US8328470B2 - Apparatus and method for ground improvement - Google Patents
Apparatus and method for ground improvement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8328470B2 US8328470B2 US12/792,258 US79225810A US8328470B2 US 8328470 B2 US8328470 B2 US 8328470B2 US 79225810 A US79225810 A US 79225810A US 8328470 B2 US8328470 B2 US 8328470B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- tines
- top plate
- feet
- length
- ground
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 57
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000000280 densification Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000009969 flowable effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 claims description 66
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims description 63
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000011440 grout Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000010881 fly ash Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000012615 aggregate Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- -1 gravel Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 42
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 35
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 26
- 238000005056 compaction Methods 0.000 description 15
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 15
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000994 depressogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910001018 Cast iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011549 displacement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D3/00—Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
- E02D3/02—Improving by compacting
- E02D3/046—Improving by compacting by tamping or vibrating, e.g. with auxiliary watering of the soil
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D3/00—Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
- E02D3/02—Improving by compacting
- E02D3/046—Improving by compacting by tamping or vibrating, e.g. with auxiliary watering of the soil
- E02D3/054—Improving by compacting by tamping or vibrating, e.g. with auxiliary watering of the soil involving penetration of the soil, e.g. vibroflotation
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D3/00—Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
- E02D3/12—Consolidating by placing solidifying or pore-filling substances in the soil
- E02D3/123—Consolidating by placing solidifying or pore-filling substances in the soil and compacting the soil
Definitions
- the present invention is related to an apparatus and method for improving the strength and stiffness of soil by treating the soil with a displacement device having a plurality of tines, and optionally subsequently filling voids made by the device with flowable media such as, for example, sand, gravel, recycled materials, waste materials, tire chips, grout, or concrete.
- flowable media such as, for example, sand, gravel, recycled materials, waste materials, tire chips, grout, or concrete.
- Deep foundations Heavy or settlement-sensitive facilities that are located in areas containing soft, loose, or weak soils are often supported on deep foundations.
- Such deep foundations are typically made from driven pilings or concrete piers installed after drilling.
- the deep foundations are designed to transfer structural loads through the soft soils to more competent soil strata. Deep foundations are often relatively expensive when compared to other construction methods.
- Another way to support such structures is to excavate out the soft, loose, or weak soils and then fill the excavation with more competent material.
- the entire area under the building foundation is normally excavated and replaced to the depth of the soft, loose, or weak soil.
- This method is advantageous because it is performed with conventional earthwork methods, but has the disadvantages of being costly when performed in urban areas and may require that costly dewatering or shoring be performed to stabilize the excavation.
- Yet another way to support such structures is to treat the soil with “deep dynamic compaction” consisting of dropping a heavy weight on the ground surface.
- the weight is dropped from a sufficient height to cause a large compression wave to develop in the soil.
- the compression wave compacts the soil, provided the soil is of a sufficient gradation to be treatable.
- a variety of weight shapes are available to achieve compaction by this method, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,505,998.
- deep dynamic compaction may be economical for certain sites, it has the disadvantage that it induces large waves as a result of the weight hitting the ground. These waves may be damaging to structures.
- the technique is deficient because it is only applicable to a small band of soil gradations (particle sizes) and is not suitable for materials with appreciable fine-sized particles. What is needed in the field is a system that can rapidly improve cohesionless, cohesive, and semi-cohesive soils without inducing damaging vibrations.
- ground reinforcement with aggregate columns has been used to support structures located in areas containing layers of soft soils.
- the columns are designed to reinforce and strengthen the soft layers and reduce settlements.
- Such piers are constructed using a variety of methods including drilling and tamping methods such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,249,892 and 6,354,766 (“Short Aggregate Piers”), driven mandrel methods such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,713 (“Lateral Displacement Pier”), and tamping head driven mandrel methods such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,246 (“Impact®” system).
- the “Short Aggregate Pier” technique referenced above such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,249,892, which includes drilling or excavating a cavity, is an effective foundation solution, especially when installed in cohesive soils where the sidewall stability of the hole is easily maintained.
- the Short Aggregate Pier method may, theoretically, also be applied to multiple holes at once.
- this technique has the disadvantages of requiring casing in granular soils with collapsing holes and of necessitating the filling of the holes prior to tamping.
- the system is limited to very shallow treatment depths such as those needed for improvement below pavements.
- Needed in the field is a system that overcomes these deficiencies by allowing soil improvement to a wide range of soil conditions without the necessity of filling the holes between tamping passes and of being able to treat to deeper depths required for the support of shallow spread footings.
- the “Lateral Displacement Pier” and “Impact®” system methods were developed for aggregate column installations in granular soils where the sidewall stability of the cavity is not easily maintained.
- the Lateral Displacement Pier is built as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,713 by driving a pipe into the ground, drilling out the soil inside the pipe, filling the pipe with aggregate, and using the pipe to compact the aggregate “in thin lifts.” A beveled edge is typically used at the bottom of the pipe for compaction.
- the Impact® system is an extension of the Lateral Displacement Pier. In this case, a smaller diameter (8 to 20 inches) tamper head is driven into the ground as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,246.
- the tamper head is attached to a pipe, which is filled with crushed stone once the tamper head is driven to the design depth. The tamper head is then lifted, thereby allowing stone to remain in the cavity, and then the tamper head is driven back down in order to densify each lift of aggregate.
- An advantage of the Impact® system, over the Lateral Displacement Pier, is the speed of construction.
- the “Rampact®” system is yet another displacement method in which a single conical shaped mandrel is driven into the ground and then filled with crushed stone as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,326,004.
- the mandrel is hollow and fitted with a sacrificial plate or a valve mechanism at the bottom. The mandrel is later lifted to allow the rock to flow out of the bottom of the mandrel. The mandrel is then redriven back down into the cavity to compact the stone.
- the pier is constructed incrementally upwards in thin lifts from the bottom.
- a device for ground improvement comprises a top plate having a first surface configured for having a driving device attached thereto to provide impact thereon; a plurality of vertically extending tines attached to a second surface of the top plate opposite the first surface of the top plate, and horizontally spaced from each other at upper lateral edges thereof, for being driven into a ground surface; and the tines being shaped, spaced, and oriented relative to each other in a manner to achieve displacement of ground material downward and radially outward.
- the tines can be tapered to be narrower at an end away from the top plate than at the attachment to the second surface of the top plate.
- the tines can be tapered at an angle in the range of 0° to 5°, and more specifically, at an angle in the range of 0.5° to 2.5°.
- the tines can have a length in the range of 2-30 feet, can be circular in cross-section, or articulated in cross-section.
- the tines can be substantially flat at an end away from the top plate, substantially pointed at an end away from the top plate, or have a bulbous shape at an end away from the top plate.
- the tines can be made of ferrous material, steel, or composite materials.
- the tines can be hollow and have openings at the ends away from the top plate and respective valves at the openings for restricting entry of soil during advancement, and for allowing passage of flowable material outward during retraction.
- the hollow tines can also have openings at the ends away from the top plate, and respective sacrificial plates at the openings.
- the plurality of tines comprises five tines horizontally spaced from each other, with four perimeter tines spaced about the periphery of the top plate and surrounding a centrally located tine. The four perimeter tines can be oriented at 45° about their vertical axis relative to the centrally located tine. In another exemplary embodiment, the plurality of tines comprises eleven tines horizontally spaced from each other, with eight perimeter tines spaced about the periphery of the top plate and surrounding three centrally located tines. The eight perimeter tines can be oriented at 45° about their vertical axis relative to the centrally located tines.
- a method for ground improvement comprises providing a device for ground improvement comprised of a top plate having a first surface configured for having a driving device attached thereto to provide impact thereon, and a plurality of vertically extending tines attached to a second surface of the top plate opposite the first surface of the top plate, and horizontally spaced from each other at upper lateral edges thereof, for being driven into a ground surface, and the tines being shaped, spaced, and oriented relative to each other in a manner to achieve displacement of ground material downward and radially outward; advancing the device tines into the ground surface; retracting the tines from the ground surface; repeating the advancing and retracting until a desired ground condition is achieved.
- the advancing of the tines creates cavities at the location the tines are advanced, and the method further comprises adding backfill into the cavities and advancing and retracting the device repeatedly after the backfill has been added.
- the tines can be hollow and each have an opening at an end away from the surface plate, such that backfill can be added through the tines and out the opening of each tine upon retraction thereof.
- the tines can have respective valves at the open ends, and the method comprises keeping the valves closed upon advancement of the device and opening the valves upon retraction, and adding the backfill through the tines.
- the tines can also have respective sacrificial plates at the open ends, and the method comprises securing the sacrificial plates to the tines upon advancement of the device and allowing the sacrificial plates to separate from the tines upon retraction, and adding the backfill through the tines.
- the backfill can be one of or a combination of crushed stone, sand, aggregate, gravel, grout, concrete, lime, fly ash, waste materials, tire chips, recycled materials, and other flowable substances.
- the level of ground improvement achieved can be measured through a monitoring of downward pressure during penetration for a determination of degree of densification.
- FIG. 1 is a drawing illustrating a system employing the device of the present invention.
- FIGS. 2A and 2B are plan and profile views of the device, respectively, illustrating the tines and top plate configuration in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B are plan and profile views of the device, respectively, illustrating the tines and top plate configuration in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
- FIGS. 4A and 4B are plan and profile views of the device, respectively, illustrating the tines and top plate configuration in accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention.
- FIGS. 5A and 5B are plan and profile views, respectively, of one embodiment showing an expanded bulb at the bottom of the tines.
- FIGS. 6A and 6B are profile views showing valves that can be positioned in the bottom portion of a single tine.
- FIG. 7 is a profile view showing a sacrificial cap at the bottom of a single tine.
- FIG. 8 is a perspective illustration of the device of FIG. 1 during driving to achieve densification.
- FIG. 9 is an illustration showing cavities or holes that are formed by the device of the present invention, after removal of the device from the ground.
- FIG. 10 is an illustration showing a ground surface as the device of the present invention is treating the soil, and illustrating surface settlement that occurs when the soil is densified.
- FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the Cone Penetration Test (“CPT”) tip resistance results in an imported sand site after treatment with a 6 foot long device.
- CPT Cone Penetration Test
- FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating the CPT tip resistance results in a natural silty sand site after treatment with a 6 foot long device.
- FIGS. 13 and 14 are graphs illustrating CPT tip resistance results in an imported sand site and in a natural silty sand site, respectively, after treatment with a 10 foot long device.
- FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating CPT tip resistance results in a natural silty sand site after treatment with a 20 foot long device.
- FIG. 16 is a graph illustrating CPT tip resistance results within the compaction footprint of the device installations after treatment with a 6 foot long device.
- FIG. 17 is a graph illustrating CPT tip resistance results after treatment with a 6 foot long device at locations 2.25 feet from the compaction footprint (between installation locations).
- the invention includes an apparatus and method for improving the strength and stiffness of in-situ subsurface materials, e.g., soil in a grounded surface, prior to loading by buildings, slabs, walls, tanks, transportation structures, industrial works, and other structures.
- the apparatus includes a device 15 made up of a series of vertically oriented tines 11 which extend downwardly and are fixed to a top plate 13 .
- the purpose of the top plate 13 is to hold the tines 11 in place.
- the top plate 13 holds the tines together and does not necessarily provide densification or confinement during densification.
- the tines 11 are affixed to the top plate 13 , with welds or other means, to achieve a mechanical attachment connection.
- the tines 11 are horizontally spaced from each other at the attachment connection on top plate 13 , and have a length to spacing (L/S) ratio of greater than two (2) wherein length (L) is the length of the tines and spacing (S) is typically the spacing between the tines on a tine center-to-center basis.
- L/S length to spacing
- the embodiment of the top plate 13 is square with dimensions of about 30 inches on each side, and is typically three inches thick.
- the top plate 13 may be made of steel.
- the top plate 13 could be made of other materials such as iron, concrete, or composite materials.
- the dimensions of the top plate 13 are selected as those appropriate to hold the tines 11 in a vertical arrangement.
- the top plate 13 is rectangular with dimensions of about 30 inches wide by about 60 inches long.
- the top plate 13 is rectangular with dimensions of about 30 inches wide by about 45 inches long. The precise dimensions of the top plate 13 are selected depending on the tine arrangement desired.
- Each tine 11 extends vertically downward from the top plate 13 .
- the tines 11 are typically five inches square at the bottom transitioning to eight inches square at the top, and extend a length of about six feet below the bottom of top plate 13 (a taper angle of approximately) 2.4°.
- the tines 11 are tapered to facilitate easy driving and extraction.
- the tapered shape also serves to confine the soil vertically from upward heaving.
- the degree of taper angle may vary but is contemplated to typically be in the range of 0 to 5°, and preferably 0.5° to 2.5°. While these angle ranges are for illustrative purposes, it is understood that other angle ranges could be used in order to achieve displacement of soil downward and radially outward to rigidify vertical soil boundaries between adjacent tines during the densification process.
- tines 11 typically four inches square at the bottom transitioning to eight inches square at the top, and extending a length of about 10 feet below the bottom of top plate 13 (a taper angle of approximately) 1.9°.
- the embodiment associated with FIG. 4B contemplates tines 11 typically four inches square at the bottom (which is 20 feet below the top plate) transitioning to eight inches square at a distance of 10 feet below the top plate and remaining 8 inches square from the mid-height to the top plate 13 (or the taper may be consistent from the bottom to the top, with an appropriate change in geometry or taper angle).
- each individual tine 11 of the present invention is important to ensure adequate densification to design depths for spread footings (as opposed to shallow treatment depths such as those needed for improvement below pavements, as taught in the prior art).
- the tines associated with FIGS. 2A and 2B tine length of six feet and transitioning from five inches wide at the bottom to eight inches wide at the top
- 3A and 3B (tine length of 10 feet and transitioning from four inches wide at the bottom to eight inches wide at the top) would have a length to width ratio ranging from 15 to 30 (measured from the top width and the bottom width, respectively).
- the tines associated with FIGS. 4A and 4B (tine length of 20 feet and transitioning from four inches wide at the bottom to eight inches wide at the top) would have a length to width ratio ranging from 30 to 60 (measured from the top width and the bottom width, respectively).
- the tines may be cylindrical.
- the tines 11 may be alternatively tapered or cylindrical.
- the tines 11 may have a bulbous bottom head 18 for additional densification as shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B .
- the tines 11 may be circular or may be articulated, such as octagonal, hexagonal, square, triangular, or another articulated or semi-articulated shape.
- the tines 11 are typically made of steel, cast iron, other ferrous metal, or composite materials and are typically hollow (thereby contributing to the relatively lightweight nature of the device).
- the tines 11 and top plate 13 making up the device 15 should be both strong and lightweight for easy driving.
- the device 15 is driven into the ground or soil by a mechanical driving apparatus or hammer 17 as shown in FIG. 1 . Accordingly, it is important that the device be constructed in a manner that is relatively lightweight to facilitate driving.
- Typical weights for the device 15 can range from 1000 to 5000 pounds. This is in contrast to the prior art, particularly the “deep dynamic compaction” devices previously discussed, which must be heavily weighted for proper functioning.
- the device 15 is driven into the ground using the driving apparatus 17 which can include a high-frequency piling hammer attached to a machine such as an excavator 16 .
- the hammer may be a vibratory hammer typically used for sheet pile driving.
- the hammer may be a drop hammer or a diesel or air hammer such as used to drive driven displacement piles.
- Other impact devices, vibratory or nonvibratory, are also envisioned.
- the top plate 13 can include a grab plate (not shown) at the surface thereof facing the driving apparatus 17 .
- the grab plate is conventional in nature and allows the top plate 13 to be attached to the driving device 17 .
- the driving of the tines 11 is performed in a smooth, vibrating or hammering manner. This is in contrast to “deep dynamic compaction” devices previously discussed which require dropping a heavily weighted device from a relatively great height at intermittent intervals required for the lifting of heavy weights.
- a sensor device may optionally be used for measurement of the degree of densification during the process.
- a sensor 101 may be attached to the driving device 17 above the top plate 13 of the multi-tined device 15 (such as, for example, at a location on a hammer sled).
- the sensor would enable measurement of applied downward “crowd” pressure during the densification process.
- the sensor could consist of a pressure gage mounted on the hydraulic lines of the rig, a strain gage mounted on the hammer sled or pull down cable, or an instrumented pin that measures shear force applied to a connection. The sensor would serve as an indicator of when the design densification level has been reached.
- the tines 11 are used as conduits for the placement of flowable fill such as grout or other flowable substance.
- the tips of the tines 11 may be fitted with mechanical valves, such as shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B , to prevent the inward intrusion of soil below the tines during penetration and to allow the outward flow of backfill through the tines during extraction.
- Backfill materials may consist of fluid mixtures such as grout, concrete, and other self binding and hardening fluids or may consist of mixes of sand, cement, flyash, and other admixtures.
- Valves may consist of portals such as shown in FIG.
- Valves may also consist of mechanical doors such as the hinged valve shown in FIG. 6B which consists of a flat plate 22 hingedly attached to the body of the tine 11 by a hinge 28 .
- the operation of any envisioned valve would allow the valve to remained closed (to prevent soil intrusion) as the tines are being inserted into the ground surface (due to upward force from the ground keeping the valve/hinge closed tight against the body of the tine) and as the tines are lifted up, the downward movement of the fill material will cause the valve to open to allow the fill material to flow from within the tines.
- sacrificial plates such as plate 32 at the bottom of tine 11 shown in FIG. 7 may be used in lieu of valves and would function the same way operationally.
- the device 15 facilitates soil improvement to a depth greater than the furthest extension of the tines 11 in the soil. This is significant because the invention provides a means to treat the soil to depths much greater than provided by other means.
- a method in accordance with the invention involves driving the device 15 and its tines 11 into the ground to a depth of desired improvement.
- the driving takes place as quickly as possible in one smooth motion facilitated by vibratory or impact energy such as that achieved by hammering.
- the device is then retracted from the ground to the ground surface.
- the sidewalls of formed holes may collapse if the matrix soil is in a very loose state. This collapse manifests itself into settlement of the ground surface in the area of ground improvement by the device 15 .
- the device 15 and its tines 11 may be then reinserted into the ground to the depth desired, and then once again retracted.
- the process of penetration and retraction serves to achieve densification through the displacement of the ground material downward and radially outward.
- the ground may “tighten up” and the holes formed by the tines 11 may stay open.
- these holes may be filled with flowable material, such as, for example, crushed limestone, sand, aggregate, gravel, granular waste products, tire chips, concrete, grout, fly ash, lime, cement, recycled materials (concrete, glass, etc.), or other flowable material.
- the purpose of the backfill is to prevent the holes from collapsing at a later time.
- the area of improvement may then be once again improved by re-inserting the device 15 and its tines 11 , or it may be considered to be fully treated, depending on design requirements.
- the presence of the plurality of vertical tines 11 serves an important function for the device 15 .
- the soil in the area of the tines 11 is displaced both downward and radially outward.
- the radial outward displacement is called cavity expansion.
- cavity expansion causes the soil around the tine 11 to displace outward and compact.
- the degree of densification depends on the ability of the soil to drain and compact, on the degree of cavity expansion, and on the boundary conditions surrounding the cavity.
- the boundary of an expanded cavity at any radius from the edge of the cavity consists of soil that itself may further deform outwardly away from the single tine.
- This non-rigid boundary lessens the amount of potential densification because it provides little lateral restraint.
- the boundary of the expanded cavity around each tine 11 is characterized in part by the presence of, and interaction with, adjacent tines 11 , that are also causing cavity expansion.
- the cavity expansion of each tine 11 is contained by an adjacent expanding cavity that is being expanded in the opposite direction.
- the method described herein contemplates various steps including multiple passes then filling; filling after each pass; never filling in soils that collapse; surface tamping later; filling with sand; filling with crushed stone; filling with other aggregate; filling with gravel; filling with granular media such as glass, recycled materials, or others; filling with tire chips; filling with a fluid media such as grout or concrete; filling with mixtures of sand, water, fly ash, and cement; or using two tines, three tines, four tines, five tines, or additional tines, as may appropriate to the site.
- testing was performed using a first embodiment of the invention at an Iowa Test Site.
- the device was used to stabilize natural sand, natural silty sand, and imported fill sand at the site.
- the device 15 of the invention was advanced at a total of 36 locations.
- the device 15 was advanced to a depth of 6 feet in all cases. This testing program was used to evaluate the quantitative improvements using the device 15 , in comparison to surface compaction with a vibratory plate applied at the ground surface.
- the device used in this Example I was fabricated to reflect the features shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B .
- five 6-foot long tines 11 were welded to a top plate 13 .
- the tines 11 were fabricated using a square cross-sectional shape tapered upward from a width of 5 inches at the bottom of the tines, to a width of 8 inches at the top of the tines 11 .
- the tines 11 were welded to a 30-inch square top plate 13 .
- the tines 11 at the perimeter or periphery of the plate 13 were oriented 45 degrees relative to a central tine 19 to reduce the potential for plugging of soil/sand between adjacent tines.
- a grab plate (not shown), as previously discussed, was attached to the upper surface of the plate 13 .
- a high frequency hammer that is often used for driving sheet piles was used to advance the device 15 into the soil. The hammer was attached to the device 15 by clamping to the grab plate.
- the Test Site contained approximately 4 feet of natural silty sand over natural clean sand.
- Standard Penetration Test (“SPT”) N-values in the upper 10 feet generally ranged between 5 and 10 blows per foot.
- Groundwater was noted at a depth of 6 to 8 feet during the post-installation Cone Penetration Test (“CPT”) measurements.
- CPT Cone Penetration Tests
- CPT tip resistances are approximately 20 tons per square foot (“tsf”) in the zone of the imported sand fill (depth of 4 feet) and approximately 50 tsf below.
- Surface compaction with vibrating plate only showed improvement to a depth of about 5 feet, increasing the CPT tip resistances from about 20 tsf (base line) to 50 tsf (after treatment with vibrating plate only).
- Treatment with three (3) passes of the device and backfilling with crushed stone gravel improved the soil up to a depth of about 17 feet; CPT tip resistances increased up to 250 tsf at a depth of 3 feet and ranged between about 50 tsf and 150 tsf below.
- the baseline CPT tip resistances ranged between 20 tsf and 80 tsf.
- Superficial compaction with vibrating plate only showed improvement to a depth of about 3 feet to 5 feet, increasing the CPT tip resistances up to 175 tsf at a depth of 1 foot and up to 50 tsf below.
- Treating the site with 3 passes backfilled with stone gravel improved the soil to a depth of about 13 feet;
- Treating the site with 12 passes backfilled with sand improved the site to a depth of about 11 feet;
- the soil improvement using the device of the present invention applied to both the imported sand backfill and natural silty sand over clean sand sites showed 5- to 7-fold increases in CPT tip resistances over the depth of tine penetration.
- the soils below the maximum penetration of the tines showed 1.5- to 3-fold increases in CPT tip resistances to depths of twice the width of the top plate extending below the maximum tine penetration depth.
- Example II In July of 2009, additional installations and testing were performed at the Iowa Test Site as described in Example I above.
- An alternate embodiment of the device 15 was advanced at a total of 22 locations, as described below. The device was advanced to a depth of 10 feet in all cases.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B The embodiment used in this Example II is shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B and is a device having eleven individual tines 11 attached to an approximately 30-inch by 60-inch top plate 13 , with eight tines 11 spaced from each other along the periphery of the top plate 13 and three central tines 19 spaced from each other in an interior region of top plate 13 .
- a grab plate (not shown) was welded to the top plate, allowing use with a vibratory hammer (amongst others).
- Each of the tines was 10 feet long, with a 4-inch by 4-inch square bottom transitioning to an 8-inch by 8-inch square top where they connected to the top plate 13 .
- the perimeter or periphery tines 11 were oriented 45 degrees to the central tines 19 to reduce the potential for plugging of soil/sand between adjacent tines 11 (including central tines 19 ).
- the installations with the embodiment of this example included four passes (insert tines, then retract and backfill holes in subsided area) and 12 passes in the imported sand site, and four passes and six passes in the natural silty sand site.
- sand backfill was used in all cases.
- the subsided area was filled with about 5 to 7 cubic yards of sand for each location. The treatment took about 2 minutes per pass. After the passes were completed the ground surface was surface compacted with a vibratory plate.
- FIGS. 13 and 14 A summary of the CPT results performed are presented in FIGS. 13 and 14 .
- FIG. 13 shows the CPT tip resistances in the imported sand site and
- FIG. 14 shows the CPT tip resistances for the natural silty sand site.
- the baseline CPT tip resistances generally ranged between 50 tsf and 100 tsf throughout the upper 15 feet of the soil profile. After treatment with four passes, the CPT tip resistances increased up to about 170 tsf to a depth of 5 feet, and ranged between 50 tsf and 150 tsf from 5 feet to 10 feet. Below a depth of 10 feet, the CPT tip resistance ranged between about 30 tsf and 120 tsf.
- the CPT tip resistances showed substantially more improvement; the tip resistances increased to values up to 240 tsf at depths of 5 feet and 7 feet; and values generally ranging between 100 tsf and 150 tsf from 7 feet to 13 feet which appeared to be the depth of soil improvement.
- the baseline CPT tip resistances generally ranged between 40 tsf and 70 tsf to a depth of 10 feet and generally ranged between 60 tsf and 110 tsf from 10 to 15 feet.
- the CPT tip resistance values increased to values of up to 100 tsf in the upper 10 feet and exceeding 150 tsf from 10 feet to 12 feet.
- the tip resistances ranged between 100 tsf and 150 tsf from depths of 12 feet to 15 feet.
- the CPT tip resistances showed substantial improvement with tip resistance values of up to 270 tsf to depths of 10 feet and ranging between 100 tsf and 180 tsf from 10 feet to 15 feet.
- test results made after installations with the 10 foot long device 15 showed significant improvements throughout the depth of device penetration and further soil improvements to about twice the width of the top plate ( 13 ) of the device extending below the maximum penetration depth.
- the degree of soil improvement increases with the number of passes.
- the device was fabricated to increase the tine length to 20 feet for a separate embodiment as described below.
- the new embodiment in this Example III was a device 15 including eight individual tines 11 attached to an approximately 30-inch by 45-inch top plate 13 as shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B .
- the individual tines 11 were each 20 feet long, with a 4-inch by 4-inch square bottom transitioning to an 8-inch by 8-inch square top where they connect to the top plate 13 . The transition was accomplished approximately half-way up the tine length.
- a grab plate was welded to the top plate, allowing use with a vibratory hammer.
- the perimeter tines 11 were oriented 45 degrees to any central tines 19 to reduce the potential for plugging of soil/sand between adjacent tines 11 .
- CPT testing was performed at the locations tested to quantify the improvement that was achieved.
- the first CPT attempt at the center of the four installations with the 8-tines encountered refusal at a depth of 5 feet.
- the next CPT attempt encountered refusal at a depth of 10 feet.
- the baseline CPT readings showed tip resistances of approximately 20 tsf to a depth of 5 feet, approximately 50 tsf to 100 tsf from 5 feet to 20 feet, and approximately 70 tsf to 150 tsf from 20 feet to 30 feet.
- the CPT tip resistance values increased with depth from about 25 tsf at one foot to 200 tsf at depths of 10 to 15 feet.
- the tip resistances were greater than 300 tsf at depths of 15 feet to 20 feet and then decreased back to the baseline readings at about 25 feet.
- test results showed significant soil improvement throughout the depth of installation and substantial improvement to a depth of about twice the width of the top plate 13 below the bottom of the maximum penetration depth of 20 feet. Increased soil improvement occurred with increasing number of passes.
- the device 15 used was similar to that described above with reference to Example I and shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B .
- the general procedure consisted of penetrating the tines to full length or a portion of the tine length, followed by retraction and backfilling with native sand. Each pass took approximately 1 ⁇ 2 minute to 1 minute to accomplish. Each set of 3 passes typically took about 4 minutes. The device sometimes achieved a penetration depth of only 1 to 4 feet during the third pass. Fine sand was used to backfill the cavities in all passes. Installations proceeded from one edge of the tank to the other.
- test site locations were in the general vicinity of the initial borings performed prior to construction.
- the tests were performed at installation locations and between adjacent installations.
- One CPT was performed outside the perimeter of the tank to serve as a baseline reading.
- test site location number 8 the ground surface was compacted with three passes of a vibratory drum roller after the installations.
- FIG. 16 presents the results of the baseline CPT readings and the CPT tip resistances at the installation locations.
- the baseline CPT tip resistances generally ranged from approximately 50 tsf to 100 tsf with an average tip resistance of about 70 tsf between depths of one to 14 feet below grade.
- the CPT tip resistances within the footprint of the device installations are also shown on FIG. 16 . Significant improvements were observed both in the reinforced zone and below the bottom of the tines to a depth of approximately 13 feet below grade. After treatment with one pass, CPT tip resistances remained near the baseline readings to a depth of about 5 feet but then increased to values exceeding 150 tsf between depths of 6 feet and 9 feet. The tip resistances ranged between 100 tsf and 150 tsf between depths of 9 feet and 13 feet below grade. After treatment with three passes, the CPT tip resistances in the upper 5 feet increased to values of up to and exceeding 250 tsf and increased to values ranging between 130 tsf and 300 tsf between a depth of 5 feet and 13 feet. No increase in tip resistance was observed in the upper 2 feet likely because there is insufficient surface confinement for densification.
- FIG. 17 presents the results of the CPT tip resistance obtained between installation locations.
- the CPT soundings were advanced at the midpoint between installation locations 3.5 feet from the center of the adjacent elements or 2.25 feet from the edge of the installation locations.
- the results indicate improvement in density evidenced by increase in tip resistance from installation.
- the tip resistance values increase to values ranging between 100 tsf and 150 tsf at depths ranging between 2 and 10 feet.
- the tip resistances increase to values exceeding 150 tsf at depths ranging between 4 and 10 feet below grade.
- Installations with the device of this example increase the tip resistance within the reinforced zone and below the reinforced zone, extending to a depth of up to 13 feet, 7 feet below the bottom of the maximum tine depth. This depth of improvement is greater than twice the width of the top plate 13 .
- the device In clean sand, the device increases the tip resistance values between adjacent compaction points. The increase is, on average, two times the tip resistance for unreinforced conditions at an installation spacing of 7 feet on center.
- the device In clean sand, the device increases the tip resistance values within the treatment footprint to up to about 250 tsf or 2 to 4 times the tip resistance for unreinforced conditions. Improvement within and below the reinforced zone, and between adjacent installation occurs from the first device penetration and increases with successive passes.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Paleontology (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Consolidation Of Soil By Introduction Of Solidifying Substances Into Soil (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (43)
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/792,258 US8328470B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2010-06-02 | Apparatus and method for ground improvement |
US12/977,196 US8360689B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2010-12-23 | Method for ground improvement with hardened inclusions |
PCT/US2011/038685 WO2011153187A2 (en) | 2010-06-02 | 2011-06-01 | Method for ground improvement with hardened inclusions |
US13/339,512 US8740501B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2011-12-29 | Apparatus and method for ground improvement |
US14/293,559 US9915050B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2014-06-02 | Apparatus and method for ground improvement |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US21981409P | 2009-06-24 | 2009-06-24 | |
US12/792,258 US8328470B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2010-06-02 | Apparatus and method for ground improvement |
Related Child Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/977,196 Continuation US8360689B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2010-12-23 | Method for ground improvement with hardened inclusions |
US12/977,196 Continuation-In-Part US8360689B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2010-12-23 | Method for ground improvement with hardened inclusions |
US13/339,512 Continuation-In-Part US8740501B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2011-12-29 | Apparatus and method for ground improvement |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100329798A1 US20100329798A1 (en) | 2010-12-30 |
US8328470B2 true US8328470B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 |
Family
ID=45090762
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/792,258 Active US8328470B2 (en) | 2009-06-24 | 2010-06-02 | Apparatus and method for ground improvement |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8328470B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011153187A2 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140248111A1 (en) * | 2013-03-04 | 2014-09-04 | David A. Williams | Clamp-on fork lift attachment |
US9091036B2 (en) | 2010-09-13 | 2015-07-28 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier |
US9567723B2 (en) | 2010-09-13 | 2017-02-14 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Open-end extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier |
US9702108B2 (en) * | 2015-05-28 | 2017-07-11 | JAFEC USA, Inc. | Direct power compaction method |
US20200115877A1 (en) * | 2015-07-27 | 2020-04-16 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Extensible shells and related methods for constructing a ductile support pier |
US12031287B2 (en) * | 2016-02-24 | 2024-07-09 | Ingios Geotechnics, Inc. | Systems and methods to provide pressed and aggregate filled concavities for improving ground stiffness and uniformity |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9915050B2 (en) * | 2009-06-24 | 2018-03-13 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Apparatus and method for ground improvement |
US9207000B2 (en) | 2011-08-22 | 2015-12-08 | Darin Kruse | Solar apparatus support structures and systems |
US8920077B2 (en) | 2011-08-22 | 2014-12-30 | Darin Kruse | Post tensioned foundations, apparatus and associated methods |
WO2015187419A1 (en) * | 2014-06-02 | 2015-12-10 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Apparatus and method for ground improvement |
CN113136856B (en) * | 2021-04-27 | 2022-08-12 | 福建省亿方建设工程有限公司 | Vibroflotation equipment convenient for pore forming and foundation treatment construction method |
Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US794971A (en) * | 1904-02-23 | 1905-07-18 | Henry Ericsson | Foundation. |
EP0299118A1 (en) | 1987-07-14 | 1989-01-18 | Ballast-Nedam Groep N.V. | Method and device for compacting soil |
US5152348A (en) * | 1991-08-05 | 1992-10-06 | Flanagan Sr Robert P | Turf aerating machine and tool attachment |
EP0514559A1 (en) | 1991-05-17 | 1992-11-25 | Kurt Ellmer | Transfer of building load via a steelmember, to the ground, by use of a special ramhead |
US5249892A (en) | 1991-03-20 | 1993-10-05 | Fox Nathaniel S | Short aggregate piers and method and apparatus for producing same |
GB2286613A (en) * | 1994-02-18 | 1995-08-23 | Roxbury Ltd | Ground improvement |
JPH08296252A (en) | 1995-04-26 | 1996-11-12 | Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd | Pushing device and pushing method for boring machine |
EP0758699A1 (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 1997-02-19 | Dipl.Ing. Helmut Hemmerlein GmbH & CO. Bau KG. | Method for installing tapered piles, tapered piles, and foundation structures made with these piles |
JP2001140247A (en) | 1999-11-12 | 2001-05-22 | Shohei Senda | Ground improvement device |
US6354766B1 (en) | 1999-02-09 | 2002-03-12 | Geotechnical Reinforcement Company, Inc. | Methods for forming a short aggregate pier and a product formed from said methods |
US6425713B2 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2002-07-30 | Geotechnical Reinforcement Company, Inc. | Lateral displacement pier, and apparatus and method of forming the same |
JP2002275879A (en) * | 2001-03-16 | 2002-09-25 | Noboru Kudo | Construction for stabilizing banking on soft ground |
US6505998B1 (en) * | 1997-08-20 | 2003-01-14 | Global Innovations, Inc. | Ground treatment |
US20050274532A1 (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-12-15 | Kevin Lephart | Ground improvement device |
US20060088388A1 (en) * | 2004-10-27 | 2006-04-27 | Wissmann Kord J | Method and apparatus for providing a rammed aggregate pier |
US7226246B2 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2007-06-05 | Geotechnical Reinforcement, Inc. | Apparatus and method for building support piers from one or successive lifts formed in a soil matrix |
JP2008121401A (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2008-05-29 | Shigekazu Hanzawa | Soil improvement-type vibration damping device |
US20080205993A1 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2008-08-28 | Wissmann Kord J | Method and apparatus for creating rammed aggregate piers using a hollow mandrel with upward flow restrictors |
-
2010
- 2010-06-02 US US12/792,258 patent/US8328470B2/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-06-01 WO PCT/US2011/038685 patent/WO2011153187A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US794971A (en) * | 1904-02-23 | 1905-07-18 | Henry Ericsson | Foundation. |
EP0299118A1 (en) | 1987-07-14 | 1989-01-18 | Ballast-Nedam Groep N.V. | Method and device for compacting soil |
US5249892A (en) | 1991-03-20 | 1993-10-05 | Fox Nathaniel S | Short aggregate piers and method and apparatus for producing same |
EP0514559A1 (en) | 1991-05-17 | 1992-11-25 | Kurt Ellmer | Transfer of building load via a steelmember, to the ground, by use of a special ramhead |
US5152348A (en) * | 1991-08-05 | 1992-10-06 | Flanagan Sr Robert P | Turf aerating machine and tool attachment |
GB2286613A (en) * | 1994-02-18 | 1995-08-23 | Roxbury Ltd | Ground improvement |
JPH08296252A (en) | 1995-04-26 | 1996-11-12 | Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd | Pushing device and pushing method for boring machine |
EP0758699A1 (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 1997-02-19 | Dipl.Ing. Helmut Hemmerlein GmbH & CO. Bau KG. | Method for installing tapered piles, tapered piles, and foundation structures made with these piles |
US6505998B1 (en) * | 1997-08-20 | 2003-01-14 | Global Innovations, Inc. | Ground treatment |
US6354766B1 (en) | 1999-02-09 | 2002-03-12 | Geotechnical Reinforcement Company, Inc. | Methods for forming a short aggregate pier and a product formed from said methods |
JP2001140247A (en) | 1999-11-12 | 2001-05-22 | Shohei Senda | Ground improvement device |
US6425713B2 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2002-07-30 | Geotechnical Reinforcement Company, Inc. | Lateral displacement pier, and apparatus and method of forming the same |
US7226246B2 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2007-06-05 | Geotechnical Reinforcement, Inc. | Apparatus and method for building support piers from one or successive lifts formed in a soil matrix |
JP2002275879A (en) * | 2001-03-16 | 2002-09-25 | Noboru Kudo | Construction for stabilizing banking on soft ground |
US20050274532A1 (en) | 2004-06-01 | 2005-12-15 | Kevin Lephart | Ground improvement device |
US20060088388A1 (en) * | 2004-10-27 | 2006-04-27 | Wissmann Kord J | Method and apparatus for providing a rammed aggregate pier |
US7326004B2 (en) | 2004-10-27 | 2008-02-05 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Apparatus for providing a rammed aggregate pier |
JP2008121401A (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2008-05-29 | Shigekazu Hanzawa | Soil improvement-type vibration damping device |
US20080205993A1 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2008-08-28 | Wissmann Kord J | Method and apparatus for creating rammed aggregate piers using a hollow mandrel with upward flow restrictors |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9091036B2 (en) | 2010-09-13 | 2015-07-28 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier |
US9567723B2 (en) | 2010-09-13 | 2017-02-14 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Open-end extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier |
US20170159257A1 (en) * | 2010-09-13 | 2017-06-08 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Open-end extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier |
US10513831B2 (en) * | 2010-09-13 | 2019-12-24 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Open-end extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier |
US20140248111A1 (en) * | 2013-03-04 | 2014-09-04 | David A. Williams | Clamp-on fork lift attachment |
US9216883B2 (en) * | 2013-03-04 | 2015-12-22 | Daws Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Clamp-on fork lift attachment with stabilizer bar |
US10030346B2 (en) * | 2015-05-28 | 2018-07-24 | JAFEC USA, Inc. | Direct power compaction method |
US9702108B2 (en) * | 2015-05-28 | 2017-07-11 | JAFEC USA, Inc. | Direct power compaction method |
US20200115877A1 (en) * | 2015-07-27 | 2020-04-16 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Extensible shells and related methods for constructing a ductile support pier |
US10858796B2 (en) * | 2015-07-27 | 2020-12-08 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Extensible shells and related methods for constructing a ductile support pier |
US11479935B2 (en) | 2015-07-27 | 2022-10-25 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Extensible shells and related methods for constructing a ductile support pier |
US12012715B2 (en) | 2015-07-27 | 2024-06-18 | Geopier Foundation Company, Inc. | Extensible shells and related methods for constructing a ductile support pier |
US12031287B2 (en) * | 2016-02-24 | 2024-07-09 | Ingios Geotechnics, Inc. | Systems and methods to provide pressed and aggregate filled concavities for improving ground stiffness and uniformity |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2011153187A3 (en) | 2012-04-05 |
US20100329798A1 (en) | 2010-12-30 |
WO2011153187A2 (en) | 2011-12-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8328470B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for ground improvement | |
US9915050B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for ground improvement | |
US7326004B2 (en) | Apparatus for providing a rammed aggregate pier | |
US10513831B2 (en) | Open-end extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier | |
CA2730150C (en) | Shielded tamper and method of use for making aggregate columns | |
US8221034B2 (en) | Methods of providing a support column | |
US9091036B2 (en) | Extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier | |
US9243379B2 (en) | Method of providing a support column | |
US8360689B2 (en) | Method for ground improvement with hardened inclusions | |
US8740501B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for ground improvement | |
CA2950733C (en) | Apparatus and method for ground improvement | |
US11773555B2 (en) | Methods and apparatuses for compacting soil and granular materials | |
US20240026625A1 (en) | Methods and apparatuses for compacting soil and granular materials | |
CA2993469C (en) | Open-bottom extensible shells and related methods for constructing a support pier | |
CA2551216C (en) | Method and apparatus for providing a rammed aggregate pier |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC., NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MAHER, STEPHEN A.;WISSMANN, KORD J.;REEL/FRAME:024582/0982 Effective date: 20100621 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: TCO FUNDING CORP., NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC;TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION;GEOCOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:025609/0407 Effective date: 20101229 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 025609/0407;ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:025619/0626 Effective date: 20101229 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AMERICAN CAPITAL, LTD., TEXAS Free format text: SECOND LIEN COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY;ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:025703/0466 Effective date: 20101229 Owner name: TCO FUNDING CORP., NEW YORK Free format text: SECOND LIEN AFTER-ACQUIRED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING);ASSIGNORS:TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC;TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION;GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:025703/0433 Effective date: 20101229 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: TCO FUNDING CORP., NEW YORK Free format text: FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:TENSAR HOLDINGS, LLC;TENSAR CORPORATION;TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:028149/0521 Effective date: 20120427 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:028173/0228 Effective date: 20120427 Owner name: GEOTECHNICAL REINFORCEMENT COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:028173/0228 Effective date: 20120427 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:028173/0228 Effective date: 20120427 Owner name: NORTH AMERICAN GREEN, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:028173/0228 Effective date: 20120427 Owner name: TENSAR POLYTECHNOLOGIES, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:028173/0228 Effective date: 20120427 Owner name: TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:028173/0228 Effective date: 20120427 Owner name: TENSAR HOLDINGS, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:028173/0228 Effective date: 20120427 Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS ADMINISTR Free format text: COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 028149/0521;ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:028177/0029 Effective date: 20120427 Owner name: GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:028173/0228 Effective date: 20120427 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN AFTER-ACQUIRED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING) (RELEASES RF 025703/0433);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0517 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN AFTER-ACQUIRED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING) (RELEASES RF 025703/0433);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0517 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN AFTER-ACQUIRED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING) (RELEASES RF 025703/0433);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0517 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: GEOTECHNICAL REINFORCEMENT COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN AFTER-ACQUIRED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING) (RELEASES RF 025703/0433);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0517 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: GEOTECHNICAL REINFORCEMENT COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TCO FUNDING CORP., NEW YORK Free format text: RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 025703/0466);ASSIGNOR:AMERICAN CAPITAL LTD.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0499 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: NORTH AMERICAN GREEN, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TENSAR INTERNATIONAL, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TCO FUNDING CORP., NEW YORK Free format text: RELEASE OF COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY (RELEASES RF 028177/0029);ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:033500/0564 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TENSAR POLYTECHNOLOGIES, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: TENSAR HOLDINGS, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT (RELEASES RF 028149/0521);ASSIGNOR:TCO FUNDING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:033500/0443 Effective date: 20140709 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, CONNECTICUT Free format text: FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY INC.;REEL/FRAME:033532/0807 Effective date: 20140709 Owner name: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, CONNECTICUT Free format text: SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY INC.;REEL/FRAME:033532/0699 Effective date: 20140709 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, DELAWARE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:UBS AG;REEL/FRAME:052311/0566 Effective date: 20200401 Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, DELAWARE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:UBS AG;REEL/FRAME:052311/0625 Effective date: 20200401 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WHITEHORSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, CONNECTICUT Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:054427/0621 Effective date: 20201120 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, ILLINOIS Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNORS:GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC.;GEOTECHNICAL REINFORCEMENT COMPANY INC.;TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:054504/0843 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: TENSAR HOLDINGS, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TENSAR HOLDINGS CORPORATION), GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0341 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: NORTH AMERICAN GREEN INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (FIRST LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0098 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: NORTH AMERICAN GREEN INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0341 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0341 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: GEOTECHNICAL REINFORCEMENT INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (FIRST LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0098 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE TENSAR CORPORATION), GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0341 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: TENSAR HOLDINGS, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TENSAR HOLDINGS CORPORATION), GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (FIRST LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0098 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (FIRST LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0098 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0341 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (FIRST LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0098 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (FIRST LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0098 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: GEOTECHNICAL REINFORCEMENT INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0341 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (SECOND LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0341 Effective date: 20201120 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE TENSAR CORPORATION), GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS (FIRST LIEN);ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:055354/0098 Effective date: 20201120 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: TENSAR TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0380 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: GEOTECHNICAL REINFORCEMENT COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0380 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0380 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0380 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0380 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0380 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: TENSAR TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WHITEHORSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0298 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: GEOTECHNICAL REINFORCEMENT COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WHITEHORSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0298 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WHITEHORSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0298 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: TENSAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WHITEHORSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0298 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WHITEHORSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0298 Effective date: 20220425 Owner name: TENSAR CORPORATION, LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WHITEHORSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC;REEL/FRAME:059804/0298 Effective date: 20220425 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |