devices 950 can be removable storage devices 951 , non-removable storage devices 952 , or a combination thereof. Examples of removable storage and non-removable storage devices include magnetic disk devices such as flexible disk drives and hard-disk drives (HDD), optical disk drives such as compact disk (CD) drives or digital versatile disk (DVD) drives, solid state drives (SSD), and tape drives to name a few.
- Example computer storage media can include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data.
- Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computing device 900 . Any such computer storage media can be part of device 900 .
- Computing device 900 can also include an interface bus 942 for facilitating communication from various interface devices (e.g., output interfaces, peripheral interfaces, and communication interfaces) to the basic configuration 901 via the bus/interface controller 940 .
- Example output interfaces 960 include a graphics processing unit 961 and an audio processing unit 962 , which can be configured to communicate to various external devices such as a display or speakers via one or more A/V ports 963 .
- Example peripheral interfaces 970 include a serial interface controller 971 or a parallel interface controller 972 , which can be configured to communicate with external devices such as input devices (e.g., keyboard, mouse, pen, voice input device, touch input device, etc.) or other peripheral devices (e.g., printer, scanner, etc.) via one or more I/O ports 973 .
- An example communication interface 980 includes a network controller 981 , which can be arranged to facilitate communications with one or more other computing devices 990 over a network communication via one or more communication ports 982 .
- a network communication connection is one example of a communication media.
- Communication media may typically be embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media.
- a “modulated data signal” can be a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal.
- communication media can include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared (IR) and other wireless media.
- RF radio frequency
- IR infrared
- the term computer readable media as used herein can include both storage media and communication media.
- Computing device 900 can be implemented as a portion of a small-form factor portable (or mobile) electronic device such as a cell phone, smart phone, a personal data assistant (PDA), a personal media player device, a wireless web-watch device, a personal headset device, an application specific device, or a hybrid device that include any of the above functions.
- a small-form factor portable (or mobile) electronic device such as a cell phone, smart phone, a personal data assistant (PDA), a personal media player device, a wireless web-watch device, a personal headset device, an application specific device, or a hybrid device that include any of the above functions.
- Computing device 900 can also be implemented as a personal computer including both laptop computer and non-laptop computer configurations or implemented in a workstation or a server configuration.
- references made in this disclosure to the term “responsive to” or “in response to” are not limited to responsiveness to only a particular feature and/or structure.
- a feature may also be responsive to another feature and/or structure and also be located within that feature and/or structure.
- terms or phrases such as “coupled” or “responsive” or “in response to” or “in communication with”, etc. are used herein or in the claims that follow, these terms should be interpreted broadly.
- the phrase “coupled to” may refer to being communicatively, electrically and/or operatively coupled as appropriate for the context in which the phrase is used.
- Examples of a signal bearing medium include, but are not limited to, the following: a recordable type medium such as a flexible disk, a hard disk drive (HDD), a Compact Disc (CD), a Digital Versatile Disk (DVD), a digital tape, a computer memory, etc.; and a transmission type medium such as a digital and/or an analog communication medium (e.g., a fiber optic cable, a waveguide, a wired communications link, a wireless communication link, etc.).
- a recordable type medium such as a flexible disk, a hard disk drive (HDD), a Compact Disc (CD), a Digital Versatile Disk (DVD), a digital tape, a computer memory, etc.
- a transmission type medium such as a digital and/or an analog communication medium (e.g., a fiber optic cable, a waveguide, a wired communications link, a wireless communication link, etc.).
- a typical data processing system generally includes one or more of a system unit housing, a video display device, a memory such as volatile and non-volatile memory, processors such as microprocessors and digital signal processors, computational entities such as operating systems, drivers, graphical user interfaces, and applications programs, one or more interaction devices, such as a touch pad or screen, and/or control systems including feedback loops and control motors (e.g., feedback for sensing position and/or velocity; control motors for moving and/or adjusting components and/or quantities).
- a typical data processing system may be implemented utilizing any suitable commercially available components, such as those typically found in data computing/communication and/or network computing/communication systems.
- any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected”, or “operably coupled”, to each other to achieve the desired functionality, and any two components capable of being so associated can also be viewed as being “operably couplable”, to each other to achieve the desired functionality.
- operably couplable include but are not limited to physically mateable and/or physically interacting components and/or wirelessly interactable and/or wirelessly interacting components and/or logically interacting and/or logically interactable components.
- the term “optimize” may include maximization and/or minimization.
- the term “minimization” and/or the like as used herein may include a global minimum, a local minimum, an approximate global minimum, and/or an approximate local minimum.
- the term “maximization” and/or the like as used herein may include a global maximum, a local maximum, an approximate global maximum, and/or an approximate local maximum.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
- Water Treatment By Electricity Or Magnetism (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (9)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2010/058580 WO2012074525A1 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2010-12-01 | Subsurface induced pore clogging to prevent spill flow |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20120141208A1 US20120141208A1 (en) | 2012-06-07 |
| US9022688B2 true US9022688B2 (en) | 2015-05-05 |
Family
ID=46162372
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/129,531 Expired - Fee Related US9022688B2 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2010-12-01 | Subsurface induced pore clogging to prevent spill flow |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US9022688B2 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN103221157B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2012074525A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107418592A (en) * | 2017-08-15 | 2017-12-01 | 安徽中铁工程材料科技有限公司 | A kind of macromolecule reaction type soil Anti-lost agent and preparation method thereof |
| CN110918627B (en) * | 2019-11-15 | 2021-03-23 | 中国科学院南京土壤研究所 | Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and chromium combined pollution soil synergistic leacheate in electroplating industry and application thereof |
Citations (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4651824A (en) | 1985-06-04 | 1987-03-24 | Gradle Donovan B | Controlled placement of underground fluids |
| JPH0247748A (en) | 1988-08-08 | 1990-02-16 | Nec Corp | Data processing system |
| US5074986A (en) | 1989-06-06 | 1991-12-24 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Electroosmosis techniques for removing materials from soil |
| US5240570A (en) | 1992-01-29 | 1993-08-31 | General Electric Company | Surfactant augmented in-situ removal of PCBs from soil by electroosmosis |
| US5476992A (en) | 1993-07-02 | 1995-12-19 | Monsanto Company | In-situ remediation of contaminated heterogeneous soils |
| CN2222913Y (en) | 1994-12-26 | 1996-03-20 | 中国气象科学研究院 | Soil moisture meter |
| US5520482A (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1996-05-28 | Rutgerswerke Aktiengesellschaft | Barrier to prevent spread of soil contamination |
| WO1998002600A1 (en) | 1996-07-17 | 1998-01-22 | Donat Anatolievich Isakov | Method for cleaning capillary and porous media |
| US5725752A (en) * | 1993-10-22 | 1998-03-10 | Ea Technology Ltd. | Electrokinetic decontamination of land |
| DE19924531A1 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2000-11-30 | Tuhh Tech Gmbh | Process and assembly to decontaminate soil from metals using single reactor vessel, imparting electrical current to suspension of solids to while mixing or agitating, adding a regeneratable extraction agent,etc. |
| US6193867B1 (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 2001-02-27 | Lynntech, Inc. | Management of soil conditions and electroosmotic flow in electrokinetic remediation |
| US6326187B1 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2001-12-04 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Method to remediate soil using a surfactant of an alkenylsuccinic anhydride or acid reacted an amine acid or salt of an amine acid |
| US6576116B2 (en) | 1997-06-13 | 2003-06-10 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Hybrid joule heating/electro-osmosis process for extracting contaminants from soil layers |
| US7060136B1 (en) * | 2002-03-28 | 2006-06-13 | Nalco Company | Method of monitoring membrane cleaning processes |
| US20080032383A1 (en) * | 2003-03-26 | 2008-02-07 | Kyu-Jin Yum | Microbial materials for degradation of oils and toxic chemicals |
| US20100209195A1 (en) * | 2001-11-06 | 2010-08-19 | Bor-Jier Shiau | In-situ surfactant and chemical oxidant flushing for complete remediation of contaminants and methods of using same |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3178581B2 (en) * | 1995-08-04 | 2001-06-18 | 株式会社大林組 | How to clean contaminated soil |
-
2010
- 2010-12-01 WO PCT/US2010/058580 patent/WO2012074525A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-12-01 US US13/129,531 patent/US9022688B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-01 CN CN201080070221.6A patent/CN103221157B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4651824A (en) | 1985-06-04 | 1987-03-24 | Gradle Donovan B | Controlled placement of underground fluids |
| JPH0247748A (en) | 1988-08-08 | 1990-02-16 | Nec Corp | Data processing system |
| US5074986A (en) | 1989-06-06 | 1991-12-24 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Electroosmosis techniques for removing materials from soil |
| US5240570A (en) | 1992-01-29 | 1993-08-31 | General Electric Company | Surfactant augmented in-situ removal of PCBs from soil by electroosmosis |
| US5476992A (en) | 1993-07-02 | 1995-12-19 | Monsanto Company | In-situ remediation of contaminated heterogeneous soils |
| CN1126450A (en) | 1993-07-02 | 1996-07-10 | 孟山都公司 | In-situ remediation of contaminated heterogeneous soils |
| US5725752A (en) * | 1993-10-22 | 1998-03-10 | Ea Technology Ltd. | Electrokinetic decontamination of land |
| US5520482A (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1996-05-28 | Rutgerswerke Aktiengesellschaft | Barrier to prevent spread of soil contamination |
| CN2222913Y (en) | 1994-12-26 | 1996-03-20 | 中国气象科学研究院 | Soil moisture meter |
| WO1998002600A1 (en) | 1996-07-17 | 1998-01-22 | Donat Anatolievich Isakov | Method for cleaning capillary and porous media |
| US6576116B2 (en) | 1997-06-13 | 2003-06-10 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Hybrid joule heating/electro-osmosis process for extracting contaminants from soil layers |
| US6193867B1 (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 2001-02-27 | Lynntech, Inc. | Management of soil conditions and electroosmotic flow in electrokinetic remediation |
| DE19924531A1 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2000-11-30 | Tuhh Tech Gmbh | Process and assembly to decontaminate soil from metals using single reactor vessel, imparting electrical current to suspension of solids to while mixing or agitating, adding a regeneratable extraction agent,etc. |
| US6326187B1 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2001-12-04 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Method to remediate soil using a surfactant of an alkenylsuccinic anhydride or acid reacted an amine acid or salt of an amine acid |
| US20100209195A1 (en) * | 2001-11-06 | 2010-08-19 | Bor-Jier Shiau | In-situ surfactant and chemical oxidant flushing for complete remediation of contaminants and methods of using same |
| US7060136B1 (en) * | 2002-03-28 | 2006-06-13 | Nalco Company | Method of monitoring membrane cleaning processes |
| US20080032383A1 (en) * | 2003-03-26 | 2008-02-07 | Kyu-Jin Yum | Microbial materials for degradation of oils and toxic chemicals |
Non-Patent Citations (17)
| Title |
|---|
| Ahmad, H., et al., Waste containment by soil stabilization using electro-kinetic grouting method, International Containment Remediation Technology Conference, Orlando, Florida accessed on May 4, 2011 via http://www.containment.fsu.edu/cd/content/pdf/245.pdf. |
| Australian Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Mar. 10, 2011, pp. 1-14, Australia. |
| Faulkner, D.W.S, et al., Electrokinetic generation of reactive iron-rich barriers in wet sediments: implications for contaminated land management, Mineralogical Magazine, Oct. 2005, pp. 749-757, vol. 69, No. 5, The Mineralogical Society. |
| Foreign Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2014 for Chinese Application No. 2010870221, "Subsurface induced pore clogging to prevent spill flow", with English Abstract. |
| Gardner, Kevin, Electrochemical remediation and stabilization of contaminated sediments, A Final Report Submitted to the NOAA/UNH Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology (CICEET), Dec. 8, 2005, pp. 1-34, Durham, New Hampshire. |
| Ho, Sa V., et al., The lasagna technology for in situ soil remediation. 1. Small Field Test, Environmental Science & Technology, 1999, pp. 1086-1091, vol. 33, No. 7, American Chemical Society. |
| Kahn, J., Underground barrier: new technique to stop spread of contaminants from hazardous waste sites, Apr. 17, 1995 accessed online on Oct. 9, 2012 via http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/underground-barrier.html. |
| Ko, Seok-oh, et al., Cyclodextrin-enhanced electrokinetic removal of phenanthrene from a model clay soil, Environmental Science & Technology, Mar. 8, 2000, pp. 1535-1541, vol. 34, No. 8, American Chemical Society. |
| Ko, Seok-oh, et al., Effects of solution chemistry on the partitioning of phenanthrene to sorbed surfactants, Environmental Science & Technology, Sep. 30, 1998, pp. 3542-3548, vol. 32, No. 22, American Chemical Society. |
| Ko, Seok-oh, et al., Partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds to hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin; experimental studies and model predictions for surfactant-enhanced remediation applications, Environmental Science & Technology, Jul. 3, 1999, pp. 2765-2770, vol. 33, No. 16, American Chemical Society. |
| Ko, Seok-oh, et al., Partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds to hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin; experimental studies and model predictions for surfactant-enhanced remediation applications, Environmental Science & Technology, Jul. 3, 1999, pp. 2765-2770, vol. 33, No. 16, American Chemical Society. |
| Ko, Seok-oh, et al., Partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds to sorbed surfactants. 1. Experimental Studies, Environmental Science & Technology, Aug. 12, 1998, pp. 2769-2775, vol. 32, No. 18, American Chemical Society. |
| Ko, Seok-oh, et al., Partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds to sorbed surfactants. 2. Model development/predictions for surfactant-enhanced remediation applications, Environmental Science & Technology, Aug. 12, 1998, pp. 2776-2781, vol. 32, No. 18, American Chemical Society. |
| Li, Z, et al, Electroremediation: Removal of heavy metals from soils by using cation selective membrane, Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 394-397. |
| Page, Mary M. and Christopher L. Page, Electroremediation of contaminated soils, Journal of Environmental Engineering, Mar. 2002, pp. 208-219, vol. 128, No. 3, accessed via http://www.aseanenvironment.info/Abstract/41013518.pdf on May 4, 2011. |
| Rahman, Pattanathu K.S.M and Edward Gakpe, Production, characterisation and applications of biosurfactants-review, Biotechnology, 2008, pp. 360-370, vol. 7, No. 2, Asian Network for Scientific Information. |
| Rodriguez-Cruz, M.S., et al., Modification of clay barriers with a cationic surfactant to improve the retention of pesticides in soils, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Jan. 10, 2007, pp. 363-372, vol. 139, No. 2, Elsevier B.V. |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20120141208A1 (en) | 2012-06-07 |
| WO2012074525A1 (en) | 2012-06-07 |
| CN103221157A (en) | 2013-07-24 |
| CN103221157B (en) | 2015-04-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Haroun et al. | Smart nano-EOR process for Abu Dhabi carbonate reservoirs | |
| Ko et al. | The “shadow effect” in colloid transport and deposition dynamics in granular porous media: measurements and mechanisms | |
| Ayatollahi et al. | Nanotechnology-assisted EOR techniques: New solutions to old challenges | |
| Sun et al. | Fouling characteristics and electrochemical recovery of carbon nanotube membranes | |
| Vinogradov et al. | Measurement of streaming potential coupling coefficient in sandstones saturated with natural and artificial brines at high salinity | |
| Ghosh et al. | The effect of DC electrical potential on enhancing sandstone reservoir permeability and oil recovery | |
| Høgnesen et al. | Scaling spontaneous imbibition of aqueous surfactant solution into preferential oil-wet carbonates | |
| Erlandsson et al. | Electrolysis‐reducing electrodes for electrokinetic devices | |
| AU2007352367A1 (en) | Electrolytic system for enhanced release and deposition of sub-surface components | |
| US9022688B2 (en) | Subsurface induced pore clogging to prevent spill flow | |
| Khezrnejad et al. | Water enhancement using nanoparticles in water alternating gas (WAG) micromodel experiments | |
| Luan et al. | An electro-hydrodynamics-based model for the ionic conductivity of solid-state nanopores during DNA translocation | |
| Yin et al. | Steady-state approximate freshwater–saltwater interface in a two-horizontal-well scavenging system | |
| US6193867B1 (en) | Management of soil conditions and electroosmotic flow in electrokinetic remediation | |
| Xu et al. | Removal of near-wellbore formation damage by ultrasonic stimulation | |
| Kadhum et al. | Propagation of carbon nanotube hybrids through porous media for advancing oilfield technology | |
| Qiao | Control of electroosmotic flow by polymer coating: effects of the electrical double layer | |
| US11608723B2 (en) | Stimulated water injection processes for injectivity improvement | |
| Ansari et al. | Increasing depth of penetration by electrokinetic driven low-concentration acid IOR in Abu Dhabi tight carbonate reservoirs | |
| Kapuralage et al. | Stirring Without Stirrers: Polymer Fouling‐Driven Mass Transport Unlocks Order‐of‐Magnitude Gain in Electrochemiluminescence | |
| Koochakzadeh et al. | Experimental evaluation of enhanced oil recovery by pH-sensitive microgels in carbonate formations | |
| Ansari et al. | Electrokinetics assisted surfactant-EOR to optimize mature waterfloods in AbuDhabi carbonate reservoirs | |
| Quirino | A cationic β‐cyclodextrin as a dynamic coating for the separation of proteins in capillary electrophoresis | |
| Omran et al. | Screening of nanoparticles with considering the pore structure and initial oil connectivity effects | |
| Collini et al. | Zeta Potential of the Crude Oil-Brine Interface and Implications for Controlled Salinity Waterflooding |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC, DELAWARE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARDENT RESEARCH CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025481/0634 Effective date: 20101124 Owner name: ARDENT RESEARCH CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KRUGLICK, EZEKIEL;REEL/FRAME:025481/0644 Effective date: 20101124 |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CRESTLINE DIRECT FINANCE, L.P., TEXAS Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC;REEL/FRAME:048373/0217 Effective date: 20181228 |
|
| LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
| FP | Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20190505 |