US825903A - Foundation. - Google Patents

Foundation. Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US825903A
US825903A US15408003A US1903154080A US825903A US 825903 A US825903 A US 825903A US 15408003 A US15408003 A US 15408003A US 1903154080 A US1903154080 A US 1903154080A US 825903 A US825903 A US 825903A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
rods
concrete
base
footing
foundation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US15408003A
Inventor
Lawrence G Hallberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US15408003A priority Critical patent/US825903A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US825903A publication Critical patent/US825903A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D27/00Foundations as substructures
    • E02D27/01Flat foundations
    • E02D27/02Flat foundations without substantial excavation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)

Description

No. 825,903. PATENTED JULY 17, 1906. L. G. HALLBERG.
FOUNDATION.
APPLIUATION FILED A1124. 190s.
W/ TNESSES:
A TTOHIVEYS TH: Nomzls Perses cu.. vrAsmNcmN, A:A r:
UNITED STATES PATENT oEEroE.
FOUNDATION.
Specification of Letters Patent.
Patented July 17, 1906.
Application filed April 24, 1903. Serial No. 154.080.
T0 @ZZ whom t may concern:
Be it known that I, LAWRENCE GUs'rAv HALLBERG, a citizen of the United States, residing at Chicago, in the county of Oook and State of Illinois, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Foundations, of which the following is a specification.
My invention relates to foundation structures, and has forits object to provide a novel and efficient foundation to serve as footings or bases adapted to support columns and walls of buildings.
In constructing foundations for use on compressible soil it is necessary to spread the load of the walls and columns over a more or less extended area or surface, and for this purpose foundations are employed which usually consist of layers of metal rails or beams embedded in masses of concrete and which are generally termed floating foundations by reason of the fact that they are placed or extended over more or less compressible soil. This construction has proved to be very expensive, for the reason that the rails or beams merely provide a resistance to transverse strains, and therefore a large amount of metal is required. Moreover, the amount of metal employed correspondingly diminishes and divides the mass of concrete and diminishes its resistance; Also in floating founda tions the line or point of weight or load is within the area of the foundation, so that the upward pressure of the earth has a tendency to break or shear the foundation approximately at about the line of connection of the load and foundation. There is a constant leverage upon the foundation at or near the line ofload, which tends to break or fracture it.
According to my present invention the rails and beams above described are replaced by a system of anchor-rods which extend outward from or beyond the point or line of load and are firmly anchored in the concrete of the foundation. By this construction Iutilize the tensile strength of the rods as a substitute for the resistance to transverse strain of the rails and beams previously employed, the tension in the rods being opposed to the compression in the concrete. By this means an increased load-carrying capacity may be obtained by employing a greatly reduced amount of metal.
My invention consists in the organizations and arrangements of parts hereinafter described, and pointed out in the claims.
In the accompanying drawings, which form a part of this specification and illustrate the application of my invention to the support of walls and columns, Figure l is a side View of part of a foundation structure constructed in accordance with my invention and representing a section of a footing for awall. i Fig. 2 is a transverse sectional view through the structure of Fig. l. Fig. 3 is a top plan view of the structure shown in Fig. 1 when the rods are set and before they are covered with concrete. Fig. 4 is a side elevation of a pier adapted to support a column and constructed in accordance with the present invention. Fig. 5 is a bottom plan view of the construction of Fig. 4. Fig. 6 is a side view of a part of a foundation structure for two columns or walls. Fig. 7 is a top plan view of the foot ing shown in Fig. 6, showing the arrangement of anchor-rods in dotted lines and Fig. 8 is a sectional view on the line 8 8 of Fig.- 6.
In the accompanying drawings the reference-letter A denotes as a whole a foundation structure suitable for use as a floating footing or base and composed of a mass of concrete in which anchor-rods a are embedded. The rods are securely anchored in the concrete by providing them with any suitable means to prevent them from slipping in the concrete or to prevent any relative movement between the rods and the concrete. For this purpose I prefer to provide them with heads a. The foundation thus constructed is adapted for use in sustaining walls or piers or other lo ads, and in the drawings I have shown the application thereof as a base or footing for various purposes.
Referring more particularly to the form shown in Figs. l, 2, and 3, the weight, such as the wall of a suitable building, is indicated by the reference-letter a2 and rests upon or is supported by the base or footing A, provided with anchor-rods a. The pressure of the wall is exerted in its line within the area of 1the footing or base A, and the earth upon which the base rests exerts an upward res'- sure on all parts of the under face of the ase, so that there is a tendency to break the base by this leverage, which tendency generally shows itself at about the line 0f connection of the wall and base or footing. The base or footing is therefore provided with a series of anchor-rods a, arranged in a row or layer extending longitudinally of the footing' and with the individual rods transverse or at right angles to the line of the wall. It is obvious that any tendency of the foundation to shear IOO IIO
or crack by the compression of the load or weight will eXert a strain in the direction of the length of the rods to stretch the latter. By this means the tensile strength of the rods is employed against the compression in the concrete caused by the load. As the rods are firmly anchored in the concrete they are secured against lengthwise displacement, and no change can take place in the base or footing beyond. the wall or load unless the rods vstretcher the concrete above them is crushed. The tensile strength of the metal of therods is thereby substituted. for the resistance to transverse strain or bending momentum of the beams and rails previously employed, and the tendency of the base or footing to break or shear by reason of the leverage between the earth and load is obviated. The same system is employed in pier constructions, as shown more particularly in Figs. 4 and 5,where the footing or base is in the form ofa pier provided with the rods similarly anchored in the concrete and running in two or more directions. In these gures the support for the column is indicated by the reference-letter a3, which rests in the line of the center ofthe pier or base and practically above the crossingpointsV of the several layers of rods a. In this construction I prefer to employ two main series or layers of rods, one superposed upon the other, with more or less intermediate cement, and extending at substantially right angles to each other, with two other layers or series of similar rods arranged to substantially bisect the angles between thefirst two or main layers to take care of the triangles of concrete between the main layers, as clearly shown in Fig. 5. All of the rods of the different layers are provided with suitable heads a", whereby they are securely anchored within the concrete. This arrangement of rods prevents the fracture of the base or pier and holds it securely together, the effects being produced in substantially the same manner as in the construction described in connection with Figs. l to 3.
In some cases it is desired to support separated loads, as two walls, upon the outer lines or ends of the same footing or base7 as shown at a4 at in Fig. 6. Under ordinary conditions these end loads would fracture the concrete and the ends would settle down and cause the intermediate material to bulge or buckle up. By employing my invention I am able `and perform the same functions.
to obviate all such ,defects in this type offoundation, as will be apparent from the organi- Zation shown in Figs. 6, 7, and 8. In this form the cross-rods a are similar in construction and arrangement to those illustrated in the other figures and act in the same manner In this construction the base or footing is provided with auxiliary longitudinal rods c5, which eX- tend along the length of the base or footing and are provided with suitable heads a6 to securely and firmly anchor them in the concrete thereof, so they will act as cantalivers. Some of the longitudinal rods a5 are bent, preferably in inverted catenary curves, as shown in Fig. 6. This arrangement of devices prevents the concrete from buckling up in the middle and from cracking under the strain of the weights or loads at the ends, as indicated at (L4, because if any buckling occurs it mustA be by stretching the rods, and as the rods are firmly anchored in the footing or base and cannot stretch it follows that they prevent this tendency to buckle and crack. The cantaliver construction is employed when it is required to carry the load at the outer line of one or both ends of the footing or base, in 'which case the end loads would tend to fracture the concrete and by the settling of the under portions would cause the center or intermediate portions of the footing or base to bulge upwardly. By embedding anchorrods in inverted catenary curves the loads at the ends cannot change the footing or base unless the rods are stretched or the mass of concrete below them is crushed. The cate- Inary curves of the bars prevent the shearing of the concrete both transversely and longi-` tudinally.
Having described my invention, I claim- A foundation comprising a base of cementitious material, headed anchor-rods embedded therein and disposed substantially transversely to the longitudinal line thereof, and a series of longitudinal headed anchorrods embedded in the said material and form- IOO
US15408003A 1903-04-24 1903-04-24 Foundation. Expired - Lifetime US825903A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15408003A US825903A (en) 1903-04-24 1903-04-24 Foundation.

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15408003A US825903A (en) 1903-04-24 1903-04-24 Foundation.

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US825903A true US825903A (en) 1906-07-17

Family

ID=2894383

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15408003A Expired - Lifetime US825903A (en) 1903-04-24 1903-04-24 Foundation.

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US825903A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3015912A (en) * 1957-05-23 1962-01-09 Stanley H Fistedis Foundation structure
US3090326A (en) * 1956-02-23 1963-05-21 Alwac Internat Elevated track and support structure therefor
US11371205B2 (en) * 2019-08-20 2022-06-28 1563100 Alberta Ltd. Insulation system for a building

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3090326A (en) * 1956-02-23 1963-05-21 Alwac Internat Elevated track and support structure therefor
US3015912A (en) * 1957-05-23 1962-01-09 Stanley H Fistedis Foundation structure
US11371205B2 (en) * 2019-08-20 2022-06-28 1563100 Alberta Ltd. Insulation system for a building

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Beutel et al. The effect of anchorage on the effectiveness of the shear reinforcement in the punching zone
US825903A (en) Foundation.
US1024852A (en) Reinforced concrete structure.
US1422821A (en) Sheet-piling wall construction
US3483707A (en) Method for reinforcing steel pipe piling in situ and the resultant piling
US1028578A (en) Straight vault.
US11629473B2 (en) Multiple friction joint pile system
Ismail et al. Out-of-plane testing of seismically retrofitted URM walls using posttensioning
Tripathi et al. Non-linear cyclic response of concrete walls with different transverse reinforcement detailing
Saiidi et al. Seismic retrofit of spread footings supporting bridge columns with short dowels
Alicia Yee Min Yik et al. Experimental study on voided slab subjected to flexural load
US705732A (en) Retaining-wall.
Ismail et al. Seismic performance of face loaded unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted using post-tensioning
Albutainy et al. Effect of Changing Boundary Element Size on The Response Of Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Walls with C-Shape Boundary Element
Ismail et al. Cyclic out-of-plane behaviour of post-tensioned clay brick masonry
Hube et al. Capacity evaluation of steel stoppers of reinforced concrete Chilean bridges
Zovkić et al. Testing of R/C frames with masonry infill of various strength
Toader et al. An analytical design approach for post-tensioned concrete slabs with unguided tendons
US1314558A (en) Reinforced masonry construction
Elgawady et al. Dynamic versus static cyclic tests of masonry walls before and after retrofitting with GFRP
RU2037013C1 (en) Pile foundation
US672175A (en) Cement or concrete construction.
US988951A (en) Reinforced concrete structure.
DE1046650B (en) Suspension bridge made of prestressed concrete
US141310A (en) Improvement in iron bridges