US8980576B2 - Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO - Google Patents

Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8980576B2
US8980576B2 US14/018,670 US201314018670A US8980576B2 US 8980576 B2 US8980576 B2 US 8980576B2 US 201314018670 A US201314018670 A US 201314018670A US 8980576 B2 US8980576 B2 US 8980576B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
clostridium
fermentation
syngas
concentration
atcc
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US14/018,670
Other versions
US20140080117A1 (en
Inventor
David Scott Snyder
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Jupeng Bio HK Ltd
Original Assignee
Ineos Bio SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US14/018,670 priority Critical patent/US8980576B2/en
Application filed by Ineos Bio SA filed Critical Ineos Bio SA
Assigned to INEOS BIO SA reassignment INEOS BIO SA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SNYDER, DAVID SCOTT
Priority to ES13770769.1T priority patent/ES2661517T3/en
Priority to EP13770769.1A priority patent/EP2898079B1/en
Priority to CN201380060090.7A priority patent/CN104955954B/en
Priority to PCT/US2013/060239 priority patent/WO2014047083A1/en
Priority to PL13770769T priority patent/PL2898079T3/en
Publication of US20140080117A1 publication Critical patent/US20140080117A1/en
Priority to IN2134DEN2015 priority patent/IN2015DN02134A/en
Publication of US8980576B2 publication Critical patent/US8980576B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Assigned to JUPENG BIO SA reassignment JUPENG BIO SA CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INEOS BIO SA
Assigned to JUPENG BIO (HK) LIMITED reassignment JUPENG BIO (HK) LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JUPENG BIO SA
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P7/00Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
    • C12P7/02Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
    • C12P7/04Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
    • C12P7/06Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/02Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable microorganisms
    • C12Q1/04Determining presence or kind of microorganism; Use of selective media for testing antibiotics or bacteriocides; Compositions containing a chemical indicator therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P7/00Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
    • C12P7/02Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
    • C12P7/04Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
    • C12P7/06Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage
    • C12P7/065Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage with microorganisms other than yeasts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P7/00Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
    • C12P7/02Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
    • C12P7/04Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
    • C12P7/06Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage
    • C12P7/08Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage produced as by-product or from waste or cellulosic material substrate
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q3/00Condition responsive control processes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/31Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/84Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving inorganic compounds or pH
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/10Biofuels, e.g. bio-diesel
    • Y02E50/17

Definitions

  • a process for fermenting CO-containing gaseous substrates More specifically, the process includes determining CO concentration in a first fermentation medium in a first fermentation zone. If the CO concentration in the first fermentation medium has a value of about 0.12 ⁇ M or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas provided to the first fermentation zone is provided to one or more subsequent fermentation zones in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentation zone of about 0.12 ⁇ M or less.
  • Acetogenic microorganisms can produce ethanol from carbon monoxide (CO) through fermentation of gaseous substrates. Fermentations using anaerobic microorganisms from the genus Clostridium produce ethanol and other useful products.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,173,429 describes Clostridium ljungdahlii ATCC No. 49587, an anaerobic microorganism that produces ethanol and acetate from synthesis gas.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,807,722 describes a method and apparatus for converting waste gases into organic acids and alcohols using Clostridium ljungdahlii ATCC No. 55380.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,136,577 describes a method and apparatus for converting waste gases into ethanol using Clostridium ljungdahlii ATCC No. 55988 and 55989.
  • Acetogenic microorganisms may be grown to produce ethanol from carbon monoxide.
  • the growth process may involve culturing the acetogenic bacteria on increasing amounts of CO over time.
  • Acetogenic microorganisms may be grown to produce ethanol from syngas that includes carbon monoxide.
  • the growth process may involve culturing the acetogenic bacteria on increasing amounts of CO over time. High or low levels of CO in the fermentation may result in lower productivity
  • a process is effective for maintaining high ethanol productivity levels during syngas fermentation.
  • the process is effective for decreasing lag times and maintaining a culture in steady state by controlling CO concentration and minimizing effects of high or low CO concentrations during fermentation.
  • a syngas fermentation process includes providing syngas to a first fermentation zone, fermenting the syngas, and determining a CO concentration in a fermentation medium in the first fermentation zone.
  • the CO concentration in fermentation medium in the first fermentation zone has a value of about 0.12 ⁇ M or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being provided to the first fermentation zone is provided to one or more subsequent fermentation zones in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentation zone of about 0.12 ⁇ M or less.
  • a syngas fermentation process includes providing syngas to a first fermentor, fermenting the syngas, and determining a CO concentration in a fermentation medium in the first fermentor.
  • the CO concentration in fermentation medium in the first fermentor has a value of about 0.12 ⁇ M or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being provided to the first fermentor is provided to one or more subsequent fermentors in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentor of about 0.12 ⁇ M or less.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a fermentor with multiple fermentation zones.
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a series of fermentors.
  • Syngas fermentations conducted in bioreactors with medium and acetogenic bacteria as described herein are effective for providing conversions of CO in syngas into alcohols and other products.
  • Control of CO concentrations in the fermentation through determining CO concentration in the fermentation medium is effective for providing high productivity levels.
  • productivity may be expressed as STY (space time yield expressed as g ethanol/(L ⁇ day).
  • the process is effective for providing a STY (space time yield) of at least about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day).
  • Possible STY values include about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 200 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 160 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 120 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 80 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 20 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 140 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 20 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 100 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 40 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 140 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), and in another aspect, about 40 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 100 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day).
  • any amount refers to the variation in that amount encountered in real world conditions, e.g., in the lab, pilot plant, or production facility.
  • an amount of an ingredient or measurement employed in a mixture or quantity when modified by “about” includes the variation and degree of care typically employed in measuring in an experimental condition in production plant or lab.
  • the amount of a component of a product when modified by “about” includes the variation between batches in a multiple experiments in the plant or lab and the variation inherent in the analytical method. Whether or not modified by “about,” the amounts include equivalents to those amounts. Any quantity stated herein and modified by “about” can also be employed in the present disclosure as the amount not modified by “about”.
  • syngas or “synthesis gas” means synthesis gas which is the name given to a gas mixture that contains varying amounts of carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
  • Examples of production methods include steam reforming of natural gas or hydrocarbons to produce hydrogen, the gasification of coal and in some types of waste-to-energy gasification facilities. The name comes from their use as intermediates in creating synthetic natural gas (SNG) and for producing ammonia or methanol. Syngas is combustible and is often used as a fuel source or as an intermediate for the production of other chemicals.
  • SNG synthetic natural gas
  • the term “fermentor” includes a fermentation device consisting of one or more vessels and/or towers or piping arrangements, which includes the Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR), Immobilized Cell Reactor (ICR), Trickle Bed Reactor (TBR), Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR), Bubble Column, Gas Lift Fermenter, Membrane Reactor such as Hollow Fibre Membrane Bioreactor (HFMBR), Static Mixer, or other vessel or other device suitable for gas-liquid contact.
  • CSTR Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor
  • ICR Immobilized Cell Reactor
  • TBR Trickle Bed Reactor
  • MBBR Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor
  • Bubble Column Gas Lift Fermenter
  • Membrane Reactor such as Hollow Fibre Membrane Bioreactor (HFMBR), Static Mixer, or other vessel or other device suitable for gas-liquid contact.
  • fermentation refers to conversion of CO to alcohol.
  • cell density means mass of microorganism cells per unit volume of fermentation broth, for example, grams/liter.
  • the term “increasing the efficiency”, “increased efficiency” and the like, when used in relation to a fermentation process includes increasing one or more of the rate of growth of microorganisms in the fermentation, the volume or mass of desired product (such as alcohols) produced per volume or mass of substrate (such as carbon monoxide) consumed, the rate of production or level of production of the desired product, and the relative proportion of the desired product produced compared with other by-products of fermentation.
  • desired product such as alcohols
  • substrate such as carbon monoxide
  • Syngas may be provided from any know source.
  • syngas may be sourced from gasification of carbonaceous materials. Gasification involves partial combustion of biomass in a restricted supply of oxygen. The resultant gas mainly includes CO and H 2 .
  • syngas will contain at least about 10 mole % CO, in one aspect, at least about 20 mole %, in one aspect, about 10 to about 100 mole %, in another aspect, about 20 to about 100 mole % CO, in another aspect, about 30 to about 90 mole % CO, in another aspect, about 40 to about 80 mole % CO, and in another aspect, about 50 to about 70 mole % CO.
  • syngas may be provided directly to a fermentation process or may be further modified to include an appropriate H 2 to CO molar ratio.
  • syngas provided to the fermentor has an H 2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.2 or more, in another aspect, about 0.25 or more, and in another aspect, about 0.5 or more.
  • syngas provided to the fermentor may include about 40 mole percent or more CO plus H 2 and about 30 mole percent or less CO, in another aspect, about 50 mole percent or more CO plus H 2 and about 35 mole percent or less CO, and in another aspect, about 80 mole percent or more CO plus H 2 and about 20 mole percent or less CO.
  • the process has applicability to supporting the production of alcohol from gaseous substrates such as high volume CO-containing industrial flue gases.
  • a gas that includes CO is derived from carbon containing waste, for example, industrial waste gases or from the gasification of other wastes.
  • the processes represent effective processes for capturing carbon that would otherwise be exhausted into the environment.
  • industrial flue gases include gases produced during ferrous metal products manufacturing, non-ferrous products manufacturing, petroleum refining processes, gasification of coal, gasification of biomass, electric power production, carbon black production, ammonia production, methanol production and coke manufacturing.
  • a gas separator is configured to substantially separate at least one portion of the gas stream, wherein the portion includes one or more components.
  • the gas separator may separate CO 2 from a gas stream comprising the following components: CO, CO 2 , H 2 , wherein the CO 2 may be passed to a CO 2 remover and the remainder of the gas stream (comprising CO and H 2 ) may be passed to a bioreactor. Any gas separator known in the art may be utilized.
  • syngas provided to the fermentor will have about 10 mole % or less CO 2 , in another aspect, about 1 mole % or less CO 2 , and in another aspect, about 0.1 mole % or less CO 2 .
  • Certain gas streams may include a high concentration of CO and low concentrations of H 2 .
  • the concentration of H 2 in the substrate stream may be increased before the stream is passed to the bioreactor.
  • streams from two or more sources can be combined and/or blended to produce a desirable and/or optimized substrate stream.
  • a stream comprising a high concentration of CO such as the exhaust from a steel mill converter
  • a stream comprising high concentrations of H 2 such as the off-gas from a steel mill coke oven.
  • the gaseous CO-containing substrate may also be desirable to treat it to remove any undesired impurities, such as dust particles before introducing it to the fermentation.
  • the gaseous substrate may be filtered or scrubbed using known methods.
  • a fermentor design may include different fermentation zones in the same fermentor.
  • a large fermentor or a bubble column type reactor may include different fermentation zones.
  • Descriptions of fermentor designs are described in U.S. Ser. Nos. 13/471,827 and 13/471,858, both filed May 15, 2012, and U.S. Ser. No. 13/473,167, filed May 16, 2012, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • a fermentor 100 includes multiple fermentation zones 200 .
  • the fermentor 100 includes a first fermentation zone 200 and four additional fermentations zones 201 , 202 , 203 , 204 .
  • the fermentor 100 may include two or more fermentation zones, and may includes from two to ten fermentation zones.
  • a fermentation zone is defined as space above a gas inlet/sparger 122 and below the next gas/inlet sparger 122 , or above a gas inlet/sparger 122 and the top of the fermentor 100 .
  • Medium, microbes and gases 305 in the fermentor 100 may flow between fermentation zones.
  • the fermentor 100 may also include pumps 124 . The pumps 124 may be used for product 222 removal and for removal of samples 210 .
  • syngas enters the fermentor 100 through a syngas supply 120 .
  • the syngas supply 120 provides syngas to the gas inlet/spargers 122 .
  • Medium and nutrients may be supplied through medium/nutrient supply 250 .
  • Off-gas may exit the fermentor 100 through an off-gas port 270 .
  • Off-gas may be provided to a vent-gas boiler.
  • the vent-gas boiler may be utilized to provide steam for energy production.
  • the fermentation process is started by addition of medium to the reactor vessel.
  • medium compositions are described in U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/650,098 and 61/650,093, filed May 22, 2012, and in U.S. Pat. No. 7,285,402, filed Jul. 23, 2001, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • the medium may be sterilized to remove undesirable microorganisms and the reactor is inoculated with the desired microorganisms. Sterilization may not always be required.
  • the microorganisms utilized include acetogenic bacteria.
  • useful acetogenic bacteria include those of the genus Clostridium , such as strains of Clostridium ljungdahlii , including those described in WO 2000/68407, EP 117309, U.S. Pat. Nos.
  • Clostridium carboxidivorans ATCC PTA-7827
  • Other suitable microorganisms includes those of the genus Moorella , including Moorella sp. HUC22-1, and those of the genus Carboxydothermus . Each of these references is incorporated herein by reference. Mixed cultures of two or more microorganisms may be used.
  • Some examples of useful bacteria include Acetogenium kivui, Acetoanaerobium noterae, Acetobacterium woodii, Alkalibaculum bacchi CP11 (ATCC BAA-1772), Blautia producta, Butyribacterium methylotrophicum, Caldanaerobacter subterraneous, Caldanaerobacter subterraneous pacificus, Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans, Clostridium aceticum, Clostridium acetobutylicum, Clostridium acetobutylicum P262 (DSM 19630 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 19630 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 10061 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 23693 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 24138 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium carboxidivorans P7 (ATCC
  • an initial feed gas supply rate is established effective for supplying the initial population of microorganisms.
  • Effluent gas is analyzed to determine the content of the effluent gas. Results of gas analysis are used to control feed gas rates.
  • the process provides a CO concentration to initial cell density ratio of about 0.5 to about 0.9, in another aspect, about 0.6 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.5 to about 0.7, and in another aspect, about 0.5 to about 0.6.
  • liquid phase and cellular material is withdrawn from the reactor and replenished with medium.
  • the process is effective for increasing cell density to about 2.0 grams/liter or more, in another aspect, about 2 to about 25 grams/liter, in another aspect, about 2 to about 20 grams/liter, in another aspect, about 2 to about 10 grams/liter, in another aspect, about 2 to about 8 grams/liter, in another aspect, about 3 to about 6 grams/liter, and in another aspect, about 4 to about 5 grams/liter.
  • the process is effective for maintaining a CO concentration ( ⁇ M) to cell density (grams/liter) ratio of about 0.001 to about 1.0.
  • a CO concentration to cell density ratio of about 0.01 to about 0.9, in another aspect, about 0.01 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.02 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.02 to about 0.75, in another aspect, about 0.03 to about 0.75, and in another aspect, about 0.03 to about 0.5.
  • the process is effective for maintaining a CO concentration ( ⁇ M) to cell density (grams/liter) ratio of about 0.001 to about 1.0.
  • a CO concentration to cell density ratio of about 0.01 to about 0.9, in another aspect, about 0.01 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.02 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.02 to about 0.75, in another aspect, about 0.03 to about 0.75, and in another aspect, about 0.03 to about 0.5.
  • syngas is supplied to a first fermentation zone 200 . If a CO concentration in the first fermentation zone 200 is about 0.12 ⁇ M or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being supplied to the first fermentation zone 200 is provided to one or more subsequent fermentation zones through gas inlet/spargers 122 .
  • the portion of syngas provided to the one or more subsequent fermentation zones provides a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentation zone of about 0.12 ⁇ M or less, in another aspect, about 0.10 ⁇ M or less, in another aspect, about 0.08 ⁇ M or less, in another aspect, about 0.06 ⁇ M or less, in another aspect, about 0.04 ⁇ M or less, and in another aspect, about 0.02 ⁇ M or less.
  • Syngas may be supplied to each fermentation zone one at a time or may be supplied to one or more fermentation zones simultaneously.
  • syngas entering a fermentation zone will have about 20 mole % or more CO, in another aspect, about 30 mole % or more, in another aspect, about 40 mole % or more, and in another aspect, about 50 mole % or more.
  • syngas supplied to any fermentation zone will have an H 2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.2 or more, and from about 4 mole % to about 99.9 mole % CO.
  • syngas entering any subsequent fermentation zone will have an H 2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.5 or more, in another aspect, about 1.0 or more, and in another aspect, about 3.5 or more.
  • FIG. 2 Another aspect of a fermentor design is shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the design includes a first fermentor 100 connected in series to subsequent fermentors, such as for example, second fermentor 102 , third fermentor 104 , and fourth fermentor 106 .
  • the design may include any number of subsequent fermentors from 1 to about 10 (for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 subsequent fermentors).
  • syngas enters the first fermentor 100 through a gas inlet/sparger 120 .
  • Dispersion of the syngas and further mixing is accomplished with at least one gas dispersion impeller 225 and at least one mixing impeller 220 which are coupled to a drive shaft 200 .
  • Syngas 150 may be conveyed to one or more subsequent bioreactors. Syngas 150 may be supplied to each subsequent fermentor one at a time in series, or may be supplied to one or more subsequent fermentors simultaneously in parallel. In this aspect, the syngas entering any subsequent fermentor will have about 20 mole % or more CO, in another aspect, about 30 mole % or more, in another aspect, about 40 mole % or more, and in another aspect, about 50 mole % or more.
  • syngas supplied to any subsequent fermentor will have an H 2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.2 or more, and from about 4 mole % to about 99.9 mole % CO.
  • syngas entering any subsequent fermentor will have an H 2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.5 or more, in another aspect, about 1.0 or more, and in another aspect, about 3.5 or more.
  • off-gas from a first or any subsequent fermentor may be provided to a vent-gas boiler.
  • the vent-gas boiler may be utilized to provide steam for energy production.
  • Certain ratios of H 2 to CO and/or CO 2 to CO are effective for providing enhanced STY.
  • the process is effective for providing a STY (space time yield) of about 1 gram or more total alcohol/(L ⁇ day).
  • the process is effective for providing a providing a STY of at least about 10 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day).
  • Possible STY values include about 10 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 300 g/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 200 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 160 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 120 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 80 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 20 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 140 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 20 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 100 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 40 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 140 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day), and in another aspect, about 40 g total alcohol/(L ⁇ day) to about 100 g total
  • total alcohol includes ethanol, butanol, propanol and methanol. In one aspect, the total alcohol may include at least about 80 weight percent or more ethanol. In another aspect, total alcohol may include at least about 25 weight percent or less butanol.
  • productivity may be expressed as STY (space time yield expressed as g ethanol/(L ⁇ day).
  • the process is effective for providing a STY (space time yield) of at least about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day).
  • Possible STY values include about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 200 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 160 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 120 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 80 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 20 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 140 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 20 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to about 100 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day), in another aspect, about 40 g ethanol/(L ⁇ day) to
  • the process includes contacting an aliquot of fermentation medium with at least one CO binding ligand and at least one microbial activator.
  • the process may include taking an aliquot of fermentation medium directly from the bioreactor or from various recycle loops associated with the bioreactor.
  • the amount of fermentation medium removed corresponds to any amount effective for providing an accurate determination of CO concentration.
  • the amount of fermentation medium removed is adjusted based on expected CO concentration levels.
  • sample amounts will range from about 0.02 ml to about 20 ml, in another aspect about, 1 ml to about 7 ml, in another aspect, about 0.1 ml to about 1 ml, in another aspect about 5 ml to about 10 ml, and in another aspect about 7 ml to about 8 ml.
  • Aliquots removed from the bioreactor will include fermentation medium and microbes capable of producing and/or consuming CO.
  • Fermentation mediums may include known mediums as described herein.
  • Microbes capable of producing and/or consuming CO include acetogenic bacteria as described herein.
  • the process may include removal of microbes from the aliquots of fermentation medium prior to CO measurements. In another aspect, the process may include analysis without removal of microbes.
  • sampling may be conducted using any type of sampling probe known in the art.
  • An appropriate sampling probe is an FISP® probe (available from Flownamics).
  • the FISP® probe is a sampling probe capable of withdrawing sterile, cell-free samples from the fermentor.
  • FISP® allows direct on-line sample transfer to a variety of analyzers, such as biochemistry and HPLC systems, as well as collection for off-line analysis.
  • FISP® is a small, tube-shaped, sterilizable 316 stainless steel carrier which is surrounded by a tubular, micro-porous membrane.
  • tubing utilized for sampling should be gas impermeable.
  • tubing should be non-metallic and non-ferrous.
  • tubing that may be utilized includes tubing made from polyetheretherketone.
  • CO binding ligands are effective for bonding to dissolved CO in the fermentation medium.
  • examples of CO binding ligands include hemoglobin, myoglobin, free heme, heme containing compounds, and mixtures thereof.
  • the CO binding ligand includes a chelating agent.
  • the chelating agent is a non-heme containing compound capable of binding CO.
  • Amounts of CO binding ligand utilized will be in an excess of the amount of CO that may be in the sample. Generally, the amount of CO binding ligand utilized in the process will be about 7 mg/ml or more.
  • Microbial inactivators are effective for preventing any microbes in the sample from consuming or creating CO.
  • microbial inactivators may include salt, acid, base, oxidizing agents, organic solvent, heat, cold, and mixtures thereof.
  • the salt may include NaCl, KCl, ammonium chloride, sodium sulfate, sodium bromide, and mixtures thereof.
  • the salt solution will be at a concentration effective for inactivating microbes capable of consuming or creating CO. In this aspect, the salt solution will have a concentration of 0.2 to about 5 M.
  • the acid may include HCl, sulfuric acid, trifluroacetic acid, acetic acid, and mixtures thereof
  • the base may include NaOH, ammonium hydroxide, triethylamine, potassium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof.
  • the acid or base solution will be at a concentration effective for inactivating microbes capable of consuming or creating CO.
  • the acid solution will have a concentration of about 0.02 to about 5 M
  • the base will have a concentration of about 0.02 to about 5 M.
  • the inactivator is hydrogen peroxide
  • the concentration may be from about 1% to about 3%.
  • temperatures from about ⁇ 270° C. to about 0° C. are effective.
  • temperatures from about 35° C. to about 100° C. are effective.
  • any known spectrophotometric equipment may provide absorbance measurements.
  • Some examples of spectrophotometric equipment include Beckman Coulter sectrophotometers (DU 800, DU730) and microplate readers such as the Spectramax (M1, M2, and M3).
  • a ratio of absorbance measurements at 538 nm and 555 nm provides a measure of CO bound to CO binding ligand.
  • the process may include use of a flow through cell in connection with an appropriate spectrophotometer to provide continuous absorbance measurements.
  • direct measurement of CO indicates a CO concentration in the fermentation medium of about 0.12 ⁇ M or more
  • at least a portion of the syngas provided to the first fermentor is provided a one or more subsequent fermentors either operating in series or in parallel.
  • the amount of syngas provided to the one of more subsequent fermentors is effective for providing a CO concentration in the fermentation medium of any subsequent fermentor of about 0.12 ⁇ M or less (as determined by direct measurement).
  • Hemoglobin Solution was Prepared as followss:
  • a 7 mg/ml solution of bovine hemoglobin was prepared in a 100 mM carbonate buffer (pH 9.3). Sodium dithionite (20 mg/ml) was added and the mixture was centrifuged at 7500 g at 4° C. Supernatant was removed and one half volume of 5M NaCl was added.
  • a syngas sparged water solution (0.0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ml) was added to a 0.6 ml of hemoglobin/salt solution in a 2 ml centrifuge tube. Water was added to bring total volumes to 2.0 ml.
  • Hemoglobin/salt solution was drawn into a serological syringe equipped with a stopcock. Sampling of fermentate was conducted by drawing a sample from a cell recycle system from a “T” off a main line from a bioreactor that was fermenting syngas. Lines were first cleared by withdrawing about 10 ml of fermentate. A 7 ml aliquot of fermentate was then rapidly removed with the syringe containing the hemoglobin/salt solution pointing downward to effect mixing the fermentate with the hemoglobin/salt solution.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)

Abstract

A process is provided for fermenting CO-containing gaseous substrates. The process is effective for decreasing lag times and maintaining a culture in steady state by controlling CO concentration and minimizing effects of high or low CO concentrations during fermentation. The process includes providing syngas to a first fermentation zone, fermenting the syngas, and determining a CO concentration in a fermentation medium in the first fermentation zone. If the CO concentration in fermentation medium in the first fermentation zone has a value of about 0.12 μM or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being provided to the first fermentation zone is provided to one or more subsequent fermentation zones in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentation zone of about 0.12 μM or less.

Description

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/702,824, 61/702,826, 61/702,832 and 61/702,837, all filed on Sep. 19, 2012, all of which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.
A process is provided for fermenting CO-containing gaseous substrates. More specifically, the process includes determining CO concentration in a first fermentation medium in a first fermentation zone. If the CO concentration in the first fermentation medium has a value of about 0.12 μM or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas provided to the first fermentation zone is provided to one or more subsequent fermentation zones in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentation zone of about 0.12 μM or less.
BACKGROUND
Acetogenic microorganisms can produce ethanol from carbon monoxide (CO) through fermentation of gaseous substrates. Fermentations using anaerobic microorganisms from the genus Clostridium produce ethanol and other useful products. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,173,429 describes Clostridium ljungdahlii ATCC No. 49587, an anaerobic microorganism that produces ethanol and acetate from synthesis gas. U.S. Pat. No. 5,807,722 describes a method and apparatus for converting waste gases into organic acids and alcohols using Clostridium ljungdahlii ATCC No. 55380. U.S. Pat. No. 6,136,577 describes a method and apparatus for converting waste gases into ethanol using Clostridium ljungdahlii ATCC No. 55988 and 55989.
Many acetogenic microorganisms are poorly suited for industrial scale bioprocessing and have therefore not demonstrated commercial viability for this purpose. Such microorganisms have slow doubling time and low total productivities. In addition, many techniques for genetic manipulation (knockout, over-expression of transgenes via integration or episomic plasmid propagation) are inefficient, time-consuming, laborious, or non-existent.
Acetogenic microorganisms may be grown to produce ethanol from carbon monoxide. The growth process may involve culturing the acetogenic bacteria on increasing amounts of CO over time. Acetogenic microorganisms may be grown to produce ethanol from syngas that includes carbon monoxide. The growth process may involve culturing the acetogenic bacteria on increasing amounts of CO over time. High or low levels of CO in the fermentation may result in lower productivity
SUMMARY
A process is effective for maintaining high ethanol productivity levels during syngas fermentation. The process is effective for decreasing lag times and maintaining a culture in steady state by controlling CO concentration and minimizing effects of high or low CO concentrations during fermentation.
A syngas fermentation process includes providing syngas to a first fermentation zone, fermenting the syngas, and determining a CO concentration in a fermentation medium in the first fermentation zone. In accordance with the process, if the CO concentration in fermentation medium in the first fermentation zone has a value of about 0.12 μM or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being provided to the first fermentation zone is provided to one or more subsequent fermentation zones in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentation zone of about 0.12 μM or less.
In another aspect, a syngas fermentation process includes providing syngas to a first fermentor, fermenting the syngas, and determining a CO concentration in a fermentation medium in the first fermentor. In accordance with the process, if the CO concentration in fermentation medium in the first fermentor has a value of about 0.12 μM or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being provided to the first fermentor is provided to one or more subsequent fermentors in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentor of about 0.12 μM or less.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of several aspects of the process will be more apparent from the following figures.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a fermentor with multiple fermentation zones.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a series of fermentors.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding components throughout the several views of the figures. Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of various aspects of the present process and apparatus. Also, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessary in commercially feasible aspects are often not depicted in order to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various aspects.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The following description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of describing the general principles of exemplary embodiments. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the claims.
Syngas fermentations conducted in bioreactors with medium and acetogenic bacteria as described herein are effective for providing conversions of CO in syngas into alcohols and other products. Control of CO concentrations in the fermentation through determining CO concentration in the fermentation medium is effective for providing high productivity levels. In this aspect, productivity may be expressed as STY (space time yield expressed as g ethanol/(L·day). In this aspect, the process is effective for providing a STY (space time yield) of at least about 10 g ethanol/(L·day). Possible STY values include about 10 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 200 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 160 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 120 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 80 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 20 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 140 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 20 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 100 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 40 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 140 g ethanol/(L·day), and in another aspect, about 40 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 100 g ethanol/(L·day).
DEFINITIONS
Unless otherwise defined, the following terms as used throughout this specification for the present disclosure are defined as follows and can include either the singular or plural forms of definitions below defined:
The term “about” modifying any amount refers to the variation in that amount encountered in real world conditions, e.g., in the lab, pilot plant, or production facility. For example, an amount of an ingredient or measurement employed in a mixture or quantity when modified by “about” includes the variation and degree of care typically employed in measuring in an experimental condition in production plant or lab. For example, the amount of a component of a product when modified by “about” includes the variation between batches in a multiple experiments in the plant or lab and the variation inherent in the analytical method. Whether or not modified by “about,” the amounts include equivalents to those amounts. Any quantity stated herein and modified by “about” can also be employed in the present disclosure as the amount not modified by “about”.
The term “syngas” or “synthesis gas” means synthesis gas which is the name given to a gas mixture that contains varying amounts of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Examples of production methods include steam reforming of natural gas or hydrocarbons to produce hydrogen, the gasification of coal and in some types of waste-to-energy gasification facilities. The name comes from their use as intermediates in creating synthetic natural gas (SNG) and for producing ammonia or methanol. Syngas is combustible and is often used as a fuel source or as an intermediate for the production of other chemicals.
The term “fermentor” includes a fermentation device consisting of one or more vessels and/or towers or piping arrangements, which includes the Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR), Immobilized Cell Reactor (ICR), Trickle Bed Reactor (TBR), Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR), Bubble Column, Gas Lift Fermenter, Membrane Reactor such as Hollow Fibre Membrane Bioreactor (HFMBR), Static Mixer, or other vessel or other device suitable for gas-liquid contact.
The terms “fermentation”, fermentation process” or “fermentation reaction” and the like are intended to encompass both the growth phase and product biosynthesis phase of the process. In one aspect, fermentation refers to conversion of CO to alcohol.
The term “cell density” means mass of microorganism cells per unit volume of fermentation broth, for example, grams/liter.
The term “increasing the efficiency”, “increased efficiency” and the like, when used in relation to a fermentation process includes increasing one or more of the rate of growth of microorganisms in the fermentation, the volume or mass of desired product (such as alcohols) produced per volume or mass of substrate (such as carbon monoxide) consumed, the rate of production or level of production of the desired product, and the relative proportion of the desired product produced compared with other by-products of fermentation.
Syngas
Syngas may be provided from any know source. In one aspect, syngas may be sourced from gasification of carbonaceous materials. Gasification involves partial combustion of biomass in a restricted supply of oxygen. The resultant gas mainly includes CO and H2. In this aspect, syngas will contain at least about 10 mole % CO, in one aspect, at least about 20 mole %, in one aspect, about 10 to about 100 mole %, in another aspect, about 20 to about 100 mole % CO, in another aspect, about 30 to about 90 mole % CO, in another aspect, about 40 to about 80 mole % CO, and in another aspect, about 50 to about 70 mole % CO. Some examples of suitable gasification methods and apparatus are provided in U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/516,667, 61/516,704 and 61/516,646, all of which were filed on Apr. 6, 2011, and in U.S. Ser. Nos. 13/427,144, 13/427,193 and 13/427,247, all of which were filed on Mar. 22, 2012, and all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Depending on the syngas composition, the syngas may be provided directly to a fermentation process or may be further modified to include an appropriate H2 to CO molar ratio. In one aspect, syngas provided to the fermentor has an H2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.2 or more, in another aspect, about 0.25 or more, and in another aspect, about 0.5 or more. In another aspect, syngas provided to the fermentor may include about 40 mole percent or more CO plus H2 and about 30 mole percent or less CO, in another aspect, about 50 mole percent or more CO plus H2 and about 35 mole percent or less CO, and in another aspect, about 80 mole percent or more CO plus H2 and about 20 mole percent or less CO.
In another aspect, the process has applicability to supporting the production of alcohol from gaseous substrates such as high volume CO-containing industrial flue gases. In some aspects, a gas that includes CO is derived from carbon containing waste, for example, industrial waste gases or from the gasification of other wastes. As such, the processes represent effective processes for capturing carbon that would otherwise be exhausted into the environment. Examples of industrial flue gases include gases produced during ferrous metal products manufacturing, non-ferrous products manufacturing, petroleum refining processes, gasification of coal, gasification of biomass, electric power production, carbon black production, ammonia production, methanol production and coke manufacturing.
In one aspect, a gas separator is configured to substantially separate at least one portion of the gas stream, wherein the portion includes one or more components. For example, the gas separator may separate CO2 from a gas stream comprising the following components: CO, CO2, H2, wherein the CO2 may be passed to a CO2 remover and the remainder of the gas stream (comprising CO and H2) may be passed to a bioreactor. Any gas separator known in the art may be utilized. In this aspect, syngas provided to the fermentor will have about 10 mole % or less CO2, in another aspect, about 1 mole % or less CO2, and in another aspect, about 0.1 mole % or less CO2.
Certain gas streams may include a high concentration of CO and low concentrations of H2. In one aspect, it may be desirable to optimize the composition of the substrate stream in order to achieve higher efficiency of alcohol production and/or overall carbon capture. For example, the concentration of H2 in the substrate stream may be increased before the stream is passed to the bioreactor.
According to particular aspects of the invention, streams from two or more sources can be combined and/or blended to produce a desirable and/or optimized substrate stream. For example, a stream comprising a high concentration of CO, such as the exhaust from a steel mill converter, can be combined with a stream comprising high concentrations of H2, such as the off-gas from a steel mill coke oven.
Depending on the composition of the gaseous CO-containing substrate, it may also be desirable to treat it to remove any undesired impurities, such as dust particles before introducing it to the fermentation. For example, the gaseous substrate may be filtered or scrubbed using known methods.
Bioreactor Design and Operation
In one aspect, a fermentor design may include different fermentation zones in the same fermentor. For example, a large fermentor or a bubble column type reactor may include different fermentation zones. Descriptions of fermentor designs are described in U.S. Ser. Nos. 13/471,827 and 13/471,858, both filed May 15, 2012, and U.S. Ser. No. 13/473,167, filed May 16, 2012, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
As shown in FIG. 1, a fermentor 100 includes multiple fermentation zones 200. As shown, the fermentor 100 includes a first fermentation zone 200 and four additional fermentations zones 201, 202, 203, 204. In another aspect, the fermentor 100 may include two or more fermentation zones, and may includes from two to ten fermentation zones. A fermentation zone is defined as space above a gas inlet/sparger 122 and below the next gas/inlet sparger 122, or above a gas inlet/sparger 122 and the top of the fermentor 100. Medium, microbes and gases 305 in the fermentor 100 may flow between fermentation zones. The fermentor 100 may also include pumps 124. The pumps 124 may be used for product 222 removal and for removal of samples 210.
In one aspect, syngas enters the fermentor 100 through a syngas supply 120. The syngas supply 120 provides syngas to the gas inlet/spargers 122. Medium and nutrients may be supplied through medium/nutrient supply 250. Off-gas may exit the fermentor 100 through an off-gas port 270. Off-gas may be provided to a vent-gas boiler. The vent-gas boiler may be utilized to provide steam for energy production.
In accordance with one aspect, the fermentation process is started by addition of medium to the reactor vessel. Some examples of medium compositions are described in U.S. Ser. Nos. 61/650,098 and 61/650,093, filed May 22, 2012, and in U.S. Pat. No. 7,285,402, filed Jul. 23, 2001, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. The medium may be sterilized to remove undesirable microorganisms and the reactor is inoculated with the desired microorganisms. Sterilization may not always be required.
In one aspect, the microorganisms utilized include acetogenic bacteria. Examples of useful acetogenic bacteria include those of the genus Clostridium, such as strains of Clostridium ljungdahlii, including those described in WO 2000/68407, EP 117309, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,173,429, 5,593,886 and 6,368,819, WO 1998/00558 and WO 2002/08438, strains of Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 10061 and DSM 19630 of DSMZ, Germany) including those described in WO 2007/117157 and WO 2009/151342 and Clostridium ragsdalei (P11, ATCC BAA-622) and Alkalibaculum bacchi (CP11, ATCC BAA-1772) including those described respectively in U.S. Pat. No. 7,704,723 and “Biofuels and Bioproducts from Biomass-Generated Synthesis Gas”, Hasan Atiyeh, presented in Oklahoma EPSCoR Annual State Conference, Apr. 29, 2010 and Clostridium carboxidivorans (ATCC PTA-7827) described in U.S. Patent Application No. 2007/0276447. Other suitable microorganisms includes those of the genus Moorella, including Moorella sp. HUC22-1, and those of the genus Carboxydothermus. Each of these references is incorporated herein by reference. Mixed cultures of two or more microorganisms may be used.
Some examples of useful bacteria include Acetogenium kivui, Acetoanaerobium noterae, Acetobacterium woodii, Alkalibaculum bacchi CP11 (ATCC BAA-1772), Blautia producta, Butyribacterium methylotrophicum, Caldanaerobacter subterraneous, Caldanaerobacter subterraneous pacificus, Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans, Clostridium aceticum, Clostridium acetobutylicum, Clostridium acetobutylicum P262 (DSM 19630 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 19630 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 10061 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 23693 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 24138 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium carboxidivorans P7 (ATCC PTA-7827), Clostridium coskatii (ATCC PTA-10522), Clostridium drakei, Clostridium ljungdahlii PETC (ATCC 49587), Clostridium ljungdahlii ERI2 (ATCC 55380), Clostridium ljungdahlii C-01 (ATCC 55988), Clostridium ljungdahlii O-52 (ATCC 55889), Clostridium magnum, Clostridium pasteurianum (DSM 525 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium ragsdali P11 (ATCC BAA-622), Clostridium scatologenes, Clostridium thermoaceticum, Clostridium ultunense, Desulfotomaculum kuznetsovii, Eubacterium limosum, Geobacter sulfurreducens, Methanosarcina acetivorans, Methanosarcina barkeri, Morrella thermoacetica, Morrella thermoautotrophica, Oxobacter pfennigii, Peptostreptococcus productus, Ruminococcus productus, Thermoanaerobacter kivui, and mixtures thereof.
Upon inoculation, an initial feed gas supply rate is established effective for supplying the initial population of microorganisms. Effluent gas is analyzed to determine the content of the effluent gas. Results of gas analysis are used to control feed gas rates. In this aspect, the process provides a CO concentration to initial cell density ratio of about 0.5 to about 0.9, in another aspect, about 0.6 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.5 to about 0.7, and in another aspect, about 0.5 to about 0.6.
Upon reaching desired levels, liquid phase and cellular material is withdrawn from the reactor and replenished with medium. The process is effective for increasing cell density to about 2.0 grams/liter or more, in another aspect, about 2 to about 25 grams/liter, in another aspect, about 2 to about 20 grams/liter, in another aspect, about 2 to about 10 grams/liter, in another aspect, about 2 to about 8 grams/liter, in another aspect, about 3 to about 6 grams/liter, and in another aspect, about 4 to about 5 grams/liter.
In another aspect, the process is effective for maintaining a CO concentration (μM) to cell density (grams/liter) ratio of about 0.001 to about 1.0. In another aspect, a CO concentration to cell density ratio of about 0.01 to about 0.9, in another aspect, about 0.01 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.02 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.02 to about 0.75, in another aspect, about 0.03 to about 0.75, and in another aspect, about 0.03 to about 0.5.
In another aspect, the process is effective for maintaining a CO concentration (μM) to cell density (grams/liter) ratio of about 0.001 to about 1.0. In another aspect, a CO concentration to cell density ratio of about 0.01 to about 0.9, in another aspect, about 0.01 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.02 to about 0.8, in another aspect, about 0.02 to about 0.75, in another aspect, about 0.03 to about 0.75, and in another aspect, about 0.03 to about 0.5.
In one aspect, syngas is supplied to a first fermentation zone 200. If a CO concentration in the first fermentation zone 200 is about 0.12 μM or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being supplied to the first fermentation zone 200 is provided to one or more subsequent fermentation zones through gas inlet/spargers 122. The portion of syngas provided to the one or more subsequent fermentation zones provides a CO concentration in any subsequent fermentation zone of about 0.12 μM or less, in another aspect, about 0.10 μM or less, in another aspect, about 0.08 μM or less, in another aspect, about 0.06 μM or less, in another aspect, about 0.04 μM or less, and in another aspect, about 0.02 μM or less.
Syngas may be supplied to each fermentation zone one at a time or may be supplied to one or more fermentation zones simultaneously. In this aspect, syngas entering a fermentation zone will have about 20 mole % or more CO, in another aspect, about 30 mole % or more, in another aspect, about 40 mole % or more, and in another aspect, about 50 mole % or more.
In another aspect, syngas supplied to any fermentation zone will have an H2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.2 or more, and from about 4 mole % to about 99.9 mole % CO. In another aspect, syngas entering any subsequent fermentation zone will have an H2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.5 or more, in another aspect, about 1.0 or more, and in another aspect, about 3.5 or more.
Another aspect of a fermentor design is shown in FIG. 2. In this aspect, the design includes a first fermentor 100 connected in series to subsequent fermentors, such as for example, second fermentor 102, third fermentor 104, and fourth fermentor 106. The design may include any number of subsequent fermentors from 1 to about 10 (for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 subsequent fermentors).
In one aspect, syngas enters the first fermentor 100 through a gas inlet/sparger 120. Dispersion of the syngas and further mixing is accomplished with at least one gas dispersion impeller 225 and at least one mixing impeller 220 which are coupled to a drive shaft 200.
Syngas 150 may be conveyed to one or more subsequent bioreactors. Syngas 150 may be supplied to each subsequent fermentor one at a time in series, or may be supplied to one or more subsequent fermentors simultaneously in parallel. In this aspect, the syngas entering any subsequent fermentor will have about 20 mole % or more CO, in another aspect, about 30 mole % or more, in another aspect, about 40 mole % or more, and in another aspect, about 50 mole % or more.
In another aspect, syngas supplied to any subsequent fermentor will have an H2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.2 or more, and from about 4 mole % to about 99.9 mole % CO. In another aspect, syngas entering any subsequent fermentor will have an H2 to CO molar ratio of about 0.5 or more, in another aspect, about 1.0 or more, and in another aspect, about 3.5 or more.
In another aspect, off-gas from a first or any subsequent fermentor may be provided to a vent-gas boiler. The vent-gas boiler may be utilized to provide steam for energy production.
Alcohol Productivity
Certain ratios of H2 to CO and/or CO2 to CO are effective for providing enhanced STY. In this aspect, the process is effective for providing a STY (space time yield) of about 1 gram or more total alcohol/(L·day). In another aspect, the process is effective for providing a providing a STY of at least about 10 g total alcohol/(L·day). Possible STY values include about 10 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 300 g/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 200 g total alcohol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 160 g total alcohol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 120 g total alcohol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 80 g total alcohol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 20 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 140 g total alcohol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 20 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 100 g total alcohol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 40 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 140 g total alcohol/(L·day), and in another aspect, about 40 g total alcohol/(L·day) to about 100 g total alcohol/(L·day).
As used herein, “total alcohol” includes ethanol, butanol, propanol and methanol. In one aspect, the total alcohol may include at least about 80 weight percent or more ethanol. In another aspect, total alcohol may include at least about 25 weight percent or less butanol.
In a related aspect, productivity may be expressed as STY (space time yield expressed as g ethanol/(L·day). In this aspect, the process is effective for providing a STY (space time yield) of at least about 10 g ethanol/(L·day). Possible STY values include about 10 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 200 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 160 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 120 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 10 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 80 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 20 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 140 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 20 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 100 g ethanol/(L·day), in another aspect, about 40 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 140 g ethanol/(L·day), and in another aspect, about 40 g ethanol/(L·day) to about 100 g ethanol/(L·day).
Determination of CO Concentrations—Direct Measurement
Sampling:
In one aspect, the process includes contacting an aliquot of fermentation medium with at least one CO binding ligand and at least one microbial activator. The process may include taking an aliquot of fermentation medium directly from the bioreactor or from various recycle loops associated with the bioreactor. The amount of fermentation medium removed corresponds to any amount effective for providing an accurate determination of CO concentration. In this aspect, the amount of fermentation medium removed is adjusted based on expected CO concentration levels. Generally, sample amounts will range from about 0.02 ml to about 20 ml, in another aspect about, 1 ml to about 7 ml, in another aspect, about 0.1 ml to about 1 ml, in another aspect about 5 ml to about 10 ml, and in another aspect about 7 ml to about 8 ml.
Aliquots removed from the bioreactor will include fermentation medium and microbes capable of producing and/or consuming CO. Fermentation mediums may include known mediums as described herein. Microbes capable of producing and/or consuming CO include acetogenic bacteria as described herein. In one aspect, the process may include removal of microbes from the aliquots of fermentation medium prior to CO measurements. In another aspect, the process may include analysis without removal of microbes.
In one aspect, sampling may be conducted using any type of sampling probe known in the art. One example of an appropriate sampling probe is an FISP® probe (available from Flownamics). The FISP® probe is a sampling probe capable of withdrawing sterile, cell-free samples from the fermentor. FISP® allows direct on-line sample transfer to a variety of analyzers, such as biochemistry and HPLC systems, as well as collection for off-line analysis. FISP® is a small, tube-shaped, sterilizable 316 stainless steel carrier which is surrounded by a tubular, micro-porous membrane.
In another aspect, tubing utilized for sampling should be gas impermeable. In this aspect, tubing should be non-metallic and non-ferrous. On example of tubing that may be utilized includes tubing made from polyetheretherketone.
CO Binding Ligand:
CO binding ligands are effective for bonding to dissolved CO in the fermentation medium. In another aspect, examples of CO binding ligands include hemoglobin, myoglobin, free heme, heme containing compounds, and mixtures thereof.
In an alternative aspect, the CO binding ligand includes a chelating agent. In this aspect, the chelating agent is a non-heme containing compound capable of binding CO.
Amounts of CO binding ligand utilized will be in an excess of the amount of CO that may be in the sample. Generally, the amount of CO binding ligand utilized in the process will be about 7 mg/ml or more.
Microbial Inactivator:
Microbial inactivators are effective for preventing any microbes in the sample from consuming or creating CO. In this aspect, microbial inactivators may include salt, acid, base, oxidizing agents, organic solvent, heat, cold, and mixtures thereof. In the aspect where the microbial inactivator is a salt, the salt may include NaCl, KCl, ammonium chloride, sodium sulfate, sodium bromide, and mixtures thereof. The salt solution will be at a concentration effective for inactivating microbes capable of consuming or creating CO. In this aspect, the salt solution will have a concentration of 0.2 to about 5 M.
In the aspect where the microbial inactivator is an acid or base, the acid may include HCl, sulfuric acid, trifluroacetic acid, acetic acid, and mixtures thereof, and the base may include NaOH, ammonium hydroxide, triethylamine, potassium hydroxide, and mixtures thereof. The acid or base solution will be at a concentration effective for inactivating microbes capable of consuming or creating CO. In this aspect, the acid solution will have a concentration of about 0.02 to about 5 M, and the base will have a concentration of about 0.02 to about 5 M. In this aspect, where the inactivator is hydrogen peroxide, the concentration may be from about 1% to about 3%. In the aspect where cold is used, temperatures from about −270° C. to about 0° C. are effective. In the aspect where heat is used, temperatures from about 35° C. to about 100° C. are effective.
Absorbance Measurement:
Any known spectrophotometric equipment may provide absorbance measurements. Some examples of spectrophotometric equipment include Beckman Coulter sectrophotometers (DU 800, DU730) and microplate readers such as the Spectramax (M1, M2, and M3). In this aspect, a ratio of absorbance measurements at 538 nm and 555 nm provides a measure of CO bound to CO binding ligand. In another aspect, the process may include use of a flow through cell in connection with an appropriate spectrophotometer to provide continuous absorbance measurements.
In one aspect, if direct measurement of CO indicates a CO concentration in the fermentation medium of about 0.12 μM or more, then at least a portion of the syngas provided to the first fermentor is provided a one or more subsequent fermentors either operating in series or in parallel. The amount of syngas provided to the one of more subsequent fermentors is effective for providing a CO concentration in the fermentation medium of any subsequent fermentor of about 0.12 μM or less (as determined by direct measurement).
EXAMPLES Example 1 Measurement of CO
Hemoglobin Solution was Prepared as Follows:
A 7 mg/ml solution of bovine hemoglobin was prepared in a 100 mM carbonate buffer (pH 9.3). Sodium dithionite (20 mg/ml) was added and the mixture was centrifuged at 7500 g at 4° C. Supernatant was removed and one half volume of 5M NaCl was added.
Standards were Prepared as Follows:
A syngas sparged water solution (0.0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 ml) was added to a 0.6 ml of hemoglobin/salt solution in a 2 ml centrifuge tube. Water was added to bring total volumes to 2.0 ml.
Sampling was Conducted as Follows:
Hemoglobin/salt solution was drawn into a serological syringe equipped with a stopcock. Sampling of fermentate was conducted by drawing a sample from a cell recycle system from a “T” off a main line from a bioreactor that was fermenting syngas. Lines were first cleared by withdrawing about 10 ml of fermentate. A 7 ml aliquot of fermentate was then rapidly removed with the syringe containing the hemoglobin/salt solution pointing downward to effect mixing the fermentate with the hemoglobin/salt solution.
Absorbance Measurements were Conducted as Follows:
All samples and standards were held at room temperature for a minimum of 10 minutes and a maximum of 2 hours. Absorbance of standards and samples was determined at 538 nm and 555 nm.
Calculating CO Concentration:
Using a Henry's Law constant of 0.00095 M/atm, stock concentrations of CO were calculated based on a percentage of CO in the syngas. A standard curve showing a ratio of absorbance at 538:555 nm versus CO concentration in μM was prepared.
While the invention herein disclosed has been described by means of specific embodiments, examples and applications thereof, numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention set forth in the claims.

Claims (32)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for reducing growth inhibition by carbon monoxide (CO) of microbes in fermentation, comprising:
a) providing syngas to a first fermentation zone;
b) fermenting the syngas; and
c) determining the CO concentration in the fermentation medium in the first fermentation zone, wherein if the CO concentration in the fermentation medium in the first fermentation zone has a calculated value of 0.12 μM or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being provided to the first fermentation zone is provided to one or more subsequent fermentation zones in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in the first fermentation zone of at least 0.12 μM or less.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the CO concentration is determined by contacting an aliquot of fermentation medium with at least one CO binding ligand and at least one microbial inactivator, and measuring the amount of CO bound to the CO binding ligand.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein the CO bonding ligand is selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, myoglobin, free heme, heme containing compounds and mixtures thereof.
4. The process of claim 2 wherein the microbial inactivator is selected from the group consisting of salt, acid, base, organic solvent, oxidizing agents, heat, cold, and mixtures thereof.
5. The process of claim 2 wherein the amount of CO bound to the CO binding ligand is measured by determining changes in absorbance.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein the syngas provided to the first or any one or more subsequent fermentation zones has a molar ratio of H2 to CO of 0.2 or more.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein the syngas provided to the first or any one or more subsequent fermentation zones has 40 mole percent or more of CO plus H2 and an H2 content of 30 mole percent or less.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein the syngas provided to the first or any one or more subsequent fermentation zones has a CO/CO2 molar ratio of at least 0.75.
9. The process of claim 1 wherein the process is effective for increasing cell density to 2.0 g/L or more in the first or any one or more subsequent fermentation zones.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein the process provides a CO concentration to initial cell density ratio of 0.5 to 0.9.
11. The process of claim 1 wherein the process is effective for maintaining a CO concentration to cell density ratio of 0.001 to 1.0.
12. The process of claim 1 wherein the fermentation medium includes microbes capable of consuming and/or producing CO.
13. The process of claim 12 wherein the microbes are acetogenic bacteria.
14. The process of claim 13 wherein the acetogenic bacteria are selected from the group consisting of Acetogenium kivui, Acetoanaerobium noterae, Acetobacterium woodii, Alkalibaculum bacchi CP11 (ATCC BAA-1772), Blautia producta, Butyribacterium methytotrophicum, Caldanaerobacter subterraneous, Caldanaerobacter subterraneous pacificus, Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans, Clostridium aceticum, Clostridium acetobutylieum, Clostridium acetobutylicum P262, Clostridium autoethanogenum, Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 10061 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 23693 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 24138 of DSMZ Germany), Ctostridium carboxidivorans P7 (ATCC PTA-7827), Clostridium coskatii (ATCC PTA-10522), Ctostridium drakei, Clostridium ljungdahlii PETC (ATCC 49587), Clostridium ljungdahlii ERI2 (ATCC 55380), Clostridium ljungdahlii C-01 (ATCC 55988), Clostridium ljungdahlii O-52 (ATCC 55889), Clostridium magnum, Clostridium pasteurianum (DSM 525 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium ragsdali P11 (ATCC BAA-622), Clostridium scatologenes, Ctostridium thermoaceticum, Clostridium ultunense, Desulfotomaculum kuznetsovii, Eubacterium limosum, Geobacter sulfurreducens, Methanosarcina acetivorans, Methanosarcina barkeri, Morrella thermoaeetica, Morrella thermoautotrophica, Oxobacter pfennigii, Peptostreptococcus productus, Ruminococcus productus, Thermoanaerobacter kivui and mixtures thereof.
15. A method for reducing growth inhibition by carbon monoxide (CO) of microbes in fermentation, comprising:
a) providing syngas to a first fermentor;
b) fermenting the syngas; and
c) determining the CO concentration in the fermentation medium in the first fermentor, wherein if the CO concentration in the fermentation medium in the first fermentor has a calculated value of 0.12 μM or greater, then at least a portion of the syngas being provided to the first fermentor is provided to one or more subsequent fermentors in an amount effective for providing a CO concentration in the first fermentor of at least 0.12 μM or less.
16. The process of claim 1 wherein the CO concentration is determined by contacting an aliquot of fermentation medium with at least one CO binding ligand and at least one microbial inactivator, and measuring the amount of CO bound to the CO binding ligand.
17. The process of claim 16 wherein the CO bonding ligand is selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin, myoglobin, free heme, heme containing compounds and mixtures thereof.
18. The process of claim 16 wherein the microbial inactivator is selected from the group consisting of salt, acid, base, organic solvent, oxidizing agents, heat, cold, and mixtures thereof.
19. The process of claim 16 wherein the amount of CO bound to the CO binding ligand is measured by determining changes in absorbance.
20. The process of claim 15 wherein the syngas provided to the first or any one or more subsequent fermentors has a molar ratio of H2 to CO of 0.2 or more.
21. The process of claim 15 wherein the syngas provided to the first or any one or more subsequent fermentors has 40 mole percent or more of CO plus H2 and an H2 content of 30 mole percent or less.
22. The process of claim 15 wherein the syngas provided to the first or any one or more subsequent fermentors has a CO/CO2 molar ratio of at least 0.75.
23. The process of claim 15 wherein the process is effective for increasing cell density to 2.0 g/L or more in the first or any one or more subsequent fermentors.
24. The process of claim 15 wherein the process provides a CO concentration to initial cell density ratio of 0.5 to 0.9.
25. The process of claim 15 wherein the process is effective for maintaining a CO concentration to cell density ratio of 0.001 to 1.0.
26. The process of claim 15 wherein the fermentation medium includes microbes capable of consuming and/or producing CO.
27. The process of claim 26 wherein the microbes are acetogenic bacteria.
28. The process of claim 27 wherein the acetogenic bacteria are selected from the group consisting of Acetogenium kivui, Acetoanaerobium noterae, Acetobacterium woodii, Alkalibaculum bacchi CP11 (ATCC BAA-1772), Blautia producta, Butyribacterium methytotrophicum, Caldanaerobacter subterraneous, Caldanaerobacter subterraneous pacificus, Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans, Clostridium aceticum, Clostridium acetobutylieum, Clostridium acetobutylicum P262, Clostridium autoethanogenum, Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 10061 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 23693 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium autoethanogenum (DSM 24138 of DSMZ Germany), Ctostridium carboxidivorans P7 (ATCC PTA-7827), Clostridium coskatii (ATCC PTA-10522), Ctostridium drakei, Clostridium ljungdahlii PETC (ATCC 49587), Clostridium ljungdahlii ERI2 (ATCC 55380), Clostridium ljungdahlii C-01 (ATCC 55988), Clostridium ljungdahlii O-52 (ATCC 55889), Clostridium magnum, Clostridium pasteurianum (DSM 525 of DSMZ Germany), Clostridium ragsdali P11 (ATCC BAA-622), Clostridium scatologenes, Ctostridium thermoaceticum, Clostridium ultunense, Desulfotomaculum kuznetsovii, Eubacterium limosum, Geobacter sulfurreducens, Methanosarcina acetivorans, Methanosarcina barkeri, Morrella thermoaeetica, Morrella thermoautotrophica, Oxobacter pfennigii, Peptostreptococcus productus, Ruminococcus productus, Thermoanaerobacter kivui and mixtures thereof.
29. The process of claim 15 wherein syngas is provided to one or more subsequent fermentors operating in parallel.
30. The process of claim 15 wherein syngas is provided to one or more subsequent fermentors operating in series.
31. The process of claim 15 wherein the first or one or more subsequent fermentors are different fermentation zones in the fermentor.
32. The process of claim 15 wherein at least a portion of the off-gas from a first or any one or more subsequent fermentors is provided to a vent-gas boiler.
US14/018,670 2012-09-19 2013-09-05 Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO Active US8980576B2 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/018,670 US8980576B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-05 Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO
ES13770769.1T ES2661517T3 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-18 A process to prevent the inhibition of acetogens by CO
EP13770769.1A EP2898079B1 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-18 A process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by co
CN201380060090.7A CN104955954B (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-18 A method of avoid CO from inhibiting acetogen
PCT/US2013/060239 WO2014047083A1 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-18 A process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by co
PL13770769T PL2898079T3 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-18 A process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by co
IN2134DEN2015 IN2015DN02134A (en) 2012-09-19 2015-03-16

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261702837P 2012-09-19 2012-09-19
US201261702824P 2012-09-19 2012-09-19
US201261702832P 2012-09-19 2012-09-19
US201261702826P 2012-09-19 2012-09-19
US14/018,670 US8980576B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-05 Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140080117A1 US20140080117A1 (en) 2014-03-20
US8980576B2 true US8980576B2 (en) 2015-03-17

Family

ID=50274850

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/017,903 Active 2033-10-15 US10233478B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-04 Process for reducing CO2 emissions and increasing alcohol productivity in syngas fermentation
US14/018,608 Active US8975013B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-05 Process to control CO concentrations in fermentations
US14/018,670 Active US8980576B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-05 Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO
US14/018,487 Active US8980575B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-05 Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO
US14/612,528 Active US9593357B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2015-02-03 Process to control CO concentrations in fermentations

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/017,903 Active 2033-10-15 US10233478B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-04 Process for reducing CO2 emissions and increasing alcohol productivity in syngas fermentation
US14/018,608 Active US8975013B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-05 Process to control CO concentrations in fermentations

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/018,487 Active US8980575B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2013-09-05 Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO
US14/612,528 Active US9593357B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2015-02-03 Process to control CO concentrations in fermentations

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (5) US10233478B2 (en)
EP (3) EP2898078B1 (en)
CN (4) CN104812904B (en)
BR (1) BR112015005715B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2884542C (en)
ES (2) ES2661517T3 (en)
IN (3) IN2015DN01981A (en)
PL (2) PL2898080T3 (en)
RU (1) RU2636349C2 (en)
TW (1) TWI635179B (en)
WO (4) WO2014047079A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9885063B2 (en) * 2013-06-10 2018-02-06 Ineos Bio Sa Process for fermenting co-containing gaseous substrates in a low phosphate medium effective for reducing water usage
US9850503B2 (en) * 2013-06-10 2017-12-26 Ineos Bio Sa Control of conductivity in anaerobic fermentation
US9617566B2 (en) 2014-07-11 2017-04-11 Lanzatech New Zealand Limited Control of bioreactor processes
HUE062028T2 (en) * 2014-10-22 2023-09-28 Lanzatech Nz Inc Multi-stage bioreactor processes
AU2019319671A1 (en) * 2018-08-08 2021-01-14 Jupeng Bio (Hk) Limited Carbon dioxide bioconversion process
CN112300971B (en) * 2019-07-26 2022-12-23 安徽吐露港生物科技有限公司 Method for improving carbon monoxide utilization rate of clostridium aerovorans by high-throughput gene synthesis
CN111154683B (en) * 2020-01-19 2022-05-13 南京工业大学 Optimized culture method of methylotrophic butanobacterium and application thereof
CN111849801A (en) * 2020-06-11 2020-10-30 北京首钢朗泽新能源科技有限公司 Method and equipment for recovering mycoprotein through clostridium fermentation waste liquid
CN116888268A (en) * 2020-12-08 2023-10-13 巨鹏生物(香港)有限公司 Methods and compositions for controlling ethanol production
CN117255714A (en) 2021-01-15 2023-12-19 碳回收国际公司 Methanol synthesis reactor
CN117280040A (en) * 2021-04-09 2023-12-22 朗泽科技有限公司 Method for controlling gas fermentation platform to improve conversion of carbon dioxide into product
CN113755534B (en) * 2021-08-13 2024-02-27 巨鹏生物(香港)有限公司 Method and system for preparing ethanol by coke oven gas fermentation

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5173429A (en) 1990-11-09 1992-12-22 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas Clostridiumm ljungdahlii, an anaerobic ethanol and acetate producing microorganism
US5807722A (en) 1992-10-30 1998-09-15 Bioengineering Resources, Inc. Biological production of acetic acid from waste gases with Clostridium ljungdahlii
US6136577A (en) 1992-10-30 2000-10-24 Bioengineering Resources, Inc. Biological production of ethanol from waste gases with Clostridium ljungdahlii
US6774148B2 (en) 2002-06-25 2004-08-10 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for conversion of LPG and CH4 to syngas and higher valued products
US7285402B2 (en) 2000-07-25 2007-10-23 Emmaus Foundation, Inc. Methods for increasing the production of ethanol from microbial fermentation
WO2011139163A1 (en) 2010-05-04 2011-11-10 Lanzatech New Zealand Limited Improved fermentation of waste gases
US20120003706A1 (en) * 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 Robert Hickey Process for Converting a CO and CO2 Feed Gas Stream to Liquid Products by Fermentation
WO2012015317A1 (en) 2010-07-28 2012-02-02 Lanzatech New Zealand Limited Novel bacteria and methods of use thereof

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4533211A (en) 1983-01-31 1985-08-06 International Business Machines Corporation Frequency multiplexed optical spatial filter based upon photochemical hole burning
US4560658A (en) * 1983-12-05 1985-12-24 Cpc International Inc. Production of butanol by fermentation in the presence of carbon monoxide
NO884986L (en) * 1987-03-10 1988-11-09 Effenberger Helmut PROCEDURE FOR CONTINUOUS PROCESSING OF MEDIA CONTAINING CARBOHYDRATED BY BACTERIA.
US5593886A (en) * 1992-10-30 1997-01-14 Gaddy; James L. Clostridium stain which produces acetic acid from waste gases
UA72220C2 (en) 1998-09-08 2005-02-15 Байоенджініерінг Рісорсиз, Інк. Water-immiscible mixture solvent/cosolvent for extracting acetic acid, a method for producing acetic acid (variants), a method for anaerobic microbial fermentation for obtaining acetic acid (variants), modified solvent and a method for obtaining thereof
NZ515009A (en) 1999-05-07 2003-04-29 Emmaus Foundation Inc Clostridium strains which produce ethanol from substrate-containing gases
MXPA06013654A (en) * 2004-05-26 2007-07-24 Novus Energy Llc Ethanol production from biological wastes.
NZ546496A (en) 2006-04-07 2008-09-26 Lanzatech New Zealand Ltd Gas treatment process
US7623909B2 (en) 2006-05-26 2009-11-24 Cameron Health, Inc. Implantable medical devices and programmers adapted for sensing vector selection
US7704723B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2010-04-27 The Board Of Regents For Oklahoma State University Isolation and characterization of novel clostridial species
MX2010009983A (en) * 2008-03-10 2010-11-26 Ineos Usa Llc Method for sustaining microorganism culture in syngas fermentation process in decreased concentration or absence of various substrates.
AU2009224112B9 (en) * 2008-03-12 2013-01-31 Lanzatech Nz, Inc. Microbial alcohol production process
US20110144393A1 (en) 2008-06-09 2011-06-16 Lanza Tech New Zealand Limited Production of butanediol by anaerobic microbial fermentation
US8592190B2 (en) * 2009-06-11 2013-11-26 Ineos Bio Limited Methods for sequestering carbon dioxide into alcohols via gasification fermentation
CN102361989B (en) * 2009-01-29 2014-03-12 兰扎泰克新西兰有限公司 Alcohol production process
CN102471783A (en) * 2009-07-02 2012-05-23 新西兰郎泽科技公司 Alcohol production process
US8597934B2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2013-12-03 Coskata, Inc. Process for controlling sulfur in a fermentation syngas feed stream
EP2646561B1 (en) * 2010-12-03 2019-07-24 Jupeng Bio (HK) Limited Method of operation of fermentation of carbon monoxide and hydrogen containing gaseous substrate

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5173429A (en) 1990-11-09 1992-12-22 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas Clostridiumm ljungdahlii, an anaerobic ethanol and acetate producing microorganism
US5807722A (en) 1992-10-30 1998-09-15 Bioengineering Resources, Inc. Biological production of acetic acid from waste gases with Clostridium ljungdahlii
US6136577A (en) 1992-10-30 2000-10-24 Bioengineering Resources, Inc. Biological production of ethanol from waste gases with Clostridium ljungdahlii
US7285402B2 (en) 2000-07-25 2007-10-23 Emmaus Foundation, Inc. Methods for increasing the production of ethanol from microbial fermentation
US6774148B2 (en) 2002-06-25 2004-08-10 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for conversion of LPG and CH4 to syngas and higher valued products
WO2011139163A1 (en) 2010-05-04 2011-11-10 Lanzatech New Zealand Limited Improved fermentation of waste gases
US20120003706A1 (en) * 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 Robert Hickey Process for Converting a CO and CO2 Feed Gas Stream to Liquid Products by Fermentation
WO2012015317A1 (en) 2010-07-28 2012-02-02 Lanzatech New Zealand Limited Novel bacteria and methods of use thereof

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Hurst, Kendall et al., "Carbon monoxide partial pressure effects on the metabolic process of syngas fermentation" Biochemical Engineering Journal, Sep. 22, 2009, 48(2010) 159-165.
Kundu, Suman et al. "Direct Measurement of Equilibrium Constants for High-Affinity Hemoglobins" Biophysical Journal, Jun. 2003, vol. 84 3931-3940.
Riggs, Seth et al. "Measuring Carbon Monoxide Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer in a Stirred Tank Reactor for Syngas Fermentation" Biotechnol, 2006, 22, 903-906.
Solubility of Gases in Water, Engineering Tool Box, http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/gases-solubility-water-d-1148.html, 2007, printed from https://web.archive.org/web/20071023034530/http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/gases-solubility-water-d-1148.html on Oct. 24, 2014. *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL2898079T3 (en) 2018-06-29
EP2898079A1 (en) 2015-07-29
WO2014047083A1 (en) 2014-03-27
US8980575B2 (en) 2015-03-17
PL2898080T3 (en) 2018-06-29
US20140080169A1 (en) 2014-03-20
ES2662522T3 (en) 2018-04-06
IN2015DN02084A (en) 2015-08-14
US10233478B2 (en) 2019-03-19
CN104919049A (en) 2015-09-16
TWI635179B (en) 2018-09-11
BR112015005715A2 (en) 2017-07-04
US8975013B2 (en) 2015-03-10
EP2898080B1 (en) 2018-01-10
US20150152464A1 (en) 2015-06-04
TW201420765A (en) 2014-06-01
RU2636349C2 (en) 2017-11-22
CN104955954A (en) 2015-09-30
CN104812904A (en) 2015-07-29
WO2014047081A1 (en) 2014-03-27
CA2884542A1 (en) 2014-03-27
WO2014047079A1 (en) 2014-03-27
EP2898079B1 (en) 2018-01-10
IN2015DN02134A (en) 2015-08-14
CA2884542C (en) 2020-12-15
US20140080195A1 (en) 2014-03-20
BR112015005715B1 (en) 2021-09-14
CN104812904B (en) 2019-05-14
WO2014047082A1 (en) 2014-03-27
ES2661517T3 (en) 2018-04-02
EP2898078A1 (en) 2015-07-29
US20140080116A1 (en) 2014-03-20
CN104919049B (en) 2019-05-10
US9593357B2 (en) 2017-03-14
US20140080117A1 (en) 2014-03-20
CN110373433A (en) 2019-10-25
IN2015DN01981A (en) 2015-08-14
RU2015111634A (en) 2016-11-10
CN104955954B (en) 2019-04-30
EP2898080A1 (en) 2015-07-29
EP2898078B1 (en) 2017-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8980576B2 (en) Process to avoid inhibition of acetogens by CO
KR102142234B1 (en) Method of operation of a syngas fermentation process
EP2956548B1 (en) A process for fermenting co-containing gaseous substrates
US9885063B2 (en) Process for fermenting co-containing gaseous substrates in a low phosphate medium effective for reducing water usage
EP4090755A1 (en) Process control for bioconversions
WO2014200817A1 (en) Control of conductivity in anaerobic fermentation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INEOS BIO SA, SWITZERLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SNYDER, DAVID SCOTT;REEL/FRAME:031210/0264

Effective date: 20130912

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL)

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: JUPENG BIO SA, SWITZERLAND

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:INEOS BIO SA;REEL/FRAME:050780/0741

Effective date: 20170616

AS Assignment

Owner name: JUPENG BIO (HK) LIMITED, HONG KONG

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:JUPENG BIO SA;REEL/FRAME:053455/0132

Effective date: 20200622

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8