US8579502B2 - Method for determining leak rate through a bond line of a MEMS device - Google Patents

Method for determining leak rate through a bond line of a MEMS device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8579502B2
US8579502B2 US13/185,723 US201113185723A US8579502B2 US 8579502 B2 US8579502 B2 US 8579502B2 US 201113185723 A US201113185723 A US 201113185723A US 8579502 B2 US8579502 B2 US 8579502B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
mems device
temperature
method
bond line
fluid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US13/185,723
Other versions
US20110271744A1 (en
Inventor
Henry C. Abbink
Gabriel M. Kuhn
Howard Ge
Daryl Sakaida
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Northrop Grumman Corp
Original Assignee
Northrop Grumman Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US68443105P priority Critical
Priority to PCT/US2006/020084 priority patent/WO2006127814A2/en
Priority to US91493207A priority
Application filed by Northrop Grumman Corp filed Critical Northrop Grumman Corp
Priority to US13/185,723 priority patent/US8579502B2/en
Publication of US20110271744A1 publication Critical patent/US20110271744A1/en
Assigned to NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION reassignment NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ABBINK, HENRY C., GE, HOWARD, KUHN, GABRIEL M., SAKAIDA, DARYL
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8579502B2 publication Critical patent/US8579502B2/en
Application status is Active legal-status Critical
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P15/00Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration
    • G01P15/02Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses
    • G01P15/08Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values
    • G01P15/0802Details
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B81MICROSTRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGY
    • B81CPROCESSES OR APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF MICROSTRUCTURAL DEVICES OR SYSTEMS
    • B81C3/00Assembling of devices or systems from individually processed components
    • B81C3/008Aspects related to assembling from individually processed components, not covered by groups B81C3/001 - B81C3/002
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P1/00Details of instruments
    • G01P1/02Housings
    • G01P1/023Housings for acceleration measuring devices
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P15/00Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration
    • G01P15/02Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses
    • G01P15/08Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values
    • G01P15/125Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values by capacitive pick-up
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P21/00Testing or calibrating of apparatus or devices covered by the preceding groups
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P15/00Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration
    • G01P15/02Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses
    • G01P15/08Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values
    • G01P2015/0805Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values being provided with a particular type of spring-mass-system for defining the displacement of a seismic mass due to an external acceleration
    • G01P2015/0822Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values being provided with a particular type of spring-mass-system for defining the displacement of a seismic mass due to an external acceleration for defining out-of-plane movement of the mass
    • G01P2015/0825Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values being provided with a particular type of spring-mass-system for defining the displacement of a seismic mass due to an external acceleration for defining out-of-plane movement of the mass for one single degree of freedom of movement of the mass
    • G01P2015/0828Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses with conversion into electric or magnetic values being provided with a particular type of spring-mass-system for defining the displacement of a seismic mass due to an external acceleration for defining out-of-plane movement of the mass for one single degree of freedom of movement of the mass the mass being of the paddle type being suspended at one of its longitudinal ends

Abstract

A method for optimizing direct wafer bond line width for reduction of parasitic capacitance in a MEMS device by reducing the width of a bond line between a first and a second wafer, exposing the MEMS device to a water vapor for a predetermined time period and at a first temperature capable of evaporating water, cooling the MEMS device at a second temperature capable of freezing the water, and operating the MEMS device at a third temperature capable of freezing the water to determine if there is discontinuity during operation.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a division of application Ser. No. 11/914,932, filed Nov. 19, 2007 for Method of Optimizing Direct Wafer Bond Line Width for Reduction of Parasitic Capacitance in MEMS Accelerometers.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The invention relates generally to Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS). More particularly, the invention relates to a method for optimizing wafer bond line width for reduction of parasitic capacitance in MEMS accelerometers and a method of determining leak rate through a bond line.

2. Description of Related Art

Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) is the integration of mechanical elements, sensors, actuators, and electronics on a common silicon substrate through microfabrication technology. The electronics in a MEMS device are fabricated using Integrated Circuit (IC) technology (CMOS, Bipolar, or BICMOS processes), while the micromechanical components are fabricated using “micromachining” techniques that selectively etch away or add new layers to the silicon wafer to form mechanical and electromechanical devices.

MEMS devices are widely used in automotives, navigation systems, chemical and biological sensors, microoptics, accelerometers, pressure sensors and other devices. A common approach to fabrication of MEMS devices is the so-called bulk MEMS process. This process consists of processing two or three silicon wafers with patterns machined by Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) to form the structure used in each layer, and then bonding these layers together by a process called direct bonding to form a hermetic cavity.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A process for optimizing direct wafer bond line width for reduction of parasitic capacitance in a MEMS device and determining leak rate through a bond line. The process involves reducing the width of a bond line between a first and a second wafer, exposing the MEMS device to water vapor for a predetermined time period and at a first temperature capable of evaporating the water, cooling the MEMS device at a second temperature capable of freezing the water, and operating the MEMS device at a third temperature capable of freezing the water to determine if there is discontinuity during operation.

In one embodiment the bond line width is reduced to approximately 100-200 microns. To optimize direct wafer bond, a different bond line width can be used to determine its operability and reliability at design conditions.

In another embodiment the first temperature used for evaporating water is approximately 100° C. The second temperature can approximately be below 0° C., preferably about −55° C. The third temperature can be approximately equal to the second temperature.

The process further includes a method of calculating the leak rate through the bond line by dividing the volume of fluid in the MEMS device by the predetermined time period. To achieve an acceptable leak rate, a different bond line width of the MEMS device can be used to reduce discontinuity during operation and achieve optimum operability and reliability of the MEMS device.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The exact nature of this invention, as well as the objects and advantages thereof, will become readily apparent from consideration of the following specification in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals designate like parts throughout the figures thereof and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a prior art silicon accelerometer sensor;

FIG. 2 is an assembly drawing of the silicon accelerometer sensor of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a side view of a silicon accelerometer sensor, according to one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing a silicon accelerometer inside a steam oven in accordance with a method of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is an exemplary flow chart depicting a method for bombing an accelerometer sensor with water vapor according to one embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 6 is an exemplary flow chart depicting a method for determining leak rate of an accelerometer sensor according to one embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Methods and systems that implement the embodiments of the various features of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings. The drawings and the associated descriptions are provided to illustrate embodiments of the invention and not to limit the scope of the invention. Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” is intended to indicate that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least an embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” or “an embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Throughout the drawings, reference numbers are re-used to indicate correspondence between referenced elements. In addition, the first digit of each reference number indicates the figure in which the element first appears.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a prior art silicon accelerometer sensor 100 before assembly. The sensor 100 has a first outside layer 110, a second outside layer 115, a first guard layer 120, a second guard layer 125, and a proof mass layer 130. The proof mass layer 130 is sandwiched between the first and second guard layers 120 and 125, which are then sandwiched between the first and second outside layers 110 and 115. The sensor 100 also has a via 135 to facilitate a path or opening for circuit shorting. The sensor 100 is fabricated from two silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers and one prime silicon wafer. The SOI wafers provide the first and second outside layers 110 and 115, and the first and second guard layers 120 and 125. The prime silicon wafer provides the proof mass layer 130.

On the surface of each wafer layer 110-130 is a layer of oxide, typically 1 micron thick. When the layers 120-130 are bonded together, a 2 micron layer of oxide is formed between the guard layers 120 and 125 and the proof mass layer 130.

One technique to bond all the wafer layers 110-130 together is by a process called direct bonding. Before bonding, the wafer layers 110-130 are preferably cleaned and activated. Activation is done by either chemical or plasma surface activation. The wafer layers 110-130 are properly aligned and coupled to each other. Van Der Waals forces will cause the layers 110-130 to bond to each other. Since the Van Der Waals forces are relatively weak, the wafer layers 110-130 may be annealed at an elevated temperature. This temperature depends on the activation process. Older processes used temperatures in excess of 1000° C. With newer plasma processes, 400° C. may suffice. It can be envisioned that other methods or techniques can be used to bond the layers 110-130 together and achieve the same objective of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is an assembly drawing of the silicon accelerometer sensor 100 of FIG. 1. The assembly drawing shows the internal components of sensor 100. Contained within the proof mass layer 130 is a proof mass paddle 205 that may be coupled to the proof mass layer 130 by silicon hinges. On opposite sides of the paddle 205 are electrodes. FIGS. 2 and 3 show electrodes 210 contained within the guard layers 120 and 125 and parallel to one another. This configuration forms a capacitor between each electrode 210 and the paddle 205. In operation, the capacitance is used to determine the gap between the paddle 205 and each electrode 210. An electronic circuit supplies the proper voltage pulses to force the paddle to null, defined as the paddle position where both capacitances are equal.

FIG. 3 is a side view of a silicon accelerometer sensor 300, according to one embodiment of the present invention. The sensor 300 has an internal cavity 315 enclosed by layers 110-130. The internal cavity 315 houses the paddle 205 and electrodes 210, leaving a gap 320 between them. The sensor 300 also has a PM-G bond line 305 formed between the proof mass layer 130 and first and second guard layers 120 and 125. Similarly, the sensor 300 has a G-E bond line 310 formed between the guard layers 120 and 125 and the outside wafer layers 110 and 115, respectively.

To decrease the PM-G parasitic capacitance, the width of the bond line 305 between the proof mass and guard should be decreased. However, as the width of the bond line 305 is decreased, the bond strength is decreased, and the ruggedness and reliability of the chip may become compromised. Typically, the prior art width used for bond line 305 is 400 microns. This prior art width is a consequence of fabrication techniques used that does not account for the optimum width necessary to reduce parasitic capacitance and maintain reliable bond strength.

From a bond strength standpoint, the bond line 305 can be reduced substantially without compromising the reliability of the chip. Using a prior art bond line 305 of 400 microns, the sensor 300 can withstand a tensile force of about 50 lbs. Given the mass of the outside wafer layer 110 or 115 is 30 mg, the G loading would be about 700,000 G and the tensile strength of the oxide would be about 3400 PSI. On a number of sensors 300, the bonds do not necessarily delaminate, but the silicon breaks instead. Consequently, from a strength standpoint, the bond line 305 can be reduced by a factor of 2 to 4 without compromising the reliability of the chip.

Although a decrease in the width of the bond line 305 may not substantially affect the bond strength of the sensor 300, it may affect the hermeticity of the chip, either by increased leak failures or inherent permeability of the silicon dioxide. According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method for optimizing bond line 305 width for reduction of parasitic capacitance in MEMS accelerometers is provided.

Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5, an application for practicing the method embodying the present invention, is generally designated 400. The sensor 300 is exposed to water vapor using a steam furnace or oven 405. Although a method utilizing an oven 405 is described herein, the method of the present invention applies equally to other steam producing sources.

According to a method embodying the present invention, the steam oven 405 is heated, at step 500, to an elevated temperature for evaporating water. For example, the temperature of the oven or furnace 405 can be preheated to approximately 100° C. A thermal controller 410 can be used to set the temperature of the steam oven 405, and a timer 415 can be used to set the period of exposure of the sensor 300 to the water vapor 420.

Once the steam oven 405 reaches the desired temperature, the MEMS device or sensor 300 is inserted, at step 510, for a desirable or predetermined period, for example, 24 hours. The period of exposure to the water vapor 420 is used in calculating the leak rate, which is discussed in detail below.

After bombing the MEMS device or sensor 300 with water vapor 420 for a specific period, the MEMS device is removed, at step 520, from the steam oven 405 and allowed to cool, at step 530, at a temperature below 0° C. In one embodiment, the MEMS device is cooled to a temperature of −55° C., as required by the military operational guidelines. At step 540, the MEMS device or sensor 300 is then tested at the temperature (below 0° C.) to determine if there is any discontinuity in performance of the device during operation.

Referring to FIG. 6, a method for determining leak rate of an accelerometer sensor 300 is provided in accordance with the present invention. When a MEMS device or sensor 300 is tested at a temperature below 0° C., for example −55° C., discontinuity in performance of the device during operation (Step 600) may occur. If the sensor 300 does not show any discontinuity in performance during operation at −55° C., then the sensor 300 does not leak, at step 610, and consequently, the reduced width of bond line 305 does not compromise the reliability of the chip.

Conversely, at step 620, if there is a discontinuity in performance during operation, then the MEMS device or sensor 300 has a leak that allowed water vapor 420 to seep through and crystallize at the lower temperature. Because the gap 320 between the paddle 205 and the electrodes 210 is about 2 microns, when the temperature is lowered to the −55° C. lower operating limit, even a very small vapor pressure in the sensor 300 will form an ice crystal or dendrite that blocks the motion of the paddle. This shows up as a discontinuity in operation of the accelerometer. At a temperature of −60° C., there is enough water in the chip to form a pillar of ice over 3 microns in diameter on both sides of the paddle 205.

At step 630, the leak rate can be calculated by dividing the volume of water in the sensor's internal cavity 315 by the water vapor bombing time period. The leak rate depends on (1) the temperature at which discontinuity of operation occurs, and (2) the time and temperature at which a MEMS device is bombed with water vapor. For example, suppose a MEMS device is bombed with saturated steam at about 100° C. for 24 hours. If there is discontinuity of operation at 0° C., it indicates that the vapor pressure of water in the MEMS device is above the equilibrium vapor pressure of ice or water at that temperature (4.58 mm of Hg). Given that the volume of an internal cavity 315 of a sensor 300 is about 4.36 μL, the chip would contain about 2.6×10−6 cm3 of water. Since, the MEMS device was exposed for 24 hours, it would have accumulated that water in 86,400 seconds, so the leak rate would be 3×10−10 cm3/s.

Similarly, if the chip shows a discontinuity of operation at −50° C., where the vapor pressure is 0.03 torr, then the leak rate is 2×10−12 cm3/s. These results show that the method embodying the present invention provides greater sensitivity than the prior art krypton bombing method.

It can be envisioned that bombing with water vapor 420 can be accomplished at different times and temperatures. For example, the bomb time or temperature could be increased. A temperature of 120° C. would approximately double the external water vapor pressure and a temperature of 180° C. would increase it 10 fold. Alternatively, the MEMS device can be cooled to a temperature even lower than −55° C. during testing.

One factor that should be taken into account at low temperatures, where the total amount of water condensing is low, is the possibility that all the water vapor 420 in the MEMS device could condense at some benign spot, so that the operation of the device would be unaffected. This may result in a false pass. However, based on experimental results obtained for low temperature failures, it appears that the gap 320 is a good nucleation area for the water vapor 420.

It is understood by a person skilled in the art that a sensor 300 can be fabricated with a combination of the prior art bond line 305 width of 400 microns with the reduced bond line 305 width of 100-200 microns. If this sensor 300 is subjected to water vapor bombing, at step 510, then any compromise of hermeticity with the reduced bond line 305 width could be determined statistically during operation testing, at step 540.

Although a decrease in the width of the bond line 305 may not substantially affect the bond strength of the sensor 300, it may affect the hermeticity of the chip, either by increased leak failures or inherent permeability of the silicon dioxide.

Although the hermeticity of a MEMS device depends on leak rates, it is also affected by inherent permeability of the silicon dioxide. Even if there is a perfect seal, permeation of water vapor 420 through the oxide may affect hermeticity. To determine the effect of permeation on the hermeticity of MEMS devices, permeation data was ascertained for Helium, Hydrogen, Deuterium and Neon at 700° C. At this temperature the permeation coefficient of Neon (the closest of the four to water in size) is about 1×10−9 cm3 mm/cm2 sec cm of Hg. Hydrogen and Deuterium are about twice as large as Neon, while Helium is about 20 times as large as Neon. The permeation coefficient of Neon would be equivalent to a leak rate of about 10−9 cm3/s.

If the MEMS device is bombed with water vapor 420 at a temperature of 100° C., the permeation constants would likely be several orders of magnitude lower than Neon at 700° C. Consequently, permeation through the oxide layer would not affect the hermeticity and reliability of a MEMS device with a reduced bond line 305 width of 100-200 microns. Even if permeation proved to be an issue for the long term stability of the MEMS device, it could be dealt with, for example, by filling the MEMS device with the same gas as the system housing the device.

While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention.

Claims (7)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for determining a leak rate through a bond line of a MEMS device with a cavity having a predetermined volume, the method comprising the steps of:
exposing the MEMS device to a fluid in a chamber for a predetermined time period at a first temperature that vaporizes the fluid;
cooling the MEMS device to a second temperature that freezes the fluid;
operating the MEMS device at a third temperature that maintains the fluid in a frozen state until occurrence of discontinuity in performance, the discontinuity in performance indicating that fluid has leaked into the MEMS cavity through the bond line;
upon occurrence of a discontinuity in performance, determining the volume of the fluid in the MEMS device using the third temperature and the predetermined volume of the MEMS cavity; and
determining the leak rate through the bond line using the determined volume of the fluid in the MEMS device and the predetermined time period the MEMS device was exposed to the vaporized fluid.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluid is water.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the third temperature is equal to the second temperature.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first temperature is approximately 100° C.
5. The method of claim 1, Wherein the second temperature is approximately −55° C.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the second temperature is approximately below 0° C.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining the leak rate comprises dividing the determined volume of the fluid in the MEMS device by the predetermined time period the MEMS device was exposed to the vaporized fluid.
US13/185,723 2005-05-25 2011-07-19 Method for determining leak rate through a bond line of a MEMS device Active 2026-08-14 US8579502B2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US68443105P true 2005-05-25 2005-05-25
PCT/US2006/020084 WO2006127814A2 (en) 2005-05-25 2006-05-24 Method for optimizing direct wafer bond line width for reduction of parasitic capacitance in mems accelerometers
US91493207A true 2007-11-19 2007-11-19
US13/185,723 US8579502B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2011-07-19 Method for determining leak rate through a bond line of a MEMS device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/185,723 US8579502B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2011-07-19 Method for determining leak rate through a bond line of a MEMS device

Related Parent Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11914932 Division
PCT/US2006/020084 Division WO2006127814A2 (en) 2005-05-25 2006-05-24 Method for optimizing direct wafer bond line width for reduction of parasitic capacitance in mems accelerometers
US91493207A Division 2007-11-19 2007-11-19

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110271744A1 US20110271744A1 (en) 2011-11-10
US8579502B2 true US8579502B2 (en) 2013-11-12

Family

ID=37160770

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/914,932 Active 2027-09-19 US8007166B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2006-05-24 Method for optimizing direct wafer bond line width for reduction of parasitic capacitance in MEMS accelerometers
US13/185,723 Active 2026-08-14 US8579502B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2011-07-19 Method for determining leak rate through a bond line of a MEMS device

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/914,932 Active 2027-09-19 US8007166B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2006-05-24 Method for optimizing direct wafer bond line width for reduction of parasitic capacitance in MEMS accelerometers

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US8007166B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2006127814A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9796585B2 (en) * 2015-12-17 2017-10-24 Texas Instruments Incorporated Leak detection using cavity surface quality factor

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8661872B2 (en) * 2010-11-12 2014-03-04 William J. Brocker Test system
US9442131B2 (en) * 2013-03-13 2016-09-13 Analog Devices, Inc. System and method for run-time hermeticity detection of a capped MEMS device

Citations (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4152477A (en) 1976-01-20 1979-05-01 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Printed circuit board and method for making the same
EP0369352A1 (en) 1988-11-15 1990-05-23 Hitachi, Ltd. Capacitance type accelerometer and method of manufacturing the same
EP0611221A1 (en) 1993-02-10 1994-08-17 Sextant Avionique S.A. Capacitive microsensor with low parasitic capacitance and manufacturing process
US5827951A (en) 1995-04-21 1998-10-27 Sandia National Laboratories Solderability test system
US6287437B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2001-09-11 Alcatel Recessed bonding of target for RF diode sputtering
US6422744B1 (en) * 1997-10-08 2002-07-23 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method of testing a display device during the manufacture thereof
US6491426B1 (en) 2001-06-25 2002-12-10 Sbs Technologies Inc. Thermal bond verification
EP1279941A2 (en) 2001-07-25 2003-01-29 Conti Temic microelectronic GmbH Procedure for testing the leak tightness of capacitive sensors
US20040057043A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-25 Newman John W. System and process for detecting leaks in sealed articles
US20040163717A1 (en) * 2003-02-21 2004-08-26 Cookson Electronics, Inc. MEMS device assembly
US6821802B2 (en) 1998-08-31 2004-11-23 Micron Technology, Inc. Silicon interposer with optical connections
US6879048B2 (en) 2001-02-02 2005-04-12 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Glass frit wafer bonding process and packages formed thereby
EP1524511A2 (en) 2003-10-15 2005-04-20 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Leak detection method and micro-machined device assembly
US6912778B2 (en) 2001-07-19 2005-07-05 Micron Technology, Inc. Methods of fabricating full-wafer silicon probe cards for burn-in and testing of semiconductor devices
US20060094149A1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2006-05-04 Chien-Hua Chen Micro electrical mechanical system
US20060292748A1 (en) 2004-05-26 2006-12-28 Haluzak Charles C Package having bond-sealed underbump
US7210337B1 (en) * 2005-10-17 2007-05-01 Honeywell International Inc. MEMS sensor package leak test
US7287903B2 (en) 2003-02-20 2007-10-30 Conductor Analysis Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for rapid thermal testing
US7299681B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2007-11-27 Idc, Llc Method and system for detecting leak in electronic devices
US7338818B2 (en) 2005-05-19 2008-03-04 International Business Machines Corporation Systems and arrangements to assess thermal performance
US7410880B2 (en) * 2004-12-27 2008-08-12 Asml Netherlands B.V. Method for measuring bonding quality of bonded substrates, metrology apparatus, and method of producing a device from a bonded substrate
US20080191729A1 (en) 2007-02-09 2008-08-14 Richard Lidio Blanco Thermal interface for electronic chip testing
US7416984B2 (en) 2004-08-09 2008-08-26 Analog Devices, Inc. Method of producing a MEMS device
US7425093B2 (en) * 2003-07-16 2008-09-16 Cabot Corporation Thermography test method and apparatus for bonding evaluation in sputtering targets
US20090090409A1 (en) 2007-10-05 2009-04-09 Marlow Industries, Inc. System and Method for Assembling a Microthermoelectric Device
US20090194309A1 (en) 2006-05-22 2009-08-06 Commissariat A Le-Energie Atomique Microcomponent Provided with a Cavity Delimited by a Cap with Enhanced Mechanical Resistance
US7651260B2 (en) 2004-11-05 2010-01-26 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus for thermal characterization under non-uniform heat load
US7654734B2 (en) 2005-05-10 2010-02-02 General Electric Company Methods and devices for evaluating the thermal exposure of a metal article
US20100066393A1 (en) 2000-07-28 2010-03-18 Bottoms W R High density interconnect system for ic packages and interconnect assemblies
US7732713B2 (en) 2004-04-26 2010-06-08 Formfactor, Inc. Method to build robust mechanical structures on substrate surfaces
US20110227173A1 (en) * 2010-03-17 2011-09-22 Honeywell International Inc. Mems sensor with integrated asic packaging
US20120015456A1 (en) * 2006-05-17 2012-01-19 Innovative Micro Technology System and method for providing access to an encapsulated device

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5246291A (en) * 1992-06-01 1993-09-21 Motorola, Inc. Bond inspection technique for a semiconductor chip
US6502983B2 (en) * 1999-03-30 2003-01-07 The Regents Of The University Of California Micro-machined thermo-conductivity detector
AT541196T (en) * 2004-12-07 2012-01-15 Fraunhofer Ges Forschung A method for testing the leak rate of in vacuum-encapsulated devices
NL2003126C2 (en) * 2009-07-03 2014-05-08 Micronit Microfluidics Bv Method for manufacturing and testing microfluidic chips.

Patent Citations (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4152477A (en) 1976-01-20 1979-05-01 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Printed circuit board and method for making the same
EP0369352A1 (en) 1988-11-15 1990-05-23 Hitachi, Ltd. Capacitance type accelerometer and method of manufacturing the same
EP0611221A1 (en) 1993-02-10 1994-08-17 Sextant Avionique S.A. Capacitive microsensor with low parasitic capacitance and manufacturing process
US5827951A (en) 1995-04-21 1998-10-27 Sandia National Laboratories Solderability test system
US6422744B1 (en) * 1997-10-08 2002-07-23 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method of testing a display device during the manufacture thereof
US6821802B2 (en) 1998-08-31 2004-11-23 Micron Technology, Inc. Silicon interposer with optical connections
US6287437B1 (en) 2000-05-05 2001-09-11 Alcatel Recessed bonding of target for RF diode sputtering
US20100066393A1 (en) 2000-07-28 2010-03-18 Bottoms W R High density interconnect system for ic packages and interconnect assemblies
US6879048B2 (en) 2001-02-02 2005-04-12 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Glass frit wafer bonding process and packages formed thereby
US6491426B1 (en) 2001-06-25 2002-12-10 Sbs Technologies Inc. Thermal bond verification
US6912778B2 (en) 2001-07-19 2005-07-05 Micron Technology, Inc. Methods of fabricating full-wafer silicon probe cards for burn-in and testing of semiconductor devices
US20030019282A1 (en) 2001-07-25 2003-01-30 Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh Method for seal testing capacitive sensors
EP1279941A2 (en) 2001-07-25 2003-01-29 Conti Temic microelectronic GmbH Procedure for testing the leak tightness of capacitive sensors
US20040057043A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-25 Newman John W. System and process for detecting leaks in sealed articles
US7287903B2 (en) 2003-02-20 2007-10-30 Conductor Analysis Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for rapid thermal testing
US20040163717A1 (en) * 2003-02-21 2004-08-26 Cookson Electronics, Inc. MEMS device assembly
US7425093B2 (en) * 2003-07-16 2008-09-16 Cabot Corporation Thermography test method and apparatus for bonding evaluation in sputtering targets
EP1524511A2 (en) 2003-10-15 2005-04-20 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Leak detection method and micro-machined device assembly
US7732713B2 (en) 2004-04-26 2010-06-08 Formfactor, Inc. Method to build robust mechanical structures on substrate surfaces
US20060292748A1 (en) 2004-05-26 2006-12-28 Haluzak Charles C Package having bond-sealed underbump
US7443017B2 (en) 2004-05-26 2008-10-28 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Package having bond-sealed underbump
US7416984B2 (en) 2004-08-09 2008-08-26 Analog Devices, Inc. Method of producing a MEMS device
US7299681B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2007-11-27 Idc, Llc Method and system for detecting leak in electronic devices
US20080029880A1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2008-02-07 Chien-Hua Chen Micro Electrical Mechanical System
US20060094149A1 (en) * 2004-10-29 2006-05-04 Chien-Hua Chen Micro electrical mechanical system
US20100046574A1 (en) 2004-11-05 2010-02-25 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus for thermal characterization under non-uniform heat load
US7651260B2 (en) 2004-11-05 2010-01-26 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus for thermal characterization under non-uniform heat load
US7410880B2 (en) * 2004-12-27 2008-08-12 Asml Netherlands B.V. Method for measuring bonding quality of bonded substrates, metrology apparatus, and method of producing a device from a bonded substrate
US7654734B2 (en) 2005-05-10 2010-02-02 General Electric Company Methods and devices for evaluating the thermal exposure of a metal article
US7338818B2 (en) 2005-05-19 2008-03-04 International Business Machines Corporation Systems and arrangements to assess thermal performance
US7210337B1 (en) * 2005-10-17 2007-05-01 Honeywell International Inc. MEMS sensor package leak test
US20120015456A1 (en) * 2006-05-17 2012-01-19 Innovative Micro Technology System and method for providing access to an encapsulated device
US20090194309A1 (en) 2006-05-22 2009-08-06 Commissariat A Le-Energie Atomique Microcomponent Provided with a Cavity Delimited by a Cap with Enhanced Mechanical Resistance
US20080191729A1 (en) 2007-02-09 2008-08-14 Richard Lidio Blanco Thermal interface for electronic chip testing
US20090090409A1 (en) 2007-10-05 2009-04-09 Marlow Industries, Inc. System and Method for Assembling a Microthermoelectric Device
US20110227173A1 (en) * 2010-03-17 2011-09-22 Honeywell International Inc. Mems sensor with integrated asic packaging

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 12, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/020084 filed May 24, 2006.

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9796585B2 (en) * 2015-12-17 2017-10-24 Texas Instruments Incorporated Leak detection using cavity surface quality factor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2006127814A2 (en) 2006-11-30
US8007166B2 (en) 2011-08-30
US20110271744A1 (en) 2011-11-10
WO2006127814A3 (en) 2007-04-12
US20080184778A1 (en) 2008-08-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN1105908C (en) Micromechanical sensor
US6294400B1 (en) Method for making micro-mechanical semiconductor accelerometer
US5912499A (en) Pressure transducer comprising a sealed transducer with a rigid diaphragm
US7767484B2 (en) Method for sealing and backside releasing of microelectromechanical systems
US6951824B2 (en) Method for manufacturing a micromechanical component and a component that is manufactured in accordance with the method
Kim et al. Frequency stability of wafer-scale film encapsulated silicon based MEMS resonators
Esashi Wafer level packaging of MEMS
US5914520A (en) Micromechanical sensor device
US7810394B2 (en) Integrated sensor and circuitry
CN102356324B (en) Vertically integrated mems acceleration transducer
US6445053B1 (en) Micro-machined absolute pressure sensor
US7757393B2 (en) Capacitive microaccelerometers and fabrication methods
US8216882B2 (en) Method of producing a microelectromechanical (MEMS) sensor device
CN102401706B (en) Mems pressure sensor device and a method
US6816301B1 (en) Micro-electromechanical devices and methods of manufacture
CN101643193B (en) Micromechanical device which has cavities having different internal atmospheric pressures
US7004015B2 (en) Method and system for locally sealing a vacuum microcavity, methods and systems for monitoring and controlling pressure and method and system for trimming resonant frequency of a microstructure therein
US20070190680A1 (en) MEMS device and manufacturing process thereof
JP5541306B2 (en) Physical quantity sensor device and manufacturing method thereof
EP1640333A1 (en) Hermetically sealed microdevice with getter shield
US6700174B1 (en) Batch fabricated semiconductor thin-film pressure sensor and method of making same
Cheng et al. A hermetic glass-silicon package formed using localized aluminum/silicon-glass bonding
US7104129B2 (en) Vertically integrated MEMS structure with electronics in a hermetically sealed cavity
US7247246B2 (en) Vertical integration of a MEMS structure with electronics in a hermetically sealed cavity
US6767757B2 (en) High-vacuum packaged microgyroscope and method for manufacturing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ABBINK, HENRY C.;KUHN, GABRIEL M.;GE, HOWARD;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060509 TO 20060512;REEL/FRAME:031331/0758

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4